title: Processing of communication sounds: contributions of learning, memory, and experience.
abstract: Abundant evidence from both field and lab studies has established that conspecific vocalizations (CVs) are of critical ecological significance for a wide variety of species, including humans, non-human primates, rodents, and other mammals and birds. Correspondingly, a number of experiments have demonstrated behavioral processing advantages for CVs, such as in discrimination and memory tasks. Further, a wide range of experiments have described brain regions in many species that appear to be specialized for processing CVs. For example, several neural regions have been described in both mammals and birds wherein greater neural responses are elicited by CVs than by comparison stimuli such as heterospecific vocalizations, nonvocal complex sounds, and artificial stimuli. These observations raise the question of whether these regions reflect domain-specific neural mechanisms dedicated to processing CVs, or alternatively, if these regions reflect domain-general neural mechanisms for representing complex sounds of learned significance. Inasmuch as CVs can be viewed as complex combinations of basic spectrotemporal features, the plausibility of the latter position is supported by a large body of literature describing modulated cortical and subcortical representation of a variety of acoustic features that have been experimentally associated with stimuli of natural behavioral significance (such as food rewards). Herein, we review a relatively small body of existing literature describing the roles of experience, learning, and memory in the emergence of species-typical neural representations of CVs and auditory system plasticity. In both songbirds and mammals, manipulations of auditory experience as well as specific learning paradigms are shown to modulate neural responses evoked by CVs, either in terms of overall firing rate or temporal firing patterns. In some cases, CV-sensitive neural regions gradually acquire representation of non-CV stimuli with which subjects have training and experience. These results parallel literature in humans describing modulation of responses in face-sensitive neural regions through learning and experience. Thus, although many questions remain, the available evidence is consistent with the notion that CVs may acquire distinct neural representation through domain-general mechanisms for representing complex auditory objects that are of learned importance to the animal. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Communication Sounds and the Brain: New Directions and Perspectives".
authors.affiliation: University of Iowa, Dept. of Psychology, Div. Behavioral & Cognitive Neuroscience, E11 SSH, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA; University of Iowa, Neuroscience Program, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: amy-poremba@uiowa.edu.
authors.forename: Amy
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Poremba
authors.forename: James
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Bigelow
authors.forename: Breein
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Rossi
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000818:Animals; D001143:Arousal; D001288:Attention; D001306:Auditory Pathways / Q000502:physiology*; D001307:Auditory Perception; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007804:Language Development; D007858:Learning; D008568:Memory; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009473:Neuronal Plasticity; D046709:Pattern Recognition, Physiological; D013045:Species Specificity; D013067:Speech Perception; D014828:Vocalization, Animal; D014831:Voice