title: Group testing regression model estimation when case identification is a goal.
abstract: Group testing is frequently used to reduce the costs of screening a large number of individuals for infectious diseases or other binary characteristics in small prevalence situations. In many applications, the goals include both identifying individuals as positive or negative and estimating the probability of positivity. The identification aspect leads to additional tests being performed, known as "retests", beyond those performed for initial groups of individuals. In this paper, we investigate how regression models can be fit to estimate the probability of positivity while also incorporating the extra information from these retests. We present simulation evidence showing that significant gains in efficiency occur by incorporating retesting information, and we further examine which testing protocols are the most efficient to use. Our investigations also demonstrate that some group testing protocols can actually lead to more efficient estimates than individual testing when diagnostic tests are imperfect. The proposed methods are applied retrospectively to chlamydia screening data from the Infertility Prevention Project. We demonstrate that significant cost savings could occur through the use of particular group testing protocols.
authors: Department of Statistics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
authors: Boan
authors: B
authors: Zhang
authors: Christopher R
authors: CR
authors: Bilder
authors: Joshua M
authors: JM
authors: Tebbs
mesh_terms: D001699:Biometry / Q000379:methods*; D002690:Chlamydia Infections / Q000175:diagnosis; D006040:Goals; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D015233:Models, Statistical; D012044:Regression Analysis
references: Biometrics. 1990 Dec;46(4):1035-46
references: 2085624
references: R J. 2010 Dec 1;2(2):56-60
references: 21833347
references: J Am Stat Assoc. 2010 Sep 1;105(491):942-955
references: 21113353
references: Biometrika. 2012 Mar;99(1):245-251
references: 23049137
references: J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2008 Dec;6(12):1032-7
references: 18479502
references: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011 Mar 1;56(3):e70-4
references: 21124228
references: Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2009 May;12(3):339-50
references: 19396735
references: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007 Feb 1;44(2):196-202
references: 17312561
references: J Vet Diagn Invest. 2000 May;12(3):195-203
references: 10826831
references: Med Vet Entomol. 2004 Jun;18(2):200-4
references: 15189246
references: N Engl J Med. 2004 Aug 19;351(8):760-8
references: 15317889
references: Nat Methods. 2006 Mar;3(3):161-2
references: 16489330
references: Stat Med. 1994 Nov 30;13(22):2337-43
references: 7855467
references: J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2012 Mar 1;61(2):277-290
references: 25035521
references: Biometrics. 2007 Dec;63(4):1152-63
references: 17501946
references: Stat Med. 2001 Jul 15;20(13):1957-69
references: 11427952
references: Biometrics. 2000 Sep;56(3):833-40
references: 10985223
references: Biometrics. 2000 Dec;56(4):1126-33
references: 11129470
references: Biometrics. 2009 Sep;65(3):903-10
references: 19053996