title: The compositional and institutional sources of union dissolution for married and unmarried parents in the United States.
abstract: Unmarried parents have less stable unions than married parents, but there is considerable debate over the sources of this instability. Unmarried parents may be more likely than married parents to end their unions because of compositional differences, such as more disadvantaged personal and relationship characteristics, or because they lack the normative and institutional supports of marriage, thus rendering their relationships more sensitive to disadvantage. In this article, we evaluate these two sources of union instability among married, cohabiting, and dating parents following the birth of a shared child, using five waves of longitudinal data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study. Using discrete-time event history models, we find that demographic, economic, and relationship differences explain more than two-thirds of the increased risk of dissolution for unmarried parents relative to married parents. We also find that differential responses to economic or relationship disadvantage do not explain why unmarried parents are more likely to end their unions than married parents.
authors: Department of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University, 247 Martha van Rensselaer Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA, lauratach@cornell.edu.
authors: Laura
authors: L
authors: Tach
authors: Kathryn
authors: K
authors: Edin
mesh_terms: D004243:Divorce / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005191:Family Characteristics; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008393:Marriage; D008603:Mental Health; D010290:Parents; D012847:Single Person / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D013997:Time Factors; D014481:United States
references: Fam Plann Perspect. 1989 Nov-Dec;21(6):256-60
references: 2620717
references: Demography. 1992 Aug;29(3):357-74
references: 1426434
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Aug;63(2):221-33
references: 1403613
references: J Hum Resour. 2011 Jun 20;46(3):482-517
references: 24639593
references: Demography. 2006 May;43(2):223-40
references: 16889126
references: Demogr Res. 2008;19:1663-1692
references: 19119426
references: Demography. 2004 Nov;41(4):607-27
references: 15622946
references: Popul Stud (Camb). 2000 Jan;54(1):29-41
references: 28489526
references: Demography. 2008 Nov;45(4):763-84
references: 19110896
references: Demography. 2010 Feb;47(1):181-204
references: 20355690
references: NCHS Data Brief. 2009 May;(18):1-8
references: 19450389
references: Demography. 1997 Aug;34(3):331-41
references: 9275243
references: Demography. 2002 May;39(2):331-51
references: 12048955
references: Future Child. 2005 Fall;15(2):117-37
references: 16158733
references: J Fam Psychol. 2009 Feb;23(1):107-11
references: 19203165
references: Demography. 1991 Nov;28(4):571-86
references: 1769403
references: Demography. 2004 May;41(2):237-61
references: 15209039