title: Human vocal attractiveness as signaled by body size projection.
abstract: Voice, as a secondary sexual characteristic, is known to affect the perceived attractiveness of human individuals. But the underlying mechanism of vocal attractiveness has remained unclear. Here, we presented human listeners with acoustically altered natural sentences and fully synthetic sentences with systematically manipulated pitch, formants and voice quality based on a principle of body size projection reported for animal calls and emotional human vocal expressions. The results show that male listeners preferred a female voice that signals a small body size, with relatively high pitch, wide formant dispersion and breathy voice, while female listeners preferred a male voice that signals a large body size with low pitch and narrow formant dispersion. Interestingly, however, male vocal attractiveness was also enhanced by breathiness, which presumably softened the aggressiveness associated with a large body size. These results, together with the additional finding that the same vocal dimensions also affect emotion judgment, indicate that humans still employ a vocal interaction strategy used in animal calls despite the development of complex language.
authors: Department of Speech, Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom. yi.xu@ucl.ac.uk
authors: Yi
authors: Y
authors: Xu
authors: Albert
authors: A
authors: Lee
authors: Wing-Li
authors: WL
authors: Wu
authors: Xuan
authors: X
authors: Liu
authors: Peter
authors: P
authors: Birkholz
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001307:Auditory Perception; D049628:Body Size; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012737:Sex Factors; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D013061:Speech Acoustics; D014831:Voice; D014833:Voice Quality; D055815:Young Adult
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Aug 22;268(1477):1669-75
references: 11506679
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Feb;87(2):820-57
references: 2137837
references: Phonetica. 2008;65(4):210-30
references: 19221452
references: J Speech Hear Res. 1990 Sep;33(3):601-11
references: 2232777
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Jan;101(1):466-81
references: 9000737
references: Horm Behav. 2006 Feb;49(2):215-22
references: 16055126
references: J Sex Res. 2012;49(2-3):227-43
references: 22380590
references: J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Dec;35(6):1209-15
references: 1494266
references: Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Jun;20(3):165-70
references: 22487788
references: Anim Behav. 2000 Dec;60(6):773-780
references: 11124875
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Aug;102(2 Pt 1):1213-22
references: 9265764
references: Curr Biol. 2010 Jan 26;20(2):116-20
references: 20129047
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 May 7;272(1566):941-7
references: 16024350
references: J Voice. 2009 May;23(3):291-4
references: 18675534
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jan 7;273(1582):83-9
references: 16519239
references: Phonetica. 1984;41(1):1-16
references: 6204347