Peer review: a view based on recent experience as an author and reviewer.
Peer review is an important stage in academic publishing, as a form of quality control to maintain the integrity of both the articles and the journals they appear in. However, the confidential nature of the relationship between reviewer and author does not necessarily benefit the system; with some reviewers using their anonymity to give unnecessary, injudicious comment. This paper explores the motives behind the reviewer's comments and how peer review could be improved by openness and honesty.
Prosthetic Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, SE1 9RT. rkfc@talk21.com
R K F
RK
Clark
D001319:Authorship; D003219:Confidentiality; D035081:Editorial Policies; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D007598:Journalism, Dental; D009042:Motivation; D017712:Peer Review, Research / Q000592:standards; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000592:standards; D014342:Truth Disclosure