Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting.
BACKGROUND
Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer has remained controversial because of the lack of level 1 evidence regarding oncologic safety and long-term survival.


OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of laparoscopic versus open resection for rectal cancer on clinical and oncologic outcome in the multimodal setting.


METHODS
This is a review of prospectively gathered data from a single-institution rectal cancer database.


METHODS
This study was conducted in the Central Hospital of Central Finland.


METHODS
From January 1999 to December 2006, 191 selected patients were included.


METHODS
One hundred patients underwent laparoscopic resection, and 91 patients, also suitable for laparoscopic surgery, underwent open major rectal resection in the multimodal setting.


METHODS
The main measures of outcome were early recovery and short- and long-term morbidity; local recurrence and survival were secondary outcomes.


CONCLUSIONS
This is not a randomized study.


RESULTS
The study groups were balanced for baseline characteristics. Conversion rate to open surgery was 22%. Laparoscopic surgery resulted in significantly less bleeding (175 mL vs 500 mL, p < 0.001), 1 day earlier recovery of normal diet (3 days vs 4 days, p = 0.001), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (7 days vs 9 days, p < 0.001). Postoperative 30-day mortality (1% vs 3%), morbidity (31% vs 43%), readmission (11% vs 15%), and reoperation (6% vs 9%) rates were similar in the 2 groups, but significantly fewer patients in the laparoscopic group had long-term complications (19% vs 36%, p = 0.033). The 5-year disease-free survival (78% vs 80%, p = 0.74) and local recurrence (5% vs 6%, p = 0.66) rates were similar in the laparoscopic and open group for those 175 patients treated for cure.


CONCLUSIONS
Laparoscopic surgery resulted in faster postoperative recovery and fewer long-term complications than open surgery without apparently compromising the long-term oncologic outcome. Our results indicate that laparoscopic rectal resection is an acceptable alternative to open surgery in selected patients with rectal cancer.
Department of Surgery, Central Hospital of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland. Ilmo.Kellokumpu@Ksshp.Fi
Ilmo H
IH
Kellokumpu
Matti I
MI
Kairaluoma
Kyösti P
KP
Nuorva
Hannu J
HJ
Kautiainen
Ismo T
IT
Jantunen
D000368:Aged; D059186:Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020360:Neoadjuvant Therapy; D009364:Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D010359:Patient Readmission / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D020127:Recovery of Function; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000401:mortality / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery* / Q000628:therapy; D012007:Rectum / Q000601:surgery*; D012086:Reoperation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D016019:Survival Analysis; D016896:Treatment Outcome