title: Echolocation may have real-life advantages for blind people: an analysis of survey data.
abstract: Some people can echolocate by making sonar emissions (e.g., mouth-clicks, finger snaps, feet shuffling, humming, cane tapping, etc.) and listening to the returning echoes. To date there are no statistics available about how many blind people use echolocation, but anecdotal reports in the literature suggest that perhaps between 20 and 30% of totally blind people may use it, suggesting that echolocation affords broad functional benefits. Consistent with the notion that blind individuals benefit from the use of echolocation, previous research conducted under controlled experimental conditions has shown that echolocation improves blind people's spatial sensing ability. The current study investigated if there is also evidence for functional benefits of echolocation in real life. To address this question the current study conducted an online survey. Thirty-seven blind people participated. Linear regression analyses of survey data revealed that, while statistically controlling for participants' gender, age, level of visual function, general health, employment status, level of education, Braille skill, and use of other mobility means, people who use echolocation have higher salary, and higher mobility in unfamiliar places, than people who do not use echolocation. The majority of our participants (34 out of 37) use the long cane, and all participants who reported to echolocate, also reported to use the long cane. This suggests that the benefit of echolocation that we found might be conditional upon the long cane being used as well. The investigation was correlational in nature, and thus cannot be used to determine causality. In addition, the sample was small (N = 37), and one should be cautious when generalizing the current results to the population. The data, however, are consistent with the idea that echolocation offers real-life advantages for blind people, and that echolocation may be involved in peoples' successful adaptation to vision loss.
authors: Department of Psychology, Durham University Durham, UK.
authors: Lore
authors: L
authors: Thaler
keywords: adaptation; blindness; correlation; mobility; regression; vision loss
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Jul;80(7):837-41
references: 10414771
references: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1982 Apr;29(4):285-9
references: 6175559
references: J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Mar;42(3):287-92
references: 8120313
references: Exp Brain Res. 2012 Feb;216(4):483-8
references: 22101568
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Sep;43(9):2874-81
references: 12202505
references: J Vis Impair Blind. 2011 Jan;105(1):20-32
references: 21611133
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20162
references: 21633496
references: Clin Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;2(1):93-102
references: 19668392
references: J Exp Psychol. 1951 Mar;41(3):170-6
references: 14841326
references: Arch Ophthalmol. 1990 Feb;108(2):286-90
references: 2271016
references: Strabismus. 2011 Sep;19(3):77-84
references: 21870909
references: NeuroRehabilitation. 1994;4(4):222-36
references: 24525408
references: Science. 1962 Aug 10;137(3528):399-404
references: 14454994
references: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 May;59(5):342-5
references: 15831678
references: Perception. 2010;39(4):483-501
references: 20514997
references: Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Nov;82(11):844-51
references: 15640920
references: Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 May;109(5):637-41
references: 2025164
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Jun;42(7):1411-3
references: 11381039
references: Am J Psychol. 1953 Oct;66(4):519-53
references: 13124562
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Apr;40(5):865-77
references: 10102283
references: Am J Psychol. 1950 Oct;63(4):485-515
references: 14790019
references: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2003 Apr;189(4):245-56
references: 12743729
references: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998 Jun;7(2):73-8
references: 9712373