title: Why is CA3 more vulnerable than CA1 in experimental models of controlled cortical impact-induced brain injury?
abstract: One interesting finding of controlled cortical impact (CCI) experiments is that the CA3 region of the hippocampus, which is positioned further from the impact than the CA1 region, is reported as being more injured. The current literature has suggested a positive correlation between brain tissue stretch and neuronal cell loss. However, it is counterintuitive to assume that CA3 is stretched more during CCI injury. Recent mechanical studies of the brain have reported on a level of spatial heterogeneity not previously appreciated-the finding that CA1 was significantly stiffer than all other regions tested and that CA3 was one of the most compliant. We hypothesized that mechanical heterogeneity of anatomical structures could underlie the proposed heterogeneous mechanical response and hence the pattern of cell death. As such, we developed a three-dimensional finite element (FE) rat brain model representing detailed hippocampal structures and simulated various CCI experiments. Four groups of material properties based on recent experiments were tested. In group 1, hyperelastic material properties were assigned to various hippocampal structures, with CA3 more compliant than CA1. In group 2, linear viscoelastic material properties were assigned to hippocampal structures, with CA3 more compliant than CA1. In group 3, the hippocampus was represented by homogenous linear viscoelastic material properties. In group 4, a homogeneous nonlinear hippocampus was adopted. Simulation results demonstrated that for CCI with a 5-mm diameter, flat shape impactor, CA3 experienced increased tensile strains over a larger area and to a greater magnitude than did CA1 for group 1, which best explained why CA3 is more sensitive to CCI injury. However, for groups 2-4, the total volume with high strain (>30%) in CA3 was smaller than that in CA1. The FE rat brain model, with detailed hippocampal structures presented here, will help to engineer desired experimental neurotrauma models by virtually characterizing brain biomechanics before testing.
authors.affiliation: Biomedical Engineering Department, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.
authors.forename: Haojie
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Mao
authors.forename: Benjamin S
authors.initials: BS
authors.lastname: Elkin
authors.forename: Vinay V
authors.initials: VV
authors.lastname: Genthikatti
authors.forename: Barclay
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Morrison
authors.forename: King H
authors.initials: KH
authors.lastname: Yang
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena / Q000502:physiology; D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000503:physiopathology; D056547:CA1 Region, Hippocampal / Q000166:cytology / Q000293:injuries* / Q000502:physiology; D056654:CA3 Region, Hippocampal / Q000166:cytology / Q000293:injuries* / Q000502:physiology; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000166:cytology / Q000293:injuries* / Q000502:physiology; D004195:Disease Models, Animal; D011859:Radiography; D051381:Rats
references.citation: Ann Biomed Eng. 1998 May-Jun;26(3):381-90
references.pmid: 9570221
references.citation: Med Biol Eng Comput. 2013 Mar;51(3):353-65
references.pmid: 23192366
references.citation: J Neurotrauma. 2005 Jul;22(7):719-32
references.pmid: 16004576
references.citation: J Biomech. 2005 May;38(5):1093-105
references.pmid: 15797591
references.citation: Neuroscience. 2005;133(1):1-15
references.pmid: 15893627
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2000 Feb;83(2):1031-8
references.pmid: 10669514
references.citation: Brain Res. 1996 Nov 11;739(1-2):111-9
references.pmid: 8955931
references.citation: J Neurotrauma. 2003 Oct;20(10):929-41
references.pmid: 14588110
references.citation: Stapp Car Crash J. 2007 Oct;51:127-38
references.pmid: 18278594
references.citation: J Biomech. 2006;39(15):2810-8
references.pmid: 16289515
references.citation: J Biomech Eng. 2001 Jun;123(3):247-55
references.pmid: 11476368
references.citation: Brain Res. 2002 Oct 4;951(2):191-201
references.pmid: 12270497
references.citation: J Neurotrauma. 2007 May;24(5):812-22
references.pmid: 17518536
references.citation: J Neurosci Methods. 2006 Jan 30;150(2):192-201
references.pmid: 16098599
references.citation: J Neurotrauma. 2011 Nov;28(11):2235-44
references.pmid: 21341982
references.citation: Exp Neurol. 2005 May;193(1):125-30
references.pmid: 15817271
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 2001 Oct;95(4):674-9
references.pmid: 11596962
references.citation: Stapp Car Crash J. 2006 Nov;50:583-600
references.pmid: 17311178
references.citation: J Biomech Eng. 2010 Jan;132(1):011010
references.pmid: 20524748
references.citation: Stapp Car Crash J. 2003 Oct;47:93-105
references.pmid: 17096246
references.citation: J Neurotrauma. 2011 Nov;28(11):2245-62
references.pmid: 21341976
references.citation: J Neurotrauma. 2006 Oct;23(10):1570-80
references.pmid: 17020491
references.citation: J Neurotrauma. 2010 May;27(5):877-88
references.pmid: 20199194