title: The Effects of Childhood Health on Adult Health and SES in China.
abstract: In this paper, we model the associations of childhood health on adult health and socio-economic status outcomes in China using a new sample of middle aged and older Chinese respondents. Modeled after the American Health and Retirement Survey (HRS), the CHARLS Pilot survey respondents are 45 years and older in two quite distinct provinces-Zhejiang, a high growth industrialized province on the East Coast and Gansu, a largely agricultural and poor province in the West. Childhood health in CHARLS relies on two measures that proxy for different dimensions of health during the childhood years. The first is a retrospective self-evaluation using a standard five-point scale (excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor) of general state of one's health when one was less than 16 years old. The second is adult height believed to be a good measure of levels of nutrition during early childhood and the prenatal period. We relate both these childhood health measures to adult health and SES outcomes during the adult years. We find strong associations of childhood health on adult health outcomes particularly among Chinese women and strong associations with adult BMI particularly for Chinese men.
authors.affiliation: Chair in Labor Markets and Demographic Studies, The RAND Corporation.
authors.forename: James P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: Yan
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Shen
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Strauss
authors.forename: Yang
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Zhe
authors.forename: Yaohui
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Zhao
references.citation: J Popul Ageing. 2010 Dec 1;3(3-4):111-142
references.pmid: 23539329
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jul;71(1):110-5
references.pmid: 20427110
references.citation: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1997 Jan;11(1):2-20
references.pmid: 9018723
references.citation: Am Econ Rev. ;92(5):1308-34
references.pmid: 29058397
references.citation: J Econ Perspect. 2008 Winter;22(1):129-152
references.pmid: 19771661
references.citation: Lancet. 2008 Feb 2;371(9610):411-6
references.pmid: 18242415
references.citation: J Health Econ. 2011 Jan;30(1):1-10
references.pmid: 21051095
references.citation: J Health Econ. 2005 Mar;24(2):365-89
references.pmid: 15721050
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 12;108(15):6032-7
references.pmid: 21444801
references.citation: Am Econ Rev. ;93(5):1813-23
references.pmid: 29058847
references.citation: J Polit Econ. 2008;116(3):499-532
references.pmid: 19603086
references.citation: Rev Econ Stat. 2009 Sep 1;91(3):478-489
references.pmid: 23585697
references.citation: Nutrition. 1997 Sep;13(9):807-13
references.pmid: 9290095
references.citation: J Nutr. 1995 Apr;125(4 Suppl):1042S-1050S
references.pmid: 7722706
references.citation: J Econ Perspect. 1999 Spring;13(2):144-66
references.pmid: 15179962
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec;39(6):1435-40
references.pmid: 19887509
references.citation: Demography. 2009 May;46(2):387-403
references.pmid: 21305399