title: An algorithm for the estimation of gestational age at the time of fetal death.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Accurate assignment of gestational age (GA) at time of fetal death is important for research and clinical practice. An algorithm to estimate GA at fetal death was developed and evaluated.
  
  
  METHODS
  The algorithm developed by the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN) incorporated clinical and post-mortem data. The SCRN conducted a population-based case-control study of women with stillbirths and livebirths from 2006 to 2008 in five geographical catchment areas. Rules were developed to estimate a due date, identify an interval during which death likely occurred, and estimate GA at the time of fetal death. Reliability of using fetal foot length to estimate GA at death was assessed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The due date estimated for 620 singleton stillbirths studied was considered clinically reliable for 87%. Only 25.2% of stillbirths were documented alive within 2 days before diagnosis and 47.6% within 1 week of diagnosis. The algorithm-derived estimate of GA at time of fetal death was one or more weeks earlier than the GA at delivery for 43.5% of stillbirths. GA estimated from fetal foot length agreed with GA by algorithm within 2 weeks for 75% within a subset of well-dated stillbirths.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Precise assignment of GA at death, defined as reliable dating criteria and a short interval (≤1 week) during which fetal death was known to have occurred, was possible in 46.6% of cases. Fetal foot length is a relatively accurate measure of GA at death and should be collected in all stillbirth cases.
authors: University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. dudleyd@uthscsa.edu
authors: Deborah L
authors: DL
authors: Conway
authors: Nellie I
authors: NI
authors: Hansen
authors: Donald J
authors: DJ
authors: Dudley
authors: Corette B
authors: CB
authors: Parker
authors: Uma M
authors: UM
authors: Reddy
authors: Robert M
authors: RM
authors: Silver
authors: Radek
authors: R
authors: Bukowski
authors: Halit
authors: H
authors: Pinar
authors: Barbara J
authors: BJ
authors: Stoll
authors: Michael W
authors: MW
authors: Varner
authors: George R
authors: GR
authors: Saade
authors: Carol
authors: C
authors: Hogue
authors: Marian
authors: M
authors: Willinger
authors: Donald
authors: D
authors: Coustan
authors: Matthew A
authors: MA
authors: Koch
authors: Robert L
authors: RL
authors: Goldenberg
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D005260:Female; D005313:Fetal Death; D005865:Gestational Age; D006801:Humans; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011247:Pregnancy; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D050497:Stillbirth / Q000453:epidemiology*
references: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;25(5):425-35
references: 21819424
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1957 Nov;74(5):1092-7
references: 13469903
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;113(3):748-761
references: 19300347
references: J Ultrasound Med. 2000 Mar;19(3):201-5
references: 10709836
references: Radiology. 1992 Feb;182(2):501-5
references: 1732970
references: Am J Public Health. 1997 Aug;87(8):1323-7
references: 9279268
references: Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Oct;80(4):585-92
references: 1407877
references: Am J Public Health. 1989 May;79(5):600-2
references: 2705595
references: Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2005 Mar-Apr;8(2):204-17
references: 15747100
references: Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Oct;80(4):575-84
references: 1383898
references: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 May;105(5):524-30
references: 9637122
references: Radiology. 1984 Aug;152(2):497-501
references: 6739822
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Oct;159(4):923-6
references: 3052082
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;104(3):639-46
references: 15339790
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Feb;156(2):350-5
references: 3548369
references: Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Oct;80(4):593-600
references: 1407878
references: Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Apr;71(4):526-31
references: 3353042
references: Am J Perinatol. 2012 Mar;29(3):187-202
references: 21815127