title: Temporal dynamics of divided spatial attention.
abstract: In naturalistic settings, observers often have to monitor multiple objects dispersed throughout the visual scene. However, the degree to which spatial attention can be divided across spatially noncontiguous objects has long been debated, particularly when those objects are in close proximity. Moreover, the temporal dynamics of divided attention are unclear: is the process of dividing spatial attention gradual and continuous, or does it onset in a discrete manner? To address these issues, we recorded steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) as subjects covertly monitored two flickering targets while ignoring an intervening distractor that flickered at a different frequency. All three stimuli were clustered within either the lower left or the lower right quadrant, and our dependent measure was SSVEP power at the target and distractor frequencies measured over time. In two experiments, we observed a temporally discrete increase in power for target- vs. distractor-evoked SSVEPs extending from ∼350 to 150 ms prior to correct (but not incorrect) responses. The divergence in SSVEP power immediately prior to a correct response suggests that spatial attention can be divided across noncontiguous locations, even when the targets are closely spaced within a single quadrant. In addition, the division of spatial attention appears to be relatively discrete, as opposed to slow and continuous. Finally, the predictive relationship between SSVEP power and behavior demonstrates that these neurophysiological measures of divided attention are meaningfully related to cognitive function.
authors: Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. Itthipuripat.Sirawaj@gmail.com
authors: Sirawaj
authors: S
authors: Itthipuripat
authors: Javier O
authors: JO
authors: Garcia
authors: John T
authors: JT
authors: Serences
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual; D005260:Female; D005425:Flicker Fusion; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D013028:Space Perception; D013997:Time Factors
keywords: attention; decision making; electroencephalography; steady-state visual evoked potentials
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Oct;29(5):882-96
references: 14585012
references: Cogn Psychol. 2001 Nov;43(3):171-216
references: 11689021
references: Neurosci Lett. 2007 Feb 27;414(1):65-70
references: 17207932
references: Vision Res. 2008 Feb;48(4):549-63
references: 18206205
references: Nature. 2003 Jul 17;424(6946):309-12
references: 12867981
references: J Neurosci. 2012 Aug 29;32(35):12180-91
references: 22933800
references: Spat Vis. 2006;19(6):485-504
references: 17278524
references: PLoS Biol. 2004 Jun;2(6):e176
references: 15208723
references: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
references: 9176953
references: Can J Exp Psychol. 1994 Mar;48(1):1-24
references: 8038765
references: Vision Res. 1989;29(11):1607-19
references: 2635484
references: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references: 9176952
references: Vision Res. 2006 Dec;46(26):4355-74
references: 17034829
references: Am J Psychol. 1992 Summer;105(2):271-315
references: 1621883
references: Percept Psychophys. 1999 Apr;61(3):403-23
references: 10334090
references: Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):685-96
references: 20438243
references: Neuron. 2011 Dec 22;72(6):1067-79
references: 22196340
references: J Vis. 2010 Oct 01;10(12):4
references: 21047736
references: Brain Topogr. 2006 Spring;18(3):167-87
references: 16544207
references: Spat Vis. 1988;3(3):179-97
references: 3153671
references: Percept Psychophys. 1998 Nov;60(8):1406-14
references: 9865080
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 3;107(31):13878-82
references: 20643918
references: Vision Res. 2011 Mar 2;51(5):489-95
references: 21236290
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Aug;18(3):837-48
references: 1500879
references: Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Jul;112(7):1295-306
references: 11516742
references: J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Aug 30;137(2):321-32
references: 15262077
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Apr;26(2):834-46
references: 10811179
references: Neuron. 2004 May 27;42(4):677-86
references: 15157427
references: Vision Res. 2004 Jun;44(12):1273-96
references: 15066391
references: Neuropsychologia. 1991;29(7):659-75
references: 1944868
references: Nat Neurosci. 1998 Nov;1(7):631-4
references: 10196572
references: J Exp Psychol. 1980 Jun;109(2):160-74
references: 7381367
references: Exp Brain Res. 2003 Dec;153(3):322-33
references: 14508634
references: Percept Psychophys. 1994 Jul;56(1):42-52
references: 8084731
references: Science. 1987 Nov 6;238(4828):778-80
references: 3672124
references: J Neurosci. 2005 Oct 12;25(41):9444-8
references: 16221854
references: Brain Res. 2009 Jan 28;1251:245-55
references: 18952069
references: Nature. 1994 May 26;369(6478):313-5
references: 8183369
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jul;9(7):349-54
references: 15953754
references: J Vis. 2009 May 08;9(5):3.1-11
references: 19757881
references: Percept Psychophys. 1986 Oct;40(4):225-40
references: 3786090
references: Front Neurosci. 2007 Oct 15;1(1):185-96
references: 18982128
references: Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):637-84
references: 20438241
references: Brain Cogn. 2005 Jul;58(2):183-92
references: 15919550
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1985 Oct;11(5):583-97
references: 2932532
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Jun;24(1):19-32
references: 15922154
references: J Neurosci. 2003 May 1;23(9):3561-5
references: 12736325