title: Lean systems approaches to health technology assessment: a patient-focused alternative to cost-effectiveness analysis.
abstract: Many countries now use health technology assessment (HTA) to review new and emerging technologies, especially with regard to reimbursement, pricing and/or clinical guidelines. One of the common, but not universal, features of these systems is the use of economic evaluation, normally cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), to confirm that new technologies offer value for money. Many have criticised these systems as primarily being concerned with cost containment, rather than advancing the interests of patients or innovators. This paper calls into question the underlying principles of CEA by arguing that value in the healthcare system may in fact be unconstrained. It is suggested that 'lean management principles' can be used not only to trim waste from the health system, but as a method of creating real incentives for innovation and value creation. Following the lean paradigm, this value must be defined purely from the patients' perspective, and the entire health system needs to work towards the creation of such value. This paper offers as a practical example a lean approach to HTA, arguing that such an approach would lead to better incentives for innovation in health, as well as more patient-friendly outcomes in the long run.
authors: Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. jbridges@jhsph.edu
authors: John F P
authors: JF
authors: Bridges
mesh_terms: D003363:Cost Control; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis / Q000379:methods; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis / Q000379:methods; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D018802:Patient-Centered Care / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D012051:Reimbursement Mechanisms; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005 Winter;21(1):89-95
references: 15736519
references: Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Fall;8 Suppl A:17A-20A
references: 11586373
references: Health Econ. 2001 Jun;10(4):317-24
references: 11400254
references: Health Policy. 2003 Feb;63(2):155-65
references: 12543528
references: J Health Econ. 1992 Oct;11(3):279-96
references: 10122540
references: CMAJ. 1999 May 18;160(10):1464-7
references: 10352637
references: Med Decis Making. 2004 May-Jun;24(3):281-6
references: 15155017
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002 Summer;18(3):733-40
references: 12391964
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001 Summer;17(3):409-17
references: 11495384
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Winter;20(1):44-54
references: 15176176
references: Health Econ. 1993 Apr;2(1):59-64
references: 8269048
references: Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2(4):213-24
references: 15119540
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Summer;16(3):896-902
references: 11028144
references: Health Policy. 2003 Sep;65(3):217-26
references: 12941490
references: Health Policy. 2003 Feb;63(2):121-32
references: 12543525
references: Health Policy. 2000 Jul;52(3):179-92
references: 10862993
references: Aust Health Rev. 2001;24(2):55-62
references: 11496472
references: Eur J Health Econ. 2002;3(1):47-53
references: 15609117
references: Soc Sci Med. 2003 Mar;56(5):1121-33
references: 12593883
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002 Spring;18(2):171-83
references: 12053417
references: Soc Sci Med. 2003 Dec;57(11):2207-15
references: 14512250
references: Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(5):419-23
references: 16706568
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Winter;15(1):236-42
references: 10407609
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Fall;20(4):493-7
references: 15609801
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002 Spring;18(2):184-91
references: 12053418
references: Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(9):1171-80
references: 9783860
references: Health Policy. 2003 Feb;63(2):167-78
references: 12543529
references: Ann Intern Med. 2005 May 17;142(10):847-54
references: 15897535
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Winter;20(1):67-70
references: 15176179
references: Health Policy. 1994 May;28(2):133-41
references: 10136058
references: Soc Sci Med. 1999 Feb;48(4):535-46
references: 10075178
references: Med J Aust. 1999 Nov 15;171(10):551-2
references: 10816709
references: Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jul;39(2):151-4
references: 8066493
references: Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(4):317-21
references: 15853432
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Summer;20(3):337-41
references: 15446763
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Winter;20(1):97-101
references: 15176185
references: Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19 Suppl 2:33-8
references: 11700787
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Winter;20(1):1-10
references: 15176172
references: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2006 Feb;6(1):19-24
references: 20528533
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Feb;24(1):29-40
references: 15647213