title: Reflexive retaliation for violent victimization: the effect of social distance on weapon lethality.
abstract: During the course of being victimized, why do people sometimes fight back with their fists; in other cases, with a knife or blunt object; and at other times, with a firearm? One theory is that the weapons involved in self-defense, also known as reflexive retaliation, become less lethal as offenders and victims become more intimate and alike culturally. Using National Crime Victimization Survey data, we test hypotheses derived from this theory and primarily find support. This article concludes by discussing implications for future work.
authors.affiliation: Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA. sjacques1@gsu.edu
authors.forename: Scott
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Jacques
authors.forename: Callie Marie
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Rennison
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D019548:Crime Victims / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D012929:Psychological Distance; D011582:Psychological Theory; D012927:Social Control, Informal; D014481:United States; D014754:Violence / Q000523:psychology*; D054041:Weapons