title: Effect of direct-to-consumer genetic tests on health behaviour and anxiety: a survey of consumers and potential consumers.
abstract: Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests can be purchased over the internet. Some companies claim to provide relative genetic risks for various diseases and thus encourage healthy behaviour. There are concerns that exposure to such information may actually discourage healthy behaviour or increase health anxiety. An online survey was conducted (n = 275). Respondents were composed of individuals who had purchased a DTC genetic test and received their results (consumers, n = 189), as well as individuals who were either awaiting test results or considering purchasing a test (potential consumers, n = 86). Consumers were asked if their health behaviour or health anxiety had changed after receiving their results. Respondents' current health behaviour and health anxiety were queried and compared. In total, 27.3 % of consumers claimed a change in health behaviour, all either positive or neutral, with no reported cessation of any existing health behaviour. A change in health anxiety was claimed by 24.6 % of consumers, 85.3 % of which were a reduction. Consumers had significantly better health behaviour scores than potential consumers (p = 0.02), with no significant difference in health anxiety. This study points towards an association between receipt of DTC genetic test results and increased adoption of healthy behaviours for a minority of consumers based on self-report, with more mixed results in relation to health anxiety.
authors.affiliation: Department of Information Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK, c.t.r.egglestone3@lboro.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Corin
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Egglestone
authors.forename: Anne
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Morris
authors.forename: Ann
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: O'Brien
mesh_terms: D001007:Anxiety; D003256:Community Participation; D003625:Data Collection; D005820:Genetic Testing / Q000379:methods*; D015438:Health Behavior; D006801:Humans
references.citation: J Genet Couns. 2012 Jun;21(3):423-32
references.pmid: 22180182
references.citation: Clin Chem. 2011 Dec;57(12):1641-4
references.pmid: 21885623
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;(2):CD003721
references.pmid: 22336791
references.citation: Genet Med. 2010 Sep;12(9):556-66
references.pmid: 20717041
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 10;364(6):524-34
references.pmid: 21226570
references.citation: J Genet Couns. 2012 Jun;21(3):413-22
references.pmid: 22278220
references.citation: Intern Med J. 2010 Mar;40(3):220-4
references.pmid: 20446967
references.citation: Trends Genet. 2010 Nov;26(11):459-61
references.pmid: 20828856
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2011 Oct 15;20(R2):R132-41
references.pmid: 21828075
references.citation: Tob Control. 2012 May;21(3):347-54
references.pmid: 21948804
references.citation: Clin Genet. 2011 Nov;80(5):407-14
references.pmid: 21696382
references.citation: J Genet Couns. 2012 Jun;21(3):433-9
references.pmid: 22194036
references.citation: Genet Med. 2010 May;12(5):304-12
references.pmid: 20386454
references.citation: Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2010;11:427-46
references.pmid: 20690815