title: Ballast water regulations and the move toward concentration-based numeric discharge limits.
abstract: Ballast water from shipping is a principal source for the introduction of nonindigenous species. As a result, numerous government bodies have adopted various ballast water management practices and discharge standards to slow or eliminate the future introduction and dispersal of these nonindigenous species. For researchers studying ballast water issues, understanding the regulatory framework is helpful to define the scope of research needed by policy makers to develop effective regulations. However, for most scientists, this information is difficult to obtain because it is outside the standard scientific literature and often difficult to interpret. This paper provides a brief review of the regulatory framework directed toward scientists studying ballast water and aquatic invasive species issues. We describe different approaches to ballast water management in international, U.S. federal and state, and domestic ballast water regulation. Specifically, we discuss standards established by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the U.S. Coast Guard and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and individual states in the United States including California, New York, and Minnesota. Additionally, outside the United States, countries such as Australia, Canada, and New Zealand have well-established domestic ballast water regulatory regimes. Different approaches to regulation have recently resulted in variations between numeric concentration-based ballast water discharge limits, particularly in the United States, as well as reliance on use of ballast water exchange pending development and adoption of rigorous science-based discharge standards. To date, numeric concentration-based discharge limits have not generally been based upon a thorough application of risk-assessment methodologies. Regulators, making decisions based on the available information and methodologies before them, have consequently established varying standards, or not established standards at all. The review and refinement of ballast water discharge standards by regulatory agencies will benefit from activity by the scientific community to improve and develop more precise risk-assessment methodologies.
authors: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Office of Wastewater Management, Permits Division, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20460, USA. albert.ryan@epa.gov
authors: Ryan J
authors: RJ
authors: Albert
authors: John M
authors: JM
authors: Lishman
authors: Juhi R
authors: JR
authors: Saxena
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000379:methods; D007390:International Agencies / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D058865:Introduced Species; D008954:Models, Biological; D012307:Risk Factors; D012767:Ships; D014865:Waste Disposal, Fluid / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000592:standards; D014873:Water Pollutants
chemical_list: D014873:Water Pollutants