title: The temporal priority principle: at what age does this develop?
abstract: The temporal priority principle states that all causes must precede their effects. It is widely assumed that children's causal reasoning is guided by this principle from early in development. However, the empirical studies that have examined children's use of the principle, most of which were conducted some decades ago, in fact show inconsistent findings. Some researchers have argued that 3-year-olds reliably use this principle, whereas others have suggested that it is not until 5 years that children properly grasp the inviolability of the principle. To examine this issue, 100 children, 50 three-year-olds, and 50 four-year-olds, took part in a study in which they had to judge which of two causes yielded an effect. In the task, children saw one event (A), an effect (E), and then another event (B). The events A and B involved the rolling of balls down runways, and the effect E was a Jack-in-a-box popping up. The extent to which E left a visible trace was also varied, because comparisons across previous studies suggested that this may affect performance. As a group, 3- and 4-year-olds performed at above-chance levels, but performance improved with age. The nature of the effect did not have a significant impact on performance. Although some previous studies suggested that 3-year-olds may be more likely to choose B rather than A as a cause due to a recency effect, we found no evidence of this pattern of performance in the younger group. Potential explanations of the age-related improvement in performance are discussed.
authors: School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast Belfast, Country Antrim, Northern Ireland.
authors: Michelle L
authors: ML
authors: Rankin
authors: Teresa
authors: T
authors: McCormack
keywords: causal reasoning; development; time
references: J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 Nov;98(3):168-83
references: 17681520
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jul;30(4):856-76
references: 15238029
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Aug;8(8):371-7
references: 15335464
references: Child Dev. 1989 Oct;60(5):1138-46
references: 2805892
references: Q J Exp Psychol B. 2004 Apr;57(2):179-91
references: 15204115
references: Dev Psychol. 1999 Jan;35(1):303-17
references: 9923484
references: Cogn Sci. 2012 Mar;36(2):261-85
references: 22050775
references: Psychol Rev. 2009 Oct;116(4):661-716
references: 19839681
references: Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;115(4):955-84
references: 18954210
references: Learn Behav. 2005 May;33(2):230-8
references: 16075841
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Nov;139(4):756-71
references: 21038987
references: Child Dev. 2008 Sep-Oct;79(5):1477-97
references: 18826537
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 May;32(3):451-60
references: 16719658
references: Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;111(1):3-32
references: 14756583
references: J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Jul;115(3):562-9
references: 23499322
references: Science. 2012 Sep 28;337(6102):1623-7
references: 23019643
references: Dev Psychol. 2005 Jan;41(1):54-63
references: 15656737