title: Medicare's national coverage determinations in diagnostic radiology: examining evidence and setting limits.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To systematically review and summarize the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) national coverage determination (NCDs) pertaining diagnostic imaging technologies from 1999 through 2010.
  
  
  METHODS
  All NCDs pertaining to diagnostic imaging were identified from the Tufts Medical Center NCD database. The variables under study included the quality of the clinical evidence and the final coverage determination. The types of restrictions were categorized. We also categorized the final decisions as "positive coverage" or "no positive/no change in coverage" and assessed the correlation between positive coverage and other variables using Fisher exact test.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Twenty-two of 152 (15%) NCDs pertained to diagnostic imaging technologies. The supporting evidence was judge to be good, fair, and poor in 5, 6, and 11 cases, respectively. Eleven technologies (50%) were covered with conditions, four (18%) deferred the coverage decision to local level, and two (9%) were completely not covered. In five instances there was no change to the prior coverage status. Of the 11 decisions resulting in positive coverage, 8 (73%) restricted use to specific population subgroups, 5 (46%) applied restrictions related to treatment, 4 were covered with evidence development, and 2 were restricted to care in specific settings. A significantly higher rate of positive coverage decisions was achieved if the available evidence was good (100% 5/5) or fair (83% 5/6) compared to technologies with poor evidence (10% 1/10) (P < .01).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  CMS has demonstrated a propensity to limit the use of advanced diagnostic imaging to scenarios in which appropriateness is supported by adequate evidence of clinical utility and improved outcomes with the quality of evidence being a significant factor on final decisions. Understanding the need for high-quality evidence and the types of limitations placed on coverage allows for appropriate planning for the incorporation of diagnostic imaging technologies into clinical practice.
authors: Department of Radiology, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Boston, MA 02111, USA. hotero@tuftsmedicalcenter.org
authors: Hansel Javier
authors: HJ
authors: Otero
authors: James D
authors: JD
authors: Chambers
authors: Brian W
authors: BW
authors: Bresnahan
authors: Maki S
authors: MS
authors: Kamae
authors: Kent E
authors: KE
authors: Yucel
authors: Peter J
authors: PJ
authors: Neumann
mesh_terms: D014487:Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.; D003952:Diagnostic Imaging / Q000191:economics*; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006801:Humans; D007345:Insurance Claim Review; D019458:Insurance Coverage / Q000191:economics*; D006278:Medicare / Q000191:economics*; D016134:Organizational Policy; D011907:Rate Setting and Review; D014481:United States