title: Assessing insect responses to climate change: What are we testing for? Where should we be heading?
abstract: To understand how researchers are tackling globally important issues, it is crucial to identify whether current research is comprehensive enough to make substantive predictions about general responses. We examined how research on climate change affecting insects is being assessed, what factors are being tested and the localities of studies, from 1703 papers published between 1985 and August 2012. Most published research (64%) is generated from Europe and North America and being dedicated to core data analysis, with 29% of the studies analysed dedicated to Lepidoptera and 22% Diptera: which are well above their contribution to the currently identified insect species richness (estimated at 13% and 17% respectively). Research publications on Coleoptera fall well short of their proportional contribution (19% of publications but 39% of insect species identified), and to a lesser extent so do Hemiptera, and Hymenoptera. Species specific responses to changes in temperature by assessing distribution/range shifts or changes in abundance were the most commonly used methods of assessing the impact of climate change on insects. Research on insects and climate change to date is dominated by manuscripts assessing butterflies in Europe, insects of economic and/or environmental concern in forestry, agriculture, and model organisms. The research on understanding how insects will respond to a rapidly changing climate is still in its infancy, but the current trends of publications give a good basis for how we are attempting to assess insect responses. In particular, there is a crucial need for broader studies of ecological, behavioural, physiological and life history responses to be addressed across a greater range of geographic locations, particularly Asia, Africa and Australasia, and in areas of high human population growth and habitat modification. It is still too early in our understanding of taxa responses to climate change to know if charismatic taxa, such as butterflies, or disease vectors, including Diptera, can be used as keystone taxa to generalise other insect responses to climate change. This is critical as the basic biology of most species is still poorly known, and dominant, well studied taxa may show variable responses to climate change across their distribution due to regional biotic and abiotic influences. Indeed identifying if insect responses to climate change can be generalised using phylogeny, functional traits, or functional groups, or will populations and species exhibit idiosyncratic responses, should be a key priority for future research.
authors: Centre for Behavioural and Physiological Ecology, Zoology , University of New England , Armidale , Australia ; School of Environmental and Rural Sciences , University of New England , Armidale , Australia.
authors: Nigel R
authors: NR
authors: Andrew
authors: Sarah J
authors: SJ
authors: Hill
authors: Matthew
authors: M
authors: Binns
authors: Md Habibullah
authors: MH
authors: Bahar
authors: Emma V
authors: EV
authors: Ridley
authors: Myung-Pyo
authors: MP
authors: Jung
authors: Chris
authors: C
authors: Fyfe
authors: Michelle
authors: M
authors: Yates
authors: Mohammad
authors: M
authors: Khusro
keywords: Climate modelling; Desktop study; Entomology; Published research
references: Science. 2009 Sep 4;325(5945):1244-6
references: 19729654
references: J Insect Physiol. 1999 Jun;45(6):559-564
references: 12770340
references: J Anim Ecol. 2011 Nov;80(6):1134-44
references: 21668894
references: Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):189-208
references: 17784923
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 8;108(10):4053-6
references: 21368106
references: Ecol Lett. 2012 Jul;15(7):637-48
references: 22583836
references: PLoS Biol. 2008 Dec 23;6(12):2621-6
references: 19108608
references: Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):389-95
references: 11919621
references: Am Nat. 2009 Nov;174(5):595-612
references: 19788354
references: Integr Comp Biol. 2011 Nov;51(5):653-61
references: 21810893
references: Nature. 2009 Dec 24;462(7276):1052-5
references: 20033047
references: Nature. 2003 Jan 2;421(6918):37-42
references: 12511946
references: Annu Rev Entomol. 2010;55:55-75
references: 19961323
references: Nature. 2012 Sep 27;489(7417):554-7
references: 22878721
references: Ecol Lett. 2013 Jan;16(1):72-80
references: 23066869
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Oct;25(10):574-82
references: 20656371
references: Ecol Lett. 2011 Jan;14(1):69-74
references: 21078034
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2012 May;29(5):1335-51
references: 22130970
references: Environ Manage. 2011 Mar;47(3):322-37
references: 21259061
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Apr;26(4):153-4
references: 21255862
references: Nature. 2003 Jan 2;421(6918):57-60
references: 12511952
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 30;108(35):14521-6
references: 21876131