title: Effects of daylight-saving time changes on stock market returns and stock market volatility: rebuttal.
abstract: In a 2011 reply to our 2010 comment in this journal, Berument and Dogen maintained their challenge to the existence of the negative daylight-saving effect in stock returns reported by Kamstra, Kramer, and Levi in 2000. Unfortunately, in their reply, Berument and Dogen ignored all of the points raised in the comment, failing even to cite the Kamstra, et al. comment. Berument and Dogen continued to use inappropriate estimation techniques, over-parameterized models, and low-power tests and perhaps most surprisingly even failed to replicate results they themselves reported in their previous paper, written by Berument, Dogen, and Onar in 2010. The findings reported by Berument and Dogen, as well as by Berument, Dogen, and Onar, are neither well-supported nor well-reasoned. We maintain our original objections to their analysis, highlight new serious empirical and theoretical problems, and emphasize that there remains statistically significant evidence of an economically large negative daylight-saving effect in U.S. stock returns. The issues raised in this rebuttal extend beyond the daylight-saving effect itself, touching on methodological points that arise more generally when deciding how to model financial returns data.
authors: Schulich School of Business, York University.
authors: Mark J
authors: MJ
authors: Kamstra
authors: Lisa A
authors: LA
authors: Kramer
authors: Maurice D
authors: MD
authors: Levi
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D007449:Investments / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010507:Periodicity; D012890:Sleep; D013995:Time