title: Outcomes of digital zone IV and V and thumb zone TI to TIV extensor tendon repairs using a running interlocking horizontal mattress technique.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Biomechanical evidence has demonstrated that the running interlocking horizontal mattress (RIHM) repair for extensor tendon lacerations is significantly stronger, with higher ultimate load to failure and less tendon shortening compared with other techniques. We investigated the efficacy and safety of primary extensor tendon repair using the RIHM repair technique in the fingers followed by the immediate controlled active motion protocol, and in the thumb followed by a dynamic extension protocol.
  
  
  METHODS
  We conducted a retrospective review of all patients undergoing extensor tendon repair from August 2009 to April 2012 by single surgeon in an academic hand surgery practice. The inclusion criteria were simple extensor tendon lacerations in digital zones IV and V and thumb zones TI to TIV and primary repair performed using the RIHM technique. We included 8 consecutive patients with 9 tendon lacerations (3 in the thumb). One patient underwent a concomitant dorsal hand rotation flap for soft tissue coverage. We used a 3-0 nonabsorbable braided suture to perform a running simple suture in 1 direction to obtain a tension-free tenorrhaphy, followed by an RIHM corset-type suture using the same continuous strand in the opposite direction. Average time to surgery was 10 days (range, 3-33 d). Mean follow-up was 15 weeks (range, 10-26 wk). We applied the immediate controlled active motion protocol to all injuries except those in the thumb, where we used a dynamic extension protocol instead.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Using the criteria of Miller, all 9 tendon repairs achieved excellent or good results. There were no tendon ruptures or extensor lags. No patients required secondary surgery for tenolysis or joint release. No wound complications occurred.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The RIHM technique for primary extensor tendon repairs in zone IV and V and T1 to TIV is safe, allows for immediate controlled active motion in the fingers and an immediate dynamic extension protocol in the thumb, and achieves good to excellent functional outcomes. These clinical outcomes support prior biomechanical data.
  
  
  METHODS
  Therapeutic IV.
authors.affiliation: Division of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Tufts Medical Center and Newton-Wellesley Hospital/Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA02462, USA.
authors.forename: Grant G
authors.initials: GG
authors.lastname: Altobelli
authors.forename: Stacy
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Conneely
authors.forename: Christina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Haufler
authors.forename: Maura
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Walsh
authors.forename: David E
authors.initials: DE
authors.lastname: Ruchelsman
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D022125:Lacerations / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019637:Orthopedic Procedures; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013524:Surgical Flaps; D013536:Suture Techniques; D013708:Tendon Injuries / Q000601:surgery*; D055815:Young Adult