title: Cultural phylogeography of the Bantu Languages of sub-Saharan Africa.
abstract: There is disagreement about the routes taken by populations speaking Bantu languages as they expanded to cover much of sub-Saharan Africa. Here, we build phylogenetic trees of Bantu languages and map them onto geographical space in order to assess the likely pathway of expansion and test between dispersal scenarios. The results clearly support a scenario in which groups first moved south through the rainforest from a homeland somewhere near the Nigeria-Cameroon border. Emerging on the south side of the rainforest, one branch moved south and west. Another branch moved towards the Great Lakes, eventually giving rise to the monophyletic clade of East Bantu languages that inhabit East and Southeastern Africa. These phylogenies also reveal information about more general processes involved in the diversification of human populations into distinct ethnolinguistic groups. Our study reveals that Bantu languages show a latitudinal gradient in covering greater areas with increasing distance from the equator. Analyses suggest that this pattern reflects a true ecological relationship rather than merely being an artefact of shared history. The study shows how a phylogeographic approach can address questions relating to the specific histories of certain groups, as well as general cultural evolutionary processes.
authors: Human Evolutionary Ecology Group, Department of Anthropology, University College London, 14 Taviton St, London WC1H 0BW, UK. t.currie@ucl.ac.uk
authors: Thomas E
authors: TE
authors: Currie
authors: Andrew
authors: A
authors: Meade
authors: Myrtille
authors: M
authors: Guillon
authors: Ruth
authors: R
authors: Mace
mesh_terms: D017954:Africa South of the Sahara; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D044383:Black People; D003468:Cultural Evolution; D063426:Human Migration; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008037:Linguistics; D010802:Phylogeny; D058974:Phylogeography
keywords: cultural diversity; language diversity; language evolution; phylogenetic comparative methods; phylogenetic inference; phyloplasty
references: Naturwissenschaften. 2006 Apr;93(4):189-94
references: 16514514
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Aug 22;277(1693):2443-50
references: 20375050
references: Nature. 2011 Oct 19;479(7373):393-6
references: 22012260
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 5;106(18):7339-44
references: 19380740
references: Math Biosci. 1998 Jan 1;147(1):63-91
references: 9401352
references: Syst Biol. 2002 Aug;51(4):588-98
references: 12228001
references: Nature. 2007 Oct 11;449(7163):717-20
references: 17928860
references: PLoS One. 2010 Jan 20;5(1):e8559
references: 20098492
references: Science. 2008 Feb 1;319(5863):588
references: 18239118
references: Science. 2009 Jan 23;323(5913):479-83
references: 19164742
references: Science. 2005 Sep 23;309(5743):2072-5
references: 16179483
references: Science. 2001 Dec 14;294(5550):2310-4
references: 11743192
references: Science. 2003 Apr 25;300(5619):597-603
references: 12714734
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Dec 7;270(1532):2425-33
references: 14667331
references: Nature. 2003 Nov 27;426(6965):435-9
references: 14647380
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 7;276(1668):2703-10
references: 19403539
references: Nature. 1988 Nov 10;336(6195):118
references: 3185733
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 22;276(1665):2299-306
references: 19324763
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 22;279(1741):3256-63
references: 22628476
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Dec 12;365(1559):3903-12
references: 21041214
references: Science. 2012 Aug 24;337(6097):957-60
references: 22923579
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 22;269(1493):793-9
references: 11958710
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Dec;19(12):639-44
references: 16701326