title: On the feasibility of optical-CT imaging in media of different refractive index.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Achieving accurate optical-CT 3D dosimetry without the use of viscous refractive index (RI) matching fluids would greatly increase convenience.
  
  
  METHODS
  Software has been developed to simulate optical-CT 3D dosimetry for a range of scanning configurations including parallel-beam, point, and converging light sources. For each configuration the efficacy of three refractive media was investigated: air, water, a fluid closely matched to PRESAGE(®), and perfect matching (RI = 1.00, 1.33, 1.49, and 1.501 respectively). Reconstructions were performed using both filtered backprojection (FBP) and algebraic reconstruction technique (ART). The efficacy of the three configurations and the two algorithms was evaluated by calculating the usable radius (i.e., the outermost radius where data were accurate to within 2%), and gamma (Γ) analysis. This definition recognizes that for optical-CT imaging, errors are greatest near the edge of the dosimeter, where refraction can be most pronounced. Simulations were performed on three types of dose distribution: uniform, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and brachytherapy (Cs-137).
  
  
  RESULTS
  For a uniformly irradiated dosimeter the usable radius achieved with filtered backprojection was 68% for water-matching and 31% for dry-scanning in air. Algebraic reconstruction gave usable radii of 99% for both water and air (dry-scanning), indicating greater recovery of useful data for the uniform distribution. FBP and ART performed equally well for a VMAT dose distribution where less dose is delivered near the edge of the dosimeter. In this case, the usable radius was 86% and 53% for scanning in water and air, respectively. For brachytherapy, the usable radius was 99% and 98% for scanning in water and air, respectively using FBP, and a major decrease was seen with ART. Point source geometry provided 1%-2% larger usable radii than parallel geometry. Converging geometry recovered less usable dosimetry data (up to 10% reduced usable radii) than point and parallel geometries. A further disadvantage of converging geometry was an increased requirement on detector size by up to 18°.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  For applications where dose information is not required in the periphery of the dosimeter, some dry and low-viscous matching configurations may be feasible. For all three dose distributions (uniform, VMAT, brachytherapy) the point source geometry produced slightly more favorable results (an extra 1%-2% usable radii) than parallel and converging. When dosimetry is required on the periphery, best results were obtained using close refractive matching and ART. A concern for water or dry-scanning is the increase in required detector size, introducing potential cost penalties for manufacturing.
authors: Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
authors: Leith
authors: L
authors: Rankine
authors: Mark
authors: M
authors: Oldham
mesh_terms: D005240:Feasibility Studies; D055620:Optical Phenomena; D011874:Radiometry / Q000379:methods*; D050397:Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated; D012984:Software; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed
references: Med Phys. 2006 May;33(5):1338-45
references: 16752569
references: Phys Med Biol. 2010 Sep 7;55(17):4885-98
references: 20679702
references: Med Phys. 2009 Jan;36(1):71-82
references: 19235375
references: Med Phys. 2006 May;33(5):1412-9
references: 16752577
references: Med Phys. 2006 Oct;33(10):3962-72
references: 17089858
references: Phys Med Biol. 1996 Dec;41(12):2695-704
references: 8971963
references: J Phys Conf Ser. 2010;250(1):311-315
references: 21617744
references: Phys Med Biol. 2001 Dec;46(12):3191-213
references: 11768500
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):540-6
references: 22361085
references: Med Phys. 2011 Aug;38(8):4846-57
references: 21928656
references: Phys Med Biol. 2010 May 21;55(10):2819-40
references: 20413828
references: Med Phys. 1985 Mar-Apr;12(2):252-5
references: 4000088
references: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1989;8(1):50-5
references: 18230499
references: J Theor Biol. 1970 Dec;29(3):471-81
references: 5492997
references: Med Phys. 2012 Jul;39(7):4515-23
references: 22830783
references: Med Phys. 2008 Jan;35(1):101-11
references: 18293567
references: Med Phys. 2004 Nov;31(11):3024-33
references: 15587656
references: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 May;29(5):1204-12
references: 20304723
references: Phys Med Biol. 2012 Feb 7;57(3):665-83
references: 22241587