title: You can't put old wine in new bottles: the effect of newcomers on coordination in groups.
abstract: A common finding in social sciences is that member change hinders group functioning and performance. However, questions remain as to why member change negatively affects group performance and what are some ways to alleviate the negative effects of member change on performance? To answer these questions we conduct an experiment in which we investigate the effect of newcomers on a group's ability to coordinate efficiently. Participants play a coordination game in a four-person group for the first part of the experiment, and then two members of the group are replaced with new participants, and the newly formed group plays the game for the second part of the experiment. Our results show that the arrival of newcomers decreases trust among group members and this decrease in trust negatively affects group performance. Knowing the performance history of the arriving newcomers mitigates the negative effect of their arrival, but only when newcomers also know the oldtimers performance history. Surprisingly, in groups that performed poorly prior to the newcomers' arrival, the distrust generated by newcomers is mainly between oldtimers about each other rather than about the newcomers.
authors: Argyros School of Business and Economics, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA. mccarter@chapman.edu
authors: Matthew W
authors: MW
authors: McCarter
authors: Roman M
authors: RM
authors: Sheremeta
mesh_terms: D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D035502:Trust; D055815:Young Adult
references: Harv Bus Rev. 2007 Nov;85(11):100-9, 153
references: 18159790
references: Science. 1999 Apr 9;284(5412):278-82
references: 10195886
references: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;33(7):1036-48
references: 17557893
references: Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2000 Jul;82(2):194-216
references: 10891295
references: Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Nov;76(2):89-112
references: 9831517
references: J Appl Psychol. 1999 Jun;84(3):445-55
references: 10380424
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Sep;91(3):456-75
references: 16938030