title: Medicines use reviews: a potential resource or lost opportunity for general practice?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Patient non-adherence to medicines represents a significant waste of health resource and lost opportunity for health gain. Medicine management services are a key health policy strategy to encourage patients to take medicines as they are prescribed. One such service is the English Medicines Use Review (MUR) which is an NHS-funded community pharmacy service involving a patient-pharmacist consultation aiming to improve patients' knowledge of medicines and their use. To date the evidence for MURs to improve patient health outcomes is equivocal and GPs are reported to be sceptical about the value of the service. This paper presents the patient's perspective of the MUR service and focuses on the importance of GP-pharmacist collaboration for patient care. Suggestions on how MURs may have value to GPs through the delivery of increased patient benefit are discussed.
  
  
  METHODS
  A qualitative study involving ten weeks of ethnographic observations in two English community pharmacies. Observations were made of all pharmacy activities including patient-pharmacist MUR consultations. Subsequent interviews with these patients were conducted to explore their experience of the service. Interviews with the pharmacy staff were conducted after the period of observations. A thematic approach was used to analyse the data.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Fifty-four patients agreed to have their MUR observed of which thirty-four were interviewed. Seventeen pharmacy staff were also interviewed. Patients reported positive views about MURs. However, there was little evidence suggesting that pharmacists and GPs were working collaboratively or communicating outcomes resulting from MURs. MURs were conducted in isolation from other aspects of patient care. Patients considered GPs to have authority over medicines making a few wary that MURs had the potential to cause tensions between these professionals and possibly adversely affect their own relationship with their doctor.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study reveals the potential for effective GP-pharmacist collaboration to improve the capacity of the MUR service to support patient medicine taking. Closer collaboration between GPs and pharmacists could potentially improve patients' use of medicines and associated health care outcomes. The current lack of such collaboration constitutes a missed opportunity for pharmacists and GPs to work together with patients to improve effective prescribing and optimise patient use of medicines.
authors: Division of Social Research in Medicines and Health, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, East Drive, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Asam.Latif@nottingham.ac.uk
authors: Asam
authors: A
authors: Latif
authors: Kristian
authors: K
authors: Pollock
authors: Helen F
authors: HF
authors: Boardman
mesh_terms: D005194:Family Practice / Q000193:education*; D006295:Health Resources; D006801:Humans; D012196:Review Literature as Topic
references: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009 Jan;14(1):58-61
references: 19103918
references: N Z Med J. 2009 Apr 24;122(1293):3566
references: 19448788
references: Soc Sci Med. 2001 Oct;53(7):943-55
references: 11522139
references: Pharm World Sci. 2010 Jun;32(3):381-5
references: 20349274
references: Health Policy. 2008 Dec;88(2-3):258-68
references: 18468713
references: Ann Pharmacother. 2002 Jul-Aug;36(7-8):1238-48
references: 12086559
references: Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Oct;57(543):777-84
references: 17925134
references: J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Jan;14 Suppl 1:S34-40
references: 9933493
references: Pharm Pract (Granada). 2010 Jan;8(1):35-42
references: 25152791
references: Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Nov;51(3):197-206
references: 14630376
references: Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Oct;74(4):573-80
references: 22607195
references: Med Care. 2004 Mar;42(3):200-9
references: 15076819
references: Soc Sci Med. 2010 Aug;71(3):451-458
references: 20570427
references: Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jul;61(1):133-55
references: 15847968
references: Pharm World Sci. 2007 Dec;29(6):574-6
references: 17479354
references: Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jul;74(1):16-33
references: 22242793
references: Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Aug;53(493):600-6
references: 14601335
references: Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Oct;74(4):581-8
references: 22621201
references: Anthropol Med. 2002 Aug;9(2):117-33
references: 26868985
references: Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jun;83(3):336-44
references: 21621943
references: Med Care. 2009 Aug;47(8):826-34
references: 19584762
references: Med Educ. 2006 May;40(5):405-14
references: 16635119
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995 Summer;11(3):443-55
references: 7591546
references: Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Feb;74(2):135-41
references: 18845412
references: Res Social Adm Pharm. 2005 Dec;1(4):565-78
references: 17138496
references: Soc Sci Med. 2001 Aug;53(4):487-505
references: 11459399