title: Effects of cereal β-glucans and enzyme inclusion on the porcine gastrointestinal tract microbiota.
abstract: This study was designed to evaluate the effect barley-based diets vs. oats based diets on levels of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium and Enterobacterium in the porcine gastrointestinal tract (GIT). In addition the effect of enzyme supplementation in both diets was explored. Twenty-eight boars were used in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement and were assigned to 1 of 4 dietary treatments: barley-based (B) diet; barley-based diet plus an enzyme supplement (B + ES); oat-based (O) diet or oat-based diet plus an enzyme supplement (O + ES). The enzyme supplement contained endo-1,3-β-glucanase and endo-1,4-β-xylanase. Faecal samples were collected from the pigs prior to initiations of the experiment and at slaughter. At slaughter digesta samples were collected from the stomach, ileum, caecum, proximal and distal colon. Alterations in Lactobacillus species composition in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) were analysed by genus-specific PCR - denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). DGGE profiles indicated that cereal source provoked shifts in Lactobacillus population. The most diverse populations of lactobacilli emerged after feeding the O diets. Enzymes inclusion altered the composition of Lactobacillus species prevalent throughout the GIT in animals fed the B diet, causing a shift in the dominant lactobacilli present in the caecum and proximal colon. No such effect was evident in animals fed the enzyme supplemented O + ES diet. Microbial plate counts revealed that the O diets gave rise to higher counts of Lactobacillus in the caecum and colon and Bifidobacterium counts in the ileum, caecum and colon than the B diets. The O diet caused a 2 log increase in Enterobacterium counts in the proximal colon, no such effects were observed in animals fed the B, the B + ES or the O + ES diets. Overall both O diets had a more positive influence on the counts of the beneficial microorganisms and richness of the Lactobacillus population in the porcine GIT.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Cork Institute of Technology, Bishopstown, Cork, Ireland.
authors.forename: Padraigin
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Murphy
authors.forename: Fabio Dal
authors.initials: FD
authors.lastname: Bello
authors.forename: John V
authors.initials: JV
authors.lastname: O'Doherty
authors.forename: Elke K
authors.initials: EK
authors.lastname: Arendt
authors.forename: Torres
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Sweeney
authors.forename: Aidan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Coffey
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D018554:Avena / Q000737:chemistry*; D058491:Bacterial Load; D001644:Bifidobacterium / Q000302:isolation & purification; D004032:Diet / Q000379:methods*; D019587:Dietary Supplements; D004755:Enterobacteriaceae / Q000302:isolation & purification; D004798:Enzymes / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D005243:Feces / Q000382:microbiology; D041981:Gastrointestinal Tract / Q000382:microbiology*; D001467:Hordeum / Q000737:chemistry*; D007778:Lactobacillus / Q000302:isolation & purification; D013552:Swine; D047071:beta-Glucans / Q000008:administration & dosage*
chemical_list: D004798:Enzymes; D047071:beta-Glucans