title: Comparison of sugar content for ionic liquid pretreated Douglas-fir woodchips and forestry residues.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The development of affordable woody biomass feedstocks represents a significant opportunity in the development of cellulosic biofuels. Primary woodchips produced by forest mills are considered an ideal feedstock, but the prices they command on the market are currently too expensive for biorefineries. In comparison, forestry residues represent a potential low-cost input but are considered a more challenging feedstock for sugar production due to complexities in composition and potential contamination arising from soil that may be present. We compare the sugar yields, changes in composition in Douglas-fir woodchips and forestry residues after pretreatment using ionic liquids and enzymatic saccharification in order to determine if this approach can efficiently liberate fermentable sugars.
  
  
  RESULTS
  These samples were either mechanically milled through a 2 mm mesh or pretreated as received with the ionic liquid (IL) 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate [C2mim][OAc] at 120°C and 160°C. IL pretreatment of Douglas-fir woodchips and forestry residues resulted in approximately 71-92% glucose yields after enzymatic saccharification. X-ray diffraction (XRD) showed that the pretreated cellulose was less crystalline after IL pretreatment as compared to untreated control samples. Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (2D-NMR) revealed changes in lignin and hemicellulose structure and composition as a function of pretreatment. Mass balances of sugar and lignin streams for both the Douglas-fir woodchips and forestry residues throughout the pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification processes are presented.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  While the highest sugar yields were observed with the Douglas-fir woodchips, reasonably high sugar yields were obtained from forestry residues after ionic liquid pretreatment. Structural changes to lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose in the woodchips and forestry residues of Douglas-fir after [C2mim][OAc] pretreatment are analyzed by XRD and 2D-NMR, and indicate that significant changes occurred. Irrespective of the particle sizes used in this study, ionic liquid pretreatment successfully allowed high glucose yields after enzymatic saccharification. These results indicate that forestry residues may be a more viable feedstock than previously thought for the production of biofuels.
authors: Deconstruction Division, Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Avenue, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA. ssingh@lbl.gov.
authors: Aaron M
authors: AM
authors: Socha
authors: Samuel P
authors: SP
authors: Plummer
authors: Vitalie
authors: V
authors: Stavila
authors: Blake A
authors: BA
authors: Simmons
authors: Seema
authors: S
authors: Singh
references: J Am Chem Soc. 2002 May 8;124(18):4974-5
references: 11982358
references: Genome Biol. 2008;9(12):242
references: 19133109
references: Bioresour Technol. 2011 Jul;102(13):6928-36
references: 21531133
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 1988 Apr 20;31(6):624-7
references: 18584655
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009 Sep 1;104(1):68-75
references: 19489027
references: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2000 Spring;84-86:693-705
references: 10849828
references: J Biotechnol. 2006 Sep 1;125(2):198-209
references: 16621087
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):19949-54
references: 22123987
references: Bioresour Technol. 2012 Jun;114:629-36
references: 22446050
references: J Agric Food Chem. 2007 Oct 31;55(22):9142-8
references: 17907779
references: Nat Protoc. 2012 Sep;7(9):1579-89
references: 22864199
references: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1991 Spring;28-29:131-44
references: 1929360
references: Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012 Sep 07;5(1):67
references: 22958710
references: J Phys Chem B. 2012 Jul 19;116(28):8131-8
references: 22574852
references: Biotechnol Prog. 2010 Jan-Feb;26(1):127-33
references: 19918908
references: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2000 Spring;84-86:561-76
references: 10849819
references: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2007 Apr;137-140(1-12):947-56
references: 18478447
references: Biomacromolecules. 2011 Apr 11;12(4):933-41
references: 21361369
references: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012 Jun;23(3):390-5
references: 22033175
references: Biotechnol J. 2011 Sep;6(9):1086-102
references: 21834132
references: J Phys Chem B. 2012 Aug 23;116(33):10049-54
references: 22823503
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011 Dec;108(12):2865-75
references: 21769858