title: Novel monosaccharide fermentation products in Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus identified using NMR spectroscopy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus is a thermophilic, Gram-positive, non-spore forming, strictly anaerobic bacterium of interest in potential industrial applications, including the production of biofuels such as hydrogen or ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass through fermentation. High-resolution, solution-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a useful method for the identification and quantification of metabolites that result from growth on different substrates. NMR allows facile resolution of isomeric (identical mass) constituents and does not destroy the sample.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Profiles of metabolites produced by the thermophilic cellulose-degrading bacterium Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus DSM 8903 strain following growth on different monosaccharides (D-glucose, D-mannose, L-arabinose, D-arabinose, D-xylose, L-fucose, and D-fucose) as carbon sources revealed several unexpected fermentation products, suggesting novel metabolic capacities and unexplored metabolic pathways in this organism. Both 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy were used to determine intracellular and extracellular metabolite profiles. One dimensional 1H NMR spectral analysis was performed by curve fitting against spectral libraries provided in the Chenomx software; 2-D homonuclear and heteronuclear NMR experiments were conducted to further reduce uncertainties due to unassigned, overlapping, or poorly-resolved peaks. In addition to expected metabolites such as acetate, lactate, glycerol, and ethanol, several novel fermentation products were identified: ethylene glycol (from growth on D-arabinose), acetoin and 2,3-butanediol (from growth on D-glucose, L-arabinose, and D-xylose), and hydroxyacetone (from growth on D-mannose, L-arabinose, and D-xylose). Production of ethylene glycol from D-arabinose was particularly notable, with around 10% of the substrate carbon converted into this uncommon fermentation product.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The present research shows that C. saccharolyticus, already of substantial interest due to its capability for biological ethanol and hydrogen production, has further metabolic potential for production of higher molecular weight compounds, such as acetoin and 2,3-butanediol, as well as hydroxyacetone and the uncommon fermentation product ethylene glycol. In addition, application of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy facilitates identification of novel metabolites, which is instrumental for production of desirable bioproducts from biomass through microbial fermentation.
authors.affiliation: Fundamental and Computational Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO Box 999, MSIN: K8-98, Richland, WA, 99352, USA. john.cort@pnnl.gov.
authors.forename: Nancy G
authors.initials: NG
authors.lastname: Isern
authors.forename: Junfeng
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Xue
authors.forename: Jaya V
authors.initials: JV
authors.lastname: Rao
authors.forename: John R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Cort
authors.forename: Birgitte K
authors.initials: BK
authors.lastname: Ahring
references.citation: Biotechnol Lett. 2010 Feb;32(2):299-304
references.pmid: 19856146
references.citation: Int J Biol Sci. 2012;8(1):66-78
references.pmid: 22211106
references.citation: Biotechnol Biofuels. 2009 Jun 17;2(1):12
references.pmid: 19534765
references.citation: Biotechnol J. 2010 Mar;5(3):274-84
references.pmid: 20213636
references.citation: Biochem Soc Trans. 2004 Apr;32(Pt 2):283-9
references.pmid: 15046590
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Apr;74(6):1358-67
references.pmid: 17216445
references.citation: Metab Eng. 2010 May;12(3):282-90
references.pmid: 20060925
references.citation: Lett Appl Microbiol. 2011 Jun;52(6):619-25
references.pmid: 21446999
references.citation: Anal Chem. 2006 Jul 1;78(13):4430-42
references.pmid: 16808451
references.citation: Anal Chem. 2008 Dec 1;80(23):8956-65
references.pmid: 19551928
references.citation: Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1998 Apr;62(4):795-7
references.pmid: 9614712
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Jan 21;6(1):e16286
references.pmid: 21283710
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;75(24):7718-24
references.pmid: 19820143
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001 Jan;55(1):10-8
references.pmid: 11234948
references.citation: J Proteome Res. 2011 Jul 1;10(7):3190-9
references.pmid: 21561166
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1994 Jul 15;120(3):263-6
references.pmid: 8076802
references.citation: Methods Mol Biol. 2011;691:385-415
references.pmid: 20972767
references.citation: Microb Cell Fact. 2010 Nov 22;9:89
references.pmid: 21092203
references.citation: J Appl Microbiol. 1998 Jan;84(1):18-24
references.pmid: 15244053
references.citation: Biochemistry. 2008 Apr 29;47(17):5037-46
references.pmid: 18363381
references.citation: Int J Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 29;5(5):500-16
references.pmid: 19680472
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1971 Apr;106(1):90-6
references.pmid: 4928018
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Nov;74(21):6720-9
references.pmid: 18776029
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1990 Jul;33(4):469-72
references.pmid: 1366749