title: Morphometric study of cricoid cartilages in Western India.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  It is important to determine the size and proportion of the larynx as such information is useful in procedures such as intubation, endoscopy and surgical manipulations. Recent interest in the cases of subglottic stenosis and postintubational stenosis of the lower respiratory tract has led to renewed interest in ascertaining the measurements of the various laryngeal cartilages. The aim of the present study was to collect morphometric data of cricoid cartilage from a regional population.
  
  
  METHODS
  Fifty laryngeal preparations from adult cadavers of Western India were assessed. Sections were prepared via dissection and the removed cricoid cartilages then measured and weighed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean antero-posterior diameter (19.29±2.47) of the cricoid cartilage was greater than the average transverse diameter (18.33±2.26). The height of arch of cricoid cartilage was 6.54±1.23mm and height of lamina was 21.45±1.97mm. Mean weight of cricoid cartilage was 4.53±1.27grams. The shape of the cricoid cartilage was ovoid in 46% of cases, oval in 38%, pear shaped in 12% and narrow-oblong in 4% of cases.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Inter-subject variability in the dimensions of cricoid cartilages was observed. The large difference in almost all sizes and shapes of the cricoid cartilage makes it difficult to standardise the rigid stents used in these organs. Endotracheal tubes of the appropriate size should therefore be based on the measurements of individual patients. Clinicians should therefore be aware of morphological variations as they are of fundamental clinical importance.
authors: Assistant Professor,  Department of Anatomy, Rural Medical College, Pravara Institute of Medical Science ,  Loni, Maharashtra, India.
authors: Mohini
authors: M
authors: Joshi
authors: Sharda
authors: S
authors: Joshi
authors: Subhash
authors: S
authors: Joshi
keywords: Cricoid cartilage; larynx; morphometry
references: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2001 Dec;110(12):1154-61
references: 11768707
references: Anat Anz. 1980;148(1):42-8
references: 7212281
references: J Anat. 1990 Aug;171:187-91
references: 2081705
references: Surg Radiol Anat. 1991;13(2):105-8
references: 1925909
references: World J Surg. 1998 Aug;22(8):845-51; discussion 852
references: 9673557
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1953 Aug;35-B(3):462-6
references: 13084697
references: Arch Otolaryngol. 1971 Nov;94(5):432-9
references: 5114952
references: Head Neck. 1999 Dec;21(8):743-50
references: 10562688
references: Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2001;60(2):73-8
references: 11407146
references: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Nov-Dec;14(6):879-84
references: 10612927
references: Surg Radiol Anat. 1994;16(1):31-6
references: 8047966
references: Chin Med J (Engl). 1981 Jun;94(6):396-400
references: 6788483
references: Indian J Med Res. 2002 Nov;116:207-16
references: 12710551
references: Ann Anat. 2007;189(1):87-95
references: 17319614
references: J Anat. 1934 Jul;68(Pt 4):500-10
references: 17104499
references: Acta Anat (Basel). 1950;9(1-2):57-68
references: 15409814
references: Surg Radiol Anat. 1987;9(3):251-5
references: 3122346