title: Using action dynamics to assess competing stimulus control during stimulus equivalence testing.
abstract: Previous studies have identified potential sources of competing stimulus control in tests for stimulus equivalence. The present experiment employed the Nintendo Wii remote (Wiimote®) to investigate whether such competition would affect suboperant action dynamics (e.g., topographies of equivalence responses). Following one-to-many training on conditional discriminations sufficient to establish three 3-member equivalence classes, participants were presented with a test for equivalence responding that included five different trial types. These included "traditional" equivalence trials, on which the incorrect stimulus had previously been presented as a correct comparison stimulus during training, trials on which a novel unrelated word was provided as the incorrect comparison, and trials on which the incorrect stimulus varied in orthographical and phonological similarity to the sample stimulus. The presence of phonological and orthographic distractor stimuli significantly reduced the probability of equivalence-consistent responding, relative to neutral distractors, but this effect was almost exclusively seen in participants who failed to demonstrate equivalence on traditional equivalence trials. Analyses of correct response trajectories suggested that the prior history of reinforcement for choosing the incorrect stimulus on the traditional equivalence trial gave rise to greater competition than did phonological or orthographic similarity between the sample and incorrect comparisons.
authors: School of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland. denis.ohora@nuigalway.ie
authors: Denis P
authors: DP
authors: O'Hora
authors: Ian T
authors: IT
authors: Tyndall
authors: Mairéad
authors: M
authors: McMorrow
authors: Rick A C
authors: RA
authors: Dale
mesh_terms: D004193:Discrimination Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D014163:Transfer, Psychology; D055815:Young Adult
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 May;71(3):395-415
references: 16812902
references: J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Spring;25(1):51-7
references: 16795771
references: Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan;108(1):204-56
references: 11212628
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 May;57(3):249-66
references: 16812655
references: Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug;36(6):1129-47
references: 22462514
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Sep;68(2):271-96
references: 16812863
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 May;95(3):327-42
references: 21547070
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Sep;50(2):125-44
references: 16812554
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Nov;86(3):337-54
references: 17191757
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 May;87(3):349-65
references: 17575901
references: J Speech Hear Res. 1971 Mar;14(1):5-13
references: 5550631
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 2004 May;81(3):239-55
references: 15357508
references: PLoS One. 2008 Mar 05;3(3):e1728
references: 18320047
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 May;57(3):429-63
references: 1602272
references: Am J Ment Defic. 1973 Mar;77(5):515-23
references: 4267398
references: Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;19(2):281-8
references: 22478264
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Nov;56(3):519-55
references: 1774543
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 May;85(3):371-91
references: 16776057
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jul;72(1):117-37
references: 10418157
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5-22
references: 7057129
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 May;89(3):383-405
references: 18540221
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 2004 May;81(3):257-66
references: 15357509
references: Biol Psychol. 1983 May-Jun;16(3-4):155-80
references: 6615951
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):183-204
references: 16812663
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 19;102(29):10393-8
references: 15985550
references: Behav Anal. 2003 Fall;26(2):195-213
references: 22478402
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185-241
references: 16812780
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):527-49
references: 12507018
references: J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446
references: 19884961
references: Psychol Rev. 1996 Jan;103(1):56-115
references: 8650300
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):127-46
references: 10966100
references: Behav Processes. 1994 Jun;32(1):29-46
references: 24925111