title: Salmonella enterica suppresses Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum population and soft rot progression by acidifying the microaerophilic environment.
abstract: Although enteric human pathogens are usually studied in the context of their animal hosts, a significant portion of their life cycle occurs on plants. Plant disease alters the phyllosphere, leading to enhanced growth of human pathogens; however, the impact of human pathogens on phytopathogen biology and plant health is largely unknown. To characterize the interaction between human pathogens and phytobacterial pathogens in the phyllosphere, we examined the interactions between Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum and Salmonella enterica or Escherichia coli O157:H7 with regard to bacterial populations, soft rot progression, and changes in local pH. The presence of P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum enhanced the growth of both S. enterica and E. coli O157:H7 on leaves. However, in a microaerophilic environment, S. enterica reduced P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum populations and soft rot progression by moderating local environmental pH. Reduced soft rot was not due to S. enterica proteolytic activity. Limitations on P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum growth, disease progression, and pH elevation were not observed on leaves coinoculated with E. coli O157:H7 or when leaves were coinoculated with S. enterica in an aerobic environment. S. enterica also severely undermined the relationship between the phytobacterial population and disease progression of a P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum budB mutant defective in the 2,3-butanediol pathway for acid neutralization. Our results show that S. enterica and E. coli O157:H7 interact differently with the enteric phytobacterial pathogen P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum. S. enterica inhibition of soft rot progression may conceal a rapidly growing human pathogen population. Whereas soft rotted produce can alert consumers to the possibility of food-borne pathogens, healthy-looking produce may entice consumption of contaminated vegetables.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli O157:H7 may use plants to move between animal and human hosts. Their populations are higher on plants cocolonized with the common bacterial soft rot pathogen Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, turning edible plants into a risk factor for human disease. We inoculated leaves with P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum and S. enterica or E. coli O157:H7 to study the interactions between these bacteria. While P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum enhanced the growth of both S. enterica and E. coli O157:H7, these human pathogens affected P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum fundamentally differently. S. enterica reduced P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum growth and acidified the environment, leading to less soft rot on leaves; E. coli O157:H7 had no such effects. As soft rot signals a food safety risk, the reduction of soft rot symptoms in the presence of S. enterica may lead consumers to eat healthy-looking but S. enterica-contaminated produce.
authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
authors: Grace
authors: G
authors: Kwan
authors: Amy O
authors: AO
authors: Charkowski
authors: Jeri D
authors: JD
authors: Barak
mesh_terms: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000378:metabolism*; D000898:Antibiosis; D001419:Bacteria; D002264:Carboxylic Acids / Q000378:metabolism*; D004777:Environment; D004926:Escherichia coli; D019453:Escherichia coli O157 / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D018545:Lactuca; D016973:Pectobacterium carotovorum / Q000254:growth & development*; D010935:Plant Diseases / Q000382:microbiology; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000382:microbiology; D010944:Plants; D019779:Salmonella enterica / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D002264:Carboxylic Acids
references: Mol Plant Pathol. 2003 Jan 1;4(1):17-30
references: 20569359
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Mar;76(5):1375-87
references: 20061451
references: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2003 Mar;16(3):179-87
references: 12650449
references: J Appl Bacteriol. 1971 Jun;34(2):459-75
references: 4329516
references: PLoS One. 2008 Feb 27;3(2):e1657
references: 18301739
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jan;77(1):156-62
references: 21075884
references: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008 Aug 29;57(34):929-34
references: 18756191
references: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2010 Mar;23(3):273-82
references: 20121449
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22974
references: 21876734
references: J Bacteriol. 1987 Jul;169(7):3340-9
references: 3298218
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 May;65(5):1924-9
references: 10223981
references: Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2012;50:241-66
references: 22656644
references: Mol Microbiol. 2011 Nov;82(4):988-97
references: 22032684
references: J Food Prot. 2008 Dec;71(12):2384-8
references: 19244888
references: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2005 Apr;18(4):343-53
references: 15828686
references: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2004 Dec;17(12):1366-75
references: 15597742
references: J Bacteriol. 1982 Sep;151(3):1320-5
references: 7050087
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Apr;69(4):1875-83
references: 12676659
references: Plant Dis. 1997 Aug;81(8):867-872
references: 30866372
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Sep;74(17):5285-9
references: 18641153
references: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2011 Jul;24(7):773-86
references: 21469936
references: J Food Sci. 2010 May;75(4):M187-92
references: 20546408