title: Social media use and impact on plastic surgery practice.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Social media platforms have revolutionized the way human beings communicate, yet there is little evidence describing how the plastic surgery community has adopted social media. In this article, the authors evaluate current trends in social media use by practicing plastic surgeons.
  
  
  METHODS
  An anonymous survey on the use of social media was distributed to members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Prevalent patterns of social media implementation were elucidated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  One-half of respondents were regular social media users. Reasons for using social media included the beliefs that incorporation of social media into medical practice is inevitable (56.7 percent), that they are an effective marketing tool (52.1 percent), and that they provide a forum for patient education (49 percent). Surgeons with a primarily aesthetic surgery practice were more likely to use social media. Most respondents (64.6 percent) stated that social media had no effect on their practice, whereas 33.8 percent reported a positive impact and 1.5 percent reported a negative impact.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study depicts current patterns of social media use by plastic surgeons, including motivations driving its implementation and impressions on its impact. Many feel that social media are an effective marketing tool that generates increased exposure and referrals. A small number of surgeons have experienced negative repercussions from social media involvement. Our study reveals the presence of a void. There is a definite interest among those surveyed in developing best practice standards and oversight to ensure ethical use of social media platforms throughout the plastic surgery community. Continuing discussion regarding these matters should be ongoing as our experience with social media in plastic surgery evolves.
authors: Los Angeles, Calif. From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles.
authors: Andrew J
authors: AJ
authors: Vardanian
authors: Nicholas
authors: N
authors: Kusnezov
authors: Daniel D
authors: DD
authors: Im
authors: James C
authors: JC
authors: Lee
authors: Reza
authors: R
authors: Jarrahy
mesh_terms: D000046:Academic Medical Centers / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D000328:Adult; D003625:Data Collection; D006801:Humans; D008389:Marketing of Health Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008875:Middle Aged; D010820:Physicians / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011331:Private Practice / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012017:Referral and Consultation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D061108:Social Media / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013518:Surgery, Plastic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D014481:United States
references: Wheeler CK, Said H, Prucz R, Rohrich RJ, Mathes DW. Social media in plastic surgery practices: Emerging trends in North America. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31:435–441
references: Nassab R, Navsaria H, Myers S, Frame J. Online marketing strategies of plastic surgeons and clinics: A comparative study of the United Kingdom and the United States. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31:566–571
references: Wong WW, Gupta SC. Plastic surgery marketing in a generation of “tweeting.”. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31:972–976
references: Rohrich RJ, Weinstein AG. Connect with plastic surgery: Social media for good. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:789–792
references: Kung TA, Pannucci CJ, Chamberlain JL, Cederna PS. Migraine surgery practice patterns and attitudes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:623–628
references: Camp SM, Mills DC II. The marriage of plastic surgery and social media: A relationship to last a lifetime. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32:349–351