title: Modulation frequency discrimination with modulated and unmodulated interference in normal hearing and in cochlear-implant users.
abstract: Differences in fundamental frequency (F0) provide an important cue for segregating simultaneous sounds. Cochlear implants (CIs) transmit F0 information primarily through the periodicity of the temporal envelope of the electrical pulse trains. Successful segregation of sounds with different F0s requires the ability to process multiple F0s simultaneously, but it is unknown whether CI users have this ability. This study measured modulation frequency discrimination thresholds for half-wave rectified sinusoidal envelopes modulated at 115 Hz in CI users and normal-hearing (NH) listeners. The target modulation was presented in isolation or in the presence of an interferer. Discrimination thresholds were strongly affected by the presence of an interferer, even when it was unmodulated and spectrally remote. Interferer modulation increased interference and often led to very high discrimination thresholds, especially when the interfering modulation frequency was lower than that of the target. Introducing a temporal offset between the interferer and the target led to at best modest improvements in performance in CI users and NH listeners. The results suggest no fundamental difference between acoustic and electric hearing in processing single or multiple envelope-based F0s, but confirm that differences in F0 are unlikely to provide a robust cue for perceptual segregation in CI users.
authors: Clinical Psychoacoustics Laboratory, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
authors: Heather A
authors: HA
authors: Kreft
authors: David A
authors: DA
authors: Nelson
authors: Andrew J
authors: AJ
authors: Oxenham
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001299:Audiometry; D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D001309:Auditory Threshold / Q000502:physiology*; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D003463:Cues; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006309:Hearing / Q000502:physiology*; D006319:Hearing Loss, Sensorineural / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010897:Pitch Discrimination / Q000502:physiology
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Nov;114(5):2913-22
references: 14650025
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Aug;122(2):1069-78
references: 17672654
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Aug;100(2 Pt 1):1081-92
references: 8759961
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Jan;99(1):517-24
references: 8568039
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Aug;116(2):1092-104
references: 15376675
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Aug;108(2):723-34
references: 10955639
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Apr;113(4 Pt 1):2042-53
references: 12703715
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Feb;123(2):973-85
references: 18247900
references: Br J Audiol. 2000 Aug;34(4):205-24
references: 10997450
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jun;129(6):3916-33
references: 21682414
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jul;126(1):281-90
references: 19603884
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Mar;121(3):1621-31
references: 17407899
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Jun;113(6):3323-34
references: 12822804
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Mar;101(3):1671-80
references: 9069634
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Jun;117(6):3860-6
references: 16018488
references: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007 Mar;8(1):119-33
references: 17216383
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Sep;120(3):1493-505
references: 17004471
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Jul;114(1):446-54
references: 12880055
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):257-69
references: 20649221
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+
references: 5541744
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Aug;112(2):621-33
references: 12186042
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jan;125(1):324-7
references: 19173419
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jan;129(1):282-92
references: 21303009
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):1026-36
references: 12243151
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Aug;124(2):EL21-7
references: 18681497
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Feb 3;101(5):1421-5
references: 14718671
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jan;125(1):457-68
references: 19173431
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Dec;132(6):3883-95
references: 23231119
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Mar;101(3):1687-95
references: 9069636
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Jan;99(1):525-33
references: 8568040
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Mar;125(3):1649-57
references: 19275322
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Apr;115(4):1736-46
references: 15101652
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Feb;125(2):1059-66
references: 19206880
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Feb;127(2):656-9
references: 20136187
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Jun;95(6):3529-40
references: 8046144