title: Are stripes beneficial? Dazzle camouflage influences perceived speed and hit rates.
abstract: In the animal kingdom, camouflage refers to patterns that help potential prey avoid detection. Mostly camouflage is thought of as helping prey blend in with their background. In contrast, disruptive or dazzle patterns protect moving targets and have been suggested as an evolutionary force in shaping the dorsal patterns of animals. Dazzle patterns, such as stripes and zigzags, are thought to reduce the probability with which moving prey will be captured by impairing predators' perception of speed. We investigated how different patterns of stripes (longitudinal-i.e., parallel to movement direction-and vertical-i.e., perpendicular to movement direction) affect the probability with which humans can hit moving objects and if differences in hitting probability are caused by a misperception of speed. A first experiment showed that longitudinally striped objects were hit more often than unicolored objects. However, vertically striped objects did not differ from unicolored objects. A second study examining the link between perceived speed and hitting probability showed that longitudinally and vertically striped objects were both perceived as moving faster and were hit more often than unicolored objects. In sum, our results provide evidence that striped patterns disrupt the perception of speed, which in turn influences how often objects are hit. However, the magnitude and the direction of the effects depend on additional factors such as speed and the task setup.
authors: Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition, Berlin, Germany. Bettina.vonhelversen@unibas.ch
authors: Bettina
authors: B
authors: von Helversen
authors: Lael J
authors: LJ
authors: Schooler
authors: Uwe
authors: U
authors: Czienskowski
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000818:Animals; D005260:Female; D005717:Games, Experimental; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009039:Motion Perception; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D055815:Young Adult
references: J Vis. 2004 Jul 14;4(7):575-84
references: 15330703
references: Vision Res. 1992 Aug;32(8):1535-49
references: 1455726
references: BMC Biol. 2011 Nov 25;9:81
references: 22117898
references: Neural Netw. 2003 Jun-Jul;16(5-6):933-8
references: 12850053
references: Exp Brain Res. 2002 Mar;143(2):198-211
references: 11880896
references: Exp Brain Res. 2000 Jul;133(2):242-8
references: 10968225
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Feb;27(1):218-28
references: 11248935
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20233
references: 21673797
references: Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1279-92
references: 11800457
references: Evolution. 1992 Oct;46(5):1284-1298
references: 28568995
references: Vision Res. 1997 May;37(10):1255-60
references: 9205717
references: Perception. 2007;36(1):3-16
references: 17357702
references: Nature. 1989 Nov 30;342(6249):542-3
references: 2586624
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Feb;21(1):19-31
references: 7707030
references: Vision Res. 2000;40(6):629-38
references: 10824266
references: Vision Res. 2002 Nov;42(25):2757-72
references: 12450495
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Nov 22;275(1651):2639-43
references: 18700203
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Dec;2(4):409-28
references: 24203782