title: White Matter Lesion Assessment in Patients with Cognitive Impairment and Healthy Controls: Reliability Comparisons between Visual Rating, a Manual, and an Automatic Volumetrical MRI Method-The Gothenburg MCI Study.
abstract: Age-related white matter lesions (WML) are a risk factor for stroke, cognitive decline, and dementia. Different requirements are imposed on methods for the assessment of WML in clinical settings and for research purposes, but reliability analysis is of major importance. In this study, WML assessment with three different methods was evaluated. In the Gothenburg mild cognitive impairment study, MRI scans from 152 participants were used to assess WML with the Fazekas visual rating scale on T2 images, a manual volumetric method on FLAIR images, and FreeSurfer volumetry on T1 images. Reliability was acceptable for all three methods. For low WML volumes (2/3 of the patients), reliability was overall lower and nonsignificant for the manual volumetric method. Unreliability in the assessment of patients with low WML with manual volumetry may mainly be due to intensity variation in the FLAIR sequence used; hence, intensity standardization and normalization methods must be used for more accurate assessments. The FreeSurfer segmentations resulted in smaller WML volumes than the volumes acquired with the manual method and showed deviations from visible hypointensities in the T1 images, which quite likely reduces validity.
authors: Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden.
authors: Erik
authors: E
authors: Olsson
authors: Niklas
authors: N
authors: Klasson
authors: Josef
authors: J
authors: Berge
authors: Carl
authors: C
authors: Eckerström
authors: Ake
authors: A
authors: Edman
authors: Helge
authors: H
authors: Malmgren
authors: Anders
authors: A
authors: Wallin
references: Neurology. 2011 Apr 26;76(17):1492-9
references: 21518999
references: Stroke. 2008 Jul;39(7):2046-51
references: 18436882
references: J Neural Transm Suppl. 2000;59:23-30
references: 10961414
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Oct;1142:266-309
references: 18990132
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Jul 15;57(2):416-22
references: 21569857
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Apr;30(4):1155-67
references: 18465744
references: J Neurol. 2006 Sep;253(9):1189-96
references: 16998647
references: Neuroradiology. 2012 Apr;54(4):299-320
references: 21584674
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Oct;30(10):3238-53
references: 19277975
references: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Feb;58(2):275-81
references: 20374403
references: Neuroimage. 2004 May;22(1):144-54
references: 15110004
references: BMJ. 2009 Jul 06;339:b2477
references: 19581317
references: Magn Reson Med. 1994 Jul;32(1):121-8
references: 8084227
references: Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;2011:546871
references: 21760989
references: J Neurol. 2004 May;251(5):584-90
references: 15164192
references: Stroke. 2006 Mar;37(3):836-40
references: 16439704
references: J Neurol Sci. 2008 Sep 15;272(1-2):48-59
references: 18571674
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Aug;149(2):351-6
references: 3496763
references: J Aging Res. 2011;2011:391783
references: 21904678
references: Neurology. 2006 Jan 10;66(1):23-9
references: 16401840
references: Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24(4):661-3
references: 3249768
references: J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26 Suppl 3:379-88
references: 21971477
references: Stroke. 2003 Feb;34(2):441-5
references: 12574557
references: Stroke. 2005 Jan;36(1):50-5
references: 15576652
references: Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jan 8;167(1):81-8
references: 17210882
references: Stroke. 2008 Apr;39(4):1127-33
references: 18292383
references: Acta Neuropathol. 2011 Aug;122(2):171-85
references: 21706175
references: BMJ. 2010 Jul 26;341:c3666
references: 20660506
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Apr;30(4):1310-27
references: 18537111
references: Stroke. 1997 Aug;28(8):1614-23
references: 9259759
references: Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;11(2):183-96
references: 8455430
references: Neuron. 2002 Jan 31;33(3):341-55
references: 11832223
references: Clin Neuropsychol. 2004 Feb;18(1):50-62
references: 15595358
references: Neurology. 1993 Sep;43(9):1683-9
references: 8414012
references: Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S69-84
references: 15501102
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jan;64(1):96-106
references: 21130355