title: Individual differences in learning and transfer: stable tendencies for learning exemplars versus abstracting rules.
abstract: We hypothesize that during training some learners may focus on acquiring the particular exemplars and responses associated with the exemplars (termed exemplar learners), whereas other learners attempt to abstract underlying regularities reflected in the particular exemplars linked to an appropriate response (termed rule learners). Supporting this distinction, after training (on a function-learning task), participants displayed an extrapolation profile reflecting either acquisition of the trained cue-criterion associations (exemplar learners) or abstraction of the function rule (rule learners; Studies 1a and 1b). Further, working memory capacity (measured by operation span [Ospan]) was associated with the tendency to rely on rule versus exemplar processes. Studies 1c and 2 examined the persistence of these learning tendencies on several categorization tasks. Study 1c showed that rule learners were more likely than exemplar learners (indexed a priori by extrapolation profiles) to resist using idiosyncratic features (exemplar similarity) in generalization (transfer) of the trained category. Study 2 showed that the rule learners but not the exemplar learners performed well on a novel categorization task (transfer) after training on an abstract coherent category. These patterns suggest that in complex conceptual tasks, (a) individuals tend to either focus on exemplars during learning or on extracting some abstraction of the concept, (b) this tendency might be a relatively stable characteristic of the individual, and (c) transfer patterns are determined by that tendency.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis.
authors.forename: Mark A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: McDaniel
authors.affiliation: Center for Integrative Research on Cognition, Learning, and Education, Washington University in St. Louis.
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Cahill
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis.
authors.forename: Mathew
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Robbins
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis.
authors.forename: Chelsea
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Wiener
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition; D003210:Concept Formation; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D007858:Learning; D014163:Transfer, Psychology