title: Have expert guidelines made a difference in asthma outcomes?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To analyze and summarize research from 2011 to 2012 that examines the relationship of guideline implementation and asthma outcomes.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Evidence of an unmet need for better asthma management was reported in two large survey studies from the US and Europe. Interventional studies of guideline implementation were often limited by lack of uptake of the intervention (i.e. educational program, computer-assisted assessment). Even studies in which there was uptake to the intervention, asthma outcomes often did not improve. Certain interventions (specific electronic asthma management tools, provider education workshops, community-wide interventional programs, and parental educational programs) were associated with improved asthma outcomes. Observational studies, likewise, revealed that evidence of guideline implementation did not necessarily translate into improved asthma outcomes.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Asthma guideline implementation studies are frequently associated with a limited impact on asthma outcomes. Understanding the gaps between guideline recommendations and translation to clinical practice remains an important opportunity to improve asthma outcomes.
authors.affiliation: Division of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
authors.forename: Jenna C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Podjasek
authors.forename: Matthew A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Rank
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001249:Asthma / Q000453:epidemiology*; D055615:Electrical Equipment and Supplies / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005060:Europe; D019983:Guideline Adherence / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D058996:Quality Improvement / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D014481:United States