title: Rethinking headache chronification.
abstract: The objective of this series is to examine several threats to the interpretation of headache chronification studies that arise from methodological issues. The study of headache chronification has extensively used longitudinal designs with 2 or more measurement occasions. Unfortunately, application of these designs, when combined with the common practice of extreme score selection as well as the extant challenges in measuring headache frequency rates (eg, unreliability, regression to the mean), induces substantive threats to accurate interpretation of findings. Partitioning the amount of observed variance in rates of chronification and remission attributable to regression artifacts is a critical yet previously overlooked step to learning more about headache as a potentially progressive disease. In this series on rethinking headache chronification, we provide an overview of methodological issues in this area (this paper), highlight the influence of rounding error on estimates of headache frequency (second paper), examine the influence of random error and regression artifacts on estimates of chronification and remission (third paper), and consider future directions for this line of research (fourth paper).
authors.affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
authors.forename: Dana P
authors.initials: DP
authors.lastname: Turner
authors.forename: Todd A
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Smitherman
authors.forename: Donald B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Penzien
authors.forename: Richard B
authors.initials: RB
authors.lastname: Lipton
authors.forename: Timothy T
authors.initials: TT
authors.lastname: Houle
mesh_terms: D006261:Headache / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000628:therapy; D006801:Humans; D008137:Longitudinal Studies / Q000379:methods*; D012307:Risk Factors; D013850:Thinking