title: Single vs composite measures of pain intensity: relative sensitivity for detecting treatment effects.
abstract: Assay sensitivity remains a significant issue in pain clinical trials. One possible method for increasing assay sensitivity for detecting changes in pain intensity is to increase the reliability of pain intensity assessment by increasing the number of intensity ratings obtained, and combining these ratings into composite scores. The current study performed secondary analyses from a published clinical trial to test this possibility. The reliability and assay sensitivity pain intensity scores made up of 1 to 9 24-hour pain intensity recall ratings were compared. Although the reliability of the outcome measures improved as the number of items increased, this increase in reliability was not associated with an increase in assay sensitivity. A single 24-hour recall rating was about as valid (sensitive) for detecting treatment effects as composite scores made up of 2 to 9 different ratings. If this finding replicates in other pain populations, it has significant implications for the design and conduct of pain clinical trials. Specifically, it suggests the possibility that assessment burden (and associated costs and problems related to missing data) might be greatly reduced by specifying a single recall rating as the primary outcome variable. Research is needed to explore this possibility further.
authors: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Endo Pharmaceuticals, Chadds Ford, PA, USA.
authors: Mark P
authors: MP
authors: Jensen
authors: Xiaojun
authors: X
authors: Hu
authors: Susan L
authors: SL
authors: Potts
authors: Errol M
authors: EM
authors: Gould
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000701:Analgesics, Opioid / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D010111:Oxymorphone / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D010146:Pain / Q000188:drug therapy*; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D000701:Analgesics, Opioid; D010111:Oxymorphone
references: Bolton JE, Humphreys BK, van Hedel HJ. Validity of weekly recall ratings of average pain intensity in neck pain patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010;33:612-617.
references: Broderick JE, Schwartz JE, Schneider S, Stone AA. Can end-of-day reports replace momentary assessment of pain and fatigue? J Pain. 2009;10:274-281.
references: Dworkin RH, Turk DC. Accelerating the development of improved analgesic treatments: the ACTION public–private partnership. Pain Med. 2011;12:S109-S117.
references: Jamison RN, Raymond SA, Slawsby EA, McHugo GJ, Baird JC. Pain assessment in patients with low back pain: comparison of weekly recall and momentary electronic data. J Pain. 2006;7:192-199.
references: Jensen MP. Hopefully, all those ratings are not necessary. PAIN®. 1994;58:279-280.
references: Jensen MP, McFarland CA. Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. PAIN®. 1993;55:195-203.
references: Jensen MP, Turner LR, Turner JA, Romano JM. The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. PAIN®. 1996;67:35-40.
references: Katz N, Rauck R, Ahdieh H, Ma T, Gerritsen van der Hoop R, Kerwin R, Podolsky G. A 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessing the safety and efficacy of oxymorphone extended release for opioid-naive patients with chronic low back pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23:117-128.
references: Kikuchi H, Yoshiuchi K, Miyasaka N, Ohashi K, Yamamoto Y, Kumano H, Kuboki T, Akabayashi A. Reliability of recalled self-report on headache intensity: investigation using ecological momentary assessment technique. Cephalalgia. 2006;26:1335-1343.
references: Salovey P, Smith AF, Turk DC, Jobe JB, Willis GB. The accuracy of memory for pain: not so bad most of the time. APS J. 1993;2:184-191.
references: Stone AA, Broderick JE, Schwartz JE. Validity of average, minimum, and maximum end-of-day recall assessments of pain and fatigue. Contemp Clin Trials. 2010;31:483-490.
references: Stone AA, Broderick JE, Shiffman SS, Schwartz JE. Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: absolute agreement, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain. PAIN®. 2004;107:61-69.
references: Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficeint alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess. 2003;80:99-103.
references: Terwee C, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34-42.