title: Performance of a high-sensitivity dedicated cardiac SPECT scanner for striatal uptake quantification in the brain based on analysis of projection data.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The authors have previously reported the advantages of high-sensitivity single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) systems for imaging structures located deep inside the brain. DaTscan (Isoflupane I-123) is a dopamine transporter (DaT) imaging agent that has shown potential for early detection of Parkinson disease (PD), as well as for monitoring progression of the disease. Realizing the full potential of DaTscan requires efficient estimation of striatal uptake from SPECT images. They have evaluated two SPECT systems, a conventional dual-head gamma camera with low-energy high-resolution collimators (conventional) and a dedicated high-sensitivity multidetector cardiac imaging system (dedicated) for imaging tasks related to PD.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cramer-Rao bounds (CRB) on precision of estimates of striatal and background activity concentrations were calculated from high-count, separate acquisitions of the compartments (right striata, left striata, background) of a striatal phantom. CRB on striatal and background activity concentration were calculated from essentially noise-free projection datasets, synthesized by scaling and summing the compartment projection datasets, for a range of total detected counts. They also calculated variances of estimates of specific-to-nonspecific binding ratios (BR) and asymmetry indices from these values using propagation of error analysis, as well as the precision of measuring changes in BR on the order of the average annual decline in early PD.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Under typical clinical conditions, the conventional camera detected 2 M counts while the dedicated camera detected 12 M counts. Assuming a normal BR of 5, the standard deviation of BR estimates was 0.042 and 0.021 for the conventional and dedicated system, respectively. For an 8% decrease to BR = 4.6, the signal-to-noise ratio were 6.8 (conventional) and 13.3 (dedicated); for a 5% decrease, they were 4.2 (conventional) and 8.3 (dedicated).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This implies that PD can be detected earlier with the dedicated system than with the conventional system; therefore, earlier identification of PD progression should be possible with the high-sensitivity dedicated SPECT camera.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. miaepark@bwh.harvard.edu
authors.forename: Mi-Ae
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Park
authors.forename: Stephen C
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Moore
authors.forename: Stefan P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Müller
authors.forename: Sarah J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: McQuaid
authors.forename: Marie Foley
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Kijewski
mesh_terms: D003287:Contrast Media / Q000493:pharmacokinetics*; D003342:Corpus Striatum / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000378:metabolism*; D004867:Equipment Design; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis; D006321:Heart / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement / Q000295:instrumentation*; D009206:Myocardium / Q000378:metabolism; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D015899:Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon / Q000295:instrumentation*
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media
references.citation: Neurology. 1992 Mar;42(3 Pt 1):556-61
references.pmid: 1549216
references.citation: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1980 Jun;4(3):361-3
references.pmid: 7372867
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1990 May;31(5):648-54
references.pmid: 2140409
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1993 Aug;34(8):1274-81
references.pmid: 8326384
references.citation: J Neurol Sci. 2011 Nov 15;310(1-2):40-3
references.pmid: 21840542
references.citation: Clin Nucl Med. 2008 Oct;33(10):719-20
references.pmid: 18806581
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2010 Apr;51(4):596-609
references.pmid: 20351351
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2009 May 7;54(9):2635-49
references.pmid: 19351981
references.citation: Eur J Nucl Med. 1996 Nov;23(11):1527-30
references.pmid: 8854853
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;74(3):294-8
references.pmid: 12588911
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 Feb;62(2):133-40
references.pmid: 9048712
references.citation: Synapse. 1998 Jun;29(2):128-41
references.pmid: 9593103
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1990 Oct;31(10):1693-701
references.pmid: 2213195
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1997 Jan;38(1):151-6
references.pmid: 8998170
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Oct;74(10):1447; author reply 1447
references.pmid: 14570850
references.citation: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003 Jan;30(1):132-6
references.pmid: 12483421
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1997 Jan;38(1):1-6
references.pmid: 8998140
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Dec 15;90(24):11965-9
references.pmid: 8265656
references.citation: Med Phys. 2005 Jul;32(7Part1):2236-2244
references.pmid: 28493590
references.citation: Neurology. 2004 May 11;62(9):1568-72
references.pmid: 15136683
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2009 Apr;50(4):635-43
references.pmid: 19339672
references.citation: J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2001;108(8-9):1011-9
references.pmid: 11716136