title: TMS-evoked changes in brain-state dynamics quantified by using EEG data.
abstract: To improve our understanding of the combined transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) method in general, it is important to study how the dynamics of the TMS-modulated brain activity differs from the dynamics of spontaneous activity. In this paper, we introduce two quantitative measures based on EEG data, called mean state shift (MSS) and state variance (SV), for evaluating the TMS-evoked changes in the brain-state dynamics. MSS quantifies the immediate TMS-elicited change in the brain state, whereas SV shows whether the rate at which the brain state changes is modulated by TMS. We report a statistically significant increase for a period of 100-200 ms after the TMS pulse in both MSS and SV at the group level. This indicates that the TMS-modulated brain state differs from the spontaneous one. Moreover, the TMS-modulated activity is more vigorous than the natural activity.
authors: Department of Biomedical Engineering and Computational Science, Aalto University School of Science Espoo, Finland ; BioMag Laboratory, HUSLAB, Helsinki University Central Hospital Helsinki, Finland.
authors: Tuomas
authors: T
authors: Mutanen
authors: Jaakko O
authors: JO
authors: Nieminen
authors: Risto J
authors: RJ
authors: Ilmoniemi
keywords: EEG; TMS; brain dynamics; recurrence quantification analysis; state space; trajectory
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 Mar;21(3):154-64
references: 14755835
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Apr;30(4):1387-96
references: 18537115
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):127-38
references: 20068583
references: Neurosci Lett. 2010 Jun 30;478(1):24-8
references: 20435086
references: J Physiol Paris. 2006 Jul-Sep;100(1-3):70-87
references: 17097864
references: Chaos. 1998 Dec;8(4):861-871
references: 12779793
references: Ann Neurol. 1988 Apr;23(4):332-8
references: 3382168
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Apr;79(8):2554-8
references: 6953413
references: Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Aug;119(8):1747-1755
references: 18486542
references: Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Aug;110(8):1325-8
references: 10454266
references: Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Feb;113(2):175-84
references: 11856623
references: J Neurophysiol. 2001 Oct;86(4):1983-90
references: 11600655
references: Neuroreport. 2007 Jan 8;18(1):13-6
references: 17259853
references: Brain Res Bull. 2006 Mar 15;69(1):86-94
references: 16464689
references: Cereb Cortex. 2013 Feb;23(2):332-8
references: 22314045
references: J Neurosci. 2009 Jun 17;29(24):7679-85
references: 19535579
references: Med Biol Eng Comput. 1997 Mar;35(2):135-40
references: 9136207
references: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980 May;48(5):517-26
references: 6153960
references: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 May;78(5):402-5
references: 1711458
references: Brain Stimul. 2013 May;6(3):371-6
references: 22902312
references: Neuroimage. 2005 Oct 1;27(4):896-908
references: 16054397
references: Exp Brain Res. 2006 Nov;175(2):231-45
references: 16783559
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Sep;18(5):1206-12
references: 12956719
references: Brain Topogr. 2010 Jan;22(4):233-48
references: 20012350
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Oct;26(2):100-9
references: 15864816
references: Science. 2005 Sep 30;309(5744):2228-32
references: 16195466
references: J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 23;30(25):8692-7
references: 20573914
references: Curr Biol. 2011 Jul 26;21(14):1176-85
references: 21723129
references: Brain Topogr. 1997 Summer;9(4):249-70
references: 9217984