title: Patterns of Limnohabitans microdiversity across a large set of freshwater habitats as revealed by Reverse Line Blot Hybridization.
abstract: Among abundant freshwater Betaproteobacteria, only few groups are considered to be of central ecological importance. One of them is the well-studied genus Limnohabitans and mainly its R-BT subcluster, investigated previously mainly by fluorescence in situ hybridization methods. We designed, based on sequences from a large Limnohabitans culture collection, 18 RLBH (Reverse Line Blot Hybridization) probes specific for different groups within the genus Limnohabitans by targeting diagnostic sequences on their 16 S-23 S rRNA ITS regions. The developed probes covered in sum 92% of the available isolates. This set of probes was applied to environmental DNA originating from 161 different European standing freshwater habitats to reveal the microdiversity (intra-genus) patterns of the Limnohabitans genus along a pH gradient. Investigated habitats differed in various physicochemical parameters, and represented a very broad range of standing freshwater habitats. The Limnohabitans microdiversity, assessed as number of RLBH-defined groups detected, increased significantly along the gradient of rising pH of habitats. 14 out of 18 probes returned detection signals that allowed predictions on the distribution of distinct Limnohabitans groups. Most probe-defined Limnohabitans groups showed preferences for alkaline habitats, one for acidic, and some seemed to lack preferences. Complete niche-separation was indicated for some of the probe-targeted groups. Moreover, bimodal distributions observed for some groups of Limnohabitans, suggested further niche separation between genotypes within the same probe-defined group. Statistical analyses suggested that different environmental parameters such as pH, conductivity, oxygen and altitude influenced the distribution of distinct groups. The results of our study do not support the hypothesis that the wide ecological distribution of Limnohabitans bacteria in standing freshwater habitats results from generalist adaptations of these bacteria. Instead, our observations suggest that the genus Limnohabitans, as well as its R-BT subgroup, represent ecologically heterogeneous taxa, which underwent pronounced ecological diversification.
authors.affiliation: Biology Centre of the ASCR, v.v.i., Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. jezbera@hbu.cas.cz
authors.forename: Jan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Jezbera
authors.forename: Jitka
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Jezberová
authors.forename: Vojtěch
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Kasalický
authors.forename: Karel
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Šimek
authors.forename: Martin W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Hahn
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological / Q000502:physiology*; D044822:Biodiversity; D042621:Comamonadaceae / Q000502:physiology*; D005618:Fresh Water / Q000382:microbiology*; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D017404:In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; D012329:RNA, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Q000235:genetics; D014871:Water Microbiology
chemical_list: D012329:RNA, Bacterial; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
references.citation: Science. 2002 May 10;296(5570):1061-3
references.pmid: 12004115
references.citation: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010 Dec;60(Pt 12):2710-2714
references.pmid: 20061501
references.citation: Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2008 Sep;39(3):314-25
references.pmid: 18761283
references.citation: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010 Dec;60(Pt 12):2946-2950
references.pmid: 20118294
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2008 Sep;10(9):2200-10
references.pmid: 18637951
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Aug;81(2):467-79
references.pmid: 22452571
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jul;11(7):1854-65
references.pmid: 19320716
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2010 Mar;12(3):658-69
references.pmid: 20041938
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2011 Mar;75(1):14-49
references.pmid: 21372319
references.citation: J Microbiol Methods. 2004 Jun;57(3):379-90
references.pmid: 15134885
references.citation: BMC Genet. 2005 Mar 11;6:13
references.pmid: 15760479
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 2007 Oct;54(3):497-507
references.pmid: 17318679
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2006 Sep;8(9):1613-24
references.pmid: 16913921
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Feb;76(3):631-9
references.pmid: 19948856
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005 May 1;52(3):351-63
references.pmid: 16329920
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Feb;71(2):766-73
references.pmid: 15691929
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2011 Apr;13(4):922-31
references.pmid: 21208356
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Jun;67(6):2723-33
references.pmid: 11375187
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58209
references.pmid: 23505469
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Apr;69(4):2253-68
references.pmid: 12676708
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jan;13(1):135-144
references.pmid: 21199253
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 May 15;17(10):R373-86
references.pmid: 17502094
references.citation: Science. 2005 Nov 11;310(5750):960-1
references.pmid: 16284155
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Oct;69(10):5875-83
references.pmid: 14532039
references.citation: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010 Jun;60(Pt 6):1358-1365
references.pmid: 19671731
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25883
references.pmid: 21998714
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Mar;76(5):1406-16
references.pmid: 20038688