title: Optimization of prosthetic foot stiffness to reduce metabolic cost and intact knee loading during below-knee amputee walking: a theoretical study.
abstract: Unilateral below-knee amputees develop abnormal gait characteristics that include bilateral asymmetries and an elevated metabolic cost relative to non-amputees. In addition, long-term prosthesis use has been linked to an increased prevalence of joint pain and osteoarthritis in the intact leg knee. To improve amputee mobility, prosthetic feet that utilize elastic energy storage and return (ESAR) have been designed, which perform important biomechanical functions such as providing body support and forward propulsion. However, the prescription of appropriate design characteristics (e.g., stiffness) is not well-defined since its influence on foot function and important in vivo biomechanical quantities such as metabolic cost and joint loading remain unclear. The design of feet that improve these quantities could provide considerable advancements in amputee care. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to couple design optimization with dynamic simulations of amputee walking to identify the optimal foot stiffness that minimizes metabolic cost and intact knee joint loading. A musculoskeletal model and distributed stiffness ESAR prosthetic foot model were developed to generate muscle-actuated forward dynamics simulations of amputee walking. Dynamic optimization was used to solve for the optimal muscle excitation patterns and foot stiffness profile that produced simulations that tracked experimental amputee walking data while minimizing metabolic cost and intact leg internal knee contact forces. Muscle and foot function were evaluated by calculating their contributions to the important walking subtasks of body support, forward propulsion and leg swing. The analyses showed that altering a nominal prosthetic foot stiffness distribution by stiffening the toe and mid-foot while making the ankle and heel less stiff improved ESAR foot performance by offloading the intact knee during early to mid-stance of the intact leg and reducing metabolic cost. The optimal design also provided moderate braking and body support during the first half of residual leg stance, while increasing the prosthesis contributions to forward propulsion and body support during the second half of residual leg stance. Future work will be directed at experimentally validating these results, which have important implications for future designs of prosthetic feet that could significantly improve amputee care.
authors: Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
authors: Nicholas P
authors: NP
authors: Fey
authors: Glenn K
authors: GK
authors: Klute
authors: Richard R
authors: RR
authors: Neptune
mesh_terms: D000671:Amputation, Surgical; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D005528:Foot; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000502:physiology; D055595:Mechanical Phenomena; D008875:Middle Aged; D008953:Models, Anatomic; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000502:physiology; D011187:Posture; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D016138:Walking
references: Ann Rheum Dis. 1978 Jun;37(3):252-4
references: 150823
references: Gait Posture. 2004 Apr;19(2):194-205
references: 15013508
references: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1990 Aug;37(8):757-67
references: 2210784
references: Gait Posture. 2008 Nov;28(4):602-9
references: 18514526
references: J Biomech. 1988;21(12):1027-41
references: 2577949
references: J Exp Biol. 2009 Mar;212(Pt 5):738-44
references: 19218526
references: J Biomech. 1987;20(2):187-201
references: 3571299
references: Gait Posture. 2003 Apr;17(2):159-69
references: 12633777
references: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 1999;2(3):201-231
references: 11264828
references: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 May;24(4):372-8
references: 19285768
references: Clin Rehabil. 2005 Jan;19(1):81-6
references: 15704512
references: J Biomech Eng. 2010 Jan;132(1):015001
references: 20524754
references: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011 Jun;26(5):509-15
references: 21251738
references: J Biomech. 1989;22(1):1-10
references: 2914967
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Apr;(361):29-38
references: 10212593
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Oct;86(10):1910-9
references: 16213230
references: Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1989;17(4):359-411
references: 2676342
references: J Biomech. 2010 Oct 19;43(14):2780-4
references: 20655046
references: J Orthop Res. 2009 Oct;27(10):1326-31
references: 19396858
references: Phys Ther. 1977 Aug;57(8):898-904
references: 877157
references: J Biomech. 2008;41(4):868-76
references: 18078943
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Nov;37(11):1948-56
references: 16286866
references: J Biomech. 1996 Jan;29(1):81-90
references: 8839020
references: Gait Posture. 2011 Feb;33(2):220-6
references: 21145747
references: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2003 Apr;6(2):99-111
references: 12745424
references: Gait Posture. 2008 Jul;28(1):135-43
references: 18158246
references: J Biomech. 2007;40(8):1824-31
references: 17045595
references: Gait Posture. 2007 Jan;25(1):86-93
references: 16567093
references: J R Soc Interface. 2010 Sep 6;7(50):1329-40
references: 20356877
references: J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002 Jan-Feb;39(1):1-11
references: 11926321
references: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2000;3(4):321-334
references: 11264857
references: J Biomech. 1997 Jun;30(6):595-602
references: 9165393
references: J Biomech. 1988;21(5):361-7
references: 3417688
references: J Biomech. 2006;39(14):2623-30
references: 16216251
references: J Biomech. 2010 Mar 22;43(5):945-52
references: 19962703
references: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004 Jan;19(1):44-9
references: 14659929
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Jan;58(1):42-6
references: 1249111
references: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000 Aug;15(7):528-35
references: 10831813
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 May;81(5):561-8
references: 10807092
references: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011 Mar;26(3):298-303
references: 21093131
references: J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(1):15-29
references: 18566923
references: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011 Dec;26(10):1025-32
references: 21777999
references: J Biomech. 2001 Nov;34(11):1387-98
references: 11672713