title: The congruency effect in the posterior medial frontal cortex is more consistent with time on task than with response conflict.
abstract: The posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC) is thought to play a pivotal role in enabling the control of attention during periods of distraction. In line with this view, pMFC activity is ubiquitously greater in incongruent trials of response-interference (e.g., Stroop) tasks than in congruent trials. Nonetheless, the process underlying this congruency effect remains highly controversial. We therefore sought to distinguish between two competing accounts of the congruency effect. The conflict monitoring account posits the effect indexes a process that detects conflict between competing response alternatives, which is indexed by trial-specific reaction time (RT). The time on task account posits the effect indexes a process whose recruitment increases with time on task independent of response conflict (e.g., sustained attention, arousal, effort, etc.). To distinguish between these accounts, we used functional MRI to record brain activity in twenty-four healthy adults while they performed two tasks: a response-interference task and a simple RT task with only one possible response. We reasoned that demands on a process that detects response conflict should increase with RT in the response-interference task but not in the simple RT task. In contrast, demands on a process whose recruitment increases with time on task independent of response conflict should increase with RT in both tasks. Trial-by-trial analyses revealed that pMFC activity increased with RT in both tasks. Moreover, pMFC activity increased with RT in the simple RT task enough to fully account for the congruency effect in the response-interference task. These findings appear more consistent with the time on task account of the congruency effect than with the conflict monitoring account.
authors: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America. danweiss@umich.edu
authors: Daniel H
authors: DH
authors: Weissman
authors: Joshua
authors: J
authors: Carp
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001519:Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005625:Frontal Lobe / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Jun 15;56(4):2276-82
references: 21440073
references: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Mar;7(1):1-17
references: 17598730
references: Magn Reson Med. 1995 Aug;34(2):201-12
references: 7476079
references: Nature. 2012 Aug 9;488(7410):218-21
references: 22722841
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54(1):541-9
references: 20728549
references: Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Dec 24;4:231
references: 21212836
references: Nature. 1999 Nov 11;402(6758):179-81
references: 10647008
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Sep;20(9):1637-55
references: 18345992
references: Cognition. 2009 May;111(2):275-9
references: 19285310
references: Mol Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;8(1):60-70
references: 12556909
references: Neuroimage. 2001 Jan;13(1):218-29
references: 11133324
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Feb 15;97(4):1944-8
references: 10677559
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1969;30:412-31
references: 5811531
references: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2002 Dec;2(4):300-17
references: 12641175
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Jul 15;57(2):303-11
references: 21168515
references: Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):853-60
references: 21835249
references: Front Psychol. 2011 Feb 28;2:30
references: 21713190
references: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003 Mar;3(1):17-26
references: 12822595
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Jul 15;57(2):316-9
references: 21530662
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Aug;24(8):1753-65
references: 22571460
references: Cereb Cortex. 2001 Sep;11(9):825-36
references: 11532888
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 19;103(51):19530-4
references: 17151200
references: PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4257
references: 19165335
references: Int J Psychophysiol. 2005 Apr;56(1):65-80
references: 15725491
references: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;7(4):380-90
references: 18189011
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 Sep-Oct;8(5):443-59
references: 11522765
references: Psychophysiology. 2000 Mar;37(2):216-23
references: 10731771
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Aug;20(4):615-30
references: 23325703
references: Cereb Cortex. 2009 Mar;19(3):703-11
references: 18653665
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 30;31(48):17488-95
references: 22131410
references: Psychophysiology. 2009 Mar;46(2):336-43
references: 19207203
references: Psychol Res. 2004 Feb;68(1):1-17
references: 14752663
references: Neurosci Lett. 2008 Apr 18;435(2):158-62
references: 18329807
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Jun;2(6):417-24
references: 11389475
references: Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):931-959
references: 15482068
references: J Neurosci. 2008 May 21;28(21):5519-28
references: 18495886
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54(1):528-40
references: 20728547
references: J Neurosci. 2012 Nov 21;32(47):16795-806
references: 23175833
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Nov;12(6):988-1000
references: 11177419
references: Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):624-52
references: 11488380
references: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;7(4):356-66
references: 18189009