title: For soldier and state: dual loyalty and World War One.
abstract: Military medicine has always been characterized by some form of dual loyalty: physicians have to consider the interests of the individual soldier--patient as well as the interests of the state and the military in general. The way in which each individual doctor responds to this dual loyalty has mostly been viewed as a product of war circumstances on the one hand, and the personal character and/or religious and ideological beliefs of the physician on the other. Taking World War One as an example, this article argues that the nature of the illness or wound also had a part to play in this. The article shows that the disfigured were looked upon mainly in relation to the patient's own interests; the invalided-out through a combination of the patient's as well as the state's interests; and the neurotic mainly out of concern for the interests of the state.
authors: KITLV-Leiden, Royal Netherlands Institute of South East Asian and Caribbean Studies, Leiden, The Netherlands. l.vanbergen@kpnmail.nl
authors: Leo
authors: L
authors: van Bergen
mesh_terms: D014943:Global Health; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D008887:Military Medicine / Q000266:history*; D008889:Military Personnel / Q000266:history*; D028681:Moral Obligations; D010819:Physician's Role / Q000266:history; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D012941:Social Responsibility; D047828:World War I; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000266:history*