title: Estimation of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) proviral load harbored by lymphocyte subpopulations in BLV-infected cattle at the subclinical stage of enzootic bovine leucosis using BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) is associated with enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL), which is the most common neoplastic disease of cattle. BLV infection may remain clinically silent at the aleukemic (AL) stage, cause persistent lymphocytosis (PL), or, more rarely, B cell lymphoma. BLV has been identified in B cells, CD2+ T cells, CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, γ/δ T cells, monocytes, and granulocytes in infected cattle that do not have tumors, although the most consistently infected cell is the CD5+ B cell. The mechanism by which BLV causes uncontrolled CD5+ B cell proliferation is unknown. Recently, we developed a new quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR, which enabled us to demonstrate that the proviral load correlates not only with BLV infection, as assessed by syncytium formation, but also with BLV disease progression. The present study reports the distribution of BLV provirus in peripheral blood mononuclear cell subpopulations isolated from BLV-infected cows at the subclinical stage of EBL as examined by cell sorting and BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Phenotypic characterization of five BLV-infected but clinically normal cattle with a proviral load of > 100 copies per 1 × 105 cells identified a high percentage of CD5+ IgM+ cells (but not CD5- IgM+ B cells, CD4+ T cells, or CD8+T cells). These lymphocyte subpopulations were purified from three out of five cattle by cell sorting or using magnetic beads, and the BLV proviral load was estimated using BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR. The CD5+ IgM+ B cell population in all animals harbored a higher BLV proviral load than the other cell populations. The copy number of proviruses infecting CD5- IgM+ B cells, CD4+ cells, and CD8+ T cells (per 1 ml of blood) was 1/34 to 1/4, 1/22 to 1/3, and 1/31 to 1/3, respectively, compared with that in CD5+ IgM+ B cells. Moreover, the BLV provirus remained integrated into the genomic DNA of CD5+ IgM+ B cells, CD5- IgM+ B cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells, even in BLV-infected cattle with a proviral load of <100 copies per 105 cells.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results of the recent study showed that, although CD5+ IgM+ B cells were the main cell type targeted in BLV-infected but clinically normal cattle, CD5- IgM+ B cells, CD4+ cells, and CD8+ T cells were infected to a greater extent than previously thought.
authors: Viral Infectious Diseases Unit, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama, Japan.
authors: Carlos Javier
authors: CJ
authors: Panei
authors: Shin-nosuke
authors: SN
authors: Takeshima
authors: Takashi
authors: T
authors: Omori
authors: Tetsuo
authors: T
authors: Nunoya
authors: William C
authors: WC
authors: Davis
authors: Hiroshi
authors: H
authors: Ishizaki
authors: Kazuhiro
authors: K
authors: Matoba
authors: Yoko
authors: Y
authors: Aida
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D058345:Asymptomatic Infections; D015496:CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes / Q000821:virology; D018956:CD5 Antigens / Q000276:immunology; D018414:CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes / Q000821:virology; D002417:Cattle; D016583:Enzootic Bovine Leukosis / Q000821:virology*; D004797:Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / Q000662:veterinary; D005434:Flow Cytometry / Q000662:veterinary; D001909:Leukemia Virus, Bovine / Q000502:physiology*; D016131:Lymphocyte Subsets / Q000821:virology*; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction / Q000662:veterinary; D011533:Proviruses / Q000502:physiology*; D019562:Viral Load / Q000662:veterinary
chemical_list: D018956:CD5 Antigens
references: Virology. 1994 Jul;202(1):458-65
references: 7516599
references: Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1988 Oct;19(3-4):307-23
references: 2855290
references: Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1999 Jan;112(1):18-23
references: 10028727
references: J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2002 Apr;49(3):123-9
references: 12019942
references: J Virol. 1998 Sep;72(9):7569-76
references: 9696855
references: Prev Vet Med. 2005 May 10;68(2-4):241-62
references: 15820118
references: Am J Vet Res. 1989 Nov;50(11):1946-51
references: 2559634
references: J Virol. 1996 Apr;70(4):2178-83
references: 8642640
references: J Virol. 1994 Jul;68(7):4589-96
references: 8207833
references: BMC Vet Res. 2012 Sep 21;8:167
references: 22995575
references: Leukemia. 1987 Nov;1(11):777-81
references: 2824938
references: Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1978 Jun;25(5):416-24
references: 211755
references: Retrovirology. 2010 Nov 02;7:91
references: 21044304
references: J Virol. 1989 May;63(5):2099-107
references: 2539506
references: J Virol. 2003 Feb;77(3):1894-903
references: 12525624
references: Vet Microbiol. 1988 Jul;17(3):197-218
references: 2847391
references: J Virol. 2003 Apr;77(7):4423-30
references: 12634400
references: Virus Res. 2003 Nov;97(2):81-7
references: 14602199
references: J Immunol. 2008 Jul 15;181(2):891-8
references: 18606640
references: J Virol Methods. 2004 Feb;115(2):167-75
references: 14667532
references: J Gen Virol. 1991 Feb;72 ( Pt 2):307-15
references: 1847172
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Apr;79(8):2465-9
references: 6283527
references: Microbes Infect. 2005 Jan;7(1):19-28
references: 15716078
references: Microbes Infect. 2004 May;6(6):584-95
references: 15158193