title: Comparison of 2 rat breeding schemes using conventional caging.
abstract: Compared with earlier editions, the eighth edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals recommends more cage floor space for female rats with litters. As such, conventional rat cages often do not supply the recommended floor space to maintain 2 adult rats and a litter in the same cage. We evaluated 2 breeding schemes using traditional cages that afford 140 in.(2) (903 cm(2)) of floor space: (1) monogamous pairs housed continuously and (2) monogamous pairs cohoused intermittently with removal of the male rat after parturition. The results did not demonstrate a significant difference between breeding schemes in generation time, number of litters per breeding pair, percentage of litters weaned, number of pups born per breeding pair, and number of pups weaned per breeding pair. However, the average weaning weight of pups was significantly higher with scheme 1 compared with scheme 2. Collectively, these results indicate continuous housing of monogamous breeding pairs may be preferable to intermittent housing when conventional cages are used.
authors.affiliation: Biomedical Resource Center, Office of Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. kpallen@mcw.edu
authors.forename: Kenneth P
authors.initials: KP
authors.lastname: Allen
authors.forename: Melinda R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Dwinell
authors.forename: Allison
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Zappa
authors.forename: Anne
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Temple
authors.forename: Joseph
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Thulin
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000830:Animals, Laboratory; D001947:Breeding / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006799:Housing, Animal; D008297:Male; D051381:Rats; D012098:Reproduction
references.citation: Mamm Genome. 2011 Aug;22(7-8):466-75
references.pmid: 21732192
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2000 Jun;114(2):183-192
references.pmid: 10890590
references.citation: Can Vet J. 2003 Sep;44(9):749-53
references.pmid: 14524633
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 2008 Mar 18;93(4-5):1055-60
references.pmid: 18294662
references.citation: Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2006 Jun;31(5):623-33
references.pmid: 16616814
references.citation: Ontogenez. 2003 Sep-Oct;34(5):371-6
references.pmid: 14582230
references.citation: Neuroendocrinology. 1984 Oct;39(4):330-3
references.pmid: 6092987
references.citation: J Reprod Fertil. 1985 Jan;73(1):1-8
references.pmid: 3968647
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2002 Oct 31;60(1):41-52
references.pmid: 12429391
references.citation: J Nutr. 1963 Jul;80(3):255-62
references.pmid: 13970597
references.citation: Endocr Rev. 2000 Oct;21(5):514-50
references.pmid: 11041447
references.citation: Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2003 Jan;42(1):9-18
references.pmid: 12580569
references.citation: Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2002 Jul;41(4):15-22
references.pmid: 12109892
references.citation: Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2004 Nov;43(6):42-51
references.pmid: 15669134
references.citation: J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2002;5(1):63-72
references.pmid: 12738589
references.citation: Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2007 Apr-Jun;5(2):210-4
references.pmid: 18604021
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2008 May;40(5):516-22
references.pmid: 18443588
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 1983 Feb;56(2):330-5
references.pmid: 6682415
references.citation: J Neurosci Res. 2011 Mar;89(3):329-40
references.pmid: 21259320
references.citation: Dev Psychobiol. 2003 Apr;42(3):246-51
references.pmid: 12621650
references.citation: Methods Mol Biol. 2010;597:151-67
references.pmid: 20013232
references.citation: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2009 Sep;48(5):492-8
references.pmid: 19807969
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 2006 Jul 30;88(4-5):605-14
references.pmid: 16828814
references.citation: Exp Anim. 2008 Jan;57(1):19-25
references.pmid: 18256515
references.citation: Mamm Genome. 2007 May;18(5):338-46
references.pmid: 17557177
references.citation: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007 Jul;293(1):H881-94
references.pmid: 17322424
references.citation: J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 1999;2(2):97-110
references.pmid: 16363949
references.citation: Cell Metab. 2012 Feb 8;15(2):129-30
references.pmid: 22326213
references.citation: Comp Med. 2009 Oct;59(5):437-43
references.pmid: 19887027
references.citation: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2012 Apr;302(7):R825-32
references.pmid: 22262304
references.citation: Clin Sci (Lond). 2010 Jul 06;119(8):303-11
references.pmid: 20615201
references.citation: Cell Metab. 2012 Feb 8;15(2):201-8
references.pmid: 22326221
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2004 Jun;46(1):30-8
references.pmid: 15215039
references.citation: Physiol Res. 2007;56(5):667-669
references.pmid: 17973600
references.citation: Braz J Med Biol Res. 1999 Oct;32(10):1229-37
references.pmid: 10510260
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2004 Aug 12;153(1):211-6
references.pmid: 15219722
references.citation: Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2003 May;42(3):8-12
references.pmid: 19760827
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1997 Aug;54(2):377-86
references.pmid: 9268470
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 2005 Sep 15;86(1-2):136-44
references.pmid: 16126237
references.citation: Trends Genet. 2010 Dec;26(12):510-8
references.pmid: 20869786