title: Challenges of using quality improvement methods in nursing homes that "need improvement".
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Qualitatively describe the adoption of strategies and challenges experienced by intervention facilities participating in a study targeted to improve quality of care in nursing homes "in need of improvement". To describe how staff use federal quality indicator/quality measure (QI/QM) scores and reports, quality improvement methods and activities, and how staff supported and sustained the changes recommended by their quality improvement teams.
  
  
  METHODS
  A randomized, two-group, repeated-measures design was used to test a 2-year intervention for improving quality of care and resident outcomes in facilities in "need of improvement". Intervention group (n = 29) received an experimental multilevel intervention designed to help them: (1) use quality-improvement methods, (2) use team and group process for direct-care decision-making, (3) focus on accomplishing the basics of care, and (4) maintain more consistent nursing and administrative leadership committed to communication and active participation of staff in decision-making.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A qualitative analysis revealed a subgroup of homes likely to continue quality improvement activities and readiness indicators of homes likely to improve: (1) a leadership team (nursing home administrator, director of nurses) interested in learning how to use their federal QI/QM reports as a foundation for improving resident care and outcomes; (2) one of the leaders to be a "change champion" and make sure that current QI/QM reports are consistently printed and shared monthly with each nursing unit; (3) leaders willing to involve all staff in the facility in educational activities to learn about the QI/QM process and the reports that show how their facility compares with others in the state and nation; (4) leaders willing to plan and continuously educate new staff about the MDS and federal QI/QM reports and how to do quality improvement activities; (5) leaders willing to continuously involve all staff in quality improvement committee and team activities so they "own" the process and are responsible for change.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Results of this qualitative analysis can help allocate expert nurse time to facilities that are actually ready to improve. Wide-spread adoption of this intervention is feasible and could be enabled by nursing home medical directors in collaborative practice with advanced practice nurses.
authors.affiliation: Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. RantzM@missouri.edu
authors.forename: Marilyn J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Rantz
authors.forename: Mary
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Zwygart-Stauffacher
authors.forename: Marcia
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Flesner
authors.forename: Lanis
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Hicks
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Mehr
authors.forename: Teresa
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Russell
authors.forename: Donna
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Minner
mesh_terms: D057179:Advanced Practice Nursing; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D006801:Humans; D007324:Institutional Management Teams; D007857:Leadership; D008923:Missouri; D009735:Nursing Homes / Q000592:standards; D015397:Program Evaluation; D058996:Quality Improvement