title: Comparing the TiOblast and Osseospeed surfaces. Histomorphometric and histological analysis in humans.
abstract: The aim of the present study was to compare two implant surfaces, the TiOblast (Astra Tech) surface, manufactured by blasting the surface and already present in literature and the Osseospeed (Astra Tech) surface, manufactured by blasting and treating the surface with fluoride ions and recently launched onto the market with the modified surfaces of the latest generation. This study is part of a more extensive research project whose protocol required the insertion of 10 couples of implants; thus in the present discussion partial data are being taken into consideration, with an eye at collecting more data in the future, regarding both microscopy and histomorphometric histological analysis on 5 couples of implants. The purpose of the study is to investigate how the modified surfaces of the latest generation can guarantee a greater osseointegration both from a qualitative and quantitative level compared to the surfaces presently used and that they may represent the first example of "bioactivity", that is, an active interaction with the processes of new bone formation and tissue healing.
authors.affiliation: Private practice in Chieti.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Rocci
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Rocci
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Martignoni
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Albrektsson
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Barlattani
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gargari
keywords: fluoride; histology; histomorphometry; macrothreads; microthreads; sandblasted surface