title: A literature review and meta-analysis of drug company-funded mental health websites.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The pharmaceutical industry exercises pervasive influence in the mental health field. The internet has become a primary source of mental health information for the public and practitioners. This study therefore compared mental health websites funded and not funded by drug companies.
  
  
  METHODS
  A systematic literature review of studies examining the role of drug companies in the funding of mental health websites was conducted, followed by a meta-analysis of studies comparing drug company-funded (DCF) sites with sites not funded by the industry.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mental health websites, in general, overemphasize biogenetic causal explanations and medication. Many mental health websites (42%) are either drug company owned (6%) or receive funding from drug companies (36%). A meta-analysis found that DCF sites are significantly more biased toward biogenetic causes (P < 0.01) and toward medication (P < 0.0001) than sites that are financially independent of the industry.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Practitioners are encouraged to inform patients about the bias inherent in industry-sponsored websites and to recommend, instead, more balanced websites that present a range of evidence-based information about causes and treatments.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Read
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Cain
mesh_terms: D004345:Drug Industry / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet / Q000191:economics* / Q000592:standards; D008603:Mental Health / Q000191:economics* / Q000193:education; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000191:economics* / Q000592:standards
keywords: drug industry; internet; mental health; psychiatry