title: Optimizing patient-centered care in breast reconstruction: the importance of preoperative information and patient-physician communication.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In breast reconstruction, achieving patient satisfaction is a central goal. While much is known about clinical variables that may influence satisfaction, little is known about how the process of care may affect patient perceptions of outcome. The aim of this study was to examine how preoperative information and interactions with the surgical and medical teams might influence patient satisfaction with the outcome.
  
  
  METHODS
  A multicenter, cross-sectional study design was used. The BREAST-Q (breast reconstruction module) was administered in a postal survey to a cohort of breast reconstruction patients in North America. The association between patient satisfaction with the process of care and satisfaction with the outcome of breast reconstruction was evaluated using linear regression. Multivariate regression models were constructed to control for confounders and to identify predictors of outcome.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The study sample (n=510; response rate, 66 percent) was characterized by a mean age of 54.3±9.3 years (range, 21.0 to 81.0 years) and a mean body mass index of 25.2±4.3 (range, 16.3 to 48.9). On multivariate analysis, satisfaction with information and satisfaction with the plastic surgeon predicted higher satisfaction with breasts (information, p<0.001; plastic surgeon, p=0.003; R(2)=0.29) and higher satisfaction with overall outcome (satisfaction with information, p<0.001; satisfaction with plastic surgeon, p<0.001; R(2)=0.31).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Patient-centered care is an important aspect of quality of care. Patients' levels of satisfaction with preoperative information and their interaction with their plastic surgeon significantly influence satisfaction with their breasts and overall outcome. Future research to develop methods to enhance information delivery and the surgeon-patient relationship may optimize outcomes in breast reconstruction patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  Risk, III.
authors.affiliation: Vancouver, British Columbia, and Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Plymouth, United Kingdom; and New York, N.Y. From the University of British Columbia; McMaster University; Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry; and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
authors.forename: Adelyn L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Ho
authors.forename: Anne F
authors.initials: AF
authors.lastname: Klassen
authors.forename: Stefan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Cano
authors.forename: Amie M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Scott
authors.forename: Andrea L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Pusic
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D001955:British Columbia; D003142:Communication; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D016014:Linear Models; D016462:Mammaplasty / Q000379:methods*; D008408:Mastectomy / Q000379:methods; D008875:Middle Aged; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D010353:Patient Education as Topic; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D018802:Patient-Centered Care / Q000379:methods*; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011300:Preoperative Care / Q000379:methods; D018570:Risk Assessment; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references.citation: Epstein RM, Street RL Jr. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9:100–103
references.citation: VanLare JM, Conway PH. Value-based purchasing: National programs to move from volume to value. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:292–295
references.citation: Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. The BREAST-Q: Further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:293–302
references.citation: Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Scott A, Klok J, Cano SJ. Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: A qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2009;9:11
references.citation: Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: The BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:345–353
references.citation: Cano SJ, Hobart JC. Watch out, watch out, the FDA are about. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:408–409
references.citation: Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:539–549
references.citation: Davis K, Schoenbaum SC, Audet AM. A 2020 vision of patient-centered primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:953–957
references.citation: Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ. 2001;323:908–911
references.citation: Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:796–804
references.citation: Kocher R, Emanuel EJ, DeParle NA. The Affordable Care Act and the future of clinical medicine: The opportunities and challenges. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:536–539
references.citation: Bamm EL, Rosenbaum P, Stratford P. Validation of the measure of processes of care for adults: A measure of client-centred care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010;22:302–309
references.citation: Solomon LS, Hays RD, Zaslavsky AM, Ding L, Cleary PD. Psychometric properties of a group-level Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) instrument. Med Care. 2005;43:53–60
references.citation: Mallinger JB, Griggs JJ, Shields CG. Patient-centered care and breast cancer survivors’ satisfaction with information. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:342–349
references.citation: Contant CM, van Wersch AM, Wiggers T, Wai RT, van Geel AN. Motivations, satisfaction, and information of immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;40:201–208
references.citation: Snell L, McCarthy C, Klassen A, et al. Clarifying the expectations of patients undergoing implant breast reconstruction: A qualitative study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1825–1830
references.citation: Levenstein JH, McCracken EC, McWhinney IR, Stewart MA, Brown JB. The patient-centred clinical method. 1. A model for the doctor-patient interaction in family medicine. Fam Pract. 1986;3:24–30
references.citation: Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: A conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1087–1110
references.citation: Thind A, Hoq L, Diamant A, Maly RC. Satisfaction with care among low-income women with breast cancer. J Womens Health (Larchmt.). 2010;19:77–86
references.citation: Colakoglu S, Khansa I, Curtis MS, et al. Impact of complications on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1428–1436
references.citation: Craft RO, Colakoglu S, Curtis MS, et al. Patient satisfaction in unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction [outcomes article]. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1417–1424
references.citation: Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, Kim M, Davis JA. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:769–776
references.citation: Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T, et al. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1585–1595
references.citation: Jhaveri JD, Rush SC, Kostroff K, et al. Clinical outcomes of postmastectomy radiation therapy after immediate breast reconstruction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:859–865
references.citation: Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, et al. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship Period. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1–8
references.citation: Macadam SA, Ho AL, Cook EF Jr, Lennox PA, Pusic AL. Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: Patient-reported outcomes among saline and silicone implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:761–771
references.citation: Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129–1136