title: Recording and analysis of circadian rhythms in running-wheel activity in rodents.
abstract: When rodents have free access to a running wheel in their home cage, voluntary use of this wheel will depend on the time of day. Nocturnal rodents, including rats, hamsters, and mice, are active during the night and relatively inactive during the day. Many other behavioral and physiological measures also exhibit daily rhythms, but in rodents, running-wheel activity serves as a particularly reliable and convenient measure of the output of the master circadian clock, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus. In general, through a process called entrainment, the daily pattern of running-wheel activity will naturally align with the environmental light-dark cycle (LD cycle; e.g. 12 hr-light:12 hr-dark). However circadian rhythms are endogenously generated patterns in behavior that exhibit a ~24 hr period, and persist in constant darkness. Thus, in the absence of an LD cycle, the recording and analysis of running-wheel activity can be used to determine the subjective time-of-day. Because these rhythms are directed by the circadian clock the subjective time-of-day is referred to as the circadian time (CT). In contrast, when an LD cycle is present, the time-of-day that is determined by the environmental LD cycle is called the zeitgeber time (ZT). Although circadian rhythms in running-wheel activity are typically linked to the SCN clock, circadian oscillators in many other regions of the brain and body could also be involved in the regulation of daily activity rhythms. For instance, daily rhythms in food-anticipatory activity do not require the SCN and instead, are correlated with changes in the activity of extra-SCN oscillators. Thus, running-wheel activity recordings can provide important behavioral information not only about the output of the master SCN clock, but also on the activity of extra-SCN oscillators. Below we describe the equipment and methods used to record, analyze and display circadian locomotor activity rhythms in laboratory rodents.
authors: Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University.
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Verwey
authors: Barry
authors: B
authors: Robinson
authors: Shimon
authors: S
authors: Amir
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D002940:Circadian Rhythm / Q000502:physiology*; D006224:Cricetinae; D005080:Exercise Test / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D051379:Mice; D051381:Rats; D012420:Running / Q000502:physiology*; D012984:Software; D013493:Suprachiasmatic Nucleus / Q000502:physiology
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jun;69(6):1583-6
references: 4556464
references: J Neurosci. 2004 Jan 28;24(4):781-90
references: 14749422
references: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1980 Summer;4(2):119-31
references: 6106914
references: Lab Anim. 2000 Jul;34(3):313-8
references: 11037127
references: Genes Dev. 2000 Dec 1;14(23):2950-61
references: 11114885
references: Brain Res. 1972 Jul 13;42(1):201-6
references: 5047187
references: Genes Cells. 2001 Mar;6(3):269-78
references: 11260270
references: Genes Brain Behav. 2003 Feb;2(1):32-9
references: 12882317
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Nov;30(9):1650-7
references: 19863660
references: J Neurosci. 2002 Jan 1;22(1):350-6
references: 11756518
references: Science. 2000 Apr 28;288(5466):682-5
references: 10784453
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Mar 15;102(11):4180-4
references: 15746242
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Jun;25(11):3195-216
references: 17552989
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Jun;29(11):2217-22
references: 19490091
references: J Neurosci. 2000 Dec 15;20(24):9326-32
references: 11125012
references: J Comp Physiol A. 1988 Jan;162(1):35-46
references: 3351785
references: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Mar;9(3):398-407
references: 16491082
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 13;101(15):5339-46
references: 14963227
references: Science. 1990 Feb 23;247(4945):975-8
references: 2305266
references: Behav Neurosci. 2004 Feb;118(1):131-7
references: 14979789
references: Behav Brain Res. 1980 Feb;1(1):39-65
references: 7284080