title: Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification between 2 aspheric microincision intraocular lenses.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between 2 microincision hydrophilic intraocular lenses (IOLs) and with a conventional spherical hydrophobic IOL.
  
  
  METHODS
  St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective randomized comparative study.
  
  
  METHODS
  A microincision Acri.Smart 36A (negatively aspheric) or Akreos MI-60 (aspherically neutral) IOL was randomized to the first eye of patients with the alternative IOL implanted in the fellow eye within 3 weeks. Postoperatively, 100% and 9% logMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were assessed. Retroillumination photographs were analyzed using the posterior capsule opacity software system. The data on PCO scores were compared with those of a conventional spherical hydrophobic IOL (Acrysof SN60AT).
  
  
  RESULTS
  One hundred percent CDVA was significantly better at 12 months and 9% CDVA was better at 6, 12, and 24 months (P<.05) with the negatively aspheric IOL. One eye in each group with microincision IOLs developed capsule phimosis at 1 month. Neodymium:YAG capsulotomies were required by 2 years in 2 eyes with a negatively aspheric IOL and 8 eyes with an aspherically neutral IOL. At 24 months, the mean PCO score remained less than 10% with the conventional spherical IOL, whereas it increased with time in the negatively aspheric IOL (up to 16%) and the aspherically neutral IOL (up to 23%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The negatively aspheric IOL had a better PCO profile than the aspherically neutral IOL. This may be attributed to the difference in the edge design between the IOLs. The microincision IOLs had more PCO than the conventional 1-piece hydrophobic IOL.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, Kings College, London, United Kingdom. mayank_nanavaty@hotmail.com
authors.forename: Mayank A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Nanavaty
authors.forename: David J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Spalton
authors.forename: Kavita B
authors.initials: KB
authors.lastname: Gala
authors.forename: Anish
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Dhital
authors.forename: James
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Boyce
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D058442:Capsule Opacification / Q000209:etiology* / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D019923:Capsulorhexis; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007368:Interferometry; D053844:Lasers, Solid-State / Q000627:therapeutic use; D019654:Lens Implantation, Intraocular; D007910:Lenses, Intraocular / Q000009:adverse effects*; D008297:Male; D008866:Microsurgery / Q000379:methods*; D018918:Phacoemulsification / Q000379:methods*; D057852:Posterior Capsule of the Lens / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D012029:Refraction, Ocular / Q000502:physiology; D014792:Visual Acuity / Q000502:physiology