Maximising harm reduction in early specialty training for general practice: validation of a safety checklist.
BACKGROUND
Making health care safer is a key policy priority worldwide. In specialty training, medical educators may unintentionally impact on patient safety e.g. through failures of supervision; providing limited feedback on performance; and letting poorly developed behaviours continue unchecked. Doctors-in-training are also known to be susceptible to medical error. Ensuring that all essential educational issues are addressed during training is problematic given the scale of the tasks to be undertaken. Human error and the reliability of local systems may increase the risk of safety-critical topics being inadequately covered. However adherence to a checklist reminder may improve the reliability of task delivery and maximise harm reduction. We aimed to prioritise the most safety-critical issues to be addressed in the first 12-weeks of specialty training in the general practice environment and validate a related checklist reminder.


METHODS
We used mixed methods with different groups of GP educators (n=127) and specialty trainees (n=9) in two Scottish regions to prioritise, develop and validate checklist content. Generation and refinement of checklist themes and items were undertaken on an iterative basis using a range of methods including small group work in dedicated workshops; a modified-Delphi process; and telephone interviews. The relevance of potential checklist items was rated using a 4-point scale content validity index to inform final inclusion.


RESULTS
14 themes (e.g. prescribing safely; dealing with medical emergency; implications of poor record keeping; and effective & safe communication) and 47 related items (e.g. how to safety-net face-to-face or over the telephone; knowledge of practice systems for results handling; recognition of harm in children) were judged to be essential safety-critical educational issues to be covered. The mean content validity index ratio was 0.98.


CONCLUSIONS
A checklist was developed and validated for educational supervisors to assist in the reliable delivery of safety-critical educational issues in the opening 12-week period of training, and aligned with national curriculum competencies. The tool can also be adapted for use as a self-assessment instrument by trainees to guide patient safety-related learning needs. Dissemination and implementation of the checklist and self-rating scale are proceeding on a national, voluntary basis with plans to evaluate its feasibility and educational impact.
Department of Postgraduate General Practice Education, NHS Education for Scotland, 2 Central Quay, Glasgow, UK, G3 8BW. paul.bowie@nes.scot.nhs.uk
Paul
P
Bowie
John
J
McKay
Moya
M
Kelly
D057189:Checklist; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000592:standards; D003479:Curriculum; D003657:Decision Making; D004496:Education, Continuing; D005180:Faculty, Medical / Q000592:standards; D058006:General Practice / Q000193:education*; D040261:Harm Reduction; D006694:Holistic Health; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D019300:Medical Errors / Q000517:prevention & control; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D017751:Safety Management / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D012606:Scotland; D012647:Self-Assessment; D013038:Specialization; D013997:Time Factors