title: A Spatial Poisson Hurdle Model for Exploring Geographic Variation in Emergency Department Visits.
abstract: We develop a spatial Poisson hurdle model to explore geographic variation in emergency department (ED) visits while accounting for zero inflation. The model consists of two components: a Bernoulli component that models the probability of any ED use (i.e., at least one ED visit per year), and a truncated Poisson component that models the number of ED visits given use. Together, these components address both the abundance of zeros and the right-skewed nature of the nonzero counts. The model has a hierarchical structure that incorporates patient- and area-level covariates, as well as spatially correlated random effects for each areal unit. Because regions with high rates of ED use are likely to have high expected counts among users, we model the spatial random effects via a bivariate conditionally autoregressive (CAR) prior, which introduces dependence between the components and provides spatial smoothing and sharing of information across neighboring regions. Using a simulation study, we show that modeling the between-component correlation reduces bias in parameter estimates. We adopt a Bayesian estimation approach, and the model can be fit using standard Bayesian software. We apply the model to a study of patient and neighborhood factors influencing emergency department use in Durham County, North Carolina.
authors.affiliation: Duke University, Durham, USA.
authors.forename: Brian
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Neelon
authors.forename: Pulak
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Ghosh
authors.forename: Patrick F
authors.initials: PF
authors.lastname: Loebs
keywords: Bivariate conditionally autoregressive (CAR) prior; Emergency department visits; Poisson hurdle model; Spatial analysis; Zero-inflated data
references.citation: Med Health R I. 2010 Jun;93(6):184-6
references.pmid: 20632716
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Aug;52(2):108-15
references.pmid: 18407374
references.citation: Biometrics. 2005 Dec;61(4):950-61
references.pmid: 16401268
references.citation: Stat Methods Med Res. 2002 Aug;11(4):341-55
references.pmid: 12197301
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Sep-Oct;25(5):w324-36
references.pmid: 16849363
references.citation: J Biomed Inform. 2011 Apr;44(2):266-76
references.pmid: 21130181
references.citation: Track Rep. 2003 May;(8):1-4
references.pmid: 12744264
references.citation: Biostatistics. 2003 Jan;4(1):11-25
references.pmid: 12925327
references.citation: Stat Med. 2007 Oct 30;26(24):4455-74
references.pmid: 17357989
references.citation: Biometrics. 2011 Mar;67(1):280-9
references.pmid: 20528856
references.citation: J Health Polit Policy Law. 2003 Dec;28(6):1089-120
references.pmid: 14756500
references.citation: J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Nov;14 Suppl:S73-81
references.pmid: 18843243
references.citation: J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;23(1):109-20
references.pmid: 20051550
references.citation: Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Aug;67(4):412-30
references.pmid: 20519430
references.citation: West J Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;10(4):233-9
references.pmid: 20046239
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Sep;29(9):1630-6
references.pmid: 20820018
references.citation: Stat Modelling. 2010 Dec;10(4):421-439
references.pmid: 21339863
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;56(1):42-8
references.pmid: 20346540
references.citation: Biostatistics. 2009 Apr;10(2):374-89
references.pmid: 19136448
references.citation: Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Aug;10(8):853-9
references.pmid: 12896886
references.citation: Biometrics. 1999 Jun;55(2):652-9
references.pmid: 11318229