title: Scanning linear estimation: improvements over region of interest (ROI) methods.
abstract: In tomographic medical imaging, a signal activity is typically estimated by summing voxels from a reconstructed image. We introduce an alternative estimation scheme that operates on the raw projection data and offers a substantial improvement, as measured by the ensemble mean-square error (EMSE), when compared to using voxel values from a maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization (MLEM) reconstruction. The scanning-linear (SL) estimator operates on the raw projection data and is derived as a special case of maximum-likelihood estimation with a series of approximations to make the calculation tractable. The approximated likelihood accounts for background randomness, measurement noise and variability in the parameters to be estimated. When signal size and location are known, the SL estimate of signal activity is unbiased, i.e. the average estimate equals the true value. By contrast, unpredictable bias arising from the null functions of the imaging system affect standard algorithms that operate on reconstructed data. The SL method is demonstrated for two different tasks: (1) simultaneously estimating a signal's size, location and activity; (2) for a fixed signal size and location, estimating activity. Noisy projection data are realistically simulated using measured calibration data from the multi-module multi-resolution small-animal SPECT imaging system. For both tasks, the same set of images is reconstructed using the MLEM algorithm (80 iterations), and the average and maximum values within the region of interest (ROI) are calculated for comparison. This comparison shows dramatic improvements in EMSE for the SL estimates. To show that the bias in ROI estimates affects not only absolute values but also relative differences, such as those used to monitor the response to therapy, the activity estimation task is repeated for three different signal sizes.
authors: College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. meredith@optics.arizona.edu
authors: Meredith K
authors: MK
authors: Kupinski
authors: Eric W
authors: EW
authors: Clarkson
authors: Harrison H
authors: HH
authors: Barrett
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D016014:Linear Models; D015899:Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon / Q000379:methods*
references: Phys Med Biol. 1984 May;29(5):543-52
references: 6610883
references: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2003 Mar;20(3):421-9
references: 12630828
references: Opt Express. 1998 Mar 16;2(6):254-60
references: 19377608
references: IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2010 Jun 1;57(3):1077-1084
references: 20824155
references: Phys Med Biol. 2008 Sep 7;53(17):4595-604
references: 18678930
references: J Nucl Med. 2006 Jun;47(6):1059-66
references: 16741317
references: J Nucl Med. 2004 Sep;45(9):1431-4
references: 15347707
references: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2007 Dec;24(12):B91-8
references: 18059918
references: Phys Med Biol. 2011 Nov 7;56(21):6983-7000
references: 22008861
references: Phys Med Biol. 1994 May;39(5):847-71
references: 15552089
references: J Nucl Med. 2012 Jan;53(1):4-11
references: 22213818
references: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 May;24(5):636-50
references: 15889551
references: PET Clin. 2008 Jan;3(1):89-99
references: 27158148
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):310-20
references: 20651185
references: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2009 Mar 12;7263:
references: 21278802
references: Opt Express. 2008 May 26;16(11):8150-73
references: 18545527
references: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 Jun;27(6):775-88
references: 18541485
references: Phys Med Biol. 2005 Aug 21;50(16):3697-715
references: 16077222
references: J Opt Soc Am A. 1992 May;9(5):649-58
references: 1588452
references: J Nucl Med. 2010 Feb;51(2):268-76
references: 20080896
references: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Nov;28(11):1717-26
references: 19447699
references: J Nucl Med. 2011 Feb;52(2):171-2
references: 21233179
references: Phys Med Biol. 1994 May;39(5):833-46
references: 15552088
references: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1998 May;15(5):1355-60
references: 9579056
references: J Nucl Med. 2005 Mar;46(3):424-8
references: 15750154
references: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986 Jul-Aug;10(4):654-63
references: 3488338
references: Nucl Med Biol. 2000 Oct;27(7):643-6
references: 11091106
references: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 May;38 Suppl 1:S69-77
references: 21484383
references: J Nucl Med. 2012 Jan;53(1):1-3
references: 22159159
references: J Nucl Med. 2004 Sep;45(9):1519-27
references: 15347719
references: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Dec;35(12):2320-33
references: 18704407
references: J Nucl Med. 1990 Oct;31(10):1693-701
references: 2213195
references: Med Phys. 2010 Jul;37(7):3660-6
references: 20831073
references: J Nucl Med. 1995 Oct;36(10):1836-9
references: 7562051
references: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984 Jun;8(3):514-22
references: 6609942
references: Med Phys. 2007 Mar;34(3):987-93
references: 17441245