title: Computational method for calculating fluorescence intensities within three-dimensional structures in cells.
abstract: The use of fluorescence microscopy is central to cell biology in general, and essential to many fields (e.g., membrane traffic) that rely upon it to identify cellular locations of molecules under study and the extent to which they co-localize with others. Rigorous localization or co-localization data require quantitative image analyses that can vary widely between fields and laboratories. While most published data use two-dimensional images, there is an increasing appreciation for the advantages of collecting three-dimensional data sets. These include the ability to evaluate the entire cell and avoidance of focal plane bias. This is particularly important when imaging and quantifying changes in organelles with irregular borders and which vary in appearance between cells in a population, e.g., the Golgi. We describe a method developed for quantifying changes in signal intensity of one protein within any three-dimensional structure, defined by the presence of a different marker. We use as examples of this method the quantification of adaptor recruitment to transmembrane protein cargos at the Golgi though it can be directly applied to any site in the cell. Together, these advantages facilitate rigorous statistical testing of differences between conditions, despite variations in organelle structure, and we believe that this method of quantification of fluorescence data can be productively applied to a wide array of experimental questions.
authors.affiliation: Neurosciences Graduate Program; Department of Biochemistry; Emory University School of Medicine; Atlanta, GA USA.
authors.forename: Amanda H
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Caster
authors.forename: Richard A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Kahn
keywords: confocal microscopy; image analysis; immunofluorescence; isosurface; membrane traffic; microscopy; quantification; wide field
references.citation: Methods. 1999 Nov;19(3):373-85
references.pmid: 10579932
references.citation: J Gen Virol. 1986 Sep;67 ( Pt 9):2029-35
references.pmid: 3018135
references.citation: Cell. 1984 Sep;38(2):535-49
references.pmid: 6432345
references.citation: Microsc Microanal. 2010 Dec;16(6):710-24
references.pmid: 20946701
references.citation: Biochemistry. 2006 Feb 28;45(8):2618-28
references.pmid: 16489755
references.citation: Traffic. 2007 Apr;8(4):339-46
references.pmid: 17319897
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1998 Jun 12;273(24):14761-6
references.pmid: 9614075
references.citation: Curr Protoc Cytom. 2010 Apr;Chapter 12:Unit 12.19.1-20
references.pmid: 20373494
references.citation: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Oct;3(10):753-66
references.pmid: 12360192
references.citation: Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Nov;16(11):6229-41
references.pmid: 8887653
references.citation: Water Res. 2001 Apr;35(5):1149-58
references.pmid: 11268835
references.citation: Mol Biol Cell. 2008 Jan;19(1):51-64
references.pmid: 17959829
references.citation: Cytometry A. 2009 Nov;75(11):941-50
references.pmid: 19746416
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 1985 Sep;101(3):949-64
references.pmid: 2863275
references.citation: IEEE Trans Image Process. 1999;8(1):69-79
references.pmid: 18262866
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1999 Mar 19;274(12):8199-207
references.pmid: 10075724
references.citation: J Histochem Cytochem. 1985 Aug;33(8):755-61
references.pmid: 3926864
references.citation: Cytometry A. 2010 Aug;77(8):733-42
references.pmid: 20653013
references.citation: Methods Cell Biol. 2007;81:447-65
references.pmid: 17519179
references.citation: Mol Biol Cell. 2000 Sep;11(9):3013-30
references.pmid: 10982397
references.citation: Virology. 1983 Mar;125(2):335-48
references.pmid: 6301145
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 2004 Apr;165(1):111-22
references.pmid: 15078902
references.citation: J Microsc. 1993 Mar;169(3):375-382
references.pmid: 33930978