Double- vs. single-balloon vs. spiral enteroscopy.
Starting with the introduction of the double-balloon enteroscope in 2001, two more techniques have been successfully developed for small bowel investigation (single-balloon enteroscopy, spiral enteroscopy). To compare the different enteroscopy systems, within this review, 68 studies were analyzed and put into context. The procedural characteristics (mean insertion depth, diagnostic yields, adverse events) were comparable for DBE, SBE or SE. The higher panenteroscopy rate in DBE might not have any clinical relevance. Therapeutic procedures, such as argon-plasma coagulation, polypectomy, dilation therapy and foreign body extraction are described with the DBE and SBE procedure. With regard to the present literature, the balloon-assisted devices as well as spiral enteroscopy technique seem to be equally suitable in clinical routine for imaging of the small bowel. The choice of the method should be based on availability, physicians' experience and clinical implications. Future randomized, controlled trials with large numbers of patients are needed to work out the subtleties of every single method.
Department of Medicine B, University of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, A1, 48149 Muenster, Germany. Lenz.Philipp@ukmuenster.de
Philipp
P
Lenz
Dirk
D
Domagk
D002404:Catheterization / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D058582:Double-Balloon Enteroscopy / Q000379:methods; D020776:Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal; D016099:Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D005767:Gastrointestinal Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000628:therapy; D006801:Humans; D007421:Intestine, Small