title: Renegotiating forensic cultures: between law, science and criminal justice.
abstract: This article challenges stereotypical conceptions of Law and Science as cultural opposites, arguing that English criminal trial practice is fundamentally congruent with modern science's basic epistemological assumptions, values and methods of inquiry. Although practical tensions undeniably exist, they are explicable-and may be neutralised-by paying closer attention to criminal adjudication's normative ideals and their institutional expression in familiar aspects of common law trial procedure, including evidentiary rules of admissibility, trial by jury, adversarial fact-finding, cross-examination and the ethical duties of expert witnesses. Effective partnerships between lawyers and forensic scientists are indispensable for integrating scientific evidence into criminal proceedings, and must be renegotiated between individual practitioners on an on-going basis. Fruitful interdisciplinary collaboration between scholars with a shared interest in forensic science should dispense with reductive cultural stereotypes of Science and Law.
authors.affiliation: School of Law, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. paul.roberts@nottingham.ac.uk
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Roberts
mesh_terms: D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003415:Crime / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003416:Criminal Law; D003469:Culture; D004739:England; D005104:Expert Testimony; D044707:Forensic Sciences / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D019359:Knowledge; D012586:Science