title: Low levels of empathic concern predict utilitarian moral judgment.
abstract: Is it permissible to harm one to save many? Classic moral dilemmas are often defined by the conflict between a putatively rational response to maximize aggregate welfare (i.e., the utilitarian judgment) and an emotional aversion to harm (i.e., the non-utilitarian judgment). Here, we address two questions. First, what specific aspect of emotional responding is relevant for these judgments? Second, is this aspect of emotional responding selectively reduced in utilitarians or enhanced in non-utilitarians? The results reveal a key relationship between moral judgment and empathic concern in particular (i.e., feelings of warmth and compassion in response to someone in distress). Utilitarian participants showed significantly reduced empathic concern on an independent empathy measure. These findings therefore reveal diminished empathic concern in utilitarian moral judges.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO), Buenos Aires, Argentina. egleich@ineco.org.ar
authors.forename: Ezequiel
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Gleichgerrcht
authors.forename: Liane
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Young
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D004645:Empathy; D028663:Ethical Theory; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D019359:Knowledge; D008297:Male; D009014:Morals; D012067:Religion; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult