title: The interblink interval in normal and dry eye subjects.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Our aim was to extend the concept of blink patterns from average interblink interval (IBI) to other aspects of the distribution of IBI. We hypothesized that this more comprehensive approach would better discriminate between normal and dry eye subjects.
  
  
  METHODS
  Blinks were captured over 10 minutes for ten normal and ten dry eye subjects while viewing a standardized televised documentary. Fifty-five blinks were analyzed for each of the 20 subjects. Means, standard deviations, and autocorrelation coefficients were calculated utilizing a single random effects model fit to all data points and a diagnostic model was subsequently fit to predict probability of a subject having dry eye based on these parameters.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mean IBI was 5.97 seconds for normal versus 2.56 seconds for dry eye subjects (ratio: 2.33, P = 0.004). IBI variability was 1.56 times higher in normal subjects (P < 0.001), and the autocorrelation was 1.79 times higher in normal subjects (P = 0.044). With regard to the diagnostic power of these measures, mean IBI was the best dry eye versus normal classifier using receiver operating characteristics (0.85 area under curve (AUC)), followed by the standard deviation (0.75 AUC), and lastly, the autocorrelation (0.63 AUC). All three predictors combined had an AUC of 0.89. Based on this analysis, cutoffs of ≤3.05 seconds for median IBI, and ≤0.73 for the coefficient of variation were chosen to classify dry eye subjects.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  (1) IBI was significantly shorter for dry eye patients performing a visual task compared to normals; (2) there was a greater variability of interblink intervals in normal subjects; and (3) these parameters were useful as diagnostic predictors of dry eye disease. The results of this pilot study merit investigation of IBI parameters on a larger scale study in subjects with dry eye and other ocular surface disorders.
authors: Ora, Inc, Andover, MA, USA.
authors: Patrick R
authors: PR
authors: Johnston
authors: John
authors: J
authors: Rodriguez
authors: Keith J
authors: KJ
authors: Lane
authors: George
authors: G
authors: Ousler
authors: Mark B
authors: MB
authors: Abelson
keywords: diagnostic model; dry eye; interblink intervals; visual function; visual tasks
references: Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Aug;136(2):318-26
references: 12888056
references: Am J Ophthalmol. 1980 Apr;89(4):507-16
references: 7369314
references: Arch Ophthalmol. 1996 Jun;114(6):715-20
references: 8639084
references: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;242(4):306-12
references: 14747951
references: Ophthalmology. 1981 Aug;88(8):844-51
references: 7322503
references: Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Feb;86(2):E106-14
references: 19156014
references: Cornea. 2008 Jun;27(5):509-13
references: 18520496
references: Am J Ophthalmol. 1997 Jul;124(1):24-30
references: 9222228
references: Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:501-6
references: 19789659
references: Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar;143(3):409-15
references: 17317388
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Oct 22;276(1673):3635-44
references: 19640888
references: Curr Eye Res. 2011 Mar;36(3):190-7
references: 21275516
references: Am J Ophthalmol. 1977 Jun;83(6):866-9
references: 868989
references: Cornea. 2010 Jun;29(6):607-12
references: 20458235
references: Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;127(6):763-8
references: 19506195
references: Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;506(Pt B):1121-5
references: 12614039