title: Intraspecific variation influences natural settlement of eastern oysters.
abstract: As populations decline, their intraspecific diversity also diminishes. Population decline may be exacerbated if a decrease in intraspecific diversity also reduces important ecological functions that maintain population numbers. Oyster reefs are severely overharvested, declining by ~85 % worldwide. We tested how increasing within-species diversity of eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) using transplants would affect recruitment of oyster larvae, a key function necessary to maintain future populations. If harvesting reduces population numbers, within-species diversity, and connectivity, then oysters may lose the ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions as well as incur lower levels of recruitment that may hasten their decline. Results from laboratory and field studies indicated that oyster larvae use chemical cues from adult oysters and not from associated fouling communities to select settlement sites. To test how increasing within-species diversity of oysters affected recruitment, we collected oysters from three distinct bay systems in Texas, USA, and compared natural settlement in treatments where all oysters were from a single bay to a mixture of all three bays. Significantly greater recruitment occurred in mixed treatments in 2010, 2011, and 2012 even though oyster recruitment varied by order of magnitude during this time. The net biodiversity effect was positive in all 3 years, indicating that increased recruitment in mixed treatments can be greater than the additive effect of the single bay treatments. Losing intraspecific diversity may reduce recruitment and lead to further declines in oyster populations, illustrating the need for understanding how intraspecific diversity influences ecological functions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, TX, 78412, USA, lee.smee@tamucc.edu.
authors.forename: Delbert L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Smee
authors.forename: R Deborah
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Overath
authors.forename: Keith D
authors.initials: KD
authors.lastname: Johnson
authors.forename: James A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Sanchez
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D063147:Animal Distribution; D000818:Animals; D049896:Crassostrea / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D017753:Ecosystem; D014644:Genetic Variation; D005828:Genetics, Population; D011157:Population Dynamics; D012098:Reproduction / Q000502:physiology; D013781:Texas
references.citation: Ecology. 2011 Oct;92(10):1902-8
references.pmid: 22073781
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Apr;26(4):183-92
references.pmid: 21367482
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Jul 5;412(6842):72-6
references.pmid: 11452308
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 22;102(8):2826-31
references.pmid: 15710890
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Jul;7(7):510-23
references.pmid: 16778835
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2010 Mar;19(6):1253-63
references.pmid: 20456227
references.citation: Ecology. 2012 May;93(5):1134-42
references.pmid: 22764499
references.citation: Ecology. 2009 May;90(5):1412-9
references.pmid: 19537560
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2011 Apr;20(7):1431-49
references.pmid: 21426432
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 15;101(24):8998-9002
references.pmid: 15184681
references.citation: Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2011;3:509-35
references.pmid: 21329215
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2008 Jun;11(6):609-23
references.pmid: 18400018
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2012 Apr;21(7):1741-53
references.pmid: 22211530
references.citation: Evolution. 1995 Feb;49(1):151-163
references.pmid: 28593664
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Jun;23(6):327-37
references.pmid: 18439706