title: Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Scoping studies are increasingly common for broadly searching the literature on a specific topic, yet researchers lack an agreed-upon definition of and framework for the methodology. In 2005, Arksey and O'Malley offered a methodological framework for conducting scoping studies. In their subsequent work, Levac et al. responded to Arksey and O'Malley's call for advances to their framework. Our paper builds on this collective work to further enhance the methodology.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This paper begins with a background on what constitutes a scoping study, followed by a discussion about four primary subjects: (1) the types of questions for which Arksey and O'Malley's framework is most appropriate, (2) a contribution to the discussion aimed at enhancing the six steps of Arskey and O'Malley's framework, (3) the strengths and challenges of our experience working with Arksey and O'Malley's framework as a large, inter-professional team, and (4) lessons learned. Our goal in this paper is to add to the discussion encouraged by Arksey and O'Malley to further enhance this methodology.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Performing a scoping study using Arksey and O'Malley's framework was a valuable process for our research team even if how it was useful was unexpected. Based on our experience, we recommend researchers be aware of their expectations for how Arksey and O'Malley's framework might be useful in relation to their research question, and remain flexible to clarify concepts and to revise the research question as the team becomes familiar with the literature. Questions portraying comparisons such as between interventions, programs, or approaches seem to be the most suitable to scoping studies. We also suggest assessing the quality of studies and conducting a trial of the method before fully embarking on the charting process in order to ensure consistency. The benefits of engaging a large, inter-professional team such as ours throughout every stage of Arksey and O'Malley's framework far exceed the challenges and we recommend researchers consider the value of such a team. The strengths include breadth and depth of knowledge each team member brings to the study and time efficiencies. In our experience, the most significant challenges presented to our team were those related to consensus and resource limitations. Effective communication is key to the success of a large group. We propose that by clarifying the framework, the purposes of scoping studies are attainable and the definition is enriched.
authors.affiliation: Clinical Research, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver Island Centre, 2410 Lee Avenue, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada. hdaudt@bccancer.bc.ca
authors.forename: Helena M L
authors.initials: HM
authors.lastname: Daudt
authors.forename: Catherine
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: van Mossel
authors.forename: Samantha J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Scott
mesh_terms: D022126:Access to Information; D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms; D016206:Databases, Bibliographic; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D016247:Information Storage and Retrieval; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D020380:Needs Assessment; D012106:Research; D012196:Review Literature as Topic