title: UV-screening of grasses by plant silica layer?
abstract: UV-screening by terrestrial plants is a crucial trait since colonization of terrestrial environments has started. In general, it is enabled by phenolic substances. Especially for grasses it remains unclear why plants grown under the absence of UV-B-radiation exhibit nonetheless a high UV-B-screening potential. But this may be explained by the UV-screening effect of the silicon double layer. It was shown for seedlings of soybeans (Glycine max L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) that enhanced silicon supply reduces stress induced by UV-radiation. Even more important is a direct correlation between silicon content in the epidermis near area (intercellular spaces) and the absorption of UV-radiation in this area shown in other papers. The silicon double layer may act like a glass layer and decreases the transmission of UV-radiation at the epidermis near area. In summary, the absorbance/reflection of ultraviolet radiation is dependent on the characteristics of the epidermis near area of leaves, particularly the occurrence (qualitatively and quantitatively) of phenolic substances and/or a silicon double layer in this area. Consequently, UV-screening by plant silicon double layer should get more attention in future research with emphasis on effects of UV-radiation on plant physiology.
authors: Technische Universitat Dresden, Institute of General Ecology and Environmental Protection, Institute of Forest Utilization and Forest Technology, D-01062 Dresden, Germany. Joerg.Schaller@tu-dresden.de
authors: Jörg
authors: J
authors: Schaller
authors: Carsten
authors: C
authors: Brackhage
authors: Ernst
authors: E
authors: Bäucker
authors: E Gert
authors: EG
authors: Dudel
mesh_terms: D019441:Plant Epidermis / Q000378:metabolism / Q000648:ultrastructure; D006109:Poaceae / Q000166:cytology / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000528:radiation effects; D012822:Silicon Dioxide / Q000378:metabolism*; D013472:Sunlight; D014466:Ultraviolet Rays
chemical_list: D012822:Silicon Dioxide
references: Ann Bot. 2005 Nov;96(6):1027-46
references: 16176944
references: Phytochemistry. 2001 Apr;56(7):685-92
references: 11314953
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Aug;11(8):392-7
references: 16839801
references: Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2012 Mar;14(2):392-6
references: 22136652
references: J Plant Physiol. 2010 Oct 15;167(15):1248-52
references: 20713250
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 1997 Jan;12(1):22-8
references: 21237957
references: Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jan 1;442:6-9
references: 23178503
references: Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jun;50:641-664
references: 15012222
references: Appl Opt. 2007 Nov 20;46(33):8118-33
references: 18026551
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2011 Feb;16(2):61-8
references: 21087891
references: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002 Jun;5(3):218-23
references: 11960739
references: Phytochemistry. 2003 Sep;64(1):243-55
references: 12946423
references: Environ Pollut. 2007 May;147(2):422-8
references: 16996179
references: Biol Trace Elem Res. 2011 Oct;143(1):507-17
references: 20882366
references: Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi. 2006 Dec;26(12):2315-8
references: 17361739
references: Phytopathology. 1998 May;88(5):396-401
references: 18944917
references: J Anim Ecol. 2009 Jan;78(1):281-91
references: 18771503
references: Nature. 2005 Feb 17;433(7027):728-31
references: 15716949
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Feb;80(3):790-1
references: 16578767
references: Nature. 2006 Mar 30;440(7084):688-91
references: 16572174
references: New Phytol. 2010 Apr;186(2):385-91
references: 20136720
references: Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2005 Nov;7(6):581-91
references: 16388461
references: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 May;54(5):845-54
references: 16635665
references: Ann Bot. 2007 Dec;100(7):1383-9
references: 17921489