title: Auditory-motor interactions for the production of native and non-native speech.
abstract: During speech production, auditory processing of self-generated speech is used to adjust subsequent articulations. The current study investigated how the proposed auditory-motor interactions are manifest at the neural level in native and non-native speakers of English who were overtly naming pictures of objects and reading their written names. Data were acquired with functional magnetic resonance imaging and analyzed with dynamic causal modeling. We found that (1) higher activity in articulatory regions caused activity in auditory regions to decrease (i.e., auditory suppression), and (2) higher activity in auditory regions caused activity in articulatory regions to increase (i.e., auditory feedback). In addition, we were able to demonstrate that (3) speaking in a non-native language involves more auditory feedback and less auditory suppression than speaking in a native language. The difference between native and non-native speakers was further supported by finding that, within non-native speakers, there was less auditory feedback for those with better verbal fluency. Consequently, the networks of more fluent non-native speakers looked more like those of native speakers. Together, these findings provide a foundation on which to explore auditory-motor interactions during speech production in other human populations, particularly those with speech difficulties.
authors: Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom. o.parkerjones@fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk
authors: Oiwi
authors: O
authors: Parker Jones
authors: Mohamed L
authors: ML
authors: Seghier
authors: Keith J
authors: KJ
authors: Kawabata Duncan
authors: Alex P
authors: AP
authors: Leff
authors: David W
authors: DW
authors: Green
authors: Cathy J
authors: CJ
authors: Price
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001306:Auditory Pathways / Q000502:physiology*; D015331:Cohort Studies; D025461:Feedback, Physiological / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D011932:Reading; D013060:Speech / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references: J Neurosci. 2008 Oct 1;28(40):9969-75
references: 18829954
references: Brain. 2010 Jun;133(Pt 6):1694-706
references: 20488886
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 15;31(24):8976-85
references: 21677181
references: Magn Reson Med. 1998 Jun;39(6):855-64
references: 9621908
references: Cortex. 2009 Apr;45(4):517-26
references: 19231480
references: Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S264-74
references: 15501096
references: J Neurophysiol. 2011 Jul;106(1):470-8
references: 21562201
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jun;22(6):1283-98
references: 19445603
references: Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 15;49(4):3099-109
references: 19914382
references: Science. 1998 Feb 20;279(5354):1213-6
references: 9469813
references: Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 Aug 26;4:
references: 20838471
references: Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jun;12(6):718-24
references: 19471271
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 1;31(22):8239-47
references: 21632945
references: Brain Lang. 1979 May;7(3):307-19
references: 455050
references: Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Oct 25;5:82
references: 22046152
references: J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 2;30(22):7604-12
references: 20519535
references: Eur J Neurosci. 1996 Nov;8(11):2236-46
references: 8950088
references: J Commun Disord. 2006 Sep-Oct;39(5):350-65
references: 16887139
references: PLoS Biol. 2009 Feb 17;7(2):e33
references: 19226186
references: Neuroimage. 2010 Sep;52(3):862-74
references: 19837177
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Sep;28(9):868-79
references: 17266104
references: Psychol Bull. 1963 May;60:213-32
references: 14002534
references: Neuroimage. 2012 May 15;61(1):314-22
references: 22406500
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e18307
references: 21625532
references: Neuroimage. 2003 Aug;19(4):1273-302
references: 12948688
references: Cereb Cortex. 2012 Apr;22(4):892-902
references: 21705392
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Mar 12;6(3):e1000709
references: 20300649
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 May 12;364(1521):1211-21
references: 19528002
references: Neuroimage. 2001 May;13(5):903-19
references: 11304086
references: Biometrika. 1947;34(1-2):28-35
references: 20287819
references: Cereb Cortex. 2010 Mar;20(3):570-82
references: 19561062
references: Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 16;2:237
references: 21954392
references: Brain Lang. 2006 Mar;96(3):280-301
references: 16040108
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2437-45
references: 20932914
references: Neurosci Lett. 1999 Sep 3;272(1):29-32
references: 10507535
references: Cereb Cortex. 2011 Jul;21(7):1519-31
references: 21109578
references: Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 1;39(3):1429-43
references: 18035557
references: Neuroimage. 2007 Feb 15;34(4):1487-96
references: 17161624
references: J Biosci. 2007 Jan;32(1):129-44
references: 17426386
references: BMC Neurosci. 2009 Jun 13;10:58
references: 19523234
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Apr;53(2):226-236
references: 19948756
references: Neuroimage. 2002 Nov;17(3):1203-6
references: 12414260
references: Cereb Cortex. 2009 Nov;19(11):2690-8
references: 19293396
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2000 Apr;9(4):183-91
references: 10770228
references: Neuroimage. 2000 Oct;12(4):466-77
references: 10988040
references: Neuroimage. 2007 Nov 15;38(3):387-401
references: 17884583
references: Neuroimage. 2005 Jul 1;26(3):839-51
references: 15955494