title: Socially-central zebrafish influence group behavior more than those on the social periphery.
abstract: Certain individuals are more effective than others at using individual experience to impact group behavior. Here, we tested whether pre-training of zebrafish that are at the focal central of social group dynamics ("Key" fish) has a stronger positive impact on group performance than does pre-training of less central ("Non-Key") fish. We used very short observation periods and social network statistics to identify Key and Non-Key individuals, trained these fish to respond to an aversive stimulus, and then measured group performance after returning these now-experienced fish to a social setting. Although Key and Non-Key fish evaded the stimulus equally quickly as individuals, groups with experienced Key fish escaped the aversive stimulus more quickly than did groups with experienced Non-Key fish. The impact depended on genetic background: PN zebrafish on the social extremes (more often males) influenced the group's baseline response to the aversive stimulus, whereas experienced Scientific Hatcheries' zebrafish (both males and females) influenced the change in response over repeated trials. These results suggest that social roles are an important feature of information transfer across a group, and set the stage for future research into the genetic and evolutionary basis of social learning.
authors: Department of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juarez, Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, México. cuauvital@gmail.com
authors: Cuauhcihuatl
authors: C
authors: Vital
authors: Emília P
authors: EP
authors: Martins
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D005260:Female; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D010812:Physical Stimulation; D012737:Sex Factors; D012919:Social Behavior; D015027:Zebrafish
references: J Comp Psychol. 2011 Aug;125(3):278-85
references: 21707139
references: Science. 2011 Nov 4;334(6056):697-700
references: 22053054
references: Science. 2003 Sep 26;301(5641):1867-70
references: 14512616
references: J Theor Biol. 2008 May 7;252(1):77-86
references: 18342891
references: Behav Brain Res. 2008 Aug 5;191(1):77-87
references: 18423643
references: Commun Integr Biol. 2009;2(2):147-50
references: 19513268
references: Can J Zool. 2008 Oct 1;86(10):1085-1094
references: 21379405
references: Neuropharmacology. 2012 Jan;62(1):135-43
references: 21843537
references: Anim Behav. 1998 Jul;56(1):181-90
references: 9710476
references: Anim Behav. 2000 Aug;60(2):175-180
references: 10973718
references: Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2012;12:3-24
references: 22250005
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 17;108(20):8373-8
references: 21536882
references: Anim Behav. 1999 Apr;57(4):771-775
references: 10202085
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Jul 22;277(1691):2105-11
references: 20236972
references: Anim Cogn. 2012 Jul;15(4):559-65
references: 22453926
references: Anim Behav. 2000 Feb;59(2):403-409
references: 10675263
references: Anim Cogn. 2003 Mar;6(1):11-6
references: 12658531
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 12;366(1567):978-87
references: 21357220
references: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008 Feb;83(1):13-34
references: 18093234
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Nov 29;357(1427):1559-66
references: 12495513
references: Anim Behav. 2008 Feb 1;75(2):501-508
references: 25948875
references: J Comp Psychol. 2007 Nov;121(4):380-6
references: 18085921
references: PLoS One. 2010 May 19;5(5):e10625
references: 20502702
references: Behav Processes. 2010 Mar;83(3):235-41
references: 19931601
references: Learn Behav. 2004 Feb;32(1):4-14
references: 15161136
references: Nature. 2006 Jan 26;439(7075):426-9
references: 16437106
references: Am Nat. 2011 May;177(5):645-54
references: 21508610
references: Am Nat. 2011 Jan;177(1):135-42
references: 21117963
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 7;270 Suppl 2:S186-8
references: 14667378
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Sep;25(9):504-11
references: 20638151