title: Delay and déjà vu: timing and repetition increase the power of false evidence.
abstract: False images and videos can induce people to believe in and remember events that never happened. Using a novel method, we examined whether the timing of false evidence would influence its effect (Experiment 1) and determined the relationship between timing and repetition (Experiment 2). Subjects completed a hazard perception driving test and were falsely accused of cheating. Some subjects were shown a fake video or photograph of the cheating either after a 9-min delay (Experiment 1) or more than once with or without a delay (Experiment 2). Subjects were more likely to falsely believe that they had cheated and to provide details about how the cheating happened when the false evidence was delayed or repeated-especially when repeated over time-relative to controls. The results show that even a strikingly short delay between an event and when false evidence is disclosed can distort people's beliefs and that repeating false evidence over a brief delay fosters false beliefs more so than without a delay. These findings have theoretical implications for metacognitive models of autobiographical memory and practical implications for police interrogations.
authors: Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
authors: Deborah S
authors: DS
authors: Wright
authors: Kimberley A
authors: KA
authors: Wade
authors: Derrick G
authors: DG
authors: Watson
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D008192:Deception; D003690:Deja Vu / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D061212:Memory, Episodic; D008875:Middle Aged; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult
references: Law Hum Behav. 2011 Jun;35(3):200-10
references: 20461542
references: Psychol Sci. 2005 Jun;16(6):481-6
references: 15943675
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):597-603
references: 12412902
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1190-5
references: 19001589
references: Law Hum Behav. 2003 Apr;27(2):141-56
references: 12733418
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Feb;139(2):320-6
references: 22257711
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1978 Jan;4(1):19-31
references: 621467
references: Conscious Cogn. 2009 Sep;18(3):773-80
references: 19477661
references: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2009 Aug;13(3):219-35
references: 19638628
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Apr;12(2):359-66
references: 16082819
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 May;92(5):821-33
references: 17484607
references: Psychol Bull. 1993 Jul;114(1):3-28
references: 8346328
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Sep;7(3):531-6
references: 11082861