title: Working memory effects in speeded RSVP tasks.
abstract: The present paper examines the effects of memory contents and memory load in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) speeded tasks, trying to explain previous inconsistent results. We used a one target (Experiment 1) and a two-target (Experiment 2) RSVP task with a concurrent memory load of one or four items, in a dual-task paradigm. A relation between material in working memory and the target in the RSVP impaired the identification of the target. In Experiments 3 and 4, the single task was to determine whether any information in memory matched the target in the RSVP, while varying the memory load. A match was detected faster than a non-match, although only when there was some distance between targets in the RSVP (Experiment 4). The results suggest that memory contents automatically capture attention, slowing processing when the memory contents are irrelevant to the task, and speeding processing when they are relevant.
authors: Departamento de Psicología Social y Metodología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Ivan Pavlov, 6, 28049, Madrid, Spain, bgil.gomezdelianno@uam.es.
authors: Beatriz
authors: B
authors: Gil-Gómez de Liaño
authors: Mary C
authors: MC
authors: Potter
authors: Carmen
authors: C
authors: Rodríguez
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Jul;125(3):319-33
references: 17116291
references: Brain Cogn. 2010 Dec;74(3):298-305
references: 20846773
references: Cogn Psychol. 2002 Mar;44(2):105-47
references: 11863322
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jun;137(2):243-7
references: 20673859
references: Mem Cognit. 2005 Jun;33(4):654-63
references: 16248330
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Apr;31(2):248-61
references: 15826228
references: Mem Cognit. 2007 Jun;35(4):621-7
references: 17848020
references: Science. 1966 Aug 5;153(3736):652-4
references: 5939936
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Oct;32(5):1243-65
references: 17002535
references: Mem Cognit. 1998 Sep;26(5):1014-32
references: 9796233
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Dec;37(6):1915-23
references: 22022894
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):364-79
references: 16634676
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 8;102(45):16524-9
references: 16258067
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222
references: 7605061
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1275-91
references: 19803636
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jun;63(6):1085-103
references: 19787551
references: Psychol Rev. 1989 Jul;96(3):433-58
references: 2756067
references: PLoS One. 2011 Feb 02;6(2):e16696
references: 21311753
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Apr;33(2):363-77
references: 17469973
references: Psychol Sci. 2000 Nov;11(6):467-73
references: 11202491