title: Human gender differences in the perception of conspecific alarm chemosensory cues.
abstract: It has previously been established that, in threatening situations, animals use alarm pheromones to communicate danger. There is emerging evidence of analogous chemosensory "stress" cues in humans. For this study, we collected alarm and exercise sweat from "donors," extracted it, pooled it and presented it to 16 unrelated "detector" subjects undergoing fMRI. The fMRI protocol consisted of four stimulus runs, with each combination of stimulus condition and donor gender represented four times. Because olfactory stimuli do not follow the canonical hemodynamic response, we used a model-free approach. We performed minimal preprocessing and worked directly with block-average time series and step-function estimates. We found that, while male stress sweat produced a comparably strong emotional response in both detector genders, female stress sweat produced a markedly stronger arousal in female than in male detectors. Our statistical tests pinpointed this gender-specificity to the right amygdala (strongest in the superficial nuclei). When comparing the olfactory bulb responses to the corresponding stimuli, we found no significant differences between male and female detectors. These imaging results complement existing behavioral evidence, by identifying whether gender differences in response to alarm chemosignals are initiated at the perceptual versus emotional level. Since we found no significant differences in the olfactory bulb (primary processing site for chemosensory signals in mammals), we infer that the specificity in responding to female fear is likely based on processing meaning, rather than strength, of chemosensory cues from each gender.
authors.affiliation: Department of Mathematics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
authors.forename: Anca R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Radulescu
authors.forename: Lilianne R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Mujica-Parodi
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000679:Amygdala / Q000502:physiology; D003463:Cues; D004644:Emotions / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009830:Olfactory Bulb / Q000502:physiology; D012737:Sex Factors; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000503:physiopathology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Chem Senses. 2011 Jan;36(1):19-27
references.pmid: 20929974
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009 Jul 29;4(7):e6415
references.pmid: 19641623
references.citation: Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2002 Apr;23(2):79-84
references.pmid: 12011790
references.citation: Vitam Horm. 2010;83:215-39
references.pmid: 20831948
references.citation: Brain Res. 1999 Feb 13;818(2):480-7
references.pmid: 10082834
references.citation: Vitam Horm. 2010;83:137-49
references.pmid: 20831944
references.citation: Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2004 Nov;281(1):1201-11
references.pmid: 15470677
references.citation: Neuroscience. 1996 Mar;71(1):55-75
references.pmid: 8834392
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Nov;48(13):3901-8
references.pmid: 20875438
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Jul;33(7):1582-93
references.pmid: 21567663
references.citation: Chem Senses. 2004 Nov;29(9):797-805
references.pmid: 15574815
references.citation: Med Hypotheses. 2011 Dec;77(6):1062-7
references.pmid: 21944887
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Mar;50(1):72-80
references.pmid: 20025979
references.citation: Percept Mot Skills. 2000 Dec;91(3 Pt 1):771-81
references.pmid: 11153847
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 2006 Feb 28;87(2):383-7
references.pmid: 16337975
references.citation: Int J Psychophysiol. 2000 May;36(2):165-81
references.pmid: 10742571
references.citation: Chem Senses. 2006 Jun;31(5):415-23
references.pmid: 16527869
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb;20(2):177-83
references.pmid: 19170944
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Apr 15;94(8):4119-24
references.pmid: 9108115
references.citation: Brain Res. 2005 May 10;1043(1-2):145-54
references.pmid: 15862528
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2012 Mar 17;228(2):375-87
references.pmid: 22197679
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1987;69(1):7-18
references.pmid: 3325300
references.citation: PLoS One. 2007 Mar 21;2(3):e307
references.pmid: 17375193
references.citation: Chem Senses. 2006 Jan;31(1):69-77
references.pmid: 16322086
references.citation: Neuron. 2001 Aug 30;31(4):661-8
references.pmid: 11545724
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Oct 15;21(20):8278-85
references.pmid: 11588199
references.citation: Chemosens Percept. 2012 Mar;5(1):55-63
references.pmid: 22448299
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Sep 28;25(39):8903-7
references.pmid: 16192380
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2006 Feb 13;394(2):127-30
references.pmid: 16257486
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009 Jun 24;4(6):e5987
references.pmid: 19551135
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Dec 6;450(7171):899-902
references.pmid: 18064011
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Apr 23;5(4):e10342
references.pmid: 20428249
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2012;23(11):1417-24
references.pmid: 23019141
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2013 Jan 15;237:230-7
references.pmid: 23026375
references.citation: Vitam Horm. 2010;83:1-23
references.pmid: 20831940
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2004 Feb;45(2):122-7
references.pmid: 15019799
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2005 May 1;25(4):1325-35
references.pmid: 15850749