title: Organic farming favours insect-pollinated over non-insect pollinated forbs in meadows and wheat fields.
abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the relative effects of landscape-scale management intensity, local management intensity and edge effect on diversity patterns of insect-pollinated vs. non-insect pollinated forbs in meadows and wheat fields. Nine landscapes were selected differing in percent intensively used agricultural area (IAA), each with a pair of organic and conventional winter wheat fields and a pair of organic and conventional meadows. Within fields, forbs were surveyed at the edge and in the interior. Both diversity and cover of forbs were positively affected by organic management in meadows and wheat fields. This effect, however, differed significantly between pollination types for species richness in both agroecosystem types (i.e. wheat fields and meadows) and for cover in meadows. Thus, we show for the first time in a comprehensive analysis that insect-pollinated plants benefit more from organic management than non-insect pollinated plants regardless of agroecosystem type and landscape complexity. These benefits were more pronounced in meadows than wheat fields. Finally, the community composition of insect-pollinated and non-insect-pollinated forbs differed considerably between management types. In summary, our findings in both agroecosystem types indicate that organic management generally supports a higher species richness and cover of insect-pollinated plants, which is likely to be favourable for the density and diversity of bees and other pollinators.
authors: Agroecology, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany. pbatary@gmail.com
authors: Péter
authors: P
authors: Batáry
authors: Laura
authors: L
authors: Sutcliffe
authors: Carsten F
authors: CF
authors: Dormann
authors: Teja
authors: T
authors: Tscharntke
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D017753:Ecosystem; D007313:Insecta; D058871:Organic Agriculture; D054817:Pollination; D014908:Triticum
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19502
references: 21611171
references: Oecologia. 2001 Oct;129(2):271-280
references: 28547606
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 7;276(1658):903-9
references: 19019785
references: Science. 2010 Jan 8;327(5962):154-5
references: 20056880
references: Ecol Appl. 2011 Jul;21(5):1772-81
references: 21830717
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e38073
references: 22666450
references: Science. 2006 Jul 21;313(5785):351-4
references: 16857940
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 22;278(1713):1894-902
references: 21106585