title: Are people who claim compensation "cured by a verdict"? A longitudinal study of health outcomes after whiplash.
abstract: This study examines whether the lure of injury compensation prompts whiplash claimants to overstate their symptoms. Claim settlement is the intervention of interest, as it represents the point at which there is no further incentive to exaggerate symptoms, and neck pain at 24 months is the outcome of interest. Longitudinal data on neck pain scores and timing of claim settlement were regressed, controlling for the effect of time on recovery, to compare outcomes in claimants who had and had not settled their compensation claims. The results show clearly that removing the financial incentive to over-report symptoms has no effect on self-reported neck pain in a fault-based compensation scheme, and this finding concurs with other studies on this topic. Policy decisions to limit compensation in the belief that claimants systematically misrepresent their health status are not supported empirically Claimants do not appear to be "cured by a verdict".
authors.affiliation: Australian Centre for Economic Research on Health, The University of Queensland. n.spearing@uq.edu.au
authors.forename: Natalie M
authors.initials: NM
authors.lastname: Spearing
authors.forename: Dorte
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Gyrd-Hansen
authors.forename: Louis H
authors.initials: LH
authors.lastname: Pobereskin
authors.forename: David S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Rowell
authors.forename: Luke B
authors.initials: LB
authors.lastname: Connelly
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D035881:Compensation and Redress / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D019547:Neck Pain / Q000209:etiology; D010147:Pain Measurement; D012044:Regression Analysis; D014911:Whiplash Injuries / Q000150:complications* / Q000191:economics*