title: The genetic analysis of tolerance to infections: a review.
abstract: Tolerance to infections is defined as the ability of a host to limit the impact of a given pathogen burden on host performance. Uncoupling resistance and tolerance is a challenge, and there is a need to be able to separate them using specific trait recording or statistical methods. We present three statistical methods that can be used to investigate genetics of tolerance-related traits. Firstly, using random regressions, tolerance can be analyzed as a reaction norm slope in which host performance (y-axis) is regressed against an increasing pathogen burden (x-axis). Genetic variance in tolerance slopes is the genetic variance for tolerance. Variation in tolerance can induce genotype re-ranking and changes in genetic and phenotypic variation in host performance along the pathogen burden trajectory, contributing to environment-dependent genetic responses to selection. Such genotype-by-environment interactions can be quantified by combining random regressions and covariance functions. To apply random regressions, pathogen burden of individuals needs to be recorded. Secondly, when pathogen burden is not recorded, the cure model for time-until-death data allows separating two traits, susceptibility and endurance. Susceptibility is whether or not an individual was susceptible to an infection, whereas endurance denotes how long time it took until the infection killed a susceptible animal (influenced by tolerance). Thirdly, the normal mixture model can be used to classify continuously distributed host performance, such as growth rate, into different sub-classes (e.g., non-infected and infected), which allows estimation of host performance reduction specific to infected individuals. Moreover, genetics of host performance can be analyzed separately in healthy and affected animals, even in the absence of pathogen burden and survival data. These methods provide novel tools to increase our understanding on the impact of parasites, pathogens, and production diseases on host traits.
authors: Biotechnology and Food Research, Biometrical Genetics, MTT Agrifood Research Finland Jokioinen, Finland.
authors: Antti
authors: A
authors: Kause
authors: Jørgen
authors: J
authors: Odegård
keywords: cure model; genotype-by-environment interaction; mixture model; quantitative genetics; random regression; resistance; statistical methods; tolerance
references: J Dairy Sci. 2000 Oct;83(10):2341-9
references: 11049078
references: Evolution. 1994 Dec;48(6):1973-1985
references: 28565152
references: J Exp Bot. 2002 Dec;53(379):2381-92
references: 12432030
references: J Dairy Sci. 2008 Nov;91(11):4355-64
references: 18946141
references: Biometrics. 1982 Dec;38(4):1041-6
references: 7168793
references: Genet Sel Evol. 2004 Sep-Oct;36(5):489-507
references: 15339629
references: Br Poult Sci. 2005 Feb;46(1):35-42
references: 15835250
references: Genet Sel Evol. 2004 Jan-Feb;36(1):3-27
references: 14713407
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 30;105(52):20786-91
references: 19088200
references: J Dairy Sci. 2011 Jun;94(6):3137-47
references: 21605783
references: Genet Sel Evol. 2011 Mar 21;43:14
references: 21418636
references: Genet Sel Evol. 2003;35 Suppl 1:S3-17
references: 12927077
references: Poult Sci. 1998 Oct;77(10):1565-73
references: 9776067
references: Int J Parasitol. 1996 Aug-Sep;26(8-9):857-68
references: 8923135
references: Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Mar 19;41:30
references: 19296859
references: J Dairy Sci. 2005 Jul;88(7):2652-9
references: 15956327
references: Genetics. 2008 Sep;180(1):507-16
references: 18757927
references: Genet Sel Evol. 2004 Jul-Aug;36(4):435-54
references: 15231233
references: Poult Sci. 2006 Jan;85(1):32-8
references: 16493943
references: Genetics. 1990 Apr;124(4):979-93
references: 2323560
references: Heredity (Edinb). 2010 Jan;104(1):20-7
references: 19773806
references: J Anim Sci. 2000 Nov;78(11):2809-20
references: 11063303
references: J Dairy Sci. 2000 Sep;83(9):2126-30
references: 11003247
references: Evolution. 2000 Jun;54(3):1024-9
references: 10937274
references: J Anim Sci. 2011 Apr;89(4):943-50
references: 21148783
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jun 24;100(13):7443-8
references: 12805560
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Jul 22;272(1571):1415-25
references: 16011915
references: J Anim Sci. 2004 Nov;82(11):3111-7
references: 15542456
references: J Dairy Sci. 2002 Nov;85(11):3092-100
references: 12487476
references: J Dairy Sci. 2003 Nov;86(11):3694-703
references: 14672200
references: G3 (Bethesda). 2012 May;2(5):527-35
references: 22670223
references: Genet Sel Evol. 2007 Sep-Oct;39(5):529-43
references: 17897595
references: Int J Parasitol. 1987 Oct;17(7):1355-63
references: 3429127
references: Genet Res (Camb). 2010 Feb;92(1):1-11
references: 20196893
references: Biometrics. 1982 Sep;38(3):623-40
references: 7171692
references: Genet Res. 2001 Aug;78(1):31-40
references: 11556135
references: Nature. 2001 Jun 14;411(6839):857-64
references: 11459070
references: J Anim Sci. 2001 Jul;79(7):1723-33
references: 11465359
references: J Anim Sci. 2012 Jul;90(7):2109-19
references: 22267000
references: Parasitology. 1995 Jun;110 ( Pt 5):573-81
references: 7596641
references: J Anim Sci. 2009 Mar;87(3):876-84
references: 18952741
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Mar;14(3):96-101
references: 10322508
references: Evolution. 1985 May;39(3):505-522
references: 28561964
references: Genet Res (Camb). 2011 Aug;93(4):291-302
references: 21767462
references: J Anim Sci. 2007 Nov;85(11):2854-60
references: 17504968
references: Science. 2012 Feb 24;335(6071):936-41
references: 22363001
references: Evolution. 2004 Jan;58(1):203-6
references: 15058734