title: Clinical evaluation of early loaded and unloaded implants in edentulous mandible.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The aim of this study is to compare and evaluate the clinical outcome of early loaded and unloaded implants in the interforaminal region of anterior mandible.
  
  
  METHODS
  Five completely edentulous patients aged between 45 and 65 years were selected satisfying certain criteria. Four implants were placed in 33, 43, 35 and 45 regions; implants in 33 and 43 regions were loaded by a Dolder bar supported overdenture at 7th day. The implants at 35 and 45 regions were connected to 33 and 43 regions, respectively after 4 months. The implants were divided into two groups. Group I consisted of early loaded implants (implants in the region of 33 and 43) and Group II consisted of delayed loaded implants (implants in the region of 35 and 45). The implants were evaluated for various clinical parameters at 2, 4 and 6 month intervals after initial placement.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There was significant increase in the bone to implant contact for unloaded implants as compared to early loaded at the end of 6 months of implant placement. There was increased marginal bone loss around early loaded implants as compared to unloaded implants at the end of 6 months. Clinical stability of early loaded implants was lower as compared to the unloaded implants at the end of 6 months. Survival rate for early loaded and unloaded implants was 100% at the end of 6 months with all implants in function.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Early loading of interforaminal mandibular implants demonstrated a highly acceptable clinical success at the end of 6 months. However, the bone density, marginal bone level and clinical stability were significantly lower for the early loaded implants as compared to unloaded implants.
authors: Army College of Dental Sciences, Secunderabad, India.
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Anil Kumar
authors: Nandkishore
authors: N
authors: Sahoo
authors: V
authors: V
authors: Radhakrishnan
authors: H S
authors: HS
authors: Sandhu
keywords: CT scan; Early loaded implants; Periotest; Unloaded implants