title: Bioethics in popular science: evaluating the media impact of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks on the biobank debate.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The global expansion of biobanks has led to a range of bioethical concerns related to consent, privacy, control, ownership, and disclosure. As an opportunity to engage broader audiences on these concerns, bioethicists have welcomed the commercial success of Rebecca Skloot's 2010 bestselling book The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. To assess the impact of the book on discussion within the media and popular culture more generally, we systematically analyzed the ethics-related themes emphasized in reviews and articles about the book, and in interviews and profiles of Skloot.
  
  
  METHODS
  We conducted a content analysis of a population of relevant English-language articles and transcripts (n = 125) produced by news organizations and publications in the U.S., Canada, Great Britain/Ireland, and Australia/New Zealand. We scored each article for the emphasis and appearance of 9 ethics-related themes. These were informed consent, welfare of the vulnerable, compensation, scientific progress, control/access, accountability/oversight, privacy, public education, and advocacy.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The informed consent theme dominated media discussion, with almost 39.2 percent of articles/transcripts featuring the theme as a major focus and 44.8 percent emphasizing the theme as a minor focus. Other prominent themes and frames of reference focused on the welfare of the vulnerable (18.4 percent major emphasis; 36.0 percent minor emphasis), and donor compensation (19.2 percent major; 52.8 percent minor). Ethical themes that comprised a second tier of prominence included those of scientific progress, control/access, and accountability/oversight. The least prominent themes were privacy, public education, and advocacy.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The book has been praised as an opportunity to elevate media discussion of bioethics, but such claims should be re-considered. The relatively narrow focus on informed consent in the media discussion generated by Skloot's book may limit the ability of ethicists and advocates to elevate attention to donor control, compensation, patenting, privacy, and other ethical issues. Still, ethicists should view the book and a pending major TV film translation as opportunities to highlight through media outreach, consultation exercises and public forums a broader range of bioethical concerns that would otherwise be under-emphasized in news coverage. Such efforts, however, need to be carefully planned and evaluated.
authors: School of Communication, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, NW 20016-8017, Washington, DC, USA. nisbet@american.edu
authors: Matthew C
authors: MC
authors: Nisbet
authors: Declan
authors: D
authors: Fahy
mesh_terms: D001315:Australia; D018070:Biological Specimen Banks / Q000941:ethics*; D002170:Canada; D006367:HeLa Cells; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics*; D018156:Journalism, Medical; D008093:Literature, Modern; D008402:Mass Media; D028681:Moral Obligations; D009520:New Zealand; D018907:Privacy; D012941:Social Responsibility; D006113:United Kingdom; D014481:United States; D035862:Vulnerable Populations