title: Is "Cootie" in the Eye of the Beholder? An Experimental Attempt to Modify Implicit Associations Tied to Contamination Fears.
abstract: To examine the causal link between implicit associations and fear reduction, a conditioning paradigm was used in an attempt to modify contamination-related implicit associations for individuals high in contamination fear. Individuals (N= 81) were assigned to a Positive, Neutral, or No Training condition. In the Positive training condition, individuals clicked on images of potential contaminants that were followed by images of the individual's smiling face or by an approach-related word. Positive training was hypothesized to result in decreased behavioral avoidance and emotional vulnerability ratings during subsequent behavioral avoidance tasks. In the Neutral training control condition, the images of potential contaminants were followed by an equal mix of the individual's smiling, disgusted, and fearful faces or an avoidance-related word. The No Training condition served as an additional control group. Contrary to expectations, training did not shift implicit associations, nor did it affect avoidance or emotional vulnerability ratings. These results raise questions about the most appropriate form and dosage of training for this population - we conclude with suggestions for researchers to learn from these null findings when developing new training programs.
authors.affiliation: University of Virginia.
authors.forename: Jennifer S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Green
authors.forename: Bethany A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Teachman
keywords: Contamination fear; Implicit associations; Information processing
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Dec;76(6):988-1002
references.pmid: 19045967
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 2007 Feb;45(2):263-76
references.pmid: 16697976
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 2008 Apr;46(4):537-47
references.pmid: 18313031
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 2004 Nov;42(11):1289-314
references.pmid: 15381439
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 1997 Jan;35(1):49-58
references.pmid: 9009043
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 2004 Nov;42(11):1227-55
references.pmid: 15381436
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2011 Apr;22(4):490-7
references.pmid: 21389338
references.citation: J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;37(1):30-40
references.pmid: 16226217
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jun;74(6):1464-80
references.pmid: 9654756
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2004 Jul;15(7):498-502
references.pmid: 15200636
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Dec;76(6):1003-14
references.pmid: 19045968
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2010 Feb;119(1):136-42
references.pmid: 20141250
references.citation: Br J Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;44(Pt 2):227-39
references.pmid: 16004657
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 2007 Sep;45(9):2110-20
references.pmid: 17481576
references.citation: Psychol Assess. 2007 Sep;19(3):281-97
references.pmid: 17845120
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1992 Oct;45(3):503-25
references.pmid: 1308736
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 1996 Feb;34(2):163-73
references.pmid: 8741724
references.citation: J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Apr;24(3):300-8
references.pmid: 20102788
references.citation: Clin Psychol Rev. 2004 Dec;24(8):1011-30
references.pmid: 15533282
references.citation: J Cogn Psychother. 2009;23(4):294-305
references.pmid: 21072138
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):197-216
references.pmid: 12916565
references.citation: Exp Psychol. 2009;56(4):283-94
references.pmid: 19439401
references.citation: J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Jan;23(1):118-23
references.pmid: 18541403