title: What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it?
abstract: A latent variable study examined whether different classes of working-memory tasks measure the same general construct of working-memory capacity (WMC). Data from 270 subjects were used to examine the relationship between Binding, Updating, Recall-N-back, and Complex Span tasks, and the relations of WMC with secondary memory measures, indicators of cognitive control from two response-conflict paradigms (Simon task and Eriksen flanker task), and fluid intelligence. Confirmatory factor analyses support the concept of a general WMC factor. Results from structural-equation modeling show negligible relations of WMC with response-conflict resolution, and very strong relations of WMC with secondary memory and fluid intelligence. The findings support the hypothesis that individual differences in WMC reflect the ability to build, maintain and update arbitrary bindings.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Ulm Ulm, Germany.
authors.forename: Oliver
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Wilhelm
authors.forename: Andrea
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hildebrandt
authors.forename: Klaus
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Oberauer
keywords: binding; cognitive control; fluid intelligence; secondary memory; working memory capacity
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):308-24
references.pmid: 21299326
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2001 Dec;6(4):317-29
references.pmid: 11778675
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):189-217
references.pmid: 15149250
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Jun;130(2):169-83
references.pmid: 11409097
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100
references.pmid: 10945922
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May;137(2):201-225
references.pmid: 18473654
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Jun;8(2):331-5
references.pmid: 11495122
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2012 Jul;119(3):480-99
references.pmid: 22486726
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):170-89
references.pmid: 20053053
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Mar;133(1):101-135
references.pmid: 14979754
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2011 Sep;16(3):319-36
references.pmid: 21843002
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1996 Mar;125(1):4-27
references.pmid: 8851737
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 1989 Dec;4(4):500-3
references.pmid: 2619956
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2009 Nov;73(6):762-76
references.pmid: 19034502
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jul;35(4):1089-1096
references.pmid: 19586272
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2007 Jan;114(1):104-32
references.pmid: 17227183
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Mar;36(2):383-97
references.pmid: 20192537
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2007 Nov;133(6):1038-66
references.pmid: 17967093
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;131(1):61-5; author reply 72-5
references.pmid: 15631551
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):615-622
references.pmid: 17470009
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 May;134(1):16-28
references.pmid: 20022311
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Dec;28(6):1345-63
references.pmid: 12542132
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;131(1):66-71
references.pmid: 15631552
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2002 Dec;7(4):403-21
references.pmid: 12530701
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Oct;16(5):931-7
references.pmid: 19815801
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2010 May;42(2):571-85
references.pmid: 20479189
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 May;136(2):217-40
references.pmid: 17500647
references.citation: Front Aging Neurosci. 2010 Jul 13;2:
references.pmid: 20725526
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Aug;136(3):414-29
references.pmid: 17696691
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2005 Jun;10(2):178-92
references.pmid: 15998176
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):482-93
references.pmid: 17958159
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;131(1):30-60
references.pmid: 15631550
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):779-819
references.pmid: 22715024
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Mar;132(1):47-70
references.pmid: 12656297
references.citation: Memory. 2010 May;18(4):394-412
references.pmid: 20408039
references.citation: Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;21(1):8-14
references.pmid: 22773897
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):769-86
references.pmid: 16523997
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2008 Jun;78(2):240-5
references.pmid: 18308483
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2011 Apr;118(2):175-92
references.pmid: 21480738