A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research.
The US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke convened major stakeholders in June 2012 to discuss how to improve the methodological reporting of animal studies in grant applications and publications. The main workshop recommendation is that at a minimum studies should report on sample-size estimation, whether and how animals were randomized, whether investigators were blind to the treatment, and the handling of data. We recognize that achieving a meaningful improvement in the quality of reporting will require a concerted effort by investigators, reviewers, funding agencies and journal editors. Requiring better reporting of animal studies will raise awareness of the importance of rigorous study design to accelerate scientific progress.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Story C
SC
Landis
Susan G
SG
Amara
Khusru
K
Asadullah
Chris P
CP
Austin
Robi
R
Blumenstein
Eileen W
EW
Bradley
Ronald G
RG
Crystal
Robert B
RB
Darnell
Robert J
RJ
Ferrante
Howard
H
Fillit
Robert
R
Finkelstein
Marc
M
Fisher
Howard E
HE
Gendelman
Robert M
RM
Golub
John L
JL
Goudreau
Robert A
RA
Gross
Amelie K
AK
Gubitz
Sharon E
SE
Hesterlee
David W
DW
Howells
John
J
Huguenard
Katrina
K
Kelner
Walter
W
Koroshetz
Dimitri
D
Krainc
Stanley E
SE
Lazic
Michael S
MS
Levine
Malcolm R
MR
Macleod
John M
JM
McCall
Richard T
RT
Moxley
Kalyani
K
Narasimhan
Linda J
LJ
Noble
Steve
S
Perrin
John D
JD
Porter
Oswald
O
Steward
Ellis
E
Unger
Ursula
U
Utz
Shai D
SD
Silberberg
D000818:Animals; D011643:Publishing / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D011897:Random Allocation; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards*; D018401:Sample Size; D013223:Statistics as Topic