title: Social brains in context: lesions targeted to the song control system in female cowbirds affect their social network.
abstract: Social experiences can organize physiological, neural, and reproductive function, but there are few experimental preparations that allow one to study the effect individuals have in structuring their social environment. We examined the connections between mechanisms underlying individual behavior and social dynamics in flocks of brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater). We conducted targeted inactivations of the neural song control system in female subjects. Playback tests revealed that the lesions affected females' song preferences: lesioned females were no longer selective for high quality conspecific song. Instead, they reacted to all cowbird songs vigorously. When lesioned females were introduced into mixed-sex captive flocks, they were less likely to form strong pair-bonds, and they no longer showed preferences for dominant males. This in turn created a cascade of effects through the groups. Social network analyses showed that the introduction of the lesioned females created instabilities in the social structure: males in the groups changed their dominance status and their courtship patterns, and even the competitive behavior of other female group-mates was affected. These results reveal that inactivation of the song control system in female cowbirds not only affects individual behavior, but also exerts widespread effects on the stability of the entire social system.
authors: Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
authors: Sarah E
authors: SE
authors: Maguire
authors: Marc F
authors: MF
authors: Schmidt
authors: David J
authors: DJ
authors: White
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D063346:Singing / Q000502:physiology*; D012919:Social Behavior; D020308:Songbirds / Q000502:physiology*
references: Neuron. 2000 Feb;25(2):481-92
references: 10719901
references: Learn Mem. 2009 Oct 22;16(11):655-69
references: 19850665
references: J Neurobiol. 2000 Jan;42(1):1-13
references: 10623896
references: J Comp Neurol. 1974 Aug 1;156(3):337-74
references: 4609173
references: Anim Behav. 2000 Nov;60(5):599-609
references: 11082230
references: Dev Neurobiol. 2010 Mar;70(4):235-52
references: 20039264
references: Brain Lang. 2010 Oct;115(1):59-68
references: 20471673
references: Nature. 1988 Jul 21;334(6179):244-6
references: 3398921
references: Behav Neurosci. 2000 Jun;114(3):526-42
references: 10883803
references: Behav Brain Res. 1998 Nov;96(1-2):151-9
references: 9821551
references: J Neurobiol. 2002 Sep 15;52(4):294-301
references: 12210096
references: J Neurobiol. 2002 Jul;52(1):1-13
references: 12115889
references: Science. 2004 Jan 23;303(5657):544-6
references: 14739462
references: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Apr;93(4):2157-66
references: 15590726
references: J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jun;107(11):2971-83
references: 22402649
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25461
references: 21980466
references: Brain Res. 2003 Jul 18;978(1-2):91-8
references: 12834902
references: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jan;89(1):472-87
references: 12522195
references: Science. 1991 Jan 18;251(4991):303-5
references: 1987645
references: Nature. 2002 Sep 5;419(6902):65-70
references: 12214232