title: Use and perceptions of information among family physicians: sources considered accessible, relevant, and reliable.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The research determined (1) the information sources that family physicians (FPs) most commonly use to update their general medical knowledge and to make specific clinical decisions, and (2) the information sources FPs found to be most physically accessible, intellectually accessible (easy to understand), reliable (trustworthy), and relevant to their needs.
  
  
  METHODS
  A cross-sectional postal survey of 792 FPs and locum tenens, in full-time or part-time medical practice, currently practicing or on leave of absence in the Canadian province of Saskatchewan was conducted during the period of January to April 2008.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of 666 eligible physicians, 331 completed and returned surveys, resulting in a response rate of 49.7% (331/666). Medical textbooks and colleagues in the main patient care setting were the top 2 sources for the purpose of making specific clinical decisions. Medical textbooks were most frequently considered by FPs to be reliable (trustworthy), and colleagues in the main patient care setting were most physically accessible (easy to access).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  When making specific clinical decisions, FPs were most likely to use information from sources that they considered to be reliable and generally physically accessible, suggesting that FPs can best be supported by facilitating easy and convenient access to high-quality information.
authors: julie.kosteniuk@usask.ca
authors: Julie G
authors: JG
authors: Kosteniuk
authors: Debra G
authors: DG
authors: Morgan
authors: Carl K
authors: CK
authors: D'Arcy
mesh_terms: D022126:Access to Information; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D057226:Information Seeking Behavior; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D010821:Physicians, Family / Q000523:psychology*; D012525:Saskatchewan; D013782:Textbooks as Topic
references: J Prim Health Care. 2010 Jun;2(2):100-4
references: 20690298
references: J Fam Pract. 1990 Mar;30(3):353-9
references: 2248632
references: J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Jan;94(1):55-60
references: 16404470
references: JAMA. 1999 Sep 1;282(9):833-9
references: 10478689
references: BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Aug 23;12:90
references: 21861880
references: Int J Med Inform. 2012 Jul;81(7):493-9
references: 22425281
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Oct 1;29(19):2173-7
references: 15454712
references: Int J Med Inform. 2003 Aug;71(1):9-15
references: 12909153
references: Yale J Biol Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;63(1):47-61
references: 2356625
references: J Med Libr Assoc. 2002 Oct;90(4):370-9
references: 12398243
references: Health Info Libr J. 2007 Jun;24(2):78-94
references: 17584211
references: Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1995 Jan;83(1):85-90
references: 7703946
references: BMJ. 2004 Oct 30;329(7473):1013
references: 15514347
references: Ann Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;5(4):345-52
references: 17664501
references: Can Fam Physician. 2012 Mar;58(3):e144-51
references: 22423028
references: J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):767-70
references: 19018908
references: Can Fam Physician. 2006 Feb;52:208-9
references: 16926965
references: J Med Libr Assoc. 2011 Jan;99(1):88-91
references: 21243061
references: Can Fam Physician. 2012 Mar;58(3):e152-8
references: 22423029
references: BMC Pediatr. 2007 Jan 15;7:1
references: 17224061
references: Health Info Libr J. 2011 Mar;28(1):23-32
references: 21314891
references: J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Spring;26(2):120-7
references: 16802313
references: Int J Med Inform. 2008 Apr;77(4):249-55
references: 17646126
references: Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2006 Mar 17;1(1):E2
references: 16759426
references: J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002 Winter;22(1):33-42
references: 12004639
references: Can Fam Physician. 2008 Jun;54(6):884-9
references: 18556498