title: Effects of stimuli shape and polarization in evoking deimatic patterns in the European cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis, under varying turbidity conditions.
abstract: Cuttlefish possess the complex ability to identify approaching threats and then to selectively express the appropriate defense. We examined the visual cues used by Sepia officinalis cuttlefish during predator detection and the responses they selected. Using computer-generated stimuli, we set out to quantitate the deimatic responses to artificial looming stimuli of different shapes and contrasts. Defensive behavior gradually intensified as geometrical shapes resembled an image of a fish. Therefore, in addition to an object's size or its sudden increase in size, cuttlefish use form recognition to identify a threat. Cuttlefish demonstrated equal performance in predator detection trough clear water when presented with intensity versus polarization contrasts. However, when the water turbidity increased, the cuttlefish still detected looming fish shapes based on polarization contrast even when intensity information alone did not suffice. These results demonstrate the interplay between intensity and polarization information transmission and processing in the spatial domain. As nectobenthic organisms, cuttlefish probably experience low visibility conditions on a regular basis. The ability to see further into turbid water and to better detect an approaching object would be beneficial for their survival.
authors.affiliation: Groupe Mémoire et Plasticité Comportementale, Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, EA 4259, 14032 Caen, France.
authors.forename: Lelia
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Cartron
authors.forename: Nadav
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Shashar
authors.forename: Ludovic
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Dickel
authors.forename: Anne-Sophie
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Darmaillacq
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D005060:Europe; D049833:Sepia / Q000502:physiology*; D014785:Vision, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Mar 12;366(1565):734-41
references.pmid: 21282177
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2011 Aug;125(3):273-7
references.pmid: 21842982
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2012 Jan 1;226(1):66-76
references.pmid: 21920389
references.citation: Vision Res. 2007 Jul;47(16):2223-35
references.pmid: 17592739
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Mar 12;366(1565):655-70
references.pmid: 21282169
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2008 Jan 10;186(1):107-17
references.pmid: 17854920
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2001 Jul;204(Pt 14):2415-22
references.pmid: 11511656
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2010 Oct 1;213(Pt 19):3364-70
references.pmid: 20833930
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2012 Feb 21;22(4):R121-2
references.pmid: 22361145
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Mar 12;366(1565):649-54
references.pmid: 21282168
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2004 Sep;207(Pt 20):3619-28
references.pmid: 15339957
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Dec 18;17(24):R1044-5
references.pmid: 18088584
references.citation: Dev Psychobiol. 2000 Mar;36(2):101-10
references.pmid: 10689281
references.citation: Opt Lett. 1995 Mar 15;20(6):608-10
references.pmid: 19859271
references.citation: Appl Opt. 1996 Apr 10;35(11):1855-70
references.pmid: 21085310
references.citation: Vision Res. 2000;40(1):71-5
references.pmid: 10768043
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2012 Jul;15(4):591-6
references.pmid: 22460628
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 1996;199(Pt 9):2077-84
references.pmid: 9319987
references.citation: Appl Opt. 2003 Jan 20;42(3):511-25
references.pmid: 12570274
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Jun 5;17(11):R400-4
references.pmid: 17550761
references.citation: Appl Opt. 2003 May 20;42(15):2794-803
references.pmid: 12777017