title: Homology of the fifth epibranchial and accessory elements of the ceratobranchials among gnathostomes: insights from the development of ostariophysans.
abstract: Epibranchials are among the main dorsal elements of the gill basket in jawed vertebrates (Gnathostomata). Among extant fishes, chondrichthyans most resemble the putative ancestral condition as all branchial arches possess every serially homologous piece. In osteichthyans, a primitive rod-like epibranchial 5, articulated to ceratobranchial 5, is absent. Instead, epibranchial 5 of many actinopterygians is here identified as an accessory element attached to ceratobranchial 4. Differences in shape and attachment of epibranchial 5 in chondrichthyans and actinopterygians raised suspicions about their homology, prompting us to conduct a detailed study of the morphology and development of the branchial basket of three ostariophysans (Prochilodus argenteus, Characiformes; Lophiosilurus alexandri and Pseudoplatystoma corruscans, Siluriformes). Results were interpreted within a phylogenetic context of major gnathostome lineages. Developmental series strongly suggest that the so-called epibranchial 5 of actinopterygians does not belong to the epal series because it shares the same chondroblastic layer with ceratobranchial 4 and its ontogenetic emergence is considerably late. This neomorphic structure is called accessory element of ceratobranchial 4. Its distribution among gnathostomes indicates it is a teleost synapomorphy, occurring homoplastically in Polypteriformes, whereas the loss of the true epibranchial 5 is an osteichthyan synapomorphy. The origin of the accessory element of ceratobranchial 4 appears to have occurred twice in osteichthyans, but it may have a single origin; in this case, the accessory element of ceratobranchial 4 would represent a remnant of a series of elements distally attached to ceratobranchials 1-4, a condition totally or partially retained in basal actinopterygians. Situations wherein a structure is lost while a similar neomorphic element is present may lead to erroneous homology assessments; these can be avoided by detailed morphological and ontogenetic investigations interpreted in the light of well-supported phylogenetic hypotheses.
authors: Laboratório de Ictiologia de Ribeirão Preto (LIRP), Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, PPG Biologia Comparada, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. mcarvalho79@gmail.com
authors: Murilo
authors: M
authors: Carvalho
authors: Flávio Alicino
authors: FA
authors: Bockmann
authors: Marcelo Rodrigues
authors: MR
authors: de Carvalho
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D001934:Branchial Region / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D005399:Fishes / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D010802:Phylogeny; D014714:Vertebrates / Q000254:growth & development*
references: J Morphol. 2007 Nov;268(11):1021-39
references: 17823913
references: J Morphol. 2008 May;269(5):522-32
references: 18157867
references: J Morphol. 2011 May;272(5):598-613
references: 21374703
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1993 Mar;2(1):31-51
references: 8081546
references: Science. 2002 Oct 11;298(5592):381-5
references: 12193642
references: J Morphol. 2011 Apr;272(4):503-12
references: 21290421
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 7;279(1730):934-43
references: 21849321
references: J Morphol. 2012 May;273(5):461-79
references: 22113621
references: Nature. 2006 Apr 6;440(7085):757-63
references: 16598249
references: J Morphol. 1975 Sep;147(1):61-88
references: 1159792
references: J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1985 Aug;88:71-83
references: 4078541
references: J Appl Ichthyol. 2012 Jun 1;28(3):341-345
references: 26566297
references: J Morphol. 2009 Apr;270(4):389-412
references: 19107939
references: Nature. 2006 May 4;441(7089):77-80
references: 16672968
references: Nature. 2009 Mar 26;458(7237):469-74
references: 19325627
references: Biochem Syst Ecol. 2000 Apr 1;28(4):319-350
references: 10725591
references: Nature. 2006 Nov 9;444(7116):199-202
references: 17051154
references: J Anat. 1922 Apr;56(Pt 3-4):189-294.43
references: 17103950
references: Science. 2003 Feb 21;299(5610):1235-6
references: 12595693
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 25;108(4):1507-12
references: 21220324
references: Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb. 1984;130(2):315-51
references: 6724286
references: J Morphol. 1996 Mar;227(3):249-287
references: 29852576
references: Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb. 1971;116(4):491-502
references: 5145665
references: Nature. 2012 Jun 13;486(7402):247-50
references: 22699617
references: Bioessays. 2000 Feb;22(2):138-47
references: 10655033
references: J Morphol. 2009 May;270(5):628-43
references: 19117064
references: Ann Anat. 2001 Jan;183(1):37-52
references: 11206982
references: J Morphol. 1996 Aug;229(2):121-160
references: 29852585
references: J Morphol. 1949 Mar;84(2):227-79
references: 18116895
references: Nature. 2003 Sep 4;425(6953):65-9
references: 12955140
references: Nature. 2008 Jun 26;453(7199):1199-204
references: 18580942
references: J Morphol. 2005 Dec;266(3):331-55
references: 16235249
references: Nature. 2009 Jan 15;457(7227):305-8
references: 19148098
references: Zoolog Sci. 2008 Oct;25(10):1045-56
references: 19267641
references: J Morphol. 2009 Mar;270(3):291-305
references: 19034917
references: J Morphol. 2008 May;269(5):604-19
references: 18196573
references: J Fish Biol. 2012 Jul;81(1):54-80
references: 22747804
references: Theory Biosci. 2005 Nov;124(2):145-63
references: 17046353