title: The effect of newly trained verbal and nonverbal labels for the cues in probabilistic category learning.
abstract: Learning in a well-established paradigm of probabilistic category learning, the weather prediction task, has been assumed to be mediated by a variety of strategies reflecting explicit learning processes, such as hypothesis testing, when it is administered to young healthy participants. Higher categorization accuracy has been observed in the task when explicit processes are facilitated. We hypothesized that furnishing verbal labels for the cues would boost the formation, testing, and application of verbal rules, leading to higher categorization accuracy. We manipulated the availability of cue names by training separate groups of participants for three consecutive days to associate hard-to-name artificial auditory cues to pseudowords or to hard-to-name ideograms, or to associate stimulus intensity with colors; a fourth group remained unexposed to the cues. Verbal labels, cue individuation, and exposure to the stimulus set each had an additive effect on categorization performance in a subsequent 200-trial session of the weather prediction task using these auditory cues. This study suggests that cue nameability, when controlled for cue individuation and cue familiarity, has an effect on hypothesis-testing processes underlying category learning.
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy & History of Science, University of Athens, Ano Ilissia Campus, GR-157 71, Athens, Greece, f_fotis@phs.uoa.gr.
authors.forename: Fotis A
authors.initials: FA
authors.lastname: Fotiadis
authors.forename: Athanassios
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Protopapas
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003210:Concept Formation / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011337:Probability Learning; D055815:Young Adult