Courts, legislators and human embryo research: lessons from Ireland.
When it comes to the matter of human embryo research law plays a crucial role in its development by helping to set the boundaries of what may be done, the sanctions for acting outside those boundaries and the rights and responsibilities of key parties. Nevertheless, the philosophical challenges raised by human embryo research, even with the best will of all concerned, may prove too great for satisfactory resolution through the legal process. Taking as its focus the position of Ireland, this paper explores the distinctive constitutional approach taken on this issue and addresses the difficulty of translating sound philosophy into judicial decrees and the difficulty of establishing expert commissions to make law reform proposals on matters of profound normative controversy. It concludes that the Irish experience does have useful lessons for those in other countries who are concerned with the legal approach to research on human embryos and points to the desirability of a diversity of normative positions in order to enrich the quality of the analysis so as to encourage more informed debate in society.
Trinity College, Dublin. WBINCHY@tcd.ie
William
W
Binchy
D015925:Cryopreservation; D033041:Embryo Research / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D032984:Ethics, Research; D005060:Europe; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D007494:Ireland; D028723:Personhood; D035521:Supreme Court Decisions; D014481:United States