title: Gender differences in intellectual performance persist at the limits of individual capabilities.
abstract: Males predominate at the top in chess, and chess is a useful domain to investigate possible causes of gender differences in high achievement. Opportunity, interest and extent of practice can be controlled for. Organized chess has objective performance measures, extensive longitudinal population-level data and little gatekeeper influence. Previous studies of gender differences in chess performance have not controlled adequately for females on average playing fewer rated games and dropping out at higher rates. The present study did so by examining performance of international chess players at asymptote and over equal numbers of rated games. Males still were very disproportionately represented at the top. Top female players showed signs of having less natural talent for chess than top males, such as taking more rated games to gain the grandmaster title. The hypothesis that males predominate because many more males play chess was tested by comparing gender performance differences in nations with varying percentages of female players. In well-practised participants, gender performance differences stayed constant even when the average national percentage of female international players increased from 4.2% to 32.3%. In Georgia, where women are encouraged strongly to play chess and females constitute nearly 32% of international players, gender performance differences are still sizeable. Males on average may have some innate advantages in developing and exercising chess skill.
authors: University of New South Wales, Australia.
authors: Robert W
authors: RW
authors: Howard
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001076:Aptitude; D004522:Educational Status; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007194:India; D007360:Intelligence; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D010988:Play and Playthings; D012727:Sex Characteristics; D012744:Sex Ratio