title: Power and predictive accuracy of polygenic risk scores.
abstract: Polygenic scores have recently been used to summarise genetic effects among an ensemble of markers that do not individually achieve significance in a large-scale association study. Markers are selected using an initial training sample and used to construct a score in an independent replication sample by forming the weighted sum of associated alleles within each subject. Association between a trait and this composite score implies that a genetic signal is present among the selected markers, and the score can then be used for prediction of individual trait values. This approach has been used to obtain evidence of a genetic effect when no single markers are significant, to establish a common genetic basis for related disorders, and to construct risk prediction models. In some cases, however, the desired association or prediction has not been achieved. Here, the power and predictive accuracy of a polygenic score are derived from a quantitative genetics model as a function of the sizes of the two samples, explained genetic variance, selection thresholds for including a marker in the score, and methods for weighting effect sizes in the score. Expressions are derived for quantitative and discrete traits, the latter allowing for case/control sampling. A novel approach to estimating the variance explained by a marker panel is also proposed. It is shown that published studies with significant association of polygenic scores have been well powered, whereas those with negative results can be explained by low sample size. It is also shown that useful levels of prediction may only be approached when predictors are estimated from very large samples, up to an order of magnitude greater than currently available. Therefore, polygenic scores currently have more utility for association testing than predicting complex traits, but prediction will become more feasible as sample sizes continue to grow.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. frank.dudbridge@lshtm.ac.uk
authors.forename: Frank
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Dudbridge
mesh_terms: D055106:Genome-Wide Association Study; D006801:Humans; D016014:Linear Models; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D020412:Multifactorial Inheritance / Q000235:genetics*; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; D040641:Quantitative Trait Loci / Q000235:genetics*
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2009 Jul;5(7):e1000540
references.pmid: 19584936
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3395
references.pmid: 18852893
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 2010 Jan;67(1):3-10
references.pmid: 20186855
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2008 Jul 25;4(7):e1000130
references.pmid: 18654633
references.citation: Genet Med. 2007 Aug;9(8):528-35
references.pmid: 17700391
references.citation: Genet Med. 2006 Jul;8(7):395-400
references.pmid: 16845271
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Oct 14;467(7317):832-8
references.pmid: 20881960
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2010 Dec 02;6(12):e1001230
references.pmid: 21151957
references.citation: Mol Autism. 2010 Feb 22;1(1):4
references.pmid: 20678243
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2011 Mar 11;88(3):294-305
references.pmid: 21376301
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2012 Jan 13;90(1):7-24
references.pmid: 22243964
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2011 Sep 18;43(10):977-83
references.pmid: 21926972
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2012 Mar 25;44(5):483-9
references.pmid: 22446960
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2011 Jun 15;20(12):2435-42
references.pmid: 21427131
references.citation: Hum Genet. 2011 Feb;129(2):221-30
references.pmid: 21104096
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2002 May;31(1):33-6
references.pmid: 11984562
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2010 Nov;42(11):937-48
references.pmid: 20935630
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):986-93
references.pmid: 20237344
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2011 Sep 18;43(10):969-76
references.pmid: 21926974
references.citation: Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Jul;19(7):807-12
references.pmid: 21407268
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;32(3):227-34
references.pmid: 18300295
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2010 Feb 26;6(2):e1000864
references.pmid: 20195508
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 26;358(26):2796-803
references.pmid: 18579814
references.citation: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 Jul;10(7):733-41
references.pmid: 11440958
references.citation: OMICS. 2011 Jun;15(6):393-8
references.pmid: 21348634
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Aug 6;460(7256):748-52
references.pmid: 19571811
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Aug 6;460(7256):753-7
references.pmid: 19571809
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;29(1):158-67
references.pmid: 10750618
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2012 Feb 19;44(3):247-50
references.pmid: 22344220
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;35(6):506-514
references.pmid: 21618606
references.citation: BMC Med Genet. 2011 Oct 26;12:146
references.pmid: 22029572
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2009 Mar 15;25(6):714-21
references.pmid: 19176549
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;36(3):214-24
references.pmid: 22714935
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;198(4):284-8
references.pmid: 21972277
references.citation: Genome Res. 2007 Oct;17(10):1520-8
references.pmid: 17785532
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2010 Jul;42(7):565-9
references.pmid: 20562875
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2010 Apr 9;86(4):621-5
references.pmid: 20362272
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2009 Sep 15;18(18):3525-31
references.pmid: 19553258