title: Tree species composition influences enzyme activities and microbial biomass in the rhizosphere: a rhizobox approach.
abstract: Monoculture causes nutrient losses and leads to declines in soil fertility and biomass production over successive cultivation. The rhizosphere, a zone of usually high microbial activities and clearly distinct from bulk soil, is defined as the volume of soil around living roots and influenced by root activities. Here we investigated enzyme activities and microbial biomass in the rhizosphere under different tree compositions. Six treatments with poplar, willow, and alder mono- or mixed seedlings were grown in rhizoboxes. Enzyme activities associated with nitrogen cycling and microbial biomass were measured in all rhizosphere and bulk soils. Both enzyme activities and microbial biomass in the rhizosphere differed significantly tree compositions. Microbial biomass contents were more sensitive to the changes of the rhizosphere environment than enzyme activities. Tree species coexistence did not consistently increase tested enzyme activities and microbial biomass, but varied depending on the complementarities of species traits. In general, impacts of tree species and coexistence were more pronounced on microbial composition than total biomass, evidenced by differences in microbial biomass C/N ratios stratified across the rhizosphere soils. Compared to poplar clone monoculture, other tree species addition obviously increased rhizosphere urease activity, but greatly reduced rhizosphere L-asparaginase activity. Poplar growth was enhanced only when coexisted with alder. Our results suggested that a highly productive or keystone plant species in a community had greater influence over soil functions than the contribution of diversity.
authors: College of Forest Resources and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, PR China.
authors: Shengzuo
authors: S
authors: Fang
authors: Dong
authors: D
authors: Liu
authors: Ye
authors: Y
authors: Tian
authors: Shiping
authors: S
authors: Deng
authors: Xulan
authors: X
authors: Shang
mesh_terms: D000383:Agriculture; D029661:Alnus / Q000201:enzymology / Q000254:growth & development; D001215:Asparaginase / Q000378:metabolism; D018533:Biomass; D002244:Carbon / Q000378:metabolism; D009584:Nitrogen / Q000378:metabolism; D058458:Nitrogen Cycle; D010447:Peptide Hydrolases / Q000378:metabolism; D018517:Plant Roots / Q000254:growth & development; D032107:Populus; D058441:Rhizosphere; D032108:Salix / Q000201:enzymology / Q000254:growth & development; D012988:Soil Microbiology; D014197:Trees / Q000201:enzymology / Q000254:growth & development*; D014510:Urease / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D002244:Carbon; D010447:Peptide Hydrolases; D001215:Asparaginase; D014510:Urease; D009584:Nitrogen
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 May 12;95(10):5632-6
references: 9576935
references: Oecologia. 2000 Nov;125(3):420-427
references: 28547337
references: New Phytol. 2004 Sep;163(3):459-480
references: 33873745
references: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009 Apr;68(1):1-13
references: 19243436
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Nov;71(11):6784-92
references: 16269710
references: J Environ Sci (China). 2010;22(7):1040-8
references: 21174994
references: J Environ Manage. 2007 Nov;85(3):672-9
references: 17110018
references: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008 Mar;63(3):372-82
references: 18205817
references: Can J Microbiol. 2004 Aug;50(8):521-77
references: 15467782