title: Understanding gesture: is the listener's motor system involved?
abstract: Listeners are able to glean information from the gestures that speakers produce, seemingly without conscious awareness. However, little is known about the mechanisms that underlie this process. Research on human action understanding shows that perceiving another's actions results in automatic activation of the motor system in the observer, which then affects the observer's understanding of the actor's goals. We ask here whether perceiving another's gesture can similarly result in automatic activation of the motor system in the observer. In Experiment 1, we first established a new procedure in which listener response times are used to study how gesture impacts sentence comprehension. In Experiment 2, we used this procedure, in conjunction with a secondary motor task, to investigate whether the listener's motor system is involved in this process. We showed that moving arms and hands (but not legs and feet) interferes with the listener's ability to use information conveyed in a speaker's hand gestures. Our data thus suggest that understanding gesture relies, at least in part, on the listener's own motor system.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology.
authors.forename: Raedy M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Ping
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology.
authors.forename: Susan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Goldin-Meadow
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology.
authors.forename: Sian L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Beilock
mesh_terms: D003142:Communication; D032882:Comprehension / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D005868:Gestures; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000502:physiology*; D013060:Speech / Q000502:physiology; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Feb;135(1):1-11
references.pmid: 16478313
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Apr;21(2):334-43
references.pmid: 7714475
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;21(11):1605-10
references.pmid: 20889932
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2004 Nov;40(6):1059-1067
references.pmid: 15535756
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1359-65
references.pmid: 19686029
references.citation: Psychol Learn Motiv. 2009;51:187-222
references.pmid: 24771952
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1999 Feb;61(2):246-58
references.pmid: 10089759
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2004 Mar 23;14(6):493-8
references.pmid: 15043814
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 9;105(36):13269-73
references.pmid: 18765806
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2001 Mar;12(2):153-6
references.pmid: 11340925
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2001 Jan;13(2):400-4
references.pmid: 11168545
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2001;65(1):3-14
references.pmid: 11505611
references.citation: Soc Neurosci. 2007;2(2):134-49
references.pmid: 18633812
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2009 Jul;20(7):794-8
references.pmid: 19493327
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2002 Mar;13(2):168-71
references.pmid: 11934002
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2007 Jan;18(1):51-7
references.pmid: 17362378
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Feb;10(2):70-6
references.pmid: 16406326
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Feb;31(1):157-69
references.pmid: 15709870
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1992 Oct;19(3):559-80
references.pmid: 1429948
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2005 Aug;164(4):517-28
references.pmid: 15887008
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):558-65
references.pmid: 12412897
references.citation: Cognition. 1986 Jun;23(1):43-71
references.pmid: 3742990
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1508-14
references.pmid: 20731515
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 May;18(5):859-70
references.pmid: 16768383
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Jun;15(3):495-514
references.pmid: 18567247
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Jun;26(3):1209-20
references.pmid: 10884018
references.citation: Cognition. 2009 Oct;113(1):98-104
references.pmid: 19682672
references.citation: J Child Lang. 2001 Jun;28(2):325-49
references.pmid: 11449942
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2004 Jun;116(2):185-203
references.pmid: 15158182
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Aug;13(4):694-701
references.pmid: 17201372
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2005 Aug;15(8):1243-9
references.pmid: 15616133
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;5(6):664-74
references.pmid: 21572548
references.citation: Cognition. 2003 Jul;88(3):B11-21
references.pmid: 12804818