title: Blood Transfusion Policies in Elective General Surgery: How to Optimise Cross-Match-to-Transfusion Ratios.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Preoperative over-ordering of blood is common and leads to the wastage of blood bank resources. The preoperative blood ordering and transfusion practices for common elective general surgical procedures were evaluated in our university hospital to formulate a maximum surgical blood order schedule (MSBOS) for those procedures where a cross-match appears necessary.
  
  
  METHODS
  We evaluated blood ordering practices retrospectively in all elective general surgical procedures in our institution over a 6-month period. Cross-match-to-transfusion ratios (C:T) were calculated and compared to current trust and the British Society of Haematology (BSH) guidelines. The adjusted C:T ratio was also calculated and was defined as the C:T ratio when only cross-matched blood used intraoperatively was included in the calculation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  541 patients were identified during the 6-month period. There were 314 minor and 227 major surgeries carried out. 99.6% (n = 226) of the patients who underwent major surgery and 95.5% (n = 300) of the patients having minor surgery had at least a group and save (G and S) test preoperatively. A total of 507 units of blood were cross-matched and 238 units were used. The overall C:T ratio was therefore 2.1:1, which corresponds to a 46.9% red cell usage. There was considerable variation in the C:T ratio, depending on the type of surgery performed. The adjusted C:T ratio varied between 3.75 and 37.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Compliance with transfusion policies is poor and over-ordering of blood products commonplace. Implementation of the updated recommended MSBOS and introduction of G and S for eligible surgical procedures is a safe, effective and cost-effective method to prevent preoperative over-ordering of blood in elective general surgery. Savings of GBP 8,596.00 per annum are achievable with the incorporation of updated evidence-based guidelines in our university hospital.
authors: Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester, UK.
authors: Thomas C
authors: TC
authors: Hall
authors: Clare
authors: C
authors: Pattenden
authors: Chloe
authors: C
authors: Hollobone
authors: Cristina
authors: C
authors: Pollard
authors: Ashley R
authors: AR
authors: Dennison
keywords: Cross-match/transfusion ratio; MSBOS; Maximum surgical blood ordering schedule; Surgery; Transfusion
references: Intern Med J. 2012 Mar;42(3):332-8
references: 22432987
references: J Postgrad Med. 2000 Jan-Mar;46(1):13-7
references: 10855071
references: Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983 Mar;156(3):326-8
references: 6828977
references: JAMA. 2012 May 2;307(17):1788-9
references: 22550188
references: J Pak Med Assoc. 2001 Jul;51(7):251-4
references: 11558217
references: Malays J Pathol. 2002 Jun;24(1):59-66
references: 16329557
references: Am J Clin Pathol. 1980 Aug;74(2):223-7
references: 7405903
references: J Clin Anesth. 2012 Mar;24(2):155-63
references: 22414711
references: Surgeon. 2011 Feb;9(1):8-12
references: 21195324
references: Transfusion. 1976 Jul-Aug;16(4):380-7
references: 951737