title: Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This study documented the ability of experienced pediatric cochlear implant (CI) users to perceive linguistic properties (what is said) and indexical attributes (emotional intent and talker identity) of speech, and examined the extent to which linguistic (LSP) and indexical (ISP) perception skills are related. Preimplant-aided hearing, age at implantation, speech processor technology, CI-aided thresholds, sequential bilateral cochlear implantation, and academic integration with hearing age-mates were examined for their possible relationships to both LSP and ISP skills.
  
  
  METHODS
  Sixty 9- to 12-year olds, first implanted at an early age (12 to 38 months), participated in a comprehensive test battery that included the following LSP skills: (1) recognition of monosyllabic words at loud and soft levels, (2) repetition of phonemes and suprasegmental features from nonwords, and (3) recognition of key words from sentences presented within a noise background, and the following ISP skills: (1) discrimination of across-gender and within-gender (female) talkers and (2) identification and discrimination of emotional content from spoken sentences. A group of 30 age-matched children without hearing loss completed the nonword repetition, and talker- and emotion-perception tasks for comparison.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Word-recognition scores decreased with signal level from a mean of 77% correct at 70 dB SPL to 52% at 50 dB SPL. On average, CI users recognized 50% of key words presented in sentences that were 9.8 dB above background noise. Phonetic properties were repeated from nonword stimuli at about the same level of accuracy as suprasegmental attributes (70 and 75%, respectively). The majority of CI users identified emotional content and differentiated talkers significantly above chance levels. Scores on LSP and ISP measures were combined into separate principal component scores and these components were highly correlated (r = 0.76). Both LSP and ISP component scores were higher for children who received a CI at the youngest ages, upgraded to more recent CI technology and had lower CI-aided thresholds. Higher scores, for both LSP and ISP components, were also associated with higher language levels and mainstreaming at younger ages. Higher ISP scores were associated with better social skills.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Results strongly support a link between indexical and linguistic properties in perceptual analysis of speech. These two channels of information appear to be processed together in parallel by the auditory system and are inseparable in perception. Better speech performance, for both linguistic and indexical perception, is associated with younger age at implantation and use of more recent speech processor technology. Children with better speech perception demonstrated better spoken language, earlier academic mainstreaming, and placement in more typically sized classrooms (i.e., >20 students). Well-developed social skills were more highly associated with the ability to discriminate the nuances of talker identity and emotion than with the ability to recognize words and sentences through listening. The extent to which early cochlear implantation enabled these early-implanted children to make use of both linguistic and indexical properties of speech influenced not only their development of spoken language, but also their ability to function successfully in a hearing world.
authors: Callier Center for Advanced Hearing Research, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75235, USA. ageers@utdallas.edu
authors: Ann E
authors: AE
authors: Geers
authors: Lisa S
authors: LS
authors: Davidson
authors: Rosalie M
authors: RM
authors: Uchanski
authors: Johanna G
authors: JG
authors: Nicholas
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D019929:Cochlear Implantation; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D003638:Deafness / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D004644:Emotions; D005260:Female; D006309:Hearing; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D008037:Linguistics; D008297:Male; D009622:Noise; D011571:Psychoacoustics; D013067:Speech Perception; D014706:Verbal Learning
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Apr;44(2):264-85
references: 11324650
references: Dev Sci. 2011 Sep;14(5):1002-11
references: 21884316
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991 Jan;17(1):152-62
references: 1826729
references: Otol Neurotol. 2007 Aug;28(5):615-28
references: 17667770
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999 Feb;42(1):141-54
references: 10025550
references: Am J Otol. 1991;12 Suppl:56-61
references: 2069190
references: Dev Psychobiol. 2005 Apr;46(3):252-61
references: 15772969
references: Otol Neurotol. 2010 Oct;31(8):1310-4
references: 20616759
references: Int J Audiol. 2011 Aug;50(8):498-502
references: 21696330
references: Ear Hear. 1996 Jun;17(3):182-97
references: 8807261
references: Ear Hear. 2011 Feb;32(1 Suppl):60S-74S
references: 21832890
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Oct;100(4 Pt 1):2415-24
references: 8865647
references: Ear Hear. 2003 Oct;24(5):392-405
references: 14534410
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Feb;131(2):1307-14
references: 22352504
references: Clin Linguist Phon. 2002 Dec;16(8):619-38
references: 12596429
references: Ear Hear. 2002 Oct;23(5):450-62
references: 12411778
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2395-405
references: 15532670
references: Ear Hear. 2010 Dec;31(6):806-14
references: 20683189
references: Ear Hear. 2003 Feb;24(1 Suppl):15S-23S
references: 12612477
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Feb;40(1):183-99
references: 9113869
references: Ear Hear. 2009 Jun;30(3):340-9
references: 19322085
references: Trends Amplif. 2007 Dec;11(4):301-15
references: 18003871
references: J Neurosci Methods. 2008 Jul 30;172(2):283-93
references: 18538414
references: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1999 Apr;177:124-8
references: 10214816
references: Otol Neurotol. 2009 Apr;30(3):304-12
references: 19225440
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Dec;35(6):1950-60
references: 19968445
references: Audiology. 2001 Sep-Oct;40(5):272-81
references: 11688546
references: Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2012 Jun;46(2):146-59
references: 21710374
references: J Neurosci Methods. 2005 Mar 15;142(1):131-6
references: 15652626
references: Speech Commun. 1996 Dec 1;20(3):255-272
references: 21461127
references: J Am Acad Audiol. 2007 Oct;18(9):777-93
references: 18354886
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30278
references: 22291928
references: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 May;130(5):624-8
references: 15148187
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Feb;48(1):204-23
references: 15938065
references: Ear Hear. 2003 Apr;24(2):157-74
references: 12677112
references: Ear Hear. 2004 Aug;25(4):375-87
references: 15292777
references: Ear Hear. 2004 Jun;25(3):230-41
references: 15179114
references: Ear Hear. 2006 Jun;27(3):286-98
references: 16672797
references: Ear Hear. 1999 Dec;20(6):443-60
references: 10613383
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Apr;56(2):643-55
references: 23275406
references: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2002 May;189:113-8
references: 12018337
references: Percept Psychophys. 1999 Feb;61(2):206-19
references: 10089756
references: Ear Hear. 2003 Feb;24(1 Suppl):24S-35S
references: 12612478
references: Ear Hear. 1995 Oct;16(5):470-81
references: 8654902
references: Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):411-20
references: 22237163
references: Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2001 Oct-Dec;36(4):421-32
references: 11802495
references: Science. 2011 Jul 29;333(6042):595
references: 21798942
references: Ear Hear. 2006 Oct;27(5):493-507
references: 16957500
references: Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2 Suppl):56S-58S
references: 17496648
references: Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Jun;34(3):199-211
references: 19531168
references: J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2009 Fall;14(4):449-64
references: 19398533
references: Am J Otol. 1994 Nov;15 Suppl 2:15-27
references: 8572106
references: Ear Hear. 2011 Feb;32(1):16-30
references: 21178567
references: J Am Acad Audiol. 2002 Jan;13(1):14-24
references: 11833989
references: Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2):163-76
references: 17496668
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Feb;52(1):141-52
references: 18664684
references: Ear Hear. 2002 Feb;23(1 Suppl):49S-58S
references: 11883767
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Aug;106(2):1054-63
references: 10462810
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Aug;126(2):762-75
references: 19640042
references: Ear Hear. 2011 Feb;32(1 Suppl):19S-26S
references: 21832887
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Aug;50(4):1048-62
references: 17675604
references: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2002 May;189:91-6
references: 12018358
references: Trends Amplif. 2009 Jun;13(2):107-23
references: 19447765
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Sep;118(3 Pt 1):1711-8
references: 16240829
references: Child Neuropsychol. 2009 Mar;15(2):136-46
references: 18828045
references: Ear Hear. 2003 Feb;24(1 Suppl):2S-14S
references: 12612476
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Mar;70(3):614-36
references: 8851745
references: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 May;130(5):587-91
references: 15148181
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Apr;123(4):2064-77
references: 18397014
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Jan;111(1 Pt 1):377-86
references: 11831811
references: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2004 Sep;5(3):253-60
references: 15492884