Designing an implementation strategy to improve interprofessional shared decision making in sciatica: study protocol of the DISC study.
BACKGROUND
Sciatica is a common condition worldwide that is characterized by radiating leg pain and regularly caused by a herniated disc with nerve root compression. Sciatica patients with persisting leg pain after six to eight weeks were found to have similar clinical outcomes and associated costs after prolonged conservative treatment or surgery at one year follow-up. Guidelines recommend that the team of professionals involved in sciatica care and patients jointly decide about treatment options, so-called interprofessional shared decision making (SDM). However, there are strong indications that SDM for sciatica patients is not integrated in daily practice. We designed a study aiming to explore the barriers and facilitators associated with the everyday embedding of SDM for sciatica patients. All related relevant professionals and patients are involved to develop a tailored strategy to implement SDM for sciatica patients.


METHODS
The study consists of two phases: identification of barriers and facilitators and development of an implementation strategy. First, barriers and facilitators are explored using semi-structured interviews among eight professionals of each (para)medical discipline involved in sciatica care (general practitioners, physical therapists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, and orthopedic surgeons). In addition, three focus groups will be conducted among patients. Second, the identified barriers and facilitators will be ranked using a questionnaire among a representative Dutch sample of 200 GPs, 200 physical therapists, 200 neurologists, all 124 neurosurgeons, 200 orthopedic surgeons, and 100 patients. A tailored team-based implementation strategy will be developed based on the results of the first phase using the principles of intervention mapping and an expert panel.


CONCLUSIONS
Little is known about effective strategies to increase the uptake of SDM. Most implementation strategies only target a single discipline, whereas multiple disciplines are involved in SDM among sciatica patients. The results of this study can be used as an example for implementing SDM in other patient groups receiving multidisciplinary complex care (e.g., elderly) and can be generalized to other countries with similar context, thereby contributing to a worldwide increase of SDM in preference sensitive choices.
Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Stefanie N
SN
Hofstede
Perla J
PJ
Marang-van de Mheen
Willem J J
WJ
Assendelft
Carmen L A
CL
Vleggeert-Lankamp
Anne M
AM
Stiggelbout
Patrick C A J
PC
Vroomen
Wilbert B
WB
van den Hout
Thea P M
TP
Vliet Vlieland
Leti
L
van Bodegom-Vos
D003657:Decision Making; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006284:Health Plan Implementation / Q000379:methods*; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae; D009426:Netherlands; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D011843:Radiculopathy / Q000628:therapy; D012107:Research Design; D012585:Sciatica / Q000628:therapy*