title: Family burden of schizophrenic patients and the welfare system; the case of Cyprus.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The shift from asylum to community care for mental health patients has burdened the providers of primary health care and, more than all, families. As a result, numerous studies [Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 31:345-348, 1995, J Health Socisl Behav 36:138-150, 1995] have focused on the burden of care experienced by family members living with individuals with severe mental disorders. This kind of provision, also extols a significant cost to the society at large in terms of significant direct and indirect costs. A cost that may be even higher in times of severe socio-economic crisis.
  
  
  METHODS
  This study, firstly, aims to examine the burden that the family members experience by caring for individuals with schizophrenia and the identification of the parameters, in a micro and macro level, that affect family burden. Secondly, this study aims to investigate whether the welfare state will be fit to help vulnerable groups as the one studied, especially during economic crisis periods when austerity measures are being implemented into welfare systems. For data collection purposes this study employed the Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire [Schizophr Bull 1998, 24(4):609-618]. The sample consisted of caregivers either living in rural or urban areas of the district of Nicosia, the capital of the Republic of Cyprus. These people were attending regular meetings with their allocated Community Psychiatric Nurses (CPN) in Community Mental Health Centres (CMHC).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was applied with the tension, the supervision, the worry, and the encouragement entering as dependent factors. In each case, participant's age, gender, marital status, income, number of people living in the same house with the participant, degree of relationship between the caregiver and the person suffering from severe mental disorder, the age of the relative, and the gender of the relative, were entered as independent factors. Four ANCOVAs were performed, one for each dimension of the family burden. The results from this analysis produced only one significant main effect of the gender of the relative on supervision [F(1,118) = 4.40, p = .011, etap2 = .053] with male relatives suffering from schizophrenia requiring higher supervision than female ones as their relative caregivers responses indicate.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Consequently, families under great stress due to the reasons derived from the weaknesses of the welfare system described throughout this paper would give up and reject the mentally ill individuals who would become outcasts socially. Therefore, health systems need to aim to the development of psychosocial provisions for both family caregivers and patients as to decrease the family burden rates and increase the possibility of smooth transition to the society.
authors: Department of Social Sciences, University of Nicosia, 46 Makedonitissa Avenue, Nicosia 1700, Cyprus. panagiotopoulos.c@unic.ac.cy.
authors: Christos
authors: C
authors: Panayiotopoulos
authors: Andreas
authors: A
authors: Pavlakis
authors: Menelaos
authors: M
authors: Apostolou
references: Schizophr Bull. 2003;29(3):573-86
references: 14609250
references: Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Mar;44(3):435-46
references: 17078957
references: Ind Psychiatry J. 2009 Jul;18(2):97-100
references: 21180485
references: BMJ. 2005 Jan 15;330(7483):123-6
references: 15567803
references: Eur Psychiatry. 1996;11(8):381-5
references: 19698486
references: BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Sep 26;12(1):101
references: 21943329
references: Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1987 Feb;75(2):158-65
references: 3565059
references: Fam Process. 2003 Spring;42(1):91-103
references: 12698601
references: Lancet. 1963 Mar 9;1(7280):544-7
references: 13949711
references: Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992 Jan;43(1):38-43
references: 1544645
references: Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1966 Summer;12(3):165-76
references: 5964677
references: J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Jun;36(2):138-50
references: 9113139
references: Med Anthropol. 1989 May;11(1):29-45
references: 2725212
references: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1996 Nov;31(6):345-8
references: 8952374
references: Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;58(2):131-7
references: 21088034
references: Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(2):149-62
references: 18198934
references: Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2009 Apr;23(2):128-37
references: 19327555
references: Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Jul;177:4-7
references: 10945080
references: Schizophr Bull. 1998;24(4):609-18
references: 9853792
references: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2002 Sep;37(9):430-4
references: 12242619
references: Compr Psychiatry. 2002 May-Jun;43(3):219-22
references: 11994841
references: Lancet. 2009 Aug 22;374(9690):603-4
references: 19708102
references: BMJ. 2002 Aug 17;325(7360):349-50
references: 12183291
references: Eur Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;19(7):395-401
references: 15504645
references: J Adv Nurs. 1995 Feb;21(2):248-55
references: 7714282