title: Disadvantaged populations in maternal health in China who and why?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  China has made impressive progress towards the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) for maternal and reproductive health, but ensuring that progress reaches all segments of the population remains a challenge for policy makers. The aim of this review is to map disadvantaged populations in terms of maternal health in China, and to explain the causes of these inequities to promote policy action.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched PUBMED, Popline, Proquest and WanFang and included primary studies conducted in mainland China. Experts were also contacted to identify additional studies. Disadvantaged populations in terms of MDG 5 and the reasons for this disadvantage explored by authors were identified and coded based on the conceptual framework developed by the WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In China, differences in maternal health service utilization and the maternal mortality ratio among different income groups, and among regions with different socio-economic development still exist, although these differences are narrowing. Groups with low levels of education and ethnic minorities utilize maternal health care less frequently and experience higher maternal mortality, although we could not determine whether these differences have changed in the last decade. Rural-to-urban migrants use maternal health care and contraception to a lower extent than permanent residents of cities, and differential maternal mortality shows a widening trend among these groups. Gender inequity also contributes to the disadvantaged position of women. Intermediary factors that explain these inequities include material circumstances such as long distances to health facilities for women living in remote areas, behavioral factors such as traditional beliefs that result in reduced care seeking among ethnic minorities, and health system determinants such as out-of-pocket payments posing financial barriers for the poor.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Inequity in maternal health continues to be an issue worthy of greater programmatic and monitoring efforts in China.
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health, Division of Global Health (IHCAR), Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden. ybb5231@gmail.com
authors.forename: Beibei
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Yuan
authors.forename: Xu
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Qian
authors.forename: Sarah
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Thomsen
mesh_terms: D002681:China; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008427:Maternal Health Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008428:Maternal Mortality / Q000639:trends; D008429:Maternal Welfare; D011204:Poverty Areas; D012111:Residence Characteristics; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D012962:Sociology, Medical; D035862:Vulnerable Populations / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*
keywords: China; disadvantaged populations; equity; maternal health
references.citation: BJOG. 2009 Feb;116(3):401-7
references.pmid: 19187372
references.citation: Matern Child Health J. 2012 Feb;16(2):501-9
references.pmid: 21431861
references.citation: Asia Pac J Public Health. 2011 Sep;23(5):682-9
references.pmid: 21852422
references.citation: BJOG. 2007 Jul;114(7):865-74
references.pmid: 17506792
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2010 Nov 15;10:695
references.pmid: 21073757
references.citation: BMC Womens Health. 2009 Mar 20;9:5
references.pmid: 19298681
references.citation: Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011 Oct;16(5):359-68
references.pmid: 21848390
references.citation: Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Dec;27(12):1038-42
references.pmid: 17415981
references.citation: Health Care Women Int. 2009 Nov;30(11):957-70
references.pmid: 19809900
references.citation: Midwifery. 2011 Dec;27(6):e260-6
references.pmid: 21145633
references.citation: Sex Transm Infect. 2008 Dec;84(7):554-5
references.pmid: 18653565
references.citation: Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1999 Oct;47 Suppl 2:2S133-56
references.pmid: 10575716
references.citation: BJOG. 2009 Nov;116(12):1640-5
references.pmid: 19735377
references.citation: Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Nov;31(11):1259-63
references.pmid: 21176688
references.citation: J Clin Nurs. 2011 Jun;20(11-12):1685-95
references.pmid: 21255168
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2001 Mar;52(5):745-61
references.pmid: 11218178
references.citation: Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Mar;29(3):224-9
references.pmid: 18788518
references.citation: Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Sep;27(9):780-4
references.pmid: 17299964
references.citation: Reprod Health Matters. 2001 May;9(17):118-27
references.pmid: 11468827
references.citation: J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008 Dec;34(6):986-93
references.pmid: 19012697
references.citation: Stud Fam Plann. 2010 Mar;41(1):31-44
references.pmid: 21465720
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 19;11:243
references.pmid: 21501529
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2011 Feb;66(2):103-8
references.pmid: 21592416
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Nov;111(2):148-51
references.pmid: 20800839
references.citation: Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Jan;27(1):9-11
references.pmid: 16737563
references.citation: Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2010 Sep;4(3):122-9
references.pmid: 25031093
references.citation: Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011 Feb;16(1):26-35
references.pmid: 21158522
references.citation: Lancet. 2011 Sep 24;378(9797):1139-65
references.pmid: 21937100
references.citation: Popul Stud (Camb). 2007 Jul;61(2):161-83
references.pmid: 17558884
references.citation: Health Policy Plan. 2010 Jul;25(4):311-8
references.pmid: 20100776
references.citation: Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Mar;27(3):223-5
references.pmid: 16792889
references.citation: Midwifery. 2010 Oct;26(5):544-8
references.pmid: 20708312
references.citation: Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Dec;27(12):1029-32
references.pmid: 17415979
references.citation: BJOG. 2010 Nov;117(12):1527-36
references.pmid: 20937073
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Sep;106(3):262-5
references.pmid: 19368919
references.citation: J Med Ethics. 2001 Aug;27(4):275-83
references.pmid: 11479360
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2004 Aug;59(4):695-708
references.pmid: 15177828
references.citation: Health Econ. 2002 Dec;11(8):659-66
references.pmid: 12457367
references.citation: Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2011 Mar;40(2):201-3
references.pmid: 21560309
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Sep;114(3):260-4
references.pmid: 21752373
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Jun 1;89(6):432-41
references.pmid: 21673859
references.citation: Trop Med Int Health. 2010 Oct;15(10):1210-7
references.pmid: 20636298
references.citation: Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Sep;37(5):342-5
references.pmid: 14680597
references.citation: Popul Stud (Camb). 2004;58(1):3-19
references.pmid: 15204259
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2011 Feb 02;11:74
references.pmid: 21284893
references.citation: Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Oct;30(10):1025-9
references.pmid: 20193382
references.citation: Reprod Health Matters. 2002 Nov;10(20):108-16
references.pmid: 12557647
references.citation: Reprod Health Matters. 2003 Nov;11(22):142-51
references.pmid: 14708405
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Oct;85(10):812-9
references.pmid: 18038064
references.citation: Reprod Health Matters. 2010 Nov;18(36):35-45
references.pmid: 21111349
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Aug;110(2):93-6
references.pmid: 20471015
references.citation: Lancet. 2008 Apr 12;371(9620):1259-67
references.pmid: 18406860