title: Is SAPS 3 better than APACHE II at predicting mortality in critically ill transplant patients?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This study compared the accuracy of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 with that of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II at predicting hospital mortality in patients from a transplant intensive care unit.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 501 patients were enrolled in the study (152 liver transplants, 271 kidney transplants, 54 lung transplants, 24 kidney-pancreas transplants) between May 2006 and January 2007. The Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 was calculated using the global equation (customized for South America) and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score; the scores were calculated within 24 hours of admission. A receiver-operating characteristic curve was generated, and the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was calculated to identify the patients at the greatest risk of death according to Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used for statistically significant results and indicated a difference in performance over deciles. The standardized mortality ratio was used to estimate the overall model performance.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The ability of both scores to predict hospital mortality was poor in the liver and renal transplant groups and average in the lung transplant group (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve = 0.696 for Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 and 0.670 for Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II). The calibration of both scores was poor, even after customizing the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 score for South America.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The low predictive accuracy of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores does not warrant the use of these scores in critically ill transplant patients.
authors.affiliation: Intensive Care Unit, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. vannessm@bol.com.br
authors.forename: Vanessa M de
authors.initials: VM
authors.lastname: Oliveira
authors.forename: Janete S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Brauner
authors.forename: Edison
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Rodrigues Filho
authors.forename: Ruth G A
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Susin
authors.forename: Viviane
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Draghetti
authors.forename: Simone T
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: Bolzan
authors.forename: Silvia R R
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Vieira
mesh_terms: D018806:APACHE; D001938:Brazil; D016638:Critical Illness / Q000401:mortality; D006305:Health Status Indicators; D017052:Hospital Mortality; D006801:Humans; D007362:Intensive Care Units; D016030:Kidney Transplantation / Q000401:mortality*; D016031:Liver Transplantation / Q000401:mortality*; D016040:Lung Transplantation / Q000401:mortality*; D016035:Pancreas Transplantation / Q000401:mortality*; D011379:Prognosis; D012372:ROC Curve; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012720:Severity of Illness Index