title: Reliability and validity of the weight status and dietary intake measures in the COMPASS questionnaire: are the self-reported measures of body mass index (BMI) and Canada's food guide servings robust?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The COMPASS study is designed to follow a cohort of ~30,000 grade 9 to 12 students attending ~60 secondary schools for four years to understand how changes in school characteristics (policies, programs, built environment) are associated with changes in youth health behaviours. Since the student-level questionnaire for COMPASS (Cq) is designed to facilitate multiple large-scale school-based data collections using passive consent procedures, the Cq is only comprised of self-reported measures. The present study assesses the 1-week (1 wk) test-retest reliability and the concurrent validity of the Cq measures for weight status and dietary intake.
  
  
  METHODS
  Validation study data were collected from 178 grade 9 students in Ontario (Canada). At time 1 (T1), participants completed the Cq and daily recoding of their dietary intake using the web-based eaTracker tool. After one week, (T2), students completed the Cq again, participants submitted their daily eaTracker logs and staff measured their height and weight. Test-retest reliability of the self-reported (SR) weight status and dietary intake measures at T1 and T2, and the concurrent validity of the objectively measured and SR weight status and dietary intake measures at T2 were examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Test-retest reliability for SR height (ICC 0.96), weight (ICC 0.99), and BMI (ICC 0.95) are considered substantial. The concurrent validity for SR height (ICC 0.88), weight (ICC 0.95), and BMI (ICC 0.84) are also considered substantial. The test-retest reliability for SR dietary intake for fruits and vegetables (ICC 0.68) and milk and alternatives (ICC 0.69) are considered moderate, whereas meat and alternatives (ICC 0.41), and grain products (ICC 0.56) are considered fair. The concurrent validity for SR dietary intake identified that fruits and vegetables (ICC 0.53), milk and alternatives (ICC 0.60), and grain products (ICC 0.41) are considered fair, whereas meat and alternatives (ICC 0.34) was considered slight.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  While the test-retest reliability of the measures used in this study were all high, the concurrent validity of the measures was considered acceptable. The results support the use of the self-reported COMPASS weight status and dietary intake measures for use in research where objective measures are not possible.
authors.affiliation: School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada. sleather@uwaterloo.ca
authors.forename: Scott T
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: Leatherdale
authors.forename: Rachel E
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: Laxer
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D001827:Body Height; D015992:Body Mass Index; D001835:Body Weight; D004032:Diet; D015930:Diet Records; D002149:Energy Intake; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005260:Female; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009765:Obesity / Q000517:prevention & control; D009864:Ontario; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012574:Schools; D057566:Self Report; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires / Q000592:standards*
references.citation: Public Health Nutr. 2003 Sep;6(6):581-8
references.pmid: 14690039
references.citation: World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2003;916:i-viii, 1-149, backcover
references.pmid: 12768890
references.citation: Eur J Public Health. 2006 Oct;16(5):532-5
references.pmid: 16601105
references.citation: BMJ. 2000 May 6;320(7244):1240-3
references.pmid: 10797032
references.citation: J Adolesc Health. 2005 Nov;37(5):371-5
references.pmid: 16227121
references.citation: J Hum Nutr Diet. 2012 Feb;25(1):59-68
references.pmid: 21615806
references.citation: J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Mar;102(3 Suppl):S13-22
references.pmid: 11902384
references.citation: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 Dec;17 Suppl 3:S43-8
references.pmid: 19927146
references.citation: Health Rep. 2010 Mar;21(1):7-20
references.pmid: 20426223
references.citation: Health Promot Pract. 2009 Apr;10(2):254-61
references.pmid: 18287582
references.citation: J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Mar;95(3):336-40
references.pmid: 7860946
references.citation: J Adolesc Health. 1992 Mar;13(2):118-20
references.pmid: 1627578
references.citation: Acta Paediatr. 2010 Jan;99(1):83-8
references.pmid: 19878130
references.citation: J Adolesc Health. 2007 Apr;40(4):305-10
references.pmid: 17367722
references.citation: Can J Public Health. 2007 Jan-Feb;98(1):12-6
references.pmid: 17278670
references.citation: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998 Jul;22(7):673-7
references.pmid: 9705028
references.citation: Br J Nutr. 2008 Jan;99(1):175-84
references.pmid: 17697426
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2007 Apr;97(4):648-54
references.pmid: 17329662
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Mar 15;141(6):575-80
references.pmid: 7900725
references.citation: Br J Nutr. 2004 Oct;92 Suppl 2:S213-22
references.pmid: 15522159
references.citation: Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2011 Dec;32(1):47-54
references.pmid: 22153176
references.citation: J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Mar;102(3):380-5
references.pmid: 11902371
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Feb 1;163(3):279-88
references.pmid: 16339051
references.citation: J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010 Oct;23(5):502-10
references.pmid: 20163509
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2006 Mar;96(3):406-9
references.pmid: 16449580
references.citation: Can J Diet Pract Res. 2001 Summer;62(2):61-9
references.pmid: 11518556
references.citation: J Am Diet Assoc. 2001 Dec;101(12):1438-46
references.pmid: 11762739
references.citation: J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Jun;106(6):925-45
references.pmid: 16812927
references.citation: J Youth Adolesc. 2011 Mar;40(3):361-72
references.pmid: 20013351
references.citation: J Adolesc Health. 2001 Jan;28(1):16-25
references.pmid: 11137901
references.citation: J Adolesc Health. 2003 Apr;32(4):281-7
references.pmid: 12667732
references.citation: Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2003 Sep;6(5):557-62
references.pmid: 12913673
references.citation: J Am Diet Assoc. 1992 Mar;92(3):313-8
references.pmid: 1552130
references.citation: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Sep;38(9):1593-600
references.pmid: 16960520
references.citation: Eur J Cancer. 2001 Oct;37 Suppl 8:S118-27
references.pmid: 11602378
references.citation: J Adolesc Health. 1992 Mar;13(2):114-7
references.pmid: 1627577
references.citation: Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002 Oct;26(5):473-8
references.pmid: 12413294
references.citation: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012 Jul;55(1):4-13
references.pmid: 22437477
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2000 Jul;106(1 Pt 1):52-8
references.pmid: 10878149
references.citation: J Adolesc Health. 2003 Dec;33(6):436-57
references.pmid: 14642706