title: Frontal theta overrides pavlovian learning biases.
abstract: Pavlovian biases influence learning and decision making by intricately coupling reward seeking with action invigoration and punishment avoidance with action suppression. This bias is not always adaptive-it can often interfere with instrumental requirements. The prefrontal cortex is thought to help resolve such conflict between motivational systems, but the nature of this control process remains unknown. EEG recordings of midfrontal theta band power are sensitive to conflict and predictive of adaptive control over behavior, but it is not clear whether this signal reflects control over conflict between motivational systems. Here we used a task that orthogonalized action requirements and outcome valence while recording concurrent EEG in human participants. By applying a computational model of task performance, we derived parameters reflective of the latent influence of Pavlovian bias and how it was modulated by midfrontal theta power during motivational conflict. Between subjects, those who performed better under Pavlovian conflict exhibited higher midfrontal theta power. Within subjects, trial-to-trial variance in theta power was predictive of ability to overcome the influence of the Pavlovian bias, and this effect was most pronounced in subjects with higher midfrontal theta to conflict. These findings demonstrate that midfrontal theta is not only a sensitive index of prefrontal control, but it can also reflect the application of top-down control over instrumental processes.
authors: Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02915, USA. jim.f.cav@gmail.com
authors: James F
authors: JF
authors: Cavanagh
authors: Ian
authors: I
authors: Eisenberg
authors: Marc
authors: M
authors: Guitart-Masip
authors: Quentin
authors: Q
authors: Huys
authors: Michael J
authors: MJ
authors: Frank
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D015982:Bias; D001931:Brain Mapping; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003214:Conditioning, Classical / Q000502:physiology*; D003657:Decision Making / Q000502:physiology; D004569:Electroencephalography; D005260:Female; D005625:Frontal Lobe / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008959:Models, Neurological; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D013826:Theta Rhythm / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references: Front Hum Neurosci. 2009 Nov 24;3:54
references: 19956401
references: J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 13;32(24):8383-90
references: 22699918
references: Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;117(2):348-68
references: 16356767
references: J Neurosci. 2006 Aug 9;26(32):8360-7
references: 16899731
references: J Neurosci. 2008 Jan 9;28(2):360-8
references: 18184778
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jan;17(1):51-72
references: 15701239
references: J Neurosci. 2011 May 25;31(21):7867-75
references: 21613500
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Dec;19(12):1994-2004
references: 17892382
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 May 15;14(4):593-602
references: 12126500
references: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002 May;26(3):321-52
references: 12034134
references: J Neurosci. 2007 Jan 10;27(2):371-8
references: 17215398
references: Neural Netw. 2006 Oct;19(8):1120-36
references: 16945502
references: J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
references: 15102499
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Apr;7(4):e1002028
references: 21556131
references: Nat Neurosci. 2011 Sep 25;14(11):1462-7
references: 21946325
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011;34:441-66
references: 21469956
references: Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 1;62(1):154-66
references: 22548809
references: Psychophysiology. 2012 Feb;49(2):220-38
references: 22091878
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8;109(19):7511-6
references: 22529363
references: Nat Neurosci. 2012 Jun;15(6):816-8
references: 22544310
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Dec;23(12):4106-21
references: 21812570
references: Cereb Cortex. 2012 Nov;22(11):2575-86
references: 22120491
references: J Neurosci. 2012 Feb 15;32(7):2453-60
references: 22396419
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Feb;20(2):215-25
references: 18275330
references: Psychophysiology. 2013 Jun;50(6):550-62
references: 23521513
references: J Neurosci. 2009 Jan 7;29(1):98-105
references: 19129388
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1979 Apr;5(2):178-93
references: 528885
references: Cell Rep. 2012 Dec 27;2(6):1747-61
references: 23246005
references: Neuroreport. 2011 Mar 30;22(5):249-52
references: 21386699
references: Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):931-959
references: 15482068
references: Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 15;49(4):3198-209
references: 19969093
references: Science. 2004 Dec 10;306(5703):1940-3
references: 15528409
references: Neural Comput. 2012 May;24(5):1186-229
references: 22295983
references: Neuron. 2002 Oct 10;36(2):285-98
references: 12383782