title: Ultrasound examination of the liver: Variations in the vascular anatomy.
abstract: The hepatic vasculature is highly complex. The hepatic artery (a branch of the celiac tripod) and the portal vein (formed by the confluence of the splenic and superior mesenteric veins) provide a dual blood supply while venous drainage is guaranteed by the hepatic veins. There are also numerous anatomic variants that can involve one or more of the system's three components.Hepatic artery variants are the least common. Ten types have been identified, including several that are fairly frequent and others that are quite rare, and the variation generally involves the extrahepatic portion of the vessel. Portal vein variants are found in around 20% of the population. They can involve the main portal trunk or segmental branches. Variants of the hepatic veins are the most common. They involve the number and course (supernumerary veins) or the number, course, and openings (accessory veins).Knowledge of portal vein and hepatic vein variants, which are extremely common, is of prime importance for precise localization of lesions. Hepatic artery variants are equally important for surgical treatment of hepatic disease, especially liver transplantation, where it is essential for preoperative workup and postoperative follow-up of the recipient as well as for assessment of potential donors.
authors: IRCCS Foundation, San Matteo Medical Center, Institute of Radiology, University of Pavia, Italy.
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Battaglia
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Fachinetti
authors: F
authors: F
authors: Draghi
authors: G L
authors: GL
authors: Rapaccini
authors: N
authors: N
authors: de Matthaeis
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Abbattista
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Busilacchi
keywords: Hepatic artery; Hepatic veins; Liver; Portal vein; Sonography; Sonography – liver
references: Am J Med Genet A. 2005 May 15;135(1):106-9
references: 15779017
references: Transplant Proc. 2005 Mar;37(2):1070-3
references: 15848625
references: Radiographics. 2005 Jul-Aug;25(4):1017-30
references: 16009821
references: Radiographics. 2002 Sep-Oct;22(5):1063-76
references: 12235336
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Oct;183(4):1055-64
references: 15385304
references: Radiographics. 2001 Jan-Feb;21(1):65-81; questionnaire 288-94
references: 11158645
references: Radiology. 1991 Nov;181(2):443-8
references: 1924786
references: J Ultrasound. 2007 Mar;10(1):28-45
references: 23396075
references: Am J Surg. 1966 Sep;112(3):337-47
references: 5917302
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jan;184(1):70-4
references: 15615953
references: Liver Transpl. 2004 Aug;10(8):1049-54
references: 15390332
references: Radiologe. 2005 Jan;45(1):8-14
references: 15609014
references: Chirurgie. 1994-1995;120(13):179-85
references: 8785920
references: J Ultrasound. 2007 Mar;10(1):22-7
references: 23396711
references: Radiographics. 2004 Sep-Oct;24(5):1367-80
references: 15371614
references: Radiographics. 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1):141-59
references: 11796904
references: Radiographics. 1995 Jul;15(4):771-80
references: 7569128
references: J Ultrasound. 2007 Mar;10(1):5-11
references: 23396216
references: J Ultrasound. 2007 Mar;10(1):53-8
references: 23395917
references: Radiology. 2002 Aug;224(2):542-7
references: 12147854
references: Eur Radiol. 2000;10(2):365-7
references: 10663770
references: J Radiol. 2002 Feb;83(2 Pt 2):235-46
references: 11981493
references: Ultrastruct Pathol. 1998 Nov-Dec;22(6):477-83
references: 9891927
references: Radiographics. 2004 May-Jun;24(3):755-72
references: 15143226