title: Video games as a means to reduce age-related cognitive decline: attitudes, compliance, and effectiveness.
abstract: Recent research has demonstrated broad benefits of video game play to perceptual and cognitive abilities. These broad improvements suggest that video game-based cognitive interventions may be ideal to combat the many perceptual and cognitive declines associated with advancing age. Furthermore, game interventions have the potential to induce higher rates of intervention compliance compared to other cognitive interventions as they are assumed to be inherently enjoyable and motivating. We explored these issues in an intervention that tested the ability of an action game and a "brain fitness" game to improve a variety of abilities. Cognitive abilities did not significantly improve, suggesting caution when recommending video game interventions as a means to reduce the effects of cognitive aging. However, the game expected to produce the largest benefit based on previous literature (an action game) induced the lowest intervention compliance. We explain this low compliance by participants' ratings of the action game as less enjoyable and by their prediction that training would have few meaningful benefits. Despite null cognitive results, data provide valuable insights into the types of video games older adults are willing to play and why.
authors: Department of Psychology, Florida State University Tallahassee, FL, USA.
authors: Walter R
authors: WR
authors: Boot
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Champion
authors: Daniel P
authors: DP
authors: Blakely
authors: Timothy
authors: T
authors: Wright
authors: Dustin J
authors: DJ
authors: Souders
authors: Neil
authors: N
authors: Charness
keywords: cognitive training; transfer of training; video games
references: Cortex. 2010 Oct;46(9):1165-77
references: 20060111
references: J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975 Oct;23(10):433-41
references: 1159263
references: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Apr;72(3):667-71
references: 20348573
references: Psychol Aging. 1999 Dec;14(4):627-44
references: 10632150
references: Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):765-77
references: 19140648
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jan;136(1):67-72
references: 21062660
references: Psychol Aging. 2000 Mar;15(1):126-47
references: 10755295
references: Curr Biol. 2010 Sep 14;20(17):1573-9
references: 20833324
references: Dev Psychol. 2005 Jul;41(4):661-71
references: 16060812
references: Cognition. 2006 Aug;101(1):217-45
references: 16359652
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29676
references: 22253758
references: Psychol Sci. 2007 Jan;18(1):88-94
references: 17362383
references: Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 13;2:226
references: 21949513
references: Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2008 Oct;9(1):1-65
references: 26162004
references: Nature. 2010 Jun 10;465(7299):775-8
references: 20407435
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993 Oct;34(11):3110-23
references: 8407219
references: Gerontechnology. 2010 Jan 1;9(1):5-17
references: 22973185
references: Comput Human Behav. 2012 May;28(3):984-994
references: 22393270
references: Psychol Aging. 2010 Dec;25(4):753-66
references: 20822257
references: J Opt Soc Am A. 1986 Jun;3(6):864-7
references: 3734925
references: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Mar;52(3):346-52
references: 14962147
references: J Vis. 2010 Dec 29;10(14):
references: 21191129
references: Psychol Aging. 1995 Sep;10(3):478-91
references: 8527068
references: Nat Neurosci. 2009 May;12(5):549-51
references: 19330003
references: Psychol Aging. 2005 Jun;20(2):195-201
references: 16029083
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Dec;32(6):1465-78
references: 17154785
references: Nature. 2003 May 29;423(6939):534-7
references: 12774121
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Nov;129(3):387-98
references: 18929349
references: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Aug 17;6:221
references: 22912609
references: Psychol Aging. 2006 Jun;21(2):333-52
references: 16768579
references: Front Psychol. 2010 Apr 21;1:8
references: 21833191
references: Psychol Bull. 2010 Jul;136(4):659-76
references: 20565172