title: Characterization of the mechanical properties of qPlus sensors.
abstract: In this paper we present a comparison of three different methods that can be used for estimating the stiffness of qPlus sensors. The first method is based on continuum theory of elasticity. The second (Cleveland's method) uses the change in the eigenfrequency that is induced by the loading of small masses. Finally, the stiffness is obtained by analysis of the thermal noise spectrum. We show that all three methods give very similar results. Surprisingly, neither the gold wire nor the gluing give rise to significant changes of the stiffness in the case of our home-built sensors. Furthermore we describe a fast and cost-effective way to perform Cleveland's method. This method is based on gluing small pieces of a tungsten wire; the mass is obtained from the volume of the wire, which is measured by optical microscopy. To facilitate detection of oscillation eigenfrequencies under ambient conditions, we designed and built a device for testing qPlus sensors.
authors: Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Cukrovarnicka 10, 162 53, Prague, Czech Republic.
authors: Jan
authors: J
authors: Berger
authors: Martin
authors: M
authors: Svec
authors: Martin
authors: M
authors: Müller
authors: Martin
authors: M
authors: Ledinský
authors: Antonín
authors: A
authors: Fejfar
authors: Pavel
authors: P
authors: Jelínek
authors: Zsolt
authors: Z
authors: Majzik
keywords: AFM; Cleveland’s method; STM; cross talk; force; qPlus; stiffness; thermal noise; tuning fork
references: Phys Rev Lett. 1986 Nov 10;57(19):2403-2406
references: 10033716
references: ACS Nano. 2012 Aug 28;6(8):6969-76
references: 22747258
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2011 May 27;106(21):216102
references: 21699319
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2005 Feb 11;94(5):056101
references: 15783662
references: Nature. 2001 Nov 1;414(6859):54-7
references: 11689939
references: Ultramicroscopy. 2003 Oct-Nov;97(1-4):113-8
references: 12801663
references: Rev Sci Instrum. 2009 Dec;80(12):125103
references: 20059166
references: Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2012;3:249-59
references: 22496998
references: Nanotechnology. 2006 Apr 14;17(7):S148-54
references: 21727406
references: Rev Sci Instrum. 2011 Sep;82(9):093703
references: 21974590
references: Nature. 2007 Mar 1;446(7131):64-7
references: 17330040
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2011 Jan 7;106(1):016802
references: 21231763
references: Science. 2008 Oct 17;322(5900):413-7
references: 18927388
references: Science. 1995 Jan 6;267(5194):68-71
references: 17840059
references: Phys Rev Lett. 1986 Mar 3;56(9):930-933
references: 10033323
references: Science. 2008 Feb 22;319(5866):1066-9
references: 18292336
references: Rev Sci Instrum. 2007 Apr;78(4):043705
references: 17477668
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2011 Apr 1;106(13):136101
references: 21517399