title: Damage control surgery for abdominal trauma.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Trauma is one of the leading causes of death in any age group. The 'lethal triad' of acidosis, hypothermia, and coagulopathy has been recognized as a significant cause of death in patients with traumatic injuries. In order to prevent the lethal triad two factors are essential, early control of bleeding and prevention of further heat loss. In patients with major abdominal trauma, damage control surgery (DCS) avoids extensive procedures on unstable patients, stabilizes potentially fatal problems at initial operation, and applies staged surgery after successful initial resuscitation. It is not currently known whether DCS is superior to immediate surgery for patients with major abdominal trauma.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To assess the effects of damage control surgery compared to traditional immediate definitive surgical treatment for patients with major abdominal trauma.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 12 of 12), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science: Science Citation Index & ISI Proceedings, Current Controlled Trials MetaRegister, Clinicaltrials.gov, Zetoc, and CINAHL for all published and unpublished randomised controlled trials. We did not restrict the searches by language, date, or publication status. The search was through December 2012.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomised controlled trials of damage control surgery versus immediate traditional surgical repair were included in this review. We included patients with major abdominal trauma (Abbreviated Injury Scale > 3) who were undergoing surgery. Patient selection was crucial as patients with relatively simple abdominal injuries should not undergo unnecessary procedures.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two authors independently evaluated the search results.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 2551 studies were identified by our search. No randomised controlled trials comparing DCS with immediate and definitive repair in patients with major abdominal trauma were found. A total of 2551 studies were excluded because they were not relevant to the review topic and two studies were excluded with reasons after examining the full-text.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Evidence that supports the efficacy of damage control surgery with respect to traditional laparotomy in patients with major abdominal trauma is limited.
authors.affiliation: Department of General Surgery, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy. cirocchiroberto@yahoo.it.
authors.forename: Roberto
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Cirocchi
authors.forename: Alessandro
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Montedori
authors.forename: Eriberto
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Farinella
authors.forename: Isabella
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Bonacini
authors.forename: Ludovica
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Tagliabue
authors.forename: Iosief
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Abraha
mesh_terms: D000007:Abdominal Injuries / Q000150:complications / Q000601:surgery*; D000138:Acidosis / Q000517:prevention & control*; D001778:Blood Coagulation Disorders / Q000517:prevention & control*; D003422:Critical Care / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D007035:Hypothermia / Q000517:prevention & control*
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1983 May;197(5):532-5
references.pmid: 6847272
references.citation: Chir Ital. 2005 Nov-Dec;57(6):695-702
references.pmid: 16400763
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1979 Oct;190(4):423-9
references.pmid: 485617
references.citation: BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535
references.pmid: 19622551
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1988 Sep;208(3):362-70
references.pmid: 3421760
references.citation: J Trauma. 2008 May;64(5):1177-82; discussion 1182-3
references.pmid: 18469638
references.citation: S D J Med. 2004 Oct;57(10):449-53
references.pmid: 15535448
references.citation: J Trauma. 1993 Oct;35(4):584-8; discussion 588-9
references.pmid: 8411283
references.citation: J Trauma. 1993 Sep;35(3):375-82; discussion 382-3
references.pmid: 8371295
references.citation: J Trauma. 1994 Sep;37(3):365-9
references.pmid: 8083894
references.citation: J Trauma. 2003 Jul;55(1):39-44
references.pmid: 12855879
references.citation: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2008 Jul 21;16:4
references.pmid: 18957066
references.citation: World J Surg. 1998 Dec;22(12):1184-90; discussion 1190-1
references.pmid: 9841741
references.citation: J Trauma. 2005 Dec;59(6):1365-71; discussion 1371-4
references.pmid: 16394910
references.citation: J Trauma. 1989 May;29(5):623-9
references.pmid: 2657085
references.citation: BMJ. 2008 Mar 15;336(7644):601-5
references.pmid: 18316340
references.citation: J Trauma. 1981 Apr;21(4):285-90
references.pmid: 7012380
references.citation: Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Mar;54(3):269-75; discussion 275
references.pmid: 15725831
references.citation: Ann Chir. 2003 Apr;128(3):150-8
references.pmid: 12821080
references.citation: Arch Surg. 1990 Jan;125(1):119-22
references.pmid: 2294876
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2000 Sep;232(3):324-30
references.pmid: 10973382