title: Committee opinion no. 537:  reprocessed single-use devices.
abstract: The reprocessing and reuse of single-use instruments has become increasingly common. Although there are limited data on reprocessed single-use devices, existing studies have found a significant rate of physical defects, performance issues, or improper decontamination. There are currently no data in the medical literature of studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of reprocessed single-use devices in gynecologic surgery. The use of a reprocessed single-use device provides no direct benefit to an individual patient or her physician. It is the operating surgeon’s ethical responsibility to make a good faith effort to know whether reprocessed single-use devices are to be used, and to not use instruments if he or she has concerns about the quality or safety of the instrument(s). Studies on the safety, quality, and cost-effectiveness of reprocessed single-use devices in gynecologic surgery are needed. Physicians should be informed whether the instruments used in surgery are original or reprocessed, and adverse events should be reported to improve the safety information about reprocessed single-use devices.
mesh_terms: D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D017743:Equipment Reuse / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards; D004869:Equipment Safety; D005260:Female; D013509:Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D061214:Patient Safety; D014481:United States