Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: an examination of differences in accessibility.
In two experiments, the locus of individual differences in working memory capacity and long-term memory recall was examined. Participants performed categorical cued and free recall tasks, and individual differences in the dynamics of recall were interpreted in terms of a hierarchical-search framework. The results from this study are in accordance with recent theorizing suggesting a strong relation between working memory capacity and retrieval from long-term memory. Furthermore, the results also indicate that individual differences in categorical recall are partially due to differences in accessibility. In terms of accessibility of target information, two important factors drive the difference between high- and low-working-memory-capacity participants. Low-working-memory-capacity participants fail to utilize appropriate retrieval strategies to access cues, and they also have difficulty resolving cue overload. Thus, when low-working-memory-capacity participants were given specific cues that activated a smaller set of potential targets, their recall performance was the same as that of high-working-memory-capacity participants.
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA. nashu@uoregon.edu
Nash
N
Unsworth
Gregory J
GJ
Spillers
Gene A
GA
Brewer
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D008297:Male; D057567:Memory, Long-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time; D011932:Reading; D014706:Verbal Learning; D014825:Vocabulary