title: Identification of the factors associated with outcomes in a Condition Management Programme.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A requirement of the Government's Pathways to Work (PtW) agenda was to introduce a Condition Management Programme (CMP). The aim of the present study was to identify the differences between those who engaged and made progress in this telephone-based biopsychosocial intervention, in terms of their health, and those who did not and to determine the client and practitioner characteristics and programme elements associated with success in a programme aimed at improving health.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data were obtained from the CMP electronic spreadsheets and clients paper-based case records. CMP standard practice was that questionnaires were administered during the pre- and post-assessment phases over the telephone. Each client's record contains their socio-demographic data, their primary health condition, as well as the pre- and post-intervention scores of the health assessment tool administered. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis was used to investigate the relationships between the database variables. Clients were included in the study if their records were available for analysis from July 2006 to December 2007.
  
  
  RESULTS
  On average there were 112 referrals per month, totalling 2016 referrals during the evaluation period. The majority (62.8%) of clients had a mental-health condition. Successful completion of the programme was 28.5% (575 "completers"; 144 "discharges"). Several factors, such as age, health condition, mode of contact, and practitioner characteristics, were significant determinants of participation and completion of the programme. The results showed that completion of the CMP was associated with a better mental-health status, by reducing the number of clients that were either anxious, depressed or both, before undertaking the programme, from 74% to 32.5%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our findings showed that an individual's characteristics are associated with success in the programme, defined as completing the intervention and demonstrating an improved health status. This study provides some evidence that the systematic evaluation of such programmes and interventions could identify ways in which they could be improved.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ, UK. evangelia.demou@glasgow.ac.uk
authors.forename: Evangelia
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Demou
authors.forename: Iain
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Gibson
authors.forename: Ewan B
authors.initials: EB
authors.lastname: Macdonald
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000072038:Cardiac Rehabilitation; D005260:Female; D006293:Health Promotion / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000534:rehabilitation; D008875:Middle Aged; D009140:Musculoskeletal Diseases / Q000534:rehabilitation; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D015397:Program Evaluation; D012017:Referral and Consultation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012140:Respiratory Tract Diseases / Q000534:rehabilitation; D062707:Return to Work; D013689:Telephone / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D055815:Young Adult