title: A qualitative study of stakeholder views on the effects of provider payment on cooperation, quality of care and cost-containment in integrated stroke care.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Stroke services are a form of integrated care which have been introduced in many countries, including the Netherlands, to improve health outcomes and processes of care by connecting the acute, rehabilitative, and chronic phases of stroke care. Limited research exists on the effects of payment systems on the functioning of integrated care services from the perspectives of those involved in providing, planning and contracting the care. This qualitative study identified stakeholder views on i) challenges in integrated stroke care associated with fee-for-service systems; ii) other possible financing models for stroke care, and iii) challenges in the implementation of an integrated financing mechanism for stroke care.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty-four participants were interviewed using face-to-face audio-recorded semi-structured interviews. Respondents were purposively selected from five stakeholder groups; care providers, health care managers, health insurers, experts and patient representatives. Transcribed data were coded and analysed to generate themes relating to the study aims.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Respondents mentioned the following challenges associated with the current fee-for-service system; inappropriate incentives for cooperation, efficiency and improving quality and the inability to exert steering power at the level of the stroke service. In addition, care is not patient-centred and the financing system is inflexible.The respondents mentioned several solutions for the challenges, but there was no consensus amongst them. Regarding the implementation of integrated financing, respondents mentioned the following general challenges; a) the foundations of the financing system are incompatible with integrated financing, b) co-morbidity and c) the lack of evidence on the effect of integrated financing. Stroke-specific challenges were; a) the diverse patient population, b) a non-uniform care trajectory, c) unclear division of responsibility for the overall care and d) different stages of development among stroke services.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study provides new knowledge on stakeholder perception of the effect of payment systems and financial incentives on cooperation processes, quality of care and cost-containment in integrated stroke care. The results show that fee-for-service does not provide the right incentives for the integration of stroke care. We recommend to perform financial experiments for integrated stroke care.
authors.affiliation: Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Johanneke F M M
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Tummers
authors.forename: Augustinus J P
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Schrijvers
authors.forename: Johanna M A
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Visser-Meily
mesh_terms: D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003363:Cost Control; D019033:Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / Q000191:economics*; D018588:Fee-for-Service Plans; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009426:Netherlands; D036301:Qualitative Research; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D012052:Reimbursement, Incentive; D000071939:Stroke Rehabilitation
references.citation: Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:e17
references.pmid: 16896372
references.citation: Int J Integr Care. 2010 Jun 23;10:e046
references.pmid: 20689772
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 15;356(11):1166-8
references.pmid: 17360996
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 22;366(12):1075-7
references.pmid: 22435368
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Sep;30(9):1627-9
references.pmid: 21900651
references.citation: Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2007 Jul;(112):1-4
references.pmid: 17649612
references.citation: Health Policy. 1999 Aug;48(2):87-105
references.pmid: 10557454
references.citation: Int J Integr Care. 2012 Oct 01;12:e193
references.pmid: 23593053
references.citation: Int J Integr Care. 2005;5:e14
references.pmid: 16773169
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):w262-71
references.pmid: 19174388
references.citation: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Fall;22(4):518-24
references.pmid: 16984687
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jul-Aug;26(4):w532-44
references.pmid: 17623687
references.citation: Health Policy. 2006 Oct;78(2-3):295-305
references.pmid: 16343688
references.citation: Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:e12
references.pmid: 16896389
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):690-8
references.pmid: 21471490
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 3;358(14):1509-14
references.pmid: 18385503
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 6;358(10):1064-71
references.pmid: 18322289
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Dec;29(12):2197-205
references.pmid: 21134920
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 17;364(11):990-1
references.pmid: 21410368
references.citation: Stroke. 2009 May;40(5):1557-63
references.pmid: 19325154
references.citation: Health Policy. 2001 Feb;55(2):111-20
references.pmid: 11163650
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 18;359(12):1197-200
references.pmid: 18799554