title: Explicit mentalizing mechanisms and their adaptive role in memory conformity.
abstract: Memory conformity occurs when an individual endorses what other individuals remember about past events. Research on memory conformity is currently dominated by a 'forensic' perspective, which views the phenomenon as inherently undesirable. This is because conformity not only distorts the accuracy of an individual's memory, but also produces false corroboration between individuals, effects that act to undermine criminal justice systems. There is growing awareness, however, that memory conformity may be interpreted more generally as an adaptive social behavior regulated by explicit mentalizing mechanisms. Here, we provide novel evidence in support of this emerging alternative theoretical perspective. We carried out a memory conformity experiment which revealed that explicit belief-simulation (i.e. using one's own beliefs to model what other people believe) systematically biases conformity towards like-minded individuals, even when there is no objective evidence that they have a more accurate memory than dissimilar individuals. We suggest that this bias is functional, i.e. adaptive, to the extent that it fosters trust, and hence cooperation, between in-group versus out-group individuals. We conclude that memory conformity is, in more fundamental terms, a highly desirable product of explicit mentalizing mechanisms that promote adaptive forms of social learning and cooperation.
authors: School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
authors: Rebecca
authors: R
authors: Wheeler
authors: Kevin
authors: K
authors: Allan
authors: Dimitris
authors: D
authors: Tsivilis
authors: Douglas
authors: D
authors: Martin
authors: Fiona
authors: F
authors: Gabbert
mesh_terms: D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D003469:Culture; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D012925:Social Conformity; D056345:Theory of Mind / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references: Mem Cognit. 2009 Dec;37(8):1069-76
references: 19933452
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):299-308
references: 17692270
references: Psychol Sci. 2010 Sep;21(9):1291-9
references: 20689054
references: Memory. 2008 Apr;16(3):231-44
references: 18324549
references: Front Neurosci. 2012 Jun 14;6:87
references: 22712006
references: Science. 2010 Aug 27;329(5995):1081-5
references: 20798320
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):151-62
references: 22506753
references: Learn Mem. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):361-6
references: 16027179
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2213-23
references: 22734064
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:287-313
references: 21838544
references: Scand J Psychol. 2009 Apr;50(2):101-7
references: 19000105
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 15;107(24):10827-32
references: 20534459
references: Soc Cogn. 2012;30(1):121-132
references: 25431516
references: Memory. 2008 Apr;16(3):262-73
references: 18324551
references: Mem Cognit. 2012 Jan;40(1):101-12
references: 21773846
references: Science. 2010 Apr 9;328(5975):208-13
references: 20378813
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Jun;8(2):365-71
references: 11495127
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jan;136(1):119-28
references: 21112042
references: Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 02;3:467
references: 23130007
references: Mem Cognit. 2012 Feb;40(2):280-6
references: 21918910
references: Mem Cognit. 1986 Jul;14(4):329-38
references: 3762387
references: Neuron. 2006 May 18;50(4):655-63
references: 16701214
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Mar;124(3):319-31
references: 16764812
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 Feb;137(1):3-21
references: 18248126
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Dec;34(12):3168-81
references: 22807311
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):476-84
references: 17937922
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:591-621
references: 14744228
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):678-90
references: 22845066
references: Conscious Cogn. 2011 Mar;20(1):64-74
references: 21220203
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 1955 Nov;51(3):629-36
references: 13286010