title: [Ultrasound versus MRI in preventive examinations - a retrospective analysis of 833 patients].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The benefit of ultrasound in comparison with full-body MRI during a medical checkup in preventive health care was examined with regard to the detection of cardiovascular risk factors, metabolic syndrome, malignant tumors and further relevant findings.
  
  
  METHODS
  833 consecutive patients (266 f/567 m, age: 19 - 93 y, mean age: 56.6 y) underwent both ultrasound (extracranial carotid arteries, thyroid, abdominal ultrasound and echocardiography) and whole-body MRI (whole-body MR angiography, head, thorax, abdomen and virtual colonoscopy). For ultrasound examinations, DEGUM level III devices were used (Siemens Acuson Antares, Siemens G60, Siemens, Erlangen). MRI examinations were performed using a 1.5 Tesla MRI device (Siemens Avanto, Siemens, Erlangen). All patients were reviewed retrospectively based on the written reports.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Ultrasound was much more sensitive in detecting early atherosclerotic changes than MRI angiography. In 33 % of the patients, manifestations of atherosclerosis were found. Thoracic (3) and abdominal aortic and mesenteric artery aneurysms (3) were diagnosed by both methods. Hepatic steatosis as an important risk factor of metabolic syndrome was only found by ultrasound in 20.4 % of our patients. Malignant tumors were rare in this population (1.4 %): all abdominal tumors except one renal oncocytoma were found using both methods. MRI and ultrasound were equally sensitive with respect to the detection of small liver foci. As expected, MRI was less sensitive than ultrasound in the diagnosis of thyroid nodes. For intracranial diagnoses, malignant intrathoracic findings and colonic polyps, ultrasound is not the method of choice.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  For the detection of lifestyle-dependent diseases such as atherosclerosis and metabolic syndrome, ultrasound examination was more sensitive than MRI, and the same was true for the early detection of thyroid diseases. For the detection of malignant abdominal tumors, both methods were equally sensitive. Whole-body MRI can additionally detect pathological changes in the head, lungs and colon.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Guth
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Leise
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Gocke
authors.forename: C U
authors.initials: CU
authors.lastname: Herborn
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Galach
authors.forename: C M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Bamberger
mesh_terms: D000008:Abdominal Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis*; D004452:Echocardiography / Q000379:methods; D005234:Fatty Liver / Q000175:diagnosis; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D018810:Magnetic Resonance Angiography / Q000379:methods; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008403:Mass Screening; D024821:Metabolic Syndrome / Q000175:diagnosis*; D008875:Middle Aged; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis*; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014463:Ultrasonography / Q000379:methods*; D018616:Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex / Q000379:methods; D051598:Whole Body Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D055815:Young Adult