title: Nursing student attitudes toward and preferences for working with older adults.
abstract: A growing aging population will require nurses who prefer to work with older adults. Schools of nursing have used several strategies to improve students' attitudes, and encourage preferences for working with older adults. However, research on these strategies is inconsistent, with some programs improving students' attitudes whereas others have no effect. More recent studies have found that although attitudes have improved, working with older adults is generally the least preferred area of nursing. The purpose of this longitudinal mixed methods study is to describe and explain student nurse attitudes and preference changes over time. Eighty undergraduate nursing students were surveyed over 2 years. Students' attitudes and preference for working with older adults improved over time. However, their preference to work in nursing homes was consistently ranked last among the 10 choices for work preferences. In focus groups, students reported that the gerontological course dispelled myths about caring for older adults, and that clinical placement played a major role in influencing student work preferences.
authors: William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Administration Hospital, Madison, WI 53792, USA. bjking2@wisc.edu
authors: Barbara J
authors: BJ
authors: King
authors: Tonya J
authors: TJ
authors: Roberts
authors: Barbara J
authors: BJ
authors: Bowers
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002321:Career Choice; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003479:Curriculum; D004493:Education / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D005260:Female; D017144:Focus Groups; D005851:Geriatric Nursing / Q000193:education*; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D007588:Job Satisfaction; D008297:Male; D020380:Needs Assessment; D013338:Students, Nursing / Q000523:psychology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013997:Time Factors
references: Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2004;25(2):1-14
references: 15778142
references: Contemp Nurse. 2008 Aug;30(1):32-45
references: 19072189
references: J Adv Nurs. 1990 Jul;15(7):777-81
references: 2394884
references: J Nurs Educ. 1986 Apr;25(4):145-7
references: 3009741
references: Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2015;36(4):396-415
references: 25162659
references: J Nurs Educ. 2009 Jul;48(7):374-80
references: 19634262
references: J Adv Nurs. 2007 Jul;59(2):155-62
references: 17484741
references: J Adv Nurs. 1999 Feb;29(2):499-505
references: 10197952
references: J Gerontol Nurs. 1987 Feb;13(2):8-13
references: 3643950
references: Nurs Outlook. 1988 Nov-Dec;36(6):285-8, 292
references: 3054818
references: Geriatr Nurs. 2005 Jan-Feb;26(1):11-5
references: 15716809
references: J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1961 Jan;62:44-54
references: 13757539
references: Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2008;28(4):39-56
references: 19042220
references: Geriatr Nurs. 2006 Mar-Apr;27(2):103-11
references: 16638481
references: J Nurs Educ. 2007 Mar;46(3):115-20
references: 17396550
references: J Prof Nurs. 2006 Mar-Apr;22(2):98-102
references: 16564474
references: Nurs Outlook. 1971 Jul;19(7):466-9
references: 5206925
references: J Adv Nurs. 1994 Aug;20(2):382-90
references: 7930159
references: J Gerontol Nurs. 1976 Jul-Aug;2(4):10-6
references: 1048149
references: Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Feb;27(2):113-21
references: 16759757
references: Gerontologist. 2008 Feb;48(1):8-15
references: 18381827
references: Nurs Res. 1975 Jan-Feb;24(1):23-6
references: 1038016
references: J Nurs Educ. 1995 Oct;34(7):312-6
references: 8576739
references: J Gerontol Nurs. 2011 Apr;37(4):32-8
references: 21261238
references: J Adv Nurs. 1986 Sep;11(5):569-72
references: 3639897
references: Nurs Outlook. 2003 Jul-Aug;51(4):149-50
references: 12949471
references: Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Jan;30(1):31-6
references: 19540632
references: J Adv Nurs. 2002 Sep;39(6):529-36
references: 12207750
references: J Nurs Educ. 2000 May;39(5):211-8
references: 10839684