title: An evaluation of data quality in Canada's Continuing Care Reporting System (CCRS): secondary analyses of Ontario data submitted between 1996 and 2011.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Evidence informed decision making in health policy development and clinical practice depends on the availability of valid and reliable data. The introduction of interRAI assessment systems in many countries has provided valuable new information that can be used to support case mix based payment systems, quality monitoring, outcome measurement and care planning. The Continuing Care Reporting System (CCRS) managed by the Canadian Institute for Health Information has served as a data repository supporting national implementation of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI 2.0) in Canada for more than 15 years. The present paper aims to evaluate data quality for the CCRS using an approach that may be generalizable to comparable data holdings internationally.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data from the RAI 2.0 implementation in Complex Continuing Care (CCC) hospitals/units and Long Term Care (LTC) homes in Ontario were analyzed using various statistical techniques that provide evidence for trends in validity, reliability, and population attributes. Time series comparisons included evaluations of scale reliability, patterns of associations between items and scales that provide evidence about convergent validity, and measures of changes in population characteristics over time.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Data quality with respect to reliability, validity, completeness and freedom from logical coding errors was consistently high for the CCRS in both CCC and LTC settings. The addition of logic checks further improved data quality in both settings. The only notable change of concern was a substantial inflation in the percentage of long term care home residents qualifying for the Special Rehabilitation level of the Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) case mix system after the adoption of that system as part of the payment system for LTC.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The CCRS provides a robust, high quality data source that may be used to inform policy, clinical practice and service delivery in Ontario. Only one area of concern was noted, and the statistical techniques employed here may be readily used to target organizations with data quality problems in that (or any other) area. There was also evidence that data quality was good in both CCC and LTC settings from the outset of implementation, meaning data may be used from the entire time series. The methods employed here may continue to be used to monitor data quality in this province over time and they provide a benchmark for comparisons with other jurisdictions implementing the RAI 2.0 in similar populations.
authors: School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, N2L 3G1, Waterloo, ON, Canada. hirdes@uwaterloo.ca
authors: John P
authors: JP
authors: Hirdes
authors: Jeff W
authors: JW
authors: Poss
authors: Hilary
authors: H
authors: Caldarelli
authors: Brant E
authors: BE
authors: Fries
authors: John N
authors: JN
authors: Morris
authors: Gary F
authors: GF
authors: Teare
authors: Kristen
authors: K
authors: Reidel
authors: Norma
authors: N
authors: Jutan
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D002170:Canada; D003266:Continuity of Patient Care / Q000592:standards*; D016208:Databases, Factual; D003953:Diagnosis-Related Groups; D006801:Humans; D009735:Nursing Homes / Q000592:standards*; D009864:Ontario; D011594:Psychometrics; D015983:Selection Bias; D012866:Skilled Nursing Facilities / Q000592:standards*