title: An anatomical-based mapping analysis of the pancreaticoduodenectomy retroperitoneal margin highlights the urgent need for standardized assessment.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Assessment of a pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen by pathologists requires specialized knowledge of anatomy. Standardized assessment, description and documentation of the retroperitoneal margin are crucial for the accurate interpretation of studies evaluating adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty-five patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinomas had their pathological specimens examined prospectively, using an anatomical-based mapping approach. All margins, including the bile duct, pancreatic neck, superior mesenteric artery, superior mesenteric vein and posterior surface of the uncinate process, were microscopically examined in their entirety. The assessment of an R1 margin in terms of distance was assessed in two ways: first defining it as a tumour at the margin or secondary as tumour within 1 mm (1 mm rule).
  
  
  RESULTS
  If the existing College of American Pathologists recommendations were applied (assessing only the bile duct, pancreatic neck and superior mesenteric artery margins), a R1 status would be achieved in only 9 of 25 patients. Extending the examination by assessment and reporting of the entire retroperitoneal resection margin, including the Superior Mesenteric Vein margin and the Posterior surface of the uncinate process margin, increased the number of patients with a R1 resection to 14 out of 25. Applying the 1-mm rule further increased the number of patient with a R1 resection to 20 of 25 patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The above findings illustrate that different approaches to the assessment and reporting of the retroperitoneal margin can change the results and adversely affect the final statistics used in pancreatic cancer studies and clinical trials.
authors: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Grand River Hospital, Kitchener, ON, Canada. volodymyr.maksymov@grhosp.on.ca
authors: Vlad
authors: V
authors: Maksymov
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Hogan
authors: Mahmoud A
authors: MA
authors: Khalifa
mesh_terms: D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D000368:Aged; D059925:Anatomic Landmarks; D017024:Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009364:Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / Q000517:prevention & control; D018365:Neoplasm, Residual; D010190:Pancreatic Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D016577:Pancreaticoduodenectomy; D010340:Pathology, Surgical / Q000592:standards*; D018579:Patient Selection; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012187:Retroperitoneal Space; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references: Ann Surg. 2006 Jul;244(1):10-5
references: 16794383
references: Ann Surg. 2009 Jul;250(1):76-80
references: 19561479
references: Histopathology. 2008 Jun;52(7):787-96
references: 18081813
references: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2004;11(6):402-8
references: 15619016
references: Ann Surg. 2007 Jul;246(1):52-60
references: 17592291
references: J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 10;27(17):2855-62
references: 19398572
references: Ann Surg. 1993 Feb;217(2):144-8
references: 8094952
references: Pancreas. 2004 Apr;28(3):219-30
references: 15084961
references: J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Dec;10(10):1338-45; discussion 1345-6
references: 17175452
references: Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Feb;18(2):337-44
references: 20811779
references: BMC Cancer. 2008 Jan 14;8:5
references: 18194510
references: Jpn J Surg. 1991 May;21(3):262-7
references: 1857030
references: HPB (Oxford). 2009 Jun;11(4):282-9
references: 19718354
references: HPB (Oxford). 2007;9(2):146-9
references: 18333131
references: Ann Pathol. 2002 Oct;22(5):422-31
references: 12483163
references: Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Apr;16(4):836-47
references: 19194760
references: Br J Surg. 2006 Oct;93(10):1232-7
references: 16804874
references: Virchows Arch. 2009 Feb;454(2):125-31
references: 19066952
references: Pancreas. 1996 May;12(4):373-80
references: 8740405
references: Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jun;15(6):1651-60
references: 18351300
references: Dig Surg. 1999;16(4):291-6
references: 10449973