title: Upper-extremity and mobility subdomains from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) adult physical functioning item bank.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To create upper-extremity and mobility subdomain scores from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical functioning adult item bank.
  
  
  METHODS
  Expert reviews were used to identify upper-extremity and mobility items from the PROMIS item bank. Psychometric analyses were conducted to assess empirical support for scoring upper-extremity and mobility subdomains.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data were collected from the U.S. general population and multiple disease groups via self-administered surveys.
  
  
  METHODS
  The sample (N=21,773) included 21,133 English-speaking adults who participated in the PROMIS wave 1 data collection and 640 Spanish-speaking Latino adults recruited separately.
  
  
  METHODS
  Not applicable.
  
  
  METHODS
  We used English- and Spanish-language data and existing PROMIS item parameters for the physical functioning item bank to estimate upper-extremity and mobility scores. In addition, we fit graded response models to calibrate the upper-extremity items and mobility items separately, compare separate to combined calibrations, and produce subdomain scores.
  
  
  RESULTS
  After eliminating items because of local dependency, 16 items remained to assess upper extremity and 17 items to assess mobility. The estimated correlation between upper extremity and mobility was .59 using existing PROMIS physical functioning item parameters (r=.60 using parameters calibrated separately for upper-extremity and mobility items).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Upper-extremity and mobility subdomains shared about 35% of the variance in common, and produced comparable scores whether calibrated separately or together. The identification of the subset of items tapping these 2 aspects of physical functioning and scored using the existing PROMIS parameters provides the option of scoring these subdomains in addition to the overall physical functioning score.
authors.affiliation: UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA; RAND, Santa Monica, CA. Electronic address: drhays@ucla.edu.
authors.forename: Ron D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Hays
authors.forename: Karen L
authors.initials: KL
authors.lastname: Spritzer
authors.forename: Dagmar
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Amtmann
authors.forename: Jin-Shei
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Lai
authors.forename: Esi Morgan
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Dewitt
authors.forename: Nan
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Rothrock
authors.forename: Darren A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Dewalt
authors.forename: William T
authors.initials: WT
authors.lastname: Riley
authors.forename: James F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Fries
authors.forename: Eswar
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Krishnan
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D002908:Chronic Disease; D006233:Persons with Disabilities / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D006801:Humans; D009068:Movement; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D010809:Physical Fitness; D011594:Psychometrics
keywords: CFI; Confirmatory Fit Index; Lower extremity; PFA; PFB; PFC; PROMIS; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; Physical Functioning-A; Physical Functioning-B; Physical Functioning-C; Psychometrics; RMSEA; Rehabilitation; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; Upper extremity