title: Chemical peels for melasma in dark-skinned patients.
abstract: Melasma is a common disorder of hyperpigmentation, which has a severe impact on the quality of life. Inspite of tremendous research, the treatment remains frustrating both to the patient and the treating physician. Dark skin types (Fitzpatrick types IV to VI) are especially difficult to treat owing to the increased risk of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). The treatment ranges from a variety of easily applied topical therapies to agents like lasers and chemical peels. Peels are a well-known modality of treatment for melasma, having shown promising results in many clinical trials. However, in darker races, the choice of the peeling agent becomes relatively limited; so, there is the need for priming agents and additional maintenance peels. Although a number of new agents have come up, there is little published evidence supporting their use in day-to -day practice. The traditional glycolic peels prove to be the best both in terms of safety as well as efficacy. Lactic acid peels being relatively inexpensive and having shown equally good results in a few studies, definitely need further experimentation. We also recommend the use of a new peeling agent, the easy phytic solution, which does not require neutralisation unlike the traditional alpha-hydroxy peels. The choice of peeling agent, the peel concentration as well as the frequency and duration of peels are all important to achieve optimum results.
authors: Department of Dermatology, Maulana Azad Medical College, and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India.
authors: Rashmi
authors: R
authors: Sarkar
authors: Shuchi
authors: S
authors: Bansal
authors: Vijay K
authors: VK
authors: Garg
keywords: Chemical peels; dark skin; melasma
references: J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1989 Sep;15(9):945-50
references: 2778184
references: Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2003 Mar-Apr;69(2):148-50
references: 17642863
references: Br J Dermatol. 2002 Feb;146(2):228-37
references: 11903232
references: Br J Dermatol. 2008 Dec;159(6):1245-66
references: 18945319
references: Am J Dermatopathol. 2005 Apr;27(2):96-101
references: 15798432
references: Indian J Dermatol. 2009;54(1):41-5
references: 20049268
references: J Cutan Med Surg. 2004 Mar-Apr;8(2):97-102
references: 15685388
references: Arch Dermatol. 1995 Dec;131(12):1453-7
references: 7492140
references: Dermatol Ther. 2004;17(2):196-205
references: 15113287
references: J Cosmet Dermatol. 2006 Sep;5(3):246-53
references: 17177748
references: Am J Clin Dermatol. 2009;10(3):153-68
references: 19354330
references: Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2010 Jul-Aug;76(4):447
references: 20657143
references: J Cosmet Dermatol. 2009 Dec;8(4):275-81
references: 19958431
references: Dermatol Surg. 1999 Oct;25(10):773-80
references: 10594578
references: Dermatol Surg. 2004 May;30(5):756-60; discussion 760
references: 15099320
references: Dermatol Surg. 2002 Sep;28(9):828-32; discussion 832
references: 12269877
references: Br J Dermatol. 1999 Sep;141(3):592
references: 10583089
references: Dermatol Surg. 2006 Dec;32(12):1429-36
references: 17199649
references: J Cosmet Dermatol. 2011 Mar;10(1):68-9
references: 21332917
references: J Dermatol Sci. 2007 May;46(2):111-6
references: 17363223
references: Dermatol Surg. 2005 Feb;31(2):149-54; discussion 154
references: 15762205
references: Dermatol Surg. 2010 Apr;36(4):490-5
references: 20187899
references: J Am Acad Dermatol. 1981 Jun;4(6):698-710
references: 6787100
references: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Oct;65(4):699-714
references: 21920242
references: Dermatol Surg. 2006 Mar;32(3):372-5; discussion 375
references: 16640681
references: J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010 Jul;3(7):32-43
references: 20725555
references: Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2008 Jan;74 Suppl:S5-12
references: 18688104
references: Dermatol Surg. 2012 Jul;38(7 Pt 1):971-84
references: 22583339
references: J Cosmet Dermatol. 2012 Mar;11(1):65-71
references: 22360337
references: Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2001 Mar-Apr;67(2):82-4
references: 17664715
references: Int J Dermatol. 2001 May;40(5):354-7
references: 11555002
references: J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2012 Apr;14(2):81-6
references: 22372386
references: Dermatol Surg. 2001 Jan;27(1):12-4
references: 11231233
references: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985 Jul;61(1):28-31
references: 3923030
references: Dermatol Surg. 1999 Jan;25(1):18-22
references: 9935087
references: Arch Dermatol. 2002 Dec;138(12):1578-82
references: 12472345
references: Int J Dermatol. 2006 Mar;45(3):285-8
references: 16533230
references: Australas J Dermatol. 1997 Feb;38(1):35-7
references: 9046652
references: Eur J Dermatol. 2003 Jan-Feb;13(1):65-8
references: 12609785
references: Dermatol Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):59-65
references: 19076192
references: Dermatol Surg. 2004 Mar;30(3):385-8; discussion 389
references: 15008866
references: Dermatol Surg. 2006 Apr;32(4):526-31
references: 16681660
references: JAMA. 1967 Feb 27;199(9):601-5
references: 6071249
references: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Oct;65(4):689-697
references: 21920241
references: Dermatol Surg. 2008 Aug;34(8):1032-9; discussion 1340
references: 18430172
references: Dermatol Surg. 1997 Mar;23(3):177-9
references: 9145959