title: A cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals to determine what they believe constitutes 'specialist' care for teenage and young adult patients with cancer.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To examine the attitudes of UK healthcare professionals towards what they believe constitutes specialist care for teenage and young adult (TYA) patients with cancer, to determine which factors they considered to be the most important components of specialist TYA care, and whether opinion varied between clinical specialties and reflected the drivers for care improvements within National Health Service (NHS) policy.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study utilised a cross-sectional survey, using Likert scales, to assess attitudes towards specialist care. Responses were grouped using model-based clustering methods implemented in LatentGold 4.5.
  
  
  METHODS
  Participants from 98 NHS trusts in the UK were invited to participate in the study.
  
  
  METHODS
  691 healthcare professionals involved in the management of TYA patients were approached; of these, 338 responded.
  
  
  RESULTS
  338 healthcare professionals responded (51.9% of those invited). Responses were grouped into three clusters according to the pattern of responses to the questions. One cluster rated age-appropriate care above all else, the second rated both age and site-appropriate care highly while the third assigned more importance to site-specific care. Overall, the psychosocial and supportive aspects of care were rated highest while statements relating to factors known to be important (access to clinical trials, treatment at a high volume centre and specialist diagnostics) were not rated as highly as expected.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Attitudes varied widely between professionals treating TYA patients with cancer as to what constitutes key aspects of specialist care. Further work is needed to quantify the extent to which this influences practice.
authors: Paediatric Epidemiology Group, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
authors: Rebecca J
authors: RJ
authors: Birch
authors: Eva J A
authors: EJ
authors: Morris
authors: Robert M
authors: RM
authors: West
authors: Dan P
authors: DP
authors: Stark
authors: Ian
authors: I
authors: Lewis
authors: Sue
authors: S
authors: Morgan
authors: Richard G
authors: RG
authors: Feltbower
references: Curr Opin Pediatr. 2002 Feb;14(1):1-4
references: 11880726
references: Eur J Cancer. 2003 Dec;39(18):2573-8
references: 14642919
references: Cancer Treat Rev. 2007 Nov;33(7):622-30
references: 17434265
references: Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008 Jul;51(1):105-9
references: 18253959
references: Br J Cancer. 2007 Jun 4;96(11):1760-6
references: 17505509
references: Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009 Jul;13(3):149-53
references: 19577960
references: Br J Cancer. 2008 Dec 16;99(12):1967-74
references: 19034273
references: Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005 Mar;44(3):259-63
references: 15514917
references: J Public Health (Oxf). 2007 Jun;29(2):178-82
references: 17327364
references: Cancer. 1998 Jul 1;83(1):69-75
references: 9655295
references: Psychooncology. 2006 Sep;15(9):805-16
references: 16363001
references: Soc Work Health Care. 1998;27(4):3-18
references: 9680652
references: Lancet Oncol. 2001 Jan;2(1):43-8
references: 11905619
references: Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2007 Sep;11(4):362-8
references: 17287143
references: Cancer. 2006 Oct 1;107(7 Suppl):1645-55
references: 16906507
references: Psychooncology. 2012 Mar;21(3):316-23
references: 22383273
references: Br Med Bull. 1996 Oct;52(4):887-97
references: 9039738
references: J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 10;28(32):4825-30
references: 20498401
references: Med Pediatr Oncol. 2002 Jan;38(1):1-10
references: 11835231
references: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2003 Mar;12(1):65-70
references: 12641558