title: Factors influencing patient safety in Sweden: perceptions of patient safety officers in the county councils.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  National, regional and local activities to improve patient safety in Sweden have increased over the last decade. There are high ambitions for improved patient safety in Sweden. This study surveyed health care professionals who held key positions in their county council's patient safety work to investigate their perceptions of the conditions for this work, factors they believe have been most important in reaching the current level of patient safety and factors they believe would be most important for achieving improved patient safety in the future.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study population consisted of 218 health care professionals holding strategic positions in patient safety work in Swedish county councils. Using a questionnaire, the following topics were analysed in this study: profession/occupation; number of years involved in a designated task on patient safety issues; knowledge/overview of the county council's patient safety work; ability to influence this work; conditions for this work; and the importance of various factors for current and future levels of patient safety.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The response rate to the questionnaire was 79%. The conditions that had the highest number of responses in complete agreement were "patients' involvement is important for patient safety" and "patient safety work has good support from the county council's management". Factors that were considered most important for achieving the current level of patient safety were root cause and risk analyses, incident reporting and the Swedish Patient Safety Law. An organizational culture that encourages reporting and avoids blame was considered most important for improved patient safety in the future, closely followed by improved communication between health care practitioners and patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Health care professionals with important positions in the Swedish county councils' patient safety work believe that conditions for this work are somewhat constrained. They attribute the current levels of patient safety to a broad range of factors and believe that many different solutions can contribute to enhanced patient safety in the future, suggesting that this work must be multifactorial.
authors: Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Health Care Analysis, Linkoping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden. mikaela.nygren@liu.se
authors: Mikaela
authors: M
authors: Nygren
authors: Kerstin
authors: K
authors: Roback
authors: Annica
authors: A
authors: Öhrn
authors: Hans
authors: H
authors: Rutberg
authors: Mikael
authors: M
authors: Rahmqvist
authors: Per
authors: P
authors: Nilsen
mesh_terms: D000288:Administrative Personnel / Q000523:psychology*; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D009726:Nurses / Q000523:psychology; D010358:Patient Participation; D061214:Patient Safety; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology; D060891:Root Cause Analysis; D017751:Safety Management / Q000379:methods*; D013222:State Medicine; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013548:Sweden
references: Healthc Q. 2008;11(3 Spec No.):91-4
references: 18382168
references: Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb;44(1):205-24
references: 18823446
references: Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 17;154(10):693-6
references: 21576538
references: Scand J Public Health. 2009 Mar;37(2):111-6
references: 19244391
references: JAMA. 2005 Sep 7;294(9):1088-100
references: 16145030
references: J Hosp Infect. 2011 Apr;77(4):299-303
references: 21236515
references: J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(4):946-53
references: 16834517
references: Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2009;22(2):168-82
references: 19536967
references: J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Jan;18(1):61-7
references: 12534766
references: N Z Med J. 2002 Dec 13;115(1167):U271
references: 12552260
references: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Mar;35(3):139-45
references: 19326805
references: N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 28;351(18):1838-48
references: 15509817
references: BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Jan;20(1):108-14
references: 21228083
references: Lakartidningen. 2012 May 14-29;109(20-21):1028-31
references: 22741408
references: Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Aug;21(4):285-91
references: 19556405
references: Med J Aust. 1995 Nov 6;163(9):458-71
references: 7476634
references: Ugeskr Laeger. 2001 Sep 24;163(39):5370-8
references: 11590953
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19(5):e10
references: 20427301
references: Circulation. 2009 Jan 20;119(2):330-7
references: 19153284
references: BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 16;11:102
references: 21575224
references: BMJ. 2007 Jan 13;334(7584):79
references: 17175566
references: Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Jan;85(1):53-62
references: 20042562
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31125
references: 22359567
references: N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 12;347(24):1933-40
references: 12477944
references: Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr;44(2 Pt 1):399-421
references: 19178583
references: BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 27;11:130
references: 21619575
references: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Nov;37(11):495-501
references: 22132661
references: Health Expect. 2007 Sep;10(3):259-67
references: 17678514
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Feb;16(1):40-4
references: 17301203
references: CMAJ. 2004 May 25;170(11):1678-86
references: 15159366
references: BMJ. 2007 Jan 13;334(7584):51
references: 17218667