title: Health policy implications of outcomes measurement in orthopaedics.
abstract: An emphasis on "value" over volume in health care is driving new healthcare measurement, delivery, and payment models. Orthopaedic surgery is a major contributor to healthcare spending and, as such, is the focus of many of these new models. WHERE ARE WE NOW?: An evaluation of "value" in orthopaedics requires information that has not traditionally been collected as part of routine clinical practice. If value is defined as patient outcomes in relation to healthcare costs, we need to collect information about both. In orthopaedics, patient-reported functional status is not routinely measured, and a poor understanding of the costs associated with the provision of musculoskeletal care limits our ability to quantify and report on financial measures. WHERE DO WE NEED TO GO?: To improve the value of musculoskeletal care, we need to focus on both improving outcomes and controlling costs. To improve outcomes, orthopaedists must agree on a set of outcome measures for appropriate care and advocate for their collection through the use of registries. Orthopaedic registries in several countries provide best practices for this information collection and sharing. In the United States, we should make comparable investments in registries to measure patient-reported outcomes. To address escalating costs, we need to improve the accuracy of cost data by applying modern cost accounting processes. HOW DO WE GET THERE?: Orthopaedists should take a leadership position in the promotion and implementation of value-based health care by advocating for the use of registries to measure risk-adjusted patient specific outcomes, negotiating with payors for value-based payment incentives and applying modern cost accounting processes to control costs rather than waiting for public and private payors to define components of the value equation that will affect how orthopaedic surgeons are evaluated and compensated in the future.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
authors.forename: John Philip
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Andrawis
authors.forename: Kate Eresian
authors.initials: KE
authors.lastname: Chenok
authors.forename: Kevin J
authors.initials: KJ
authors.lastname: Bozic
mesh_terms: D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D017048:Health Care Costs; D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006291:Health Policy / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D018803:Models, Economic; D019637:Orthopedic Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011050:Policy Making; D019984:Quality Indicators, Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D012042:Registries; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D062505:Value-Based Purchasing / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*