title: The flexibility of letter-position flexibility: evidence from eye movements in reading Hebrew.
abstract: Hebrew provides an intriguing contrast to European languages. On the one hand, like any European language, it has an alphabetic script. On the other hand, being a Semitic language, it differs in the structure of base words. By monitoring eye movements, we examined the time-course of processing letter transpositions in Hebrew and assessed their impact on reading different types of Hebrew words that differ in their internal structure. We found that letter transposition resulted in dramatic reading costs for words with Semitic word structure, and much smaller costs for non-Semitic words. Moreover, the strongest impact of transposition occurred where root-letter transposition resulted in a pseudo-root, where significant interference emerged already in first fixation duration. Our findings thus suggest that Hebrew readers differentiate between Semitic and non-Semitic forms already at first fixation, at the early phase of word recognition. Moreover, letters are differentially processed across the visual array, given their morphological structure and their contribution to recovering semantic meaning. We conclude that flexibility or rigidity in encoding letter position is determined by cues regarding the internal structure of printed words.
authors: Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel. hadas.velan@gmail.com
authors: Hadas
authors: H
authors: Velan
authors: Avital
authors: A
authors: Deutsch
authors: Ram
authors: R
authors: Frost
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D053483:Eye Movement Measurements / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000523:psychology; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D011578:Psycholinguistics / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D011932:Reading; D055815:Young Adult
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):296-7
references: 22929590
references: Cereb Cortex. 2002 Mar;12(3):297-305
references: 11839603
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):191-212
references: 22060141
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Oct;34(5):1261-76
references: 18823209
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jul;24(7):1610-24
references: 22185490
references: Cognition. 2011 Feb;118(2):141-56
references: 21163472
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1327-39
references: 16393049
references: Nat Neurosci. 2000 Mar;3(3):264-9
references: 10700259
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1293-326
references: 16393048
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Jun;17(3):375-80
references: 20551361
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Aug;62(8):1457-506
references: 19449261
references: Psychol Bull. 1998 Nov;124(3):372-422
references: 9849112
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):308-9
references: 22929623
references: J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2012;24(4):476-495
references: 23082239
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Sep;59(9):1600-13
references: 16873111
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):415-22
references: 12921418
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jul;35(4):943-69
references: 19586263
references: Cognition. 2007 Dec;105(3):691-703
references: 17217942
references: Science. 2012 Apr 13;336(6078):245-8
references: 22499949
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):283-4
references: 22929150
references: Lang Cogn Process. 2011 Jan 1;26(4-6):482-508
references: 22933829
references: Mem Cognit. 2003 Sep;31(6):829-41
references: 14651292
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):263-79
references: 22929057
references: J Mem Lang. 2009 Oct 1;61(3):285-302
references: 20161017
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Feb;33(1):209-29
references: 17311489
references: Brain Lang. 2004 Mar;88(3):294-311
references: 14967213
references: Neuron. 2001 Sep 13;31(5):681-97
references: 11567610
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Sep;22(9):2042-57
references: 19583463
references: Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):192-3
references: 16507057
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):287
references: 22929059
references: Psychol Rev. 2010 Jul;117(3):713-58
references: 20658851
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):913-8
references: 18087959