title: Outcome after pollicization: comparison of patients with mild and severe longitudinal radial deficiency.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Pollicization of the index finger is a well-established treatment in type IIIB to type V hypoplastic thumbs. However, there is a lack of quantitative outcome studies, and little is known about the outcome differences between patients with mild and severe longitudinal radial deficiencies. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantitatively assess and compare outcome after pollicization in severe and mild longitudinal radial deficiency and compare outcome to healthy controls.
  
  
  METHODS
  In total, the authors included 24 patients with 30 affected hands. The study group consisted of 16 male patients and eight female patients with a mean age of 14 years. Median time between pollicization and evaluation was 9.4 years. Active and passive range of motion, extrinsic and intrinsic strength, sensibility, and patient and parent satisfaction were measured in patients with mild and severe longitudinal radial deficiency. Means are expressed as a percentage of normative data, and standard deviations and ranges were calculated. The independent samples t test was used to compare means between groups.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In the overall pollicization group with associated longitudinal radial deficiency, range of motion and strength were significantly diminished compared with normative data. In severe longitudinal radial deficiency, all strength measurements were significantly more affected than in mild longitudinal radial deficiency.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Overall, range of motion and strength of pollicizations were diminished compared with normative data. In severe longitudinal radial deficiency, this was even more pronounced. Despite this outcome, patients and their parents were very satisfied with function and appearance of the new thumb.
authors.affiliation: Rotterdam, The Netherlands From the Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center.
authors.forename: Marjolein
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: de Kraker
authors.forename: Ruud W
authors.initials: RW
authors.lastname: Selles
authors.forename: Jeanette
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: van Vooren
authors.forename: Henk J
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Stam
authors.forename: Steven E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Hovius
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D005385:Fingers / Q000601:surgery*; D006226:Hand Deformities / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D013933:Thumb / Q000002:abnormalities / Q000601:surgery; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Buck-Gramcko D. Pollicization of the index finger: Method and results in aplasia and hypoplasia of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53:1605–1617.
references.citation: Foucher G, Medina J, Lorea P, Pivato G. Principalization of pollicization of the index finger in congenital absence of the thumb. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2005;9:96–104.
references.citation: Clark DI, Chell J, Davis TR. Pollicisation of the index finger: A 27-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:631–635.
references.citation: Foucher G, Medina J, Lorea P, Pivato G, Szabó Z. Pollicization in congenital differences. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2004;36:146–151.
references.citation: Kozin SH, Weiss AA, Webber JB, Betz RR, Clancy M, Steel HH. Index finger pollicization for congenital aplasia or hypoplasia of the thumb. J Hand Surg Am. 1992;17:880–884.
references.citation: Sykes PJ, Chandraprakasam T, Percival NJ. Pollicisation of the index finger in congenital anomalies: A retrospective analysis. J Hand Surg Br. 1991;16:144–147.
references.citation: Littler JW. Architectural principles of reconstructive hand surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 1950;31:463–476.
references.citation: Foucher G, Loréa P, Pivato G, Medina J, Szabo Z. Technical note: Ulnar “pseudo-pollicisation” in congenital hand differences (in French). Chir Main 2004;23:289–293.
references.citation: Littler JW. On making a thumb: One hundred years of surgical effort. J Hand Surg Am. 1976;1:35–51.
references.citation: Egloff DV, Verdan C. Pollicization of the index finger for reconstruction of the congenitally hypoplastic or absent thumb. J Hand Surg Am. 1983;8:839–848.
references.citation: Blauth W. Indication and technics of the index-finger thumb in aplasia of the thumb. Handchirurgie 1969;1:28–33.
references.citation: Lister G. Reconstruction of the hypoplastic thumb. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;195:52–65.
references.citation: Zancolli E. Transplantation of the index finger in congenital absence of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1960;42:658–660.
references.citation: Manske PR, Rotman MB, Dailey LA. Long-term functional results after pollicization for the congenitally deficient thumb. J Hand Surg Am. 1992;17:1064–1072.
references.citation: Vekris MD, Beris AE, Lykissas MG, Soucacos PN. Index finger pollicization in the treatment of congenitally deficient thumb. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66:137–142.
references.citation: Roper BA, Turnbull TJ. Functional assessment after pollicisation. J Hand Surg Br. 1986;11:399–403.
references.citation: Molenaar HM, Zuidam JM, Selles RW, Stam HJ, Hovius SE. Age-specific reliability of two grip-strength dynamometers when used by children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1053–1059.
references.citation: Gilbert A. Congenital absence of the thumb and digits. J Hand Surg Br. 1989;14:6–17.
references.citation: Kozin SH. Pollicization: The concept, technical details, and outcome. Clin Orthop Surg. 2012;4:18–35.
references.citation: Manske PR, McCaroll HR Jr. Index finger pollicization for a congenitally absent or nonfunctioning thumb. J Hand Surg Am. 1985;10:606–613.
references.citation: Manske PR, McCarroll HR Jr. Abductor digiti minimi opponensplasty in congenital radial dysplasia. J Hand Surg Am. 1978;3:552–559.
references.citation: James MA, Green HD, McCaroll HR Jr, Manske PR. The association of radial deficiency with thumb hypoplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2196–2205.
references.citation: de Kraker M, Selles RW, Molenaar TM, Schreuders TA, Hovius SE, Stam HJ. Palmar abduction measurements: Reliability and introduction of normative data in healthy children. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34:1704–1708.
references.citation: de Kraker M, Selles RW, Schreuders TA, Stam HJ, Hovius SE. Palmar abduction: Reliability of 6 measurement methods in healthy adults. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34:523–530.
references.citation: Lemmen MH, Schreuders TA, Stam HJ, Hovius SE. Evaluation of restoration of extensor pollicis function by transfer of the extensor indicis. J Hand Surg Br. 1999;24:46–49.
references.citation: Schreuders TA, Roebroeck M, van der Kar TJ, Soeters JN, Hovius SE, Stam HJ. Strength of the intrinsic muscles of the hand measured with a hand-held dynamometer: Reliability in patients with ulnar and median nerve paralysis. J Hand Surg Br. 2000;25:560–565.
references.citation: Schreuders TA, Roebroeck ME, Jaquet JB, Hovius SE, Stam HJ. Measuring the strength of the intrinsic muscles of the hand in patients with ulnar and median nerve injuries: Reliability of the Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer (RIHM). J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29:318–324.
references.citation: Selles RW, van Ginneken BT, Schreuders TA, Janssen WG, Stam HJ. Dynamometry of intrinsic hand muscles in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neurology 2006;67:2022–2027.
references.citation: Molenaar HM, Selles RW, Willemsen SP, Hovius SE, Stam HJ. Growth diagrams for individual finger strength in children measured with the RIHM. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:868–876.
references.citation: Jerosch-Herold C. Assessment of sensibility after nerve injury and repair: A systematic review of evidence for validity, reliability and responsiveness of tests. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30:252–264.
references.citation: Kozin SH. Upper-extremity congenital anomalies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1564–1576.
references.citation: Manske PR, McCarroll HR Jr. Reconstruction of the congenitally deficient thumb. Hand Clin. 1992;8:177–196.
references.citation: Oberlin C, Gilbert A. Transfer of the abductor digiti minimi (quinti) in radial deformities of the hand in children. Ann Chir Main 1984;3:215–220.
references.citation: Upton J, Taghinia A. Abductor digiti minimi myocutaneous flap for opponensplasty in congenital hypoplastic thumbs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:1807–1811.
references.citation: Huber E. Hilfsoperation bei Medianuslähmung. Dtsch Z Chir. 1921;5:271–275.
references.citation: Latimer J, Shah M, Kay S. Abductor digiti minimi transfer for the restoration of opposition in children. J Hand Surg Br. 1994;19:653–658.
references.citation: Ogino T, Minami A, Fukuda K. Abductor digiti minimi opponensplasty in hypoplastic thumb. J Hand Surg Br. 1986;11:372–377.
references.citation: Cawrse NH, Sammut D. A modification in technique of abductor digiti minimi (Huber) opponensplasty. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28:233–237.
references.citation: Percival NJ, Sykes PJ, Chandraprakasam T. A method of assessment of pollicisation. J Hand Surg Br. 1991;16:141–143.
references.citation: Goldfarb CA, Deardorff V, Chia B, Meander A, Manske PR. Objective features and aesthetic outcome of pollicized digits compared with normal thumbs. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32:1031–1036.