title: Why urban citizens in developing countries use traditional medicines: the case of suriname.
abstract: The use of traditional medicines (TMs) among urban populations in developing countries and factors underlying people's decision to use TMs are poorly documented. We interviewed 270 adults in Paramaribo, Suriname, using a stratified random household sample, semistructured questionnaires, and multivariate analysis. Respondents mentioned 144 medicinal plant species, most frequently Gossypium barbadense, Phyllanthus amarus, and Quassia amara. 66% had used TMs in the previous year, especially people who suffered from cold, fever, hypertension, headache, uterus, and urinary tract problems. At least 22% combined herbs with prescription medicine. The strongest explanatory variables were health status, (transfer of) plant knowledge, and health status combined with plant knowledge. Other predictive variables included religion, marital status, attitude of medical personnel, religious opinion on TMs, and number of children per household. Age, gender, nationality, rural background, education, employment, income, insurance, and opinion of government or doctors had no influence. People's main motivation to use TMs was their familiarity with herbs. Given the frequent use of self-collected, home-prepared herbal medicine and the fact that illness and traditional knowledge predict plant use rather than poverty or a limited access to modern health care, the potential risks and benefits of TMs should be put prominently on the national public health agenda.
authors: Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9514, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
authors: Tinde
authors: T
authors: van Andel
authors: Luísa G
authors: LG
authors: Carvalheiro
references: Health Policy Plan. 2012 Sep;27(6):505-15
references: 22080515
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37643
references: 22662184
references: Adv Data. 2004 May 27;(343):1-19
references: 15188733
references: Aust N Z J Public Health. 1998 Apr;22(2):223-6
references: 9744181
references: Complement Ther Med. 2010 Feb;18(1):13-20
references: 20178874
references: Lancet. 1996 Mar 2;347(9001):569-73
references: 8596318
references: J Health Psychol. 2007 Nov;12(6):851-67
references: 17956965
references: J Ethnopharmacol. 2011 Sep 1;137(1):305-11
references: 21645607
references: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011 Nov 23;7:35
references: 22113005
references: J Ethnopharmacol. 2011 Jan 27;133(2):490-510
references: 20965241
references: J Ethnopharmacol. 2011 Nov 18;138(2):286-313
references: 21982793
references: Prev Med. 2002 Aug;35(2):166-73
references: 12200102
references: Reprod Toxicol. 2003 Jan-Feb;17(1):45-50
references: 12507657
references: J Ethnopharmacol. 2008 May 8;117(2):362-77
references: 18359178
references: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:807452
references: 22110548
references: Epilepsia. 2005 Apr;46(4):583-7
references: 15816956
references: N Engl J Med. 1993 Jan 28;328(4):246-52
references: 8418405
references: JAMA. 1998 May 20;279(19):1548-53
references: 9605899
references: BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011 Nov 25;11:117
references: 22117933
references: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Jun 6;282(6279):1823-4
references: 6786635
references: Am J Public Health. 2002 Oct;92(10):1582-91
references: 12356597
references: BMJ. 1994 Jul 9;309(6947):107-11
references: 8038643
references: J Ethnopharmacol. 2012 Mar 27;140(2):368-78
references: 22306470
references: J Ethnopharmacol. 2010 Feb 17;127(3):694-701
references: 20004237