title: The diagnostic significance of the holter monitoring in the evaluation of palpitation.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the diagnostic yield of the 24-hour Holter monitoring in the patients who were evaluated for palpitations.
  
  
  METHODS
  A prospective, single-centre study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of the Holter monitoring. The inclusion criteria was age greater then 18 years with the symptom of unexplained recurrent palpitations. The exclusion criteria was patients with known medical causes of palpitation, a history of documented arrhythmias, or a history of or the current use of anti-arrhythmic drugs. The outcomes included a diagnostic Holter monitor recording.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The data analysis of the 335 patients who were studied, showed that there were 160 (47.8%) females and 175 (52.2%) males with a mean age of 55± 18.85 years (18 to 90 years). Ventricular ectopics as bigeminy in 36.7% patients and as couplets in 20% patients, were detected. Non-sustained VT was detected in 5.7% patients, VT was detected in 0.9% cases and SVT was detected in 12.5% cases. 3.58% cases had paraxosymal atrial flutter/fibrillation. The ST segment shift which is suggestive of silent ischaemia, was present in 17.6% of the study population. Second or higher degrees of AV blocks were noted in 2 cases, while one patient had the WPW syndrome. Ventricular bigeminy, couplets, VT,SVT and AF were statistically significant in the patients who were over the age of 50 years as compared to those who were less than 50 years.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In patients with non-specific symptoms, Holter monitoring has a significant role in the primary diagnosis of myocardial ischaemia or arrhythmia as a cause of such symptoms in the older age groups.
authors: Associate Professor, Department of Medicine.
authors: Badri
authors: B
authors: Paudel
authors: Klara
authors: K
authors: Paudel
keywords: Arrhythmias; Elderly patients; Holter monitoring; Ischaemia; Palpitations
references: J Hypertens. 1995 Feb;13(2):269-76
references: 7615959
references: Am J Cardiol. 1993 Oct 15;72(12):889-93
references: 8213544
references: Int J Cardiol. 2010 Mar 18;139(3):305-6
references: 18990460
references: Am J Med. 1996 Feb;100(2):138-48
references: 8629647
references: Can J Cardiol. 1995 Feb;11(2):117-22
references: 7866934
references: Ann Intern Med. 1998 Jun 1;128(11):890-5
references: 9634426
references: Circulation. 1971 Jul;44(1):130-42
references: 4104697
references: Arch Intern Med. 1995 Sep 11;155(16):1782-8
references: 7654112
references: N Engl J Med. 1985 Jan 24;312(4):193-7
references: 2578212
references: Ann Intern Med. 1999 May 18;130(10):848-56
references: 10366376
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Sep;34(3):912-48
references: 10483977
references: Ann Intern Med. 2001 May 1;134(9 Pt  2):832-7
references: 11346318
references: Am J Cardiol. 1976 Jan;37(1):102-7
references: 1244726
references: Am J Cardiol. 1997 Feb 1;79(3):371-2
references: 9036763
references: J Electrocardiol. 2010 May-Jun;43(3):251-9
references: 20096853
references: Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jan 1;124(1 Pt 1):16-20
references: 7503472
references: Klin Med (Mosk). 2009;87(12):28-32
references: 20135882
references: J Fam Pract. 1987 Apr;24(4):357-60
references: 3559487
references: J Electrocardiol. 1980 Oct;13(4):341-6
references: 7430862