title: Feature-positive and feature-negative learning in honey bees.
abstract: Honey bees (Apis mellifera anatolica) were subjected to sequential trials where they were given the choice between a feature-positive and a feature-negative feeding plate. The 'feature' being manipulated is the presence of a single blue circle among three circles marking the location of a small sucrose reward. That is, a 'feature-negative' target had three white circles, while a 'feature-positive' target had two white circles and one blue one. Two experiments were performed. In both experiments, each bee was tested under two different reward scenarios (treatments). In the first experiment, during the feature-positive treatment bees received 4 μl of 2 mol l(-1) sucrose when choosing the feature-positive plate, but received 4 μl of saturated NaCl solution (saltwater) when choosing the feature-negative plate. During the feature-negative treatment, bees were rewarded when visiting the feature-negative plate, while visitation to the feature-positive plate only offered bees the saltwater. The second experiment was a repeat of the first except that pure water was offered instead of saltwater in the non-rewarding feeding plate. As an experimental control, a set of bees was offered sequential trials where both the feature-positive and feature-negative plates offered the sucrose reward. Bee feeding plate choice differed between the feature-positive and feature-negative treatments in both experiments. Bees favored the feeding plate type with the sucrose reward in each treatment, and never consumed the saltwater or pure water when encountered in either treatment. Further, behavior of bees during both the feature-positive and feature-negative treatments differed from that of control bees. However, neither feature-positive nor feature-negative learning reached high levels of success. Further, a feature-positive effect was seen when pure water was offered; bees learned to solve the feature-positive problem more rapidly. When we tested bees using simply the choice of blue versus white targets, where one color held the sucrose reward and the other the saltwater, a bee's fidelity to the color offering the sucrose reward quickly reached very high levels.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
authors.forename: Charles I
authors.initials: CI
authors.lastname: Abramson
authors.forename: Ibrahim
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Cakmak
authors.forename: Meghan E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Duell
authors.forename: Leah M
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Bates-Albers
authors.forename: Enoc M
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Zuniga
authors.forename: Loma
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Pendegraft
authors.forename: Amanda
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Barnett
authors.forename: Carmen L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Cowo
authors.forename: Joshua J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Warren
authors.forename: Aaron C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Albritton-Ford
authors.forename: John F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Barthell
authors.forename: John M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Hranitz
authors.forename: Harrington
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Wells
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001516:Bees / Q000502:physiology*; D003216:Conditioning, Operant; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D012201:Reward