title: Neural limits to representing objects still within view.
abstract: Visual working memory is an online workspace for temporarily representing visual information from the environment. The two most prevalent empirical characteristics of working memory are that it is supported by sustained neural activity over a delay period and it has a severely limited capacity for representing multiple items simultaneously. Traditionally, such delay activity and capacity limits have been considered to be exclusive for maintaining information about objects that are no longer visible to the observers. Here, by contrast, we provide both neurophysiological and psychophysical evidence that the sustained neural activity and capacity limits for items that are continuously visible to the human observer are indistinguishable from those measured for items that are no longer visible. This holds true even when the observers know that the objects will not disappear from the visual field. These results demonstrate that our explicit representation of objects that are still "in view" is far more limited than previously assumed.
authors: Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 153-8904, Japan. htsubomi@hmt.u-toyama.ac.jp
authors: Hiroyuki
authors: H
authors: Tsubomi
authors: Keisuke
authors: K
authors: Fukuda
authors: Katsumi
authors: K
authors: Watanabe
authors: Edward K
authors: EK
authors: Vogel
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D004569:Electroencephalography; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011930:Reaction Time; D013334:Students; D014495:Universities; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
references: J Neurophysiol. 1998 Jun;79(6):2919-40
references: 9636098
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Apr;20(2):177-82
references: 20362427
references: Nature. 1988 Jan 7;331(6151):68-70
references: 3340148
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Feb;6(2):97-107
references: 15654324
references: Percept Psychophys. 1984 Mar;35(3):245-55
references: 6728623
references: Nature. 1997 Apr 10;386(6625):608-11
references: 9121584
references: Cortex. 2007 Jan;43(1):77-94
references: 17334209
references: Exp Brain Res. 1974 Mar 29;19(5):493-506
references: 4852102
references: Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25
references: 7367577
references: Neuroreport. 1999 Jul 13;10(10):2001-5
references: 10424664
references: Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):622-8
references: 17614871
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:193-224
references: 17854286
references: Spat Vis. 1988;3(3):179-97
references: 3153671
references: Science. 2008 Aug 8;321(5890):851-4
references: 18687968
references: Nat Neurosci. 2001 Mar;4(3):311-6
references: 11224549
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 5;108(27):11252-5
references: 21690375
references: Psychol Sci. 2005 Aug;16(8):637-43
references: 16102067
references: J Neurophysiol. 1990 Sep;64(3):681-97
references: 2230917
references: J Neurosci. 2012 May 30;32(22):7711-22
references: 22649249
references: Percept Psychophys. 1988 Oct;44(4):369-78
references: 3226885
references: Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81
references: 9384378
references: Percept Psychophys. 2007 Jan;69(1):123-35
references: 17515222
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 12;31(2):659-68
references: 21228175
references: Curr Biol. 2000 Oct 5;10(19):1209-12
references: 11050390
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85
references: 11515286
references: Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):751-4
references: 15085133
references: Perception. 2000;29(10):1143-54
references: 11220207
references: J Vis. 2004 Dec 29;4(12):1120-35
references: 15669916
references: Nature. 2008 May 8;453(7192):233-5
references: 18385672
references: J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 16;28(16):4183-91
references: 18417697
references: Neuroimage. 2010 Dec;53(4):1334-45
references: 20643214
references: J Neurophysiol. 1989 Feb;61(2):331-49
references: 2918358
references: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985 May;62(3):203-8
references: 2581760
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Sep;7(9):415-423
references: 12963473
references: Psychol Sci. 2001 Jul;12(4):287-92
references: 11476094
references: Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):748-51
references: 15085132
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Feb;27(1):92-114
references: 11248943
references: Cogn Psychol. 2008 Jun;56(4):237-83
references: 17451667
references: J Neurosci. 1993 Apr;13(4):1460-78
references: 8463829
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Oct;11(5):854-61
references: 15732694
references: PLoS One. 2009 Nov 26;4(11):e8042
references: 19956663
references: Brain. 2001 May;124(Pt 5):941-52
references: 11335696