title: Combining optimal defense theory and the evolutionary dilemma model to refine predictions regarding plant invasion.
abstract: Optimal defense theory posits that plants with limited resources deploy chemical defenses based on the fitness value of different tissues and their probability of attack. However, what constitutes optimal defense depends on the identity of the herbivores involved in the interaction. Generalists, which are not tightly coevolved with their many host plants, are typically deterred by chemical defenses, while coevolved specialists are often attracted to these same chemicals. This imposes an "evolutionary dilemma" in which generalists and specialists exert opposing selection on plant investment in defense, thereby stabilizing defenses at intermediate levels. We used the natural shift in herbivore community composition that typifies many plant invasions to test a novel, combined prediction of optimal defense theory and the evolutionary dilemma model: that the within-plant distribution of defenses reflects both the value of different tissues (i.e., young vs. old leaves) and the relative importance of specialist and generalist herbivores in the community. Using populations of Verbascum thapsus exposed to ambient herbivory in its native range (where specialist and generalist chewing herbivores are prevalent) and its introduced range (where only generalist chewing herbivores are prevalent), we illustrate significant differences in the way iridoid glycosides are distributed among young and old leaves. Importantly, high-quality young leaves are 6.5x more highly defended than old leaves in the introduced range, but only 2x more highly defended in the native range. Additionally, defense levels are tracked by patterns of chewing damage, with damage restricted mostly to low-quality old leaves in the introduced range, but not the native range. Given that whole-plant investment in defense does not differ between ranges, introduced mullein may achieve increased fitness simply by optimizing its within-plant distribution of defense in the absence of certain specialist herbivores.
authors.affiliation: Graduate Degree Program in Ecology and Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA. 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309 USA. Christina.Alba@ibot.cas.cz
authors.forename: Christina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Alba
authors.forename: M Deane
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Bowers
authors.forename: Ruth
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Hufbauer
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D017753:Ecosystem; D060434:Herbivory / Q000502:physiology; D007313:Insecta / Q000502:physiology; D058865:Introduced Species; D057889:Iridoid Glycosides / Q000378:metabolism; D008954:Models, Biological; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000378:metabolism; D032265:Verbascum / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D057889:Iridoid Glycosides