title: Providing supplemental milk to piglets preweaning improves the growth but not survival of gilt progeny compared with sow progeny.
abstract: Gilt progeny have lighter weaning weights and greater postweaning medication and mortality rates compared with the progeny of older parity sows. Because weaning weight has been positively correlated with postweaning survival, this study aimed to determine whether the provision of supplemental milk preweaning could improve weaning weight and subsequent weights as well as postweaning survival of gilt progeny. The study was replicated in summer and winter as the effects of supplemental milk were expected to vary with season. The progeny of 80 gilts (parity 0) and 80 sows (parity 2 to 5) were allocated to both treatments: with or without supplemental milk in these 2 seasons with 5 sheds/season. Litter size was standardized (10 to 11 piglets) and each piglet was weighed at birth, d 21, weaning (4 wk), and 10 wk of age. Medications and mortalities were recorded both preweaning and postweaning. Pigs were housed within treatment groups postweaning, and ADFI and G:F were measured. Gilt progeny were 200 g lighter at birth in both replicates (P < 0.001) and were 500 g lighter at weaning in the winter replicate (P < 0.05) compared with sow progeny. The provision of supplemental milk improved weaning weight for both gilt and sow progeny by 800 g in summer (P < 0.05) and by 350 g in winter (P < 0.05). This improvement in weaning weight had no effect on the incidence of death or disease in milk-supplemented progeny of either gilts or sows (P > 0.05). Supplemental milk disappearance (the daily difference between the volume of milk provided and the residue left in the drinker) was greater in summer than winter (by 130 mL/piglet d(-1); P < 0.05) as were the associated weaning weight benefits. The weaning weights of supplemented gilt progeny reached or exceeded that of nonsupplemented sow progeny. Gilt progeny had greater postweaning mortality (2.6%) and medication rates (6.2%) than sow progeny (1 and 2.2%, respectively; both P < 0.05) in both seasons, but medication rates were greater in winter (7.2%) for both treatment groups than in summer (1.9%; P < 0.05). Gilt progeny also had less postweaning ADFI than sow progeny in winter (528 and 636 g, respectively; P < 0.05) with no dam parity effect on G:F (both P > 0.05). The hypothesis that supplemental milk provision did increase gilt progeny weaning weight was supported (especially in summer) but the supplementation had no effect on postweaning weights and survival. Efforts to improve gilt progeny postweaning growth and survival need to be aimed at improving health and immunity, not just weaning weight.
authors: Portec Veterinary Services, Welshpool WA, 6106 Australia. yvette@portec.com.au
authors: Y J
authors: YJ
authors: Miller
authors: A M
authors: AM
authors: Collins
authors: R J
authors: RJ
authors: Smits
authors: P C
authors: PC
authors: Thomson
authors: P K
authors: PK
authors: Holyoake
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001835:Body Weight; D019587:Dietary Supplements / Q000032:analysis*; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D008892:Milk / Q000378:metabolism*; D010298:Parity; D011247:Pregnancy; D012621:Seasons; D034421:Sus scrofa / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000502:physiology; D014886:Weaning; D015430:Weight Gain