title: The veil of ignorance and health resource allocation.
abstract: Some authors view the veil of ignorance as a preferred method for allocating resources because it imposes impartiality by stripping deliberators of knowledge of their personal identity. Using some prominent examples of such reasoning in the health care sector, I will argue for the following claims. First, choice behind a veil of ignorance often fails to provide clear guidance regarding resource allocation. Second, regardless of whether definite results could be derived from the veil, these results do not in themselves have important moral standing. This is partly because the veil does not determine which features are morally relevant for a given distributive problem. Third, even when we have settled the question of what features to count, choice behind a veil of ignorance arguably fails to take persons seriously. Ultimately, we do not need the veil to solve distributive problems, and we have good reason to appeal to some other distributive model.
authors: NYU Langone Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, 550 1st Ave, New York, NY 10016, USA. csoto300@gmail.com
authors: Carlos
authors: C
authors: Soto
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000941:ethics; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000941:ethics* / Q000458:organization & administration; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D017059:Models, Econometric; D009014:Morals; D010686:Philosophy, Medical; D019057:Quality-Adjusted Life Years; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012935:Social Justice / Q000941:ethics