title: Factors that introduce intrasubject variability into ear-canal absorbance measurements.
abstract: Wideband immittance measures can be useful in analyzing acoustic sound flow through the ear and also have diagnostic potential for the identification of conductive hearing loss as well as causes of conductive hearing loss. To interpret individual measurements, the variability in test–retest data must be described and quantified. Contributors to variability in ear-canal absorbance–based measurements are described in this article. These include assumptions related to methodologies and issues related to the probe fit within the ear and potential acoustic leaks. Evidence suggests that variations in ear-canal cross-sectional area or measurement location are small relative to variability within a population. Data are shown to suggest that the determination of the Thévenin equivalent of the ER-10C probe introduces minimal variability and is independent of the foam ear tip itself. It is suggested that acoustic leaks in the coupling of the ear tip to the ear canal lead to substantial variations and that this issue needs further work in terms of potential criteria to identify an acoustic leak. In addition, test–retest data from the literature are reviewed.
authors.affiliation: Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts 01063, USA. svoss@smith.edu
authors.forename: Susan E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Voss
authors.forename: Stefan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Stenfelt
authors.forename: Stephen T
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: Neely
authors.forename: John J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Rosowski
mesh_terms: D000158:Acoustic Impedance Tests / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D001298:Audiology / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000592:standards; D004424:Ear Canal; D006314:Hearing Loss, Conductive / Q000175:diagnosis*; D006801:Humans; D015588:Observer Variation; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2000 Oct;21(5):443-61
references.pmid: 11059703
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Oct;88(4):1773-8
references.pmid: 2262633
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Aug;112(2):600-20
references.pmid: 12186041
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Jan;95(1):372-84
references.pmid: 8120248
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2007 Sep;28(5):669-81
references.pmid: 17804981
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2008 Aug;29(4):651-65
references.pmid: 18600136
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Nov;94(5):2617-38
references.pmid: 8270739
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Dec;130(6):3873-81
references.pmid: 22225043
references.citation: J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Apr;19(4):309-24
references.pmid: 18795470
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):19-34
references.pmid: 21857517
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Sep;108(3 Pt 1):1147-61
references.pmid: 11008816
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2010 Oct;31(5):587-98
references.pmid: 20517155