title: E-learning in medical education in resource constrained low- and middle-income countries.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In the face of severe faculty shortages in resource-constrained countries, medical schools look to e-learning for improved access to medical education. This paper summarizes the literature on e-learning in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and presents the spectrum of tools and strategies used.
  
  
  METHODS
  Researchers reviewed literature using terms related to e-learning and pre-service education of health professionals in LMIC. Search terms were connected using the Boolean Operators "AND" and "OR" to capture all relevant article suggestions. Using standard decision criteria, reviewers narrowed the article suggestions to a final 124 relevant articles.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of the relevant articles found, most referred to e-learning in Brazil (14 articles), India (14), Egypt (10) and South Africa (10). While e-learning has been used by a variety of health workers in LMICs, the majority (58%) reported on physician training, while 24% focused on nursing, pharmacy and dentistry training. Although reasons for investing in e-learning varied, expanded access to education was at the core of e-learning implementation which included providing supplementary tools to support faculty in their teaching, expanding the pool of faculty by connecting to partner and/or community teaching sites, and sharing of digital resources for use by students. E-learning in medical education takes many forms. Blended learning approaches were the most common methodology presented (49 articles) of which computer-assisted learning (CAL) comprised the majority (45 articles). Other approaches included simulations and the use of multimedia software (20 articles), web-based learning (14 articles), and eTutor/eMentor programs (3 articles). Of the 69 articles that evaluated the effectiveness of e-learning tools, 35 studies compared outcomes between e-learning and other approaches, while 34 studies qualitatively analyzed student and faculty attitudes toward e-learning modalities.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  E-learning in medical education is a means to an end, rather than the end in itself. Utilizing e-learning can result in greater educational opportunities for students while simultaneously enhancing faculty effectiveness and efficiency. However, this potential of e-learning assumes a certain level of institutional readiness in human and infrastructural resources that is not always present in LMICs. Institutional readiness for e-learning adoption ensures the alignment of new tools to the educational and economic context.
authors: The George Washington University, 2121 K St NW, Washington, DC, 20037, USA. seblelf@gwu.edu.
authors: Seble
authors: S
authors: Frehywot
authors: Yianna
authors: Y
authors: Vovides
authors: Zohray
authors: Z
authors: Talib
authors: Nadia
authors: N
authors: Mikhail
authors: Heather
authors: H
authors: Ross
authors: Hannah
authors: H
authors: Wohltjen
authors: Selam
authors: S
authors: Bedada
authors: Kristine
authors: K
authors: Korhumel
authors: Abdel Karim
authors: AK
authors: Koumare
authors: James
authors: J
authors: Scott
references: Med Teach. 2009 May;31(5):452-3
references: 19811133
references: Telemed J E Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):11-3
references: 22171597
references: Hum Resour Health. 2010 Dec 31;8:30
references: 21194417
references: Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(4):619-22
references: 21655756
references: East Mediterr Health J. 2008 May-Jun;14(3):675-85
references: 18720632
references: J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007 Sep-Oct;52(5):e37-41
references: 17826702
references: Med Teach. 2001 May;23(3):263-269
references: 12098398
references: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2009 Jan-Feb;17(1):7-13
references: 19377800
references: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;122:186-9
references: 17102245
references: World Neurosurg. 2011 Sep-Oct;76(3-4):224-30
references: 21986410
references: Artif Intell Med. 2011 Jun;52(2):115-21
references: 21641781
references: Med Teach. 2010;32(7):562-8
references: 20653378
references: Lancet. 2011 Mar 26;377(9771):1113-21
references: 21074256
references: J Dent Educ. 2009 Oct;73(10):1178-86
references: 19805782
references: Int J Telemed Appl. 2011;2011:230670
references: 21603023
references: J Audiov Media Med. 2000 Dec;23(4):153-60
references: 11271863
references: Health Info Libr J. 2010 Dec;27(4):316-22
references: 21050374
references: Med Educ. 2002 May;36(5):441-8
references: 12028394
references: Ghana Med J. 2010 Dec;44(4):159-62
references: 21416051
references: Telemed J E Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):32-7
references: 22150714
references: Med Teach. 2009 Aug;31(8):732-8
references: 19811210
references: Med Educ. 2001 Oct;35(10):983-9
references: 11564203
references: Adv Physiol Educ. 2011 Dec;35(4):369-77
references: 22139773
references: J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9 Suppl 2:S71-2
references: 14728768
references: Eur J Dent Educ. 2003 Aug;7(3):111-5
references: 12846819
references: BMC Med Educ. 2011 Jan 25;11:3
references: 21266070
references: J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(2):105-6
references: 17359576
references: Teach Learn Med. 2005 Summer;17(3):269-73
references: 16042524
references: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010 Jun;24(6):655-60
references: 19906046
references: Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2001 May-Jun;56(3):69-74
references: 11514906
references: J Urol. 2004 Mar;171(3):1220-2
references: 14767306
references: J Audiov Media Med. 2002 Mar;25(1):8-15
references: 12025491
references: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;156:89-102
references: 20543344
references: Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Mar;87(3):225-30
references: 19377719
references: J Nurs Educ. 2011 Aug;50(8):483-6
references: 21524019
references: Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008 Sep;32(3):299-312
references: 18720252
references: Anat Rec B New Anat. 2003 Jul;273(1):126-31
references: 12833272