title: Specific aspects of cognitive and language proficiency account for variability in neural indices of semantic and syntactic processing in children.
abstract: The neural activity mediating language processing in young children is characterized by large individual variability that is likely related in part to individual strengths and weakness across various cognitive abilities. The current study addresses the following question: How does proficiency in specific cognitive and language functions impact neural indices mediating language processing in children? Thirty typically developing seven- and eight-year-olds were divided into high-normal and low-normal proficiency groups based on performance on nonverbal IQ, auditory word recall, and grammatical morphology tests. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were elicited by semantic anomalies and phrase structure violations in naturally spoken sentences. The proficiency for each of the specific cognitive and language tasks uniquely contributed to specific aspects (e.g., timing and/or resource allocation) of neural indices underlying semantic (N400) and syntactic (P600) processing. These results suggest that distinct aptitudes within broader domains of cognition and language, even within the normal range, influence the neural signatures of semantic and syntactic processing. Furthermore, the current findings have important implications for the design and interpretation of developmental studies of ERPs indexing language processing, and they highlight the need to take into account cognitive abilities both within and outside the classic language domain.
authors.affiliation: University of Oregon, United States; Purdue University, Eugene 97403-1227, USA. hamptonw@uoregon.edu
authors.forename: Amanda
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hampton Wray
authors.forename: Christine
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Weber-Fox
mesh_terms: D001921:Brain / Q000473:pathology / Q000502:physiology; D002648:Child; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008297:Male; D009415:Nerve Net / Q000502:physiology* / Q000503:physiopathology; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D012660:Semantics
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2009 Jul;12(4):634-46
references.pmid: 19635089
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1993 Jan;30(1):47-61
references.pmid: 8416062
references.citation: Science. 1980 Jan 11;207(4427):203-5
references.pmid: 7350657
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;18(3):193-8
references.pmid: 17444909
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 1998 Mar;47(3):193-221
references.pmid: 9564450
references.citation: Nature. 1984 Jan 12-18;307(5947):161-3
references.pmid: 6690995
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2010 May;48(6):1525-42
references.pmid: 20138065
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Dec 1;4(12):463-470
references.pmid: 11115760
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Nov;10(6):717-33
references.pmid: 9831740
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Sep;21(9):1693-708
references.pmid: 18855546
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Spring;5(2):235-53
references.pmid: 23972156
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Summer;5(3):317-34
references.pmid: 23972220
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Sep;22(5):1219-48
references.pmid: 8805821
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2003 May;85(2):231-44
references.pmid: 12735941
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):2752-65
references.pmid: 20964590
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Dec;22(12):2728-44
references.pmid: 19925188
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2012 Feb;120(2):135-62
references.pmid: 21924483
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Feb;22(1):77-94; discussion 95-126
references.pmid: 11301522
references.citation: Dev Psychobiol. 2002 Apr;40(3):293-310
references.pmid: 11891640
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992 Dec;121(4):459-79
references.pmid: 1431739
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 1995;46:91-120
references.pmid: 7872739
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Jul 1;15(5):643-57
references.pmid: 12965038
references.citation: Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2004 Nov;13(4):275-90
references.pmid: 15719895
references.citation: Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Feb;83(2):176-90
references.pmid: 22019481
references.citation: J Neurolinguistics. 2009 May;22(3):281-300
references.pmid: 19430590
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Sep;16(7):1302-18
references.pmid: 15453981
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Oct;17(10):1667-78
references.pmid: 16269104
references.citation: J Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Jan;11(1):111-3
references.pmid: 8195414
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:621-47
references.pmid: 20809790
references.citation: Neuropsychology. 2010 Sep;24(5):625-36
references.pmid: 20804251
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Dec;22(12):2886-98
references.pmid: 19929760
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Sep;4(2):99-107
references.pmid: 8883923
references.citation: Physiol Rev. 2011 Oct;91(4):1357-92
references.pmid: 22013214
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
references.pmid: 5146491
references.citation: Brain Res. 2007 Jan 26;1130(1):167-80
references.pmid: 17173867
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2001 Jan;38(1):41-63
references.pmid: 11321620
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1982;20(5):579-90
references.pmid: 7145083
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Oct;41(5):1136-46
references.pmid: 9771635
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2011 Jul;14(4):786-98
references.pmid: 21676098
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Feb;56(1):123-30
references.pmid: 3346437
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Dec;18(12):2030-48
references.pmid: 17129189
references.citation: J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
references.pmid: 15102499