title: Global taxonomic diversity of living reptiles.
abstract: Reptiles are one of the most ecologically and evolutionarily remarkable groups of living organisms, having successfully colonized most of the planet, including the oceans and some of the harshest and more environmentally unstable ecosystems on earth. Here, based on a complete dataset of all the world's diversity of living reptiles, we analyse lineage taxonomic richness both within and among clades, at different levels of the phylogenetic hierarchy. We also analyse the historical tendencies in the descriptions of new reptile species from Linnaeus to March 2012. Although (non-avian) reptiles are the second most species-rich group of amniotes after birds, most of their diversity (96.3%) is concentrated in squamates (59% lizards, 35% snakes, and 2% amphisbaenians). In strong contrast, turtles (3.4%), crocodilians (0.3%), and tuataras (0.01%) are far less diverse. In terms of species discoveries, most turtles and crocodilians were described early, while descriptions of lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians are multimodal with respect to time. Lizard descriptions, in particular, have reached unprecedented levels during the last decade. Finally, despite such remarkably asymmetric distributions of reptile taxonomic diversity among groups, we found that the distributions of lineage richness are consistently right-skewed, with most clades (monophyletic families and genera) containing few lineages (monophyletic genera and species, respectively), while only a few have radiated greatly (notably the families Colubridae and Scincidae, and the lizard genera Anolis and Liolaemus). Therefore, such consistency in the frequency distribution of richness among clades and among phylogenetic levels suggests that the nature of reptile biodiversity is fundamentally fractal (i.e., it is scale invariant). We then compared current reptile diversity with the global reptile diversity and taxonomy known in 1980. Despite substantial differences in the taxonomies (relative to 2012), the patterns of lineage richness remain qualitatively identical, hence reinforcing our conclusions about the fractal nature of reptile biodiversity.
authors.affiliation: Laboratory of Evolutionary Ecology of Adaptations, School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Riseholme Park, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom. DPincheiraDonoso@lincoln.ac.uk
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Pincheira-Donoso
authors.forename: Aaron M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Bauer
authors.forename: Shai
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Meiri
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Uetz
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D038622:Internationality; D010802:Phylogeny; D012104:Reptiles / Q000145:classification*; D013045:Species Specificity
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28942
references.pmid: 22194953
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1997 Jun;12(6):218-22
references.pmid: 21238045
references.citation: Am Nat. 2000 Apr;155(4):419-434
references.pmid: 10753072
references.citation: Science. 1999 Feb 12;283(5404):998-1001
references.pmid: 9974396
references.citation: Am Nat. 2010 Jun;175(6):623-39
references.pmid: 20412015
references.citation: Evolution. 2008 Nov;62(11):2727-41
references.pmid: 18764918
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 Jan;9(1):27-31
references.pmid: 21236760
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012 Jan;62(1):496-507
references.pmid: 22100825
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 5;103(27):10334-10339
references.pmid: 16801546
references.citation: Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 1860 Apr;25(50):367-404
references.pmid: 30164232
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2004 Oct;53(5):735-57
references.pmid: 15545252
references.citation: Evolution. 2010 Apr 1;64(4):934-43
references.pmid: 19895554
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27373
references.pmid: 22087300
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Feb 27;8:68
references.pmid: 18304333
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Feb 2;439(7076):584-8
references.pmid: 16292255
references.citation: Am Nat. 2009 Aug;174(2):204-20
references.pmid: 19538089
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2011 Jul;60(1):62-7
references.pmid: 21463698
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012 Dec;65(3):992-1003
references.pmid: 22982633
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2010 Jan;59(1):42-58
references.pmid: 20525619
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):391-399
references.pmid: 11403872
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2010 Dec;59(6):674-88
references.pmid: 20930035
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2012 Dec 23;8(6):1043-6
references.pmid: 22993238
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Oct 7;274(1624):2399-408
references.pmid: 17686731
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2010 May 13;10:141
references.pmid: 20465814
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2009 Mar;12(3):249-59
references.pmid: 19245587
references.citation: Gene. 2007 Feb 15;388(1-2):19-26
references.pmid: 17118581
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2007 Sep;20(5):1751-62
references.pmid: 17714293
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2011 Feb;58(2):329-42
references.pmid: 21074626
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Nov 30;101(48):16819-24
references.pmid: 15550549
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2004 Mar;17(2):408-20
references.pmid: 15009274
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2011 Nov;61(2):363-80
references.pmid: 21787873
references.citation: Zootaxa. 2018 Jan 24;4375(2):257-264
references.pmid: 29689772