title: Selection for genetic markers in beef cattle reveals complex associations of thyroglobulin and casein1-s1 with carcass and meat traits.
abstract: Genetic markers in casein (CSN1S1) and thyroglobulin (TG) genes have previously been associated with fat distribution in cattle. Determining the nature of these genetic associations (additive, recessive, or dominant) has been difficult, because both markers have small minor allele frequencies in most beef cattle populations. This results in few animals homozygous for the minor alleles. selection to increase the frequencies of the minor alleles for 2 SNP markers in these genes was undertaken in a composite population. The objective was to obtain better estimates of genetic effects associated with these markers and determine if there were epistatic interactions. Selection increased the frequencies of minor alleles for both SNP from <0.30 to 0.45. Bulls (n = 24) heterozygous for both SNP were used in 3 yr to produce 204 steer progeny harvested at an average age of 474 d. The combined effect of the 9 CSN1S1 × TG genotypes was associated with carcass-adjusted fat thickness (P < 0.06) and meat tenderness predicted at the abattoir by visible and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (P < 0.04). Genotype did not affect BW from birth through harvest, ribeye area, marbling score, slice shear force, or image-based yield grade (P > 0.10). Additive, dominance, and epistatic SNP association effects were estimated from genotypic effects for adjusted fat thickness and predicted meat tenderness. Adjusted fat thickness showed a dominance association with TG SNP (P < 0.06) and an epistatic additive CSN1S1 × additive TG association (P < 0.03). For predicted meat tenderness, heterozygous TG meat was more tender than meat from either homozygote (P < 0.002). Dominance and epistatic associations can result in different SNP allele substitution effects in populations where SNP have the same linkage disequilibrium with causal mutations but have different frequencies. Although the complex associations estimated in this study would contribute little to within-population selection response, they could be important for marker-assisted management or reciprocal selection schemes.
authors.affiliation: USDA-ARS, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933-0166, USA. gary.bennett@ars.usda.gov
authors.forename: G L
authors.initials: GL
authors.lastname: Bennett
authors.forename: S D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Shackelford
authors.forename: T L
authors.initials: TL
authors.lastname: Wheeler
authors.forename: D A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: King
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Casas
authors.forename: T P L
authors.initials: TP
authors.lastname: Smith
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001823:Body Composition / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D002364:Caseins / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D002417:Cattle / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology; D005786:Gene Expression Regulation; D005819:Genetic Markers; D008460:Meat / Q000592:standards*; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; D012641:Selection, Genetic; D013954:Thyroglobulin / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D002364:Caseins; D005819:Genetic Markers; D013954:Thyroglobulin