title: Witchcraft beliefs and witch hunts: an interdisciplinary explanation.
abstract: This paper proposes an interdisciplinary explanation of the cross-cultural similarities and evolutionary patterns of witchcraft beliefs. It argues that human social dilemmas have led to the evolution of a fear system that is sensitive to signs of deceit and envy. This was adapted in the evolutionary environment of small foraging bands but became overstimulated by the consequences of the Agricultural Revolution, leading to witch paranoia. State formation, civilization, and economic development abated the fear of witches and replaced it in part with more collectivist forms of social paranoia. However, demographic-economic crises could rekindle fear of witches-resulting, for example, in the witch craze of early modern Europe. The Industrial Revolution broke the Malthusian shackles, but modern economic growth requires agricultural development as a starting point. In sub-Saharan Africa, witch paranoia has resurged because the conditions for agricultural development are lacking, leading to fighting for opportunities and an erosion of intergenerational reciprocity.
authors: Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. niek.koning@wur.nl
authors: Niek
authors: N
authors: Koning
mesh_terms: D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D003469:Culture; D005239:Fear; D006801:Humans; D012919:Social Behavior; D018599:Witchcraft / Q000523:psychology*
references: Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Nov 15;52(10):927-37
references: 12437934
references: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Mar;5(3):277-83
references: 11850635
references: Epilepsia. 2007 May;48(5):886-93
references: 17508998
references: J Econ Behav Organ. 1998 Feb;34(1):1-47
references: 12321893
references: Can J Psychiatry. 1979 Aug;24(5):437-49
references: 487338
references: Transcult Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;42(2):219-41
references: 16114584
references: Psychol Bull. 2007 Jan;133(1):46-64
references: 17201570
references: Med Anthropol Q. 2010 Sep;24(3):399-420
references: 20949843
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Oct 29;351(1346):1413-20
references: 8941953
references: Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1969 Summer;15(3):165-78
references: 5394187
references: Am J Public Health. 2002 Oct;92(10):1593-6; discussion 1594-5
references: 12356599
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2711-22
references: 20679114
references: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 May;28(3):333-42
references: 15225975
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2663-74
references: 20679110
references: Nature. 1994 Dec 15;372(6507):669-72
references: 7990957
references: Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1976 Mar;10(1):39-45
references: 1065314
references: Br J Psychiatry. 1986 Aug;149:145-55
references: 3535977
references: Science. 2009 Oct 30;326(5953):682-8
references: 19900925
references: Nat Neurosci. 2001 Apr;4(4):437-41
references: 11276236
references: Psychopathology. 1997 Mar-Apr;30(2):93-9
references: 9168565
references: Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):470-4
references: 9624002
references: Brain. 1998 Jan;121 ( Pt 1):47-57
references: 9549487
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 11;107 Suppl 2:9007-14
references: 20445099
references: Child Abuse Negl. 2011 Sep;35(9):741-52
references: 21943497
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 May;2(5):352-63
references: 11331919
references: Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2002 Dec;23 Suppl 4:105-15
references: 12496741
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2723-35
references: 20679115
references: Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jan;7(1):3-7
references: 17366150
references: Am J Public Health. 2002 Oct;92(10):1564-6
references: 12356591