title: End-point variability is not noise in saccade adaptation.
abstract: When each of many saccades is made to overshoot its target, amplitude gradually decreases in a form of motor learning called saccade adaptation. Overshoot is induced experimentally by a secondary, backwards intrasaccadic target step (ISS) triggered by the primary saccade. Surprisingly, however, no study has compared the effectiveness of different sizes of ISS in driving adaptation by systematically varying ISS amplitude across different sessions. Additionally, very few studies have examined the feasibility of adaptation with relatively small ISSs. In order to best understand saccade adaptation at a fundamental level, we addressed these two points in an experiment using a range of small, fixed ISS values (from 0° to 1° after a 10° primary target step). We found that significant adaptation occurred across subjects with an ISS as small as 0.25°. Interestingly, though only adaptation in response to 0.25° ISSs appeared to be complete (the magnitude of change in saccade amplitude was comparable to size of the ISS), further analysis revealed that a comparable proportion of the ISS was compensated for across conditions. Finally, we found that ISS size alone was sufficient to explain the magnitude of adaptation we observed; additional factors did not significantly improve explanatory power. Overall, our findings suggest that current assumptions regarding the computation of saccadic error may need to be revisited.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, The City College of New York, New York, New York, United States of America. james.herman@nih.gov
authors.forename: James P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Herman
authors.forename: C Phillip
authors.initials: CP
authors.lastname: Cloud
authors.forename: Josh
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Wallman
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological / Q000502:physiology*; D000328:Adult; D000465:Algorithms; D002138:Calibration; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D009048:Motor Skills; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design; D012438:Saccades / Q000502:physiology*; D014785:Vision, Ocular
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 May;15(2):249-58
references.pmid: 2525598
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1998 Aug;121(4):391-400
references.pmid: 9746145
references.citation: Hum Neurobiol. 1986;5(4):245-53
references.pmid: 3818374
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Mar 11;29(10):3026-35
references.pmid: 19279239
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1997 Feb;77(2):874-95
references.pmid: 9065856
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2008 May;99(5):2577-83
references.pmid: 18353917
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985 Jul;26(7):924-31
references.pmid: 3874190
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):655-64
references.pmid: 19019979
references.citation: Vision Res. 2000;40(20):2779-96
references.pmid: 10960651
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 17;28(51):13929-37
references.pmid: 19091981
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Jul;34(8):1103-20
references.pmid: 20026351
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Aug;96(2):710-20
references.pmid: 16707722
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Aug;90(2):1235-44
references.pmid: 12711711
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981 Apr;7(2):356-66
references.pmid: 6453929
references.citation: J Vis. 2010 Feb 23;10(2):22.1-12
references.pmid: 20462323
references.citation: J Vis. 2010 Jun 01;10(6):2
references.pmid: 20884551
references.citation: J Vis. 2008 Jun 02;8(8):3.1-16
references.pmid: 18831626
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2012 Sep;108(6):1752-63
references.pmid: 22773782
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol. 1976 Aug;15(8):657-60
references.pmid: 955831
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1985 Oct;54(4):940-58
references.pmid: 4067628
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2011 Mar;105(3):1130-40
references.pmid: 21123665
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1998 Feb;79(2):704-15
references.pmid: 9463434
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 1984 Oct;16(4):449-54
references.pmid: 6497354
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jun;103(6):3302-10
references.pmid: 20393067
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 1978 Oct;4(4):313-8
references.pmid: 727736
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jun;107(12):3342-8
references.pmid: 22442574
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1999 Feb;124(3):351-62
references.pmid: 9989441
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1980 Dec;44(6):1058-76
references.pmid: 7452323
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1995;104(2):349-50
references.pmid: 7672027
references.citation: Prog Neurobiol. 2004 Jan;72(1):27-53
references.pmid: 15019175
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 1998 Oct;95(2):205-17
references.pmid: 9806440