title: Oculomotor Exploration of Impossible Figures in Early Infancy.
abstract: Previous studies with young infants revealed that young infants can distinguish between displays of possible or impossible figures, which may require detection of inconsistent depth relations among local line junctions that disrupt global object configurations. Here, we used an eye-tracking paradigm to record eye movements in young infants during an object discrimination task with matched pairs of possible and impossible figures. Our goal was to identify differential patterns of oculomotor activity as infants viewed pictures of possible and impossible objects. We predicted that infants would actively attend to specific pictorial depth cues that denote shape (e.g., T-junctions), and in the context of an impossible figure that they would fixate to a greater extent in anomalous regions of the display relative to other parts. By the age of 4 months, infants fixated reliably longer overall on displays of impossible vs. possible cubes, specifically within the critical region where the incompatible lines and irreconcilable depth relations were located, implying an early capacity for selective attention to critical line junction information and integration of local depth cues necessary to perceive object coherence.
authors: New York University, Department of Psychology, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, sms425@nyu.edu.
authors: Sarah M
authors: SM
authors: Shuwairi
authors: Scott P
authors: SP
authors: Johnson
keywords: 3D coherence; cue integration; eye tracking; impossible objects; object perception in infancy; pictorial depth cues; visual development
references: J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1968 Oct;66(2):247-58
references: 5722034
references: Percept Psychophys. 2001 Feb;63(2):209-25
references: 11281097
references: Perception. 1994;23(12):1427-35
references: 7792132
references: Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1978 Feb 23;200(1140):269-94
references: 24223
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1987 Nov;13(4):545-57
references: 2965746
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1978 May;4(2):284-93
references: 660101
references: Psychol Rev. 1987 Apr;94(2):115-147
references: 3575582
references: Infancy. 2010 Nov;15(6):636-649
references: 32693461
references: J Exp Child Psychol. 1990 Feb;49(1):101-25
references: 2303772
references: Percept Psychophys. 1984 Oct;36(4):353-8
references: 6522232
references: Can J Psychol. 1992 Jun;46(2):143-69
references: 1451039
references: J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Sep;104(1):115-23
references: 19038399
references: Cognition. 1987 Nov;27(2):145-79
references: 3691024
references: Perception. 1981;10(1):91-105
references: 7255087
references: Infant Behav Dev. 2009 Jun;32(3):245-53
references: 19328557
references: J Exp Child Psychol. 2001 Dec;80(4):315-32
references: 11689033
references: Infancy. 2004 Sep;6(2):185-201
references: 33430533
references: J Exp Child Psychol. 1998 Sep;70(3):207-24
references: 9742180
references: J Exp Child Psychol. 1999 Mar;72(3):177-92
references: 10047438
references: Cogn Psychol. 1983 Oct;15(4):483-524
references: 6641127
references: Dev Psychol. 2006 Nov;42(6):1236-45
references: 17087555
references: Cogn Psychol. 1988 Jan;20(1):38-64
references: 3338267
references: Percept Psychophys. 1988 Feb;43(2):165-71
references: 3340515
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Mar;7(3):102-104
references: 12639685
references: Psychol Sci. 2007 Apr;18(4):303-7
references: 17470252
references: Dev Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1214-24
references: 18793055