title: The Organization of Words and Symbolic Gestures in 18-Month-Olds' Lexicons: Evidence from a Disambiguation Task.
abstract: Infants' early communicative repertoires include both words and symbolic gestures. The current study examined the extent to which infants organize words and gestures in a single unified lexicon. As a window into lexical organization, eighteen-month-olds' (N = 32) avoidance of word-gesture overlap was examined and compared to avoidance of word-word overlap. The current study revealed that when presented with novel words, infants avoided lexical overlap, mapping novel words onto novel objects. In contrast, when presented with novel gestures, infants sought overlap, mapping novel gestures onto familiar objects. The results suggest that infants do not treat words and gestures as equivalent lexical items and that during a period of development when word and symbolic gesture processing share many similarities, important differences also exist between these two symbolic forms.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Emory University.
authors.forename: Sumarga H
authors.initials: SH
authors.lastname: Suanda
authors.forename: Laura L
authors.initials: LL
authors.lastname: Namy
references.citation: Cognition. 2011 Feb;118(2):234-44
references.pmid: 21092945
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2003 Nov;47(3):241-75
references.pmid: 14559217
references.citation: Cognition. 2003 Feb;87(1):B23-34
references.pmid: 12499109
references.citation: Child Dev. 1994 Dec;65(6):1646-62
references.pmid: 7859547
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1994 Feb;21(1):125-55
references.pmid: 8006089
references.citation: J Child Lang. 2005 Feb;32(1):207-22
references.pmid: 15779884
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1995 Jun;22(2):345-68
references.pmid: 8550727
references.citation: Infancy. 2001 Jan;2(1):73-86
references.pmid: 33451221
references.citation: Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1989;54(3-4):1-132
references.pmid: 2608077
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 May;16(5):367-71
references.pmid: 15869695
references.citation: Child Dev Perspect. 2009 Aug 1;3(2):106-111
references.pmid: 20228883
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2001 Sep;37(5):630-41
references.pmid: 11552759
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1995 Jun;22(2):369-87
references.pmid: 8550728
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2007 Sep;43(5):1111-23
references.pmid: 17723039
references.citation: J Child Lang. 2007 Nov;34(4):875-89
references.pmid: 18062363
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1992 Oct;19(3):559-80
references.pmid: 1429948
references.citation: J Child Lang. 2004 Nov;31(4):821-35
references.pmid: 15658747
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1988 Apr;20(2):121-57
references.pmid: 3365937
references.citation: Child Dev. 1988 Apr;59(2):450-66
references.pmid: 2452052
references.citation: Infancy. 2010 Mar;15(2):125-150
references.pmid: 32693477
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2007 Jun;101(3):246-59
references.pmid: 17250885
references.citation: Child Dev. 1998 Apr;69(2):295-308
references.pmid: 9586206
references.citation: Child Dev. 1999 Jan-Feb;70(1):65-77
references.pmid: 10191515
references.citation: New Dir Child Dev. 1998 Spring;(79):61-73
references.pmid: 9507704
references.citation: Child Dev. 1991 Dec;62(6):1288-301
references.pmid: 1786716
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2009 Sep;12(5):815-23
references.pmid: 19702772
references.citation: Child Dev. 2013 Jan-Feb;84(1):143-53
references.pmid: 22957802