title: Trehalases: a neglected carbon metabolism regulator?
abstract: Trehalases are enzymes that carry out the degradation of the non-reducing disaccharide trehalose. Trehalase phylogeny unveiled three major branches comprising those from bacteria; plant and animals; and those from fungal origin. Comparative analysis between several deduced trehalase structures and the crystallographic structure of bacterial trehalase indicated that these enzyme's structures are highly conserved in spite of the marked differences found at the sequence level. These results suggest a bacterial origin for the trehalases in contrast to an eukaryotic origin, as previously proposed. Trehalases structural analysis showed that they contain six discrete motifs which are characteristic of each phylogenetic group, suggesting a positive evolutionary selection pressure for the structural conservation. Interestingly, trehalases are involved in multiple regulatory functions: In the response against pathogens (plant-pathogen interactions); the regulation of bacterial viability in symbiotic interactions (legume-Rhizobium); carbon partitioning in plants; regulating chitin biosynthesis, as well as energy supply in the hemolymph for flight, in insects. In summary, trehalases seem to have a prokaryotic origin and play an active role in carbon metabolism and other diverse regulatory effects on cell physiology.
authors: Departamento de Biología Molecular de Plantas; Instituto de Biotecnología/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
authors: Aarón
authors: A
authors: Barraza
authors: Federico
authors: F
authors: Sánchez
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D010944:Plants / Q000201:enzymology* / Q000235:genetics; D040681:Structural Homology, Protein; D014198:Trehalase / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D014198:Trehalase
keywords: Trehalases; carbon-metabolism; structural conservation and distribution
references: Funct Plant Biol. 2007 Jun;34(6):550-563
references: 32689383
references: New Phytol. 2013 Jan;197(1):194-206
references: 23121215
references: J Plant Physiol. 2009 Jul 15;166(11):1218-22
references: 19232773
references: New Phytol. 2007;174(4):879-891
references: 17504469
references: Glycobiology. 2003 Apr;13(4):17R-27R
references: 12626396
references: J Microbiol. 2011 Oct;49(5):809-15
references: 22068499
references: Gene. 1997 Nov 20;202(1-2):69-74
references: 9427547
references: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:417-41
references: 18257709
references: J Insect Physiol. 2011 May;57(5):608-13
references: 20965194
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Oct;28(10):2731-9
references: 21546353
references: J Exp Biol. 2010 Nov 15;213(Pt 22):3852-7
references: 21037064
references: New Phytol. 2008;180(2):379-390
references: 18665900
references: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2007;46(22):4115-9
references: 17455176
references: PLoS One. 2010 Apr 12;5(4):e10133
references: 20405036
references: FEBS J. 2009 Oct;276(19):5432-46
references: 19703229
references: Plant Physiol. 2001 Feb;125(2):1086-93
references: 11161063
references: J Cell Sci. 2000 Feb;113 ( Pt 4):721-7
references: 10652264
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2006 Dec 19;6:109
references: 17178000
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Feb;74(3):605-14
references: 18065618
references: Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2010 Oct;40(10):733-41
references: 20691783
references: Funct Plant Biol. 2003 Oct;30(9):965-971
references: 32689081
references: J Exp Biol. 2003 Dec;206(Pt 24):4393-412
references: 14610026
references: Plant Physiol. 2013 Mar;161(3):1158-71
references: 23341362
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Dec 1;15(12):496-503
references: 11114436
references: FEBS Lett. 2007 Aug 21;581(21):4010-6
references: 17673210
references: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2002 Jul;15(7):693-700
references: 12118885
references: Glycobiology. 2010 Sep;20(9):1186-95
references: 20542873