title: The impact of distractor congruency on stimulus processing in retinotopic visual cortex.
abstract: The brain is frequently confronted with sensory information that elicits conflicting response choices. While much research has addressed the top down control mechanisms associated with detection and resolution of response competition, the effects of response competition on sensory processing in the primary visual cortex remain unclear. To address this question we modified a typical 'flanker task' (Eriksen and Eriksen, 1974) so that the effects of response competition on human early retinotopic visual cortex could be assessed. Healthy human participants were scanned using fMRI while making a speeded choice response that classified a target object image into one of two categories (e.g. fruits, animals). An irrelevant distractor image that was either congruent (same image as target), incongruent (image from opposite category as target), or neutral (image from task-irrelevant category, e.g. household items) was also present on each trial, but in a different quadrant of the visual field relative to the target. Retinotopic V1 areas responding to the target stimuli showed increased response to targets in the presence of response-incongruent (compared to response-neutral) distractors. A negative correlation with behavioral response competition effects indicated that an increased primary visual cortical response to targets in the incongruent (vs. neutral) trials is associated with a reduced response competition effect on behavior. These results suggest a novel conflict resolution mechanism in the primary visual cortex.
authors: Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK.
authors: Todd A
authors: TA
authors: Kelley
authors: Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK.
authors: Geraint
authors: G
authors: Rees
authors: Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK. Electronic address: n.lavie@ucl.ac.uk.
authors: Nilli
authors: N
authors: Lavie
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D014793:Visual Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Attention; Flanker; Response competition; Retinotopic cortex; V1; fMRI
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):75-82
references: 15668100
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Dec;12(3):467-73
references: 11689307
references: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Jun;4(2):117-26
references: 15460918
references: Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203
references: 2034749
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1985;8:407-30
references: 3885829
references: Neuroimage. 2001 Dec;14(6):1302-8
references: 11707086
references: Brain. 2001 Oct;124(Pt 10):2074-86
references: 11571223
references: Neurobiol Aging. 2007 Jun;28(6):937-46
references: 21887888
references: Cereb Cortex. 2000 Apr;10(4):359-70
references: 10769248
references: Exp Brain Res. 2003 May;150(2):259-63
references: 12682809
references: Nature. 1999 Nov 11;402(6758):179-81
references: 10647008
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Jun;20(6):1063-78
references: 18211237
references: Science. 1995 May 12;268(5212):889-93
references: 7754376
references: Percept Psychophys. 1982 Feb;31(2):101-16
references: 7079090
references: Neuroimage. 2005 Jun;26(2):471-9
references: 15907304
references: Nature. 1994 Jun 16;369(6481):525
references: 8031403
references: Science. 2008 Jul 18;321(5887):414-7
references: 18635806
references: Neuroimage. 2003 Jan;18(1):42-57
references: 12507442
references: Science. 2000 Jun 9;288(5472):1835-8
references: 10846167
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2000;12 Suppl 2:118-29
references: 11506652
references: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;7(4):380-90
references: 18189011
references: J Neurosci. 2007 Oct 17;27(42):11343-53
references: 17942729
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2620-8
references: 20849233
references: Science. 1998 May 1;280(5364):747-9
references: 9563953
references: Cereb Cortex. 2000 Apr;10(4):343-58
references: 10769247
references: J Neurosci. 2012 Feb 22;32(8):2773-82
references: 22357860
references: Cereb Cortex. 2011 Mar;21(3):659-65
references: 20699229
references: Exp Brain Res. 2002 Jan;142(1):139-50
references: 11797091
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992 Dec;121(4):480-506
references: 1431740
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:315-41
references: 10845067
references: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;7(4):367-79
references: 18189010
references: Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):624-52
references: 11488380
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1663-8
references: 9990081
references: Science. 2004 Feb 13;303(5660):1023-6
references: 14963333
references: Neuroimage. 2002 Nov;17(3):1562-71
references: 12414294
references: Neuroimage. 2004 Feb;21(2):757-67
references: 14980579
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Aug;30(8):2530-41
references: 19072895
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Oct;12(10):374-80
references: 18760657