title: Inter-limb transfer of ballistic motor skill following non-dominant limb training in young and older adults.
abstract: We recently reported considerably less inter-limb transfer in older, compared to young, adults following dominant (right) hand motor training (Hinder et al. in J Appl Physiol 110:166-175, 2011). This occurred despite the fact that both age groups exhibited similar performance improvements in the trained limb. However, asymmetries can exist with respect to the degree of transfer observed in some tasks, depending upon which limb undertakes the training. Accordingly, here we investigated inter-limb transfer following left hand ballistic motor training in young (n = 15; mean age 21.2 years) and older (n = 15; mean age 70.3 years) right handers. Following motor training that required participants to maximally abduct the left index finger, both groups exhibited significant performance improvements in the trained left hand. Moreover, the extent of inter-limb transfer was substantial and indistinguishable between the two age groups. Transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed that both age groups exhibited bilateral increases in cortical excitability following unilateral training, indicating that unilateral training affects both the trained and untrained hemisphere. However, only for young adults was the extent of the performance gain in the trained hand able to predict the degree of transfer. These findings suggest that different mechanisms may mediate inter-limb transfer of ballistic motor tasks for older and young adults. Because such tasks evoke similar neural responses to those observed following strength training (Selvanayagam et al. in J Appl Physiol 111:367-375, 2011; Carroll et al. in Acta Physiol 202:119-140, 2011), our findings have important implications for rehabilitation paradigms following stroke or limb immobilisation due to injury.
authors.affiliation: Human Motor Control Laboratory, School of Psychology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 30, Hobart, Tas, 7001, Australia. Mark.Hinder@Utas.edu.au
authors.forename: Mark R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Hinder
authors.forename: Timothy J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Carroll
authors.forename: Jeffery J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Summers
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D019054:Evoked Potentials, Motor / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009044:Motor Cortex / Q000502:physiology; D009048:Motor Skills / Q000502:physiology*; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000502:physiology; D055070:Resistance Training; D050781:Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D034941:Upper Extremity / Q000502:physiology* / Q000601:surgery; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Neurology. 2002 Feb 26;58(4):630-5
references.pmid: 11865144
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 Nov;17(3):1394-402
references.pmid: 12414279
references.citation: Neurobiol Aging. 2008 Sep;29(9):1434-46
references.pmid: 17566608
references.citation: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Sep;37(9):1594-600
references.pmid: 16177613
references.citation: Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 Jun 07;4:17
references.pmid: 20589101
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jul;92(1):349-60
references.pmid: 15028745
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Jul;105(1):139-51
references.pmid: 18450985
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Jan;112(1):114-21
references.pmid: 11137668
references.citation: J Physiol. 2010 Jan 1;588(Pt 1):201-12
references.pmid: 19917563
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 1998 Sep;44(3):317-25
references.pmid: 9749597
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Feb 7;415(6872):640-4
references.pmid: 11807497
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;186(1):59-66
references.pmid: 18040671
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Jun;104(6):1656-64
references.pmid: 18403447
references.citation: Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2011 Jun;202(2):119-40
references.pmid: 21382178
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Nov 1;5(11):479-486
references.pmid: 11684480
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Aug;111(2):367-75
references.pmid: 21551014
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Jul 20;25(29):6787-96
references.pmid: 16033888
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2010 Sep;205(3):423-33
references.pmid: 20686888
references.citation: Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Mar;96(5):564-71
references.pmid: 16369818
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2003 Apr;149(4):520-6
references.pmid: 12677333
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Dec;11(12):1454-61
references.pmid: 19011624
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Feb 7;268(1464):221-7
references.pmid: 11217890
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2002 Aug;145(4):437-47
references.pmid: 12172655
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jan;89(1):168-76
references.pmid: 12522169
references.citation: J Physiol. 1993 Nov;471:501-19
references.pmid: 8120818
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Mar;97(3):2511-5
references.pmid: 17215494
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Jan;110(1):166-75
references.pmid: 21088207
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;120(4):802-8
references.pmid: 19230754