title: Attitudes Toward Divorce, Commitment, and Divorce Proneness in First Marriages and Remarriages.
abstract: A random multistate sample of married individuals (N= 1,931) was used to explore whether more positive attitudes toward divorce and weaker commitment to marriage may contribute to the greater instability of remarriages than first marriages. Remarried adults, whether or not they brought children from a previous union into the remarriage, reported marital quality (happiness and conflict) equal to those in first marriages. They also reported more positive attitudes toward divorce, which were associated with higher divorce proneness (i.e., thinking about and taking actions toward divorce). Marriage type interacted with marital quality to predict divorce proneness, such that the association between low marital quality and divorce proneness was stronger for remarried individuals than for those in first marriages. This suggests that remarried adults may be more likely than adults in first marriages to take steps toward divorce when experiencing marital distress, possibly reflecting a weaker commitment to marriage.
authors: Department of Psychology, Mail Center 0376, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0376.
authors: Sarah W
authors: SW
authors: Whitton
authors: Scott M
authors: SM
authors: Stanley
authors: Howard J
authors: HJ
authors: Markman
authors: Christine A
authors: CA
authors: Johnson
keywords: divorce; marital commitment; marital conflict; marital stability; relationship commitment; remarriage
references: Fam Process. 2002 Winter;41(4):659-75
references: 12613123
references: J Marriage Fam. 2017 Jun;79(3):723-738
references: 28579639
references: Fam Relat. 2008 Apr;57(2):211-226
references: 23667284
references: J Fam Psychol. 2011 Oct;25(5):741-50
references: 21744961
references: Vital Health Stat 23. 2002 Jul;(22):1-93
references: 12183886
references: J Fam Theory Rev. 2010 Dec 1;2(4):243-257
references: 21339829
references: J Fam Psychol. 2008 Oct;22(5):789-793
references: 18855515
references: J Fam Issues. 1985 Sep;6(3):331-46
references: 12313804
references: J Fam Issues. 1992 Jun;13(2):179-94
references: 12343619