title: Is artists' perception more veridical?
abstract: Figurative artists spend years practicing their skills, analyzing objects, and scenes in order to reproduce them accurately. In their drawings, they must depict distant objects as smaller and shadowed surfaces as darker, just as they are at the level of the retinal image. However, this retinal representation is not what we consciously see. Instead, the visual system corrects for distance, changes in ambient illumination and view-point so that our conscious percept of the world remains stable. Does extensive experience modify an artist's visual system so that he or she can access this retinal, veridical image better than a non-artist? We have conducted three experiments testing artists' perceptual abilities and comparing them to those of non-artists. The subjects first attempted to match the size or the luminance of a test stimulus to a standard that could be presented either on a perspective grid (size) or within a cast shadow. They were explicitly instructed to ignore these surrounding contexts and to judge the stimulus as if it were seen in isolation. Finally, in a third task, the subjects searched for an L-shape that either contacted or did not contact an adjacent circle. When in contact, the L-shape appeared as an occluded square behind a circle. This high-level completion camouflaged the L-shape unless subjects could access the raw image. However, in all these tasks, artists were as much affected by visual context as novices. We concluded that artists have no special abilities to access early, non-corrected visual representations and that better accuracy in artists' drawings cannot be attributed to the effects of expertise on early visual processes.
authors: Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité Paris, France.
authors: Florian
authors: F
authors: Perdreau
authors: Patrick
authors: P
authors: Cavanagh
keywords: artists; expertise; scene perception; visual constancy; visual search
references: Psychol Sci. 2006 Dec;17(12):1009-14
references: 17201779
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Feb;27(1):178-94
references: 11248932
references: Vision Res. 2009 Mar;49(8):791-800
references: 19264091
references: Psychol Sci. 2005 Oct;16(10):763-8
references: 16181437
references: Perception. 2008;37(1):161-4
references: 18399254
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49:585-612
references: 9496632
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Jun;23(3):609-21
references: 9180037
references: Cortex. 2009 Mar;45(3):368-76
references: 18656183
references: Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Dec 30;5:171
references: 22232584
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Jun;5(6):495-501
references: 15152199
references: Neuron. 2002 Dec 5;36(5):791-804
references: 12467584
references: Perception. 2008;37(4):628-30
references: 18546669
references: Vision Res. 2009 Mar;49(8):810-8
references: 19268685
references: Vision Res. 1998 Aug;38(15-16):2489-505
references: 9798011
references: Nature. 1992 Sep 17;359(6392):231-3
references: 1528263
references: Percept Psychophys. 2002 Apr;64(3):462-77
references: 12049286
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Oct;8(10):457-64
references: 15450510
references: Psychol Sci. 2002 Jan;13(1):89-93
references: 11892786
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1985 May;59(1):23-33
references: 4024981
references: J Exp Psychol. 1962 Jan;63:68-73
references: 13876651
references: Psychol Rev. 1987 Apr;94(2):115-147
references: 3575582
references: Perception. 1993;22(10):1175-93
references: 8047407
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):996-1003
references: 16262494
references: Percept Psychophys. 1988 May;43(5):415-24
references: 3380632
references: J Exp Psychol. 1967 Jul;74(3):378-82
references: 6052616
references: Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):692-701
references: 19140641
references: J Physiol. 1970 Feb;206(2):419-36
references: 5498493
references: Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136
references: 7351125
references: Invest Ophthalmol. 1972 Jun;11(6):525-32
references: 4537467
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Dec;22(6):1467-81
references: 8953230
references: Percept Psychophys. 2005 Aug;67(6):997-1009
references: 16396008
references: Cogn Psychol. 1999 Aug;39(1):37-68
references: 10433787
references: Percept Psychophys. 1993 Oct;54(4):457-68
references: 8255708
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Oct;23(5):1412-26
references: 9411022
references: Percept Psychophys. 1993 Oct;54(4):446-56
references: 8255707
references: J Exp Psychol. 1969 Jul;81(1):36-43
references: 5812175
references: Science. 1993 Dec 24;262(5142):2042-4
references: 8266102
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Feb;15(1):3-27
references: 2522531
references: Cogn Psychol. 1991 Apr;23(2):141-221
references: 2055000