title: Reported goals of instructors of responsible conduct of research for teaching of skills.
abstract: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) training grant requirement to provide training in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) is now more than 20 years old. Implicit in the requirement is that this training will have an impact not only on what trainees know, but on what they know how to do. There is, however, a range of responses about what skills are seen to be necessary for the ethical practice of science. As part of a larger, earlier study examining RCR instructors' overall goals in teaching RCR, we asked 50 RCR instructors from 37 different institutions what their goals were for teaching skills in their RCR courses. The responses about what constituted necessary skills were wide ranging, from a focus on teaching the skill of ethical decision making to the perceived importance of ensuring that trainees understand the importance of the community in some research relationships. This diversity in responses about what skills should be taught in RCR courses is not especially surprising, given the variation in instructors, formats, instruction, goals, and outcome measures for RCR courses, but it does reinforce the necessity of giving more thought to what goals are to be achieved. This is true not only of skills to be learned, but of any other objectives one might have for research ethics teaching and learning.
authors: University of California, San Diego, CA 92093-0612, USA. dplemmons@ucsd.edu
authors: Dena K
authors: DK
authors: Plemmons
authors: Michael W
authors: MW
authors: Kalichman
mesh_terms: D003657:Decision Making; D032984:Ethics, Research / Q000193:education*; D005178:Faculty; D006040:Goals; D006801:Humans; D011361:Professional Competence; D012111:Residence Characteristics; D012941:Social Responsibility; D013663:Teaching / Q000379:methods*
references: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2007 Jun;2(2):57-66
references: 19385796
references: Account Res. 2009;16(5):268-83
references: 19757232
references: Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):870-5
references: 17726394
references: Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):846-52
references: 17726389
references: Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Jul;12(3):571-82
references: 16909159
references: Ethics Behav. 2008 Oct 1;18(4):315-339
references: 19578559
references: Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Jun;13(2):249-64
references: 17717736
references: Acad Med. 2010 Mar;85(3):519-26
references: 20182131
references: Science. 2008 Nov 21;322(5905):1186
references: 19023060