title: Parents Without Partners: Drosophila as a Model for Understanding the Mechanisms and Evolution of Parthenogenesis.
abstract: Of 40 Drosophila species screened to date, a majority have shown some ability to at least initiate parthenogenetic development. In one case, Drosophila mangebeirai, natural populations are entirely female, making it the only obligate parthenogenetic species of Drosophila Only a few of the species that exhibit the ability to undergo early embryonic development of unfertilized eggs successfully respond to selection for parthenogenetic production of adult flies. Laboratory strains of parthenogenetic Drosophila mercatorum have been created by artificial selection on multiple occasions, but the proportion of eggs undergoing development to adulthood has never exceeded 8%. Selection produces gains in the number of unfertilized eggs undergoing early development, but the majority arrest at the embryonic or first larval instar stages. Four components to successful parthenogenesis include (1) a female's propensity to lay unfertilized eggs, (2) the ability of the eggs to restore diploidy, (3) the ability of the parthenogenetically produced diploid embryo to complete larval development and pupation, and (4) the existence of genetic variability within and among Drosophila species in the frequency of parthenogenesis suggests the existence of multiple steps in its evolution and offers a way to explore the genetics of this unusual reproductive strategy.
authors.affiliation: Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California at San Diego, California 92093-0116, and Laboratorio Nacional de Genomica de la Biodiversidad, CINVESTAV, Irapuato, Guanajuato CP 36821, Mexico tmarkow@ucsd.edu.
authors.forename: Therese Ann
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Markow
references.citation: Genetics. 1986 Oct;114(2):495-509
references.pmid: 17246347
references.citation: Cell Cycle. 2005 Oct;4(10):1332-4
references.pmid: 16138012
references.citation: BMC Genet. 2010 Nov 16;11:104
references.pmid: 21080953
references.citation: Genetics. 2008 Apr;178(4):2017-29
references.pmid: 18430932
references.citation: Genes Dev. 2003 Dec 1;17(23):2979-91
references.pmid: 14665672
references.citation: Fly (Austin). 2012 Apr-Jun;6(2):98-101
references.pmid: 22627903
references.citation: Genetics. 1986 Feb;112(2):237-48
references.pmid: 17246314
references.citation: Adv Genet. 1950;3:193-253
references.pmid: 15425392
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 10;106(6):1838-43
references.pmid: 19181861
references.citation: Genetics. 1954 Jan;39(1):4-34
references.pmid: 17247466
references.citation: BMC Dev Biol. 2009 Jul 23;9:43
references.pmid: 19627584
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2002 Feb;88(2):85-93
references.pmid: 11932766
references.citation: Science. 1960 Sep 9;132(3428):677-8
references.pmid: 13817039
references.citation: Fly (Austin). 2007 Nov-Dec;1(6):317-29
references.pmid: 18820446
references.citation: Genetics. 1979 Aug;92(4):1283-93
references.pmid: 17248952
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2006 Jul 25;16(14):1435-40
references.pmid: 16860743
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 16;106 Suppl 1:10017-24
references.pmid: 19528648
references.citation: Genetics. 1960 Mar;45(3):243-56
references.pmid: 17247922
references.citation: Genet Res. 2004 Apr;83(2):83-9
references.pmid: 15219153
references.citation: Development. 2009 Sep;136(18):3033-42
references.pmid: 19700615
references.citation: Genetics. 1976 Mar 25;82(3):527-42
references.pmid: 1269907
references.citation: Genetics. 1967 Jan;55(1):157-71
references.pmid: 6031599
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 1965 Feb;20:9-19
references.pmid: 14300932
references.citation: Genetics. 1969 Nov;63(3):619-28
references.pmid: 5399250