title: Flexible switching of feedback control mechanisms allows for learning of different task dynamics.
abstract: To produce skilled movements, the brain flexibly adapts to different task requirements and movement contexts. Two core abilities underlie this flexibility. First, depending on the task, the motor system must rapidly switch the way it produces motor commands and how it corrects movements online, i.e. it switches between different (feedback) control policies. Second, it must also adapt to environmental changes for different tasks separately. Here we show these two abilities are related. In a bimanual movement task, we show that participants can switch on a movement-by-movement basis between two feedback control policies, depending only on a static visual cue. When this cue indicates that the hands control separate objects, reactions to force field perturbations of each arm are purely unilateral. In contrast, when the visual cue indicates a commonly controlled object, reactions are shared across hands. Participants are also able to learn different force fields associated with a visual cue. This is however only the case when the visual cue is associated with different feedback control policies. These results indicate that when the motor system can flexibly switch between different control policies, it is also able to adapt separately to the dynamics of different environmental contexts. In contrast, visual cues that are not associated with different control policies are not effective for learning different task dynamics.
authors: Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unit 1093, Cognition, Action and Sensorimotor Plasticity, Dijon, France. olivier.white@u-bourgogne.fr
authors: Olivier
authors: O
authors: White
authors: Jörn
authors: J
authors: Diedrichsen
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001132:Arm / Q000502:physiology; D003463:Cues; D005246:Feedback; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000502:physiology; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D055815:Young Adult
references: J Neurosci. 2008 Oct 15;28(42):10531-40
references: 18923029
references: Hum Mov Sci. 2009 Jun;28(3):334-47
references: 19131136
references: J Neurosci. 1994 May;14(5 Pt 2):3208-24
references: 8182467
references: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jul;100(1):224-38
references: 18463184
references: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Nov;9(11):1364-6
references: 17028583
references: Exp Brain Res. 2006 Sep;173(4):689-97
references: 16525798
references: Brain. 1981 Sep;104(3):513-34
references: 7272713
references: Neural Comput. 2001 Oct;13(10):2201-20
references: 11570996
references: Nat Neurosci. 2004 Feb;7(2):111-2
references: 14745452
references: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;102(6):3142-55
references: 19793874
references: Hum Mov Sci. 2004 Nov;23(5):543-68
references: 15589621
references: Nature. 1980 Jul 31;286(5772):496-8
references: 7402329
references: Curr Biol. 2007 Oct 9;17(19):1675-9
references: 17900901
references: J Neurophysiol. 2001 Aug;86(2):971-85
references: 11495965
references: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5(11):1226-35
references: 12404008
references: Curr Biol. 2012 Mar 6;22(5):432-6
references: 22326201
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Jan;14(1):31-9
references: 20005767
references: J Neurophysiol. 1997 Jul;78(1):554-60
references: 9242306
references: J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 14;30(15):5159-66
references: 20392938
references: PLoS Biol. 2006 Jun;4(6):e179
references: 16700627
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 30;93(9):3843-6
references: 8632977
references: Nature. 2001 Nov 22;414(6862):446-9
references: 11719805
references: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Sep;100(3):1455-64
references: 18596187
references: PLoS One. 2008 Apr 23;3(4):e1990
references: 18431477
references: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Feb;93(2):786-800
references: 15385598