title: Do Subtle Cues About Belongingness Constrain Women's Career Choices?
abstract: Nilanjana Dasgupta's (this issue) stereotype inoculation model (SIM) helps explain why what feels like a free choice to pursue one life path over another "is often constrained by subtle cues in achievement environments that signal who naturally belongs there and is most likely to succeed and who else is a dubious fit" (p. 231). She posits that seeing others like themselves in successful roles inoculates women against negative stereotypes that impede their success and persistence in specific achievement contexts.As is true of classic theoretical positions (see Nagel, 1961), Dasgupta presents postulates from which she deduces a specific set of hypotheses, and she reviews the relevant empirical/observational data in support of them. It is precisely what this area of research has long needed-moving beyond demonstrations of identity threats to a theory about their underlying causes, conditions, and interventions. This proposal leads her to four broad predictions, the first of which is the primary focus of our comment.
authors.affiliation: Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
authors.forename: Stephen J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Ceci
authors.forename: Wendy M
authors.initials: WM
authors.lastname: Williams
authors.forename: Rachel A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Sumner
authors.forename: William C
authors.initials: WC
authors.lastname: Defraine