Outcome measure to assess head-down bed rest subject performance.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of the present study was to develop an objective outcome measure to assess the performance of head-down bed rest subjects. The rationale behind the development was that the current outcome measure is subjective and dependent upon how much the clinical psychologist knows about subject behaviors during the study to rate them accurately.


METHODS
The behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) were developed through the use of the critical incident technique, along with traditional BARS development procedures, and the use of focus groups.


RESULTS
Use of these methodologies yielded 86 usable critical incidents, which were used as anchors for the scales.


CONCLUSIONS
Further research will be necessary to determine whether or not associations exist between data from the BARS and psychological screening data.
University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Julia M P
JM
Poritz
Kimberly A
KA
Seaton
Susana B
SB
Zanello
Ronita L
RL
Cromwell
D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D001510:Bed Rest / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D018475:Head-Down Tilt / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D010560:Personnel Selection; D012307:Risk Factors; D013026:Space Flight; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014481:United States; D018557:United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration