title: Quantitative neurosensory findings, symptoms and signs in young vibration exposed workers.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Long-term exposure to hand-held vibrating tools may cause the hand arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) including vibration induced white fingers and sensorineural symptoms. The aim was to study early neurosensory effects by quantitative vibrotactile and monofilament tests in young workers with hand-held vibration exposure.
  
  
  METHODS
  This cross-sectional study consisted of 142 young, male machine shop and construction workers with hand-held exposure to vibrating tools. They were compared with 41 non-vibration exposed subjects of the same age-group. All participants passed a structured interview, answered several questionnaires and had a physical examination including the determination of vibrotactile perception thresholds (VPTs) at two frequencies (31.5 and 125 Hz) and Semmes Weinstein's Monofilament test.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In the vibration exposed group 8% of the workers reported episodes of tingling sensations and 10% numbness in their fingers. Approximately 5-10% of the exposed population displayed abnormal results on monofilament tests. The vibrotactile testing showed significantly increased VPTs for 125 Hz in dig II bilaterally (right hand, p = 0.01; left hand, p = 0.024) in the vibration exposed group.A multiple regression analysis (VPT - dependent variable; age, height, examiner and five different vibration dose calculations - predictor variables) in dig II bilaterally showed rather low R2-values. None of the explanatory variables including five separately calculated vibration doses were included in the models, neither for the total vibration exposed group, nor for the highest exposed quartile.A logistic multiple regression analysis (result of monofilament testing - dependent variable; age, height, examiner and five vibration dose calculations - predictor variables) of the results of monofilament testing in dig II bilaterally gave a similar outcome. None of the independent variables including five calculated vibration doses were included in the models neither for the total exposed group nor for the highest exposed quartile.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In spite of the fairly short vibration exposure, a tendency to raised VPTs as well as pathologic monofilament test results was observed. Thus, early neurophysiologic symptoms and signs of vibration exposure may appear after short-term exposure also in young workers.
authors.affiliation: Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Box 414, Gothenburg, SE-405 30, Sweden. lars.gerhardsson@amm.gu.se.
authors.forename: Lars
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Gerhardsson
authors.forename: Lage
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Burstrom
authors.forename: Mats
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hagberg
authors.forename: Ronnie
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Lundstrom
authors.forename: Tohr
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Nilsson
references.citation: Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 Apr;81(5):519-33
references.pmid: 18180945
references.citation: Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1996 Sep;64(3):287-98
references.pmid: 8862263
references.citation: Occup Med (Lond). 2005 Mar;55(2):139-41
references.pmid: 15757991
references.citation: Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2000 Apr;73(3):150-5
references.pmid: 10787129
references.citation: Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2002 Jan;75(1-2):43-54
references.pmid: 11898876
references.citation: Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2002 Jan;75(1-2):68-77
references.pmid: 11898879
references.citation: Occup Environ Med. 1997 Feb;54(2):90-5
references.pmid: 9072015
references.citation: Scand J Work Environ Health. 1986 Aug;12(4 Spec No):293-5
references.pmid: 3775314
references.citation: Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1992;64(3):201-7
references.pmid: 1328063
references.citation: J Hand Ther. 1999 Jan-Mar;12(1):16-24
references.pmid: 10192631
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2006 Jan 9;392(1-2):62-7
references.pmid: 16183200
references.citation: Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1989;61(7):473-81
references.pmid: 2789195
references.citation: Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2003 Sep;76(7):517-28
references.pmid: 12827371
references.citation: J Occup Med. 1994 Sep;36(9):1032-7
references.pmid: 7823216
references.citation: Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998 Jun;71(4):270-6
references.pmid: 9638484
references.citation: Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998 Nov;71(8):509-19
references.pmid: 9860158
references.citation: Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Mar;84(3):325-34
references.pmid: 20496077
references.citation: Br J Ind Med. 1992 Jan;49(1):53-62
references.pmid: 1733457
references.citation: Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jan;60(1):16-26
references.pmid: 12499452
references.citation: Appl Ergon. 2001 Feb;32(1):47-51
references.pmid: 11209831
references.citation: Lepr Rev. 1999 Sep;70(3):305-13
references.pmid: 10603720
references.citation: Occup Environ Med. 2001 Jul;58(7):472-8
references.pmid: 11404453
references.citation: Diabet Med. 2001 Jun;18(6):469-75
references.pmid: 11472466
references.citation: Appl Ergon. 2005 Jan;36(1):55-60
references.pmid: 15627422