title: Why selective publication of statistically significant results can be effective.
abstract: Concerns exist within the medical and psychological sciences that many published research findings are not replicable. Guidelines accordingly recommend that the file drawer effect should be eliminated and that statistical significance should not be a criterion in the decision to submit and publish scientific results. By means of a simulation study, we show that selectively publishing effects that differ significantly from the cumulative meta-analytic effect evokes the Proteus phenomenon of poorly replicable and alternating findings. However, the simulation also shows that the selective publication approach yields a scientific record that is content rich as compared to publishing everything, in the sense that fewer publications are needed for obtaining an accurate meta-analytic estimation of the true effect. We conclude that, under the assumption of self-correcting science, the file drawer effect can be beneficial for the scientific collective.
authors.affiliation: Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands. j.c.f.dewinter@tudelft.nl
authors.forename: Joost
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: de Winter
authors.forename: Riender
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Happee
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D003198:Computer Simulation; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D006801:Humans; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D017712:Peer Review, Research; D017594:Publication Bias; D011643:Publishing; D015203:Reproducibility of Results