title: Similarity-dissimilarity competition in disjunctive classification tasks.
abstract: Typical disjunctive artificial classification tasks require participants to sort stimuli according to rules such as "x likes cars only when black and coupe OR white and SUV." For categories like this, increasing the salience of the diagnostic dimensions has two simultaneous effects: increasing the distance between members of the same category and increasing the distance between members of opposite categories. Potentially, these two effects respectively hinder and facilitate classification learning, leading to competing predictions for learning. Increasing saliency may lead to members of the same category to be considered lesssimilar, while the members of separate categories might be considered moredissimilar. This implies a similarity-dissimilarity competition between two basic classification processes. When focusing on sub-category similarity, one would expect more difficult classification when members of the same category become less similar (disregarding the increase of between-category dissimilarity); however, the between-category dissimilarity increase predicts a less difficult classification. Our categorization study suggests that participants rely more on using dissimilarities between opposite categories than finding similarities between sub-categories. We connect our results to rule- and exemplar-based classification models. The pattern of influences of within- and between-category similarities are challenging for simple single-process categorization systems based on rules or exemplars. Instead, our results suggest that either these processes should be integrated in a hybrid model, or that category learning operates by forming clusters within each category.
authors: Department of Psychology, Université de Franche-Comté Besançon, France.
authors: Fabien
authors: F
authors: Mathy
authors: Harry H
authors: HH
authors: Haladjian
authors: Eric
authors: E
authors: Laurent
authors: Robert L
authors: RL
authors: Goldstone
keywords: categorization; dimension saliency; disjunctive rules; exemplar-based; hybrid; learning; rule-based; similarity effects
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Mar;133(1):63-82
references: 14979752
references: Mem Cognit. 2009 Sep;37(6):715-29
references: 19679853
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Mar;130(1):116-39
references: 11293456
references: Nature. 2000 Oct 5;407(6804):630-3
references: 11034211
references: Cognition. 1994 Aug;52(2):125-57
references: 7924201
references: Cognition. 1998 Jan;65(2-3):197-230
references: 9557383
references: Psychol Rev. 1994 Jan;101(1):53-79
references: 8121960
references: Mem Cognit. 1994 Jul;22(4):377-86
references: 7934944
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Dec;8(4):629-47
references: 11848582
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1984 Jan;10(1):104-14
references: 6242730
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998 May;24(3):732-53
references: 9606933
references: Cognition. 1998 Jan;65(2-3):231-62
references: 9557384
references: Cognition. 2001 Jan;78(1):27-43
references: 11062321
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Dec;16(6):1050-7
references: 19966254
references: J Exp Psychol. 1953 Mar;45(3):175-82
references: 13052849
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994 Jun;123(2):178-200
references: 8014612
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998 Jun;127(2):107-40
references: 9622910
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jul;35(4):1062-80
references: 19586270
references: Mem Cognit. 1994 May;22(3):352-69
references: 8007837
references: Cogn Process. 2011 May;12(2):161-75
references: 21080030
references: Mem Cognit. 2003 Jul;31(5):790-9
references: 12956243
references: Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):309-32
references: 15065912
references: Mem Cognit. 1996 Sep;24(5):608-28
references: 8870531
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1986 Mar;115(1):39-61
references: 2937873
references: Psychol Sci. 2008 Jun;19(6):585-92
references: 18578849
references: Cognition. 1998 Jan;65(2-3):167-96
references: 9557382
references: Cognition. 2009 Jul;112(1):105-19
references: 19426967
references: Cogn Sci. 2010 Sep 1;34(7):1244-1286
references: 21116483
references: Cognition. 2011 Oct;121(1):83-100
references: 21733497
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Oct;60(10):1337-46
references: 17853242
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 May 1;5(5):204-210
references: 11323265
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jan;26(1):3-27
references: 10682288
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Mar;20(2):443-460
references: 8151279
references: Cogn Psychol. 2011 Aug;63(1):34-59
references: 21679784
references: Science. 1987 Sep 11;237(4820):1317-23
references: 3629243
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jan;64(1):41-64
references: 20680890
references: Psychol Rev. 1998 Jul;105(3):442-81
references: 9697427