title: Robust detection of rare species using environmental DNA: the importance of primer specificity.
abstract: Environmental DNA (eDNA) is being rapidly adopted as a tool to detect rare animals. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) using probe-based chemistries may represent a particularly powerful tool because of the method's sensitivity, specificity, and potential to quantify target DNA. However, there has been little work understanding the performance of these assays in the presence of closely related, sympatric taxa. If related species cause any cross-amplification or interference, false positives and negatives may be generated. These errors can be disastrous if false positives lead to overestimate the abundance of an endangered species or if false negatives prevent detection of an invasive species. In this study we test factors that influence the specificity and sensitivity of TaqMan MGB assays using co-occurring, closely related brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and bull trout (S. confluentus) as a case study. We found qPCR to be substantially more sensitive than traditional PCR, with a high probability of detection at concentrations as low as 0.5 target copies/µl. We also found that number and placement of base pair mismatches between the Taqman MGB assay and non-target templates was important to target specificity, and that specificity was most influenced by base pair mismatches in the primers, rather than in the probe. We found that insufficient specificity can result in both false positive and false negative results, particularly in the presence of abundant related species. Our results highlight the utility of qPCR as a highly sensitive eDNA tool, and underscore the importance of careful assay design.
authors.affiliation: United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, Montana, United States of America. taylor.wilcox@umontana.edu
authors.forename: Taylor M
authors.initials: TM
authors.lastname: Wilcox
authors.forename: Kevin S
authors.initials: KS
authors.lastname: McKelvey
authors.forename: Michael K
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Young
authors.forename: Stephen F
authors.initials: SF
authors.lastname: Jane
authors.forename: Winsor H
authors.initials: WH
authors.lastname: Lowe
authors.forename: Andrew R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Whiteley
authors.forename: Michael K
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Schwartz
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D004247:DNA / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics*; D017931:DNA Primers / Q000235:genetics*; D015342:DNA Probes / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics; D004777:Environment; D010802:Phylogeny; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D019914:Taq Polymerase / Q000378:metabolism; D014337:Trout / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics*
chemical_list: D017931:DNA Primers; D015342:DNA Probes; D004247:DNA; D019914:Taq Polymerase
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2012 Apr;21(8):1789-93
references.pmid: 22486819
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41732
references.pmid: 22952584
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Sep;22(9):465-71
references.pmid: 17640765
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2012 Jun;21(11):2555-8
references.pmid: 22624944
references.citation: Mol Cell Probes. 2006 Oct;20(5):311-6
references.pmid: 16704921
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2012 Jun;21(11):2565-73
references.pmid: 22151771
references.citation: Environ Res. 2011 Oct;111(7):978-88
references.pmid: 21353670
references.citation: J Clin Virol. 2005 Oct;34(2):104-7
references.pmid: 16157260
references.citation: J Agric Food Chem. 2010 Apr 28;58(8):4794-9
references.pmid: 20355721
references.citation: Genome Res. 1996 Oct;6(10):986-94
references.pmid: 8908518
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35868
references.pmid: 22563411
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46662
references.pmid: 23071608
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 15;28(2):655-61
references.pmid: 10606668
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2009 Aug;23(4):859-70
references.pmid: 19210302
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2002 Apr;11(4):627-41
references.pmid: 11972753
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22746
references.pmid: 21818382
references.citation: BMC Biotechnol. 2006 Jul 06;6:33
references.pmid: 16824215
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41781
references.pmid: 22952587
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Mar;49(3):918-24
references.pmid: 21177904
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2008 Aug 23;4(4):423-5
references.pmid: 18400683
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23398
references.pmid: 21858099