title: Potential environmental and human health impacts of rechargeable lithium batteries in electronic waste.
abstract: Rechargeable lithium-ion (Li-ion) and lithium-polymer (Li-poly) batteries have recently become dominant in consumer electronic products because of advantages associated with energy density and product longevity. However, the small size of these batteries, the high rate of disposal of consumer products in which they are used, and the lack of uniform regulatory policy on their disposal means that lithium batteries may contribute substantially to environmental pollution and adverse human health impacts due to potentially toxic materials. In this research, we used standardized leaching tests, life-cycle impact assessment (LCIA), and hazard assessment models to evaluate hazardous waste classification, resource depletion potential, and toxicity potentials of lithium batteries used in cellphones. Our results demonstrate that according to U.S. federal regulations, defunct Li-ion batteries are classified hazardous due to their lead (Pb) content (average 6.29 mg/L; σ = 11.1; limit 5). However, according to California regulations, all lithium batteries tested are classified hazardous due to excessive levels of cobalt (average 163,544 mg/kg; σ = 62,897; limit 8000), copper (average 98,694 mg/kg; σ = 28,734; limit 2500), and nickel (average 9525 mg/kg; σ = 11,438; limit 2000). In some of the Li-ion batteries, the leached concentrations of chromium, lead, and thallium exceeded the California regulation limits. The environmental impact associated with resource depletion and human toxicity is mainly associated with cobalt, copper, nickel, thallium, and silver, whereas the ecotoxicity potential is primarily associated with cobalt, copper, nickel, thallium, and silver. However, the relative contribution of aluminum and lithium to human toxicity and ecotoxicity could not be estimated due to insufficient toxicity data in the models. These findings support the need for stronger government policy at the local, national, and international levels to encourage recovery, recycling, and reuse of lithium battery materials.
authors: School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, United States.
authors: Daniel Hsing Po
authors: DH
authors: Kang
authors: Mengjun
authors: M
authors: Chen
authors: Oladele A
authors: OA
authors: Ogunseitan
mesh_terms: D011211:Electric Power Supplies; D006801:Humans; D008094:Lithium / Q000633:toxicity; D012037:Refuse Disposal
chemical_list: D008094:Lithium
references: J Hazard Mater. 2010 May 15;177(1-3):251-9
references: 20056318
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Apr 15;40(8):2721-6
references: 16683614
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Jan 15;47(2):1040-7
references: 23237340
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Apr 1;41(7):2572-8
references: 17438818
references: Science. 2009 Oct 30;326(5953):670-1
references: 19900918
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Sep 1;44(17):6550-6
references: 20695466
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2011 May 15;45(10):4548-54
references: 21506538
references: Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2012 Oct;8(4):723-30
references: 22492719
references: Waste Manag. 2006;26(3):293-8
references: 16169210