title: Functional realism: a defense of narrative medicine.
abstract: In this paper we (1) define and describe the practice of narrative medicine, (2) reveal the need for narrative medicine by exposing the presuppositions that give rise to its discounting, including a reductive empiricism and a strict dichotomy between scientific fact and narrative value, (3) show evidence of the effects of education in narrative competence in the medical clinic, and (4) present Peircean realism as the proper conceptual model for our argument that the medical school curriculum committees should give space to the employment of the scientific and literary knowledge in medical practice. On account of our argument, we contend that the medical community should tend to latitude and openness with regard to the tools we use to resolve medical problems. These tools include both biomedical and narrative knowledge.
authors.affiliation: Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Seth.Vannatta@morgan.edu
authors.forename: Seth
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Vannatta
authors.forename: Jerry
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Vannatta
mesh_terms: D002983:Clinical Competence; D003142:Communication; D004501:Education, Medical; D006801:Humans; D033262:Narration; D010686:Philosophy, Medical; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D024382:Professional Role; D012942:Social Sciences