title: Evaluation of Greek psychiatric reforms: methodological issues.
abstract: Over the last three decades significant efforts have been made in many European countries to move away from a mental health system dominated by institutional care towards one whereby the main emphasis is on providing care and support within the community. Although the time of starting the reforms, their pace, the political context, and the exact objectives varies substantially across Europe, practically all countries have been undergoing such major reforms aimed at establishing services in the community to replace institutional based care. Each country makes its own decisions about the necessary mental health services taking into account a range of factors including population needs, level of resources, flexibility and coordination of organizational structures, as well as local culture. These factors become an integral element of a national mental health policy and action plan, closely linked with national public health strategies.Greece has been modernizing an outdated mental health system, which was based on institutional care, over the last 20 years, by developing community-based mental health care. This article describes the methodology used for the evaluation of the Psychargos programme of the mental health reforms in Greece. Various forms of community-based mental health services have been developed including supported living facilities, community mental health centres and employment opportunities.
authors.affiliation: Maudsley International, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. nick.bouras@kcl.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Evangelia
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Loukidou
authors.forename: Anastasios
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Mastroyannakis
authors.forename: Tracey
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Power
authors.forename: Graham
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Thornicroft
authors.forename: Tom
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Craig
authors.forename: Nick
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Bouras
references.citation: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;47(3):447-54
references.pmid: 21293841
references.citation: World Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;9(2):67-77
references.pmid: 20671888
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Jun;56(527):415-22
references.pmid: 16762122
references.citation: Psychiatriki. 2013 Jan-Mar;24(1):37-44
references.pmid: 23603267
references.citation: Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Dec;62(12):1405
references.pmid: 22193782
references.citation: Eur Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;14(8):462-7
references.pmid: 10683633
references.citation: Int Psychiatry. 2007 Jan 01;4(1):16-19
references.pmid: 31507877
references.citation: Psychiatriki. 2008 Oct;19(4):320-9
references.pmid: 22218080
references.citation: Psychol Med. 2011 Oct;41(10):2015-21
references.pmid: 21320391
references.citation: Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;58(2):172-7
references.pmid: 21106603
references.citation: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2011 Mar;20(1):7-13
references.pmid: 21657109
references.citation: Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;22(6):631-5
references.pmid: 19820648
references.citation: Psychol Med. 2013 Apr;43(4):849-63
references.pmid: 22785067
references.citation: World Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;11(2):129-32
references.pmid: 22654946
references.citation: Community Ment Health J. 1999 Aug;35(4):313-23
references.pmid: 10452699
references.citation: World Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;10(3):217-25
references.pmid: 21991282
references.citation: Int Psychiatry. 2010 Jul 01;7(3):64-67
references.pmid: 31508042
references.citation: Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;24(4):301-6
references.pmid: 22950768
references.citation: J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2010 Jun;13(2):73-86
references.pmid: 20919594
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Oct;195(4):283-5
references.pmid: 19794192