title: Longevity of direct restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities: a retrospective study.
abstract: The aims of this retrospective clinical study were to compare the longevities of direct posterior amalgam restorations (AMs) and resin composite restorations (RCs) that were subjected to occlusal stresses and to investigate variables predictive of their outcome. A total of 269 AMs and RCs filled in Class I and II cavities of posterior teeth were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier survival estimator and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. Seventy-one retreated restorations were reviewed from dental records. The other 198 restorations still in use were evaluated according to modified US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria by two investigators. The longevity of RCs was significantly lower than that of AMs (AM = 8.7 years and RC = 5.0 years, p<0.05), especially in molars. The prognostic variables, such as age, restorative material, tooth type, operator group, diagnosis, cavity classification, and gender, affected the longevity of the restorations (multivariate Cox regression analysis, p<0.05). However, among the restorations working in oral cavities, their clinical performance evaluated with modified USPHS criteria showed no statistical difference between both restoratives. In contrast to the short longevity of RCs relative to AMs, the clinical performance of RCs working in oral cavities was observed to be not different from that of AMs. This suggests that once a RC starts to fail, it happens in a rapid progression. As posterior esthetic restorations, RCs must be observed carefully with periodic follow-ups for early detection and timely repair of failures.
authors.forename: Y-J
authors.initials: YJ
authors.lastname: Rho
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Namgung
authors.forename: B-H
authors.initials: BH
authors.lastname: Jin
authors.forename: B-S
authors.initials: BS
authors.lastname: Lim
authors.forename: B-H
authors.initials: BH
authors.lastname: Cho
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002648:Child; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003723:Dental Amalgam / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D003731:Dental Caries; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000379:methods*; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D053208:Kaplan-Meier Estimate; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D003188:Composite Resins; D003723:Dental Amalgam