title: Modelled air pollution levels versus EC air quality legislation - results from high resolution simulation.
abstract: An appropriate method for evaluating the air quality of a certain area is to contrast the actual air pollution levels to the critical ones, prescribed in the legislative standards. The application of numerical simulation models for assessing the real air quality status is allowed by the legislation of the European Community (EC). This approach is preferable, especially when the area of interest is relatively big and/or the network of measurement stations is sparse, and the available observational data are scarce, respectively. Such method is very efficient for similar assessment studies due to continuous spatio-temporal coverage of the obtained results. In the study the values of the concentration of the harmful substances sulphur dioxide, (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), particulate matter - coarse (PM10) and fine (PM2.5) fraction, ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO) and ammonia (NH3) in the surface layer obtained from modelling simulations with resolution 10 km on hourly bases are taken to calculate the necessary statistical quantities which are used for comparison with the corresponding critical levels, prescribed in the EC directives. For part of them (PM2.5, CO and NH3) this is done for first time with such resolution. The computational grid covers Bulgaria entirely and some surrounding territories and the calculations are made for every year in the period 1991-2000. The averaged over the whole time slice results can be treated as representative for the air quality situation of the last decade of the former century.
authors.affiliation: National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology - branch Plovdiv, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
authors.forename: Hristo
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Chervenkov
keywords: Air pollution simulation; EC-directives; Long-term air pollution levels; Pollutant exceedances
references.citation: Epidemiology. 2005 Nov;16(6):727-36
references.pmid: 16222161
references.citation: Environ Monit Assess. 2007 May;128(1-3):19-30
references.pmid: 17106777
references.citation: Waste Manag. 2011 Nov;31(11):2253-62
references.pmid: 21802934