title: Comparing the sensitivity of geographically distinct Lemna minor populations to atrazine.
abstract: The objectives of this study were to compare the sensitivities of field populations and a laboratory culture of a duckweed species (Lemna minor) to the herbicide atrazine using three different endpoints and to determine whether sensitivity to atrazine was affected by past exposure to the herbicide. L. minor cultures were purchased commercially or collected from field sites within an agricultural watershed and exposed to atrazine for 7 days under greenhouse conditions. Populations differed significantly in their sensitivity to atrazine. Biomass was more sensitive than frond number, while chlorophyll fluorescence was not a sensitive endpoint. Overall, the sensitivity of the various populations to atrazine was not strongly related to measures of past exposure to agriculture stressors. Positive correlations between biomass twenty-five percent inhibition concentrations (IC25s), biomass estimated marginal means and in-stream atrazine concentrations were observed, providing evidence that atrazine exposure is linked to a decrease in sensitivity to atrazine. However, IC25s generated for each population were similar, ranging from 19 to 40 and 57 to 92 μg/L atrazine for biomass and frond data respectively, and likely do not represent biologically significant differences in atrazine sensitivity. Given the small range in sensitivity observed between populations, commercial laboratory cultures appear to provide a good estimate of the sensitivity of field populations of L. minor to atrazine and should continue to be used in regulatory phytotoxicity testing.
authors.affiliation: Ottawa-Carleton Institute of Biology, University of Ottawa, 30 Marie Curie, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada. rdalt018@uottawa.ca
authors.forename: Rebecca L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Dalton
authors.forename: Christina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Nussbaumer
authors.forename: Frances R
authors.initials: FR
authors.lastname: Pick
authors.forename: Céline
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Boutin
mesh_terms: D029064:Araceae / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000254:growth & development; D001280:Atrazine / Q000032:analysis / Q000633:toxicity*; D018533:Biomass; D023381:Endpoint Determination; D005843:Geography; D006540:Herbicides / Q000032:analysis / Q000633:toxicity*; D017711:Nonlinear Dynamics; D013312:Stress, Physiological; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000633:toxicity
chemical_list: D006540:Herbicides; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical; D001280:Atrazine
references.citation: Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1994 Jul;53(1):120-6
references.pmid: 8069061
references.citation: Environ Int. 2004 Aug;30(6):811-4
references.pmid: 15120200
references.citation: Chemosphere. 2011 Feb;82(8):1155-60
references.pmid: 21215422
references.citation: Environ Toxicol. 2005 Feb;20(1):67-73
references.pmid: 15712290
references.citation: Aquat Toxicol. 2010 Mar 1;96(4):256-63
references.pmid: 20004984
references.citation: J Environ Monit. 2011 Sep;13(9):2582-7
references.pmid: 21811729
references.citation: Acta Biol Hung. 2001;52(1):179-85
references.pmid: 11396838
references.citation: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2010 May;17(4):820-3
references.pmid: 20191396
references.citation: Environ Res. 1990 Jun;52(1):7-22
references.pmid: 2190824
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Sep 04;3(9):e3133
references.pmid: 18769541
references.citation: Chemosphere. 2007 Feb;67(1):194-201
references.pmid: 17083966
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2004 Jan 5;318(1-3):101-14
references.pmid: 14654278
references.citation: Aquat Toxicol. 2009 Jan 18;91(1):1-9
references.pmid: 19027182
references.citation: Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2007 Jul;3(3):466-7
references.pmid: 17695122