Is arterial pulse contour analysis using Nexfin a new option in the noninvasive measurement of cardiac output?--A pilot study.
OBJECTIVE
A growing interest in monitoring cardiac output (CO) noninvasively has emerged; however, its determination has been difficult using the standard approaches. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of pulse contour analysis (PCA) compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).


METHODS
A single-center prospective study.


METHODS
A university hospital.


METHODS
Thirty-nine consecutive stable patients undergoing CMR.


METHODS
CO was determined twice by PCA using the Nexfin monitoring system (BMEYE BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Measurements were performed after 10 minutes of rest in a stable supine position immediately before or after the CMR examination.


RESULTS
There was a mean bias of 0.2 ± 1.9 L/min between CMR and PCA and a reproducibility of 0.2 ± 0.6 L/min for PCA. Between 4.8 and 6.3 L/min (second quartile of COCMR), there was a good agreement (mean bias = -0.2 ± 1.3 L/min). Comparing quartile 1 (-1.3 ± 2.0 L/min) overestimating and quartiles 3 (1.4 ± 0.9 L/min) and 4 (0.9 ± 2.0 L/min) underestimating CO, a statistically significant difference was found. The reproducibility was not affected by the quartile (p = 0.23, analysis of variance), whereas there was a significant difference between the nonoutlier and outlier group when using the Mann-Whitney U test (p = 0.02).


CONCLUSIONS
Noninvasive PCA allows the safe and economic measurement of CO, yet it still has major limitations. Although the agreement with CMR was acceptable, there was a clinically unacceptable variation; absolute values should not be used interchangeably. These results suggest that therapeutic interventions and clinical decisions should not be based on noninvasive PCA measurements at the present time.
1st Department of Medicine (Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology, Intensive Care), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Frederik
F
Trinkmann
Matthias
M
Sampels
Christina
C
Doesch
Theano
T
Papavassiliu
Joachim
J
Brade
Gerald
G
Schmid-Bindert
Ursula
U
Hoffmann
Martin
M
Borggrefe
Jens J
JJ
Kaden
Joachim
J
Saur
D000368:Aged; D001794:Blood Pressure / Q000502:physiology; D002302:Cardiac Output / Q000502:physiology*; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D004562:Electrocardiography; D005260:Female; D006321:Heart / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016343:Monitoring, Intraoperative / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D018408:Patch-Clamp Techniques; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011674:Pulse; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D051598:Whole Body Imaging