title: Speed-invariant encoding of looming object distance requires power law spike rate adaptation.
abstract: Neural representations of a moving object's distance and approach speed are essential for determining appropriate orienting responses, such as those observed in the localization behaviors of the weakly electric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus. We demonstrate that a power law form of spike rate adaptation transforms an electroreceptor afferent's response to "looming" object motion, effectively parsing information about distance and approach speed into distinct measures of the firing rate. Neurons with dynamics characterized by fixed time scales are shown to confound estimates of object distance and speed. Conversely, power law adaptation modifies an electroreceptor afferent's response according to the time scales present in the stimulus, generating a rate code for looming object distance that is invariant to speed and acceleration. Consequently, estimates of both object distance and approach speed can be uniquely determined from an electroreceptor afferent's firing rate, a multiplexed neural code operating over the extended time scales associated with behaviorally relevant stimuli.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1H 8M5. stephen.elisha.clarke@gmail.com
authors.forename: Stephen E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Clarke
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Naud
authors.forename: André
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Longtin
authors.forename: Leonard
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Maler
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002531:Cerebellum / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D004553:Electric Conductivity; D023702:Gymnotiformes / Q000502:physiology*; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D009474:Neurons / Q000378:metabolism*; D013997:Time Factors
keywords: neural coding; perceptual invariance; sensory transformations; spike frequency adaptation
references.citation: Neuron. 2002 Apr 25;34(3):437-46
references.pmid: 11988174
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Aug 14;85(7):1576-9
references.pmid: 10970558
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2001 Feb;204(Pt 3):543-57
references.pmid: 11171305
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005 Aug;72(2 Pt 1):021911
references.pmid: 16196608
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 1998 Aug;1(4):296-303
references.pmid: 10195163
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2010 Nov;104(5):2487-99
references.pmid: 20810689
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011 Oct;21(5):752-60
references.pmid: 21683574
references.citation: Ann Biomed Eng. 2008 Jan;36(1):153-61
references.pmid: 17952602
references.citation: Physiol Rev. 2004 Apr;84(2):541-77
references.pmid: 15044682
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 1989 Sep;146:39-62
references.pmid: 2689569
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2013 Feb;16(2):154-6
references.pmid: 23313908
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2006 May;95(5):2933-46
references.pmid: 16495358
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2004 Nov 17;24(46):10440-53
references.pmid: 15548659
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 2009 Jun;100(6):505-20
references.pmid: 19381681
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1985 Oct;54(4):782-806
references.pmid: 2999347
references.citation: Neural Comput. 2010 Mar;22(3):621-59
references.pmid: 19922294
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2005 Apr;191(4):331-45
references.pmid: 15800793
references.citation: Neuron. 2000 Jun;26(3):695-702
references.pmid: 10896164
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 2009 Oct 10;516(5):376-93
references.pmid: 19655387
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2002 Jun 1;22(11):4577-90
references.pmid: 12040065
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2007 May;97(5):3155-64
references.pmid: 17344377
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Mar 2;25(9):2312-21
references.pmid: 15745957
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1999 Feb 1;19(3):1122-41
references.pmid: 9920674
references.citation: Neuron. 2009 Mar 12;61(5):750-61
references.pmid: 19285471
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov;96(5):2724-38
references.pmid: 16914609
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 7;30(14):5071-7
references.pmid: 20371827
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2009 Mar;12(3):318-26
references.pmid: 19198607
references.citation: Neuron. 2002 Dec 5;36(5):909-19
references.pmid: 12467594
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Jul 15;21(14):5328-43
references.pmid: 11438609
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 4;30(31):10380-90
references.pmid: 20685981
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2002 Mar;87(3):1363-8
references.pmid: 11877510
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2010 Mar;33(3):111-20
references.pmid: 20045201
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Aug;96(2):826-33
references.pmid: 16641386
references.citation: Neural Comput. 2003 Nov;15(11):2523-64
references.pmid: 14577853
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 1971 Feb;57(2):125-63
references.pmid: 5543415
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;97(4):2917-29
references.pmid: 17287436
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 13;108 Suppl 3:15588-95
references.pmid: 21383192
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Mar;85(5):1503-7
references.pmid: 2449693
references.citation: Prog Brain Res. 2001;134:171-91
references.pmid: 11702543
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1998 Mar 1;18(5):1893-903
references.pmid: 9465014
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Nov;11(11):1335-42
references.pmid: 18931665
references.citation: Science. 1994 Feb 11;263(5148):823-6
references.pmid: 17770837
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Feb;93(2):1035-41
references.pmid: 15356185
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1996 Sep;76(3):2020-32
references.pmid: 8890311
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 26;103(39):14596-601
references.pmid: 16983081
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jun;89(6):3279-93
references.pmid: 12649312