title: Winner and loser effects are modulated by hormonal states.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Many animals use information acquired from recent experiences to modify their responses to new situations. Animals' decisions in contests also depend on their previous experience: after recent victories individuals tend to behave more aggressively and after defeats more submissively. Although these winner and/or loser effects have been reported for animals of different taxa, they have only recently been shown to be flexible traits, which can be influenced by extrinsic factors. In a mangrove killifish (Kryptolebias marmoratus), for instance, individuals which lost an earlier contest were more likely than others to alter contest decisions after a recent win/loss. This result suggests that individuals perceiving themselves to have worse fighting abilities are more inclined to adjust contest strategy based on new information. If this is the case, an individual's propensity to modify behaviour after a win/loss might also be modulated by intrinsic mechanisms related to its ability to fight. Stress and sex steroid hormones are often associated with an individual's contest behaviour and performance, so, in this study, we tested the hypothesis that an individual's propensity to change behaviour after wins or losses also depends on its hormonal state.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Our results show that an individual's propensity to adjust contest decisions after wins and losses does depend on its hormonal state: individuals with lower levels of cortisol (F), testosterone (T) and 11-ketotestosterone (KT) are more receptive than others to the influence of recent contest experiences, especially losing experiences, and the influences last longer. Furthermore, although winning and losing experiences resulted in significant changes in behaviour, they did not bring about a significant change in the levels of F, T, KT or oestradiol (E2).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study shows that an individual's receptivity to the influence of recent wins and losses is modulated by its internal state, as well as by extrinsic factors. Individuals with hormonal profiles corresponding to lower aggressiveness and a reduced likelihood of winning were more likely to alter contest decisions after a recent win/loss. The results also suggest that F, T, KT and E2 are not the primary physiological mechanisms mediating winner-loser effects in this fish.
authors: Department of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, No, 88, Section 4, Ting-Chou Rd, Taipei 11677, TAIWAN. yuyinghs@ntnu.edu.tw.
authors: Ryan L
authors: RL
authors: Earley
authors: Chung-Kai
authors: CK
authors: Lu
authors: I-Han
authors: IH
authors: Lee
authors: Stephanie C
authors: SC
authors: Wong
authors: Yuying
authors: Y
authors: Hsu
references: Horm Behav. 2003 Aug;44(2):93-102
references: 13129480
references: Horm Behav. 2007 Jan;51(1):164-70
references: 17081541
references: Anim Behav. 1999 Apr;57(4):903-910
references: 10202098
references: Horm Behav. 1996 Mar;30(1):2-12
references: 8724173
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 27;103(26):9924-8
references: 16785430
references: Integr Comp Biol. 2012 Dec;52(6):801-13
references: 22576819
references: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 Feb;81(1):33-74
references: 16460581
references: Horm Behav. 2005 Sep;48(3):253-5; discussion 256-8
references: 15996665
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 22;273(1605):3085-92
references: 17015351
references: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1998;23(2):337-44
references: 9884127
references: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2005 Sep-Oct;78(5):679-94
references: 16059845
references: Horm Behav. 2008 Mar;53(3):442-51
references: 18191133
references: Horm Behav. 2006 Mar;49(3):369-75
references: 16257404
references: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31(3):396-412
references: 17182101
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Jan;21(1):16-21
references: 16701465
references: Anim Cogn. 2008 Jan;11(1):75-82
references: 17492317
references: Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2009 Apr;161(2):202-7
references: 19174165
references: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2007 Jan;87(1):140-8
references: 16973384
references: Eur J Pharmacol. 2005 Dec 5;526(1-3):21-35
references: 16298361
references: J Comp Psychol. 2004 Sep;118(3):332-9
references: 15482061
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 22;276(1665):2249-56
references: 19324741
references: Neuroscience. 2003;116(2):553-63
references: 12559110
references: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999 Nov;23(7):925-35
references: 10580307
references: Front Zool. 2011 Nov 03;8(1):28
references: 22051441
references: Horm Behav. 2001 Nov;40(3):419-27
references: 11673915
references: Bull Math Biol. 1999 Nov;61(6):1151-86
references: 17879874
references: Science. 1961 Dec 1;134(3492):1749-50
references: 17779074
references: Am Nat. 2012 Sep;180(3):364-71
references: 22854079
references: Front Neuroendocrinol. 2006 Jul;27(2):170-9
references: 16376420
references: Physiol Behav. 2006 Jul 30;88(4-5):353-63
references: 16723141
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Apr;20(4):187-93
references: 16701367
references: Integr Comp Biol. 2012 Dec;52(6):724-36
references: 22576816
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 7;277(1686):1427-34
references: 20053644