title: Invited review: piglet mortality: management solutions.
abstract: Preweaning mortality varies greatly among herds and this is partly attributed to differences in farrowing house management. In this review, we describe the various management strategies than can be adopted to decrease mortality and critically examine the evidence that exists to support their use. First, we consider which management procedures are effective against specific causes of death: intrapartum stillbirth, hypothermia, starvation, disease, crushing, and savaging. The most effective techniques include intervention to assist dystocic sows, measures to prevent and treat sow hypogalactia, good farrowing house hygiene, providing newborn piglets with a warm microenvironment, early fostering of supernumerary piglets, methods that assist small and weak piglets to breathe and obtain colostrum, and intervention to prevent deaths from crushing and savaging. The provision of nest-building material and modifications to the pen to assist the sow when lying down may also be beneficial, but the evidence is less clear. Because most deaths occur around the time of farrowing and during the first few days of life, the periparturient period is a particularly important time for management interventions intended to reduce piglet mortality. A number of procedures require a stockperson to be present during and immediately after farrowing. Second, we consider the benefits of farrowing supervision for preweaning mortality in general, focusing particularly on methods for the treatment of dystocia and programs of piglet care that combine multiple procedures. Third, we discuss the need for good stockmanship if farrowing supervision is to be effective. Stockmanship refers not only to technical skills but also to the manner in which sows are handled because this influences their fearfulness of humans. We conclude that piglet survival can be improved by a range of management procedures, many of which occur in the perinatal period and require the supervision of farrowing by trained staff. Although this incurs additional labor costs, there is some evidence that this can be economically offset by improved piglet survival.
authors.affiliation: University of Cambridge, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ES, UK. rdkirkden@cantab.net
authors.forename: R D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Kirkden
authors.forename: D M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Broom
authors.forename: I L
authors.initials: IL
authors.lastname: Andersen
mesh_terms: D000374:Aggression; D000822:Animal Husbandry / Q000379:methods*; D000818:Animals; D009043:Motor Activity; D013552:Swine / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D013553:Swine Diseases / Q000209:etiology / Q000401:mortality*