title: Clinical impact of time-of-flight and point response modeling in PET reconstructions: a lesion detection study.
abstract: Time-of-flight (TOF) and point spread function (PSF) modeling have been shown to improve PET reconstructions, but the impact on physicians in the clinical setting has not been thoroughly investigated. A lesion detection and localization study was performed using simulated lesions in real patient images. Four reconstruction schemes were considered: ordinary Poisson OSEM (OP) alone and combined with TOF, PSF, and TOF + PSF. The images were presented to physicians experienced in reading PET images, and the performance of each was quantified using localization receiver operating characteristic. Numerical observers (non-prewhitening and Hotelling) were used to identify optimal reconstruction parameters, and observer SNR was compared to the performance of the physicians. The numerical models showed good agreement with human performance, and best performance was achieved by both when using TOF + PSF. These findings suggest a large potential benefit of TOF + PSF for oncology PET studies, especially in the detection of small, low-intensity, focal disease in larger patients.
authors: Molecular Imaging and Translational Research, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN 37920, USA. jschaefferkoetter@utmck.edu
authors: Joshua
authors: J
authors: Schaefferkoetter
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Casey
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Townsend
authors: Georges
authors: G
authors: El Fakhri
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D015588:Observer Variation; D049268:Positron-Emission Tomography / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D013997:Time Factors
references: J Nucl Med. 2008 Mar;49(3):462-70
references: 18287269
references: J Nucl Med. 2010 Feb;51(2):237-45
references: 20080882
references: J Opt Soc Am A. 1992 May;9(5):649-58
references: 1588452
references: J Nucl Med. 1983 Jan;24(1):73-8
references: 6336778
references: J Nucl Med. 2011 May;52(5):712-9
references: 21498523
references: Phys Med Biol. 2005 Oct 7;50(19):4507-26
references: 16177486
references: Phys Med Biol. 2010 Mar 7;55(5):1453-73
references: 20150683
references: Phys Med Biol. 2009 Jan 21;54(2):373-84
references: 19098351
references: J Nucl Med. 2000 Mar;41(3):514-21
references: 10716327
references: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2001 Mar;18(3):473-88
references: 11265678
references: IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2007;54:116-123
references: 18392119
references: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 Feb;24(2):160-9
references: 15707242
references: J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Oct;2(10):1752-9
references: 4056949
references: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006 Jul;25(7):907-21
references: 16827491
references: IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997). 2009 Oct 24;2009(2009):3042-3047
references: 20495686
references: IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2012 Oct;59(5):1940-1947
references: 23293380
references: Med Phys. 1996 Oct;23(10):1709-25
references: 8946368
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Nov 1;90(21):9758-65
references: 8234311
references: J Nucl Med. 2011 Mar;52(3):347-53
references: 21321265
references: J Nucl Med. 2009 Aug;50(8):1315-23
references: 19617317
references: Phys Med Biol. 2011 Feb 21;56(4):931-49
references: 21248391