title: The influence of onsets and offsets on saccade programming.
abstract: When making a saccadic eye movement to a peripheral target, a simultaneous stimulus onset at central fixation generally increases saccadic latency, while offsets reduce latency ('gap effect'). Visual onsets remote from fixation also increase latency ('remote distractor effect'); however, the influence of remote visual offsets is less clear. Previous studies, which used a search task, found that remote offsets either facilitated, inhibited, or did nothing to saccade latencies towards a peripheral target. It cannot be excluded, however, that the target selection process in such search tasks influenced the results. We therefore simplified the task and asked participants to make eye movements to a predictable target. Simultaneously with target onset, either one or multiple remote stimulus onsets and offsets were presented. It was found that peripheral onsets increased saccade latencies, but offsets did not influence the initiation of a saccade to the target. Moreover, the number of onsets and offsets did not affect the results. These results suggest that earlier effects of remote stimulus offsets and of the number of remote distractor onsets reside in the target identification process of the visual search task rather than the competition between possible saccade goals. The results are discussed in the context of models of saccade target selection.
authors: Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, TW20 0EX, UK, Also at Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven, B-3000, Belgium; e-mail:  frouke.hermens@gmail.com.
authors: Frouke
authors: F
authors: Hermens
authors: Robin
authors: R
authors: Walker
keywords: eye movements; remote distractor effect; saccadic response times
references: Exp Brain Res. 1995;103(2):287-93
references: 7789436
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Oct;28(5):1039-54
references: 12421054
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Nov;63(11):2120-40
references: 20486017
references: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jan;97(1):795-805
references: 17108094
references: J Neurosci. 2007 May 9;27(19):5053-62
references: 17494691
references: J Vis. 2008 Oct 23;8(14):11.1-16
references: 19146312
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Feb 15;13(2):256-71
references: 11244550
references: Nature. 1995 Sep 7;377(6544):59-62
references: 7659161
references: Psychol Bull. 1979 May;86(3):446-61
references: 451109
references: Exp Brain Res. 1988;73(3):546-52
references: 3224663
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Jun;30(3):538-54
references: 15161385
references: Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jul;67(5):910-28
references: 16334062
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979 Nov;5(4):625-38
references: 528963
references: Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 Nov;1(6):872-881
references: 26271783
references: Exp Brain Res. 1995;103(2):294-310
references: 7789437
references: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Mar;101(3):1222-34
references: 19019977
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Apr 1;14(3):371-88
references: 11970798
references: J Vis. 2007 Jul 20;7(10):7.1-20
references: 17997676
references: Exp Brain Res. 2008 Oct;191(1):117-22
references: 18784920
references: J Opt Soc Am. 1967 Aug;57(8):1024-9
references: 6035296
references: J Vis. 2009 Aug 10;9(9):3.1-13
references: 19761336
references: Biol Cybern. 2010 Apr;102(4):271-91
references: 20162429
references: J Neurophysiol. 1993 Aug;70(2):559-75
references: 8410157
references: J Neurophysiol. 1999 Dec;82(6):3236-53
references: 10601457
references: Vision Res. 2008 Dec;48(28):2805-16
references: 18831984
references: Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Aug;22(4):661-74; discussion 674-721
references: 11301526
references: J Neurophysiol. 1997 Aug;78(2):1108-19
references: 9307138
references: Percept Psychophys. 1980 Mar;27(3):251-7
references: 7383806
references: Biol Cybern. 2005 Jan;92(1):21-37
references: 15650897
references: J Neurophysiol. 1993 Aug;70(2):576-89
references: 8410158
references: Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1986;235(5):269-75
references: 3732337
references: Brain Res. 1983 Jan 31;260(1):21-6
references: 6402272
references: Exp Brain Res. 2009 Mar;193(3):467-76
references: 19034440
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Feb;30(1):194-211
references: 14769077
references: J Vis. 2003 Dec 29;3(11):877-92
references: 14765969
references: J Vis. 2009 Aug 28;9(9):17.1-14
references: 19761350