title: Agreement between self-reported use of in vitro fertilization or ovulation induction, and medical insurance claims in Australian women aged 28-36 years.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  What is the self-reported use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and ovulation induction (OI) in comparison with insurance claims by Australian women aged 28-36 years?
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The self-reported use of IVF is quite likely to be valid; however, the use of OI is less well reported.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Population-based research often relies on the self-reported use of IVF and OI because access to medical records can be difficult and the data need to include sufficient personal identifying information for linkage to other data sources. There have been few attempts to explore the reliability of the self-reported use of IVF and OI using the linkage to medical insurance claims for either treatment.
  
  
  METHODS
  This prospective, population-based, longitudinal study included the cohort of women born during 1973-1978 and participating in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH) (n = 14247). From 1996 to 2009, participants were surveyed up to five times.
  
  
  METHODS
  Participants self-reported their use of IVF or OI in two mailed surveys when aged 28-33 and 31-36 years (n = 7280), respectively. This study links self-report survey responses and claims for treatment or medication from the universal national health insurance scheme (i.e. Medicare Australia).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Comparisons between self-reports and claims data were undertaken for all women consenting to the linkage (n = 3375). The self-reported use of IVF was compared with claims for OI for IVF (Kappa, K = 0.83), oocyte collection (K = 0.82), sperm preparation (K = 0.83), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (K = 0.40), fresh embryo transfers (K = 0.82), frozen embryo transfers (K = 0.64) and OI for IVF medication (K = 0.17). The self-reported use of OI was compared with ovulation monitoring (K = 0.52) and OI medication (K = 0.71).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There is a possibility of selection bias due to the inclusion criteria for participants in this study: (1) completion of the last two surveys in a series of five and (2) consent to the linkage of their responses with Medicare data.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results are relevant to questionnaire-based research studies with infertile women in developed countries.
authors: The University of Queensland School of Population Health, Public Health Building, Herston Rd, Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia. d.herbert@sph.uq.edu.au
authors: Danielle
authors: D
authors: Herbert
authors: Jayne
authors: J
authors: Lucke
authors: Annette
authors: A
authors: Dobson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001315:Australia; D005260:Female; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007247:Infertility, Female / Q000191:economics / Q000628:therapy*; D007345:Insurance Claim Review; D007348:Insurance, Health; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D015233:Models, Statistical; D010062:Ovulation Induction / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D057566:Self Report; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires