title: [Flicker and conventional perimetry in comparison with structural changes in glaucoma].
abstract: The selective perimetry with the FDF flicker stimulation has proven to be effective in a sample of 131 eyes in detecting early glaucomatous alterations, frequently without detectable changes in standard automated perimetry (SAP). Probability values may be successfully used as a new ordinal score of abnormality, especially for such marginal changes. Subjects must be thoroughly introduced to this new form of stimulation. The correlation of global perimetric with optic disc parameters is limited but slightly higher for FDF than for SAP. Interpretation thus requires an individual approach. In advanced cases SAP is preferable due to its larger dynamic range offered by the same instrument.
authors: dannheim@uke.uni-hamburg.de
authors: F
authors: F
authors: Dannheim
mesh_terms: D005425:Flicker Fusion; D005901:Glaucoma / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D058609:Visual Field Tests / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends; D014794:Visual Fields
references: Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;149(1):102-12
references: 19800607
references: Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jun;151(6):1057-1064.e1
references: 21470593
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Feb;50(2):974-9
references: 18952921
references: Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2012 Apr;229(4):319-22
references: 22495996
references: J Vis. 2008 Apr 22;8(4):15.1-11
references: 18484854
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;46(12):4600-6
references: 16303955
references: Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Sep;129(9):1167-74
references: 21555599
references: Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 May;130(5):E1-10
references: 22826832
references: Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Sep;115(9):1129-33
references: 9298053
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Sep;44(9):3873-9
references: 12939303
references: J Glaucoma. 2003 Oct;12(5):417-26
references: 14520150
references: Ophthalmologe. 2012 Apr;109(4):319-24
references: 22527728
references: Vision Res. 2005 Apr;45(8):1075-84
references: 15695191
references: Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Mar;99(3):323-8
references: 25232025
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987 Jun;28(6):913-20
references: 3583630
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Oct 09;53(11):6981-90
references: 22969077
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Feb 09;52(2):764-71
references: 20881286
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Nov 07;53(12):7553-9
references: 23074201
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jul;46(7):2451-7
references: 15980235
references: Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 May-Jun;40(4):369-80
references: 22339936
references: Doc Ophthalmol. 1993;83(1):1-25
references: 8334916