title: Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic accuracy in Alzheimer's disease: a synthesis of existing evidence.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This report synthesizes existing evidence to compare the accuracy of various Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnostic approaches.
  
  
  METHODS
  Meta-analyses and reviews of diagnostic accuracy of AD were identified through a search of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases using the keyword combinations of "sensitivity specificity Alzheimer's disease diagnosis" and "accuracy of Alzheimer's disease diagnosis."
  
  
  RESULTS
  From 507 abstracts initially identified, 41 systematic reviews or meta-analyses were selected. Cerebrospinal fluid-tau demonstrated variable sensitivity (range 73.3%-100%) and specificity (range 70.0%-92.4%) in diagnosing AD when compared to neuropathological verification of clinical criteria for AD. Various positron emission tomography approaches showed a similar range of sensitivity (range 80.0%-100%) and specificity (range 62.0%-90%) as diagnostic protocols.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Issues that remain in the study of AD diagnosis include the need to determine the comparative effectiveness of diagnostic approaches. Variations in study quality make empirically derived conclusions about the diagnostic accuracy of existing approaches tenuous.
authors.affiliation: School of Nursing & Center on Aging, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. gaug0015@umn.edu
authors.forename: Joseph E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Gaugler
authors.forename: Robert L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Kane
authors.forename: Joseph A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Johnston
authors.forename: Khaled
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Sarsour
mesh_terms: D000544:Alzheimer Disease / Q000175:diagnosis*; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006801:Humans; D009462:Neurology / Q000592:standards*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity
keywords: clinical; dementia; meta-analysis; sensitivity; specificity; systematic review