title: Preference heterogeneity and selection in private health insurance: the case of Australia.
abstract: A basic prediction of theoretical models of insurance is that if consumers have private information about their risk of suffering a loss there will be a positive correlation between risk and the level of insurance coverage. We test this prediction in the context of the market for private health insurance in Australia. Despite a universal public system that provides comprehensive coverage for inpatient and outpatient care, roughly half of the adult population also carries private health insurance, the main benefit of which is more timely access to elective hospital treatment. Like several studies on different types of insurance in other countries, we find no support for the positive correlation hypothesis. Because strict underwriting regulations create strong information asymmetries, this result suggests the importance of multi-dimensional private information. Additional analyses suggest that the advantageous selection observed in this market is driven by the effect of risk aversion, the ability to make complex financial decisions and income.
authors.affiliation: University of Michigan, United States. Electronic address: tbuch@umich.edu.
authors.forename: Thomas C
authors.initials: TC
authors.lastname: Buchmueller
authors.forename: Denzil G
authors.initials: DG
authors.lastname: Fiebig
authors.forename: Glenn
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.forename: Elizabeth
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Savage
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D017677:Age Distribution; D000368:Aged; D001315:Australia; D002755:Choice Behavior; D005260:Female; D006296:Health Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006801:Humans; D019458:Insurance Coverage; D007348:Insurance, Health / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017149:Private Sector / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D017678:Sex Distribution; D013222:State Medicine
keywords: Asymmetric information; Australia; Community rating; Health insurance; Risk selection