title: Exploring the movement dynamics of deception.
abstract: BOTH THE SCIENCE AND THE EVERYDAY PRACTICE OF DETECTING A LIE REST ON THE SAME ASSUMPTION: hidden cognitive states that the liar would like to remain hidden nevertheless influence observable behavior. This assumption has good evidence. The insights of professional interrogators, anecdotal evidence, and body language textbooks have all built up a sizeable catalog of non-verbal cues that have been claimed to distinguish deceptive and truthful behavior. Typically, these cues are discrete, individual behaviors-a hand touching a mouth, the rise of a brow-that distinguish lies from truths solely in terms of their frequency or duration. Research to date has failed to establish any of these non-verbal cues as a reliable marker of deception. Here we argue that perhaps this is because simple tallies of behavior can miss out on the rich but subtle organization of behavior as it unfolds over time. Research in cognitive science from a dynamical systems perspective has shown that behavior is structured across multiple timescales, with more or less regularity and structure. Using tools that are sensitive to these dynamics, we analyzed body motion data from an experiment that put participants in a realistic situation of choosing, or not, to lie to an experimenter. Our analyses indicate that when being deceptive, continuous fluctuations of movement in the upper face, and somewhat in the arms, are characterized by dynamical properties of less stability, but greater complexity. For the upper face, these distinctions are present despite no apparent differences in the overall amount of movement between deception and truth. We suggest that these unique dynamical signatures of motion are indicative of both the cognitive demands inherent to deception and the need to respond adaptively in a social context.
authors.affiliation: Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California Merced Merced, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Nicholas D
authors.initials: ND
authors.lastname: Duran
authors.forename: Rick
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Dale
authors.forename: Christopher T
authors.initials: CT
authors.lastname: Kello
authors.forename: Chris N H
authors.initials: CN
authors.lastname: Street
authors.forename: Daniel C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Richardson
keywords: Dynamical Systems Theory; body and facial movements; deception; embodiment; multiscale entropy analysis; non-linear measures; recurrence quantification analysis; time series analysis
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1992 Mar;111(2):203-243
references.pmid: 1557474
references.citation: J Mot Behav. 2005 Jul;37(4):311-24
references.pmid: 15967756
references.citation: Law Hum Behav. 2008 Jun;32(3):253-65
references.pmid: 17694424
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Sep;132(3):331-50
references.pmid: 13678372
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct;13(5):813-9
references.pmid: 17328378
references.citation: Res Q Exerc Sport. 2003 Dec;74(4):366-75
references.pmid: 14768837
references.citation: J Mot Behav. 2002 Jun;34(2):99-125
references.pmid: 12057885
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2009 Dec;37(8):1132-49
references.pmid: 19933457
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Aug;17(4):486-91
references.pmid: 20702866
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994 Feb;76(2):965-73
references.pmid: 8175612
references.citation: Science. 2000 Apr 7;288(5463):100-6
references.pmid: 10753108
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Sep;129(1):1-7
references.pmid: 18504035
references.citation: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000 Jun;278(6):H2039-49
references.pmid: 10843903
references.citation: Phys Ther. 2009 Mar;89(3):267-82
references.pmid: 19168711
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005 Feb;71(2 Pt 1):021906
references.pmid: 15783351
references.citation: Emotion. 2003 Mar;3(1):68-75
references.pmid: 12899317
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(3):214-34
references.pmid: 16859438
references.citation: Gait Posture. 2008 Feb;27(2):271-9
references.pmid: 17524648
references.citation: Science. 2009 Jul 3;325(5936):48-50
references.pmid: 19574380
references.citation: Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2010 Dec;11(3):89-121
references.pmid: 26168416
references.citation: Crit Care. 2004 Dec;8(6):R367-84
references.pmid: 15566580
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 May;19(5):508-14
references.pmid: 18466413
references.citation: Pain. 2002 Jul;98(1-2):135-44
references.pmid: 12098625
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2003 Jan;129(1):74-118
references.pmid: 12555795
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Apr;29(2):326-332
references.pmid: 12760618
references.citation: Hum Mov Sci. 2007 Aug;26(4):657-97
references.pmid: 17604860
references.citation: Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan;4(1):21-34
references.pmid: 22253175
references.citation: Law Hum Behav. 2012 Feb;36(1):51-9
references.pmid: 22471385
references.citation: Gait Posture. 2002 Aug;16(1):1-14
references.pmid: 12127181
references.citation: Am Psychol. 1990 Aug;45(8):938-53
references.pmid: 2221565
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Oct;16(5):901-6
references.pmid: 19815796