title: Connecting spatial memories of two nested spaces.
abstract: Four experiments investigated the manner in which people use spatial reference directions to organize spatial memories of 2 conceptually nested layouts. Participants learned directions of 8 remote cities centered to Beijing or Edmonton, where the experiments occurred, using a map or using direct pointing. The map and the environment were aligned, and participants faced north (0°). Participants also learned locations of 7 objects on a table. Participants faced north (0°) during learning but were instructed to learn the layout along the northwest-southeast (45°-225°) axis. Judgments of relative direction (imagine you are standing at X, facing Y, point to Z) were used to determine spatial reference directions in retrieval of bearings between 2 objects or 2 cities. The results showed that when the tested bearing and the imagined heading were within an array, participants used 0° as the reference direction in retrieving bearings between cities but used 45°-225° to retrieve bearings between objects. When the tested bearing and the imagined heading were across 2 arrays, participants used the reference direction of the array from which the tested bearing was. These results indicated that bearings between items within an array were represented only with respect to the reference directions of this array and the relationship between spatial reference directions in these 2 arrays was also represented.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
authors.forename: Hui
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Alberta.
authors.forename: Weimin
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Mou
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University.
authors.forename: Timothy P
authors.initials: TP
authors.lastname: McNamara
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Alberta.
authors.forename: Lin
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Wang
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D013037:Spatial Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D013334:Students; D014495:Universities
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jan;28(1):162-70
references.pmid: 11827078
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2011 Nov;39(8):1401-8
references.pmid: 21584854
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1981 Apr;13(2):149-206
references.pmid: 7226737
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1993 Apr;100(2):163-82
references.pmid: 8483980
references.citation: Cognition. 2010 Sep;116(3):409-20
references.pmid: 20591422
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1986 Jan;18(1):87-121
references.pmid: 3948491
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 Mar;15(2):211-27
references.pmid: 2522511
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):938-57
references.pmid: 20565211
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2001 Jul;12(4):343-7
references.pmid: 11476104
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 May;29(3):398-404
references.pmid: 12776750
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Oct;15(5):1015-21
references.pmid: 18926998
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):750-69
references.pmid: 17540353
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1985 May;13(3):208-17
references.pmid: 4046821
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jan;30(1):142-57
references.pmid: 14736303
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1978 Oct;10(4):422-37
references.pmid: 699514
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;23(2):120-5
references.pmid: 22207644
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):83-93
references.pmid: 19170472