title: Optimization of the preparation of fish protein anti-obesity hydrolysates using response surface methodology.
abstract: The enzymatic condition for producing the anti-obesity hydrolysates from fish water-soluble protein was optimized with the aid of response surface methodology, which also derived a statistical model for experimental validation. Compared with neutral protease, papain and protamex, the porcine pancreas lipase inhibitory rate of hydrolysates from fish water-soluble protein was higher with alkaline protease. Results showed that the model terms were significant, the terms of lack of fit were not significant, and the optimal conditions for the hydrolysis by alkaline protease were initial pH 11, temperature 39 °C, enzyme dosage 122 U/mL and 10 h of hydrolysis time. Under these conditions, the porcine pancreas lipase and the α-amylase inhibitory rate could reach 53.04% ± 1.32% and  20.03 ± 0.89%, while predicted value were 54.63% ± 1.75%, 21.22% ± 0.70%, respectively. In addition, Lineweaver-Burk plots showed noncompetitive inhibition. The K(i) value calculated was 84.13 mg/mL. These results demonstrated that fish water-soluble protein could be used for obtaining anti-obesity hydrolysates.
authors: Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Ministry of Education, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, China. ypwang40@yahoo.com.
authors: Liyuan
authors: L
authors: Liu
authors: Yanping
authors: Y
authors: Wang
authors: Chen
authors: C
authors: Peng
authors: Jinju
authors: J
authors: Wang
references: Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1998 Jul;40 Suppl:S51-5
references: 9740503
references: Amino Acids. 2012 May;42(5):1641-9
references: 21384132
references: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002 Nov;26(11):1469-75
references: 12439649
references: J Nutr. 2004 Jun;134(6):1320-7
references: 15173391
references: Biomacromolecules. 2005 Sep-Oct;6(5):2809-14
references: 16153122
references: Drugs. 1998 Dec;56(6):1093-124
references: 9878996
references: J Lipid Res. 1996 Jul;37(7):1481-7
references: 8827520
references: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007 Nov;276(1):93-8
references: 17937667
references: Immunobiology. 2006;211(5):341-50
references: 16716803
references: Life Sci. 1996;58(20):1745-55
references: 8637399
references: Bioresour Technol. 2008 Jan;99(2):335-43
references: 17303414
references: J Agric Food Chem. 2000 May;48(5):1653-6
references: 10820073
references: J Nutr. 2000 Feb;130(2S Suppl):284S-288S
references: 10721889
references: Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997 Jan 7;1344(1):6-37
references: 9022752
references: Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2009 Jul-Aug;11(4):445-55
references: 19067077
references: Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1989 Dec;39(4):339-48
references: 2561019
references: Eur J Nutr. 1999 Feb;38(1):1-13
references: 10338682
references: Peptides. 2007 Nov;28(11):2098-103
references: 17935831
references: Food Chem. 2008 Jul 1;109(1):176-83
references: 26054279
references: J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2009 Aug;10(8):572-9
references: 19650195
references: Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999 Apr 12;1431(1):97-106
references: 10209283
references: J Agric Food Chem. 2004 Dec 29;52(26):7842-5
references: 15612765
references: Int J Mol Sci. 2010 Sep 20;11(9):3387-96
references: 20957102
references: Yakugaku Zasshi. 1993 Apr;113(4):334-42
references: 8492298
references: J Food Sci Technol. 2013 Jun;50(3):521-7
references: 24425947
references: Food Chem Toxicol. 2010 Oct;48(10):2633-7
references: 20600532
references: J Nutr. 2004 Jan;134(1):18-23
references: 14704287