title: The capacity of audiovisual integration is limited to one item.
abstract: The human visual attention system is geared toward detecting the most salient and relevant events in an overwhelming stream of information. There has been great interest in measuring how many visual events can be processed at a time, and most of the work has suggested that the limit is three to four. However, attention to a visual stimulus can also be driven by a synchronous auditory event. The present work indicates that a fundamentally different limit applies to audiovisual processing, such that at most only a single audiovisual event can be processed at a time. This limited capacity is not due to a limitation in visual selection; participants were able to process about four visual objects simultaneously. Instead, we propose that audiovisual orienting is subject to a fundamentally different capacity limit than pure visual selection is.
authors: Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. erik.vanderburg@sydney.edu.au
authors: Erik
authors: E
authors: Van der Burg
authors: Edward
authors: E
authors: Awh
authors: Christian N L
authors: CN
authors: Olivers
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D013997:Time Factors; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references: Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(13):1847-62
references: 14527547
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Jul-Aug;16(6):1000-9
references: 15298787
references: Neuroreport. 2001 Jan 22;12(1):7-10
references: 11201094
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Jun;130(2):169-83
references: 11409097
references: PLoS One. 2010 May 14;5(5):e10664
references: 20498844
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):904-9
references: 21748418
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Dec;37(6):1784-802
references: 21942418
references: Curr Biol. 2004 Feb 3;14(3):257-62
references: 14761661
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jul;9(7):349-54
references: 15953754
references: Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):748-51
references: 15085132
references: Can J Exp Psychol. 1994 Jun;48(2):205-17
references: 8069282
references: Neuroreport. 1999 Jul 13;10(10):2001-5
references: 10424664
references: Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):622-8
references: 17614871
references: J Vis. 2008 May 07;8(5):2.1-10
references: 18842073
references: Psychol Rev. 1994 Jan;101(1):80-102
references: 8121961
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 1;55(3):1208-18
references: 21195781
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Nov;16(4):812-25
references: 2148594
references: Neurosci Lett. 2009 Jan 23;450(1):60-4
references: 19013216
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39137
references: 22808027
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Oct;34(5):1053-65
references: 18823194
references: Percept Psychophys. 1988 Oct;44(4):369-78
references: 3226885
references: Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81
references: 9384378
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85
references: 11515286
references: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Aug;72(6):1654-65
references: 20675808
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Oct;20(5):1000-14
references: 7964526
references: Percept Mot Skills. 1973 Dec;37(3):967-79
references: 4764534
references: Cognition. 2001 Jun;80(1-2):127-58
references: 11245842
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Sep;11(5):473-90
references: 10511637