title: Genes versus environment: geography and phylogenetic relationships shape the chemical profiles of stingless bees on a global scale.
abstract: Chemical compounds are highly important in the ecology of animals. In social insects, compounds on the body surface represent a particularly interesting trait, because they comprise different compound classes that are involved in different functions, such as communication, recognition and protection, all of which can be differentially affected by evolutionary processes. Here, we investigate the widely unknown and possibly antagonistic influence of phylogenetic and environmental factors on the composition of the cuticular chemistry of tropical stingless bees. We chose stingless bees because some species are unique in expressing not only self-produced compounds, but also compounds that are taken up from the environment. By relating the cuticular chemistry of 40 bee species from all over the world to their molecular phylogeny and geographical occurrence, we found that distribution patterns of different groups of compounds were differentially affected by genetic relatedness and biogeography. The ability to acquire environmental compounds was, for example, highly correlated with the bees' phylogeny and predominated in evolutionarily derived species. Owing to the presence of environmentally derived compounds, those species further expressed a higher chemical and thus functional diversity. In Old World species, chemical similarity of both environmentally derived and self-produced compounds was particularly high among sympatric species, even when they were less related to each other than to allopatric species, revealing a strong environmental effect even on largely genetically determined compounds. Thus, our findings do not only reveal an unexpectedly strong influence of the environment on the cuticular chemistry of stingless bees, but also demonstrate that even within one morphological trait (an insect's cuticular profile), different components (compound classes) can be differentially affected by different drivers (relatedness and biogeography), depending on the functional context.
authors: Department of Ecology, Leuphana University, 21335 Lüneburg, Germany. leonhardt@leuphana.de
authors: Sara D
authors: SD
authors: Leonhardt
authors: Claus
authors: C
authors: Rasmussen
authors: Thomas
authors: T
authors: Schmitt
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001516:Bees / Q000737:chemistry / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D008401:Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; D005843:Geography; D006838:Hydrocarbons / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D010802:Phylogeny; D012116:Resins, Plant / Q000032:analysis / Q000737:chemistry*
chemical_list: D006838:Hydrocarbons; D012116:Resins, Plant
keywords: bees; chemical ecology; phylogeny; resin
references: Folia Primatol (Basel). 1989;53(1-4):190-202
references: 2606395
references: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2008 Apr;194(4):313-27
references: 18350303
references: J Chem Ecol. 2006 Dec;32(12):2629-46
references: 17131188
references: Ecol Lett. 2009 Nov;12(11):1137-46
references: 19708969
references: Evolution. 1983 Jul;37(4):657-674
references: 28568118
references: J Chem Ecol. 1994 Jul;20(7):1677-87
references: 24242660
references: J Chem Ecol. 2001 Sep;27(9):1805-19
references: 11545372
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Jun;10(6):248-52
references: 21237029
references: Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4
references: 12912839
references: J Insect Physiol. 1970 Aug;16(8):1637-48
references: 5433728
references: J Chem Ecol. 2009 Oct;35(10):1151-61
references: 19866237
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Aug 7;278(1716):2384-91
references: 21208967
references: Genet Mol Res. 2003 Jun 30;2(2):191-9
references: 14966684
references: Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Nov;8(11):845-56
references: 17943192
references: Bioinformatics. 2003 Jan 22;19(2):301-2
references: 12538260
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Dec 7;278(1724):3593-600
references: 21490010
references: J Chem Ecol. 2011 Jan;37(1):98-104
references: 21165680
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Apr;23(4):220-8
references: 18308422
references: Naturwissenschaften. 2000 Sep;87(9):412-6
references: 11091966
references: J Chem Ecol. 2009 Mar;35(3):368-74
references: 19263166
references: J Chem Ecol. 1990 Dec;16(12):3213-44
references: 24263425
references: Science. 1990 May 25;248(4958):1026-7
references: 17745410
references: J Evol Biol. 2011 Jun;24(6):1188-98
references: 21375648
references: J Chem Ecol. 1982 Sep;8(9):1227-39
references: 24413965
references: J Chem Ecol. 1989 Jul;15(7):2003-17
references: 24272291
references: J Insect Physiol. 2004 Aug;50(8):761-6
references: 15288209
references: J Chem Ecol. 2007 May;33(5):971-84
references: 17404819
references: J Insect Physiol. 2010 Jul;56(7):800-4
references: 20170657
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 7;276(1654):21-30
references: 18796398
references: J Chem Ecol. 2009 Oct;35(10):1172-80
references: 19813058
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23445
references: 21858119
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 3;92(1):19-22
references: 7816814
references: J Chem Ecol. 2010 Aug;36(8):855-63
references: 20509042
references: Evolution. 1991 Aug;45(5):1184-1197
references: 28564173