title: Contrasting Chronic Fatigue Syndrome versus Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Much debate is transpiring regarding whether chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) are different illnesses. Several prior studies that compared the Fukuda et al. CFS criteria to the Canadian ME/CFS criteria found that the Canadian criteria identified patients with more functional impairments and greater physical, mental, and cognitive problems than those who met Fukuda et al. criteria.[3,4] These samples were located in the Chicago metropolitan area, so the results could not be generalized to other locations. In addition, past studies used a symptom questionnaire that was not specifically developed to tap the Canadian criteria.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The present comparative study of CFS and ME/CFS criteria was intended to correct the methodological problems of prior studies.
  
  
  METHODS
  This article used data from three distinct samples to compare patients who met criteria for the ME/CFS Canadian clinical case definition [1] to those who met the Fukuda et al. CFS case definition.[2].
  
  
  RESULTS
  Findings indicated that fewer individuals met the Canadian criteria than the Fukuda et al. criteria. Those who met the Canadian criteria evidenced more severe symptoms and physical functioning impairment.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Future research should continue to compare existing case definitions and determine which criteria best select for this illness.
authors.affiliation: DePaul University.
authors.forename: Leonard A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Jason
authors.forename: Abigail
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Brown
authors.forename: Meredyth
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Evans
authors.forename: Madison
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sunnquist
authors.forename: Julia L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Newton
keywords: Canadian clinical criteria; Fukuda criteria; chronic fatigue syndrome; myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome
references.citation: J Clin Psychol. 2012 Jan;68(1):41-9
references.pmid: 21823124
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;85(2):214-9
references.pmid: 23160704
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2002 Feb;59(1):15-27
references.pmid: 11790441
references.citation: Med Care. 1994 Jan;32(1):40-66
references.pmid: 8277801
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26358
references.pmid: 22039471
references.citation: Am J Med. 1959 Apr;26(4):569-95
references.pmid: 13637100
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1988 Mar;108(3):387-9
references.pmid: 2829679
references.citation: J Psychosom Res. 2000 Jan;48(1):59-68
references.pmid: 10750631
references.citation: J Intern Med. 2011 Oct;270(4):327-38
references.pmid: 21777306
references.citation: BMC Res Notes. 2011 May 09;4:139
references.pmid: 21554673
references.citation: J R Soc Med. 1991 Feb;84(2):118-21
references.pmid: 1999813
references.citation: Psychiatry Res. 2012 Dec 30;200(2-3):754-60
references.pmid: 22521895
references.citation: Eval Health Prof. 2012 Sep;35(3):280-304
references.pmid: 22158691
references.citation: Int J Psychiatry Med. 2002;32(2):109-24
references.pmid: 12269593
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1994 Dec 15;121(12):953-9
references.pmid: 7978722
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec 31;3(1):25
references.pmid: 14702202
references.citation: Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
references.pmid: 1593914
references.citation: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2002 Apr;37(4):183-9
references.pmid: 12027245
references.citation: BMC Med. 2005 Dec 15;3:19
references.pmid: 16356178