title: Usefulness of perfusion index to detect the effect of brachial plexus block.
abstract: The traditional method to evaluate adequacy of the block for surgery is based on loss of sensory response to stimuli, which requires patient cooperation. Several methods have been described for objective assessment of the nerve block. The aim of the study was to investigate whether perfusion index (PI), a measure of peripheral perfusion from a pulse oximetry finger sensor, is a reliable and objective method for assessing the adequacy of infraclavicular blockade and to describe the time course of PI changes once peripheral nerve block has been achieved during surgery. The study was performed on patients scheduled for elective hand, wrist and forearm surgery under infraclavicular brachial plexus block. The pulse oximetry sensor was affixed to a finger ipsilateral to the side of the infraclavicular block for continuous measurement of PI. The average PI and the average percent change in PI from baseline, at 10, 20 and 30 min from the administration of the block were calculated. Baseline values of PI ranged from 0.6 to 4.7 % in 44 patients for whom infraclavicular block was effective and 1.8 to 2.4 % in 2 patients for whom infraclavicular block failed. Differences were not significant (p = 0.60). In the effective infraclavicular block group, PI rose continuously during the 30-min observation period. At 10 min, PI increased by (mean ± standard deviation) 120 ± 119 % from baseline. At 20 and 30 min, perfusion index increased by 133 ± 125 % and 155 ± 144 % from baseline. All changes from baseline were significant (p < 0.01). The perfusion index is a predictor of infraclavicular block success. The largest changes in PI occur 30 min after the block administration but significant changes in PI were detected 10 min after administration. Perfusion index monitoring may provide a highly valuable tool to quickly evaluate the success of regional anesthesia of the upper extremity in clinical practice.
authors: Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Medical Faculty, Kocaeli University, Umuttepe, Kocaeli, Turkey. alparslankus@gmail.com
authors: Alparslan
authors: A
authors: Kus
authors: Yavuz
authors: Y
authors: Gurkan
authors: Suna Kara
authors: SK
authors: Gormus
authors: Mine
authors: M
authors: Solak
authors: Kamil
authors: K
authors: Toker
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000765:Anesthesia, Conduction / Q000379:methods; D000779:Anesthetics, Local / Q000008:administration & dosage; D001132:Arm / Q000098:blood supply / Q000294:innervation / Q000601:surgery; D001340:Autonomic Nerve Block / Q000379:methods*; D001917:Brachial Plexus; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010092:Oximetry; D010147:Pain Measurement; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D000779:Anesthetics, Local
references: J Clin Monit Comput. 2000;16(7):475-83
references: 12580205
references: Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):239-43, table of contents
references: 16790660
references: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996 Oct;40(9):1145-8
references: 8933857
references: Br J Anaesth. 1988 May;60(6):703-8
references: 3377954
references: Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):598-604
references: 16428569
references: Can J Anaesth. 2012 Dec;59(12):1095-101
references: 23055034
references: J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):749-53
references: 21367563
references: Anesthesiology. 2000 Dec;93(6):1517-30
references: 11149448