Summary workshop report: Facilitating oral product development and reducing regulatory burden through novel approaches to assess bioavailability/bioequivalence.
This summary workshop report highlights presentations and over-arching themes from an October 2011 workshop. Discussions focused on best practices in the application of biopharmaceutics in oral drug product development and evolving bioequivalence approaches. Best practices leverage biopharmaceutic data and other drug, formulation, and patient/disease data to identify drug development challenges in yielding a successfully performing product. Quality by design and product developability paradigms were discussed. Development tools include early development strategies to identify critical absorption factors and oral absorption modeling. An ongoing theme was the desire to comprehensively and systematically assess risk of product failure via the quality target product profile and root cause and risk analysis. However, a parallel need is reduced timelines and fewer resources. Several presentations discussed applying Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) and in vitro-in vivo correlations in development and in post-development and discussed both resource savings and best scientific practices. The workshop also focused on evolving bioequivalence approaches, with emphasis on highly variable products (HVDP), as well as specialized modified-release products. In USA, two bioequivalence approaches for HVDP are the reference-scaled average bioequivalence approach and the two-stage group-sequential design. An adaptive sequential design approach is also acceptable in Canada. In European Union, two approaches for HVDP are a two-stage design and an approach to widen C (max) acceptance limits. For some specialized modified-release products, FDA now requests partial area under the curve. Rationale and limitations of such metrics were discussed (e.g., zolpidem and methylphenidate). A common theme was the benefit of the scientific and regulatory community developing, validating, and harmonizing newer bioequivalence methodologies (e.g., BCS-based waivers and HVDP trial designs).
University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA. jpolli@rx.umaryland.edu
James E
JE
Polli
Jack A
JA
Cook
Barbara M
BM
Davit
Paul A
PA
Dickinson
Domenick
D
Argenti
Nancy
N
Barbour
Alfredo
A
García-Arieta
Jean-Marie
JM
Geoffroy
Kerry
K
Hartauer
Shoufeng
S
Li
Amitava
A
Mitra
Francis X
FX
Muller
Vivek
V
Purohit
Manuel
M
Sanchez-Felix
John W
JW
Skoug
Kin
K
Tang
D000284:Administration, Oral; D001682:Biological Availability; D015195:Drug Design; D013810:Therapeutic Equivalency