title: Similar local and landscape processes affect both a common and a rare newt species.
abstract: Although rare species are often the focus of conservation measures, more common species may experience similar decline and suffer from the same threatening processes. We tested this hypothesis by examining, through an information-theoretic approach, the importance of ecological processes at multiple scales in the great crested newt Triturus cristatus, regionally endangered and protected in Europe, and the more common smooth newt, Lissotriton vulgaris. Both species were similarly affected by the same processes, i.e. suitability of aquatic and terrestrial components of their habitat at different scales, connectivity among breeding sites, and the presence of introduced fish. T. cristatus depended more on water depth and aquatic vegetation than L. vulgaris. The results show that environmental pressures threaten both common and rare species, and therefore the more widespread species should not be neglected in conservation programs. Because environmental trends are leading to a deterioration of aquatic and terrestrial habitat features required by newt populations, populations of the common species may follow the fate of the rarest species. This could have substantial conservation implications because of the numerical importance of common species in ecosystems and because commonness could be a transient state moving towards rarity. On the other hand, in agreement with the umbrella species concept, targeting conservation efforts on the most demanding species would also protect part of the populations of the most common species.
authors: Laboratory of Fish and Amphibian Ethology, Behavioural Biology Unit, Department of Biology, Ecology and Evolution, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium. Mathieu.Denoel@ulg.ac.be
authors: Mathieu
authors: M
authors: Denoël
authors: Amélie
authors: A
authors: Perez
authors: Yves
authors: Y
authors: Cornet
authors: Gentile Francesco
authors: GF
authors: Ficetola
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D017753:Ecosystem; D056727:Endangered Species / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000639:trends*; D005060:Europe; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D061005:Ponds; D012455:Salamandridae / Q000502:physiology*; D013045:Species Specificity
references: Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1783-6
references: 15486254
references: Science. 2010 Jan 8;327(5962):154-5
references: 20056880
references: Ecology. 2009 Jan;90(1):46-56
references: 19294912
references: Ecol Appl. 2007 Dec;17(8):2298-309
references: 18213970
references: J Evol Biol. 2005 Mar;18(2):415-25
references: 15715847
references: Conserv Biol. 2009 Feb;23(1):114-23
references: 18983602
references: Ecol Appl. 2007 Jan;17(1):302-9
references: 17479853
references: Ecotoxicology. 2011 Aug;20(6):1246-57
references: 21512748
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 18;101(20):7646-50
references: 15136741
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 12;105 Suppl 1:11466-73
references: 18695221
references: J Anim Ecol. 2003 Jul;72(4):567-575
references: 30893969
references: Nature. 2000 Apr 13;404(6779):752-5
references: 10783886
references: J Evol Biol. 2005 May;18(3):619-28
references: 15842491
references: Conserv Biol. 2011 Feb;25(1):9-20
references: 21091767
references: Ecol Appl. 2011 Jun;21(4):1272-82
references: 21774429
references: Conserv Biol. 2011 Jun;25(3):556-66
references: 21342266