title: PCR testing of a ventilated caging system to detect murine fur mites.
abstract: Rodents housed in microisolation caging are commonly monitored for infectious agents by the use of soiled bedding sentinels. This strategy relies on the successful transmission of rodent pathogens from the index rodents via soiled bedding to sentinel cages and the subsequent infection or colonization of sentinel rodents. When the prevalence of a pathogen is low or the target agent is not readily transmitted by soiled bedding, alternative testing methodologies should be used. Given the continued prevalence of institutions self-reporting murine fur mites and with the advent of a new sensitive and specific PCR assay for mites, we sought to determine whether the exhaust system of an individual ventilated caging (IVC) system could be used for monitoring the rack's rodent population for mites rather than relying on the responses of sentinels. We deployed single cages of mice (Mus musculus) that were known to be infested with either Radfordia affinis or Myobia musculi on a 70-cage rack, sampled the horizontal exhaust manifolds weekly, and used the new PCR assay to test these samples for mite DNA. We detected the presence of fur mites at a 94.1% probability of detection within 4 wk of placement. Therefore, we recommend swabbing and testing the shelf exhaust manifolds of IVC racks rather than relying on soiled-bedding sentinels as an indicator of the mite status of the rodents on that rack.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA. ejensen@mcw.edu
authors.forename: Eric S
authors.initials: ES
authors.lastname: Jensen
authors.forename: Kenneth P
authors.initials: KP
authors.lastname: Allen
authors.forename: Kenneth S
authors.initials: KS
authors.lastname: Henderson
authors.forename: Aniko
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Szabo
authors.forename: Joseph D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Thulin
mesh_terms: D000827:Animal Welfare; D000818:Animals; D006799:Housing, Animal / Q000592:standards*; D051379:Mice; D008924:Mite Infestations / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000662:veterinary*; D008925:Mites / Q000235:genetics*; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D012376:Rodent Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000469:parasitology*
references.citation: J Dermatol Sci. 1999 Jan;19(1):37-43
references.pmid: 9890373
references.citation: Comp Med. 2004 Aug;54(4):382-92
references.pmid: 15357318
references.citation: Lab Anim Sci. 1989 Jul;39(4):324-7
references.pmid: 2548034
references.citation: ILAR J. 2008;49(3):272-6
references.pmid: 18506060
references.citation: Lab Anim. 2010 Jan;44(1):14-9
references.pmid: 19535389
references.citation: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2011 Jan;50(1):54-60
references.pmid: 21333164
references.citation: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2010 Sep;49(5):583-7
references.pmid: 20858359
references.citation: Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 1997 Mar;36(2):73-6
references.pmid: 16426026
references.citation: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2012 Mar;51(2):199-208
references.pmid: 22776120
references.citation: Lab Anim (NY). 2003 May;32(5):44-51
references.pmid: 19757616
references.citation: Lab Anim Sci. 1975 Aug;25(4):440-5
references.pmid: 1152418
references.citation: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2011 May;50(3):337-43
references.pmid: 21640028
references.citation: ILAR J. 2008;49(3):316-25
references.pmid: 18506065
references.citation: Scand J Immunol. 1996 Jun;43(6):604-12
references.pmid: 8658048