title: Within-day test-retest reliability of the Timed Up & Go test in patients with advanced chronic organ failure.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To investigate the within-day test-retest reliability of the Timed Up & Go (TUG) test in patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic heart failure (CHF), and chronic renal failure (CRF).
  
  
  METHODS
  Cross-sectional.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients' home environment.
  
  
  METHODS
  Subjects (N=235, 64% men; median age, 70y [interquartile range, 61-77y]; median body mass index, 25.6kg/m(2) [interquartile range, 22.8-29.4kg/m(2)]) with advanced COPD (n=95), CHF (n=68), or CRF (n=72).
  
  
  METHODS
  Not applicable.
  
  
  METHODS
  Time to complete the TUG test. Three trials were performed on the same day and by the same assessors. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), kappa coefficient, standard error of measurement, and absolute and relative minimal detectable change (MDC) values were calculated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Good agreement was observed, in general, for both the total sample and subgroups (COPD, CHF, CRF), with ICC values ranging from .85 to .98, and kappa coefficients from .49 to 1.00. However, statistical improvement occurred in the total sample from the first to the second trial with large limits of agreement (mean difference, -.97s; 95% confidence interval, 3.00 to -4.94s; P<.01). The third trial added little or no information to the first 2 trials. For the total sample, a standard error of measurement value of approximately 1.6 seconds, an absolute value of MDC at the 95% confidence level (MDC95%) of approximately 4.5 seconds, and a relative value of MDC at the 95% confidence level (MDC95%%) of approximately 35% were found between the first 2 trials, with similar values found for the subgroups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The TUG test is reliable in patients with advanced COPD, CHF, or CRF after 2 trials. Values of standard error of measurement and MDC may be used in daily clinical practice with these populations to define what is expected and what represents true change in repeated measures.
authors.affiliation: Program Development Center, Center of Expertise for Chronic Organ Failure (CIRO+), Horn, The Netherlands; Centro de Pesquisa em Ciências da Saúde, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Norte do Paraná (UNOPAR), Londrina, Paraná, Brazil; Laboratório de Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Pulmonar, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Paraná, Brazil. Electronic address: rafaelmesquita14@ymail.com.
authors.forename: Rafael
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Mesquita
authors.forename: Daisy J A
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Janssen
authors.forename: Emiel F M
authors.initials: EF
authors.lastname: Wouters
authors.forename: Jos M G A
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Schols
authors.forename: Fabio
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Pitta
authors.forename: Martijn A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Spruit
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D015897:Comorbidity; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D006333:Heart Failure / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D006801:Humans; D007676:Kidney Failure, Chronic / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D029424:Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000534:rehabilitation*
keywords: ANOVA; BMI; CDS; CHF; CI; COPD; CRF; Care Dependence Scale; EQ-5D; EuroQol-5 Dimensions; GOLD; Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; Heart failure; ICC; Kidney failure; MDC; MDC(95%); MDC(95%)%; NYHA; New York Heart Association; Outcome assessment (health care); Pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive; Rehabilitation; Reproducibility of results; TUG; Timed Up & Go; absolute value of MDC at the 95% confidence level; analysis of variance; body mass index; chronic heart failure; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; chronic renal failure; confidence interval; intraclass correlation coefficient; minimal detectable change; relative value of MDC at the 95% confidence level