title: Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine.
abstract: Peer review processes in teaching requires a reviewer to observe a teacher's practice in a planned manner. Conversation between the two enables the teacher to reflect on their own teaching, promoting self-improvement. Although a central part of the teaching process, and despite its crucial role in continuing professional development, peer review is not widely practiced in hospital settings. This article explains the process and its benefits. Practical implementations of the process in busy clinical settings are suggested. Its evaluation and incorporation into undergraduate learning and postgraduate clinical practice are described. With enthusiastic support for colleagues and allowances for its implementation, it should become part of the regular teaching practice, improving the quality of teaching delivered.
authors.affiliation: Department of Vascular Surgery, Imperial College NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
authors.forename: Matthew J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Metcalfe
authors.forename: Mal
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Farrant
authors.forename: Jm
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Farrant
keywords: clinical practice; education; peer review; teaching