title: Impaired ultrasonographic cervical assessment after voiding: a randomized controlled trial.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To estimate whether the timing of bladder emptying affects focal myometrial contraction development and image adequacy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Women at 14 0/7-32 0/7 weeks of gestation undergoing a transvaginal ultrasound examination from January 1, 2012, to September 1, 2012, were eligible for this blinded randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to undergo transvaginal imaging immediately after urination (within 5 minutes) or to defer the imaging by at least 15 minutes. The primary outcome was focal myometrial contraction development as determined by two independent blinded reviews of the images. Secondary outcomes included image adequacy and the diagnosis of placenta previa. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using repeated-measures log binomial regression.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Two hundred twenty-one women provided 335 randomized encounters for analysis. Women in the deferred scan group were 30% less likely to experience a focal myometrial contraction (28.1% compared with 40.5%, RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.93) and 41% less likely to have inadequate images (18.6% compared with 31.5%, RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.86). The two groups were equally likely to be diagnosed with placenta previa (P=.13). However, participants in the deferred scan group were 76% less likely to have images demonstrating a placenta previa and focal myometrial contraction (3.0% compared with 12.5%, RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09-0.62) than participants in the immediate scan group. Eight women would need to defer imaging for 15 minutes from bladder voiding to prevent one focal myometrial contraction of the lower uterine segment or inadequate imaging.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A brief interval (at least 15 minutes) between voiding and transvaginal cervical evaluation is associated with decreased risk for focal myometrial contractions and improved imaging.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01513395.
  
  
  METHODS
  I.
authors: Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
authors: William
authors: W
authors: Schnettler
authors: Melissa
authors: M
authors: March
authors: Michele R
authors: MR
authors: Hacker
authors: Anna Merport
authors: AM
authors: Modest
authors: Diana
authors: D
authors: Rodriguez
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002584:Cervix Uteri / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D009119:Muscle Contraction; D009215:Myometrium / Q000502:physiology*; D011247:Pregnancy; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016037:Single-Blind Method; D013997:Time Factors; D016216:Ultrasonography, Prenatal / Q000379:methods; D014554:Urination
references: Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Mar;89(3):364-7
references: 9052586
references: Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Aug 1;162(3):199-200
references: 15987728
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Oct;177(4):723-30
references: 9369810
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb;113(2 Pt 1):451-61
references: 19155920
references: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jul 1;2(4):256-60
references: 12796951
references: JAMA. 2001 Sep 19;286(11):1340-8
references: 11560539
references: Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2008 Jun;377(4-6):503-13
references: 18071676
references: Gynecol Oncol. 1996 Sep;62(3):370-8
references: 8812535
references: Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Apr;93(4):510-6
references: 10214824
references: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Sep;10(3):156-60
references: 9339521
references: Reprod Fertil Dev. 2006;18(5):525-31
references: 16836959
references: N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 29;334(9):567-72
references: 8569824
references: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;38(1):32-7
references: 21157771
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;202(6):548.e1-8
references: 20079888
references: Radiology. 1993 Jun;187(3):707-10
references: 8497617
references: Cell Tissue Res. 1999 May;296(2):293-305
references: 10382273