title: An application of item response theory to fMRI data: prospects and pitfalls.
abstract: When using functional brain imaging to study neuropsychiatric patients an important challenge is determining whether the imaging task assesses individual differences with equal precision in healthy control and impaired patient groups. Classical test theory (CTT) requires separate reliability studies of patients and controls to determine equivalent measurement precision with additional studies to determine measurement precision for different levels of disease severity. Unlike CTT, item response theory (IRT) provides estimates of measurement error for different levels of ability, without the need for separate studies, and can determine if different tests are equivalently difficult when investigating differential deficits between groups. To determine the potential value of IRT in functional brain imaging, IRT was applied to behavioral data obtained during a multi-center functional MRI (fMRI) study of working memory (WM). Average item difficulty was approximately one standard deviation below the ability scale mean, supporting the task's sensitivity to individual differences within the ability range of patients with WM impairment, but not within the range of most controls. The correlation of IRT estimated ability with fMRI activation during the task recognition period supported the linkage of the latent IRT scale to brain activation data. IRT can meaningfully contribute to the design of fMRI tasks.
authors: University of California, Department of Psychiatry, La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92093, United States.
authors: Michael L
authors: ML
authors: Thomas
authors: Gregory G
authors: GG
authors: Brown
authors: Wesley K
authors: WK
authors: Thompson
authors: James
authors: J
authors: Voyvodic
authors: Douglas N
authors: DN
authors: Greve
authors: Jessica A
authors: JA
authors: Turner
authors: Daniel H
authors: DH
authors: Mathalon
authors: Judith
authors: J
authors: Ford
authors: Cynthia G
authors: CG
authors: Wible
authors: Steven G
authors: SG
authors: Potkin
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D059907:Functional Neuroimaging; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D011594:Psychometrics; D011930:Reaction Time; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
references: Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3049-67
references: 19630097
references: Biol Psychiatry. 2012 May 15;71(10):881-9
references: 22401986
references: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992 May;49(5):409-14
references: 1586277
references: Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 15;35(3):1093-102
references: 17346988
references: Magn Reson Med. 2011 Apr;65(4):1053-61
references: 21413069
references: Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2006;2:51-81
references: 17716064
references: Neuropsychology. 2011 Sep;25(5):622-33
references: 21534685
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2163-75
references: 20932915
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Oct;4(3):149-61
references: 8924044
references: Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 15;31(4):1693-9
references: 16603387
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 Nov;114(4):599-611
references: 16351383
references: Assessment. 2011 Sep;18(3):291-307
references: 20644081
references: Schizophr Bull. 2009 Jan;35(1):19-31
references: 19042912
references: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jul;36(1):39-54
references: 22314879
references: Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009;5:27-48
references: 18976138