title: Focusing the lens of language experience: perception of Ma'di stops by Greek and English bilinguals and monolinguals.
abstract: Monolingual listeners are constrained by native language experience when categorizing and discriminating unfamiliar non-native contrasts. Are early bilinguals constrained in the same way by their two languages, or do they possess an advantage? Greek-English bilinguals in either Greek or English language mode were compared to monolinguals on categorization and discrimination of Ma'di stop-voicing distinctions that are non-native to both languages. As predicted, English monolinguals categorized Ma'di prevoiced plosive and implosive stops and the coronal voiceless stop as English voiced stops. The Greek monolinguals categorized the Ma'di short-lag voiceless stops as Greek voiceless stops, and the prevoiced implosive stops and the coronal prevoiced stop as Greek voiced stops. Ma'di prenasalized stops were uncategorized. Greek monolinguals discriminated the non-native voiced-voiceless contrasts very well, whereas the English monolinguals did poorly. Bilinguals were given all oral and written instructions either in English or in Greek (language mode manipulation). Each language mode subgroup categorized Ma'di stop-voicing comparably to the corresponding monolingual group. However, the bilinguals' discrimination was unaffected by language mode: both subgroups performed intermediate to the monolinguals for the prevoiced-voiceless contrast. Thus, bilinguals do not possess an advantage for unfamiliar non-native contrasts, but are nonetheless uniquely configured language users, differing from either monolingual group.
authors.affiliation: The Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA. mark.antoniou@northwestern.edu
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Antoniou
authors.forename: Catherine T
authors.initials: CT
authors.lastname: Best
authors.forename: Michael D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Tyler
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000328:Adult; D001302:Audiometry, Speech; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D019303:Multilingualism; D010700:Phonetics; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D013061:Speech Acoustics; D013067:Speech Perception; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Feb;119(2):1118-30
references.pmid: 16521773
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2003 Sep;47(2):204-38
references.pmid: 12948518
references.citation: Cognition. 1985 Oct;21(1):1-36
references.pmid: 4075760
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2001 Nov;12(6):445-9
references.pmid: 11760129
references.citation: J Phon. 2012 Jul 1;40(4):582-594
references.pmid: 22844163
references.citation: Speech Commun. 2009 Apr 1;51(4):369-378
references.pmid: 19829747
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Feb;109(2):775-94
references.pmid: 11248981
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1973 Aug;54(2):421-8
references.pmid: 4759015
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Oct;17(3):833-44
references.pmid: 14561466
references.citation: J Phon. 2010 Oct;38(4):640-653
references.pmid: 21743759
references.citation: J Phon. 2011 Oct;39(4):558-570
references.pmid: 22787285
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2012 Jun;121(3):194-205
references.pmid: 22534571
references.citation: Cognition. 1997 Sep;64(3):B9-17
references.pmid: 9426508
references.citation: Cognition. 1999 Sep 30;72(2):111-23
references.pmid: 10553668