title: Are we really measuring what we say we're measuring? Using video techniques to supplement traditional construct validation procedures.
abstract: Several researchers have persuasively argued that the most important evidence to consider when assessing construct validity is whether variations in the construct of interest cause corresponding variations in the measures of the focal construct. Unfortunately, the literature provides little practical guidance on how researchers can go about testing this. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to describe how researchers can use video techniques to test whether their scales measure what they purport to measure. First, we discuss how researchers can develop valid manipulations of the focal construct that they hope to measure. Next, we explain how to design a study to use this manipulation to test the validity of the scale. Finally, comparing and contrasting traditional and contemporary perspectives on validation, we discuss the advantages and limitations of video-based validation procedures.
authors.affiliation: Department of Management and Organizations, Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ85720-1080, USA. podsakof@email.arizona.edu
authors.forename: Nathan P
authors.initials: NP
authors.lastname: Podsakoff
authors.forename: Philip M
authors.initials: PM
authors.lastname: Podsakoff
authors.forename: Scott B
authors.initials: SB
authors.lastname: Mackenzie
authors.forename: Ryan L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Klinger
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D016544:Patient Simulation; D011585:Psychology, Applied / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design; D014743:Videotape Recording / Q000379:methods*