title: Tobacco Industry Influence on the American Law Institute's Restatements of Torts and Implications for Its Conflict of Interest Policies.
abstract: The American Law Institute ("ALI") is a prestigious and influential organization that creates treatises on the current state of the law, including "Restatements" of case law that guide judicial decisions and legislation. This paper uses previously secret tobacco industry documents made available as the result of state and federal litigation against the industry to describe how the tobacco companies, acting both indirectly through their trade organization, the Tobacco Institute, and directly, using influential lawyers, quietly influenced the ALI's writing of the Restatements. The tobacco industry's ease of access to the ALI calls into question the Institute's independence, the preparation of major policy documents such as the Restatements, as well as the Institute's ability to monitor and control conflicts of interest. The ALI's conflict of interest policies lag behind comparable organizations such as the National Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Medicine, and are insufficient to protect Institute projects from significant outside influence. Because of the undisclosed influence of the tobacco industry over the ALI, courts and legislatures should not apply the principles embodied in the Restatements in tort cases against the tobacco companies for injuries suffered from tobacco use. Until the ALI implements strong conflict of interest policies to ensure independence from private-interest manipulation, courts and legislatures should not rely on Institute reports and recommendations as neutral scholarly summaries of the law that should guide judicial and legislative decision-making.
authors: Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California, San Francisco.
authors: Elizabeth
authors: E
authors: Laposata
authors: Richard
authors: R
authors: Barnes
authors: Stanton
authors: S
authors: Glantz
references: Food Drug Law J. 1998;53(2):225-42
references: 10346683
references: J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2003 Winter;20(1):181-215
references: 15067930
references: Soc Sci Med. 2008 Feb;66(4):970-81
references: 18164524
references: Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S20-7
references: 16030333
references: Ochsner J. 1999 Jul;1(3):109-25
references: 21845128
references: Eur J Public Health. 2006 Feb;16(1):69-77
references: 16076855
references: Tob Control. 2000 Sep;9(3):334-8
references: 10982579
references: Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Jun;5(3):303-14
references: 12791525
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Aug;24(4):994-1004
references: 16136637
references: Tob Control. 2005 Oct;14(5):328-37
references: 16183984
references: Cornell Law Rev. 1997 Mar;82(3):644-93
references: 10343053
references: Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1749-57
references: 11684593
references: N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 15;350(3):293-301
references: 14715919
references: J Am Geriatr Soc. 1953 Apr;1(4):250-8
references: 13052410
references: N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 26;335(13):988-94
references: 8782508
references: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Sep 10;59(35):1135-40
references: 20829747
references: Milbank Q. 2009 Mar;87(1):259-94
references: 19298423
references: Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):585-92
references: 12660202
references: Science. 2007 Aug 17;317(5840):898
references: 17702925
references: Am J Prev Med. 2004 Feb;26(2):167-77
references: 14751332
references: Prev Med. 2004 Sep;39(3):568-80
references: 15313097
references: Am J Public Health. 2001 Sep;91(9):1419-23
references: 11527774
references: JAMA. 1985 May 24-31;253(20):2986-94
references: 3889389