title: Advance information modulates the global effect even without instruction on where to look.
abstract: When observers are asked to make an eye movement to a visual target in the presence of a near distractor, their eyes tend to land on a position in between the target and the distractor, an effect known as the global effect. While it was initially believed that the global effect is a mandatory eye movement strategy, recent studies have shown that explicit instructions to make an eye movement to a certain part of the scene can overrule the effect. We here investigate whether such top-down influences are also found when people are not actively involved in an explicit eye movement task, but instead, make eye movements in the service of another task. Participants were presented with arrays of yellow and green discs, each containing a letter, and were asked to identify a target letter. Because the discs were presented away from fixation, participants made an eye movement to the array of discs on most of the trials. An analysis of the landing sites of these eye movements revealed that, even without an explicit instruction, observers take the advance information about the colour of the disc containing the target into account before moving their eyes. Moreover, when asking participants to maintain fixation for intervals of different durations, it was found that the implicit top-down influences operated on a very similar time-scale as previously observed for explicit eye movement instructions.
authors.affiliation: Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, bus 3711, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. frouke.hermens@gmail.com
authors.forename: Frouke
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Hermens
authors.forename: Tandra
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Ghose
authors.forename: Johan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Wagemans
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D025461:Feedback, Physiological / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012438:Saccades; D013997:Time Factors; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Percept Mot Skills. 1972 Apr;34(2):499-508
references.pmid: 5063190
references.citation: Vision Res. 1985;25(6):849-62
references.pmid: 4024483
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jan;97(1):795-805
references.pmid: 17108094
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 2010 Apr;102(4):271-91
references.pmid: 20162429
references.citation: Optom Vis Sci. 2000 Jun;77(6):321-30
references.pmid: 10879789
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Feb 15;13(2):256-71
references.pmid: 11244550
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Oct;102(4):2387-95
references.pmid: 19657078
references.citation: Vision Res. 2006 Jul;46(14):2204-16
references.pmid: 16494920
references.citation: Vision Res. 1997 Mar;37(5):617-31
references.pmid: 9156206
references.citation: Vision Res. 1982;22(8):1033-45
references.pmid: 7135840
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 31;31(35):12501-12
references.pmid: 21880912
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982 Feb;8(1):113-26
references.pmid: 6460077
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Jul;125(3):279-90
references.pmid: 17022930
references.citation: Vision Res. 1987;27(2):227-40
references.pmid: 3576983
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Aug;20(3):525-8
references.pmid: 15268929
references.citation: Vision Res. 1984;24(10):1169-79
references.pmid: 6523740
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1995 Jun;73(6):2313-33
references.pmid: 7666141
references.citation: Vision Res. 1989;29(9):1165-81
references.pmid: 2617863
references.citation: Vision Res. 2009 Jun;49(10):1267-74
references.pmid: 18691610
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1997 Aug;78(2):1108-19
references.pmid: 9307138
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1995 Jun;73(6):2334-48
references.pmid: 7666142