title: Efficacy and tolerance of tacrolimus and pimecrolimus for atopic dermatitis: a meta-analysis.
abstract: Tacrolimus ointment and pimecrolimus cream have proved to be suitable for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. We conducted a meta-analysis of the efficacy, adverse events/withdrawal of tacrolimus versus pimecrolimus in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. According to our meta-analysis, 0.1% tacrolimus was more effective than 1% pimecrolimus in the treatment of adult patients and moderate to very severe pediatric patients, and more 0.1% mild pediatric patients treatal with pimecrolimus withdrew from the trials because of a lack of efficacy or the occurrence of adverse events, compared with mild pediatric patients treated with 0.03% tacrolimus. The combined analyses of tacrolimus with pimecrolimus showed that tacrolimus was more effective than pimecrolimus (week 3: RR=0.67, 95%CI=0.56-0.80; week 6/end of study: RR=0.65, 95%CI=0.57-0.75), and fewer tacrolimus-treated patients withdrew because of a lack of efficacy (RR=0.32, 95CI%=0.19-0.53) or the occurrence of adverse events (RR=0.43, 95%CI=0.24-0.75), compared with pimecrolimus-treated patients. In conclusion, tacrolimus has higher efficacy and better tolerance than pimecrolimus in the treatment of atopic dermatitis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Dermatology;
authors.forename: Zhiqiang
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Yin
authors.forename: Jiali
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Xu
authors.forename: Dan
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Luo
keywords: atopic dermatitis; meta-analysis; pimecrolimus; tacrolimus
references.citation: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 May;52(5):810-22
references.pmid: 15858471
references.citation: Br J Dermatol. 2000 May;142(5):931-6
references.pmid: 10809850
references.citation: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 Oct;51(4):515-25
references.pmid: 15389185
references.citation: J Drugs Dermatol. 2010 Apr;9(4):372-6
references.pmid: 20514795
references.citation: J Dermatolog Treat. 2007;18(3):151-7
references.pmid: 17538803
references.citation: Acta Derm Venereol. 2010;90(1):58-64
references.pmid: 20107727