title: Bulbar urethroplasty:  transecting vs. nontransecting techniques.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To transect or not to transect the bulbar urethra in nontraumatic urethral strictures still remains an issue that is open to debate. Herewith, we evaluate and compare the results of these two different options in the treatment of bulbar urethral strictures.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In 404 patients, bulbar urethroplasty using transecting techniques (end-to-end anastomosis and augmented anastomotic repair) provided a success rate ranging from 90 to 98.6%. In 522 patients, bulbar urethroplasty using nontransecting techniques (nontransecting anastomotic urethroplasty and simple oral grafting techniques) provided approximately the same success rate, ranging from 81.8 to 100%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Future studies, including more homogenous series of patients and subjective evaluation of urinary and sexual complications after repair, are necessary to surely establish the gold standard of treatment for nontraumatic strictures located in the proximal bulbar urethra.
authors: Center for Reconstructive Urethral Surgery, Arezzo, Italy.
authors: Guido
authors: G
authors: Barbagli
authors: Salvatore
authors: S
authors: Sansalone
authors: Giuseppe
authors: G
authors: Romano
authors: Massimo
authors: M
authors: Lazzeri
mesh_terms: D000714:Anastomosis, Surgical; D006801:Humans; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014521:Urethra / Q000601:surgery*; D014525:Urethral Stricture / Q000601:surgery*; D013520:Urologic Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*