Assessing the association of appropriateness of coronary revascularization and clinical outcomes for patients with stable coronary artery disease.
OBJECTIVE
The study assessed the appropriateness of coronary revascularization in Ontario, Canada, and examined its association with longer-term outcomes.


BACKGROUND
Although appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization have been developed to improve the rational use of cardiac invasive procedures, it is unknown whether greater adherence to appropriateness guidelines is associated with improved clinical outcomes in stable coronary artery disease.


METHODS
A population-based cohort of stable patients undergoing cardiac catheterization was assembled from April 1, 2006, to March 31, 2007. The appropriateness for coronary revascularization at the time of coronary angiography was retrospectively adjudicated using the appropriate use criteria. Clinical outcomes between coronary revascularization and medical treatment without revascularization, stratified by appropriateness categories, were compared.


RESULTS
In 1,625 patients with stable coronary artery disease, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting was only performed in 69% who had an appropriate indication for coronary revascularization. Coronary revascularization was associated with a lower adjusted hazard of death or acute coronary syndrome (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42 to 0.88) at 3 years compared with medical therapy in appropriate patients. The rate of coronary revascularization was 54% in the uncertain category and 45% in the inappropriate category. No significant difference in death or acute coronary syndrome between coronary revascularization and no revascularization in the uncertain category (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.28 to 1.16) and the inappropriate category (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.48 to 2.02) was observed.


CONCLUSIONS
Using the appropriateness use criteria, we identified substantial underutilization and overutilization of coronary revascularization in contemporary clinical practice. Underutilization of coronary revascularization is associated with significantly increased risks of adverse outcomes in patients with appropriate indications.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. dennis.ko@ices.on.ca
Dennis T
DT
Ko
Helen
H
Guo
Harindra C
HC
Wijeysundera
Madhu K
MK
Natarajan
A Dave
AD
Nagpal
Christopher M
CM
Feindel
Kori
K
Kingsbury
Eric A
EA
Cohen
Jack V
JV
Tu
D000368:Aged; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D062645:Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / Q000592:standards / Q000639:trends*; D011159:Population Surveillance / Q000379:methods; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome