title: Six common mistakes in conservation priority setting.
abstract: A vast number of prioritization schemes have been developed to help conservation navigate tough decisions about the allocation of finite resources. However, the application of quantitative approaches to setting priorities in conservation frequently includes mistakes that can undermine their authors' intention to be more rigorous and scientific in the way priorities are established and resources allocated. Drawing on well-established principles of decision science, we highlight 6 mistakes commonly associated with setting priorities for conservation: not acknowledging conservation plans are prioritizations; trying to solve an ill-defined problem; not prioritizing actions; arbitrariness; hidden value judgments; and not acknowledging risk of failure. We explain these mistakes and offer a path to help conservation planners avoid making the same mistakes in future prioritizations.
authors.affiliation: Conservation Science, The Nature Conservancy, 245 Riverside Drive, West End, QLD, 4101, Australia. egame@tnc.org
authors.forename: Edward T
authors.initials: ET
authors.lastname: Game
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Kareiva
authors.forename: Hugh P
authors.initials: HP
authors.lastname: Possingham
mesh_terms: D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D003657:Decision Making; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D011340:Problem Solving; D012306:Risk
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2012 Oct;26(5):810-20
references.pmid: 22862796
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2008 Apr;18(3):670-80
references.pmid: 18488626
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2000 Dec 18;14(6):1567-1568
references.pmid: 35701937
references.citation: J Environ Manage. 2003 Jun;68(2):121-32
references.pmid: 12781752
references.citation: Science. 2006 Jul 7;313(5783):58-61
references.pmid: 16825561
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2012 Oct;26(5):943-4
references.pmid: 22827266
references.citation: Oper Res. 1982 Sep-Oct;30(5):803-38
references.pmid: 10298708
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Mar 16;440(7082):337-40
references.pmid: 16541073
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2007 Sep;5(9):e223
references.pmid: 17713985
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2009 Apr;23(2):328-38
references.pmid: 19183202
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2006 Dec;20(6):1626-34
references.pmid: 17181798
references.citation: Nature. 2011 Jun 15;474(7351):275-7
references.pmid: 21677724
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2008 Dec;22(6):1619-29
references.pmid: 18759769