title: The stubborn roots of metabolic cycles.
abstract: Efforts to catalogue the structure of metabolic networks have generated highly detailed, genome-scale atlases of biochemical reactions in the cell. Unfortunately, these atlases fall short of capturing the kinetic details of metabolic reactions, instead offering only topological information from which to make predictions. As a result, studies frequently consider the extent to which the topological structure of a metabolic network determines its dynamic behaviour, irrespective of kinetic details. Here, we study a class of metabolic networks known as non-autocatalytic metabolic cycles, and analytically prove an open conjecture regarding the stability of their steady states. Importantly, our results are invariant to the choice of kinetic parameters, rate laws, equilibrium fluxes and metabolite concentrations. Unexpectedly, our proof exposes an elementary but apparently open problem of locating the roots of a sum of two polynomials S = P + Q, when the roots of the summand polynomials P and Q are known. We derive two new results named the Stubborn Roots Theorems, which provide sufficient conditions under which the roots of S remain qualitatively identical to the roots of P. Our study illustrates how complementary feedback, from classical fields such as dynamical systems to biology and vice versa, can expose fundamental and potentially overlooked questions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA. ereznik@bu.edu
authors.forename: Ed
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Reznik
authors.forename: Alex
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Watson
authors.forename: Osman
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Chaudhary
mesh_terms: D007700:Kinetics; D053858:Metabolic Networks and Pathways; D008954:Models, Biological; D049490:Systems Biology / Q000379:methods
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Aug;84(2 Pt 1):021913
references.pmid: 21929026
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e45772
references.pmid: 23071525
references.citation: EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol. 2009;:630695
references.pmid: 19197379
references.citation: Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3:146
references.pmid: 18004279
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Jan 20;403(6767):335-8
references.pmid: 10659856
references.citation: Nature. 2005 May 5;435(7038):118-22
references.pmid: 15875027
references.citation: Science. 2009 Aug 7;325(5941):747-50
references.pmid: 19661430
references.citation: Chaos. 2013 Mar;23(1):013132
references.pmid: 23556969
references.citation: Monogr Popul Biol. 1973;6:1-235
references.pmid: 4723571
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Aug 05;6(8):
references.pmid: 20700491
references.citation: Naturwissenschaften. 1977 Nov;64(11):541-65
references.pmid: 593400
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Apr;31(4):357-61
references.pmid: 23455438
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Feb 17;101(7):1822-7
references.pmid: 14766974
references.citation: Science. 2010 Mar 12;327(5971):1389-91
references.pmid: 20223989
references.citation: Biochem J. 1992 Sep 1;286 ( Pt 2):313-30
references.pmid: 1530563
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 8;103(32):11868-73
references.pmid: 16880395
references.citation: Science. 2002 Aug 30;297(5586):1551-5
references.pmid: 12202830
references.citation: Science. 2011 Jan 14;331(6014):183-5
references.pmid: 21233379
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2010 Oct 21;266(4):536-49
references.pmid: 20673772
references.citation: Bull Math Biol. 2007 May;69(4):1199-231
references.pmid: 17415616