title: The embodied mind extended: using words as social tools.
abstract: The extended mind view and the embodied-grounded view of cognition and language are typically considered as rather independent perspectives. In this paper we propose a possible integration of the two views and support it proposing the idea of "Words As social Tools" (WAT). In this respect, we will propose that words, also due to their social and public character, can be conceived as quasi-external devices that extend our cognition. Moreover, words function like tools in that they enlarge the bodily space of action thus modifying our sense of body. To support our proposal, we review the relevant literature on tool-use and on words as tools and report recent evidence indicating that word use leads to an extension of space close to the body. In addition, we outline a model of the neural processes that may underpin bodily space extension via word use and may reflect possible effects on cognition of the use of words as external means. We also discuss how reconciling the two perspectives can help to overcome the limitations they encounter if considered independently.
authors: EMbodied COgnition Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Bologna Bologna, Italy ; Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council Rome, Italy.
authors: Anna M
authors: AM
authors: Borghi
authors: Claudia
authors: C
authors: Scorolli
authors: Daniele
authors: D
authors: Caligiore
authors: Gianluca
authors: G
authors: Baldassarre
authors: Luca
authors: L
authors: Tummolini
keywords: body schema; embodied cognition; extended cognition; incorporation; language comprehension; social cognition; tool-use; words as tools
references: Front Psychol. 2011 Aug 17;2:187
references: 21887149
references: Brain Lang. 2013 Nov;127(2):222-9
references: 22889467
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Feb;8(2):79-86
references: 15588812
references: Neuroimage. 2000 Oct;12(4):478-84
references: 10988041
references: Cogn Sci. 2013 Mar;37(2):255-85
references: 23167661
references: Cortex. 2012 Jul;48(7):905-22
references: 21601842
references: Psychol Res. 2009 Jul;73(4):441-62
references: 19347356
references: PLoS One. 2011 Apr 04;6(4):e17923
references: 21483734
references: Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Aug;22(4):577-609; discussion 610-60
references: 11301525
references: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Jun;5(2-3):180-7
references: 20068033
references: Top Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;6(3):359-70
references: 24935903
references: Front Neurorobot. 2010 May 28;4:
references: 20725506
references: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Feb;48(3):643-4
references: 20004678
references: Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jul;10(7):817-8
references: 17529986
references: Brain Res. 2009 Feb 9;1253:117-28
references: 19073156
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Apr;18(2):302-8
references: 21327375
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:25-45
references: 16968210
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jun;61(6):825-50
references: 18470815
references: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:2735-9
references: 18002560
references: Front Psychol. 2010 Dec 27;1:234
references: 21833288
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 27;364(1528):2349-58
references: 19620106
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Aug;33(4):245-66; discussion 266-313
references: 20964882
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 12;363(1499):1951-7
references: 18292060
references: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Feb;48(3):703-12
references: 19819247
references: Cereb Cortex. 2005 Jun;15(6):681-95
references: 15342430
references: J Physiol Paris. 2008 Jan-May;102(1-3):71-9
references: 18472404
references: Psychol Res. 2013 Jan;77(1):40-52
references: 22160607
references: Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):889-95
references: 18706538
references: Conscious Cogn. 2010 Sep;19(3):711-20
references: 20739194
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 May;12(3):415-20
references: 10931768
references: Cerebellum. 2012 Jun;11(2):325-35
references: 21181462
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 12;105(6):2209-13
references: 18238904
references: Front Psychol. 2011 Jan 31;2:5
references: 21713184
references: Conscious Cogn. 2012 Sep;21(3):1551-7
references: 22832214
references: Psychol Res. 2013 Jan;77(1):64-73
references: 21879354
references: Top Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;6(3):442-60
references: 23616259
references: Cereb Cortex. 2008 May;18(5):1160-8
references: 17728264
references: Science. 2004 Aug 6;305(5685):782-3
references: 15297651
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):625-36
references: 12613670
references: Psychol Rev. 2010 Oct;117(4):1188-228
references: 21038976
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):849-78; discussion 878-937
references: 12239891
references: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Feb;48(3):812-30
references: 19835894
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 29;362(1485):1585-99
references: 17428779
references: Cogn Process. 2012 Aug;13 Suppl 1:S161-4
references: 22802036
references: Trends Neurosci. 1997 Dec;20(12):560-4
references: 9416668
references: Front Psychol. 2012 Dec 28;3:582
references: 23293620
references: Exp Brain Res. 2003 Nov;153(2):146-57
references: 14610633
references: Lang Cogn. 2010 May;2(1):79-116
references: 20802833
references: Brain Lang. 2007 Jun;101(3):278-89
references: 17416411
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;13(4):154-9
references: 19269881
references: Nature. 1998 Nov 19;396(6708):228
references: 9834030
references: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Mar;37(3):491-521
references: 23333761
references: Front Psychol. 2013 Feb 12;4:58
references: 23408669
references: Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Oct;4(4):773-85
references: 22961950
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jan 12;367(1585):75-87
references: 22106428
references: Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(2):238-48
references: 15707908
references: Cognition. 2009 May;111(2):270-4
references: 19285660
references: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Feb;48(3):763-73
references: 19913041
references: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(1):243-7
references: 19766665
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:617-45
references: 17705682
references: Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;1(2):320-39
references: 25164936
references: Exp Brain Res. 2012 Apr;218(2):331-9
references: 22349562
references: Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(6):977-81
references: 16243365
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):80-9
references: 21928928
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Apr;14(2):203-11
references: 15082326
references: Neuroreport. 1996 Oct 2;7(14):2325-30
references: 8951846
references: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Feb;48(3):803-11
references: 19931547
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Jun;24(3):453-76; discussion 476-509
references: 11682799
references: Cognition. 2009 Sep;112(3):451-6
references: 19539277
references: Soc Neurosci. 2008;3(3-4):317-33
references: 18979384
references: Front Psychol. 2012 Mar 08;3:54
references: 22408629
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36390
references: 22693550
references: Front Neurosci. 2010 Dec 08;4:200
references: 21151783