title: Glomerular input patterns in the mouse olfactory bulb evoked by retronasal odor stimuli.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Odorant stimuli can access the olfactory epithelium either orthonasally, by inhalation through the external nares, or retronasally by reverse airflow from the oral cavity. There is evidence that odors perceived through these two routes can differ in quality and intensity. We were curious whether such differences might potentially have a neural basis in the peripheral mechanisms of odor coding. To explore this possibility, we compared olfactory receptor input to glomeruli in the dorsal olfactory bulb evoked by orthonasal and retronasal stimulation. Maps of glomerular response were acquired by optical imaging of transgenic mice expressing synaptopHluorin (spH), a fluorescent reporter of presynaptic activity, in olfactory nerve terminals.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We found that retronasally delivered odorants were able to activate inputs to multiple glomeruli in the dorsal olfactory bulb. The retronasal responses were smaller than orthonasal responses to odorants delivered at comparable concentrations and flow rates, and they displayed higher thresholds and right-shifted dose-response curves. Glomerular maps of orthonasal and retronasal responses were usually well overlapped, with fewer total numbers of glomeruli in retronasal maps. However, maps at threshold could be quite distinct with little overlap. Retronasal responses were also more narrowly tuned to homologous series of aliphatic odorants of varying carbon chain length, with longer chain, more hydrophobic compounds evoking little or no response at comparable vapor levels.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Several features of retronasal olfaction are possibly referable to the observed properties of glomerular odorant responses. The finding that retronasal responses are weaker and sparser than orthonasal responses is consistent with psychophysical studies showing lower sensitivity for retronasal olfaction in threshold and suprathreshold tests. The similarity and overlap of orthonasal and retronasal odor maps at suprathreshold concentrations agrees with generally similar perceived qualities for the same odorant stimuli administered by the two routes. However, divergence of maps near threshold is a potential factor in perceptual differences between orthonasal and retronasal olfaction. Narrower tuning of retronasal responses suggests that they may be less influenced by chromatographic adsorption effects.
authors.affiliation: Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
authors.forename: Yuichi
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Furudono
authors.forename: Ginny
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Cruz
authors.forename: Graeme
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Lowe
mesh_terms: D000281:Administration, Intranasal; D000344:Afferent Pathways / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D051379:Mice; D008810:Mice, Inbred C57BL; D008822:Mice, Transgenic; D009415:Nerve Net / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000502:physiology; D009812:Odorants; D009830:Olfactory Bulb / Q000166:cytology*; D051842:Olfactory Marker Protein / Q000235:genetics; D012903:Smell / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000502:physiology*; D013268:Stimulation, Chemical
chemical_list: D051842:Olfactory Marker Protein; C497598:Omp protein, mouse
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Jan 25;26(4):1247-59
references.pmid: 16436612
references.citation: Chem Senses. 2003 Jul;28(6):467-77
references.pmid: 12907584
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Sep 28;101(39):14168-73
references.pmid: 15377787
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1982 Apr;31(4):397-401
references.pmid: 7110896
references.citation: Neuron. 2001 Nov 20;32(4):723-35
references.pmid: 11719211
references.citation: Nature. 2011 Oct 12;479(7373):397-400
references.pmid: 21993623
references.citation: Chem Senses. 1996 Oct;21(5):529-43
references.pmid: 8902282
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 2009 Jun;123(3):481-9
references.pmid: 19485554
references.citation: Science. 1964 Mar 20;143(3612):1336-7
references.pmid: 17799244
references.citation: Nature. 2010 May 6;465(7294):47-52
references.pmid: 20393466
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 2000 Jul 10;422(4):496-509
references.pmid: 10861522
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 6;104(6):1953-8
references.pmid: 17261800
references.citation: Chem Senses. 2006 Feb;31(2):167-79
references.pmid: 16339265
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 2004 Apr;118(2):412-9
references.pmid: 15113268
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Jul 20;31(29):10615-26
references.pmid: 21775605
references.citation: Histochem Cell Biol. 2003 Dec;120(6):483-92
references.pmid: 14628145
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Aug;102(2):817-30
references.pmid: 19474178
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 22;31(25):9179-91
references.pmid: 21697369
references.citation: Cell. 1996 Nov 15;87(4):675-86
references.pmid: 8929536
references.citation: Chem Senses. 2009 Jul;34(6):499-502
references.pmid: 19414494
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Apr 6;25(14):3586-92
references.pmid: 15814789
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2005 Nov;28(11):620-7
references.pmid: 16182387
references.citation: Cell Rep. 2012 Nov 29;2(5):1143-50
references.pmid: 23168258
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 1977 Mar;69(3):343 -61
references.pmid: 300427
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2009 Apr 24;454(2):124-8
references.pmid: 19429068
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Jul 9;394(6689):192-5
references.pmid: 9671304
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 1970 Jul;56(1):46-63
references.pmid: 5514160
references.citation: Chem Senses. 2005 Sep;30(7):575-82
references.pmid: 16120767
references.citation: Nature. 1964 Sep 12;203:1181-2
references.pmid: 14213677
references.citation: Chem Senses. 2006 Feb;31(2):107-18
references.pmid: 16354744
references.citation: J Physiol. 2003 Jan 15;546(Pt 2):363-74
references.pmid: 12527724
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 2007 Jul 1;503(1):1-34
references.pmid: 17480025
references.citation: Physiol Rev. 2006 Apr;86(2):409-33
references.pmid: 16601265
references.citation: Neuron. 1999 Jul;23(3):499-511
references.pmid: 10433262
references.citation: Cell. 1991 Apr 5;65(1):175-87
references.pmid: 1840504
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 1990 Jul;48(1):37-40
references.pmid: 2236276
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:487-509
references.pmid: 10202546
references.citation: Chem Senses. 2003 Jan;28(1):57-69
references.pmid: 12502524
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):1089-102
references.pmid: 19052108
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 30;29(39):12070-8
references.pmid: 19793965
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2003 May 15;23(10):4108-16
references.pmid: 12764098
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Feb 15;21(4):1351-60
references.pmid: 11160406
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Mar;23(6):1436-44
references.pmid: 16553607
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1996 Jan;16(1):345-53
references.pmid: 8613801
references.citation: Neuron. 2012 Jul 26;75(2):320-9
references.pmid: 22841316
references.citation: Cell. 1993 May 7;73(3):597-609
references.pmid: 7683976
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 1987;41(1):59-69
references.pmid: 3685154
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Aug 15;21(16):6018-25
references.pmid: 11487625
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44781
references.pmid: 22970305
references.citation: Phytother Res. 2001 Mar;15(2):135-8
references.pmid: 11268113
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Dec;105(6):1975-9
references.pmid: 18832758
references.citation: Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006 Jul;63(13):1465-75
references.pmid: 16732429
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Mar;97(3):1941-50
references.pmid: 17215498
references.citation: Chem Senses. 2007 Mar;32(3):273-84
references.pmid: 17220517
references.citation: Cell. 1994 Dec 30;79(7):1245-55
references.pmid: 7528109
references.citation: Cell. 1994 Dec 16;79(6):981-91
references.pmid: 8001145
references.citation: Cell. 1994 Sep 9;78(5):823-34
references.pmid: 8087849
references.citation: Chem Senses. 2008 Jul;33(6):553-61
references.pmid: 18502772
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2000 Oct;3(10):1035-43
references.pmid: 11017177
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 1987 Nov;90(5):625-50
references.pmid: 3500998
references.citation: Science. 1973 Sep 28;181(4106):1247-9
references.pmid: 4542192
references.citation: Br Med J. 1954 Feb 6;1(4857):287-90
references.pmid: 13115699
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2009 Jun 8;200(1):68-75
references.pmid: 19162085
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 6;32(23):7949-59
references.pmid: 22674270
references.citation: Cell. 1999 Mar 5;96(5):713-23
references.pmid: 10089886
references.citation: Neuron. 2004 Apr 8;42(1):9-21
references.pmid: 15066261
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Oct;18(7):2059-68
references.pmid: 14622239
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2005 Oct;166(3-4):345-57
references.pmid: 16028032
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2000 Dec;3(12):1248-55
references.pmid: 11100145
references.citation: J Agric Food Chem. 2003 Aug 13;51(17):5052-7
references.pmid: 12903969
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Mar 5;99(5):3222-7
references.pmid: 11854464
references.citation: J Aerosol Sci. 2010 Nov 1;41(11):1030-1043
references.pmid: 21076632
references.citation: Neuron. 1997 May;18(5):737-52
references.pmid: 9182799
references.citation: Chem Senses. 2001 Nov;26(9):1211-9
references.pmid: 11705807
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Dec;98(6):3134-42
references.pmid: 17855585
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Aug 18;47(4):593-605
references.pmid: 16102541
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 1994 Oct;56(4):729-36
references.pmid: 7800740
references.citation: Chem Senses. 2007 Mar;32(3):215-23
references.pmid: 17220519