title: Traditional medicine in china, Korea, and Japan: a brief introduction and comparison.
abstract: Background and Purpose. Traditional medicine (TM) has been widely used in China (including the Taiwan region), Korea, and Japan. The purposes of this paper are to summarize the basic data on TM systems in these three countries and to compare them in terms of overall policy, education, and insurance. Methods. Government websites, national statistics, and authoritative papers from each country were fully searched. Further data were gathered by TM experts from each country. Results. China and Korea showed similar patterns in TM systems, whereas Japan showed different patterns. In China and Korea, TM was practiced in a dual system with conventional medicine (CM), and TM education was 6-year training programs on average for TM doctors, and acupuncture, moxibustion, and cupping were completely insured. Whereas, CM was dominant in Japan, and TM was practiced by each health care worker who has received different TM education respectively, and main TM therapies were partially insured. Conclusions. TM was developed similarly or somewhat differently based on differences in cultural background and national policies in East Asia. We cautiously propose that this study could contribute to the development of TM and also be used for reference in complementary and alternative medicine systems.
authors.affiliation: School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan 626-870, Republic of Korea.
authors.forename: Hye-Lim
authors.initials: HL
authors.lastname: Park
authors.forename: Hun-Soo
authors.initials: HS
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Byung-Cheul
authors.initials: BC
authors.lastname: Shin
authors.forename: Jian-Ping
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.forename: Qinghua
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Shang
authors.forename: Hitoshi
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Yamashita
authors.forename: Byungmook
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Lim