title: Second-person social neuroscience: connections to past and future theories, methods, and findings.
abstract: We argue that Schilbach et al. have neglected an important part of the social neuroscience literature involving participants in social interactions. We also clarify some part of the models the authors discussed superficially. We finally propose that social neuroscience should take into consideration the effect of being observed and the complexity of the task as potentially influencing factors.
authors.affiliation: Psychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. Nicolas.Vermeulen@uclouvain.be
authors.forename: Nicolas
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Vermeulen
authors.forename: Gordy
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Pleyers
authors.forename: Martial
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mermillod
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000209:etiology*; D004042:Dietary Fats, Unsaturated / Q000009:adverse effects*; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D059167:Mirror Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D012938:Social Perception; D056345:Theory of Mind / Q000502:physiology*
chemical_list: D004042:Dietary Fats, Unsaturated