title: Investigation of gated cone-beam CT to reduce respiratory motion blurring.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Methods of reducing respiratory motion blurring in cone-beam CT (CBCT) have been limited to lung where soft tissue contrast is large. Respiration-correlated cone-beam CT uses slow continuous gantry rotation but image quality is limited by uneven projection spacing. This study investigates the efficacy of a novel gated CBCT technique.
  
  
  METHODS
  In gated CBCT, the linac is programmed such that gantry rotation and kV image acquisition occur within a gate around end expiration and are triggered by an external respiratory monitor. Standard CBCT and gated CBCT scans are performed in 22 patients (11 thoracic, 11 abdominal) and a respiration-correlated CT (RCCT) scan, acquired on a standard CT scanner, from the same day serves as a criterion standard. Image quality is compared by calculating contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for tumors in lung, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tissue, and pancreas tissue, relative to surrounding background tissue. Congruence between the object in the CBCT images and that in the RCCT is measured by calculating the optimized normalized cross-correlation (NCC) following CBCT-to-RCCT rigid registrations.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Gated CBCT results in reduced motion artifacts relative to standard CBCT, with better visualization of tumors in lung, and of abdominal organs including GEJ, pancreas, and organs at risk. CNR of lung tumors is larger in gated CBCT in 6 of 11 cases relative to standard CBCT. A paired two-tailed t-test of lung patient mean CNR shows no statistical significance (p = 0.133). In 4 of 5 cases where CNR is not increased, lung tumor motion observed in RCCT is small (range 1.3-5.2 mm). CNR is increased and becomes statistically significant for 6 out of 7 lung patients with > 5 mm tumor motion (p = 0.044). CNR is larger in gated CBCT in 5 of 7 GEJ cases and 3 of 4 pancreas cases (p = 0.082 and 0.192). Gated CBCT yields improvement with lower NCC relative to standard CBCT in 10 of 11, 7 of 7, and 3 of 4 patients for lung, GEJ, and pancreas images, respectively (p = 0.0014, 0.0030, 0.165).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Gated CBCT reduces image blurring caused by respiratory motion. The gated gantry rotation yields uniformly and closely spaced projections resulting in improved reconstructed image quality. The technique is shown to be applicable to abdominal sites, where image contrast of soft tissues is low.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.
authors.forename: Russell E
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: Kincaid
authors.forename: Ellen D
authors.initials: ED
authors.lastname: Yorke
authors.forename: Karyn A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Goodman
authors.forename: Andreas
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Rimner
authors.forename: Abraham J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Wu
authors.forename: Gig S
authors.initials: GS
authors.lastname: Mageras
mesh_terms: D016477:Artifacts; D003198:Computer Simulation; D054893:Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / Q000379:methods*; D056973:Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008954:Models, Biological; D009068:Movement; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods*; D061089:Radiotherapy, Image-Guided / Q000379:methods; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D015656:Respiratory Mechanics; D055425:Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques / Q000379:methods*; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity
references.citation: Med Phys. 2007 Sep;34(9):3520-9
references.pmid: 17926955
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Dec 1;75(5):1605-12
references.pmid: 19931739
references.citation: Med Phys. 2005 Apr;32(4):1176-86
references.pmid: 15895601
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Aug 1;53(5):1337-49
references.pmid: 12128137
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jul 1;74(3):884-91
references.pmid: 19395190
references.citation: Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6):3070-9
references.pmid: 22755692
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71(1 Suppl):S103-7
references.pmid: 18406905
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jun 1;83(2):e273-80
references.pmid: 22440040
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jul 1;80(3):918-27
references.pmid: 20950961
references.citation: Radiother Oncol. 2008 Jan;86(1):61-8
references.pmid: 18039549
references.citation: Med Phys. 2006 Oct;33(10):3874-900
references.pmid: 17089851
references.citation: Acta Oncol. 2006;45(7):881-9
references.pmid: 16982554
references.citation: Med Dosim. 2006 Summer;31(2):141-51
references.pmid: 16690455
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Feb 1;70(2):590-8
references.pmid: 18037579
references.citation: Med Phys. 2006 Jul;33(7):2354-61
references.pmid: 16898437
references.citation: Med Phys. 2005 Mar;32(3):819-29
references.pmid: 15839355
references.citation: Radiother Oncol. 2010 Apr;95(1):103-8
references.pmid: 20189669
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Apr 1;67(5):1548-58
references.pmid: 17394950
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Nov 1;75(3):688-95
references.pmid: 19395200
references.citation: Med Phys. 2006 Oct;33(10):3825-33
references.pmid: 17089847
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Feb 1;79(2):602-8
references.pmid: 20675063
references.citation: Med Phys. 2007 Oct;34(10):3893-903
references.pmid: 17985635
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Oct 1;66(2):610-9
references.pmid: 16966004