title: Inherently Analog Quantity Representations in Olive Baboons (Papio anubis).
abstract: Strong evidence indicates that non-human primates possess a numerical representation system, but the inherent nature of that system is still debated. Two cognitive mechanisms have been proposed to account for non-human primate numerical performance: (1) a discrete object-file system limited to quantities <4, and (2) an analog system which represents quantities comparatively but is limited by the ratio between two quantities. To test the underlying nature of non-human primate quantification, we asked eight experiment-naive olive baboons (Papio anubis) to discriminate between number pairs containing small (<4), large (>4), or span (small vs. large) numbers of food items presented simultaneously or sequentially. The prediction from the object-file hypothesis is that baboons will only accurately choose the larger quantity in small pairs, but not large or span pairs. Conversely, the analog system predicts that baboons will be successful with all numbers, and that success will be dependent on numerical ratio. We found that baboons successfully discriminated all pair types at above chance levels. In addition, performance significantly correlated with the ratio between the numerical values. Although performance was better for simultaneous trials than sequential trials, evidence favoring analog numerical representation emerged from both conditions, and was present even in the first exposure to number pairs. Together, these data favor the interpretation that a single, coherent analog representation system underlies spontaneous quantitative abilities in primates.
authors: Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester Rochester, NY, USA.
authors: Allison M
authors: AM
authors: Barnard
authors: Kelly D
authors: KD
authors: Hughes
authors: Regina R
authors: RR
authors: Gerhardt
authors: Louis
authors: L
authors: Divincenti
authors: Jenna M
authors: JM
authors: Bovee
authors: Jessica F
authors: JF
authors: Cantlon
keywords: analog magnitude; baboons; numerosity; object-file; primates
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Jul;34(3):388-99
references: 18665721
references: Dev Sci. 2008 Nov;11(6):803-8
references: 19046148
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Apr;32(2):120-34
references: 16634655
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Jan;33(1):42-54
references: 17227194
references: Anim Cogn. 2003 Jun;6(2):105-12
references: 12709845
references: Cognition. 2000 Jan 10;74(1):B1-B11
references: 10594312
references: Cognition. 2008 May;107(2):603-22
references: 18164282
references: Cognition. 2007 Nov;105(2):395-438
references: 17208214
references: Psychol Rev. 1994 Jan;101(1):80-102
references: 8121961
references: Cognition. 2003 Jan;86(3):201-21
references: 12485738
references: Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):207-21
references: 17379202
references: J Comp Psychol. 2003 Jun;117(2):217-25
references: 12856792
references: Psychol Sci. 2004 Feb;15(2):94-9
references: 14738515
references: J Comp Psychol. 2004 Mar;118(1):25-36
references: 15008670
references: Dev Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1457-65
references: 18793076
references: J Comp Psychol. 2007 Aug;121(3):241-9
references: 17696650
references: J Comp Psychol. 2008 Feb;122(1):52-61
references: 18298281
references: Cognition. 2003 Aug;89(1):B15-25
references: 12893126
references: Dev Sci. 2010 Sep 1;13(5):790-7
references: 20712745
references: Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):377-91
references: 16909236
references: Anim Cogn. 2007 Jan;10(1):63-70
references: 16868736
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jul;8(7):307-14
references: 15242690
references: Science. 2009 Jan 2;323(5910):38; author reply 38
references: 19119201
references: Dev Sci. 2010 Mar;13(2):289-97
references: 20136925
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Jan;31(1):79-94
references: 15656729
references: Anim Cogn. 2009 Sep;12(5):733-8
references: 19387706
references: Anim Cogn. 2007 Jan;10(1):71-80
references: 16941158
references: Front Psychol. 2012 Sep 21;3:357
references: 23049522
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Dec;59(12):2065-82
references: 17095488
references: J Comp Psychol. 2001 Jun;115(2):181-91
references: 11459165
references: J Comp Psychol. 2005 Aug;119(3):296-303
references: 16131258
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Jan;33(1):21-31
references: 17227192
references: Cognition. 2005 Oct;97(3):295-313
references: 16260263
references: Psychol Sci. 2006 May;17(5):401-6
references: 16683927
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Apr 22;267(1445):829-33
references: 10819154
references: Psychol Sci. 2002 Mar;13(2):150-6
references: 11933999
references: Science. 1998 Oct 23;282(5389):746-9
references: 9784133
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Dec;8(4):698-707
references: 11848588
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Apr;19(2):331-51
references: 8473843
references: Cognition. 1992 Aug;44(1-2):43-74
references: 1511586
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Jan;26(1):31-49
references: 10650542
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Jan;33(1):32-41
references: 17227193
references: Cogn Psychol. 2003 Dec;47(4):367-401
references: 14642289
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1983 Jul;9(3):320-34
references: 6886634
references: Dev Psychol. 2009 Nov;45(6):1583-94
references: 19899916