title: Different conditions and strategies to utilize forensic radiology in the cities of Melbourne, Australia and Berlin, Germany.
abstract: Forensic radiology has become a common modality in many forensic practices around the world. Here, we report and compare the usage patterns in the cities of Melbourne, Australia, and Berlin, Germany, using 16 multislice scanners in two large forensic facilities with both machines integrated in the mortuary. While in Melbourne all bodies receive a full body computed tomography (CT) scan resulting in nearly 5,000 scans per year, the situation differs in Berlin where approximately 250 state prosecutor sanctioned cases are scanned per year. While in Melbourne the CT scanner is an integral element of the process of determining whether further examinations will follow, in contrast in Berlin all cases proceed to autopsy irrespective of the findings from the CT scan. While pathologists in Berlin receive on site training to use the CT scanner by a highly experienced forensic pathologist who has previously been involved in the Virtopsy(®) program in Switzerland, training of pathologists in Melbourne is multifaceted. A radiologist with extensive experience in the forensic environment is employed part time at the institute in Melbourne and provides radiology lectures including topics such as postmortem artifacts, regional anatomy, and neuroradiology. CT is gaining acceptance as a useful modality for presenting information to the courts and juries, as well as providing an easily accessible platform to review cases and initiated research projects.
authors.affiliation: Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, 57-83 Kavanagh St, Southbank, VIC, 3006, Australia. paul.bedford@vifm.org
authors.forename: Paul J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Bedford
authors.forename: Lars
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Oesterhelweg
mesh_terms: D001344:Autopsy; D035843:Biomedical Research; D002423:Cause of Death; D002947:Cities; D004867:Equipment Design; D049429:Forensic Pathology / Q000193:education / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000639:trends*; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D007318:Inservice Training; D061330:Multidetector Computed Tomography / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D015898:Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed; D014739:Victoria; D057188:Workflow
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Feb 25;205(1-3):2-7
references.pmid: 20832958
references.citation: J Forensic Sci. 2008 Mar;53(2):465-8
references.pmid: 18366581
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Oct 10;222(1-3):33-9
references.pmid: 22621794
references.citation: Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012 Sep;8(3):208-17
references.pmid: 21979427
references.citation: Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012 Dec;8(4):390-4
references.pmid: 22615069
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2008 Feb;18(2):273-82
references.pmid: 17705044
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int. 1991 Sep;50(2):179-85
references.pmid: 1748354
references.citation: Leg Med (Tokyo). 2012 May;14(3):116-20
references.pmid: 22342377
references.citation: Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012 Dec;8(4):367-72
references.pmid: 22644883
references.citation: J Clin Pathol. 2011 Aug;64(8):711-7
references.pmid: 21617173
references.citation: Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013 Mar;9(1):3-12
references.pmid: 22760696
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Mar;188(3):832-8
references.pmid: 17312075
references.citation: J Trauma. 1994 Oct;37(4):552-5; discussion 555-6
references.pmid: 7932884
references.citation: BMC Pediatr. 2011 Dec 22;11:120
references.pmid: 22192497
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Oct 10;212(1-3):273.e1-5
references.pmid: 21723055
references.citation: Z Rechtsmed. 1977 Nov 18;80(3):227-46
references.pmid: 602451
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Jul 4;169(2-3):118-28
references.pmid: 16997522