title: Proposal for a state health technology assessment program.
abstract: Evidence suggests that a significant number of medical technologies are of little or no benefit to patients. Under current budgetary pressures, state health care programs cannot afford continued spending on unnecessary medical care without further cuts in enrollment. Limiting coverage of high-tech care only to indications supported by good clinical evidence would help save state health care dollars. However, there is currently no public process to formally evaluate new medical interventions in Wisconsin. In fact, new therapies often are introduced into clinical practice, and covered by state health insurance programs, even when there is weak or questionable evidence of clinical effectiveness. This article proposes the creation of a state Health Technology Assessment program in Wisconsin to systematically evaluate new tests or treatments, and to promote evidence-based coverage decisions. Such a program would help limit wasteful spending on unnecessary technologies, reinforce good clinical practice, and protect patients from the risks of interventions that have not been proven effective.
authors.affiliation: Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA. philcolmenares@gmail.com
authors.forename: Phil
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Colmenares
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D014922:Wisconsin