title: Water Quality Conditions Associated with Cattle Grazing and Recreation on National Forest Lands.
abstract: There is substantial concern that microbial and nutrient pollution by cattle on public lands degrades water quality, threatening human and ecological health. Given the importance of clean water on multiple-use landscapes, additional research is required to document and examine potential water quality issues across common resource use activities. During the 2011 grazing-recreation season, we conducted a cross sectional survey of water quality conditions associated with cattle grazing and/or recreation on 12 public lands grazing allotments in California. Our specific study objectives were to 1) quantify fecal indicator bacteria (FIB; fecal coliform and E. coli), total nitrogen, nitrate, ammonium, total phosphorus, and soluble-reactive phosphorus concentrations in surface waters; 2) compare results to a) water quality regulatory benchmarks, b) recommended maximum nutrient concentrations, and c) estimates of nutrient background concentrations; and 3) examine relationships between water quality, environmental conditions, cattle grazing, and recreation. Nutrient concentrations observed throughout the grazing-recreation season were at least one order of magnitude below levels of ecological concern, and were similar to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) estimates for background water quality conditions in the region. The relative percentage of FIB regulatory benchmark exceedances widely varied under individual regional and national water quality standards. Relative to USEPA's national E. coli FIB benchmarks-the most contemporary and relevant standards for this study-over 90% of the 743 samples collected were below recommended criteria values. FIB concentrations were significantly greater when stream flow was low or stagnant, water was turbid, and when cattle were actively observed at sampling. Recreation sites had the lowest mean FIB, total nitrogen, and soluble-reactive phosphorus concentrations, and there were no significant differences in FIB and nutrient concentrations between key grazing areas and non-concentrated use areas. Our results suggest cattle grazing, recreation, and provisioning of clean water can be compatible goals across these national forest lands.
authors.affiliation: Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
authors.forename: Leslie M
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Roche
authors.forename: Lea
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Kromschroeder
authors.forename: Edward R
authors.initials: ER
authors.lastname: Atwill
authors.forename: Randy A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Dahlgren
authors.forename: Kenneth W
authors.initials: KW
authors.lastname: Tate
mesh_terms: D000383:Agriculture; D000818:Animals; D002140:California; D002417:Cattle; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D004926:Escherichia coli; D005243:Feces / Q000737:chemistry / Q000382:microbiology; D065928:Forests; D060434:Herbivory; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D009566:Nitrates / Q000032:analysis; D009584:Nitrogen / Q000032:analysis; D010710:Phosphates / Q000032:analysis; D010758:Phosphorus / Q000032:analysis; D011998:Recreation; D045483:Rivers; D060753:Water Quality; D014887:Weather
chemical_list: D009566:Nitrates; D010710:Phosphates; D010758:Phosphorus; D009584:Nitrogen