title: [Treatment of isolated fractures of the olecranon: percutaneous double-screw fixation versus conventional tension band wiring].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Isolated fractures of the olecranon account for 7-10% of all osseous injuries in adults. These fractures are usually treated surgically by conventional tension band wiring. The percutaneous double-screw fixation is an optional treatment in patients with two fragment olecranon fractures with some postoperative advantages.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 13 patients with isolated fractures of the olecranon (Schatzker-Schmelling type A) treated by percutaneous double-screw fixation were included in this prospective study. The mean age of patients was 43.6 ± 11.0 years. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Functional results were assessed after a mean follow-up of 38.2 ± 11.5 months using the Quick-DASH score. The results were compared with those obtained in the control group including 26 patients treated by conventional tension band wiring.
  
  
  RESULTS
  No intraoperative complications were observed in both groups. In the group with percutaneous double-screw fixation the scar length was significantly shorter (2.4 ± 0.4 cm vs. 11.0 ± 1.8 cm, p < 0.001) and the hardware removal was substantially less frequent that in the group with conventional tension band wiring with 38.5 % and 73.1 %, respectively. At the minimum follow-up of 2 years comparable functional results were obtained in both groups (Quick-DASH score 2.3 vs. 0.0 points, respectively, p = 0.155); however, the range of elbow motion was significantly higher in the group with percutaneous double-screw fixation (extension/flexion 145° vs. 130°, p < 0.001; pronation/supination 165° vs. 155°, p < 0.001).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The percutaneous double-screw fixation is a safe and viable treatment option in patients with isolated fractures of the olecranon (Schatzker-Schmelling type A). The functional results regarding DASH scores obtained using this technique were comparable with those observed in patients with conventional tension band wiring; however, range of elbow motion and cosmetic results were significantly better in the patient group with percutaneous double-screw fixation.
authors.affiliation: Klinik für Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Basel, Spitalstraße 21, CH-4031, Basel, Schweiz.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Uhlmann
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Barg
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Valderrabano
authors.forename: O
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Weber
authors.forename: D C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Wirtz
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Pagenstert
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001863:Bone Screws; D001864:Bone Wires; D004551:Elbow Joint / Q000601:surgery; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis; D005260:Female; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D056740:Olecranon Process / Q000293:injuries* / Q000601:surgery*; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011859:Radiography; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D014143:Traction / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014458:Ulna Fractures / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D000092464:Elbow Injuries