title: Cooperation and the fate of microbial societies.
abstract: Microorganisms have been cooperating with each other for billions of years: by sharing resources, communicating with each other, and joining together to form biofilms and other large structures. These cooperative behaviors benefit the colony as a whole; however, they may be costly to the individuals performing them. This raises the question of how such cooperation can arise from natural selection. Mathematical modeling is one important avenue for exploring this question. Evolutionary experiments are another, providing us with an opportunity to see evolutionary dynamics in action and allowing us to test predictions arising from mathematical models. A new study in this issue of PLOS Biology investigates the evolution of a cooperative resource-sharing behavior in yeast. Examining the competition between cooperating and "cheating" strains of yeast, the authors find that, depending on the initial mix of strains, this yeast society either evolves toward a stable coexistence or collapses for lack of cooperation. Using a simple mathematical model, they show how these dynamics arise from eco-evolutionary feedback, where changes in the frequencies of strains are coupled with changes in population size. This study and others illustrate the combined power of modeling and experiment to elucidate the origins of cooperation and other fundamental questions in evolutionary biology.
authors: Department of Mathematics, Emmanuel College, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. allenb@emmanuel.edu
authors: Benjamin
authors: B
authors: Allen
authors: Martin A
authors: MA
authors: Nowak
mesh_terms: D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D056265:Microbial Interactions / Q000235:genetics*; D012441:Saccharomyces cerevisiae / Q000235:genetics*
references: Nature. 2006 May 25;441(7092):502-5
references: 16724065
references: Nature. 2006 Jul 6;442(7098):75-8
references: 16823452
references: Nature. 2003 Sep 4;425(6953):72-4
references: 12955142
references: PLoS Biol. 2013;11(4):e1001547
references: 23637571
references: Nature. 2004 Aug 26;430(7003):1024-7
references: 15329720
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 30;108(35):14397-404
references: 21788506
references: Science. 2009 Jan 9;323(5911):272-5
references: 19131632
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11621-6
references: 11572999
references: Nat Genet. 2005 Jan;37(1):77-83
references: 15592468
references: Nature. 2004 Apr 8;428(6983):643-6
references: 15074318
references: Nature. 2000 Apr 6;404(6778):598-601
references: 10766241
references: Nature. 2009 May 14;459(7244):253-6
references: 19349960
references: Nature. 2002 Jul 11;418(6894):171-4
references: 12110887
references: Nature. 2009 Oct 29;461(7268):1243-7
references: 19838166
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 12;364(1523):1629-40
references: 19414476
references: J Theor Biol. 2012 Apr 21;299:9-20
references: 21723299
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 12;364(1523):1483-9
references: 19414463
references: Science. 2006 Apr 7;312(5770):111-4
references: 16601193
references: Nat Rev Genet. 2003 Jun;4(6):457-69
references: 12776215
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 12;106(19):7910-4
references: 19416839
references: J Theor Biol. 1998 Aug 21;193(4):631-648
references: 9750181
references: J Math Biol. 2014 Jan;68(1-2):109-43
references: 23179131
references: Science. 2011 Jan 28;331(6016):426-9
references: 21273479
references: Nature. 2010 Aug 26;466(7310):1057-62
references: 20740005
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2565-70
references: 16959650
references: Science. 2004 Feb 6;303(5659):793-9
references: 14764867
references: Science. 2006 Dec 8;314(5805):1560-3
references: 17158317
references: Science. 2012 Jun 1;336(6085):1175-7
references: 22654061
references: Nature. 2007 May 24;447(7143):469-72
references: 17522682
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jan 12;365(1537):19-30
references: 20008382
references: Theor Popul Biol. 2008 Mar;73(2):257-63
references: 18221761
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19926-30
references: 18056799