title: Brevity is prevalent in bat short-range communication.
abstract: Animal communication follows many coding schemes. Less is known about the coding strategy for signal length and rates of use in animal vocal communication. A generalized brevity (negative relation between signal length and frequency of use) is innovatively explored but remains controversial in animal vocal communication. We tested brevity for short-range social and distress sounds from four echolocating bats: adult black-bearded tomb bat Taphozous melanopogon, Mexican free-tailed bat Tadarida brasiliensis, adult greater horseshoe bat Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, and adult least horseshoe bat Rhinolophus pusillus. There was a negative association between duration and number of social but not distress calls emitted. The most frequently emitted social calls were brief, while most distress calls were long. Brevity or lengthiness was consistently selected in vocal communications for each species. Echolocating bats seem to have convergent coding strategy for communication calls. The results provide the evidence of efficient coding in bat social vocalizations, and lay the basis of future researches on the convergence for neural control on bats' communication calls.
authors: Jinlin Key Laboratory of Animal Resource Conservation and Utilization, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.
authors: Bo
authors: B
authors: Luo
authors: Tinglei
authors: T
authors: Jiang
authors: Ying
authors: Y
authors: Liu
authors: Jing
authors: J
authors: Wang
authors: Aiqing
authors: A
authors: Lin
authors: Xuewen
authors: X
authors: Wei
authors: Jiang
authors: J
authors: Feng
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001307:Auditory Perception; D002685:Chiroptera / Q000502:physiology*; D004455:Echolocation; D012919:Social Behavior; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D013997:Time Factors; D014828:Vocalization, Animal
references: Anim Behav. 1977 May;25(2):390-9
references: 889151
references: J Comp Physiol A. 1997 Apr;180(4):301-11
references: 9106994
references: ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:128695
references: 22693429
references: Anim Behav. 1998 Mar;55(3):705-13
references: 9514675
references: Science. 1994 May 6;264(5160):847-50
references: 8171341
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Sep;96(3):1229-54
references: 7962992
references: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2006 May;192(5):535-50
references: 16418857
references: Neuroreport. 1996 Jul 29;7(11):1749-55
references: 8905657
references: Biol Lett. 2011 Feb 23;7(1):23-5
references: 20573617
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 7;277(1686):1325-31
references: 20053641
references: Science. 2010 May 21;328(5981):969-71
references: 20489002
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 9;94(25):14019-24
references: 9391145
references: Nature. 1991 Apr 4;350(6317):421-3
references: 2011191
references: Biol Lett. 2010 Aug 23;6(4):469-71
references: 20106854
references: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2009 Jul;195(7):663-72
references: 19387652
references: J Comp Physiol A. 1991 Jul;169(1):69-85
references: 1941720
references: J Exp Biol. 2012 Sep 1;215(Pt 17):2935-44
references: 22875762
references: BMC Biol. 2005 Aug 01;3:17
references: 16053533
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 May;85(10):3657-60
references: 3368470
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Sep;124(3):1838-48
references: 19045674
references: Nature. 2006 May 18;441(7091):303
references: 16710411
references: J Exp Biol. 1999 Dec;202(Pt 23):3359-67
references: 10562518
references: Brain Behav Evol. 1986;28(1-3):70-82
references: 3567542