title: Advances in multiplex PCR: balancing primer efficiencies and improving detection success.
abstract: 1.Multiplex PCR is a valuable tool in many biological studies but it is a multifaceted procedure that has to be planned and optimised thoroughly to achieve robust and meaningful results. In particular, primer concentrations have to be adjusted to assure an even amplification of all targeted DNA fragments. Until now, total DNA extracts were used for balancing primer efficiencies; however, the applicability for comparisons between taxa or different multiple-copy genes was limited owing to the unknown number of template molecules present per total DNA.2.Based on a multiplex system developed to track trophic interactions in high Alpine arthropods, we demonstrate a fast and easy way of generating standardised DNA templates. These were then used to balance the amplification success for the different targets and to subsequently determine the sensitivity of each primer pair in the multiplex PCR.3.In the current multiplex assay, this approach led to an even amplification success for all seven targeted DNA fragments. Using this balanced multiplex PCR, methodological bias owing to variation in primer efficiency will be avoided when analysing field-derived samples.4.The approach outlined here allows comparing multiplex PCR sensitivity, independent of the investigated species, genome size or the targeted genes. The application of standardised DNA templates not only makes it possible to optimise primer efficiency within a given multiplex PCR, but it also offers to adjust and/or to compare the sensitivity between different assays. Along with other factors that influence the success of multiplex reactions, and which we discuss here in relation to the presented detection system, the adoption of this approach will allow for direct comparison of multiplex PCR data between systems and studies, enhancing the utility of this assay type.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck Technikerstraße 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
authors.forename: Daniela
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Sint
authors.forename: Lorna
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Raso
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Traugott
keywords: PCR optimisation; diagnostic PCR; primer sensitivity; standardise DNA templates; trophic interactions
references.citation: Biotechniques. 1997 Sep;23(3):504-11
references.pmid: 9298224
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2009 Jun 1;407(12):3641-51
references.pmid: 19062077
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Jan;11(1):171-5
references.pmid: 21429118
references.citation: Biol Pharm Bull. 2008 Apr;31(4):685-90
references.pmid: 18379063
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 May;60(2):341-50
references.pmid: 17343679
references.citation: Bull Entomol Res. 2011 Apr;101(2):201-10
references.pmid: 21034519
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2005 Mar;14(3):819-27
references.pmid: 15723673
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 May;9(3):771-3
references.pmid: 21564740
references.citation: Soil Biol Biochem. 2011 Feb;43(2):346-350
references.pmid: 21317975
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Jul;11(4):591-611
references.pmid: 21565126
references.citation: Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994 Oct;3(5):294-9
references.pmid: 7881515
references.citation: Med Vet Entomol. 2010 Dec;24(4):449-55
references.pmid: 20704655
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2009 May;47(5):1325-32
references.pmid: 19261786
references.citation: Environ Microbiol Rep. 2010 Dec;2(6):715-9
references.pmid: 23766275
references.citation: Food Microbiol. 2011 Aug;28(5):980-9
references.pmid: 21569942
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2010 Aug 27;172(1-2):160-3
references.pmid: 20483540
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 May;8(3):678-81
references.pmid: 21585869
references.citation: J Clin Lab Anal. 2002;16(1):47-51
references.pmid: 11835531
references.citation: Sci China C Life Sci. 2003 Feb;46(1):67-76
references.pmid: 20213363
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Oct;64(10):3724-30
references.pmid: 9758791
references.citation: J Fish Dis. 2009 Aug;32(8):645-53
references.pmid: 19500208
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 2011 Jan;48(1):53-60
references.pmid: 21337948
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Mar;11(2):370-3
references.pmid: 21429146
references.citation: J Helminthol. 2010 Mar;84(1):107-14
references.pmid: 19646307
references.citation: PCR Methods Appl. 1995 Apr;4(5):S185-94
references.pmid: 7580907
references.citation: J Forensic Sci. 2009 Sep;54(5):1008-15
references.pmid: 19627417
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Mar;11(2):286-93
references.pmid: 21429135
references.citation: J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Jun 24;57(12):5167-72
references.pmid: 19473001
references.citation: J Invertebr Pathol. 2010 Oct;105(2):151-5
references.pmid: 20570679
references.citation: Hereditas. 1990;113(3):277-89
references.pmid: 2093704
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Sep;11(5):795-801
references.pmid: 21507208
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2010 Apr;19(8):1721-32
references.pmid: 20345680
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 2007 Sep;44(5):723-31
references.pmid: 17915501
references.citation: Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000 Oct;13(4):559-70
references.pmid: 11023957
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2008 Sep;17(17):3928-38
references.pmid: 18662231
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2008 Feb;17(4):947-63
references.pmid: 18208490
references.citation: Bull Entomol Res. 2012 Apr;102(2):239-47
references.pmid: 22008233