title: Understanding the role of the 'self' in the social priming of mimicry.
abstract: People have a tendency to unconsciously mimic other's actions. This mimicry has been regarded as a prosocial response which increases social affiliation. Previous research on social priming of mimicry demonstrated an assimilative relationship between mimicry and prosociality of the primed construct: prosocial primes elicit stronger mimicry whereas antisocial primes decrease mimicry. The present research extends these findings by showing that assimilative and contrasting prime-to-behavior effect can both happen on mimicry. Specifically, experiment 1 showed a robust contrast priming effect where priming antisocial behaviors induces stronger mimicry than priming prosocial behaviors. In experiment 2, we manipulated the self-relatedness of the pro/antisocial primes and further revealed that prosocial primes increase mimicry only when the social primes are self-related whereas antisocial primes increase mimicry only when the social primes are self-unrelated. In experiment 3, we used a novel cartoon movie paradigm to prime pro/antisocial behaviors and manipulated the perspective-taking when participants were watching these movies. Again, we found that prosocial primes increase mimicry only when participants took a first-person point of view whereas antisocial primes increase mimicry only when participants took a third-person point of view, which replicated the findings in experiment 2. We suggest that these three studies can be best explained by the active-self theory, which claims that the direction of prime-to-behavior effects depends on how primes are processed in relation to the 'self'.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom. mirrorneuronwang@gmail.com
authors.forename: Yin
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Antonia F de C
authors.initials: AF
authors.lastname: Hamilton
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004532:Ego; D005260:Female; D005717:Games, Experimental; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012919:Social Behavior; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 27;364(1528):2359-67
references.pmid: 19620107
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Apr;7(4):268-77
references.pmid: 16552413
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 Aug;11(3):234-61
references.pmid: 18453463
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Sep;6(4):417-25
references.pmid: 20551143
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Feb;96(2):395-414
references.pmid: 19159139
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jun;76(6):893-910
references.pmid: 10402679
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jun 04;6:153
references.pmid: 22675295
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Apr 24;6:82
references.pmid: 22536177
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Nov;12(11):441-6
references.pmid: 18805040
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jan;24(1):235-45
references.pmid: 21878057
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2009 Apr;12(3):F1-8
references.pmid: 19371357
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 17;31(33):12001-10
references.pmid: 21849560
references.citation: Br J Soc Psychol. 2002 Mar;41(Pt 1):123-38
references.pmid: 11970778
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2003 Jul;14(4):334-9
references.pmid: 12807406
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Aug;19(8):816-22
references.pmid: 18816290
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Aug;71(2):230-44
references.pmid: 8765481
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):210-25
references.pmid: 16634666
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2003 Jul;110(3):472-89
references.pmid: 12885111
references.citation: Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(3):197-211
references.pmid: 19424905
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:285-308
references.pmid: 23020640
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Jun;90(6):893-910
references.pmid: 16784341
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 1;50(2):701-8
references.pmid: 20045472
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):98-106
references.pmid: 20116291
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2006 Feb;120(1):48-57
references.pmid: 16551164
references.citation: J Autism Dev Disord. 2012 Jun;42(6):1045-51
references.pmid: 21833823
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2011 Mar 1;55(1):381-8
references.pmid: 21122817
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(1):11-21
references.pmid: 10617288
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(1):89-98
references.pmid: 15488909
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 May;84(5):1093-102
references.pmid: 12757151
references.citation: Neuropsychology. 2003 Apr;17(2):265-71
references.pmid: 12803432
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Nov 22;450(7169):557-9
references.pmid: 18033298
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):601-12
references.pmid: 21336831
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2008 Mar;77(3):343-52
references.pmid: 18164534
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29081
references.pmid: 22279526
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2001 Dec;14(6):1416-23
references.pmid: 11707097
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 12;31(41):14531-5
references.pmid: 21994369
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Aug;95(2):404-19
references.pmid: 18665710
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;81(6):1014-27
references.pmid: 11761304
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 27;364(1528):2381-9
references.pmid: 19620109
references.citation: Brain. 2010 Feb;133(Pt 2):611-24
references.pmid: 20008375
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2011 Feb 23;7(1):7-10
references.pmid: 20427328
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2011 May;137(3):463-83
references.pmid: 21280938
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Apr 26;6:105
references.pmid: 22557956
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2000 Nov;44(2):124-43
references.pmid: 11041986
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2001 Jan;106(1-2):3-22
references.pmid: 11256338