title: Practical application of suspension criteria scenarios: radiotherapy.
abstract: In 2007, the European Commission (EC) commissioned a group of experts to undertake the revision of Report RP91 'Criteria for Acceptability of Radiological (including Radiotherapy) and Nuclear Medicine Installations' written in 1997. The revised draft report was submitted to the EC in 2010, which issued it for public consultation. The EC commissioned the same group of experts to consider the comments of the public consultation for further improvement of the revised report. The EC intends to publish the final report under its Radiation Report Series as RP162. This paper presents a selection of practical applications of suspension criteria scenarios in radiotherapy, mostly in brachytherapy, with special emphasis on the critical roles and responsibilities of qualified radiotherapy staff (radiation oncologists, medical physicists and radiotherapy technicians).
authors.affiliation: Medical Radiation Physics,  Lund University, Lund,  Sweden.
authors.forename: I-L
authors.initials: IL
authors.lastname: Lamm
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Horton
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Lehmann
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Lillicrap
mesh_terms: D001918:Brachytherapy / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D005060:Europe; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009683:Nuclear Medicine / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D010315:Particle Accelerators; D061214:Patient Safety; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy; D011786:Quality Control; D011835:Radiation Protection / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D011874:Radiometry / Q000379:methods; D011878:Radiotherapy / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D002583:Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy