title: Decreasing perceived optic flow rigidity increases postural sway.
abstract: Optic flow simulating self-motion through the environment can induce postural adjustments in observers. Some studies investigating this phenomenon have used optic flow patterns increasing in speed from center to periphery, whereas others used optic flow patterns with a constant speed. However, altering the speed gradient of an optic flow stimulus changes the perceived rigidity of such a stimulus. Optic flow stimuli that are perceived as rigid can be expected to provide a stronger sensation of self-motion than non-rigid optic flow, and this may well be reflected in the amount of postural sway. The current study, therefore, examined, by manipulating the speed gradient, to what extent the rigidity of an optic flow stimulus influences posture along the anterior-posterior axis. We used radial random dot expanding or contracting optic flow patterns with three different speed profiles (single-speed, linear speed gradient or quadratic speed gradient) that differentially induce the sensation of self-motion. Interestingly, most postural sway was observed for the non-rigid single-speed optic flow pattern, which contained the least self-motion information of the three profiles. Moreover, we found an anisotropy in that contracting optic flow produced more postural sway than expanding optic flow. In addition, the amount of postural sway increased with increasing stimulus speed, but for contracting optic flow only. Taken together, the results of the current study support the view that visual and sensorimotor systems appear to be tailored toward compensating for rigid optic flow stimulation.
authors: Division of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. v.holten@uu.nl
authors: Vivian
authors: V
authors: Holten
authors: Stella F
authors: SF
authors: Donker
authors: Frans A J
authors: FA
authors: Verstraten
authors: Maarten J
authors: MJ
authors: van der Smagt
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D004576:Electromyography; D019054:Evoked Potentials, Motor / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D057849:Optic Flow; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D004856:Postural Balance / Q000502:physiology*; D011187:Posture / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult
references: Exp Brain Res. 1995;105(1):101-10
references: 7589307
references: J Nerv Ment Dis. 1961 Jan;132:26-32
references: 13713070
references: Perception. 1990;19(1):21-7
references: 2336331
references: Percept Psychophys. 1986 May;39(5):355-60
references: 3737368
references: Perception. 2008;37(5):704-11
references: 18605144
references: Biomed Eng. 1970 Jul;5(7):333-7
references: 5432313
references: J Vis. 2010 Dec 03;10(14):4
references: 21131564
references: Perception. 2007;36(1):113-24
references: 17357709
references: Exp Brain Res. 1977 Jun 27;28(3-4):363-84
references: 885185
references: Exp Brain Res. 1986;63(3):655-8
references: 3489640
references: Percept Psychophys. 1989 May;45(5):453-8
references: 2726408
references: Perception. 1973;2(3):287-94
references: 4546578
references: J Vis. 2012 Nov 26;12(12):15
references: 23184234
references: Science. 1962 Jun 15;136(3520):982-3
references: 14498362
references: Perception. 1993;22(9):1013-23
references: 8041584
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1980 Jul 8;290(1038):169-79
references: 6106236
references: Perception. 2009;38(3):442-53
references: 19485137
references: Dev Sci. 2009 Nov;12(6):946-55
references: 19840050
references: Exp Brain Res. 1990;79(1):167-74
references: 2311693
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982 Apr;8(2):238-52
references: 6461720
references: Perception. 2010;39(3):320-9
references: 20465169
references: Perception. 2010;39(10):1303-10
references: 21180352
references: Vision Res. 1986;26(1):161-79
references: 3716209
references: Exp Brain Res. 1995;103(1):137-50
references: 7615029