title: Novel motor design for rotating anode x-ray tubes operating in the fringe field of a magnetic resonance imaging system.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Using hybrid x-ray∕MR (XMR) systems for image guidance during interventional procedures could enhance the diagnosis and treatment of neurologic, oncologic, cardiovascular, and other disorders. The authors propose a close proximity hybrid system design in which a C-arm fluoroscopy unit is placed immediately adjacent to the solenoid magnet of a MR system with a minimum distance of 1.2 m between the x-ray and MR imaging fields of view. Existing rotating anode x-ray tube designs fail within MR fringe field environments because the magnetic fields alter the electron trajectories in the x-ray tube and act as a brake on the induction motor, reducing the rotation speed of the anode. In this study the authors propose a novel motor design that avoids the anode rotation speed reduction.
  
  
  METHODS
  The proposed design replaces the permanent magnet stator found in brushed dc motors with the radial component of the MR fringe field. The x-ray tube is oriented such that the radial component of the MR fringe field is orthogonal to the cathode-anode axis. Using a feedback position sensor and the support bearings as electrical slip rings, the authors use electrical commutation to eliminate the need for mechanical brushes and commutators. A vacuum compatible prototype of the proposed motor design was assembled, and its performance was evaluated at various operating conditions. The prototype consisted of a 3.1 in. diameter anode rated at 300 kHU with a ceramic rotor that was 5.6 in. in length and had a 2.9 in. diameter. The material chosen for all ceramic components was MACOR, a machineable glass ceramic developed by Corning Inc. The approximate weight of the entire assembly was 1750 g. The maximum rotation speed, angular acceleration, and acceleration time of the motor design were investigated, as well as the dependence of these parameters on rotor angular offset, magnetic field strength, and field orientation. The resonance properties of the authors' assembly were also evaluated to determine its stability during acceleration, and a pulse width modulation algorithm was implemented to control the rotation speed of the motor.
  
  
  RESULTS
  At a magnetic flux density of 41 mT orthogonal to the axis of rotation (on the lower end of the expected flux density in the MR suite) the maximum speed of the motor was found to be 5150 revolutions per minute (rpm). The acceleration time necessary to reach 3000 rpm was found to be approximately 10 s at 59 mT. The resonance frequency of the assembly with the anode attached was 1310 rpm (21.8 Hz) which is far below the desired operating speeds. Pulse width modulation provides an effective method to control the speed of the motor with a resolution of 100 rpm.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The proposed design can serve as a direct replacement to the conventional induction motor used in rotating anode x-ray tubes. It does not suffer from a reduced rotation speed when operating in a MR environment. The presence of chromic steel bearings in the prototype prevented testing at the higher field strengths, and future iterations of the design could eliminate this shortcoming. The prototype assembly demonstrates proof of concept of the authors' design and overcomes one of the major obstacles for a MR compatible rotating anode x-ray tube.
authors: Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. plillane@gmail.com
authors: Prasheel
authors: P
authors: Lillaney
authors: Mihye
authors: M
authors: Shin
authors: Waldo
authors: W
authors: Hinshaw
authors: N Robert
authors: NR
authors: Bennett
authors: Norbert
authors: N
authors: Pelc
authors: Rebecca
authors: R
authors: Fahrig
mesh_terms: D004566:Electrodes; D004867:Equipment Design; D005246:Feedback; D060526:Magnetic Fields; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000295:instrumentation*; D012399:Rotation; D013997:Time Factors; D014965:X-Rays
references: Acad Radiol. 2005 Sep;12(9):1167-77
references: 16099685
references: Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003 Nov;145(11):995-7; discussion 997
references: 14628205
references: Radiother Oncol. 2010 Aug;96(2):166-71
references: 20615565
references: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2007;10(Pt 1):575-83
references: 18051105
references: J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 Feb;16(2 Pt 1):227-34
references: 15713923
references: J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Sep;14(9 Pt 1):1169-75
references: 14514809
references: Circ Heart Fail. 2011 Mar;4(2):170-9
references: 21216832
references: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003 Nov;22(11):1369-78
references: 14606671
references: Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2001 Nov;11(4):767-72, xii
references: 11995431
references: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Feb;13(2):294-300
references: 11169837
references: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2005;8(Pt 2):607-15
references: 16686010
references: Med Phys. 2005 Jul;32(7):2327-36
references: 16121589
references: Med Phys. 2006 Aug;33(8):3033-45
references: 16964881
references: Med Phys. 2009 May;36(5):1717-26
references: 19544789
references: Magn Reson Med. 2009 Mar;61(3):595-602
references: 19097239
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Aug 1;71(5):1518-25
references: 18513881
references: Eur Radiol. 2002 Jun;12(6):1394-400
references: 12042944
references: Med Phys. 2007 Feb;34(2):408-18
references: 17388157
references: J Neurosurg. 2007 Aug;107(2):266-73
references: 17695379
references: Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2001 Nov;11(4):715-25
references: 11995426
references: Acad Radiol. 2001 Dec;8(12):1200-7
references: 11770916
references: Med Phys. 2012 Sep;39(9):5567-83
references: 22957623