title: Improved nutritive quality and salt resistance in transgenic maize by simultaneously overexpression of a natural lysine-rich protein gene, SBgLR, and an ERF transcription factor gene, TSRF1.
abstract: Maize (Zea mays L.), as one of the most important crops in the world, is deficient in lysine and tryptophan. Environmental conditions greatly impact plant growth, development and productivity. In this study, we used particle bombardment mediated co-transformation to obtain marker-free transgenic maize inbred X178 lines harboring a lysine-rich protein gene SBgLR from potato and an ethylene responsive factor (ERF) transcription factor gene, TSRF1, from tomato. Both of the target genes were successfully expressed and showed various expression levels in different transgenic lines. Analysis showed that the protein and lysine content in T1 transgenic maize seeds increased significantly. Compared to non-transformed maize, the protein and lysine content increased by 7.7% to 24.38% and 8.70% to 30.43%, respectively. Moreover, transgenic maize exhibited more tolerance to salt stress. When treated with 200 mM NaCl for 48 h, both non-transformed and transgenic plant leaves displayed wilting and losing green symptoms and dramatic increase of the free proline contents. However, the degree of control seedlings was much more serious than that of transgenic lines and much more increases of the free proline contents in the transgenic lines than that in the control seedlings were observed. Meanwhile, lower extent decreases of the chlorophyll contents were detected in the transgenic seedlings. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to analyze the expression of ten stress-related genes, including stress responsive transcription factor genes, ZmMYB59 and ZmMYC1, proline synthesis related genes, ZmP5CS1 and ZmP5CS2, photosynthesis-related genes, ZmELIP, ZmPSI-N, ZmOEE, Zmrbcs and ZmPLAS, and one ABA biosynthesis related gene, ZmSDR. The results showed that with the exception of ZmP5CS1 and ZmP5CS2 in line 9-10 and 19-11, ZmMYC1 in line 19-11 and ZmSDR in line 19-11, the expression of other stress-related genes were inhibited in transgenic lines under normal conditions. After salt treatment, the expressions of the ten stress-related genes were significantly induced in both wild-type (WT) and transgenic lines. However, compared to WT, the increases of ZmP5CS1 in all these three transgenic lines and ZmP5CS2 in line 9-10 were less than WT plants. This study provides an effective approach of maize genetic engineering for improved nutritive quality and salt tolerance.
authors: State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China. yujj@cau.edu.cn.
authors: Meizhen
authors: M
authors: Wang
authors: Chen
authors: C
authors: Liu
authors: Shixue
authors: S
authors: Li
authors: Dengyun
authors: D
authors: Zhu
authors: Qian
authors: Q
authors: Zhao
authors: Jingjuan
authors: J
authors: Yu
mesh_terms: D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D019470:Biolistics; D020090:Chromosome Segregation; D003433:Crosses, Genetic; D018506:Gene Expression Regulation, Plant; D017343:Genes, Plant; D005819:Genetic Markers; D007178:Inbreeding; D018551:Solanum lycopersicum / Q000378:metabolism; D008239:Lysine / Q000378:metabolism*; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D010940:Plant Proteins / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism; D030821:Plants, Genetically Modified; D055049:Salt Tolerance; D017386:Sequence Homology, Amino Acid; D011198:Solanum tuberosum / Q000378:metabolism; D014157:Transcription Factors / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism; D003313:Zea mays / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology*
chemical_list: D005819:Genetic Markers; D010940:Plant Proteins; D014157:Transcription Factors; D008239:Lysine
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Feb 4;94(3):1035-40
references: 9023378
references: Plant Cell. 2002 Apr;14(4):817-31
references: 11971137
references: Science. 2009 Nov 20;326(5956):1112-5
references: 19965430
references: Plant Biotechnol J. 2005 Nov;3(6):555-69
references: 17147627
references: Plant Cell. 2000 Mar;12(3):393-404
references: 10715325
references: J Exp Bot. 2008;59(3):645-52
references: 18252700
references: Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Jun;61(3):525-35
references: 16830184
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Dec 29;32(22):e189
references: 15625231
references: Plant Cell Rep. 2008 Mar;27(3):411-24
references: 18026957
references: FEBS Lett. 1995 Sep 18;372(1):13-9
references: 7556633
references: Transgenic Res. 2002 Aug;11(4):381-96
references: 12212841
references: Int Rev Cytol. 1991;124:217-73
references: 2001917
references: Planta. 2008 Oct;228(5):777-87
references: 18597110
references: Plant Physiol. 2008 Apr;146(4):1622-36
references: 18235037
references: J Biol Chem. 1995 Sep 1;270(35):20491-6
references: 7657626
references: J Appl Genet. 2010;51(3):243-57
references: 20720299
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(24):8014-8
references: 6096873
references: Plant Mol Biol. 1997 Jan;33(2):291-300
references: 9037147
references: Plant Mol Biol. 2004 Jul;55(4):607-18
references: 15604704
references: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:781-803
references: 16669782
references: Plant J. 1995 May;7(5):751-60
references: 7773306
references: Plant Mol Biol. 2004 Aug;55(6):825-34
references: 15604719
references: J Agric Food Chem. 2004 Apr 7;52(7):1958-64
references: 15053536
references: Plant Physiol. 2006 Feb;140(2):411-32
references: 16407444
references: Plant Cell. 2003 Dec;15(12):3033-50
references: 14630974
references: Plant Cell. 2002;14 Suppl:S165-83
references: 12045276
references: Transgenic Res. 2008 Feb;17(1):59-71
references: 17387628
references: Plant Cell Rep. 2009 Nov;28(11):1655-68
references: 19701639
references: Plant J. 1997 Jan;11(1):15-29
references: 9025300
references: Plant Mol Biol. 2007 Jan;63(1):63-71
references: 17160455
references: Planta. 2005 Apr;220(6):875-88
references: 15538622
references: Plant J. 2007 Aug;51(3):406-18
references: 17559515
references: Plant Cell Rep. 2011 Jul;30(7):1241-52
references: 21327387
references: Transgenic Res. 2002 Feb;11(1):11-20
references: 11874099
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2000 Jul;5(7):273-4
references: 10871898
references: Plant Cell. 1998 Aug;10(8):1391-406
references: 9707537
references: Plant Biotechnol J. 2010 May 1;8(4):476-88
references: 20233336
references: Science. 2002 Apr 19;296(5567):557-9
references: 11964485
references: Plant Biotechnol J. 2007 Sep;5(5):605-14
references: 17553105
references: Plant Physiol. 2003 Sep;133(1):29-36
references: 12970472
references: Plant J. 1997 Sep;12(3):557-69
references: 9351242
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402
references: 9254694
references: Plant Cell. 1995 Feb;7(2):173-82
references: 7756828
references: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Feb;7(1):40-9
references: 14732440
references: J Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;109(6 Pt 2):3367-76
references: 2480963
references: Plant Cell Rep. 2008 Oct;27(10):1635-44
references: 18663452
references: J Biosci. 2012 Mar;37(1):167-97
references: 22357214
references: Planta. 2007 Sep;226(4):827-38
references: 17541631
references: Science. 1964 Jul 17;145(3629):279-80
references: 14171571
references: Genetics. 2003 Sep;165(1):387-97
references: 14504244