title: Auxiliary variables in multiple imputation in regression with missing X: a warning against including too many in small sample research.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Multiple imputation is becoming increasingly popular. Theoretical considerations as well as simulation studies have shown that the inclusion of auxiliary variables is generally of benefit.
  
  
  METHODS
  A simulation study of a linear regression with a response Y and two predictors X1 and X2 was performed on data with n = 50, 100 and 200 using complete cases or multiple imputation with 0, 10, 20, 40 and 80 auxiliary variables. Mechanisms of missingness were either 100% MCAR or 50% MAR + 50% MCAR. Auxiliary variables had low (r=.10) vs. moderate correlations (r=.50) with X's and Y.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The inclusion of auxiliary variables can improve a multiple imputation model. However, inclusion of too many variables leads to downward bias of regression coefficients and decreases precision. When the correlations are low, inclusion of auxiliary variables is not useful.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  More research on auxiliary variables in multiple imputation should be performed. A preliminary rule of thumb could be that the ratio of variables to cases with complete data should not go below 1 : 3.
authors.affiliation: Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Mainz, Duesbergweg 6, Mainz 55128, Germany. jochen.hardt@gmx.de
authors.forename: Jochen
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hardt
authors.forename: Max
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Herke
authors.forename: Rainer
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Leonhart
mesh_terms: D003198:Computer Simulation; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D006801:Humans; D015233:Models, Statistical; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012107:Research Design; D018401:Sample Size