title: Do researchers have an obligation to actively look for genetic incidental findings?
abstract: The rapid growth of next-generation genetic sequencing has prompted debate about the responsibilities of researchers toward genetic incidental findings. Assuming there is a duty to disclose significant incidental findings, might there be an obligation for researchers to actively look for these findings? We present an ethical framework for analyzing whether there is a positive duty to look for genetic incidental findings. Using the ancillary care framework as a guide, we identify three main criteria that must be present to give rise to an obligation to look: high benefit to participants, lack of alternative access for participants, and reasonable burden on researchers. Our analysis indicates that there is no obligation to look for incidental findings today, but during the ongoing translation of genomic analysis from research to clinical care, this obligation may arise.
authors: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
authors: Catherine
authors: C
authors: Gliwa
authors: Benjamin E
authors: BE
authors: Berkman
mesh_terms: D022126:Access to Information; D026686:Beneficence; D016265:Conflict of Interest; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D032984:Ethics, Research; D005544:Forecasting; D036281:Genetic Research / Q000941:ethics*; D015894:Genome, Human; D006295:Health Resources; D006801:Humans; D033162:Incidental Findings; D028681:Moral Obligations; D012108:Research Personnel / Q000941:ethics*; D035844:Researcher-Subject Relations / Q000941:ethics*; D012941:Social Responsibility; D014342:Truth Disclosure / Q000941:ethics; D016526:Workload
references: Genome Res. 2011 Jul;21(7):1001-7
references: 21632745
references: J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):341-51, 213
references: 18547203
references: Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):399-404
references: 22323072
references: PLoS Med. 2008 May 20;5(5):e90
references: 18494553
references: J Med Ethics. 2008 Mar;34(3):210-3
references: 18316466
references: J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):271-9, 211
references: 18547194
references: Lancet. 2010 May 1;375(9725):1525-35
references: 20435227
references: J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):292-7, 212
references: 18547197
references: Nature. 2011 Feb 10;470(7333):204-13
references: 21307933
references: Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Dec;155A(12):2916-24
references: 22038764
references: Science. 2012 Jun 1;336(6085):1112-3
references: 22654044
references: Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):361-84
references: 22436882
references: Hastings Cent Rep. 2008 Mar-Apr;38(2):30-42
references: 18457227
references: J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):286-91, 212
references: 18547196
references: Am J Med Genet A. 2006 May 15;140(10):1033-40
references: 16575896
references: J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):256-70, 211
references: 18547193
references: Genet Med. 2011 Jun;13(6):499-504
references: 21558861
references: Genet Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;6(1):60
references: 14726812
references: Lancet. 2007 Mar 10;369(9564):874-877
references: 17350458
references: Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33:148-64
references: 21709145
references: Trends Genet. 2011 Feb;27(2):41-7
references: 21190750
references: Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010 Dec;3(6):574-80
references: 21156933
references: Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):405-10
references: 22422049
references: Genome Res. 2012 Mar;22(3):421-8
references: 22147367
references: J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):280-5, 212
references: 18547195
references: BMJ. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1494-6
references: 15205296
references: Bull Med Ethics. 2002 Oct;(182):17-23
references: 14983848
references: Genet Med. 2012 Aug;14(8):759-61
references: 22863877
references: Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2009 Dec 03;4:16
references: 19958542
references: Eur J Hum Genet. 2006 Nov;14(11):1170-8
references: 16868560
references: Genome Biol. 2011 Sep 14;12(9):227
references: 21920052
references: Am J Bioeth. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):8-17
references: 17085395
references: J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):219-48, 211
references: 18547191
references: Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):393-8
references: 22344227
references: Hastings Cent Rep. 2004 Jan-Feb;34(1):25-33
references: 15098404