title: Segmental spinal canal volume in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), typically characterized by the forward slippage of the superior vertebra of a lumbar motion segment, is a common spinal pathological condition in elderly individuals. Significant deformation and volume changes of the spinal canal can occur because of the vertebral slippage, but few data have been reported on these anatomic variations in DS patients. Whether to restore normal anatomy, such as reduction of the slippage and restoration of disc height, is still not clear in surgery.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  This study was designed to determine the volume change of the spinal canal and detect specific anatomic factors affecting the spinal canal volume in DS patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  A case-control study.
  
  
  METHODS
  Nine asymptomatic volunteers (mean age 54.4) and 9 patients with L4/L5 DS (mean age 73.4) were recruited. All patients had intermittent claudication and different extent low back pain, and two patients also had leg pain. L4/L5 vertebral motion segment unit of each subject was reconstructed using three-dimensional computed tomography or magnetic resonance images in a solid modeling software. In vivo lumbar vertebral motion during functional postures (supine, standing upright, flexion, and extension) was determined using a dual fluoroscopic imaging technique. The volume of the spinal canal was measured at each functional posture. Various anatomic parameters (disc height, cross-sectional area of the canal, left-right diameter of the canal, anterior-posterior diameter of the canal, slippage, posture, intervertebral disc angle [DA], etc.) that may potentially affect the canal volume were also measured, and their correlations with the volume change of spinal canal were analyzed. This study was funded by a 2-year, $275,000 grant from the National Institutes of Health.
  
  
  RESULTS
  On average, spinal canal volume was larger at supine and flexion postures than at stand and extension postures in both the DS and the asymptomatic groups. Spinal canal volume of the DS patients were significantly lower than that of the asymptomatic subjects under all the four postures (p<.05). Correlation analysis showed that spinal canal volume was strongly affected by the posterior disc height (Pearson correlation coefficient γb=0.822) and the slippage percentage (γb=-0.593) and moderately affected by the anterior disc height (γb=0.300) and the DA (γb=-0.237).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The volume of spinal canal is affected by multiple factors. Increased spinal canal volume at supine and flexion positions may explain the clinical observations of relief of symptoms at these postures in DS patients. The data also suggest that reduction of slipped vertebral body, decrease of DA, intervertebral distraction, and decompression could all be effective to increase the canal volume of DS patients thus to relieve clinical symptoms.
authors.affiliation: Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, GRJ 1215, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
authors.forename: Jun
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Miao
authors.forename: Shaobai
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Won Man
authors.initials: WM
authors.lastname: Park
authors.forename: Qun
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Xia
authors.forename: Xiutong
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Fang
authors.forename: Martin P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Torriani
authors.forename: Kirkham B
authors.initials: KB
authors.lastname: Wood
authors.forename: Guoan
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Li
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000473:pathology*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011187:Posture; D013115:Spinal Canal / Q000473:pathology*; D013168:Spondylolisthesis / Q000473:pathology*
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):61-7
references.pmid: 18165750
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 May;14(5):523-5
references.pmid: 2727797
references.citation: J Biomech. 2010 Jul 20;43(10):1905-9
references.pmid: 20381051
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Oct 1;31(21):2484-90
references.pmid: 17023859
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 15;32(4):E136-40
references.pmid: 17304123
references.citation: J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002 Apr;15(2):93-9
references.pmid: 11927816
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2008 Oct;17(10):1311-6
references.pmid: 18685873
references.citation: Am J Hosp Pharm. 1980 Dec;37(12):1673-80
references.pmid: 7446542
references.citation: J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008 Apr;16(4):208-15
references.pmid: 18390483
references.citation: J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jul;13(1):27-35
references.pmid: 20594014
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2008 Sep;17(9):1170-6
references.pmid: 18600350
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Mar;(384):54-60
references.pmid: 11249180
references.citation: Scoliosis. 2011 Jul 28;6(1):14
references.pmid: 21797995
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jan 5;93(1):29-37
references.pmid: 21209266
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Oct 1;21(19):2218-23
references.pmid: 8902965
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Oct;16(10 Suppl):S526-9
references.pmid: 1801265
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Feb 1;26(3):E13-8
references.pmid: 11224873
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 15;22(24):2968-76
references.pmid: 9431634
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Dec 1;26(23):2601-6
references.pmid: 11725242
references.citation: J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Oct;25(7):374-8
references.pmid: 22015626
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Oct 1;30(19):E579-84
references.pmid: 16205332
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2009 Jul;18(7):1013-21
references.pmid: 19301040
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Mar 15;30(6 Suppl):S60-5
references.pmid: 15767888
references.citation: Neurosurg Focus. 2002 Jul 15;13(1):E1
references.pmid: 15916408
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Mar 15;30(6 Suppl):S71-81
references.pmid: 15767890
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Nov;15(11):1211-5
references.pmid: 2267618
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 20;35(9):1002-7
references.pmid: 20407340
references.citation: Radiology. 1985 Oct;157(1):243-6
references.pmid: 4034968
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 15;33(11):E355-61
references.pmid: 18469683