title: Use of more than one electronic medical record system within a single health care organization.
abstract: Healthcare organizations vary in the number of electronic medical record (EMR) systems they use. Some use a single EMR for nearly all care they provide, while others use EMRs from more than one vendor. These strategies create a mixture of advantages, risks and costs. Based on our experience in two organizations over a decade, we analyzed use of more than one EMR within our two health care organizations to identify advantages, risks and costs that use of more than one EMR presents. We identified the data and functionality types that pose the greatest challenge to patient safety and efficiency. We present a model to classify patterns of use of more than one EMR within a single healthcare organization, and identified the most important 28 data types and 4 areas of functionality that in our experience present special challenges and safety risks with use of more than one EMR within a single healthcare organization. The use of more than one EMR in a single organization may be the chosen approach for many reasons, but in our organizations the limitations of this approach have also become clear. Those who use and support EMRs realize that to safely and efficiently use more than one EMR, a considerable amount of IT work is necessary. Thorough understanding of the challenges in using more than one EMR is an important prerequisite to minimizing the risks of using more than one EMR to care for patients in a single healthcare organization.
authors: Departments of Medicine, Health Services and Biomedical & Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle , WA.
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Payne
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Fellner
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Dugowson
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Liebovitz
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Fletcher
mesh_terms: D003626:Data Display; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000191:economics; D057286:Electronic Health Records / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D061214:Patient Safety; D057766:Policy; D012306:Risk
keywords: Electronic health records; computerized; medical records systems
references: N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19;348(25):2526-34
references: 12815139
references: Ann Intern Med. 2005 Apr 19;142(8):709-14
references: 15838090
references: JAMA. 2005 Feb 2;293(5):565-71
references: 15687311
references: Healthc Inform. 2012 Sep;29(8):18, 20-1
references: 23012906
references: Health Policy. 2011 Oct;102(2-3):229-34
references: 21628079
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):174-83
references: 18096911
references: JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1311-6
references: 9794308
references: N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 14;366(24):2240-2
references: 22693995
references: J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):924-32
references: 22350761
references: N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 4;362(5):382-5
references: 20042745
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):441-8
references: 21515544
references: Comput Nurs. 2000 Jul-Aug;18(4):157-61
references: 10939184
references: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):660-3
references: 17911799
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):341-4
references: 20442154
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):678-82
references: 21676940
references: Lancet. 1998 Jun 13;351(9118):1811
references: 9635973
references: Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010 Sep 1;67(17):1406, 1408, 1410
references: 20720237
references: MD Comput. 1992 Sep-Oct;9(5):297-303
references: 1326074