title: Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  To minimise the risk of implant failures after their placement, dental implants are kept load-free for 3 to 8 months to establish osseointegration (conventional loading). It would be beneficial if the healing period could be shortened without jeopardising implant success. Nowadays implants are loaded early and even immediately and it would be useful to know whether there is a difference in success rates between immediately and early loaded implants compared with conventionally loaded implants.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the effects of (1) immediate (within 1 week), early (between 1 week and 2 months), and conventional (after 2 months) loading of osseointegrated implants; (2) immediate occlusal versus non-occlusal loading and early occlusal versus non-occlusal loading; (3) direct loading versus progressive loading immediately, early and conventionally.
  
  
  METHODS
  The following electronic databases were searched: the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 8 June 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2012, Issue 4), MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to 8 June 2012) and EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 8 June 2012). Authors of identified trials were contacted to find unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs). There were no restrictions regarding language or date of publication.
  
  
  METHODS
  All RCTs of root-form osseointegrated dental implants, having a follow-up of 4 months to 1 year, comparing the same implant type immediately, early or conventionally loaded, occlusally or non-occlusally loaded, or progressively loaded or not. Outcome measures were: prosthesis and implant failures and radiographic marginal bone level changes.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data were independently extracted, in duplicate, by at least two review authors. Trial authors were contacted for missing information. Risk of bias was assessed for each trial by at least two review authors, and data were extracted independently, and in duplicate. Results were combined using fixed-effect models with mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A summary of findings table of the main findings was constructed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Forty-five RCTs were identified and, from these, 26 trials including a total of 1217 participants and 2120 implants were included. Three trials were at low risk of bias, 12 were at high risk of bias and for the remaining 11 the risk of bias was unclear. In nine of the included studies there were no prosthetic failures within the first year, with no implant failures in 7 studies and the mean rate of implant failure in all 26 trials was a low 2.5%. From 15 RCTs comparing immediate with convential loading there was no evidence of a difference in either prosthesis failure (RR 1.87; 95% CI 0.70 to 5.01; 8 trials) or implant failure (RR 1.65; 95% CI 0.68 to 3.98; 10 trials) in the first year, but there is some evidence of a small reduction in bone loss favouring immediate loading (MD -0.10 mm; 95% CI -0.20 to -0.01; P = 0.03; 9 trials), with some heterogeneity (Tau² = 0.01; Chi² = 14.37, df = 8 (P = 0.07); I² = 44%). However, this very small difference may not be clinically important. From three RCTs which compared early loading with conventional loading, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether or not there is a clinically important difference in prosthesis failure, implant failure or bone loss. Six RCTs compared immediate and early loading and found insufficient evidence to determine whether or not there is a clinically important difference in prosthesis failure, implant failure or bone loss. From the two trials which compared occlusal loading with non-occlusal loading there is insufficient evidence to determine whether there is a clinically important difference in the outcomes of prosthesis failure, implant failure or bone loss. We did not identify any trials which evaluated progressive loading of implants.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Overall there was no convincing evidence of a clinically important difference in prosthesis failure, implant failure, or bone loss associated with different loading times of implants. More well-designed RCTs are needed and should be reported according to the CONSORT guidelines (www.consort-statement.org/).
authors.affiliation: Cochrane Oral Health Group, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. espositomarco@hotmail.com.
authors.forename: Marco
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Esposito
authors.forename: Maria Gabriella
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Grusovin
authors.forename: Hassan
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Maghaireh
authors.forename: Helen V
authors.initials: HV
authors.lastname: Worthington
mesh_terms: D015519:Bone Density; D003758:Dental Implantation, Endosseous; D015921:Dental Implants; D006801:Humans; D057893:Immediate Dental Implant Loading; D008334:Mandible / Q000502:physiology; D008422:Materials Testing; D016348:Osseointegration; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D013997:Time Factors; D016388:Tooth Loss / Q000601:surgery*
chemical_list: D015921:Dental Implants
references.citation: Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012 Summer;5(2):111-21
references.pmid: 22866288
references.citation: J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Oct;34(10):773-80
references.pmid: 17824890
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Dec;12(6):572-8
references.pmid: 11737100
references.citation: Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Summer;3(2):111-20
references.pmid: 20623036
references.citation: J Clin Periodontol. 2006 Mar;33(3):233-8
references.pmid: 16489951
references.citation: Eur J Oral Implantol. 2008 Winter;1(4):277-92
references.pmid: 20467635
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Apr;16(2):161-7
references.pmid: 15777325
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jun;20(6):566-70
references.pmid: 19302238
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 May;19(5):442-50
references.pmid: 18416725
references.citation: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Sep-Oct;23(5):867-75
references.pmid: 19014156
references.citation: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997 Aug;17(4):326-33
references.pmid: 9497723
references.citation: J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Oct;35(10):745-53
references.pmid: 18422510
references.citation: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):753-8
references.pmid: 18807574
references.citation: Eur J Oral Implantol. 2008 Summer;9 Suppl 1(2):127-39
references.pmid: 20467650
references.citation: J Oral Implantol. 2010;36(4):315-24
references.pmid: 20735268
references.citation: J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Feb;38(2):186-94
references.pmid: 21087294
references.citation: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Mar;9(1):34-45
references.pmid: 17362495
references.citation: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 1999;1(1):2-16
references.pmid: 11359307
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD003878
references.pmid: 12535491
references.citation: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008 Mar;10(1):30-9
references.pmid: 18335584
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD003878
references.pmid: 17443531
references.citation: Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2003 Nov-Dec;15(10):787-94; quiz 796
references.pmid: 14969216
references.citation: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002;4(1):33-42
references.pmid: 11938636
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25491
references.pmid: 22028777
references.citation: Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1-132
references.pmid: 356184
references.citation: Aust Dent J. 2008 Jun;53 Suppl 1:S82-8
references.pmid: 18498589
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17(5):501-5
references.pmid: 16958688
references.citation: Implant Dent. 2009 Feb;18(1):27-37
references.pmid: 19212235
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jun;19(6):546-52
references.pmid: 18422981
references.citation: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):893-904
references.pmid: 18271370
references.citation: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 May;12 Suppl 1:e28-38
references.pmid: 19438962
references.citation: J Periodontol. 2006 May;77(5):874-82
references.pmid: 16671881
references.citation: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Jul-Aug;16(4):537-46
references.pmid: 11516001
references.citation: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Oct;14(5):663-71
references.pmid: 20977611
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Apr;15(2):142-9
references.pmid: 15008926
references.citation: Implant Dent. 2007 Jun;16(2):212-23
references.pmid: 17563512
references.citation: J Oral Implantol. 1990;16(2):96-105
references.pmid: 2074597
references.citation: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jul-Aug;27(4):945-56
references.pmid: 22848898
references.citation: Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012 Winter;5(4):333-42
references.pmid: 23304687
references.citation: Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012 Winter;5(4):345-53
references.pmid: 23304688
references.citation: Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155-70
references.pmid: 7246093
references.citation: J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Feb;39(2):196-202
references.pmid: 22118014
references.citation: Stat Med. 2002 Aug 15;21(15):2145-59
references.pmid: 12210630
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Aug;15(4):498-503
references.pmid: 15248886
references.citation: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 May-Jun;23(3):474-80
references.pmid: 18700371
references.citation: BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
references.pmid: 9310563
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Apr;19(4):335-41
references.pmid: 18294232
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):140-9
references.pmid: 11914310
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Nov;21(11):1223-33
references.pmid: 20626424
references.citation: J Periodontol. 2010 Dec;81(12):1743-51
references.pmid: 20681808
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Feb;27(2):e74-9
references.pmid: 25557878
references.citation: J Periodontol. 2005 Aug;76(8):1252-8
references.pmid: 16101355
references.citation: J Dent. 2010 Aug;38(8):612-20
references.pmid: 20546821
references.citation: J Periodontol. 2006 Dec;77(12):1998-2004
references.pmid: 17209784
references.citation: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006 Jun;26(3):249-63
references.pmid: 16836167
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Nov;19(11):1119-28
references.pmid: 18983314
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Dec;13(6):603-9
references.pmid: 12519334
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD003815
references.pmid: 17943800
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD003878
references.pmid: 19160225
references.citation: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 May-Jun;19(3):374-81
references.pmid: 15214221
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Feb;19(2):148-52
references.pmid: 18067598
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD003878
references.pmid: 15266505
references.citation: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Sep-Oct;20(5):769-76
references.pmid: 16274152
references.citation: Int J Prosthodont. 2011 Jul-Aug;24(4):294-302
references.pmid: 21716965
references.citation: Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Jan-Feb;19(1):17-9
references.pmid: 16479752
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 May;22(5):455-63
references.pmid: 21435016
references.citation: J Periodontol. 2009 Sep;80(9):1393-8
references.pmid: 19722788
references.citation: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006 Oct;26(5):459-69
references.pmid: 17073356
references.citation: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008 Oct;28(5):453-9
references.pmid: 18990996
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jul;21(7):682-7
references.pmid: 20412091
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 May;19(5):433-41
references.pmid: 18371094
references.citation: J Dent Res. 1979 Oct;58(10):1953-69
references.pmid: 291620
references.citation: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Jun;64(6):936-42
references.pmid: 16713809
references.citation: Eur J Oral Implantol. 2008 Spring;1(1):33-43
references.pmid: 20467642
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jul;45(7):769-73
references.pmid: 1619456
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Aug;19(8):740-8
references.pmid: 18507667
references.citation: J Oral Implantol. 2011 Oct;37(5):610-21
references.pmid: 22004059
references.citation: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Mar-Apr;21(2):245-52
references.pmid: 16634495
references.citation: Eur J Oral Implantol. 2008 Autumn;1(3):207-20
references.pmid: 20467623
references.citation: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Feb;111(2):164-9
references.pmid: 20656532
references.citation: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):815-22
references.pmid: 17974118
references.citation: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Oct;13(5):495-501
references.pmid: 12453126
references.citation: Int J Prosthodont. 2011 Sep-Oct;24(5):405-16
references.pmid: 21909481
references.citation: Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Autumn;3(3):209-19
references.pmid: 20847991
references.citation: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Jul-Aug;18(4):512-22
references.pmid: 12939002