title: A solution to release twisted DNA during chromosome replication by coupled DNA polymerases.
abstract: Chromosomal replication machines contain coupled DNA polymerases that simultaneously replicate the leading and lagging strands. However, coupled replication presents a largely unrecognized topological problem. Because DNA polymerase must travel a helical path during synthesis, the physical connection between leading- and lagging-strand polymerases causes the daughter strands to entwine, or produces extensive build-up of negative supercoils in the newly synthesized DNA. How DNA polymerases maintain their connection during coupled replication despite these topological challenges is unknown. Here we examine the dynamics of the Escherichia coli replisome, using ensemble and single-molecule methods, and show that the replisome may solve the topological problem independent of topoisomerases. We find that the lagging-strand polymerase frequently releases from an Okazaki fragment before completion, leaving single-strand gaps behind. Dissociation of the polymerase does not result in loss from the replisome because of its contact with the leading-strand polymerase. This behaviour, referred to as 'signal release', had been thought to require a protein, possibly primase, to pry polymerase from incompletely extended DNA fragments. However, we observe that signal release is independent of primase and does not seem to require a protein trigger at all. Instead, the lagging-strand polymerase is simply less processive in the context of a replisome. Interestingly, when the lagging-strand polymerase is supplied with primed DNA in trans, uncoupling it from the fork, high processivity is restored. Hence, we propose that coupled polymerases introduce topological changes, possibly by accumulation of superhelical tension in the newly synthesized DNA, that cause lower processivity and transient lagging-strand polymerase dissociation from DNA.
authors.affiliation: The Rockefeller University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 1230 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065, USA.
authors.forename: Isabel
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Kurth
authors.forename: Roxana E
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: Georgescu
authors.forename: Mike E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: O'Donnell
mesh_terms: D004247:DNA / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism; D019915:DNA Primase / Q000378:metabolism; D004261:DNA Replication; D004269:DNA, Bacterial / Q000096:biosynthesis / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D004278:DNA, Superhelical / Q000096:biosynthesis / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism; D004268:DNA-Binding Proteins / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D004259:DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D004926:Escherichia coli / Q000201:enzymology* / Q000235:genetics*; D008856:Microscopy, Fluorescence; D009097:Multienzyme Complexes / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D009690:Nucleic Acid Conformation; D011485:Protein Binding; D000099272:Replisomes
chemical_list: D004247:DNA; D019915:DNA Primase; D004269:DNA, Bacterial; D004278:DNA, Superhelical; D004268:DNA-Binding Proteins; D004259:DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase; D009097:Multienzyme Complexes; D000099272:Replisomes; C022262:Okazaki fragments
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 11;106(32):13236-41
references.pmid: 19666586
references.citation: EMBO J. 2009 Oct 7;28(19):2981-91
references.pmid: 19696739
references.citation: Cell. 1976 Nov;9(3):393-407
references.pmid: 825231
references.citation: Cell. 2006 Sep 8;126(5):893-904
references.pmid: 16959569
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2004 May;52(4):925-31
references.pmid: 15130115
references.citation: Mol Cell. 2006 Jan 20;21(2):153-64
references.pmid: 16427006
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2004 May 14;279(20):21543-51
references.pmid: 15014081
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2000 Nov 3;275(44):34757-65
references.pmid: 10948202
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Mar;37(4):e27
references.pmid: 19155275
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1995 Jun 2;270(22):13366-77
references.pmid: 7768938
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2000 Jan 14;275(2):1421-32
references.pmid: 10625694
references.citation: Sci Prog. 2006;89(Pt 3-4):151-66
references.pmid: 17338437
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2005 Jan 7;280(1):355-60
references.pmid: 15522872
references.citation: Annu Rev Biochem. 2011;80:403-36
references.pmid: 21675919
references.citation: EMBO Rep. 2007 Feb;8(2):147-51
references.pmid: 17268506
references.citation: BMC Microbiol. 2012 Feb 28;12:26
references.pmid: 22373098
references.citation: Mol Cell. 2003 Feb;11(2):315-27
references.pmid: 12620221
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Mar;6(3):967-82
references.pmid: 155809
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1992 Feb 25;267(6):4074-83
references.pmid: 1740453
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Jan 15;457(7227):336-9
references.pmid: 19029884
references.citation: Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:283-315
references.pmid: 15952889
references.citation: Curr Biol. 1995 Apr 1;5(4):334-7
references.pmid: 7627541
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2000 Jan 13;10(1):R25-9
references.pmid: 10660290
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1985 Oct 15;260(23):12884-9
references.pmid: 2413036
references.citation: Bioessays. 1999 Oct;21(10):805-8
references.pmid: 10497329
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2003 Jun 6;278(23):21276-85
references.pmid: 12649286