title: The politics of paranoia.
abstract: For almost 20 years, gay rights advocates and defenders of military anti-gay discrimination engaged in a phony debate about whether allowing open service would undermine unit cohesion. To be sure, a preponderance of evidence showed that open service would not undermine cohesion, and the repeal of don't ask, don't tell (DADT) required advocates to prevail on that point in the court of public opinion. But concerns about cohesion were never the basis of opposition to open service. Rather, opposition was a modern incarnation of the politics of paranoia, a dangerous tradition in American history. Acknowledging that DADT had nothing to do with cohesion and that military leaders allowed the armed forces to be implicated in the politics of paranoia could facilitate disabling paranoia as the basis for other political projects such as anti-immigrant xenophobia. For a video on DADT and paranoia, search for "Donnelly Belkin DADT" on YoutTube.
authors: Department of Political Science, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 94132, USA. plsi@sfsu.edu
authors: Aaron
authors: A
authors: Belkin
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D049674:History, 21st Century; D006716:Homosexuality / Q000266:history* / Q000523:psychology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008889:Military Personnel / Q000266:history / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology; D010259:Paranoid Disorders; D011057:Politics; D011640:Public Policy; D012650:Self Disclosure; D063508:Social Discrimination / Q000266:history / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology; D014481:United States