Timing of restorative proctocolectomy in patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis: the patient's point of view.
BACKGROUND
Development of biologic agents has led to new therapeutic options for patients with refractory ulcerative colitis, and intensive medical therapy allows delay of restorative colectomy. However, the overall rate of colectomies has not changed. The decision as to timing of the operation is difficult.


OBJECTIVE
Our aim was to elucidate the patients' views about the timing of their own proctocolectomy.


METHODS
This was a retrospective review of a prospectively designed database combined with a follow-up survey questionnaire.


METHODS
We included patients who underwent proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for refractory ulcerative colitis from 1999 through 2009 at our university hospital.


METHODS
A questionnaire was sent to patients asking whether they would have preferred to have had the operation performed earlier, later, or at the same time as it was actually done and to give the number of years or months earlier or later that they would have preferred. They were also asked to give reasons for their preference. Patients who preferred an earlier operation were compared with those satisfied with the timing regarding measures of postoperative quality of life and pouch function collected from the institution's prospective database.


RESULTS
Of 84 eligible patients, 70 (83%) responded. Of these, 37 (53%) would have preferred an earlier operation; 33 patients (47%) were satisfied with the timing. No patient would have chosen a later operation. Patients who preferred an earlier operation wished it to have been a median of 2 years earlier (range, 2-120 months). The main reasons for a preferred earlier time point were postoperative improvement of stool regulation in 89% (33/37), reduction of bleedings in 84% (31/37), and relief of pain in 68% (25/37). No significant differences were observed between groups regarding postoperative quality of life or pouch function.


CONCLUSIONS
Limitations of the study included lack of validation and a nonsymmetrical structure of the questionnaire.


CONCLUSIONS
About half of the patients of our study would have preferred to have had proctocolectomy earlier than it had been performed, mainly because of the relief of symptoms that they experienced after the operation. For patients with an emerging refractory course of ulcerative colitis, earlier restorative proctocolectomy should be considered as an alternative to further intensified medical treatment.
Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany.
Philipp-Alexander
PA
Neumann
Rudolf B
RB
Mennigen
Norbert
N
Senninger
Matthias
M
Bruewer
Emile
E
Rijcken
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000714:Anastomosis, Surgical; D003093:Colitis, Ulcerative / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D017060:Patient Satisfaction / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D016737:Proctocolectomy, Restorative; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult