title: Validation of orthopedic postoperative pain assessment methods for dogs: a prospective, blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
abstract: In the context of translational research, there is growing interest in studying surgical orthopedic pain management approaches that are common to humans and dogs. The validity of postoperative pain assessment methods is uncertain with regards to responsiveness and the potential interference of analgesia. The hypothesis was that video analysis (as a reference), electrodermal activity, and two subjective pain scales (VAS and 4A-VET) would detect different levels of pain intensity in dogs after a standardized trochleoplasty procedure. In this prospective, blinded, randomized study, postoperative pain was assessed in 25 healthy dogs during a 48-hour time frame (T). Pain was managed with placebo (Group 1, n = 10), preemptive and multimodal analgesia (Group 2, n = 5), or preemptive analgesia consisting in oral tramadol (Group 3, n = 10). Changes over time among groups were analyzed using generalized estimating equations. Multivariate regression tested the significance of relationships between pain scales and video analysis. Video analysis identified that one orthopedic behavior, namely 'Walking with full weight bearing' of the operated leg, decreased more in Group 1 at T24 (indicative of pain), whereas three behaviors indicative of sedation decreased in Group 2 at T24 (all p<0.004). Electrodermal activity was higher in Group 1 than in Groups 2 and 3 until T1 (p<0.0003). The VAS was not responsive. 4A-VET showed divergent results as its orthopedic component (4A-VETleg) detected lower pain in Group 2 until T12 (p<0.0009), but its interactive component (4A-VETbeh) was increased in Group 2 from T12 to T48 (p<0.001). Concurrent validity established that 4A-VETleg scores the painful orthopedic condition accurately and that pain assessment through 4A-VETbeh and VAS was severely biased by the sedative side-effect of the analgesics. Finally, the video analysis offered a concise template for assessment in dogs with acute orthopedic pain. However, subjective pain quantification methods and electrodermal activity need further investigation.
authors.affiliation: Groupe de Recherche en Pharmacologie Animale du Québec-GREPAQ, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada.
authors.forename: Pascale
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Rialland
authors.forename: Simon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Authier
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Guillot
authors.forename: Jérôme R E
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Del Castillo
authors.forename: Daphnée
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Veilleux-Lemieux
authors.forename: Diane
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Frank
authors.forename: Dominique
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Gauvin
authors.forename: Eric
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Troncy
mesh_terms: D000698:Analgesia; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D004285:Dogs; D005712:Galvanic Skin Response; D008297:Male; D023421:Models, Animal; D009985:Orthopedics; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000379:methods*; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000628:therapy; D011897:Random Allocation; D015203:Reproducibility of Results