title: The Process-Interaction-Model: a common representation of rule-based and logical models allows studying signal transduction on different levels of detail.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Signaling systems typically involve large, structured molecules each consisting of a large number of subunits called molecule domains. In modeling such systems these domains can be considered as the main players. In order to handle the resulting combinatorial complexity, rule-based modeling has been established as the tool of choice. In contrast to the detailed quantitative rule-based modeling, qualitative modeling approaches like logical modeling rely solely on the network structure and are particularly useful for analyzing structural and functional properties of signaling systems.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We introduce the Process-Interaction-Model (PIM) concept. It defines a common representation (or basis) of rule-based models and site-specific logical models, and, furthermore, includes methods to derive models of both types from a given PIM. A PIM is based on directed graphs with nodes representing processes like post-translational modifications or binding processes and edges representing the interactions among processes. The applicability of the concept has been demonstrated by applying it to a model describing EGF insulin crosstalk. A prototypic implementation of the PIM concept has been integrated in the modeling software ProMoT.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The PIM concept provides a common basis for two modeling formalisms tailored to the study of signaling systems: a quantitative (rule-based) and a qualitative (logical) modeling formalism. Every PIM is a compact specification of a rule-based model and facilitates the systematic set-up of a rule-based model, while at the same time facilitating the automatic generation of a site-specific logical model. Consequently, modifications can be made on the underlying basis and then be propagated into the different model specifications - ensuring consistency of all models, regardless of the modeling formalism. This facilitates the analysis of a system on different levels of detail as it guarantees the application of established simulation and analysis methods to consistent descriptions (rule-based and logical) of a particular signaling system.
authors.affiliation: Max Planck Institute Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Sandtorstr. 1, Germany. kolczyk@mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de
authors.forename: Katrin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kolczyk
authors.forename: Regina
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Samaga
authors.forename: Holger
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Conzelmann
authors.forename: Sebastian
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Mirschel
authors.forename: Carsten
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Conradi
mesh_terms: D002468:Cell Physiological Phenomena; D008954:Models, Biological; D011499:Protein Processing, Post-Translational; D017434:Protein Structure, Tertiary / Q000502:physiology*; D015398:Signal Transduction / Q000502:physiology*; D012984:Software