Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse using robot assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: quality of life and technique.
OBJECTIVE
Measuring quality of life of women with disorders of the pelvic floor is crucial when evaluating a therapy. The aim of this study is to profile health related quality of life of women with pelvic organ prolapse who are treated with robot assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (RALS). We also compare the operative characteristics and learning curve in this study with the current literature and describe the surgical technique.


METHODS
A prospective cohort study in a teaching hospital in The Netherlands. Fifty women with uterovaginal prolapse were treated with RALS. This study presents the largest cohort in Europe treated by RALS to date. Quality of life was assessed pre- and post-operatively using the UDI/IIQ validated self-questionnaire designed for Dutch-speaking patients. Clinical and operative data were prospectively collected up to 29 months. RALS was performed with preservation of the uterus. Statistical analysis of categorical data was performed with the paired T-test. Descriptive statistics were computed with the use of standard methods for means, median and proportions.


RESULTS
Before operation, overall wellbeing was scored at 67.7% and after surgery this improved to 82.1% (p=0.03). Feelings of nervousness, frustration and embarrassment reduced significantly. Sexual functioning improved, but not significantly. The mean operative time was 223 (103-340) min. Operative time decreased significantly with gained experience and became comparable to the operative time for abdominal sacrocolpopexy and classic laparoscopy. Average blood loss was less than 50 ml and patients had a mean hospital stay of 2 days. Of all women, 95.2% were very satisfied with the result after RALS.


CONCLUSIONS
Health related quality of life improves significantly after RALS. There are high rates of patient satisfaction. RALS proves to be a safe and effective treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Operative time is comparable to abdominal sacrocolpopexy and classic laparoscopy in the current literature.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maasstad Hospital, PO Box 9100, 3007 AC Rotterdam, Netherlands. sarahmourik@gmail.com
Sarah L
SL
Mourik
Jolise E
JE
Martens
Mustafa
M
Aktas
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D016063:Blood Loss, Surgical / Q000517:prevention & control; D015331:Cohort Studies; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D013509:Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects; D006784:Hospitals, Teaching; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D007902:Length of Stay; D008875:Middle Aged; D009426:Netherlands; D061646:Operative Time; D059351:Organ Sparing Treatments; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D056887:Pelvic Organ Prolapse / Q000601:surgery*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011788:Quality of Life; D012371:Robotics; D013526:Surgical Mesh / Q000009:adverse effects; D014599:Uterus / Q000601:surgery*