title: Minimally invasive reconstruction of lateral tibial plateau fractures using the jail technique: a biomechanical study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  This study described a novel, minimally invasive reconstruction technique of lateral tibial plateau fractures using a three-screw jail technique and compared it to a conventional two-screw osteosynthesis technique. The benefit of an additional screw implanted in the proximal tibia from the anterior at an angle of 90° below the conventional two-screw reconstruction after lateral tibial plateau fracture was evaluated. This new method was called the jail technique.
  
  
  METHODS
  The two reconstruction techniques were tested using a porcine model (n = 40). Fracture was simulated using a defined osteotomy of the lateral tibial plateau. Load-to-failure and multiple cyclic loading tests were conducted using a material testing machine. Twenty tibias were used for each reconstruction technique, ten of which were loaded in a load-to-failure protocol and ten cyclically loaded (5000 times) between 200 and 1000 N using a ramp protocol. Displacement, stiffness and yield load were determined from the resulting load displacement curve. Failure was macroscopically documented.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In the load-to-failure testing, the jail technique showed a significantly higher mean maximum load (2275.9 N) in comparison to the conventional reconstruction (1796.5 N, p < 0.001). The trend for better outcomes for the novel technique in terms of stiffness and yield load did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). In cyclic testing, the jail technique also showed better trends in displacement that were not statistically significant. Failure modes showed a tendency of screws cutting through the bone (cut-out) in the conventional reconstruction. No cut-out but a bending of the lag screws at the site of the additional third screw was observed in the jail technique.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results of this study indicate that the jail and the conventional technique have seemingly similar biomechanical properties. This suggests that the jail technique may be a feasible alternative to conventional screw osteosynthesis in the minimally invasive reconstruction of lateral tibial plateau fractures. A potential advantage of the jail technique is the prevention of screw cut-outs through the cancellous bone.
authors.forename: Andre
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Weimann
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Heinkele
authors.forename: Mirco
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Herbort
authors.forename: Benedikt
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Schliemann
authors.forename: Wolf
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Petersen
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Raschke
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena / Q000502:physiology; D001863:Bone Screws; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal / Q000379:methods*; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D013552:Swine; D013978:Tibial Fractures / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D016474:Weight-Bearing / Q000502:physiology
references.citation: J Anat. 1991 Oct;178:11-20
references.pmid: 1810918
references.citation: Injury. 2003 Aug;34 Suppl 1:A11-5
references.pmid: 14563006
references.citation: Chirurg. 1975 Aug;46(8):348-52
references.pmid: 1157638
references.citation: Unfallchirurg. 1997 Sep;100(9):742-9; quiz 749
references.pmid: 9411802
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 May;81(3):478-80
references.pmid: 10872370
references.citation: Chirurg. 2007 Dec;78(12):1157-69; quiz 1170-1
references.pmid: 18026913
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jun;85(6):1156-60
references.pmid: 12784017
references.citation: Surg Radiol Anat. 2005 Dec;27(5):372-6
references.pmid: 16237489
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Oct;439:207-14
references.pmid: 16205161
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Jan-Feb;(138):94-104
references.pmid: 445923
references.citation: J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6(3):340-6
references.pmid: 1403254
references.citation: J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Jan;21(1):5-10
references.pmid: 17211262
references.citation: J Orthop Res. 2003 Jan;21(1):177-82
references.pmid: 12507596
references.citation: Arthroscopy. 1985;1(2):76-82
references.pmid: 4091921
references.citation: Unfallchirurg. 2006 Mar;109(3):219-32; quiz 233-4
references.pmid: 16523282
references.citation: J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(5):304-8
references.pmid: 8814570
references.citation: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003 Nov;123(9):489-93
references.pmid: 12720016
references.citation: Hefte Unfallheilkd. 1975;(120):99-113
references.pmid: 1120704
references.citation: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003 Nov;18(9):864-70
references.pmid: 14527814
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Jan-Feb;(138):84-93
references.pmid: 445922
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Jul;(292):87-100
references.pmid: 8519141
references.citation: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002 Nov;10(6):364-70
references.pmid: 12444516
references.citation: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 May;13(4):263-7
references.pmid: 15685461