title: Elective ventilation and the politics of death.
abstract: This essay comments on the British Medical Association's recent suggestion that protocols for Elective Ventilation (EV) might be revived in order to increase the number of viable organs available for transplant. I suggest that the proposed revival results, at least in part, from developments in the contemporary political landscape, notably the decreasing likelihood of an opt-out system for the UK's Organ Donor Register. I go on to suggest that EV is unavoidably situated within complex debates surrounding the epistemology and ontology of death. Such questions cannot be settled a priori by medical science, bioethics or philosophical reflection. As Radcliffe-Richards suggests, the determination of death has become a moral question, and therefore, now extends into the political arena. I argue for the conclusion that EV, and wider debates about organ donation and the constitution of the organ donation register, are matters of 'biocitizenship' and must, therefore, be addressed as 'biopolitical' questions.
authors.affiliation: Visiting Research Fellow, School of Politics, International Politics and Philosophy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK. nemmerich01@qub.ac.uk
authors.forename: Nathan
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Emmerich
mesh_terms: D001926:Brain Death; D006323:Heart Arrest; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D009014:Morals; D016377:Organ Transplantation / Q000941:ethics; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D011057:Politics; D012042:Registries; D012121:Respiration, Artificial / Q000941:ethics*; D012955:Societies, Medical; D014019:Tissue Donors / Q000600:supply & distribution*; D020858:Tissue and Organ Harvesting / Q000941:ethics*; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement / Q000941:ethics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006113:United Kingdom