title: 3D imaging reconstruction and impacted third molars: case reports.
abstract: There is a debate in the literature about the need for Computed Tomagraphy (CT) before removing third molars, even if positive radiographic signs are present. In few cases, the third molar is so close to the inferior alveolar nerve that its extraction might expose patients to the risk of post-operative neuro-sensitive alterations of the skin and the mucosa of the homolateral lower lip and chin. Thus, the injury of the inferior alveolar nerve may represent a serious, though infrequent, neurologic complication in the surgery of the third molars rendering necessary a careful pre-operative evaluation of their anatomical relationship with the inferior alveolar nerve by means of radiographic imaging techniques. This contribution presents two case reports showing positive radiographic signs, which are the hallmarks of a possible close relationship between the inferior alveolar nerve and the third molars. We aim at better defining the relationship between third molars and the mandibular canal using Dental CT Scan, DICOM image acquisition and 3D reconstruction with a dedicated software. By our study we deduce that 3D images are not indispensable, but they can provide a very agreeable assistance in the most complicated cases.
authors: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
authors: Andrea
authors: A
authors: Tuzi
authors: Roberto
authors: R
authors: Di Bari
authors: Andrea
authors: A
authors: Cicconetti
keywords: 3D reconstruction; 3M third molar; CBCT Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; DICOM image; Dental CT Scan; IAN Inferior Alveolar Nerve
references: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 May;68(5):1170-3
references: 20185220
references: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Feb;42(1):21-7
references: 14706294
references: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Jan;65(1):83-8
references: 17174769
references: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Nov;20(11):1212-8
references: 19719735
references: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Jan;63(1):3-7
references: 15635549
references: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Oct;66(10):2130-5
references: 18848113
references: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Aug;67(8):1764-6
references: 19615596
references: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 May;105(5):633-42; discussion 643
references: 18299225
references: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Feb;109(2):294-302
references: 19846324
references: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Aug;66(8):1678-85
references: 18634957
references: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Feb;103(2):e7-9
references: 17095260
references: Clin Oral Investig. 2008 Dec;12(4):291-302
references: 18446390
references: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Mar;109(3):335-45
references: 20097103
references: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan;68(1):74-82
references: 20006158
references: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jun;68(6):1296-303
references: 20356665
references: Aust Dent J. 2006 Mar;51(1):64-8
references: 16669480
references: N Y State Dent J. 2005 Nov;71(6):32-5
references: 16447543
references: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Aug;37(8):704-9
references: 18501561
references: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Jul;64(7):1030-7
references: 16781335
references: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Feb;103(2):253-9
references: 17234544
references: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jan;67(1):58-66
references: 19070749