title: Systematic versus random sampling in stereological studies.
abstract: The sampling that takes place at all levels of an experimental design must be random if the estimate is to be unbiased in a statistical sense. There are two fundamental ways by which one can make a random sample of the sections and positions to be probed on the sections. Using a card-sampling analogy, one can pick any card at all out of a deck of cards. This is referred to as independent random sampling because the sampling of any one card is made without reference to the position of the other cards. The other approach to obtaining a random sample would be to pick a card within a set number of cards and others at equal intervals within the deck. Systematic sampling along one axis of many biological structures is more efficient than random sampling, because most biological structures are not randomly organized. This article discusses the merits of systematic versus random sampling in stereological studies.
authors.forename: Mark J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: West
mesh_terms: D001699:Biometry / Q000379:methods*; D010336:Pathology / Q000379:methods*; D012494:Sampling Studies