title: Simultaneous catabolism of plant-derived aromatic compounds results in enhanced growth for members of the Roseobacter lineage.
abstract: Plant-derived aromatic compounds are important components of the dissolved organic carbon pool in coastal salt marshes, and their mineralization by resident bacteria contributes to carbon cycling in these systems. Members of the roseobacter lineage of marine bacteria are abundant in coastal salt marshes, and several characterized strains, including Sagittula stellata E-37, utilize aromatic compounds as primary growth substrates. The genome sequence of S. stellata contains multiple, potentially competing, aerobic ring-cleaving pathways. Preferential hierarchies in substrate utilization and complex transcriptional regulation have been demonstrated to be the norm in many soil bacteria that also contain multiple ring-cleaving pathways. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether substrate preference exists in S. stellata when the organism is provided a mixture of aromatic compounds that proceed through different ring-cleaving pathways. We focused on the protocatechuate (pca) and the aerobic benzoyl coenzyme A (box) pathways and the substrates known to proceed through them, p-hydroxybenzoate (POB) and benzoate, respectively. When these two substrates were provided at nonlimiting carbon concentrations, temporal patterns of cell density, gene transcript abundance, enzyme activity, and substrate concentrations indicated that S. stellata simultaneously catabolized both substrates. Furthermore, enhanced growth rates were observed when S. stellata was provided both compounds simultaneously compared to the rates of cells grown singly with an equimolar concentration of either substrate alone. This simultaneous-catabolism phenotype was also demonstrated in another lineage member, Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3. These findings challenge the paradigm of sequential aromatic catabolism reported for soil bacteria and contribute to the growing body of physiological evidence demonstrating the metabolic versatility of roseobacters.
authors.affiliation: Department of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
authors.forename: Christopher A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Gulvik
authors.forename: Alison
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Buchan
mesh_terms: D000214:Acyl Coenzyme A / Q000378:metabolism; D001565:Benzoates / Q000378:metabolism; D057486:Carbon Cycle / Q000502:physiology*; D002851:Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; D019295:Computational Biology; D019015:Geologic Sediments / Q000382:microbiology*; D006841:Hydrocarbons, Aromatic / Q000378:metabolism*; D062385:Hydroxybenzoates / Q000378:metabolism; D053858:Metabolic Networks and Pathways / Q000502:physiology*; D010226:Parabens / Q000378:metabolism; D011520:Protocatechuate-3,4-Dioxygenase; D020133:Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; D041904:Roseobacter / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000378:metabolism*; D013056:Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet; D053833:Wetlands
chemical_list: D000214:Acyl Coenzyme A; D001565:Benzoates; D006841:Hydrocarbons, Aromatic; D062385:Hydroxybenzoates; D010226:Parabens; C009091:protocatechuic acid; C037817:benzoyl-coenzyme A; D011520:Protocatechuate-3,4-Dioxygenase; C038193:4-hydroxybenzoic acid
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Jan;73(1):232-42
references.pmid: 17085716
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Jan 29;427(6973):445-8
references.pmid: 14749832
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2010 Jul 2;285(27):20615-24
references.pmid: 20452977
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1994 Nov;176(21):6479-88
references.pmid: 7961399
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1993 Jul;175(14):4499-506
references.pmid: 8331077
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Mar;69(3):1598-606
references.pmid: 12620848
references.citation: J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002 Jul;4(4):389-404
references.pmid: 12125820
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1998 Mar;180(6):1512-24
references.pmid: 9515921
references.citation: Arch Microbiol. 1976 Oct 11;110(1):37-42
references.pmid: 1015938
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003;54:519-46
references.pmid: 14503002
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Jul;73(14):4559-69
references.pmid: 17526795
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1994 Sep;176(18):5771-9
references.pmid: 8083169
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1990 Dec;172(12):6651-60
references.pmid: 2254244
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 1996;50:553-90
references.pmid: 8905091
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2006 Jul;188(13):4690-7
references.pmid: 16788178
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Mar;70(3):1658-68
references.pmid: 15006791
references.citation: Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54
references.pmid: 942051
references.citation: Arch Microbiol. 1977 Jun 20;113(3):257-64
references.pmid: 879963
references.citation: Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997 Jul;47(3):773-80
references.pmid: 9226910
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Jun 11;297(1088):459-80
references.pmid: 6180444
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Nov;44(5):1086-95
references.pmid: 6817710
references.citation: Eur J Biochem. 1967 May;1(3):289-300
references.pmid: 6060184
references.citation: BMC Microbiol. 2009 Jun 12;9:124
references.pmid: 19523213
references.citation: Adv Microb Physiol. 1973;9(0):89-151
references.pmid: 4599397
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jun;13(6):1590-600
references.pmid: 21450007
references.citation: Nature. 2008 Feb 7;451(7179):708-11
references.pmid: 18223640
references.citation: Arch Microbiol. 2007 Jul;188(1):55-68
references.pmid: 17483933
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2007;8(2):R19
references.pmid: 17291332
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011 Oct 03;9(11):803-16
references.pmid: 21963803
references.citation: Gene. 2001 Feb 7;264(1):77-85
references.pmid: 11245981
references.citation: Science. 1966 Aug 12;153(3737):755-7
references.pmid: 5328677
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1972 Feb;109(2):790-5
references.pmid: 4621687
references.citation: ISME J. 2010 Jun;4(6):784-98
references.pmid: 20072162
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1954 Oct;210(2):799-808
references.pmid: 13211618
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Nov;66(11):4662-72
references.pmid: 11055908
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1966 Aug 25;241(16):3776-86
references.pmid: 5916391
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Apr;80(1):45-63
references.pmid: 22133061
references.citation: Water Res. 2010 Sep;44(17):4826-37
references.pmid: 20688348
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Mar;45(3):898-904
references.pmid: 16346253
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1997 Sep;179(18):5943-6
references.pmid: 9294456
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1996 Dec;178(23):6833-41
references.pmid: 8955304
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Nov;69(11):6676-87
references.pmid: 14602628
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jul;78(14):4771-80
references.pmid: 22582055
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 1987;41:465-505
references.pmid: 3318677
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Oct;57(10):2981-5
references.pmid: 1746958
references.citation: ISME J. 2011 Oct;5(10):1652-9
references.pmid: 21525946
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1989 Nov;171(11):5907-14
references.pmid: 2808302
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1994 Jul;176(14):4277-84
references.pmid: 8021213
references.citation: Microbiology (Reading). 2010 May;156(Pt 5):1313-1322
references.pmid: 20110298
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1995 Oct;177(20):5826-33
references.pmid: 7592330
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1995 Dec;177(24):7033-40
references.pmid: 8522507
references.citation: J Biochem. 1967 Feb;61(2):220-30
references.pmid: 4860714