title: Characterization of cross-linked porous gelatin carriers and their interaction with corneal endothelium: biopolymer concentration effect.
abstract: Cell sheet-mediated tissue regeneration is a promising approach for corneal reconstruction. However, the fragility of bioengineered corneal endothelial cell (CEC) monolayers allows us to take advantage of cross-linked porous gelatin hydrogels as cell sheet carriers for intraocular delivery. The aim of this study was to further investigate the effects of biopolymer concentrations (5-15 wt%) on the characteristic and safety of hydrogel discs fabricated by a simple stirring process combined with freeze-drying method. Results of scanning electron microscopy, porosity measurements, and ninhydrin assays showed that, with increasing solid content, the pore size, porosity, and cross-linking index of carbodiimide treated samples significantly decreased from 508±30 to 292±42 µm, 59.8±1.1 to 33.2±1.9%, and 56.2±1.6 to 34.3±1.8%, respectively. The variation in biopolymer concentrations and degrees of cross-linking greatly affects the Young's modulus and swelling ratio of the gelatin carriers. Differential scanning calorimetry measurements and glucose permeation studies indicated that for the samples with a highest solid content, the highest pore wall thickness and the lowest fraction of mobile water may inhibit solute transport. When the biopolymer concentration is in the range of 5-10 wt%, the hydrogels have high freezable water content (0.89-0.93) and concentration of permeated glucose (591.3-615.5 µg/ml). These features are beneficial to the in vitro cultivation of CECs without limiting proliferation and changing expression of ion channel and pump genes such as ATP1A1, VDAC2, and AQP1. In vivo studies by analyzing the rabbit CEC morphology and count also demonstrate that the implanted gelatin discs with the highest solid content may cause unfavorable tissue-material interactions. It is concluded that the characteristics of cross-linked porous gelatin hydrogel carriers and their triggered biological responses are in relation to biopolymer concentration effects.
authors: Institute of Biochemical and Biomedical Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China. jylai@mail.cgu.edu.tw
authors: Jui-Yang
authors: JY
authors: Lai
authors: David Hui-Kang
authors: DH
authors: Ma
authors: Meng-Heng
authors: MH
authors: Lai
authors: Ya-Ting
authors: YT
authors: Li
authors: Ren-Jie
authors: RJ
authors: Chang
authors: Li-Mei
authors: LM
authors: Chen
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001704:Biopolymers / Q000494:pharmacology*; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D003315:Cornea / Q000166:cytology* / Q000378:metabolism; D003432:Cross-Linking Reagents; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D004728:Endothelium, Corneal / Q000166:cytology / Q000187:drug effects / Q000254:growth & development*; D005780:Gelatin / Q000737:chemistry / Q000494:pharmacology*; D020100:Hydrogels / Q000494:pharmacology; D008297:Male; D016062:Porosity; D011817:Rabbits; D014867:Water
chemical_list: D001704:Biopolymers; D003432:Cross-Linking Reagents; D020100:Hydrogels; D014867:Water; D005780:Gelatin
references: Transplantation. 2006 Feb 15;81(3):473-6
references: 16477237
references: Int J Mol Sci. 2009 Aug 03;10(8):3442-56
references: 20111679
references: Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003 May;22(3):359-89
references: 12852491
references: Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:1101-14
references: 22403490
references: J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2008;19(1):1-18
references: 18177550
references: J Biomed Mater Res. 2002 Jul;61(1):19-25
references: 12001241
references: Biomaterials. 2003 Mar;24(6):1067-74
references: 12504529
references: Macromol Biosci. 2011 Mar 10;11(3):427-34
references: 21108455
references: Biomaterials. 1999 Jul;20(14):1339-44
references: 10403052
references: Biomaterials. 2006 Feb;27(4):607-14
references: 16099037
references: J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010 Jun;21(6):1899-911
references: 20238149
references: Int J Biol Macromol. 2011 Apr 1;48(3):474-81
references: 21255605
references: Biomaterials. 1995 Mar;16(4):297-303
references: 7772669
references: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Mar 15;80(4):1003-10
references: 17187393
references: Transplantation. 2007 Nov 27;84(10):1222-32
references: 18049106
references: J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2012 Feb;6(2):135-43
references: 21351375
references: Biomacromolecules. 2007 Feb;8(2):331-7
references: 17291055
references: N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 16;351(12):1187-96
references: 15371576
references: Biomacromolecules. 2009 Feb 9;10(2):310-9
references: 19063667
references: Biomacromolecules. 2006 Jun;7(6):1836-44
references: 16768405
references: J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008 Jun;19(6):2445-52
references: 18219558
references: Biomacromolecules. 2010 May 10;11(5):1387-97
references: 20355704
references: J Biomed Mater Res. 2001 Feb;54(2):284-93
references: 11093189
references: J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2010;21(3):359-76
references: 20178691
references: Acta Biomater. 2012 Mar;8(3):1068-79
references: 22134163
references: Biomaterials. 2002 Jul;23(14):2827-34
references: 12069321
references: Biomaterials. 2007 Dec;28(34):5033-43
references: 17761277
references: Biomaterials. 2006 Oct;27(28):4881-93
references: 16762407
references: Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2011 Oct;17(5):349-64
references: 21699434
references: Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Oct;124(10):1441-8
references: 17030712
references: Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11(12):5256-72
references: 21614206
references: Biomaterials. 2012 Mar;33(7):2372-87
references: 22182746
references: Acta Biomater. 2011 Jan;7(1):31-56
references: 20659596
references: Int J Pharm. 2008 Mar 20;352(1-2):152-8
references: 18061379
references: Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jun;139(6):1123-5
references: 15953454
references: Acta Biomater. 2010 Mar;6(3):1167-77
references: 19733699
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995 Jun;36(7):1317-26
references: 7775109
references: Biomaterials. 2010 Sep;31(25):6647-58
references: 20541801
references: Biomaterials. 2002 Feb;23(4):1205-12
references: 11791924