title: Videolaparoscopic catheter placement reduces contraindications to peritoneal dialysis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Videolaparoscopy is considered the reference method for peritoneal catheter placement in patients with previous abdominal surgery. The placement procedure is usually performed with at least two access sites: one for the catheter and the second for the laparoscope. Here, we describe a new one-port laparoscopic procedure that uses only one abdominal access site in patients not eligible for laparotomic catheter placement.
  
  
  METHODS
  We carried out one-port laparoscopic placement in 21 patients presenting contraindications to blind surgical procedures because of prior abdominal surgery. This technique consists in the creation of a single mini-laparotomy access through which laparoscopic procedures and placement are performed. The catheter, rectified by an introducer, is inserted inside the port. Subsequently, the port is removed, leaving the catheter in pelvic position. The port is reintroduced laterally to the catheter, confirming or correcting its position. Laparotomic placement was performed in a contemporary group of 32 patients without contraindications to blind placement. Complications and long-term catheter outcome in the two groups were evaluated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Additional interventions during placement were necessary in 12 patients of the laparoscopy group compared with 5 patients of the laparotomy group (p = 0.002). Laparoscopy documented adhesions in 13 patients, with need for adhesiolysis in 6 patients. Each group had 1 intraoperative complication: leakage in the laparoscopy group, and intestinal perforation in the laparotomy group. During the 2-year follow-up period, laparoscopic revisions had to be performed in 6 patients of the laparoscopy group and in 5 patients of the laparotomy group (p = 0.26). The 1-year catheter survival was similar in both groups. Laparoscopy increased by 40% the number of patients eligible to receive peritoneal dialysis.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Videolaparoscopy placement in patients not eligible for blind surgical procedures seems to be equivalent to laparotomic placement with regard to complications and long-term catheter outcome. The number of patients able to receive peritoneal dialysis is substantially increased.
authors.affiliation: Department of Nephrology, Ospedale Carlo Urbani, Jesi, Italy.
authors.forename: Stefano
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Santarelli
authors.forename: Matthias
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Zeiler
authors.forename: Tania
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Monteburini
authors.forename: Rosa Maria
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Agostinelli
authors.forename: Rita
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Marinelli
authors.forename: Giorgio
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Degano
authors.forename: Emilio
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Ceraudo
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D002404:Catheterization / Q000379:methods*; D002408:Catheters, Indwelling; D000075202:Contraindications; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010530:Peritoneal Dialysis / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D025321:Surgery, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D000267:Tissue Adhesions / Q000601:surgery; D014741:Video Recording