No difference in accuracy between pinless and conventional computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty.
OBJECTIVE
Many studies have demonstrated higher precision and better radiological results in Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with computer-assisted surgery (CAS). On the other hand, studies revealed a lengthening of operation time up to 20 min for this technique and demonstrated rare additional complications as fractures and neurovascular injuries caused by the array pins and any intraoperative array dislocation leads to abortion of CAS. To combine the advantages and eliminate the disadvantages of standard CAS, we evaluated the accuracy of a so-called pinless CT-free version of knee navigation (pinless CAS) abandoning the reference pins and reducing the necessary workflow to a minimum.


METHODS
The present study compares the accuracy of the reference methods of two different CT-free knee navigation software versions (Brainlab Knee 2.1 and Brainlab Knee Express 2.5). Thirty patients received TKA assisted by standard CAS. Intraoperatively, the proposed bony resections of standard CAS were matched with the new pinless CAS. Postoperatively, the results were checked by evaluating the radiographs concerning leg axis, femoral flexion and tibial slope.


RESULTS
All results concerning precise cuts (femoral as well as tibial coronal/varus-valgus alignment, femoral flexion alignment and tibial slope, resection height) were comparable between both groups (n.s.). In femoral, we found a mean deviation of coronal alignment of 0.3° (SD 0.7) and flexion of 0.2° (SD 0.8). In tibial, we found a mean deviation of coronal alignment of 0.2° (SD 0.5) and slope of 0.2° (SD 0.6). The mean additional operation time for the pinless CAS was below 2 min. The postoperative mechanical leg axis was within the threshold of 3° in all patients, tibial slope and femoral flexion matched with CAS values.


CONCLUSIONS
In clinical routine, pinless CAS can comprise the advantages of CAS leaving the disadvantages aside. It reduces surgical time and avoids complications associated with the tracking pins of conventional CAS.
Orthopaedic Department, University of Regensburg, Kaiser-Karl V.-Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany, dr.clemensbaier@gmail.com.
C
C
Baier
G
G
Maderbacher
H R
HR
Springorum
F
F
Zeman
W
W
Fitz
J
J
Schaumburger
J
J
Grifka
J
J
Beckmann
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; D001858:Bone Nails; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000601:surgery; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000601:surgery; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D012984:Software; D025321:Surgery, Computer-Assisted; D013977:Tibia / Q000601:surgery