title: Reducing neonatal mortality in India: critical role of access to emergency obstetric care.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Neonatal mortality currently accounts for 41% of all global deaths among children below five years. Despite recording a 33% decline in neonatal deaths between 2000 and 2009, about 900,000 neonates died in India in 2009. The decline in neonatal mortality is slower than in the post-neonatal period, and neonatal mortality rates have increased as a proportion of under-five mortality rates. Neonatal mortality rates are higher among rural dwellers of India, who make up at least two-thirds of India's population. Identifying the factors influencing neonatal mortality will significantly improve child survival outcomes in India.
  
  
  METHODS
  Our analysis is based on household data from the nationally representative 2008 Indian District Level Household Survey (DLHS-3). We use probit regression techniques to analyse the links between neonatal mortality at the household level and households' access to health facilities. The probability of the child dying in the first month of birth is our dependent variable.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We found that 80% of neonatal deaths occurred within the first week of birth, and that the probability of neonatal mortality is significantly lower when the child's village is closer to the district hospital (DH), suggesting the critical importance of specialist hospital care in the prevention of newborn deaths. Neonatal deaths were lower in regions where emergency obstetric care was available at the District Hospitals. We also found that parental schooling and household wealth status improved neonatal survival outcomes.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Addressing the main causes of neonatal deaths in India--preterm deliveries, asphyxia, and sepsis--requires adequacy of specialised workforce and facilities for delivery and neonatal intensive care and easy access by mothers and neonates. The slow decline in neonatal death rates reflects a limited attention to factors which contribute to neonatal deaths. The suboptimal quality and coverage of Emergency Obstetric Care facilities in India require urgent attention.
authors.affiliation: School of Business, Discipline of Economics, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia.
authors.forename: Anu
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Rammohan
authors.forename: Kazi
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Iqbal
authors.forename: Niyi
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Awofeso
mesh_terms: D036861:Delivery, Obstetric / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004632:Emergency Medical Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D007194:India / Q000453:epidemiology; D007226:Infant Mortality; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D011336:Probability
references.citation: Lancet. 1999 Dec 4;354(9194):1955-61
references.pmid: 10622298
references.citation: Lancet. 2005 Mar 5-11;365(9462):891-900
references.pmid: 15752534
references.citation: Indian Pediatr. 2008 Dec;45(12):991-4
references.pmid: 19129568
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Feb;87(2):130-8
references.pmid: 19274365
references.citation: Lancet. 2011 May 7;377(9777):1610-23
references.pmid: 21496910
references.citation: Semin Perinatol. 2010 Dec;34(6):371-86
references.pmid: 21094412
references.citation: Pediatr Int. 2007 Aug;49(4):452-8
references.pmid: 17587267
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2011 Aug;8(8):e1001080
references.pmid: 21918640
references.citation: Reprod Health Matters. 2012 Jun;20(39):142-54
references.pmid: 22789092
references.citation: Lancet. 2008 Sep 27;372(9644):1151-62
references.pmid: 18926277
references.citation: Lancet. 2011 Feb 12;377(9765):587-98
references.pmid: 21227499
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Feb;96(2):139-46
references.pmid: 17274999
references.citation: Lancet. 2010 Nov 27;376(9755):1853-60
references.pmid: 21075444
references.citation: Lancet. 2010 Jun 5;375(9730):2009-23
references.pmid: 20569841
references.citation: J Health Econ. 2008 May;27(3):690-705
references.pmid: 18187216