title: Inter-arm Differences in Simultaneous Blood Pressure Measurements in Ambulatory Patients without Cardiovascular Diseases.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  It has traditionally been known that there is normally a difference in blood pressure (BP) between the two arms; there is at least 20 mm Hg difference in the systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 10 mm Hg difference in the diastolic blood pressure (DBP). However, recent epidemiologic studies have shown that there are between-arm differences of < 5 mm Hg in simultaneous BP measurements. The purposes of this study is to examine whether there are between-arm differences in simultaneous BP measurements obtained from ambulatory patients without cardiovascular diseases and to identify the factors associated these differences.
  
  
  METHODS
  We examined 464 patients who visited the outpatient clinic of Gangneung Asan Hospital clinical department. For the current analysis, we excluded patients with ischemic heart disease, stroke, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, or hyperthyroidism. Simultaneous BP measurements were obtained using the Omron MX3 BP monitor in both arms. The inter-arm difference (IAD) in BP was expressed as the relative difference (right-arm BP [R] minus left-arm BP [L]: R - L) and the absolute difference (|R - L|).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean absolute IAD in SBP and DBP were 3.19 ± 2.38 and 2.41 ± 1.59 mm Hg, respectively, in men and 2.61 ± 2.18 and 2.25 ± 2.01 mm Hg, respectively, in women. In men, there were 83.8% of patients with the IAD in SBP of ≤ 6 mm Hg, 98.1% with the IAD in SBP of ≤ 10 mm Hg, 96.5% with the IAD in DBP of ≤ 6 mm Hg and 0% with the IAD in DBP of > 10 mm Hg. In women, 89.6% of patients had IAD in SBP of ≤ 6 mm Hg, 92.1% with IAD in DBP of ≤ 6 mm Hg, and 0% with IAD in SBP of > 10 mm Hg or IAD in DBP of > 10 mm Hg. Gangneung Asan Hospital clinical series of patients showed that the absolute IAD in SBP had a significant correlation with cardiovascular risk factors such as the 10-year Framingham cardiac risk scores and higher BP in men and higher BP in women. However, the absolute IAD in SBP and DBP had no significant correlation with the age, obesity, smoking, drinking, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and renal function.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our results showed that there were no significant between-arm differences in simultaneous BP measurements. It was also shown that most of the ambulatory patients without cardiovascular diseases had an IAD in SBP of < 10 mm Hg and an IAD in DBP of < 6 mm Hg.
authors.affiliation: Department of Family Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea.
authors.forename: Kyoung Bog
authors.initials: KB
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Mi Kyeong
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Oh
authors.forename: Haa Gyoung
authors.initials: HG
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Ji Hoon
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Ki
authors.forename: Soo Hee
authors.initials: SH
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Su Min
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Kim
keywords: Adults; Arm; Blood Pressure Determination; Risk Factors
references.citation: Am J Emerg Med. 2001 Jan;19(1):43-5
references.pmid: 11146017
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2007 Feb 26;167(4):388-93
references.pmid: 17325301
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 1996 Sep 23;156(17):2005-8
references.pmid: 8823153
references.citation: J Hypertens. 2005 Jun;23(6):1141-7
references.pmid: 15894889
references.citation: Hypertension. 2008 Mar;51(3):657-62
references.pmid: 18212263
references.citation: Circulation. 1960 Sep;22:419-36
references.pmid: 13711816
references.citation: JAMA. 2003 May 21;289(19):2560-72
references.pmid: 12748199
references.citation: J Hum Hypertens. 2006 Dec;20(12):923-31
references.pmid: 17036043
references.citation: Fam Pract. 2002 Oct;19(5):439-41
references.pmid: 12356690
references.citation: Blood Press Monit. 2011 Feb;16(1):37-42
references.pmid: 21284132
references.citation: Lancet. 2012 Mar 10;379(9819):905-914
references.pmid: 22293369
references.citation: BMJ. 2012 Mar 20;344:e1327
references.pmid: 22433975
references.citation: Circulation. 1998 May 12;97(18):1837-47
references.pmid: 9603539
references.citation: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Sep 6;293(6547):611-5
references.pmid: 3092951
references.citation: Age Ageing. 1999 Oct;28(6):537-42
references.pmid: 10604505