title: Why do cuckolded males provide paternal care?
abstract: In most species, males do not abandon offspring or reduce paternal care when they are cuckolded by other males. This apparent lack of adjustment of paternal investment with the likelihood of paternity presents a potential challenge to our understanding of what drives selection for paternal care. In a comparative analysis across birds, fish, mammals, and insects we identify key factors that explain why cuckolded males in many species do not reduce paternal care. Specifically, we show that cuckolded males only reduce paternal investment if both the costs of caring are relatively high and there is a high risk of cuckoldry. Under these circumstances, selection is expected to favour males that reduce paternal effort in response to cuckoldry. In many species, however, these conditions are not satisfied and tolerant males have outcompeted males that abandon young.
authors.affiliation: Edward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Ashleigh S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Griffin
authors.forename: Suzanne H
authors.initials: SH
authors.lastname: Alonzo
authors.forename: Charlie K
authors.initials: CK
authors.lastname: Cornwallis
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005260:Female; D005399:Fishes / Q000502:physiology; D007313:Insecta / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D008322:Mammals / Q000502:physiology; D010332:Paternal Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Aug 19;466(7309):969-72
references.pmid: 20725039
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 Nov;86(4):836-52
references.pmid: 21223481
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jun 22;269(1497):1263-9
references.pmid: 12065043
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Mar;87(6):2324-8
references.pmid: 2315323
references.citation: Am Nat. 2007 Feb;169(2):274-81; discussion 282-3
references.pmid: 17211810
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 22;20(2):289-90
references.pmid: 14734327
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Jan 7;279(1726):163-70
references.pmid: 21632630
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 29;357(1419):341-50
references.pmid: 11958702
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Feb;25(2):99-108
references.pmid: 19762111
references.citation: Science. 2003 Oct 24;302(5645):634-6
references.pmid: 14576431
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2010 Mar;23(3):494-508
references.pmid: 20070460
references.citation: Am Nat. 2005 May;165 Suppl 5:S26-37
references.pmid: 15795859
references.citation: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jan 12;9:2
references.pmid: 19138428
references.citation: BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
references.pmid: 9310563
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 29;357(1419):351-62
references.pmid: 11958703
references.citation: JAMA. 2006 Feb 8;295(6):676-80
references.pmid: 16467236
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1-16
references.pmid: 5875341
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Apr 17;422(6933):716-9
references.pmid: 12700761