title: Subjective size perception depends on central visual cortical magnification in human v1.
abstract: In the Ebbinghaus illusion, the context surrounding an object modulates its subjectively perceived size. Previous work implicates human primary visual cortex (V1) as the neural substrate mediating this contextual effect. Here we studied in healthy adult humans how two different types of context (large or small inducers) in this illusion affected size perception by comparing each to a reference stimulus without any context. We found that individual differences in the magnitudes of the illusion produced by either type of context were correlated with V1 area defined through retinotopic mapping using functional MRI. However, participants' objective ability to discriminate the size of objects presented in isolation was unrelated to illusion strength and did not correlate with V1 area. Control analyses showed no correlations between behavioral measures and the overall V1 area estimated probabilistically on the basis of neuroanatomy alone. Therefore, subjective size perception correlated with variability in central cortical magnification rather than the anatomical extent of primary visual cortex. We propose that such changes in subjective perception of size are mediated by mechanisms that scale with the extent to which an individual's V1 selectively represents the central visual field.
authors.affiliation: Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom. s.schwarzkopf@ucl.ac.uk
authors.forename: D Samuel
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Schwarzkopf
authors.forename: Geraint
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Rees
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D001931:Brain Mapping; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007088:Illusions; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012737:Sex Factors; D012858:Size Perception; D014793:Visual Cortex / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 15;39(4):1585-99
references.pmid: 18055222
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Dec 16;29(50):15721-6
references.pmid: 20016087
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2012 Apr;107(7):1857-67
references.pmid: 22170967
references.citation: Perception. 2004;33(1):79-86
references.pmid: 15035330
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1293-313
references.pmid: 11800458
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1993 Nov;54(5):579-88
references.pmid: 8290327
references.citation: Spat Vis. 2002;15(2):191-203
references.pmid: 11991574
references.citation: Perception. 1979;8(3):303-9
references.pmid: 534157
references.citation: J Vis. 2012 Mar 08;12(3):10
references.pmid: 22408041
references.citation: Perception. 2005;34(7):847-56
references.pmid: 16124270
references.citation: Science. 1995 May 12;268(5212):889-93
references.pmid: 7754376
references.citation: Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Dec;85(3 Pt 2):1203-8
references.pmid: 9450272
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Sep 21;31(38):13604-12
references.pmid: 21940451
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1999 Jan;61(1):3-12
references.pmid: 10070195
references.citation: Schizophr Bull. 2011 Jul;37(4):690-9
references.pmid: 21700589
references.citation: J Physiol. 1968 Mar;195(1):215-43
references.pmid: 4966457
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 16;6:200
references.pmid: 22811662
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Jan 15;39(2):647-60
references.pmid: 17977024
references.citation: BMC Neurosci. 2011 Mar 11;12:27
references.pmid: 21396093
references.citation: Neuroimage. 1999 Feb;9(2):179-94
references.pmid: 9931268
references.citation: Neuron. 2003 May 22;38(4):659-71
references.pmid: 12765616
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 May;4(3):294-8
references.pmid: 26158966
references.citation: J Vis. 2012 Feb 21;12(2):
references.pmid: 22353777
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Sep;33(9):2035-46
references.pmid: 21769992
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2008 Nov 11;18(21):1707-12
references.pmid: 18993076
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2010 Sep 1;13(5):714-21
references.pmid: 20712737
references.citation: Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Jun;84(3 Pt 2):1171-5
references.pmid: 9229431
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Mar;9(3):429-34
references.pmid: 16462737
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2012 Nov 6;22(21):2081-5
references.pmid: 23041195
references.citation: J Vis. 2003;3(10):586-98
references.pmid: 14640882
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references.pmid: 9176952
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2011 Jan;14(1):28-30
references.pmid: 21131954
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2012 Jan 25;32(4):1507-12
references.pmid: 22279235
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2012 Mar 11;15(4):540-2
references.pmid: 22406550
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 19;106(20):8356-61
references.pmid: 19416820
references.citation: Neuroimage. 1999 Feb;9(2):195-207
references.pmid: 9931269