title: Capturing treatment decision making among patients with solid tumors and their caregivers.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To examine the feasibility and acceptability of using a decision aid with an interactive decision-making process in patients with solid tumors and their caregivers during cancer-related treatment.
  
  
  METHODS
  A phenomenologic approach was used to analyze qualitative data, with a focus on the meaning of participants' lived experiences. Interviews were conducted by telephone or in person.
  
  
  METHODS
  Outpatient clinics at two regional cancer centers.
  
  
  METHODS
  160 total individuals; 80 patients with newly diagnosed breast (n = 22), advanced-stage prostate (n = 19), or advanced-stage lung (n = 39) cancer, and their caregivers (n = 80).
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty-seven of the 80 pairs engaged in audio recorded interviews that were conducted using a semistructured interview guide. Continuous text immersion revealed themes. Validity of qualitative analysis was achieved by member checking.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Significant findings included three themes: (a) the decision aid helped patients and caregivers understand treatment decisions better, (b) the decision aid helped patients and caregivers to be more involved in treatment decisions, and (c) frequent contact with the study nurse was valuable.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Decision making was more complex than participants expected. The decision aid helped patients and caregivers make satisfying treatment decisions and become integral in a shared treatment decision-making process.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Decision aids can help patients and their caregivers make difficult treatment decisions affecting quantity and quality of life during cancer treatment. The findings provide valuable information for healthcare providers helping patients and their caregivers make treatment decisions through a shared, informed, decision-making process.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Decision aids can be helpful with treatment choices. Caregivers' understanding about treatment is just as important in the decision-making process as the patients' understanding. Incorporating decision aids that are delivered by healthcare providers or trained personnel has the potential to improve patients' decision satisfaction.
authors.affiliation: School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. raj9c@virginia.edu
authors.forename: Randy A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Steeves
authors.forename: Mary E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Ropka
authors.forename: Patricia
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Hollen
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000451:nursing / Q000523:psychology; D017028:Caregivers / Q000523:psychology*; D003657:Decision Making; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000451:nursing / Q000523:psychology; D008297:Male; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000451:nursing* / Q000523:psychology*; D009723:Nurse-Patient Relations; D015404:Nursing Methodology Research; D009859:Oncology Nursing / Q000379:methods*; D010045:Outpatients / Q000523:psychology; D010358:Patient Participation / Q000523:psychology; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000451:nursing / Q000523:psychology