Two h-index benchmarks for evaluating the publication performance of medical informatics researchers.
BACKGROUND
The h-index is a commonly used metric for evaluating the publication performance of researchers. However, in a multidisciplinary field such as medical informatics, interpreting the h-index is a challenge because researchers tend to have diverse home disciplines, ranging from clinical areas to computer science, basic science, and the social sciences, each with different publication performance profiles.


OBJECTIVE
To construct a reference standard for interpreting the h-index of medical informatics researchers based on the performance of their peers.


METHODS
Using a sample of authors with articles published over the 5-year period 2006-2011 in the 2 top journals in medical informatics (as determined by impact factor), we computed their h-index using the Scopus database. Percentiles were computed to create a 6-level benchmark, similar in scheme to one used by the US National Science Foundation, and a 10-level benchmark.


RESULTS
The 2 benchmarks can be used to place medical informatics researchers in an ordered category based on the performance of their peers. A validation exercise mapped the benchmark levels to the ranks of medical informatics academic faculty in the United States. The 10-level benchmark tracked academic rank better (with no ties) and is therefore more suitable for practical use.


CONCLUSIONS
Our 10-level benchmark provides an objective basis to evaluate and compare the publication performance of medical informatics researchers with that of their peers using the h-index.
Electronic Health Information Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada. kelemam@uottawa.ca
Khaled
K
El Emam
Luk
L
Arbuckle
Elizabeth
E
Jonker
Kevin
K
Anderson
D019985:Benchmarking; D008490:Medical Informatics; D011643:Publishing; D012106:Research; D018401:Sample Size