title: Invited commentary: structural equation models and epidemiologic analysis.
abstract: In this commentary, structural equation models (SEMs) are discussed as a tool for epidemiologic analysis. Such models are related to and compared with other analytic approaches often used in epidemiology, including regression analysis, causal diagrams, causal mediation analysis, and marginal structural models. Several of these other approaches in fact developed out of the SEM literature. However, SEMs themselves tend to make much stronger assumptions than these other techniques. SEMs estimate more types of effects than do these other techniques, but this comes at the price of additional assumptions. Many of these assumptions have often been ignored and not carefully evaluated when SEMs have been used in practice. In light of the strong assumptions employed by SEMs, the author argues that they should be used principally for the purposes of exploratory analysis and hypothesis generation when a broad range of effects are potentially of interest.
authors.affiliation: Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. tvanderw@hsph.harvard.edu
authors.forename: Tyler J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: VanderWeele
mesh_terms: D005221:Fatigue / Q000150:complications*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D015233:Models, Statistical; D060051:Occupational Injuries / Q000209:etiology*; D012892:Sleep Deprivation / Q000150:complications*; D014940:Work Schedule Tolerance; D016526:Workload