title: Advancing Research on Productive Aging Activities in Greater Chinese Societies.
abstract: The public discourse on productive aging as a research and policy initiative has just begun in greater China. Two conferences in Mainland China in 2009 and 2011 and subsequent conferences in Taiwan and Hong Kong in 2012 have set it in motion. Because applied social science research has just started in greater China, researchers in Chinese societies will benefit from the experience and rich literature accumulated over the last three decades in the West. In this paper, I review and reflect on the research methods used in productive aging research in both Chinese societies and in the West. I believe that to advance productive aging research in greater China, we need to (1) discuss and agree upon a definition of productive aging, (2) identify and differentiate outputs and outcomes of productive aging activities in greater China, (3) develop precise measures for productive aging involvement, (4) focus on institutional (program and public policy) factors that promote productive aging involvement, (5) use a strong research design (such as a quasi-experimental design) to establish the internal validity of productive aging programs, and (6) be theory-driven. Lastly, productive aging should be seen as a choice, not an obligation for older people; otherwise, the productive aging agenda will be seen as exploiting older people. It is important that Chinese researchers and policy-makers have this in mind when they are advocating productive engagement of older people in China.
authors: Sau Po Centre on Ageing and Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
authors: Terry Yat-Sang
authors: TY
authors: Lum
keywords: Productive aging; Productive aging in China; Productive aging research; Review on productive aging
references: J Health Soc Behav. 2002 Dec;43(4):490-509
references: 12664678
references: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1999 May;54(3):S173-80
references: 10363048
references: Age Ageing. 2009 Sep;38(5):531-7
references: 19474036
references: J Gerontol Soc Work. 2005;45(4):41-63
references: 16219599
references: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003 May;58(3):S137-45
references: 12730314
references: J Gerontol Soc Work. 2008;51(3-4):210-27
references: 19043900
references: Gerontologist. 2008 Feb;48(1):59-70
references: 18381833
references: Gerontologist. 2010 Oct;50(5):603-12
references: 20211944
references: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011 Jul;66(4):490-501
references: 21743042
references: J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2005 Mar;20(1):27-45
references: 15875123
references: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 Jul;65(4):461-9
references: 20400498
references: J Urban Health. 2004 Mar;81(1):64-78
references: 15047786
references: Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jul;71(2):414-420
references: 20510493
references: Inquiry. 2002 Fall;39(3):279-97
references: 12479539
references: Gerontologist. 2009 Feb;49(1):91-102
references: 19363007
references: J Aging Soc Policy. 1996;8(2-3):79-96
references: 10183245
references: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 Sep;64(5):644-55
references: 19213847
references: N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):45-53
references: 20463332
references: Gerontologist. 1993 Apr;33(2):221-8
references: 8468015
references: Gerontologist. 2008 Dec;48(6):793-801
references: 19139252