[The role of economics in fair rationing].
For several years academic disciplines have discussed the potential conflict between scarcity of funding and fair health care. This review article shows the necessity of involving economic scientists in this discussion as well as their contribution to rationalisation, prioritisation and rationing of health care services. Thereby, it becomes clear that rationing and justice are not a contradiction per se. The interdisciplinary discussion in Germany needs less disciplinary egotism and more willingness to seek solutions and compromises. In this context the procedures followed in other countries can serve as examples.
Leibniz Universität Hannover, Center for Health Economics Research Hannover, Königsworther Platz 1, 30167, Hannover, Deutschland. ap@ivbl.uni-hannover.de
A
A
Prenzler
D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D005858:Germany; D019983:Guideline Adherence / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000191:economics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006292:Health Priorities / Q000191:economics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000191:economics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006301:Health Services Needs and Demand / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000191:economics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D017008:Negotiating / Q000379:methods; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011157:Population Dynamics; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D011908:Rationalization