title: Nonlinearities lead to qualitative differences in population dynamics of predator-prey systems.
abstract: Since typically there are many predators feeding on most herbivores in natural communities, understanding multiple predator effects is critical for both community and applied ecology. Experiments of multiple predator effects on prey populations are extremely demanding, as the number of treatments and the amount of labour associated with these experiments increases exponentially with the number of species in question. Therefore, researchers tend to vary only presence/absence of the species and use only one (supposedly realistic) combination of their numbers in experiments. However, nonlinearities in density dependence, functional responses, interactions between natural enemies etc. are typical for such systems, and nonlinear models of population dynamics generally predict qualitatively different results, if initial absolute densities of the species studied differ, even if their relative densities are maintained. Therefore, testing combinations of natural enemies without varying their densities may not be sufficient. Here we test this prediction experimentally. We show that the population dynamics of a system consisting of 2 natural enemies (aphid predator Adalia bipunctata (L.), and aphid parasitoid, Aphidius colemani Viereck) and their shared prey (peach aphid, Myzus persicae Sulzer) are strongly affected by the absolute initial densities of the species in question. Even if their relative densities are kept constant, the natural enemy species or combination thereof that most effectively suppresses the prey may depend on the absolute initial densities used in the experiment. Future empirical studies of multiple predator - one prey interactions should therefore use a two-dimensional array of initial densities of the studied species. Varying only combinations of natural enemies without varying their densities is not sufficient and can lead to misleading results.
authors: Department of Biodiversity Research, Global Change Research Centre, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. olgameixa@portugalmail.pt
authors: Olga M C C
authors: OM
authors: Ameixa
authors: Gerben J
authors: GJ
authors: Messelink
authors: Pavel
authors: P
authors: Kindlmann
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D001042:Aphids / Q000502:physiology; D017711:Nonlinear Dynamics; D031701:Piper / Q000469:parasitology; D011157:Population Dynamics; D011235:Predatory Behavior
references: Ecology. 2007 Nov;88(11):2713-9
references: 18051638
references: Am Nat. 1997 Nov;150(5):519-53
references: 18811299
references: Science. 1972 Sep 22;177(4054):1121-2
references: 17840606
references: Ecology. 2007 Oct;88(10):2415-26
references: 18027743
references: Am Nat. 2000 Apr;155(4):435-453
references: 10753073
references: Annu Rev Entomol. 1998;43:421-47
references: 9444753
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Sep 1;13(9):350-5
references: 21238339
references: Nature. 2004 May 27;429(6990):407-10
references: 15164061
references: Oecologia. 1993 Jun;94(3):339-350
references: 28313669
references: Ecology. 2008 Jun;89(6):1605-15
references: 18589525
references: Ecology. 2009 Sep;90(9):2339-45
references: 19769111
references: Oecologia. 2006 Jul;148(4):702-9
references: 16568277
references: Oecologia. 1993 Dec;96(3):439-449
references: 28313662
references: Ecol Lett. 2006 Sep;9(9):995-1004
references: 16925648
references: Ecology. 2007 Nov;88(11):2689-96
references: 18051635
references: Oecologia. 2005 Dec;146(3):452-60
references: 16047196
references: Oecologia. 2002 May;131(4):569-579
references: 28547552
references: Oecologia. 1996 Oct;108(2):375-379
references: 28307852
references: Oecologia. 1996 May;106(3):407-415
references: 28307329
references: Monogr Popul Biol. 1978;(13):III-VII, 1-237
references: 732858
references: Oecologia. 1998 Nov;117(1-2):279-285
references: 28308499
references: Oecologia. 2005 Jul;144(3):472-80
references: 15891830