EEG from a single-channel dry-sensor recording device.
While a laboratory setting and research-grade electroencephalogram (EEG) equipment allow control of variables and high-quality multiple-channel EEG recording, there are situations and populations for which this is not suitable. The present studies examined the validity of a new method of single-channel EEG measurement that is portable and uses dry-sensor technology. In study 1, EEG was recorded simultaneously from the portable device and 4 standard EEG electrodes from a research system, during eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) resting conditions, with 20 adult participants. Average correlations with the research system frequency spectra were highest at site F3 for portable device data processed onboard of the device (r = .90), and for device data processed in a standard manner (r = .89). Further, predictable variations in EO versus EC comparisons were observed. In study 2, twenty-three healthy children had EEGs recorded from the portable device during EO and EC resting conditions, and 3 EO active conditions (ie, relaxation, attention, and cognitive load). Absolute and relative EEG band power differed between conditions in predicted ways, including a reduction in relative theta power and an increase in relative alpha power in EC compared to EO resting conditions. Overall, the results suggest that, while limited in terms of scalp recording locations, the portable device has potential utility in certain EEG recording situations where ease of use is a priority.
Brain & Behaviour Research Institute, School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia. sjohnsto@uow.edu.au
Stuart J
SJ
Johnstone
Russell
R
Blackman
Jason M
JM
Bruggemann
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000465:Algorithms; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D002648:Child; D004566:Electrodes; D004569:Electroencephalography / Q000295:instrumentation*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity