title: Insights into biodiversity sampling strategies for freshwater microinvertebrate faunas through bioblitz campaigns and DNA barcoding.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Biodiversity surveys have long depended on traditional methods of taxonomy to inform sampling protocols and to determine when a representative sample of a given species pool of interest has been obtained. Questions remain as to how to design appropriate sampling efforts to accurately estimate total biodiversity. Here we consider the biodiversity of freshwater ostracods (crustacean class Ostracoda) from the region of Churchill, Manitoba, Canada. Through an analysis of observed species richness and complementarity, accumulation curves, and richness estimators, we conduct an a posteriori analysis of five bioblitz-style collection strategies that differed in terms of total duration, number of sites, protocol flexibility to heterogeneous habitats, sorting of specimens for analysis, and primary purpose of collection. We used DNA barcoding to group specimens into molecular operational taxonomic units for comparison.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Forty-eight provisional species were identified through genetic divergences, up from the 30 species previously known and documented in literature from the Churchill region. We found differential sampling efficiency among the five strategies, with liberal sorting of specimens for molecular analysis, protocol flexibility (and particularly a focus on covering diverse microhabitats), and a taxon-specific focus to collection having strong influences on garnering more accurate species richness estimates.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our findings have implications for the successful design of future biodiversity surveys and citizen-science collection projects, which are becoming increasingly popular and have been shown to produce reliable results for a variety of taxa despite relying on largely untrained collectors. We propose that efficiency of biodiversity surveys can be increased by non-experts deliberately selecting diverse microhabitats; by conducting two rounds of molecular analysis, with the numbers of samples processed during round two informed by the singleton prevalence during round one; and by having sub-teams (even if all non-experts) focus on select taxa. Our study also provides new insights into subarctic diversity of freshwater Ostracoda and contributes to the broader "Barcoding Biotas" campaign at Churchill. Finally, we comment on the associated implications and future research directions for community ecology analyses and biodiversity surveys through DNA barcoding, which we show here to be an efficient technique enabling rapid biodiversity quantification in understudied taxa.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada. laforest@yorku.ca
authors.forename: Brandon J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Laforest
authors.forename: Amanda K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Winegardner
authors.forename: Omar A
authors.initials: OA
authors.lastname: Zaheer
authors.forename: Nicholas W
authors.initials: NW
authors.lastname: Jeffery
authors.forename: Elizabeth E
authors.initials: EE
authors.lastname: Boyle
authors.forename: Sarah J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Adamowicz
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D003445:Crustacea / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics*; D004247:DNA / Q000235:genetics; D058893:DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic / Q000379:methods; D005618:Fresh Water / Q000469:parasitology*; D008350:Manitoba; D010802:Phylogeny
chemical_list: D004247:DNA
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2012 Jan;61(1):165-9
references.pmid: 21482553
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2012 Apr;21(8):1794-805
references.pmid: 22486820
references.citation: Mol Ecol Notes. 2007 Jul;7(4):535-543
references.pmid: 18784793
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Apr 13;6(4):e17497
references.pmid: 21533287
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 7;270(1512):313-21
references.pmid: 12614582
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2006 Sep;15(10):3073-82
references.pmid: 16911222
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e18364
references.pmid: 21610864
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 20;104(12):4967-72
references.pmid: 17360352
references.citation: BMC Genomics. 2008 May 12;9:214
references.pmid: 18474098
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010 Feb;54(2):542-52
references.pmid: 19703573
references.citation: Front Zool. 2009 Dec 10;6:30
references.pmid: 20003245
references.citation: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2002 Apr 15;360(1793):695-718
references.pmid: 12804300
references.citation: Mol Ecol Notes. 2007 May 1;7(3):355-364
references.pmid: 18784790
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 12;101(41):14812-7
references.pmid: 15465915
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 26;105(34):12359-64
references.pmid: 18716001
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 7;103(10):3657-62
references.pmid: 16505365
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 May;9 Suppl s1:208-16
references.pmid: 21564980
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111-20
references.pmid: 7463489
references.citation: Cladistics. 2012 Apr;28(2):190-194
references.pmid: 34861755
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Jul;48(1):157-67
references.pmid: 18482852
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Apr 15;6(4):e18749
references.pmid: 21526211