title: Better by design: rethinking interventions for better environmental regulation.
abstract: Better regulation seeks to extend existing policy and regulatory outcomes at less burden for the actors involved. No single intervention will deliver all environmental outcomes. There is a paucity of evidence on what works why, when and with whom. We examine how a sample (n=33) of policy makers select policy and regulatory instruments, through a case study of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), UK. Policy makers have a wide range of instruments at their disposal and are seeking ways to harness the influence of non-governmental resources to encourage good environmental behaviour. The relevance of each influence varies as risk and industry characteristics vary between policy areas. A recent typology of policy and regulatory instruments has been refined. Direct regulation is considered necessary in many areas, to reduce environmental risks with confidence and to tackle poor environmental performance. Co-regulatory approaches may provide important advantages to help accommodate uncertainty for emerging policy problems, providing a mechanism to develop trusted evidence and to refine objectives as problems are better understood.
authors: Cranfield University, Centre for Environmental Risks and Futures, School of Applied Sciences, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, MK43 0AL, UK.
authors: C M
authors: CM
authors: Taylor
authors: S J T
authors: SJ
authors: Pollard
authors: A J
authors: AJ
authors: Angus
authors: S A
authors: SA
authors: Rocks
mesh_terms: D000288:Administrative Personnel; D058735:Environmental Policy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000639:trends*; D006801:Humans; D012307:Risk Factors; D006113:United Kingdom