title: From repulsion to attraction: species- and spatial context-dependent threat sensitive response of the spider mite Tetranychus urticae to predatory mite cues.
abstract: Prey perceiving predation risk commonly change their behavior to avoid predation. However, antipredator strategies are costly. Therefore, according to the threat-sensitive predator avoidance hypothesis, prey should match the intensity of their antipredator behaviors to the degree of threat, which may depend on the predator species and the spatial context. We assessed threat sensitivity of the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, to the cues of three predatory mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis, Neoseiulus californicus, and Amblyseius andersoni, posing different degrees of risk in two spatial contexts. We first conducted a no-choice test measuring oviposition and activity of T. urticae exposed to chemical traces of predators or traces plus predator eggs. Then, we tested the site preference of T. urticae in choice tests, using artificial cages and leaves. In the no-choice test, T. urticae deposited their first egg later in the presence of cues of P. persimilis than of the other two predators and cue absence, indicating interspecific threat-sensitivity. T. urticae laid also fewer eggs in the presence of cues of P. persimilis and A. andersoni than of N. californicus and cue absence. In the artificial cage test, the spider mites preferred the site with predator traces, whereas in the leaf test, they preferentially resided on leaves without traces. We argue that in a nonplant environment, chemical predator traces do not indicate a risk for T. urticae, and instead, these traces function as indirect habitat cues. The spider mites were attracted to these cues because they associated them with the existence of a nearby host plant.
authors: Group of Arthropod Ecology and Behavior, Division of Plant Protection, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Peter Jordanstrasse 82, 1190, Vienna, Austria.
authors: M Celeste
authors: MC
authors: Fernández Ferrari
authors: Peter
authors: P
authors: Schausberger
mesh_terms: D000819:Animal Communication; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D020387:Food Chain; D008925:Mites / Q000737:chemistry / Q000502:physiology*; D010058:Oviposition / Q000502:physiology
references: Anim Behav. 2011 Jan;81(1):177-184
references: 21317973
references: Naturwissenschaften. 2008 Dec;95(12):1195-8
references: 18754089
references: Exp Appl Acarol. 2010 Jan;50(1):1-8
references: 19526199
references: Oecologia. 2009 Jan;158(4):615-23
references: 18982355
references: Oecologia. 2002 Jun;132(1):143-149
references: 28547275
references: Oecologia. 2007 Mar;151(2):262-7
references: 17102994
references: J Anim Ecol. 2009 May;78(3):556-62
references: 19076259
references: J Anim Ecol. 2008 Nov;77(6):1109-14
references: 18624737
references: Oecologia. 2007 Jan;150(4):699-705
references: 16955289
references: BMC Ecol. 2003 Nov 13;3:10
references: 14614781
references: J Chem Ecol. 2003 Nov;29(11):2609-13
references: 14682537
references: Pest Manag Sci. 2007 Jul;63(7):658-76
references: 17533640
references: Annu Rev Entomol. 1997;42:291-321
references: 15012316
references: Anim Behav. 1997 Nov;54(5):1053-62
references: 9398362
references: Exp Appl Acarol. 2010 Jan;50(1):23-34
references: 19517257