title: Technological innovation and its effect on public health in the United States.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Good public health ensures an efficient work force. Organizations can ensure a prominent position on the global stage by staying on the leading edge of technological development. Public health and technological innovation are vital elements of prosperous economies. It is important to understand how these elements affect each other. This research study explored and described the relationship between these two critical elements/constructs.
  
  
  METHODS
  Indicators representing technological innovation and public health were identified. Indicator data from 2000 to 2009 were collected from various US federal government sources, for the four US Census regions. The four US Census regions were then compared in terms of these indicators. Canonical correlation equations were formulated to identify combinations of the indicators that are strongly related to each other. Additionally, the cause-effect relationship between public health and technological innovation was described using the structural equation modeling technique.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The four US Census regions ranked differently in terms of both type of indicators in a statistically significant manner. The canonical correlation analysis showed that the first set of canonical variables had a fairly strong relationship, with a magnitude > 0.65 at the 95% confidence interval, for all census regions. Structural equation modeling analysis provided β < -0.69 and Student's t statistic > 12.98, for all census regions. The threshold Student's t statistic was 1.98. Hence, it was found that the β values were significant at the 95% confidence interval, for all census regions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results of the study showed that better technological innovation indicator scores were associated with better public health indicator scores. Furthermore, the study provided preliminary evidence that technological innovation shares causal relation with public health.
authors: College of Technology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA.
authors: Preetinder Singh
authors: PS
authors: Gill
keywords: public health; technological innovation
references: Perspect Public Health. 2011 May;131(3):114-5
references: 21692396
references: Public Health. 2006 Nov;120(11):994-1001
references: 17027052
references: Health Policy. 2003 Feb;63(2):121-32
references: 12543525
references: Health Policy. 2007 Jun;82(1):37-50
references: 16996637
references: Patient. 2009 Sep 1;2(3):179-90
references: 22273169
references: Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Sep;87(9):714-9
references: 19784452
references: JAMA. 2003 Apr 16;289(15):1969-75
references: 12697800
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Fall;20(4):493-7
references: 15609801
references: Am J Public Health. 2006 Feb;96(2):209-10
references: 16380555
references: Health Policy. 1997 Jun;40(3):177-98
references: 10168751
references: Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Oct;44(4):65-103
references: 5342045
references: Soc Sci Med. 2008 Apr;66(8):1699-708
references: 18308440
references: Bull World Health Organ. 2006 May;84(5):338
references: 16710532
references: JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2443-54
references: 14612481
references: Health Policy. 2008 Aug;87(2):160-71
references: 18295925
references: Perspect Public Health. 2011 May;131(3):112-4
references: 21692395