title: Maternal position during caesarean section for preventing maternal and neonatal complications.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  During caesarean section mothers can be in different positions. Theatre tables could be tilted laterally, upwards, downwards or flexed and wedges or cushions could be used. There is no consensus on the best positioning at present.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  We assessed all available data on positioning of the mother to determine if there is an ideal position during caesarean section that would improve outcomes.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (20 August 2012), PubMed (1966 to 20 August 2012) and manually searched the references of retrieved articles.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomised trials of woman undergoing caesarean section comparing different positions.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two review authors assessed eligibility, trial quality and extracted data.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We identified 22 studies with a total of 857 women included. We included 11 studies and excluded 11. Included trials were of variably quality with small sample sizes. Most comparisons had data from single trials. This is a shortcoming and applicability of results is limited.The incidence of air embolism was not affected by head up versus horizontal position (average risk ratio (RR) 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28 to 2.57; Tau² = 0.50; I² = 74%).We found no change in hypotensive episodes when comparing left lateral tilt (RR 0.11; 95% CI 0.01 to 1.94), right lateral tilt (RR 1.25; 95% CI 0.39 to 3.99), a right lumbar pelvic wedge (RR 0.85; CI 0.53 to1.37) and head down tilt (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.42) with horizontal positions. We found no change in hypotensive episodes when comparing full lateral tilt with 15-degree tilt (RR 1.20; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.79). Hypotensive episodes were decreased with manual displacers (RR 0.11; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.45), and increased with a right lumbar wedge compared with a right pelvic wedge (RR 1.64; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.53) and increased with a right lateral tilt compared with a left lateral tilt (RR 3.30; 95% CI 1.20 to 9.08).Position did not affect systolic blood pressure when comparing left lateral tilt (MD 2.70; 95% CI -1.47 to 6.87) or head down tilt (MD -3.00; 95% CI -8.38 to 2.38) with horizontal positions, or full lateral tilt with 15-degree tilt (MD -5.00; 95% CI -11.45 to 1.45). Manual displacers showed decreased fall in mean systolic blood pressure compared with left lateral tilt (MD -8.80; 95% CI -13.08 to -4.52).Position did not affect diastolic blood pressures when comparing left lateral tilt versus horizontal positions (MD-1.90; 95% CI -5.28 to 1.48). The mean diastolic pressure was lower in head down tilt (MD -7.00; 95% CI -12.05 to -1.95) when compared with horizontal positions.There were no statistically significant changes in maternal pulse rate, five-minute Apgars, maternal blood pH or cord blood pH when comparing different positions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There is limited evidence to support or clearly disprove the value of the use of tilting or flexing the table, the use of wedges and cushions or the use of mechanical displacers. A left lateral tilt may be better than a right lateral tilt and manual displacers may be better than a left lateral tilt but larger studies with more robust data are needed to confirm these findings.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Tygerberg,South Africa. cathycluver@hotmail.com.
authors.forename: Catherine
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Cluver
authors.forename: Natalia
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Novikova
authors.forename: G Justus
authors.initials: GJ
authors.lastname: Hofmeyr
authors.forename: David R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Hall
mesh_terms: D001794:Blood Pressure / Q000502:physiology; D002585:Cesarean Section / Q000379:methods*; D004618:Embolism, Air / Q000517:prevention & control; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007022:Hypotension / Q000517:prevention & control; D007431:Intraoperative Complications / Q000517:prevention & control; D058638:Operating Tables; D056888:Patient Positioning / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D011247:Pregnancy; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
references.citation: S Afr Med J. 1978 Sep 16;54(12):489-92
references.pmid: 734581
references.citation: Anaesthesia. 2002 Jan;57(1):15-20
references.pmid: 11843736
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 1973 Aug;42(2):290-8
references.pmid: 4721420
references.citation: Anesthesiology. 1987 Jan;66(1):93-4
references.pmid: 3541694
references.citation: Lancet. 2006 Jun 3;367(9525):1819-29
references.pmid: 16753484
references.citation: Int J Obstet Anesth. 1994 Oct;3(4):187-92
references.pmid: 15636948
references.citation: Anaesthesia. 1974 Nov;29(6):696-703
references.pmid: 4429194
references.citation: Anaesthesia. 2007 May;62(5):460-5
references.pmid: 17448057
references.citation: Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011 Oct;20(4):307-11
references.pmid: 21852106
references.citation: Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008 Nov;36(6):835-9
references.pmid: 19115653
references.citation: Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1098-102
references.pmid: 21918160
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;(6):CD007623
references.pmid: 20556781
references.citation: Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014 May;23(2):106-12
references.pmid: 24631058
references.citation: Anesth Analg. 1989 Nov;69(5):620-3
references.pmid: 2679231
references.citation: Can J Anaesth. 1991 Mar;38(2):191-5
references.pmid: 2021988
references.citation: J Perinat Med. 1998;26(4):284-92
references.pmid: 9846303
references.citation: Br J Anaesth. 1972 May;44(5):477-84
references.pmid: 5044078
references.citation: Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006 Oct;15(4):317-9
references.pmid: 16774831
references.citation: Anaesthesia. 2012 Aug;67(8):889-93
references.pmid: 22646056
references.citation: Reg Anesth. 1997 May-Jun;22(3):239-42
references.pmid: 9168215
references.citation: Anesth Analg. 1993 Sep;77(3):448-52
references.pmid: 8368543
references.citation: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;21(2):98-113
references.pmid: 17302638
references.citation: Br J Anaesth. 1977 Oct;49(10):1009-15
references.pmid: 921864
references.citation: BMJ. 1992 Sep 5;305(6853):539-40
references.pmid: 1393031