title: Geniculocalcarine tract disintegration after ischemic stroke: a diffusion tensor imaging study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Our aim was to investigate the disintegration of the geniculocalcarine tract by using DTI-derived parameters in cases of unilateral occipital or temporal-occipital ischemic stroke with geniculocalcarine tract involvement and to determine whether geniculocalcarine tract fibers affected by infarction and unaffected ipsilateral geniculocalcarine tract fibers have different disintegration processes.
  
  
  METHODS
  Seventy-one patients underwent routine MR imaging and DTI of the brain. Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity of the geniculocalcarine tract fibers affected by infarction, ipsilateral unaffected GCT fibers, and the contralateral geniculocalcarine tract were measured and compared at 5 different time points (from <1 week to >1 year) poststroke.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The fractional anisotropy of geniculocalcarine tract fibers affected by infarction (0.27 ± 0.06) was lower than that of contralateral GCT fibers (0.49 ± 0.03). The fractional anisotropy of geniculocalcarine tract fibers affected by infarction was not different in the first 3 weeks (P = .306). The mean diffusivity of geniculocalcarine tract fibers affected by infarction (0.53 ± 0.14) was lower than that of the contralateral GCT fibers (0.79 ± 0.07) in the first week but higher after the second week (0.95 ± 0.20 to 0.79 ± 0.06). The mean diffusivity gradually increased until it was equal to the mean diffusivity of CSF after the eighth week (2.43 ± 0.26), at which time both the fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity values stabilized. The fractional anisotropy (0.50 ± 0.04) and mean diffusivity (0.77 ± 0.06) of the ipsilateral unaffected GCT fibers were similar to those of the contralateral GCT fibers (0.50 ± 0.03 and 0.79 ± 0.07) during the first 3 weeks. The fractional anisotropy then gradually decreased (from 0.42 ± 0.03 to 0.27 ± 0.05), while the mean diffusivity increased (from 0.95 ± 0.09 to 1.35 ± 0.11), though to a lesser degree than in the corresponding geniculocalcarine tract fibers affected by infarction.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The geniculocalcarine tract fibers affected by infarction and the ipsilateral unaffected GCT fibers showed different disintegration processes. The progressive disintegration of geniculocalcarine tract fibers affected by infarction was stable until the eighth week poststroke. The ipsilateral unaffected GCT fibers began to disintegrate at the fourth week, but to a lesser degree than the geniculocalcarine tract fibers affected by infarction.
authors: Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GuangDong, China.
authors: Y
authors: Y
authors: Zhang
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Wan
authors: X
authors: X
authors: Zhang
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D016880:Anisotropy; D002545:Brain Ischemia / Q000473:pathology*; D002544:Cerebral Infarction / Q000473:pathology; D056324:Diffusion Tensor Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005829:Geniculate Bodies / Q000473:pathology*; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009412:Nerve Fibers / Q000473:pathology; D009778:Occipital Lobe / Q000473:pathology*; D020521:Stroke / Q000473:pathology*; D013702:Temporal Lobe / Q000473:pathology*
references: Neuroradiology. 2003 Aug;45(8):532-5
references: 12856090
references: Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov;140(5):896-7
references: 16310467
references: Neuropsychol Rev. 2010 Jun;20(2):209-25
references: 20422451
references: Stroke. 1999 Feb;30(2):293-8
references: 9933262
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Jun;4(6):469-80
references: 12778119
references: Epilepsia. 1999 Aug;40(8):1155-8
references: 10448831
references: Lancet Neurol. 2008 Aug;7(8):715-27
references: 18635020
references: Stroke. 2010 May;41(5):910-5
references: 20378864
references: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Dec;26(6):1399-404
references: 17968908
references: Neurology. 2010 Sep 21;75(12):1048-54
references: 20855848
references: Stroke. 2001 Jan;32(1):107-12
references: 11136923
references: Neurology. 2005 Jan 11;64(1):108-13
references: 15642912
references: Neurology. 2010 Jan 26;74(4):280-7
references: 20101033
references: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Apr;56(4):344-51
references: 8482953
references: Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov;140(5):781-785
references: 16310456
references: Neuroimage. 1999 Mar;9(3):352-61
references: 10075905
references: Ann Neurol. 2008 Oct;64(4):460-5
references: 18661560
references: Stroke. 2003 Sep;34(9):E159-62
references: 12907811
references: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Mar;29(3):488-93
references: 18079190
references: Neurology. 2005 Aug 23;65(4):596-9
references: 16116123
references: BMC Neurol. 2005 Sep 26;5:17
references: 16185359
references: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 May;32(5):857-63
references: 21474629
references: Stroke. 2010 Oct;41(10 Suppl):S112-3
references: 20876482
references: Brain. 2003 Jul;126(Pt 7):1650-9
references: 12805118
references: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Jan;28(1):92-6
references: 17213432
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Nov;30(11):3461-74
references: 19370766
references: Magn Reson Med. 1996 Dec;36(6):893-906
references: 8946355
references: Exp Neurol. 2010 Jul;224(1):258-70
references: 20394745
references: Ann Neurol. 1996 Apr;39(4):460-70
references: 8619524
references: J Rehabil Med. 2008 Feb;40(2):96-101
references: 18509572