title: How effective are DNA barcodes in the identification of African rainforest trees?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  DNA barcoding of rain forest trees could potentially help biologists identify species and discover new ones. However, DNA barcodes cannot always distinguish between closely related species, and the size and completeness of barcode databases are key parameters for their successful application. We test the ability of rbcL, matK and trnH-psbA plastid DNA markers to identify rain forest trees at two sites in Atlantic central Africa under the assumption that a database is exhaustive in terms of species content, but not necessarily in terms of haplotype diversity within species.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We assess the accuracy of identification to species or genus using a genetic distance matrix between samples either based on a global multiple sequence alignment (GD) or on a basic local alignment search tool (BLAST). Where a local database is available (within a 50 ha plot), barcoding was generally reliable for genus identification (95-100% success), but less for species identification (71-88%). Using a single marker, best results for species identification were obtained with trnH-psbA. There was a significant decrease of barcoding success in species-rich clades. When the local database was used to identify the genus of trees from another region and did include all genera from the query individuals but not all species, genus identification success decreased to 84-90%. The GD method performed best but a global multiple sequence alignment is not applicable on trnH-psbA.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Barcoding is a useful tool to assign unidentified African rain forest trees to a genus, but identification to a species is less reliable, especially in species-rich clades, even using an exhaustive local database. Combining two markers improves the accuracy of species identification but it would only marginally improve genus identification. Finally, we highlight some limitations of the BLAST algorithm as currently implemented and suggest possible improvements for barcoding applications.
authors.affiliation: Evolutionary Biology and Ecology-Faculté des Sciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
authors.forename: Ingrid
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Parmentier
authors.forename: Jérôme
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Duminil
authors.forename: Maria
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kuzmina
authors.forename: Morgane
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Philippe
authors.forename: Duncan W
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Thomas
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Kenfack
authors.forename: George B
authors.initials: GB
authors.lastname: Chuyong
authors.forename: Corinne
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Cruaud
authors.forename: Olivier J
authors.initials: OJ
authors.lastname: Hardy
mesh_terms: D002163:Cameroon; D058893:DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic; D030541:Databases, Genetic; D017343:Genes, Plant; D018087:Plastids / Q000235:genetics; D011110:Polymorphism, Genetic; D013045:Species Specificity; D014197:Trees / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics*; D014329:Tropical Climate
references.citation: Cladistics. 2007 Feb;23(1):1-21
references.pmid: 34905841
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4598
references.pmid: 19240801
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 29;360(1462):1905-16
references.pmid: 16214748
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2011 Feb;98(2):254-64
references.pmid: 21613114
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009 Oct 16;4(10):e7483
references.pmid: 19834612
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Nov 09;5(11):e15409
references.pmid: 21085700
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 26;105(8):2923-8
references.pmid: 18258745
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):12794-7
references.pmid: 19666622
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e20552
references.pmid: 21857897
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 May;11(3):450-60
references.pmid: 21481203
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Jan;11(1):89-100
references.pmid: 21429104
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2010 Oct;19(20):4462-77
references.pmid: 20854478
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26841
references.pmid: 22096501
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111-20
references.pmid: 7463489
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2012 May;12(3):377-88
references.pmid: 22356472
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2010 Jul 13;8(7):e1000417
references.pmid: 20644709
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 3;106(44):18621-6
references.pmid: 19841276
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Jan;11(1):72-83
references.pmid: 21429102
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30490
references.pmid: 22272356
references.citation: Brief Bioinform. 2010 Jul;11(4):440-53
references.pmid: 20156987
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 May;9 Suppl s1:130-9
references.pmid: 21564972
references.citation: Science. 2002 Jan 11;295(5553):276-7
references.pmid: 11789538
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26619
references.pmid: 22039517
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Dec;84(24):9054-8
references.pmid: 3480529
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1596-9
references.pmid: 17488738
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012 Jan;62(1):275-85
references.pmid: 22019936
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010 Nov;57(2):859-67
references.pmid: 20813193
references.citation: Mol Ecol Notes. 2007 May 1;7(3):355-364
references.pmid: 18784790
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19254
references.pmid: 21637336
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Jul 30;3(7):e2802
references.pmid: 18665273
references.citation: PLoS One. 2007 Jun 06;2(6):e508
references.pmid: 17551588
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 May;9 Suppl s1:172-80
references.pmid: 21564976