title: Humans strengthen bottom-up effects and weaken trophic cascades in a terrestrial food web.
abstract: Ongoing debate about whether food webs are primarily regulated by predators or by primary plant productivity, cast as top-down and bottom-up effects, respectively, may becoming superfluous. Given that most of the world's ecosystems are human dominated we broadened this dichotomy by considering human effects in a terrestrial food-web. We studied a multiple human-use landscape in southwest Alberta, Canada, as opposed to protected areas where previous terrestrial food-web studies have been conducted. We used structural equation models (SEMs) to assess the strength and direction of relationships between the density and distribution of: (1) humans, measured using a density index; (2) wolves (Canis lupus), elk (Cervus elapahus) and domestic cattle (Bos taurus), measured using resource selection functions, and; (3) forage quality, quantity and utilization (measured at vegetation sampling plots). Relationships were evaluated by taking advantage of temporal and spatial variation in human density, including day versus night, and two landscapes with the highest and lowest human density in the study area. Here we show that forage-mediated effects of humans had primacy over predator-mediated effects in the food web. In our parsimonious SEM, occurrence of humans was most correlated with occurrence of forage (β = 0.637, p<0.0001). Elk and cattle distribution were correlated with forage (elk day: β = 0.400, p<0.0001; elk night: β = 0.369, p<0.0001; cattle day: β = 0.403, p<0.0001; cattle, night: β = 0.436, p<0.0001), and the distribution of elk or cattle and wolves were positively correlated during daytime (elk: β = 0.293, p <0.0001, cattle: β = 0.303, p<0.0001) and nighttime (elk: β = 0.460, p<0.0001, cattle: β = 0.482, p<0.0001). Our results contrast with research conducted in protected areas that suggested human effects in the food web are primarily predator-mediated. Instead, human influence on vegetation may strengthen bottom-up predominance and weaken top-down trophic cascades in ecosystems. We suggest that human influences on ecosystems may usurp top-down and bottom-up effects.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Environmental Design, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. tyler.muhly@albertainnovates.ca
authors.forename: Tyler B
authors.initials: TB
authors.lastname: Muhly
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hebblewhite
authors.forename: Dale
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Paton
authors.forename: Justin A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Pitt
authors.forename: Mark S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Boyce
authors.forename: Marco
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Musiani
mesh_terms: D000416:Alberta; D000824:Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena / Q000502:physiology*; D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle / Q000502:physiology*; D003670:Deer / Q000502:physiology*; D020387:Food Chain; D040362:Geographic Information Systems; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008954:Models, Biological; D011156:Population Density; D013045:Species Specificity; D019596:Wolves / Q000502:physiology*