title: Outcome of radical prostatectomy in patients meeting criteria for active surveillance.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Advances in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa)have led to an increased detection of these tumors, some of them with low-risk of progression, with the consequent risk of overdiagnosis and overt treatment. In consequence, there is a tendency to offer alternatives to active therapy, like active surveillance (AS)however, some patients under AS need definitive therapy and after surgery it becomes evident that they are not "low-risk" patients. We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who met criteria for low-risk tumors treated with radical prostatectomy.
  
  
  METHODS
  We selected 21 out of 190 patients treated with radical prostatectomy from January 2004 to December 2008 who met Epstein's criteria for low-risk tumors. We analyzed the number of organ-confined tumors,Gleason undergrading and understaging by biopsy, surgical margins and postoperative PSA.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mean age was 58.6 years; mean PSA was 6.6 ng/ml, predominant Gleason score was 6 (3+3), 76%were unilateral tumors and 90%were organ-confined, 10% had extracapsular extension, none had involvement of the seminal % vesicles, 15% of the patients had Gleason score >6 and surgical margins were positive in 30% of the specimens. Eighty five percent had their first postoperative PSA <0.10 ng/ml and 75% remain free of biochemical recurrence. According to the Johns Hopkins criteria for "incurable tumors ", our cohort had 28%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Patients with low-risk prostate cancer include cases that may have greater risk than estimated. In our series, we had 10% extracapsular disease, 15% understaging for Gleason score and 25% biochemical recurrence, which demonstrates that current criteria do not warrant good oncological results. Active surveillance offers good quality of life and acceptable oncological results, it can be proposed until definitive therapy, without seriously endangering the patient. Anyway, as a therapeutic tool, it still requires improvements. Technical advances are awaited so as to properly assess each patient's risk and to define the best therapeutic option for every case.
authors.affiliation: Fundación Urológica Córdoba para Docencia e Investigación Médica, Córdoba, Argentina. trisdellavedova@hotmail.com
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Dellavedova
authors.forename: R M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Ponzano
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Sarria
authors.forename: P G
authors.initials: PG
authors.lastname: Minuzzi
authors.forename: R H
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Nobile
authors.forename: F G
authors.initials: FG
authors.lastname: Minuzzi
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D015331:Cohort Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D011467:Prostate / Q000473:pathology; D017430:Prostate-Specific Antigen / Q000032:analysis; D011468:Prostatectomy; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D017430:Prostate-Specific Antigen