title: Predator faunas past and present: quantifying the influence of waterborne cues in divergent ecotypes of the isopod Asellus aquaticus.
abstract: Waterborne chemical cues are an important source of information for many aquatic organisms, in particular when assessing the current risk of predation. The ability to use chemical cues to detect and respond to potential predators before an actual encounter can improve prey chances of survival. We investigated predator recognition and the impact of chemical cues on predator avoidance in the freshwater isopod Asellus aquaticus. This isopod has recently colonised a novel habitat and diverged into two distinct ecotypes, which encounter different predator communities. Using laboratory-based choice experiments, we have quantified behavioural responses to chemical cues from predators typical of the two predator communities (larval dragonflies in the ancestral habitat, perch in the newly colonised habitat) in wild-caught and lab-reared Asellus of the two ecotypes. Individuals with prior experience of predators showed strong predator avoidance to cues from both predator types. Both ecotypes showed similar antipredator responses, but sexes differed in terms of threat-sensitive responses with males avoiding areas containing predator cues to a larger extent than females. Overall, chemical cues from fish elicited stronger predator avoidance than cues from larval dragonflies. Our results indicate that in these isopods, prior exposure to predators is needed to develop antipredator behaviour based on waterborne cues. Furthermore, the results emphasise the need to analyse predator avoidance in relation to waterborne cues in a sex-specific context, because of potential differences between males and females in terms of vulnerability and life history strategies.
authors: Department of Biology, Ecology Building, Lund University, Lund, 22362, Sweden.
authors: Sanna
authors: S
authors: Harris
authors: Kristina
authors: K
authors: Karlsson Green
authors: Lars B
authors: LB
authors: Pettersson
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001362:Avoidance Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D003463:Cues; D017753:Ecosystem; D005260:Female; D005618:Fresh Water / Q000737:chemistry*; D033321:Isopoda / Q000502:physiology*; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D063191:Odonata; D010471:Perches; D011235:Predatory Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D021641:Recognition, Psychology / Q000502:physiology*; D013045:Species Specificity; D013548:Sweden
references: Oecologia. 1997 Jul;111(2):166-171
references: 28307990
references: Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):505-12
references: 21352454
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Jan;15(1):3-4
references: 10603494
references: PLoS One. 2009 Jul 09;4(7):e6173
references: 19587791
references: Anim Behav. 2000 Jul;60(1):85-93
references: 10924207
references: J Evol Biol. 2010 Dec;23(12):2540-9
references: 20939835
references: Oecologia. 1999 Feb;118(2):256-264
references: 28307702
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Aug 7;275(1644):1811-6
references: 18445564
references: Oecologia. 2009 Mar;159(3):679-87
references: 19139923
references: Evolution. 2004 Jan;58(1):81-94
references: 15058721
references: Anim Behav. 1999 Feb;57(2):475-481
references: 10049488
references: J Evol Biol. 2005 May;18(3):713-21
references: 15842500
references: J Evol Biol. 2009 May;22(5):1098-1110
references: 21462414
references: J Evol Biol. 2011 Sep;24(9):1887-96
references: 21658187
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Aug 7;274(1620):1853-9
references: 17519190
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 06;280(1756):20122712
references: 23390103
references: PLoS One. 2010 Sep 16;5(9):
references: 20862332
references: Mol Ecol. 2005 Dec;14(14):4355-69
references: 16313598
references: J Evol Biol. 2006 Nov;19(6):1911-9
references: 17040388