title: Potentials-attract or likes-attract in human mate choice in China.
abstract: To explain how individuals' self-perceived long-term mate value influences their mate preference and mate choice, two hypotheses have been presented, which are "potentials-attract" and "likes-attract", respectively. The potentials-attract means that people choose mates matched with their sex-specific traits indicating reproductive potentials; and the likes-attract means that people choose mates matched with their own conditions. However, the debate about these two hypotheses still remains unsolved. In this paper, we tested these two hypotheses using a human's actual mate choice data from a Chinese online dating system (called the Baihe website), where 27,183 users of Baihe website are included, in which there are 590 paired couples (1180 individuals) who met each other via the website. Our main results show that not only the relationship between individuals' own attributes and their self-stated mate preference but also that between individuals' own attributes and their actual mate choice are more consistent with the likes-attract hypothesis, i.e., people tend to choose mates who are similar to themselves in a variety of attributes.
authors.affiliation: Key Lab of Animal Ecology and Conservational Biology, Centre for Computational and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
authors.forename: Qiao-Qiao
authors.initials: QQ
authors.lastname: He
authors.forename: Zhen
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: Jian-Xin
authors.initials: JX
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: Zhi-Guo
authors.initials: ZG
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Ying
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Tu
authors.forename: Ting
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Ji
authors.forename: Yi
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Tao
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D044466:Asian People / Q000523:psychology*; D002681:China; D002755:Choice Behavior; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D057566:Self Report; D012747:Sexual Partners / Q000523:psychology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1967 Dec;7(4):351-61
references.pmid: 6065864
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Jul;37(7):942-54
references.pmid: 21632966
references.citation: Soc Biol. 1984 Fall-Winter;31(3-4):243-78
references.pmid: 6400148
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Feb 7;266(1416):281-5
references.pmid: 10081164
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2011 Aug 23;7(4):562-6
references.pmid: 21288936
references.citation: Am J Hum Biol. 2003 Sep-Oct;15(5):620-7
references.pmid: 12953173
references.citation: Eugen Q. 1968 Jun;15(2):113-27
references.pmid: 5702327
references.citation: Ethology. 1997 Aug;103(8):681-99
references.pmid: 12293453
references.citation: J Pers. 2004 Oct;72(5):1029-68
references.pmid: 15335336
references.citation: Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1990;27(4):255-64
references.pmid: 12283589
references.citation: Ann Hum Biol. 2002 Mar-Apr;29(2):111-30
references.pmid: 11874619
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):125-39
references.pmid: 1388281
references.citation: Hum Biol. 1959 May;31(2):121-37
references.pmid: 13664298
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22330
references.pmid: 21818310
references.citation: Arch Sex Behav. 2007 Feb;36(1):79-88
references.pmid: 17136591
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 22;100(15):8805-10
references.pmid: 12843405
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 18;104(38):15011-6
references.pmid: 17827279
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 May 1;2(5):190-8
references.pmid: 21227154
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Feb;88(2):304-26
references.pmid: 15841861
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
references.pmid: 19565683
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1993 Apr;100(2):204-32
references.pmid: 8483982