title: Intermediate coupling between aboveground and belowground biomass maximises the persistence of grasslands.
abstract: Aboveground and belowground biomass compartments of vegetation fulfil different functions and they are coupled by complex interactions. These compartments exchange water, carbon and nutrients and the belowground biomass compartment has the capacity to buffer vegetation dynamics when aboveground biomass is removed by disturbances such as herbivory or fire. However, despite their importance, root-shoot interactions are often ignored in more heuristic vegetation models. Here, we present a simple two-compartment grassland model that couples aboveground and belowground biomass. In this model, the growth of belowground biomass is influenced by aboveground biomass and the growth of aboveground biomass is influenced by belowground biomass. We used the model to explore how the dynamics of a grassland ecosystem are influenced by fire and grazing. We show that the grassland system is most persistent at intermediate levels of aboveground-belowground coupling. In this situation, the system can sustain more extreme fire or grazing regimes than in the case of strong coupling. In contrast, the productivity of the system is maximised at high levels of coupling. Our analysis suggests that the yield of a grassland ecosystem is maximised when coupling is strong, however, the intensity of disturbance that can be sustained increases dramatically when coupling is intermediate. Hence, the model predicts that intermediate coupling should be selected for as it maximises the chances of persistence in disturbance driven ecosystems.
authors: Biodiversität und Klima Forschungszentrum (LOEWE BiK-F), Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. scheiter@em.uni-frankfurt.de
authors: Simon
authors: S
authors: Scheiter
authors: Steven I
authors: SI
authors: Higgins
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D018533:Biomass; D005390:Fires; D060434:Herbivory; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D006109:Poaceae / Q000254:growth & development*
references: Plant Physiol. 1990 Oct;94(2):621-7
references: 16667757
references: Am Nat. 2007 Oct;170(4):587-601
references: 17891737
references: Am Nat. 1999 May;153(5):527-539
references: 29578792
references: J Math Biol. 2005 Jun;50(6):663-82
references: 15614548
references: Ecology. 2010 Jun;91(6):1682-92
references: 20583710
references: J Theor Biol. 1997 Feb 7;184(3):353-358
references: 31940744
references: Nature. 2005 Dec 8;438(7069):846-9
references: 16341012
references: Planta. 1980 Jun;149(1):78-90
references: 24306196
references: Oecologia. 2009 Aug;161(1):1-14
references: 19412705
references: J Theor Biol. 1978 Apr 6;71(3):347-80
references: 642535