title: Wintertime factors affecting contaminant distribution in a swine farrowing room.
abstract: An estimated 200,000 to 500,000 U.S. workers in concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) are at risk of adverse respiratory outcomes from exposures to indoor contaminants. In the wintertime, general ventilation is minimized in the Midwest due to high heating costs required to maintain indoor temperatures optimal for animal production. Pit fans typically operate to exhaust under-floor manure pits, but little other fresh air intake exists. Many operators believe that these systems are sufficient to reduce contaminant concentrations within the building during winter. Investigating whether these pit fans provide sufficient protection against classic CAFO contaminants during minimal wintertime ventilation was warranted. Direct-reading instruments were used to measure and record concentrations of multiple contaminants using both fixed-area and mobile contaminant mapping in a farrowing room during a Midwest winter. With the exception of CO, concentrations were significantly (p<0.001) higher with the pit fan off compared with those with the pit fan on. Additional analyses identified that significant changes (p<0.001) in mean room concentrations of respirable dust (decreased, 77% with pit fan off and 87% with pit fan on) and CO2 (increased, 24%) over the 5-hr study periods and that multiple fixed-area monitors rather than the much-used, single center-of-room monitor provided a more conservative (e.g., protective) assessment of room concentrations. While concentrations did not exceed occupational exposure limits from OSHA or ACGIH for individual contaminants, recommended agricultural health limits from exposure-response studies suggested in the literature were exceeded for respirable dust, CO2, and NH3, indicating a need to consider personal exposures and control options to reduce contaminant concentrations in farrowing rooms. Pit fans reduced NH3 and H2S concentrations, but these fans may not be sufficient to control dust and eliminate the need for secondary exposure prevention methods.
authors.affiliation: Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
authors.forename: Kelsie A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Reeve
authors.forename: Thomas M
authors.initials: TM
authors.lastname: Peters
authors.forename: T Renée
authors.initials: TR
authors.lastname: Anthony
mesh_terms: D000383:Agriculture; D000395:Air Pollutants, Occupational / Q000032:analysis*; D000818:Animals; D007484:Iowa; D016273:Occupational Exposure / Q000032:analysis*; D012621:Seasons; D013552:Swine; D014481:United States; D014489:United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration; D014691:Ventilation / Q000379:methods*
chemical_list: D000395:Air Pollutants, Occupational
references.citation: Chest. 2000 May;117(5):1488-95
references.pmid: 10807840
references.citation: Br J Ind Med. 1989 Jan;46(1):31-7
references.pmid: 2920141
references.citation: J Agric Saf Health. 2002 Nov;8(4):349-64
references.pmid: 12549241
references.citation: Ann Occup Hyg. 2012 Nov;56(9):1080-90
references.pmid: 22904211
references.citation: J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010 Jan;7(1):7-13
references.pmid: 19904655
references.citation: Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991 Aug;17(4):269-75
references.pmid: 1925439
references.citation: Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1985 Nov;46(11):658-61
references.pmid: 3934947
references.citation: Chest. 1992 Mar;101(3):767-74
references.pmid: 1541145
references.citation: AIHAJ. 2000 Jan-Feb;61(1):56-63
references.pmid: 10772615
references.citation: Eur Respir J. 2000 Sep;16(3):404-8
references.pmid: 11028651
references.citation: Am J Ind Med. 1995 Mar;27(3):405-18
references.pmid: 7747746