title: Rethinking programme evaluation in health professions education: beyond 'did it work?'.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  For nearly 40 years, outcome-based models have dominated programme evaluation in health professions education. However, there is increasing recognition that these models cannot address the complexities of the health professions context and studies employing alternative evaluation approaches that are appearing in the literature. A similar paradigm shift occurred over 50 years ago in the broader discipline of programme evaluation. Understanding the development of contemporary paradigms within this field provides important insights to support the evolution of programme evaluation in the health professions.
  
  
  METHODS
  In this discussion paper, we review the historical roots of programme evaluation as a discipline, demonstrating parallels with the dominant approach to evaluation in the health professions. In tracing the evolution of contemporary paradigms within this field, we demonstrate how their aim is not only to judge a programme's merit or worth, but also to generate information for curriculum designers seeking to adapt programmes to evolving contexts, and researchers seeking to generate knowledge to inform the work of others.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  From this evolution, we distil seven essential elements of educational programmes that should be evaluated to achieve the stated goals. Our formulation is not a prescriptive method for conducting programme evaluation; rather, we use these elements as a guide for the development of a holistic 'programme of evaluation' that involves multiple stakeholders, uses a combination of available models and methods, and occurs throughout the life of a programme. Thus, these elements provide a roadmap for the programme evaluation process, which allows evaluators to move beyond asking whether a programme worked, to establishing how it worked, why it worked and what else happened. By engaging in this process, evaluators will generate a sound understanding of the relationships among programmes, the contexts in which they operate, and the outcomes that result from them.
authors.affiliation: Wilson Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. faizal.a.haji@gmail.com
authors.forename: Faizal
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Haji
authors.forename: Marie-Paule
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Morin
authors.forename: Kathryn
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Parker
mesh_terms: D003479:Curriculum; D004501:Education, Medical / Q000266:history / Q000379:methods*; D006281:Health Occupations / Q000193:education*; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D015397:Program Evaluation