title: Retrospective database analysis of the impact of prior authorization for type 2 diabetes medications on health care costs in a Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan population.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Health plans and pharmacy benefit managers have implemented utilization management strategies for newer type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) medications to control pharmacy expenditures. Little is known about the impact of utilization management strategies on overall health care costs and subsequent use of T2DM medications among members who request, but do not receive, a T2DM medication requiring prior authorization (PA).
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To examine the relationship between the receipt of a T2DM medication requiring PA, health care costs, and subsequent treatment for T2DM.
  
  
  METHODS
  A retrospective cohort study using pharmacy, medical, and laboratory claims data was conducted among Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plan members with a denied claim for a T2DM medication requiring PA (sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor [DPP-4i], and exenatide, an incretin mimetic) between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2009. Subjects were required to have 12 months of continuous enrollment both before and after the index date. The entire study period was 24 months in duration, including a 12-month pre-index and 12-month post-index period. Three cohorts were identified: 1 that received a medication requiring PA (denied claim, subsequent fill) and 2 nonfilling control groups. Both control groups requested a medication requiring PA, as evidenced by the denied claim, but neither received the medication, either because the medication was not authorized or the member chose not to fill. Claims-based estimates were used to infer whether the individual likely met the criteria for PA, with 1 control group designated as having met the claims-based criteria (qualifying nonfilling cohort) and the other not having done so (nonqualifying nonfilling cohort.) The primary endpoint evaluated was the relationship between PA medication fill status and plan-paid costs (medical [including laboratory] and pharmacy) over the 12-month post-denial period, with generalized linear models adjusting for key covariates including demographics, concomitant medications, pre-index costs, pre-index adherence, and comorbidities. The secondary endpoint of T2DM medication use (post-denial) among the 2 nonfilling control groups was also evaluated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were 1,728 members identified who received medication for T2DM requiring PA (the received authorization cohort) and 2,373 who did not (606 qualifying nonfilling cohort; 1,767 nonqualifying nonfilling cohort.) Cohorts were similar with regard to age and gender, but the nonfilling cohort had more comorbidities. Total unadjusted plan-paid 12-month costs were lowest among the received authorization cohort ($11,739), slightly higher ($11,980) for the qualifying nonfilling cohort, and notably higher for the nonqualifying nonfilling cohort ($12,962), although no differences were statistically significant. After adjusting for key covariates, the difference between the nonqualifying nonfilling cohort ($11,980) and the received authorization cohort ($11,729) was statistically significant (P = 0.034). Large differences in plan-paid medical costs ($10,127 for the nonqualifying nonfilling cohort vs. $8,192 for the received authorization cohort) appeared to drive the overall cost totals and were significant in both the unadjusted (P = 0.005) and adjusted models (P  less than  0.001). Pharmacy costs were significantly lower for the nonqualifying nonfilling cohort in the adjusted model and for the qualifying nonfilling cohort in both models (all P  less than  0.001), but the lower pharmacy costs were not offset by the higher medical costs. In examining the use of medication for treatment of T2DM following the denied claim, 10.6% of the qualifying nonfilling cohort and 13.4% of the nonqualifying nonfilling cohort added another oral therapy, 10.2% and 5.8% added insulin, and 11.9% and 7.1% had treatment intensification, respectively. More than half (56.1%) of the qualifying nonfilling cohort, but only 32.1% of the nonqualifying nonfilling cohort, maintained current therapy.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study found higher plan-paid health care costs (overall and medical alone) among members who requested a type 2 diabetes medication requiring PA, but never received it, compared with those who qualified for and received the requested medication. A notable number of individuals who were assumed to have met the criteria based on a claims-based equivalent, but who never received the medication, made no change to their current therapy. Failure of a member to take medication deemed necessary by his or her physician could translate to inadequate control of the diabetic condition and result in an excess of resource utilization and costs for treating the disease and associated comorbidities. In light of the present findings, health plans should consider not only the impact of utilization management strategies on reducing pharmacy costs, but the broader implication for overall health care costs and subsequent treatment patterns among members.
authors.affiliation: Comprehensive Health Insights, 325 W. Main St. WFP6W, Louisville, KY 40202, USA. kworley@humana.com
authors.forename: Joette Gdovin
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Bergeson
authors.forename: Karen
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Worley
authors.forename: Anthony
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Louder
authors.forename: Melea
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ward
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Graham
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015331:Cohort Studies; D016208:Databases, Factual; D003924:Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000191:economics; D000077270:Exenatide; D005260:Female; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D007004:Hypoglycemic Agents / Q000191:economics / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D054524:Medicare Part D / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010455:Peptides / Q000191:economics / Q000627:therapeutic use; D011719:Pyrazines / Q000191:economics / Q000627:therapeutic use; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D000068900:Sitagliptin Phosphate; D014230:Triazoles / Q000191:economics / Q000627:therapeutic use; D014481:United States; D014688:Venoms / Q000191:economics / Q000627:therapeutic use; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D007004:Hypoglycemic Agents; D010455:Peptides; D011719:Pyrazines; D014230:Triazoles; D014688:Venoms; D000077270:Exenatide; D000068900:Sitagliptin Phosphate