title: Predicting patient-reported stroke outcomes: a validation of the six simple variable prognostic model.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Case-mix represents the range of disease severity and baseline characteristics that may be the cause of variation in outcomes between individuals and populations. Adjustment for case-mix is therefore important to allow meaningful comparison of healthcare outcomes. The best available case-mix adjustment model for stroke (the Six Simple Variable [SSV] model) was developed to adjust the hard endpoints of independent survival, survival and alive and living at home. There is increasing interest in the measurement of patient-reported outcomes through self-completed questionnaires, though there are currently no robust adjustment models for any such outcome. We aimed to determine whether the SSV prognostic model derived to predict 6-month post-stroke independent survival has wider utility in case-mix adjustment of a patient-reported functional outcome measure, the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO), collected by post 6 months after stroke onset.
  
  
  METHODS
  We examined data from 176 patients admitted following an acute stroke and recruited into a prospective cohort study in three participating acute hospitals in Yorkshire, UK. Patients in receipt of palliative care or with transient ischaemic attack were excluded. Using the beta coefficients from the published SSV model to predict independent survival, individual probabilities of 'good' outcome as measured with the dichotomised SIPSO collected by post 6 months after stroke onset were calculated. The ability of the SSV case-mix adjustment model to discriminate patients with 'good' over 'poor' outcome was assessed through calculation of C statistics. Correct predictions were visualised with calibration plots.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The C statistics for the SSV model to predict the physical and social subscales of the SIPSO outcome measure were 0.73 (95% CI 0.65-0.79) and 0.66 (0.58-0.82), respectively. Inclusion of patients who died prior to follow-up and ascribing them a score of 0 improved the discrimination (0.76 [0.70-0.82] and 0.70 [0.64-0.76], respectively). Calibration plots demonstrated a tendency to over-optimistic predictions, although confidence limits were wide.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The SSV model predicts adequately the physical component of the SIPSO patient-reported outcome measure and may be useful to adjust this outcome for case-mix following stroke in survivors to follow-up. This could be of benefit in observational studies, stratified randomisation for trials, and in comparison of between-institution clinical trials. Further exploration of the generalizability of the model to adjust other patient-reported stroke outcomes may be warranted.
authors.affiliation: Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
authors.forename: Elizabeth
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Teale
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Young
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Dennis
authors.forename: Trevor
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Sheldon
keywords: Case-mix; Outcome assessment; Stroke
references.citation: BMC Neurol. 2010 Apr 26;10:26
references.pmid: 20420687
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;79(4):397-400
references.pmid: 17766429
references.citation: Stroke. 2003 Jan;34(1):127-33
references.pmid: 12511763
references.citation: Stat Med. 1996 Feb 28;15(4):361-87
references.pmid: 8668867
references.citation: Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Feb;17(1):31-6
references.pmid: 15668308
references.citation: BMJ. 1996 Jun 15;312(7045):1503-5
references.pmid: 8646140
references.citation: Clin Rehabil. 2003 May;17(3):283-9
references.pmid: 12735535
references.citation: Stroke. 2002 Apr;33(4):1041-7
references.pmid: 11935058
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;78(12):1390-1
references.pmid: 18024695
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;79(8):888-94
references.pmid: 18208861
references.citation: Clin Rehabil. 2000 Jun;14(3):288-99
references.pmid: 10868724
references.citation: Clin Rehabil. 2012 Sep;26(9):771-86
references.pmid: 22257504
references.citation: Stroke. 2001 Jun;32(6):1415-21
references.pmid: 11387507