title: Magnetic resonance angiography of the aorta.
abstract: Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is capable of imaging arteries in the half to whole body by a single acquisition without a nephrotoxic contrast medium, and acquired images can be reconstructed into a specific cross-sectional view in an arbitrary directions. MRA is applicable for vessels non-reachable by a catheter approach, and collateral vessels can be fully visualized. Since MRA is minimally-invasive with no exposure to ionized radiation, it can be repeatedly applied for follow-up. However, there are also disadvantages: the temporal and spatial resolutions are inferior to those of X-ray angiography, and, at present, it cannot be used as a guide for intervention. Moreover, gadolinium administrations may cause NSF in patients who have lost renal function, as a new risk. Accordingly, strict consideration is required for an indication of its application. Development of non-contrast MRA and evaluation of the wall itself may draw more attention in the future. Plaque imaging is being routinely performed nowadays, and the measurement of vascular wall shear stress, which has a close association with arteriosclerosis, may become possible by utilizing the time-resolved phase-contrast method capable of measuring the time-resolved velocity vectors of blood flow throughout the body. (*English Translation of J Jpn Coll Angiol, 2009, 49: 503-516.).
authors.affiliation: Radiology, Hamamatsu University Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
authors.forename: Yasuo
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Takehara
authors.forename: Shuhei
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Yamashita
authors.forename: Harumi
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Sakahara
authors.forename: Takayuki
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Masui
authors.forename: Haruo
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Isoda
keywords: atherosclerosis; contrast-enhanced MRA; flow analysis; non-contrast MRA
references.citation: Radiology. 1986 Apr;159(1):101-5
references.pmid: 3513243
references.citation: Radiology. 1997 Apr;203(1):275-80
references.pmid: 9122407
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Mar;25(3):473-8
references.pmid: 17279504
references.citation: Radiology. 2008 Sep;248(3):807-16
references.pmid: 18710976
references.citation: J Vasc Surg. 2003 May;37(5):1106-17
references.pmid: 12756363
references.citation: Radiology. 1985 Sep;156(3):721-6
references.pmid: 4023233
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996 Jan-Feb;6(1):162-6
references.pmid: 8851422
references.citation: JAMA. 1999 Dec 1;282(21):2035-42
references.pmid: 10591386
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002 Apr;15(4):484-91
references.pmid: 11948840
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Nov;12(5):776-83
references.pmid: 11050650
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jun;192(6):1538-43
references.pmid: 19457816
references.citation: Radiology. 1990 Mar;174(3 Pt 1):727-31
references.pmid: 2305057
references.citation: Neurosurgery. 1989 Jan;24(1):88-92
references.pmid: 2648178
references.citation: Circ Res. 2001 Aug 17;89(4):305-16
references.pmid: 11509446
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Apr;17(4):499-506
references.pmid: 12655592
references.citation: Radiology. 1993 Jun;187(3):637-41
references.pmid: 8497608
references.citation: Radiology. 1983 Jul;148(1):161-6
references.pmid: 6856827
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2002 Mar;47(3):616-20
references.pmid: 11870851
references.citation: Radiology. 1983 Sep;148(3):733-7
references.pmid: 6878694
references.citation: Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 May;39(5):930-6
references.pmid: 11979336
references.citation: Radiology. 1999 Dec;213(3):913-8
references.pmid: 10580975
references.citation: Circ J. 2009 Nov;73(11):1983-92
references.pmid: 19801852
references.citation: Radiology. 2002 May;223(2):311-8; discussion 328-9
references.pmid: 11997530
references.citation: Radiology. 1992 Nov;185(2):615-6
references.pmid: 1410386