title: Blunt versus bladed trocars in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Trocar-associated visceral injuries are rare but potentially fatal complications of laparoscopic access. More commonly, abdominal wall bleeding occurs, which usually requires hemostatic measures and prolongs operative time. Blunt-tipped trocars have been postulated to carry a lower risk of abdominal wall bleeding and intra-abdominal injuries. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to comparatively evaluate the relative risks of abdominal wall bleeding, visceral injuries, and overall complications with the use of bladed and blunt-tipped laparoscopic trocars.
  
  
  METHODS
  The databases of Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Trials were searched to identify randomized studies that compared trocar-associated complications with the use of blunt and bladed trocars. Primary outcome measure was the relative risk of abdominal wall trocar site bleeding, and secondary outcome measures included visceral injuries and overall complications. Outcome data were pooled and combined overall effect sizes were calculated using the fixed- or random-effects model.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Eight eligible randomized trials were identified; they included 720 patients with a median Jadad score of 4. The incidence of abdominal wall bleeding for the blunt and the bladed trocar group was 3 and 9 %, respectively [odds ratio (OR) 0.42, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.88]. Trocar-associated morbidity rate, excluding bleeding events of the abdominal wall, was documented at 0.2 and 0.7 % of the blunt and the bladed trocar arm, respectively (OR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.06-2.97). The overall trocar-associated morbidity rate was 3 % in the blunt trocar group and 10 % in the bladed trocar group (OR 0.38, 95 % CI 0.19-0.77).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Reliable data support a lower relative risk of trocar site bleeding and overall complications with blunt laparoscopic cannulas than bladed trocars. Transition to blunt trocars for secondary cannulation of the abdominal wall is thus strongly recommended. Larger patient populations are required to estimate the relative risk of visceral injuries.
authors: Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hospital Neuwerk, Mönchengladbach, Germany. stavros.antoniou@hotmail.com
authors: Stavros A
authors: SA
authors: Antoniou
authors: George A
authors: GA
authors: Antoniou
authors: Oliver O
authors: OO
authors: Koch
authors: Rudolph
authors: R
authors: Pointner
authors: Frank A
authors: FA
authors: Granderath
mesh_terms: D034861:Abdominal Wall; D004867:Equipment Design; D006470:Hemorrhage / Q000209:etiology; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000295:instrumentation*; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D013525:Surgical Instruments / Q000009:adverse effects
references: Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jul;94(1):83-8
references: 10389723
references: Vascular. 2010 Jul-Aug;18(4):197-204
references: 20643029
references: Surg Endosc. 2007 Jun;21(6):965-9
references: 17287914
references: JSLS. 2007 Apr-Jun;11(2):198-203
references: 17761080
references: Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12
references: 8721797
references: J Gynecol Endosc Surg. 2009 Jan;1(1):4-11
references: 22442503
references: J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996 Aug;3(4):609-15
references: 9050697
references: J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 May;29(5):433-447
references: 17493376
references: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999 Apr;9(2):135-40
references: 10235350
references: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2000 Oct;10(5):269-73
references: 11071407
references: Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):843-6
references: 21993944
references: Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005 Apr;390(2):128-33
references: 15700192
references: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001 Aug;11(4):259-62
references: 11569519
references: BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
references: 19622552
references: J Urol. 2004 Jan;171(1):349-50
references: 14665922
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Mar;97(3):435-8
references: 11239652
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr;103(4):681-5
references: 15051559
references: JSLS. 2000 Jan-Mar;4(1):11-5
references: 10772522
references: Surg Endosc. 1996 Jul;10(7):775-8
references: 8662440
references: J Gastrointest Surg. 2000 Jul-Aug;4(4):392-7
references: 11058851
references: Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):2012-6
references: 17705082
references: J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):176-83
references: 17368253
references: J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):302-7
references: 16036187
references: Urol Int. 2007;79(3):276-9
references: 17940363
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Jun;192(6):677-83
references: 11400960