title: Lumbar posterolateral fusion with local bone graft plus bone extender compared with iliac crest bone graft: a systematic review.
abstract: METHODS
  Systematic review. Study rationale and context:  Bone graft from the iliac crest has been the gold standard in posterolateral spinal fusion procedures, but is associated with chronic pain at the harvest site. Bone graft harvested locally from the spine and combined with extenders may decrease the morbidity associated with iliac graft harvest, but questions remain on the success of this technique to achieve bone union.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  Compare the fusion rate, functional outcomes, and safety of local bone graft plus bone extender compared with iliac crest bone graft in posterolateral spinal fusion procedures.
  
  
  METHODS
  A systematic review of the literature was undertaken for articles published through January 2011. Pubmed, Cochrane, National Guideline Clearinghouse Databases, and bibliographies of key articles were searched. Two independent reviewers studied the articles. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were set and each article was subject to a predefined quality-rating scheme.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We identified three articles meeting our inclusion criteria. Fusion rates were high across studies, with no significant differences between treatment groups in fusion, functional outcomes, or quality of life. There were two deep infections (5.3%) in one study among patients receiving local bone graft plus extender.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Local bone graft plus bone extender has similar fusion rates, functional outcomes, and patient quality-of-life scores as iliac crest bone graft in posterolateral spinal fusion procedures. Additional randomized trials with standardized methods of measuring fusion and functional outcomes are needed.
authors: University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
authors: Robert A
authors: RA
authors: McGuire
authors: Leslie E
authors: LE
authors: Pilcher
authors: Joseph R
authors: JR
authors: Dettori
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 May;89(5):1010-8
references: 17473138
references: J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Jun;2(6):733-6
references: 16028744
references: Can J Surg. 2001 Aug;44(4):262-6
references: 11504259
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 20;33(12):1299-304
references: 18496340
references: J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Feb;18 Suppl:S77-81
references: 15699810
references: Eur Spine J. 2005 Sep;14(7):630-8
references: 15789231