title: Informational connectivity: identifying synchronized discriminability of multi-voxel patterns across the brain.
abstract: The fluctuations in a brain region's activation levels over a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time-course are used in functional connectivity (FC) to identify networks with synchronous responses. It is increasingly recognized that multi-voxel activity patterns contain information that cannot be extracted from univariate activation levels. Here we present a novel analysis method that quantifies regions' synchrony in multi-voxel activity pattern discriminability, rather than univariate activation, across a timeseries. We introduce a measure of multi-voxel pattern discriminability at each time-point, which is then used to identify regions that share synchronous time-courses of condition-specific multi-voxel information. This method has the sensitivity and access to distributed information that multi-voxel pattern analysis enjoys, allowing it to be applied to data from conditions not separable by univariate responses. We demonstrate this by analyzing data collected while people viewed four different types of man-made objects (typically not separable by univariate analyses) using both FC and informational connectivity (IC) methods. IC reveals networks of object-processing regions that are not detectable using FC. The IC results support prior findings and hypotheses about object processing. This new method allows investigators to ask questions that are not addressable through typical FC, just as multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) has added new research avenues to those addressable with the general linear model (GLM).
authors: Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA.
authors: Marc N
authors: MN
authors: Coutanche
authors: Sharon L
authors: SL
authors: Thompson-Schill
keywords: MVPA; connectivity; fMRI; method; multivariate; networks; pattern discriminability
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Apr;17(4):580-90
references: 15829079
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Jul 1;57(1):113-123
references: 21513803
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Apr;24(4):868-77
references: 22220728
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 7;103(10):3863-8
references: 16537458
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Sep;10(9):424-30
references: 16899397
references: Neuroimage. 2007 Mar;35(1):105-20
references: 17239619
references: J Comput Neurosci. 2011 Feb;30(1):85-107
references: 20799057
references: Neuron. 2007 Aug 2;55(3):507-20
references: 17678861
references: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009 Mar;4(1):101-9
references: 19151374
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 20;106(42):17974-9
references: 19805050
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Jul 1;57(1):293-300
references: 21315158
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jul;7(7):523-34
references: 16791142
references: Neuropsychologia. 2012 Mar;50(4):479-86
references: 21787796
references: Nat Neurosci. 2005 May;8(5):679-85
references: 15852014
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Nov;19(11):1735-52
references: 17958478
references: Neuroimage. 1997 Oct;6(3):218-29
references: 9344826
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Feb;8(2):71-8
references: 15588811
references: Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):1113-9
references: 22498658
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:27-51
references: 18767921
references: Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Aug 10;4:
references: 20740073
references: Comput Biomed Res. 1996 Jun;29(3):162-73
references: 8812068
references: Magn Reson Med. 1995 Oct;34(4):537-41
references: 8524021
references: Neuroimage. 2000 Oct;12(4):478-84
references: 10988041
references: Biol Psychiatry. 2005 May 1;57(9):991-8
references: 15860339
references: Science. 2001 Sep 28;293(5539):2425-30
references: 11577229
references: Neuroimage. 2004 Sep;23(1):156-66
references: 15325362
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Feb;20(2):356-70
references: 18275340
references: Neuropsychologia. 2012 Mar;50(4):544-52
references: 22100534