title: Word-level information influences phonetic learning in adults and infants.
abstract: Infants begin to segment words from fluent speech during the same time period that they learn phonetic categories. Segmented words can provide a potentially useful cue for phonetic learning, yet accounts of phonetic category acquisition typically ignore the contexts in which sounds appear. We present two experiments to show that, contrary to the assumption that phonetic learning occurs in isolation, learners are sensitive to the words in which sounds appear and can use this information to constrain their interpretation of phonetic variability. Experiment 1 shows that adults use word-level information in a phonetic category learning task, assigning acoustically similar vowels to different categories more often when those sounds consistently appear in different words. Experiment 2 demonstrates that 8-month-old infants similarly pay attention to word-level information and that this information affects how they treat phonetic contrasts. These findings suggest that phonetic category learning is a rich, interactive process that takes advantage of many different types of cues that are present in the input.
authors.affiliation: Department of Linguistics, University of Maryland, United States. nhf@umd.edu
authors.forename: Naomi H
authors.initials: NH
authors.lastname: Feldman
authors.forename: Emily B
authors.initials: EB
authors.lastname: Myers
authors.forename: Katherine S
authors.initials: KS
authors.lastname: White
authors.forename: Thomas L
authors.initials: TL
authors.lastname: Griffiths
authors.forename: James L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Morgan
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000328:Adult; D003463:Cues; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007804:Language Development; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D010700:Phonetics; D014825:Vocabulary
references.citation: Cognition. 2002 Jan;82(3):B101-11
references.pmid: 11747867
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1979 Jun;6(2):183-200
references.pmid: 468932
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 1995 Sep;6(5):314-317
references.pmid: 25152566
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2010 May;13(3):407-420
references.pmid: 20443962
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 28;109(9):3253-8
references.pmid: 22331874
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Apr;20(2):421-35
references.pmid: 8189202
references.citation: Hear Res. 1990 Aug 1;47(1-2):103-38
references.pmid: 2228789
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):238-65
references.pmid: 18191826
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2008 Jan;11(1):122-34
references.pmid: 18171374
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 14;104(33):13273-8
references.pmid: 17664424
references.citation: Science. 1992 Jan 31;255(5044):606-8
references.pmid: 1736364
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 May;97(5 Pt 1):3099-111
references.pmid: 7759650
references.citation: Cogn Sci. 2006 Sep 10;30(5):945-82
references.pmid: 21702842
references.citation: J Phon. 2011 Jul 1;39(3):388-402
references.pmid: 21804656
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1995 Aug;29(1):1-23
references.pmid: 7641524
references.citation: Cognition. 2009 Nov;113(2):234-43
references.pmid: 19765698
references.citation: Cognition. 2006 Oct;101(3):B31-41
references.pmid: 16364279
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2009 Apr;12(3):369-78
references.pmid: 19371359
references.citation: J Child Lang. 2009 Nov;36(5):1157-65
references.pmid: 19281635
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Dec;102(6):3742-53
references.pmid: 9407666
references.citation: J Child Lang. 2003 May;30(2):441-69
references.pmid: 12846305
references.citation: Child Dev. 1998 Apr;69(2):309-20
references.pmid: 9586207
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2013 Oct;120(4):751-78
references.pmid: 24219848
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2006 Mar;9(2):F13-F21
references.pmid: 16472309
references.citation: Cogn Sci. 2013 Mar;37(2):344-77
references.pmid: 23137418
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):850-5
references.pmid: 18590910
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Apr;16(4):298-304
references.pmid: 15828977
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 1998 Nov;34(6):1289-309
references.pmid: 9823513
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2011 Sep;47(5):1448-58
references.pmid: 21744949
references.citation: Nature. 1997 Jul 24;388(6640):381-2
references.pmid: 9237755
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 1998 May;69(2):133-49
references.pmid: 9637756
references.citation: Infancy. 2010 Jul;15(4):420-433
references.pmid: 32693519
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Dec 27;364(1536):3617-32
references.pmid: 19933136
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 12;108(15):6038-43
references.pmid: 21444800
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1990 Feb;17(1):205-15
references.pmid: 2312642
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2005 Sep;8(5):432-43
references.pmid: 16048516
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1999 Nov-Dec;39(3-4):159-207
references.pmid: 10631011
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):EL206-12
references.pmid: 21974493
references.citation: Cogn Sci. 2013 Jan-Feb;37(1):103-24
references.pmid: 22985465
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1995 Oct;22(3):727-35
references.pmid: 8789521
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2007 Mar;54(2):99-132
references.pmid: 17054932
references.citation: Child Dev. 2010 Jul-Aug;81(4):1287-303
references.pmid: 20636696
references.citation: Lang Speech. 2003;46(Pt 2-3):217-43
references.pmid: 14748445
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2013 Jan;16(1):24-34
references.pmid: 23278924
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1994 Jun;21(2):257-71
references.pmid: 7929681