title: Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Perineal trauma following vaginal birth can be associated with significant short-term and long-term morbidity. Antenatal perineal massage has been proposed as one method of decreasing the incidence of perineal trauma.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To assess the effect of antenatal digital perineal massage on the incidence of perineal trauma at birth and subsequent morbidity.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (22 October 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 10), PubMed (1966 to October 2012), EMBASE (1980 to October 2012) and reference lists of relevant articles.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials evaluating any described method of antenatal digital perineal massage undertaken for at least the last four weeks of pregnancy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Both review authors independently applied the selection criteria, extracted data from the included studies and assessed study quality. We contacted study authors for additional information.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We included four trials (2497 women) comparing digital perineal massage with control. All were of good quality. Antenatal digital perineal massage was associated with an overall reduction in the incidence of trauma requiring suturing (four trials, 2480 women, risk ratio (RR) 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 0.96), number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 15 (10 to 36)) and women practicing perineal massage were less likely to have an episiotomy (four trials, 2480 women, RR 0.84 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.95), NNTB 21 (12 to 75)). These findings were significant for women without previous vaginal birth only. No differences were seen in the incidence of first- or second-degree perineal tears or third-/fourth-degree perineal trauma. Only women who have previously birthed vaginally reported a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of pain at three months postpartum (one trial, 376 women, RR 0.45 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.87) NNTB 13 (7 to 60)). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of instrumental deliveries, sexual satisfaction, or incontinence of urine, faeces or flatus for any women who practised perineal massage compared with those who did not massage.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Antenatal digital perineal massage reduces the likelihood of perineal trauma (mainly episiotomies) and the reporting of ongoing perineal pain, and is generally well accepted by women. As such, women should be made aware of the likely benefit of perineal massage and provided with information on how to massage.
authors: Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Australia. michael.beckmann@mater.org.au.
authors: Michael M
authors: MM
authors: Beckmann
authors: Owen M
authors: OM
authors: Stock
mesh_terms: D036861:Delivery, Obstetric / Q000009:adverse effects*; D004841:Episiotomy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008405:Massage / Q000379:methods*; D007744:Obstetric Labor Complications / Q000517:prevention & control*; D010502:Perineum / Q000293:injuries*; D011247:Pregnancy; D011295:Prenatal Care / Q000379:methods*; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000947
references: 10796227
references: Birth. 1998 Dec;25(4):226-34
references: 9892890
references: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Feb;16(1):99-115
references: 11866500
references: J Nurse Midwifery. 1987 May-Jun;32(3):123-30
references: 3647118
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Mar;180(3 Pt 1):593-600
references: 10076134
references: Birth. 2002 Mar;29(1):18-27
references: 11843786
references: Isr Med Assoc J. 2008 Jul;10(7):499-502
references: 18751626
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;(5):CD002006
references: 22592681
references: N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 23;329(26):1905-11
references: 8247054
references: J Reprod Med. 2002 Jun;47(6):477-82
references: 12092017
references: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993 Jan;72(1):31-5
references: 8382428
references: BJOG. 2001 May;108(5):499-504
references: 11368136
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Sep;171(3):591-8
references: 8092203
references: BJOG. 2000 Feb;107(2):186-95
references: 10688502
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000224
references: 10796182
references: Birth. 1994 Mar;21(1):20-5
references: 8155220
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000081
references: 10796120
references: Birth. 1999 Mar;26(1):11-7
references: 10352050
references: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Dec;105(12):1262-72
references: 9883917
references: J Nurse Midwifery. 1986 May-Jun;31(3):128-34
references: 3635585
references: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Sep 26;295(6601):749-51
references: 3119022
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jan;182(1 Pt 1):76-80
references: 10649159
references: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Jul;104(7):787-91
references: 9236642
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Sep;173(3 Pt 1):906-12
references: 7573267
references: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997 May;73(1):1-4
references: 9175681
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;(1):CD005123
references: 16437520
references: BMJ. 2001 May 26;322(7297):1277-80
references: 11375230
references: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Apr;102(4):282-7
references: 7612509
references: Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004 Jun 30;116(11-12):379-84
references: 15291290
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr;184(5):881-8; discussion 888-90
references: 11303195
references: Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1995 Nov;50(11):821-35
references: 8545087
references: CMAJ. 2002 Feb 5;166(3):326-30
references: 11868640