title: Unregulated provider perceptions of audit and feedback reports in long-term care: cross-sectional survey findings from a quality improvement intervention.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Audit with feedback is a moderately effective approach for improving professional practice in other health care settings. Although unregulated caregivers give the majority of direct care in long-term care settings, little is known about how they understand and perceive feedback reports because unregulated providers have not been directly targeted to receive audit with feedback in quality improvement interventions in long-term care. The purpose of this paper is to describe unregulated care providers' perceptions of usefulness of a feedback report in four Canadian long-term care facilities.
  
  
  METHODS
  We delivered monthly feedback reports to unregulated care providers for 13 months in 2009-2010. The feedback reports described a unit's performance in relation to falls, depression, and pain as compared to eight other units in the study. Follow-up surveys captured participant perceptions of the feedback report. We conducted descriptive analyses of the variables related to participant perceptions and multivariable logistic regression to assess the association between perceived usefulness of the feedback report and a set of independent variables.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The vast majority (80%) of unregulated care providers (n = 171) who responded said they understood the reports. Those who discussed the report with others and were interested in other forms of data were more likely to find the feedback report useful for making changes in resident care.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This work suggests that unregulated care providers can understand and feel positively about using audit with feedback reports to make changes to resident care. Further research should explore ways to promote fuller engagement of unregulated care providers in decision-making to improve quality of care in long-term care settings.
authors: Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. kimberly.fraser@ualberta.ca
authors: Kimberly D
authors: KD
authors: Fraser
authors: Hannah M
authors: HM
authors: O'Rourke
authors: Melba Andrea B
authors: MA
authors: Baylon
authors: Anne-Marie
authors: AM
authors: Boström
authors: Anne E
authors: AE
authors: Sales
mesh_terms: D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005246:Feedback; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006282:Health Personnel / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D008134:Long-Term Care / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards*; D008485:Medical Audit / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards*; D010865:Pilot Projects; D058996:Quality Improvement / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards*; D058028:Research Report / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards*
references: J Nurs Adm. 2007 Feb;37(2):77-84
references: 17273028
references: Gerontologist. 2001 Aug;41(4):525-38
references: 11490051
references: J Nurs Adm. 2005 Apr;35(4):181-7
references: 15834257
references: Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(10):1618-25
references: 20207464
references: Nurs Older People. 2009 Nov;21(9):18-23
references: 19947025
references: J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008 Nov;9(9):633-40
references: 18992695
references: Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2007;20(2):39-49
references: 17619595
references: Adv Skin Wound Care. 2010 Mar;23(3):120-31
references: 20177165
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD000259
references: 22696318
references: Health Policy. 2006 Dec;79(2-3):175-94
references: 16430989
references: Can J Aging. 2006 Winter;25(4):347-61
references: 17310456
references: Health Care Manage Rev. 2005 Apr-Jun;30(2):110-5
references: 15923913
references: Gerontologist. 2009 Oct;49(5):611-22
references: 19506032
references: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008 Jul;63(4):S255-S265
references: 18689775
references: Geriatr Nurs. 2007 Sep-Oct;28(5):312-8
references: 17923288
references: J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2001 Jul-Aug;2(4):141-5
references: 12812569
references: J Clin Nurs. 2008 Nov;17(22):3059-66
references: 18298502
references: J Nurs Adm. 2007 Jul-Aug;37(7-8):366-72
references: 17939468
references: J Aging Soc Policy. 2001;13(2-3):69-81
references: 12216363
references: J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Feb;18(1):63-9
references: 20738467
references: Implement Sci. 2010 Oct 13;5:74
references: 20939926
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD000259
references: 16625533
references: Gerontologist. 2004 Apr;44(2):256-61
references: 15075422
references: Generations. 1994 Autumn;18(3):71-4
references: 11660097
references: Gerontologist. 1990 Jun;30(3):293-307
references: 2354790
references: Gerontologist. 2004 Feb;44(1):24-38
references: 14978318
references: J Nurs Care Qual. 2011 Jul-Sep;26(3):236-42
references: 21278595