title: Relationship of segment area and monitor unit efficiency in aperture-based IMRT optimization.
abstract: In step-and-shoot IMRT plans, aperture-based optimization (or one-step optimization) has been considered as a means of improving monitor unit (MU) efficiency compared to fluence-based optimization (or two-step optimization). However, the extent of improvement on MU efficiency varies, depending on the implementation and design of one-step optimization. In this paper, we attempted to investigate MU efficiency issue in two methods of one-step optimization implemented in two commercial treatment planning systems (TPSs). Five patients with nasopharyngeal cancer and five patients with advanced prostate cancer were selected for this study. For these patients, clinically used IMRT plans were generated using the Direct Machine Parameter Optimization (DMPO) in the Pinnacle TPS. New IMRT plans were created using the Direct Aperture Optimization (DAO) method in the Panther TPS. For the purpose of this study, we used the similar planning dose objectives and beam configurations with a similar total number of segments in each pair of DMPO and DAO plans. With similar plan quality, DMPO plans required more MUs than DAO plans. The average number of MUs (expressed in mean ± 1 SD) for the DMPO and DAO plans was 1,169 ± 186 and 671 ± 135 for the nasopharynx cases, and 711 ± 48 and 400 ± 65 for the prostate cases, respectively. The average segment areas (expressed in mean ± 1 SD) for the DMPO plans were smaller than those for the DAO plans: 46.0 ± 7.6 cm2 vs. 100.9 ± 32.3 cm2 for the nasopharynx cases, and 58.3 ± 17.2 cm2 vs. 97.4 ± 35.0 cm2 for the prostate cases, respectively. In conclusion, two one-step optimization algorithms, DMPO and DAO, resulted in much different MU efficiency with the similar number of segments and optimization parameters. This MU difference is largely attributed to the fact that large area segments are used more often in DAO plans than in DMPO plans.
authors: Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
authors: Peng
authors: P
authors: Qi
authors: Ping
authors: P
authors: Xia
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009303:Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D011879:Radiotherapy Dosage; D011880:Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; D020266:Radiotherapy, Conformal; D050397:Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
references: Radiother Oncol. 2006 May;79(2):162-9
references: 16712992
references: Med Phys. 2007 May;34(5):1631-46
references: 17555245
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Apr 1;58(5):1616-34
references: 15050343
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3):935-42
references: 20044214
references: Phys Med Biol. 2007 Jan 21;52(2):479-98
references: 17202628
references: Med Phys. 2008 Jan;35(1):310-7
references: 18293586
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jul 1;59(3):886-96
references: 15183492
references: Radiat Oncol. 2011 Feb 21;6:20
references: 21338501
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Feb 1;64(2):333-42
references: 16414369
references: Phys Med Biol. 2003 Oct 21;48(20):3353-74
references: 14620063
references: Med Phys. 2002 Jun;29(6):952-9
references: 12094990
references: Med Phys. 2006 Oct;33(10):3666-79
references: 17089832
references: Med Phys. 2002 Jun;29(6):1007-18
references: 12094970
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 15;67(4):1248-58
references: 17275205
references: J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 1;27(22):3684-90
references: 19564532
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jul 15;62(4):1195-203
references: 15990025
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Nov 1;51(3):849-59
references: 11699497
references: Med Dosim. 2008 Spring;33(1):86-92
references: 18262129
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Apr 1;67(5):1596-605
references: 17394954
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 May 1;47(2):291-8
references: 10802351
references: Med Phys. 1993 Sep-Oct;20(5):1327-36
references: 8289713
references: Phys Med Biol. 2008 Feb 7;53(3):807-21
references: 18199916
references: Radiat Oncol. 2009 Feb 16;4:8
references: 19220906
references: Radiat Oncol. 2010 Nov 30;5:115
references: 21114865
references: J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009 Apr 28;10(2):43-61
references: 19458598
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 May 1;56(1):83-8
references: 12694826
references: Phys Med Biol. 2003 Sep 21;48(18):2987-98
references: 14529206
references: Med Phys. 1985 Mar-Apr;12(2):188-96
references: 4000075
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Sep 1;72(1):69-77
references: 18342454
references: Phys Med Biol. 2005 Dec 7;50(23):5653-63
references: 16306659
references: Med Phys. 2006 Apr;33(4):944-58
references: 16696471