title: "Role magnets"? An empirical investigation of popularity trajectories for life-course persistent individuals during adolescence.
abstract: Recent scholarship has focused on the role of social status in peer groups to explain the fact that delinquency is disproportionately committed during adolescence. Yet, the precise mechanism linking adolescence, social status, and antisocial behavior is not well understood. Dual-taxonomy postulates a testable mechanism that links the sudden increase in risky behavior among adolescents to the social magnetism of a small group of persistently antisocial individuals, referred to here as the "role magnet" hypothesis. Using semi-parametric group-based trajectory modeling and growth-curve modeling, this study provides the first test of this hypothesis by examining physical violence and popularity trajectories for 1,845 male respondents age 11-32 from a nationally representative sample (54 % non-Hispanic White; 21 % non-Hispanic African American; 17 % Hispanic; 8 % Asian). Individuals assigned to a "chronic violence" trajectory group showed consistently lower average levels of popularity from 11 to 19. But, these same individuals experienced increases in popularity during early adolescence and subsequent declines in late adolescence. These findings are linked to current research examining social status as a mechanism generating antisocial behavior during adolescence and the consequences of delayed entry into adult roles.
authors.affiliation: School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 411 N. Central Ave., Suite 600, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA, Jacob.Young.1@asu.edu.
authors.forename: Jacob T N
authors.initials: JT
authors.lastname: Young
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000294:Adolescent Behavior; D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D006801:Humans; D007604:Juvenile Delinquency / Q000523:psychology*; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D015233:Models, Statistical; D063588:National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health; D010379:Peer Group; D012928:Social Desirability; D012931:Social Environment; D014481:United States; D014754:Violence / Q000523:psychology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Aggress Behav. 2009 Mar-Apr;35(2):117-35
references.pmid: 19184986
references.citation: Soc Networks. 2011 May;33(2):101-112
references.pmid: 21765588
references.citation: Prev Sci. 2006 Mar;7(1):31-41
references.pmid: 16378226
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2002 Sep;38(5):635-47
references.pmid: 12220043
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2003 Mar;39(2):222-45
references.pmid: 12661883
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2003 Nov;39(6):992-1004
references.pmid: 14584980
references.citation: Criminology. 2011 Feb;49(1):95-127
references.pmid: 21572969
references.citation: J Pediatr Psychol. 2003 Jun;28(4):243-9
references.pmid: 12730281
references.citation: Aggress Behav. 2009 Mar-Apr;35(2):164-78
references.pmid: 19177554
references.citation: Child Dev. 2004 Jan-Feb;75(1):147-63
references.pmid: 15015681
references.citation: J Pediatr Psychol. 2010 May;35(4):354-67
references.pmid: 19667053
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1993 Oct;100(4):674-701
references.pmid: 8255953
references.citation: J Pediatr Psychol. 2011 Oct;36(9):980-90
references.pmid: 21852342
references.citation: Dev Psychopathol. 2006 Winter;18(1):155-72
references.pmid: 16478557
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2011 Jul;47(4):1167-72
references.pmid: 21463036
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2007 Nov;43(6):1531-1543
references.pmid: 18020830
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:141-71
references.pmid: 18851686
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2000 Jan;36(1):14-24
references.pmid: 10645741
references.citation: J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Dec;42(12):1801-10
references.pmid: 23275064