title: The effects of task demands on bimanual skill acquisition.
abstract: Bimanual coordination is essential for everyday activities. It is thought that different degrees of demands may affect learning of new bimanual patterns. One demand is at the level of performance and involves breaking the tendency to produce mirror-symmetric movements. A second is at a perceptual level and involves controlling each hand to separate (i.e., split) goals. A third demand involves switching between different task contexts (e.g., a different uni- or bimanual task), instead of continuously practicing one task repeatedly. Here, we studied the effect of these task demands on motor planning (reaction time) and execution (error) while subjects learned a novel bimanual isometric pinch force task. In Experiment 1, subjects continuously practiced in one of the two extremes of the following bimanual conditions: (1) symmetric force demands and a perceptually unified target for each hand or (2) asymmetric force demands and perceptually split targets. Subjects performing in the asymmetric condition showed some interference between hands, but all subjects, regardless of group, could learn the isometric pinch force task similarly. In Experiment 2, subjects practiced these and two other conditions, but in a paradigm where practice was briefly interrupted by the performance of either a unimanual or a different bimanual condition. Reaction times were longer and errors were larger well after the interruption when the main movement to be learned required asymmetric forces. There was no effect when the main movement required symmetric forces. These findings demonstrate two main points. First, people can learn bimanual tasks with very different demands on the same timescale if they are not interrupted. Second, interruption during learning can negatively impact both planning and execution and this depends on the demands of the bimanual task to be learned. This information will be important for training patient populations, who may be more susceptible to increased task demands.
authors: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Phipps 174, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. ehoyer1@jhmi.edu
authors: Erik H
authors: EH
authors: Hoyer
authors: Amy J
authors: AJ
authors: Bastian
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology*; D006225:Hand / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009048:Motor Skills / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references: Exp Brain Res. 1999 Nov;129(2):302-16
references: 10591904
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Aug;27(4):763-97
references: 11518143
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb;29(1):64-77
references: 12669748
references: Exp Brain Res. 2008 Oct;191(1):1-12
references: 18704386
references: Exp Brain Res. 1987;67(2):241-52
references: 3622687
references: Nature. 1996 Jul 18;382(6588):252-5
references: 8717039
references: Exp Brain Res. 2009 Aug;197(3):269-78
references: 19565226
references: Neuron. 2003 Aug 14;39(4):713-26
references: 12925284
references: Psychol Bull. 2010 Sep;136(5):849-74
references: 20804238
references: J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 22;29(29):9396-404
references: 19625530
references: Hum Mov Sci. 2005 Oct-Dec;24(5-6):798-814
references: 16330121
references: Curr Biol. 2010 Jul 27;20(14):1290-5
references: 20598886
references: Psychol Sci. 2001 Nov;12(6):493-8
references: 11760137
references: Brain Cogn. 2002 Feb;48(1):166-78
references: 11812040
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2000 Jan;9(1):103-9
references: 10666562
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb;29(1):92-105
references: 12669750
references: J Neurosci. 1994 May;14(5 Pt 2):3208-24
references: 8182467
references: Exp Brain Res. 1999 Dec;129(3):417-32
references: 10591913
references: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jul;48(9):2517-27
references: 20434467
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 May;34(3):478-94
references: 18444750
references: J Neurophysiol. 2011 Aug;106(2):652-61
references: 21613597
references: Motor Control. 2000 Apr;4(2):232-56
references: 11500577
references: Cereb Cortex. 2004 Oct;14(10):1153-63
references: 15142955
references: Science. 1979 Mar 9;203(4384):1029-31
references: 424729
references: Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 31;46(2):419-25
references: 17904169
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Mar;129(1):4-26
references: 10756484
references: J Mot Behav. 2004 Dec;36(4):355-70
references: 15695214
references: Neuroreport. 2003 Jul 18;14(10):1329-32
references: 12876467
references: Exp Brain Res. 2010 Aug;205(2):273-82
references: 20652230
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jan;8(1):18-25
references: 14697399
references: Cereb Cortex. 2007 May;17(5):1227-34
references: 16855008
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 3;106(5):1590-5
references: 19164589
references: Aust J Physiother. 2005;51(2):119-22
references: 15924514
references: Exp Brain Res. 1998 Feb;118(3):381-92
references: 9497145
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1983 May;35(Pt 2):347-75
references: 6571316
references: J Mot Behav. 2004 Mar;36(1):71-81
references: 14766490
references: J Mot Behav. 1998 Jun;30(2):151-7
references: 20037030
references: Psychol Res. 2003 Feb;67(1):56-70
references: 12589450
references: Neuropsychologia. 1996 Dec;34(12):1203-13
references: 8951832
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Mar;19(6):1643-52
references: 15066160
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Sep;129(3):308-39
references: 11006903
references: Nature. 2001 Nov 1;414(6859):69-73
references: 11689944
references: Exp Brain Res. 2011 Feb;208(4):533-41
references: 21132279
references: Cortex. 2002 Apr;38(2):201-14
references: 12056689
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1991 Sep;77(2):137-51
references: 1759589
references: Exp Brain Res. 2011 Dec;215(3-4):257-67
references: 21984054
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Dec;19(6):1200-20
references: 8294888
references: Neuropsychology. 1998 Jul;12(3):380-98
references: 9673995
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Nov;19(6):1328-44
references: 8270889
references: J Neurotrauma. 2011 Jun;28(6):897-913
references: 21501046
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Jun;26(3):1209-20
references: 10884018
references: Res Q Exerc Sport. 1991 Mar;62(1):18-26
references: 2028089
references: Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
references: 5146491
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Mar;7(3):134-140
references: 12639695
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Apr;19(2):416-28
references: 8473848
references: Exp Psychol. 2004;51(1):52-8
references: 14959506
references: J Neurophysiol. 2002 Sep;88(3):1533-44
references: 12205173
references: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Oct;94(4):2403-15
references: 15958603
references: Learn Mem. 2002 Sep-Oct;9(5):279-92
references: 12359837
references: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Oct;90(4):2409-18
references: 14534269
references: Exp Brain Res. 2005 Mar;162(1):78-88
references: 15772872
references: Exp Brain Res. 2005 Aug;164(4):484-99
references: 15971067
references: J Mot Behav. 2001 Mar;33(1):103-12
references: 11265060
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2002 Jun;110(2-3):161-86
references: 12102104
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Feb;31(1):145-56
references: 15709869