title: Crowding during restricted and free viewing.
abstract: Crowding impairs the perception of form in peripheral vision. It is likely to be a key limiting factor of form vision in patients without central vision. Crowding has been extensively studied in normally sighted individuals, typically with a stimulus duration of a few hundred milliseconds to avoid eye movements. These restricted testing conditions do not reflect the natural behavior of a patient with central field loss. Could unlimited stimulus duration and unrestricted eye movements change the properties of crowding in any fundamental way? We studied letter identification in the peripheral vision of normally sighted observers in three conditions: (i) a fixation condition with a brief stimulus presentation of 250 ms, (ii) another fixation condition but with an unlimited viewing time, and (iii) an unrestricted eye movement condition with an artificial central scotoma and an unlimited viewing time. In all conditions, contrast thresholds were measured as a function of target-to-flanker spacing, from which we estimated the spatial extent of crowding in terms of critical spacing. We found that presentation duration beyond 250 ms had little effect on critical spacing with stable gaze. With unrestricted eye movements and a simulated central scotoma, we found a large variability in critical spacing across observers, but more importantly, the variability in critical spacing was well correlated with the variability in target eccentricity. Our results assure that the large body of findings on crowding made with briefly presented stimuli remains relevant to conditions where viewing time is unconstrained. Our results further suggest that impaired oculomotor control associated with central vision loss can confound peripheral form vision beyond the limits imposed by crowding.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, USA.
authors.forename: Julian M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Wallace
authors.forename: Michael K
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Chiu
authors.forename: Anirvan S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Nandy
authors.forename: Bosco S
authors.initials: BS
authors.lastname: Tjan
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology; D003441:Crowding; D005556:Form Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D012684:Sensory Thresholds / Q000502:physiology; D014794:Visual Fields / Q000502:physiology
references.citation: Vision Res. 1976 Jan;16(1):71-8
references.pmid: 1258390
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2009 Dec 15;19(23):1988-93
references.pmid: 19853450
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Oct;11(10):1129-35
references.pmid: 18828191
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1991 Jun;49(6):495-508
references.pmid: 1857623
references.citation: J Vis. 2011 May 25;11(6):
references.pmid: 21613388
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1983 Feb;33(2):113-20
references.pmid: 6844102
references.citation: Vision Res. 1992 Jul;32(7):1349-57
references.pmid: 1455707
references.citation: J Vis. 2004 Dec 30;4(12):1136-69
references.pmid: 15669917
references.citation: J Vis. 2012 Mar 21;12(3):
references.pmid: 22438467
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2001 Jul;4(7):739-44
references.pmid: 11426231
references.citation: Vision Res. 2002 Jun;42(12):1571-81
references.pmid: 12074951
references.citation: J Vis. 2009 Nov 19;9(12):13.1-18
references.pmid: 20053104
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jan 22;6(1):e1000646
references.pmid: 20098499
references.citation: Vision Res. 2002 Sep;42(20):2357-69
references.pmid: 12350424
references.citation: Vision Res. 1998 Oct;38(19):2949-62
references.pmid: 9797990
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Apr;15(4):160-8
references.pmid: 21420894
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2011 Aug 14;14(9):1195-201
references.pmid: 21841776
references.citation: J Vis. 2010 May 01;10(5):16
references.pmid: 20616136
references.citation: Vision Res. 2007 Nov;47(25):3150-9
references.pmid: 17928026
references.citation: Nature. 1970 Apr 11;226(5241):177-8
references.pmid: 5437004
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 20;26(38):9683-94
references.pmid: 16988039
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 2005 Sep;112(9):1579-85
references.pmid: 16087239
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 2004 Dec;111(12):2265-70
references.pmid: 15582084
references.citation: J Vis. 2002;2(2):167-77
references.pmid: 12678590
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Aug;18(4):445-51
references.pmid: 18835355
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2012 Jan 08;15(3):463-9, S1-2
references.pmid: 22231425
references.citation: Vision Res. 2005 Mar;45(5):617-33
references.pmid: 15621179
references.citation: J Neurosci Methods. 2003 Nov 30;130(1):9-18
references.pmid: 14583400
references.citation: Vision Res. 2009 Nov;49(23):2782-9
references.pmid: 19695281
references.citation: Vision Res. 2008 Feb;48(5):635-54
references.pmid: 18226828
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1994;8(2):255-79
references.pmid: 7993878
references.citation: Vision Res. 2008 Oct;48(22):2382-93
references.pmid: 18722398