title: Analysis of Schistosomiasis haematobium infection prevalence and intensity in Chikhwawa, Malawi: an application of a two part model.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Urinary Schistosomiasis infection, a common cause of morbidity especially among children in less developed countries, is measured by the number of eggs per urine. Typically a large proportion of individuals are non-egg excretors, leading to a large number of zeros. Control strategies require better understanding of its epidemiology, hence appropriate methods to model infection prevalence and intensity are crucial, particularly if such methods add value to targeted implementation of interventions.
  
  
  METHODS
  We consider data that were collected in a cluster randomized study in 2004 in Chikhwawa district, Malawi, where eighteen (18) villages were selected and randomised to intervention and control arms. We developed a two-part model, with one part for analysis of infection prevalence and the other to model infection intensity. In both parts of the model we adjusted for age, sex, education level, treatment arm, occupation, and poly-parasitism. We also assessed for spatial correlation in the model residual using variogram analysis and mapped the spatial variation in risk. The model was fitted using maximum likelihood estimation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The study had a total of 1642 participants with mean age of 32.4 (Standard deviation: 22.8), of which 55.4 % were female. Schistosomiasis prevalence was 14.2 %, with a large proportion of individuals (85.8 %) being non-egg excretors, hence zero-inflated data. Our findings showed that S. haematobium was highly localized even after adjusting for risk factors. Prevalence of infection was low in males as compared to females across all the age ranges. S. haematobium infection increased with presence of co-infection with other parasite infection. Infection intensity was highly associated with age; with highest intensity in school-aged children (6 to 15 years). Fishing and working in gardens along the Shire River were potential risk factors for S. haematobium infection intensity. Intervention reduced both infection intensity and prevalence in the intervention arm as compared to control arm. Farmers had high infection intensity as compared to non farmers, despite the fact that being a farmer did not show any significant association with probability of infection. These results evidently indicate that infection prevalence and intensity are associated with risk factors differently, suggesting a non-singular epidemiological setting. The dominance of agricultural, socio-economic and demographic factors in determining S. haematobium infection and intensity suggest that disease transmission and control strategies should continue centring on improving socio-economic status, environmental modifications to control S. haematobium intermediate host snails and mass drug administration, which may be more promising approaches to disease control in high intensity and prevalence settings.
authors.affiliation: Malawi Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi. mikechipeta@yahoo.co.uk
authors.forename: Michael G
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Chipeta
authors.forename: Bagrey
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Ngwira
authors.forename: Lawrence N
authors.initials: LN
authors.lastname: Kazembe
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000871:Anthelmintics / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D008295:Malawi / Q000453:epidemiology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015233:Models, Statistical; D015995:Prevalence; D012307:Risk Factors; D012553:Schistosomiasis haematobia / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000469:parasitology* / Q000517:prevention & control; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D000871:Anthelmintics
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Dec;26(6):1392-400
references.pmid: 9447422
references.citation: BMC Infect Dis. 2009 Feb 19;9:20
references.pmid: 19228385
references.citation: Lancet. 2009 Oct 17;374(9698):1329
references.pmid: 19837252
references.citation: BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Jun 13;11:169
references.pmid: 21668948
references.citation: Int J Health Geogr. 2009 Jul 09;8:42
references.pmid: 19589144
references.citation: Int J Parasitol. 2006 Sep;36(10-11):1143-51
references.pmid: 16814294
references.citation: PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Jun;5(6):e1200
references.pmid: 21666800
references.citation: Acta Trop. 2000 Oct 23;77(1):41-51
references.pmid: 10996119
references.citation: Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2012 Feb;65(1):163-80
references.pmid: 21950803
references.citation: BMC Infect Dis. 2004 Oct 07;4:40
references.pmid: 15471549
references.citation: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002 Jan-Feb;96(1):29-33
references.pmid: 11925985
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Dec;87(12):921-9
references.pmid: 20454483
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Oct;77(4):672-5
references.pmid: 17978069
references.citation: Biometrics. 2000 Dec;56(4):1030-9
references.pmid: 11129458
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 2;103(18):6934-9
references.pmid: 16632601
references.citation: Parasitology. 2009 Nov;136(13):1695-705
references.pmid: 19490724
references.citation: Infect Immun. 1993 Dec;61(12):4984-93
references.pmid: 8225573
references.citation: Parasitology. 2001 May;122(Pt 5):537-44
references.pmid: 11393827
references.citation: Geospat Health. 2008 Nov;3(1):57-67
references.pmid: 19021109
references.citation: BMC Infect Dis. 2004 Nov 16;4:49
references.pmid: 15546483
references.citation: Lancet Infect Dis. 2006 Jul;6(7):411-25
references.pmid: 16790382
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Jan;70(1):48-56
references.pmid: 14971698
references.citation: Adv Parasitol. 2011;74:267-96
references.pmid: 21295680
references.citation: Acta Trop. 2003 May;86(2-3):161-83
references.pmid: 12745135
references.citation: BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Jan 22;12:16
references.pmid: 22264258