title: Stage-stratified analysis of prognostic significance of tumor size in patients with gastric cancer.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The prognostic significance of tumor size in gastric cancer is not well defined. The objective of this study was to identify the prognostic value of tumor size in patients with gastric cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  We retrospectively reviewed a total of 1800 patients with gastric cancer admitted to our hospital between 1997 and 2007. These patients were divided into two groups according to tumor size: small size group (SSG, tumor ≤5 cm) and large size group (LSG, tumor >5 cm). We compared clinico-pathologic features of the two groups and investigated the prognostic factors by performing univariate, multivariate, and stage- stratified analyses according to tumor size.
  
  
  RESULTS
  LSG had more aggressive clinico-pathologic features than SSG. Tumor size was an independent prognostic indicator in patients with gastric cancer. In a stratified-pT, pN, and pTNM analysis, survival of patients with LSG was significantly worse than that of patients with SSG and advanced stage. Tumor size was not a significant predictor of survival in patients with early stage tumors. Large tumor size was associated with shorter survival in patients with stages N0, N1, N2, and N3, and stages I, II, III, and IV.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Tumor size is a simple and practical prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. Tumor size could supplement clinical staging in the future.
authors: Department of Gastroenterologic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin,   2) Department of General Surgery, Daqing Oilfield General Hospital, Daqing, Heilongjiang Province,China.
authors: Hongliang
authors: H
authors: Zu
authors: Feng
authors: F
authors: Wang
authors: Yan
authors: Y
authors: Ma
authors: Yingwei
authors: Y
authors: Xue
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D011379:Prognosis; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013274:Stomach Neoplasms / Q000401:mortality* / Q000473:pathology*; D047368:Tumor Burden; D055815:Young Adult
references: Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Jul;175(1):13-6
references: 1621194
references: Cancer. 1992 Jul 15;70(2):392-5
references: 1617589
references: J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 May;13(5):881-5
references: 19184612
references: J Surg Oncol. 2008 Mar 1;97(3):236-40
references: 18095266
references: J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Dec;22(4):531-8
references: 15053293
references: Ann Surg. 2005 Jan;241(1):27-39
references: 15621988
references: Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004 Apr;39(4):380-4
references: 15125471
references: Ann Surg. 1998 Oct;228(4):449-61
references: 9790335
references: Ann Surg Oncol. 1997 Mar;4(2):137-40
references: 9084850
references: J Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun 1;101(7):622-5
references: 20461771
references: Surgery. 1997 Jun;121(6):633-9
references: 9186463
references: J Surg Oncol. 2010 Jul 1;102(1):64-7
references: 20578080
references: Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007 Mar;392(2):131-4
references: 17089174
references: World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb 28;12(8):1182-6
references: 16534868
references: Acta Chir Belg. 2004 Nov-Dec;104(6):677-82
references: 15663274
references: Gastric Cancer. 2011 Aug;14(3):274-8
references: 21461654
references: Am J Surg. 2006 Sep;192(3):296-300
references: 16920421
references: CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90
references: 21296855
references: Gastric Cancer. 1999 Nov;2(3):173-178
references: 11957092
references: J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 1;23(28):7114-24
references: 16192595
references: Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004 Apr;389(2):69-74
references: 14985987
references: J Surg Oncol. 1995 Feb;58(2):112-7
references: 7844980
references: CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 Mar-Apr;58(2):71-96
references: 18287387
references: Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jul;16(7):1875-82
references: 19373514
references: Anticancer Res. 2002 Nov-Dec;22(6B):3673-7
references: 12552975
references: Cancer. 1994 Apr 15;73(8):2059-64
references: 8156511
references: Lancet. 2003 Jul 26;362(9380):305-15
references: 12892963