title: Odour cues influence predation risk at artificial bat roosts in urban bushland.
abstract: Odours that accumulate from roosting can attract predators and increase predation risk. Consequently, selection should favour strategies that allow prey to evade detection by predators, including changing roosts. Insectivorous bats that roost in tree hollows regularly switch roosts and roost in different sized groups, strategies that would alter the accumulation of roost odours and are hypothesized to reduce predation risk. We experimentally manipulated the amount and refresh rate of roosting odour cues at 90 artificial bat roosts in Sydney, Australia, to test the hypothesis that odours increase predator visitation. Predators visited roosts with bat faeces significantly more often than untreated control roosts. Roosts with small amounts of faeces mimicking sites used by solitary bats had the greatest rate of visitation. This suggests that bats roosting alone, rather than in groups, have a greater likelihood of disturbance or predation. Roost switching probably decreases the predictability of finding occupied roosts; however, we show that all roosts (those currently or recently occupied) were visited by predators, suggesting generalist urban predators readily investigate potential roosts. This is the first demonstration that bat odours are attractive to predators that use olfactory cues, showing that bats are at risk of predation in visually cryptic roosts.
authors: Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia. caragh.threlfall@unimelb.edu.au
authors: Caragh
authors: C
authors: Threlfall
authors: Bradley
authors: B
authors: Law
authors: Peter B
authors: PB
authors: Banks
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002685:Chiroptera / Q000502:physiology*; D009517:New South Wales; D009812:Odorants; D011235:Predatory Behavior
keywords: Rattus rattus; bat roost; nest predation; predation risk; urban ecology
references: Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Sep 21;205(1161):489-511
references: 42057
references: J Anim Ecol. 2010 Jan;79(1):88-97
references: 19941627
references: PLoS One. 2010 Sep 30;5(9):
references: 20927352
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Aug 22;267(1453):1621-5
references: 11467424
references: Oecologia. 2007 Dec;154(3):581-8
references: 17805579