title: Direct and indirect abortion in the Roman Catholic tradition: a review of the Phoenix case.
abstract: In Roman Catholic Moral Theology, a direct abortion is never permitted. An indirect abortion, in which a life threatening pathology is treated, and the treatment inadvertently leads to the death of the fetus, may be permissible in proportionately grave situations. In situations in which a mother's life is endangered by the pregnancy before the fetus is viable, there is some debate about whether the termination of the pregnancy is a direct or indirect abortion. In this essay a recent case from a Roman Catholic sponsored hospital in Phoenix is reviewed along with the justifications for and arguments against viewing the pregnancy termination as an indirect abortion. After review of several arguments on both sides of the debate, it is concluded that termination of the pregnancy itself as the means of saving the mother cannot be considered an indirect abortion and that the principle of "double effect" does not justify the termination. In addition, the importance of a breakdown in communication between the local bishop and the administration of the hospital is shown to have contributed to the ultimate loss of Catholic sponsorship of the hospital.
authors.affiliation: Daughters of Charity Health System of the West, Los Altos Hills, CA, USA. colemanatcarmel@aol.com
authors.forename: Gerald D
authors.initials: GD
authors.lastname: Coleman
mesh_terms: D000028:Abortion, Induced / Q000145:classification / Q000941:ethics*; D000328:Adult; D001130:Arizona; D002410:Catholicism; D005260:Female; D016519:Hospitals, Religious / Q000941:ethics; D006801:Humans; D006976:Hypertension, Pulmonary / Q000150:complications* / Q000628:therapy; D009935:Organizational Affiliation; D019982:Organizational Case Studies; D011247:Pregnancy; D011248:Pregnancy Complications / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references.citation: Origins. 1995 Apr 6;24(42):689, 691-730
references.pmid: 11660191
references.citation: Sci Am. 2010 Aug;303(2):36
references.pmid: 20684370
references.citation: Theor Med Bioeth. 2011 Aug;32(4):271-83
references.pmid: 21597907