title: Intraoperative accuracy of a point-of-care glucose meter compared with simultaneous central laboratory measurements.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Concerns have been raised about the use of point-of-care (POC) glucose meters in the hospital setting. Accuracy has been questioned especially in critically ill patients. Although commonly used in intensive care units and operating rooms, POC meters were not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for such use. Data on POC glucose meter performance during anesthesia are lacking. We evaluated accuracy of a POC meter in the intraoperative setting.
  
  
  METHODS
  We retrospectively reviewed 4,333 intraoperative records in which at least one intraoperative glucose was measured using electronic medical records at a large academic hospital. We evaluated the accuracy of a POC glucose meter (ACCU-CHEK® Inform, Roche Pharmaceuticals) based on the 176 simultaneous central laboratory (CL) blood glucose (BG) measurements that were found (i.e., documented collection times within 5 minutes). Point-of-care and central lab BG differences were analyzed by Bland-Altman and revised error grid analysis (rEGA).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mean POC BG was 163.4 ± 64.7 mg/dl [minimum (min) 48 mg/dl, maximum (max) 537 mg/dl] and mean CL BG was 162.6 ± 65.1 mg/dl (min 44 mg/dl, max 502 mg/dl). Mean absolute difference between POC and CL BG was 24.3 mg/dl. Mean absolute relative difference was 16.5% with standard deviation 26.4%. Point-of-care measurements showed a bias of 0.8 relative to the corresponding CL value, with a precision of 39.0 mg/dl. Forty (23%) POC BG values fell outside the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guideline and 3.4% POC measurements fell in zones C and D of the rEGA plot.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The tested POC glucose meter performed poorly compared to a CL analyzer intraoperatively. Perioperative clinicians should be aware of limitations of specific POC glucose meters, and routine use of POC glucose meters as sole measurement devices in the intraoperative period should be carefully considered.
authors: Department of Anesthesiology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA. boris.mraovic@jefferson.edu
authors: Boris
authors: B
authors: Mraovic
authors: Eric S
authors: ES
authors: Schwenk
authors: Richard H
authors: RH
authors: Epstein
mesh_terms: D015415:Biomarkers / Q000032:analysis; D001774:Blood Chemical Analysis / Q000295:instrumentation*; D001786:Blood Glucose / Q000378:metabolism*; D004867:Equipment Design; D006785:Hospitals, University; D006801:Humans; D007432:Intraoperative Period; D016343:Monitoring, Intraoperative / Q000295:instrumentation*; D015588:Observer Variation; D019095:Point-of-Care Systems; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012189:Retrospective Studies
chemical_list: D015415:Biomarkers; D001786:Blood Glucose