title: The new guidelines for paternity analysis in Germany-how many STR loci are necessary when investigating duo cases?
abstract: The requirements in the new German guidelines for paternity analysis have not only changed according to the so-called Gendiagnostikgesetz, the new German law regulating human genetic as well as paternity analyses, but also regarding the minimal number of short tandem repeats (STRs) which should be investigated (15 STRs) and the minimal required average exclusion chance (99.999 %). Even in paternity analyses involving only two people (e.g., father and child or mother and child), this exclusion chance is mandatory. A retrospective analysis of 330 father-child cases from our routine investigations showed in 142 cases (43 %) an individual exclusion chance below 99.999 % when using 15 STRs as required, in our routine work provided by the Powerplex® 16 kit which is reported to have an average exclusion chance of 99.988 %. Therefore, these same 330 father-child pairs were additionally analysed using the Powerplex® 21 kit and 120 of these duos were additionally analysed using the Powerplex® ESX17 kit enabling the analysis of 20 or 16 loci respectively. Now, an individual exclusion chance of more than 99.999 % could be achieved in 95.5 % (Powerplex® 21; calculation without the results of D6S1043), 98.8 % (Powerplex® 21; calculation with the results of D6S1043, using allele frequencies established in this study for a German and a West African population) and 98.3 % (Powerplex® ESX17). These data clearly demonstrate that in duo cases, more than the required 15 STR loci have to be investigated to obtain sufficient results.
authors: Institute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. micaela.poetsch@uk-essen.de
authors: Micaela
authors: M
authors: Poetsch
authors: Andrea
authors: A
authors: Preusse-Prange
authors: Thorsten
authors: T
authors: Schwark
authors: Nicole
authors: N
authors: von Wurmb-Schwark
mesh_terms: D000354:Africa, Western; D016172:DNA Fingerprinting / Q000379:methods*; D005787:Gene Frequency; D005858:Germany; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D018895:Microsatellite Repeats; D010334:Paternity; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction; D044469:Racial Groups / Q000235:genetics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012189:Retrospective Studies
references: Int J Legal Med. 2012 Mar;126(2):331-5
references: 22005758
references: Forensic Sci Int. 2004 Feb 10;140(1):133-5
references: 15013178
references: Int J Legal Med. 2011 Sep;125(5):733-9
references: 20567841
references: Evol Bioinform Online. 2007 Feb 23;1:47-50
references: 19325852
references: Forensic Sci Int. 2006 Jun 2;159(2-3):98-103
references: 16105725
references: Forensic Sci Int. 2003 Dec 17;138(1-3):37-43
references: 14642717
references: Forensic Sci Int. 2004 May 10;141(2-3):197-9
references: 15062963
references: Int J Legal Med. 2011 Jan;125(1):149-54
references: 20827485
references: Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013 Feb;7(2):279-89
references: 23266302
references: Forensic Sci Int. 2004 Jun 30;143(1):47-52
references: 15177629
references: Forensic Sci Int. 2006 Jun 2;159(2-3):92-7
references: 16143476
references: Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013 Jan;56(1):169-75
references: 23275970