title: Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Chip-off fracture of veneering porcelain has been described as the most frequent reason for the failure of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of two commercial zirconia core ceramics to their corresponding veneering ceramics.
  
  
  METHODS
  Zirconia disks with 7-mm diameter and 3-mm height were prepared (Cercon and Biodenta systems) and veneered with recommended layering ceramics (Cercon ceram and 2 in 1 ceramic, respectively) (n = 10). The disks were polished with diamond paste and airborne-particle abraded before layering. The specimens were mounted in a T-shaped metal holder using autopolymerized acrylic resin and stored in 37°C distilled water for one week, after which they were subjected to thermal cycling. SBS of zirconia core to veneering ceramic was measured using a universal testing machine and failure modes were determined microscopically. Data were analyzed using t test (α < 0.05).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mean (±SD) SBS values were 27.19(±3.43) and 28.22(±4.08) MPa for Cercon and Biodenta systems, respectively, with no significant difference. Biodenta system showed more adhesive failure compared to more combined (adhesive and cohesive) failures in Cercon system.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Within the limitations of this study it can be concluded that SBS of Biodenta and Cercon specimens were nearly the same, but the fracture mode of these two systems were different. Since Biodenta fracture pattern was predominantly adhesive, it seems that maybe Biodenta porcelain was stronger than Cercon porcelain where as its adhesive bond was weaker.
authors.affiliation: Dental Implant Research Center and Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
authors.forename: Mansour
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Rismanchian
authors.forename: Soufia
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Shafiei
authors.forename: Navid
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Askari
authors.forename: Niloufar
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Khodaeian
keywords: Failure mode; shear bond strength; veneering ceramic; zirconia
references.citation: J Dent Res. 2007 Feb;86(2):142-6
references.pmid: 17251513
references.citation: J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Mar;32(3):180-7
references.pmid: 15707428
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Dec;15(6):654-66
references.pmid: 15533126
references.citation: Acta Odontol Scand. 1991 Feb;49(1):35-40
references.pmid: 2024573
references.citation: J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Jan;99(1):54-9
references.pmid: 18182186
references.citation: J Biomed Mater Res. 1989 Jan;23(1):45-61
references.pmid: 2708404
references.citation: Dent Mater. 2006 Sep;22(9):857-63
references.pmid: 16376981
references.citation: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994 Dec;22(6):448-52
references.pmid: 7882661
references.citation: J Dent. 2003 Mar;31(3):181-8
references.pmid: 12726702
references.citation: Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Jul-Aug;20(4):383-8
references.pmid: 17695869
references.citation: J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Apr;79(4):459-64
references.pmid: 9576323
references.citation: Quintessence Int. 2006 Oct;37(9):685-93
references.pmid: 17017630
references.citation: Dent Mater. 2007 May;23(5):630-6
references.pmid: 16844212
references.citation: J Oral Rehabil. 1999 Feb;26(2):91-6
references.pmid: 10080304
references.citation: Int J Prosthodont. 2005 Jan-Feb;18(1):71-2
references.pmid: 15754896
references.citation: J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Aug;94(2):125-31
references.pmid: 16046966
references.citation: Dent Mater. 2008 Nov;24(11):1556-67
references.pmid: 18466964
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:86-96
references.pmid: 17594373
references.citation: Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Mar-Apr;17(2):142-9
references.pmid: 15119863
references.citation: Oper Dent. 1993 Mar-Apr;18(2):61-5
references.pmid: 8337183
references.citation: Int J Comput Dent. 2001 Apr;4(2):89-106
references.pmid: 11697309
references.citation: Int J Comput Dent. 2004 Jan;7(1):25-45
references.pmid: 15317306
references.citation: Dent Mater. 2005 Oct;21(10):984-91
references.pmid: 16085302
references.citation: J Dent Res. 1987 Aug;66(8):1341-5
references.pmid: 3305635
references.citation: J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Nov;90(5):465-73
references.pmid: 14586311
references.citation: Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2000;110(12):131-9
references.pmid: 11396401
references.citation: Dent Mater J. 2008 May;27(3):448-54
references.pmid: 18717175
references.citation: J Dent. 2008 May;36(5):316-21
references.pmid: 18339469
references.citation: J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Dec;92(6):557-62
references.pmid: 15583562
references.citation: J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Oct;100(4):274-84
references.pmid: 18922256
references.citation: Dent Mater. 2008 Oct;24(10):1400-4
references.pmid: 18417202
references.citation: J Prosthet Dent. 2010 May;103(5):267-74
references.pmid: 20416409
references.citation: Dent Mater. 2007 Jan;23(1):115-23
references.pmid: 16473403
references.citation: Dent Mater J. 2010 Mar;29(2):138-46
references.pmid: 20379023
references.citation: J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Oct;96(4):237-44
references.pmid: 17052467
references.citation: J Prosthet Dent. 1984 Mar;51(3):338-42
references.pmid: 6584601
references.citation: J Adv Prosthodont. 2009 Nov;1(3):129-35
references.pmid: 21165268
references.citation: J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Apr;91(4):349-55
references.pmid: 15116036
references.citation: J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Jul;76(1):23-8
references.pmid: 8814630
references.citation: J Prosthodont. 2008 Jan;17(1):9-13
references.pmid: 17931369
references.citation: Dent Mater. 2005 Mar;21(3):242-51
references.pmid: 15705431