title: Determination of the interfacial rheological properties of a poly(DL-lactic acid)-encapsulated contrast agent using in vitro attenuation and scattering.
abstract: The stabilizing encapsulation of a microbubble-based ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) critically affects its acoustic properties. Polymers, which behave differently from materials commonly used (i.e., lipids or proteins) for monolayer encapsulation, have the potential for better stability and improved control of encapsulation properties. Air-filled microbubbles coated with poly(DL-lactic acid) (PLA) are characterized here using in vitro acoustic experiments and several models of encapsulation. The interfacial rheological properties of the encapsulation are determined according to each model using attenuation of ultrasound through a suspension of microbubbles. Then the model predictions are compared with scattered non-linear (sub- and second harmonic) responses. For this microbubble population (average diameter, 1.9 μm), the peak in attenuation measurement indicates a weighted-average resonance frequency of 2.5-3 MHz, which, in contrast to other encapsulated microbubbles, is lower than the resonance frequency of a free bubble of similar size (diameter, 1.9 μm). This apparently contradictory result stems from the extremely low surface dilational elasticity (around 0.01-0.07 N/m) and the reduced surface tension of the poly(DL-lactic acid) encapsulation, as well as the polydispersity of the bubble population. All models considered here are shown to behave similarly even in the non-linear regime because of the low surface dilational elasticity value. Pressure-dependent scattering measurements at two different excitation frequencies (2.25 and 3 MHz) revealed strongly non-linear behavior with 25-30 dB and 5-20 dB enhancements in fundamental and second-harmonic responses, respectively, for a contrast agent concentration of 1.33 μg/mL in the suspension. Sub-harmonic responses are registered above a relatively low generation threshold of 100-150 kPa, with up to 20 dB enhancement beyond that pressure. Numerical predictions from all models show good agreement with the experimentally measured fundamental response, but not with the experimental second-harmonic response. The characteristic features of sub-harmonic responses and the steady response beyond the threshold are matched well by model predictions. However, prediction of the threshold value depends on estimated properties and size distribution. The variation in size distribution from sample to sample leads to variation in estimates of encapsulation properties: the lowest estimated value for surface dilational viscosity better predicts the sub-harmonic threshold.
authors: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
authors: Shirshendu
authors: S
authors: Paul
authors: Daniel
authors: D
authors: Russakow
authors: Tyler
authors: T
authors: Rodgers
authors: Kausik
authors: K
authors: Sarkar
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Cochran
authors: Margaret A
authors: MA
authors: Wheatley
mesh_terms: D002214:Capsules / Q000737:chemistry*; D003287:Contrast Media / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000528:radiation effects*; D019220:High-Energy Shock Waves; D008422:Materials Testing; D011091:Polyesters / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000528:radiation effects*; D012542:Scattering, Radiation; D013499:Surface Properties / Q000528:radiation effects; D014783:Viscosity / Q000528:radiation effects
chemical_list: D002214:Capsules; D003287:Contrast Media; D011091:Polyesters; C033616:poly(lactide)
references: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003 Aug 1;66(2):347-55
references: 12889005
references: Ultrasonics. 2012 Sep;52(7):962-9
references: 22652364
references: Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003 Dec;29(12):1749-57
references: 14698342
references: J Control Release. 2010 Apr 2;143(1):38-44
references: 20060024
references: Invest Radiol. 2005 Aug;40(8):536-44
references: 16024992
references: J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2011;22(4-6):417-28
references: 21144258
references: Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Jul;35(7):1139-47
references: 19427102
references: Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2009 May;9(4):325-41
references: 19435455
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Apr;107(4):2272-80
references: 10790053
references: Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Aug;35(8):1385-96
references: 19616160
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Jul;118(1):539-50
references: 16119373
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Jan;121(1):648-56
references: 17297818
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Jan;121(1):EL48-53
references: 17297826
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Oct;106(4 Pt 1):2104-10
references: 10530033
references: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Jan;57(1):24-8
references: 19709952
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Jun;121(6):3331-40
references: 17552685
references: Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010 Dec;36(12):2080-92
references: 21030140
references: Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2006 May;6(3):493-502
references: 16706749
references: J Colloid Interface Sci. 2009 Aug 15;336(2):519-25
references: 19524251
references: Ultrasonics. 2006 Nov;44(4):360-7
references: 16730047
references: J Colloid Interface Sci. 2010 Mar 1;343(1):42-7
references: 20005522
references: Ultrasonics. 2009 Feb;49(2):263-8
references: 18977009
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Nov;132(5):3576-85
references: 23145637
references: Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Jul;35(7):1127-38
references: 19427099
references: Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005 Jun;31(6):781-6
references: 15936494
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):3137-47
references: 22087942
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jun;127(6):3846-57
references: 20550283
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jun;123(6):4059-70
references: 18537358
references: Ultrasonics. 2009 Dec;49(8):628-33
references: 19394992
references: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2007 Jul;54(7):1333-45
references: 17718322
references: Invest Radiol. 2007 Feb;42(2):95-104
references: 17220727
references: Langmuir. 2006 Apr 25;22(9):4397-402
references: 16618193
references: Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000 Jan;26(1):93-104
references: 10687797
references: Ultrasonics. 2012 Mar;52(3):456-64
references: 22133737
references: Mol Pharm. 2012 Sep 4;9(9):2554-64
references: 22849291
references: Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007 Nov;33(11):1767-76
references: 17720301
references: Biomacromolecules. 2007 Feb;8(2):516-22
references: 17291076
references: Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004 Oct;30(10):1281-7
references: 15582227
references: Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004 Jun;30(6):793-802
references: 15219959
references: J Nanobiotechnology. 2009 Apr 07;7:1
references: 19351396