Validation of sick leave measures: self-reported sick leave and sickness benefit data from a Danish national register compared to multiple workplace-registered sick leave spells in a Danish municipality.
BACKGROUND
Previous validation studies of sick leave measures have focused on self-reports. Register-based sick leave data are considered to be valid; however methodological problems may be associated with such data. A Danish national register on sickness benefit (DREAM) has been widely used in sick leave research. On the basis of sick leave records from 3,554 and 2,311 eldercare workers in 14 different workplaces, the aim of this study was to: 1) validate registered sickness benefit data from DREAM against workplace-registered sick leave spells of at least 15 days; 2) validate self-reported sick leave days during one year against workplace-registered sick leave.


METHODS
Agreement between workplace-registered sick leave and DREAM-registered sickness benefit was reported as sensitivities, specificities and positive predictive values. A receiver-operating characteristic curve and a Bland-Altman plot were used to study the concordance with sick leave duration of the first spell. By means of an analysis of agreement between self-reported and workplace-registered sick leave sensitivity and specificity was calculated. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (95% CI) were used.


RESULTS
The probability that registered DREAM data on sickness benefit agrees with workplace-registered sick leave of at least 15 days was 96.7% (95% CI: 95.6-97.6). Specificity was close to 100% (95% CI: 98.3-100). The registered DREAM data on sickness benefit overestimated the duration of sick leave spells by an average of 1.4 (SD: 3.9) weeks. Separate analysis on pregnancy-related sick leave revealed a maximum sensitivity of 20% (95% CI: 4.3-48.1).The sensitivity of self-reporting at least one or at least 56 sick leave day/s was 94.5 (95% CI: 93.4 - 95.5) % and 58.5 (95% CI: 51.1 - 65.6) % respectively. The corresponding specificities were 85.3 (95% CI: 81.4 - 88.6) % and 98.9 (95% CI: 98.3 - 99.3) %.


CONCLUSIONS
The DREAM register offered valid measures of sick leave spells of at least 15 days among eldercare employees. Pregnancy-related sick leave should be excluded in studies planning to use DREAM data on sickness benefit. Self-reported sick leave became more imprecise when number of absence days increased, but the sensitivity and specificity were acceptable for lengths not exceeding one week.
Section of Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Deparment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. ChristinaMalmose.Stapelfeldt@stab.rm.dk
Christina Malmose
CM
Stapelfeldt
Chris
C
Jensen
Niels Trolle
NT
Andersen
Nils
N
Fleten
Claus Vinther
CV
Nielsen
D000041:Absenteeism; D000328:Adult; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003718:Denmark / Q000453:epidemiology; D005260:Female; D006264:Health Benefit Plans, Employee / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006299:Health Services for the Aged; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009313:National Health Programs; D009784:Occupational Diseases / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011247:Pregnancy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012042:Registries / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D057566:Self Report; D018582:Sick Leave / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014938:Work Capacity Evaluation; D000078329:Workforce; D017132:Workplace / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data