title: How superhydrophobicity breaks down.
abstract: A droplet deposited or impacting on a superhydrophobic surface rolls off easily, leaving the surface dry and clean. This remarkable property is due to a surface structure that favors the entrainment of air cushions beneath the drop, leading to the so-called Cassie state. The Cassie state competes with the Wenzel (impaled) state, in which the liquid fully wets the substrate. To use superhydrophobicity, impalement of the drop into the surface structure needs to be prevented. To understand the underlying processes, we image the impalement dynamics in three dimensions by confocal microscopy. While the drop evaporates from a pillar array, its rim recedes via stepwise depinning from the edge of the pillars. Before depinning, finger-like necks form due to adhesion of the drop at the pillar's circumference. Once the pressure becomes too high, or the drop too small, the drop slowly impales the texture. The thickness of the air cushion decreases gradually. As soon as the water-air interface touches the substrate, complete wetting proceeds within milliseconds. This visualization of the impalement dynamics will facilitate the development and characterization of superhydrophobic surfaces.
authors: Physics at Interfaces,  Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, D-55128 Mainz,  Germany.
authors: Periklis
authors: P
authors: Papadopoulos
authors: Lena
authors: L
authors: Mammen
authors: Xu
authors: X
authors: Deng
authors: Doris
authors: D
authors: Vollmer
authors: Hans-Jürgen
authors: HJ
authors: Butt
references: Adv Mater. 2011 Jul 12;23(26):2911-4
references: 21538591
references: J Am Chem Soc. 2007 Feb 14;129(6):1478-9
references: 17243677
references: Nat Commun. 2012;3:1025
references: 22929782
references: Lab Chip. 2010 Mar 7;10(5):556-8
references: 20162229
references: Langmuir. 2007 Jun 5;23(12):6501-3
references: 17497815
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Mar 19;104(11):116102
references: 20366488
references: J Colloid Interface Sci. 2009 Nov 1;339(1):208-16
references: 19683717
references: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010 Nov 22;49(48):9145-8
references: 20931579
references: Small. 2012 Apr 23;8(8):1229-36
references: 22337592
references: J Phys Chem B. 2009 Mar 26;113(12):3906-9
references: 19673137
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2011 Jan 7;106(1):014501
references: 21231746
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2011 Jan 21;106(3):036102
references: 21405283
references: Soft Matter. 2008 Jan 22;4(2):224-240
references: 32907233
references: Lab Chip. 2008 Apr;8(4):582-6
references: 18369513
references: Chem Soc Rev. 2007 Aug;36(8):1350-68
references: 17619692
references: Adv Mater. 2011 Jul 12;23(26):2962-5
references: 21538988
references: Langmuir. 2012 Jun 5;28(22):8392-8
references: 22578130
references: Nat Mater. 2003 Jul;2(7):457-60
references: 12819775
references: Langmuir. 2005 Nov 22;21(24):11053-60
references: 16285771
references: Nano Lett. 2012 Sep 12;12(9):4551-7
references: 22876877
references: Langmuir. 2004 Jun 8;20(12):5013-8
references: 15984262
references: Langmuir. 2011 May 17;27(10):5705-8
references: 21510655
references: J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Apr 20;133(15):5764-6
references: 21446675
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 26;109(26):10210-3
references: 22689952
references: Adv Mater. 2012 May 8;24(18):2409-12
references: 22488898
references: Nature. 2004 Nov 4;432(7013):36
references: 15525973
references: Nature. 2001 Nov 1;414(6859):33-4
references: 11689930