title: Natural category discrimination in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) at three levels of abstraction.
abstract: Two adult chimpanzees were presented with a series of natural category discrimination tasks on a touch screen computer, in which the discriminations varied in degree of abstraction. At the concrete level, discriminations could be made on the basis of single perceptual features, but at the more abstract level, categories were more inclusive, containing exemplars with variant perceptual features. For instance, at the most abstract level, the chimpanzees were required to select images of animals rather than nonanimals, and exemplars within both categories were perceptually diverse. One chimpanzee showed positive transfer at each level of abstraction but required more sessions to reach criterion as the discriminations became more abstract. The other chimpanzee failed to demonstrate consistent significant acquisition of a concept. The results indicate that unlike other apes and black bears, tested previously, chimpanzees found the most abstract discriminations the most difficult to acquire. Analyses of the features of pictures that yielded high or low accuracy revealed no significant differences on several key features, suggesting that the presence of facial features, eyes, or specific coloration did not control responding. In addition, the chimpanzees performed more accurately with photos judged as less typical exemplars of the category by human raters. However, responses to pictures of particular species suggest that chimpanzees may rely on perceptual similarity to familiar exemplars when acquiring experimenter-defined natural categories.
authors: Department of Psychology, Oakland University, 2200 N Squirrel Rd, Rochester, MI 48309, USA. vonk@oakland.edu
authors: Jennifer
authors: J
authors: Vonk
authors: Stephanie E
authors: SE
authors: Jett
authors: Kelly W
authors: KW
authors: Mosteller
authors: Moriah
authors: M
authors: Galvan
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003210:Concept Formation / Q000502:physiology*; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D002679:Pan troglodytes / Q000523:psychology*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology; D014163:Transfer, Psychology
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):315-32
references: 12507006
references: Dev Sci. 2005 May;8(3):240-54
references: 15819756
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Dec;11(6):1111-7
references: 15875984
references: Cognition. 1990 Nov;37(1-2):133-66
references: 2269005
references: Cognition. 1998 Jan;65(2-3):137-65
references: 9557381
references: BMJ. 1998 Apr 18;316(7139):1236-8
references: 9553006
references: Science. 1999 Jun 4;284(5420):1670-2
references: 10356397
references: Behav Processes. 2010 Oct;85(3):236-45
references: 20600696
references: Primates. 2003 Apr;44(2):157-65
references: 12687480
references: Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):257-70
references: 16909238
references: Mem Cognit. 2000 Apr;28(3):439-51
references: 10881561
references: Behav Processes. 2008 Jul;78(3):351-7
references: 18342457
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Apr;12(2):350-8
references: 16082818
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1979 Apr;5(2):116-29
references: 528881
references: Anim Cogn. 2008 Oct;11(4):569-85
references: 18415129
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 3;108(18):7635-40
references: 21502509
references: J Comp Psychol. 2004 Mar;118(1):3-13
references: 15008667
references: Cogn Sci. 2010 Sep 1;34(7):1244-1286
references: 21116483
references: Behav Processes. 2013 Feb;93:98-110
references: 23174337
references: J Comp Psychol. 2000 Dec;114(4):392-400
references: 11149543
references: Anim Cogn. 2008 Apr;11(2):339-47
references: 18026761
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1976 Oct;2(4):285-302
references: 978139
references: Anim Cogn. 2001 Nov;4(3-4):201-11
references: 24777510
references: Child Dev. 1994 Jun;65(3):903-17
references: 8045176
references: Cognition. 1998 Jan;65(2-3):231-62
references: 9557384
references: Primates. 2007 Oct;48(4):303-9
references: 17387432
references: Anim Cogn. 2007 Apr;10(2):169-79
references: 17171361