title: Fuzzy trace theory and medical decisions by minors: differences in reasoning between adolescents and adults.
abstract: Standard models of adolescent risk taking posit that the cognitive abilities of adolescents and adults are equivalent, and that increases in risk taking that occur during adolescence are the result of socio emotional differences in impulsivity, sensation seeking, and lack of self-control. Fuzzy-trace theory incorporates these socio emotional differences. However, it predicts that there are also cognitive differences between adolescents and adults, specifically that there are developmental increases in gist-based intuition that reflects understanding. Gist understanding, as opposed to verbatim-based analysis, generally has been hypothesized to have a protective effect on risk taking in adolescence. Gist understanding is also an essential element of informed consent regarding risks in medical decision- making. Evidence thus supports the argument that adolescents' status as mature minors should be treated as an exception rather than a presumption, because accuracy in verbatim analysis is not mature gist understanding. Use of the exception should be accompanied by medical experts' input on the bottom-line gist of risks involved in treatment.
authors.affiliation: Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14850, USA. eaw97@cornell.edu
authors.forename: Evan A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Wilhelms
authors.forename: Valerie F
authors.initials: VF
authors.lastname: Reyna
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D041923:Adolescent Development; D000328:Adult; D001921:Brain / Q000254:growth & development*; D003071:Cognition; D003657:Decision Making; D004644:Emotions; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D011340:Problem Solving; D011582:Psychological Theory; D012309:Risk-Taking
keywords: adolescence; fuzzy-trace theory; informed decision-making; medical consent; risk communication; risk taking