title: Physical and psychosocial benefits of yoga in cancer patients and survivors, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  This study aimed to systematically review the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to conduct a meta-analysis of the effects of yoga on physical and psychosocial outcomes in cancer patients and survivors.
  
  
  METHODS
  A systematic literature search in ten databases was conducted in November 2011. Studies were included if they had an RCT design, focused on cancer patients or survivors, included physical postures in the yoga program, compared yoga with a non-exercise or waitlist control group, and evaluated physical and/or psychosocial outcomes. Two researchers independently rated the quality of the included RCTs, and high quality was defined as >50% of the total possible score. Effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated for outcomes studied in more than three studies among patients with breast cancer using means and standard deviations of post-test scores of the intervention and control groups.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Sixteen publications of 13 RCTs met the inclusion criteria, of which one included patients with lymphomas and the others focused on patients with breast cancer. The median quality score was 67% (range: 22-89%). The included studies evaluated 23 physical and 20 psychosocial outcomes. Of the outcomes studied in more than three studies among patients with breast cancer, we found large reductions in distress, anxiety, and depression (d = -0.69 to -0.75), moderate reductions in fatigue (d = -0.51), moderate increases in general quality of life, emotional function and social function (d = 0.33 to 0.49), and a small increase in functional well-being (d = 0.31). Effects on physical function and sleep were small and not significant.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Yoga appeared to be a feasible intervention and beneficial effects on several physical and psychosocial symptoms were reported. In patients with breast cancer, effect size on functional well-being was small, and they were moderate to large for psychosocial outcomes.
authors.affiliation: EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, The Netherlands. l.buffart@vumc.nl
authors.forename: Laurien M
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Buffart
authors.forename: Jannique G Z
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: van Uffelen
authors.forename: Ingrid I
authors.initials: II
authors.lastname: Riphagen
authors.forename: Johannes
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Brug
authors.forename: Willem
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: van Mechelen
authors.forename: Wendy J
authors.initials: WJ
authors.lastname: Brown
authors.forename: Mai J M
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Chinapaw
mesh_terms: D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation; D005260:Female; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D008223:Lymphoma / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation; D008297:Male; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000523:psychology* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D011788:Quality of Life; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D017741:Survivors / Q000523:psychology*; D015013:Yoga