title: Remembering what could have happened: neural correlates of episodic counterfactual thinking.
abstract: Recent evidence suggests that our capacities to remember the past and to imagine what might happen in the future largely depend on the same core brain network that includes the middle temporal lobe, the posterior cingulate/retrosplenial cortex, the inferior parietal lobe, the medial prefrontal cortex, and the lateral temporal cortex. However, the extent to which regions of this core brain network are also responsible for our capacity to think about what could have happened in our past, yet did not occur (i.e., episodic counterfactual thinking), is still unknown. The present study examined this issue. Using a variation of the experimental recombination paradigm (Addis, Pan, Vu, Laiser, & Schacter, 2009. Neuropsychologia. 47: 2222-2238), participants were asked both to remember personal past events and to envision alternative outcomes to such events while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. Three sets of analyses were performed on the imaging data in order to investigate two related issues. First, a mean-centered spatiotemporal partial least square (PLS) analysis identified a pattern of brain activity across regions of the core network that was common to episodic memory and episodic counterfactual thinking. Second, a non-rotated PLS analysis identified two different patterns of brain activity for likely and unlikely episodic counterfactual thoughts, with the former showing significant overlap with the set of regions engaged during episodic recollection. Finally, a parametric modulation was conducted to explore the differential engagement of brain regions during counterfactual thinking, revealing that areas such as the parahippocampal gyrus and the right hippocampus were modulated by the subjective likelihood of counterfactual simulations. These results suggest that episodic counterfactual thinking engages regions that form the core brain network, and also that the subjective likelihood of our counterfactual thoughts modulates the engagement of different areas within this set of regions.
authors: Department of Psychology, UNC, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States; Department of Psychology, Harvard University, William James Hall, 33 Kirkland St., Cambridge, MA 02138, United States. Electronic address: brigard@wjh.harvard.edu.
authors: F
authors: F
authors: De Brigard
authors: D R
authors: DR
authors: Addis
authors: J H
authors: JH
authors: Ford
authors: D L
authors: DL
authors: Schacter
authors: K S
authors: KS
authors: Giovanello
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology; D001931:Brain Mapping; D005260:Female; D006624:Hippocampus / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination / Q000502:physiology*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D061212:Memory, Episodic; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D020534:Parahippocampal Gyrus / Q000502:physiology*; D013850:Thinking / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Counterfactual thinking; Episodic memory; FMRI; Imagination; Mental time travel; Partial least squares
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jul;11(7):299-306
references: 17548229
references: Psychol Aging. 2011 Mar;26(1):80-4
references: 21058863
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 9;104(2):642-7
references: 17202254
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Sep;19(9):1520-34
references: 17714013
references: Conscious Cogn. 2012 Sep;21(3):1085-96
references: 22818200
references: Behav Neurol. 2010;23(4):225-7
references: 21422561
references: Nature. 2007 Nov 1;450(7166):102-5
references: 17960136
references: Psychol Rev. 2000 Apr;107(2):261-88
references: 10789197
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 2008 Feb;117(1):247-51
references: 18266503
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 May 29;362(1481):773-86
references: 17395575
references: Conscious Cogn. 2004 Dec;13(4):844-58
references: 15522635
references: Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2908-22
references: 22001264
references: Neuron. 2012 Nov 21;76(4):677-94
references: 23177955
references: Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov;49(13):3656-69
references: 21945808
references: Mem Cognit. 2006 Dec;34(8):1644-51
references: 17489291
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Dec 1;5(12):533-539
references: 11728911
references: Hippocampus. 1999;9(1):7-24
references: 10088896
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 May 12;364(1521):1291-300
references: 19528010
references: Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;22(1):80-6
references: 21148459
references: Psychol Bull. 1997 Jan;121(1):133-48
references: 9000895
references: Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;19(1):33-41
references: 18181789
references: Conscious Cogn. 2008 Mar;17(1):330-4
references: 17540581
references: Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jul;19(7):1539-48
references: 18980949
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Oct 1;6(10):426-431
references: 12413576
references: Hippocampus. 2008;18(2):227-37
references: 18157862
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1970 Jul;15(3):234-9
references: 5485415
references: Hippocampus. 2004;14(1):5-8
references: 15058477
references: Am Psychol. 1981 Feb;36(2):129-48
references: 7224324
references: Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 1;50(2):709-16
references: 20045470
references: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jun;48(7):2091-7
references: 20381507
references: Psychol Aging. 2010 Jun;25(2):369-76
references: 20545421
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Sep;16(7):1131-42
references: 15453969
references: Neuroimage. 2008 Mar 1;40(1):398-407
references: 18164213
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 30;104(5):1726-31
references: 17229836
references: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jan 04;5:173
references: 22291625
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 2;107(44):19044-8
references: 20956323
references: Neuroimage. 2003 Aug;19(4):1369-80
references: 12948695
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Sep;8(9):657-61
references: 17700624
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13858-63
references: 21810986
references: Hippocampus. 1999;9(6):637-43
references: 10641756
references: Neuropsychologia. 2007 Apr 8;45(7):1363-77
references: 17126370
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:1-25
references: 11752477
references: Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):371-83
references: 15641426
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Aug;22(8):1701-13
references: 19642887
references: Science. 2004 May 21;304(5674):1167-70
references: 15155951
references: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;5(2):142-62
references: 26162121
references: Hippocampus. 2010 Jun;20(6):685-90
references: 19693779
references: Nature. 2007 Jan 4;445(7123):27
references: 17203045
references: Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan 1;23(1):24-9
references: 22138157
references: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2008 May;12(2):168-92
references: 18453477
references: Behav Brain Res. 2001 Dec 14;127(1-2):199-207
references: 11718892
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:39-60
references: 18400923
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 May 12;364(1521):1263-71
references: 19528007
references: Neuropsychologia. 2009 Oct;47(12):2660-71
references: 19497331
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Mar;21(3):489-510
references: 18510452
references: Conscious Cogn. 2006 Jun;15(2):342-50
references: 16230028
references: Cereb Cortex. 2000 Mar;10(3):308-17
references: 10731225
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):723-6
references: 16099374
references: Hippocampus. 2011 Oct;21(10):1045-52
references: 20882550
references: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Jun;8(5):556-64
references: 22403155
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jun;11(6):258-65
references: 17475537
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:1-38
references: 18400922
references: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Sep;8(9):1255-62
references: 16116457
references: Neuropsychologia. 2009 Sep;47(11):2222-38
references: 19041331
references: Mem Cognit. 1996 Jan;24(1):116-25
references: 8822164
references: Hippocampus. 2004;14(6):752-62
references: 15318333
references: Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1329-34
references: 23673994
references: J Neurosci. 2007 Dec 26;27(52):14365-74
references: 18160644
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Jul 13;31(28):10262-9
references: 21753003
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):49-57
references: 17188554