title: Reliability of templating with patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.
abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography-based patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) may allow for reliable alignment and fewer outliers when compared with conventionally instrumented total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, some authors have suggested that frequent intraoperative surgeon-directed changes may still be required. This study evaluated the accuracy of PSI to predict component sizing and alignment during TKA. A total of 84 patients (89 knees) who underwent a TKA using a PSI system were evaluated. An MRI-based preoperative plan of every knee was provided and approved by the surgeons. This demonstrated the proposed prosthetic component alignment, as well as the femoral, tibial, and bearing insert component size and position. Intraoperative changes to these components were prospectively recorded and compared with the computerized preoperative plan. Major changes were defined as any changes in femoral or tibial resection, size, and position of the components. Minor changes were defined as any change in the size of the polyethylene bearing insert. The preoperative plan was able to correctly predict the size of the implanted tibial and femoral component in 93 and 95.5% of the cases, respectively. Thirteen major intraoperative changes were made. In one knee, the proposed femoral resection was not acceptable (because of the presence of significant amount of osteophytes) and was abandoned in favor of a manual extramedullary guide. In another patient, the proposed femoral and tibial components were upsized. In two other patients, the femoral components were downsized, in four patients, the tibial components were downsized, and in another patient, it was upsized. There were also 16 minor changes, which included 2-mm upsizing of the polyethylene liner in 13 knees and 4-mm upsizing in 3 knees. Surgical experience is necessary to recognize improper component size, incorrect surgical resection, or nonideal alignment when performing TKA using PSI. The authors believe that the design and manufacture of PSI combined with a comprehensive templating resulted in excellent intraoperative concordance of the preoperative plan at the default settings with minimal changes.
authors.affiliation: Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland.
authors.forename: Kimona
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Issa
authors.forename: Aiman
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Rifai
authors.forename: Mike S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: McGrath
authors.forename: John J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Callaghan
authors.forename: Craig
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Wright
authors.forename: Arthur L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Malkani
authors.forename: Michael A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Mont
authors.forename: Vincent K
authors.initials: VK
authors.lastname: McInerney
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000295:instrumentation*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007720:Knee Prosthesis / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010347:Patient Care Planning; D011300:Preoperative Care; D011446:Prospective Studies