title: Effect of different monosaccharides and disaccharides on boar sperm quality after cryopreservation.
abstract: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cryoprotectant effect of different non-permeating sugars for boar sperm. Pooled semen from three boars was used for the experiments. In the first experiment, the sperm quality of boar sperm cryopreserved with an egg-yolk based extender supplemented with different monosaccharides (glucose, galactose or fructose) was compared to a control cryopreserved in lactose-egg yolk extender. In the second experiment, the effect of five disaccharides (lactose, sucrose, lactulose, trehalose or melibiose) on boar sperm cryosurvival was studied. Several sperm quality parameters were assessed by flow cytometry in samples incubated for 30 and 150 min at 37°C after thawing: percentages of sperm with intact plasma membrane (SIPM), sperm presenting high plasma membrane fluidity (HPMF), sperm with intracellular reactive oxygen substances production (IROSP) and apoptotic sperm (AS). In addition, the percentages of total motile (TMS) and progressively motile sperm (PMS) were assessed at the same incubation times with a computer-assisted sperm analysis system. Freezing extenders supplemented with each of the monosaccharide presented smaller cryoprotective effect than the control extender supplemented with lactose (P<0.05). However, from the three monosaccharides tested, glucose provided the best sperm quality after freezing-thawing. With respect to the disaccharides studied, samples frozen with the extender supplemented with lactulose exhibited in general the lowest sperm quality, except for the percentage of capacitated sperm, which was highest (P<0.05) in the samples cryopreserved with the trehalose extender. Our results suggest that disaccharides have higher cryoprotective effect than monosaccharides, although the monosaccharide composition of the disaccharides is also important, since the best results were obtained with those disaccharides presenting glucose in their composition.
authors: Centro de Pruebas de Porcino, Área de Investigación Ganadera, Subdirección de Investigación y Tecnología, Instituto Tecnológico Agrario, Consejería de Agricultura y Ganadería, Junta de Castilla y León, Hontalbilla, Segovia, Spain.
authors: José
authors: J
authors: Gómez-Fernández
authors: Emilio
authors: E
authors: Gómez-Izquierdo
authors: Cristina
authors: C
authors: Tomás
authors: Eva
authors: E
authors: Mocé
authors: Eduardo
authors: E
authors: de Mercado
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002462:Cell Membrane / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology; D002463:Cell Membrane Permeability / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology; D015925:Cryopreservation / Q000662:veterinary; D003451:Cryoprotective Agents / Q000494:pharmacology; D004187:Disaccharides / Q000494:pharmacology*; D005615:Freezing / Q000009:adverse effects; D008297:Male; D009005:Monosaccharides / Q000494:pharmacology*; D055101:Semen Analysis / Q000662:veterinary; D012662:Semen Preservation / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary; D013075:Sperm Capacitation / Q000187:drug effects; D013081:Sperm Motility / Q000187:drug effects; D013094:Spermatozoa; D013552:Swine / Q000502:physiology
chemical_list: D003451:Cryoprotective Agents; D004187:Disaccharides; D009005:Monosaccharides