title: [How free is free will? Neuro-scientific and philosophical aspects of motivation and decision-making].
abstract: The question concerning the postulated freedom of will continues to occupy the neuro-sciences, psychiatry, law and neuro-philosophy. Do current research results really show that freedom and responsibility were only illusions, since previously supposed free decisions were only accompanying features of long held neuronal activations? Did Julien de La Mettrie have a great vision, when, already in the Eighteenth Century, he expected a "monsieur Machine"?This article attempts to summarize and evaluate findings that are currently available. The autonomy of human action is not only founded in a subjectively perceived act of will but far more in the ability of the human being to act according to an inner drive which is steered consciously and rationally. The autonomy of human action is not only restricted to the perceived ego, but comprises body and soul, brain and spirit and consequently the whole human being with all their characteristics, values and aims. Modern science thereby supports the old philosophical theory of a conditional freedom of will.
authors: Department für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Österreich, Hartmann.Hinterhuber@i-med.ac.at.
authors: Hartmann
authors: H
authors: Hinterhuber
mesh_terms: D001921:Brain; D003657:Decision Making; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D009042:Motivation; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010684:Philosophy