title: Daily temperature fluctuations unpredictably influence developmental rate and morphology at a critical early larval stage in a frog.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Environmental temperature has profound consequences for early amphibian development and many field and laboratory studies have examined this. Most laboratory studies that have characterized the influence of temperature on development in amphibians have failed to incorporate the realities of diel temperature fluctuations (DTF), which can be considerable for pond-breeding amphibians.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We evaluated the effects of different ecologically relevant ranges of DTF compared with effects of constant temperatures on development of embryos and larvae of the Korean fire-bellied toad (Bombina orientalis). We constructed thermal reaction norms for developmental stage, snout-vent length, and tail length by fitting a Gompertz-Gaussian function to measurements taken from embryos after 66 hours of development in 12 different constant temperature environments between 14°C and 36°C. We used these reaction norms as null models to test the hypothesis that developmental effects of DTF are more than the sum of average constant temperature effects over the distribution of temperatures experienced. We predicted from these models that growth and differentiation would be positively correlated with average temperature at low levels of DTF but not at higher levels of DTF. We tested our prediction in the laboratory by rearing B. orientalis embryos at three average temperatures (20°C, 24°C, and 28°C) and four levels of thermal variation (0°C, 6°C, 13°C, and 20°C). Several of the observed responses to DTF were significantly different from both predictions of the model and from responses in constant temperature treatments at the same average temperatures. At an average temperature of 24°C, only the highest level of DTF affected differentiation and growth rates, but at both cooler and warmer average temperatures, moderate DTF was enough to slow developmental and tail growth rates.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These results demonstrate that both the magnitude of DTF range and thermal averages need to be considered simultaneously when parsing the effects of changing thermal environments on complex developmental responses, particularly when they have potential functional and adaptive significance.
authors: Department of Biology, Reed College, Portland, OR 97202, USA.
authors: Juliana M
authors: JM
authors: Arrighi
authors: Ezra S
authors: ES
authors: Lencer
authors: Advait
authors: A
authors: Jukar
authors: Daesik
authors: D
authors: Park
authors: Patrick C
authors: PC
authors: Phillips
authors: Robert H
authors: RH
authors: Kaplan
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001001:Anura / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000196:embryology*; D017753:Ecosystem; D013696:Temperature
references: J Exp Biol. 2011 Jun 1;214(Pt 11):1965-70
references: 21562184
references: Evolution. 2004 Jan;58(1):160-5
references: 15058728
references: J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2008 Mar 1;309(3):138-46
references: 18236390
references: Oecologia. 1987 Jan;71(2):273-279
references: 28312256
references: PLoS One. 2010 Feb 09;5(2):e9117
references: 20161745
references: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2009 Mar-Apr;82(2):105-12
references: 19199555
references: J Anim Ecol. 2006 May;75(3):686-92
references: 16689951
references: Oecologia. 2003 Jan;134(2):182-8
references: 12647158
references: Integr Comp Biol. 2011 Nov;51(5):653-61
references: 21810893
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 4;107(18):8292-7
references: 20404185
references: Oecologia. 2003 May;135(4):548-54
references: 16228254
references: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2010 Sep-Oct;83(5):869-76
references: 20687844
references: Evolution. 2006 Jan;60(1):142-56
references: 16568639
references: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2006 Jan-Feb;79(1):140-9
references: 16380935
references: Evolution. 1981 May;35(3):423-432
references: 28563592
references: Am Nat. 2008 Mar;171(3):E102-18
references: 18271721
references: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2005 Jan-Feb;78(1):18-30
references: 15702459
references: Br J Ophthalmol. 1940 Apr;24(4):153-78
references: 18169685
references: J Anim Ecol. 2011 Jan;80(1):79-88
references: 20964684
references: Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):20-9
references: 18173498
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Apr 11;92(8):3507-10
references: 11607529
references: Evolution. 2009 Feb;63(2):537-41
references: 19154355
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 1989 May;4(5):131-5
references: 21227334
references: J Exp Biol. 2012 Feb 15;215(Pt 4):694-701
references: 22279077
references: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2011 Nov-Dec;84(6):543-52
references: 22030847
references: J Morphol. 2010 Sep;271(9):1044-52
references: 20730918
references: Zoology (Jena). 2003;106(2):91-9
references: 16351894
references: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2010 Mar-Apr;83(2):197-206
references: 20001251
references: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2010 Jul-Aug;83(4):597-607
references: 20477533
references: Genetica. 2001;112-113:183-98
references: 11838765
references: Ecol Evol. 2012 Jul;2(7):1637-43
references: 22957168
references: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2000 Sep-Oct;73(5):621-8
references: 11073798
references: Integr Comp Biol. 2011 Jul;51(1):111-27
references: 21642239
references: Integr Comp Biol. 2003 Jul;43(3):470-7
references: 21680455
references: Evolution. 2009 Apr;63(4):898-909
references: 19154374
references: Evolution. 2008 May;62(5):1243-51
references: 18266988