title: Mixed method approaches in open-ended, qualitative, exploratory research involving people with intellectual disabilities: a comparative methods study.
abstract: People with intellectual disabilities and their families are increasingly being asked to provide input into the services they receive. Under the aegis of the United Nation Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, support plans crucially depend on a participant's articulation of his or her preferences and life goals. Yet, research highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of different methodological approaches has not been published. This study compared the results of a suite of qualitative methods (questionnaire, focus group, semi-structured interview, "case in point" ethnographic observation, photographic images, and carer proxy response) by identifying the advantages and disadvantages of each method employed. It also foregrounds an effective mix of methods that is likely to produce an adequate representation of the views of people with disabilities within the context of open-ended exploratory questions.
authors.affiliation: Deakin University/Uniting Care Community Options, Australia.
authors.forename: Goetz
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Ottmann
authors.forename: Jenny
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Crosbie
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008607:Intellectual Disability / Q000523:psychology*; D008297:Male; D036301:Qualitative Research; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: inclusion; intellectual disability; mixed methods comparison; photovoice; stakeholder consultation