title: Evolution of neuroarchitecture, multi-level analyses and calibrative reductionism.
abstract: Evolution has sculpted the incredibly complex human nervous system, among the most complex functions of which extend beyond the individual to an intricate social structure. Although these functions are deterministic, those determinants are legion, heavily interacting and dependent on a specific evolutionary trajectory. That trajectory was directed by the adaptive significance of quasi-random genetic variations, but was also influenced by chance and caprice. With a different evolutionary pathway, the same neural elements could subserve functions distinctly different from what they do in extant human brains. Consequently, the properties of higher level neural networks cannot be derived readily from the properties of the lower level constituent elements, without studying these elements in the aggregate. Thus, a multi-level approach to integrative neuroscience may offer an optimal strategy. Moreover, the process of calibrative reductionism, by which concepts and understandings from one level of organization or analysis can mutually inform and 'calibrate' those from other levels (both higher and lower), may represent a viable approach to the application of reductionism in science. This is especially relevant in social neuroscience, where the basic subject matter of interest is defined by interacting organisms across diverse environments.
authors: Department of Psychology ,  Ohio State University ,  1885 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210 ,  USA.
authors: Gary G
authors: GG
authors: Berntson
authors: Greg J
authors: GJ
authors: Norman
authors: Louise C
authors: LC
authors: Hawkley
authors: John T
authors: JT
authors: Cacioppo
keywords: calibrative reductionism; complexity; emergence; evolution; nervous system; social neuroscience
references: Am Psychol. 1992 Aug;47(8):1019-28
references: 1510329
references: Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2005 Jun;36(2):421-41
references: 19260199
references: Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2003 Oct;23(4-5):727-38
references: 14514027
references: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008 Sep 13;366(1878):3001-15
references: 18559318
references: Child Dev. 2010 Jan-Feb;81(1):41-79
references: 20331654
references: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Jul;4(4):326-39
references: 19844601
references: Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2005 Jun;36(2):349-71
references: 19260196
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Nov 17;702:75-102
references: 8109879
references: Ann Hum Biol. 2009 Sep-Oct;36(5):562-72
references: 19575315
references: Behav Neurosci. 2000 Feb;114(1):173-83
references: 10718272
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 15;106(50):21437-41
references: 19934046
references: Br Med J. 1884 Apr 5;1(1214):660-3
references: 20750867
references: Science. 1972 Aug 4;177(4047):393-6
references: 17796623
references: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2000;4(1):3-15
references: 15710559
references: Physiol Behav. 2004 Apr;81(2):179-209
references: 15159167
references: Psychol Bull. 2000 Nov;126(6):829-43
references: 11107878
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:693-716
references: 18771388
references: Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Jun;154(6):726-35
references: 9167498
references: Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Feb 15;61(4):498-503
references: 16904652
references: Brain Res. 2008 Oct 27;1237:12-24
references: 18694740