title: Emotional expression in music: contribution, linearity, and additivity of primary musical cues.
abstract: The aim of this study is to manipulate musical cues systematically to determine the aspects of music that contribute to emotional expression, and whether these cues operate in additive or interactive fashion, and whether the cue levels can be characterized as linear or non-linear. An optimized factorial design was used with six primary musical cues (mode, tempo, dynamics, articulation, timbre, and register) across four different music examples. Listeners rated 200 musical examples according to four perceived emotional characters (happy, sad, peaceful, and scary). The results exhibited robust effects for all cues and the ranked importance of these was established by multiple regression. The most important cue was mode followed by tempo, register, dynamics, articulation, and timbre, although the ranking varied across the emotions. The second main result suggested that most cue levels contributed to the emotions in a linear fashion, explaining 77-89% of variance in ratings. Quadratic encoding of cues did lead to minor but significant increases of the models (0-8%). Finally, the interactions between the cues were non-existent suggesting that the cues operate mostly in an additive fashion, corroborating recent findings on emotional expression in music (Juslin and Lindström, 2010).
authors.affiliation: Department of Music, University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä, Finland.
authors.forename: Tuomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Eerola
authors.forename: Anders
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Friberg
authors.forename: Roberto
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Bresin
keywords: discrete emotion ratings; emotion; factorial design; music cues
references.citation: Emotion. 2010 Jun;10(3):335-48
references.pmid: 20515223
references.citation: Cognition. 2001 Jul;80(3):B1-10
references.pmid: 11274986
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Feb;93(2):1097-108
references.pmid: 8445120
references.citation: Scand J Psychol. 1972;13(4):241-57
references.pmid: 4645509
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Dec;26(6):1797-813
references.pmid: 11129375
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e31942
references.pmid: 22431970
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2008 Oct;31(5):559-75; discussion 575-621
references.pmid: 18826699
references.citation: Cogn Emot. 2009 Feb 1;23(2):209-237
references.pmid: 19809584
references.citation: Cognition. 1998 Aug;68(2):111-41
references.pmid: 9818509
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2009 Sep;14(3):202-24
references.pmid: 19719358
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1986 Mar;99(2):143-65
references.pmid: 3515381
references.citation: Cortex. 2011 Oct;47(9):1068-81
references.pmid: 21696717
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2003 Sep;129(5):770-814
references.pmid: 12956543
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Sep;110(3 Pt 1):1581-97
references.pmid: 11572368