title: The complex and elusive nature of religious prosociality: reply to Myers (2012) and Saroglou (2012).
abstract: This reply explores issues raised in comments by Myers (2012) and Saroglou (2012) on Galen (2012) regarding whether religiosity has any influence on prosociality. Areas of contention include (a) the distinction between religious belief and other influences, mainly the socialization effects of group behavior; (b) whether behavior largely restricted to the ingroup is genuine prosociality; (c) methodological issues such as the validity of self-report and peer-reported data and effects of social desirability; (d) the often paradoxical relationships with different forms of religiosity; and (e) potential curvilinear effects. Recent work regarding these issues is highlighted, and future directions that may productively resolve these debates are suggested.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI 49401, USA. galenl@gvsu.ed
authors.forename: Luke W
authors.initials: LW
authors.lastname: Galen
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals; D011582:Psychological Theory; D012069:Religion and Psychology; D012919:Social Behavior; D013240:Stereotyping