title: Ending versus controlling versus employing addiction in the tobacco-caused disease endgame: moral psychological perspectives.
abstract: Even though interest in reducing or eliminating tobacco-caused diseases is a common goal in tobacco control, many experts hold different views on addiction as a target of intervention. Some consider tobacco-caused addiction as a tobacco-caused disease to be eliminated alongside the other diseases. Some consider tobacco-caused addiction as a much lower priority disease to be eliminated, and a subset of this group is prepared to employ addiction to tobacco (nicotine) as a tool to reduce other tobacco-caused disease. These varying attitudes towards ending, controlling or employing tobacco addiction to reduce damage from tobacco use constitute quite different approaches to tobacco control and cause conflict among those in tobacco control. Moral psychological analyses argue that there is more than scientific evidence involved in supporting this continuum of approaches. Divergent values also influence positions in tobacco control. Attention to these values as well as the scientific evidence should be included in policy and practice in tobacco control. It is not that one constellation of values is necessarily superior, but debates need to be informed by and engage discussions of these values as well as the scientific evidence.
authors.affiliation: Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214-3079, USA. lk22@buffalo.edu
authors.forename: Lynn T
authors.initials: LT
authors.lastname: Kozlowski
mesh_terms: D001294:Attitude to Health; D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals; D012907:Smoking / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000523:psychology; D016540:Smoking Cessation / Q000379:methods* / Q000523:psychology; D000074606:Smoking Prevention; D014029:Tobacco Use Disorder / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000523:psychology