title: The frontal eye fields limit the capacity of visual short-term memory in rhesus monkeys.
abstract: The frontal eye fields (FEF) in rhesus monkeys have been implicated in visual short-term memory (VSTM) as well as control of visual attention. Here we examined the importance of the area in the VSTM capacity and the relationship between VSTM and attention, using the chemical inactivation technique and multi-target saccade tasks with or without the need of target-location memory. During FEF inactivation, serial saccades to targets defined by color contrast were unaffected, but saccades relying on short-term memory were impaired when the target count was at the capacity limit of VSTM. The memory impairment was specific to the FEF-coded retinotopic locations, and subject to competition among targets distributed across visual fields. These results together suggest that the FEF plays a crucial role during the entry of information into VSTM, by enabling attention deployment on targets to be remembered. In this view, the memory capacity results from the limited availability of attentional resources provided by FEF: The FEF can concurrently maintain only a limited number of activations to register the targets into memory. When lesions render part of the area unavailable for activation, the number would decrease, further reducing the capacity of VSTM.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. kminlee@snu.ac.kr
authors.forename: Kyoung-Min
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Kyung-Ha
authors.initials: KH
authors.lastname: Ahn
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005123:Eye / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D005260:Female; D008253:Macaca mulatta / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology*; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D012438:Saccades / Q000502:physiology; D013037:Spatial Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D014794:Visual Fields / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: J Vis. 2012 May 25;12(5):9
references.pmid: 22637710
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jun;9(6):296-305
references.pmid: 15925809
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Aug;16(8):637-43
references.pmid: 16102067
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1997 Sep;116(2):229-49
references.pmid: 9348123
references.citation: Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81
references.pmid: 9384378
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):364-79
references.pmid: 20056554
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1999 May;81(5):2191-214
references.pmid: 10322059
references.citation: Brain. 1992 Oct;115 ( Pt 5):1387-402
references.pmid: 1422794
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):152-62
references.pmid: 13679398
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 Apr;28(2):181-200
references.pmid: 15172763
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2010 Oct;20(10):2464-77
references.pmid: 20100901
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39886
references.pmid: 22761923
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;100(5):2726-37
references.pmid: 18784274
references.citation: Nature. 2011 May 15;474(7351):372-5
references.pmid: 21572439
references.citation: Science. 2008 Aug 8;321(5890):851-4
references.pmid: 18687968
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 29;109(22):8780-5
references.pmid: 22582168
references.citation: J Vis. 2011 Mar 14;11(3):
references.pmid: 21402883
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1995 Dec;74(6):2744-8
references.pmid: 8747229
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 5;108(27):11252-5
references.pmid: 21690375
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2007 Aug 6;18(12):1207-13
references.pmid: 17632269
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 1;102(5):1797-802
references.pmid: 15665101
references.citation: Science. 2007 Mar 30;315(5820):1860-2
references.pmid: 17395832
references.citation: Neuron. 2009 Aug 13;63(3):386-96
references.pmid: 19679077
references.citation: Nature. 1993 Dec 2;366(6454):467-9
references.pmid: 8247155
references.citation: Neuron. 2012 Feb 9;73(3):581-94
references.pmid: 22325208
references.citation: Cognition. 2010 Oct;117(1):69-79
references.pmid: 20659731
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85
references.pmid: 11515286
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 19;26(16):4228-35
references.pmid: 16624943
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):751-4
references.pmid: 15085133
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jan;14(1):106-19
references.pmid: 14654462
references.citation: Nature. 2008 May 8;453(7192):233-5
references.pmid: 18385672
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;102(6):3656-72
references.pmid: 19828723
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 22;105(16):5975-9
references.pmid: 18420818
references.citation: Science. 2009 Feb 13;323(5916):877; author reply 877
references.pmid: 19213899
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:319-49
references.pmid: 10202542
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):748-51
references.pmid: 15085132
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Mar;131(1):48-64
references.pmid: 11900102
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1985 Mar;53(3):603-35
references.pmid: 3981231
references.citation: J Vis. 2012 Mar 14;12(3):
references.pmid: 22419756
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Nov;88(3):405-33
references.pmid: 18047230
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2010 Oct;20(10):2478-85
references.pmid: 20100899
references.citation: J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001 Mar 1;218(5):669-96
references.pmid: 11280396
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2011 Jun 7;21(11):975-9
references.pmid: 21596568
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Nov 24;438(7067):500-3
references.pmid: 16306992
references.citation: J Vis. 2010 Sep 29;10(11):28
references.pmid: 20884523