title: Linking traffic noise, noise annoyance and life satisfaction: a case study.
abstract: The primary purpose of this study was to explore the link between rail and road traffic noise and overall life satisfaction. While the negative relationship between residential satisfaction and traffic noise is relatively well-established, much less is known about the effect of traffic noise on overall life satisfaction. Based on results of previous studies, we propose a model that links objective noise levels, noise sensitivity, noise annoyance, residential satisfaction and life satisfaction. Since it is not clear whether a bottom-up or top-down relationship between residential satisfaction and life satisfaction holds, we specify models that incorporate both of these theoretical propositions. Empirical models are tested using structural equation modeling and data from a survey among residents of areas with high levels of road traffic noise (n1 = 354) and rail traffic noise (n2 = 228). We find that traffic noise has a negative effect on residential satisfaction, but no significant direct or indirect effects on overall life satisfaction. Noise annoyance due to road and rail traffic noise has strong negative effect on residential satisfaction rather than on overall life satisfaction. These results are very similar for the road and railway traffic contexts and regardless of whether the model assumes the top-down or bottom-up direction of the causation between life satisfaction and residential satisfaction.
authors: Charles University Environment Center, José Martího 2, 160 00 Praha 6, Czech Republic. jan.urban@czp.cuni.cz
authors: Jan
authors: J
authors: Urban
authors: Vojtěch
authors: V
authors: Máca
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002947:Cities; D018153:Czech Republic; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D018986:Motor Vehicles; D009622:Noise; D011788:Quality of Life; D011890:Railroads; D012111:Residence Characteristics
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Oct;120(4):2037-42
references: 17069301
references: Noise Health. 1999;1(3):57-68
references: 12689500
references: Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Sep;7(9):3382-405
references: 20948931
references: Qual Life Res. 2010 Feb;19(1):37-46
references: 20044782
references: J Appl Psychol. 1978 Aug;63(4):458-66
references: 701213
references: Environ Int. 2009 Apr;35(3):552-6
references: 19007991
references: Noise Health. 2004 Jul-Sep;6(24):43-9
references: 15703140
references: Noise Health. 1999;1(3):45-56
references: 12689499
references: Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Oct;7(10):3579-94
references: 21139850
references: Environ Res. 1973 Mar;6(1):1-36
references: 4745369
references: Environ Int. 2009 Jan;35(1):91-7
references: 18823662
references: Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1373-82
references: 8560305
references: Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Mar;8(3):777-98
references: 21556178
references: Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Apr;109(4):409-16
references: 11335190
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Mar;113(3):1492-504
references: 12656384
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1978 Aug;64(2):377-405
references: 361792
references: Sci Total Environ. 2009 Jun 1;407(12):3707-11
references: 19327817