title: The health benefits of selective taxation as an economic instrument in relation to IHD and nutrition-related cancers.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The present study aimed to estimate the health benefits of selective taxation of healthy and unhealthy food commodities in relation to CVD and nutrition-related cancers.
  
  
  METHODS
  The potential health effects of a selective taxation scenario were estimated as changes in the burden of disease, measured by disability-adjusted life years, from health outcomes affected by the changes in food intake. The change in burden of a disease was calculated as the change in incidence of the disease due to a modified exposure level, using the potential impact fraction. Estimates of relative risk for the associations between various foods and relevant diseases were found through a literature search and used in the calculation of potential impact fractions.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study was based in Denmark, estimating the health effects of a Danish selective taxation scenario.
  
  
  METHODS
  The potential health effects of selective taxation were modelled for the adult Danish population.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Halving the rate of value-added tax on fruit and vegetables and increasing the tax on fats would result in moderate reductions in the burden of disease from IHD, ischaemic stroke, and colorectal, lung and breast cancer (0·4–2·4 % change). The largest effect could be obtained through increased intake of fruit and vegetables (0·9–2·4 %).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Applying selective taxation to healthy and unhealthy foods can moderately reduce the burden of disease in the Danish population.
authors: 1 Department of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, CSS, Øster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1014 Copenhagen, Denmark.
authors: Astrid L
authors: AL
authors: Holm
authors: Mai-Britt
authors: MB
authors: Laursen
authors: Maria
authors: M
authors: Koch
authors: Jørgen D
authors: JD
authors: Jensen
authors: Finn
authors: F
authors: Diderichsen
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases / Q000209:etiology*; D017281:Cost of Illness; D003718:Denmark; D004032:Diet / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics* / Q000592:standards; D004041:Dietary Fats; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005523:Food Supply / Q000191:economics*; D005638:Fruit; D006293:Health Promotion / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000209:etiology*; D018673:Nutrition Policy / Q000191:economics*; D012307:Risk Factors; D013660:Taxes; D014675:Vegetables
chemical_list: D004041:Dietary Fats
references: J Community Health. 1982 Summer;7(4):292-309
references: 7130448
references: Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:115-34
references: 11910057
references: Lancet. 2005 Nov 19;366(9499):1784-93
references: 16298215
references: Arch Intern Med. 2004 Feb 23;164(4):370-6
references: 14980987
references: J Health Econ. 1997 Dec;16(6):703-30
references: 10176780
references: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Apr 04;4:10
references: 17408494
references: J Health Econ. 1997 Dec;16(6):685-702
references: 10176779
references: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Aug;61(8):689-94
references: 17630367
references: WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser. 2004;(96):i-xvi, 1-385, back cover
references: 15038063
references: BMJ. 2011 Nov 10;343:d6617
references: 22074852
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Sep;94(3):900-5
references: 21775566
references: Eur J Public Health. 2006 Feb;16(1):31-5
references: 16141300
references: Public Health Nutr. 2003 Aug;6(5):453-61
references: 12943561
references: Br J Cancer. 2003 Nov 3;89(9):1672-85
references: 14583769
references: Public Health Nutr. 2000 Mar;3(1):103-7
references: 10786730
references: Nutr Rev. 2006 Dec;64(12):518-31
references: 17274494
references: Popul Health Metr. 2003 Apr 14;1(1):1
references: 12780936