title: Little consensus in either definition or diagnosis of a lower gastro-intestinal anastomotic leak amongst colorectal surgeons.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purposes of this study were to assess the working definition of a colorectal anastomotic leak among colorectal surgeons and to survey the current approach to investigation and management of a patient with a suspected anastomotic leak.
  
  
  METHODS
  Online survey consisting of nine questions regarding the definition, assessment and investigation of anastomotic leaks was conducted. Of the 738 eligible ACP members contacted, 210 responded (28.4%).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Results demonstrated that 94.2% of surgeons agreed 'extravasation of contrast on enema' and 91.8% agreed 'faecal material seen in drains/from the wound' constituted a clinical leak. Only 69.2% agreed that a leak was 'intra-abdominal sepsis requiring a laparotomy', and about half agreed that radiological collections constituted a leak when either treated with antibiotics (46.6%) or with percutaneous drainage (51.4%). Serial clinical examination was the perceived most sensitive clinical feature for a leak, with 75% of surgeons ranking this in their top three choices. Surgeons radiologically confirm a leak on average in 80.2% of cases. A CT with rectal contrast for a left-sided leak was selected by 42.9% of respondents. For a right-sided/small bowel anastomosis, 44.5% selected a CT with oral contrast and 43.4% a CT with IV contrast.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There is still significant heterogeneity between surgeons in what they define as an anastomotic leak. Most surgeons valued clinical examination as the most sensitive initial tool for leak detection; however, radiology has a major role in the confirmation of clinical leaks in colorectal patients. There is an increasing need to be able to classify and grade anastomotic leaks, both to improve the care of patients and for audit purposes.
authors: Department of Academic Colorectal Surgery, King's College Hospital, 2nd Floor Hambledon Wing, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK.
authors: K
authors: K
authors: Adams
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Papagrigoriadis
mesh_terms: D057868:Anastomotic Leak / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000209:etiology* / Q000473:pathology; D003107:Colorectal Surgery / Q000009:adverse effects*; D032921:Consensus; D005767:Gastrointestinal Diseases / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D010820:Physicians; D011859:Radiography
references: Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Dec;22(12):1499-507
references: 17639424
references: Br J Surg. 2009 Sep;96(9):1066-75
references: 19672927
references: Eval Health Prof. 2007 Dec;30(4):303-21
references: 17986667
references: ANZ J Surg. 2006 Sep;76(9):821-4
references: 16922906
references: Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 May;24(5):569-76
references: 19221768
references: J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Dec;189(6):554-9
references: 10589591
references: Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
references: 15273542
references: Br J Surg. 1996 Jan;83(1):60-2
references: 8653367
references: Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 May;48(5):1021-6
references: 15789125
references: Fam Pract. 2003 Oct;20(5):545-51
references: 14507796
references: Br J Surg. 1998 Mar;85(3):355-8
references: 9529492
references: Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992 Sep;7(3):141-3
references: 1402311
references: Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2004 Oct;18(5):865-80
references: 15494283
references: Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1991 Nov;73(6):385-8
references: 1759770
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Sep;165(3):567-71
references: 7645472
references: Int J Surg. 2008 Feb;6(1):28-35
references: 18037067
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Aug;215(2):255-61
references: 22640532
references: Ann Surg. 1998 Feb;227(2):179-86
references: 9488514
references: Br J Surg. 2001 Sep;88(9):1157-68
references: 11531861
references: Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Nov;50(11):1918-27
references: 17763907
references: Colorectal Dis. 2011 May;13(5):583-7
references: 20163424
references: Br J Surg. 2009 May;96(5):462-72
references: 19358171
references: Ann Surg. 2011 May;253(5):890-9
references: 21394013
references: Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Nov;49(11):1719-25
references: 17051321
references: Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Apr;55(4):387-92
references: 22426261
references: World J Surg. 2002 Apr;26(4):499-502
references: 11910487
references: BMJ. 2011 Aug 16;343:d4836
references: 21846714
references: Surgery. 2010 Mar;147(3):339-51
references: 20004450
references: J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Aug;185(2):105-13
references: 9249076
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Nov;205(5):648-53
references: 17964440
references: Tech Coloproctol. 2009 Mar;13(1):41-7
references: 19288246
references: Arch Surg. 2003 Dec;138(12):1334-8; discussion 1339
references: 14662534
references: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Jan;46(1):69-76
references: 19921078