title: Riding other people's coattails: individuals with low self-control value self-control in other people.
abstract: Two laboratory experiments and one dyadic study of ongoing relationships of romantic partners examined how temporary and chronic deficits in self-control affect individuals' evaluations of other people. We suggest that when individuals lack self-control resources, they value such resources in other people. Our results support this hypothesis: We found that individuals low (but not high) in self-control use information about other people's self-control abilities when judging them, evaluating other people with high self-control more positively than those with low self-control. In Study 1, participants whose self-control was depleted preferred people with higher self-control, whereas nondepleted participants did not show this preference. In Study 2, we conceptually replicated this effect while using a behavioral measure of trait self-control. In Study 3, individuals with low (but not high) self-control reported greater dependence on dating partners with high self-control than on those with low self-control. We theorize that individuals with low self-control may use interpersonal relationships to compensate for their lack of personal self-control resources.
authors.affiliation: Duke University, USA.
authors.forename: Catherine T
authors.initials: CT
authors.lastname: Shea
authors.forename: Erin K
authors.initials: EK
authors.lastname: Davisson
authors.forename: Gráinne M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Fitzsimons
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004532:Ego; D056344:Executive Function / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D012747:Sexual Partners / Q000523:psychology*; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: interpersonal relationships; self-control
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 May;74(5):1252-65
references.pmid: 9599441
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
references.pmid: 847061
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Jul;16(7):497-500
references.pmid: 16008778
references.citation: J Pers. 2004 Apr;72(2):271-324
references.pmid: 15016066
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Dec;16(12):939-44
references.pmid: 16313657
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jul;95(1):111-27
references.pmid: 18605855
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Feb;36(2):251-63
references.pmid: 20008967
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Feb;92(2):325-36
references.pmid: 17279852
references.citation: J Health Psychol. 2011 Jul;16(5):750-9
references.pmid: 21421645
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Aug;95(2):319-37
references.pmid: 18665705
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Aug;81(2):263-77
references.pmid: 11519931
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 15;108(7):2693-8
references.pmid: 21262822
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Sep;91(3):456-75
references.pmid: 16938030
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:351-75
references.pmid: 12415073
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Mar;84(3):558-68
references.pmid: 12635916
references.citation: Science. 1989 May 26;244(4907):933-8
references.pmid: 2658056