Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences.
To clarify the role of spatial cues in sound segregation, this study explored whether interaural time differences (ITDs) are sufficient to allow listeners to identify a novel sound source from a mixture of sources. Listeners heard mixtures of two synthetic sounds, a target and distractor, each of which possessed naturalistic spectrotemporal correlations but otherwise lacked strong grouping cues, and which contained either the same or different ITDs. When the task was to judge whether a probe sound matched a source in the preceding mixture, performance improved greatly when the same target was presented repeatedly across distinct distractors, consistent with previous results. In contrast, performance improved only slightly with ITD separation of target and distractor, even when spectrotemporal overlap between target and distractor was reduced. However, when subjects localized, rather than identified, the sources in the mixture, sources with different ITDs were reported as two sources at distinct and accurately identified locations. ITDs alone thus enable listeners to perceptually segregate mixtures of sources, but the perceived content of these sources is inaccurate when other segregation cues, such as harmonicity and common onsets and offsets, do not also promote proper source separation.
Harvard∕MIT Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology Program, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Andrew
A
Schwartz
Josh H
JH
McDermott
Barbara
B
Shinn-Cunningham
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D009622:Noise; D010470:Perceptual Masking / Q000502:physiology*; D011571:Psychoacoustics; D013017:Sound Localization / Q000502:physiology*; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D055815:Young Adult