title: Long-range order in canary song.
abstract: Bird songs range in form from the simple notes of a Chipping Sparrow to the rich performance of the nightingale. Non-adjacent correlations can be found in the syntax of some birdsongs, indicating that the choice of what to sing next is determined not only by the current syllable, but also by previous syllables sung. Here we examine the song of the domesticated canary, a complex singer whose song consists of syllables, grouped into phrases that are arranged in flexible sequences. Phrases are defined by a fundamental time-scale that is independent of the underlying syllable duration. We show that the ordering of phrases is governed by long-range rules: the choice of what phrase to sing next in a given context depends on the history of the song, and for some syllables, highly specific rules produce correlations in song over timescales of up to ten seconds. The neural basis of these long-range correlations may provide insight into how complex behaviors are assembled from more elementary, stereotyped modules.
authors: Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
authors: Jeffrey E
authors: JE
authors: Markowitz
authors: Elizabeth
authors: E
authors: Ivie
authors: Laura
authors: L
authors: Kligler
authors: Timothy J
authors: TJ
authors: Gardner
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002171:Canaries / Q000502:physiology*; D019295:Computational Biology / Q000379:methods*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D008954:Models, Biological; D015233:Models, Statistical; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014828:Vocalization, Animal / Q000502:physiology*
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 22;276(1669):2881-6
references: 19474048
references: Nature. 2008 Jan 17;451(7176):305-10
references: 18202651
references: Biometrika. 1951 Jun;38(1-2):141-9
references: 14848119
references: Anim Behav. 2000 Jun;59(6):1167-1176
references: 10877896
references: Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):579-594
references: 9784206
references: Nature. 2010 Nov 18;468(7322):394-9
references: 20972420
references: J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 20;26(38):9619-28
references: 16988032
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Jul 6;31(27):10023-33
references: 21734294
references: PLoS One. 2008 Jul 09;3(7):e2581
references: 18612467
references: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Nov;80(5 Pt 1):051902
references: 20365001
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1016:724-35
references: 15313802
references: J Comput Neurosci. 2011 Nov;31(3):509-32
references: 21404048
references: Biol Cybern. 2007 Dec;97(5-6):441-8
references: 17965875
references: J Neurosci. 1991 Sep;11(9):2896-913
references: 1880555
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24516
references: 21915345
references: Bioinformatics. 2001 Jan;17(1):23-43
references: 11222260
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Mar;7(3):e1001108
references: 21445230
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2001 Nov 12;87(20):208101
references: 11690514
references: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003 Oct;68(4 Pt 1):041908
references: 14682974
references: Nature. 2002 Sep 5;419(6902):65-70
references: 12214232
references: Science. 2005 May 13;308(5724):1046-9
references: 15890887
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Dec;7(12):e1002303
references: 22194676
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 18;103(16):6094-9
references: 16601097