Clinical errors and medical negligence.
This paper discusses the definition, nature and origins of clinical errors including their prevention. The relationship between clinical errors and medical negligence is examined as are the characteristics of litigants and events that are the source of litigation. The pattern of malpractice claims in different specialties and settings is examined. Among hospitalized patients worldwide, 3-16% suffer injury as a result of medical intervention, the most common being the adverse effects of drugs. The frequency of adverse drug effects appears superficially to be higher in intensive care units and emergency departments but once rates have been corrected for volume of patients, comorbidity of conditions and number of drugs prescribed, the difference is not significant. It is concluded that probably no more than 1 in 7 adverse events in medicine result in a malpractice claim and the factors that predict that a patient will resort to litigation include a prior poor relationship with the clinician and the feeling that the patient is not being kept informed. Methods for preventing clinical errors are still in their infancy. The most promising include new technologies such as electronic prescribing systems, diagnostic and clinical decision-making aids and error-resistant systems.
University of Birmingham, National Centre for Mental Health, Birmingham, UK. Femi.oyebode@bsmhft.nhs.uk
Femi
F
Oyebode
D003675:Defensive Medicine; D006801:Humans; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D019300:Medical Errors / Q000517:prevention & control*; D008511:Medicine / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D061214:Patient Safety; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D013043:Specialties, Surgical / Q000706:statistics & numerical data