title: How women organize social networks different from men.
abstract: Superpositions of social networks, such as communication, friendship, or trade networks, are called multiplex networks, forming the structural backbone of human societies. Novel datasets now allow quantification and exploration of multiplex networks. Here we study gender-specific differences of a multiplex network from a complete behavioral dataset of an online-game society of about 300,000 players. On the individual level females perform better economically and are less risk-taking than males. Males reciprocate friendship requests from females faster than vice versa and hesitate to reciprocate hostile actions of females. On the network level females have more communication partners, who are less connected than partners of males. We find a strong homophily effect for females and higher clustering coefficients of females in trade and attack networks. Cooperative links between males are under-represented, reflecting competition for resources among males. These results confirm quantitatively that females and males manage their social networks in substantially different ways.
authors: Section for Science of Complex Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Szell
authors: Stefan
authors: S
authors: Thurner
mesh_terms: D000374:Aggression; D005260:Female; D033062:Friends; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D012309:Risk-Taking; D012737:Sex Factors; D012919:Social Behavior; D060756:Social Networking
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29796
references: 22253784
references: Science. 2007 Jul 27;317(5837):472-6
references: 17656715
references: Cyberpsychol Behav. 2003 Feb;6(1):81-91
references: 12650566
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 3;107(31):13636-41
references: 20643965
references: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Jun;79(6 Pt 2):066117
references: 19658574
references: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2002 Sep;66(3 Pt 2A):035101
references: 12366169
references: Sci Rep. 2012;2:370
references: 22518274
references: Science. 2007 Jul 27;317(5837):482-7
references: 17656717
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38924
references: 22719989
references: Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008 Feb;11(1):47-53
references: 18275312
references: Sci Rep. 2012;2:457
references: 22708055
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Dec;28(6):795-815; discussion 815-55
references: 16372952
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7332-6
references: 17456605
references: J Adolesc. 2004 Feb;27(1):87-96
references: 15013262
references: Science. 2009 Feb 6;323(5915):721-3
references: 19197046
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 30;106(26):10570-5
references: 19549871