title: Personality psychology: lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts reveal only half of the story--why it is time for a paradigm shift.
abstract: This article develops a comprehensive philosophy-of-science for personality psychology that goes far beyond the scope of the lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts that currently prevail. One of the field's most important guiding scientific assumptions, the lexical hypothesis, is analysed from meta-theoretical viewpoints to reveal that it explicitly describes two sets of phenomena that must be clearly differentiated: 1) lexical repertoires and the representations that they encode and 2) the kinds of phenomena that are represented. Thus far, personality psychologists largely explored only the former, but have seriously neglected studying the latter. Meta-theoretical analyses of these different kinds of phenomena and their distinct natures, commonalities, differences, and interrelations reveal that personality psychology's focus on lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts entails a) erroneous meta-theoretical assumptions about what the phenomena being studied actually are, and thus how they can be analysed and interpreted, b) that contemporary personality psychology is largely based on everyday psychological knowledge, and c) a fundamental circularity in the scientific explanations used in trait psychology. These findings seriously challenge the widespread assumptions about the causal and universal status of the phenomena described by prominent personality models. The current state of knowledge about the lexical hypothesis is reviewed, and implications for personality psychology are discussed. Ten desiderata for future research are outlined to overcome the current paradigmatic fixations that are substantially hampering intellectual innovation and progress in the field.
authors: Comparative Differential and Personality Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany. mail@janauher.com
authors: Jana
authors: J
authors: Uher
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D018187:Personal Construct Theory; D010551:Personality / Q000502:physiology*; D010684:Philosophy; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011584:Psychology / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards / Q000639:trends; D011603:Psychophysiology / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards / Q000639:trends
references: J Pers Assess. 2003 Feb;80(1):11-8
references: 12584062
references: Percept Mot Skills. 1984 Aug;59(1):335-6
references: 6493951
references: Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2012 Sep;46(3):357-72
references: 22566006
references: Psychol Rev. 1995 Apr;102(2):246-68
references: 7740090
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Sep;81(3):524-39
references: 11554651
references: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Jun;71(3):516-27
references: 12795575
references: Brain Behav Evol. 2002;59(1-2):54-67
references: 12097860
references: Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2012 Mar;46(1):118-27
references: 21913062
references: Dev Psychobiol. 2011 Sep;53(6):521-48
references: 21432848
references: Child Dev. 2010 Jan-Feb;81(1):6-22
references: 20331651
references: Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2009 Sep;43(3):185-213
references: 19330558
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Nov;63(11):2273-87
references: 20486018
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Apr;86(4):599-614
references: 15053708
references: Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 1860 Apr;25(50):367-404
references: 30164232
references: Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2013 Mar;47(1):56-76
references: 22987259
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Dec;53(6):1159-77
references: 3694455
references: Dev Psychol. 1999 Jul;35(4):1102-12
references: 10442878
references: Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2012 Jun;46(2):235-42
references: 22403021
references: Adv Study Behav. 2008;38:227-281
references: 24991063
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):903-18
references: 12051579
references: Child Dev. 2000 Mar-Apr;71(2):323-8
references: 10834467
references: J R Soc Med. 2007 Jun;100(6):268-74
references: 17541097
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Dec;59(6):1216-29
references: 2283588
references: Curr Biol. 2007 Dec 4;17(23):R1004-5
references: 18054758
references: Psychol Sci. 2010 Apr;21(4):589-94
references: 20424106
references: Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2001;52(2):91-101
references: 11352201
references: Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2008 Sep;42(3):245-65
references: 18528738
references: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;2(4):396-403
references: 26151975
references: Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2012 Jun;46(2):129-45
references: 21573922
references: Am Psychol. 1997 May;52(5):509-16
references: 9145021
references: Psychol Rev. 1948 Jul;55(4):189-208
references: 18870876
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984 Dec;47(6):1325-33
references: 6527217
references: J Comp Psychol. 2012 Feb;126(1):97-108
references: 22352887
references: Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:495-511
references: 16186044
references: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Jun;37(6):796-814
references: 21398584
references: J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1999 Fall;47(4):1061-106
references: 10650551
references: Science. 1988 Apr 8;240(4849):167-71
references: 3353713
references: Anim Behav. 2008 Aug;76(2):455-465
references: 23483039
references: J Pers. 1992 Jun;60(2):329-61
references: 1635046
references: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Feb 1;118(2):135-42
references: 15653193
references: J Comp Psychol. 2005 Feb;119(1):99-110
references: 15740434
references: Am Psychol. 1993 Jan;48(1):26-34
references: 8427480
references: Science. 2004 Jun 11;304(5677):1682-3
references: 15192233
references: J Health Psychol. 2004 Mar;9(2):229-43
references: 15018725
references: J Pers. 1998 Aug;66(4):495-524
references: 9728415
references: Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2011 Mar;45(1):21-47
references: 21258882
references: Psychol Rev. 1949 Nov;56(6):325-33
references: 15392591
references: Psychol Rev. 1955 May;62(3):193-217
references: 14371898
references: Psychol Bull. 1995 Mar;117(2):187-215
references: 7724687
references: Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;18(12):1044-9
references: 18031410
references: J Pers Disord. 2005 Jun;19(3):303-8
references: 16175738
references: Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2012 Mar;46(1):1-19
references: 21695392