title: Functional morphology underlies performance differences among invasive and non-invasive ruderal Rubus species.
abstract: The ability of some introduced plant species to outperform native species under altered resource conditions makes them highly productive in ecosystems with surplus resources. However, ruderal native species are also productive when resources are available. The differences in abundance among invasive and non-invasive ruderal plants may be related to differences in ability to maintain access to or store resources for continual use. For a group of ruderal species in the Pacific Northwest of North America (invasive Rubus armeniacus; non-invasive R. ursinus, R. parviflorus, R. spectabilis, and Rosa nutkana), we sought to determine whether differences in functional morphological traits, especially metrics of water access and storage, were consistent with differences in water conductance and growth rate. We also investigated the changes in these traits in response to abundant vs. limited water availability. Rubus armeniacus had among the largest root systems and cane cross-sectional areas, the lowest cane tissue densities, and the most plastic ratios of leaf area to plant mass and of xylem area to leaf area, often sharing its rank with R. ursinus or Rosa nutkana. These three species had the highest water conductance and relative growth rates, though Rubus armeniacus grew the most rapidly when water was not limited. Our results suggest that water access and storage abilities vary with morphology among the ruderal species investigated, and that these abilities, in combination, are greatest in the invasive. In turn, functional morphological traits allow R. armeniacus to maintain rapid gas exchange rates during the dry summers in its invaded range, conferring on it high productivity.
authors: Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, jcaplan@aesop.rutgers.edu.
authors: Joshua S
authors: JS
authors: Caplan
authors: J Alan
authors: JA
authors: Yeakley
mesh_terms: D058865:Introduced Species; D015205:Northwestern United States; D010641:Phenotype; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism; D018517:Plant Roots / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism; D018547:Plant Stems / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism; D027824:Rosaceae / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000378:metabolism; D012621:Seasons; D013045:Species Specificity; D014867:Water / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D014867:Water
references: Tree Physiol. 2009 Nov;29(11):1407-18
references: 19797243
references: Oecologia. 2002 Oct;133(2):102-111
references: 28547296
references: Am J Bot. 2002 Sep;89(9):1431-8
references: 21665744
references: Am Nat. 2011 Feb;177(2):153-66
references: 21460552
references: Environ Pollut. 2011 Aug-Sep;159(8-9):1974-83
references: 21435761
references: Ann Bot. 2003 Jan;91(1):39-48
references: 12495918
references: Nature. 2011 Jun 08;474(7350):153-4
references: 21654782
references: Nature. 2007 Apr 26;446(7139):1079-81
references: 17460672
references: Am J Bot. 2007 Apr;94(4):526-32
references: 21636422
references: J Environ Qual. 2003 Jan-Feb;32(1):310-6
references: 12549571
references: Ecology. 2010 Sep;91(9):2705-15
references: 20957964
references: Ann Bot. 2012 Jul;110(1):141-53
references: 22589328
references: Science. 2008 Feb 8;319(5864):756-60
references: 18258902
references: Science. 1979 Jun 29;204(4400):1380-6
references: 17814182