Day-to-day reliability of two different models to quantify knee kinematics in subjects with knee osteoarthritis and healthy controls.
Results from instrumented gait analysis vary between test situations. Subject characteristics and the biomechanical model can influence the total amount of variability. The purpose of this study was to quantify reliability of gait data in general, and with respect to the applied model, and investigated population group. Reliability was compared between a functional and a predictive gait model in subjects with knee osteoarthritis and healthy controls. Day-to-day consistency for sagittal plane variables was comparable between models and population groups. Transversal plane variables relative to joint excursion showed larger inconsistency for repeated measures, even for a more sophisticated biomechanical approach. In conclusion, the presented reliability data of sagittal plane kinematics should be used for a reasonable interpretation of results derived in clinical gait analysis. Variables of the transversal plane should not be used as long as sources of error are not sufficiently minimized.
University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany.
Inga
I
Krauss
Thomas
T
Ukelo
Christoph
C
Ziegler
Detlef
D
Axmann
Stefan
S
Grau
Thomas
T
Horstmann
Alex
A
Stacoff
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D015992:Body Mass Index; D005260:Female; D005684:Gait / Q000502:physiology*; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000503:physiopathology*; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008954:Models, Biological; D020370:Osteoarthritis, Knee / Q000503:physiopathology*; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D055815:Young Adult