title: Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
abstract: The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare outcomes of posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses. A computerized literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing the clinical outcomes of cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized designs. The table of contents of four major Orthopaedic journals and the references section of two arthroplasty text books were reviewed to identify other relevant studies. Ultimately, 1114 patients (1265 knees) were compared. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in flexion and range of motion in favor of posterior-stabilized knees, but no difference in complication rates. The clinical importance of this remains unknown. The decision to use one design versus the other should rest with the surgeon's preference and comfort with a particular design.
authors: Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
authors: Michael J
authors: MJ
authors: Bercik
authors: Ashish
authors: A
authors: Joshi
authors: Javad
authors: J
authors: Parvizi
mesh_terms: D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D016119:Posterior Cruciate Ligament / Q000601:surgery; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular