title: Piecewise disassembly of a large-herbivore community across a rainfall gradient: the UHURU experiment.
abstract: Large mammalian herbivores (LMH) strongly influence plant communities, and these effects can propagate indirectly throughout food webs. Most existing large-scale manipulations of LMH presence/absence consist of a single exclusion treatment, and few are replicated across environmental gradients. Thus, important questions remain about the functional roles of different LMH, and how these roles depend on abiotic context. In September 2008, we constructed a series of 1-ha herbivore-exclusion plots across a 20-km rainfall gradient in central Kenya. Dubbed "UHURU" (Ungulate Herbivory Under Rainfall Uncertainty), this experiment aims to illuminate the ecological effects of three size classes of LMH, and how rainfall regimes shape the direction and magnitude of these effects. UHURU consists of four treatments: total-exclusion (all ungulate herbivores), mesoherbivore-exclusion (LMH >120-cm tall), megaherbivore-exclusion (elephants and giraffes), and unfenced open plots. Each treatment is replicated three times at three locations ("sites") along the rainfall gradient: low (440 mm/year), intermediate (580 mm/year), and high (640 mm/year). There was limited variation across sites in soil attributes and LMH activity levels. Understory-plant cover was greater in plots without mesoherbivores, but did not respond strongly to the exclusion of megaherbivores, or to the additional exclusion of dik-dik and warthog. Eleven of the thirteen understory plant species that responded significantly to exclusion treatment were more common in exclusion plots than open ones. Significant interactions between site and treatment on plant communities, although uncommon, suggested that differences between treatments may be greater at sites with lower rainfall. Browsers reduced densities of several common overstory species, along with growth rates of the three dominant Acacia species. Small-mammal densities were 2-3 times greater in total-exclusion than in open plots at all sites. Although we expect patterns to become clearer with time, results from 2008-2012 show that the effects of excluding successively smaller-bodied subsets of the LMH community are generally non-additive for a given response variable, and inconsistent across response variables, indicating that the different LMH size classes are not functionally redundant. Several response variables showed significant treatment-by-site interactions, suggesting that the nature of plant-herbivore interactions can vary across restricted spatial scales.
authors: Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
authors: Jacob R
authors: JR
authors: Goheen
authors: Todd M
authors: TM
authors: Palmer
authors: Grace K
authors: GK
authors: Charles
authors: Kristofer M
authors: KM
authors: Helgen
authors: Stephen N
authors: SN
authors: Kinyua
authors: Janet E
authors: JE
authors: Maclean
authors: Benjamin L
authors: BL
authors: Turner
authors: Hillary S
authors: HS
authors: Young
authors: Robert M
authors: RM
authors: Pringle
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D058448:Biota; D017753:Ecosystem; D004777:Environment; D020387:Food Chain; D060434:Herbivory; D007630:Kenya; D008322:Mammals; D010944:Plants; D011891:Rain
references: Nature. 2011 Mar 3;471(7336):51-7
references: 21368823
references: Ecology. 2009 Jul;90(7):1996-2006
references: 19694146
references: Oecologia. 1998 Sep;116(3):381-389
references: 28308070
references: Ecology. 2010 Sep;91(9):2522-33
references: 20957942
references: Ecol Lett. 2008 Jul;11(7):740-55
references: 18445030
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Jul 1;13(7):261-5
references: 21238294
references: Nature. 2005 Dec 8;438(7069):846-9
references: 16341012
references: Science. 2011 Oct 14;334(6053):230-2
references: 21998389
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 2;104(1):193-7
references: 17190823
references: Ecology. 2006 Oct;87(10):2657-63
references: 17089673
references: Science. 2005 Aug 19;309(5738):1239-41
references: 16037416
references: Nature. 2006 Aug 3;442(7102):555-8
references: 16885982
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 30;106(26):10702-5
references: 19528635
references: Ecology. 2011 Aug;92(8):1626-36
references: 21905429
references: Ecology. 2007 May;88(5):1191-201
references: 17536405
references: Annu Rev Nutr. 1999;19:247-77
references: 10448524
references: Ecol Lett. 2006 Jul;9(7):780-8
references: 16796567
references: Ecology. 2008 Jan;89(1):26-33
references: 18376543
references: Ecology. 2006 Dec;87(12):3128-39
references: 17249237
references: Science. 2008 Jan 11;319(5860):192-5
references: 18187652
references: Science. 1997 Oct 24;278(5338):689-92
references: 9381179
references: J Anim Ecol. 2010 Mar;79(2):372-82
references: 20039982
references: Ecology. 2011 May;92(5):1063-72
references: 21661567
references: Science. 2002 May 3;296(5569):904-7
references: 11988573