title: Target prioritization and strategy selection for active case-finding of pulmonary tuberculosis: a tool to support country-level project planning.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Despite the progress made in the past decade, tuberculosis (TB) control still faces significant challenges. In many countries with declining TB incidence, the disease tends to concentrate in vulnerable populations that often have limited access to health care. In light of the limitations of the current case-finding approach and the global urgency to improve case detection, active case-finding (ACF) has been suggested as an important complementary strategy to accelerate tuberculosis control especially among high-risk populations. The present exercise aims to develop a model that can be used for county-level project planning.
  
  
  METHODS
  A simple deterministic model was developed to calculate the number of estimated TB cases diagnosed and the associated costs of diagnosis. The model was designed to compare cost-effectiveness parameters, such as the cost per case detected, for different diagnostic algorithms when they are applied to different risk populations. The model was transformed into a web-based tool that can support national TB programmes and civil society partners in designing ACF activities.
  
  
  RESULTS
  According to the model output, tuberculosis active case-finding can be a costly endeavor, depending on the target population and the diagnostic strategy. The analysis suggests the following: (1) Active case-finding activities are cost-effective only if the tuberculosis prevalence among the target population is high. (2) Extensive diagnostic methods (e.g. X-ray screening for the entire group, use of sputum culture or molecular diagnostics) can be applied only to very high-risk groups such as TB contacts, prisoners or people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. (3) Basic diagnostic approaches such as TB symptom screening are always applicable although the diagnostic yield is very limited. The cost-effectiveness parameter was sensitive to local diagnostic costs and the tuberculosis prevalence of target populations.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The prioritization of appropriate target populations and careful selection of cost-effective diagnostic strategies are critical prerequisites for rational active case-finding activities. A decision to conduct such activities should be based on the setting-specific cost-effectiveness analysis and programmatic assessment. A web-based tool was developed and is available to support national tuberculosis programmes and partners in the formulation of cost-effective active case-finding activities at the national and subnational levels.
authors: World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines. nishikiorin@wpro.who.int
authors: Nobuyuki
authors: N
authors: Nishikiori
authors: Catharina
authors: C
authors: Van Weezenbeek
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D002160:Cambodia / Q000453:epidemiology; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D006292:Health Priorities; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods; D012040:Regional Health Planning / Q000379:methods*; D018570:Risk Assessment; D014397:Tuberculosis, Pulmonary / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000191:economics / Q000453:epidemiology; D014744:Vietnam / Q000453:epidemiology
references: Epidemiol Infect. 2008 Oct;136(10):1342-9
references: 18177518
references: Am J Public Health. 2006 Jan;96(1):14-6
references: 16317206
references: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002 Feb;6(2):121-9
references: 11931410
references: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Aug;102(8):797-804
references: 18513768
references: BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 21;12:469
references: 22720878
references: Lancet Infect Dis. 2008 Jun;8(6):359-68
references: 18450516
references: Lancet. 2010 May 22;375(9728):1814-29
references: 20488524
references: Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Apr;88(4):273-80
references: 20431791
references: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005 Nov;9(11):1183-203
references: 16333924
references: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006 Aug;10(8):876-82
references: 16898372
references: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1998 Sep;2(9 Suppl 1):S9-15
references: 9755959
references: Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(3):217-27
references: 11984608
references: Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;39(1):149-55
references: 19820104
references: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009 Nov;13(11):1399-404
references: 19861013
references: PLoS Med. 2008 Jul 15;5(7):e152
references: 18630984
references: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007 Oct;11(10):1049-61
references: 17945060
references: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001 May;5(5):419-25
references: 11336272
references: Soc Sci Med. 2009 Jun;68(12):2240-6
references: 19394122
references: Lancet. 2010 Oct 9;376(9748):1244-53
references: 20923715