title: Arthroscopic proficiency: methods in evaluating competency.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The current paradigm of arthroscopic training lacks objective evaluation of technical ability and its adequacy is concerning given the accelerating complexity of the field. To combat insufficiencies, emphasis is shifting towards skill acquisition outside the operating room and sophisticated assessment tools. We reviewed (1) the validity of cadaver and surgical simulation in arthroscopic training, (2) the role of psychomotor analysis and arthroscopic technical ability, (3) what validated assessment tools are available to evaluate technical competency, and (4) the quantification of arthroscopic proficiency.
  
  
  METHODS
  The Medline and Embase databases were searched for published articles in the English literature pertaining to arthroscopic competence, arthroscopic assessment and evaluation and objective measures of arthroscopic technical skill. Abstracts were independently evaluated and exclusion criteria included articles outside the scope of knee and shoulder arthroscopy as well as original articles about specific therapies, outcomes and diagnoses leaving 52 articles cited in this review.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Simulated arthroscopic environments exhibit high levels of internal validity and consistency for simple arthroscopic tasks, however the ability to transfer complex skills to the operating room has not yet been established. Instrument and force trajectory data can discriminate between technical ability for basic arthroscopic parameters and may serve as useful adjuncts to more comprehensive techniques. There is a need for arthroscopic assessment tools for standardized evaluation and objective feedback of technical skills, yet few comprehensive instruments exist, especially for the shoulder. Opinion on the required arthroscopic experience to obtain proficiency remains guarded and few governing bodies specify absolute quantities.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Further validation is required to demonstrate the transfer of complex arthroscopic skills from simulated environments to the operating room and provide objective parameters to base evaluation. There is a deficiency of validated assessment tools for technical competencies and little consensus of what constitutes a sufficient case volume within the arthroscopy community.
authors: Division of Orthopaedics, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada. justin.hodgins@mail.utoronto.ca
authors: Justin L
authors: JL
authors: Hodgins
authors: Christian
authors: C
authors: Veillette
mesh_terms: D001182:Arthroscopy / Q000193:education / Q000592:standards*; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000592:standards*; D004521:Educational Measurement / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Jul;72(6):799-800
references: 2365712
references: Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2010;68(1):5-10
references: 20345354
references: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;81:465-70
references: 11317792
references: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004 Mar-Apr;13(2):196-205
references: 14997099
references: Br J Surg. 2008 Sep;95(9):1088-97
references: 18690637
references: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;111:54-6
references: 15718698
references: Acta Orthop. 2011 Feb;82(1):90-5
references: 21281257
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Oct 5;93(19):e115(1-9)
references: 22005876
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Apr;87(4):903-8
references: 15805223
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Feb;467(2):546-52
references: 18791774
references: Surgery. 2004 Jan;135(1):6-20
references: 14694296
references: Arthroscopy. 2010 Jun;26(6):832-40
references: 20511043
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Nov;199(5):571.e1-5
references: 18799153
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Apr;90(4):494-9
references: 18378926
references: J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Dec;189(6):566-74
references: 10589593
references: Bull Am Coll Surg. 2001 Apr;86(4):10-5
references: 11357767
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Nov 7;94(21):e160
references: 23138247
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Nov;193(5):479-85
references: 11708503
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jun;88(6):1405-11
references: 16757778
references: BMJ. 1999 Apr 3;318(7188):887-8
references: 10102830
references: Arthroscopy. 2012 Feb;28(2):218-24
references: 22035780
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jun;89(6):1393-8
references: 17545443
references: Am J Surg. 2007 May;193(5):551-5; discussion 555
references: 17434353
references: Stud Health Technol Inform. 1999;62:221-7
references: 10538361
references: Arthroscopy. 2011 Sep;27(9):A30
references: 22263225
references: J Surg Res. 2003 Oct;114(2):156-62
references: 14559441
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Nov;76(11):1603-5
references: 7962019
references: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999 Oct;46(10):1212-21
references: 10513126
references: Arthroscopy. 2002 Jul-Aug;18(6):E28
references: 12098110
references: Stud Health Technol Inform. 1999;62:337-43
references: 10538383
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Jul;90(7):958-65
references: 18591610
references: Surgery. 2005 Oct;138(4):640-7; discussion 647-9
references: 16269292
references: Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1139-42
references: 18326032
references: Surg Endosc. 2002 Dec;16(12):1753-8
references: 12140623
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Dec;80(12):1833-6; discussion 1846-50
references: 9875943
references: JSLS. 2006 Jul-Sep;10(3):284-92
references: 17212881
references: Surgery. 2005 Aug;138(2):246-53
references: 16153433
references: Surg Endosc. 2003 May;17(5):803-10
references: 12582752
references: Surg Endosc. 2002 Jan;16(1):126-9
references: 11961622
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Nov;76(11):1599-602
references: 7962018
references: Am J Surg. 1999 Jan;177(1):28-32
references: 10037304
references: South Med J. 2007 Oct;100(10):985-90
references: 17943041
references: Br J Surg. 1997 Feb;84(2):273-8
references: 9052454
references: Arthroscopy. 2002 Jul-Aug;18(6):E29
references: 12098111
references: Arthroscopy. 1993;9(1):125-7
references: 8442822
references: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Jan;22(1):33-40
references: 23052120
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Nov 2;93(21):e1271-5
references: 22048106
references: Am Surg. 2005 Jan;71(1):29-35
references: 15757053
references: Arthroscopy. 2013 Jan;29(1):106-12
references: 23177383
references: Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):883-8
references: 17261572
references: Arthroscopy. 2008 Mar;24(3):335-42
references: 18308187
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar;88(3):660-7
references: 16510834
references: Iowa Orthop J. 2001;21:31-5
references: 11813948
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 5;94(17):e132
references: 22992861
references: Ann Surg. 2004 Sep;240(3):518-25; discussion 525-8
references: 15319723
references: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Feb;19(2):248-54
references: 20814661
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jan;442:21-9
references: 16394734
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Sep;91(9):2287-95
references: 19724008
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 3;94(13):e97
references: 22760398
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Dec;93(12):1586-91
references: 22161918
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Apr;466(4):963-8
references: 18213507
references: Br J Surg. 2010 Jul;97(7):972-87
references: 20632260
references: Arthroscopy. 2002 Sep;18(7):795-800
references: 12209439
references: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2001 May;48(5):579-91
references: 11341532