title: Posterior muscolofascial reconstruction incorporated into urethrovescical anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
abstract: The rationale of posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction during radical prostatectomy is to shorten the time to reach urinary continence recovery and to reduce the risk of bleeding and anastomosis leakage. We describe our original technique incorporating the posterior muscolofascial reconstruction into urethrovesical anastomosis using robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). For this reconstructive step, we use a 30-cm V-Loc 90 3-0 barbed suture (V-20 tapered needle). Specifically, the free edge of the posterior layer of the Denonvilliers fascia is approximated to the posterior part of the sphincteric apparatus in a running fashion from left to right. The musculature of the urethral wall is incorporated in this first layer of the running suture. This suture is then continued back to the left in a second layer incorporating the anterior layer of the Denonvilliers fascia (or prostatovesical muscle), the bladder neck, and again the urethra, this time also with urethral mucosa. The urethrovesical anastomosis is completed using a second running barbed suture (15-cm V-Loc 90 3-0 barbed suture, V-20 tapered needle). No intraoperative complications were observed during this step of the procedure. Anastomotic leakages were observed only in 2% of cases. Only 12.5% showed urinary incontinence after catheter removal (1-2 pads). At mean follow-up of 9 months, the urinary continence recovery was 95%, and an anastomosis stricture necessitating an endoscopic incision developed in only three (1.5%) patients. Recent systematic reviews of the literature showed only a minimal advantage in favor of posterior musculofascial reconstruction in terms of urinary continence recovery within 1 month after radical prostatectomy. We support the use of this step of RARP because it is simple, reproducible, with a very limited increase in operative time, and with only a slight risk of potential harm to the patient. Moreover, it could improve hemostasis and provide greater support for a delicate anastomosis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. vincenzo.ficarra@unipd.it
authors.forename: Vincenzo
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Ficarra
authors.forename: Melanie
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gan
authors.forename: Marco
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Borghesi
authors.forename: Fabio
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Zattoni
authors.forename: Alexandre
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Mottrie
mesh_terms: D000714:Anastomosis, Surgical; D000071938:Fasciotomy; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009132:Muscles / Q000601:surgery*; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000379:methods*; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D012371:Robotics; D014521:Urethra / Q000601:surgery*; D001743:Urinary Bladder / Q000601:surgery*