title: PFO Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke: Review of New Data and Results.
abstract: Observational studies over 20 years have suggested that a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an important cause of cryptogenic stroke in young individuals; case series and registries suggest that PFO closure confers superior protection from recurrent transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke. Recently completed randomized clinical trials did not confirm this hypothesis, but have provided reassurance that the risk of recurrent stroke is low at 1.5 %/yr. A target subset that may benefit are those with ischemic stroke, a large right-to-left shunt, and an atrial septal aneurysm. Further study is needed to determine the optimum strategy to reduce the long-term stroke risk in a lifetime of varying situational risk factors and temporary interruptions of medical therapies.
authors.affiliation: Internal Medicine, Fairview Hospital, 18200 Lorain Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44111, USA, shyam.rao1311@yahoo.com.
authors.forename: Shyam
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Rao
authors.forename: Cathy
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Sila
references.citation: Neurology. 1993 May;43(5):1021-7
references.pmid: 8492920
references.citation: Int J Cardiol. 2012 Apr 5;156(1):47-52
references.pmid: 21112103
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 May 26;53(21):2014-8
references.pmid: 19460622
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):1048-50
references.pmid: 22417260
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2001 Sep 13;345(11):803
references.pmid: 11556300
references.citation: Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2008 Jul-Aug;101(7-8):435-41
references.pmid: 18848685
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):991-9
references.pmid: 22417252
references.citation: Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jul 1;106(1):129-34
references.pmid: 20609660
references.citation: Circulation. 2007 Aug 7;116(6):677-82
references.pmid: 17679629
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 15;345(20):1444-51
references.pmid: 11794192
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1997 Sep 4;337(10):681
references.pmid: 9278465
references.citation: Neurology. 2004 Apr 13;62(7):1042-50
references.pmid: 15078999
references.citation: Neurol Sci. 2006 Feb;26(6):411-8
references.pmid: 16601933
references.citation: Neurology. 2010 Jan 12;74(2):136-41
references.pmid: 20065248
references.citation: Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;28(4):349-56
references.pmid: 19628936
references.citation: Stroke. 2012 Dec;43(12):3387-8
references.pmid: 23033345
references.citation: Stroke. 1988 May;19(5):547-54
references.pmid: 3363586
references.citation: Int J Cardiol. 2005 May 11;101(1):77-82
references.pmid: 15860387
references.citation: Stroke. 2010 Dec;41(12):2872-83
references.pmid: 21051670
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 23;329(13):930
references.pmid: 8361507
references.citation: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Nov;68(5):741-6
references.pmid: 17039525
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Aug 18;44(4):750-8
references.pmid: 15312853
references.citation: J Neurol. 2013 Jan;260(1):260-7
references.pmid: 22865239
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2003 Nov 4;139(9):753-60
references.pmid: 14597460
references.citation: Can J Neurol Sci. 2006 Feb;33(1):39-47
references.pmid: 16583720
references.citation: Circulation. 2012 Feb 14;125(6):803-12
references.pmid: 22238228
references.citation: Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;31(2):109-16
references.pmid: 21088390
references.citation: Stroke. 1993 Jan;24(1):35-41
references.pmid: 7678184
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 21;368(12):1092-100
references.pmid: 23514286