title: Trends in the surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: an analysis of the national survey of ambulatory surgery database.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To ascertain trends in the surgical treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow within the United States.
  
  
  METHODS
  We analyzed the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery to study trends in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome from 1994 to 2006. The National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery provides a comprehensive overview of ambulatory surgical procedures performed in the United States. Patients identified in the database with surgically treated cubital tunnel syndrome were verified by members of our research staff and compiled into these 3 groups: decompression, transposition, and other. The data were then statistically analyzed for trends in treatment, utilization, and demographics.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 52,133 surgical procedures were recorded in the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery for the treatment of ulnar nerve compression in 2006. This represents an increase from 26,283 in 1994 and 35,406 in 1996. In the 11 years from 1996 to 2006, the total surgical procedures on the ulnar nerve increased by 47%. Transposition went from 49% of all cubital tunnel procedures in the 1990s to 38% in 2006. In 2006, women were much more likely to have a simple decompression (70%) than a transposition or other technique. Decompression had a mean surgical time of 48 minutes, and transposition had a mean surgical time of 59 minutes.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The percentage of transpositions used in the treatment of cubital syndrome has decreased to 37% in the last survey. Possible reasons include expanded indications or changing surgical preferences.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prognostic II.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic, Aesthetic, and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. asoltani@med.miami.edu
authors.forename: Ali M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Soltani
authors.forename: Matthew J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Best
authors.forename: Cameron S
authors.initials: CS
authors.lastname: Francis
authors.forename: Bassan J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Allan
authors.forename: Zubin J
authors.initials: ZJ
authors.lastname: Panthaki
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000556:Ambulatory Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends*; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D020430:Cubital Tunnel Syndrome / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000601:surgery*; D016208:Databases, Factual; D019299:Decompression, Surgical / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016067:Nerve Transfer / Q000379:methods; D019635:Neurosurgical Procedures / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends; D010147:Pain Measurement; D012044:Regression Analysis; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012737:Sex Factors; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014459:Ulnar Nerve / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D014481:United States; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Cubital tunnel syndrome; hand surgery; healthcare survey; peripheral nerve surgery; ulnar nerve compression