Abutment design for implant-supported indirect composite molar crowns: reliability and fractography.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the reliability of titanium abutments veneered with indirect composites for implant-supported crowns and the possibility to trace back the fracture origin by qualitative fractographic analysis.


METHODS
Large base (LB) (6.4-mm diameter base, with a 4-mm high cone in the center for composite retention), small base (SB-4) (5.2-mm base, 4-mm high cone), and small base with cone shortened to 2 mm (SB-2) Ti abutments were used. Each abutment received incremental layers of indirect resin composite until completing the anatomy of a maxillary molar crown. Step-stress accelerated-life fatigue testing (n = 18 each) was performed in water. Weibull curves with use stress of 200 N for 50,000 and 100,000 cycles were calculated. Probability Weibull plots examined the differences between groups. Specimens were inspected in light-polarized and scanning electron microscopes for fractographic analysis.


RESULTS
Use level probability Weibull plots showed Beta values of 0.27 for LB, 0.32 for SB-4, and 0.26 for SB-2, indicating that failures were not influenced by fatigue and damage accumulation. The data replotted as Weibull distribution showed no significant difference in the characteristic strengths between LB (794 N) and SB-4 abutments (836 N), which were both significantly higher than SB-2 (601 N). Failure mode was cohesive within the composite for all groups. Fractographic markings showed that failures initiated at the indentation area and propagated toward the margins of cohesively failed composite.


CONCLUSIONS
Reliability was not influenced by abutment design. Qualitative fractographic analysis of the failed indirect composite was feasible.
Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, UNIGRANRIO University, School of Health Sciences, Duque de Caxias, RJ, Brazil. estevamab@gmail.com
Estevam Augusto
EA
Bonfante
Marcelo
M
Suzuki
William
W
Lubelski
Van P
VP
Thompson
Ricardo Marins
RM
de Carvalho
Lukasz
L
Witek
Paulo G
PG
Coelho
D000497:Alloys; D000537:Aluminum Oxide / Q000737:chemistry; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D003442:Crowns; D000044:Dental Abutments; D003722:Dental Alloys / Q000737:chemistry; D045662:Dental Etching / Q000379:methods; D059605:Dental Implant-Abutment Design; D003764:Dental Materials / Q000737:chemistry; D003775:Dental Polishing / Q000379:methods; D017267:Dental Prosthesis Design; D019094:Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D003801:Dental Veneers; D006801:Humans; D008689:Methacrylates / Q000737:chemistry; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D008859:Microscopy, Polarization; D008963:Molar; D019279:Resin Cements / Q000737:chemistry; D017640:Silicates / Q000737:chemistry; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013499:Surface Properties; D014025:Titanium / Q000737:chemistry; D014867:Water / Q000737:chemistry; D015040:Zirconium / Q000737:chemistry
D000497:Alloys; D003188:Composite Resins; D003722:Dental Alloys; D003764:Dental Materials; D008689:Methacrylates; D019279:Resin Cements; D017640:Silicates; C574687:ceramage; D014867:Water; C031462:titanium alloy (TiAl6V4); C100646:Metal Primer; D015040:Zirconium; D014025:Titanium; D000537:Aluminum Oxide