title: Noninvasive predictors of subdural grid seizure localization in children with nonlesional focal epilepsy.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Subdural grid evaluation (SDE) in refractory focal epilepsy aims to precisely define the ictal onset zone and map eloquent cortex. In a small but significant proportion of children, SDE shows multifocal or diffuse, rather than focal, seizure onset. Resective epilepsy surgery is denied, or is unsuccessful, in the majority of such patients. The authors investigated whether the noninvasive data could be abstracted to predict subsequent SDE electrographic outcome (focal vs. multifocal/diffuse ictal onset).
  
  
  METHODS
  The authors retrospectively reviewed charts of 66 children with refractory focal epilepsy undergoing SDE at Cleveland Clinic over a 7-year period, studied previously by Pestana Knight et al. A semiquantitative "score" summarizing the localizing value and concordance between selected noninvasive investigations (interictal and ictal EEG; positron emission tomography [PET], and/or single-photon emission computed tomography [SPECT]), as well as Bayesian predictors of individual investigations and their combinations, were adapted from the study of Kalamangalam et al to the subset of patients with nonlesional cranial MRI.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Forty (60.6%) patients had a single MRI brain lesion, 7 (10.6%) had bilateral or diffuse MRI changes, and 19 (28.8%) were nonlesional. Subdural grid evaluation ictal onset was nonfocal in four patients in the first group (10%) and in two patients (28.5%) in the second group. One patient in the third (nonlesional) group was excluded because of incomplete data. In the remainder (n = 18), SDE ictal onset was multifocal or diffuse in 5 (27.8%) and focal in 13 (72.2%). Focality on SDE was positively correlated with higher noninvasive scores in the nonlesional patient group (χ test, P < 0.025). Bayesian predictors in this group were highest for concordance between the interictal and ictal scalp EEG (likelihood ratio = 3.85). Considered separately, interictal and ictal EEG were of equivalent predictive value (likelihood ratio = 2.3 and 2.1, respectively). Metabolic imaging was the least useful modality.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  (1) Diffuse or multifocal ictal onsets on SDE are almost three times as likely in nonlesional patients as in those with a single definite MRI brain lesion. (ii) The noninvasive data of children with nonlesional brain MRI may be summarized by a score that rewards localizing information and intermodality concordance: low-scoring patients are more likely to exhibit diffuse or multifocal ictal onset on subsequent SDE. (iii) Bayesian likelihood ratios predictive of ictal focality on SDE are highly favorable for concordant scalp interictal-ictal EEG combinations. (iv) Decision-theoretic methods of this type may find use in the selection of nonlesional pediatric presurgical candidates offered SDE.
authors: Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
authors: Giridhar P
authors: GP
authors: Kalamangalam
authors: Elia M
authors: EM
authors: Pestana Knight
authors: Shyam
authors: S
authors: Visweswaran
authors: Ajay
authors: A
authors: Gupta
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D001931:Brain Mapping; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004569:Electroencephalography; D004828:Epilepsies, Partial / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D008297:Male; D011877:Radionuclide Imaging; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012640:Seizures / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology*
references: Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Aug;121(8):1153-75
references: 20185365
references: J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 Sep;8(3):269-78
references: 21882919
references: Pediatr Neurosurg. 1995;22(4):174-80
references: 7619717
references: J Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Oct;26(5):333-41
references: 20168131
references: Neurology. 2007 Jul 24;69(4):389-97
references: 17646632
references: Neurology. 2001 Jun 26;56(12):1650-8
references: 11425929
references: Epilepsia. 2000;41 Suppl 3:S61-74
references: 11001338
references: J Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Sep;16(5):408-18
references: 10576223
references: J Nucl Med. 2010 Dec;51(12):1901-7
references: 21078805
references: J Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Sep;16(5):426-38
references: 10576225
references: Epilepsia. 2008 May;49(5):758-64
references: 18266748