title: Models in animal collective decision-making: information uncertainty and conflicting preferences.
abstract: Collective decision-making plays a central part in the lives of many social animals. Two important factors that influence collective decision-making are information uncertainty and conflicting preferences. Here, I bring together, and briefly review, basic models relating to animal collective decision-making in situations with information uncertainty and in situations with conflicting preferences between group members. The intention is to give an overview about the different types of modelling approaches that have been employed and the questions that they address and raise. Despite the use of a wide range of different modelling techniques, results show a coherent picture, as follows. Relatively simple cognitive mechanisms can lead to effective information pooling. Groups often face a trade-off between decision accuracy and speed, but appropriate fine-tuning of behavioural parameters could achieve high accuracy while maintaining reasonable speed. The right balance of interdependence and independence between animals is crucial for maintaining group cohesion and achieving high decision accuracy. In conflict situations, a high degree of decision-sharing between individuals is predicted, as well as transient leadership and leadership according to needs and physiological status. Animals often face crucial trade-offs between maintaining group cohesion and influencing the decision outcome in their own favour. Despite the great progress that has been made, there remains one big gap in our knowledge: how do animals make collective decisions in situations when information uncertainty and conflict of interest operate simultaneously?
authors.affiliation: LARG, Department of Zoology , University of Cambridge , Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ , UK.
authors.forename: Larissa
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Conradt
keywords: collective decisions; game-theory models; self-organizing systems
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Jan 9;421(6919):155-8
references.pmid: 12520299
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 7;278(1722):3270-6
references.pmid: 21411454
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):821-31
references.pmid: 19073477
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Feb 15;445(7129):715
references.pmid: 17301775
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):755-62
references.pmid: 19073474
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Nov 7;273(1602):2785-90
references.pmid: 17015328
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2008 Dec 9;18(23):1833-8
references.pmid: 19026539
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 17;108(20):8373-8
references.pmid: 21536882
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2006 Nov 7;16(21):2123-8
references.pmid: 17084696
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 May 13;105(19):6948-53
references.pmid: 18474860
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 11;103(15):5835-40
references.pmid: 16581903
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):845-52
references.pmid: 19073483
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 7;278(1712):1697-704
references.pmid: 21084348
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 24;103(43):15906-10
references.pmid: 17038502
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Apr;19(4):168-9
references.pmid: 16701250
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):743-53
references.pmid: 19073480
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Apr 8;464(7290):890-3
references.pmid: 20376149
references.citation: Oecologia. 1993 Mar;93(3):356-359
references.pmid: 28313435
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2000 Feb;59(2):403-409
references.pmid: 10675263
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 1995 Aug 7;75(6):1226-1229
references.pmid: 10060237
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2008 May;78(1):84-92
references.pmid: 18281161
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Aug;20(8):449-56
references.pmid: 16701416
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Jul;88(7):1864-70
references.pmid: 17645033
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Nov 7;267(1458):2213-8
references.pmid: 11413635
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):807-19
references.pmid: 19073479
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 22;274(1623):2317-26
references.pmid: 17644505
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Feb 3;433(7025):513-6
references.pmid: 15690039
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 29;362(1485):1699-710
references.pmid: 17428770
references.citation: Am Nat. 2009 Mar;173(3):304-12
references.pmid: 19199520
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Nov 24;5(11):e15505
references.pmid: 21124803
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):781-9
references.pmid: 19073481
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):719-42
references.pmid: 19073475
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):763-9
references.pmid: 19073484
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2010 Jul;84(3):675-7
references.pmid: 20350592
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 Feb;77(1):77-96
references.pmid: 11911375
references.citation: Biol Bull. 2002 Jun;202(3):296-305
references.pmid: 12087003
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 8;108(6):2312-5
references.pmid: 21262802
references.citation: Nature. 2003 May 22;423(6938):432-4
references.pmid: 12761547
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jan;25(1):28-34
references.pmid: 19735961
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Jul 22;265(1403):1359-63
references.pmid: 9718738
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Sep;19(9):453-5
references.pmid: 16701304