title: Impact of sham-controlled vertebroplasty trials on referral patterns at two academic medical centers.
abstract: Debate persists regarding the merit of vertebroplasty following publication of blinded vertebroplasty trials in 2009, one of which was the Investigational Vertebroplasty Efficacy and Safety Trial (INVEST). This study was performed to determine whether referring physicians at two academic medical centers were aware of the trial results and to assess if this awareness prompted a change in their treatment of osteoporotic fractures. E-mail surveys were distributed to physicians within the Mayo Clinic and Baylor Health Care System (BHCS). Of 1390 surveys sent, 194 (14%) were returned. Results showed that 92 of 158 respondents (58%) reported familiarity with INVEST; 66 of 92 (72%) agreed that INVEST changed their understanding of vertebroplasty efficacy; and 64 of 92 (70%) agreed that INVEST diminished their enthusiasm to refer patients for vertebroplasty. However, 105 of 159 respondents (66%) felt vertebroplasty was an effective procedure in appropriate patients. Mayo physicians were more likely than BHCS physicians to be aware of INVEST (73% vs 67%, P < .0001), respond that INVEST changed their understanding of the appropriate treatment for osteoporotic compression fractures (79% vs 57%, P = 0.026), view vertebroplasty less favorably (45% vs 21%, P = 0.005), and treat osteoporotic compression fractures with medical therapy/pain management alone (73% vs 48%, P = 0.003). INVEST changed referring physicians' understanding of the role of vertebroplasty and diminished their willingness to refer osteoporotic compression fracture patients; the impact varied by location.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas (Lindsey, Opatowsky, Broyles, Layton); and the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Kallmes).
authors.forename: Sara S
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Lindsey
authors.forename: David F
authors.initials: DF
authors.lastname: Kallmes
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Opatowsky
authors.forename: Elizabeth A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Broyles
authors.forename: Kennith F
authors.initials: KF
authors.lastname: Layton
references.citation: Lancet. 2010 Sep 25;376(9746):1085-92
references.pmid: 20701962
references.citation: Med J Aust. 2010 Mar 15;192(6):334-7
references.pmid: 20230351
references.citation: Radiology. 2010 Jun;255(3):675-80
references.pmid: 20501706
references.citation: Spine J. 2010 Mar;10(3):241-3
references.pmid: 20207334
references.citation: Med J Aust. 2010 Mar 15;192(6):338-41
references.pmid: 20230352
references.citation: Radiology. 2010 Jun;255(3):669-74
references.pmid: 20501705
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 6;361(6):557-68
references.pmid: 19657121
references.citation: Spine J. 2009 Jun;9(6):501-8
references.pmid: 19251485
references.citation: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Apr;32(4):647-8
references.pmid: 21349971
references.citation: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Apr;28(4):683-9
references.pmid: 17416821
references.citation: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Oct;31(9):1631-4
references.pmid: 20522567
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 6;361(6):569-79
references.pmid: 19657122
references.citation: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Nov;30(10):1809-10
references.pmid: 19815617