title: Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: is there a cross-language difference?
abstract: Research on the impact of letter transpositions that arise across morpheme boundaries has yielded conflicting results. These results have led to the suggestion that a cross-linguistic difference may exist in the recognition of Spanish and English words. In two masked-priming experiments run on separate groups of Spanish and English speakers, we tested this hypothesis by comparing the impacts of primes with letter transpositions that arose within morphemes or across morpheme boundaries on the recognition of identical or near-identical Spanish-English cognate targets. The results showed transposed-letter benefits in both Spanish and English that were not modulated by the position of the transposed letter in the prime stimulus. Our findings therefore add to the growing body of literature suggesting that the transposed-letter benefit is not affected by the position of the transposed letters relative to the morpheme boundary, and they dispel previous suggestions that there might be a genuine difference in orthographic coding across the Spanish and English writing systems.
authors.affiliation: University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
authors.forename: Claudia
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Sánchez-Gutiérrez
authors.forename: Kathleen
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Rastle
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D011578:Psycholinguistics / Q000379:methods; D011932:Reading; D060865:Repetition Priming / Q000502:physiology; D014956:Writing
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(12):2389-410
references.pmid: 23590520
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Dec;11(6):1090-8
references.pmid: 15875981
references.citation: Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003 Feb;35(1):116-24
references.pmid: 12723786
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(9):1798-819
references.pmid: 22540902
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2010 Jul;117(3):713-58
references.pmid: 20658851
references.citation: Cognition. 2007 Dec;105(3):691-703
references.pmid: 17217942
references.citation: Lang Cogn Process. 2011 Jan 1;26(4-6):482-508
references.pmid: 22933829
references.citation: J Mem Lang. 2009 Oct 1;61(3):285-302
references.pmid: 20161017
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Feb;33(1):209-29
references.pmid: 17311489
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1327-39
references.pmid: 16393049
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;115(3):577-600
references.pmid: 18729592