title: Submission of scientifically sound and ethical manuscripts to peer-reviewed journals - a reviewer's personal perspective on bioanalytical publications.
abstract: In the pharmaceutical industry, bioanalysis is very dynamic and is probably one of the few fields of research covering the entire drug discovery, development and post-marketing process. Important decisions on drug safety can partially rely on bioanalytical data, which therefore can be subject to regulatory scrutiny. Bioanalytical scientists have historically contributed significant numbers of scientific manuscripts in many peer-reviewed analytical journals. All of these journals provide some high-level instructions, but they also leave sufficient flexibility for reviewers to perform independent critique and offer recommendations for each submitted manuscript. Reviewers play a pivotal role in the process of bioanalytical publication to ensure the publication of high-quality manuscripts in a timely fashion. Their efforts usually lead to improved manuscripts. However, it has to be a joint effort among authors, reviewers and editors to promote scientifically sound and ethically fair bioanalytical publications. Most of the submitted manuscripts were well written with only minor or moderate revisions required for further improvement. Nevertheless, there were small numbers of submitted manuscripts that did not meet the requirements for publications because of scientific or ethical deficiencies, which are discussed in this Letter to the Editor.
authors.affiliation: Janssen Research and Development, Global Development Operations, 1000 US Highway 202, Raritan, NJ, 08869, USA. NWeng@its.jnj.com
authors.forename: Naidong
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Weng
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics* / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D017712:Peer Review, Research; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D011643:Publishing / Q000941:ethics* / Q000592:standards*; D015871:Scientific Misconduct