The doctor-patient tie in Plato's Laws: a backdrop for reflection.
The merit of Plato's Laws remains largely untapped by those seeking genuinely collaborative models of the doctor-patient tie as alternatives to paternalism and autonomy. A persistent difficulty confronting proposed alternatives has been surpassing the notion of pronounced intellectual and values asymmetry favoring the doctor. Having discussed two prominent proposals, both of which evince marked paternalism, I argue that reflection on Plato yields four criteria that a genuinely collaborative model must meet and suggest how the Laws addresses them. In the process, the Laws' doctor-patient tie is shown to be far more nuanced than interpreters have previously observed. Although Plato's account will not solve our own quandaries, it illustrates how one might retain asymmetry of a kind without capitulating to familiar oppositional modalities. Through this account, I hope to show that the Laws merits fuller inclusion in contemporary discussions than it has heretofore received.
Department of Philosophy, Dewey Hall, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063, USA. slevin@smith.edu
Susan B
SB
Levin
D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals; D026706:Paternalism; D010358:Patient Participation; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010686:Philosophy, Medical; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations / Q000941:ethics*