title: Pain measurement and brain activity: will neuroimages replace pain ratings?
abstract: Arguments made for the advantages of replacing pain ratings with brain-imaging data include assumptions that pain ratings are less reliable and objective and that brain image data would greatly benefit the measurement of treatment efficacy. None of these assumptions are supported by available evidence. Self-report of pain is predictable and does not necessarily reflect unreliability or error. Because pain is defined as an experience, magnitudes of its dimensions can be estimated by well-established methods, including those used to validate brain imaging of pain. Brain imaging helps to study pain mechanisms and might be used as proxy measures of pain in persons unable to provide verbal reports. Yet eliminating pain ratings or replacing them with neuroimaging data is misguided because brain images only help explain pain if they are used in conjunction with self-report. There is no objective readout mechanism of pain (pain thermometer) that is unaffected by psychological factors. Benefits from including neuroimaging data might include increased understanding of underlying neural mechanisms of treatment efficacy, discovery of new treatment vectors, and support of conclusions derived from self-report. However, neither brain imaging nor self-report data are privileged over the other. The assumption that treatment efficacy is hampered by self-report has not been shown; there is a plethora of treatment studies showing that self-report is sensitive to treatment. Dismissal of patients' self-reports (pain ratings) by brain-imaging data is potentially harmful. The aim of replacing self-report with brain-imaging data is misguided and has no scientific or philosophical foundation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although brain imaging may offer considerable insight into the neural mechanisms of pain, including relevant causes and correlations, brain images cannot and should not replace self-report. Only the latter assesses the experience of pain, which is not identical to neural activity. Brain imaging may help to explain pain, but replacing self-report with brain-imaging data would be philosophically and scientifically misguided and potentially harmful to pain patients.
authors.forename: Michael E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Robinson
authors.forename: Roland
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Staud
authors.forename: Donald D
authors.initials: DD
authors.lastname: Price
mesh_terms: D001921:Brain; D006801:Humans; D059906:Neuroimaging; D010146:Pain; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000379:methods*; D057566:Self Report
references.citation: Pain. 2002 Sep;99(1-2):49-59
references.pmid: 12237183
references.citation: Pain. 1983 Sep;17(1):45-56
references.pmid: 6226917
references.citation: Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3 Suppl):S49-S64
references.pmid: 21146929
references.citation: J Pain. 2005 May;6(5):323-32
references.pmid: 15890634
references.citation: Pain. 2002 Jul;98(1-2):205-16
references.pmid: 12098633
references.citation: Science. 2009 Jan 9;323(5911):195
references.pmid: 19131600
references.citation: Pain. 2007 Jan;127(1-2):63-72
references.pmid: 16963184
references.citation: Brain. 2001 May;124(Pt 5):916-27
references.pmid: 11335694
references.citation: Acad Radiol. 2005 Feb;12(2):164-72
references.pmid: 15721593
references.citation: J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008;36(4):491-8
references.pmid: 19092066
references.citation: Pain. 2008 Oct 31;139(3):660-669
references.pmid: 18804916
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 Dec;38(4):720-9
references.pmid: 17904390
references.citation: Pain. 1989 Jul;38(1):51-56
references.pmid: 2780063
references.citation: Health Psychol. 2007 Jan;26(1):1-9
references.pmid: 17209691
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8538-42
references.pmid: 12824463
references.citation: Pain. 1992 May;49(2):221-230
references.pmid: 1535122
references.citation: Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2005 Oct;9(5):316-21
references.pmid: 16157059
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Apr;93(4):2183-93
references.pmid: 15601733
references.citation: Eur J Pain. 2001;5(2):209-17
references.pmid: 11465986
references.citation: Pain. 2003 Sep;105(1-2):215-22
references.pmid: 14499438