title: Tissue metabolic responses to salt stress in wild and cultivated barley.
abstract: A thorough understanding of the mechanisms underlying barley salt tolerance and exploitation of elite genetic resource are essential for utilizing wild barley germplasm in developing barley varieties with salt tolerance. In order to reveal the physiological and molecular difference in salt tolerance between Tibetan wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) and cultivated barley (Hordeum vulgare), profiles of 82 key metabolites were studies in wild and cultivated barley in response to salinity. According to shoot dry biomass under salt stress, XZ16 is a fast growing and salt tolerant wild barley. The results of metabolite profiling analysis suggested osmotic adjustment was a basic mechanism, and polyols played important roles in developing salt tolerance only in roots, and high level of sugars and energy in roots and active photosynthesis in leaves were important for barley to develop salt tolerance. The metabolites involved in tolerance enhancement differed between roots and shoots, and also between genotypes. Tibetan wild barley, XZ16 had higher chlorophyll content and higher contents of compatible solutes than CM72, while the cultivated barley, CM72 probably enhanced its salt tolerance mainly through increasing glycolysis and energy consumption, when the plants were exposed to high salinity. The current research extends our understanding of the mechanisms involved in barley salt tolerance and provides possible utilization of Tibetan wild barley in developing barley cultivars with salt tolerance.
authors: Department of Agronomy, Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Resource of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
authors: Dezhi
authors: D
authors: Wu
authors: Shengguan
authors: S
authors: Cai
authors: Mingxian
authors: M
authors: Chen
authors: Lingzhen
authors: L
authors: Ye
authors: Zhonghua
authors: Z
authors: Chen
authors: Haitao
authors: H
authors: Zhang
authors: Fei
authors: F
authors: Dai
authors: Feibo
authors: F
authors: Wu
authors: Guoping
authors: G
authors: Zhang
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological / Q000502:physiology*; D000383:Agriculture / Q000379:methods; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D004734:Energy Metabolism / Q000502:physiology; D008401:Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; D005838:Genotype; D001467:Hordeum / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D055442:Metabolome / Q000502:physiology; D018517:Plant Roots / Q000378:metabolism; D018520:Plant Shoots / Q000378:metabolism; D054712:Salinity; D013045:Species Specificity; D013312:Stress, Physiological / Q000502:physiology*; D018609:Tibet
references: New Phytol. 2011 Jan;189(1):54-81
references: 21118256
references: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Oct;6(5):441-5
references: 12972044
references: Plant J. 2005 Dec;44(5):826-39
references: 16297073
references: Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Apr;33(4):670-85
references: 20040064
references: Nat Protoc. 2011 Jun;6(6):743-60
references: 21637195
references: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010 Apr;13(2):132-8
references: 20080055
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2005 Dec;10(12):615-20
references: 16280254
references: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:651-81
references: 18444910
references: Nat Protoc. 2006;1(1):387-96
references: 17406261
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22938
references: 21829562
references: J Exp Bot. 2004 Oct;55(406):2213-8
references: 15361537
references: Plant Physiol. 2010 Sep;154(1):187-96
references: 20634393
references: J Exp Bot. 2009;60(14):4089-103
references: 19666960
references: J Exp Bot. 2007;58(15-16):4245-55
references: 18182428
references: Bioinformatics. 2008 Mar 1;24(5):732-7
references: 18204057
references: Physiol Plant. 2008 Feb;132(2):209-19
references: 18251862
references: Planta. 2008 Feb;227(3):611-23
references: 17952457
references: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002 Jun;5(3):250-7
references: 11960744
references: Plant Physiol. 2007 Dec;145(4):1714-25
references: 17965172
references: Plant Cell. 2011 Apr;23(4):1231-48
references: 21467579
references: J Exp Bot. 2005 May;56(415):1369-78
references: 15809285
references: Plant Physiol. 2004 Apr;134(4):1683-96
references: 15047901
references: Plant Physiol. 2009 Jun;150(2):772-85
references: 19346439
references: Plant Physiol. 2004 Dec;136(4):4159-68
references: 15557093
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2001 Feb;6(2):66-71
references: 11173290
references: Plant Cell Environ. 2008 Mar;31(3):325-40
references: 18088330
references: Plant J. 2008 Nov;56(4):653-64
references: 18643972
references: Plant Cell. 1995 Jul;7(7):1099-1111
references: 12242400
references: Theor Appl Genet. 2011 Mar;122(4):695-703
references: 20981400
references: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53:247-73
references: 12221975
references: Plant Physiol. 1997 Jun;114(2):591-6
references: 9193091
references: Physiol Plant. 2008 Feb;132(2):199-208
references: 18251861
references: New Phytol. 2005 Sep;167(3):645-63
references: 16101905
references: Plant Physiol. 2000 Apr;122(4):1129-36
references: 10759508
references: J Proteome Res. 2012 Jan 1;11(1):49-67
references: 22017755
references: Plant Physiol. 2003 Apr;131(4):1748-55
references: 12692333
references: Xenobiotica. 1999 Nov;29(11):1181-9
references: 10598751
references: Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000 Aug;12(4):431-4
references: 10873827
references: Plant Mol Biol. 2002 Jan;48(1-2):155-71
references: 11860207
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):16969-73
references: 23033493
references: Planta. 2007 Feb;225(3):753-61
references: 16955270
references: Plant Physiol. 2006 Nov;142(3):1087-101
references: 16998089
references: Plant Mol Biol. 1998 Dec;38(6):1011-9
references: 9869407
references: J Exp Bot. 2007;58(3):415-24
references: 17118972
references: Phytochem Anal. 2010 Jan-Feb;21(1):4-13
references: 19904733
references: Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Apr;33(4):453-67
references: 19712065