title: Predictive value of time-intensity curves obtained with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the follow-up of 30 patients with Crohn's disease.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  CEUS can provide accurate quantitative estimates of intestinal wall microvascularization in Crohn's disease. We hypothesized that inflammation of the intestinal wall is correlated not with the amount of wall vascularization (study of vascularization patterns, SVP) but with the degree of wall flow during a period of time (time-intensity study, TIS). Our objective was to discover whether CEUS SPV and/or CEUS-TIS reflect(s) vascular inflammation of the intestinal wall and display(s) correlation with clinical activity of the disease at the time of the examination (T0) or at the 3- and 6-month follow-up (T3, T6).
  
  
  METHODS
  30 patients with Crohn's disease (12 men, 18 women, mean age: 41.96 years; treatment: 5-ASA (n = 8), steroids (n = 13), anti-TNF (n = 7), azathioprine (n = 2) were studied with CEUS SPV and CEUS-TIS and followed for at least 6 months. The sonographic examinations were performed with SonoVue (BR1, Bracco) and a dedicated scanner (TECHNOS MPX, Esaote) equipped with software for calculation of time-intensity curves. Four vascular patterns (1: vascularization of the entire wall; 2: vascularization of >50% of the wall; 3: flow exclusively within the submucosal layer; 4: no signal). The semiquantitative analysis consisted in measurement of the area under the curve (AUC) (cut-off between active and inactive disease, 15), mean intesnity (IMA) (cut-off = 10). Each examination (180 s) was digitally recorded and analyzed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  T0: cDAI <150 in 22 pts; cDAI > 150 in 8; T3: 22 pts. with cDAI<150, 8 with cDAI >150. At T0 CEUS SPV and CEUS-TIS both displayed low specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and negative predictive values (p = ns). At T0, CEUS SPV produced 8 true positives (TP), 15 true negatives (TN), 8 false positives (FP), 0 false negative (FN) (sensitivity: 100%; specificity: 68.2%; diagnostic accuracy: 69.5%; Positive predictive value (PPV): 100%; negative predictive value (NPV: 53.3%), and CEUS-TIS produced 6 TP, 18 TN, 4 FP, 2 FN (sensitivity 75%; specificity: 81.8%; diagnostic accuracy: 75%; PPV: 60%; NPV: 90%). At T3, CEUS SPV produced 8 TP, 12 TN, 7 FP, 3 FN (sensitivity: 72.7%; specificity: 63.2%; diagnostic accuracy: 50%; PPV: 53.3%; NPV: 80%), and CEUS SIT produced the following results: 10 TP, 19 TN, 0 FP, 1 FN (sensitivity: 90,9%; specificity: 100%; diagnostic accuracy: 96,5%; PPV: 100%; NPV: 95%). At T3 CEUS-SVP displayed low sensitivity and low diagnostic accuracy, whereas SIT was able to predict clinical activity during follow-up in all but one case (which showed reactivation after 6 months) (p = 0.001)
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  CEUS-TIS alone was found to reflect vascular inflammation of the intestinal wall in Crohn's disease and predicted clinical activity during follow-up.
authors: Gastroenterology Operative Unit, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy.
authors: F
authors: F
authors: Giangregorio
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Bertone
authors: L
authors: L
authors: Fanigliulo
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Comparato
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Aragona
authors: M G
authors: MG
authors: Marinone
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Sbolli
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Tansini
authors: F
authors: F
authors: Fornari
keywords: CDAI; CEUS; Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; Crohn's disease; Disease activity; SonoVue; Ultrasonography
references: Radiology. 2000 Dec;217(3):787-91
references: 11110944
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;(1):CD003459
references: 15674908
references: Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005 Aug;40(8):985-91
references: 16173144
references: Eur J Radiol. 2007 Apr;62(1):114-21
references: 17239555
references: Am J Cardiol. 2000 Aug 17;86(4A):19G-24G
references: 10997347
references: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Sep;11(9):1007-12
references: 10503838
references: Abdom Imaging. 2004 Nov-Dec;29(6):648-52
references: 15162232
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Oct;179(4):1029-36
references: 12239060
references: Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2006 Jan-Feb;10(1):23-6
references: 16494107
references: Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006 Oct;32(10):1459-66
references: 17045864
references: Gut. 1998 Nov;43(5):645-50
references: 9824345
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD000296
references: 16235274
references: Radiology. 2005 Jul;236(1):95-101
references: 15987966
references: Scand J Gastroenterol. 1992 Jun;27(6):501-7
references: 1631496
references: Digestion. 1988;41(3):180-4
references: 3066675
references: J Ultrasound Med. 2005 Jul;24(7):975-83
references: 15972712
references: Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;20(1):93-112
references: 16473803
references: Gastroenterology. 1979 Oct;77(4 Pt 2):843-6
references: 467941
references: Invest Radiol. 2000 Jul;35(7):431-7
references: 10901105
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Feb;168(2):429-33
references: 9016220
references: Dig Dis. 2004;22(1):67-72
references: 15292697
references: Abdom Imaging. 1999 Nov-Dec;24(6):544-9
references: 10525803
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;(1):CD006097
references: 17253580
references: Z Gastroenterol. 2002 Mar;40(3):171-5
references: 11901450
references: Lancet. 1989 Nov 4;2(8671):1057-62
references: 2572794
references: Br J Radiol. 2005 May;78(929):433-6
references: 15845938
references: Radiol Med. 2006 Jun;111(4):539-50
references: 16779540
references: Eur Radiol. 2001;11(8):1423-8
references: 11519551
references: J Clin Ultrasound. 1987 Mar-Apr;15(3):153-63
references: 3134409
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD004826
references: 17054217
references: J Ultrasound Med. 2005 Jan;24(1):59-65
references: 15615929
references: Dig Dis Sci. 1997 Feb;42(2):378-86
references: 9052523
references: Gut. 2006 May;55(5):733-41
references: 16609136
references: Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004 Oct;30(10):1355-63
references: 15582235
references: Br Med J. 1955 Oct 29;2(4947):1041-8
references: 13260656
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD000297
references: 15846602
references: Scand J Gastroenterol. 1996 Jun;31(6):590-3
references: 8789898
references: Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;40(11):1328-33
references: 16243717
references: Gut. 1994 Feb;35(2):231-5
references: 7508411
references: Gastroenterology. 1982 Aug;83(2):430-4
references: 7084620
references: N Engl J Med. 1987 Dec 24;317(26):1625-9
references: 3317057
references: Dig Dis. 2004;22(1):63-6
references: 15292696