title: Implicit and explicit second language training recruit common neural mechanisms for syntactic processing.
abstract: In contrast to native language acquisition, adult second-language (L2) acquisition occurs under highly variable learning conditions. Although most adults acquire their L2 at least partially through explicit instruction, as in a classroom setting, many others acquire their L2 primarily through implicit exposure, as is typical of an immersion environment. Whether these differences in acquisition environment play a role in determining the neural mechanisms that are ultimately recruited to process L2 grammar has not been well characterized. This study investigated this issue by comparing the ERP response to novel L2 syntactic rules acquired under conditions of implicit exposure and explicit instruction, using a novel laboratory language-learning paradigm. Native speakers tested on these stimuli showed a biphasic response to syntactic violations, consisting of an earlier negativity followed by a later P600 effect. After merely an hour of training, both implicitly and explicitly trained learners who were capable of detecting grammatical violations also elicited P600 effects. In contrast, learners who were unable to discriminate between grammatically correct and incorrect sentences did not show significant P600 effects. The magnitude of the P600 effect was found to correlate with learners' behavioral proficiency. Behavioral measures revealed that successful learners from both the implicit and explicit groups gained explicit, verbalizable knowledge about the L2 grammar rules. Taken together, these results indicate that late, controlled mechanisms indexed by the P600 play a crucial role in processing a late-learned L2 grammar, regardless of training condition. These findings underscore the remarkable plasticity of later, attention-dependent processes and their importance in lifelong learning.
authors: University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA. lbatteri@uoregon.edu
authors: Laura
authors: L
authors: Batterink
authors: Helen
authors: H
authors: Neville
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004569:Electroencephalography / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D007807:Language Tests; D007858:Learning / Q000145:classification / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D019303:Multilingualism; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011578:Psycholinguistics / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D055815:Young Adult
references: Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91
references: 18697684
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1993 Oct;1(3):183-92
references: 8257874
references: J Psycholinguist Res. 2001 May;30(3):251-66
references: 11523274
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Aug;17(8):1229-44
references: 16197680
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Mar;11(2):194-205
references: 10198134
references: Psychophysiology. 1999 Jan;36(1):126-37
references: 10098388
references: Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jun;49(7):1651-9
references: 21349278
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Apr;24(4):933-47
references: 21861686
references: BMC Neurosci. 2007 Mar 02;8:18
references: 17331265
references: Neuron. 2003 Jan 9;37(1):159-70
references: 12526781
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Mar;21(3):433-46
references: 18510445
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 May;13(3):339-56
references: 11918999
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32974
references: 22470434
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 8;99(1):529-34
references: 11773629
references: J Neurolinguistics. 2008 Nov;21(6):509-521
references: 19079740
references: Exp Psychol. 2003;50(2):124-30
references: 12693197
references: Neuroreport. 2001 Oct 29;12(15):3391-4
references: 11711892
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 1991 Spring;3(2):151-65
references: 23972090
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jul;128(3):514-27
references: 18061129
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):2752-65
references: 20964590
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Dec;22(12):2728-44
references: 19925188
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Oct;2(10):717-26
references: 11584309
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jan;15(2):116-26
references: 12429364
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jul;128(3):466-78
references: 18479667
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Aug;17(8):1212-28
references: 16197679
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jan;18(1):121-34
references: 16417688
references: Lang Learn. 2010 Mar;60(1):154-193
references: 21359123
references: Neuroreport. 1996 Nov 4;7(15-17):2439-44
references: 8981399
references: Memory. 2010 May;18(4):427-41
references: 20408037
references: Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(11):1531-49
references: 10906378
references: Brain. 1998 Oct;121 ( Pt 10):1841-52
references: 9798741
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Feb;18(2):149-57
references: 16494677
references: Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jul;7(7):703-4
references: 15195094
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Oct;25(2):484-98
references: 16139489
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Aug;22(8):1870-87
references: 19580390
references: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985 May;62(3):203-8
references: 2581760
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Feb 1;6(2):78-84
references: 15866191
references: Neurosci Lett. 2008 Oct 3;443(2):77-81
references: 18674588
references: Psychophysiology. 1997 Nov;34(6):660-76
references: 9401421
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000 Mar;104(1):45-67
references: 10769939
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Summer;8(3):231-56
references: 23968150
references: Neuroreport. 1997 Dec 1;8(17):3809-15
references: 9427375
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Dec;18(12):2030-48
references: 17129189
references: J Neurosci. 1999 Apr 15;19(8):3050-6
references: 10191322
references: J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
references: 15102499
references: Brain Lang. 1995 Sep;50(3):259-81
references: 7583190
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Jul;22(4):970-87
references: 8708606