title: The effect of averaging adjacent planes for artifact reduction in matrix inversion tomosynthesis.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Matrix inversion tomosynthesis (MITS) uses linear systems theory and knowledge of the imaging geometry to remove tomographic blur that is present in conventional backprojection tomosynthesis reconstructions, leaving in-plane detail rendered clearly. The use of partial-pixel interpolation during the backprojection process introduces imprecision in the MITS modeling of tomographic blur, and creates low-contrast artifacts in some MITS planes. This paper examines the use of MITS slabs, created by averaging several adjacent MITS planes, as a method for suppressing partial-pixel artifacts.
  
  
  METHODS
  Human chest tomosynthesis projection data, acquired as part of an IRB-approved pilot study, were used to generate MITS planes, three-plane MITS slabs (MITSa3), five-plane MITS slabs (MITSa5), and seven-plane MITS slabs (MITSa7). These were qualitatively examined for partial-pixel artifacts and the visibility of normal and abnormal anatomy. Additionally, small (5 mm) subtle pulmonary nodules were simulated and digitally superimposed upon human chest tomosynthesis projection images, and their visibility was qualitatively assessed in the different reconstruction techniques. Simulated images of a thin wire were used to generate modulation transfer function (MTF) and slice-sensitivity profile curves for the different MITS and MITS slab techniques, and these were examined for indications of partial-pixel artifacts and frequency response uniformity. Finally, mean-subtracted, exposure-normalized noise power spectra (ENNPS) estimates were computed and compared for MITS and MITS slab reconstructions, generated from 10 sets of tomosynthesis projection data of an acrylic slab. The simulated in-plane MTF response of each technique was also combined with the square root of the ENNPS estimate to yield stochastic signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) information about the different reconstruction techniques.
  
  
  RESULTS
  For scan angles of 20° and 5 mm plane separation, seven MITS planes must be averaged to sufficiently remove partial-pixel artifacts. MITSa7 does appear to subtly reduce the contrast of high-frequency "edge" information, but the removal of partial-pixel artifacts makes the appearance of low-contrast, fine-detail anatomy even more conspicuous in MITSa7 slices. MITSa7 also appears to render simulated subtle 5 mm pulmonary nodules with greater visibility than MITS alone, in both the open lung and regions overlying the mediastinum. Finally, the MITSa7 technique reduces stochastic image variance, though the in-plane stochastic SNR (for very thin objects which do not span multiple MITS planes) is only improved at spatial frequencies between 0.05 and 0.20 cycles∕mm.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The MITSa7 method is an improvement over traditional single-plane MITS for thoracic imaging and the pulmonary nodule detection task, and thus the authors plan to use the MITSa7 approach for all future MITS research at the authors' institution.
authors: Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA. devon.godfrey@duke.edu
authors: Devon J
authors: DJ
authors: Godfrey
authors: H Page
authors: HP
authors: McAdams
authors: James T
authors: JT
authors: Dobbins
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D016477:Artifacts; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000379:methods*; D008168:Lung / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods*; D013902:Radiography, Thoracic; D059629:Signal-To-Noise Ratio; D013269:Stochastic Processes
references: Clin Radiol. 2012 Mar;67(3):232-8
references: 21939964
references: Phys Med Biol. 2003 Oct 7;48(19):R65-106
references: 14579853
references: Med Phys. 2009 May;36(5):1521-32
references: 19544768
references: Med Phys. 2006 Mar;33(3):655-67
references: 16878569
references: Radiology. 1997 Jan;202(1):117-24
references: 8988200
references: Med Phys. 2010 Aug;37(8):4298-306
references: 20879590
references: Med Phys. 2009 Dec;36(12):5480-7
references: 20095260
references: J Thorac Imaging. 2008 May;23(2):86-92
references: 18520565
references: Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):269-77
references: 20851944
references: Invest Radiol. 2011 Aug;46(8):471-7
references: 21487302
references: Med Phys. 2008 Jun;35(6):2554-7
references: 18649488
references: Eur J Radiol. 2009 Nov;72(2):244-51
references: 19616909
references: Acad Radiol. 2010 Oct;17(10):1267-74
references: 20591695
references: Radiology. 2003 Jul;228(1):76-84
references: 12750455
references: Radiology. 1999 Dec;213(3):727-34
references: 10580946
references: Med Phys. 1995 Oct;22(10):1581-93
references: 8551982
references: Radiology. 2008 Dec;249(3):1034-41
references: 18849504