title: Divergent receiver responses to components of multimodal signals in two foot-flagging frog species.
abstract: Multimodal communication of acoustic and visual signals serves a vital role in the mating system of anuran amphibians. To understand signal evolution and function in multimodal signal design it is critical to test receiver responses to unimodal signal components versus multimodal composite signals. We investigated two anuran species displaying a conspicuous foot-flagging behavior in addition to or in combination with advertisement calls while announcing their signaling sites to conspecifics. To investigate the conspicuousness of the foot-flagging signals, we measured and compared spectral reflectance of foot webbings of Micrixalus saxicola and Staurois parvus using a spectrophotometer. We performed behavioral field experiments using a model frog including an extendable leg combined with acoustic playbacks to test receiver responses to acoustic, visual and combined audio-visual stimuli. Our results indicated that the foot webbings of S. parvus achieved a 13 times higher contrast against their visual background than feet of M. saxicola. The main response to all experimental stimuli in S. parvus was foot flagging, whereas M. saxicola responded primarily with calls but never foot flagged. Together these across-species differences suggest that in S. parvus foot-flagging behavior is applied as a salient and frequently used communicative signal during agonistic behavior, whereas we propose it constitutes an evolutionary nascent state in ritualization of the current fighting behavior in M. saxicola.
authors: Department of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. doris.preininger@univie.ac.at
authors: Doris
authors: D
authors: Preininger
authors: Markus
authors: M
authors: Boeckle
authors: Marc
authors: M
authors: Sztatecsny
authors: Walter
authors: W
authors: Hödl
mesh_terms: D000819:Animal Communication; D000818:Animals; D001001:Anura / Q000502:physiology*; D005075:Biological Evolution; D001893:Borneo; D003116:Color; D005528:Foot / Q000502:physiology*; D016014:Linear Models; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D013045:Species Specificity; D013053:Spectrophotometry
references: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003 Nov;78(4):575-95
references: 14700392
references: Behav Ecol. 2008 Nov;19(6):1250-1257
references: 19529816
references: Anim Behav. 2008 Sep;76(3):901-910
references: 19727331
references: Am Nat. 2006 Jul;168(1):100-13
references: 16874617
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 21;100(2):577-80
references: 12515862
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Sep 7;267(1454):1735-40
references: 12233770
references: Zoolog Sci. 2007 Jan;24(1):101-6
references: 17409723
references: Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2013;67:1449-1456
references: 23956486
references: Science. 1999 Feb 26;283(5406):1272-3
references: 10084931
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37965
references: 22655089
references: Am Nat. 2005 Aug;166(2):231-45
references: 16032576
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 15;102(7):2425-9
references: 15677318
references: J Exp Biol. 2001 May;204(Pt 9):1559-75
references: 11398746
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 7;276(1666):2351-8
references: 19324736
references: Anim Behav. 1999 Nov;58(5):921-931
references: 10564594
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 May 22;279(1735):1943-9
references: 22217724
references: Nat Commun. 2010 Apr 12;1:4
references: 20975675