title: Individualized Theory of Mind (iToM): When Memory Modulates Empathy.
abstract: Functional neuroimaging studies have noted that brain regions supporting theory of mind (ToM) overlap remarkably with those underlying episodic memory, suggesting a link between the two processes. The present study shows that memory for others' past experiences modulates significantly our appraisal of, and reaction to, what is happening to them currently. Participants read the life story of two characters; one had experienced a long series of love-related failures, the other a long series of work-related failures. In a later faux pas recognition task, participants reported more empathy for the character unlucky in love in love-related faux pas scenarios, and for the character unlucky at work in work-related faux pas scenarios. The memory-based modulation of empathy correlated with the number of details remembered from the characters' life story. These results suggest that individuals use memory for other people's past experiences to simulate how they feel in similar situations they are currently facing. The integration of ToM and memory processes allows adjusting mental state inferences to fit unique social targets, constructing an individualized ToM.
authors: Dipartimento di Psicologia and Centro Studi e Ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, Università di Bologna Bologna, Italy.
authors: Elisa
authors: E
authors: Ciaramelli
authors: Francesco
authors: F
authors: Bernardi
authors: Morris
authors: M
authors: Moscovitch
keywords: autobiographical memory; empathy; episodic memory; episodic simulation; theory of mind
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001 Apr;11(2):194-201
references: 11301239
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 23;103(21):8275-80
references: 16702548
references: Neuron. 2006 May 18;50(4):655-63
references: 16701214
references: Brain Res. 2012 Jan 5;1428:43-50
references: 21172325
references: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 Nov;18(6):962-71
references: 22929298
references: Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 26;3:529
references: 23189069
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1156:81-96
references: 19338504
references: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;42(2):241-51
references: 11280420
references: Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(7):989-1021
references: 15769487
references: Psychiatry Res. 2010 Jun 30;178(1):214-6
references: 20452047
references: Neuropsychologia. 2012 Dec;50(14):3781-5
references: 23088818
references: J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 13;30(41):13906-15
references: 20943931
references: Cereb Cortex. 2011 Dec;21(12):2788-96
references: 21527789
references: Brain. 2001 Feb;124(Pt 2):279-86
references: 11157555
references: Psychiatry Res. 2011 May 15;187(1-2):241-7
references: 21055831
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:279-300
references: 17550343
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Apr;7(4):268-77
references: 16552413
references: J Autism Dev Disord. 2004 Jun;34(3):301-10
references: 15264498
references: Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):399-404
references: 18399894
references: Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2439-47
references: 21550352
references: Brain. 2009 Mar;132(Pt 3):617-27
references: 18971202
references: Cogn Behav Neurol. 2005 Mar;18(1):55-67
references: 15761277
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 30;104(5):1726-31
references: 17229836
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 2;107(44):19044-8
references: 20956323
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 May 12;364(1521):1309-16
references: 19528012
references: J Clin Psychol. 2012 Aug;68(8):922-34
references: 22729358
references: Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 1;62(1):520-9
references: 22584225
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Feb;7(2):77-83
references: 12584026
references: J Exp Child Psychol. 1995 Jun;59(3):516-48
references: 7622991
references: J Autism Dev Disord. 1999 Oct;29(5):407-18
references: 10587887
references: Brain. 1998 Oct;121 ( Pt 10):1951-73
references: 9798749
references: Science. 2007 Nov 23;318(5854):1257
references: 18033875
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):1669-76
references: 20817106
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2002 Feb;25(1):1-20; discussion 20-71
references: 12625087
references: Psychol Psychother. 2011 Mar;84(1):58-69; discussion 98-110
references: 22903831
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Oct;10(10):435-41
references: 16949331
references: Schizophr Res. 2007 Mar;91(1-3):82-6
references: 17307337
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Sep;8(9):396-403
references: 15350240
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:39-60
references: 18400923
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jun;22(6):1095-111
references: 19803685
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jun;23(6):1275-84
references: 20521858
references: Psychol Sci. 2001 Mar;12(2):135-40
references: 11340922
references: Psychol Med. 2003 Jul;33(5):897-905
references: 12877404
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Sep;10(5):640-56
references: 9802997
references: Front Psychol. 2013 Jan 24;3:588
references: 23355827
references: Psychol Aging. 2002 Dec;17(4):677-89
references: 12507363
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:1-38
references: 18400922
references: Nat Neurosci. 2012 Apr 15;15(5):675-80
references: 22504346
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jun;22(6):1112-23
references: 19580387
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 May;62(5):787-97
references: 1593418
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Jul 13;31(28):10262-9
references: 21753003
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):49-57
references: 17188554
references: Conscious Cogn. 2008 Sep;17(3):778-89
references: 18394921