title: Perception of time in articulated visual events.
abstract: Perceived duration of a sensory event often exceeds its actual duration. This phenomenon is called time dilation. The distortion may occur because sensory systems are optimized for perception within their respective modalities and not for perception of time. We investigated how the dilation of visual events depends on the duration and content of events. Observers compared the durations of two successive visual stimuli while the luminance of one of the stimuli was modulated at different temporal frequencies. Time dilation correlated with the frequency of modulation and the duration of the stimulus: the faster the modulation and the longer the stimulus duration, the larger the dilation. Notably, time dilation was also accompanied by a decreased sensitivity to stimulus duration. We show that these results are consistent with the notion that stimulus duration is estimated using measurement intervals of the lengths that depend on stimulus frequency content. Estimation of temporal frequency content is more precise using longer measurement intervals, whereas estimation of temporal location is more precise using shorter ones. As a result, visual perception will benefit from using longer intervals when the stimulus is modulated so that its frequency content is measured more precisely. A side effect of using longer temporal intervals is a larger uncertainty about the timing of stimulus offset (temporal location), ensuing time dilation and the reduction of sensitivity to duration. Our findings support the view that time dilation follows from basic principles of measurement and from the notion that visual systems are optimized for visual perception rather than for perception of time.
authors: Functional Brain Mapping Laboratory, Department of Fundamental Neuroscience, University of Geneva Geneva, Switzerland.
authors: Gijs
authors: G
authors: Plomp
authors: Cees
authors: C
authors: van Leeuwen
authors: Sergei
authors: S
authors: Gepshtein
keywords: dilation; duration estimation; measurement; optimality; time perception; uncertainty principle; vision
references: J Vis. 2012 Apr 02;12(4):
references: 22469816
references: J Vis. 2007 Jul 06;7(10):2.1-5
references: 17997671
references: Psychol Sci. 2003 May;14(3):225-31
references: 12741745
references: Percept Mot Skills. 1974 Aug;39(1):63-82
references: 4415924
references: Percept Psychophys. 1983 Feb;33(2):113-20
references: 6844102
references: Percept Mot Skills. 1963 Apr;16:376
references: 13948719
references: Percept Psychophys. 1998 Nov;60(8):1305-17
references: 9865072
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:307-40
references: 15217335
references: J Vis. 2006 Dec 15;6(12):1421-30
references: 17209745
references: J Neurosci. 2005 Nov 9;25(45):10369-71
references: 16280574
references: J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 5;28(10):2539-50
references: 18322098
references: J Exp Psychol. 1974 Jul;103(1):156-9
references: 4418727
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jul;12(7):273-80
references: 18539519
references: Percept Psychophys. 2007 Aug;69(6):952-7
references: 18018976
references: Front Neuroinform. 2008 Nov 04;2:4
references: 19050754
references: J Opt Soc Am. 1979 Oct;69(10):1340-9
references: 521853
references: Percept Psychophys. 2004 Oct;66(7):1171-89
references: 15751474
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 1984;35:1-36
references: 6367623
references: Vision Res. 2006 Sep;46(18):2926-33
references: 16647741
references: Percept Mot Skills. 1974 Aug;39(1):295-307
references: 4415925
references: J Vis. 2007 Jun 21;7(8):8
references: 17685815