title: Review of Cochrane reviews on acupuncture: how Chinese resources contribute to Cochrane reviews.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Cochrane Systematic Reviews (CSRs) are frequently referenced by acupuncture efficacy studies currently. In this study, the CSRs on acupuncture are reviewed, and the disease fields they covered and the conclusions they reached are analyzed. In order to explore the potential contribution to CSRs by Chinese resources, the authors analyzed whether the participation of Chinese reviewers, the utilization of Chinese databases, and the inclusion of Chinese clinical trials would affect the positive conclusion ratios of the CSRs.
  
  
  METHODS
  Acupuncture-related CSRs in the Cochrane Library were searched and classified based on the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10). The CSRs were further designated as positive or negative according to the conclusion statements. CSRs with the participation of Chinese reviewers, the utilization of Chinese databases, or the inclusion of Chinese clinical trials were extracted, and the positive ratios of conclusions were compared separately with corresponding CSRs without those three Chinese resources.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Thirty-two (32) CSRs were identified, 9 (28.1%) of which reached positive conclusions. The CSRs with positive conclusions were mainly about multifarious pains, nausea and vomiting, and functional disorders. Seventeen (17; 53.1%) included the participation of Chinese reviewers, 18 (56.3%) involved the utilization of Chinese databases, and 20 (62.5%) included Chinese clinical trials. No differences on the positive conclusion ratios were observed between CSRs with reviewers from Chinese institutions and those that did not (odds ratio [OR]: 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06, 1.62), the utilization of Chinese databases and those that did not (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.11, 2.44), or the inclusion of Chinese clinical trials and those that did not (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.26, 6.49).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Most CSRs on acupuncture are inconclusive. No significant differences regarding the positive conclusion ratios were found between the CSRs with or without the utilization of Chinese resources.
authors: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
authors: Shuang
authors: S
authors: Jiao
authors: Kiichiro
authors: K
authors: Tsutani
authors: Nobuhiko
authors: N
authors: Haga
mesh_terms: D015670:Acupuncture Therapy; D002681:China; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D016206:Databases, Bibliographic; D006801:Humans; D012196:Review Literature as Topic; D016896:Treatment Outcome