title: Incommensurable worldviews? Is public use of complementary and alternative medicines incompatible with support for science and conventional medicine?
abstract: Proponents of controversial Complementary and Alternative Medicines, such as homeopathy, argue that these treatments can be used with great effect in addition to, and sometimes instead of, 'conventional' medicine. In doing so, they accept the idea that the scientific approach to the evaluation of treatment does not undermine use of and support for some of the more controversial CAM treatments. For those adhering to the scientific canon, however, such efficacy claims lack the requisite evidential basis from randomised controlled trials. It is not clear, however, whether such opposition characterises the views of the general public. In this paper we use data from the 2009 Wellcome Monitor survey to investigate public use of and beliefs about the efficacy of a prominent and controversial CAM within the United Kingdom, homeopathy. We proceed by using Latent Class Analysis to assess whether it is possible to identify a sub-group of the population who are at ease in combining support for science and conventional medicine with use of CAM treatments, and belief in the efficacy of homeopathy. Our results suggest that over 40% of the British public maintain positive evaluations of both homeopathy and conventional medicine simultaneously. Explanatory analyses reveal that simultaneous support for a controversial CAM treatment and conventional medicine is, in part, explained by a lack of scientific knowledge as well as concerns about the regulation of medical research.
authors: Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom. p.stoneman@surrey.ac.uk
authors: Paul
authors: P
authors: Stoneman
authors: Patrick
authors: P
authors: Sturgis
authors: Nick
authors: N
authors: Allum
authors: Elissa
authors: E
authors: Sibley
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research; D000529:Complementary Therapies / Q000941:ethics / Q000523:psychology; D006705:Homeopathy / Q000941:ethics / Q000523:psychology; D006801:Humans; D011639:Public Opinion; D006113:United Kingdom
references: Psychol Methods. 2001 Mar;6(1):18-34
references: 11285809
references: J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Apr;26(4):399-404
references: 21053090
references: Acad Med. 2001 Mar;76(3):230-7
references: 11242572
references: J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Apr;16(2):276-81
references: 20367847
references: J Health Psychol. 2007 Nov;12(6):868-70
references: 17956966
references: BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011 Dec 30;11:138
references: 22208873
references: Soc Sci Med. 2000 Nov;51(10):1555-61
references: 11077957
references: J Altern Complement Med. 1998 Winter;4(4):371-88
references: 9884175
references: BMC Complement Altern Med. 2010 Oct 18;10:58
references: 20955609
references: Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Feb;65(2):163-4
references: 17875194
references: Can J Public Health. 1997 May-Jun;88(3):159-62
references: 9260355
references: Public Underst Sci. 2012 Aug;21(6):759-73
references: 23832159
references: Lancet. 2005 Aug 27-Sep 2;366(9487):726-32
references: 16125589
references: Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Apr;56(1):27-33
references: 10853874
references: BMC Complement Altern Med. 2005 Jun 14;5:12
references: 15955254
references: BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008 Apr 23;8:14
references: 18433476
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD002766
references: 22696330
references: Arch Intern Med. 2009 May 11;169(9):858-66
references: 19433697
references: JAMA. 1998 May 20;279(19):1548-53
references: 9605899
references: Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Dec;54(6):577-82
references: 12492603
references: Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jul;51(2):251-64
references: 10832572
references: Altern Ther Health Med. 2000 Jan;6(1):98-101
references: 10631828
references: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Feb;22(2):87-90
references: 10073623
references: BMC Complement Altern Med. 2010 Jul 20;10:38
references: 20646290
references: Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jun;62(11):2646-57
references: 16376470
references: BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011 Nov 04;11:107
references: 22053865
references: Prev Med. 2002 Aug;35(2):166-73
references: 12200102
references: J Altern Complement Med. 2009 Oct;15(10):1139-42
references: 19848550
references: Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;13(3):146-57
references: 17631257
references: BMJ. 1991 Feb 9;302(6772):316-23
references: 1825800
references: Lancet. 2007 Nov 17;370(9600):1672-3
references: 18022024
references: Complement Ther Med. 2003 Mar;11(1):33-8
references: 12667973