title: Red, yellow, and super-white sclera : uniquely human cues for healthiness, attractiveness, and age.
abstract: The sclera, the eye's tough outer layer, is, among primates, white only in humans, providing the ground necessary for the display of colors that vary in health and disease. The current study evaluates scleral color as a cue of socially significant information about health, attractiveness, and age by contrasting the perception of eyes with normal whites with copies of those eyes whose whites were reddened, yellowed, or further whitened by digital editing. Individuals with red and yellow sclera were rated to be less healthy, less attractive, and older than individuals with untinted control sclera. Individuals with whitened, "super-white" sclera were rated as younger, although not more healthy or attractive, than controls. In humans, clear, white sclera may join such traits as smooth skin and long, lustrous hair as signs of health, beauty, and reproductive fitness. The evolution of a white sclera may have contributed to the emergence of humans as a social species.
authors: Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA. provine@umbc.edu
authors: Robert R
authors: RR
authors: Provine
authors: Marcello O
authors: MO
authors: Cabrera
authors: Jessica
authors: J
authors: Nave-Blodgett
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000375:Aging; D001504:Beauty; D003116:Color; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010465:Perception; D012590:Sclera / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references: J Hum Evol. 2007 Mar;52(3):314-20
references: 17140637
references: Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1988 Winter;28(4):294-302
references: 3053488
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Dec 22;274(1629):3113-7
references: 17925281
references: Exp Eye Res. 2004 Mar;78(3):609-23
references: 15106941
references: Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2008 Feb;26(1):57-72, vi
references: 18249257
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Dec;3(12):452-460
references: 10562724
references: Ophthalmology. 2005 Oct;112(10):1801-8
references: 16111757
references: J Hum Evol. 2001 May;40(5):419-35
references: 11322803
references: Surv Ophthalmol. 1986 Mar-Apr;30(5):298-313
references: 2872731
references: J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Dec;11(12):1728-31
references: 17896166
references: Am Fam Physician. 2004 Jan 15;69(2):299-304
references: 14765767
references: Eye (Lond). 2007 May;21(5):633-8
references: 16518366
references: N Engl J Med. 2000 Aug 3;343(5):345-51
references: 10922425
references: Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1962 Sep;39:459-70
references: 13913887
references: Arch Ophthalmol. 1969 Feb;81(2):151-4
references: 5772978
references: Arch Ophthalmol. 1961 Jul;66:90-4
references: 13733331
references: Ophthalmologica. 1975;171(1):82-5
references: 1124206
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jan;10(1):9-13
references: 16311066
references: Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1985 Apr;63(2):236-41
references: 4003053
references: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000 Aug;24(6):581-604
references: 10940436
references: Cornea. 2012 Mar;31(3):245-52
references: 22316649
references: Psychol Bull. 2000 May;126(3):390-423
references: 10825783
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:199-226
references: 16318594