title: Sex differences in mathematics and reading achievement are inversely related: within- and across-nation assessment of 10 years of PISA data.
abstract: We analyzed one decade of data collected by the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), including the mathematics and reading performance of nearly 1.5 million 15 year olds in 75 countries. Across nations, boys scored higher than girls in mathematics, but lower than girls in reading. The sex difference in reading was three times as large as in mathematics. There was considerable variation in the extent of the sex differences between nations. There are countries without a sex difference in mathematics performance, and in some countries girls scored higher than boys. Boys scored lower in reading in all nations in all four PISA assessments (2000, 2003, 2006, 2009). Contrary to several previous studies, we found no evidence that the sex differences were related to nations' gender equality indicators. Further, paradoxically, sex differences in mathematics were consistently and strongly inversely correlated with sex differences in reading: Countries with a smaller sex difference in mathematics had a larger sex difference in reading and vice versa. We demonstrate that this was not merely a between-nation, but also a within-nation effect. This effect is related to relative changes in these sex differences across the performance continuum: We did not find a sex difference in mathematics among the lowest performing students, but this is where the sex difference in reading was largest. In contrast, the sex difference in mathematics was largest among the higher performing students, and this is where the sex difference in reading was smallest. The implication is that if policy makers decide that changes in these sex differences are desired, different approaches will be needed to achieve this for reading and mathematics. Interventions that focus on high-achieving girls in mathematics and on low achieving boys in reading are likely to yield the strongest educational benefits.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. g.stoet@leeds.ac.uk
authors.forename: Gijsbert
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Stoet
authors.forename: David C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Geary
mesh_terms: D000124:Achievement; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008433:Mathematics; D011932:Reading; D012737:Sex Factors