title: Electronic fetal monitoring: the debate goes on...and on...and on.
authors: Dr. Resnik is from the Department of Reproductive Medicine at the University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA; e-mail: rresnik@mail.ucsd.edu.
authors: Robert
authors: R
authors: Resnik
mesh_terms: D015148:Cardiotocography / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007232:Infant, Newborn, Diseases / Q000453:epidemiology*; D011247:Pregnancy
references: Gabert HA, Stenchever MA. The results of a five year study of continuous fetal monitoring on an obstetric service. Obstet Gynecol 1977;50:275–9.
references: Yeh SY, Diaz F, Paul RH. Ten year experience of intrapartum fetal monitoring in Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Medical Center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;143:496–500.
references: Nelson KB, Dambrosia JM, Ting TY, Grether JK. Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 1996;334:613–8.
references: Ananth CV, Chauhan SP, Chen H-Y, D’Alton ME, Vintzileos AM. Electronic fetal monitoring in the United States: temporal trends and adverse perinatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:927–33.