title: Minimising medically unwarranted computed tomography scans.
abstract: As computed tomography (CT) is such a superb diagnostic tool and individual CT risks are small, whenever a CT scan is clinically warranted, the CT benefit/risk balance is by far in the patient's favour. However, if a CT scan is not clinically warranted, this balance shifts dramatically. It is likely that at least 25% of CT scans fall into this latter category, in that they could either be replaced with alternative imaging modalities or could be avoided entirely. Use of clinical decision rules for CT usage represents a powerful approach for slowing down the increase in CT usage, because they have the potential to overcome some of the major factors that result in some CT scans being undertaken when they may not be clinically helpful.
authors.affiliation: Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA. djb3@columbia.edu
authors.forename: D J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Brenner
mesh_terms: D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011835:Radiation Protection; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods*; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*