title: Our words, our story: a textual analysis of articles published in the Bulletin of the Medical Library Association/Journal of the Medical Library Association from 1961 to 2010.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This lecture explores changes in the medical library profession over the last fifty years, as revealed by individual word usage in a body of literature.
  
  
  METHODS
  I downloaded articles published in the Bulletin of the Medical Library Association and Journal of the Medical Library Association between 1961 and 2000 to create an electronic corpus and tracked annual frequency of individual word usage. I used frequency sparklines of words, matching one of four archetypal shapes (level, rise, fall, and rise-and-fall) to identify significant words.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Most significant words fell into the categories of environment, management, technology, and research. Based on word usage changes, the following trends are revealed: Compared to 1961, today's medical librarians are more concerned with digital information, not physical packages. We prefer information to be evidence-based. We focus more on health than medicine. We are reaching out to new constituents, sometimes leaving our building to do so. Teaching has become important for us. We run our libraries more like businesses, using constantly changing technology. We are publishing more research articles.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although these words were chosen by individual authors to tell their particular stories, in the aggregate, our words reveal our story of change in our profession.
authors: Resources Management, Samuel J. Wood Library, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA. mefunk@med.cornell.edu
authors: Mark E
authors: ME
authors: Funk
mesh_terms: D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D007996:Library Associations / Q000266:history*; D008490:Medical Informatics / Q000266:history; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000266:history*; D014481:United States
references: J Med Libr Assoc. 2012 Jan;100(1):10-9
references: 22272154
references: Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1957 Jul;45(3):426-8
references: 16017049
references: Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1992 Oct;80(4):340-6
references: 1422504
references: J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Jul;97(3):203-11
references: 19626146
references: Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1980 Oct;68(4):327-35
references: 7437587
references: Science. 2011 Jan 14;331(6014):176-82
references: 21163965