title: Valuing health at the end of life: an empirical study of public preferences.
abstract: In 2009, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) issued supplementary advice to its Appraisal Committees to be taken into account when appraising life-extending, 'end-of-life' treatments. This indicated that if certain criteria are met, it may be appropriate to recommend the use of such treatments even if they would not normally be considered cost-effective. However, NICE's public consultation revealed concerns that there is little scientific evidence to support such a policy. This study examines whether there is public support for giving higher priority to life-extending, end-of-life treatments than to other types of treatment. In face-to-face interviews, respondents answered six questions asking them to choose which of two hypothetical patients they would prefer to treat, assuming that the health service has enough funds to treat one but not both of them. The various scenarios were designed so as to control for age- and time-related preferences. Fifty members of the general public in England were interviewed in July 2011. We find some evidence of support for giving priority to the patient with shorter remaining life expectancy, but note that a nontrivial minority of respondents expressed the opposite preference. Substantial preference for quality-of-life improvement over life extension was observed. Very few respondents expressed indifference or unwillingness to choose between the patients. Whilst there cannot be described to be a single 'consensus' set of preferences, we conclude that there are ways in which the results suggest that the current NICE policy may be insufficient.
authors: Office of Health Economics, 7th floor Southside, 105 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 6QT, UK, kshah@ohe.org.
authors: Koonal K
authors: KK
authors: Shah
authors: Aki
authors: A
authors: Tsuchiya
authors: Allan J
authors: AJ
authors: Wailoo
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D026683:Advisory Committees; D000368:Aged; D001294:Attitude to Health; D016208:Databases, Factual; D036262:Empirical Research; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011639:Public Opinion; D036301:Qualitative Research; D019057:Quality-Adjusted Life Years; D013727:Terminal Care; D019452:Terminally Ill; D006113:United Kingdom; D026712:Value of Life; D055815:Young Adult
references: Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(5):1-186
references: 11262422
references: Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jan;60(2):265-75
references: 15522484
references: Health Policy. 2009 Dec;93(2-3):77-84
references: 19712990
references: N Engl J Med. 1977 Mar 31;296(13):716-21
references: 402576
references: Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(27):1-162
references: 20525460
references: BMJ. 2004 Jul 24;329(7459):224-7
references: 15271836
references: Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661-77
references: 18620460
references: Health Econ. 2005 Feb;14(2):197-208
references: 15386656
references: Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(12):983-9
references: 19908923
references: Health Econ. 2013 Aug;22(8):948-64
references: 22961976