title: Gene patents: a broken incentives system.
abstract: The proliferation of patents on human genes has raised important ethical questions centered on the conflict of patient rights and intellectual property rights. With the Supreme Court's June 2013 decision that altered the patent eligibility of genetic material, it is important to reexamine the ethical implications of gene patents as a concept. Such patents suggest an ownership of genetic material that may hinder access to healthcare and inhibit medical progress. The application of the current patent system to genetic material thus violates patients' rights without fulfilling the system's goal of promoting innovation, suggesting a need for a revised incentives infrastructure.
authors.affiliation: Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan-Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA, yuh2006@med.cornell.edu.
authors.forename: Yun-Han
authors.initials: YH
authors.lastname: Huang
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics; D005796:Genes; D005826:Genetics, Medical / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D009042:Motivation; D010067:Ownership / Q000941:ethics*; D010330:Patents as Topic / Q000941:ethics*; D028701:Patient Rights / Q000941:ethics