title: Why sauropods had long necks; and why giraffes have short necks.
abstract: The necks of the sauropod dinosaurs reached 15 m in length: six times longer than that of the world record giraffe and five times longer than those of all other terrestrial animals. Several anatomical features enabled this extreme elongation, including: absolutely large body size and quadrupedal stance providing a stable platform for a long neck; a small, light head that did not orally process food; cervical vertebrae that were both numerous and individually elongate; an efficient air-sac-based respiratory system; and distinctive cervical architecture. Relevant features of sauropod cervical vertebrae include: pneumatic chambers that enabled the bone to be positioned in a mechanically efficient way within the envelope; and muscular attachments of varying importance to the neural spines, epipophyses and cervical ribs. Other long-necked tetrapods lacked important features of sauropods, preventing the evolution of longer necks: for example, giraffes have relatively small torsos and large, heavy heads, share the usual mammalian constraint of only seven cervical vertebrae, and lack an air-sac system and pneumatic bones. Among non-sauropods, their saurischian relatives the theropod dinosaurs seem to have been best placed to evolve long necks, and indeed their necks probably surpassed those of giraffes. But 150 million years of evolution did not suffice for them to exceed a relatively modest 2.5 m.
authors: Department of Earth Sciences , University of Bristol , Bristol , England.
authors: Michael P
authors: MP
authors: Taylor
authors: Mathew J
authors: MJ
authors: Wedel
keywords: Cervical vertebra; Dinosaur; Evolution; Giraffe; Neck; Sauropod
references: Biol Lett. 2012 Dec 23;8(6):1032-5
references: 23034173
references: Science. 1975 May 16;188(4189):676
references: 17755159
references: Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2002 Dec;133(4):1135-57
references: 12485697
references: Naturwissenschaften. 2010 Apr;97(4):379-91
references: 20179896
references: J Morphol. 2005 Feb;263(2):151-78
references: 15593309
references: Naturwissenschaften. 2002 Apr;89(4):180-4
references: 12061403
references: Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2002 Dec;133(4):1051-86
references: 12485692
references: Nature. 2001 Aug 2;412(6846):530-4
references: 11484051
references: Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2002 Dec;133(4):1001-11
references: 12485689
references: Acta Morphol Neerl Scand. 1987;25(3):131-55
references: 3331053
references: Bioessays. 2003 Nov;25(11):1035-9
references: 14579244
references: J Exp Zool. 1999 Apr 15;285(1):19-26
references: 10327647
references: Am Nat. 2007 Jan;169(1):130-5
references: 17206591
references: PLoS One. 2010 Nov 15;5(11):e13982
references: 21085624
references: J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2009 Oct 1;311(8):611-28
references: 19204909
references: Integr Zool. 2006 Jun;1(2):80-5
references: 21395998
references: J Morphol. 2007 Aug;268(8):701-14
references: 17514722
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26037
references: 22022500
references: PLoS One. 2008 May 28;3(5):e2271
references: 18509539
references: Nature. 2007 Jun 14;447(7146):844-7
references: 17565365
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37701
references: 22662194