title: Differences in impact of long term caregiving for mentally ill older adults on the daily life of informal caregivers: a qualitative study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Owing to the policy of extramuralization of care in most Western countries older people with severe mental illness have to rely more and more on informal caregivers for daily care. Caregivers themselves are often aged, and although caregiving implies an impact on daily life that exceeds the boundaries of usual informal care, the impact differs across caregivers. Some caregivers seem to suffer more than others, and the differences cannot be fully understood by factors currently known to exacerbate the burden of caregiving. In order to help caregivers reduce the impact of caregiving it is important to gain a deeper understanding of factors influencing the burden and its impact on the caregiver's life. With this in mind, the aim of the study is to explore and understand differences in the impact of long-term caregiving on the quality of life of caregivers who look after older adults with severe mental illness.
  
  
  METHODS
  A qualitative, associative, inductive strategy and continuous simultaneous coding were used to interpret the data of 19 semi-structured interviews.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We identified an underlying psychological factor "perceived freedom of choice" which explains the gross differences in impact, leading to a definition of two main types of caregivers. Depending on how people perceive freedom of choice to provide care, the consequences of caregiving can be characterized as a process of gain (type 1) or loss (type 2). Four influential factors deepen the impact of caregiving for the type 2 caregivers, and two subtypes are identified for this category. Consequences of caregiving are most readily seen in a deteriorating quality of the relationship with the care recipient and in the psychosocial well-being of the caregiver.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The concept of freedom of choice adds to our understanding of the differences and explains the variation in impact on the caregivers' life. The type 1 caregiver generally experiences gain whereas type 2 generally experiences loss, which puts the latter group typically at risk of becoming overloaded. Whether people perceive that they have freedom of choice in caregiving is an important consideration in evaluating the type of intervention needed to support caregivers.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry of the Elderly, Altrecht Mental Health Care, Oude Arnhemseweg 260, Zeist 3705 BK, The Netherlands. M.Zegwaard@Altrecht.nl
authors.forename: Marian I
authors.initials: MI
authors.lastname: Zegwaard
authors.forename: Marja J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Aartsen
authors.forename: Mieke Hf
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Grypdonck
authors.forename: Pim
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Cuijpers
mesh_terms: D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D017028:Caregivers / Q000523:psychology*; D017281:Cost of Illness; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D028642:Persons with Psychiatric Disorders / Q000523:psychology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D036301:Qualitative Research; D011788:Quality of Life / Q000523:psychology*; D012649:Self Concept; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000523:psychology*
references.citation: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2001 Nov;29(2):117-28
references.pmid: 11939747
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2006 Oct;56(1):55-61
references.pmid: 16972918
references.citation: BMJ. 2011 Mar 25;342:d403
references.pmid: 21441296
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(3):263-72
references.pmid: 3629300
references.citation: West J Nurs Res. 2002 Aug;24(5):516-36
references.pmid: 12148833
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2000 Feb;37(1):37-43
references.pmid: 10687808
references.citation: Eur Psychiatry. 1996;11(4):192-7
references.pmid: 19698449
references.citation: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;19(1):85-92
references.pmid: 14716704
references.citation: Soc Work. 2000 Oct;45(5):439-47
references.pmid: 11029899
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003 Mar;58(2):P112-28
references.pmid: 12646594
references.citation: J Clin Nurs. 2011 Aug;20(15-16):2233-58
references.pmid: 21332854
references.citation: Psychiatr Q. 1996 Fall;67(3):221-34
references.pmid: 8829245
references.citation: J Nurs Scholarsh. 2003;35(1):27-32
references.pmid: 12701523
references.citation: Aging Ment Health. 2010 Jan;14(1):113-9
references.pmid: 20155528
references.citation: Qual Health Res. 2002 Oct;12(8):1076-92
references.pmid: 12365589
references.citation: Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2006 Feb;20(1):41-51
references.pmid: 16442473
references.citation: Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2007 Dec;16(6):381-9
references.pmid: 17995509
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 1981 Dec;22(4):337-56
references.pmid: 7320473
references.citation: Qual Health Res. 1998 Sep;8(5):694-706
references.pmid: 10621569
references.citation: Qual Health Res. 2000 Jan;10(1):6-25
references.pmid: 10724753
references.citation: Gerontologist. 2002 Dec;42(6):772-80
references.pmid: 12451158
references.citation: Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2006 May;52(3):278-85
references.pmid: 16875199