title: The effects of fixation target size and luminance on microsaccades and square-wave jerks.
abstract: A large amount of classic and contemporary vision studies require subjects to fixate a target. Target fixation serves as a normalizing factor across studies, promoting the field's ability to compare and contrast experiments. Yet, fixation target parameters, including luminance, contrast, size, shape and color, vary across studies, potentially affecting the interpretation of results. Previous research on the effects of fixation target size and luminance on the control of fixation position rendered conflicting results, and no study has examined the effects of fixation target characteristics on square-wave jerks, the most common type of saccadic intrusion. Here we set out to determine the effects of fixation target size and luminance on the characteristics of microsaccades and square-wave jerks, over a large range of stimulus parameters. Human subjects fixated a circular target with varying luminance and size while we recorded their eye movements with an infrared video tracker (EyeLink 1000, SR Research). We detected microsaccades and SWJs automatically with objective algorithms developed previously. Microsaccade rates decreased linearly and microsaccade magnitudes increased linearly with target size. The percent of microsaccades forming part of SWJs decreased, and the time from the end of the initial SWJ saccade to the beginning of the second SWJ saccade (SWJ inter-saccadic interval; ISI) increased with target size. The microsaccadic preference for horizontal direction also decreased moderately with target size . Target luminance did not affect significantly microsaccades or SWJs, however. In the absence of a fixation target, microsaccades became scarcer and larger, while SWJ prevalence decreased and SWJ ISIs increased. Thus, the choice of fixation target can affect experimental outcomes, especially in human factors and in visual and oculomotor studies. These results have implications for previous and future research conducted under fixation conditions, and should encourage forthcoming studies to report the size of fixation targets to aid the interpretation and replication of their results.
authors: Department of Neurobiology , Barrow Neurological Institute , USA.
authors: Michael B
authors: MB
authors: McCamy
authors: Ali
authors: A
authors: Najafian Jazi
authors: Jorge
authors: J
authors: Otero-Millan
authors: Stephen L
authors: SL
authors: Macknik
authors: Susana
authors: S
authors: Martinez-Conde
keywords: Fixation control; Fixation error; Saccadic intrusions
references: Science. 2009 Feb 13;323(5916):940-3
references: 19213919
references: J Vis. 2010 Dec 20;10(14):22
references: 21172899
references: Vision Res. 2010 Jun 11;50(12):1173-84
references: 20382176
references: Trends Neurosci. 2009 Sep;32(9):463-75
references: 19716186
references: J Vis. 2012 Jun 22;12(6):
references: 22728680
references: Exp Brain Res. 1986;61(2):386-94
references: 3948945
references: J Vis. 2008 Nov 04;8(14):15.1-9
references: 19146316
references: Exp Brain Res. 2010 Jun;203(4):753-7
references: 20467731
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 2;103(18):7192-7
references: 16632611
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Jul 1;15(5):664-72
references: 12965040
references: J Neurosci. 2012 Jul 4;32(27):9194-204
references: 22764228
references: Vision Res. 2004 Oct;44(23):2675-90
references: 15358063
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Sep;1233:107-16
references: 21950983
references: J Vis. 2005 Aug 17;5(7):632-9
references: 16231998
references: Neuron. 2006 Jan 19;49(2):297-305
references: 16423702
references: Exp Brain Res. 1998 Oct;122(4):367-77
references: 9827856
references: J Vis. 2008 Dec 18;8(14):21.1-18
references: 19146322
references: J Neurosci. 2012 Apr 25;32(17):6043-51
references: 22539864
references: Opt Acta (Lond). 1969 Mar-Apr;16(2):183-90
references: 5794318
references: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Apr;72(3):683-94
references: 20348575
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 23;31(12):4379-87
references: 21430139
references: Vision Res. 1977;17(8):919-26
references: 595398
references: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
references: 9176953
references: Vision Res. 2005 Mar;45(6):721-30
references: 15639499
references: Prog Brain Res. 2006;154:151-76
references: 17010709
references: Vision Res. 2009 Oct;49(20):2415-41
references: 19683016
references: PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5163
references: 19357789
references: PLoS One. 2008 Jul 23;3(7):e2741
references: 18648651
references: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Sep;240(9):765-70
references: 12271375
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981 Feb;20(2):268-72
references: 7461930
references: Vision Res. 2003 Apr;43(9):1035-45
references: 12676246
references: Nat Neurosci. 2011 Feb;14(2):252-6
references: 21186360
references: Prog Brain Res. 2006;154:177-92
references: 17010710
references: Vision Res. 1972 May;12(5):1059-64
references: 5037696
references: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references: 9176952
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 14;105(41):16033-8
references: 18843109
references: Neuroreport. 2006 Jul 17;17(10):1001-4
references: 16791092
references: Exp Brain Res. 2006 Mar;169(3):369-76
references: 16328308
references: Vision Res. 2013 Jan 14;76:31-42
references: 23099046