title: Context-dependent generalization.
abstract: The pattern of generalization following motor learning can provide a probe on the neural mechanisms underlying learning. For example, the breadth of generalization to untrained regions of space after visuomotor adaptation to targets in a restricted region of space has been attributed to the directional tuning properties of neurons in the motor system. Building on this idea, the effect of different types of perturbations on generalization (e.g., rotation vs. visual translation) have been attributed to the selection of differentially tuned populations. Overlooked in this discussion is consideration of how the context of the training environment may constrain generalization. Here, we explore the role of context by having participants learn a visuomotor rotation or a translational shift in two different contexts, one in which the array of targets were presented in a circular arrangement and the other in which they were presented in a rectilinear arrangement. The perturbation and environments were either consistent (e.g., rotation with circular arrangement) or inconsistent (e.g., rotation with rectilinear arrangement). The pattern of generalization across the workspace was much more dependent on the context of the environment than on the perturbation, with broad generalization for the rectilinear arrangement for both types of perturbations. Moreover, the generalization pattern for this context was evident, even when the perturbation was introduced in a gradual manner, precluding the use of an explicit strategy. We describe how current models of generalization might be modified to incorporate these results, building on the idea that context provides a strong bias for how the motor system infers the nature of the visuomotor perturbation and, in turn, how this information influences the pattern of generalization.
authors: Department of Psychology, Princeton University Princeton, NJ, USA.
authors: Jordan A
authors: JA
authors: Taylor
authors: Richard B
authors: RB
authors: Ivry
keywords: generalization (psychology); models; motor adaptation; motor control; motor learning; theoretical
references: Phys Ther. 2000 Apr;80(4):373-85
references: 10758522
references: J Neurosci. 1994 May;14(5 Pt 2):3208-24
references: 8182467
references: J Neurophysiol. 2011 Dec;106(6):3157-72
references: 21917998
references: J Neurosci. 2005 Sep 28;25(39):8948-53
references: 16192385
references: J Neurosci. 1996 Nov 1;16(21):7085-96
references: 8824344
references: J Neurosci. 2000 Dec 1;20(23):8916-24
references: 11102502
references: Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
references: 5146491
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1989;12:157-83
references: 2648948
references: Exp Brain Res. 2006 Mar;169(3):417-26
references: 16328305
references: J Neurophysiol. 2013 Jan;109(1):202-15
references: 23054603
references: Neuroreport. 1996 Oct 2;7(14):2357-61
references: 8951852
references: Science. 1986 Sep 26;233(4771):1416-9
references: 3749885
references: Psychol Res. 1993;55(3):208-22
references: 8416040
references: J Neurosci. 2004 Sep 15;24(37):8084-9
references: 15371509
references: J Neurophysiol. 1997 Jul;78(1):554-60
references: 9242306
references: Nature. 2004 Oct 14;431(7010):768-74
references: 15483597
references: PLoS One. 2010 Feb 24;5(2):e9399
references: 20195373
references: Exp Brain Res. 1997 Jul;115(3):557-61
references: 9262212
references: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Nov;102(5):2921-32
references: 19741098
references: J Neurosci. 2003 Oct 8;23(27):9032-45
references: 14534237
references: Brain Res. 2008 Mar 4;1197:123-34
references: 18241844
references: J Neurosci. 2008 Sep 24;28(39):9610-8
references: 18815247
references: Nature. 2001 Nov 1;414(6859):69-73
references: 11689944
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Jun;19(3):517-30
references: 8331313
references: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Aug;102(2):931-40
references: 19494195
references: J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 24;32(43):14951-65
references: 23100418
references: Nature. 1997 Mar 27;386(6623):392-5
references: 9121554
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999 Dec;9(6):713-7
references: 10607638
references: J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jun;103(6):2938-52
references: 20357068
references: Exp Brain Res. 2010 May;203(1):75-87
references: 20237773
references: Nature. 2000 Oct 12;407(6805):742-7
references: 11048720
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Mar;1251:1-12
references: 22329960