title: Prospective clinical comparisons of semitendinosus versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The data available from the previously reported clinical studies remains insufficient concerning the hamstring graft preparation in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To test the hypothesis that there are no significant differences between the semitendinosus tendon alone and the semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft fashioning techniques concerning knee stability and clinical outcome after anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction.
  
  
  METHODS
  A prospective study was performed on 120 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction according to the graft fashioning technique. The authors developed the protocol to use hamstring tendon autografts. When the harvested doubled semitendinosus tendon is thicker than 6 mm, each half of the semitendinosus tendon is doubled and used for the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundle grafts (Group I). On the other hand, when the harvested semitendinosus tendon is under 6 mm in thickness, the gracilis tendon is harvested additionally. The distal half of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons are doubled and used for the AM bundle graft, and the remaining proximal half of the semitendinosus tendon is doubled and used for the PL bundle grafts (Group II). Sixty-one patients were included in Group I, and 59 patients in Group II. The two groups were compared concerning knee stability and clinical outcome 2 years after surgery.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The postoperative side-to-side anterior laxity averaged 1.3 mm in both groups, showing no statistical difference. There were also no significant differences between the two groups concerning the peak isokinetic torque of the quadriceps and the hamstrings, the Lysholm knee score, and the International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There were no significant differences between the two graft fashioning techniques after anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction concerning knee stability and postoperative outcome. The present study provided orthopedic surgeons with important information on double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons.
  
  
  METHODS
  Level II; prospective comparative study.
authors.affiliation: Department of Sports Medicine and Joint Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita-15, Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
authors.forename: Yusuke
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Inagaki
authors.forename: Eiji
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Kondo
authors.forename: Nobuto
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Kitamura
authors.forename: Jun
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Onodera
authors.forename: Tomonori
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Yagi
authors.forename: Yasuhito
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Tanaka
authors.forename: Kazunori
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Yasuda
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D059549:Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction / Q000379:methods*; D064592:Autografts; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013710:Tendons / Q000637:transplantation*