title: Dissociation between memory retention across a delay and pattern separation following medial prefrontal cortex lesions in the touchscreen TUNL task.
abstract: The neural structures that support the retention of memories over time has been a subject of intense research in cognitive neuroscience. However, recently much attention has turned to pattern separation, the putative process by which memories are stored as unique representations that are resistant to confusion. It remains unclear, however, to what extent these two processes can be neurally dissociated. The trial-unique delayed nonmatching-to-location (TUNL) task was developed to assess spatial working memory and pattern separation function using trial-unique locations on a touch-sensitive screen (Talpos, McTighe, Dias, Saksida, & Bussey, 2010). Using this task, Talpos et al. (2010) showed that lesions of the hippocampus led to both impairments with a 6s delay, and impairments in pattern separation. The present study shows that lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex lead to a different pattern of effects: impairment at the same, 6s delay, but no hint of impairment in pattern separation. In addition, rats with medial prefrontal lesions were more susceptible to interference in this task. When compared with previously published results, these data show that whereas the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus likely interact in the service of working memory across a delay, only the hippocampus and not the medial prefrontal cortex is essential for pattern separation.
authors: University of Cambridge Department of Psychology, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK. kalmcallister@gmail.com
authors: Kathryn A L
authors: KA
authors: McAllister
authors: Lisa M
authors: LM
authors: Saksida
authors: Timothy J
authors: TJ
authors: Bussey
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology; D006624:Hippocampus / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D017397:Prefrontal Cortex / Q000502:physiology* / Q000601:surgery; D051381:Rats; D012153:Retention, Psychology / Q000502:physiology*; D013028:Space Perception; D013997:Time Factors
references: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Dec;4(4):600-8
references: 15849900
references: J Neurosci. 2000 Jun 1;20(11):4320-4
references: 10818167
references: J Neurosci Methods. 1980 Dec;3(2):129-49
references: 6110810
references: Science. 2007 Jul 6;317(5834):94-9
references: 17556551
references: Behav Neurosci. 1994 Oct;108(5):883-91
references: 7826511
references: Neuropsychologia. 2007 Oct 1;45(13):2883-901
references: 17675110
references: Cereb Cortex. 2005 Dec;15(12):2003-12
references: 15788702
references: Biol Psychiatry. 1999 Sep 1;46(5):650-61
references: 10472417
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2000 Apr;10(2):205-10
references: 10753790
references: Nature. 2010 Apr 1;464(7289):763-7
references: 20360742
references: Rev Neurosci. 2004;15(5):333-51
references: 15575490
references: Behav Brain Res. 2006 Dec 15;175(2):329-36
references: 17045348
references: Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9 Suppl 1:257-61; discussion 269-72
references: 9447446
references: Behav Neurosci. 2007 Aug;121(4):698-706
references: 17663595
references: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Jun;174(1):111-25
references: 15205882
references: Mem Cognit. 1973 Mar;1(1):19-40
references: 24214472
references: Behav Brain Res. 2008 Oct 10;192(2):216-25
references: 18499279
references: Behav Neurosci. 2003 Oct;117(5):1044-53
references: 14570553
references: Learn Mem. 2008 Feb 19;15(3):97-105
references: 18285468
references: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;62(4):379-86
references: 15809405
references: Am J Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;167(10):1178-93
references: 20810471
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 16;100(19):11171-5
references: 12958206
references: Behav Neurosci. 2008 Feb;122(1):16-26
references: 18298245
references: Behav Brain Res. 2006 Apr 25;169(1):142-9
references: 16455144
references: Prog Brain Res. 2007;163:567-76
references: 17765738
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 2;107(5):2367-72
references: 20133882
references: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1997 Nov;134(1):73-82
references: 9399369
references: Behav Neurosci. 1996 Dec;110(6):1282-98
references: 8986332
references: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Feb;5(2):162-8
references: 11780144
references: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2010 Oct;94(3):341-52
references: 20692356
references: J Neurosci. 1998 Jan 15;18(2):804-10
references: 9425021
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Nov 29;353(1377):1819-28
references: 9854254
references: Trends Neurosci. 2011 Oct;34(10):515-25
references: 21788086
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Mar;32(2):183-196
references: 16569140
references: J Neurosci. 1998 Feb 15;18(4):1613-21
references: 9454866
references: Science. 2009 Jul 10;325(5937):210-3
references: 19590004
references: Trends Neurosci. 2002 Jul;25(7):340-3
references: 12079756
references: Neuroreport. 2009 Jun 17;20(9):881-5
references: 19421077
references: Behav Brain Res. 2006 Jul 15;171(1):116-26
references: 16677723
references: Hippocampus. 2001;11(6):626-36
references: 11811656
references: Mem Cognit. 1999 Sep;27(5):759-67
references: 10540805
references: Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jan;35(1):86-104
references: 19776728
references: Science. 2009 May 1;324(5927):605
references: 19407193
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Dec;18(1):26-38
references: 14659494
references: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Nov;37(9 Pt B):2111-24
references: 22464948
references: Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28;139(1):181-93
references: 16337090
references: Science. 1997 Jul 18;277(5324):376-80
references: 9219696