title: The Piper Fatigue Scale-12 (PFS-12): psychometric findings and item reduction in a cohort of breast cancer survivors.
abstract: Brief, valid measures of fatigue, a prevalent and distressing cancer symptom, are needed for use in research. This study's primary aim was to create a shortened version of the revised Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS-R) based on data from a diverse cohort of breast cancer survivors. A secondary aim was to determine whether the PFS captured multiple distinct aspects of fatigue (a multidimensional model) or a single overall fatigue factor (a unidimensional model). Breast cancer survivors (n = 799; stages in situ through IIIa; ages 29-86 years) were recruited through three SEER registries (New Mexico, Western Washington, and Los Angeles, CA) as part of the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle (HEAL) study. Fatigue was measured approximately 3 years post-diagnosis using the 22-item PFS-R that has four subscales (Behavior, Affect, Sensory, and Cognition). Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare unidimensional and multidimensional models. Six criteria were used to make item selections to shorten the PFS-R: scale's content validity, items' relationship with fatigue, content redundancy, differential item functioning by race and/or education, scale reliability, and literacy demand. Factor analyses supported the original 4-factor structure. There was also evidence from the bi-factor model for a dominant underlying fatigue factor. Six items tested positive for differential item functioning between African-American and Caucasian survivors. Four additional items either showed poor association, local dependence, or content validity concerns. After removing these 10 items, the reliability of the PFS-12 subscales ranged from 0.87 to 0.89, compared to 0.90-0.94 prior to item removal. The newly developed PFS-12 can be used to assess fatigue in African-American and Caucasian breast cancer survivors and reduces response burden without compromising reliability or validity. This is the first study to determine PFS literacy demand and to compare PFS-R responses in African-Americans and Caucasian breast cancer survivors. Further testing in diverse populations is warranted.
authors.affiliation: Department of Health Policy & Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7411, USA. bbreeve@email.unc.edu
authors.forename: Bryce B
authors.initials: BB
authors.lastname: Reeve
authors.forename: Angela M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Stover
authors.forename: Catherine M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Alfano
authors.forename: Ashley Wilder
authors.initials: AW
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: Rachel
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ballard-Barbash
authors.forename: Leslie
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Bernstein
authors.forename: Anne
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: McTiernan
authors.forename: Kathy B
authors.initials: KB
authors.lastname: Baumgartner
authors.forename: Barbara F
authors.initials: BF
authors.lastname: Piper
mesh_terms: D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000150:complications / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000523:psychology* / Q000628:therapy; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology; D005221:Fatigue / Q000145:classification / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000379:methods; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D017741:Survivors / Q000523:psychology*