title: Host plant selection by larvae of the muga silk moth, Antheraea assamensis, and the role of the antenna and maxillary palp.
abstract: The importance of olfactory senses in food preference in fifth instar larvae of Antheraea assamensis Helfer (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) was examined by subjecting larvae with only antennae or maxillary palpi after microsurgery to food and odor choice tests. Mean percent consumption, total consumption, and choice indices were used as parameters for drawing conclusions. The foods used were two hosts, two non-hosts, and a neutral medium (water). Both antennae and maxillary palpi were fully competent in preference for host plants, Persea bombycina Kostermans (Laurales: Lauraceae) and Litsea polyantha Juss, over the non-hosts, Litsea grandifolia Teschner and Ziziphus jujuba Miller (Rosales: Rhamnaceae). Both were competent in rejecting the non-hosts, L. grandifolia and Z. jujuba. The odor choice test was carried out using a Y-tube olfactometer and showed similar results to the ingestive tests. The results indicate the necessity of functional integration of a combination of olfactory and gustatory sensilla present in different peripheral organs in food acceptance by A. assamensis larvae.
authors.affiliation: Department of Life Sciences, Dibrugarh University, Dibrugarh-786004, Assam, India. dipsikhabora03@yahoo.com
authors.forename: D S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Bora
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Deka
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Sen
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D057506:Arthropod Antennae / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D005518:Food Preferences; D060434:Herbivory; D007814:Larva / Q000502:physiology; D032862:Litsea; D009036:Moths / Q000502:physiology*; D009812:Odorants; D027421:Persea; D031957:Ziziphus
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 17;106(46):19219-26
references.pmid: 19907000
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 May 9;92(10):4169-74
references.pmid: 7753779
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2010 May;36(5):467-78
references.pmid: 20401755
references.citation: Science. 1998 Feb 20;279(5354):1201-2
references.pmid: 9469809
references.citation: Annu Rev Entomol. 2003;48:455-84
references.pmid: 12414737
references.citation: Nature. 2001 May 10;411(6834):186-9
references.pmid: 11346793
references.citation: Microsc Res Tech. 1999 Dec 15;47(6):401-15
references.pmid: 10607380
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 May 14;3(5):e2191
references.pmid: 18478104
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2000 Apr;203(Pt 8):1299-315
references.pmid: 10729279
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2003 Nov;206(Pt 22):3979-90
references.pmid: 14555738
references.citation: J Insect Physiol. 1973 May;19(5):1019-34
references.pmid: 4774528
references.citation: Chem Senses. 2007 Nov;32(9):863-79
references.pmid: 17768225
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Aug 31;25(35):8017-26
references.pmid: 16135759
references.citation: J Plant Growth Regul. 2000 Jun;19(2):195-216
references.pmid: 11038228
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1992 Jun;18(6):885-95
references.pmid: 24254092
references.citation: J Insect Sci. 2011;11:133
references.pmid: 22243364
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 2000 Nov;186(11):1011-8
references.pmid: 11195277
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2004 Aug;30(8):1547-64
references.pmid: 15537158
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 1982 Apr;79(4):549-69
references.pmid: 7069398