title: Generation of high current densities by pure cultures of anode-respiring Geoalkalibacter spp. under alkaline and saline conditions in microbial electrochemical cells.
abstract: Anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) generate electric current in microbial electrochemical cells (MXCs) by channeling electrons from the oxidation of organic substrates to an electrode. Production of high current densities by monocultures in MXCs has resulted almost exclusively from the activity of Geobacter sulfurreducens, a neutrophilic freshwater Fe(III)-reducing bacterium and the highest-current-producing member documented for the Geobacteraceae family of the Deltaproteobacteria. Here we report high current densities generated by haloalkaliphilic Geoalkalibacter spp., thus broadening the capability for high anode respiration rates by including other genera within the Geobacteraceae. In this study, acetate-fed pure cultures of two related Geoalkalibacter spp. produced current densities of 5.0 to 8.3 and 2.4 to 3.3 A m(-2) under alkaline (pH 9.3) and saline (1.7% NaCl) conditions, respectively. Chronoamperometric studies of halophilic Glk. subterraneus DSM 23483 and alkaliphilic Glk. ferrihydriticus DSM 17813 suggested that cells performed long-range electron transfer through electrode-attached biofilms and not through soluble electron shuttles. Glk. ferrihydriticus also oxidized ethanol directly to produce current, with maximum current densities of 5.7 to 7.1 A m(-2) and coulombic efficiencies of 84 to 95%. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) elicited a sigmoidal response with characteristic onset, midpoint, and saturation potentials, while CV performed in the absence of an electron donor suggested the involvement of redox molecules in the biofilm that were limited by diffusion. These results matched those previously reported for actively respiring Gb. sulfurreducens biofilms producing similar current densities (~5 to 9 A m(-2)).
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  This study establishes the highest current densities ever achieved by pure cultures of anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) under alkaline and saline conditions in microbial electrochemical cells (MXCs) and provides the first electrochemical characterization of the genus Geoalkalibacter. Production of high current densities among the Geobacteraceae is no longer exclusive to Geobacter sulfurreducens, suggesting greater versatility for this family in fundamental and applied microbial electrochemical cell (MXC) research than previously considered. Additionally, this work raises the possibility that different members of the Geobacteraceae have conserved molecular mechanisms governing respiratory extracellular electron transfer to electrodes. Thus, the capacity for high current generation may exist in other uncultivated members of this family. Advancement of MXC technology for practical uses must rely on an expanded suite of ARB capable of using different electron donors and producing high current densities under various conditions. Geoalkalibacter spp. can potentially broaden the practical capabilities of MXCs to include energy generation and waste treatment under expanded ranges of salinity and pH.
authors: Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
authors: Jonathan P
authors: JP
authors: Badalamenti
authors: Rosa
authors: R
authors: Krajmalnik-Brown
authors: César I
authors: CI
authors: Torres
mesh_terms: D000085:Acetates / Q000378:metabolism; D001674:Bioelectric Energy Sources; D018441:Biofilms / Q000254:growth & development; D003470:Culture Media / Q000737:chemistry*; D020564:Deltaproteobacteria / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D004560:Electricity; D004566:Electrodes / Q000382:microbiology*; D004583:Electrons; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D054712:Salinity
chemical_list: D000085:Acetates; D003470:Culture Media
references: Langmuir. 2012 May 22;28(20):7904-13
references: 22524560
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013 Apr;110(4):1020-7
references: 23124549
references: ChemSusChem. 2012 Jun;5(6):1071-9
references: 22615062
references: ChemSusChem. 2012 Jun;5(6):1039-46
references: 22614997
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 29;106(52):22169-74
references: 20018742
references: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009 Apr;59(Pt 4):781-5
references: 19329606
references: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Nov 30;1717(2):67-88
references: 16277975
references: BMC Microbiol. 2009 May 27;9:109
references: 19473543
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008 Aug 1;100(5):872-81
references: 18551519
references: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004 May;54(Pt 3):739-743
references: 15143017
references: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Nov;77(2):393-402
references: 17786426
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Mar;69(3):1548-55
references: 12620842
references: Arch Microbiol. 1998 Dec;171(1):19-30
references: 9871015
references: Bioresour Technol. 2012 May;112:336-40
references: 22414574
references: Mikrobiologiia. 2006 Nov-Dec;75(6):775-85
references: 17205802
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Sep;70(9):5595-602
references: 15345448
references: ChemSusChem. 2012 Jun;5(6):1106-18
references: 22581467
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Feb;72(2):1558-68
references: 16461711
references: Trends Microbiol. 2011 Jul;19(7):330-40
references: 21664821
references: J Bacteriol. 2011 Mar;193(5):1023-33
references: 21169487
references: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Dec;77(4):927-34
references: 17943280
references: Environ Microbiol. 2008 Oct;10(10):2505-14
references: 18564184
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Sep 18;46(18):10349-55
references: 22909141
references: Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995 Jul;45(3):441-8
references: 8590670
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Feb;77(4):1254-62
references: 21169451
references: BMC Genomics. 2009 Mar 11;10:103
references: 19284579
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Apr;51(4):683-9
references: 16347032
references: ChemSusChem. 2012 Jun;5(6):1047-53
references: 22577055
references: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004 Sep;54(Pt 5):1591-1599
references: 15388715
references: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Oct;4(10):752-64
references: 16980937
references: Bioresour Technol. 2011 Dec;102(24):11218-25
references: 22001056
references: Bioresour Technol. 2010 May;101(10):3514-9
references: 20093009
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009 Jun 15;103(3):513-23
references: 19191353
references: ChemSusChem. 2012 Jun;5(6):1092-8
references: 22577044
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010 Jan 1;105(1):69-78
references: 19688868
references: BMC Genomics. 2010 Jan 17;11:40
references: 20078895
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Dec;74(23):7329-37
references: 18849456
references: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010 Jan;34(1):3-17
references: 19895647
references: Bioresour Technol. 2007 Aug;98(11):2131-6
references: 17046245
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5347-53
references: 17574993
references: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Dec;77(3):689-97
references: 17909786
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Dec 15;43(24):9519-24
references: 20000550
references: ChemSusChem. 2012 Jun;5(6):1027-38
references: 22615099