title: Improving 3D structure prediction from chemical shift data.
abstract: We report advances in the calculation of protein structures from chemical shift nuclear magnetic resonance data alone. Our previously developed method, CS-Rosetta, assembles structures from a library of short protein fragments picked from a large library of protein structures using chemical shifts and sequence information. Here we demonstrate that combination of a new and improved fragment picker and the iterative sampling algorithm RASREC yield significant improvements in convergence and accuracy. Moreover, we introduce improved criteria for assessing the accuracy of the models produced by the method. The method was tested on 39 proteins in the 50-100 residue size range and yields reliable structures in 70 % of the cases. All structures that passed the reliability filter were accurate (<2 Å RMSD from the reference).
authors.affiliation: Computational Structural Biology, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science-Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Gijs
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: van der Schot
authors.forename: Zaiyong
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Vernon
authors.forename: Yang
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Shen
authors.forename: Wim F
authors.initials: WF
authors.lastname: Vranken
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Baker
authors.forename: Alexandre M J J
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Bonvin
authors.forename: Oliver F
authors.initials: OF
authors.lastname: Lange
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008958:Models, Molecular; D019906:Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular / Q000379:methods*; D011487:Protein Conformation; D011506:Proteins / Q000648:ultrastructure*
chemical_list: D011506:Proteins
references.citation: Science. 2010 Feb 19;327(5968):1014-8
references.pmid: 20133520
references.citation: J Biomol NMR. 2009 Feb;43(2):63-78
references.pmid: 19034676
references.citation: Proteins. 2012 Mar;80(3):884-95
references.pmid: 22423358
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2012 Mar 9;416(5):668-77
references.pmid: 22285518
references.citation: J Biomol NMR. 2009 Aug;44(4):213-23
references.pmid: 19548092
references.citation: Methods Enzymol. 2004;383:66-93
references.pmid: 15063647
references.citation: J Am Chem Soc. 2010 Jan 13;132(1):202-7
references.pmid: 20000319
references.citation: Structure. 2012 Feb 8;20(2):227-36
references.pmid: 22325772
references.citation: J Biomol NMR. 1995 Nov;6(3):277-93
references.pmid: 8520220
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jul 1;36(Web Server issue):W496-502
references.pmid: 18515350
references.citation: Cell. 2012 Apr 13;149(2):262-73
references.pmid: 22500796
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2009 Sep;6(9):625-6
references.pmid: 19718014
references.citation: J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Feb 16;127(6):1665-74
references.pmid: 15701001
references.citation: Biophys J. 2006 Jun 15;90(12):4558-73
references.pmid: 16565070
references.citation: J Biomol NMR. 2010 Sep;48(1):13-22
references.pmid: 20628786
references.citation: Protein Sci. 2009 Jan;18(1):229-39
references.pmid: 19177366
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 25;105(12):4685-90
references.pmid: 18326625
references.citation: Proteins. 2010 Aug 15;78(11):2482-9
references.pmid: 20602353
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 5;104(23):9615-20
references.pmid: 17535901
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 3;109(27):10873-8
references.pmid: 22733734
references.citation: BMC Struct Biol. 2009 Apr 02;9:20
references.pmid: 19341463