title: Native macrophyte density and richness affect the invasiveness of a tropical poaceae species.
abstract: The role of the native species richness and density in ecosystem invasibility is a matter of concern for both ecologists and managers. We tested the hypothesis that the invasiveness of Urochloa arrecta (non-native in the Neotropics) is negatively affected by the species richness and abundance of native aquatic macrophytes in freshwater ecosystems. We first created four levels of macrophyte richness in a greenhouse (richness experiment), and we then manipulated the densities of the same native species in a second experiment (density experiment). When the native macrophytes were adults, fragments of U. arrecta were added, and their growth was assessed. Our results from the richness experiment corroborated the hypothesis of a negative relationship between the native species richness and the growth of U. arrecta, as measured by sprout length and root biomass. However, the resistance to invasion was not attributed to the presence of a particular native species with a greater competitive ability. In the density experiment, U. arrecta growth decreased significantly with an increased density of all five of the native species. Density strongly affected the performance of the Poaceae in a negative manner, suggesting that patches that are densely colonized by native macrophytes and less subject to disturbances will be more resistant to invasion than those that are poorly colonized and more commonly subjected to disturbances. Our density experiment also showed that some species exhibit a higher competitive ability than others (sampling effect). Although native richness and abundance clearly limit the colonization and establishment of U. arrecta, these factors cannot completely prevent the invasion of aquatic ecosystems by this Poaceae species.
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Nupelia, Maringá, PR, Brazil. thaisamichelan@gmail.com
authors.forename: Thaisa S
authors.initials: TS
authors.lastname: Michelan
authors.forename: Sidinei M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Thomaz
authors.forename: Luis M
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Bini
mesh_terms: D044822:Biodiversity; D017753:Ecosystem; D004780:Environment, Controlled; D005618:Fresh Water; D058865:Introduced Species; D010788:Photosynthesis; D006109:Poaceae / Q000254:growth & development*
references.citation: Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 1860 Apr;25(50):367-404
references.pmid: 30164232
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2006 Oct;9(10):1146-56
references.pmid: 16972878
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Jul 5;412(6842):72-6
references.pmid: 11452308
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Dec;88(12):3135-43
references.pmid: 18229847
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2008 Jun;22(3):544-50
references.pmid: 18577083
references.citation: Ecology. 2011 Mar;92(3):610-20
references.pmid: 21608470
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Oct 26;443(7114):989-92
references.pmid: 17066035
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Mar;20(3):110
references.pmid: 16701353
references.citation: Braz J Biol. 2011 Apr;71(1 Suppl 1):255-63
references.pmid: 21537598
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4823
references.pmid: 19283070
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 13;104(46):18123-8
references.pmid: 17991772
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2008 Jan 22;18(2):R57-60
references.pmid: 18211837
references.citation: Science. 2000 Mar 10;287(5459):1770-4
references.pmid: 10710299
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2011 Jan;14(1):52-7
references.pmid: 21070561