title: Processing counterfactual and hypothetical conditionals: an fMRI investigation.
abstract: Counterfactual thinking is ubiquitous in everyday life and an important aspect of cognition and emotion. Although counterfactual thought has been argued to differ from processing factual or hypothetical information, imaging data which elucidate these differences on a neural level are still scarce. We investigated the neural correlates of processing counterfactual sentences under visual and aural presentation. We compared conditionals in subjunctive mood which explicitly contradicted previously presented facts (i.e. counterfactuals) to conditionals framed in indicative mood which did not contradict factual world knowledge and thus conveyed a hypothetical supposition. Our results show activation in right occipital cortex (cuneus) and right basal ganglia (caudate nucleus) during counterfactual sentence processing. Importantly the occipital activation is not only present under visual presentation but also with purely auditory stimulus presentation, precluding a visual processing artifact. Thus our results can be interpreted as reflecting the fact that counterfactual conditionals pragmatically imply the relevance of keeping in mind both factual and supposed information whereas the hypothetical conditionals imply that real world information is irrelevant for processing the conditional and can be omitted. The need to sustain representations of factual and suppositional events during counterfactual sentence processing requires increased mental imagery and integration efforts. Our findings are compatible with predictions based on mental model theory.
authors: Department of Psychology and Centre for Neurocognitive Research, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria. eugenia.kulakova@sbg.ac.at
authors: Eugenia
authors: E
authors: Kulakova
authors: Markus
authors: M
authors: Aichhorn
authors: Matthias
authors: M
authors: Schurz
authors: Martin
authors: M
authors: Kronbichler
authors: Josef
authors: J
authors: Perner
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D013850:Thinking / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Nov;9(11):512-8
references: 16214387
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Oct 1;6(10):426-431
references: 12413576
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Sep;31(9):1430-45
references: 20112243
references: Cereb Cortex. 2001 Oct;11(10):954-65
references: 11549618
references: Cognition. 2004 Oct;93(3):B109-21
references: 15178381
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Dec;21(12):2358-68
references: 19016600
references: Neuropsychologia. 2012 Dec;50(14):3663-72
references: 22975196
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Nov;132(3):240-9
references: 19695557
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Mar;18(3):320-34
references: 16512999
references: Neuroimage. 2003 Nov;20 Suppl 1:S18-29
references: 14597293
references: Brain Res. 2012 May 21;1455:40-55
references: 22483958
references: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Apr;48(5):1501-9
references: 20132831
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Oct;11(10):435-41
references: 17913567
references: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Aug;9(8):991-2
references: 16871165
references: Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2649-61
references: 19896538
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1154-70
references: 12450339
references: J Neurosci. 2007 Dec 26;27(52):14365-74
references: 18160644
references: Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):112-24
references: 14741648
references: Neuroimage. 2010 Jul 1;51(3):1213-21
references: 20302951
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jun;134(2):245-52
references: 20219182
references: Can J Exp Psychol. 2004 Jun;58(2):113-20
references: 15285601
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(5):939-61
references: 22313036
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Apr;13(2):203-12
references: 11958963
references: Mem Cognit. 1999 Jul;27(4):726-40
references: 10479830
references: Cognition. 2012 Jan;122(1):102-9
references: 21962826
references: Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):3433-40
references: 22116039
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Nov;62(11):2113-25
references: 19565429
references: Brain Res. 2008 Oct 21;1236:113-25
references: 18722356
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):1149-54
references: 16248757
references: Neuroimage. 2000 Nov;12(5):504-14
references: 11034858
references: Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(9):901-9
references: 11516443
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 May 15;15(4):559-73
references: 12803967
references: Mem Cognit. 2007 Sep;35(6):1410-21
references: 18035637
references: Brain. 2005 Mar;128(Pt 3):584-96
references: 15659423