title: Murder must memorise.
abstract: Memory reports usually provide the evidence that is most determinative of guilt or innocence in criminal proceedings-including in the most serious proceedings, capital murder trials. Thus memory research is bedrock science when it comes to the reliability of legal evidence, and expert testimony on such research is a linchpin of just verdicts. This principle is illustrated with a capital murder trial in which several of the most powerful forms of memory distortion were present (e.g., phantom recollections, robust interrogation methods that stimulate false self-incrimination). A key question before the jury, whether to regard the defendant's confession as true or false, turned on a theoretical principle that is used to explain memory distortion in the laboratory, the verbatim-gist distinction, and on research showing that it is possible to create false memories that embody the gist of experience. The scientific testimony focused on instances in which false gist memories had been created under controlled conditions (e.g., of having been lost in a mall, of receiving surgery for a fictitious injury), as well as on real-life examples of false memory for the gist experience (e.g., recovered memories of sexual abuse, alien abduction memories). The defendant was found innocent of capital murder.
authors: a Department of Human Development , Cornell University , Ithaca , NY , USA.
authors: C J
authors: CJ
authors: Brainerd
keywords: Capital punishment; False confession; False memory; Fuzzy-trace theory; Interrogation; Verbatim–gist distinction
references: Law Hum Behav. 2010 Feb;34(1):49-52
references: 20112057
references: J Mem Lang. 2011 Jan 1;64(1):18-31
references: 21103451
references: Psychol Sci. 2001 Nov;12(6):473-7
references: 11760134
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1190-5
references: 19001589
references: Dev Rev. 2012 Sep;32(3):224-267
references: 23139439
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:419-39
references: 10074684
references: Child Dev. 1998 Oct;69(5):1361-77
references: 9839421
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1978 Jan;4(1):19-31
references: 621467
references: Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):222-33
references: 17349990