title: Vibrissal touch sensing in the harbor seal (Phoca vitulina): how do seals judge size?
abstract: "Whisker specialists" such as rats, shrews, and seals actively employ their whiskers to explore their environments and extract object properties such as size, shape, and texture. It has been suggested that whiskers could be used to discriminate between different sized objects in one of two ways: (i) to use whisker positions, such as angular position, spread or amplitude to approximate size; or (ii) to calculate the number of whiskers that contact an object. This study describes in detail how two adult harbor seals use their whiskers to differentiate between three sizes of disk. The seals judged size very fast, taking <400 ms. In addition, they oriented their smaller, most rostral, ventral whiskers to the disks, so that more whiskers contacted the surface, complying to a maximal contact sensing strategy. Data from this study supports the suggestion that it is the number of whisker contacts that predict disk size, rather than how the whiskers are positioned (angular position), the degree to which they are moved (amplitude) or how spread out they are (angular spread).
authors: Active Touch Laboratory, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. r.a.grant@sheffield.ac.uk
authors: Robyn
authors: R
authors: Grant
authors: Sven
authors: S
authors: Wieskotten
authors: Nina
authors: N
authors: Wengst
authors: Tony
authors: T
authors: Prescott
authors: Guido
authors: G
authors: Dehnhardt
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D017753:Ecosystem; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D040542:Mechanotransduction, Cellular; D009792:Oceans and Seas; D046049:Phoca / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology* / Q000523:psychology; D011312:Pressure; D012858:Size Perception; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D013997:Time Factors; D014110:Touch; D055698:Touch Perception; D014738:Vibrissae / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D014741:Video Recording
references: J Comp Physiol A. 1994 Dec;175(6):791-800
references: 7807420
references: Science. 2001 Jul 6;293(5527):102-4
references: 11441183
references: J Exp Biol. 1995 Nov;198(Pt 11):2317-23
references: 7490570
references: J Exp Biol. 2010 Nov 1;213(Pt 21):3734-40
references: 20952623
references: J Neurosci. 2006 Aug 16;26(33):8451-64
references: 16914670
references: Somatosens Mot Res. 1997;14(3):203-12
references: 9402650
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 22;274(1613):1035-41
references: 17331893
references: Dev Psychobiol. 2012 Mar;54(2):151-68
references: 22231841
references: J Neurosci. 2006 Aug 23;26(34):8838-46
references: 16928873
references: Behav Brain Res. 1997 Mar;84(1-2):81-97
references: 9079775
references: J Neurophysiol. 1975 May;38(3):650-62
references: 1127461
references: J Exp Psychol. 1959 Feb;57(2):91-5
references: 13641579
references: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Sep;98(3):1380-91
references: 17625063
references: Front Behav Neurosci. 2012 Jul 09;6:39
references: 22787445
references: Somatosens Mot Res. 2001;18(3):211-22
references: 11562084
references: J Exp Biol. 2011 Jun 1;214(Pt 11):1922-30
references: 21562180
references: J Exp Biol. 1998 Nov;201(Pt 22):3023-9
references: 9787122
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 12;366(1581):3070-6
references: 21969688
references: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):862-74
references: 19036871
references: Vet Res Commun. 1986 Jul;10(4):245-68
references: 3526705
references: Neirofiziologiia. 1985;17(3):344-51
references: 4022183
references: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jul;100(1):504-15
references: 18463190
references: Neuron. 2008 Jul 10;59(1):35-42
references: 18614027
references: J Exp Biol. 2010 Jul 1;213(Pt 13):2194-200
references: 20543117
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 12;366(1581):3037-48
references: 21969685
references: Exp Brain Res. 1989;78(1):62-8
references: 2591519