title: Sex-biased gene expression in the brown alga Fucus vesiculosus.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The fucoid brown algae (Heterokontophyta, Phaeophyceae) are increasingly the focus of ecological genetics, biodiversity, biogeography and speciation research. The molecular genetics underlying mating system variation, where repeated dioecious - hermaphrodite switches during evolution are recognized, and the molecular evolution of sex-related genes are key questions currently hampered by a lack of genomic information. We therefore undertook a comparative analysis of male and female reproductive tissue transcriptomes against a vegetative background during natural reproductive cycles in Fucus vesiculosus.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Over 300 k reads were assembled and annotated against public protein databases including a brown alga. Compared with the vegetative tissue, photosynthetic and carbohydrate metabolism pathways were under-expressed, particularly in male tissue, while several pathways involved in genetic information processing and replication were over-expressed. Estimates of sex-biased gene (SBG) expression were higher for male (14% of annotated orthologues) than female tissue (9%) relative to the vegetative background. Mean expression levels and variance were also greater in male- than female-biased genes. Major female-biased genes were carbohydrate-modifying enzymes with likely roles in zygote cell wall biogenesis and/or modification. Male-biased genes reflected distinct sperm development and function, and orthologues for signal perception (a phototropin), transduction (several kinases), and putatively flagella-localized proteins (including candidate gamete-recognition proteins) were uniquely expressed in males. Overall, the results suggest constraint on female-biased genes (possible pleiotropy), and less constrained male-biased genes, mostly associated with sperm-specific functions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our results support the growing contention that males possess a large array of genes regulating male fitness, broadly supporting findings in evolutionarily distant heterogametic animal models. This work identifies an annotated set of F. vesiculosus gene products that potentially regulate sexual reproduction and may contribute to prezygotic isolation, one essential step towards developing tools for a functional understanding of species isolation and differentiation.
authors: CCMAR,CIMAR-Laboratório Associado, Universidade do Algarve, Gambelas, Faro 8005-139, Portugal.
authors: Maria João F
authors: MJ
authors: Martins
authors: Catarina F
authors: CF
authors: Mota
authors: Gareth A
authors: GA
authors: Pearson
mesh_terms: D020418:Algal Proteins / Q000096:biosynthesis*; D015982:Bias; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D044645:Fucus / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D015870:Gene Expression; D053858:Metabolic Networks and Pathways / Q000235:genetics; D058977:Molecular Sequence Annotation; D012098:Reproduction; D059467:Transcriptome
chemical_list: D020418:Algal Proteins
references: PLoS Biol. 2012;10(4):e1001308
references: 22529744
references: Physiology (Bethesda). 2007 Feb;22:40-6
references: 17289929
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Dec;26(12):647-54
references: 21890230
references: J Cell Sci. 1979 Apr;36:19-30
references: 457806
references: Genome Res. 2004 Jun;14(6):1147-59
references: 15140833
references: Evolution. 2004 Feb;58(2):308-23
references: 15068348
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 3;102 Suppl 1:6522-6
references: 15851676
references: New Biol. 1990 May;2(5):410-9
references: 2288911
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 May 1;30(9):e36
references: 11972351
references: Mol Ecol. 2005 Jun;14(7):2033-46
references: 15910325
references: Genome Biol. 2002 Jun 18;3(7):RESEARCH0034
references: 12184808
references: Photochem Photobiol. 2002 Jan;75(1):76-8
references: 11837330
references: Curr Biol. 2003 Jul 1;13(13):1145-9
references: 12842015
references: Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Feb;3(2):137-44
references: 11836507
references: Integr Comp Biol. 2006 Oct;46(5):587-97
references: 21672769
references: Nature. 2007 Nov 8;450(7167):233-7
references: 17994089
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 1992 Apr;7(4):114-8
references: 21235975
references: Integr Comp Biol. 2011 Sep;51(3):456-65
references: 21700571
references: Science. 2003 Jan 31;299(5607):697-700
references: 12511656
references: Physiol Genomics. 2003 Jan 15;12(2):159-62
references: 12429865
references: Am Nat. 2008 Jan;171(1):35-43
references: 18171149
references: Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2009 Jan-Feb;11(1):118-23
references: 18661183
references: Bioessays. 2005 May;27(5):518-25
references: 15832384
references: J Cell Biol. 2007 Nov 5;179(3):515-26
references: 17967944
references: PLoS Biol. 2010 Oct 05;8(10):
references: 20957185
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e19402
references: 21695117
references: Planta. 1967 Mar;75(1):39-54
references: 24550014
references: Biotechniques. 2003 Feb;34(2):374-8
references: 12613259
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Dec 21;11:371
references: 22188734
references: Am Nat. 2009 Feb;173(2):141-50
references: 20374139
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Jan;27(1):27-39
references: 21978464
references: Microbiol Rev. 1993 Dec;57(4):953-94
references: 8302218
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Mar;22(3):533-41
references: 15525699
references: Mol Cell. 2000 Sep;6(3):605-16
references: 11030340
references: Science. 1998 Sep 25;281(5385):1995-8
references: 9748153
references: Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4(11):1189-200
references: 23097318
references: Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2010 Apr;12(2):195-213
references: 19609612
references: Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2002 May;52(1):43-55
references: 11977082
references: Mol Biol Cell. 2002 Sep;13(9):3303-13
references: 12221134
references: Nat Genet. 2004 Jun;36(6):642-6
references: 15156144
references: Plant Physiol. 2003 Oct;133(2):726-35
references: 14526115
references: Mol Ecol. 2010 Nov;19(21):4812-22
references: 20958817
references: Plant Signal Behav. 2011 Nov;6(11):1858-60
references: 22067105
references: J Cell Sci. 2005 May 1;118(Pt 9):2013-22
references: 15840651
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Feb 28;103(9):3209-13
references: 16492742
references: Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Sep;8(9):689-98
references: 17680007
references: Biol Lett. 2009 Jun 23;5(3):409-12
references: 19433612
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 May 28;93(11):5286-90
references: 11607682
references: Genome Biol. 2004;5(6):R40
references: 15186491
references: Evolution. 2009 Jun;63(6):1464-72
references: 19154378
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):372-380
references: 11403870
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Dec;24(12):2698-706
references: 17893399
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35978
references: 22563429
references: J Cell Sci. 1980 Jun;43:209-24
references: 7191429
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2005 Jul;10(7):339-46
references: 15953753
references: BMC Genomics. 2007 Dec 18;8:464
references: 18088424
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Jul;27(7):1570-8
references: 20142440
references: Nature. 2007 Nov 8;450(7167):238-41
references: 17994090
references: Planta. 1988 Dec;176(3):298-306
references: 24220858
references: Oecologia. 1989 Jan;78(1):97-105
references: 28311907
references: Bioessays. 2011 Jan;33(1):52-60
references: 21110346
references: Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 15;27(6):863-4
references: 21278185
references: Heredity (Edinb). 2009 Jan;102(1):66-76
references: 19018273
references: J Reprod Immunol. 2002 Jan;53(1-2):133-50
references: 11730911
references: Heredity (Edinb). 2009 Jan;102(1):4-15
references: 18781167
references: Plant Physiol. 1998 Sep;118(1):305-13
references: 9733550
references: Nature. 2010 Jun 3;465(7298):617-21
references: 20520714
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Sep 14;101(37):13483-8
references: 15340140
references: Physiol Rev. 2011 Oct;91(4):1305-55
references: 22013213
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Mar 31;9:70
references: 19335884
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Jul;65(7):3121-8
references: 10388712