title: What is required for the validation of in vitro assays for predicting contaminant relative bioavailability? Considerations and criteria.
abstract: A number of studies have shown the potential of in vitro assays to predict contaminant in vivo relative bioavailability in order to refine human health exposure assessment. Although the term 'validated' has been used to describe the goodness of fit between in vivo and in vitro observations, its misuse has arisen from semantic considerations in addition to the lack of defined criteria for establishing performance validation. While several internal validation methods may be utilised, performance validation should preferably focus on assessing the agreement of model predictions with a set of data which are independent of those used to construct the model. In order to achieve robust validated predictive models, a number of parameters (e.g. size of data set, source of independent soils, contaminant concentration range, animal model, relative bioavailability endpoint) need to be considered in addition to defined criteria for establishing performance validation which are currently lacking.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation (CERAR), University of South Australia, Building X1-17, Mawson Lakes Campus, Adelaide, SA 5095, Australia. Albert.Juhasz@unisa.edu.au
authors.forename: Albert L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Juhasz
authors.forename: Nicholas T
authors.initials: NT
authors.lastname: Basta
authors.forename: Euan
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Smith
mesh_terms: D001681:Biological Assay / Q000379:methods*; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D004785:Environmental Pollutants / Q000032:analysis*; D054928:Validation Studies as Topic
chemical_list: D004785:Environmental Pollutants
keywords: Bioaccessibility; Bioavailability; Correlation; Human health risk assessment; Validation