title: General anaesthesia with multimodal principles versus intrathecal analgesia with conventional principles in total knee arthroplasty: a consecutive, randomized study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Postoperative outcomes following major surgery are influenced by surgical and anaesthesiological factors. While techniques of minimal invasive surgery have been associated with improved outcome, the techniques of minimal invasive, multimodal anaesthesia have not been adequately investigated. The aim of this study was to compare intrathecally based anaesthesia (ITA) including standardized, traditional intraoperative and postoperative care, with, general anaesthesia (GA) combined with intraoperative glucocorticoids, exclusion of intraoperative tourniquet and indwelling urethral catheter, and, an accelerated postoperative care regime. Outcome variables in the study were pain, requirement of analgesics, global satisfaction score and length-of-hospital stay.
  
  
  METHODS
  Sixty patients were included and randomized to the ITA or the GA group. The ITA group received intrathecal bupivacaine (12.5 - 15.0 mg)/morphine (0.1 mg)/clonidine (0.03 mg), a standard surgical procedure, local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with ropivacaine (110 mg) /epinephrine (0.5 mg)/morphine (10 mg), an indwelling urethral catheter and mobilization with start Day 1 after the surgery. The GA group received a target-controlled infusion of propofol/remifentanil, betamethasone 4 mg i.v. intraoperatively, surgery was performed without a tourniquet, an indwelling urethral catheter was not used, LIA was with ropivacaine (250 mg)/epinephrine (0.3 mg) and mobilization was planned with start ≤ 2 hrs. after end of surgery. Outcomes were followed daily for the first 96 hrs. and at visits 3 months and 12 months postoperatively.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Requirement of analgesics was decreased in the ITA group in the immediate postoperative period (P < 0.05). Pain scores were significantly lower in the ITA group (P < 0.01) between 0 - 12 hrs and in the GA group (P < 0.05) between 12 - 24 hrs after surgery. Fifteen of the patients in the GA group had to be intermittent catheterized due to bladder volumes > 400 mL. The LOS in the ITA group was significantly longer compared to the GA group (P < 0.01). There was no difference in global satisfaction score.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  General anaesthesia combined with intraoperative glucocorticoids and accelerated postoperative care, compared with, intrathecal blockade and traditional postoperative care, seems to generate the same overall pain ratings and a decrease in length-of-hospital stay, in patients undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty.
authors: Department of Anesthesiology, Hassleholm Hospital, 281 25 Hassleholm, Sweden.
authors: Andreas
authors: A
authors: Harsten
authors: Hjortur
authors: H
authors: Hjartarson
authors: Mads Utke
authors: MU
authors: Werner
authors: Soren
authors: S
authors: Toksvig-Larsen
keywords: General anaesthesia; Glucocorticoids; Intrathecal analgesia; Length of hospital stay; Postoperative recovery; Total knee arthroplasty; Urinary catheter
references: Minerva Anestesiol. 2010 Feb;76(2):120-30
references: 20150853
references: Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;28(6):404-11
references: 21502865
references: Anesthesiology. 2011 Sep;115(3):575-88
references: 21799397
references: Acta Orthop. 2008 Dec;79(6):800-5
references: 19085498
references: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Nov;48(10):1223-31
references: 15504180
references: Anaesthesia. 2010 Sep;65(9):904-12
references: 20586748
references: Can J Anaesth. 1990 May;37(4 Pt 2):S97
references: 2361330
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep;467(9):2379-402
references: 19130163
references: Br J Anaesth. 2011 Oct;107(4):487-9
references: 21903643
references: Pain. 2012 Apr;153(4):784-793
references: 22230804
references: Anesthesiology. 1997 Jan;86(1):24-33
references: 9009936
references: Anesth Analg. 2012 Feb;114(2):255-6
references: 22266695
references: Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(4):300-6
references: 20055568
references: Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2010 Mar;71(3):148-50, 151-2
references: 20220720
references: Anesth Analg. 2010 Jan 1;110(1):199-207
references: 19910619
references: Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jan;110(1):21-7
references: 23002167