title: [Work-related stress: comparing two assessment methods].
abstract: Aim of the study is to compare and evaluate the possible integration of two methods of work-related stress risk assessment: the "subjective/perceptive" ISPESL-HSE and the "objective/intersubjective" VIS. Four different types of companies were examined: public education, social services, forestry work, agricultural machinery industry. Both VIS and HSE showed a different level of risk among the companies, with a good overlap of the results obtained with the two different methods of investigation. They also integrate each other in eliciting a better and more articulated study of work-related stress risk.
authors: Scuola di Specializzazione in Medicina del Lavoro, Dipartimento di Medicina Ambientale e Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy.
authors: F
authors: F
authors: Zovi
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Parente
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Costantin
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Marcuzzo
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Iavicoli
authors: N A
authors: NA
authors: De Carlo
authors: G B
authors: GB
authors: Bartolucci
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D009784:Occupational Diseases / Q000453:epidemiology*; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000453:epidemiology*