title: Effects of dynamic range compression on spatial selective auditory attention in normal-hearing listeners.
abstract: Many hearing aids introduce compressive gain to accommodate the reduced dynamic range that often accompanies hearing loss. However, natural sounds produce complicated temporal dynamics in hearing aid compression, as gain is driven by whichever source dominates at a given moment. Moreover, independent compression at the two ears can introduce fluctuations in interaural level differences (ILDs) important for spatial perception. While independent compression can interfere with spatial perception of sound, it does not always interfere with localization accuracy or speech identification. Here, normal-hearing listeners reported a target message played simultaneously with two spatially separated masker messages. We measured the amount of spatial separation required between the target and maskers for subjects to perform at threshold in this task. Fast, syllabic compression that was independent at the two ears increased the required spatial separation, but linking the compressors to provide identical gain to both ears (preserving ILDs) restored much of the deficit caused by fast, independent compression. Effects were less clear for slower compression. Percent-correct performance was lower with independent compression, but only for small spatial separations. These results may help explain differences in previous reports of the effect of compression on spatial perception of sound.
authors.affiliation: Harvard/Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology Program, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
authors.forename: Andrew H
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Schwartz
authors.forename: Barbara G
authors.initials: BG
authors.lastname: Shinn-Cunningham
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000293:Adolescent; D001288:Attention; D001301:Audiometry, Pure-Tone; D001302:Audiometry, Speech; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D003463:Cues; D006310:Hearing Aids; D006801:Humans; D009622:Noise / Q000009:adverse effects*; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D011571:Psychoacoustics; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; D013017:Sound Localization; D013067:Speech Perception; D013997:Time Factors; D014732:Vibration; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Jul;132(1):357-68
references.pmid: 22779483
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jun;103(6):3656-66
references.pmid: 9637047
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Nov;124(5):3064-75
references.pmid: 19045792
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2006 Jun;27(3):279-85
references.pmid: 16672796
references.citation: Ear Hear. 1999 Apr;20(2):117-26
references.pmid: 10229513
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Mar;101(3):1649-59
references.pmid: 9069632
references.citation: Trends Amplif. 1998 Jun;3(2):51-73
references.pmid: 25425879
references.citation: Trends Amplif. 2007 Mar;11(1):31-45
references.pmid: 17301336
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Aug;124(2):1146-58
references.pmid: 18681603
references.citation: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2011 Jun;12(3):395-405
references.pmid: 21128091
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Aug;114(2):1023-34
references.pmid: 12942981
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Oct;102(4):2343-52
references.pmid: 9348693
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug;118(2):982-92
references.pmid: 16158654
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jun;123(6):4369-79
references.pmid: 18537388
references.citation: Br J Audiol. 1992 Dec;26(6):351-61
references.pmid: 1292819
references.citation: Ear Hear. 1996 Apr;17(2):162-75
references.pmid: 8698161
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):399-410
references.pmid: 22246139
references.citation: Ear Hear. 1996 Apr;17(2):133-61
references.pmid: 8698160
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):1046-57
references.pmid: 12243153
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1998 Feb;60(2):239-49
references.pmid: 9529908
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Mar;129(3):1616-25
references.pmid: 21428524
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1965 Jul;70:130-2
references.pmid: 14315123
references.citation: J Speech Hear Res. 1974 Dec;17(4):724-39
references.pmid: 4444292
references.citation: Int J Audiol. 2006 Oct;45(10):563-79
references.pmid: 17062498
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2007 Jul;69(5):757-71
references.pmid: 17929698
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1991 Mar;49(3):227-9
references.pmid: 2011460
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+
references.pmid: 5541744
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Dec;118(6):3804-15
references.pmid: 16419825
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):360-71
references.pmid: 20649230
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Dec;130(6):3939-53
references.pmid: 22225049
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jul;124(1):439-49
references.pmid: 18646988
references.citation: Neuron. 2010 Jun 24;66(6):937-48
references.pmid: 20620878
references.citation: Int J Audiol. 2004 Feb;43(2):85-99
references.pmid: 15035561
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Mar;121(3):1654-64
references.pmid: 17407902
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1978 Feb;63(2):511-23
references.pmid: 670548
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 May;117(5):3100-15
references.pmid: 15957778
references.citation: Trends Amplif. 2008 Dec;12(4):283-99
references.pmid: 18974202
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136
references.pmid: 7351125
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2010 Apr;31(2):213-20
references.pmid: 20075737
references.citation: Hear Res. 1990 Aug 1;47(1-2):103-38
references.pmid: 2228789
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 May;12(5):182-6
references.pmid: 18396091
references.citation: Int J Audiol. 2004 Sep;43(8):442-8
references.pmid: 15643737
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Jan;107(1):517-27
references.pmid: 10641660