title: Neural variability, or lack thereof.
abstract: We do not claim that the brain is completely deterministic, and we agree that noise may be beneficial in some cases. But we suggest that neuronal variability may be often overestimated, due to uncontrolled internal variables, and/or the use of inappropriate reference times. These ideas are not new, but should be re-examined in the light of recent experimental findings: trial-to-trial variability is often correlated across neurons, across trials, greater for higher-order neurons, and reduced by attention, suggesting that "intrinsic" sources of noise can only account for a minimal part of it. While it is obviously difficult to control for all internal variables, the problem of reference time can be largely avoided by recording multiple neurons at the same time, and looking at statistical structures in relative latencies. These relative latencies have another major advantage: they are insensitive to the variability that is shared across neurons, which is often a significant part of the total variability. Thus, we suggest that signal-to-noise ratios in the brain may be much higher than usually thought, leading to reactive systems, economic in terms of number of neurons, and energy efficient.
authors: Unit for Brain and Cognition, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, Spain ; Laboratory of Neurobiology of Adaptive Processes, UMR 7102, CNRS - University Pierre and Marie Curie Paris, France.
authors: Timothée
authors: T
authors: Masquelier
keywords: neural coding; neural variability; redundancy; reliability; signal-to-noise ratio