title: Surgical management of leiomyomas for fertility or uterine preservation.
abstract: Leiomyomas are the most common pelvic tumors in women. These tumors are not always symptomatic but can cause abnormal uterine bleeding and anemia, pelvic pressure and pain, urinary frequency, and adverse reproductive outcomes-symptoms that can diminish the quality of life of women. Myomectomy is the primary treatment modality for women with symptomatic leiomyomas who are of reproductive age and desire future fertility. Myomectomy can significantly improve symptoms and quality of life and, in some clinical situations, improve reproductive outcomes. There are robust surgical outcome data supporting the use of a minimally invasive approach such as laparoscopy and hysteroscopy over laparotomy. Perioperative outcomes and return to normal activity are significantly better with a minimally invasive approach. Reproductive outcomes are not adversely affected. Detailed preoperative imaging is required for minimally invasive procedures to be successful. There are several evidence-based techniques that can be used to reduce blood loss during surgery. The role of robotic technology in enhancing surgical outcomes has not been clearly defined.
authors: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of California-Los Angeles School of Medicine, Santa Monica, California.
authors: Tommaso
authors: T
authors: Falcone
authors: William H
authors: WH
authors: Parker
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D059247:Fertility Preservation; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy / Q000379:methods; D015907:Hysteroscopy; D010535:Laparoscopy; D007813:Laparotomy; D007889:Leiomyoma / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*; D011300:Preoperative Care; D012371:Robotics; D014594:Uterine Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*; D014599:Uterus
references: Spies JB, Bradley LD, Guido R, Maxwell GL, Levine BA, Coyne K. Outcomes from leiomyoma therapies: comparison with normal controls. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:641–52.
references: Baird DD, Dunson DB, Hill MC, Cousins D, Schectman JM. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:100–7.
references: Wechter ME, Stewart E, Myers E, Kho R, Wu J. Leiomyoma-related hospitalization and surgery: prevalence and predicted growth based on population trends. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:492.e1–5.
references: Taran FA, Weaver AL, Coddington CC, Stewart EA. Characteristics indicating adenomyosis existing with leiomyomas: a case control study. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1177–82.
references: Huang JQ, Lathi RB, Lemyre M, Rodriguez HE, Nezhat CH, Nezhat C. Coexistence of endometriosis in women with symptomatic leiomyomas. Fertil Steril 2010;94:720–3.
references: Peddada SD, Lauglin SK, Miner K, Guyon JP, Haneke K, Vahdat HL, et al.. Growth of uterine leiomyomata among premenopausal black and white women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:19887–92.
references: Saravelos S, Yan J, Rehmani H, Li TC. The prevalence and impact of fibroids and their treatment on the outcome of pregnancy in women with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2011;26:3274–9.
references: Pritts E, Parker W, Olive D. Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence. Fertil Steril 2009;91:1215–23.
references: Rackow BW, Taylor HS. Submucosal uterine leiomyomas have a global effect on molecular determinants of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 2010;93:2027–34.
references: Sunkara SK, Khairy M, El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Coomarasamy A. The effect of intramural fibroids without uterine cavity involvement on the outcome of IVF treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2010;25:418–29.
references: Qidwai GI, Caughey AB, Jacoby AF. Obstetric outcomes in women with sonographically identified uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:376–82.
references: Stout M, Odibo A, Graseck A, Macones G, Crane J, Cahill A. Leiomyomas at routine second-trimester ultrasound examination and adverse obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1056–63.
references: Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Broder MS, Fraser IS. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011;113:3–13.
references: Diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding reproductive age women. Practice Bulletin No. 128. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:197–206.
references: Tsuji S, Takahashi K, Imaoka I, Sugimura K, Miyazaki K, Noda Y. MRI evaluation of the uterine structure after myomectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2006;61:106–10.
references: Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen E, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Evaluation of the uterine cavity with magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal sonography, hysterosonographic examination, and diagnostic hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 2001;76:350–7.
references: Levens E, Wesley R, Premkumar A, Blocker W, Nieman LK. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasound for determining fibroid burden: implications for research and clinical care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:537.e1–7.
references: Goto A, Takeuchi S, Sugimura K, Maruo T. Usefulness of Gd-DTPA contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI and serum determination of LDH and its isozymes in the differential diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma from degenerated leiomyoma of the uterus. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002;12:354–61.
references: Parker WH. The utility of MRI for the surgical treatment of women with uterine fibroid tumors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:31–6.
references: Kim YH, Chung HH, Kang SB, Kim SC, Kim YT. Safety and usefulness of intravenous iron sucrose in the management of preoperative anemia in patients with menorrhagia: a phase IV, open-label, prospective, randomized study. Acta Haematol 2009;121:37–41.
references: Wurnig C, Schatz K, Noske H, Hemon Y, Dahlberg G, Josefsson G, et al.. Subcutaneous low-dose epoetin beta for the avoidance of transfusion in patients scheduled for elective surgery not eligible for autologous blood donation. Eur Surg Res 2001;33:303–10.
references: Stovall TG, Muneyyirci-Delale O, Summitt RL Jr, Scialli AR. GnRH agonist and iron versus placebo and iron in the anemic patient before surgery for leiomyomas: a randomized controlled trial. Leuprolide Acetate Study Group. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:65–71.
references: Antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 104. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:1180–9.
references: Ginsburg ES, Benson CB, Garfield JM, Gleason RE, Friedman AJ. The effect of operative technique and uterine size on blood loss during myomectomy: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 1993;60:956–62.
references: Yamada T, Ikeda A, Okamoto Y, Okamoto Y, Kanda T, Ueki M. Intraoperative blood salvage in abdominal simple total hysterectomy for uterine myoma. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997;59:233–6.
references: Discepola F, Valenti DA, Reinhold C, Tulandi T. Analysis of arterial blood vessels surrounding the myoma: relevance to myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1301–3.
references: Tinelli A, Hurst BS, Hudelist G, Tsin DA, Stark M, Mettler L, et al.. Laparoscopic myomectomy focusing on the myoma pseudocapsule: technical and outcome reports. Hum Reprod 2012;27:427–35.
references: Walocha JA, Litwin JA, Miodonski AJ. Vascular system of intramural leiomyomata revealed by corrosion casting and scanning electron microscopy. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1088–93.
references: Tsuji S, Takahashi K, Yomo H, Fujiwara M, Kita N, Takebayashi K, et al.. Effectiveness of antiadhesion barriers in preventing adhesion after myomectomy in patients with uterine leiomyoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;123:244–8.
references: Munro MG. Complications of hysteroscopic and uterine resectoscopic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2010;37:399–425.
references: Murakami T, Hayasaka S, Terada Y, Yuki H, Tamura M, Yokomizo R, et al.. Predicting outcome of one-step total hysteroscopic resection of sessile submucous myoma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15:74–7.
references: Candiani GB, Vercellini P, Fedele L, Carinelli SG, Merlo D, Arcaini L. Repair of the uterine cavity after hysteroscopic septal incision. Fertil Steril 1990;54:991–4.
references: Hysteroscopy. ACOG Technology Assessment No. 4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:439–42.
references: Goldenberg M, Zolti M, Bider D, Etchin A, Sela BA, Seidman DS. The effect of intracervical vasopressin on the systemic absorption of glycine during hysteroscopic endometrial ablation. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:1025–9.
references: Yang JH, Chen MJ, Wu MY, Chao KH, Ho HN, Yang YS. Office hysteroscopic early lysis of intrauterine adhesion after transcervical resection of multiple apposing submucous myomas. Fertil Steril 2008;89:1254–9.
references: Jin C, Hu Y, Chen XC, Zheng FY, Lin F, Zhou K, et al.. Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy—a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;145:14–21.
references: Alessandri F, Lijoi D, Mistrangelo E, Ferrero S, Ragni N. Randomized study of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy for uterine myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:92–7.
references: Cicinelli E, Tinelli R, Colafiglio G, Saliani N. Laparoscopy vs minilaparotomy in women with symptomatic uterine myomas: a prospective randomized study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16:422–6.
references: Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Bifulco G, Ercoli A, Malzoni M, Scambia G. A prospective study of laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy in the treatment of uterine myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12:470–4.
references: Palomba S, Zupi E, Russo T, Falbo A, Marconi D, Tolino A, et al.. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: short-term outcomes. Fertil Steril 2007;88:942–51.
references: Seracchioli R, Manuzzi L, Vianello F, Gualerzi B, Savelli L, Paradisi R, et al.. Obstetric and delivery outcome of pregnancies achieved after laparoscopic myomectomy. Fertil Steril 2006;86:159–65.
references: Palomba S, Zupi E, Falbo A, Russo T, Marconi D, Tolino A, et al.. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: reproductive outcomes. Fertil Steril 2007;88:933–41.
references: Sizzi O, Rossetti A, Malzoni M, Minelli L, La Grotta F, Soranna L, et al.. Italian multicenter study on complications of laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:453–62.
references: Barakat EE, Bedaiwy MA, Zimberg S, Nutter B, Nosseir M, Falcone T. Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:256–65.
references: Litta P, Fantinato S, Calonaci F, Cosmi E, Filippeschi M, Zerbetto I, et al.. A randomized controlled study comparing harmonic versus electrosurgery in laparoscopic myomectomy. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1882–6.
references: Alessandri F, Remorgida V, Venturini PL, Ferrero S. Unidirectional barbed suture versus continuous suture with intracorporeal knots in laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010;17:725–9.
references: Angioli R, Plotti F, Montera R, Damiani P, Terranova C, Oronzi I, et al.. A new type of absorbable barbed suture for use in laparoscopic myomectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012;117:220–3.
references: Einarsson JI, Vellinga TT, Twijnstra AR, Chavan NR, Suzuki Y, Greenberg JA. Bidirectional barbed suture: an evaluation of safety and clinical outcomes. JSLS 2010;14:381–5.
references: Tulandi T, Murray C, Guralinick M. Adhesion formation and reproductive outcome after myomectomy and second look laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:213–5.
references: Kikuchi I, Kumakiri J, Kuroda K, Matsuoka S, Kitade M, Takeda S. A novel modification of traditional 2-port laparoscopic surgery using a 5-mm flexible scope. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16:734–8.
references: Kim YW, Park BJ, Ro DY, Kim TE. Single-port laparoscopic myomectomy using a new single-port transumbilical morcellation system: initial clinical study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010;17:587–92.
references: Falcone T. Single port/single site laparoscopic procedures. Fertil Steril 2012;98:816–7.
references: Nezhat C, Lavie O, Hsu S, Watson J, Barnett O, Lemyre M. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy—a retrospective matched control study. Fertil Steril 2009;91:556–9.
references: Kalogiannidis I, Prapas N, Xiromeritis P, Prapas Y. Laparoscopically assisted myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy in short-term outcomes: a prospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010;281:865–70.
references: Advincula AP, Song A, Burke W, Reynolds RK. Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004;11:511–8.
references: Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Bess O, Nezhat CH, Mashiach R. Laparoscopically assisted myomectomy: a report of a new technique in 57 cases. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 1994;39:39–44.
references: Bedient CE, Marina JF, Noble BN, Kho RM. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:566.el–5.
references: Gargiulo A, Srouji S, Missmer S, Correia K, Vellinga T, Einarsson J. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:284–91.
references: Ascher-Walsh CJ, Capes TL. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy is an improvement over laparotomy in women with a limited number of myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010;17:306–10.
references: Behera MA, Likes CE, Judd JP, Barnett JC, Havrilesky LJ, Wu JM. Cost analysis of abdominal, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted myomectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012;19:52–7.
references: Lonnerfors C, Persson J. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy; a feasible technique for removal of unfavorably localized myomas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:994–9.
references: George A, Eisenstein D, Wegienka G. Analysis of the impact of body mass index on the surgical outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16:730–3.
references: Lonnerfors C, Persson J. Pregnancy following robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy in women with deep intramural myomas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:972–7.
references: Chen I, Motan T, Kiddoo D. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in laparoscopic myomectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011;18:303–9.
references: Kalogiannidis I, Xiromeritis P, Prapas N, Prapas Y. Intravaginal misoprostol reduces intraoperative blood loss in minimally invasive myomectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2010;38:46–9.
references: Alborzi S, Ghannadan E, Alborzi M. A comparison of combined laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy in treatment of symptomatic myoma. Fertil Steril 2009;92:742–7.
references: Bae JH, Chong GO, Seong WJ, Hong DG, Lee YS. Benefit of uterine artery ligation in laparoscopic myomectomy. Fertil Steril 2011;95:775–8.
references: Wang PH, Liu WM, Fuh JL, Chao HT, Chao KC, Yuan CC. Laparoscopic uterine vessel occlusion in the treatment of women with symptomatic uterine myomas with and without adding laparoscopic myomectomy: 4-year results. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15:712–8.
references: Chang WC, Chou LY, Chang DY, Huang PS, Huang SC, Chen SY, et al.. Simultaneous laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic uterine myomas with and without in situ morcellation. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1735–40.
references: Kho KA, Nezhat C. Parasitic myomas. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:611–5.
references: Parker WH, Einarsson J, Istre O, Dubuisson JB. Risk factors for uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010;17:551–4.
references: Pitter MC, Gargiulo AR, Bonaventura LM, Lehman JS, Srouji SS. Pregnancy outcomes following robot-assisted myomectomy. Hum Reprod 2013;28:99–108.