title: [Medical rehabilitation group-programmes concerning health promotion, patient education and psychoeducation - a 2010 national survey].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  High quality demands are being placed on concepts of educational group programmes in medical rehabilitation as well as the related trainer qualifications. A nationwide survey of German medical rehabilitation clinics in 2005 had revealed a need for improving educational practice according to these quality criteria. An updated investigation was performed in 2010 aiming at describing group programmes used in medical rehabilitation.
  
  
  METHODS
  1 473 inpatient and outpatient medical rehabilitation clinics were invited to participate. 908 clinics reported on their training programmes. Data from clinics caring for patients with somatic disorders could be compared to the 2005 survey. Data from clinics for both psychosomatic and substance abuse disorders was collected for the first time in 2010.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Overall, psychologists and physicians were reported to be the most frequent conductors of educative programmes. In somatic clinics, psychologists, dieticians and occupational therapists or physiotherapists were the most common conductors. Two-thirds of the institutions reported no training prerequisites for staff members to perform patient education. 80% of the education programmes were categorized post hoc into 3 classes: "generic health education", "disorder-specific patient education", and "psychoeducational group programmes". Almost two-thirds of all programmes were carried out with 8-15 participants, and many used several interactive didactic methods. Programmes conducted in small groups (<8 participants) used significantly more interactive methods than those conducted in larger groups did (>15 participants). Only half of the programmes were manualized. Significantly more interactive methods were used in completely manualized programmes. Only about half of the programmes were evaluated, and only very few evaluation studies were published. The institutions wished additional support by workshops especially concerning qualification of their staff and concerning educational concepts.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A need for further improvement and support exists relative to the training of educators and the development of manuals as well as evaluation and publication of the programmes.
authors.affiliation: Arbeitsbereich Rehabilitationswissenschaften, Universität Würzburg. a.reusch@uni-wuerzburg.de
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Reusch
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Schug
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Küffner
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Vogel
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Faller
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003625:Data Collection; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany / Q000453:epidemiology; D006293:Health Promotion / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008503:Medical Staff / Q000193:education* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D015995:Prevalence; D011615:Psychotherapy, Group / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012046:Rehabilitation / Q000193:education* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012307:Risk Factors