title: [Circumcision in male newborns--update].
abstract: Recently, there have been efforts in a number of countries to forbid the circumcision of infants and children. This position, which is based on alleged violation of autonomy and on serious harm to the infant or child, is not supported by the medical literature. Controlled studies have accumulated showing the major health benefits of circumcision of infants; there is a decrease in urinary tract infections, a virtual elimination of cancer of the penis, a reduction in HIV and HPV infections, as well as other sexually transmitted diseases, and perhaps, reductions in prostatic cancer and in uterine cervical cancer. The complications of the procedure are minimal, especially when performed in infancy. Recent studies have not confirmed the alleged reduction in sexual pleasure as a result of circumcision. Therefore, there is no justification, whatsoever, for attempts to forbid circumcision of infants. On the contrary, there seem to be good reasons to encourage such practices.
authors.affiliation: Rabbi Immanuel Jakobovits Center for Jewish Medical Ethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheba, Israel. gshimon@bgu.ac.il
authors.forename: Shimon M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Glick
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002944:Circumcision, Male / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D010409:Penile Diseases / Q000517:prevention & control*; D012749:Sexually Transmitted Diseases / Q000517:prevention & control*; D014552:Urinary Tract Infections / Q000517:prevention & control*