title: Disentangling taste and toxicity in aposematic prey.
abstract: Many predators quickly learn to avoid attacking aposematic prey. If the prey vary in toxicity, the predators may alternatively learn to capture and taste-sample prey carefully before ingesting or rejecting them (go-slow behaviour). An increase in prey toxicity is generally thought to decrease predation on prey populations. However, while prey with a higher toxin load are more harmful to ingest, they may also be easier to recognize and reject owing to greater distastefulness, which can facilitate a taste-sampling foraging strategy. Here, the classic diet model is used to study the separate effects of taste and toxicity on predator preferences. The taste-sampling process is modelled using signal detection theory. The model is applicable to automimicry and batesian mimicry. It shows that when the defensive toxin is sufficiently distasteful, a mimicry complex may be less profitable to the predator and better protected against predation if the models are moderately toxic than if they are highly toxic. Moreover, taste mimicry can reduce the profitability of the mimicry complex and increase protection against predation. The results are discussed in relation to the selection pressures acting on prey defences and the evolution of mimicry.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biology, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway. o.h.holen@bio.uio.no
authors.forename: Øistein Haugsten
authors.initials: ØH
authors.lastname: Holen
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D004032:Diet; D007858:Learning; D008954:Models, Biological; D010858:Pigmentation; D011235:Predatory Behavior; D013649:Taste; D014118:Toxins, Biological / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D014118:Toxins, Biological