title: Avoiding type III, IV, and V errors through collaborative research.
abstract: Major types of empirical errors reviewed by a number of leading research textbooks include discussions of Type I and Type II errors. However, applied human service researchers can commit other types of errors that should be avoided. The potential benefits of the applied, collaborative research (in contrast to traditional participatory research) include an assurance that the study begins with the "right" questions that are important for community residents. Such research practice also helps generate useful research findings for decisions regarding redistribution of resources and resolving community issues. The aim of collaborative research is not merely to advance scientific understanding, but also to produce empirical findings that are usable for addressing priority needs and problems of distressed communities. A review of a case example (Garfield Community Assessment Study) illustrates the principles and practices of collaborative research.
authors.affiliation: School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. hzy@pitt.edu
authors.forename: Hide
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Yamatani
authors.forename: Aaron
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Mann
authors.forename: Marvin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Feit
mesh_terms: D055812:Community-Based Participatory Research / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006801:Humans; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D009937:Organizational Objectives; D010414:Pennsylvania; D011638:Public Housing; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012947:Social Work / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D014506:Urban Renewal / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration