title: Grounding quantum probability in psychological mechanism.
abstract: Pothos & Busemeyer (P&B) provide a compelling case that quantum probability (QP) theory is a better match to human judgment than is classical probability (CP) theory. However, any theory (QP, CP, or other) phrased solely at the computational level runs the risk of being underconstrained. One suggestion is to ground QP accounts in mechanism, to leverage a wide range of process-level data.
authors.affiliation: University College London, Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain Sciences, London WC1H 0AP, United Kingdom. b.love@ucl.ac.uk
authors.forename: Bradley C
authors.initials: BC
authors.lastname: Love
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition; D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011338:Probability Theory; D011789:Quantum Theory