title: Patterns of detection and capture are associated with cohabiting predators and prey.
abstract: Avoidance behaviour can play an important role in structuring ecosystems but can be difficult to uncover and quantify. Remote cameras have great but as yet unrealized potential to uncover patterns arising from predatory, competitive or other interactions that structure animal communities by detecting species that are active at the same sites and recording their behaviours and times of activity. Here, we use multi-season, two-species occupancy models to test for evidence of interactions between introduced (feral cat Felis catus) and native predator (Tasmanian devil Sarcophilus harrisii) and predator and small mammal (swamp rat Rattus lutreolus velutinus) combinations at baited camera sites in the cool temperate forests of southern Tasmania. In addition, we investigate the capture rates of swamp rats in traps scented with feral cat and devil faecal odours. We observed that one species could reduce the probability of detecting another at a camera site. In particular, feral cats were detected less frequently at camera sites occupied by devils, whereas patterns of swamp rat detection associated with devils or feral cats varied with study site. Captures of swamp rats were not associated with odours on traps, although fewer captures tended to occur in traps scented with the faecal odour of feral cats. The observation that a native carnivorous marsupial, the Tasmanian devil, can suppress the detectability of an introduced eutherian predator, the feral cat, is consistent with a dominant predator-mesopredator relationship. Such a relationship has important implications for the interaction between feral cats and the lower trophic guilds that form their prey, especially if cat activity increases in places where devil populations are declining. More generally, population estimates derived from devices such as remote cameras need to acknowledge the potential for one species to change the detectability of another, and incorporate this in assessments of numbers and survival.
authors.affiliation: School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Billie.Lazenby@dpipwe.tas.gov.au
authors.forename: Billie T
authors.initials: BT
authors.lastname: Lazenby
authors.forename: Christopher R
authors.initials: CR
authors.lastname: Dickman
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D002415:Cats; D017753:Ecosystem; D011235:Predatory Behavior; D051381:Rats; D012621:Seasons; D013648:Tasmania
references.citation: Science. 2001 Feb 9;291(5506):1036-9
references.pmid: 11161215
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 May 22;274(1615):1237-43
references.pmid: 17360286
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2009 Sep;12(9):982-98
references.pmid: 19614756
references.citation: Am Nat. 1999 May;153(5):492-508
references.pmid: 29578790
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1976 Jul;83(4):505-39
references.pmid: 822437
references.citation: Oecologia. 1998 Aug;116(1-2):227-233
references.pmid: 28308530
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 May;22(5):229-30; author reply 230-1
references.pmid: 17300855
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009 Nov;84(4):617-35
references.pmid: 19681844
references.citation: Oecologia. 1991 Feb;85(4):464-471
references.pmid: 28312492
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2009 Jul;78(4):724-31
references.pmid: 19175695
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2010 Jul;20(5):1467-75
references.pmid: 20666262
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2012 May;87(2):390-413
references.pmid: 22051057
references.citation: Science. 1971 Feb 5;171(3970):443-9
references.pmid: 4992621
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2000 Jul;60(1):121-130
references.pmid: 10924211
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2011 Oct;14(10):1035-42
references.pmid: 21806747
references.citation: Oecologia. 2012 Apr;168(4):947-57
references.pmid: 22042524
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29(8):1123-44
references.pmid: 16085312