title: Comparative evaluation of anti-plaque efficacy of herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash in a 4-day plaque re-growth study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash has earned eponym of gold standard to treat and/or prevent periodontal disease. However, it has been reported to have local side-effects on long-term use. To explore a herbal alternative, the present study was carried out with an aim to compare the anti-plaque efficacy of a herbal mouthwash with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash and normal saline.
  
  
  METHODS
  It was an examiner-blinded, parallel designed clinical trial, in which 90 pre-clinical dental students with gingival index (GI) ≤1 were enrolled. To begin with, GI and plaque index (PI) were recorded. Then, baseline plaque scores were brought to zero by professionally cleaning the teeth with scaling and polishing. After that, randomized 3 groups were made (of 30 subjects each - after excluding the drop-outs) who were refrained from regular mechanical oral hygiene measures. Subjects were asked to swish with respective mouthwash (0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash, herbal mouthwash, or normal saline) as per therapeutic dose for 4 days. Then, GI and PI scores were re-evaluated on 5(th) day by the same investigator, and the differences were compared statistically by ANOVA and Student's 't'-test.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Least post-rinsing GI and PI scores were demonstrated with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash, followed by herbal mouthwash and highest scores with normal saline. The difference of post-rinsing PI scores between the chlorhexidine and herbal mouthwash groups was statistically non-significant, whereas this difference was significant between chlorhexidine and saline groups, and the difference between herbal and saline groups was non-significant. It was concluded that 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash remains the best anti-plaque agent. However, when socio-economic factor and/or side-effects of chlorhexidine need consideration, presently tested herbal mouthwash may be considered as a good alternative.
authors: Department of Periodontics, Modern Dental College and Research Centre, Indore, India.
authors: Simran R
authors: SR
authors: Parwani
authors: Rajkumar N
authors: RN
authors: Parwani
authors: P J
authors: PJ
authors: Chitnis
authors: Himanshu P
authors: HP
authors: Dadlani
authors: Sakur V Sai
authors: SV
authors: Prasad
keywords: Anti-plaque efficacy; chlorhexidine; gingival index; herbal; mouthwash; plaque index
references: Periodontol 2000. 1997 Oct;15:55-62
references: 9643233
references: J Periodontol. 1970 Jan;41(1):41-3
references: 5264376
references: Scand J Dent Res. 1971;79(2):119-25
references: 5280246
references: J Clin Dent. 1998;9(4):97-100
references: 10518858
references: J Clin Periodontol. 1986 Nov;13(10):957-64
references: 3540026
references: Acta Odontol Scand. 1980;38(4):213-7
references: 7008491
references: J Clin Periodontol. 1983 Jan;10(1):89-99
references: 6572638
references: Int Dent J. 2004 Oct;54(5):279-83
references: 15503853
references: J Clin Periodontol. 1988 Sep;15(8):488-98
references: 3053790
references: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Sep;96(3):199-207
references: 2788990
references: J Clin Periodontol. 1992 Sep;19(8):578-82
references: 1447382
references: J Periodontol. 1991 Oct;62(10):617-22
references: 1770421
references: Int J Dent Hyg. 2005 Feb;3(1):18-24
references: 16451373
references: J Am Dent Assoc. 1994 Aug;125 Suppl 2:2S-10S
references: 8064061
references: J Periodontol. 1967 Nov-Dec;38(6):Suppl:610-6
references: 5237684
references: Acta Odontol Scand. 1963 Dec;21:533-51
references: 14121956
references: J Am Dent Assoc. 1962 Jul;65:26-9
references: 14489483