title: Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation.
abstract: A variety of nonsurgical and surgical treatment options exist for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. While nonsurgical management is often selected as first-line treatment, many women eventually elect to undergo surgical management. Traditionally, prolapse repair often includes concomitant hysterectomy; however, women increasingly desire uterine preservation for a myriad of reasons. Multiple surgical procedures have been described to correct apical prolapse while preserving the uterus. Many studies suggest similar anatomic and functional outcomes compared to prolapse procedures with concomitant hysterectomy. Potential benefits include decreased operative time and avoidance of hysterectomy-specific complications, although there are several unique issues to consider if the uterus is retained. Surgeons must provide adequate counseling and preoperative evaluation before proceeding with uterine preservation.
authors.affiliation: From the Center of Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Disorders, Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic and the Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA, kown@ccf.org.
authors.forename: Nathan
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Kow
authors.forename: Howard B
authors.initials: HB
authors.lastname: Goldman
authors.forename: Beri
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Ridgeway
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D013509:Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D013526:Surgical Mesh; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014596:Uterine Prolapse / Q000601:surgery*; D014599:Uterus / Q000601:surgery*