Brain-dead patients are not cadavers: the need to revise the definition of death in Muslim communities.
The utilitarian construct of two alternative criteria of human death increases the supply of transplantable organs at the end of life. Neither the neurological criterion (heart-beating donation) nor the circulatory criterion (non-heart-beating donation) is grounded in scientific evidence but based on philosophical reasoning. A utilitarian death definition can have unintended consequences for dying Muslim patients: (1) the expedited process of determining death for retrieval of transplantable organs can lead to diagnostic errors, (2) the equivalence of brain death with human death may be incorrect, and (3) end-of-life religious values and traditional rituals may be sacrificed. Therefore, it is imperative to reevaluate the two different types and criteria of death introduced by the Resolution (Fatwa) of the Council of Islamic Jurisprudence on Resuscitation Apparatus in 1986. Although we recognize that this Fatwa was based on best scientific evidence available at that time, more recent evidence shows that it rests on outdated knowledge and understanding of the phenomenon of human death. We recommend redefining death in Islam to reaffirm the singularity of this biological phenomenon as revealed in the Quran 14 centuries ago.
Department of Critical Care, Mayo Clinic Hospital, 5777 East Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA. rady.mohamed@mayo.edu
Mohamed Y
MY
Rady
Joseph L
JL
Verheijde
D001926:Brain Death / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003422:Critical Care; D006801:Humans; D007514:Islam; D012068:Religion and Medicine; D013727:Terminal Care; D020858:Tissue and Organ Harvesting; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement