title: [The efficacy of psychodynamic therapy: a controversy].
abstract: There is growing evidence from randomized controlled trials supporting the efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT) in specific mental disorders. Yet the evidence for the efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy has not gone unchallenged. Several responses have addressed these concerns, showing that most of the criticism was not justified. Nevertheless, the evidence for psychodynamic psychotherapy continues to be frequently ignored, criticized or presented in a distorted way. A recent controversy published in the Nervenarzt may serve as an illustrative example, which is discussed here more in detail. This example shows that some authors are not interested in a truly scientific discussion, but rather try to discredit a rival method of psychotherapy and its scientific representatives for political reasons.
authors.affiliation: Abteilung Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Universität Gießen, Ludwigstraße 76, 35392 Gießen. Falk.Leichsenring@psycho.med.uni-giessen.de
authors.forename: Falk
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Leichsenring
authors.forename: Sven
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Rabung
mesh_terms: D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D008134:Long-Term Care; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D011575:Psychoanalytic Therapy; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012107:Research Design; D016896:Treatment Outcome