title: Parents are a drag: long-lived birds share the cost of increased foraging effort with their offspring, but males pass on more of the costs than females.
abstract: Life history theory predicts that parents will balance benefits from investment in current offspring against benefits from future reproductive investments. Long-lived organisms are therefore less likely to increase parental effort when environmental conditions deteriorate. To investigate the effect of decreased foraging capacity on parental behaviour of long-lived monogamous seabirds, we experimentally increased energy costs for chick-rearing thick-billed murres (Uria lomvia). Handicapped birds had lighter chicks and lower provisioning rates, supporting the prediction that long-lived animals would pass some of the costs of impaired foraging ability on to their offspring. Nonetheless, handicapped birds spent less time underwater, had longer inter-dive surface intervals, had lower body mass, showed lower resighting probabilities in subsequent years and consumed fewer risky prey items. Corticosterone levels were similar between control and handicapped birds. Apparently, adults shared some of the costs of impaired foraging, but those costs were not measurable in all metrics. Handicapped males had higher plasma neutral lipid concentrations (higher energy mobilisation) and their chicks exhibited lower growth rates than handicapped females, suggesting different sex-specific investment strategies. Unlike other studies of auks, partners did not compensate for handicapping, despite good foraging conditions for unhandicapped birds. In conclusion, parental murres and their offspring shared the costs of experimentally increased foraging constraints, with females investing more than males.
authors: Department of Integrated Biology, Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
authors: Shoshanah R
authors: SR
authors: Jacobs
authors: Kyle Hamish
authors: KH
authors: Elliott
authors: Anthony J
authors: AJ
authors: Gaston
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D001717:Birds / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D001835:Body Weight; D003345:Corticosterone / Q000097:blood; D004242:Diving; D004734:Energy Metabolism; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005260:Female; D008055:Lipids / Q000097:blood; D008297:Male; D012737:Sex Factors
chemical_list: D008055:Lipids; D003345:Corticosterone
references: Science. 1988 Sep 16;241(4872):1449-55
references: 17790040
references: J Anim Ecol. 2006 Sep;75(5):1182-9
references: 16922854
references: J Exp Biol. 2010 Apr;213(Pt 7):1018-25
references: 20228337
references: Environ Monit Assess. 2003 Oct-Nov;88(1-3):153-75
references: 14570414
references: Horm Behav. 2003 Jan;43(1):140-9
references: 12614644
references: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2007 May-Jun;80(3):283-92
references: 17390284
references: Oecologia. 2007 Feb;151(1):150-60
references: 17124570
references: J Exp Biol. 2003 Jun;206(Pt 11):1929-40
references: 12728014
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Dec 7;276(1676):4105-9
references: 19729454
references: J Exp Biol. 2002 Aug;205(Pt 16):2453-60
references: 12124368
references: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2002 Jan-Feb;75(1):101-10
references: 11880983
references: Ecology. 2007 Aug;88(8):2024-33
references: 17824434
references: Am J Physiol. 1998 Mar;274(3):R746-53
references: 9530242
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Feb 22;273(1585):445-50
references: 16615211
references: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2000 Dec;279(6):R2104-12
references: 11080075
references: Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2011 Jan;158(1):77-82
references: 20888927
references: Horm Behav. 2004 Dec;46(5):574-81
references: 15555499
references: Am Nat. 2008 Feb;171(2):E89-E101
references: 18173366
references: J Exp Biol. 2009 Sep 1;212(17):2824-9
references: 19684217
references: J Anim Ecol. 2006 Nov;75(6):1304-12
references: 17032362
references: J Exp Biol. 2010 Jan 1;213(1):33-9
references: 20008359
references: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2012 Jan-Feb;85(1):85-95
references: 22237292