title: [Oral mucosa for reconstructive urethral surgery].
abstract: The use of oral mucosa for urethral stricture repair has become the standard approach in reconstructive urethral surgery. Compared to other tissues oral mucosa shows several advantages, such as simple harvesting, good urine tolerance and low harvesting morbidity. For defects of the male bulbar urethra measuring 2 cm or longer, urethral reconstruction with oral mucosa is the procedure of choice. The oral mucosa graft can be used as an inlay or as an onlay graft. Most repairs can be completed in one stage but for complex strictures two stages are needed.
authors: Abteilung für Urologie, Zentralkrankenhaus Bozen, Lorenz Böhler Straße 5, I-39100 Bozen, Italien.
authors: R
authors: R
authors: Mayr
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Pycha
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009061:Mouth Mucosa / Q000637:transplantation*; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D014525:Urethral Stricture / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D013521:Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male / Q000379:methods*
references: BJU Int. 2001 Sep;88(4):385-9
references: 11564027
references: J Urol. 2004 Oct;172(4 Pt 1):1365-7; discussion 1367
references: 15371845
references: BJU Int. 2004 Oct;94(6):867-9
references: 15476524
references: Eur Urol. 2012 Oct;62(4):624-7
references: 22749735
references: J Urol. 1992 Mar;147(3):662-4
references: 1538451
references: Urology. 2003 May;61(5):1008-10
references: 12736025
references: J Urol. 1996 Jun;155(6):1912-5
references: 8618286
references: BJU Int. 2004 Jun;93(9):1191-3
references: 15180603
references: J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):614-9; discussion 619
references: 16813903
references: J Urol. 1998 Aug;160(2):359-63
references: 9679877
references: Urologe A. 2006 Apr;45(4):499-511; quiz 512-3
references: 16528536
references: Br J Urol. 1998 May;81(5):738-40
references: 9634052
references: J Urol. 1998 Aug;160(2):378-82
references: 9679882
references: J Urol. 1947 Jul;58(1):68-73
references: 20249379
references: BJU Int. 1999 May;83(7):751-4
references: 10368190
references: Urology. 2003 May;61(5):1004-7
references: 12736024
references: J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):387-94
references: 17561150
references: Urology. 2012 Feb;79(2):443-7
references: 22119261
references: J Urol. 2002 Jan;167(1):127-9
references: 11743289
references: Curr Urol Rep. 2000 Oct;1(3):180-9
references: 12084312
references: J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1970-2; discussion 1972
references: 15540768
references: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Aug;43(4):320-3
references: 15993285
references: BJU Int. 2004 Jun;93(9):1287-90
references: 15180624
references: Eur Urol. 2005 Dec;48(6):1013-7
references: 15970374
references: BJU Int. 2005 Jun;95(9):1299-302
references: 15892821
references: Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5):1086-9; discussion 1089-90
references: 16286129
references: J Urol. 1987 Oct;138(4 Pt 2):1096-8
references: 3309375
references: Eur Urol. 1996;29(2):227-30
references: 8647153
references: Tech Urol. 1998 Dec;4(4):173-6
references: 9891996
references: J Urol. 1993 Feb;149(2):276-8
references: 8426400
references: BJU Int. 1999 Jul;84(1):108-11
references: 10444136
references: J Urol. 2004 Feb;171(2 Pt 1):726-9
references: 14713797
references: BJU Int. 2012 Jan;109(1):150-62
references: 22151751
references: BJU Int. 2005 Mar;95(4):625-9
references: 15705092
references: Urology. 2004 Oct;64(4):648-50
references: 15491691
references: J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):955-7; discussion 957-8
references: 16094007
references: J Urol. 2002 Mar;167(3):1314-7
references: 11832721
references: Urol Int. 1995;55(1):29-31
references: 7571180
references: J Urol. 2003 May;169(5):1754-7
references: 12686826
references: Eur Urol. 2001 Mar;39(3):264-7
references: 11275716
references: J Urol. 1998 Oct;160(4):1307-9
references: 9751341
references: Br J Urol. 1992 Jun;69(6):621-8
references: 1638346
references: Urology. 2001 Nov;58(5):657-9
references: 11711331