Impact of negation salience and cognitive resources on negation during attitude formation.
Because of the increased cognitive resources required to process negations, past research has shown that explicit attitude measures are more sensitive to negations than implicit attitude measures. The current work demonstrated that the differential impact of negations on implicit and explicit attitude measures was moderated by (a) the extent to which the negation was made salient and (b) the amount of cognitive resources available during attitude formation. When negations were less visually salient, explicit but not implicit attitude measures reflected the intended valence of the negations. When negations were more visually salient, both explicit and implicit attitude measures reflected the intended valence of the negations, but only when perceivers had ample cognitive resources during encoding. Competing models of negation processing, schema-plus-tag and fusion, were examined to determine how negation salience impacts the processing of negations.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E. 10th St., Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. katbraun@indiana.edu
Kathryn L
KL
Boucher
Robert J
RJ
Rydell
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001290:Attitude; D003071:Cognition; D003657:Decision Making; D030141:Feedback, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008568:Memory; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D018187:Personal Construct Theory; D012919:Social Behavior; D055815:Young Adult