title: Salience-based selection: attentional capture by distractors less salient than the target.
abstract: Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably selected first. However, existing salience and visual search models assume noise in the map computation or selection process. Consequently, they predict the first selection to be stochastically dependent on salience, implying that attention could even be captured first by the second most salient (instead of the most salient) stimulus in the field. Yet, capture by less salient distractors has not been reported and salience-based selection accounts claim that the distractor has to be more salient in order to capture attention. We tested this prediction using an empirical and modeling approach of the visual search distractor paradigm. For the empirical part, we manipulated salience of target and distractor parametrically and measured reaction time interference when a distractor was present compared to absent. Reaction time interference was strongly correlated with distractor salience relative to the target. Moreover, even distractors less salient than the target captured attention, as measured by reaction time interference and oculomotor capture. In the modeling part, we simulated first selection in the distractor paradigm using behavioral measures of salience and considering the time course of selection including noise. We were able to replicate the result pattern we obtained in the empirical part. We conclude that each salience value follows a specific selection time distribution and attentional capture occurs when the selection time distributions of target and distractor overlap. Hence, selection is stochastic in nature and attentional capture occurs with a certain probability depending on relative salience.
authors: Department Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany. mzehetleitner@psy.lmu.de
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Zehetleitner
authors: Anja Isabel
authors: AI
authors: Koch
authors: Harriet
authors: H
authors: Goschy
authors: Hermann Joseph
authors: HJ
authors: Müller
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*
references: J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 25;30(34):11458-65
references: 20739567
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Aug;38(4):941-57
references: 22506778
references: Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jan;19(1):106-14
references: 18515299
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):1-16
references: 19170466
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Jan 1;6(1):9-16
references: 11849610
references: J Vis. 2007 May 23;7(7):6.1-14
references: 17685802
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:269-97
references: 9046562
references: Vision Res. 1994 Sep;34(18):2453-67
references: 7975284
references: Vision Res. 1996 Jun;36(12):1827-37
references: 8759451
references: Exp Brain Res. 2010 Apr;201(4):789-96
references: 19940982
references: Percept Psychophys. 1991 Aug;50(2):184-93
references: 1945740
references: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul;74(5):879-90
references: 22391894
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Mar;2(3):194-203
references: 11256080
references: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Sep;99(3):225-34
references: 8862112
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Jun;16(5):751-9
references: 15200703
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Apr;18(4):604-13
references: 16768363
references: Percept Psychophys. 1996 Jan;58(1):88-101
references: 8668524
references: Neural Comput. 2009 Jan;21(1):239-71
references: 19210172
references: Percept Psychophys. 2000 Apr;62(3):425-51
references: 10909235
references: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Feb;73(2):349-63
references: 21264729
references: J Vis. 2011 Jan 31;11(1):
references: 21282341
references: Hum Neurobiol. 1985;4(4):219-27
references: 3836989
references: Cogn Psychol. 1990 Apr;22(2):225-71
references: 2331857
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Oct;61(10):1553-72
references: 17926227
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222
references: 7605061
references: Percept Psychophys. 1993 May;53(5):563-80
references: 8332425
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1983 Aug;9(4):510-22
references: 6224889
references: Curr Biol. 2010 Jan 26;20(2):121-4
references: 20079642
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:1-21
references: 20192813
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Aug;16(3):459-78
references: 2144564
references: J Neurosci. 2010 Sep 22;30(38):12831-43
references: 20861387
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):438-81
references: 12412886
references: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jan;72(1):5-18
references: 20045875
references: J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 7;32(10):3433-46
references: 22399766
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):202-38
references: 24203471
references: Cogn Psychol. 1990 Jul;22(3):273-341
references: 2376113
references: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Nov;71(8):1760-70
references: 19933560
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Mar;24(3):749-59
references: 21861683
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Dec;14(6):1011-26
references: 18229471
references: Mem Cognit. 1994 Nov;22(6):657-72
references: 7808275
references: J Neurosci. 1999 Mar 1;19(5):1736-53
references: 10024360
references: J Vis. 2005 May 02;5(5):376-404
references: 16097871
references: Neuron. 2001 Aug 30;31(4):523-35
references: 11545712
references: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Nov;71(8):1739-59
references: 19933559
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Oct;20(5):1000-14
references: 7964526
references: J Vis. 2008 Jun 13;8(7):13.1-18
references: 19146246
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Feb;13(1):132-8
references: 16724780
references: Percept Psychophys. 1992 Jun;51(6):599-606
references: 1620571
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Aug 29;353(1373):1245-55
references: 9770219
references: J Vis. 2009 Mar 13;9(3):5.1-24
references: 19757944
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Aug;15(3):419-33
references: 2527952
references: Neuron. 2007 Jan 4;53(1):9-16
references: 17196526
references: Psychol Res. 1999;62(2-3):182-94
references: 10490397
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):847-58
references: 9627420
references: Vision Res. 2000;40(10-12):1227-68
references: 10788638
references: Spat Vis. 1993;7(4):341-63
references: 8110633
references: Vision Res. 2000;40(10-12):1489-506
references: 10788654
references: J Vis. 2010 Dec 31;10(14):
references: 21196515
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:535-74
references: 17600525
references: Front Biosci. 2008 May 01;13:5279-93
references: 18508586
references: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Aug;8(8):1110-6
references: 16007082
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Fall;8(4):311-27
references: 23971503
references: PLoS One. 2011 Jan 21;6(1):e16276
references: 21283699
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):77-99
references: 20507828
references: Nature. 1998 Jan 29;391(6666):481-4
references: 9461214
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Oct;29(5):1021-35
references: 14585020
references: Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):550-92
references: 11488378