title: Familial sinistrals avoid exact numbers.
abstract: We report data from an internet questionnaire of sixty number trivia. Participants were asked for the number of cups in their house, the number of cities they know and 58 other quantities. We compare the answers of familial sinistrals--individuals who are left-handed themselves or have a left-handed close blood-relative--with those of pure familial dextrals--right-handed individuals who reported only having right-handed close blood-relatives. We show that familial sinistrals use rounder numbers than pure familial dextrals in the survey responses. Round numbers in the decimal system are those that are multiples of powers of 10 or of half or a quarter of a power of 10. Roundness is a gradient concept, e.g. 100 is rounder than 50 or 200. We show that very round number like 100 and 1000 are used with 25% greater likelihood by familial sinistrals than by pure familial dextrals, while pure familial dextrals are more likely to use less round numbers such as 25, 60, and 200. We then use Sigurd's (1988, Language in Society) index of the roundness of a number and report that familial sinistrals' responses are significantly rounder on average than those of pure familial dextrals. To explain the difference, we propose that the cognitive effort of using exact numbers is greater for the familial sinistral group because their language and number systems tend to be more distributed over both hemispheres of the brain. Our data support the view that exact and approximate quantities are processed by two separate cognitive systems. Specifically, our behavioral data corroborates the view that the evolutionarily older, approximate number system is present in both hemispheres of the brain, while the exact number system tends to be localized in only one hemisphere.
authors.affiliation: Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America. uli@alum.mit.edu
authors.forename: Uli
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Sauerland
authors.forename: Nicole
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Gotzner
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005190:Family; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008297:Male; D008433:Mathematics
references.citation: Brain Lang. 1981 Mar;12(2):261-84
references.pmid: 7214131
references.citation: Neuron. 2007 Jan 18;53(2):293-305
references.pmid: 17224409
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1990;28(1):61-9
references.pmid: 2314564
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2008 Sep;134(5):677-699
references.pmid: 18729568
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 6;30(40):13314-8
references.pmid: 20926657
references.citation: Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2004 Jan;44(1):1-12
references.pmid: 14739000
references.citation: J Psycholinguist Res. 1989 Jan;18(1):89-103
references.pmid: 2647963
references.citation: Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):487-506
references.pmid: 20957581
references.citation: Brain. 1958 Sep;81(3):415-25
references.pmid: 13596474
references.citation: Laterality. 2000 Apr;5(2):111-20
references.pmid: 15513136
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2003 Aug;52(3):390-8
references.pmid: 12907183
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jan;22(1):48-66
references.pmid: 19199416
references.citation: Laterality. 2005 Jul;10(4):369-79
references.pmid: 16020373
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 1994 Nov;26(2):103-67
references.pmid: 7531983
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1977 May;84(3):385-404
references.pmid: 859955
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Nov;16(9):1493-504
references.pmid: 15601514
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1995 Dec;33(12):1627-35
references.pmid: 8745120
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jul;8(7):307-14
references.pmid: 15242690
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1977;15(6):769-78
references.pmid: 600372
references.citation: Brain Res. 2006 Aug 23;1106(1):177-188
references.pmid: 16828717
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2001 Sep;78(3):308-31
references.pmid: 11703060