title: Life cycle analysis of fuel production from fast pyrolysis of biomass.
abstract: A well-to-wheels (WTW) analysis of pyrolysis-based gasoline was conducted and compared with petroleum gasoline. To address the variation and uncertainty in the pyrolysis pathways, probability distributions for key parameters were developed with data from literature. The impacts of two different hydrogen sources for pyrolysis oil upgrading and of two bio-char co-product applications were investigated. Reforming fuel gas/natural gas for H2 reduces WTW GHG emissions by 60% (range of 55-64%) compared to the mean of petroleum fuels. Reforming pyrolysis oil for H2 increases the WTW GHG emissions reduction up to 112% (range of 97-126%), but reduces petroleum savings per unit of biomass used due to the dramatic decline in the liquid fuel yield. Thus, the hydrogen source causes a trade-off between GHG reduction per unit fuel output and petroleum displacement per unit biomass used. Soil application of biochar could provide significant carbon sequestration with large uncertainty.
authors: Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, United States. jhan@anl.gov
authors: Jeongwoo
authors: J
authors: Han
authors: Amgad
authors: A
authors: Elgowainy
authors: Jennifer B
authors: JB
authors: Dunn
authors: Michael Q
authors: MQ
authors: Wang
mesh_terms: D056804:Biofuels / Q000032:analysis*; D018533:Biomass; D001709:Biotechnology / Q000379:methods*; D002244:Carbon / Q000032:analysis; D017752:Greenhouse Effect; D006859:Hydrogen / Q000032:analysis; D010100:Oxygen / Q000032:analysis; D059205:Renewable Energy; D013696:Temperature; D014866:Waste Products / Q000032:analysis; D003313:Zea mays / Q000737:chemistry
chemical_list: D056804:Biofuels; D014866:Waste Products; D002244:Carbon; D006859:Hydrogen; D010100:Oxygen