title: Poisoning: fact or fiction?
abstract: Analytical toxicology is a complex discipline. Simply detecting a poison in a biological sample does not necessarily mean that the individual from whom the sample was obtained had been poisoned. An analysis can prove exposure and perhaps give an indication of the magnitude of exposure, but the results have to be placed in proper context. Even if sampling was ante-mortem an analysis does not necessarily prove the effects that the drug or poison had on the victim immediately before or at the time of sampling. Tolerance is one big issue, the mechanism of exposure (how the drug got into the body) is another, and of course with post-mortem work there are always additional considerations such as site of sample collection and the possibility of post-mortem change in analyte concentration. There are also questions of quality and reliability, and whether a particular analysis and the interpretation placed upon the result are appropriate in a particular case.
authors: King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. robert.flanagan@nhs.net
authors: Robert J
authors: RJ
authors: Flanagan
mesh_terms: D031841:Aconitum / Q000506:poisoning; D000077582:Amisulpride; D014150:Antipsychotic Agents / Q000506:poisoning; D002725:Chloroform / Q000506:poisoning; D053593:Forensic Toxicology / Q000266:history*; D049672:History, 19th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D006708:Homicide; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D011041:Poisoning / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000266:history*; D012997:Solvents / Q000506:poisoning; D013398:Sudden Infant Death; D013469:Sulpiride / Q000031:analogs & derivatives / Q000506:poisoning
chemical_list: D014150:Antipsychotic Agents; D012997:Solvents; D013469:Sulpiride; D002725:Chloroform; D000077582:Amisulpride