Estimating improvement in prediction with matched case-control designs.
When an existing risk prediction model is not sufficiently predictive, additional variables are sought for inclusion in the model. This paper addresses study designs to evaluate the improvement in prediction performance that is gained by adding a new predictor to a risk prediction model. We consider studies that measure the new predictor in a case-control subset of the study cohort, a practice that is common in biomarker research. We ask if matching controls to cases in regards to baseline predictors improves efficiency. A variety of measures of prediction performance are studied. We find through simulation studies that matching improves the efficiency with which most measures are estimated, but can reduce efficiency for some. Efficiency gains are less when more controls per case are included in the study. A method that models the distribution of the new predictor in controls appears to improve estimation efficiency considerably.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. abansal@uw.edu
Aasthaa
A
Bansal
Margaret Sullivan
MS
Pepe
D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases / Q000209:etiology; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D015233:Models, Statistical; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012372:ROC Curve; D012107:Research Design; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012307:Risk Factors