title: Consumer choice among Mutual Healthcare Purchasers: a feasible option for China?
abstract: In its 2009 blue print of healthcare reform, the Chinese government aimed to create a competitive health insurance market in order to increase efficiency in the health insurance sector. A major advantage of a competitive health insurance market is that insurers are stimulated to act as well-motivated prudent purchasers of healthcare on behalf of their enrolees, and that consumers can choose among these purchasers. To emphasize the insurers' role of purchasers of care we denote them, as well as other entities that can fulfil this role (e.g. fundholding community health centres), as 'Mutual Healthcare Purchasers' (MHPs). As feasible proposals for creating competition in China's health insurance sector have yet to be made, we suggest two potential approaches to create competition among MHPs: (1) separating finance and operation of social health insurance and allowing consumer choice among operators of social health insurance schemes; (2) allowing consumer choice among fund-holding community health centres. Although the benefits of competition are widely accepted in China, the problematic consequences of a free competitive health insurance market - especially in relation to affordability and accessibility - are generally neglected. To solve the problems of lack of affordability and inaccessibility that would occur in the case of unregulated competition among MHPs, at least the following regulations are proposed to the Chinese policy makers: a 'standard benefit package' for basic health insurance, a 'risk-equalization scheme', and 'open enrolment'. Potential obstacles for implementing a risk equalization scheme are examined based on theoretical arguments and international experiences. We conclude that allowing consumer choice among MHPs and implementing a risk equalization scheme in China is politically and technically complex. Therefore, the Chinese government should prepare carefully for a market-oriented reform in its healthcare sector and adopt a strategic approach in the implementation procedure.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: xu@bmg.eur.nl.
authors.forename: Weiwei
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Xu
authors.forename: Wynand P M M
authors.initials: WP
authors.lastname: van de Ven
mesh_terms: D002681:China; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003258:Consumer Behavior / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004465:Economic Competition; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D007348:Insurance, Health / Q000191:economics*; D020379:Risk Adjustment