Midsession reversal learning: why do pigeons anticipate and perseverate?
Past research has shown that when given a simultaneous visual-discrimination midsession reversal task, pigeons typically anticipate the reversal well before it occurs and perseverate after it occurs. It appears that they use the estimation of time (or trial number) into the session, rather than (or in addition to) the more reliable cue, the outcome from the previous trial (i.e., a win-stay/lose-shift response rule), to determine which stimulus they should choose. In the present research, we investigated several variables that we thought might encourage pigeons to use a more efficient response strategy. In Experiment 1, we used a treadle-stepping response, rather than key pecking, to test the hypothesis that reflexive key pecking may have biased pigeons to estimate the time (or trial number) into the session at which the reversal would occur. In Experiment 2, we attempted to make the point of reversal in the session more salient by inserting irrelevant trials with stimuli different from the original discriminative stimuli, and for a separate group, we added a 5-s time-out penalty following incorrect choices. The use of a treadle-stepping response did not improve reversal performance, and although we found some improvement in reversal performance when the reversal was signaled and when errors resulted in a time-out, we found little evidence for performance that approached the win-stay/lose-shift accuracy shown by rats.
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA.
Jessica P
JP
Stagner
Daniel M
DM
Michler
Rebecca M
RM
Rayburn-Reeves
Jennifer R
JR
Laude
Thomas R
TR
Zentall
D000818:Animals; D059031:Anticipation, Psychological; D002755:Choice Behavior; D010856:Columbidae / Q000502:physiology; D003216:Conditioning, Operant; D003463:Cues; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D012193:Reversal Learning; D013028:Space Perception; D014796:Visual Perception