title: Polarotaxis and scototaxis in the supratidal amphipod Platorchestia platensis.
abstract: Talitrid amphipods use many cues for orientation during forays between temporary burrows and feeding areas, and for locating beaches when submerged, with visual cues being particularly important. Little evidence exists for polarized light among these visual cues despite extensive orientation by celestial and underwater polarized light in other crustaceans and in insects. We used electroretinography to assess spectral sensitivity in the eye of the beach flea Platorchestia platensis, and behavioral studies to test whether linearly polarized light serves as an orientation cue. Two spectral classes were present in the P. platensis eye with maxima at 431 and 520 nm. Non-uniform orientation of amphipods in the laboratory arena required either light/dark or polarized cues. Scototactic movements depended on arena conditions (day/night, wet/dry), while orientation under linearly polarized light was wavelength-dependent and parallel to the e-vector. Subsequent tests presented conflicting and additive scototactic and polarotactic cues to differentiate among these responses. In dry conditions, orientation parallel to the polarization e-vector overcame a dominant negative scototaxis, confirming that polarotaxis and scototaxis are separate orientation responses in this species. These behavioral results demonstrate talitrid amphipods can perceive and orient to linearly polarized light, and may use it to orient toward preferred zones on beaches.
authors: College of Earth, Ocean and Environment, School of Marine Science and Policy, University of Delaware, 700 Pilottown Road, Lewes, DE 19958, USA. jhcohen@udel.edu
authors: Jonathan H
authors: JH
authors: Cohen
authors: Meagan R
authors: MR
authors: Putts
mesh_terms: D033304:Amphipoda / Q000502:physiology*; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D004596:Electroretinography; D008027:Light; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Mar 12;366(1565):619-26
references: 21282165
references: J Exp Biol. 2012 Oct 15;215(Pt 20):3577-86
references: 22771743
references: Front Biosci. 2003 May 01;8:s722-32
references: 12700076
references: J Exp Biol. 2010 Nov 15;213(Pt 22):3843-51
references: 21037063
references: J Exp Biol. 2001 Jul;204(Pt 14):2461-7
references: 11511661
references: Microsc Res Tech. 1999 Dec 15;47(6):368-79
references: 10607378
references: Vis Neurosci. 2000 Jul-Aug;17(4):509-28
references: 11016572
references: J Cell Comp Physiol. 1960 Dec;56:137-59
references: 13789377
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Mar 12;366(1565):649-54
references: 21282168
references: J Exp Biol. 1999 May;202 (Pt 9):1159-66
references: 10101113
references: Appl Opt. 2006 Aug 1;45(22):5582-9
references: 16855654
references: Brain Behav Evol. 2010;75(3):156-73
references: 20733292
references: Biol Bull. 2010 Aug;219(1):72-9
references: 20813991
references: J Exp Biol. 2012 Aug 15;215(Pt 16):2814-9
references: 22837453
references: J Exp Biol. 2006 Jul;209(Pt 13):2509-14
references: 16788034
references: Vision Res. 1995 Jun;35(12):1651-66
references: 7660573