title: Otology versus Otosociology.
abstract: Otology concerns the biological study of ear alterations and diseases, solely. So, the diagnosis of audiovestibular diseases tends to be idiopathic or is based on theoretical concepts such as idiopathic sudden deafness, Ménière disease, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, tinnitus, hyperacusis, or idiopathic facial paralysis. The treatment for these pathologies is symptomatic. Otosociology takes the aetiology and pathogenesis of the ear and situates them within the social and cultural environment of the patient. Then, audiovestibular disease is based on evidence, and the treatment options seek to solve the causes and consequences produced. Otosociology should be considered as a new discipline. Otosociology came into being since otology does not provide definitive solutions for the audiovestibular alterations produced from the point of view of the ear, whereas otosociology finds these solutions within the social/cultural environment of the patient. Where otology emphasises the diseases of the ear, otosociology deals with social manifestations. Where otology deals with idiopathic diseases, otosociology deals with causes and pathogeny produced by interactions in the social and cultural surroundings of the patient. Where otology offers symptomatic treatment, otosociology offers treatment of causes and consequences. Otosociology can fill significant voids in audiovestibular processes from the perspective of the patient's social environment.
authors.affiliation: UGC Otorhinolaryngology, Virgen of Rocio University Hospital, C/Manuel Siurot, s/n 41.013 Sevilla, Spain.
authors.forename: Miguel A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Lopez-Gonzalez
authors.forename: Georgina
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Cherta
authors.forename: Jose A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Nieto
authors.forename: Francisco
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Esteban