title: High proficiency in a second language is characterized by greater involvement of the first language network: evidence from Chinese learners of English.
abstract: The assimilation hypothesis argues that second language learning recruits the brain network for processing the native language, whereas the accommodation hypothesis argues that learning a second language recruits brain structures not involved in native language processing. This study tested these hypotheses by examining brain activation of a group of native Chinese speakers, who were late bilinguals with varying levels of proficiency in English, when they performed a rhyming judgment to visually presented English word pairs (CE group) during fMRI. Assimilation was examined by comparing the CE group to native Chinese speakers performing the rhyming task in Chinese (CC group), and accommodation was examined by comparing the CE group to native English speakers performing the rhyming task in English (EE group). The CE group was very similar in activation to the CC group, supporting the assimilation hypothesis. Additional support for the assimilation hypothesis was the finding that higher proficiency in the CE group was related to increased activation in the Chinese network (as defined by the CC > EE), including the left middle frontal gyrus, the right inferior parietal lobule, and the right precuneus, and decreased activation in the English network (as defined by the EE > CC), including the left inferior frontal gyrus and the left inferior temporal gyrus. Although most of the results support assimilation, there was some evidence for accommodation as the CE group showed less activation in the Chinese network including the right middle occipital gyrus, which has been argued to be involved in holistic visuospatial processing of Chinese characters.
authors: Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. caofanntu@gmail.com
authors: Fan
authors: F
authors: Cao
authors: Ran
authors: R
authors: Tao
authors: Li
authors: L
authors: Liu
authors: Charles A
authors: CA
authors: Perfetti
authors: James R
authors: JR
authors: Booth
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001921:Brain / Q000098:blood supply / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D019303:Multilingualism; D010100:Oxygen / Q000097:blood; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011932:Reading; D014705:Verbal Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D010100:Oxygen
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2003 Mar;18(3):167-75
references: 12599274
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2002;25:189-220
references: 12052908
references: Neuroimage. 1999 Dec;10(6):695-704
references: 10600415
references: Cereb Cortex. 2010 May;20(5):1223-33
references: 19773547
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2003 Mar;18(3):158-66
references: 12599273
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May;25(1):92-104
references: 15846818
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jul;128(3):466-78
references: 18479667
references: Brain. 1998 Oct;121 ( Pt 10):1841-52
references: 9798741
references: Mod Trends Neurol. 1970;5(0):29-40
references: 5528140
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Sep;16(7):1234-49
references: 15453976
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):1476-87
references: 20854914
references: Neuropsychologia. 2009 Nov;47(13):2712-20
references: 19501603
references: Psychol Rev. 1999 Jul;106(3):491-528
references: 10467896
references: Cereb Cortex. 2007 Oct;17(10):2283-92
references: 17215478
references: Exp Brain Res. 2005 May;163(1):109-13
references: 15821933
references: Neuroreport. 2003 Aug 26;14(12):1557-62
references: 14502075
references: Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jun;219(3):327-37
references: 22543811
references: Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(7):1029-40
references: 16427099
references: Ann Neurol. 2007 Apr;61(4):363-70
references: 17444510
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Sep 15;58(2):362-80
references: 21718787
references: J Mem Lang. 2009 Aug 2;61(2):238-257
references: 20161189
references: Brain. 1996 Aug;119 ( Pt 4):1221-38
references: 8813285
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Jan;33(1):235-45
references: 21391265
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Aug;23(8):1998-2012
references: 20807053
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2003 Jul;19(3):155-69
references: 12811732
references: Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):565-76
references: 12880788
references: Comput Biomed Res. 1996 Jun;29(3):162-73
references: 8812068
references: Neuroimage. 2001 May;13(5):836-46
references: 11304080
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Mar;30(3):797-809
references: 18330872
references: Neuroreport. 2004 Apr 9;15(5):791-6
references: 15073516
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May;25(1):83-91
references: 15846817
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Feb;28(2):94-108
references: 16718651
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Jul;34(7):1670-84
references: 22378588
references: Neuroimage. 2012 Mar;60(1):419-25
references: 22245646
references: Neuroimage. 2006 Nov 1;33(2):774-83
references: 16959500
references: Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):816-47
references: 22584224
references: Brain. 1996 Feb;119 ( Pt 1):89-100
references: 8624697
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Nov;28(11):1223-34
references: 17274024
references: Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 15;49(4):3286-94
references: 20004256
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2003 Jul;19(3):170-82
references: 12811733
references: Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):1367-75
references: 22658973
references: Neuropsychologia. 1997 Feb;35(2):111-8
references: 9025115
references: J Neurosci. 2005 Feb 16;25(7):1637-44
references: 15716399
references: Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):1864-76
references: 18514678
references: Nature. 2004 Oct 14;431(7010):757
references: 15483594
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Mar;30(3):810-20
references: 18381767
references: J Neurosci. 1999 Apr 15;19(8):3050-6
references: 10191322
references: Brain. 1994 Dec;117 ( Pt 6):1255-69
references: 7820564