title: Negotiating policy in practice: child and family health nurses' approach to the process of postnatal psychosocial assessment.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There is growing recognition internationally of the need to identify women with risk factors for poor perinatal mental health in pregnancy and following birth. In the state of New South Wales, Australia the Supporting Families Early policy provides a framework of assessment and support for women and families and includes routine psychosocial assessment and depression screening. This study investigated the approach taken by Child and Family Health Nurses (CFHNs) following birth to assessment and screening as recommended by state policy. This was a qualitative ethnographic study that included 83 CFHN and 20 women. Observations occurred with thirteen nurses; with 20 women, in the home or the clinic environment. An additional 70 nurses participated in discussion groups. An observational tool (4D&4R) and field notes were used to record observations and analysed descriptively using frequencies. Field notes, interview data and discussion group transcripts were analysed thematically.
  
  
  METHODS
  This was a qualitative ethnographic study that included 83 CFHN and 20 women. Observations occurred with thirteen nurses; with 20 women, in the home or the clinic environment. An additional 70 nurses participated in discussion groups. An observational tool (4D&4R) and field notes were used to record observations and analysed descriptively using frequencies. Field notes, interview data and discussion group transcripts were analysed thematically.
  
  
  RESULTS
  CFHNs demonstrated a range of approaches to assessment and screening. Psychosocial assessment was conducted in 50% (10 out of the 20) of the interactions observed; however, all the women were screened using the Edinburgh Depression Scale. Four major themes that represent the approach taken to the assessment process were identified: 'Engagement: getting that first bit right', 'Doing some paperwork', 'Creating comfort' and 'Psychosocial assessment: doing it another way'. Nurses utilised other skills such as observing the women interacting with their baby, taking note of non verbal communication and using intuition to develop a clinical decision.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Overall, nurses' took a sensitive and caring approach to assessment and screening, however, there were differences in interpretations of the policy recommendations across the two sites. Nurses adopt a flexible, relationship-based approach to the assessment process; however, they experience tension when required to incorporate structured psychosocial assessment processes. To undertake assessment and screening effectively, CFHNs require ongoing support, training and supervision to maintain this sensitive and emotionally challenging work.
authors.affiliation: School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. m.rollans@uws.edu.au
authors.forename: Mellanie
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Rollans
authors.forename: Virginia
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Schmied
authors.forename: Lynn
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Kemp
authors.forename: Tanya
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Meade
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003863:Depression / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology; D019052:Depression, Postpartum / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D017579:Domestic Violence / Q000523:psychology; D022143:Family Nursing / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D017008:Negotiating; D009517:New South Wales; D009723:Nurse-Patient Relations; D009736:Nursing Process / Q000592:standards*; D011181:Postnatal Care / Q000592:standards*; D011247:Pregnancy; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; D012307:Risk Factors; D012944:Social Support
references.citation: Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007 Feb;31(1):57-61
references.pmid: 17333610
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 1990 Jan;15(1):74-82
references.pmid: 2303617
references.citation: Women Birth. 2006 Mar;19(1):11-6
references.pmid: 16791999
references.citation: Arch Womens Ment Health. 2009 Apr;12(2):97-103
references.pmid: 19184343
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Sep;41(7):785-97
references.pmid: 15288801
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Aug;45(8):1137-47
references.pmid: 17761183
references.citation: Contemp Nurse. 2009 Aug;33(1):50-8
references.pmid: 19715495
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Aug;53(493):614-9
references.pmid: 14601337
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2001 Oct;36(2):294-301
references.pmid: 11580805
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 1992 Nov;17(11):1317-25
references.pmid: 1430638
references.citation: Health Soc Care Community. 2010 Nov;18(6):671-80
references.pmid: 20637041
references.citation: Midwifery. 1998 Mar;14(1):4-9
references.pmid: 9633371
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2005 Jan;49(2):182-90
references.pmid: 15641951
references.citation: Contemp Nurse. 2011 Dec;40(1):71-86
references.pmid: 22545907
references.citation: Nurs Ethics. 2000 Sep;7(5):425-38
references.pmid: 11221402
references.citation: Arch Womens Ment Health. 2003 Aug;6 Suppl 2:S71-7
references.pmid: 14615925
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2005 Aug;51(4):414-20
references.pmid: 16086810
references.citation: Community Pract. 2011 Aug;84(8):33-7
references.pmid: 21877523
references.citation: Med J Aust. 2009 Sep 7;191(5):276-9
references.pmid: 19740052
references.citation: J Clin Nurs. 2010 Dec;19(23-24):3516-26
references.pmid: 20946442
references.citation: Contemp Nurse. 2011 Feb;37(2):137-48
references.pmid: 21692585
references.citation: Perspect Public Health. 2009 Sep;129(5):221-7
references.pmid: 19788165
references.citation: Contemp Nurse. 2006 Dec-2007 Jan;23(2):303-11
references.pmid: 17343533
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 May;45(5):682-96
references.pmid: 17418848
references.citation: Nurse Res. 2013 May;20(5):11-9
references.pmid: 23687844
references.citation: Qual Health Res. 2012 Mar;22(3):384-96
references.pmid: 21890718
references.citation: Nurs Inq. 2010 Mar;17(1):27-38
references.pmid: 20137028
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6
references.pmid: 3651732
references.citation: Community Pract. 2009 Jun;82(6):18-22
references.pmid: 19552111
references.citation: Birth. 2007 Jun;34(2):155-63
references.pmid: 17542820
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Feb;45(2):232-45
references.pmid: 17049352
references.citation: Birth. 2011 Mar;38(1):49-60
references.pmid: 21332775
references.citation: Women Birth. 2009 Jun;22(2):64-72
references.pmid: 19217366
references.citation: Public Health Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;27(4):347-52
references.pmid: 20626835
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2003 Jul;43(1):82-92
references.pmid: 12801399
references.citation: Acta Paediatr. 2007 Jun;96(6):897-901
references.pmid: 17537020