Hip prosthesis introduction and early revision risk. A nationwide population-based study covering 39,125 operations.
OBJECTIVE
Little is known about the effect of the learning curve for different types of total hip arthroplasties (THAs). We investigated the prostheses survival of THAs just after the implementation of a model new to the hospital, and compared these results with the results of THAs done when more than 100 implantations had been undertaken. In addition, we investigated whether differences exist between different types of femoral stems and acetabular cups at the early implementation phase.


METHODS
We used comprehensive registry data from all units (n = 76) that performed THAs for primary osteoarthritis in Finland between 1998 and 2007. Complete data including follow-up data to December 31, 2010 or until death were available for 33,819 patients (39,125 THAs). The stems and cups used were given order numbers in each hospital and classified into 5 groups: operations with order number (a) 1-15, (b) 16-30, (c) 31-50, (d) 51-100, and (e) > 100. We used Cox's proportional hazards modeling for calculation of the adjusted hazard ratios for the risk of revision during the 3 years following the implementation of a new THA endoprosthesis type in the groups.


RESULTS
Introduction of new endoprosthesis types was common, as more than 1 in 7 patients received a type that had been previously used in 15 or less operations. For the first 15 operations after a stem or cup type was introduced, there was an elevated risk of revision (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.5). There were differences in the risk of early revision between stem and cup types at implementation.


CONCLUSIONS
The first 15 operations with a new stem or cup model had an increased risk of early revision surgery. Stems and cups differed in their early revision risk, particularly at the implementation phase. Thus, the risk of early revision at the implementation phase should be considered when a new type of THA is brought into use.
National Institute for Health and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Economics CHESS, Finland. mikko.peltola@thl.fi
Mikko
M
Peltola
Antti
A
Malmivaara
Mika
M
Paavola
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005260:Female; D005387:Finland / Q000453:epidemiology; D006622:Hip Prosthesis / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D059032:Learning Curve; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D012042:Registries; D012086:Reoperation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors