title: What is the efficacy of circumcision in boys with complex urinary tract abnormalities?
abstract: The risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) in normal boys is 1%. This risk is significantly increased in boys with congenital abnormalities of the urinary tract, which includes such abnormalities as vesico-ureteric reflux, obstructive megaureter (VUJO) and posterior urethral valves. UTI in these boys can lead to urosepsis, a potentially life-threatening complication, and in the longer term renal scarring complicating pyelonephritis can lead to chronic renal impairment or even end-stage renal disease. Circumcision has been shown in normal boys to reduce the risk of UTI by 90%, and potentially could be a simple intervention to reduce the risk of urosepsis and renal scarring. In order to make this decision a clinician really needs to have the answers to two questions: 1) What is the risk of UTI in this particular boy? 2) What is the evidence of efficacy of circumcision in this particular condition? This article reviews what evidence exists to make a calculation of the risk/benefit ratio for circumcision in boys with abnormalities of the urinary tract.
authors: Birmingham Children's Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK.
authors: Mohammed
authors: M
authors: Bader
authors: Liam
authors: L
authors: McCarthy
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D002648:Child; D002944:Circumcision, Male; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D018579:Patient Selection; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014552:Urinary Tract Infections / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D014564:Urogenital Abnormalities / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*
references: Pediatr Nephrol. 2010 Sep;25(9):1679-86
references: 20424865
references: J Pediatr. 1996 Jan;128(1):23-7
references: 8551417
references: Pediatr Radiol. 1985;15(2):105-9
references: 3975102
references: Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1993 Mar;32(3):130-4
references: 8453827
references: Br J Surg. 1993 Oct;80(10):1231-6
references: 8242285
references: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Jul 25;295(6592):237-41
references: 2888509
references: J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):1098-101; discussion 1101
references: 17296419
references: Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989 Sep;71(5):275-7
references: 2802472
references: J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Feb;44(2):417-21
references: 19231547
references: Arch Dis Child. 2005 Aug;90(8):853-8
references: 15890696
references: Genitourin Med. 1997 Aug;73(4):288-90
references: 9389952
references: J Urol. 1992 Nov;148(5 Pt 2):1667-73
references: 1433585
references: Br Med J. 1949 Dec 24;2(4642):1433-7, illust
references: 15408299
references: Arch Dis Child. 1968 Apr;43(228):200-3
references: 5689532
references: J Urol. 2010 Jul;184(1):286-91
references: 20488494
references: JAMA. 1992 Feb 5;267(5):679-81
references: 1472171
references: Arch Dis Child. 1988 May;63(5):556-7
references: 3291784
references: J Urol. 2008 Apr;179(4):1524-8
references: 18295269
references: J Pediatr. 1988 Sep;113(3):442-6
references: 3411387
references: BJU Int. 1999 Jan;83 Suppl 1:34-44
references: 10349413