title: The effect of resting condition on resting-state fMRI reliability and consistency: a comparison between resting with eyes open, closed, and fixated.
abstract: Resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) has been demonstrated to have moderate to high reliability and produces consistent patterns of connectivity across a wide variety of subjects, sites, and scanners. However, there is no one agreed upon method to acquire rs-fMRI data. Some sites instruct their subjects, or patients, to lie still with their eyes closed, while other sites instruct their subjects to keep their eyes open or even fixating on a cross during scanning. Several studies have compared those three resting conditions based on connectivity strength. In our study, we assess differences in metrics of test-retest reliability (using an intraclass correlation coefficient), and consistency of the rank-order of connections within a subject and the ranks of subjects for a particular connection from one session to another (using Kendall's W tests). Twenty-five healthy subjects were scanned at three different time points for each resting condition, twice the same day and another time two to three months later. Resting-state functional connectivity measures were evaluated in motor, visual, auditory, attention, and default-mode networks, and compared between the different resting conditions. Of the networks examined, only the auditory network resulted in significantly higher connectivity in the eyes closed condition compared to the other two conditions. No significant between-condition differences in connectivity strength were found in default mode, attention, visual, and motor networks. Overall, the differences in reliability and consistency between different resting conditions were relatively small in effect size but results were found to be significant. Across all within-network connections, and within default-mode, attention, and auditory networks statistically significant greater reliability was found when the subjects were lying with their eyes fixated on a cross. In contrast, primary visual network connectivity was most reliable when subjects had their eyes open (and not fixating on a cross).
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
authors.forename: Rémi
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Patriat
authors.forename: Erin K
authors.initials: EK
authors.lastname: Molloy
authors.forename: Timothy B
authors.initials: TB
authors.lastname: Meier
authors.forename: Gregory R
authors.initials: GR
authors.lastname: Kirk
authors.forename: Veena A
authors.initials: VA
authors.lastname: Nair
authors.forename: Mary E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Meyerand
authors.forename: Vivek
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Prabhakaran
authors.forename: Rasmus M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Birn
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping / Q000379:methods*; D005123:Eye; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012146:Rest / Q000502:physiology*