title: Considerations for planning and evaluating economic analyses of telemental health.
abstract: The economic evaluation of telemental health (TMH) is necessary to inform ways to decrease the cost of delivering care, to improve access to care, and to make decisions about the allocation of resources. Previous reviews of telehealth economic analysis studies have concluded that there are significant methodological deficiencies and inconsistencies that limit the ability to make generalized conclusions about the costs and benefits of telehealth programs. Published economic evaluations specific to TMH are also limited. There are unique factors that influence costs in TMH that are necessary for those who are planning and evaluating economic analyses to consider. The purpose of this review is to summarize the main problems and limitations of published economic analyses, to discuss considerations specific to TMH, and to inform and encourage the economic evaluation of TMH in both the public and private sectors. The topics presented here include perspective of costs, direct and indirect costs, and technology, as well as research methodology considerations. The integration of economic analyses into effectiveness trials, the standardization of outcome measurement, and the development of TMH economic evaluation guidelines are recommended.
authors.affiliation: The National Center for Telehealth & Technology and University of Washington School of Medicine, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA 98431, USA. david.luxton@us.army.mil
authors.forename: David D
authors.initials: DD
authors.lastname: Luxton
mesh_terms: D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006801:Humans; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000191:economics / Q000628:therapy; D017149:Private Sector / Q000191:economics; D017150:Public Sector / Q000191:economics; D012106:Research / Q000191:economics; D012107:Research Design; D017216:Telemedicine / Q000191:economics*