title: The real war on cancer: the evolutionary dynamics of cancer suppression.
abstract: Cancer is a disease of multicellular animals caused by unregulated cell division. The prevailing model of cancer (multistage carcinogenesis) is based on the view that cancer results after a series of (generally somatic) mutations that knock out the genetic mechanisms suppressing unregulated cell growth. The chance of these mutations occurring increases with size and longevity, leading to Peto's paradox: why don't large animals have a higher lifetime incidence of cancer than small animals? The solution to this paradox is evolution. From an evolutionary perspective, an increasing frequency of prereproductive cancer deaths results in natural selection for enhanced cancer suppression. The expected result is a prereproductive risk of cancer across species that is independent of life history. However, within species, we still expect cancer risk to increase with size and longevity. Here, I review the evolutionary model of cancer suppression and some recent empirical evidence supporting it. Data from humans and domestic dogs confirm the expected intraspecific association between size and cancer risk, while results from interspecific comparisons between rodents provide the best evidence to date of the predicted recruitment of additional cancer suppression mechanisms as species become larger or longer lived.
authors: Department of Biology, University of California Riverside, CA, USA  and  Center for Evolution and Cancer, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA.
authors: Leonard
authors: L
authors: Nunney
keywords: adaptation; comparative biology; evolutionary medicine; evolutionary theory
references: J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988 Jul 20;80(10):772-4
references: 3385783
references: Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Oct;9(10):749-58
references: 19776744
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jul;86(1):82-91
references: 17616766
references: Endocr Rev. 2011 Jun;32(3):422-40
references: 21441345
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Apr;68(4):820-3
references: 5279523
references: Nat Rev Cancer. 2003 Mar;3(3):226-31
references: 12612657
references: Nat Rev Cancer. 2010 Nov;10(11):794-802
references: 20966923
references: Nature. 2000 Nov 9;408(6809):248-54
references: 11089982
references: Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Jan 15;173(2):201-16
references: 21084558
references: Res Vet Sci. 2007 Apr;82(2):208-14
references: 16919689
references: Nature. 1975 May 15;255(5505):197-200
references: 1143315
references: Trends Genet. 1997 Oct;13(10):410-4
references: 9351343
references: Lancet Oncol. 2011 Aug;12(8):785-94
references: 21782509
references: Nat Rev Cancer. 2006 Dec;6(12):924-35
references: 17109012
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 May;75(5):2453-7
references: 276883
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 17;106(46):19352-7
references: 19858485
references: Vet Rec. 1999 Nov 27;145(22):625-9
references: 10619607
references: Aging Cell. 2008 Dec;7(6):813-23
references: 18778411
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Nov;3(11):e225
references: 17997597
references: Nat Rev Cancer. 2003 Dec;3(12):952-9
references: 14737125
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jun 7;270(1520):1183-91
references: 12816658
references: Aging Cell. 2007 Feb;6(1):45-52
references: 17173545
references: Nat Rev Cancer. 2007 Mar;7(3):213-21
references: 17301845
references: Med Hypotheses. 2009 Apr;72(4):407-8
references: 19136220
references: Nature. 1997 Apr 24;386(6627):761, 763
references: 9126728
references: Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Mar 7;266(1418):493-8
references: 10189713
references: Br J Cancer. 1954 Mar;8(1):1-12
references: 13172380
references: PLoS Med. 2012;9(4):e1001200
references: 22606070
references: Cancer Cell. 2004 Aug;6(2):171-83
references: 15324700
references: Br J Cancer. 2010 Oct 26;103(9):1467-74
references: 20978513
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Apr;26(4):175-82
references: 21296451
references: Nutr Cancer. 1990;14(1):69-77
references: 2367236
references: Br J Cancer. 1953 Mar;7(1):68-72
references: 13051507
references: Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Jul 22;263(1372):813-22
references: 8760489
references: Cell. 1996 Jul 26;86(2):173-5
references: 8706120
references: Trends Genet. 2012 Mar;28(3):118-27
references: 22226176
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Dec 21;96(26):15121-6
references: 10611348
references: Cancer Cell Int. 2005 Mar 02;5(1):5
references: 15743536
references: BMC Cancer. 2010 Jan 05;10:3
references: 20051132
references: J Natl Cancer Inst. 1966 Jun;36(6):1137-50
references: 5221997
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Sep;(270):159-68
references: 1884536
references: Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 May;2(5):373-82
references: 12044013
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 12;99(23):15095-100
references: 12415112
references: Cancer Res. 1988 Mar 15;48(6):1658-62
references: 3345534
references: J Vet Intern Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(2):187-98
references: 21352376
references: J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2007 Mar 15;308(2):119-26
references: 16788896
references: J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1-16
references: 5875341
references: Cancer Res. 2011 Jun 1;71(11):3739-44
references: 21610109
references: Br J Cancer. 2004 Dec 13;91(12):1981-2
references: 15599379
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(22):7406-16
references: 17913752
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Oct;20(10):545-52
references: 16701433