title: Self-serving bias effects on job analysis ratings.
abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether worker-oriented job analysis importance ratings were influenced by subject matter experts' (SME) standing (as measured by self-rated performance) on a competency. This type of relationship (whereby SMEs indicate that the traits they have are important for successful job performance) is an example of the self-serving bias (which is widely described in the social cognition literature and rarely described in the industrial/organizational psychology literature). An archival dataset covering 57 clerical and technical occupations with 26,682 participants was used. Support was found for the relationship between self-rated performance and importance ratings. Significant relationships (typically in the .30s) were observed for all 31 competencies that were studied. Controls were taken to account for common method bias and differences in the competencies required for each of the 57 occupations. Past research has demonstrated the effects of the self-serving bias on personality-based job analysis ratings. This study was the first to extend these findings to traditional job analysis, which covers other competencies in addition to personality. In addition, this study is the first to use operational field data instead of laboratory data.
authors.affiliation: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, USA. jcucina@gmail.com
authors.forename: Jeffrey M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Cucina
authors.forename: Nicholas R
authors.initials: NR
authors.lastname: Martin
authors.forename: Nicholas L
authors.initials: NL
authors.lastname: Vasilopoulos
authors.forename: Henry F
authors.initials: HF
authors.lastname: Thibodeuax
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004650:Employee Performance Appraisal; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007587:Job Description; D008297:Male; D009790:Occupations; D011590:Psychology, Industrial; D012649:Self Concept; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires