title: Photosynthetically relevant foliar traits correlating better on a mass vs an area basis: of ecophysiological relevance or just a case of mathematical imperatives and statistical quicksand?
authors.affiliation: Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science (TESS), School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, 4878, Australia.|School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
authors.forename: Jon
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lloyd
authors.affiliation: School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.|Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, 0200, ACT, Australia.
authors.forename: Keith
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Bloomfield
authors.affiliation: Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Univeridade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
authors.forename: Tomas F
authors.initials: TF
authors.lastname: Domingues
authors.affiliation: Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, 0200, ACT, Australia.
authors.forename: Graham D
authors.initials: GD
authors.lastname: Farquhar
mesh_terms: D002245:Carbon Dioxide / Q000378:metabolism; D016018:Least-Squares Analysis; D009584:Nitrogen / Q000378:metabolism; D009929:Organ Size; D010788:Photosynthesis / Q000502:physiology*; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology*; D019655:Quantitative Trait, Heritable; D013223:Statistics as Topic
chemical_list: D002245:Carbon Dioxide; D009584:Nitrogen