title: The occlusion rate and patterns of saphenous vein after radiofrequency ablation.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a widely accepted to treat the varicose vein. However, outcome studies for occlusion rate and patterns of the saphenous vein after RFA are scarce. The purpose of our study is to report the results of RFA in patients with varicose vein.
  
  
  METHODS
  We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes after RFA using ClosureFAST (Covidien) catheter. We evaluated the occlusion rate and patterns with duplex scanning after RFA.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 200 limbs (148 patients) underwent RFA. The truncal veins were ablated in 163 great saphenous veins (GSV) and 41 small saphenous veins (SSVs). The mean age was 52.1 ± 11.9 years and female to male ratio was 125 : 87. At the mean follow-up of 13.9 months, the CEAP score, VCSS, and QoL score were significantly improved 2.33 ± 0.78 to 1.29 ± 0.96 (P < 0.0001), 3.48 ± 0.98 to 0.63 ± 1.16 (P < 0.0001), and 6.91 ± 6.69 to 3.38 ± 4.74 (P < 0.0001), respectively. The occlusion rate was 94.6% (53/56) in GSV and 94.5% (17/18) in SSV. The most common occlusion pattern in GSV was total occlusion of main trunk with patent superficial inferior epigastric vein in 41.1%. And, the most common pattern in SSV was the total occlusion of SSV with stump in 66.7%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  RFA is an effective modality in the treatment of varicose vein. At the mean follow-up of 13.9 months, the occlusion rate was 94.6%in GSV and 94.5% in SSV. There are several patterns of saphenous occlusion after RFA.
authors: Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
authors: Jung Hyun
authors: JH
authors: Choi
authors: Ho-Chul
authors: HC
authors: Park
authors: Jin Hyun
authors: JH
authors: Joh
keywords: Catheter ablation; Radiofrequency; Ultrasonography; Varicose veins; Vein occlusion
references: Br J Surg. 2011 Apr;98(4):501-10
references: 21283981
references: J Vasc Surg. 2010 Aug;52(2):388-93
references: 20646894
references: J Vasc Surg. 2000 Aug;32(2):330-42
references: 10917994
references: J Vasc Surg. 2011 May;53(5 Suppl):2S-48S
references: 21536172
references: J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov;52(5):1387-96
references: 20875713
references: J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jul;54(1):146-52
references: 21439757
references: Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Jun;8(4):233-45
references: 10950599
references: J Vasc Surg. 2005 Jan;41(1):130-5
references: 15696055
references: J Vasc Surg. 1994 Dec;20(6):953-8
references: 7990191
references: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Aug;40(2):246-53
references: 20537570
references: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Oct;40(4):521-7
references: 20655773
references: J Vasc Surg. 2004 Dec;40(6):1174-83
references: 15622372
references: Br J Surg. 2011 Aug;98(8):1079-87
references: 21725957
references: J Vasc Surg. 2002 Jun;35(6):1190-6
references: 12042730
references: Semin Vasc Surg. 2010 Jun;23(2):90-100
references: 20685563
references: Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):876-81
references: 21934487
references: Angiology. 2011 Jan;62(1):49-54
references: 20724299
references: Qual Health Care. 1993 Mar;2(1):5-10
references: 10132081
references: J Vasc Surg. 2004 Sep;40(3):500-4
references: 15337880