title: Adaptation improves performance on a visual search task.
abstract: Temporal context, or adaptation, profoundly affects visual perception. Despite the strength and prevalence of adaptation effects, their functional role in visual processing remains unclear. The effects of spatial context and their functional role are better understood: these effects highlight features that differ from their surroundings and determine stimulus salience. Similarities in the perceptual and physiological effects of spatial and temporal context raise the possibility that they serve similar functions. We therefore tested the possibility that adaptation can enhance stimulus salience. We measured the effects of prolonged (40 s) adaptation to a counterphase grating on performance in a search task in which targets were defined by an orientation offset relative to a background of distracters. We found that, for targets with small orientation offsets, adaptation reduced reaction times and decreased the number of saccades made to find targets. Our results provide evidence that adaptation may function to highlight features that differ from the temporal context in which they are embedded.
authors: Dominick Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
authors: Stephanie C
authors: SC
authors: Wissig
authors: Carlyn A
authors: CA
authors: Patterson
authors: Adam
authors: A
authors: Kohn
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011930:Reaction Time; D012438:Saccades / Q000502:physiology*; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*
references: Nature. 2005 Mar 17;434(7031):387-91
references: 15772663
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 31;96(18):10530-5
references: 10468643
references: Vision Res. 1973 Oct;13(10):1915-31
references: 4746989
references: Prog Brain Res. 2006;154:93-120
references: 17010705
references: Psychol Sci. 2003 Nov;14(6):558-66
references: 14629686
references: J Physiol. 1969 Jul;203(1):237-60
references: 5821879
references: Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136
references: 7351125
references: Vision Res. 2000;40(10-12):1489-506
references: 10788654
references: Vision Res. 2001 Mar;41(6):685-9
references: 11248258
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 1;88(11):4966-70
references: 2052578
references: Spat Vis. 2002;16(1):45-58
references: 12636224
references: Vision Res. 1992 May;32(5):983-95
references: 1604866
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2011 Sep;34(5):766-79
references: 21864319
references: J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jun;107(12):3370-84
references: 22423001
references: J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 9;33(2):532-43
references: 23303933
references: Nature. 2003 Jul 17;424(6946):312-5
references: 12867982
references: J Vis. 2008 Jan 04;8(1):1.1-20
references: 18318604
references: J Neurophysiol. 2007 May;97(5):3155-64
references: 17344377
references: Psychol Rev. 1988 Jan;95(1):15-48
references: 3353475
references: Nature. 2005 Jul 7;436(7047):71-7
references: 16001064
references: Trends Neurosci. 2001 May;24(5):283-8
references: 11311381
references: J Opt Soc Am A. 1993 Jul;10(7):1433-49
references: 8350144
references: Vision Res. 1976;16(10):1043-5
references: 969214
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jun 15;90(12):5718-22
references: 8516322
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Jul;8(7):522-35
references: 17585305
references: Spat Vis. 1996;9(4):423-74
references: 8774089
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Mar 1;6(3):136-143
references: 11861192
references: Vision Res. 1994 Jan;34(1):31-40
references: 8116266
references: Exp Brain Res. 1991;87(1):205-12
references: 1756826
references: Percept Psychophys. 2001 Apr;63(3):381-9
references: 11414127
references: Psychol Bull. 1972 Oct;78(4):266-78
references: 4562947
references: J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 15;29(15):5009-21
references: 19369570
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Mar 1;2(3):111-7
references: 21227087
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):202-38
references: 24203471
references: Vision Res. 1993 Nov;33(16):2353-7
references: 8273300
references: Vision Res. 1988;28(7):791-7
references: 3227656
references: Proc Biol Sci. 1991 Jan 22;243(1306):75-81
references: 1673245
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Aug;13(4):428-32
references: 12965289
references: Mem Cognit. 1994 Nov;22(6):657-72
references: 7808275
references: J Vis. 2011 Sep 14;11(5):
references: 21917784
references: J Neurosci. 2008 Jan 30;28(5):1131-9
references: 18234891
references: J Vis. 2011 May 20;11(5):
references: 21602298
references: J Vis. 2010 Nov 24;10(13):17
references: 21106682
references: J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Feb;2(2):147-55
references: 3973752
references: J Neurosci. 2005 Dec 14;25(50):11666-75
references: 16354925
references: Vision Res. 1995 Jul;35(13):1835-44
references: 7660590
references: Nat Neurosci. 2011 Jun 05;14(7):926-32
references: 21642976
references: J Physiol Paris. 2003 Jul-Nov;97(4-6):453-74
references: 15242657
references: Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1526-37
references: 20837042