title: Enamel surface remineralization: Using synthetic nanohydroxyapatite.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of synthetically processed hydroxyapatite particles in remineralization of the early enamel lesions in comparison with 2% sodium fluoride.
  
  
  METHODS
  Thirty sound human premolars were divided into nanohydroxyapatite group (n = 15) and the sodium fluoride group (n = 15). The specimens were subjected to demineralization before being coated with 10% aqueous slurry of 20 nm nanohydroxyapatite or 2% sodium fluoride. The remineralizing efficacy of the materials was evaluated using surface microhardness (SMH) measurements, scanning microscopic analysis and analysis of the Ca/P ratio of the surface enamel. Data analysis was carried out using paired t-test and independent t-test.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The results showed that the nanohydroxyapatite group produced a surface morphology close to the biologic enamel, the increase in mineral content (Ca/P ratio) was more significant in the nanohydroxyapatite group (P < 0.05) and the SMH recovery was closer to the baseline level in the nanohydroxyapatite group (P < 0.05). Both the groups did not show any significant difference in thickness (P > 0.05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The use of biomimetic nanohydroxyapatite as a remineralizing agent holds promise as a new synthetic enamel biocompatible material to repair early carious lesions.
authors: Department of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal University, Mangalore, India.
authors: J Shanti
authors: JS
authors: Swarup
authors: Arathi
authors: A
authors: Rao
keywords: Biomimetic; enamel; microhardness; mineral content; nanohydroxyapatite; remineralization; sodium fluoride
references: Biomaterials. 2003 Jun;24(13):2133-51
references: 12699650
references: J Dent Res. 1985 Mar;64(3):416-21
references: 3855891
references: Biomed Mater. 2009 Jun;4(3):034104
references: 19498220
references: J Clin Dent. 2006;17(4):94-9
references: 17131711
references: Aust Dent J. 2008 Sep;53(3):268-73
references: 18782374
references: Quintessence Int. 2007 Apr;38(4):313-9
references: 17432787
references: J Oral Sci. 2007 Jun;49(2):147-54
references: 17634728