title: Transcranial Doppler ultrasound to assess cerebrovascular reactivity: reliability, reproducibility and effect of posture.
abstract: Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) allows measurement of blood flow velocities in the intracranial vessels, and can be used to assess cerebral vasodilator responses to a hypercapnic stimulus. The reliability of this technique has not been established, nor is there agreement about whether the technique should be performed in sitting or lying postures. We tested the intra- and inter-rater reliability of measures of cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in 10 healthy adults, in sitting and lying postures. Participants underwent triplicate bilateral ultrasound assessment of flow velocities in the middle cerebral arteries whilst sitting and lying supine prior to and during inhalation of Carbogen (5% CO2, 95% O2) for 2 min. This procedure was performed twice by each of two raters for a total of four sessions. CVR was calculated as the difference between baseline and the peak blood flow velocity attained during CO2 inhalation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intra-rater reliability were greater sitting than lying for both raters (e.g. Rater 1 ICC sitting = 0.822, lying = 0.734), and inter-rater reliability was also greater in sitting (e.g. sitting ICC = 0.504, lying = 0.081). These results suggest that assessment of CVR using TCD should be performed with participants sitting in order to maximise CVR measurement reliability.
authors: School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia , Australia.
authors: Michelle N
authors: MN
authors: McDonnell
authors: Narelle M
authors: NM
authors: Berry
authors: Mark A
authors: MA
authors: Cutting
authors: Hannah A
authors: HA
authors: Keage
authors: Jonathan D
authors: JD
authors: Buckley
authors: Peter R C
authors: PR
authors: Howe
keywords: Cerebrovascular reactivity; Doppler ultrasound; Posture; Reliability; Reproducibility
references: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006 Oct;291(4):H1856-61
references: 16766649
references: JAMA. 2000 Apr 26;283(16):2122-7
references: 10791504
references: Proc R Soc Med. 1971 Jan;64(1):77-80
references: 4994580
references: Stroke. 1994 Apr;25(4):793-7
references: 7909175
references: Ultraschall Med. 2011 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S95-101
references: 20414858
references: Stroke. 2000 Jul;31(7):1672-8
references: 10884472
references: J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996 Sep;81(3):1084-95
references: 8889738
references: Proc R Soc Med. 1972 Jan;65(1):80-2
references: 4622641
references: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009 May;296(5):R1473-95
references: 19211719
references: J Hypertens. 2013 Jan;31(1):192-200
references: 23221935
references: Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999 May-Jun;9(3):142-5
references: 10207205
references: J Clin Monit Comput. 1999 May;15(3-4):179-84
references: 12568169
references: Circulation. 2003 Apr 15;107(14):1901-5
references: 12665500
references: Neurosurgery. 1993 Oct;33(4):761-4
references: 7901798
references: Stroke. 1995 Dec;26(12):2302-6
references: 7491655
references: Neurosurgery. 1993 May;32(5):737-41; discussion 741-2
references: 8492848
references: J Neurol Sci. 2006 Nov 15;249(2):135-9
references: 16859710
references: Stroke. 2005 Jun;36(6):1146-52
references: 15879326
references: Clin Sci (Lond). 2009 Mar;116(6):513-20
references: 18939945
references: J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Mar 30;196(2):221-37
references: 21276818
references: Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
references: 18839484
references: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 May;30(5):972-7
references: 19435945
references: Clin Sci (Lond). 1993 Jun;84(6):599-604
references: 8334805
references: Brain. 2001 Mar;124(Pt 3):457-67
references: 11222446
references: J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1996 Oct;8(4):268-72
references: 8884622
references: J Neurosurg. 1982 Dec;57(6):769-74
references: 7143059
references: Stroke. 2000 Feb;31(2):456-62
references: 10657422
references: J Clin Ultrasound. 2006 Feb;34(2):70-6
references: 16547983