title: Geographic variation in chin shape challenges the universal facial attractiveness hypothesis.
abstract: The universal facial attractiveness (UFA) hypothesis proposes that some facial features are universally preferred because they are reliable signals of mate quality. The primary evidence for this hypothesis comes from cross-cultural studies of perceived attractiveness. However, these studies do not directly address patterns of morphological variation at the population level. An unanswered question is therefore: Are universally preferred facial phenotypes geographically invariant, as the UFA hypothesis implies? The purpose of our study is to evaluate this often overlooked aspect of the UFA hypothesis by examining patterns of geographic variation in chin shape. We collected symphyseal outlines from 180 recent human mandibles (90 male, 90 female) representing nine geographic regions. Elliptical Fourier functions analysis was used to quantify chin shape, and principle components analysis was used to compute shape descriptors. In contrast to the expectations of the UFA hypothesis, we found significant geographic differences in male and female chin shape. These findings are consistent with region-specific sexual selection and/or random genetic drift, but not universal sexual selection. We recommend that future studies of facial attractiveness take into consideration patterns of morphological variation within and between diverse human populations.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. zane@u.northwestern.edu
authors.forename: Zaneta M
authors.initials: ZM
authors.lastname: Thayer
authors.forename: Seth D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Dobson
mesh_terms: D001504:Beauty; D002680:Chin / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D005260:Female; D005843:Geography; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008297:Male; D008334:Mandible / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D025341:Principal Component Analysis; D012727:Sex Characteristics
references.citation: Evolution. 2008 Oct;62(10):2473-86
references.pmid: 18691260
references.citation: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012 Apr;147(4):661-70
references.pmid: 22371071
references.citation: J Hum Evol. 2007 Aug;53(2):135-45
references.pmid: 17512036
references.citation: J Hum Evol. 2006 Jun;50(6):627-43
references.pmid: 16678885
references.citation: J Dent Res. 2006 Jul;85(7):638-42
references.pmid: 16798865
references.citation: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2008 Aug;136(4):441-54
references.pmid: 18383159
references.citation: Hum Nat. 1993 Sep;4(3):237-69
references.pmid: 24214366
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jan 22;273(1583):135-40
references.pmid: 16555779
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Sep 17;395(6699):229-30
references.pmid: 9751046
references.citation: J Hum Evol. 2002 Jul;43(1):67-87
references.pmid: 12098211
references.citation: Hum Nat. 1993 Sep;4(3):271-96
references.pmid: 24214367
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 12;366(1571):1638-59
references.pmid: 21536551
references.citation: Perception. 2001;30(5):611-25
references.pmid: 11430245
references.citation: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010 Nov;143(3):417-25
references.pmid: 20949612
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Dec;3(12):452-460
references.pmid: 10562724
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Jan;17(1):2-22
references.pmid: 10666702
references.citation: J Biomech. 2006;39(10):1903-13
references.pmid: 16084518
references.citation: Am J Hum Biol. 1994;6(2):203-213
references.pmid: 28548277
references.citation: J Hum Evol. 2000 Jul;39(1):107-22
references.pmid: 10896813
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Oct 22;270(1529):2167-72
references.pmid: 14561281
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2000 May;126(3):390-423
references.pmid: 10825783
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Aug 27;394(6696):884-7
references.pmid: 9732869
references.citation: Int J Evol Biol. 2011 Jan 20;2011:632484
references.pmid: 21350636
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 May 7;271 Suppl 4:S233-6
references.pmid: 15252993
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Nov 26;396(6709):321-2
references.pmid: 9845067
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003 Aug;78(3):385-407
references.pmid: 14558590
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Jul;59(1):61-72
references.pmid: 2213490
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1998 Jan;26(1):146-60
references.pmid: 9519705
references.citation: Theor Popul Biol. 1994 Feb;45(1):1-15
references.pmid: 8023313
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Aug 7;270 Suppl 1:S93-5
references.pmid: 12952647
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1975 Sep;53(1):205-14
references.pmid: 1195756