title: The effects of attentional load on saccadic task switching.
abstract: Everyday life requires the ability to flexibly switch between tasks. Often, task switching is accompanied by concurrent cognitive activities that compete for limited attentional resources. This study aimed to characterize the effects of attentional load on task switching. In experiment 1, participants performed an interleaved pro-saccade and anti-saccade task. In experiment 2, participants performed an interleaved pro-saccade and anti-saccade task simultaneously with a rapid serial visual presentation task that has been shown to create an attentional load. Error rates and reaction times of pro-saccades and anti-saccades were analysed for both experiments separately and together. Overall, error rates and reaction times increased with attentional load. With attentional load, switches to pro-saccades were associated with increased error rates and reaction times, whereas switches to anti-saccades were only associated with increased error rates. We propose that attentional load interferes with neural task-set representation and that the resulting executive control is different for the dominant and non-dominant task.
authors: Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
authors: Jason L
authors: JL
authors: Chan
authors: Joseph F X
authors: JF
authors: DeSouza
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012438:Saccades / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
references: J Neurosci. 2000 Jan 1;20(1):RC52
references: 10627629
references: Brain. 1991 Jun;114 ( Pt 3):1473-85
references: 2065261
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:219-45
references: 18558854
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Oct;4(10):829-39
references: 14523382
references: Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jan;168(1-2):76-87
references: 16096781
references: J Neurosci. 2001 Oct 1;21(19):7733-41
references: 11567063
references: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jul;94(1):429-40
references: 15728770
references: Cereb Cortex. 2002 Sep;12(9):908-14
references: 12183390
references: Nature. 1997 Jun 19;387(6635):805-7
references: 9194560
references: Psychol Bull. 1994 Sep;116(2):220-44
references: 7972591
references: Neuroimage. 2005 Dec;28(4):967-79
references: 16109493
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Mar;5(3):218-28
references: 14976521
references: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Apr;36(4):1107-18
references: 22305996
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Jan 1;14(1):95-103
references: 11798390
references: Nature. 1999 May 13;399(6732):148-51
references: 10335843
references: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Dec;5(12):1345-52
references: 12411958
references: Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28;139(1):5-21
references: 16517088
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Sep;17(9):1483-96
references: 16197701
references: Biol Psychiatry. 2005 May 15;57(10):1159-65
references: 15866556
references: J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 29;29(17):5516-24
references: 19403819
references: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Sep;98(3):1751-62
references: 17596416
references: Exp Brain Res. 1985;58(3):455-72
references: 4007089
references: Brain Res. 1976 Oct 29;116(1):145-9
references: 824019
references: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Feb;89(2):1016-23
references: 12574477
references: J Neurosci. 2006 Nov 29;26(48):12471-8
references: 17135409
references: J Neurosci. 1988 Nov;8(11):4049-68
references: 2846794
references: Neuron. 2007 Feb 1;53(3):453-62
references: 17270740
references: J Neurosci. 2006 Feb 1;26(5):1429-38
references: 16452666
references: Exp Brain Res. 2002 Jun;144(4):528-37
references: 12037637
references: Prog Brain Res. 2000;126:95-102
references: 11105642
references: Brain. 2003 Jun;126(Pt 6):1460-73
references: 12764065
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202
references: 11283309
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995 Dec 15;769:191-211
references: 8595026
references: Vision Res. 1978;18(10):1279-96
references: 726270
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Jun;4(6):435-43
references: 12778116
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Mar;7(3):134-140
references: 12639695
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000 Mar;104(1):69-85
references: 10769940
references: Nature. 1995 Nov 16;378(6554):279-81
references: 7477346
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Aug;18(3):849-60
references: 1500880