title: Surgical strategies in polytraumatized patients with femoral shaft fractures - comparing a German and an Australian level I trauma centre.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Femoral shaft fractures are one of the most common injuries in multiple trauma patients. Due to their prognostic relevance, there is an ongoing controversial discussion as to the optimal treatment strategy in terms of Damage Control Orthopaedics (DCO) and Early Total Care (ETC). We aimed to describe the differences in fracture management and clinical outcome of multiple trauma patients with concomitant femoral shaft fractures treated at a German and an Australian level I trauma centre using the same inclusion criteria.
  
  
  METHODS
  Polytraumatized patients (ISS ≥ 16) with a femoral shaft fracture aged ≥ 16 years treated at a German and an Australian trauma centre between 2003 and 2007 were included. According to ETC and DCO management principles, we evaluated demographic parameters as well as posttraumatic complications and clinical outcome.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Seventy-three patients were treated at the German and 134 patients at the Australian trauma centre. DCO was performed in case of increased injury severity in both hospitals. Prolonged mechanical ventilation time, and length of ICU and hospital stay were demonstrated in DCO treatment regardless of the trauma centre. No differences concerning posttraumatic complications and survival were found between both centres. Survival of patients after DCO was similar to those managed using ETC despite a greater severity of injury and lower probability of survival. There was no difference in the incidence of ARDS. DCO was, however, associated with a greatly increased length of time on mechanical ventilation and length of stay in the ICU.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We found no differences concerning patient demographics or clinical outcomes in terms of incidence of ARDS, MODS, or mortality. As such, we propose that comparability between German and Australian trauma populations is justified. Despite a higher ISS in the DCO group, there were no differences in posttraumatic complications and survival depending on ETC or DCO treatment. Further research is required to confirm whether this is the case with other countries, too.
authors: Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany. andruszkow.hagen@mh-hannover.de
authors: Hagen
authors: H
authors: Andruszkow
authors: Adam S
authors: AS
authors: Dowrick
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Frink
authors: Christian
authors: C
authors: Zeckey
authors: Christian
authors: C
authors: Krettek
authors: Frank
authors: F
authors: Hildebrand
authors: Elton R
authors: ER
authors: Edwards
authors: Philipp
authors: P
authors: Mommsen
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001315:Australia / Q000453:epidemiology; D005260:Female; D005264:Femoral Fractures / Q000150:complications / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D005858:Germany / Q000453:epidemiology; D006801:Humans; D015601:Injury Severity Score; D007362:Intensive Care Units / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009102:Multiple Organ Failure / Q000150:complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D009104:Multiple Trauma / Q000150:complications / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D012128:Respiratory Distress Syndrome / Q000150:complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014193:Trauma Centers / Q000458:organization & administration*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult