title: Control of finger force vectors with changes in fingertip referent coordinates.
abstract: The central hypothesis explored in the experiment is that adjustments of fingertip force vectors during object manipulation could result from a simple scaling rule applied to commands to individual digits. The commands have been associated with referent coordinates of the digit tips. The subjects performed quick lifting movements (over 20 cm in under 0.5 s) of a horizontally oriented handle with different combinations of the external load and torque. The prismatic grasp was used with the 4 fingers pressing on the bottom of the handle and the thumb acting on its top. Principal component and correlation analyses applied to the normal and tangential force vector components confirmed that the force direction of each digit was kept nearly constant in the object-centered referent frame across the loading conditions and movement phases. The middle and ring fingers showed weaker correlations between the force components as compared to the index and little fingers. The differences were likely related to the different roles of the normal force components in the moment of force production. The neural control of the hand, within the studied task, may be adequately described as a simple rule applied to a handful of parameters, such as the referent digit-tip coordinates.
authors: Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
authors: Yen-Hsun
authors: YH
authors: Wu
authors: Vladimir M
authors: VM
authors: Zatsiorsky
authors: Mark L
authors: ML
authors: Latash
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena / Q000502:physiology; D005385:Fingers / Q000502:physiology*; D018737:Hand Strength / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D017770:Lifting; D008297:Male; D009068:Movement; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D019415:Torque; D016474:Weight-Bearing / Q000502:physiology
references: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5(11):1226-35
references: 12404008
references: J Mot Behav. 2008 Sep;40(5):446-76
references: 18782719
references: Exp Brain Res. 2009 Mar;194(1):1-15
references: 19048236
references: Motor Control. 2010 Jul;14(3):294-322
references: 20702893
references: J Neurosci. 1999 Apr 15;19(8):3238-47
references: 10191336
references: Exp Brain Res. 2009 Mar;194(1):39-58
references: 19082821
references: Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jan;216(2):249-61
references: 22071684
references: Biol Cybern. 2012 Dec;106(11-12):757-65
references: 22895830
references: Exp Brain Res. 2011 Feb;208(3):423-35
references: 21104236
references: Exp Brain Res. 2010 Apr;202(1):213-29
references: 20033397
references: Neurosci Lett. 2009 Jun 19;457(1):16-20
references: 19429153
references: J Neurophysiol. 1999 Apr;81(4):1706-17
references: 10200206
references: Exp Brain Res. 2012 Mar;217(1):1-5
references: 22246105
references: Exp Brain Res. 2003 Jan;148(1):77-87
references: 12478398
references: Exp Brain Res. 1988;71(1):72-86
references: 3416959
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Jan;14(1):31-9
references: 20005767
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999 Dec;9(6):718-27
references: 10607637
references: Exp Brain Res. 2012 Oct;222(3):277-90
references: 22910900
references: Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jul;181(1):49-67
references: 17340124