title: Prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in white and black patients undergoing screening colonoscopy in a safety-net hospital.
abstract: Chinese translation
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Black persons are more likely than white persons to be diagnosed with colorectal cancer and to die from it. The extent to which genetic or biological factors versus disparities in screening rates explain this variance remains controversial.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To define the prevalence and location of presymptomatic advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) among white and black persons undergoing screening colonoscopy, controlling for other epidemiologic risk factors.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cross-sectional survey between 22 March 2005 and 31 January 2012.
  
  
  METHODS
  Urban, open-access, academic, safety-net hospital in Massachusetts.
  
  
  METHODS
  Asymptomatic, average-risk white (n = 1172) and black (n = 1681) persons aged 50 to 79 years undergoing screening colonoscopy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Adjusted prevalence and location of ACN, defined as a tubular adenoma 10 mm or more in size, any adenoma with villous features or high-grade dysplasia, any dysplastic serrated lesion, or invasive cancer.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The prevalence of ACN was higher among white patients than black patients (6.8% vs. 5.0%; P = 0.039) but varied by sex (white vs. black men, 9.3% vs. 5.7%; white vs. black women, 3.5% vs. 4.3%; interaction P = 0.034). After controlling for many risk factors, black men were 41% less likely than white men (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.89]) to have ACN. No statistically significant difference was seen for women (AOR, 1.32 [CI, 0.73 to 2.40]). Black patients with ACN had a higher percentage of proximal disease (52% vs. 39%) after adjustment for age and sex (P = 0.055).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Single-institution study with inadequate statistical power for subgroup analyses and recall bias.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Black men are less likely than white men to have ACN at screening colonoscopy in a safety-net health care setting. Disparities in access to screening and differential exposure to modifiable risk factors rather than genetic or biological factors may be largely responsible for the higher incidence of CRC among black men. Genetic or biological factors may explain the predilection for proximal disease.
authors.affiliation: Boston University School of Medicine and Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA. paul.schroy@bmc.org
authors.forename: Paul C
authors.initials: PC
authors.lastname: Schroy
authors.forename: Alison
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Coe
authors.forename: Clara A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: O'Brien
authors.forename: Timothy C
authors.initials: TC
authors.lastname: Heeren
mesh_terms: D000046:Academic Medical Centers; D001741:Black or African American / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D000368:Aged; D003113:Colonoscopy; D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000208:ethnology / Q000473:pathology; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D006786:Hospitals, Urban; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008403:Mass Screening; D008404:Massachusetts / Q000453:epidemiology; D008875:Middle Aged; D015995:Prevalence; D012307:Risk Factors; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D044465:White People / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*