title: Recommendations for the reporting of foot and ankle models.
abstract: Multiple marker sets and models are currently available for assessing foot and ankle kinematics in gait. Despite the presence of such a wide variety of models, the reporting of methodological designs remains inconsistent and lacks clearly defined standards. This review highlights the variability found when reporting biomechanical model parameters, methodological design, and model reliability. Further, the review clearly demonstrates the need for a consensus of what methodological considerations to report in manuscripts, which focus on the topic of foot and ankle biomechanics. We propose five minimum reporting standards, that we believe will ensure the transparency of methods and begin to allow the community to move towards standard modelling practice. The strict adherence to these standards should ultimately improve the interpretation and clinical useability of foot and ankle marker sets and their corresponding models.
authors: School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, Biomechanics & Neuromotor Labs, Bazil Hetzel Building H1-10 GPO Box 2471, Adelaide 5001, Australia. christopher.bishop@mymail.unisa.edu.au
authors: Chris
authors: C
authors: Bishop
authors: Gunther
authors: G
authors: Paul
authors: Dominic
authors: D
authors: Thewlis
mesh_terms: D000842:Ankle / Q000502:physiology*; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D005528:Foot / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008954:Models, Biological