title: Intrinsic control of axon regeneration.
abstract: Spinal cord injury disrupts the connections between the brain and spinal cord, often resulting in the loss of sensory and motor function below the lesion site. The most important reason for such permanent functional deficits is the failure of injured axons to regenerate after injury. In principle, the functional recovery could be achieved by two forms of axonal regrowth: the regeneration of lesioned axons which will reconnect with their original targets and the sprouting of spared axons that form new circuits and compensate for the lost function. Our recent studies reveal the activity of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, a major regulator of new protein synthesis, as a critical determinant of axon regrowth in the adult retinal ganglion neurons[1]. In this review, I summarize current understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms that control the intrinsic regenerative ability of mature neurons.
authors.affiliation: F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Children's Hospital, and Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
authors.forename: Zhigang
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: He
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2008 May;31(5):215-20
references.pmid: 18395807
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Sep 1;21(17):RC164
references.pmid: 11511695
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2009 Jan;32(1):41-7
references.pmid: 18977039
references.citation: Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2005 Feb;16(1):29-37
references.pmid: 15659337
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2005 Sep 20;15(18):R749-53
references.pmid: 16169471
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Sep 29;361(1473):1565-74
references.pmid: 16939975
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Jul 27;442(7101):471-4
references.pmid: 16810178
references.citation: Cancer Cell. 2005 Sep;8(3):179-83
references.pmid: 16169463
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Nov;9(11):1371-81
references.pmid: 17057708
references.citation: Science. 2008 Nov 7;322(5903):963-6
references.pmid: 18988856
references.citation: Trends Mol Med. 2005 Aug;11(8):353-61
references.pmid: 16002336
references.citation: Neuron. 2002 Jul 3;35(1):65-76
references.pmid: 12123609
references.citation: Science. 2002 Jun 7;296(5574):1860-4
references.pmid: 12052959
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1991 Mar 29;331(1261):337-43
references.pmid: 1677478
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007 Feb;17(1):120-7
references.pmid: 17223033
references.citation: EMBO J. 2005 Mar 9;24(5):1068-78
references.pmid: 15719013
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Aug;7(8):617-27
references.pmid: 16858390
references.citation: Science. 2004 Feb 13;303(5660):1026-30
references.pmid: 14716021
references.citation: Exp Neurol. 2008 Feb;209(2):321-32
references.pmid: 17720160
references.citation: Neuron. 2006 May 4;50(3):389-400
references.pmid: 16675394
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:579-612
references.pmid: 10845076