title: The diagnostic evaluation of a patient with dementia.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This review outlines a practical approach to the history, mental state, neurologic examination, and laboratory tests in the diagnosis of dementia.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Proposed new diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer disease recognize that nonamnestic presentations with symptoms that predominantly affect language, visuospatial abilities, or executive function may occur, particularly with onset before the age of 65. New criteria assign greater likelihood to diagnosis if progressive cognitive decline is documented through serial assessment, or if biomarkers are supportive. In patients aged 80 or older, more than one cause of dementia is often present, for example, Alzheimer disease plus vascular dementia. Clinical diagnostic criteria for non-Alzheimer dementias are evolving, particularly in areas such as frontotemporal dementia. Imaging and CSF biomarkers have been proposed in recent diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer disease. Although biomarkers can provide a higher level of certainty that Alzheimer pathology may or may not be present, biomarkers for non-Alzheimer dementias are lacking.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The availability of biomarkers does not replace or diminish the need for a thorough clinical evaluation. A structured clinical approach helps to define the diagnosis and collects information essential for establishing a comprehensive care plan for patients with dementia and their families.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurosciences, UC San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive 0948, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
authors.forename: Douglas
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Galasko
mesh_terms: D017668:Age of Onset; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015415:Biomarkers / Q000134:cerebrospinal fluid*; D003704:Dementia / Q000134:cerebrospinal fluid / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology; D018450:Disease Progression; D006801:Humans; D008609:Mental Status Schedule; D009460:Neurologic Examination
chemical_list: D015415:Biomarkers
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;68(6):617-26
references.pmid: 21646578
references.citation: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2010 Jun;25(4):301-16
references.pmid: 20539025
references.citation: Neurology. 2011 Mar 15;76(11):1006-14
references.pmid: 21325651
references.citation: Neurology. 2001 May 8;56(9):1143-53
references.pmid: 11342678
references.citation: Neurology. 2011 May 17;76(20):1711-9
references.pmid: 21471469
references.citation: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012;34(7):750-7
references.pmid: 22468719
references.citation: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;14(11):900-10
references.pmid: 17068312
references.citation: Mov Disord. 2011 Feb 1;26(2):256-63
references.pmid: 21412832
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 2011 Aug;70(2):327-40
references.pmid: 21823158
references.citation: Brain. 2011 Sep;134(Pt 9):2456-77
references.pmid: 21810890
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 2008 Jul;64(1):97-108
references.pmid: 18668637
references.citation: Neurology. 2011 Aug 30;77(9):875-82
references.pmid: 21849645
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:257-82
references.pmid: 18616392
references.citation: JAMA. 2007 Jun 6;297(21):2391-404
references.pmid: 17551132
references.citation: Lancet Neurol. 2012 Feb;11(2):170-8
references.pmid: 22265212
references.citation: Neurology. 2011 Dec 6;77(23):2034-42
references.pmid: 22131541
references.citation: Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9
references.pmid: 21514250
references.citation: Neurology. 2006 Dec 12;67(11):1942-8
references.pmid: 17159098