title: Comparison of photoacclimation in twelve freshwater photoautotrophs (chlorophyte, bacillaryophyte, cryptophyte and cyanophyte) isolated from a natural community.
abstract: Different representative of algae and cyanobacteria were isolated from a freshwater habitat and cultivated in laboratory to compare their photoacclimation capacity when exposed to a wide range of light intensity and to understand if this factor may modify natural community dominance. All species successfully acclimated to all light intensities and the response of phytoplankton to increased light intensity was similar and included a decrease of most photosynthetic pigments accompanied by an increase in photoprotective pigment content relative to Chl a. Most species also decreased their light absorption efficiency on a biovolume basis. This decrease not only resulted in a lower fraction of energy absorbed by the cell, but also to a lower transfer of energy to PSII and PSI. Furthermore, energy funnelled to PSII or PSI was also rearranged in favour of PSII. High light acclimated organisms also corresponded to high non-photochemical quenching and photosynthetic electron transport reduction state and to a low Φ'M. Thus photoacclimation processes work toward reducing the excitation pressure in high light environment through a reduction of light absorption efficiency, but also by lowering conversion efficiency. Interestingly, all species of our study followed that tendency despite being of different functional groups (colonial, flagellated, different sizes) and of different phylogeny demonstrating the great plasticity and adaptation ability of freshwater phytoplankton to their light environment. These adjustments may explain the decoupling between growth rate and photosynthesis observed above photosynthesis light saturation point for all species. Even if some species did reach higher growth rate in our conditions and thus, should dominate in natural environment with respect to light intensity, we cannot exclude that other environmental factors also influence the population dynamic and make the outcome harder to predict.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, TOXEN, Ecotoxicology of Aquatic Microorganisms Laboratory, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
authors.forename: Charles P
authors.initials: CP
authors.lastname: Deblois
authors.forename: Axelle
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Marchand
authors.forename: Philippe
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Juneau
mesh_terms: D000064:Acclimatization; D002734:Chlorophyll / Q000378:metabolism; D000077194:Chlorophyll A; D000460:Chlorophyta / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology / Q000528:radiation effects; D044785:Cryptophyta / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology / Q000528:radiation effects; D000458:Cyanobacteria / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology / Q000528:radiation effects; D017377:Diatoms / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology / Q000528:radiation effects; D017753:Ecosystem; D005618:Fresh Water / Q000382:microbiology; D010788:Photosynthesis; D010839:Phytoplankton / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology* / Q000528:radiation effects; D010860:Pigments, Biological / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D010860:Pigments, Biological; D002734:Chlorophyll; D000077194:Chlorophyll A