title: Induction of low-nutritious food intake by subsequent nutrient supplementation in sheep (Ovis aries).
abstract: Acceptance of and preference for a particular food depends not only on its intrinsic (e.g. nutritional) properties but also on expected or recent food experiences. An instance of this type of phenomenon has been called induction effect, which consists of an increased intake of a type of food when it precedes a hedonically preferred food in a sequence familiar to the animal, relative to controls that have access only to the less-preferred food. The purpose of our study was to assess intake induction of a low-nutritious food when followed by different high-nutritious supplements in sheep (Ovis aries). In this experiment, we ran a supplemented phase where animals fed oat hay (a low-nutritious food) in the first part of the daily feeding sessions followed by a supplement with either a high (soya bean meal; group GS) or a low (ground corn; group GC) protein-energy ratio in the second part ate more oat hay than controls that were fed oat hay in both parts of sessions (group GH). In addition, supplemented animals presented a stronger preference for oat hay over alfalfa hay than controls in a subsequent choice. When all animals received no food in the second part of the sessions (Non-supplemented phase), intake of oat hay converged to the control's intake level in all the groups, suggesting that the presence of supplements after access to oat hay was responsible for intake induction. Lastly, we repeated the supplemented phase with a different control group where animals received oat hay in the first part of the sessions and no food in the second part (group NF), thus equalizing groups in terms of the time of access to oat hay in a session. Groups GS and GC still developed higher intake of oat hay than group NF. In both supplemented phases of the experiment, we estimated animals' daily metabolizable energy (ME) and crude protein (CP) intake. CP intake was higher in group GS than in groups GC, GH and NF, but there was no difference between group GC and the controls. In turn, groups did not differ in ME intake in the First supplemented phase, and only group GS presented higher ME intake than the rest of the groups in the Second supplemented phase. Therefore, a nutritional account of the present induction effect seems insufficient. We propose that a learned association between oat hay and the post-ingestive feedback from the subsequent high-nutritious supplements underlay sheep's intake induction and increased preference for oat hay.
authors.affiliation: Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida (CERZOS), Centro Científico Tecnológico CONICET, PC 8000, Bahía Blanca, Arg entina. efreidin@criba.edu.ar
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Freidin
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Catanese
authors.forename: M I
authors.initials: MI
authors.lastname: Cuello
authors.forename: R A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Distel
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000824:Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena / Q000502:physiology*; D000818:Animals; D018554:Avena; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D019587:Dietary Supplements; D004435:Eating / Q000502:physiology*; D004734:Energy Metabolism / Q000502:physiology; D005518:Food Preferences / Q000502:physiology*; D012756:Sheep / Q000502:physiology*