title: Strengths and weaknesses of parent-staff communication in the NICU: a survey assessment.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Parents of infants hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) find themselves in a situation of emotional strain. Communication in the NICU presents special challenges due to parental stress and the complexity of the highly technologized environment. Parents' need for communication may not always be met by the NICU staff. This study aimed to describe strengths and weaknesses of parent-nurse and parent-doctor communication in a large level III NICU in Sweden in order to improve our understanding of parents' communication needs.
  
  
  METHODS
  Parents were asked to complete a survey consisting of sixteen questions about their experiences of communication with nurses and doctors in the NICU. In each question the parents evaluated some aspect of communication on a five- or six-point Likert scale. They also had the opportunity on each question to comment on their experiences in their own words. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 and qualitative manifest content analysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  270 parents (71.4%) completed the survey. Parents generally rated communication with the staff in the NICU positively and appreciated having received emotional support and regular information about their child´s care. Although a large majority of the parents were satisfied with their communication with doctors and nurses, only about half of the parents felt the nurses and doctors understood their emotional situation very well. Some parents would have desired easier access to conversations with doctors and wanted medical information to be given directly by doctors rather than by nurses. Parents' communication with the staff was hampered when many different nurses were involved in caring for the infant or when the transfer of information in connection with shift changes or between the maternity ward and NICU was poor. Parents also desired to be present during doctors' rounds on their infant.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Training both doctors and nurses in communication skills, especially in how to meet parents' emotional needs better, could make communication at the NICU more effective and improve parental well-being. Creating a framework for the parents of what to expect from NICU communication might also be helpful. In addition, our results support the use of primary nurse teams to improve continuity of care and thereby promote successful communication.
authors: Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Box 457, Gothenburg, SE 405 30, Sweden. helena.wigert@gu.se
authors: Helena
authors: H
authors: Wigert
authors: Michaela Blom
authors: MB
authors: Dellenmark
authors: Kristina
authors: K
authors: Bry
mesh_terms: D001294:Attitude to Health; D003142:Communication; D005260:Female; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006785:Hospitals, University / Q000458:organization & administration; D006801:Humans; D007363:Intensive Care Units, Neonatal; D008297:Male; D009726:Nurses / Q000523:psychology*; D010290:Parents / Q000523:psychology*; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology*; D011368:Professional-Family Relations; D036301:Qualitative Research; D013548:Sweden
references: ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2009 Jul-Sep;32(3):E1-16
references: 19707083
references: J Pediatr Nurs. 2009 Apr;24(2):153-63
references: 19268237
references: Pediatr Nurs. 2001 May-Jun;27(3):281-6
references: 12964668
references: J Clin Nurs. 2006 Jun;15(6):726-34
references: 16684168
references: BMC Pediatr. 2008 Jan 23;8:3
references: 18215259
references: J Pediatr Nurs. 2008 Jun;23(3):e26-36
references: 18492543
references: J Perinatol. 2006 Jan 1;26(1):44-8
references: 16292336
references: J Perinatol. 2007 Dec;27 Suppl 2:S32-7
references: 18034178
references: Soc Sci Med. 2006 Mar;62(6):1319-29
references: 16213077
references: J Clin Nurs. 2003 Sep;12(5):752-61
references: 12919222
references: Am J Crit Care. 2010 Mar;19(2):156-63
references: 20194612
references: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Oct;24 Suppl 1:135-7
references: 21942613
references: Neonatal Netw. 2003 Nov-Dec;22(6):25-31
references: 14700179
references: Nurs Ethics. 2006 Jan;13(1):52-64
references: 16425904
references: J Pediatr Nurs. 2007 Dec;22(6):490-7
references: 18036470
references: J Perinatol. 2010 Jun;30(6):425-30
references: 19847189
references: Pediatrics. 1993 Nov;92(5):643-50
references: 8414850
references: Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Mar;82(3):281-4
references: 21296536
references: Neonatal Netw. 2005 May-Jun;24(3):25-33
references: 15960009
references: Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Aug;76(2):159-73
references: 19321288
references: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Nov;24(11):1403-6
references: 21801140
references: J Child Health Care. 2005 Jun;9(2):122-36
references: 15961367
references: Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar;74(3):331-8
references: 19157761
references: Semin Perinatol. 2011 Feb;35(1):20-8
references: 21255703
references: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 Sep;90(5):F429-31
references: 16113156
references: J Adv Nurs. 2002 Jan;37(1):62-9
references: 11784399
references: J Adv Nurs. 2008 Nov;64(4):363-71
references: 18783472
references: Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12
references: 14769454
references: J Pediatr Nurs. 2009 Apr;24(2):164-70
references: 19268238
references: J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008 Nov-Dec;37(6):666-91
references: 19012717
references: J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;39(6):675-83
references: 21039850
references: Pediatrics. 2008 Feb;121(2):e215-22
references: 18182470
references: J Perinat Educ. 2009 Summer;18(3):23-9
references: 20514124
references: Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Mar;20(1):35-41
references: 16489958
references: J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2001 Dec;15(3):74-83
references: 11785579
references: Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):1341-7
references: 15520119
references: Nurs Ethics. 2003 Mar;10(2):138-48
references: 12659485
references: J Clin Nurs. 2011 May;20(9-10):1462-71
references: 21492286