title: People, organizational, and leadership factors impacting informatics support for clinical and translational research.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In recent years, there have been numerous initiatives undertaken to describe critical information needs related to the collection, management, analysis, and dissemination of data in support of biomedical research (J Investig Med 54:327-333, 2006); (J Am Med Inform Assoc 16:316-327, 2009); (Physiol Genomics 39:131-140, 2009); (J Am Med Inform Assoc 18:354-357, 2011). A common theme spanning such reports has been the importance of understanding and optimizing people, organizational, and leadership factors in order to achieve the promise of efficient and timely research (J Am Med Inform Assoc 15:283-289, 2008). With the emergence of clinical and translational science (CTS) as a national priority in the United States, and the corresponding growth in the scale and scope of CTS research programs, the acuity of such information needs continues to increase (JAMA 289:1278-1287, 2003); (N Engl J Med 353:1621-1623, 2005); (Sci Transl Med 3:90, 2011). At the same time, systematic evaluations of optimal people, organizational, and leadership factors that influence the provision of data, information, and knowledge management technologies and methods are notably lacking.
  
  
  METHODS
  In response to the preceding gap in knowledge, we have conducted both: 1) a structured survey of domain experts at Academic Health Centers (AHCs); and 2) a subsequent thematic analysis of public-domain documentation provided by those same organizations. The results of these approaches were then used to identify critical factors that may influence access to informatics expertise and resources relevant to the CTS domain.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 31 domain experts, spanning the Biomedical Informatics (BMI), Computer Science (CS), Information Science (IS), and Information Technology (IT) disciplines participated in a structured surveyprocess. At a high level, respondents identified notable differences in theaccess to BMI, CS, and IT expertise and services depending on the establishment of a formal BMI academic unit and the perceived relationship between BMI, CS, IS, and IT leaders. Subsequent thematic analysis of the aforementioned public domain documents demonstrated a discordance between perceived and reported integration across and between BMI, CS, IS, and IT programs and leaders with relevance to the CTS domain.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Differences in people, organization, and leadership factors do influence the effectiveness of CTS programs, particularly with regard to the ability to access and leverage BMI, CS, IS, and IT expertise and resources. Based on this finding, we believe that the development of a better understanding of how optimal BMI, CS, IS, and IT organizational structures and leadership models are designed and implemented is critical to both the advancement of CTS and ultimately, to improvements in the quality, safety, and effectiveness of healthcare.
authors: Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. philip.payne@osumc.edu
authors: Philip R O
authors: PR
authors: Payne
authors: Taylor R
authors: TR
authors: Pressler
authors: Indra Neil
authors: IN
authors: Sarkar
authors: Yves
authors: Y
authors: Lussier
mesh_terms: D019295:Computational Biology; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D007857:Leadership; D008490:Medical Informatics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D057170:Translational Research, Biomedical / Q000458:organization & administration*
references: N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 13;353(15):1621-3
references: 16221788
references: Methods Inf Med. 2000 Aug;39(3):267-77
references: 10992757
references: Science. 2005 May 6;308(5723):821-4
references: 15879210
references: Acad Med. 2009 Jul;84(7):964-70
references: 19550198
references: JAMA. 2003 Mar 12;289(10):1278-87
references: 12633190
references: J Transl Med. 2010 Feb 26;8:22
references: 20187952
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Sep-Oct;24(5):1222-33
references: 16162567
references: Physiol Genomics. 2009 Nov 6;39(3):131-40
references: 19737991
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Nov-Dec;19(6):931-8
references: 22683918
references: J Investig Med. 2006 Sep;54(6):327-33
references: 17134616
references: J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
references: 18929686
references: Sci Transl Med. 2011 Jul 6;3(90):90cm17
references: 21734173
references: J Investig Med. 2005 May;53(4):192-200
references: 15974245
references: Acad Med. 2011 Apr;86(4):429-34
references: 20711055
references: JAMA. 1990 Feb 23;263(8):1114-20
references: 2405204
references: AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;:331-5
references: 14728189
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):354-7
references: 21561873
references: Am J Prev Med. 2011 May;40(5 Suppl 2):S97-102
references: 21521604
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):283-9
references: 18308986
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 May-Jun;16(3):316-27
references: 19261934
references: Acad Med. 2009 Jul;84(7):818-20
references: 19550167
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):169-70
references: 19074294