title: How to interpret the transmissibility of novel influenza A(H7N9): an analysis of initial epidemiological data of human cases from China.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  As the human infections with novel influenza A(H7N9) virus have been reported from several different provinces in China, the pandemic potential of the virus has been questioned. The presence of human-to-human transmission has not been demonstrated, but the absence of demonstration does not guarantee that there is no such transmission.
  
  
  METHODS
  A mathematical model of cluster size distribution is devised without imposing an assumption of subcriticality of the reproduction number and accounting for right censoring of new clusters. The proportion of cases with a history of bird contact is analytically derived, permitting us to fit the model to the observed data of confirmed cases. Using contact history with bird among confirmed cases (n = 129), we estimate the reproduction number of the novel influenza A(H7N9) from human to human.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Analysing twenty confirmed cases with known exposure, the reproduction number for human-to-human transmission was estimated at 0.28 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.45). Sensitivity analysis indicated that the reproduction number is substantially below unity.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  It is unlikely to observe an immediate pandemic of novel influenza A(H7N9) virus with human to human transmission. Continued monitoring of cases and animals would be the key to elucidate additional epidemiological characteristics of the virus.
authors: School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Level 6, Core F, Cyberport 3, Pokfulam, Hong Kong. nishiurah@gmail.com
authors: Hiroshi
authors: H
authors: Nishiura
authors: Kenji
authors: K
authors: Mizumoto
authors: Keisuke
authors: K
authors: Ejima
mesh_terms: D002681:China / Q000453:epidemiology; D006801:Humans; D009980:Influenza A virus / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D007251:Influenza, Human / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000635:transmission* / Q000821:virology
references: Epidemiology. 2013 Mar;24(2):244-50
references: 23337238
references: Science. 2012 Mar 9;335(6073):1173-4
references: 22345402
references: Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Jul;13(7):1074-6
references: 18214184
references: Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Sep;13(9):1348-53
references: 18252106
references: Nature. 2005 Nov 17;438(7066):355-9
references: 16292310
references: N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 6;370(6):520-32
references: 23614499
references: Science. 2004 May 14;304(5673):968-9
references: 15143265
references: PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001399
references: 23472057
references: J R Soc Interface. 2010 Feb 6;7(43):297-307
references: 19570792
references: N Engl J Med. 2013 May 16;368(20):1862-4
references: 23577629
references: J Theor Biol. 2012 Feb 7;294:48-55
references: 22079419
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Jul;3(7):e145
references: 17676981
references: Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Feb 27;10(3):816-29
references: 23446821
references: Lancet. 2013 Jun 1;381(9881):1916-25
references: 23623390