title: Strategic reactions to infants: female self-presentation in a romantic context.
abstract: Research has demonstrated that humans engage in various self-presentational behaviours in the context of mate attraction. We build and expand on these efforts by showing that female facial behaviour also responds to the manipulation of romantic motivation in ways congruent with the logic of evolutionary theory. Given that childbearing is an important goal of human courtship, we hypothesized that during the initial stages of romantic encounters one way that women can advertize their quality is through their emotional reactions to children. Two studies were conducted to determine whether women would self-present in the context of romance by augmenting positive reactions (e.g., smiling more) or by attenuating negative reactions (e.g., frowning less). In both studies participants were undergraduate psychology students. Study 1 was an online study; it examined reported facial expressions towards and cognitive evaluations of infants. Study 2 was a laboratory study in which participants' spontaneous facial behavior was videotaped while they watched a video of infants (vs. a neutral film). In both studies we found support only for the hypothesis that, when in a romantic context, women attenuate negative reactions. Such attenuation was found for facial expressions, but not for cognitive or affective evaluations of infants.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. tinizul@gmail.com
authors.forename: Dina
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Dosmukhambetova
authors.forename: Antony S R
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Manstead
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D004644:Emotions; D005149:Facial Expression; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D020377:Self Efficacy; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jul;93(1):85-102
references.pmid: 17605591
references.citation: Emotion. 2005 Sep;5(3):258-66
references.pmid: 16187862
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(1):63-76
references.pmid: 16834480
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 May 7;271 Suppl 4:S177-9
references.pmid: 15252976
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Aug;91(2):281-94
references.pmid: 16881765
references.citation: Child Abuse Negl. 2005 Sep;29(9):969-84
references.pmid: 16165212
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Jan;84(1):148-64
references.pmid: 12518976
references.citation: Child Dev. 2004 Nov-Dec;75(6):1761-73
references.pmid: 15566378
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Mar;29(3):393-404
references.pmid: 15273016