title: Mechanical, chemical and laser treatments of the implant surface in the presence of marginal bone loss around implants.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The objective of this review was to summarise current evidence with regard to the decontamination of implant surfaces by mechanical, chemical and physical methods in the presence of marginal bone loss arising from peri-implant infections.
  
  
  METHODS
  A PubMed search identified studies and publications dealing with 'peri-implantitis', 'treatment', 'surface decontamination', 'laser application' 'air-abrasive treatment' and 'photodynamic therapy'. Only studies in international peer-reviewed journals were selected for further evaluation; case reports were not included.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Several therapeutic approaches were identified such as mechanical treatment, antiseptics and air-abrasive treatment, photodynamic treatment, and laser applications. Since treatment of infected surfaces with air-powder +/- citric acid, gauze soaked with saline + citric acid or gauze soaked with chlorhexidine led to similar results in experimental studies, cotton pellets with saline may be adequate for cleaning micro-rough surfaces. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy can effectively reduce the prevalence of pathogens on implant surfaces, but the clinical benefits remain unknown. The increase in temperature of the implant surface caused by the CO2 laser poses a risk. The Er:YAG laser is considered to possess the best properties for implant surface decontamination. In vivo, no single method of surface decontamination (chemical agents, air abrasives or lasers) was found to be superior. In several animal experiments, thorough cleaning of the infected implant surfaces and implantation of these previously infected devices into freshly prepared sites resulted in re-osseointegration, while currently there are no controlled clinical trials where re-osseointegration has been demonstrated in patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  For decontamination of the infected implant surfaces, rinsing with saline (or cleaning with cotton pellets soaked with sterile saline) and air-abrasive treatment seem to work. Laser decontamination of the surface does not improve healing results. Non-surgical therapy of implants with peri-implantitis does not lead to successful treatment outcomes.
authors: Department of Periodontology, Centre for Dental, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Schlangenzahl 14, D-35392 Giessen, Germany. Joerg.Meyle@dentist.med.uni-giessen.de
authors: Joerg
authors: J
authors: Meyle
mesh_terms: D016301:Alveolar Bone Loss / Q000628:therapy; D019551:Dental Disinfectants / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D045662:Dental Etching / Q000379:methods; D015921:Dental Implants; D004203:Disinfection / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D028022:Low-Level Light Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D057873:Peri-Implantitis / Q000628:therapy*; D010778:Photochemotherapy / Q000379:methods; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D019551:Dental Disinfectants; D015921:Dental Implants