title: Small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a ten-point contemporary review.
abstract: The introduction of capsule endoscopy (CE) in clinical practice increased the interest for the study of the small-bowel. Consequently, in about 10 years, an impressive quantity of literature on indications, diagnostic yield (DY), safety profile and technical evolution of CE has been published as well as several reviews. At present time, there are 5 small-bowel capsule enteroscopy (SBCE) models in the worldwide market. Head-to-head trials have showed in the great majority of studies comparable results in terms of DY, image quality and completion rate. CE meta-analyses formed the basis of national/international guidelines; these guidelines place CE in a prime position for the diagnostic work-up of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, known and/or suspected Crohn's disease and possible small-bowel neoplasia. A 2-L polyethylene glycol-based purge, administered the day before the procedure, is the most widely practiced preparation regimen. Whether this regimen can be further improved (i.e., by further decreasing its volume, changing the timing of administration, coupling it with prokinetics and/or other factors) or if it can really affect the DY, is still under discussion. Faecal calprotectin has been used in SBCE studies in two settings: in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, to evaluate the type and extent of mucosal damage and, more importantly from a clinical point of view, in patients with known or suspected Crohn's disease for assessment of inflammation activity. Although there is still a lot of debate around the exact reasons of SBCE poor performance in various small-bowel segments, it is worth to remember that the capsule progress is non-steerable, hence more rapid in the proximal than in lower segments of the small-bowel. Capsule aspiration, a relatively unexpected complication, has been reported with increasing frequency. This is probably related with the increase in the mean age of patients undergoing CE. CE video review is a time-consuming procedure. Therefore, several attempts have been made to develop technical software features, in order to make CE video analysis easier and shorter (without jeopardizing its accuracy). Suspected Blood Indicator, QuickView and Fujinon Intelligent Chromo Endoscopy are some of the software tools that have been checked in various clinical studies to date.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Liver and Digestive Disorders, the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Scotland, United Kingdom. akoulaouzidis@hotmail.com
authors.forename: Anastasios
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Koulaouzidis
authors.forename: Emanuele
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Rondonotti
authors.forename: Alexandros
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Karargyris
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D053704:Capsule Endoscopy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D007410:Intestinal Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis*; D007421:Intestine, Small; D012984:Software
keywords: Calprotectin; Capsule endoscopy; Complication; Indications; Meta-analysis; Preparation; Reading software; Review