title: The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of shared care: protocol for a realist review.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Shared care (an enhanced information exchange over and above routine outpatient letters) is commonly used to improve care coordination and communication between a specialist and primary care services for people with long-term conditions. Evidence of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of shared care is mixed. Informed decision-making for targeting shared care requires a greater understanding of how it works, for whom it works, in what contexts and why. This protocol outlines how realist review methods can be used to synthesise evidence on shared care for long-term conditions.A further aim of the review is to explore economic evaluations of shared care. Economic evaluations are difficult to synthesise due to problems in accounting for contextual differences that impact on resource use and opportunity costs. Realist review methods have been suggested as a way to overcome some of these issues, so this review will also assess whether realist review methods are amenable to synthesising economic evidence.
  
  
  METHODS
  Database and web searching will be carried out in order to find relevant evidence to develop and test programme theories about how shared care works. The review will have two phases. Phase 1 will concentrate on the contextual conditions and mechanisms that influence how shared care works, in order to develop programme theories, which partially explain how it works. Phase 2 will focus on testing these programme theories. A Project Reference Group made up of health service professionals and people with actual experience of long-term conditions will be used to ground the study in real-life experience. Review findings will be disseminated through local and sub-national networks for integrated care and long-term conditions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This realist review will explore why and for whom shared care works, in order to support decision-makers working to improve the effectiveness of care for people outside hospital. The development of realist review methods to take into account cost and cost-effectiveness evidence is particularly innovative and challenging, and if successful will offer a new approach to synthesising economic evidence. This systematic review protocol is registered on the PROSPERO database (registration number: CRD42012002842).
authors: PenTAG, Institute of Health Services Research, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Veysey Building, Salmon Pool Lane, Exeter EX2 4SG, UK. r.j.l.hardwick@exeter.ac.uk
authors: Rebecca
authors: R
authors: Hardwick
authors: Mark
authors: M
authors: Pearson
authors: Richard
authors: R
authors: Byng
authors: Rob
authors: R
authors: Anderson
mesh_terms: D002908:Chronic Disease; D003142:Communication; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D008511:Medicine; D005791:Patient Care / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards; D011320:Primary Health Care; D012107:Research Design; D000078202:Systematic Reviews as Topic
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD004910
references: 17636778
references: BMJ. 2008 Jun 7;336(7656):1281-3
references: 18535071
references: BMJ. 1990 Jun 2;300(6737):1442-6
references: 2116199
references: J Public Health Med. 1994 Dec;16(4):447-54
references: 7880576