title: Simultaneous analysis and quality assurance for diffusion tensor imaging.
abstract: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) enables non-invasive, cyto-architectural mapping of in vivo tissue microarchitecture through voxel-wise mathematical modeling of multiple magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisitions, each differently sensitized to water diffusion. DTI computations are fundamentally estimation processes and are sensitive to noise and artifacts. Despite widespread adoption in the neuroimaging community, maintaining consistent DTI data quality remains challenging given the propensity for patient motion, artifacts associated with fast imaging techniques, and the possibility of hardware changes/failures. Furthermore, the quantity of data acquired per voxel, the non-linear estimation process, and numerous potential use cases complicate traditional visual data inspection approaches. Currently, quality inspection of DTI data has relied on visual inspection and individual processing in DTI analysis software programs (e.g. DTIPrep, DTI-studio). However, recent advances in applied statistical methods have yielded several different metrics to assess noise level, artifact propensity, quality of tensor fit, variance of estimated measures, and bias in estimated measures. To date, these metrics have been largely studied in isolation. Herein, we select complementary metrics for integration into an automatic DTI analysis and quality assurance pipeline. The pipeline completes in 24 hours, stores statistical outputs, and produces a graphical summary quality analysis (QA) report. We assess the utility of this streamlined approach for empirical quality assessment on 608 DTI datasets from pediatric neuroimaging studies. The efficiency and accuracy of quality analysis using the proposed pipeline is compared with quality analysis based on visual inspection. The unified pipeline is found to save a statistically significant amount of time (over 70%) while improving the consistency of QA between a DTI expert and a pool of research associates. Projection of QA metrics to a low dimensional manifold reveal qualitative, but clear, QA-study associations and suggest that automated outlier/anomaly detection would be feasible.
authors: Department of Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
authors: Carolyn B
authors: CB
authors: Lauzon
authors: Andrew J
authors: AJ
authors: Asman
authors: Michael L
authors: ML
authors: Esparza
authors: Scott S
authors: SS
authors: Burns
authors: Qiuyun
authors: Q
authors: Fan
authors: Yurui
authors: Y
authors: Gao
authors: Adam W
authors: AW
authors: Anderson
authors: Nicole
authors: N
authors: Davis
authors: Laurie E
authors: LE
authors: Cutting
authors: Bennett A
authors: BA
authors: Landman
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D002648:Child; D056324:Diffusion Tensor Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D025341:Principal Component Analysis; D011786:Quality Control; D012984:Software
references: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002 Oct;21(10):1280-91
references: 12585710
references: Magn Reson Med. 2013 Mar 1;69(3):891-902
references: 22611000
references: Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jul;26(6):790-800
references: 18499378
references: NMR Biomed. 2002 Nov-Dec;15(7-8):431-4
references: 12489093
references: Magn Reson Med. 2000 Jul;44(1):41-50
references: 10893520
references: Magn Reson Med. 1995 Dec;34(6):910-4
references: 8598820
references: Neuroimage. 2006 Oct 15;33(1):115-26
references: 16860573
references: Med Image Anal. 2008 Feb;12(1):26-41
references: 17659998
references: Magn Reson Med. 2005 Feb;53(2):485-90
references: 15678537
references: Neuroimage. 2007 Jul 15;36(4):1123-38
references: 17532649
references: J Magn Reson. 2000 Dec;147(2):340-52
references: 11097823
references: Magn Reson Med. 2004 Nov;52(5):979-93
references: 15508154
references: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Oct;29(10):1714-29
references: 20562040
references: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004 Jul;23(7):903-21
references: 15250643
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Jun;25(2):237-46
references: 15846770
references: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995 Jul-Aug;19(4):615-23
references: 7622696
references: Magn Reson Med. 2005 May;53(5):1088-95
references: 15844157
references: Magn Reson Med. 2001 Mar;45(3):448-53
references: 11241703
references: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004 Aug;23(8):983-94
references: 15338732
references: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2012;15(Pt 3):426-34
references: 23286159
references: Magn Reson Med. 2004 Sep;52(3):582-9
references: 15334578
references: Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Oct;25(8):1196-202
references: 17442523
references: Med Image Anal. 2001 Jun;5(2):143-56
references: 11516708
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Nov;17(3):143-55
references: 12391568
references: Magn Reson Med. 2009 Aug;62(2):365-72
references: 19526493
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Feb;31(2):193-202
references: 19603408
references: Neuroimage. 2002 Oct;17(2):825-41
references: 12377157
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Mar;29(3):346-62
references: 17455199
references: NMR Biomed. 2002 Nov-Dec;15(7-8):456-67
references: 12489095
references: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Apr;33(4):695-700
references: 22173748
references: Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2006 Feb;81(2):106-16
references: 16413083
references: Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jul;31(6):857-64
references: 23465764
references: Neuron. 2006 Sep 7;51(5):527-39
references: 16950152
references: Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Dec;24(10):1349-61
references: 17145407
references: Neuroimage. 2009 Jul 1;46(3):786-802
references: 19195496
references: J Magn Reson. 2003 Sep;164(1):1-9
references: 12932449
references: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Sep;26(3):756-67
references: 17729339
references: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Jun;23(6):827-39
references: 16649196