title: Controversies in the management of mesh-based complications: a urology perspective.
abstract: Since the introduction of the synthetic midurethral sling, several transvaginal mesh delivery systems have been developed for treating stress incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Widespread use of these "kits" has introduced a new dilemma of mesh-specific complications that female pelvic surgeons must manage. Differing treatment techniques have been described and controversy exists as to which method is preferred for vaginal mesh extrusion, mesh perforations, pelvic pain, and dyspareunia. This article addresses the differing management strategies for mesh complications after reconstructive surgery and highlights the available literature on the success of each option.
authors.affiliation: Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. marksb@ccf.org
authors.forename: Brian K
authors.initials: BK
authors.lastname: Marks
authors.forename: Howard B
authors.initials: HB
authors.lastname: Goldman
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology / Q000628:therapy; D013526:Surgical Mesh / Q000009:adverse effects*; D013520:Urologic Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods