title: MODELING REPEATED MEASURES OF DICHOTOMOUS DATA: Testing Whether the Within-Person Trajectory of Change Varies Across Levels of Between-Person Factors.
abstract: In this paper, we consider the following question for the analysis of data obtained in longitudinal panel designs: How should repeated-measures data be modeled and interpreted when the outcome or dependent variable is dichotomous and the objective is to determine whether the within-person rate of change over time varies across levels of one or more between-person factors? Standard approaches address this issue by means of generalized estimating equations or generalized linear mixed models with logistic links. Using an empirical example and simulated data, we show (1) that cross-level product terms from these models can produce misleading results with respect to whether the within-person rate of change varies across levels of a dichotomous between-person factor; and (2) that subgroup differences in the rate of change should be assessed on an additive scale (using group differences in the effects of predictors on theprobabilityof disease) rather than on a multiplicative scale (using group differences in the effects of predictors on theoddsof disease). Because usual approaches do not provide a significance test for whether the rate ofadditivechange varies across levels of a between-person factor, sample differences in the rate of additive change may be due to sampling error. We illustrate how standard software can be used to estimate and test whether additive changes vary across levels of a between-person factor.
authors.forename: Lawrence R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Landerman
authors.forename: Sarah A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Mustillo
authors.forename: Kenneth C
authors.initials: KC
authors.lastname: Land
references.citation: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002 Oct;57(10):M678-82
references.pmid: 12242324
references.citation: Epidemiology. 1992 Sep;3(5):452-6
references.pmid: 1391139
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2011 Feb 28;11:139
references.pmid: 21356045
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Jan 1;141(1):41-9
references.pmid: 7801965
references.citation: Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20(7):563-4
references.pmid: 16119427
references.citation: J Gerontol. 1991 Nov;46(6):M210-5
references.pmid: 1834726
references.citation: Epidemiology. 2010 Jul;21(4):467-74
references.pmid: 20220526
references.citation: Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(8):769-76
references.pmid: 15469034
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2010 Mar;25(1):84-94
references.pmid: 20230130
references.citation: J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985 Oct;33(10):698-706
references.pmid: 4045087
references.citation: Ann Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;17(3):227-36
references.pmid: 17320789
references.citation: Epidemiology. 2009 Jan;20(1):6-13
references.pmid: 19234396
references.citation: Epidemiology. 2009 Mar;20(2):159-60
references.pmid: 19234409
references.citation: Gerontologist. 2005 Apr;45(2):222-30
references.pmid: 15799987
references.citation: J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975 Oct;23(10):433-41
references.pmid: 1159263
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2002 Jun;7(2):147-77
references.pmid: 12090408
references.citation: Epidemiology. 1996 May;7(3):286-90
references.pmid: 8728443
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;36(5):1111-8
references.pmid: 17726040