title: Retrophylogenomics place tarsiers on the evolutionary branch of anthropoids.
abstract: One of the most disputed issues in primate evolution and thus of our own primate roots, is the phylogenetic position of the Southeast Asian tarsier. While much molecular data indicate a basal place in the primate tree shared with strepsirrhines (prosimian monophyly hypothesis), data also exist supporting either an earlier divergence in primates (tarsier-first hypothesis) or a close relationship with anthropoid primates (Haplorrhini hypothesis). The use of retroposon insertions embedded in the Tarsius genome afforded us the unique opportunity to directly test all three hypotheses via three pairwise genome alignments. From millions of retroposons, we found 104 perfect orthologous insertions in both tarsiers and anthropoids to the exclusion of strepsirrhines, providing conflict-free evidence for the Haplorrhini hypothesis, and none supporting either of the other two positions. Thus, tarsiers are clearly the sister group to anthropoids in the clade Haplorrhini.
authors: Institute of Experimental Pathology, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
authors: Gerrit
authors: G
authors: Hartig
authors: Gennady
authors: G
authors: Churakov
authors: Wesley C
authors: WC
authors: Warren
authors: Jürgen
authors: J
authors: Brosius
authors: Wojciech
authors: W
authors: Makałowski
authors: Jürgen
authors: J
authors: Schmitz
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D016678:Genome / Q000235:genetics*; D000882:Haplorhini / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics*; D010802:Phylogeny; D011443:Strepsirhini / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics; D016699:Tarsiidae / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics*
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 31;106(13):5235-40
references: 19286970
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1999 Feb;11(1):77-83
references: 10082612
references: J Mol Evol. 1998 Sep;47(3):249-57
references: 9732451
references: Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;108(1-3):26-37
references: 15545713
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Sep 11;109(37):14942-7
references: 22930817
references: Nature. 2001 Feb 1;409(6820):614-8
references: 11214319
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 16;107(11):4797-804
references: 20212104
references: PLoS Genet. 2011 Mar;7(3):e1001342
references: 21436896
references: J Hum Evol. 2011 Sep;61(3):295-305
references: 21620437
references: Gene. 2008 Sep 15;421(1-2):37-51
references: 18590805
references: Trends Genet. 2005 Sep;21(9):511-7
references: 16009448
references: Cell. 2008 Oct 3;135(1):192-192.e1
references: 18854165
references: Genome Res. 2009 May;19(5):868-75
references: 19261842
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Dec 02;10:376
references: 21126360
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Apr;19(4):544-53
references: 11919296
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Oct 27;9:259
references: 19860891
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Dec;19(12):2308-12
references: 12446821
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jun 11;99(12):8151-6
references: 12034869
references: Genetics. 2001 Feb;157(2):777-84
references: 11156996
references: Genome Inform. 2001;12:141-54
references: 11791233
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1998 Jun;9(3):585-98
references: 9668008
references: Genome Res. 2012 Apr;22(4):746-54
references: 22207614