title: Learning to lie: effects of practice on the cognitive cost of lying.
abstract: Cognitive theories on deception posit that lying requires more cognitive resources than telling the truth. In line with this idea, it has been demonstrated that deceptive responses are typically associated with increased response times and higher error rates compared to truthful responses. Although the cognitive cost of lying has been assumed to be resistant to practice, it has recently been shown that people who are trained to lie can reduce this cost. In the present study (n = 42), we further explored the effects of practice on one's ability to lie by manipulating the proportions of lie and truth-trials in a Sheffield lie test across three phases: Baseline (50% lie, 50% truth), Training (frequent-lie group: 75% lie, 25% truth; control group: 50% lie, 50% truth; and frequent-truth group: 25% lie, 75% truth), and Test (50% lie, 50% truth). The results showed that lying became easier while participants were trained to lie more often and that lying became more difficult while participants were trained to tell the truth more often. Furthermore, these effects did carry over to the test phase, but only for the specific items that were used for the training manipulation. Hence, our study confirms that relatively little practice is enough to alter the cognitive cost of lying, although this effect does not persist over time for non-practiced items.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University Ghent, Belgium.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Van Bockstaele
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Verschuere
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Moens
authors.forename: Kristina
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Suchotzki
authors.forename: Evelyne
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Debey
authors.forename: Adriaan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Spruyt