title: Successful malaria elimination strategies require interventions that target changing vector behaviours.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The ultimate long-term goal of malaria eradication was recently placed back onto the global health agenda. When planning for this goal, it is important to remember why the original Global Malaria Eradication Programme (GMEP), conducted with DDT-based indoor residual spraying (IRS), did not achieve its goals. One of the technical reasons for the failure to eliminate malaria was over reliance on a single intervention and subsequently the mosquito vectors developed behavioural resistance so that they did not come into physical contact with the insecticide. HYPOTHESIS AND HOW TO TEST IT: Currently, there remains a monolithic reliance on indoor vector control. It is hypothesized that an outcome of long-term, widespread control is that vector populations will change over time, either in the form of physiological resistance, changes in the relative species composition or behavioural resistance. The potential for, and consequences of, behavioural resistance was explored by reviewing the literature regarding vector behaviour in the southwest Pacific.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Here, two of the primary vectors that were highly endophagic, Anopheles punctulatus and Anopheles koliensis, virtually disappeared from large areas where DDT was sprayed. However, high levels of transmission have been maintained by Anopheles farauti, which altered its behaviour to blood-feed early in the evening and outdoors and, thereby, avoiding exposure to the insecticides used in IRS. This example indicates that the efficacy of programmes relying on indoor vector control (IRS and long-lasting, insecticide-treated nets [LLINs]) will be significantly reduced if the vectors change their behaviour to avoid entering houses.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Behavioural resistance is less frequently seen compared with physiological resistance (where the mosquito contacts the insecticide but is not killed), but is potentially more challenging to control programmes because the intervention effectiveness cannot be restored by rotating the insecticide to one with a different mode of action. The scientific community needs to urgently develop systematic methods for monitoring behavioural resistance and then to work in collaboration with vector control programmes to implement monitoring in sentinel sites. In situations where behavioural resistance is detected, there will be a need to target other bionomic vulnerabilities that may exist in the larval stages, during mating, sugar feeding or another aspect of the life cycle of the vector to continue the drive towards elimination.
authors: James Cook University, Queensland Tropical Health Alliance, Cairns, Queensland, Australia. tanya.russell@jcu.edu.au.
authors: Tanya L
authors: TL
authors: Russell
authors: Nigel W
authors: NW
authors: Beebe
authors: Robert D
authors: RD
authors: Cooper
authors: Neil F
authors: NF
authors: Lobo
authors: Thomas R
authors: TR
authors: Burkot
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000852:Anopheles / Q000502:physiology*; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D004199:Disease Vectors; D006801:Humans; D008288:Malaria / Q000517:prevention & control*; D009032:Mosquito Control / Q000379:methods*
references: Indian J Malariol. 1958 Jun;12(2):129-56
references: 13586885
references: J Med Entomol. 1967 May;4(2):192-6
references: 4383193
references: Med Hist. 1999 Apr;43(2):192-207
references: 10885139
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 May 7;272(1566):877-86
references: 16024341
references: PLoS Med. 2010 Feb 09;7(2):e1000209
references: 20161718
references: Malar J. 2011 Jul 07;10:184
references: 21736750
references: Med Vet Entomol. 1987 Jul;1(3):319-27
references: 2979548
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1952 Sep;1(5):853-61
references: 14952711
references: Med J Malaya. 1960 Jun;14:228-31
references: 13740490
references: Nature. 1964 Aug 29;203:940-1
references: 14203509
references: Malar J. 2013 Jan 08;12:13
references: 23297732
references: Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1962 Apr;56:20-32
references: 14485752
references: J Med Entomol. 2002 Jan;39(1):16-27
references: 11931251
references: Trends Parasitol. 2011 Feb;27(2):91-8
references: 20843745
references: Malar J. 2010 Feb 26;9:62
references: 20187956
references: Malar J. 2011 Apr 09;10:80
references: 21477321
references: Annu Rev Entomol. 1962;7:419-36
references: 14471420
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1972 Sep;21(5):755-63
references: 4561523
references: Acta Leiden. 1957;27:1-128
references: 13443838