title: Unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures: is there a consensus on definition and treatment in Germany?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Extramedullary and intramedullary implants have improved in recent years, although consensus is lacking concerning the definition and classification of unstable intertrochanteric fractures, with uncertainties regarding treatment.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  We conducted a national survey of practicing chairpersons of German institutions to determine current perspectives and perceptions of practice in the diagnosis, management, and surgical treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures.
  
  
  METHODS
  Between January and February 2010, we emailed 575 German chairpersons of trauma and/or orthopaedic departments, asking them to complete a 26-question web-based survey regarding three broad domains: fracture classification and instability criteria, implants and surgical treatment algorithms, and timing of operations. Response rate was 42%.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There was a clear preference for use of the AO/OTA fracture classification with geographic variations. Absence of medial support was considered the main criterion for fracture instability (84%), whereas a broken lateral wall and detached greater trochanter were considered by 4% and 5% of the respondents, respectively, to determine instability. Two percent routinely fixed unstable intertrochanteric fractures with extramedullary devices. Ninety-eight percent of German hospitals reportedly perform surgery within 24 hours after admission. Time to surgery was dependent on hospital level, with more direct surgeries in Level I hospitals.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Despite varying opinions in the literature in recent years, we found some instability criteria (lateral wall breach, a detached greater trochanter) played a minor role in defining an unstable intertrochanteric fracture pattern. Despite recent meta-analyses suggesting clinical equivalence of intra- and extramedullary implants, few respondents routinely treat unstable intertrochanteric fractures with extramedullary plates. Additional studies are required to specify the influence of fracture characteristics on complication rate and function and to establish a classification system with clear treatment recommendations for unstable intertrochanteric fractures.
authors: Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 30 Pauwelsstreet, 52074, Aachen, Germany. mknobe@ukaachen.de
authors: Matthias
authors: M
authors: Knobe
authors: Gertraud
authors: G
authors: Gradl
authors: Andreas
authors: A
authors: Ladenburger
authors: Ivan S
authors: IS
authors: Tarkin
authors: Hans-Christoph
authors: HC
authors: Pape
mesh_terms: D001858:Bone Nails; D001863:Bone Screws; D032921:Consensus; D005269:Femur / Q000601:surgery*; D005592:Fracture Fixation / Q000379:methods*; D005858:Germany; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006620:Hip Fractures / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000601:surgery*; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references: JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1738-43
references: 15082701
references: BMJ. 2006 Apr 22;332(7547):947-51
references: 16554334
references: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Oct;97(6 Suppl):S95-100
references: 21903500
references: Osteoporos Int. 2010 Dec;21(Suppl 4):S529-34
references: 21057992
references: Acta Orthop. 2011 Apr;82(2):166-70
references: 21434790
references: Int Orthop. 2003;27(4):197-203
references: 12734684
references: J Orthop Trauma. 2000 Sep-Oct;14(7):490-5
references: 11083611
references: BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Dec 29;9:171
references: 19114019
references: Unfallchirurg. 1992 May;95(5):246-53
references: 1604336
references: Injury. 2010 Dec;41(12):1234-8
references: 21374904
references: Z Orthop Unfall. 2009 May-Jun;147(3):306-13
references: 19551581
references: Injury. 2005 Jul;36(7):858-61
references: 15949488
references: Injury. 2008 Aug;39(8):932-9
references: 18582887
references: Int Orthop. 2011 Dec;35(12):1855-61
references: 21387175
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Mar;89(3):470-5
references: 17332094
references: J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Apr;25(4):191-5
references: 21399466
references: Z Orthop Unfall. 2008 Jan-Feb;146(1):44-51
references: 18324581
references: J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Jun;27(6):312-7
references: 22955336
references: J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(10 Suppl):S1-133
references: 18277234
references: BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):299-302
references: 7633241
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Jan-Feb;(138):41-4
references: 445917
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1949 May;31B(2):190-203
references: 18150534
references: J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Jan;23(1):31-8
references: 19104301
references: Injury. 2010 Dec;41(12):1292-6
references: 20728885
references: Int Orthop. 2006 Apr;30(2):69-78
references: 16496147
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2302-12
references: 22311725
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Apr;92(4):792-8
references: 20360500
references: Injury. 2002 Oct;33(8):713-5
references: 12213423
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967 Apr;49(3):440-50
references: 6022353
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;52(10):997-1005
references: 10513763
references: Age Ageing. 2010 Mar;39(2):203-9
references: 20075035
references: Injury. 2010 Apr;41(4):377-81
references: 19906370
references: Injury. 1997 Jun-Jul;28(5-6):337-41
references: 9764228
references: Injury. 2004 Oct;35(10):994-8
references: 15351665
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Aug;(425):82-6
references: 15292791
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jul;77(7):1058-64
references: 7608228
references: J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Jun;27(6):e127-36
references: 23114419
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD000093
references: 16235272
references: Injury. 2004 Feb;35(2):142-51
references: 14736471