title: On the content of learning in interval timing: representations or associations?
abstract: Models of timing differ on two fundamental issues, the form of the representation and the content of learning. First, regarding the representation of time some models assume a linear encoding, others a logarithmic encoding. Second, regarding the content of learning cognitive models assume that the animal learns explicit representations of the intervals relevant to the task and that their behavior is based on a comparison of those representations, whereas associative models assume that the animal learns associations between its representations of time and responding, which then drive performance. In this paper, we show that some key empirical findings (timescale invariant psychometric curves, bisection point at the geometric mean of the trained durations in the bisection procedure, and location of the indifference point in the time-left procedure) seem to make these two issues interdependent. That is, cognitive models seem to entail a linear representation of time, and at least a certain class of associative models seem to entail a log representation of time. These interdependencies suggest new ways to compare and contrast timing models.
authors.affiliation: Laboratoire URÊCA, Université Lille Nord de France, Campus de Lille3, Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, France. jeremie.jozefowiez@univ-lille3.fr
authors.forename: Jeremie
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Jozefowiez
authors.forename: Armando
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Machado
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001245:Association Learning / Q000502:physiology; D003213:Conditioning, Psychological / Q000502:physiology; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008960:Models, Psychological; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors