title: Number trumps area for 7-month-old infants.
abstract: Over the past few decades, there has been extensive debate as to whether humans represent number abstractly and, if so, whether perceptual features of a set such as cumulative surface area or contour length are extracted more readily than number from the external world. Here we show that 7-month-old infants are sensitive to smaller ratio changes in number than cumulative area when each variable is tested separately and that infants prefer to look at number changes compared with area changes when the 2 variables are pitted directly against each other. Our results provide strong evidence that number is a more salient dimension to young infants than cumulative surface area and that infants' ability to discriminate sets on the basis of number is more finely tuned than their ability to discriminate sets on the basis of cumulative surface area.
authors: Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences.
authors: Melissa E
authors: ME
authors: Libertus
authors: Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University.
authors: Ariel
authors: A
authors: Starr
authors: Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University.
authors: Elizabeth M
authors: EM
authors: Brannon
mesh_terms: D002657:Child Development; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D008297:Male; D008433:Mathematics; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
references: Psychol Bull. 2002 Mar;128(2):278-94
references: 11931520
references: Cogn Psychol. 2002 Feb;44(1):33-66
references: 11814309
references: Dev Sci. 2009 Apr;12(3):453-63
references: 19371370
references: Child Dev. 2003 Nov-Dec;74(6):1807-22
references: 14669897
references: Infancy. 2013 Nov 1;18(6):
references: 24353478
references: Child Dev. 2008 Mar-Apr;79(2):476-89
references: 18366435
references: Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 19;2:65
references: 21687440
references: Dev Sci. 2006 Nov;9(6):F59-64
references: 17059447
references: Dev Sci. 2010 Nov;13(6):900-6
references: 20977560