title: Perceptual load corresponds with factors known to influence visual search.
abstract: One account of the early versus late selection debate in attention proposes that perceptual load determines the locus of selection. Attention selects stimuli at a late processing level under low-load conditions but selects stimuli at an early level under high-load conditions. Despite the successes of perceptual load theory, a noncircular definition of perceptual load remains elusive. We investigated the factors that influence perceptual load by using manipulations that have been studied extensively in visual search, namely target-distractor similarity and distractor-distractor similarity. Consistent with previous work, search was most efficient when targets and distractors were dissimilar and the displays contained homogeneous distractors; search became less efficient when target-distractor similarity increased irrespective of display heterogeneity. Importantly, we used these same stimuli in a typical perceptual load task that measured attentional spillover to a task-irrelevant flanker. We found a strong correspondence between search efficiency and perceptual load; stimuli that generated efficient searches produced flanker interference effects, suggesting that such displays involved low perceptual load. Flanker interference effects were reduced in displays that produced less efficient searches. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that search difficulty, as measured by search intercept, has little bearing on perceptual load. We conclude that rather than be arbitrarily defined, perceptual load might be defined by well-characterized, continuous factors that influence visual search.
authors: Department of Psychology, University of Iowa.
authors: Zachary J J
authors: ZJ
authors: Roper
authors: Joshua D
authors: JD
authors: Cosman
authors: Shaun P
authors: SP
authors: Vecera
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references: Percept Psychophys. 1991 Aug;50(2):184-93
references: 1945740
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):451-68
references: 7790827
references: Percept Psychophys. 1991 Mar;49(3):270-88
references: 2011464
references: Psychol Sci. 2004 Feb;15(2):106-11
references: 14738517
references: Vision Res. 1996 May;36(10):1439-65
references: 8762762
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):1030-44
references: 1431742
references: Percept Psychophys. 2000 Jan;62(1):175-86
references: 10703265
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222
references: 7605061
references: Percept Psychophys. 2008 Aug;70(6):1130-7
references: 18717397
references: Vision Res. 2010 Jun 18;50(13):1292-8
references: 20430048
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Apr 20;31(16):6199-207
references: 21508243
references: Psychol Sci. 2001 May;12(3):213-8
references: 11437303
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Aug;20(4):799-806
references: 8083635
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):339-54
references: 15355143
references: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Aug;8(8):1110-6
references: 16007082
references: Psychol Sci. 2008 Oct;19(10):1045-50
references: 19000216
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1645-56
references: 20822300
references: Psychol Rev. 1969 May;76(3):282-99
references: 4893203
references: Vision Res. 1991;31(6):951-66
references: 1858326
references: Psychol Rev. 1990 Oct;97(4):523-47
references: 2247540
references: Psychol Rev. 1980 May;87(3):272-300
references: 7384344
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Feb;16(1):135-49
references: 2137515
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1983 Aug;9(4):497-509
references: 6224888
references: Nat Neurosci. 2004 Sep;7(9):992-6
references: 15286791
references: Psychol Rev. 1989 Jul;96(3):433-58
references: 2756067
references: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references: 9176952
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008;61(12):1886-96
references: 18609364
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1985 Dec;114(4):472-97
references: 2934499
references: Percept Psychophys. 1994 Aug;56(2):183-97
references: 7971119