title: Clinical and electrical performance of currently available MRI-safe pacing systems. Do all devices perform in the same way?
authors.forename: Giovanni B
authors.initials: GB
authors.lastname: Forleo
authors.forename: Domenico G
authors.initials: DG
authors.lastname: Della Rocca
authors.forename: Germana
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Panattoni
authors.forename: Valentina
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Schirripa
authors.forename: Domenico
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Sergi
authors.forename: Giulia
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Magliano
authors.forename: Manfredi
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Tesauro
authors.forename: Luca
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Santini
authors.forename: Francesco
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Romeo
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002304:Cardiac Pacing, Artificial / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D015331:Cohort Studies; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged