title: Linking trait differences to community dynamics: evidence from Eupatorium adenophorum and co-occurring native species during a three-year succession.
abstract: Trait differences between invasive and native species are believed to be closely related to whether the former are successful. However, few studies have measured trait differences between invasive and native species directly under field conditions or during long term experiments. We examined the phenological pattern, plant height and biomass accumulation and allocation of Crofton weed (Eupatorium adenophorum Spreng.) and co-occurring native species in a community during a three-year succession. The phenological pattern of Crofton weed differed from that of co-occurring native species. Crofton weed had longer vegetative stage (when resources were more available), a higher biomass accumulation and a higher above/below-ground ratio compared to native species. Crofton weed was shorter than grasses and two forbs (Artemisia tangutica and Cynoglossum amabile) during its first year of growth, but was significantly taller than all other species during subsequent years. The dominance (calculated as the importance value) of Crofton weed was the highest among all other species and continually increased over time while the dominance of co-occurring native species decreased. This study provides direct field evidence that trait differences are important to plant invasion.
authors: State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. xmgao@ibcas.ac.cn
authors: Xianming
authors: X
authors: Gao
authors: Yujie
authors: Y
authors: Zhao
authors: Xuejun
authors: X
authors: Yang
authors: Shucun
authors: S
authors: Sun
mesh_terms: D000220:Adaptation, Biological / Q000235:genetics*; D036603:Ageratina / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development*; D018533:Biomass; D017753:Ecosystem; D010641:Phenotype; D006109:Poaceae / Q000254:growth & development*
references: Ecology. 2006 Mar;87(3):603-15
references: 16602290
references: Nature. 2007 Apr 26;446(7139):1079-81
references: 17460672
references: Oecologia. 2008 May;156(2):281-6
references: 18347817
references: Oecologia. 1999 Nov;121(2):183-192
references: 28308558
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Apr 22;270(1517):775-81
references: 12737654
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Apr 1;16(4):199-204
references: 11245943
references: Am Nat. 2002 Apr;159(4):396-419
references: 18707424
references: Ecol Lett. 2010 Feb;13(2):235-45
references: 20002494
references: Ann Bot. 2007 May;99(5):967-85
references: 17085470
references: Am Nat. 2003 Oct;162(4):442-60
references: 14582007
references: Oecologia. 2011 Mar;165(3):735-44
references: 20809406
references: Oecologia. 2008 Aug;157(1):131-40
references: 18491146
references: Science. 2007 Feb 2;315(5812):640-2
references: 17272720
references: Oecologia. 2007 Nov;154(1):11-21
references: 17647021
references: New Phytol. 2011 Feb;189(3):818-828
references: 21087259
references: Oecologia. 2006 Nov;150(2):300-9
references: 16927104
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 11;100(23):13384-9
references: 14595028
references: Ecology. 2006 Jun;87(6):1359-67
references: 16869409
references: Ann Bot. 2009 Feb;103(3):485-94
references: 19033284
references: New Phytol. 2011 Feb;189(3):649-652
references: 21223282