title: Responding to discriminatory requests for a different healthcare provider.
abstract: Patient requests for a healthcare provider of a particular race or sexual orientation create a conflict of obligations. On the one hand, providers have a duty to deliver clinically indicated care consistent with patient preferences. On the other hand, providers have legal, professional, and organizational assurances that they should not suffer workplace discrimination. Protecting healthcare providers from harm while maintaining obligations to patients requires unambiguous messaging to both parties. Providers need to be clear that their organization will not be complicit in discrimination against them, instead supporting their needs and preferences for management of the situation. In a context of patient-centered care, harm principle-based boundaries of respect for autonomy must be defined. A Caregiver preference guideline developed and used at University Health Network, Toronto provides a standardized way for the organization to decide when it will honor patient requests for providers of a particular background. This process stresses dialogue, assessment of clinical feasibility, and empowerment and support for affected care providers.
authors.affiliation: University Health Network, Canada; University of Toronto, Canada.
authors.forename: Kyle
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Anstey
authors.forename: Linda
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Wright
mesh_terms: D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000941:ethics*; D006282:Health Personnel; D006801:Humans; D057240:Patient Preference / Q000523:psychology*; D018802:Patient-Centered Care / Q000941:ethics*; D010361:Patients / Q000523:psychology*; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations / Q000941:ethics*
keywords: Accommodation; discriminatory requests diversity; ethics; guidelines; harm; racism