title: Hierarchy, causation and explanation: ubiquity, locality and pluralism.
abstract: The ubiquity of top-down causal explanations within and across the sciences is prima facie evidence for the existence of top-down causation. Much debate has been focused on whether top-down causation is coherent or in conflict with reductionism. Less attention has been given to the question of whether these representations of hierarchical relations pick out a single, common hierarchy. A negative answer to this question undermines a commonplace view that the world is divided into stratified 'levels' of organization and suggests that attributions of causal responsibility in different hierarchical representations may not have a meaningful basis for comparison. Representations used in top-down and bottom-up explanations are primarily 'local' and tied to distinct domains of science, illustrated here by protein structure and folding. This locality suggests that no single metaphysical account of hierarchy for causal relations to obtain within emerges from the epistemology of scientific explanation. Instead, a pluralist perspective is recommended-many different kinds of top-down causation (explanation) can exist alongside many different kinds of bottom-up causation (explanation). Pluralism makes plausible why different senses of top-down causation can be coherent and not in conflict with reductionism, thereby illustrating a productive interface between philosophical analysis and scientific inquiry.
authors: Department of Philosophy, Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science ,  University of Minnesota ,  831 Heller Hall, 271 19th Ave. S, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0310 ,  USA.
authors: Alan C
authors: AC
authors: Love
keywords: causation; explanation; hierarchy; pluralism; reductionism; top-down
references: Novartis Found Symp. 2008;291:23-36; discussion 36-44, 137-40
references: 18575264
references: Q Rev Biol. 2008 Mar;83(1):65-76
references: 18481590
references: Science. 1973 Jul 20;181(4096):223-30
references: 4124164
references: Annu Rev Biochem. 2001;70:603-47
references: 11395418
references: EMBO J. 2008 May 21;27(10):1458-68
references: 18418386
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 19;105(33):11754-9
references: 18697933
references: Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2004 Jun;14(3):374-9
references: 15193319
references: Cell. 2006 Jun 2;125(5):903-14
references: 16751100
references: PLoS One. 2011 Apr 04;6(4):e17857
references: 21483739
references: Annu Rev Physiol. 1999;61:243-82
references: 10099689
references: Trends Biochem Sci. 2004 Oct;29(10):527-34
references: 15450607
references: Trends Biochem Sci. 1998 Feb;23(2):43-5
references: 9538685
references: Cell. 2006 Jan 13;124(1):75-88
references: 16413483
references: Novartis Found Symp. 2008;291:45-54; discussion 54-8, 137-40
references: 18575265
references: Theory Biosci. 2006 Mar;124(3-4):317-33
references: 17046363
references: Science. 2008 Aug 8;321(5890):784-6
references: 18687949
references: J Mol Biol. 1999 Oct 22;293(2):283-93
references: 10550209
references: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010 Dec;2(12):a003665
references: 20685845
references: Nat Genet. 2005 Dec;37(12):1376-9
references: 16273106
references: Trends Biochem Sci. 2001 Oct;26(10):597-604
references: 11590012
references: Nature. 2003 Dec 18;426(6968):884-90
references: 14685248
references: Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009 Jun;16(6):574-81
references: 19491934
references: Cell. 2005 Mar 11;120(5):715-27
references: 15766533
references: Cell. 2005 Jun 3;121(5):739-48
references: 15935760