title: Does a new knee design perform as well as the design it replaces?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The objective of this study was to compare the early migration characteristics and functional outcome of the Triathlon cemented knee prosthesis with its predecessor, the Duracon cemented knee prosthesis (both Stryker).
  
  
  METHODS
  A total 60 patients were prospectively randomised and tibial component migration was measured by radiostereometric analysis (RSA) at three months, one year and two years; clinical outcome was measured by the American Knee Society score and the Knee Osteoarthritis and Injury Outcome Score.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were no statistically significant differences in rotation or translation around or along the three coordinal axes, or in the maximum total point motion (MTPM) during the two-year follow-up.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The Triathlon cemented knee prosthesis has similar early stability and is likely to perform at least as well as the Duracon cemented knee prosthesis over the longer term.
authors.affiliation: Hässleholm Hospital, Orthopaedic Clinic Hässleholm - Kristianstad - Ystad, Box 351, 281 25 Hässleholm, Sweden.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Molt
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Ljung
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Toksvig-Larsen
keywords: New design; RSA; Safety; Single radius; TKR; Total knee replacement