title: An old test for new neurons: refining the Morris water maze to study the functional relevance of adult hippocampal neurogenesis.
abstract: The Morris water maze represents the de-facto standard for testing hippocampal function in laboratory rodents. In the field of adult hippocampal neurogenesis, however, using this paradigm to assess the functional relevance of the new neurons yielded surprisingly inconsistent results. While some authors found aspects of water maze performance to be linked to adult neurogenesis, others obtained different results or could not demonstrate any effect of manipulating adult neurogenesis. In this review we discuss evidence that the large diversity of protocols and setups used is an important aspect in interpreting the differences in the results that have been obtained. Even simple parameters such as pool size, number, and configuration of visual landmarks, or number of trials can become highly relevant for getting the new neurons involved at all. Sets of parameters are often chosen with implicit or explicit concepts in mind and these might lead to different views on the function of adult-generated neurons. We propose that the classical parameters usually used to measure spatial learning performance in the water maze might not be particularly well-suited to sensitively and specifically detect the supposedly highly specific functional changes elicited by the experimental modulation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis. As adult neurogenesis is supposed to affect specific aspects of information processing only in the hippocampus, any claim for a functional relevance of the new neurons has to be based on hippocampus-specific parameters. We also placed a special emphasis on the fact that the dentate gyrus (DG) facilitates the differentiation between contexts as opposed to just differentiating places. In conclusion, while the Morris water maze has proven to be one of the most effective testing paradigms to assess hippocampus-dependent spatial learning, new and more specific questions ask for new parameters. Therefore, the full potential of the water maze task remains to be tapped.
authors: German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Dresden, Germany ; CRTD - DFG Research Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden Dresden, Germany.
authors: Alexander
authors: A
authors: Garthe
authors: Gerd
authors: G
authors: Kempermann
keywords: CA3; adult neurogenesis; dentate gyrus; flexibility; hippocampus; pattern separation; spatial learning; water maze
references: Learn Mem. 2009 Jan 29;16(2):147-54
references: 19181621
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;14(7):325-37
references: 20471301
references: Exp Neurol. 1978 Nov;62(2):282-97
references: 729680
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Jan 27;7(1):e1001063
references: 21298080
references: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jun;9(6):729-31
references: 16648847
references: Nature. 2008 Feb 21;451(7181):1004-7
references: 18235445
references: Hippocampus. 2002;12(5):578-84
references: 12440573
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 13;104(11):4642-6
references: 17360577
references: Trends Neurosci. 2004 Aug;27(8):447-52
references: 15271491
references: Nature. 1997 Apr 3;386(6624):493-5
references: 9087407
references: Network. 2009;20(3):137-61
references: 19731146
references: Hippocampus. 2006;16(3):329-43
references: 16435309
references: Hippocampus. 2008;18(9):955-64
references: 18493930
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 May;11(5):339-50
references: 20354534
references: Nat Neurosci. 1999 Mar;2(3):266-70
references: 10195220
references: J Neurophysiol. 1975 May;38(3):690-713
references: 1127462
references: Behav Brain Res. 2010 Dec 31;215(2):180-96
references: 20307583
references: J Neurosci Methods. 1984 May;11(1):47-60
references: 6471907
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Mar;14(3):138-46
references: 20138795
references: Brain Res. 1998 Jun 22;797(1):35-41
references: 9630498
references: Exp Neurol. 2004 Aug;188(2):316-30
references: 15246832
references: Nature. 1982 Jun 24;297(5868):681-3
references: 7088155
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 27;107(17):7963-8
references: 20375283
references: J Neurosci. 1990 Nov;10(11):3531-42
references: 2230943
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:111-40, C1-3
references: 19575621
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1971 Jul 1;262(841):23-81
references: 4399412
references: Neuroscience. 2008 Jul 17;154(4):1155-72
references: 18554812
references: J Comp Neurol. 2003 Dec 22;467(4):455-63
references: 14624480
references: Physiol Behav. 2001 Aug;73(5):745-53
references: 11566208
references: Behav Brain Res. 2010 Apr 2;208(2):408-14
references: 20035800
references: PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5464
references: 19421325
references: Behav Neurosci. 1996 Oct;110(5):998-1005
references: 8919002
references: Trends Neurosci. 2008 Apr;31(4):163-9
references: 18329110
references: Exp Brain Res. 1988;71(2):307-19
references: 3169166
references: Hippocampus. 2006;16(3):216-24
references: 16421862
references: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jun;9(6):723-7
references: 16732202
references: Hippocampus. 2013 Jan;23(1):66-74
references: 22826108
references: Cell. 2008 Feb 22;132(4):645-60
references: 18295581
references: Science. 2009 Jul 10;325(5937):210-3
references: 19590004
references: Nat Neurosci. 2007 Mar;10(3):355-62
references: 17277773
references: PLoS One. 2008 Apr 09;3(4):e1959
references: 18509506
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Oct;13(10):727-36
references: 22948073
references: Hippocampus. 1996;6(6):601-20
references: 9034849
references: Exp Brain Res. 1989;76(3):485-96
references: 2792242
references: Neuron. 2009 Jan 29;61(2):187-202
references: 19186162
references: Hippocampus. 1997;7(6):624-42
references: 9443059
references: Neuroscience. 2008 Jun 23;154(2):521-9
references: 18502050
references: Neuroscience. 2005;130(4):843-52
references: 15652983
references: Hippocampus. 2006;16(3):296-304
references: 16411241