title: Management continuity from the patient perspective: comparison of primary healthcare evaluation instruments.
abstract: Management continuity, operationally defined as "the extent to which services delivered by different providers are timely and complementary such that care is experienced as connected and coherent," is a core attribute of primary healthcare. Continuity, as experienced by the patient, is the result of good care coordination or integration.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To provide insight into how well management continuity is measured in validated coordination or integration subscales of primary healthcare instruments.
  
  
  METHODS
  Relevant subscales from the Primary Care Assessment Survey (PCAS), the Primary Care Assessment Tool - Short Form (PCAT-S), the Components of Primary Care Instrument (CPCI) and the Veterans Affairs National Outpatient Customer Satisfaction Survey (VANOCSS) were administered to 432 adult respondents who had at least one healthcare contact with a provider other than their family physician in the previous 12 months. Subscales were examined descriptively, by correlation and factor analysis and item response theory analysis. Because the VANOCSS elicits coordination problems and is scored dichotomously, we used logistic regression to examine how evaluative subscales relate to reported problems.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Most responses to the PCAS, PCAT-S and CPCI subscales were positive, yet 83% of respondents reported having one or more problems on the VANOCSS Overall Coordination subscale and 41% on the VANOCSS Specialist Access subscale. Exploratory factor analysis suggests two distinct factors. The first (eigenvalue=6.98) is coordination actions by the primary care physician in transitioning patient care to other providers (PCAS Integration subscale and most of the PCAT-S Coordination subscale). The second (eigenvalue=1.20) is efforts by the primary care physician to create coherence between different visits both within and outside the regular doctor's office (CPCI Coordination subscale). The PCAS Integration subscale was most strongly associated with lower likelihood of problems reported on the VANOCSS subscales.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Ratings of management continuity correspond only modestly to reporting of coordination problems, possibly because they rate only the primary care physician, whereas patients experience problems across the entire system. The subscales were developed as measures of integration and provider coordination and do not capture the patient's experience of connectedness and coherence.
authors.affiliation: Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC.
authors.forename: Jeannie L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Haggerty
authors.forename: Frederick
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Burge
authors.forename: Raynald
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Pineault
authors.forename: Marie-Dominique
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Beaulieu
authors.forename: Fatima
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Bouharaoui
authors.forename: Christine
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Beaulieu
authors.forename: Darcy A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Santor
authors.forename: Jean-Frédéric
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Lévesque