title: The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Internet technology can provide a diverse array of online resources for low-income disabled and homebound older adults to manage their health and mental health problems and maintain social connections. Despite many previous studies of older adults' Internet use, none focused on these most vulnerable older adults.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  This study examined Internet use patterns, reasons for discontinued use, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use among low-income homebound individuals aged 60 and older in comparison to their younger counterparts-homebound adults under age 60.
  
  
  METHODS
  Face-to-face or telephone surveys were conducted with 980 recipients of home-delivered meals in central Texas (78% were age 60 years and older and 22% under age 60). The eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) and the efficacy and interest subscales of the Attitudes Toward Computer/Internet Questionnaire (ATC/IQ) were used to measure the respective constructs. Age groups were compared with chi-square tests and t tests. Correlates of Internet use were analyzed with multinomial logistic regression, and correlates of eHEALS and ATC/IQ scores were analyzed with OLS regression models.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Only 34% of the under-60 group and 17% of the 60 years and older group currently used the Internet, and 35% and 16% of the respective group members reported discontinuing Internet use due to cost and disability. In addition to being older, never users were more likely to be black (OR 4.41; 95% CI 2.82-6.91, P<.001) or Hispanic (OR 4.69; 95% CI 2.61-8.44, P<.001), and to have lower incomes (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.27-0.49, P<.001). Discontinued users were also more likely to be black or Hispanic and to have lower incomes. Among both age groups, approximately three-fourths of the current users used the Internet every day or every few days, and their eHEALS scores were negatively associated with age and positively associated with frequency of use. Among the 60 and older group, a depression diagnosis was also negatively associated with eHEALS scores. ATC/IQ efficacy among never users of all ages and among older adults was positively associated with living alone, income, and the number of medical conditions and inversely associated with age, Hispanic ethnicity, and Spanish as the primary language. Although ATC/IQ interest among older adults was also inversely associated with age, it was not associated with Hispanic ethnicity and Spanish as the primary language.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study is the first to describe in detail low-income disabled and homebound adults' and older adults' Internet use. It shows very low rates of Internet use compared to the US population, either due to lack of exposure to computer/Internet technology; lack of financial resources to obtain computers and technology; or medical conditions, disabilities, and associated pain that restrict use. Recommendations to reduce the digital divide among these individuals are provided.
authors: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-0358, USA. nchoi@austin.utexas.edu
authors: Namkee G
authors: NG
authors: Choi
authors: Diana M
authors: DM
authors: Dinitto
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001292:Attitude to Computers; D005260:Female; D057220:Health Literacy; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011203:Poverty
keywords: Internet; attitudes toward Internet; eHealth literacy; homebound older adults; housebound older adults
references: Educ Gerontol. 2008 Sep 1;34(9):831
references: 20148185
references: Aging Ment Health. 2010 Mar;14(2):145-54
references: 19946802
references: J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 03;13(4):e90
references: 22052161
references: J Med Internet Res. 2011 Apr 20;13(2):e33
references: 21752784
references: Med Inform Internet Med. 2005 Mar;30(1):3-17
references: 16036626
references: J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jan 27;14(1):e19
references: 22357448
references: Home Health Care Serv Q. 2005;24(4):1-19
references: 16446263
references: J Gerontol. 1992 Jul;47(4):P250-7
references: 1624702
references: Hum Factors. 2011 Oct;53(5):431-47
references: 22046718
references: Alzheimers Dement. 2012 Nov;8(6):544-52
references: 23102124
references: Telemed J E Health. 2011 Mar;17(2):131-48
references: 21385026
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):277-84
references: 22802269
references: Maturitas. 2012 Oct;73(2):94-114
references: 22809497
references: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;23(12):1306-11
references: 18615448
references: J Aging Health. 2010 Sep;22(6):804-26
references: 20495159
references: J Med Internet Res. 2013 May 16;15(5):e97
references: 23681083
references: Gerontology. 2012;58(2):164-70
references: 21734360
references: Crit Care. 2012 Jul 18;16(4):R127
references: 22809335
references: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1998 Sep;53(5):P329-40
references: 9750571
references: Australas J Ageing. 2009 Dec;28(4):189-93
references: 19951340
references: Australas J Ageing. 2008 Jun;27(2):78-82
references: 18713197
references: J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Jan;97(1):12-20
references: 19159002
references: J Med Internet Res. 2006 Nov 14;8(4):e27
references: 17213046
references: Libr Inf Sci Res. 2009 Sep 1;31(3):155
references: 20161649