title: Conserving the birds of Uganda's banana-coffee arc: land sparing and land sharing compared.
abstract: Reconciling the aims of feeding an ever more demanding human population and conserving biodiversity is a difficult challenge. Here, we explore potential solutions by assessing whether land sparing (farming for high yield, potentially enabling the protection of non-farmland habitat), land sharing (lower yielding farming with more biodiversity within farmland) or a mixed strategy would result in better bird conservation outcomes for a specified level of agricultural production. We surveyed forest and farmland study areas in southern Uganda, measuring the population density of 256 bird species and agricultural yield: food energy and gross income. Parametric non-linear functions relating density to yield were fitted. Species were identified as "winners" (total population size always at least as great with agriculture present as without it) or "losers" (total population sometimes or always reduced with agriculture present) for a range of targets for total agricultural production. For each target we determined whether each species would be predicted to have a higher total population with land sparing, land sharing or with any intermediate level of sparing at an intermediate yield. We found that most species were expected to have their highest total populations with land sparing, particularly loser species and species with small global range sizes. Hence, more species would benefit from high-yield farming if used as part of a strategy to reduce forest loss than from low-yield farming and land sharing, as has been found in Ghana and India in a previous study. We caution against advocacy for high-yield farming alone as a means to deliver land sparing if it is done without strong protection for natural habitats, other ecosystem services and social welfare. Instead, we suggest that conservationists explore how conservation and agricultural policies can be better integrated to deliver land sparing by, for example, combining land-use planning and agronomic support for small farmers.
authors: British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford, Norfolk, United Kingdom. mark.hulme@bto.org
authors: Mark F
authors: MF
authors: Hulme
authors: Juliet A
authors: JA
authors: Vickery
authors: Rhys E
authors: RE
authors: Green
authors: Ben
authors: B
authors: Phalan
authors: Dan E
authors: DE
authors: Chamberlain
authors: Derek E
authors: DE
authors: Pomeroy
authors: Dianah
authors: D
authors: Nalwanga
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Mushabe
authors: Raymond
authors: R
authors: Katebaka
authors: Simon
authors: S
authors: Bolwig
authors: Philip W
authors: PW
authors: Atkinson
mesh_terms: D000383:Agriculture / Q000458:organization & administration*; D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D001717:Birds / Q000502:physiology*; D040503:Coffea / Q000254:growth & development*; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000706:statistics & numerical data* / Q000639:trends; D017753:Ecosystem; D006801:Humans; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D028521:Musa / Q000254:growth & development*; D011156:Population Density; D014197:Trees; D014454:Uganda
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 18;105(46):17852-4
references: 18981411
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):19639-44
references: 20643935
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 30;107(13):5786-91
references: 20339080
references: Science. 2001 Apr 13;292(5515):281-4
references: 11303102
references: Science. 2010 Sep 10;329(5997):1298-303
references: 20829476
references: J Appl Ecol. 2010 Feb;47(1):5-14
references: 20383262
references: Science. 2011 Nov 4;334(6056):593; author reply 594-5
references: 22053026
references: Science. 2011 Sep 2;333(6047):1289-91
references: 21885781
references: Ecol Lett. 2006 Mar;9(3):243-54; discussion 254-7
references: 16958888
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 May;23(5):261-7
references: 18359125
references: Science. 2011 Sep 2;333(6047):1231-2
references: 21885765
references: PLoS One. 2011 Jan 27;6(1):e16238
references: 21298054
references: Conserv Biol. 2008 Feb;22(1):163-71
references: 18254861
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):20260-4
references: 22106295
references: Conserv Biol. 2006 Jun;20(3):709-10
references: 16909562
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 8;106(49):20675-80
references: 19955435
references: Science. 2005 Jan 28;307(5709):550-5
references: 15618485
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1134:173-200
references: 18566094
references: Ecol Appl. 2011 Sep;21(6):2187-96
references: 21939053
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 22;279(1739):2714-24
references: 22535780
references: Nature. 2011 Oct 12;478(7369):337-42
references: 21993620
references: Science. 2010 Feb 12;327(5967):812-8
references: 20110467