title: Scaling of compensatory eye movements during translations: virtual versus real depth.
abstract: Vestibulo-ocular reflexes are the fastest compensatory reflex systems. One of these is the translational vestibulo-ocular reflex (TVOR) which stabilizes the gaze at a given fixation point during whole body translations. For a proper response of the TVOR the eyes have to counter rotate in the head with a velocity that is inversely scaled to viewing distance of the target. It is generally assumed that scaling of the TVOR is automatically coupled to vergence angle at the brainstem level. However, different lines of evidence also argue that in humans scaling of the TVOR also depends on a mechanism that pre-sets gain on a priori knowledge of target distance. To discriminate between these two possibilities we used a real target paradigm with vergence angle coupled to distance and a virtual target paradigm with vergence angle dissociated from target distance. We compared TVOR responses in six subjects who underwent lateral sinusoidal whole-body translations at 1 and 2 Hz. Real targets varied between distance of 50 and 22.4 cm in front of the subjects, whereas the virtual targets consisting of a green and red light emitting diode (LED) were physically located at 50 cm from the subject. Red and green LED's were dichoptically viewed. By shifting the red LED relative to the green LED we created a range of virtual viewing distances where vergence angle changed but the ideal kinematic eye velocity was always the same. Eye velocity data recorded with virtual targets were compared to eye velocity data recorded with real targets. We also used flashing targets (flash frequency 1 Hz, duration 5 ms). During the real, continuous visible targets condition scaling of compensatory eye velocity with vergence angle was nearly perfect. During viewing of virtual targets, and with flashed targets compensatory eye velocity only weakly correlated to vergence angle, indicating that vergence angle is only partially coupled to compensatory eye velocity during translation. Our data suggest that in humans vergence angle as a measure of target distance estimation has only limited use for automatic TVOR scaling.
authors: Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Dits
authors: W M
authors: WM
authors: King
authors: J
authors: J
authors: van der Steen
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003867:Depth Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D010865:Pilot Projects; D012027:Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references: J Neurosci. 2003 Feb 15;23(4):1104-8
references: 12598596
references: Nat Neurosci. 2007 May;10(5):640-6
references: 17396123
references: Nature. 2000 Oct 26;407(6807):1003-7
references: 11069179
references: Exp Brain Res. 1996 Nov;112(2):313-24
references: 8951399
references: Neurosci Lett. 2004 Aug 12;366(2):115-9
references: 15276229
references: Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1991;481:282-6
references: 1927396
references: Vision Res. 1985;25(4):583-8
references: 4060612
references: J Physiol. 1984 Feb;347:17-33
references: 6707954
references: Vision Res. 2004 Apr;44(9):933-42
references: 14992837
references: Exp Brain Res. 2005 Sep;165(3):294-304
references: 15889244
references: J Neurophysiol. 1998 Nov;80(5):2391-404
references: 9819251
references: J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jul;92(1):20-35
references: 15212435
references: J Neurophysiol. 2002 Nov;88(5):2880-5
references: 12424322
references: Vision Res. 1987;27(9):1639-57
references: 3445495
references: Exp Brain Res. 1989;77(3):585-93
references: 2806449
references: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1984 Dec;31(12):910-9
references: 6396218
references: J Vestib Res. 1994 Sep-Oct;4(5):391-400
references: 7994484
references: Eye (Lond). 1996;10 ( Pt 2):167-71
references: 8776444
references: J Neurophysiol. 1992 Apr;67(4):861-74
references: 1588387
references: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Dec;100(6):2981-96
references: 18842952
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Apr;1039:68-80
references: 15826962
references: J Neurophysiol. 2011 Jul;106(1):71-7
references: 21346201
references: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jul;94(1):199-205
references: 15730979
references: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Mar;93(3):1710-7
references: 15496490
references: J Neurophysiol. 2004 Sep;92(3):1501-11
references: 15331647
references: J Neurophysiol. 1995 May;73(5):2115-9
references: 7623103
references: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010 Sep;11(3):383-93
references: 20177730
references: J Vestib Res. 2005;15(4):173-83
references: 16286699
references: J Neurophysiol. 1998 Sep;80(3):1151-66
references: 9744929
references: Nature. 1998 Jun 18;393(6686):692-5
references: 9641680
references: J Neurophysiol. 1991 Sep;66(3):851-64
references: 1753290
references: J Neurophysiol. 1997 Oct;78(4):1775-90
references: 9325347
references: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Aug;90(2):887-902
references: 12672783
references: J Neurophysiol. 1984 May;51(5):1091-1108
references: 6726313
references: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Oct;94(4):2391-402
references: 15901755
references: J Neurosci. 2003 Sep 10;23(23):8340-50
references: 12967996