title: Provincialization of terrestrial faunas following the end-Permian mass extinction.
abstract: In addition to their devastating effects on global biodiversity, mass extinctions have had a long-term influence on the history of life by eliminating dominant lineages that suppressed ecological change. Here, we test whether the end-Permian mass extinction (252.3 Ma) affected the distribution of tetrapod faunas within the southern hemisphere and apply quantitative methods to analyze four components of biogeographic structure: connectedness, clustering, range size, and endemism. For all four components, we detected increased provincialism between our Permian and Triassic datasets. In southern Pangea, a more homogeneous and broadly distributed fauna in the Late Permian (Wuchiapingian, ∼257 Ma) was replaced by a provincial and biogeographically fragmented fauna by Middle Triassic times (Anisian, ∼242 Ma). Importantly in the Triassic, lower latitude basins in Tanzania and Zambia included dinosaur predecessors and other archosaurs unknown elsewhere. The recognition of heterogeneous tetrapod communities in the Triassic implies that the end-Permian mass extinction afforded ecologically marginalized lineages the ecospace to diversify, and that biotic controls (i.e., evolutionary incumbency) were fundamentally reset. Archosaurs, which began diversifying in the Early Triassic, were likely beneficiaries of this ecological release and remained dominant for much of the later Mesozoic.
authors: Department of Biology and Burke Museum, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. casidor@uw.edu
authors: Christian A
authors: CA
authors: Sidor
authors: Daril A
authors: DA
authors: Vilhena
authors: Kenneth D
authors: KD
authors: Angielczyk
authors: Adam K
authors: AK
authors: Huttenlocker
authors: Sterling J
authors: SJ
authors: Nesbitt
authors: Brandon R
authors: BR
authors: Peecook
authors: J Sébastien
authors: JS
authors: Steyer
authors: Roger M H
authors: RM
authors: Smith
authors: Linda A
authors: LA
authors: Tsuji
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D005075:Biological Evolution; D025061:Dinosaurs / Q000235:genetics*; D004463:Ecology; D017753:Ecosystem; D053476:Extinction, Biological; D005580:Fossils; D005843:Geography; D010163:Paleontology / Q000379:methods*; D013636:Tanzania; D013997:Time Factors; D015024:Zambia
keywords: biogeography; biotic recovery; complex networks; macroevolution; paleoecology
references: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Nov;80(5 Pt 2):056117
references: 20365053
references: Science. 1986 Jan 10;231(4734):129-33
references: 17842630
references: Science. 2011 Dec 9;334(6061):1367-72
references: 22096103
references: Nature. 2010 Mar 4;464(7285):95-8
references: 20203608
references: Biol Lett. 2012 Feb 23;8(1):147-50
references: 21865241
references: Naturwissenschaften. 2010 Feb;97(2):187-96
references: 19956920
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 29;105(4):1118-23
references: 18216267
references: Science. 2005 Feb 4;307(5710):709-14
references: 15661973
references: Nature. 2004 Nov 4;432(7013):97-100
references: 15525988
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Oct;22(10):548-57
references: 17919771
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Apr 7;275(1636):759-65
references: 18198148
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 1;99(20):12917-22
references: 12235364
references: Science. 2004 Jul 23;305(5683):506-9
references: 15273391
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 7;278(1708):1107-13
references: 20926435
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Apr 7;279(1732):1310-8
references: 22031757
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25693
references: 22022431
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 7;274(1622):2077-86
references: 17609191
references: Biol Lett. 2012 Dec 05;9(1):20120949
references: 23221875
references: Science. 2000 Jul 21;289(5478):432-6
references: 10903200