title: Source confusion influences the effectiveness of the autobiographical IAT.
abstract: We examined the claim that the autobiographical Implicit Association Test (aIAT) can detect concealed memories. Subjects read action statements (e.g., "break the toothpick") and either performed the action or completed math problems. They then imagined some of these actions and some new actions. Two weeks later, the subjects completed a memory test and then an aIAT in which they categorized true and false statements (e.g., "I am in front of the computer") and whether they had or had not performed actions from Session 1. For half of the subjects, the nonperformed statements were actions that they saw but did not perform; for the remaining subjects, these statements were actions that they saw and imagined but did not perform. Our results showed that the aIAT can distinguish between true autobiographical events (performed actions) and false events (nonperformed actions), but that it is less effective, the more that subjects remember performing actions that they did not really perform. Thus, the diagnosticity of the aIAT may be limited.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, South Australia, melanie.takarangi@flinders.edu.au.
authors.forename: Melanie K T
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Takarangi
authors.forename: Deryn
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Strange
authors.forename: Alexandra E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Shortland
authors.forename: Hannah E
authors.initials: HE
authors.lastname: James
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001245:Association Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D003221:Confusion; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology; D061212:Memory, Episodic; D012094:Repression, Psychology; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2000 Nov;11(6):507-10
references.pmid: 11202498
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 1993 Feb;84 ( Pt 1):111-8
references.pmid: 8467368
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1998 Jan;26(1):20-33
references.pmid: 9519694
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jun;74(6):1464-80
references.pmid: 9654756
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2009 Apr;20(4):410-3
references.pmid: 19298261
references.citation: Neuron. 2004 Sep 30;44(1):149-60
references.pmid: 15450167
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):197-216
references.pmid: 12916565
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):800-14
references.pmid: 11708558
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 27;3:310
references.pmid: 22969740
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Aug;19(8):772-80
references.pmid: 18816284
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Jul;4(4):370-4
references.pmid: 26158984
references.citation: Memory. 2008;16(5):500-16
references.pmid: 18569679
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Mar;136(3):269-75
references.pmid: 21232728
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2012 Aug;49(8):1090-100
references.pmid: 22681260
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1993 Jul;114(1):3-28
references.pmid: 8346328
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2009 Jun;37(4):414-24
references.pmid: 19460949
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1988 Dec;117(4):371-6
references.pmid: 2974863