title: [Present state of the art in topical and systemic immunosuppression after keratoplasty].
abstract: Today MMF can be considered as standard treatment besides cyclosporin A for immunosuppression after high-risk perforating keratoplasty. The efficacy of systemic MMF for this indication has been documented in several clinical studies including multicentre designs. Whether or not MPA therapy offers further advantages is currently under discussion. Sirolimus and tacrolimus are effective but could not achieve clinical importance due to higher rates of side effects. An additional benefit of combination therapies is not proven by clinical studies up to date. Everolimus shows pre-clinically a promising immunosuppressive and antiproliferative effect. Topical preparations of immunosuppressants as monotherapy are obviously insufficient as alternatives for systemic immunosuppressive therapy. Whether or not topical combination therapies will become established as alternatives to systemic treatment has to be demonstrated in the following years.
authors.affiliation: Augenklinik, Charité Campus Virchow Klinikum, Universitätsmedizin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin. eckart.bertelmann@charite.de
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Bertelmann
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Torun
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Pleyer
mesh_terms: D003316:Corneal Diseases / Q000209:etiology* / Q000517:prevention & control*; D016039:Corneal Transplantation / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods; D006084:Graft Rejection / Q000209:etiology* / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006801:Humans; D007166:Immunosuppressive Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D011292:Premedication / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D007166:Immunosuppressive Agents