title: Using methods from the data-mining and machine-learning literature for disease classification and prediction: a case study examining classification of heart failure subtypes.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Physicians classify patients into those with or without a specific disease. Furthermore, there is often interest in classifying patients according to disease etiology or subtype. Classification trees are frequently used to classify patients according to the presence or absence of a disease. However, classification trees can suffer from limited accuracy. In the data-mining and machine-learning literature, alternate classification schemes have been developed. These include bootstrap aggregation (bagging), boosting, random forests, and support vector machines.
  
  
  METHODS
  We compared the performance of these classification methods with that of conventional classification trees to classify patients with heart failure (HF) according to the following subtypes: HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) and HF with reduced ejection fraction. We also compared the ability of these methods to predict the probability of the presence of HFPEF with that of conventional logistic regression.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We found that modern, flexible tree-based methods from the data-mining literature offer substantial improvement in prediction and classification of HF subtype compared with conventional classification and regression trees. However, conventional logistic regression had superior performance for predicting the probability of the presence of HFPEF compared with the methods proposed in the data-mining literature.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The use of tree-based methods offers superior performance over conventional classification and regression trees for predicting and classifying HF subtypes in a population-based sample of patients from Ontario, Canada. However, these methods do not offer substantial improvements over logistic regression for predicting the presence of HFPEF.
authors: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, G105, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. peter.austin@ices.on.ca
authors: Peter C
authors: PC
authors: Austin
authors: Jack V
authors: JV
authors: Tu
authors: Jennifer E
authors: JE
authors: Ho
authors: Daniel
authors: D
authors: Levy
authors: Douglas S
authors: DS
authors: Lee
mesh_terms: D001185:Artificial Intelligence; D057225:Data Mining; D006333:Heart Failure / Q000145:classification*; D006801:Humans; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012044:Regression Analysis
references: Adv Dent Res. 2003 Dec;17:109-14
references: 15126220
references: Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;1(1):1-15
references: 22254181
references: Ann Behav Med. 2003 Dec;26(3):172-81
references: 14644693
references: JAMA. 2009 Dec 2;302(21):2330-7
references: 19923205
references: Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S106-13
references: 20473190
references: Methods Inf Med. 1998 Sep;37(3):226-34
references: 9787621
references: Stat Med. 2007 Jul 10;26(15):2937-57
references: 17186501
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Jan 15;41(2):217-23
references: 12535812
references: Artif Intell Med. 2005 Jun;34(2):113-27
references: 15894176
references: Psychol Methods. 2004 Dec;9(4):403-25
references: 15598095
references: Circulation. 2009 Apr 14;119(14):e391-479
references: 19324966
references: Biom J. 2012 Sep;54(5):657-73
references: 22777999
references: Eur Heart J. 2012 Jul;33(14):1734-41
references: 22507977
references: Circulation. 2009 Jun 23;119(24):3070-7
references: 19506115
references: BMC Res Notes. 2011 Aug 17;4:299
references: 21849043
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Mar;51(3):199-209
references: 9495685