title: The cost-effectiveness of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to total abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early stage endometrial cancer.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To summarise how costs and health benefits will change with the adoption of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to total abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early stage endometrial cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cost-effectiveness modelling using the information from a randomised controlled trial.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two hypothetical modelled cohorts of 1000 individuals undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Surgery costs; hospital bed days used; total healthcare costs; quality-adjusted life years; and net monetary benefits.
  
  
  RESULTS
  For 1000 individuals receiving total laparoscopic hysterectomy surgery, the costs were $509 575 higher, 3548 hospital fewer bed days were used and total health services costs were reduced by $3 746 221. There were 39.13 more quality-adjusted life years for a 5 year period following surgery.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The adoption of total laparoscopic hysterectomy is almost certainly a good decision for health services policy makers. There is 100% probability that it will be cost saving to health services, a 86.8% probability that it will increase health benefits and a 99.5% chance that it returns net monetary benefits greater than zero.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Health Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
authors.forename: Nicholas
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Graves
authors.forename: Monika
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Janda
authors.forename: Katharina
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Merollini
authors.forename: Val
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Gebski
authors.forename: Andreas
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Obermair