title: Peer coaching to improve diabetes self-management: which patients benefit most?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Peer health coaching is an effective method of enhancing self-management support in patients with diabetes. It is unclear whether peer health coaching is equally beneficial to all patients with poor glycemic control, or is most effective for subgroups of patients.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To examine whether the effect of peer health coaching on hemoglobin A1c (A1c) is modified by characteristics that are known to be associated with diabetes control.
  
  
  METHODS
  Sub-group analyses of randomized control trial.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two hundred and ninety nine patients with diabetes receiving care in public health clinics who participated in a randomized controlled trial of peer health coaches.
  
  
  METHODS
  We examined whether the association between study group and change in A1c was modified by differences in patients' demographic, behavioral or psychosocial characteristics. Analyses were adjusted for co-variables associated with change in A1c.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The effect of coaching on patient A1c was modified by patients' level of self-management and degree of medication adherence as baseline (p=.02, and p=.03 respectively in adjusted models). For participants with "low" self-management (one standard deviation below the mean score), the usual care group experienced a slight increase in A1c (0.3 %), while the health coaching group experienced a decrease (-0.9 %). For participants with "high" self-management (one standard deviation above the mean score), both groups experienced a similar decrease in A1c (usual care group: -1.0 %; health coaching group: -1.1 %). Participants with "low" medication adherence in the usual care group experienced an increase in A1c (0.5 %), while the health coaching group experienced a decrease (-0.8 %). Participants with "high" medication adherence experienced similar decreases (usual care group: -1.1 %; health coaching group: -1.3 %).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Peer health coaching had a larger effect on lowering A1c in patients with low levels of medication adherence and self-management support than in patients with higher levels. Peer health coaching interventions may be most effective if targeted to high-risk patients with diabetes with poor glycemic control and with poor self-management and medication adherence.
authors: Department of Ambulatory and Preventive Medicine, Alameda County Medical Center, 1411 East 31st St, Oakland, CA, 94602, USA. dmoskowitz@acmedctr.org
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Moskowitz
authors: David H
authors: DH
authors: Thom
authors: Danielle
authors: D
authors: Hessler
authors: Amireh
authors: A
authors: Ghorob
authors: Thomas
authors: T
authors: Bodenheimer
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003924:Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / Q000097:blood / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006442:Glycated Hemoglobin / Q000378:metabolism; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010379:Peer Group; D012648:Self Care / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D006442:Glycated Hemoglobin; C517652:hemoglobin A1c protein, human
references: Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9):794-811
references: 12218770
references: Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 20;156(6):416-24
references: 22431674
references: Diabetes Care. 2002 Jul;25(7):1159-71
references: 12087014
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
references: 3806354
references: Diabetes Care. 2012 Jan;35 Suppl 1:S101-8
references: 22187467
references: J Behav Med. 2007 Oct;30(5):395-401
references: 17522972
references: Diabetes Educ. 2001 Sep-Oct;27(5):703-10
references: 12212020
references: Med Care. 1986 Jan;24(1):67-74
references: 3945130
references: Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27 Suppl 1:i23-32
references: 19293400
references: JAMA. 2002 Jul 24-31;288(4):475-82
references: 12132978
references: Health Psychol. 2004 Mar;23(2):207-18
references: 15008666
references: Diabetes Care. 2002 Sep;25(9):1576-83
references: 12196430
references: J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Sep;25 Suppl 4:S610-4
references: 20737236
references: Health Educ Behav. 2003 Apr;30(2):170-95
references: 12693522
references: Ann Intern Med. 2010 Oct 19;153(8):507-15
references: 20956707
references: Fam Med. 2004 Sep;36(8):588-94
references: 15343421
references: Am J Prev Med. 2009 Feb;36(2):126-32
references: 19062239
references: Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27 Suppl 1:i6-16
references: 19276176
references: Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43
references: 11491192
references: Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):160-8
references: 21292425
references: J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):561-6
references: 18335281
references: Diabetes Educ. 2008 Mar-Apr;34(2):266-76
references: 18375776
references: Epidemiol Rev. 2004;26:63-77
references: 15234948
references: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 May;10(5):348-54
references: 18453793
references: Arch Intern Med. 2000 Nov 27;160(21):3278-85
references: 11088090
references: J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):163-73
references: 18752852
references: BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 01;11:208
references: 21457567
references: Med Care. 2001 Nov;39(11):1217-23
references: 11606875