title: Guidance of attention by information held in working memory.
abstract: Information held in working memory (WM) can guide attention during visual search. The authors of recent studies have interpreted the effect of holding verbal labels in WM as guidance of visual attention by semantic information. In a series of experiments, we tested how attention is influenced by visual features versus category-level information about complex objects held in WM. Participants either memorized an object's image or its category. While holding this information in memory, they searched for a target in a four-object search display. On exact-match trials, the memorized item reappeared as a distractor in the search display. On category-match trials, another exemplar of the memorized item appeared as a distractor. On neutral trials, none of the distractors were related to the memorized object. We found attentional guidance in visual search on both exact-match and category-match trials in Experiment 1, in which the exemplars were visually similar. When we controlled for visual similarity among the exemplars by using four possible exemplars (Exp. 2) or by using two exemplars rated as being visually dissimilar (Exp. 3), we found attentional guidance only on exact-match trials when participants memorized the object's image. The same pattern of results held when the target was invariant (Exps. 2-3) and when the target was defined semantically and varied in visual features (Exp. 4). The findings of these experiments suggest that attentional guidance by WM requires active visual information.
authors: Department of Cognitive Science and ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia. marissa.calleja@mq.edu.au
authors: Marissa Ortiz
authors: MO
authors: Calleja
authors: Anina N
authors: AN
authors: Rich
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D008875:Middle Aged; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011930:Reaction Time; D012660:Semantics; D014796:Visual Perception
references: Cogn Psychol. 1996 Feb;30(1):39-78
references: 8635311
references: Percept Psychophys. 2008 Nov;70(8):1444-58
references: 19064489
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222
references: 7605061
references: Am Psychol. 2001 Nov;56(11):851-64
references: 11785152
references: Mem Cognit. 2010 Dec;38(8):1058-76
references: 21156870
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Feb;14(1):148-53
references: 17546745
references: Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul 1;23(7):698-703
references: 22623508
references: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Dec;4(4):501-16
references: 15849893
references: Science. 2001 Mar 2;291(5509):1803-6
references: 11230699
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Oct;32(5):1243-65
references: 17002535
references: Percept Psychophys. 2008 Jul;70(5):924-34
references: 18613638
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Aug;139(3):558-78
references: 20677899
references: Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28;139(1):201-8
references: 16324792
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jun;22(6):1189-200
references: 19445604
references: Nat Neurosci. 2003 Feb;6(2):182-9
references: 12514738
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Apr;31(2):248-61
references: 15826228
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Jun;33(3):730-7
references: 17563233
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Sep;12(9):342-8
references: 18693131
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):423-42
references: 16634680
references: Psychol Sci. 2000 Nov;11(6):467-73
references: 11202491