title: [Airway pressure monitoring by the continuous flow method in paediatric thoracoscopic surgery. A study in an animal model].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the airway pressures obtained before the endotracheal tube with the intratracheal ones in the continuous flow ventilation mode, in thoracoscopic surgery for one lung ventilation, in a paediatric model in animals.
  
  
  METHODS
  A simple prospective observational study was conducted. Ten Large White pigs weighing 4.6 ± 0.8 kg were used. The animals were ventilated in neonatal mode (continuous flow) with a Temel Supra ventilator. Using tracheotomy, we completely sealed the respiratory system in order to use tubes without special endotracheal cuffs, which would enable tracheal pressures to be registered without interfering with ventilation. Collapse of the right lung was performed by videothoracoscopy and was maintained for 120 min. The variables were measured at 10 time periods: start and 5 min with both lungs, after collapse at 5, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min, and 5 and 15 min after lung re-expansion. We recorded the baseline, peak, plateau and positive end expiratory pressure in the mouth of the animal and intratracheal.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean peak pressure in the mouth of the animal in one lung ventilation was 23.38 mmHg and tracheal ventilation was 21.24 mmHg, while the mean plateau pressure in the mouth of the animal in one lung ventilation it was 21.88 mmHg and tracheal was 21.39 mmHg, respectively, with significant differences in all of them (P<.05). We found statistically significant differences (P<.05) for peak and plateau pressure on comparing the record in the animal mouth with the tracheal record. The difference in absolute value was higher for the peak pressure record.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The pressure parameters recorded in the animal mouth were acceptable for surgery, with a suitable respiratory and haemodynamic stability being maintained. We can state that the continuous flow mode according to the pressures study may be suitable for this type of surgery, and that the mouth of the animal (patient) record for the peak pressure does not reflect what really happens in the alveoli, but we can give a suitable clinical estimate for the plateau pressure.
authors: Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Complejo Hospitalario de Cáceres, Cáceres, España.
authors: F
authors: F
authors: García-Montoto
authors: M F
authors: MF
authors: Martín-Cancho
authors: M S
authors: MS
authors: Carrasco-Jiménez
authors: F
authors: F
authors: Soria
authors: J R
authors: JR
authors: Lima
authors: F M
authors: FM
authors: Sánchez-Margallo
mesh_terms: D000399:Air Pressure; D000403:Airway Resistance; D000818:Animals; D006801:Humans; D008365:Manometry / Q000379:methods*; D023421:Models, Animal; D009055:Mouth; D061810:One-Lung Ventilation; D010372:Pediatrics / Q000379:methods*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011650:Pulmonary Alveoli; D012129:Respiratory Function Tests / Q000379:methods*; D034421:Sus scrofa; D013552:Swine; D013906:Thoracoscopy / Q000379:methods*