title: Evidence suggesting that desire-state attribution may govern food sharing in Eurasian jays.
abstract: State-attribution is the ability to ascribe to others an internal life like one's own and to understand that internal, psychological states such as desire, hope, belief, and knowledge underlie others' actions. Despite extensive research, comparative studies struggle to adequately integrate key factors of state-attribution that have been identified by evolutionary and developmental psychology as well as research on empathy. Here, we develop a behavioral paradigm to address these issues and investigate whether male Eurasian jays respond to the changing desire-state of their female partners when sharing food. We demonstrate that males feed their mates flexibly according to the female's current food preference. Critically, we show that the males need to see what the female has previously eaten to know what food she will currently want. Consequently, the males' sharing pattern was not simply a response to their mate's behavior indicating her preference as to what he should share, nor was it a response to the males' own desire-state. Our results raise the possibility that these birds may be capable of ascribing desire to their mates.
authors: Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
authors: Ljerka
authors: L
authors: Ostojić
authors: Rachael C
authors: RC
authors: Shaw
authors: Lucy G
authors: LG
authors: Cheke
authors: Nicola S
authors: NS
authors: Clayton
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D005260:Female; D005502:Food; D008297:Male; D046109:Passeriformes / Q000502:physiology*; D012919:Social Behavior
references: Commun Integr Biol. 2010 Nov;3(6):522-4
references: 21331228
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:279-300
references: 17550343
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Aug 22;272(1573):1641-6
references: 16087417
references: Biol Lett. 2012 Apr 23;8(2):171-5
references: 22048890
references: Science. 2006 Jun 16;312(5780):1662-5
references: 16709747
references: Curr Biol. 2005 Mar 8;15(5):447-52
references: 15753039
references: Anim Behav. 2001 Jan;61(1):139-151
references: 11170704
references: Cognition. 2008 Nov;109(2):224-34
references: 18849023
references: Child Dev. 2001 May-Jun;72(3):685-7
references: 11405572
references: Child Dev. 1989 Aug;60(4):946-64
references: 2758888
references: Curr Biol. 2007 May 15;17(10):856-61
references: 17462894
references: Nature. 2001 Nov 22;414(6862):443-6
references: 11719804
references: Anim Cogn. 2001 Nov;4(3-4):269-80
references: 24777517
references: Dev Sci. 2009 Sep;12(5):688-98
references: 19702761
references: Cognition. 1988 Dec;30(3):239-77
references: 3215003
references: Child Dev. 2001 May-Jun;72(3):655-84
references: 11405571
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2002 Feb;25(1):1-20; discussion 20-71
references: 12625087
references: Anim Behav. 1998 Jul;56(1):256-9
references: 9710485
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Oct;28(5):675-91; discussion 691-735
references: 16262930
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):731-44
references: 17264056
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 15;108(7):3077-9
references: 21282649