title: Concreteness and word production.
abstract: Two experiments are reported that investigated the effect of concreteness on the ability to generate words to fit sentence contexts. When participants attempted to retrieve words from dictionary definitions in experiment 1, abstract words were associated with more omissions and more alternates than were concrete words. These findings are consistent with the view that the semantic-lexical weights in the word production system are weaker for abstract than for concrete words. We found no evidence that greater competition from semantic neighbors was an additional reason why abstract words were harder to produce. Participants also reported more positive tip-of-the-tongue states (TOTs) when attempting to produce abstract words from their definitions, consistent with more phonological retrieval problems for abstract than for concrete words. In experiment 2, participants attempted to generate words to fit into a sentence that described a specific event. The difference between the numbers of abstract and concrete words recalled was significantly smaller in the event condition than in the definition condition, and evidence no longer emerged of greater phonological retrieval failure for abstract words. Overall, the results are consistent with the view that the semantic-lexical weights, but not the lexical-phonological weights, are weaker for abstract than for concrete words in the word production system.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK. rhanley@essex.ac.uk
authors.forename: J Richard
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Hanley
authors.forename: Rebecka P
authors.initials: RP
authors.lastname: Hunt
authors.forename: Deborah A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Steed
authors.forename: Shannon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Jackman
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D006801:Humans; D010700:Phonetics; D011578:Psycholinguistics / Q000379:methods*; D011897:Random Allocation; D012660:Semantics; D055815:Young Adult