title: Strategically placing green infrastructure: cost-effective land conservation in the floodplain.
abstract: Green infrastructure approaches have attracted increased attention from local governments as a way to lower flood risk and provide an array of other environmental services. The peer-reviewed literature, however, offers few estimates of the economic impacts of such approaches at the watershed scale. We estimate the avoided flood damages and the costs of preventing development of floodplain parcels in the East River Watershed of Wisconsin's Lower Fox River Basin. Results suggest that the costs of preventing conversion of all projected floodplain development would exceed the flood damage mitigation benefits by a substantial margin. However, targeting of investments to high-benefit, low-cost parcels can reverse this equation, generating net benefits. The analysis demonstrates how any flood-prone community can use a geographic-information-based model to estimate the flood damage reduction benefits of green infrastructure, compare them to the costs, and target investments to design cost-effective nonstructural flood damage mitigation policies.
authors.affiliation: Resources for the Future, 1616 P Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036, United States. kousky@rff.org
authors.forename: Carolyn
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Kousky
authors.forename: Sheila M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Olmstead
authors.forename: Margaret A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Walls
authors.forename: Molly
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Macauley
mesh_terms: D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000191:economics*; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D055868:Floods / Q000191:economics*; D005843:Geography; D045483:Rivers; D014922:Wisconsin