title: Latent classes of prognosis conversations in palliative care: a mixed-methods study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Prognosis conversations are complex phenomena of substantial importance to palliative care (PC), yet these remain poorly understood. This study empirically identifies and describes major types of prognosis conversations that occur in the natural setting of PC consultation.
  
  
  METHODS
  We audio-recorded and coded 71 inpatient "goals of care" PC consultations at a large academic medical center in the northeastern United States. We used quantitative Latent Class Analyses for identifying discrete prognosis conversation types and qualitative Dimensional Analyses for more fully describing the process and content of the latent classes.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We observed three discrete types of prognosis conversations, each placing different communication demands upon all participants for achieving goal-concordant care: Navigating Options & Goals (56% of consultations), Facilitating New Goals (23%) and Preparing for End-of-Life (21%). This study provides the first step for developing educational and clinical prognosis communication interventions that are tailored to common decision-making contexts facing seriously ill patients, their families, and PC clinicians.
authors: Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA. Robert_Gramling@URMC.Rochester.edu
authors: Robert
authors: R
authors: Gramling
authors: Sally
authors: S
authors: Norton
authors: Susan
authors: S
authors: Ladwig
authors: Paul
authors: P
authors: Winters
authors: Maureen
authors: M
authors: Metzger
authors: Timothy
authors: T
authors: Quill
authors: Stewart
authors: S
authors: Alexander
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003142:Communication; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D009511:New England; D010166:Palliative Care; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011379:Prognosis; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D013637:Tape Recording
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:255-78
references: 18154502
references: J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 10;29(17):2319-26
references: 21555700
references: Acad Med. 2006 Nov;81(11):1008-12
references: 17065871
references: Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12;167(5):453-60
references: 17353492
references: Ann Intern Med. 2003 Mar 4;138(5):439-43
references: 12614110
references: Psychooncology. 2010 Apr;19(4):408-14
references: 19441006
references: Support Care Cancer. 2011 Jan;19(1):155-9
references: 20820814
references: Struct Equ Modeling. 2007;14(4):671-694
references: 19953201
references: Soc Sci Med. 2007 Aug;65(3):586-98
references: 17462801
references: Qual Health Res. 2003 Jul;13(6):871-83
references: 12891720
references: Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Feb;70(1 Suppl):94S-112S
references: 23035055
references: JAMA. 2011 Oct 5;306(13):1483-4
references: 21972312
references: J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1203-8
references: 20124172
references: Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Mar;70(3):430-6
references: 18201858
references: Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 1;155(9):593-601
references: 22041948
references: Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jul;76(1):51-6
references: 19041211
references: J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 20;25(36):5748-52
references: 18089870
references: Am Psychol. 2003 Sep;58(9):697-720
references: 14584987
references: Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
references: 843571
references: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Feb;45(2):202-12
references: 22652135
references: Support Care Cancer. 2008 Sep;16(9):1049-57
references: 18196288