title: Is helicopter evacuation effective in rural trauma transport?
abstract: Helicopter transport for trauma remains controversial because its appropriate utilization and efficacy with regard to improved survival is unproven. The purpose of this study was to assess rural trauma helicopter transport utilization and effect on patient survival. A retrospective  chart review over a 2-year period (2007-2008) was performed of all rural helicopter and ground ambulance trauma patient transports to an urban Level I trauma center. Data was collected with regard to patient mortality and Injury Severity Score (ISS). Miles to the Level I trauma center  were calculated from the point where helicopter or ground ambulance transport services initiated contact with the patient to the Level I trauma center. During the 2-year period, 1443 rural trauma patients were transported by ground ambulance and 1028 rural trauma patients were transported  by helicopter. Of the patients with ISS of 0 to 10, 471 patients were transported by helicopter and 1039 transported by ground. There were 465 (99%) survivors with ISS 0 to 10 transported by helicopter with an average transport distance of 34.6 miles versus 1034 (99.5%) survivors with  ISS 0 to 10 who were transported by ground an average of 41.0 miles. Four hundred and twenty-one patients with ISS 11 to 30 were transported by helicopter an average of 33.3 miles with 367 (87%) survivors versus a 95 per cent survival in 352 patients with ISS 11 to 30 who were transported  by ground an average of 39.9 miles. One hundred and thirty-six patients with ISS > 30 were transported by helicopter an average of 32.8 miles with 78 (57%) survivors versus a 69 per cent survival in 52 patients with ISS > 30 who were transported by ground an average of 33.0 miles.  Helicopter transport does not seem to improve survival in severely injured (ISS > 30) patients. Helicopter transport does not improve survival and is associated with shorter travel distances in less severely injured (ISS < 10) patients in rural areas. This data questions effective helicopter  utilization for trauma patients in rural areas. Further study with regard to helicopter transport effect on patient survival and cost-effective utilization is warranted.
authors: Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Center for the Study of Rural Vehicular Trauma, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama 36619, USA. mrose@usouthal.edu
authors: Melanie K
authors: MK
authors: Rose
authors: G R
authors: GR
authors: Cummings
authors: Charles B
authors: CB
authors: Rodning
authors: Sid B
authors: SB
authors: Brevard
authors: Richard P
authors: RP
authors: Gonzalez
mesh_terms: D017732:Air Ambulances / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D000407:Alabama; D000552:Ambulances / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006801:Humans; D015601:Injury Severity Score; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D019035:Rural Health Services; D015996:Survival Rate; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000401:mortality* / Q000628:therapy