Interference between outcomes, spontaneous recovery, and context effects as measured by a cued response reaction time task: evidence for associative retrieval models.
The most common associative explanation of interference is based on a retrieval failure. Retrieval, in turn, is considered as the result of an associative activation mechanism that is thought to be fast and automatic. However, up-to-date, there is no evidence of interference based on dependent measures specifically related to this kind of low level processes. The objective of the present study was to test whether interference phenomena can be observed by using a cued response task designed to detect low level retrieval processes. Experiment 1 evaluated whether the cued response task served to show a priming effect. Such effect allowed us to interpret the results found in the remaining experiments of the series. Experiment 2 aimed to find the interference effect by using the cued response task. Experiments 3 and 4 were conducted to assess whether spontaneous recovery and context-change effects could also be observed. The results showed that interference and recovery from interference phenomena can be attributable to fast retrieval processes, which is consistent with associative accounts of interference.
Departamento de Psicología Básica, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain. iviri_yo@hotmail.com
Estrella
E
González-Martín
Pedro L
PL
Cobos
Joaquín
J
Morís
Francisco J
FJ
López
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001245:Association Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D005178:Faculty; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*; D012660:Semantics; D013997:Time Factors; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology