title: Why do some patients prefer to leave decisions up to the doctor: lack of self-efficacy or a matter of trust?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Decision-making preferences among cancer survivors during their follow-up care remains understudied and limited research examines factors that underlie these preferences. The purpose of this study was to assess cancer patients' decision-making preferences during follow-up care, the role of trust and self-efficacy, and the effect of preferences on health outcomes.
  
  
  METHODS
  Six hundred twenty-three bladder, leukemia, and colorectal cancer survivors were recruited to the Assessment of Patient Experiences of Cancer Care study between April 2003 and November 2004. Respondents were asked about their follow-up care experiences, including decision-making preferences, trust in physicians, self-efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and health appraisal. Unadjusted mean scores of trust and self-efficacy measures by decision preference group were examined. Multinomial logistic and linear regressions were conducted to examine predictors of decision-making preferences and the impact of decision-making preferences on HRQOL and health appraisal.
  
  
  RESULTS
  While the majority of patients preferred shared decision-making (61.0 %), 16.1 % preferred to control their decisions and 22.1 % preferred physician control over decisions. Compared to the other groups, patients preferring physician control had greater trust in their physician (p < 0.001), similar self-efficacy for engaging in the decision-making process, and lower self-efficacy for taking responsibility over decisions (p < 0.001). There were no notable differences between decision-making groups on outcome measures.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Patients who prefer physicians to control decisions are as confident about participating in the decision-making process and experience similar health outcomes as those preferring greater decisional control. Physicians need to tailor their communication behavior to encourage participation and trust among all patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Findings from this study provide unique insights into the decision-making preferences of cancer patients during receipt of follow-up care, which remains an understudied phase of cancer care delivery. Results underscore the need for approaches to decision-making and patient engagement to become more nuanced and to encourage patients to participate in decision-making in ways they are most comfortable. Furthermore, physicians and health care professionals should foster environments that promote trust and clear communication regardless of patient decision-making styles.
authors.affiliation: Outcomes Research Branch, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, 3E450, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA, neetu.chawla@nih.gov.
authors.forename: Neetu
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Chawla
authors.forename: Neeraj K
authors.initials: NK
authors.lastname: Arora
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D010358:Patient Participation / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D057240:Patient Preference / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010819:Physician's Role / Q000523:psychology; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D020377:Self Efficacy; D035502:Trust / Q000523:psychology
references.citation: Can J Nurs Res. 1997 Fall;29(3):21-43
references.pmid: 9505581
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Dec;77(3):319-21
references.pmid: 19948297
references.citation: Health Expect. 2004 Jun;7(2):104-14
references.pmid: 15117385
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Dec;77(3):404-12
references.pmid: 19892508
references.citation: J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 1;29(10):1280-9
references.pmid: 21357781
references.citation: Am J Manag Care. 2010 Sep;16(9):688-96
references.pmid: 20873956
references.citation: Ann Behav Med. 2010 Feb;39(1):91-7
references.pmid: 20333563
references.citation: Public Health Rep. 2007 Mar-Apr;122(2):217-23
references.pmid: 17357364
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):262-7
references.pmid: 17000073
references.citation: J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct 1;28(28):4364-70
references.pmid: 20713872
references.citation: J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 20;25(33):5275-80
references.pmid: 18024875
references.citation: Br J Cancer. 2004 Mar 22;90(6):1144-50
references.pmid: 15026793
references.citation: Psychol Rep. 1990 Dec;67(3 Pt 2):1091-100
references.pmid: 2084735
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jun;21(6):618-22
references.pmid: 16808746
references.citation: Health Expect. 2004 Dec;7(4):317-26
references.pmid: 15544684
references.citation: Psychooncology. 2008 Mar;17(3):244-51
references.pmid: 17534881
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jan;86(1):9-18
references.pmid: 21474265
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Mar;60(3):301-12
references.pmid: 16051459
references.citation: Cancer. 2008 Jun 1;112(11 Suppl):2577-92
references.pmid: 18428205
references.citation: J Health Commun. 2010 Oct;15(7):754-68
references.pmid: 21104504
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Jul;59(564):e248-59
references.pmid: 19566991
references.citation: Qual Life Res. 2009 Feb;18(1):1-4
references.pmid: 19005778
references.citation: Health Expect. 2013 Dec;16(4):373-84
references.pmid: 21923813
references.citation: J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 1;21(5):932-6
references.pmid: 12610196
references.citation: Med Care. 1999 May;37(5):510-7
references.pmid: 10335753
references.citation: Med Care. 2000 Mar;38(3):335-41
references.pmid: 10718358
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):780-1
references.pmid: 22375967
references.citation: JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1583-4
references.pmid: 22511682
references.citation: Cancer. 2008 Feb 15;112(4):934-42
references.pmid: 18181099
references.citation: Med Care. 2005 Sep;43(9):865-72
references.pmid: 16116351
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Aug;23(4):124-32
references.pmid: 15318572