title: Interaction between language and vision: it's momentary, abstract, and it develops.
abstract: In this paper, we present a case study that explores the nature and development of the mechanisms by which language interacts with and influences our ability to represent and retain information from one of our most important non-linguistic systems - vision. In previous work (Dessalegn & Landau, 2008), we showed that 4 year-olds remembered conjunctions of visual features better when the visual target was accompanied by a sentence containing an asymmetric spatial predicate (e.g., the yellow is to the left of the black) but not when the visual target was accompanied by a sentence containing a novel noun (e.g., look at the dax) or a symmetric spatial predicate (e.g., the yellow is touching the black). In this paper, we extend these findings. In three experiments, 3, 4 and 6 year-olds were shown square blocks split in half by color vertically, horizontally or diagonally (e.g., yellow-left, black-right) and were asked to perform a delayed-matching task. We found that sentences containing spatial asymmetric predicates (e.g., the yellow is to the left of the black) and non-spatial asymmetric predicates (e.g., the yellow is prettier than the black) helped 4 year-olds, although not to the same extent. By contrast, 3 year-olds did not benefit from different linguistic instructions at all while 6 year-olds performed at ceiling in the task with or without the relevant sentences. Our findings suggest by age 4, the effects of language on non-linguistic tasks depend on highly abstract representations of the linguistic instructions and are momentary, seen only in the context of the task. We further speculate that language becomes more automatically engaged in nonlinguistic tasks over development.
authors.affiliation: University of Chicago, Department of Psychology, 5848 S. University Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. banchiamlack@gmail.com
authors.forename: Banchiamlack
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Dessalegn
authors.forename: Barbara
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Landau
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D007804:Language Development; D008297:Male; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Jul;108(1):155-84
references.pmid: 18395705
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1982 Jan;14(1):107-41
references.pmid: 7053925
references.citation: Child Dev. 1968 Mar;39(1):113-21
references.pmid: 5645788
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2012 Feb;64(1-2):74-92
references.pmid: 22112644
references.citation: Nature. 1999 Mar 18;398(6724):203-4
references.pmid: 10094043
references.citation: Child Dev. 1975 Jun;46(2):400-7
references.pmid: 1183272
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1994 Apr;101(2):343-52
references.pmid: 8022966
references.citation: Child Dev. 1982 Oct;53(5):1215-23
references.pmid: 7140427
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1986 Mar;39(3):164-74
references.pmid: 3737341
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1999 Aug;39(1):3-36
references.pmid: 10433786
references.citation: Child Dev. 1966 Jun;37(2):283-99
references.pmid: 5941895
references.citation: Cognition. 1987 Jul;26(2):89-114
references.pmid: 3652651
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2005 Jun;50(4):315-53
references.pmid: 15893523
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Sep;129(3):369-98
references.pmid: 11006906
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2003 May;46(3):260-301
references.pmid: 12694695
references.citation: Cognition. 1996 Aug;60(2):143-71
references.pmid: 8811743
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1967 Aug;74(4):543-9
references.pmid: 6065475
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Feb;19(2):189-95
references.pmid: 18271868
references.citation: J Mem Lang. 2007 Nov;57(4):544-569
references.pmid: 18978929
references.citation: Adv Child Dev Behav. 1970;5:181-211
references.pmid: 4950020
references.citation: Cognition. 2002 Jun;84(2):155-88
references.pmid: 12175571
references.citation: Cognition. 2011 Jul;120(1):33-53
references.pmid: 21481854
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2001 Jul;12(4):282-6
references.pmid: 11476093
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1952 Sep;44(3):151-5
references.pmid: 12990756
references.citation: Neuron. 1999 Sep;24(1):105-10, 111-25
references.pmid: 10677031
references.citation: Cognition. 1996 Mar;58(3):321-76
references.pmid: 8871343
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1998 Jan;105(1):158-73
references.pmid: 9450375
references.citation: Cognition. 1991 Feb;38(2):179-211
references.pmid: 2049905
references.citation: Cognition. 2011 Aug;120(2):186-201
references.pmid: 21665199
references.citation: Cognition. 2009 Jun;111(3):329-44
references.pmid: 19345937
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Aug;108(2):566-77
references.pmid: 18448087
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Nov;72(8):2236-53
references.pmid: 21097866
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136
references.pmid: 7351125
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2000 Sep;28(6):977-86
references.pmid: 11105523
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1996 Apr;6(2):171-8
references.pmid: 8725958
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):819-24
references.pmid: 18547557
references.citation: Cognition. 2002 Apr;83(3):265-94
references.pmid: 11934404
references.citation: J Psycholinguist Res. 1998 May;27(3):385-411
references.pmid: 9631562