title: Evaluating the role of attention in the context of unconscious thought theory: differential impact of attentional scope and load on preference and memory.
abstract: Attention is a key process used to conceptualize and define modes of thought, but we lack information about the role of specific attentional processes on preferential choice and memory in multi-attribute decision making. In this study, we examine the role of attention based on two dimensions, attentional scope and load on choice preference strength and memory using a paradigm that arguably elicits unconscious thought. Scope of attention was manipulated by using global or local processing during distraction (Experiment 1) and before the information-encoding stage (Experiment 2). Load was manipulated by using the n-back task in Experiment 1. Results from Experiment 1 show that global processing or distributed attention during distraction results in stronger preference irrespective of load but better memory only at low cognitive load. Task difficulty or load did not have any effect on preference or memory. In Experiment 2, distributed attention before attribute encoding facilitated only memory but did not influence preference. Results show that attentional processes at different stages of processing like distraction and information-encoding influence decision making processes. Scope of attention not only influences preference and memory but the manner in which attentional scope influences them depends on both load and stage of information processing. The results indicate the important role of attention in processes critical for decision making and calls for a re-evaluation of the unconscious thought theory (UTT) and the need for reconceptualizing the role of attention.
authors: Centre of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Allahabad Allahabad, India.
authors: Narayanan
authors: N
authors: Srinivasan
authors: Sumitava
authors: S
authors: Mukherjee
authors: Maruti V
authors: MV
authors: Mishra
authors: Smriti
authors: S
authors: Kesarwani
keywords: decision making; distraction; global attention; local attention; memory; preference; unconscious thought
references: Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Jan;2(1):39-46
references: 26301911
references: Psychol Sci. 2005 Aug;16(8):631-6
references: 16102066
references: Science. 2006 Feb 17;311(5763):1005-7
references: 16484496
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Apr;62(4):707-32
references: 18726822
references: Hum Factors. 2008 Jun;50(3):456-60
references: 18689053
references: Prog Brain Res. 2008;168:65-75
references: 18166386
references: Psychol Sci. 2009 Jun;20(6):671-5
references: 19422631
references: Psychol Res. 2009 May;73(3):372-9
references: 18626659
references: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Feb;72(2):369-77
references: 20139452
references: Psychol Sci. 2010 Feb;21(2):211-5
references: 20424047
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Feb;37(1):1-19
references: 24461214
references: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;1(2):95-109
references: 26151465
references: Psychol Sci. 2009 Nov;20(11):1381-7
references: 19818044
references: Mem Cognit. 2006 Dec;34(8):1754-68
references: 17489300
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Sep 29;95(20):12061-8
references: 9751790
references: Conscious Cogn. 2010 Jun;19(2):644-52
references: 20347600
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Aug;97(2):203-16
references: 19634971
references: Psychol Sci. 2002 Mar;13(2):194-6
references: 11934008
references: Science. 2006 Aug 11;313(5788):760-1; author reply 760-1
references: 16902110
references: Psychol Sci. 2010 Apr;21(4):484-8
references: 20424087
references: Psychol Sci. 2002 Jan;13(1):34-40
references: 11892776
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Nov;87(5):586-98
references: 15535773
references: Front Psychol. 2011 Jun 17;2:129
references: 21734897
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Jan;7(1):12-18
references: 12517353
references: Am Psychol. 2009 Sep;64(6):515-26
references: 19739881
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Mar;64(3):425-33
references: 21347993
references: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Aug;73(6):1733-41
references: 21607816
references: Prog Brain Res. 2013;202:117-34
references: 23317829
references: Front Psychol. 2011 Mar 15;2:37
references: 21716605
references: Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):748-51
references: 15085132
references: Front Psychol. 2010 Dec 20;1:217
references: 21833272
references: Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:87-100
references: 19733751
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):225-37
references: 19293088
references: Cogn Emot. 2005 May 1;19(3):313-332
references: 21852891