title: Time trends and geographic variation in use of minimally invasive breast biopsy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Current guidelines recommend minimally invasive breast biopsy (MIBB) as the gold standard for the diagnosis of breast lesions. The purpose of this study was to describe geographic patterns and time trends in the use of MIBB in Texas.
  
  
  METHODS
  We used 100% Texas Medicare claims data (2000-2008) to identify women older than 66 years of age who underwent breast biopsy. Biopsies were classified as open or MIBB. Time trends, racial/ethnic variation, and geographic variation in the use of biopsy techniques were examined.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 87,165 breast biopsies were performed on 75,518 breast masses in 67,582 women; 65.8% of the initial biopsies were MIBB. Radiologists performed 70.3% and surgeons performed 26.2% of MIBB. Surgeons performed 94.2% of open biopsies. Hispanic women were less likely to undergo MIBB (55.9%) compared with white (66.6%) and black (68.9%) women (p < 0.0001). Women undergoing MIBB were also more likely to live in metropolitan areas and have higher income and educational levels (p < 0.0001). The rate of MIBB increased from 44.4% in 2001 to 79.1% in 2008 (p < 0.0001). There are clear geographic patterns in MIBB use, with highest use near major cities. Although rates are increasing overall, rates of improvement in the use of MIBB vary considerably across geographic regions and remain persistently low in more rural areas.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Despite an increase in the use of MIBB over time, MIBB use was consistently lower than recommended. We must identify specific barriers in rural areas to effectively change practice and achieve the statewide goal of 90% MIBB.
authors: Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0541, USA.
authors: Christopher J
authors: CJ
authors: Zimmermann
authors: Kristin M
authors: KM
authors: Sheffield
authors: Casey B
authors: CB
authors: Duncan
authors: Yimei
authors: Y
authors: Han
authors: Catherine D
authors: CD
authors: Cooksley
authors: Courtney M
authors: CM
authors: Townsend
authors: Taylor S
authors: TS
authors: Riall
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001707:Biopsy, Needle / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data* / Q000639:trends*; D001940:Breast / Q000473:pathology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends; D013781:Texas; D013997:Time Factors
references: Eur J Radiol. 2011 Jan;77(1):131-6
references: 19853395
references: Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;18(13):3802-10
references: 21630122
references: Surgery. 2011 Oct;150(4):635-42
references: 22000174
references: J Breast Cancer. 2011 Mar;14(1):1-7
references: 21847387
references: Cancer. 2009 Feb 15;115(4):716-24
references: 19152430
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Oct;209(4):504-20
references: 19801324
references: Acad Radiol. 2004 Mar;11(3):293-308
references: 15035520
references: Am J Surg. 2011 Aug;202(2):127-32
references: 21295284
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Jan;208(1):75-8
references: 19228506
references: Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun;42(3 Pt 1):950-70
references: 17489898
references: Health Care Financ Rev. 2000 Summer;21(4):91-105
references: 11481748
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Oct;201(4):586-97
references: 16183499
references: J Surg Res. 1998 Jul 15;78(1):23-6
references: 9733612
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Sep;193(3):297-302
references: 11548800
references: Breast. 2010 Aug;19(4):289-96
references: 20382531
references: Eur Radiol. 2008 Nov;18(11):2390-7
references: 18491102
references: Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Oct;14(10):2932-9
references: 17619931
references: J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009 Nov;7(10):1060-96
references: 19930975
references: Ann Surg. 2012 Jan;255(1):38-43
references: 22167007
references: J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Feb;9(2):137-40
references: 22305700