title: Impact of clinical and health services research projects on decision-making: a qualitative study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  This article reports on the impact assessment experience of a funding program of non-commercial clinical and health services research. The aim was to assess the level of implementation of results from a subgroup of research projects (on respiratory diseases), and to detect barriers (or facilitators) in the translation of new knowledge to informed decision-making.
  
  
  METHODS
  A qualitative study was performed. The sample consisted of six projects on respiratory diseases funded by the Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia between 1996 and 2004. Semi-structured interviews to key informants including researchers and healthcare decision-makers were carried out. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed on an individual (key informant) and group (project) basis. In addition, the differences between achieved and expected impacts were described.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Twenty-three semi-structured interviews were conducted. Most participants indicated changes in health services or clinical practice had resulted from research. The channels used to transfer new knowledge were mainly conventional ones, but also in less explicit ways, such as with the involvement of local scientific societies, or via debates and discussions with colleagues and local leaders. The barriers and facilitators identified were mostly organizational (in research management, and clinical and healthcare practice), although there were also some related to the nature of the research as well as personal factors. Both the expected and achieved impacts enabled the identification of the gaps between what is expected and what is truly achieved.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In this study and according to key informants, the impact of these research projects on decision-making can be direct (the application of a finding or innovation) or indirect, contributing to a more complex change in clinical practice and healthcare organization, both having other contextual factors. The channels used to transfer this new knowledge to clinical practice are complex. Local scientific societies and the relationships between researchers and decision-makers can play a very important role. Specifically, the relationships between managers and research teams and the mutual knowledge of their activity have shown to be effective in applying research funding to practice and decision-making. Finally the facilitating factors and barriers identified by the respondents are closely related to the idiosyncrasy of the human relations between the different stakeholders involved.
authors.affiliation: Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), Roc Boronat 81-95, Barcelona, 08020, Spain. mtsolans@gencat.cat
authors.forename: Maite
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Solans-Domènech
authors.forename: Paula
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Adam
authors.forename: Imma
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Guillamón
authors.forename: Gaietà
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Permanyer-Miralda
authors.forename: Joan M V
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Pons
authors.forename: Joan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Escarrabill
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003657:Decision Making; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D015272:Pulmonary Medicine / Q000592:standards*; D036301:Qualitative Research; D057170:Translational Research, Biomedical / Q000706:statistics & numerical data