title: Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics.
abstract: Robotic guidance is an engineered form of haptic-guidance training and intended to enhance motor learning in rehabilitation, surgery, and sports. However, its benefits (and pitfalls) are still debated. Here, we investigate the effects of different presentation modes on the reproduction of a spatiotemporal movement pattern. In three different groups of participants, the movement was demonstrated in three different modalities, namely visual, haptic, and visuo-haptic. After demonstration, participants had to reproduce the movement in two alternating recall conditions: haptic and visuo-haptic. Performance of the three groups during recall was compared with regard to spatial and dynamic movement characteristics. After haptic presentation, participants showed superior dynamic accuracy, whereas after visual presentation, participants performed better with regard to spatial accuracy. Added visual feedback during recall always led to enhanced performance, independent of the movement characteristic and the presentation modality. These findings substantiate the different benefits of different presentation modes for different movement characteristics. In particular, robotic guidance is beneficial for the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics.
authors: IfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystraße 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany. luettgen@ifado.de
authors: Jenna
authors: J
authors: Lüttgen
authors: Herbert
authors: H
authors: Heuer
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D017711:Nonlinear Dynamics; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D012371:Robotics; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors; D014110:Touch; D055815:Young Adult