title: Effects of humans on behaviour of wildlife exceed those of natural predators in a landscape of fear.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Human disturbance can influence wildlife behaviour, which can have implications for wildlife populations. For example, wildlife may be more vigilant near human disturbance, resulting in decreased forage intake and reduced reproductive success. We measured the effects of human activities compared to predator and other environmental factors on the behaviour of elk (Cervus elaphus Linnaeus 1758) in a human-dominated landscape in Alberta, Canada.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We collected year-round behavioural data of elk across a range of human disturbances. We estimated linear mixed models of elk behaviour and found that human factors (land-use type, traffic and distance from roads) and elk herd size accounted for more than 80% of variability in elk vigilance. Elk decreased their feeding time when closer to roads, and road traffic volumes of at least 1 vehicle every 2 hours induced elk to switch into a more vigilant behavioural mode with a subsequent loss in feeding time. Other environmental factors, thought crucial in shaping vigilance behaviour in elk (natural predators, reproductive status of females), were not important. The highest levels of vigilance were recorded on public lands where hunting and motorized recreational activities were cumulative compared to the national park during summer, which had the lowest levels of vigilance.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In a human-dominated landscape, effects of human disturbance on elk behaviour exceed those of habitat and natural predators. Humans trigger increased vigilance and decreased foraging in elk. However, it is not just the number of people but also the type of human activity that influences elk behaviour (e.g. hiking vs. hunting). Quantifying the actual fitness costs of human disturbance remains a challenge in field studies but should be a primary focus for future researches. Some species are much more likely to be disturbed by humans than by non-human predators: for these species, quantifying human disturbance may be the highest priority for conservation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. ciuti@ualberta.ca
authors.forename: Simone
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Ciuti
authors.forename: Joseph M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Northrup
authors.forename: Tyler B
authors.initials: TB
authors.lastname: Muhly
authors.forename: Silvia
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Simi
authors.forename: Marco
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Musiani
authors.forename: Justin A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Pitt
authors.forename: Mark S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Boyce
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001143:Arousal; D001336:Automobiles; D005239:Fear; D060434:Herbivory / Q000502:physiology; D006802:Human Activities / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D011235:Predatory Behavior; D012418:Ruminants / Q000523:psychology*; D013997:Time Factors; D014186:Transportation