title: Recursive fury: conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation.
abstract: Conspiracist ideation has been repeatedly implicated in the rejection of scientific propositions, although empirical evidence to date has been sparse. A recent study involving visitors to climate blogs found that conspiracist ideation was associated with the rejection of climate science and the rejection of other scientific propositions such as the link between lung cancer and smoking, and between HIV and AIDS (Lewandowsky et al., in press; LOG12 from here on). This article analyses the response of the climate blogosphere to the publication of LOG12. We identify and trace the hypotheses that emerged in response to LOG12 and that questioned the validity of the paper's conclusions. Using established criteria to identify conspiracist ideation, we show that many of the hypotheses exhibited conspiratorial content and counterfactual thinking. For example, whereas hypotheses were initially narrowly focused on LOG12, some ultimately grew in scope to include actors beyond the authors of LOG12, such as university executives, a media organization, and the Australian government. The overall pattern of the blogosphere's response to LOG12 illustrates the possible role of conspiracist ideation in the rejection of science, although alternative scholarly interpretations may be advanced in the future.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, University of Western Australia Crawley, WA, Australia.
authors.forename: Stephan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Lewandowsky
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Cook
authors.forename: Klaus
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Oberauer
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Marriott
keywords: Internet blogs; climate change; conspiracist ideation; conspiracy theories; science denial