title: Developmental mode influences diversification in ascidians.
abstract: Ascidian species (Tunicata: Ascidiacea) usually have tailed, hatching tadpole larvae. In several lineages, species have evolved larvae that completely lack any tail tissues and are unable to disperse actively. Some tailless species hatch, but some do not hatch before going through metamorphosis. We show here that ascidian species with the highest speciation rates are those with the largest range sizes and tailed hatching larval development. We use methods for examining diversification in binary characters across a posterior distribution of trees, and show that mode of larval development predicts geographical range sizes. Conversely, we find that species with the least dispersive larval development (tailless, non-hatching) have the lowest speciation rates and smallest geographical ranges. Our speciation rate results are contrary to findings from sea urchins and snails examined in the fossil record, and further work is necessary to reconcile these disparate results.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, University of Washington, , 24 Kincaid Hall, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. mem24@uw.edu
authors.forename: Max E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Maliska
authors.forename: Matthew W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Pennell
authors.forename: Billie J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Swalla
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D008675:Metamorphosis, Biological; D014561:Urochordata / Q000145:classification / Q000254:growth & development*
references.citation: Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2000 Dec;11(6):419-26
references.pmid: 11145870
references.citation: Science. 1983 Apr 29;220(4596):501-2
references.pmid: 17816221
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Oct;53(1):320-8
references.pmid: 19501178
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Nov 08;7:214
references.pmid: 17996036
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Dec 13;102(50):18040-5
references.pmid: 16330783
references.citation: Science. 2010 Oct 22;330(6003):493-5
references.pmid: 20966249
references.citation: Science. 1978 Feb 24;199(4331):885-7
references.pmid: 17757588
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 31;96(18):10272-7
references.pmid: 10468598
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1950 Jan;25(1):1-45
references.pmid: 24537188
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2007 Oct;56(5):701-10
references.pmid: 17849325
references.citation: Evolution. 1995 Jun;49(3):476-489
references.pmid: 28565076
references.citation: Am Nat. 2012 Jan;179(1):1-21
references.pmid: 22173457
references.citation: Evolution. 2010 Jun;64(6):1816-24
references.pmid: 20030708
references.citation: Evolution. 2003 May;57(5):1031-48
references.pmid: 12836821
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2009 Dec;58(6):595-611
references.pmid: 20525612
references.citation: Development. 1999 Apr;126(8):1643-53
references.pmid: 10079227
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20657
references.pmid: 21701684
references.citation: Biol Bull. 1988 Feb;174(1):39-46
references.pmid: 29314881
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2013 Feb 11;13:38
references.pmid: 23398853
references.citation: Brief Bioinform. 2008 Jul;9(4):286-98
references.pmid: 18372315