title: Comparative pooled survival and revision rate of Austin-Moore hip arthroplasty in published literature and arthroplasty register data.
abstract: The aim was to evaluate the pooled survival and revision rate of Austin-Moore hip arthroplasty (AMHA) in published literature and arthroplasty register data. A comprehensive literature analysis of clinical publications and register reports was conducted with the main endpoints revision surgery and revision rate. Sixteen relevant clinical studies have been found to significantly underestimate revision rates by a ratio of 2.15 compared to register data sets. The medium-term outcome of AMHA showed significantly worse outcomes than the use of other bipolar implants, or modular cervicocephalic prostheses and data of journal publications on revision rates deviate significantly from data of arthroplasty registers.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
authors.forename: Patrick
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Sadoghi
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Thaler
authors.forename: Wolfgang
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Janda
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hübl
authors.forename: Andreas
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Leithner
authors.forename: Gerold
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Labek
mesh_terms: D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000401:mortality / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D001315:Australia; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006622:Hip Prosthesis / Q000145:classification* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D012042:Registries; D012086:Reoperation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012383:Romania; D015996:Survival Rate; D013548:Sweden; D016896:Treatment Outcome
keywords: arthroplasty; register data; revision rate