title: The relationship between cup-to-disc ratio and estimated number of retinal ganglion cells.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To investigate the relationship between cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) and estimates of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) number.
  
  
  METHODS
  This cross-sectional study included 156 healthy eyes, 53 glaucoma suspects, and 127 eyes with glaucoma. All eyes had standard automated perimetry (SAP), Cirrus SD-OCT, and stereoscopic optic disc photography within 6 months. CDR was determined from stereoscopic photographs by two or more masked graders. The number of RGCs in each eye was estimated using a published model that combines estimates of RGC number from SAP sensitivity thresholds and SD-OCT retinal nerve fiber layer measurements.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean estimated RGC count was 1,063,809 in healthy eyes; 828,522 in eyes with suspected glaucoma; and 774,200 in early, 468,568 in moderate, and 218,471 in advanced glaucoma. Healthy eyes had a mean vertical CDR of 0.45 ± 0.15 vs. 0.80 ± 0.16 in glaucomatous eyes. There was good correlation between stereophotographic vertical CDR and SD-OCT vertical CDR (R(2) = 0.825; P < 0.001). The relationship between estimated RGCs and vertical CDR was best represented using a third degree polynomial regression model, including age and optic disc area, which accounted for 83.3% of the variation in estimated RGC counts. The nonlinear relationship between RGC estimates and CDRs indicated that eyes with a large CDR would require loss of large RGC numbers for a small increase in CDR.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The relationship between estimated RGC counts and CDR suggests that assessment of change in CDR is an insensitive method for evaluation of progressive neural losses in glaucoma. Even relatively small changes in CDR may be associated with large losses of RGCs, especially in eyes with large CDRs. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00221923, NCT00221897.).
authors.affiliation: Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Department of Ophthalmology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0946, USA.
authors.forename: Andrew J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Tatham
authors.forename: Robert N
authors.initials: RN
authors.lastname: Weinreb
authors.forename: Linda M
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Zangwill
authors.forename: Jeffrey M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Liebmann
authors.forename: Christopher A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Girkin
authors.forename: Felipe A
authors.initials: FA
authors.lastname: Medeiros
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000465:Algorithms; D002452:Cell Count; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D005902:Glaucoma, Open-Angle / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009412:Nerve Fibers / Q000473:pathology*; D009798:Ocular Hypertension / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis; D009898:Optic Disk / Q000473:pathology*; D009901:Optic Nerve Diseases / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis*; D010781:Photography; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012165:Retinal Ganglion Cells / Q000473:pathology*; D041623:Tomography, Optical Coherence; D058609:Visual Field Tests
keywords: ganglion cell; glaucoma; optic disc; optical coherence tomography; perimetry
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 2008 Aug;115(8):1340-6
references.pmid: 18207246
references.citation: Am J Ophthalmol. 1981 May;91(5):588-97
references.pmid: 7234939
references.citation: J Glaucoma. 2007 Mar;16(2):209-14
references.pmid: 17473732
references.citation: Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 May;128(5):551-9
references.pmid: 20457975
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 1999 May;106(5):1013-8
references.pmid: 10328406
references.citation: Am J Ophthalmol. 1985 Apr 15;99(4):383-7
references.pmid: 3985075
references.citation: Am J Ophthalmol. 1964 Dec;58:958-64
references.pmid: 14233720
references.citation: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1992;230(6):552-60
references.pmid: 1427140
references.citation: Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007 Nov;26(6):688-710
references.pmid: 17889587
references.citation: J Glaucoma. 1996 Dec;5(6):384-9
references.pmid: 8946294
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 2009 Feb;116(2):223-30
references.pmid: 19084274
references.citation: Arch Ophthalmol. 1967 Jul;78(1):35-43
references.pmid: 6067496
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991 Feb;32(2):401-5
references.pmid: 1993592
references.citation: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000 Jul;20(4):265-73
references.pmid: 10962691
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Oct 05;53(11):6939-46
references.pmid: 22893677
references.citation: Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Oct;123(10):1351-60
references.pmid: 16219726
references.citation: Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):645-6
references.pmid: 10877330
references.citation: Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan;147(1):39-44.e1
references.pmid: 18790472
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 1988 Mar;95(3):350-6
references.pmid: 3174002
references.citation: Surv Ophthalmol. 1999 Jan-Feb;43(4):293-320
references.pmid: 10025513
references.citation: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;246(2):305-14
references.pmid: 17934750
references.citation: Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Jun;97(6):760-6
references.pmid: 6731540
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988 Jul;29(7):1151-8
references.pmid: 3417404
references.citation: Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov;154(5):814-824.e1
references.pmid: 22840484
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 1994 Mar;101(3):519-23
references.pmid: 8127572
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2002 Jan;19(1):197-207
references.pmid: 11778725
references.citation: Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1973 Mar-Apr;77(2):OP157-61
references.pmid: 4729633
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Oct;49(10):4437-43
references.pmid: 18539947
references.citation: Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb;86(2):196-202
references.pmid: 11815347
references.citation: Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep;127(9):1136-45
references.pmid: 19752422
references.citation: Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Apr;82(4):352-61
references.pmid: 9640180
references.citation: Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;130(9):1107-16
references.pmid: 23130365
references.citation: Semin Ophthalmol. 2000 Dec;15(4):194-205
references.pmid: 17585434
references.citation: Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Oct;82(10):1118-24
references.pmid: 9924296
references.citation: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov;248(11):1671-3
references.pmid: 20532551
references.citation: Br J Ophthalmol. 1983 Jun;67(6):356-61
references.pmid: 6849856
references.citation: Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1976;74:532-72
references.pmid: 867638
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 1989 Jan;96(1):26-32
references.pmid: 2919049
references.citation: Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul;152(1):81-6
references.pmid: 21570047
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 2009 Jul;116(7):1271-7
references.pmid: 19395086
references.citation: Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1974 Mar-Apr;78(2):OP255-74
references.pmid: 4825055
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 2009 May;116(5):840-7
references.pmid: 19410941
references.citation: Lancet. 2004 May 22;363(9422):1711-20
references.pmid: 15158634
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992 May;33(6):2012-8
references.pmid: 1582806
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 1989 Sep;96(9):1325-8
references.pmid: 2780002
references.citation: Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010 Jul;29(4):249-71
references.pmid: 20226873
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 1992 Feb;99(2):215-21
references.pmid: 1553210
references.citation: Surv Ophthalmol. 2006 Jul-Aug;51(4):293-315
references.pmid: 16818081