The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization.
Recent research has challenged the notion that word frequency is the organizing principle underlying lexical access, pointing instead to the number of contexts that a word occurs in (Adelman, Brown, & Quesada, 2006). Counting contexts gives a better quantitative fit to human lexical decision and naming data than counting raw occurrences of words. However, this approach ignores the information redundancy of the contexts in which the word occurs, a factor we refer to as semantic diversity. Using both a corpus-based study and a controlled artificial language experiment, we demonstrate the importance of contextual redundancy in lexical access, suggesting that contextual repetitions in language only increase a word's memory strength if the repetitions are accompanied by a modulation in semantic context. We introduce a cognitive process mechanism to explain the pattern of behaviour by encoding the word's context relative to the information redundancy between the current context and the word's current memory representation. The model gives a better account of identification latency data than models based on either raw frequency or document count, and also produces a better-organized space to simulate semantic similarity.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47404, USA. jonesmn@indiana.edu
Michael N
MN
Jones
Brendan T
BT
Johns
Gabriel
G
Recchia
D003198:Computer Simulation; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008960:Models, Psychological; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012660:Semantics; D014825:Vocabulary; D055815:Young Adult