title: The effect of group attachment and social position on prosocial behavior. Evidence from lab-in-the-field experiments.
abstract: Social life is regulated by norms of fairness that constrain selfish behavior. While a substantial body of scholarship on prosocial behavior has provided evidence of such norms, large inter- and intra-personal variation in prosocial behavior still needs to be explained. The article identifies two social-structural dimensions along which people's generosity varies systematically: group attachment and social position. We conducted lab-in-the-field experiments involving 2,597 members of producer organizations in rural Uganda. Using different variants of the dictator game, we demonstrate that group attachment positively affects prosocial behavior, and that this effect is not simply the by-product of the degree of proximity between individuals. Second, we show that occupying a formal position in an organization or community leads to greater generosity toward in-group members. Taken together, our findings show that prosocial behavior is not an invariant social trait; rather, it varies according to individuals' relative position in the social structure.
authors.affiliation: Sociology Department, New York University, New York, New York, USA. delia.b@nyu.edu
authors.forename: Delia
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Baldassarri
authors.forename: Guy
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Grossman
mesh_terms: D005717:Games, Experimental; D006801:Humans; D009938:Organizations; D012929:Psychological Distance; D012919:Social Behavior; D012923:Social Class; D014454:Uganda
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Nov 12;5(11):e13749
references.pmid: 21103058
references.citation: Science. 2010 Jun 25;328(5986):1627
references.pmid: 20576866
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jul 22;278(1715):2223-32
references.pmid: 21147798
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 5;108(27):11023-7
references.pmid: 21690401
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 28;107(52):22384-90
references.pmid: 21098283
references.citation: Science. 2006 Dec 8;314(5805):1560-3
references.pmid: 17158317
references.citation: Am J Pol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;56(4):964-985
references.pmid: 23729913
references.citation: Nature. 2012 Jan 25;481(7382):497-501
references.pmid: 22281599
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Mar 11;6(3):e16836
references.pmid: 21412431
references.citation: Nature. 2006 May 25;441(7092):502-5
references.pmid: 16724065
references.citation: Evol Hum Behav. 2012 Jul 1;33(4):334-345
references.pmid: 22822299
references.citation: Hum Nat. 2010 Oct 1;21(3):243-268
references.pmid: 21218145
references.citation: Science. 2006 Jun 23;312(5781):1767-70
references.pmid: 16794075
references.citation: Science. 2010 Mar 19;327(5972):1480-4
references.pmid: 20299588