title: Effect of a proprietary intraluminal stiffening wire device on cecal intubation time and rate with used colonoscopes; a randomized, controlled trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Colonoscopes are designed with balance between flexibility, required to negotiate angulations, and stiffness, required to counteract the propensity for looping in unfixed sections of the colon, which retards advancement of the instrument. Colonoscopy can be challenging with old instruments that have lost native stiffness and become less responsive to torquing.A new intraluminal stiffening device has become available in two grades of stiffness. However, there is no published evidence of its effectiveness. This randomized, controlled trial was designed to determine the effectiveness of the stiffening wires in improving cecal intubation rate and time following routine application. A secondary analysis determines effectiveness of application only after intractable failure with the unaided colonoscope.
  
  
  METHODS
  The colonoscope tested was an Olympus CF-100TL, approximately fifteen years old. Patients were randomly assigned to the unaided colonoscope or the standard or firm wire introduced routinely on entry into transverse colon. Each phase of colonoscopy was timed. Failure to advance the colonoscope for 5 minutes (despite usual manipulations to minimize looping) required switching to another intervention according to a prescribed methodology and the originally assigned intervention was recorded as failed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The study was terminated after accrual of 112 participants (target sample size 480) because the colonoscope required repairs (no damage attributable to stiffening wires) which would have been uneconomical. There were no statistically significant differences between per-protocol cecal intubation rates (81.1, 71.1 and 70.3 percent respectively), a finding which persisted after multiple imputation for a virtual sample size of 480. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences between per-protocol cecal intubation times (15, 16.2 and 13.9 minutes). However, a statistically significant improvement in cecal intubation rate (from 81.1% to 97.3%, P = 0.0313) was achieved when the wires were applied after intractable failure of the unaided colonoscope in the first intervention group.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Routine application of either stiffening wire does not improve caecal intubation rate nor time compared to the unaided colonoscope. However, application of the stiffening wires after intractable failure of the unaided colonoscope enabled a statistically significant improvement in cecal intubation rate.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01115010.
authors: Department of Surgery, Cornwall Regional Hospital (CRH), Montego Bay, Jamaica. jeast@cwjamaica.com
authors: Jeffrey M
authors: JM
authors: East
mesh_terms: D002432:Cecum; D003113:Colonoscopy / Q000295:instrumentation*; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans
references: Biometrics. 1998 Mar;54(1):229-42
references: 9544518
references: Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2005 Oct;15(4):673-86
references: 16278132
references: Endoscopy. 2001 Jan;33(1):65-9
references: 11204990
references: Control Clin Trials. 1990 Apr;11(2):116-28
references: 2161310
references: Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Oct;58(4):579-84
references: 14520299
references: Endoscopy. 2009 Jan;41(1):17-24
references: 19160154
references: Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Jun;48(6):1295-300
references: 15793639
references: J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;40(8):711-6
references: 16940884
references: Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Nov;54(5):558-62
references: 11677470
references: J Chin Med Assoc. 2008 Jan;71(1):23-9
references: 18218556
references: Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Dec;97(12):2942-3
references: 12492173
references: Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 Jan-Feb;37(1):107-8
references: 2004675
references: Gastrointest Endosc. 1990 Nov-Dec;36(6):642-3
references: 2279681