title: Models of professional regulation: institutionalizing an agency relationship.
abstract: The regulation of medical practice can historically be understood as a second-level agency relationship whereby the state delegated authority to professional bodies to police the primary agency relationship between the individual physician and the patient. Borow, Levi and Glekin show how different national systems vary in the degree to which they insist on institutionally insulating the agency function from the promotion of private professional interests, and relate these variations to different models of the health care state. In fact these differences have even deeper roots in different "liberal" or "coordinated" varieties of capitalist political economies. Neither model is inherently more efficient than the other: what matters is the internal coherence or logic of these systems that conditions the expectations of actors in responding to particular challenges. The territory that Borow, Levi and Glekin have usefully mapped invites further exploration in this regard.This is a commentary on http://www.ijhpr.org/content/2/1/8.
authors.affiliation: School of Public Policy and Governance, University of Toronto, Toronto, CANADA. c.tuohy@utoronto.ca.
authors.forename: Carolyn Hughes
authors.initials: CH
authors.lastname: Tuohy
references.citation: J Health Polit Policy Law. 2003 Apr-Jun;28(2-3):195-215
references.pmid: 12836883
references.citation: Br Med J. 1975 Apr 19;2(5963):154
references.pmid: 20792151
references.citation: Isr J Health Policy Res. 2013 Feb 20;2(1):8
references.pmid: 23425333
references.citation: J Health Polit Policy Law. 1995 Fall;20(3):615-52
references.pmid: 8530770