title: When forgetting preserves memory.
abstract: There has been a resurgence of interest in defining the circumstances leading to memory modifications. Studies have shown that reactivating a supposedly stable memory re-introduces a time-limited window of plasticity during which presentation of interfering material can cause long-term memory changes. The present study asks whether such memory changes can be prevented if people are instructed to forget the memory before the new material is encoded. Participants learned a set of objects. After 48 h, they were reminded of this learning episode, and learned another set of objects. Again 48 h later, they recalled the first (Exp. 1) or second set (Exp. 3). As shown previously, a reminder caused intrusions from the second set into recall of the first set. Here I show that the instruction to forget the first set significantly diminished intrusions from the second set, especially when the instruction was given before the new set was encoded in the second session. Experiment 2 suggests that the reduced intrusions were due to list segregation/isolation, rather than temporarily inhibited access to Set 1. Taken together, the study shows that the attempt to forget a memory can immunize it such that the presentation of interfering material has limited effects, and the memory can be recalled unchanged in the future. This is important when veridical memory is essential, such as in eyewitness testimonies.
authors: Department of Psychology, Lehigh University Bethlehem, PA, USA.
authors: Almut
authors: A
authors: Hupbach
keywords: episodic memory; intentional forgetting; list learning; memory modification; memory reconsolidation
references: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2010 Jan;93(1):77-84
references: 19703575
references: J Neurosci. 2004 May 19;24(20):4787-95
references: 15152039
references: Science. 2000 Jan 14;287(5451):248-51
references: 10634773
references: Learn Mem. 2008 Aug 06;15(8):574-9
references: 18685148
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Mar;10(3):224-34
references: 19229241
references: Mem Cognit. 2005 Jun;33(4):577-87
references: 16248323
references: Front Behav Neurosci. 2011 May 17;5:24
references: 21629821
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1983 Mar;112(1):58-72
references: 6221062
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:141-67
references: 19575608
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jul;35(4):970-88
references: 19586264
references: Memory. 2009 Jul;17(5):502-10
references: 19468955
references: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2012 Mar;97(3):338-45
references: 22406658
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1064-72
references: 12450332
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Sep;33(5):977-82
references: 17723074
references: Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;21(7):1036-42
references: 20548055
references: Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):66-73
references: 19037905
references: Memory. 2010 Oct;18(7):763-73
references: 20924949
references: Mem Cognit. 2011 Apr;39(3):403-11
references: 21264601
references: Neuron. 2006 May 4;50(3):479-89
references: 16675401
references: Prog Neurobiol. 2012 Oct;99(1):61-80
references: 22877586
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jul;31(4):789-801
references: 16060780
references: Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2017 Apr;26(2):197-206
references: 28458471
references: Learn Mem. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):361-6
references: 16027179
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):54-65
references: 20053044
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Sep;36(5):1346-54
references: 20804302
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Mar;63(3):425-33
references: 19921597
references: Learn Mem. 2007 Jan 03;14(1-2):47-53
references: 17202429
references: Trends Neurosci. 2009 Aug;32(8):413-20
references: 19640595
references: Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jul;12(7):905-12
references: 19543280