title: Manipulation in the enrollment of research participants.
abstract: Researchers can design recruitment and consent processes so that potential participants are more likely to decide to enroll. These strategies work by subtly manipulating the participants. But how much manipulation is acceptable?
authors: Amulya
authors: A
authors: Mandava
authors: Joseph
authors: J
authors: Millum
mesh_terms: D002755:Choice Behavior; D008192:Deception; D003657:Decision Making; D032984:Ethics, Research; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics* / Q000523:psychology / Q000592:standards; D018579:Patient Selection / Q000941:ethics*; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010565:Persuasive Communication; D012107:Research Design; D012108:Research Personnel / Q000941:ethics*; D035842:Research Subjects / Q000523:psychology; D012938:Social Perception; D012945:Social Values
references: J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Spring;32(1):100-5
references: 15152431
references: J Med Ethics. 2008 May;34(5):389-92
references: 18448723
references: Milbank Q. 1996;74(1):87-114
references: 8596525
references: JAMA. 2003 Mar 12;289(10):1278-87
references: 12633190
references: Hastings Cent Rep. 2005 Sep-Oct;35(5):20-8
references: 16295261
references: Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 May;32(3):342-52
references: 21146635
references: IRB. 2006 May-Jun;28(3):1-6
references: 17036437
references: Soc Sci Med. 1999 Jan;48(2):139-48
references: 10048773