title: A data-driven approach to preprocessing Illumina 450K methylation array data.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  As the most stable and experimentally accessible epigenetic mark, DNA methylation is of great interest to the research community. The landscape of DNA methylation across tissues, through development and in disease pathogenesis is not yet well characterized. Thus there is a need for rapid and cost effective methods for assessing genome-wide levels of DNA methylation. The Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 (450K) BeadChip is a very useful addition to the available methods for DNA methylation analysis but its complex design, incorporating two different assay methods, requires careful consideration. Accordingly, several normalization schemes have been published. We have taken advantage of known DNA methylation patterns associated with genomic imprinting and X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), in addition to the performance of SNP genotyping assays present on the array, to derive three independent metrics which we use to test alternative schemes of correction and normalization. These metrics also have potential utility as quality scores for datasets.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The standard index of DNA methylation at any specific CpG site is β = M/(M + U + 100) where M and U are methylated and unmethylated signal intensities, respectively. Betas (βs) calculated from raw signal intensities (the default GenomeStudio behavior) perform well, but using 11 methylomic datasets we demonstrate that quantile normalization methods produce marked improvement, even in highly consistent data, by all three metrics. The commonly used procedure of normalizing betas is inferior to the separate normalization of M and U, and it is also advantageous to normalize Type I and Type II assays separately. More elaborate manipulation of quantiles proves to be counterproductive.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Careful selection of preprocessing steps can minimize variance and thus improve statistical power, especially for the detection of the small absolute DNA methylation changes likely associated with complex disease phenotypes. For the convenience of the research community we have created a user-friendly R software package called wateRmelon, downloadable from bioConductor, compatible with the existing methylumi, minfi and IMA packages, that allows others to utilize the same normalization methods and data quality tests on 450K data.
authors: Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK.
authors: Ruth
authors: R
authors: Pidsley
authors: Chloe C
authors: CC
authors: Y Wong
authors: Manuela
authors: M
authors: Volta
authors: Katie
authors: K
authors: Lunnon
authors: Jonathan
authors: J
authors: Mill
authors: Leonard C
authors: LC
authors: Schalkwyk
mesh_terms: D041321:Chromosomes, Human, X / Q000235:genetics; D019295:Computational Biology / Q000379:methods*; D019175:DNA Methylation; D018392:Genomic Imprinting; D006801:Humans; D020411:Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide / Q000235:genetics; D013223:Statistics as Topic
references: Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 15;29(2):189-96
references: 23175756
references: Epigenetics. 2008 Mar-Apr;3(2):89-96
references: 18398312
references: Biostatistics. 2003 Apr;4(2):249-64
references: 12925520
references: PLoS Genet. 2011 Sep;7(9):e1002300
references: 21980303
references: Genomics. 2011 Apr;97(4):214-22
references: 21211562
references: BMC Res Notes. 2012 Apr 30;5:210
references: 22546179
references: BMC Med Genomics. 2011 Dec 16;4:84
references: 22171553
references: BMC Cancer. 2011 Feb 11;11:66
references: 21314941
references: Bioinformatics. 2005 Oct 15;21(20):3940-1
references: 16096348
references: BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Nov 30;11:587
references: 21118553
references: Epigenomics. 2011 Dec;3(6):771-84
references: 22126295
references: Bioinformatics. 2012 Mar 1;28(5):729-30
references: 22253290
references: Epigenetics. 2011 Jun;6(6):692-702
references: 21593595
references: Genome Biol. 2012 Jun 15;13(6):R44
references: 22703947
references: Epigenomics. 2012 Jun;4(3):325-41
references: 22690668
references: Hum Mol Genet. 2011 Dec 15;20(24):4786-96
references: 21908516
references: Epigenomics. 2009 Oct;1(1):177-200
references: 22122642
references: Neuromolecular Med. 2013 Mar;15(1):95-101
references: 22961555
references: Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;41(1):74-8
references: 22269254
references: Genome Biol. 2004;5(10):R80
references: 15461798
references: Genomics. 2011 Oct;98(4):288-95
references: 21839163