title: The acquisition of abstract words by young infants.
abstract: Young infants' learning of words for abstract concepts like 'all gone' and 'eat,' in contrast to their learning of more concrete words like 'apple' and 'shoe,' may follow a relatively protracted developmental course. We examined whether infants know such abstract words. Parents named one of two events shown in side-by-side videos while their 6-16-month-old infants (n=98) watched. On average, infants successfully looked at the named video by 10 months, but not earlier, and infants' looking at the named referent increased robustly at around 14 months. Six-month-olds already understand concrete words in this task (Bergelson & Swingley, 2012). A video-corpus analysis of unscripted mother-infant interaction showed that mothers used the tested abstract words less often in the presence of their referent events than they used concrete words in the presence of their referent objects. We suggest that referential uncertainty in abstract words' teaching conditions may explain the later acquisition of abstract than concrete words, and we discuss the possible role of changes in social-cognitive abilities over the 6-14 month period.
authors.affiliation: Dept. of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Institute for Research in Cognition Science, 3401 Walnut St., 400a, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. elikab@psych.upenn.edu
authors.forename: Elika
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Bergelson
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Swingley
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000375:Aging / Q000523:psychology; D005133:Eye Movements; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007804:Language Development; D008297:Male; D009034:Mother-Child Relations; D009035:Mothers; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D014825:Vocabulary
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2005 Nov;8(6):535-43
references.pmid: 16246245
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1979 Jun;6(2):183-200
references.pmid: 468932
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Dec;24(6):1119-1120
references.pmid: 18241412
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jun;13(6):258-63
references.pmid: 19447670
references.citation: Cognition. 1999 Dec 7;73(2):135-76
references.pmid: 10580161
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul 1;23(7):728-33
references.pmid: 22692337
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2005 Sep;8(5):432-43
references.pmid: 16048516
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 28;109(9):3253-8
references.pmid: 22331874
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1992 Jun;19(2):311-33
references.pmid: 1527205
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 May;107(2):705-17
references.pmid: 17869235
references.citation: Lang Speech. 2006;49(Pt 2):137-74
references.pmid: 17037120
references.citation: J Mem Lang. 2009 Feb;60(2):252
references.pmid: 20126290
references.citation: Child Dev. 2000 Jul-Aug;71(4):878-94
references.pmid: 11016554
references.citation: Science. 1992 Jan 31;255(5044):606-8
references.pmid: 1736364
references.citation: Cognition. 2001 Sep;81(2):B33-44
references.pmid: 11376642
references.citation: Infancy. 2012 Jul;17(4):432-444
references.pmid: 32693484
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2005 Apr;112(2):347-82
references.pmid: 15783290
references.citation: Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994;59(5):1-173; discussion 174-85
references.pmid: 7845413
references.citation: Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1998;63(4):i-vi, 1-143
references.pmid: 9835078
references.citation: Cognition. 2007 Aug;104(2):287-314
references.pmid: 16930577
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1987 Feb;14(1):23-45
references.pmid: 3558524
references.citation: Science. 2010 Dec 24;330(6012):1830-4
references.pmid: 21205671
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Apr;20(2):421-35
references.pmid: 8189202
references.citation: Child Dev. 2012 Mar-Apr;83(2):486-96
references.pmid: 22224547
references.citation: Science. 1997 Sep 26;277(5334):1984-6
references.pmid: 9302291