title: Compression therapy: clinical and experimental evidence.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  A review is given on the different tools of compression therapy and their mode of action.
  
  
  METHODS
  Interface pressure and stiffness of compression devices, alone or in combination can be measured in vivo. Hemodynamic effects have been demonstrated by measuring venous volume and flow velocity using MRI, Duplex and radioisotopes, venous reflux and venous pumping function using plethysmography and phlebodynamometry. Oedema reduction can be measured by limb volumetry.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Compression stockings exerting a pressure of ~20 mmHg on the distal leg are able to increase venous blood flow velocity in the supine position and to prevent leg swelling after prolonged sitting and standing. In the upright position, an interface pressure of more than 50 mmHg is needed for intermittent occlusion of incompetent veins and for a reduction of ambulatory venous hypertension during walking. Such high intermittent interface pressure peaks exerting a "massaging effect" may rather be achieved by short stretch multilayer bandages than by elastic stockings.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Compression is a cornerstone in the management of venous and lymphatic insufficiency. However, this treatment modality is still underestimated and deserves better understanding and improved educational programs, both for patients and medical staff.
authors: The Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
authors: Hugo
authors: H
authors: Partsch
keywords: compression bandages; compression pressure; compression stockings; stiffness
references: J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jan;55(1):122-8
references: 21944912
references: Int Angiol. 2008 Jun;27(3):193-219
references: 18506124
references: Dermatol Surg. 2006 Feb;32(2):224-32; discussion 233
references: 16442043
references: Int Angiol. 2011 Dec;30(6):527-33
references: 22233613
references: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Aug;42(2):261-6
references: 21612949
references: Am J Med. 2010 Aug;123(8):735-40
references: 20670728
references: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Mar;33(3):309-10
references: 17196406
references: Vasa. 1984;13(1):58-64
references: 6702282
references: J Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;52(4):925-31
references: 20620002
references: J Vasc Surg. 2012 May;55(5):1376-85
references: 22429451
references: Dermatol Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):985-91
references: 21575097
references: Phlebology. 2008;23(6):252-8
references: 19029006
references: Dermatol Surg. 2008 May;34(5):600-9
references: 18261106
references: Int Angiol. 2004 Dec;23(4):317-45
references: 15767979
references: Int Wound J. 2013 Oct;10(5):516-26
references: 22716023
references: Phlebology. 2011 Oct;26(7):285-91
references: 21478139
references: Int Angiol. 2010 Oct;29(5):408-10
references: 20924342