title: Prospect theory does not describe the feedback-related negativity value function.
abstract: Humans handle uncertainty poorly. Prospect theory accounts for this with a value function in which possible losses are overweighted compared to possible gains, and the marginal utility of rewards decreases with size. fMRI studies have explored the neural basis of this value function. A separate body of research claims that prediction errors are calculated by midbrain dopamine neurons. We investigated whether the prospect theoretic effects shown in behavioral and fMRI studies were present in midbrain prediction error coding by using the feedback-related negativity, an ERP component believed to reflect midbrain prediction errors. Participants' stated satisfaction with outcomes followed prospect theory but their feedback-related negativity did not, instead showing no effect of marginal utility and greater sensitivity to potential gains than losses.
authors.affiliation: Cognition Institute, School of Psychology, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK. tom.sambrook@plymouth.ac.uk
authors.forename: Thomas D
authors.initials: TD
authors.lastname: Sambrook
authors.forename: Matthew
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Roser
authors.forename: Jeremy
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Goslin
mesh_terms: D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D004569:Electroencephalography; D018913:Event-Related Potentials, P300 / Q000502:physiology*; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D030141:Feedback, Psychological / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008636:Mesencephalon / Q000502:physiology; D011582:Psychological Theory; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology