title: High lability of sexual system over 250 million years of evolution in morphologically conservative tadpole shrimps.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Sexual system is a key factor affecting the genetic diversity, population structure, genome structure and the evolutionary potential of species. The sexual system androdioecy - where males and hermaphrodites coexist in populations - is extremely rare, yet is found in three crustacean groups, barnacles, a genus of clam shrimps Eulimnadia, and in the order Notostraca, the tadpole shrimps. In the ancient crustacean order Notostraca, high morphological conservatism contrasts with a wide diversity of sexual systems, including androdioecy. An understanding of the evolution of sexual systems in this group has been hampered by poor phylogenetic resolution and confounded by the widespread occurrence of cryptic species. Here we use a multigene supermatrix for 30 taxa to produce a comprehensive phylogenetic reconstruction of Notostraca. Based on this phylogenetic reconstruction we use character mapping techniques to investigate the evolution of sexual systems. We also tested the hypothesis that reproductive assurance has driven the evolution of androdioecy in Notostraca.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Character mapping analysis showed that sexual system is an extremely flexible trait within Notostraca, with repeated shifts between gonochorism and androdioecy, the latter having evolved a minimum of five times. In agreement with the reproductive assurance hypothesis androdioecious notostracans are found at significantly higher latitudes than gonochoric ones indicating that post glacial re-colonisation may have selected for the higher colonisation ability conferred by androdioecy.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In contrast to their conserved morphology, sexual system in Notostraca is highly labile and the rare reproductive mode androdioecy has evolved repeatedly within the order. Furthermore, we conclude that this lability of sexual system has been maintained for at least 250 million years and may have contributed to the long term evolutionary persistence of Notostraca. Our results further our understanding of the evolution of androdioecy and indicate that reproductive assurance is a recurrent theme involved in the evolution of this sexual system.
authors: School of Biological, Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK. t.c.mathers@2006.hull.ac.uk
authors: Thomas C
authors: TC
authors: Mathers
authors: Robert L
authors: RL
authors: Hammond
authors: Ronald A
authors: RA
authors: Jenner
authors: Thorid
authors: T
authors: Zierold
authors: Bernd
authors: B
authors: Hänfling
authors: Africa
authors: A
authors: Gómez
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D005075:Biological Evolution; D003445:Crustacea / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology*; D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial / Q000235:genetics; D005260:Female; D014644:Genetic Variation; D057850:Hermaphroditic Organisms / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D010802:Phylogeny; D012098:Reproduction / Q000235:genetics; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA
chemical_list: D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial
references: Genet Res (Camb). 2008 Feb;90(1):73-84
references: 18289402
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 7;273(1604):3011-9
references: 17015349
references: Am Nat. 2004 Jan;163(1):122-37
references: 14767842
references: Syst Biol. 2004 Oct;53(5):673-84
references: 15545248
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jun 20;97(13):7037-42
references: 10860968
references: Nature. 1999 Oct 28;401(6756):877-84
references: 10553904
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Oct;28(10):2731-9
references: 21546353
references: Syst Biol. 2006 Aug;55(4):595-609
references: 16967577
references: Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001 Dec;11(6):685-90
references: 11682314
references: Monogr Popul Biol. 1982;18:1-355
references: 7144766
references: Nature. 1954 Apr 24;173(4408):781-2
references: 13165649
references: Integr Comp Biol. 2006 Aug;46(4):449-64
references: 21672757
references: Evolution. 1997 Feb;51(1):10-20
references: 28568790
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1998 Aug;10(1):23-36
references: 9751915
references: Am Nat. 2002 Dec;160(6):712-26
references: 18707460
references: Evolution. 1998 Jun;52(3):657-668
references: 28565251
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Sep 13;7:161
references: 17854482
references: Am Nat. 2006 Mar;167(3):354-66
references: 16673344
references: Zoolog Sci. 2006 Dec;23(12):1109-13
references: 17261925
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Mar 22;273(1587):725-34
references: 16608693
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Aug;29(8):1969-73
references: 22367748
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 7;279(1730):959-66
references: 21881138
references: Am Nat. 1993 Feb;141(2):314-28
references: 19426084
references: Syst Biol. 2008 Feb;57(1):104-15
references: 18288620
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Nov 08;7:214
references: 17996036
references: Zootaxa. 2016 Oct 25;4178(3):328-346
references: 27811712
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W516-20
references: 15980525
references: Evolution. 1967 Dec;21(4):853-856
references: 28563079
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2011 May 27;11:146
references: 21619604
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010 Sep;56(3):1115-8
references: 20416383
references: Am Nat. 1993 Feb;141(2):329-37
references: 19426085
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Oct;37(18):6184-93
references: 19723687
references: Syst Biol. 2004 Aug;53(4):571-81
references: 15371247
references: Bioinformatics. 2006 Nov 1;22(21):2688-90
references: 16928733
references: Evolution. 2006 Sep;60(9):1801-15
references: 17089965
references: J Evol Biol. 2009 Sep;22(9):1781-99
references: 19702888
references: Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994 Oct;3(5):294-9
references: 7881515
references: J Evol Biol. 2010 May;23(5):1100-6
references: 20298443
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7
references: 15034147
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Dec;23(12):678-85
references: 18947899