title: [Stakeholder participation in priority setting - a consideration of the normative status of quantitative and qualitative methods].
abstract: Priority setting in medicine is generally regarded as an appropriate means for preparing just allocation of medical resources. By involving the general public or affected stakeholders in priority setting, advocates hope to legitimise this process and increase the acceptability of future decisions on resource allocation. Here, we differentiate between two ideal-typical methods of stakeholder involvement: 1) qualitative and 2) quantitative ones. We argue that the level of information of participants is important to the quality of the outcome of participatory events. Qualitative methods aim at fostering deliberative discussions among well-informed stakeholders. By contrast, quantitative methods usually do not have the capacity to ensure or, at least, control the level of information that participants use to guide their decisions. Hence, we conclude that in the context of priority setting qualitative and especially deliberative methods are preferable to quantitative approaches.
authors.affiliation: Institut für Ethik, Geschichte und Theorie der Medizin, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster. Daniel.Friedrich@ukmuenster.de
authors.forename: Daniel R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Friedrich
authors.forename: Sabine
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Stumpf
authors.forename: Kathrin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Alber
mesh_terms: D003256:Community Participation; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D005858:Germany; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006292:Health Priorities / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000458:organization & administration*; D011057:Politics