The Court Impact Scale: a tool for evaluating IPV victims' experience in court.
The court system is a central part of the societal response to intimate partner violence (IPV), and is a frequently used source of help for victims. The concept of therapeutic jurisprudence suggests that the court should be evaluated not just for its potential effect on recidivism, but for its impact on the well-being of all those who participate in it, and IPV scholars suggest that empowerment is a key component of any therapeutic intervention for victims. Research in these areas is limited by the lack of a standard method for examining victim experience in the court system. This article describes the development and piloting of a 23-item measure designed to address this gap. The pilot sample included 157 victims of IPV seeking civil protection orders (CPOs). Exploratory factor analysis yielded 5 factors: Negative Impact, Positive Impact, Fear, Validation, and Network Impact. Validation was most strongly correlated with global satisfaction with the court process. Implications and applications for work in therapeutic jurisprudence and empowerment are discussed.
George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA. lcattane@gmu.edu
Lauren Bennett
LB
Cattaneo
Jessica L
JL
Dunn
Aliya R
AR
Chapman
D001290:Attitude; D018585:Battered Women / Q000523:psychology; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D033222:Judicial Role; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011209:Power, Psychological; D011594:Psychometrics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013179:Spouse Abuse / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000517:prevention & control; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States