title: Enabling interspecies epigenomic comparison with CEpBrowser.
abstract: CONCLUSIONS
  We developed the Comparative Epigenome Browser (CEpBrowser) to allow the public to perform multi-species epigenomic analysis. The web-based CEpBrowser integrates, manages and visualizes sequencing-based epigenomic datasets. Five key features were developed to maximize the efficiency of interspecies epigenomic comparisons.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  CEpBrowser is a web application implemented with PHP, MySQL, C and Apache. URL: http://www.cepbrowser.org/.
authors.affiliation: Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
authors.forename: Xiaoyi
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Cao
authors.forename: Sheng
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Zhong
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D057890:Epigenomics / Q000379:methods*; D059014:High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; D020407:Internet; D012984:Software
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Oct;28(10):1039-44
references.pmid: 20944594
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Aug;28(8):817-25
references.pmid: 20657582
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Nov 19;462(7271):315-22
references.pmid: 19829295
references.citation: Nature. 2011 Feb 10;470(7333):279-83
references.pmid: 21160473
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan;39(Database issue):D800-6
references.pmid: 21045057
references.citation: Cell. 2008 Jun 13;133(6):1106-17
references.pmid: 18555785
references.citation: Nature. 2011 May 5;473(7345):43-9
references.pmid: 21441907
references.citation: Genome Res. 2013 Feb;23(2):352-64
references.pmid: 23033340
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2011 Nov 29;8(12):989-90
references.pmid: 22127213
references.citation: Science. 2004 Oct 22;306(5696):636-40
references.pmid: 15499007
references.citation: Nature. 2011 Sep 28;477(7366):518
references.pmid: 21956305
references.citation: Cell. 2010 Oct 1;143(1):156-69
references.pmid: 20887899
references.citation: Science. 2010 Apr 9;328(5975):235-9
references.pmid: 20299549
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:439-66, C1-3
references.pmid: 19958180
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Oct;28(10):1045-8
references.pmid: 20944595
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 11;107(19):8689-94
references.pmid: 20395551
references.citation: Circ Res. 2010 Aug 6;107(3):327-39
references.pmid: 20689072
references.citation: Genome Res. 2002 Jun;12(6):996-1006
references.pmid: 12045153
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Oct;28(10):1053-6
references.pmid: 20944597
references.citation: Cell. 2007 Feb 23;128(4):669-81
references.pmid: 17320505
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2010 Jan;7(1):47-9
references.pmid: 19946276
references.citation: Cell. 2012 Jun 8;149(6):1381-92
references.pmid: 22682255
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2009 Apr;6(4):239-40
references.pmid: 19333237