title: Getting a tool gives wings: overestimation of tool-related benefits in a motor imagery task and a decision task.
abstract: Two experiments examine whether people overestimate the benefits provided by tool use in motor tasks. Participants had to move different quantities of objects by hand (two at a time) or with a tool (four at a time). The tool was not within reach so participants had to get it before moving the objects. In Experiment 1, the task was performed in a real and an imagined situation. In Experiment 2, participants had to decide for each quantity, whether they preferred moving the objects by hand or with the tool. Our findings indicated that people perceive tool actions as less costly in terms of movement time than they actually are (Experiment 1) and decide to use a tool even when it objectively provides less time-based benefits than using the hands (Experiment 2). Taken together, the data suggest that people overestimate the benefits provided by tool use.
authors: Laboratoire d'Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs (EA 3082), Université Lyon 2, Lyon, France, Francois.Osiurak@univ-lyon2.fr.
authors: François
authors: F
authors: Osiurak
authors: Nicolas
authors: N
authors: Morgado
authors: Guillaume T
authors: GT
authors: Vallet
authors: Marion
authors: M
authors: Drot
authors: Richard
authors: R
authors: Palluel-Germain
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003657:Decision Making / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006225:Hand / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000502:physiology*; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D055815:Young Adult
references: Behav Brain Res. 1989 Aug 1;34(1-2):35-42
references: 2765170
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2008 Apr;31(2):109-30; discussion 130-178
references: 18479531
references: Neuropsychologia. 2011 Feb;49(3):299-312
references: 21236274
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Dec;34(6):1479-92
references: 19045987
references: Exp Brain Res. 2012 Apr;218(2):169-79
references: 22294026
references: Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):517-40
references: 20438236
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):880-8
references: 16262485
references: J Mot Behav. 2008 Jan;40(1):11-7
references: 18316293
references: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;1(2):110-22
references: 26151466
references: Cortex. 2007 Apr;43(3):368-75
references: 17533760
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Feb;18(1):158-64
references: 21327358
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1458-71
references: 19803649
references: J Mot Behav. 2011;43(2):131-6
references: 21347951
references: Perception. 2009;38(1):79-91
references: 19323138
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Aug;37(4):1148-56
references: 21500947
references: Exp Brain Res. 2012 Apr;218(2):331-9
references: 22349562
references: Cortex. 2007 Apr;43(3):285-8
references: 17533752