title: Endovascular training of vascular surgeons in the USA.
abstract: Current trends in vascular surgery in the USA are driven by increased demand for endovascular procedures. Traditionally-trained vascular surgeons have adapted to these trends by acquiring endovascular skills; vascular surgery fellowships were standardized to 2-years to incorporate endovascular training. However, the traditional "5 + 2" training paradigm appears to be less appealing to the current generation of surgical students, resulting in fellowship positions going unfilled, and potentially predicting a shortage of vascular surgeons. Recognition of this trend has led to the adoption of alternative training pathways, in particular the integrated "0 + 5" pathway, to supplement the traditional "5 + 2" independent pathway. The integrated pathway has several perceived advantages for vascular surgery trainees including early teaching of endovascular skills. However, it has challenges that include maintaining open operative skills and changing strategies to attract candidates from among the pool of medical students instead of the pool of general surgery residents. Simulators, both open and endovascular, are playing an increasingly important role in training programs as well as for outreach programs to medical students. Recruitment strategies for future generations of vascular surgeons in the USA may need to consider residents' lifestyle preferences as well as outreach to traditionally underrepresented groups such as women and minorities.
authors: The Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
authors: Roland
authors: R
authors: Assi
authors: Alan
authors: A
authors: Dardik
keywords: endovascular; recruitment; technology; training; vascular surgeons; vascular surgery
references: J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):924-8
references: 22226189
references: J Vasc Surg. 2012 May;55(5):1394-9; discussion 1399-400
references: 22248530
references: J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):1187-94
references: 22209607
references: J Vasc Surg. 2012 May;55(5):1515-21
references: 22464708
references: Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 Jan;26(1):1-9
references: 21764547
references: J Vasc Surg. 1997 Jan;25(1):8-18
references: 9013903
references: J Vasc Surg. 2009 Dec;50(6):1513-8; discussion 1518
references: 19958993
references: Semin Vasc Surg. 2006 Dec;19(4):194-9
references: 17178322
references: J Surg Educ. 2009 Nov-Dec;66(6):330-5
references: 20142130
references: J Vasc Surg. 2012 May;55(5):1509-14; discussion 1514
references: 22440630
references: Semin Vasc Surg. 2006 Dec;19(4):172-9
references: 17178318
references: Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;25(8):1104-12
references: 21945331
references: J Vasc Surg. 2010 Mar;51(3):771-5, 775.e1-4
references: 19939608
references: J Vasc Surg. 2009 Oct;50(4):946-52
references: 19703756
references: J Vasc Surg. 2009 May;49(5):1339-44
references: 19217743