title: Non-local mind from the perspective of social cognition.
abstract: Two main conceptual approaches have been employed to study the mechanisms of social cognition, whether one considers isolated or interacting minds. Using neuro-imaging of subjects in isolation, the former approach has provided knowledge on the neural underpinning of a variety of social processes. However, it has been argued that considering one brain alone cannot account for all mechanisms subtending online social interaction. This challenge has been tackled recently by using neuro-imaging of multiple interacting subjects in more ecological settings. The present short review aims at offering a comprehensive view on various advances done in the last decade. We provide a taxonomy of existing research in neuroscience of social interaction, situating them in the frame of general organization principles of social cognition. Finally, we discuss the putative enabling role of emerging non-local social mechanisms-such as interpersonal brain and body coupling-in processes underlying our ability to create a shared world.
authors.affiliation: Gipsa-lab, UMR 5216 CNRS, Grenoble INP, Université Joseph Fourier, Université Stendhal Grenoble, France.
authors.forename: Jonas
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Chatel-Goldman
authors.forename: Jean-Luc
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Schwartz
authors.forename: Christian
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Jutten
authors.forename: Marco
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Congedo
keywords: brain and body coupling; empathy; hyperscanning; joint action; social interaction; theory of mind
references.citation: Science. 2005 Apr 1;308(5718):78-83
references.pmid: 15802598
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54(1):439-46
references.pmid: 20624471
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Jun;11(6):449
references.pmid: 20485366
references.citation: Soc Neurosci. 2008;3(2):178-92
references.pmid: 18552971
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Oct;14(10):441-7
references.pmid: 20674467
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 8;104(19):8190-5
references.pmid: 17470821
references.citation: Neuron. 2008 Nov 6;60(3):503-10
references.pmid: 18995826
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 17;108(20):8514-9
references.pmid: 21536887
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1156:81-96
references.pmid: 19338504
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:287-313
references.pmid: 21838544
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 18;107(20):9388-93
references.pmid: 20439736
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24893
references.pmid: 21957466
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30613
references.pmid: 22355319
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20021
references.pmid: 21637754
references.citation: Commun Integr Biol. 2011 May;4(3):349-52
references.pmid: 21980578
references.citation: Cortex. 2011 Oct;47(9):1082-90
references.pmid: 21664610
references.citation: Neuron. 2010 Mar 25;65(6):752-67
references.pmid: 20346753
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 10;107(32):14425-30
references.pmid: 20660768
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Apr 11;6:81
references.pmid: 22514529
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(2):260-7
references.pmid: 15707910
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(6):855-63
references.pmid: 16904182
references.citation: Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Jan;71(1):50-6
references.pmid: 18723054
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Feb;16(2):114-21
references.pmid: 22221820
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 24;6:215
references.pmid: 22837744
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Mar;60(1):105-16
references.pmid: 22186679
references.citation: BMC Neurosci. 2009 Mar 17;10:22
references.pmid: 19292892
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Aug 17;5(8):e12166
references.pmid: 20808907
references.citation: Front Integr Neurosci. 2010 Nov 05;4:127
references.pmid: 21119770
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jun 07;6:163
references.pmid: 22701412
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2430-7
references.pmid: 21933717
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Dec 01;5(12):e14187
references.pmid: 21152069
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jun 01;6:156
references.pmid: 22675297
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Mar;5(1):98-107
references.pmid: 20223797
references.citation: Brain Topogr. 2010 Sep;23(3):243-56
references.pmid: 20480221
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):393-414
references.pmid: 23883742
references.citation: Science. 2007 Sep 7;317(5843):1344-7
references.pmid: 17823343
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Oct;10(10):435-41
references.pmid: 16949331
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2011 Mar 09;2:38
references.pmid: 21716606
references.citation: Physiol Rev. 2009 Apr;89(2):453-79
references.pmid: 19342612
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jun 07;6:164
references.pmid: 22701413
references.citation: Science. 2006 May 19;312(5776):1047-50
references.pmid: 16709783
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 May;11(5):194-6
references.pmid: 17344090
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Apr;11(4):404-9
references.pmid: 18368047
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1795-803
references.pmid: 21871572