title: Effects of biofilm growth on plasmid copy number and expression of antibiotic resistance genes in Enterococcus faecalis.
abstract: Biofilm growth causes increased average plasmid copy number as well as increased copy number heterogeneity in Enterococcus faecalis cells carrying plasmid pCF10. In this study, we examined whether biofilm growth affected the copy number and expression of antibiotic resistance determinants for several plasmids with diverse replication systems. Four different E. faecalis plasmids, unrelated to pCF10, demonstrated increased copy number in biofilm cells. In biofilm cells, we also observed increased transcription of antibiotic resistance genes present on these plasmids. The increase in plasmid copy number correlated with increased plating efficiency on high concentrations of antibiotics. Single-cell analysis of strains carrying two different plasmids suggested that the increase in plasmid copy number associated with biofilm growth was restricted to a subpopulation of biofilm cells. Regrowth of harvested biofilm cells in liquid culture resulted in a rapid reduction of plasmid copy number to that observed in the planktonic state. These results suggest a possible mechanism by which biofilm growth could reduce susceptibility to antibiotics in clinical settings.
authors: Department of Microbiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
authors: L C
authors: LC
authors: Cook
authors: G M
authors: GM
authors: Dunny
mesh_terms: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000494:pharmacology*; D018441:Biofilms / Q000187:drug effects*; D024881:Drug Resistance, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics; D013293:Enterococcus faecalis / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000235:genetics; D010957:Plasmids / Q000235:genetics*
chemical_list: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents
references: Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010 Apr;35(4):322-32
references: 20149602
references: Plasmid. 2000 Sep;44(2):183-90
references: 10964628
references: Plasmid. 1996 Jan;35(1):46-57
references: 8693026
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 May 1;29(9):e45
references: 11328886
references: J Bacteriol. 2009 Apr;191(8):2806-14
references: 19218379
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jul;75(7):3479-83
references: 98769
references: Gene. 1991 Jun 15;102(1):99-104
references: 1864514
references: Mol Microbiol. 2009 Nov;74(3):609-18
references: 19775247
references: Plasmid. 1981 Nov;6(3):270-8
references: 6796985
references: Lancet. 2001 Jul 14;358(9276):135-8
references: 11463434
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Oct 1;89(19):9020-4
references: 1384040
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Mar;61(3):860-7
references: 7793920
references: J Bacteriol. 2012 Apr;194(8):2062-73
references: 22343293
references: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998 Jun;62(2):434-64
references: 9618448
references: Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007 Jan;20(1):79-114
references: 17223624
references: J Bacteriol. 2007 Feb;189(4):1399-406
references: 17098891
references: Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990 Jan;3(1):46-65
references: 2404568
references: Mol Microbiol. 2011 Sep;81(6):1499-510
references: 21843206
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Jan;56(1):195-201
references: 16348091
references: J Bacteriol. 1975 Nov;124(2):784-90
references: 810482
references: J Bacteriol. 1993 Apr;175(7):1900-9
references: 8384618
references: J Bacteriol. 2007 Sep;189(17):6490-3
references: 17586623
references: Genes Dev. 2009 Jul 15;23(14):1631-8
references: 19605685
references: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Jan;47(1):317-23
references: 12499208
references: Microbiology (Reading). 2012 Dec;158(Pt 12):3014-3019
references: 23023972
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Jun 15;97(3):439-46
references: 17058286
references: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Jun;53(6):2354-9
references: 19332680