title: Assessment of Random Recruitment Assumption in Respondent-Driven Sampling in Egocentric Network Data.
abstract: One of the key assumptions in respondent-driven sampling (RDS) analysis, called "random selection assumption," is that respondents randomly recruit their peers from their personal networks. The objective of this study was to verify this assumption in the empirical data of egocentric networks.
  
  
  
  We conducted an egocentric network study among young drug users in China, in which RDS was used to recruit this hard-to-reach population. If the random recruitment assumption holds, the RDS-estimated population proportions should be similar to the actual population proportions. Following this logic, we first calculated the population proportions of five visible variables (gender, age, education, marital status, and drug use mode) among the total drug-use alters from which the RDS sample was drawn, and then estimated the RDS-adjusted population proportions and their 95% confidence intervals in the RDS sample. Theoretically, if the random recruitment assumption holds, the 95% confidence intervals estimated in the RDS sample should include the population proportions calculated in the total drug-use alters.
  
  
  
  The evaluation of the RDS sample indicated its success in reaching the convergence of RDS compositions and including a broad cross-section of the hidden population. Findings demonstrate that the random selection assumption holds for three group traits, but not for two others. Specifically, egos randomly recruited subjects in different age groups, marital status, or drug use modes from their network alters, but not in gender and education levels.
  
  
  
  This study demonstrates the occurrence of non-random recruitment, indicating that the recruitment of subjects in this RDS study was not completely at random. Future studies are needed to assess the extent to which the population proportion estimates can be biased when the violation of the assumption occurs in some group traits in RDS samples.
authors: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
authors: Hongjie
authors: H
authors: Liu
authors: Jianhua
authors: J
authors: Li
authors: Toan
authors: T
authors: Ha
authors: Jian
authors: J
authors: Li
keywords: Egocentric Network; Random Selection Assumption; Respondent-Driven Sampling
references: J Urban Health. 2006 Nov;83(6 Suppl):i29-38
references: 16933101
references: Int J Drug Policy. 2008 Feb;19(1):42-51
references: 18226516
references: J Urban Health. 2006 Nov;83(6 Suppl):i16-28
references: 17031567
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 13;107(15):6743-7
references: 20351258
references: Sociol Methodol. 2010 Aug;40(1):285-327
references: 22969167
references: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005 May 9;78(2):147-57
references: 15845318
references: J Urban Health. 2006 Nov;83(6 Suppl):i98-112
references: 16937083
references: AIDS Rev. 2002 Oct-Dec;4(4):213-23
references: 12555695
references: AIDS. 2005 May;19 Suppl 2:S67-72
references: 15930843
references: AIDS Behav. 2005 Dec;9(4):403-8; discussion 409-13
references: 16344920
references: AIDS Behav. 2008 Jul;12(4 Suppl):S131-41
references: 18535901
references: Addiction. 2011 Oct;106(10):1780-7; discussion 1788-9
references: 21457169
references: Nurs Res. 1983 Jan-Feb;32(1):4-9
references: 6549842
references: Addict Behav. 2007 May;32(5):924-37
references: 16901654
references: Stat Med. 2009 Jul 30;28(17):2202-29
references: 19572381
references: AIDS Behav. 2011 Oct;15(7):1579-88
references: 21431412
references: Int J Drug Policy. 2008 Jun;19(3):238-40; discussion 246-7
references: 18434125
references: J Urban Health. 2006 Nov;83(6 Suppl):i54-9
references: 16977493
references: Soc Networks. 2010 May 1;32(2):112-124
references: 20383316
references: AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2009 Oct;23(10):885-93
references: 19803695