title: Patient safety and quality improvement education: a cross-sectional study of medical students' preferences and attitudes.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Recent educational initiatives by both the World Health Organization and the American Association of Medical Colleges have endorsed integrating teaching of patient safety and quality improvement (QI) to medical students. Curriculum development should take into account learners' attitudes and preferences. We surveyed students to assess preferences and attitudes about QI and patient safety education.
  
  
  METHODS
  An electronic survey was developed through focus groups, literature review, and local expert opinion and distributed via email to all medical students at a single medical school in the spring of 2012.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A greater proportion of students reported previous exposure to patient safety than to quality improvement topics (79% vs. 47%). More than 80% of students thought patient safety was of the same or greater importance than basic science or clinical skills whereas quality improvement was rated as the same or more important by about 70% of students. Students rated real life examples of quality improvement projects and participation in these projects with actual patients as potentially the most helpful (mean scores 4.2/5 and 3.9/5 respectively). For learning about patient safety, real life examples of mistakes were again rated most highly (mean scores 4.5/5 for MD presented mistakes and 4.1/5 for patient presented mistakes). Students rated QI as very important to their future career regardless of intended specialty (mean score 4.5/5).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Teaching of patient safety and quality improvement to medical students will be best received if it is integrated into clinical education rather than solely taught in pre-clinical lectures or through independent computer modules. Students recognize that these topics are important to their careers as future physicians regardless of intended specialty.
authors: School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. claire.teigland@gmail.com
authors: Claire L
authors: CL
authors: Teigland
authors: Rachel C
authors: RC
authors: Blasiak
authors: Lindsay A
authors: LA
authors: Wilson
authors: Rachel E
authors: RE
authors: Hines
authors: Karen L
authors: KL
authors: Meyerhoff
authors: Anthony J
authors: AJ
authors: Viera
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003479:Curriculum; D003625:Data Collection; D004501:Education, Medical / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D061214:Patient Safety; D058996:Quality Improvement; D013337:Students, Medical / Q000523:psychology* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data
references: Acad Med. 2005 Jun;80(6):600-6
references: 15917366
references: Anat Sci Educ. 2009 Jan-Feb;2(1):2-8
references: 19217066
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):716-22
references: 21471493
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug;16(4):256-9
references: 17693671
references: Teach Learn Med. 2009 Jul;21(3):229-32
references: 20183343
references: Acad Med. 2002 Oct;77(10):1011-8
references: 12377677
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):542-6
references: 21127112
references: Acad Med. 2009 Dec;84(12):1677-92
references: 19940573
references: J Gen Intern Med. 2006 May;21(5):419-23
references: 16704381
references: Harv Bus Rev. 1979 Mar-Apr;57(2):106-14
references: 10240501
references: Mt Sinai J Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;78(6):834-41
references: 22069207
references: BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Feb;20(2):201
references: 21303775
references: Med Teach. 2010;32(12):e547-51
references: 21090942
references: BMC Med Educ. 2011 Jun 14;11:33
references: 21669007
references: Acad Med. 2010 Sep;85(9):1425-39
references: 20543652
references: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011 Aug;16(3):347-58
references: 21132361