title: A review of tip apex distance in dynamic hip screw fixation of osteoporotic hip fractures.
abstract: Fractured neck of femur is a common problem seen in elderly osteoporotic females, mostly in Western countries, among which are the extra-capsular fractures such as intertrochanteric and pertrochanteric fractures also known as peritrochanteric fractures, and commonly treated with dynamic hip screw (DHS) or compression hip screw (CHS). The DHS is based on tension band principle and allows the screw to slide within the barrel to enable compression of the fracture when the patient begins to bear weight. This principle only works in the presence of intact medial wall and so cannot be successful in a reverse oblique fracture of the proximal femur. However, it is important that the technique of screw placement is precise and should ideally be central in the femoral neck, on both AP and lateral radiographs. This is why the concept of tip apex distance (TAD) is critical to the outcome of fixation and can accurately predict failure or survival of the screw. A systematic review of articles published in PubMed/Medline, from 1991 to 2011 (twenty years), was carried out to critically analyse common practice with regards to DHS fixation of extra-capsular femoral neck fractures, and review the recommendations of previous authors, with regard to the effect of TAD in DHS fixation. Search words used include TAD, DHS, sliding hip screw, femoral neck fractures, peritrochanteric fractures, tension band principle, fracture collapse, screw cut-out, DHS failure, and failure of fixation. At the end of the review, recommendations and suggestions regarding the ideal techniques of placement of DHS screw into the femoral neck will be made in line with current published literature, in order to establish an evidence base for best practice. A total of forty eight (48) published articles were found relevant to the review topic. Most papers suggested that Tip Apex Distance (TAD) is the most important predictive factor for DHS failure, followed by lag screw position, fracture pattern and reduction, patient's age and presence of osteoporosis. Therefore, we recommend proper training of surgeons, as well as attention to detail while performing DHS for intertrochanteric neck of femur fractures.
authors: Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Leeds University Teaching Hospitals, Leeds West Yorkshire LS1 3EX, United Kingdom.
authors: Imran Haruna
authors: IH
authors: Abdulkareem
keywords: DHS failure; dynamic hip screw; femoral fractures; intertrochanteric fractures; screw cut-out; tip apex distance
references: Orthopedics. 2006 Oct;29(10):919-25
references: 17061418
references: Injury. 2007 Jul;38(7):792-6
references: 17296198
references: Int Orthop. 2010 Dec;34(8):1273-6
references: 19784649
references: J Orthop Traumatol. 2009 Jun;10(2):59-61
references: 19484356
references: Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Mar;25(3):334-6
references: 21500588
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Apr;92(4):792-8
references: 20360500
references: J Orthop Res. 2005 Nov;23(6):1329-35
references: 15994054
references: Int Orthop. 2011 Dec;35(12):1855-61
references: 21387175
references: Injury. 2009 Mar;40(3):283-7
references: 19193375
references: J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Jan;19(1):1-4
references: 15668576
references: Z Orthop Unfall. 2008 Jan-Feb;146(1):44-51
references: 18324581
references: Med Eng Phys. 1997 Jul;19(5):446-53
references: 9338885
references: J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Oct;19(9):610-5
references: 16247305
references: Injury. 2008 Jul;39(7):786-90
references: 18539280
references: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010 Sep;5(5):455-60
references: 20567950
references: Med J Malaysia. 2001 Dec;56 Suppl D:12-7
references: 14569760
references: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Jan;24(1):59-64
references: 18977058
references: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;133:1-10
references: 18376008
references: Int Orthop. 2003;27(4):197-203
references: 12734684
references: Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010 Oct;77(5):395-401
references: 21040651
references: Injury. 1998 Sep;29(7):569
references: 10193508
references: Acta Orthop Belg. 2005 Jun;71(3):260-3
references: 16035697
references: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010 Feb;96(1):21-7
references: 20170854
references: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Mar;124(2):119-22
references: 14652777
references: Injury. 1991 Jan;22(1):45-6
references: 2030031
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Nov;79(6):969-71
references: 9393914
references: J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2010 Aug;18(2):158-65
references: 20808005
references: Orthopedics. 2009 Jul;32(7):488
references: 19634855
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Aug;90(8):1073-8
references: 18669966
references: Int Orthop. 2009 Apr;33(2):555-60
references: 18478227
references: Clin Orthop Surg. 2011 Jun;3(2):107-13
references: 21629470
references: Injury. 2004 Oct;35(10):994-8
references: 15351665
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jul;77(7):1058-64
references: 7608228
references: Int J Med Robot. 2009 Mar;5(1):45-50
references: 19115246
references: Surg Innov. 2011 Jun;18(2):99-105
references: 21712233
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 May;(254):242-6
references: 2182255
references: Z Orthop Unfall. 2009 May-Jun;147(3):306-13
references: 19551581
references: Rofo. 2011 Jun;183(6):536-42
references: 21506071
references: Injury. 2005 Nov;36(11):1361-4
references: 16214479
references: Injury. 2009 Apr;40(4):422-7
references: 19309606
references: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Jan;24(1):53-8
references: 19012997
references: Injury. 2005 Nov;36(11):1355-60
references: 16214478