title: Visual mismatch negativity in the dorsal stream is independent of concurrent visual task difficulty.
abstract: The manipulation of attention can produce mismatch negativity-like components that are not necessarily connected to the unintentional sensory registration of the violation of probability-based regularity. For clinical purposes, attentional bias should be quantified because it can vary substantially among subjects and can decrease the specificity of the examination. This experiment targets the role of attention in the generation of visual mismatch negativity (vMMN). The visual regularity was generated by a sequence of two radial motions while subjects focused on visual tasks in the central part of the display. Attentional load was systematically varied and had three levels, no-load, easy, and difficult. Rare, deviant, and frequent standard motions were presented with a 10/60 ratio in oddball sequences. Data from 12 subjects was recorded from 64 channels and processed. vMMN was identified within the interval of 142-198 ms. The mean amplitude was evaluated during the aforementioned interval in the parietal and fronto-central regions. A general linear model for repeated measures was applied to the mean amplitude with a three-factor design and showed a significant difference [F (1, 11) = 17.40, p = 0.002] between standard and deviant stimuli and between regions [F (1, 11) = 8.40, p = 0.01]; however, no significant effect of the task [F (2, 22) = 1.26, p = 0.30] was observed. The unintentional detection of irregularity during the processing of the visual motion was independent of the attentional load associated with handling the central visual task. The experiment did not demonstrate an effect of attentional load manipulation on mismatch negativity (MMN) induced by the motion-sequence, which supports the clinical utility of this examination. However, used stimulation paradigm should be further optimized to generate mismatch negativity that is stable enough to be usable not only for group comparisons but also for a single subject assessment.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
authors.forename: Jan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kremláček
authors.forename: Miroslav
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kuba
authors.forename: Zuzana
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Kubová
authors.forename: Jana
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Langrová
authors.forename: Jana
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Szanyi
authors.forename: František
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Vít
authors.forename: Michal
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Bednář
keywords: attention; dorsal stream; irrelevant stimulus processing; magnocellular pathway; visual mismatch negativity; visual motion
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Apr;19(7):1978-86
references.pmid: 15078572
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2001 May;24(5):283-8
references.pmid: 11311381
references.citation: Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2008;68(1):97-102
references.pmid: 18389020
references.citation: Vision Res. 2012 Jun 1;62:9-16
references.pmid: 22503557
references.citation: Schizophr Res. 2008 Jul;102(1-3):320-8
references.pmid: 18472402
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Mar;120(3):453-63
references.pmid: 19181570
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Mar;123(3):424-58
references.pmid: 22169062
references.citation: Science. 1997 Nov 28;278(5343):1616-9
references.pmid: 9374459
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2003 Jul;63(3):199-236
references.pmid: 12853168
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008 Oct;32(8):1409-15
references.pmid: 18514901
references.citation: Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:130714
references.pmid: 21687590
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references.pmid: 9176952
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 Feb 1;34(3):1245-52
references.pmid: 17161626
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Apr;48(5):1277-82
references.pmid: 20036268
references.citation: Vision Res. 2007 Jan;47(2):189-202
references.pmid: 17129593
references.citation: Doc Ophthalmol. 2004 Sep;109(2):169-75
references.pmid: 15881263
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Jun;110(6):1048-57
references.pmid: 10402092
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2008 Apr;46(5):1224-32
references.pmid: 18190933
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Apr 15;69(8):742-7
references.pmid: 21288505
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Nov 1;4(11):432-440
references.pmid: 11058821
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2013 Mar;50(3):240-52
references.pmid: 23316882
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):427-32
references.pmid: 12930472
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2007 Jul;44(4):610-9
references.pmid: 17521378
references.citation: J Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Apr;29(2):174-80
references.pmid: 22469684
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1978 Jul;42(4):313-29
references.pmid: 685709
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 1997 Mar 21;45(1-3):183-215
references.pmid: 9083650
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2008 Sep;45(5):731-41
references.pmid: 18665864
references.citation: Brain Res. 2006 Aug 9;1104(1):129-40
references.pmid: 16822480
references.citation: Science. 1988 May 6;240(4853):740-9
references.pmid: 3283936
references.citation: Vision Res. 2006 Feb;46(4):485-90
references.pmid: 16289272
references.citation: Vision Res. 1996 Jan;36(1):181-90
references.pmid: 8746252
references.citation: Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Feb;83(2):144-55
references.pmid: 22137965
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):339-54
references.pmid: 15355143
references.citation: Doc Ophthalmol. 2008 Nov;117(3):245-55
references.pmid: 18563464
references.citation: Vision Res. 1997 Jan;37(1):17-23
references.pmid: 9068828
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 May;13(3):393-405
references.pmid: 11919003
references.citation: Vision Res. 2011 Aug 15;51(16):1820-8
references.pmid: 21723311
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2006 Jun 26;17(9):887-90
references.pmid: 16738482
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1975 Apr;38(4):387-401
references.pmid: 46819