title: Evaluation of Columbia, USMARC-Composite, Suffolk, and Texel rams as terminal sires in an extensive rangeland production system: V. Postweaning growth, feed intake, and feed efficiency.
abstract: This study was conducted to quantify differences in feed efficiency among 4 sire breeds using records from 1,109 crossbred lambs over 3 yr. Lambs were produced from mating Columbia, USMARC-Composite (Composite), Suffolk, and Texel rams to adult Rambouillet ewes. After weaning, lambs were finished on a high-energy diet in group-fed pens. Efficiency was assessed at 45 and 90 d on study, 50 and 60 kg of BW, and 6.6 and 9.1 mm of fat depth between the 12th and 13th ribs. Sire breed affected most of the traits that were measured. At 90 d, Suffolk-sired lambs had gained 13 to 19% more BW (P < 0.001), were 7 to 13% heavier (P < 0.001), and had consumed 4 to 11% more (P < 0.001) ME than the other breed crosses. However, at 90 d, G:F (59.9 vs. mean of 56.2 g BW gain/Mcal of ME; P < 0.01) and residual BW gain (RG; 0.94 vs. -0.33 kg BW; P < 0.05) were greater for Suffolk-sired lambs than for the other 3 sire breeds. Also, RG for Suffolk-sired lambs was greater (P < 0.01) at 6.6 and 9.1 mm of fat depth (0.62 vs. -0.24 kg and 0.87 vs. -0.33 kg of BW, respectively) and at 60 kg of BW (0.73 vs. 0.31 kg of BW) than for the other sire breeds. At 90 d, Columbia-sired lambs had the greatest (P < 0.01) residual feed intake (RFI; 7.01 vs. mean of -2.33 Mcal ME for the 3 other sire breeds). At 60 kg of BW, Texel- and Composite- (-2.34 Mcal ME, combined) had more favorable (P < 0.01) RFI than Columbia-sired lambs (6.42 Mcal ME), and Suffolk-sired lambs (0.49 Mcal ME) were intermediate and not different from the other 3 sire breeds. At 6.6 mm of fat depth, Columbia- and Suffolk- (3.30 Mcal ME, combined) had greater (P < 0.001) RFI than Texel-sired lambs (-4.23 Mcal ME); at 9.1 mm of fat depth, Columbia-sired lambs had the greatest (P < 0.05) RFI (7.35 vs. -2.11 Mcal ME for the other breeds combined). In summary, except for ME intake at 90 d, Suffolk-sired lambs were equal or superior to Columbia-, Composite-, and Texel-sired lambs for BW, BW gain, ME intake, G:F, RFI, and RG to 90 d, 60 kg of BW, and 9.1 mm of fat depth. Breed rankings were consistent across the study period for G:F and RG, but rankings changed over time for RFI.
authors.affiliation: USDA, ARS, U.S. Sheep Experiment Station, Dubois, ID 83423, USA.
authors.forename: D P
authors.initials: DP
authors.lastname: Kirschten
authors.forename: D R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Notter
authors.forename: T D
authors.initials: TD
authors.lastname: Leeds
authors.forename: M R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Mousel
authors.forename: J B
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Taylor
authors.forename: G S
authors.initials: GS
authors.lastname: Lewis
mesh_terms: D000822:Animal Husbandry / Q000379:methods*; D000824:Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; D000818:Animals; D003433:Crosses, Genetic; D004063:Digestion; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D008297:Male; D009820:Ohio; D012756:Sheep / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D013045:Species Specificity; D015430:Weight Gain