Eating beef: cattle, methane and food production.
A number of prominent people have advocated eating less meat or becoming a vegetarian to reduce global warming, because cattle produce the greenhouse gas methane. This raises a number of questions including: what will happen to the grasslands that much of the world's cattle currently graze; how will alternate protein be produced, and what will the greenhouse consequences of that production be? It comes down to production systems. About 70 per cent of the world's agricultural land is grassland, and the only way to produce food from grasslands is to graze ruminants on it. If domesticated animals do not graze the grasslands, native or feral ruminants, which also produce methane, tend to move in. Feeding high quality grain to cattle is much less defensible. Replacing animal protein with plant proteins like soybeans necessitates more cropping land, water, fuel and chemicals being used.  A more rational food system would raise cattle on grasslands but not feed them high quality grains. Instead more of the currently grown crop could be devoted to human consumption.
awahlquist@bigpond.com
Åsa K
ÅK
Wahlquist
D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D005523:Food Supply; D005579:Fossil Fuels; D060434:Herbivory; D008460:Meat; D008697:Methane / Q000378:metabolism*; D010575:Pesticides
D005579:Fossil Fuels; D010575:Pesticides; D008697:Methane