title: Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature.
abstract: Species introductions of anthropogenic origins are a major aspect of rapid ecological change globally. Research on biological invasions has generated a large literature on many different aspects of this phenomenon. Here, we describe and categorize some aspects of this literature, to better understand what has been studied and what we know, mapping well-studied areas and important gaps. To do so, we employ the techniques of systematic reviewing widely adopted in other scientific disciplines, to further the use of approaches in reviewing the literature that are as scientific, repeatable, and transparent as those employed in a primary study. We identified 2398 relevant studies in a field synopsis of the biological invasions literature. A majority of these studies (58%) were concerned with hypotheses for causes of biological invasions, while studies on impacts of invasions were the next most common (32% of the publications). We examined 1537 papers in greater detail in a systematic review. Superior competitive abilities of invaders, environmental disturbance, and invaded community species richness were the most common hypotheses examined. Most studies examined only a single hypothesis. Almost half of the papers were field observational studies. Studies of terrestrial invasions dominate the literature, with most of these concerning plant invasions. The focus of the literature overall is uneven, with important gaps in areas of theoretical and practical importance.
authors: Department of Ecology & Evolution, Stony Brook University Stony Brook, New York, 11794-5245.
authors: Edward
authors: E
authors: Lowry
authors: Emily J
authors: EJ
authors: Rollinson
authors: Adam J
authors: AJ
authors: Laybourn
authors: Tracy E
authors: TE
authors: Scott
authors: Matthew E
authors: ME
authors: Aiello-Lammens
authors: Sarah M
authors: SM
authors: Gray
authors: James
authors: J
authors: Mickley
authors: Jessica
authors: J
authors: Gurevitch
keywords: Biological invasions; Charles Elton; EICA; disturbance; enemy escape; invasion hypothesis; systematic review
references: Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Aug 1;170(3):269-79
references: 19498075
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Sep;22(9):465-71
references: 17640765
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 May;23(5):237-44
references: 18367291
references: Ecol Lett. 2006 Jun;9(6):726-40
references: 16706916
references: Ecol Appl. 2009 Jun;19(4):931-41
references: 19544735
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 May;13(5):195-8
references: 21238260
references: Ecology. 2007 Jan;88(1):3-17
references: 17489447
references: Nature. 2001 Nov 8;414(6860):195-7
references: 11700555
references: Ecol Lett. 2011 Jul;14(7):702-8
references: 21592274
references: J Anim Ecol. 2012 Jan;81(1):233-41
references: 21854375
references: PLoS Med. 2007 Mar 27;4(3):e78
references: 17388659
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Sep;19(9):470-4
references: 16701309
references: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Aug 17;103(16):1227-35
references: 21693730
references: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Jun 6;104(11):840-54
references: 22523397
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34
references: 19631507
references: JAMA. 2000 Apr 19;283(15):2008-12
references: 10789670
references: Biol Lett. 2010 Feb 23;6(1):78-81
references: 19776064
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22056
references: 21811559
references: Nat Genet. 2008 Jul;40(7):827-34
references: 18583979
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Apr 1;16(4):199-204
references: 11245943
references: Conserv Biol. 2006 Dec;20(6):1647-56
references: 17181800
references: Ann Intern Med. 1997 Mar 1;126(5):376-80
references: 9054282