title: Estimating the hidden burden of bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain.
abstract: The number of cattle herds placed under movement restrictions in Great Britain (GB) due to the suspected presence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) has progressively increased over the past 25 years despite an intensive and costly test-and-slaughter control program. Around 38% of herds that clear movement restrictions experience a recurrent incident (breakdown) within 24 months, suggesting that infection may be persisting within herds. Reactivity to tuberculin, the basis of diagnostic testing, is dependent on the time from infection. Thus, testing efficiency varies between outbreaks, depending on weight of transmission and cannot be directly estimated. In this paper, we use Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) to parameterize two within-herd transmission models within a rigorous inferential framework. Previous within-herd models of bTB have relied on ad-hoc methods of parameterization and used a single model structure (SORI) where animals are assumed to become detectable by testing before they become infectious. We study such a conventional within-herd model of bTB and an alternative model, motivated by recent animal challenge studies, where there is no period of epidemiological latency before animals become infectious (SOR). Under both models we estimate that cattle-to-cattle transmission rates are non-linearly density dependent. The basic reproductive ratio for our conventional within-herd model, estimated for scenarios with no statutory controls, increases from 1.5 (0.26-4.9; 95% CI) in a herd of 30 cattle up to 4.9 (0.99-14.0) in a herd of 400. Under this model we estimate that 50% (33-67) of recurrent breakdowns in Britain can be attributed to infection missed by tuberculin testing. However this figure falls to 24% (11-42) of recurrent breakdowns under our alternative model. Under both models the estimated extrinsic force of infection increases with the burden of missed infection. Hence, improved herd-level testing is unlikely to reduce recurrence unless this extrinsic infectious pressure is simultaneously addressed.
authors.affiliation: Disease Dynamics Unit (DDU), Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. ajkc2@cam.ac.uk
authors.forename: Andrew J K
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Conlan
authors.forename: Trevelyan J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: McKinley
authors.forename: Katerina
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Karolemeas
authors.forename: Ellen Brooks
authors.initials: EB
authors.lastname: Pollock
authors.forename: Anthony V
authors.initials: AV
authors.lastname: Goodchild
authors.forename: Andrew P
authors.initials: AP
authors.lastname: Mitchell
authors.forename: Colin P D
authors.initials: CP
authors.lastname: Birch
authors.forename: Richard S
authors.initials: RS
authors.lastname: Clifton-Hadley
authors.forename: James L N
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Wood
mesh_terms: D000822:Animal Husbandry; D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D004196:Disease Outbreaks / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000662:veterinary*; D008954:Models, Biological; D014380:Tuberculosis, Bovine / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000635:transmission; D006113:United Kingdom / Q000453:epidemiology