title: A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions.
abstract: Bayesian estimation has played a pivotal role in the understanding of individual differences. However, for many models in psychology, Bayesian estimation of model parameters can be difficult. One reason for this difficulty is that conventional sampling algorithms, such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), can be inefficient and impractical when little is known about the target distribution--particularly the target distribution's covariance structure. In this article, we highlight some reasons for this inefficiency and advocate the use of a population MCMC algorithm, called differential evolution Markov chain Monte Carlo (DE-MCMC), as a means of efficient proposal generation. We demonstrate in a simulation study that the performance of the DE-MCMC algorithm is unaffected by the correlation of the target distribution, whereas conventional MCMC performs substantially worse as the correlation increases. We then show that the DE-MCMC algorithm can be used to efficiently fit a hierarchical version of the linear ballistic accumulator model to response time data, which has proven to be a difficult task when conventional MCMC is used.
authors: Department of Psychology.
authors: Brandon M
authors: BM
authors: Turner
authors: Per B
authors: PB
authors: Sederberg
authors: Scott D
authors: SD
authors: Brown
authors: Mark
authors: M
authors: Steyvers
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D006801:Humans; D016014:Linear Models; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D011594:Psychometrics; D012494:Sampling Studies
references: Psychol Methods. 2009 Mar;14(1):54-75
references: 19271848
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Apr;12(2):195-223
references: 16082801
references: Psychol Aging. 2010 Jun;25(2):377-90
references: 20545422
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Jul 1;57(1):89-100
references: 21549204
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Aug;12(4):573-604
references: 16447374
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1209-17
references: 19001592
references: Psychol Rev. 2005 Jan;112(1):117-28
references: 15631590
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Mar;133(3):269-82
references: 19962683
references: Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1111-20
references: 19897818
references: Psychol Rev. 2013 Jul;120(3):667-678
references: 23586446
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 11;105(45):17538-42
references: 18981414
references: Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):313-35
references: 22962886
references: Psychol Methods. 2009 Jun;14(2):126-49
references: 19485625
references: Psychol Methods. 2007 Dec;12(4):434-450
references: 18179354
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 7;107(36):15916-20
references: 20733082
references: Psychol Methods. 2007 Mar;12(1):58-79
references: 17402812
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 23;31(47):17242-9
references: 22114290
references: Psychol Methods. 2010 Sep;15(3):281-99
references: 20822253
references: Cogn Psychol. 2008 Nov;57(3):153-78
references: 18243170
references: Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1095-110
references: 19897817
references: Psychol Methods. 2009 Dec;14(4):301-22
references: 19968395
references: Psychol Aging. 2007 Mar;22(1):56-66
references: 17385983
references: Psychol Methods. 2011 Mar;16(1):44-62
references: 21299302
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Dec;16(6):1026-36
references: 19966251
references: Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):550-92
references: 11488378