title: Responses to flooding of plant water relations and leaf gas exchange in tropical tolerant trees of a black-water wetland.
abstract: This review summarizes the research on physiological responses to flooding of trees in the seasonal black-water wetland of the Mapire River in Venezuela. Inter-annual variability was found during 8 years of sampling, in spite of which a general picture emerged of increased stomatal conductance (gs) and photosynthetic rate (PN) during the flooded period to values as high as or higher than in plants in drained wet soil. Models explaining the initial inhibitory responses and the acclimation to flooding are proposed. In the inhibitory phase of flooding, hypoxia generated by flooding causes a decrease in root water absorption and stomatal closure. An increase with flooding in xylem water potential (ψ) suggests that flooding does not cause water deficit. The PN decreases due to changes in relative stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to photosynthesis; an increase in the latter is due to reduced chlorophyll and total soluble protein content. Total non-structural carbohydrates (TNC) accumulate in leaves but their content begins to decrease during the acclimatized phase at full flooding, coinciding with the resumption of high gs and PN. The reversal of the diminution in gs is associated, in some but not all species, to the growth of adventitious roots. The occurrence of morpho-anatomical and biochemical adaptations which improve oxygen supply would cause the acclimation, including increased water absorption by the roots, increased rubisco and chlorophyll contents and ultimately increased PN. Therefore, trees would perform as if flooding did not signify a stress to their physiology.
authors: Centro de Botánica Tropical, Instituto de Biología Experimental, Universidad Central de Venezuela Caracas, Venezuela.
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Herrera
keywords: flooding; photosynthesis; sap flux; stomatal conductance; tolerance
references: Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2004 May;6(3):299-306
references: 15143438
references: Tree Physiol. 1999 Feb;19(2):79-85
references: 12651586
references: Plant Physiol. 1995 Nov;109(3):1017-1024
references: 12228649
references: Tree Physiol. 1995 Oct;15(10):629-38
references: 14965996
references: AoB Plants. 2010;2010:plq003
references: 22476061
references: J Exp Bot. 2012 Jan;63(1):43-57
references: 21914658
references: Nature. 2003 Sep 25;425(6956):393-7
references: 14508488
references: Plant Physiol. 2005 Sep;139(1):497-508
references: 16126859
references: Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1997 Jun;48:223-250
references: 15012263
references: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:313-39
references: 18444902
references: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Jun;6(3):247-56
references: 12753974
references: Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Nov;30(11):1411-21
references: 17897411
references: Ann Bot. 2005 Sep;96(4):501-5
references: 16217870
references: Ann Bot. 2009 Jan;103(2):281-93
references: 18819952
references: New Phytol. 2011 Apr;190(2):379-86
references: 21175639
references: Funct Plant Biol. 2009 Aug;36(8):665-681
references: 32688679
references: Tree Physiol. 1992 Apr;10(3):285-95
references: 14969985
references: Physiol Plant. 2008 Sep;134(1):41-8
references: 18444960
references: Ann Bot. 2009 Jan;103(2):313-23
references: 19001430
references: New Phytol. 2011 Apr;190(2):269-73
references: 21443603
references: Tree Physiol. 1999 Dec;19(14):925-932
references: 12651304
references: New Phytol. 2006;172(4):719-31
references: 17096797
references: Oecologia. 2001 Aug;128(3):326-335
references: 24549901