title: A non-paternalistic model of research ethics and oversight: assessing the benefits of prospective review.
abstract: This paper offers a non-paternalistic justification for prospective research review as providing a credible social assurance that the institutions of scientific advancement respect and affirm the moral equality of all community members and as creating a "market" in which stakeholders working to advance diverse ends also advance the common good.
authors.affiliation: Center for Ethics and Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.
authors.forename: Alex John
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: London
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics* / Q000458:organization & administration; D034462:Dissent and Disputes; D028744:Ethics Committees, Research / Q000941:ethics* / Q000458:organization & administration; D006805:Human Experimentation / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D017146:Models, Organizational; D015279:Organizational Culture; D026706:Paternalism; D012935:Social Justice; D012941:Social Responsibility; D035502:Trust; D014481:United States