title: The approximate number system is not predictive for symbolic number processing in kindergarteners.
abstract: The relation between the approximate number system (ANS) and symbolic number processing skills remains unclear. Some theories assume that children acquire the numerical meaning of symbols by mapping them onto the preexisting ANS. Others suggest that in addition to the ANS, children also develop a separate, exact representational system for symbolic number processing. In the current study, we contribute to this debate by investigating whether the nonsymbolic number processing of kindergarteners is predictive for symbolic number processing. Results revealed no association between the accuracy of the kindergarteners on a nonsymbolic number comparison task and their performance on the symbolic comparison task six months later, suggesting that there are two distinct representational systems for the ANS and numerical symbols.
authors.affiliation: a Experimental Psychology , KU Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.
authors.forename: Delphine
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Sasanguie
authors.forename: Emmy
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Defever
authors.forename: Bieke
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Maertens
authors.forename: Bert
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Reynvoet
mesh_terms: D002675:Child, Preschool; D003071:Cognition; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D055641:Mathematical Concepts; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D013561:Symbolism