title: Evaluation of clinical usefulness of a medical monitor equipped with an organic electroluminescence panel in comparison with liquid crystal display monitors.
abstract: The medical liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor is a conventionally used imaging device for diagnosis and during endoscopic surgery. Recently, a medical organic electroluminescence panel, the organic light-emitting diode (OLED) monitor, was made available commercially. The advantages of the OLED monitor include good color reproducibility, high contrast, and high video responsiveness. In this nonclinical study, we compared the clinical usefulness and image quality of the OLED monitor and those of the LCD monitor using videos of gynecologic endoscopic surgeries. Monitors were set for blind evaluation. Five evaluators with varying experience in endoscopic surgery evaluated 21 surgery videos played simultaneously on an OLED monitor and two LCD monitors for 2 to 3 minutes twice. Evaluators judged 13 clinical usefulness indices and 11 image quality indices using a 5-point scale (1, very good; 5, very poor) for each video. The mean scores of clinical usefulness indices of the OLED monitor and the LCD monitors 1 and 2 were 2.2 to 2.7, 2.1 to 3.3, and 3.0 to 3.2, respectively. Of seven indices measured, five including motion response, the ability to differentiate organs, recognize lesions, and reproduce actual images, and the general impression of picture quality were statistically superior with use of the OLED monitor compared with the LCD monitor 1, and two including ability to distinguish blood vessels and the ureters were statistically superior with use of the LCD monitor 1 compared with the OLED monitor. The mean scores of image quality indices of the OLED monitor and the LCD monitors 1 and 2 were 1.8 to 3.2, 2.6 to 3.6, and 2.8 to 4.0, respectively. Each index of the OLED monitor was superior to or comparable with those of the LCD monitors. We conclude that the OLED monitor is superior to the LCD monitors insofar as several video presentation characteristics required in gynecologic endoscopic surgery. These findings suggest that the OLED monitor is expected to contribute detailed assessment of organs and the operative field.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Keio University. f-kata@a6.keio.jp
authors.forename: Fumio
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Kataoka
authors.forename: Hiroyuki
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Nomura
authors.forename: Yuya
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Nogami
authors.forename: Hirokazu
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Arima
authors.forename: Yoshiko
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Sawano
authors.forename: Kouji
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Banno
authors.forename: Takuma
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Fujii
authors.forename: Daisuke
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Aoki
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D050866:Liquid Crystals; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014584:User-Computer Interface; D014741:Video Recording / Q000295:instrumentation*
keywords: Liquid crystal display; Medical monitor; Organic light-emitted diode