title: An evaluation of two conducted electrical weapons and two probe designs using a swine comparative cardiac safety model.
abstract: Despite human laboratory and field studies that have demonstrated a reasonable safety profile for TASER brand conducted electrical weapons (CEW), the results of some swine studies and arrest related deaths temporal to the use of the CEWs continue to raise questions regarding cardiac safety. TASER International, Inc., has released a new CEW, the TASER X2, touted to have a better safety profile than its long-standing predecessor, the TASER X26. We have developed a model to assess the relative cardiac safety of CEWs and used it to compare the TASER X2 and the TASER X26. This safety model was also used to assess the relative safety of an experimental probe design as compared to the standard steel probe. Our results suggest that the TASER X2 has an improved safety margin over the TASER X26. The new probe design also has promise for enhanced cardiac safety, although may have some disadvantages when compared to the existing design which would make field use impractical.
authors.affiliation: Lompoc Valley Medical Center, Lompoc, CA 93436, USA.
authors.forename: Donald Murray
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Dawes
authors.forename: Jeffrey D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Ho
authors.forename: Johanna C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Moore
authors.forename: James R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Miner
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002244:Carbon; D000077482:Carbon Fiber; D057667:Conducted Energy Weapon Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology* / Q000517:prevention & control; D004597:Electroshock / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation*; D004867:Equipment Design; D006335:Heart Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology* / Q000517:prevention & control; D008422:Materials Testing; D023421:Models, Animal; D018570:Risk Assessment; D013232:Steel; D013552:Swine; D054041:Weapons
chemical_list: D000077482:Carbon Fiber; D013232:Steel; D002244:Carbon
references.citation: West J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;11(1):49-56
references.pmid: 20411076
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Aug 15;48(4):798-804
references.pmid: 16904552
references.citation: Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012 Dec;8(4):358-66
references.pmid: 22610783
references.citation: Circulation. 2012 May 22;125(20):2417-22
references.pmid: 22547671
references.citation: Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;28(1):49-55
references.pmid: 20006201
references.citation: Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;15(9):838-44
references.pmid: 19244634
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Jan 30;204(1-3):50-7
references.pmid: 20537475
references.citation: Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):436-43
references.pmid: 20370784
references.citation: Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2007 Sep;28(3):195-201
references.pmid: 17721165
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Aug 15;48(4):805-11
references.pmid: 16904553
references.citation: J Emerg Med. 2011 May;40(5):598-604
references.pmid: 21220194
references.citation: J Forensic Sci. 2009 Sep;54(5):1113-8
references.pmid: 19737245
references.citation: J Trauma. 2007 Sep;63(3):581-90
references.pmid: 18073604
references.citation: J Trauma. 2008 Dec;65(6):1478-85; discussion 1485-7
references.pmid: 19077646
references.citation: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008 Dec;55(12):2768-71
references.pmid: 19126456
references.citation: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007 Aug;18(8):876-9
references.pmid: 17573837
references.citation: Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2010 Dec;6(4):268-74
references.pmid: 20502988
references.citation: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Apr;31(4):398-408
references.pmid: 18373757