title: Antenatal and obstetric care in Afghanistan--a qualitative study among health care receivers and health care providers.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Despite attempts from the government to improve ante- and perinatal care, Afghanistan has once again been labeled "the worst country in which to be a mom" in Save the Children's World's Mothers' Report. This study investigated how pregnant women and health care providers experience the existing antenatal and obstetric health care situation in Afghanistan.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data were obtained through one-to-one semi-structured interviews of 27 individuals, including 12 women who were pregnant or had recently given birth, seven doctors, five midwives, and three traditional birth attendants. The interviews were carried out in Kabul and the village of Ramak in Ghazni Province. Interviews were taped, transcribed, and analyzed according to the principles of Giorgi's phenomenological analysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Antenatal care was reported to be underused, even when available. Several obstacles were identified, including a lack of knowledge regarding the importance of antenatal care among the women and their families, financial difficulties, and transportation problems. The women also reported significant dissatisfaction with the attitudes and behavior of health personnel, which included instances of verbal and physical abuse. According to the health professionals, poor working conditions, low salaries, and high stress levels contributed to this matter. Personal contacts inside the hospital were considered necessary for receiving high quality care, and bribery was customary. Despite these serious concerns, the women expressed gratitude for having even limited access to health care, especially treatment provided by a female doctor. Health professionals were proud of their work and enjoyed the opportunity to help their community.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study identified several obstacles which must be addressed to improve reproductive health in Afghanistan. There was limited understanding of the importance of antenatal care and a lack of family support. Financial and transportation problems led to underuse of available care, especially by poorly educated rural women. Patients frequently complained of being treated disrespectfully, and health care providers correspondingly complained about poor working conditions leading to exhaustion and a lack of compassion. Widespread corruption, including the necessity of personal contacts inside hospitals, was also emphasized as an obstacle to equitable antenatal and obstetric health care.
authors: Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
authors: Zuhal
authors: Z
authors: Rahmani
authors: Mette
authors: M
authors: Brekke
mesh_terms: D000346:Afghanistan; D005194:Family Practice; D005260:Female; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D009774:Obstetrics; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D018743:Perinatal Care; D011247:Pregnancy; D011295:Prenatal Care; D014932:Women's Health Services
references: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Feb;62(2):153-9
references: 18192604
references: Educ Health (Abingdon). 2011 Apr;24(1):387
references: 21710412
references: Lancet. 2012 Mar 31;379(9822):1225-33
references: 22464386
references: BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 11;12:641
references: 22883138
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26990
references: 22073233
references: J Behav Med. 2011 Aug;34(4):254-67
references: 21127959
references: Reprod Health Matters. 2011 Nov;19(38):176-82
references: 22118151
references: Lancet. 2006 Oct 14;368(9544):1377-86
references: 17046470
references: BMJ. 2012 Mar 21;344:e2197
references: 22438385
references: Lancet. 2010 Jun 12;375(9731):2063-4
references: 20549839
references: Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Oct;85(10):745-54
references: 18038055
references: Health Policy. 2004 Apr;68(1):37-46
references: 15033551
references: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Mar;116(3):192-6
references: 22196990
references: BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec 21;11 Suppl 2:S11
references: 22376191
references: Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jul;51(1):103-13
references: 10817473
references: Reprod Health Matters. 2011 Nov;19(38):26-34
references: 22118139
references: J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;50(4):e31-5
references: 15973254
references: Lancet. 2002 May 11;359(9318):1681-5
references: 12020546
references: Health Care Women Int. 2011 Oct;32(10):901-16
references: 21919627
references: BMJ. 2011 Dec 01;343:d7102
references: 22134967
references: BMJ. 2011 Sep 28;343:d5712
references: 21957207
references: Lancet. 2001 Aug 11;358(9280):483-8
references: 11513933
references: BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jan 21;8:15
references: 18208604
references: Lancet. 1971 Feb 27;1(7696):405-12
references: 4100731
references: Fam Pract. 1993 Jun;10(2):201-6
references: 8359612
references: J Midwifery Womens Health. 2001 Jul-Aug;46(4):240-7
references: 11603639
references: BMJ. 2012 Feb 14;344:e981
references: 22334574
references: JAMA. 2002 Sep 11;288(10):1284-91
references: 12215139
references: Lancet. 2004 Sep 11-17;364(9438):970-9
references: 15364188
references: Health Policy Plan. 2001 Dec;16(4):353-61
references: 11739360
references: Lancet. 2006 Oct 21;368(9545):1457-65
references: 17055948
references: Disasters. 2004 Sep;28(3):269-82
references: 15344941
references: Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Mar;58(3):325-6
references: 22106048
references: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002 Jun;81(6):491-501
references: 12047301
references: BMJ. 2012 Feb 06;344:e453
references: 22310993
references: BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2012 May 03;12:5
references: 22554349
references: Int J Emerg Med. 2009 Jun 05;2(2):77-82
references: 20157448