title: Evaluating the accuracy of morphological identification of larval fishes by applying DNA barcoding.
abstract: Due to insufficient morphological diagnostic characters in larval fishes, it is easy to misidentify them and difficult to key to the genus or species level. The identification results from different laboratories are often inconsistent. This experiment aims to find out, by applying DNA barcoding, how inconsistent the identifications can be among larval fish taxonomists. One hundred morphotypes of larval fishes were chosen as test specimens. The fishes were collected with either larval fish nets or light traps in the northern, southern and northwestern waters of Taiwan. After their body lengths (SL) were measured and specimen photos were taken, all specimens were delivered, in turn, to five laboratories (A-E) in Taiwan to be identified independently. When all the results were collected, these specimens were then identified using COI barcoding. Out of a total of 100 specimens, 87 were identified to the family level, 79 to the genus level and 69 to the species level, based on the COI database currently available. The average accuracy rates of the five laboratories were quite low: 80.1% for the family level, 41.1% for the genus level, and 13.5% for the species level. If the results marked as "unidentified" were excluded from calculations, the rates went up to 75.4% and 43.7% for the genus and species levels, respectively. Thus, we suggest that larval fish identification should be more conservative; i.e., when in doubt, it is better to key only to the family and not to the genus or species level. As to the most misidentified families in our experiment, they were Sparidae, Scorpaenidae, Scombridae, Serranidae and Malacanthidae. On the other hand, Mene maculata and Microcanthus strigatus were all correctly identified to the species level because their larvae have distinct morphology. Nevertheless, barcoding remains one of the best methods to confirm species identification.
authors: Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
authors: Hui-Ling
authors: HL
authors: Ko
authors: Yu-Tze
authors: YT
authors: Wang
authors: Tai-Sheng
authors: TS
authors: Chiu
authors: Ming-An
authors: MA
authors: Lee
authors: Ming-Yih
authors: MY
authors: Leu
authors: Kuang-Zong
authors: KZ
authors: Chang
authors: Wen-Yu
authors: WY
authors: Chen
authors: Kwang-Tsao
authors: KT
authors: Shao
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D058893:DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic; D003576:Electron Transport Complex IV / Q000235:genetics*; D005399:Fishes / Q000235:genetics*; D007814:Larva / Q000235:genetics*; D010802:Phylogeny; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA; D013045:Species Specificity; D013624:Taiwan
chemical_list: D003576:Electron Transport Complex IV
references: Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 May;9 Suppl s1:42-50
references: 21564963
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 29;360(1462):1847-57
references: 16214743
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 28;108(26):10602-7
references: 21670289
references: Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406-25
references: 3447015
references: Brief Bioinform. 2004 Jun;5(2):150-63
references: 15260895
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010 Jun;55(3):1195-203
references: 20188843
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 7;270(1512):313-21
references: 12614582
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e28987
references: 22438862
references: J Fish Biol. 2009 Feb;74(2):329-56
references: 20735564