title: The impact of biases in mobile phone ownership on estimates of human mobility.
abstract: Mobile phone data are increasingly being used to quantify the movements of human populations for a wide range of social, scientific and public health research. However, making population-level inferences using these data is complicated by differential ownership of phones among different demographic groups that may exhibit variable mobility. Here, we quantify the effects of ownership bias on mobility estimates by coupling two data sources from the same country during the same time frame. We analyse mobility patterns from one of the largest mobile phone datasets studied, representing the daily movements of nearly 15 million individuals in Kenya over the course of a year. We couple this analysis with the results from a survey of socioeconomic status, mobile phone ownership and usage patterns across the country, providing regional estimates of population distributions of income, reported airtime expenditure and actual airtime expenditure across the country. We match the two data sources and show that mobility estimates are surprisingly robust to the substantial biases in phone ownership across different geographical and socioeconomic groups.
authors: Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15221, USA.
authors: Amy
authors: A
authors: Wesolowski
authors: Nathan
authors: N
authors: Eagle
authors: Abdisalan M
authors: AM
authors: Noor
authors: Robert W
authors: RW
authors: Snow
authors: Caroline O
authors: CO
authors: Buckee
mesh_terms: D040421:Cell Phone / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D007630:Kenya; D008954:Models, Biological; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000502:physiology*; D015983:Selection Bias; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors
references: Nature. 2006 Jan 26;439(7075):462-5
references: 16437114
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15301-6
references: 16230616
references: J R Soc Interface. 2008 Jul 6;5(24):759-72
references: 17999949
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 17;109(29):11576-81
references: 22711804
references: Science. 2009 Jul 24;325(5939):412-3
references: 19628854
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 17;109(16):6000-5
references: 22474361
references: Science. 2010 Feb 19;327(5968):1018-21
references: 20167789
references: J R Soc Interface. 2010 Sep 6;7(50):1247-56
references: 20504800
references: Nature. 2008 Jun 5;453(7196):779-82
references: 18528393
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 6;107(27):12222-7
references: 20566870
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39253
references: 22761748
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 22;106(51):21484-9
references: 20018697
references: Science. 2012 Oct 12;338(6104):267-70
references: 23066082
references: Sci Rep. 2011;1:93
references: 22355611
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 22;277(1681):557-65
references: 19864279
references: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2009 Aug 28;367(1901):3321-9
references: 19620127
references: PLoS One. 2010 Jul 12;5(7):e11539
references: 20634965
references: Science. 2011 Dec 9;334(6061):1424-7
references: 22158822
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35319
references: 22558140
references: Int Migr Rev. 2001;35(3):749-71
references: 19186413
references: Soc Indic Res. 2007 Oct;84(1):117-126
references: 20076776