title: Single-Cell DNA barcoding using sequences from the small subunit rRNA and internal transcribed spacer region identifies new species of Trichonympha and Trichomitopsis from the hindgut of the termite Zootermopsis angusticollis.
abstract: To aid in their digestion of wood, lower termites are known to harbour a diverse community of prokaryotes as well as parabasalid and oxymonad protist symbionts. One of the best-studied lower termite gut communities is that of Zootermopsis angusticollis which has been known for almost 100 years to possess 3 species of Trichonympha (T. campanula, T. collaris, and T. sphaerica), 1 species of Trichomitopsis (T. termopsidis), as well as smaller flagellates. We have re-assessed this community by sequencing the small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region from a large number of single Trichonympha and Trichomitopsis cells for which morphology was also documented. Based on phylogenetic clustering and sequence divergence, we identify 3 new species: Trichonympha postcylindrica, Trichomitopsis minor, and Trichomitopsis parvus spp. nov. Once identified by sequencing, the morphology of the isolated cells for all 3 new species was re-examined and found to be distinct from the previously described species: Trichonympha postcylindrica can be morphologically distinguished from the other Trichonympha species by an extension on its posterior end, whereas Trichomitopsis minor and T. parvus are smaller than T. termopsidis but similar in size to each other and cannot be distinguished based on morphology using light microscopy. Given that Z. angusticollis has one of the best characterized hindgut communities, the near doubling of the number of the largest and most easily identifiable symbiont species suggests that the diversity of hindgut symbionts is substantially underestimated in other termites as well. Accurate descriptions of the diversity of these microbial communities are essential for understanding hindgut ecology and disentangling the interactions among the symbionts, and molecular barcoding should be a priority for these systems.
authors.affiliation: Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. vera.tai@botany.ubc.ca
authors.forename: Vera
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Tai
authors.forename: Erick R
authors.initials: ER
authors.lastname: James
authors.forename: Steve J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Perlman
authors.forename: Patrick J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Keeling
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D058893:DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic; D021903:DNA, Ribosomal Spacer / Q000235:genetics*; D056952:Hypermastigia / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics*; D020049:Isoptera / Q000469:parasitology*; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D010802:Phylogeny; D011528:Protozoan Infections / Q000469:parasitology; D012335:RNA, Ribosomal / Q000235:genetics*; D059010:Single-Cell Analysis
chemical_list: D021903:DNA, Ribosomal Spacer; D012335:RNA, Ribosomal
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2009 Jan;18(2):332-42
references.pmid: 19192183
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Oct;63(10):4039-46
references.pmid: 16535716
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2003 Mar 7;326(5):1337-49
references.pmid: 12595248
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2006 Apr 25;6:34
references.pmid: 16638131
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42780
references.pmid: 22916158
references.citation: Eukaryot Cell. 2006 Jan;5(1):148-54
references.pmid: 16400177
references.citation: J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2000 May-Jun;47(3):249-59
references.pmid: 10847341
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Jul;52(1):217-24
references.pmid: 19306937
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005 Jun;35(3):646-55
references.pmid: 15878133
references.citation: Gene. 1995 Jan 11;152(1):27-33
references.pmid: 7828924
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2006 Nov 1;22(21):2688-90
references.pmid: 16928733
references.citation: J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2011 Nov-Dec;58(6):487-96
references.pmid: 21895839
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009 Aug 11;4(8):e6577
references.pmid: 19668363
references.citation: Brief Bioinform. 2008 Jul;9(4):286-98
references.pmid: 18372315
references.citation: Comput Appl Biosci. 1996 Aug;12(4):357-8
references.pmid: 8902363
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 8;105(14):5555-60
references.pmid: 18391199
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002 Dec;25(3):545-56
references.pmid: 12450758
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2001 Dec;17(12):1246-7
references.pmid: 11751242
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Apr;17(4):540-52
references.pmid: 10742046
references.citation: Protist. 2003 Apr;154(1):147-55
references.pmid: 12812374
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 22;276(1655):239-45
references.pmid: 18812290
references.citation: J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1998 Nov-Dec;45(6):643-50
references.pmid: 9864854
references.citation: J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2007 Jul-Aug;54(4):325-32
references.pmid: 17669157
references.citation: Protist. 2006 Aug;157(3):335-44
references.pmid: 16839812
references.citation: Protist. 2010 Jul;161(3):400-33
references.pmid: 20093080
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2012 Dec;14(12):3259-70
references.pmid: 23116209
references.citation: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011 Oct;61(Pt 10):2547-2558
references.pmid: 21112987
references.citation: Protist. 2010 Jan;161(1):122-32
references.pmid: 19664955
references.citation: Int J Parasitol. 2004 Jul;34(8):963-70
references.pmid: 15217735
references.citation: J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2011 Sep-Oct;58(5):426-36
references.pmid: 21699624
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4
references.pmid: 12912839
references.citation: J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1998 Jul-Aug;45(4):445-7
references.pmid: 9703681
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2007 Dec;16(24):5326-40
references.pmid: 17995924
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Aug;48(2):615-27
references.pmid: 18502666