title: Depression as a psychosocial consequence of occupational injury in the US working population: findings from the medical expenditure panel survey.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Empirical evidence describing the psychosocial consequences of occupational injury is still limited. The effect of occupational injury on depression might pose unique challenges in workers compared with other kinds of injury. This study aimed to assess the differential impact of workplace injury compared with non-workplace injury on depression over time, and to identify the potential risk factors associated with post-injury depression in the US working population.
  
  
  METHODS
  Using pooled panel data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2000-2006, a total of 35,155 workers aged 18-64 years who had been followed for about 18 months in each panel were analyzed. Injuries in the 4-5 months before baseline, and subsequent depression incidence during follow-up, were identified using ICD-9 codes for the medical conditions captured in personal interviews. A discrete time-proportional odds model was used.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 5.5% of workers with occupational injury at baseline reported depression at follow-up, compared with 4.7% of workers with non-occupational injury and 3.1% of workers without injuries. Those with occupational injuries had more severe injuries and required longer treatment, compared with those with non-occupational injuries. Only 39% of workers with workplace injuries were paid Workers' Compensation (WC). The association between injury and depression appeared to be stronger for workplace injury, and the adjusted odds ratio for depression was 1.72 for those with occupational injury (95% CI: 1.27-2.32), and 1.36 for those with non-occupational injury (95% CI: 1.07-1.65) compared with the no-injury group, after controlling for relevant covariates. Occupational injury was associated with higher odds of developing depression over time. WC as a source of medical payment was associated with 33% higher odds of developing depression (95% CI: 1.01-1.74). Part-time work, shorter job tenure, and long working hours were independently associated with post-injury depression risk.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Workers with occupational injury were more likely to become depressed than those with non-occupational injury. The psychosocial consequences of occupational injury, including depression, deserve further exploration to adequately support those injured at work. This finding also emphasizes a need for early intervention to reduce the burden of depression associated with occupational injury.
authors.affiliation: Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Keimyung University, Daegu, South Korea. jaeykim@dsmc.or.kr
authors.forename: Jaeyoung
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kim
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003866:Depressive Disorder / Q000191:economics* / Q000209:etiology* / Q000628:therapy; D005260:Female; D005102:Health Expenditures / Q000706:statistics & numerical data* / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D060051:Occupational Injuries / Q000150:complications / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000523:psychology*; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology
references.citation: Brain Inj. 2008 Mar;22(3):233-41
references.pmid: 18297595
references.citation: J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Jun;46(6):521-7
references.pmid: 15213513
references.citation: Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:349-75
references.pmid: 11910067
references.citation: Versicherungsmedizin. 2003 Jun 1;55(2):76-81
references.pmid: 12838747
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2004 Apr;58(7):1385-93
references.pmid: 14759683
references.citation: Am J Ind Med. 2001 Oct;40(4):438-51
references.pmid: 11598993
references.citation: Am J Ind Med. 2007 Sep;50(9):633-45
references.pmid: 17680640
references.citation: Can J Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;54(8):534-46
references.pmid: 19726006
references.citation: Am J Ind Med. 2000 Nov;38(5):498-506
references.pmid: 11025491
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2003 Dec;57(11):2173-82
references.pmid: 14512247
references.citation: J Trauma. 2002 Jul;53(1):98-103
references.pmid: 12131397
references.citation: Occup Environ Med. 2008 Jul;65(7):438-45
references.pmid: 18417557
references.citation: Am J Ind Med. 2001 Oct;40(4):398-402
references.pmid: 11598990
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2008 Sep;248(3):429-37
references.pmid: 18791363
references.citation: Inj Prev. 2002 Jun;8(2):91-6
references.pmid: 12120842
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;49(12):1429-33
references.pmid: 8991959
references.citation: Br J Clin Psychol. 2006 Jun;45(Pt 2):217-30
references.pmid: 16719980
references.citation: Am J Ind Med. 2001 Oct;40(4):403-17
references.pmid: 11598991
references.citation: J Occup Environ Med. 2002 May;44(5):425-34
references.pmid: 12024688
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2004 May;58(10):1889-901
references.pmid: 15020006
references.citation: Int J Occup Environ Health. 1998 Oct-Dec;4(4):209-16
references.pmid: 9876629
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Jun;156(6):837-41
references.pmid: 10360120
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2000 Jan;90(1):70-7
references.pmid: 10630140
references.citation: Am J Ind Med. 2000 Apr;37(4):400-9
references.pmid: 10706752
references.citation: J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Jun;50(6):658-66
references.pmid: 18545093
references.citation: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000;250(3):156-62
references.pmid: 10941992
references.citation: J Health Soc Policy. 1994;6(1):87-100
references.pmid: 10140442
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:191-214
references.pmid: 9046559