title: Removal of antibodies from red cells: Comparison of three elution methods.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Direct antiglobulin test (DAT) is the most common test done in immunohematology lab, which detects immunoglobulin and fragments of complement attached to the red blood cells. These coated red blood cells are difficult to accurately phenotype, which may be required for selection of appropriate unit of red blood cells for transfusion.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  We have studied the efficacy of various elution methods in removing the antibodies coating the red cells and their impact on different blood group antigen activity.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patient samples sent for serological evaluation of autoimmune hemolysis were included in the study. DAT and Indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) were performed using gel cards (ID system, DiaMed Switzerland). Antibody coated red cells, either by in-vivo or in-vitro sensitization, were used to assess the outcome of three elution methods.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Out of 93 DAT positive samples already sensitized in vivo, 28 (30 %) samples became DAT negative post elution using either of three methods, while 36 (38.8%) showed reduction in strength of reaction, whereas in 29 (31.2%) there was no change in strength of reaction. Similarly, out of the 17 samples prepared by in vitro sensitization, 12 samples became completely negative after glycine-HCl/EDTA elution, 9 and 5 samples became negative after heat elution and chloroquine diphosphate elution methods, respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  On comparative analysis glycine-HCl/EDTA elution method was better than the other two methods and can be used for eluting immunoglobulins from intact red cells.
authors.affiliation: Department of Transfusion Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
authors.forename: Rahul
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Katharia
authors.forename: Rajendra K
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Chaudhary
keywords: Elution; phenotype; red cells
references.citation: Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Aug;78(2):161-7
references.pmid: 6808844
references.citation: Transfusion. 1997 May;37(5):497-501
references.pmid: 9149774
references.citation: Transfusion. 2009 Nov;49(11):2395-9
references.pmid: 19903295
references.citation: Transfus Med Rev. 1999 Oct;13(4):297-310
references.pmid: 10553272
references.citation: Acta Physiol Acad Sci Hung. 1970;38(4):411-7
references.pmid: 5521452
references.citation: Infusionsther Transfusionsmed. 1995 Apr;22(2):117-27
references.pmid: 7787405
references.citation: Immunohematology. 1991;7(2):46-7
references.pmid: 15946021
references.citation: Transfusion. 1990 Feb;30(2):109-13
references.pmid: 2305438
references.citation: Transfusion. 1982 Jan-Feb;22(1):59-61
references.pmid: 6801829
references.citation: Vox Sang. 1976;30(6):453-63
references.pmid: 1274288