title: Quantitative method for evaluation of aesthetic results after laser treatment for birthmarks.
abstract: Subjective assessment of results after laser treatment for birthmarks does not provide a validated method for clinicians. Previous reports concerning objective evaluation using L*a*b color coordinates were only partially successful due to difficulties in standardizing and comparing colors from pre- and posttreatment photographs. The study aimed to present a reliable and clinically applicable method of aesthetic result assessment after laser treatment for birthmarks. All 48 patients, included in the study, were treated for birthmarks on the face or neck using laser. Each pre- and posttreatment photograph was subjected to triple objective comparative assessment of color fading with use of a computer program, as well as to subjective evaluation by three core physicians and three laypeople. Objective analysis was based on an innovative method using combined L*a*b and hue saturation value color coordinates. Accuracy was higher between objective assessment with the computer program and subjective evaluation by core physicians than by laypeople. Repeatability of results was higher with the use of the computer program than among core physicians or among laypeople. In conclusion, our method may be considered for objective assessment of the results after laser treatment of vascular and pigmented birthmarks.
authors: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, St John's Hospital, Howden Road West, Livingston, West Lothian, EH54 6PP, UK, szychta@yahoo.pl.
authors: Pawel
authors: P
authors: Szychta
authors: Khalil
authors: K
authors: Al-Nakib
authors: Will
authors: W
authors: Anderson
authors: Ken
authors: K
authors: Stewart
authors: Awf
authors: A
authors: Quaba
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003116:Color; D005145:Face; D006801:Humans; D054025:Lasers, Dye / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D009333:Neck; D010781:Photography; D019339:Port-Wine Stain / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012880:Skin Pigmentation; D012984:Software; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references: Arch Dermatol. 2001 Jun;137(6):741-4
references: 11405763
references: Dermatol Surg. 2012 Mar;38(3):351-66
references: 22269028
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 09;(11):CD007152
references: 22071834
references: Anal Chem. 2010 Jan 15;82(2):531-42
references: 20000770
references: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Aug;67(2):289-304
references: 22305042
references: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Sep 15;108(4):842-7
references: 11547137
references: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Oct 22;10:102
references: 20969785
references: J Pediatr. 1993 Jan;122(1):71-7
references: 8419617
references: Lasers Surg Med. 2012 Feb;44(2):152-7
references: 22241659
references: Br J Dermatol. 1995 Feb;132(2):245-50
references: 7888361
references: Dermatol Surg. 1999 Feb;25(2):127-32
references: 10037519
references: Ann Plast Surg. 2008 Apr;60(4):426-30
references: 18362573
references: Dermatology. 1997;194(2):127-30
references: 9094459
references: Curr Probl Dermatol. 2011;42:67-80
references: 21865800
references: Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2001 Nov;9(4):561-7
references: 17590942
references: Arch Dermatol Res. 1993;285(5):278-82
references: 8379687