title: Color polymorphism in a land snail Cepaea nemoralis (Pulmonata: Helicidae) as viewed by potential avian predators.
abstract: Avian predation is one of the most probable factors maintaining polymorphism of shell coloration in Cepaea nemoralis. This assumption is justified by the fact that birds frequently forage on snails and their prey choice varies with morph coloration. However, in all preceding studies, the conspicuousness of morphs was determined only by using human vision which is significantly different from birds' visual perception. In this study, we assessed how birds perceive colors of four Cepaea nemoralis morphs using physiological models of avian color vision. We calculated combined chromatic and achromatic contrast between shells and three habitat background types as a measure of shell conspicuousness. The degree of background color matching in Cepaea nemoralis depended on both shell morph and habitat type. On average, banded morphs were more conspicuous than unbanded morphs. Morphs were the most cryptic against dry vegetation and the most conspicuous on bare ground. We also found a significant interaction between habitat type and color morph. The relative conspicuousness of shell morphs depended on habitat and was the most variable against green vegetation. Our study provides the first insight into how potential avian predators view Cepaea nemoralis morphs. The results are discussed in light of multiple hypotheses explaining selective predation on Cepaea nemoralis morphs.
authors: Department of Avian Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614, Poznań, Poland. adrian@amu.edu.pl
authors: Adrian
authors: A
authors: Surmacki
authors: Agata
authors: A
authors: Ożarowska-Nowicka
authors: Zuzanna M
authors: ZM
authors: Rosin
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001717:Birds / Q000502:physiology*; D017753:Ecosystem; D020387:Food Chain; D010858:Pigmentation / Q000502:physiology*; D012908:Snails / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
references: J Comp Physiol A. 2000 Apr;186(4):375-87
references: 10798725
references: Annee Biol. 1951 Jan;55(1):39-49
references: 14820033
references: Genetics. 1954 Jan;39(1):89-116
references: 17247470
references: Zoology (Jena). 2010 May;113(3):131-9
references: 20435453
references: Oecologia. 1975 Mar;19(1):59-70
references: 28308831
references: Nature. 2002 Jan 10;415(6868):133
references: 11805822
references: Heredity (Edinb). 1974 Dec;33(3):361-72
references: 4532101
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Mar 22;272(1563):665-70
references: 15817442
references: J Comp Physiol A. 1998 Nov;183(5):621-33
references: 9839454
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Feb 28;103(9):3214-9
references: 16481615
references: Evolution. 1986 Jan;40(1):68-77
references: 28564112
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 27;364(1516):423-7
references: 18990674
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30316
references: 22295080
references: J Biosci. 2011 Sep;36(4):691-9
references: 21857115
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 11;103(15):5852-7
references: 16574774
references: Heredity (Edinb). 1969 Aug;24(3):347-52
references: 5262945
references: J Exp Biol. 2004 Jun;207(Pt 14):2471-85
references: 15184519
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Jun;20(6):855-61
references: 12716987
references: BMC Ecol. 2009 May 08;9:12
references: 19426509
references: Heredity (Edinb). 2005 May;94(5):497-500
references: 15742002
references: Heredity (Edinb). 1974 Apr;32(2):165-70
references: 4526160
references: Heredity (Edinb). 1950 Dec;4(3):275-94
references: 14802986
references: Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Mar 7;265(1394):351-8
references: 9523436
references: Evolution. 1999 Dec;53(6):1898-1914
references: 28565459
references: Nature. 1968 Nov 2;220(5166):501-2
references: 5686173
references: Evolution. 2004 Jul;58(7):1549-59
references: 15341157
references: Nature. 2002 Feb 7;415(6872):609-13
references: 11832937
references: Heredity (Edinb). 1975 Feb;34(1):128-31
references: 1054673