Variable penetration of primary angioplasty in Europe--what determines the implementation rate?
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the recommended treatment for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A survey conducted in 2008 in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) countries reported that the annual incidence of hospital admissions for acute STEMI is around 800 patients per million inhabitants. The survey also showed that STEMI patients' access to reperfusion therapy and the use of PPCI or thrombolytic therapy (TT) vary considerably among countries. Northern, Western and Central Europe already had well-developed PPCI services, offering PPCI to 60-90% of all STEMI patients. Southern Europe and the Balkans were still predominantly using TT and had a higher proportion of patients who were left without any reperfusion treatment. The survey concluded that a nationwide PPCI strategy results in more patients being offered reperfusion therapy. To address the inequalities in STEMI patients' access to life-saving PPCI and to support the implementation of the ESC STEMI treatment guidelines in Europe, the Stent for Life (SFL) Initiative was launched jointly by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and EuroPCR in 2008. The aim of the SFL Initiative is to improve the delivery of life-saving PPCI for STEMI patients. Currently, 10 national cardiac societies support the SFL Initiative in their respective countries. SFL national action programmes have been developed and are being implemented in several countries. The formation of regional PPCI networks involving emergency medical services, non-PPCI hospitals and PPCI centres is considered to be a critical factor in implementing PPCI services effectively. Better monitoring of STEMI incidence and prospective registration of PPCI in all countries is required to document improvements in health care and to identify areas where further effort is required. Furthermore, studies on potential factors or characteristics that explain the national penetration of PPCI are needed. Such knowledge will be necessary to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the implementation, and will be the first step in ensuring equal access to PPCI treatment for STEMI patients in Europe. Establishing the delivery of PPCI in an effective, high-quality and timely manner is a great challenge.
Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Steen D
SD
Kristensen
Kristina G
KG
Laut
Zuzana
Z
Kaifoszova
Petr
P
Widimsky
D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000191:economics / Q000401:mortality / Q000628:therapy*; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005060:Europe; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006285:Health Planning / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006293:Health Promotion; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D007391:International Cooperation; D017146:Models, Organizational; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000191:economics / Q000209:etiology / Q000401:mortality / Q000628:therapy*; D009937:Organizational Objectives; D062645:Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000401:mortality; D012955:Societies, Medical; D015607:Stents / Q000191:economics; D013997:Time Factors; D061665:Time-to-Treatment; D016896:Treatment Outcome