title: Postmortem and perimortem cesarean section: historical, religious and ethical considerations.
abstract: Guillimeau was the first to use the term cesarean section (CS) in 1598, but this name became universal only in the 20th century. The many theories of the origin of this name will be discussed. This surgery has been reported to be performed in all cultures dating to ancient times. In the past, it was mainly done to deliver a live baby from a dead mother, hence the name postmortem CS (PMCS). Many heroes are reported to have been delivered this way. Old Jewish sacred books have made references to abdominal delivery. It was especially encouraged and often mandated in Catholicism. There is evidence that the operation was done in Muslim countries in the middle ages. Islamic rulings support the performance of PMCS. Now that most maternal deaths occur in the hospital, perimortem CS (PRMCS) is recommended for the delivery of a fetus after 24 weeks from a pregnant woman with cardiac arrest. It is believed that emergent delivery within four minutes of initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves the chances of success of maternal resuscitation and survival and increases the chance of delivering a neurologically intact neonate. It is agreed that physicians are not to be held legally liable for the performance of PMCS and PRMCS regardless of the outcome. The ethical aspects of these operations are also discussed including a discussion about PMCS for the delivery of women who have been declared brain dead.
authors.affiliation: Maternal Fetal Medicine, University Hospital, Clinical Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia.
authors.forename: Hossam E
authors.initials: HE
authors.lastname: Fadel
keywords: Catholicism; Islam; Judaism; Postmortem cesarean section; brain death; history of medicine; medical ethics; perimortem cesarean section