title: Targeting motility properties of bacteria in the development of probiotic cultures against Campylobacter jejuni in broiler chickens.
abstract: Campylobacter is the leading cause of gastroenteritis worldwide. Campylobacter is commonly present in the intestinal tract of poultry, and one strategy to reduce enteric colonization is the use of probiotic cultures. This strategy has successfully reduced enteric colonization of Salmonella, but has had limited success against Campylobacter. In an effort to improve the efficacy of probiotic cultures, we developed a novel in vitro screening technique for selecting bacterial isolates with enhanced motility. It is proposed that motility-selected bacteria have the marked ability to reach the same gastrointestinal niche in poultry and competitively reduce C. jejuni. Bacterial isolates were collected from ceca of healthy chickens, and motile isolates were identified and tested for anti-Campylobacter activity. Isolates with these properties were selected for increased motility by passing each isolate 10 times and at each passage selecting bacteria that migrated the farthest during each passage. Three bacterial isolates with the greatest motility (all Bacillus subtilis) were used alone or in combination in two chicken trials. At day of hatch, chicks were administered these isolates alone or in combination (n=10/treatment, two trials), and chicks were orally challenged with a mixture of four different wild-type strains of C. jejuni (∼10(5) CFU/mL) on day 7. Isolate 1 reduced C. jejuni colonization in both of the trials (p<0.05). A follow-up study was conducted to compare isolate 1 subjected to enhanced motility selection with its nonselected form. A reduction (p<0.05) in Campylobacter colonization was observed in all three trials in the chickens dosed using isolate with enhanced motility compared to the control and unselected isolate. These findings support the theory that the motility enhancement of potential probiotic bacteria may provide a strategy for reduction of C. jejuni in preharvest chickens.
authors.affiliation: Poultry Science Department, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701, USA.
authors.forename: Vivian F
authors.initials: VF
authors.lastname: Aguiar
authors.forename: Ann M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Donoghue
authors.forename: Komala
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Arsi
authors.forename: Ixchel
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Reyes-Herrera
authors.forename: Joel H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Metcalf
authors.forename: Fausto S
authors.initials: FS
authors.lastname: de los Santos
authors.forename: Pamela J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Blore
authors.forename: Dan J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Donoghue
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000898:Antibiosis; D001412:Bacillus subtilis / Q000302:isolation & purification / Q000502:physiology*; D002169:Campylobacter Infections / Q000382:microbiology / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000662:veterinary*; D016123:Campylobacter jejuni / Q000502:physiology*; D002432:Cecum / Q000382:microbiology; D002645:Chickens / Q000382:microbiology*; D009068:Movement; D011201:Poultry Diseases / Q000382:microbiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D019936:Probiotics / Q000494:pharmacology*; D011897:Random Allocation