title: Neural responses to smoking stimuli are influenced by smokers' attitudes towards their own smoking behaviour.
abstract: An important feature of addiction is the high drug craving that may promote the continuation of consumption. Environmental stimuli classically conditioned to drug-intake have a strong motivational power for addicts and can elicit craving. However, addicts differ in the attitudes towards their own consumption behavior: some are content with drug taking (consonant users) whereas others are discontent (dissonant users). Such differences may be important for clinical practice because the experience of dissonance might enhance the likelihood to consider treatment. This fMRI study investigated in smokers whether these different attitudes influence subjective and neural responses to smoking stimuli. Based on self-characterization, smokers were divided into consonant and dissonant smokers. These two groups were presented smoking stimuli and neutral stimuli. Former studies have suggested differences in the impact of smoking stimuli depending on the temporal stage of the smoking ritual they are associated with. Therefore, we used stimuli associated with the beginning (BEGIN-smoking-stimuli) and stimuli associated with the terminal stage (END-smoking-stimuli) of the smoking ritual as distinct stimulus categories. Stimulus ratings did not differ between both groups. Brain data showed that BEGIN-smoking-stimuli led to enhanced mesolimbic responses (amygdala, hippocampus, insula) in dissonant compared to consonant smokers. In response to END-smoking-stimuli, dissonant smokers showed reduced mesocortical responses (orbitofrontal cortex, subcallosal cortex) compared to consonant smokers. These results suggest that smoking stimuli with a high incentive value (BEGIN-smoking-stimuli) are more appetitive for dissonant than consonant smokers at least on the neural level. To the contrary, smoking stimuli with low incentive value (END-smoking-stimuli) seem to be less appetitive for dissonant smokers than consonant smokers. These differences might be one reason why dissonant smokers experience difficulties in translating their attitudes into an actual behavior change.
authors.affiliation: Bender Institute of Neuroimaging, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany. bastian.stippekohl@psychol.uni-giessen.de
authors.forename: Bastian
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Stippekohl
authors.forename: Markus H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Winkler
authors.forename: Bertram
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Walter
authors.forename: Sabine
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kagerer
authors.forename: Ronald F
authors.initials: RF
authors.lastname: Mucha
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Pauli
authors.forename: Dieter
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Vaitl
authors.forename: Rudolf
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Stark
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001290:Attitude; D016739:Behavior, Addictive / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000523:psychology; D001921:Brain / Q000503:physiopathology*; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D059907:Functional Neuroimaging; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012907:Smoking / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000523:psychology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires