title: Under-dominance constrains the evolution of negative autoregulation in diploids.
abstract: Regulatory networks have evolved to allow gene expression to rapidly track changes in the environment as well as to buffer perturbations and maintain cellular homeostasis in the absence of change. Theoretical work and empirical investigation in Escherichia coli have shown that negative autoregulation confers both rapid response times and reduced intrinsic noise, which is reflected in the fact that almost half of Escherichia coli transcription factors are negatively autoregulated. However, negative autoregulation is rare amongst the transcription factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This difference is surprising because E. coli and S. cerevisiae otherwise have similar profiles of network motifs. In this study we investigate regulatory interactions amongst the transcription factors of Drosophila melanogaster and humans, and show that they have a similar dearth of negative autoregulation to that seen in S. cerevisiae. We then present a model demonstrating that this striking difference in the noise reduction strategies used amongst species can be explained by constraints on the evolution of negative autoregulation in diploids. We show that regulatory interactions between pairs of homologous genes within the same cell can lead to under-dominance--mutations which result in stronger autoregulation, and decrease noise in homozygotes, paradoxically can cause increased noise in heterozygotes. This severely limits a diploid's ability to evolve negative autoregulation as a noise reduction mechanism. Our work offers a simple and general explanation for a previously unexplained difference between the regulatory architectures of E. coli and yeast, Drosophila and humans. It also demonstrates that the effects of diploidy in gene networks can have counter-intuitive consequences that may profoundly influence the course of evolution.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America. alstew@sas.upenn.edu
authors.forename: Alexander J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Stewart
authors.forename: Robert M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Seymour
authors.forename: Andrew
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pomiankowski
authors.forename: Max
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Reuter
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001665:Binding Sites; D004171:Diploidy; D004331:Drosophila melanogaster; D004926:Escherichia coli / Q000235:genetics; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D005786:Gene Expression Regulation; D053263:Gene Regulatory Networks; D006706:Homeostasis; D006801:Humans; D008957:Models, Genetic; D056004:Molecular Dynamics Simulation; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D009154:Mutation; D012441:Saccharomyces cerevisiae / Q000235:genetics; D014157:Transcription Factors / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D014157:Transcription Factors
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Sep 9;467(7312):167-73
references.pmid: 20829787
references.citation: Science. 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804
references.pmid: 12399584
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2009 Apr 7;257(3):419-29
references.pmid: 19121637
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2002 Nov 8;323(5):785-93
references.pmid: 12417193
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 1;105(13):5081-6
references.pmid: 18353986
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 19;108(16):E67-76
references.pmid: 21464323
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2002 May;31(1):64-8
references.pmid: 11967538
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 17;98(15):8614-9
references.pmid: 11438714
references.citation: Science. 2004 Mar 5;303(5663):1538-42
references.pmid: 15001784
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Sep 17;99(19):12015-20
references.pmid: 12218191
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Jun 1;405(6786):590-3
references.pmid: 10850721
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Sep 27;8 Suppl 6:S7
references.pmid: 17903288
references.citation: Nature. 2011 May 19;473(7347):337-42
references.pmid: 21593866
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Sep 9;467(7312):174-8
references.pmid: 20829788
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 2;106(22):8841-6
references.pmid: 19470486
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2007 Apr;39(4):503-12
references.pmid: 17322878
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2002 May;31(1):60-3
references.pmid: 11967534
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Feb;11(2):97-108
references.pmid: 20051986
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D108-10
references.pmid: 16381825
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jan;38(Database issue):D563-9
references.pmid: 19884133
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 15;21(8):1747-9
references.pmid: 15572468
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(Database issue):D102-6
references.pmid: 18006571
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2239-47
references.pmid: 21690103
references.citation: Cell. 2007 Jul 13;130(1):153-64
references.pmid: 17632062
references.citation: Mol Syst Biol. 2008;4:190
references.pmid: 18463614
references.citation: Cell. 2008 Oct 17;135(2):216-26
references.pmid: 18957198
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Sep 15;3(9):e3210
references.pmid: 18791639
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Jan 1;24(1):238-41
references.pmid: 8594589
references.citation: Bioessays. 1998 May;20(5):433-40
references.pmid: 9670816
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2004 Oct 28;4:42
references.pmid: 15511291
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2006 Oct;4(10):e309
references.pmid: 17048983
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Aug 07;9:193
references.pmid: 19664220
references.citation: Nature. 1997 May 29;387(6632 Suppl):67-73
references.pmid: 9169866
references.citation: Database (Oxford). 2011 Jul 23;2011:bar030
references.pmid: 21785142
references.citation: Science. 2011 Feb 11;331(6018):764-8
references.pmid: 21233346
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104
references.pmid: 15343339