title: Low-pass filters and differential tympanal tuning in a paleotropical bushcricket with an unusually low frequency call.
abstract: Low-frequency sounds are advantageous for long-range acoustic signal transmission, but for small animals they constitute a challenge for signal detection and localization. The efficient detection of sound in insects is enhanced by mechanical resonance either in the tracheal or tympanal system before subsequent neuronal amplification. Making small structures resonant at low sound frequencies poses challenges for insects and has not been adequately studied. Similarly, detecting the direction of long-wavelength sound using interaural signal amplitude and/or phase differences is difficult for small animals. Pseudophylline bushcrickets predominantly call at high, often ultrasonic frequencies, but a few paleotropical species use lower frequencies. We investigated the mechanical frequency tuning of the tympana of one such species, Onomarchus uninotatus, a large bushcricket that produces a narrow bandwidth call at an unusually low carrier frequency of 3.2 kHz. Onomarchus uninotatus, like most bushcrickets, has two large tympanal membranes on each fore-tibia. We found that both these membranes vibrate like hinged flaps anchored at the dorsal wall and do not show higher modes of vibration in the frequency range investigated (1.5-20 kHz). The anterior tympanal membrane acts as a low-pass filter, attenuating sounds at frequencies above 3.5 kHz, in contrast to the high-pass filter characteristic of other bushcricket tympana. Responses to higher frequencies are partitioned to the posterior tympanal membrane, which shows maximal sensitivity at several broad frequency ranges, peaking at 3.1, 7.4 and 14.4 kHz. This partitioning between the two tympanal membranes constitutes an unusual feature of peripheral auditory processing in insects. The complex tracheal shape of O. uninotatus also deviates from the known tube or horn shapes associated with simple band-pass or high-pass amplification of tracheal input to the tympana. Interestingly, while the anterior tympanal membrane shows directional sensitivity at conspecific call frequencies, the posterior tympanal membrane is not directional at conspecific frequencies and instead shows directionality at higher frequencies.
authors.affiliation: Center for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012,  India.
authors.forename: Kaveri
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Rajaraman
authors.forename: Natasha
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Mhatre
authors.forename: Manjari
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Jain
authors.forename: Mathew
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Postles
authors.forename: Rohini
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Balakrishnan
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Robert
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000819:Animal Communication; D000825:Animal Structures / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D005260:Female; D007194:India; D008297:Male; D009987:Orthoptera / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology*; D013017:Sound Localization; D014732:Vibration; D055114:X-Ray Microtomography