title: Persistence of internal representations of alternative voluntary actions.
abstract: We have investigated a situation in which externally available response alternatives and their internal representations could be dissociated, by suddenly removing some action alternatives from the response space during the interval between the free selection and the execution of a voluntary action. Choice reaction times in this situation were related to the number of initially available response alternatives, rather than to the number of alternatives available effectively available after the change in the external environment. The internal representations of response alternatives appeared to persist after external changes actually made the corresponding action unavailable. This suggests a surprising dynamics of voluntary action representations: counterfactual response alternatives persist, and may even be actively maintained, even when they are not available in reality. Our results highlight a representational basis for the counterfactual course of action. Such representations may play a key role in feelings of regret, disappointment, or frustration. These feelings all involve persistent representation of counterfactual response alternatives that may not actually be available in the environment.
authors: Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London London, UK ; Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Max Planck Institut für Bildungsforschung Berlin, Germany.
authors: Elisa
authors: E
authors: Filevich
authors: Patrick
authors: P
authors: Haggard
keywords: Hick’s law; free action; reselection; response selection; volition
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 May 29;362(1481):773-86
references: 17395575
references: Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):392-402
references: 22776456
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:269-98
references: 20345247
references: Neuroimage. 2000 Oct;12(4):404-17
references: 10988034
references: Vision Res. 2000;40(10-12):1433-41
references: 10788650
references: Cereb Cortex. 2009 Oct;19(10):2352-60
references: 19211661
references: Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):767-776
references: 21255591
references: J Neurosci. 2000 Apr 1;20(7):2691-700
references: 10729350
references: Neuron. 2011 Jun 23;70(6):1054-69
references: 21689594
references: Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1985 Jan 22;223(1232):331-54
references: 2858101
references: Exp Brain Res. 1969;7(2):158-68
references: 5799432
references: Neuron. 2005 Mar 3;45(5):801-14
references: 15748854
references: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Apr;36(4):1107-18
references: 22305996
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Jan 1;5(1):10-16
references: 11164731
references: Exp Brain Res. 2012 Nov;223(3):341-51
references: 23007721
references: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;101(4):1913-20
references: 19164107
references: Neuron. 2009 Jun 11;62(5):733-43
references: 19524531
references: Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1407-15
references: 15050566
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 29;362(1485):1585-99
references: 17428779
references: Nature. 2009 Sep 10;461(7261):263-6
references: 19693010
references: Neuroimage. 2006 Jan 1;29(1):286-94
references: 16087350
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Apr;10(2):276-91
references: 6232345
references: PLoS Biol. 2011 Jun;9(6):e1001093
references: 21738446
references: J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 7;32(10):3433-46
references: 22399766
references: Trends Neurosci. 2004 Mar;27(3):161-8
references: 15036882
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:535-74
references: 17600525
references: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Sep;8(9):1255-62
references: 16116457
references: J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 13;32(24):8373-82
references: 22699917