title: Can audit improve patient care and treatment outcomes in endodontics?
abstract: Clinical audit is part of the NHS clinical governance framework for dentistry and is recommended as a quality improvement process for patient care, yet there is very mixed evidence supporting audit's ability to produce change in practice. Findings show evidence of changes following audit which improved patient care and practice efficiency. However, there is a general lack of dissemination of audit results, little useful feedback provided to participants, limited use of formal re-auditing of a particular topic and little reported on whether audit improves outcomes for patients. As part of its clinical governance responsibility, the Community Dental Service (CDS) is committed to ensuring that its clinical audit is robust, strategic and measures patient outcomes in its evaluation. The aim of this paper is to present a complete endodontic audit cycle; its recommendations and effects on the process and on outcomes of clinical patient endodontic care; and to evaluate if audit was a useful tool in this case.
authors: St. Leonards Hospital, Nuttall Street, London, UK. debra.simons@bartshealth.nhs.uk
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Simons
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Williams
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D054976:Clinical Governance; D019230:Dental Audit / Q000592:standards; D003792:Dental Records / Q000592:standards; D017598:Efficiency, Organizational; D005246:Feedback; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D058996:Quality Improvement; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000592:standards; D016300:Radiography, Bitewing / Q000592:standards; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials / Q000592:standards; D012390:Root Canal Therapy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000592:standards*; D059039:Standard of Care; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials