title: Convergent gene loss following gene and genome duplications creates single-copy families in flowering plants.
abstract: The importance of gene gain through duplication has long been appreciated. In contrast, the importance of gene loss has only recently attracted attention. Indeed, studies in organisms ranging from plants to worms and humans suggest that duplication of some genes might be better tolerated than that of others. Here we have undertaken a large-scale study to investigate the existence of duplication-resistant genes in the sequenced genomes of 20 flowering plants. We demonstrate that there is a large set of genes that is convergently restored to single-copy status following multiple genome-wide and smaller scale duplication events. We rule out the possibility that such a pattern could be explained by random gene loss only and therefore propose that there is selection pressure to preserve such genes as singletons. This is further substantiated by the observation that angiosperm single-copy genes do not comprise a random fraction of the genome, but instead are often involved in essential housekeeping functions that are highly conserved across all eukaryotes. Furthermore, single-copy genes are generally expressed more highly and in more tissues than non-single-copy genes, and they exhibit higher sequence conservation. Finally, we propose different hypotheses to explain their resistance against duplication.
authors: Department of Plant Systems Biology,  VIB, 9052 Ghent,  Belgium.
authors: Riet
authors: R
authors: De Smet
authors: Keith L
authors: KL
authors: Adams
authors: Klaas
authors: K
authors: Vandepoele
authors: Marc C E
authors: MC
authors: Van Montagu
authors: Steven
authors: S
authors: Maere
authors: Yves
authors: Y
authors: Van de Peer
mesh_terms: D017353:Gene Deletion; D020440:Gene Duplication; D017343:Genes, Plant; D019684:Magnoliopsida / Q000235:genetics*
references: Science. 2008 Oct 3;322(5898):86-9
references: 18832643
references: Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2007;8:17-35
references: 17386002
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Aug;28(8):2359-69
references: 21389272
references: Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:75-86
references: 21148284
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Feb 24;10:61
references: 20181251
references: Genome Biol. 2004;5(2):R7
references: 14759257
references: New Phytol. 2009 Aug;183(3):557-564
references: 19555435
references: Genetics. 1994 Mar;136(3):927-35
references: 8005445
references: Plant Cell. 2007 Feb;19(2):395-402
references: 17293565
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Dec;29(12):3793-806
references: 22821009
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Jan;5(1):e1000262
references: 19148271
references: Plant J. 2011 Apr;66(1):58-65
references: 21443623
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Jan;30(1):177-90
references: 22936721
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 12;102(15):5454-9
references: 15800040
references: PLoS One. 2007 Apr 18;2(4):e383
references: 17440619
references: Science. 2003 Oct 31;302(5646):841
references: 14593171
references: Bioessays. 2011 Oct;33(10):769-80
references: 21853451
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Oct 10;8:280
references: 18847470
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 5;107(1):472-7
references: 19966307
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 18;107(20):9270-4
references: 20439718
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2009 Dec;14(12):680-8
references: 19818673
references: Plant Cell. 2007 Dec;19(12):3843-51
references: 18083908
references: Trends Genet. 2009 Apr;25(4):185-92
references: 19303165
references: Nature. 2010 Jan 14;463(7278):178-83
references: 20075913
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Feb 11;15(3):1281-95
references: 3547335
references: Nat Genet. 2005 May;37(5):501-6
references: 15806101
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Sep 11;109(37):14746-53
references: 22908297
references: Nat Genet. 2000 May;25(1):25-9
references: 10802651
references: N Engl J Med. 1985 Oct 31;313(18):1111-6
references: 4047115
references: Trends Genet. 1998 Feb;14(2):46-9; discussion 49-50
references: 9520595
references: Nature. 2006 Nov 9;444(7116):171-8
references: 17086204
references: Chromosome Res. 2009;17(5):699-717
references: 19802709
references: Nat Genet. 2011 Aug 28;43(10):1035-9
references: 21873998
references: Nature. 1987 Sep 17-23;329(6136):219-22
references: 2442619
references: J Comput Biol. 2006 Mar;13(2):320-35
references: 16597243
references: Plant Cell. 2004 Jul;16(7):1667-78
references: 15208399
references: Plant Cell. 2004 Jul;16(7):1679-91
references: 15208398
references: Nat Genet. 2010 Oct;42(10):833-9
references: 20802477
references: PLoS Genet. 2010 May 13;6(5):e1000944
references: 20485561
references: Genome Res. 2003 Sep;13(9):2178-89
references: 12952885
references: Genome Biol Evol. 2009 Oct 29;1:409-14
references: 20333209
references: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:433-53
references: 19575588
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Apr;7(4):e1002029
references: 21490719
references: Trends Genet. 2006 Nov;22(11):597-602
references: 16979781
references: Nature. 2003 Jul 10;424(6945):194-7
references: 12853957
references: Nature. 2012 May 30;485(7400):635-41
references: 22660326
references: Nature. 2011 May 5;473(7345):97-100
references: 21478875
references: Science. 2006 Sep 15;313(5793):1596-604
references: 16973872
references: Nature. 2007 Sep 6;449(7158):54-61
references: 17805289
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Nov;13(11):602-9
references: 18838332
references: Cell. 2008 Jul 25;134(2):341-52
references: 18662548
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Dec 23;100(26):15682-7
references: 14671323
references: Nature. 2012 Aug 9;488(7410):213-7
references: 22801500
references: New Phytol. 2012 Aug;195(3):707-720
references: 22651224
references: PLoS Biol. 2004 Mar;2(3):E55
references: 15024414
references: BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Feb 27;12:63
references: 21352572
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 7;106(14):5737-42
references: 19325131
references: Plant Physiol. 2012 Feb;158(2):590-600
references: 22198273