title: Choice-induced preference change in the free-choice paradigm: a critical methodological review.
abstract: Choices not only reflect our preference, but they also affect our behavior. The phenomenon of choice-induced preference change has been of interest to cognitive dissonance researchers in social psychology, and more recently, it has attracted the attention of researchers in economics and neuroscience. Preference modulation after the mere act of making a choice has been repeatedly demonstrated over the last 50 years by an experimental paradigm called the "free-choice paradigm." However, Chen and Risen (2010) pointed out a serious methodological flaw in this paradigm, arguing that evidence for choice-induced preference change is still insufficient. Despite the flaw, studies using the traditional free-choice paradigm continue to be published without addressing the criticism. Here, aiming to draw more attention to this issue, we briefly explain the methodological problem, and then describe simple simulation studies that illustrate how the free-choice paradigm produces a systematic pattern of preference change consistent with cognitive dissonance, even without any change in true preference. Our stimulation also shows how a different level of noise in each phase of the free-choice paradigm independently contributes to the magnitude of artificial preference change. Furthermore, we review ways of addressing the critique and provide a meta-analysis to show the effect size of choice-induced preference change after addressing the critique. Finally, we review and discuss, based on the results of the stimulation studies, how the criticism affects our interpretation of past findings generated from the free-choice paradigm. We conclude that the use of the conventional free-choice paradigm should be avoided in future research and the validity of past findings from studies using this paradigm should be empirically re-established.
authors: Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA, USA ; Brain Science Institute, Tamagawa University Tokyo, Japan.
authors: Keise
authors: K
authors: Izuma
authors: Kou
authors: K
authors: Murayama
keywords: attitude change; choice justification; cognitive consistency; cognitive dissonance; free-choice paradigm; preference change; self-perception theory; social influence
references: Psychol Sci. 2007 Nov;18(11):978-83
references: 17958712
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jun;76(6):988-1007
references: 10402682
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Oct;99(4):573-94
references: 20658837
references: Science. 2010 May 7;328(5979):709
references: 20448177
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1970 Jan;14(1):1-7
references: 5435535
references: J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1963 Apr;66:325-31
references: 14015625
references: Psychol Rev. 1967 May;74(3):183-200
references: 5342882
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Jun;64(6):885-96
references: 8326471
references: Psychol Sci. 2010 Apr;21(4):489-93
references: 20424088
references: Psychol Sci. 2010 Sep;21(9):1231-5
references: 20679522
references: J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 7;30(27):9209-15
references: 20610755
references: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan;7(1):58-9
references: 26168423
references: Neuroimage. 2013 Apr 1;69:206-12
references: 23238432
references: J Pers. 1962 Mar;30:16-28
references: 13885858
references: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Sep;6(4):460-7
references: 20621961
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e37857
references: 22761661
references: J Comp Psychol. 2010 Nov;124(4):425-32
references: 20836593
references: Science. 2005 Oct 7;310(5745):116-9
references: 16210542
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Sep;89(3):294-310
references: 16248715
references: Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1123-1129
references: 22933456
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Oct;14(10):457-63
references: 20817592
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1969 Apr;11(4):328-33
references: 5787021
references: Psychol Sci. 2001 Mar;12(2):135-40
references: 11340922
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Mar 1;55(1):240-6
references: 21130888
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 1956 May;52(3):384-9
references: 13318848
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jan;12(1):13-6
references: 18063405
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 21;107(51):22014-9
references: 21135218
references: J Pers. 1970 Jun;38(2):264-72
references: 5427614
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 1959 May;58(3):373-8
references: 13653888
references: J Neurosci. 2009 Mar 25;29(12):3760-5
references: 19321772
references: Psychol Sci. 2004 Aug;15(8):527-33
references: 15270997
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jan;94(1):1-15
references: 18179314