title: Characterization of statistical prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS): II. Application to dose reduction.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The ionizing radiation imparted to patients during computed tomography exams is raising concerns. This paper studies the performance of a scheme called dose reduction using prior image constrained compressed sensing (DR-PICCS). The purpose of this study is to characterize the effects of a statistical model of x-ray detection in the DR-PICCS framework and its impact on spatial resolution.
  
  
  METHODS
  Both numerical simulations with known ground truth and in vivo animal dataset were used in this study. In numerical simulations, a phantom was simulated with Poisson noise and with varying levels of eccentricity. Both the conventional filtered backprojection (FBP) and the PICCS algorithms were used to reconstruct images. In PICCS reconstructions, the prior image was generated using two different denoising methods: a simple Gaussian blur and a more advanced diffusion filter. Due to the lack of shift-invariance in nonlinear image reconstruction such as the one studied in this paper, the concept of local spatial resolution was used to study the sharpness of a reconstructed image. Specifically, a directional metric of image sharpness, the so-called pseudopoint spread function (pseudo-PSF), was employed to investigate local spatial resolution.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In the numerical studies, the pseudo-PSF was reduced from twice the voxel width in the prior image down to less than 1.1 times the voxel width in DR-PICCS reconstructions when the statistical model was not included. At the same noise level, when statistical weighting was used, the pseudo-PSF width in DR-PICCS reconstructed images varied between 1.5 and 0.75 times the voxel width depending on the direction along which it was measured. However, this anisotropy was largely eliminated when the prior image was generated using diffusion filtering; the pseudo-PSF width was reduced to below one voxel width in that case. In the in vivo study, a fourfold improvement in CNR was achieved while qualitatively maintaining sharpness; images also had a qualitatively more uniform noise spatial distribution when including a statistical model.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  DR-PICCS enables to reconstruct CT images with lower noise than FBP and the loss of spatial resolution can be mitigated to a large extent. The introduction of statistical modeling in DR-PICCS may improve some noise characteristics, but it also leads to anisotropic spatial resolution properties. A denoising method, such as the directional diffusion filtering, has been demonstrated to reduce anisotropy in spatial resolution effectively when it was combined with DR-PICCS with statistical modeling.
authors: Medical Physics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
authors: Pascal Theriault
authors: PT
authors: Lauzier
authors: Guang-Hong
authors: GH
authors: Chen
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D000818:Animals; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D059629:Signal-To-Noise Ratio; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*
references: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998 Dec;17(6):1101-5
references: 10048870
references: Phys Med Biol. 2011 Mar 21;56(6):1545-61
references: 21325707
references: Radiology. 2011 Jul;260(1):248-56
references: 21436086
references: Phys Med Biol. 2009 Oct 7;54(19):5781-804
references: 19741274
references: Med Phys. 2012 Jan;39(1):66-80
references: 22225276
references: Phys Med Biol. 2010 Nov 7;55(21):6411-29
references: 20938070
references: Med Phys. 2010 Sep;37(9):5113-25
references: 20964231
references: Med Phys. 2007 Nov;34(11):4526-44
references: 18072519
references: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984 Apr;8(2):306-16
references: 6608535
references: Med Phys. 2009 Nov;36(11):4920-32
references: 19994501
references: IEEE Trans Image Process. 1996;5(9):1346-58
references: 18285223
references: Phys Med Biol. 1995 Jul;40(7):1225-41
references: 7568379
references: Med Phys. 2010 Aug;37(8):4377-88
references: 20879597
references: Phys Med Biol. 2011 Oct 21;56(20):6709-21
references: 21965275
references: Phys Med Biol. 2008 Sep 7;53(17):4777-807
references: 18701771
references: Med Phys. 2012 Oct;39(10):5930-48
references: 23039632
references: Phys Med Biol. 2010 Nov 21;55(22):6575-99
references: 20962368
references: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000 Jun;19(6):601-15
references: 11026463
references: Med Phys. 2008 Feb;35(2):660-3
references: 18383687
references: Phys Med Biol. 1999 Nov;44(11):2835-51
references: 10588288
references: Med Phys. 2011 Apr;38(4):2157-67
references: 21626949
references: Med Phys. 2011 Oct;38(10):5530-8
references: 21992371
references: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Apr;31(4):907-23
references: 22027367
references: IEEE Trans Image Process. 1998;7(3):398-410
references: 18276260
references: Phys Med Biol. 2010 Apr 21;55(8):2333-50
references: 20360635
references: Phys Med Biol. 2008 Oct 21;53(20):5653-73
references: 18812650
references: Med Phys. 2009 Jun;36(6):2130-5
references: 19610302
references: Med Phys. 2007 Nov;34(11):4476-83
references: 18072512
references: IEEE Trans Image Process. 1996;5(3):480-92
references: 18285133