title: Oncology patients' perceptions of "the good nurse": a descriptive study in Flanders, Belgium.
abstract: The image of "the good nurse" is mainly studied from the perspective of nurses, which often does not match the image held by patients. Therefore, a descriptive study was conducted to examine oncology patients' perceptions of "the good nurse" and the influence of patient- and context-related variables. A cross-sectional, comparative, descriptive design was used. The sample comprised 557 oncology patients at one of six Flemish hospitals, where they were treated in an oncology day-care unit, oncology hospital ward, or palliative care unit. Data were collected using the Flemish Care-Q instrument. Factor analysis summarised the most important characteristics of "the good nurse". We reassessed the reliability and construct validity of the Flemish Care-Q and examined the influence of patient- and context-related variables on patient perceptions. Using factor analysis, we grouped the different items of the Flemish Care-Q according to three characteristics: "the good nurse" (I) has a supportive and communicative attitude towards patient and family, (II) is competent and employs a professional attitude, and (III) demonstrates personal involvement towards patient and family. Median factor scores of Factors I, II, and III, respectively, were 8.00, 9.00, and 8.00 (varying from 1, not important, to 10, very important). In order of importance, Factors II, I, and III were identified as valuable characteristics of "the good nurse". Gender, care setting, and province were influential variables. As perceived by oncology patients, "the good nurse" has a broad range of qualities, of which competence and professionalism are the most valuable.
authors: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
authors: Elisa
authors: E
authors: Van der Elst
authors: Bernadette
authors: B
authors: Dierckx de Casterlé
authors: Robin
authors: R
authors: Biets
authors: Leila
authors: L
authors: Rchaidia
authors: Chris
authors: C
authors: Gastmans
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001294:Attitude to Health; D001530:Belgium; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000451:nursing* / Q000523:psychology; D009723:Nurse-Patient Relations; D009859:Oncology Nursing / Q000592:standards*; D011594:Psychometrics; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult
references: J Adv Nurs. 1991 Nov;16(11):1363-74
references: 1721634
references: J Clin Nurs. 2006 Feb;15(2):188-96
references: 16422736
references: J Adv Nurs. 2004 Jun;46(6):649-56
references: 15154906
references: J Nurs Care Qual. 1999 Jun;13(5):65-74
references: 10343481
references: J Adv Nurs. 1992 Jan;17(1):52-63
references: 1537991
references: Int J Nurs Pract. 2002 Feb;8(1):8-15
references: 11831430
references: J Adv Nurs. 2011 Jun;67(6):1191-205
references: 21306423
references: HEC Forum. 2012 Mar;24(1):1-11
references: 22446885
references: Medsurg Nurs. 1998 Apr;7(2):99-105
references: 9727124
references: J Med Ethics. 2008 Oct;34(10):757-60
references: 18827110
references: Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008 Sep;12(4):281-2
references: 18765209
references: Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Aug;43(6):745-54
references: 16321387
references: Cancer Nurs. 2005 Sep-Oct;28(5):331-9
references: 16192823
references: Int Nurs Rev. 2010 Jun;57(2):232-9
references: 20579159
references: J Palliat Med. 2005;8 Suppl 1:S148-60
references: 16499463
references: J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2010 Sep;24(3):244-50
references: 20718645
references: ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2006 Apr-Jun;29(2):E14-26
references: 16717483
references: Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Jul;40(5):487-97; discussion 499-502
references: 12828970
references: Res Nurs Health. 2000 Jun;23(3):179-90
references: 10871533
references: Nurs Ethics. 2010 Nov;17(6):687-94
references: 21097967
references: Int J Nurs Pract. 2003 Jun;9(3):191-201
references: 12801251
references: Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 1999 Winter;13(4):327-43; discussion 345-47
references: 10731849
references: Nurs Ethics. 1997 Jan;4(1):3-11
references: 9052177
references: J Clin Nurs. 2010 Jul;19(13-14):2039-47
references: 20920030
references: Cancer Nurs. 2010 Mar-Apr;33(2):E1-8
references: 20142746
references: Nurs Ethics. 2009 Sep;16(5):528-42
references: 19671641
references: J Adv Nurs. 1999 Jul;30(1):24-32
references: 10403977
references: Cancer Nurs. 2000 Feb;23(1):32-9
references: 10673805
references: BMC Nurs. 2010 Jun 15;9:10
references: 20550677
references: Nurs Ethics. 1999 May;6(3):214-23
references: 10455657
references: J Adv Nurs. 2001 Feb;33(4):456-66
references: 11251733
references: J Clin Nurs. 1999 Sep;8(5):487-95
references: 10786519
references: Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008 Apr;12(2):97-102
references: 18242139
references: Nurs Ethics. 2002 May;9(3):301-12
references: 12035435
references: J Clin Nurs. 2012 May;21(9-10):1387-400
references: 21951344
references: J Prof Nurs. 1999 Sep-Oct;15(5):302-12
references: 10554471
references: Hastings Cent Rep. 1984 Jun;14(3):32-40
references: 6746274
references: Nurs Ethics. 2010 Mar;17(2):213-24
references: 20185445
references: J Nurs Adm. 1996 May;26(5):15-20
references: 8627388