title: Current Laser Resurfacing Technologies: A Review that Delves Beneath the Surface.
abstract: Numerous laser platforms exist that rejuvenate the skin by resurfacing its upper layers. In varying degrees, these lasers improve the appearance of lentigines and rhytides, eliminate photoaging, soften scarring due to acne and other causes, and treat dyspigmentation. Five major classes of dermatologic lasers are currently in common use: ablative and nonablative lasers in both fractionated and unfractionated forms as well as radiofrequency technologies. The gentler nonablative lasers allow for quicker healing, whereas harsher ablative lasers tend to be more effective. Fractionating either laser distributes the effect, increasing the number of treatments but minimizing downtime and complications. In this review article, the authors seek to inform surgeons about the current laser platforms available, clarify the differences between them, and thereby facilitate the identification of the most appropriate laser for their practice.
authors.affiliation: Department of Dermatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
authors.forename: Jason
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Preissig
authors.forename: Kristy
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Hamilton
authors.forename: Ramsey
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Markus
keywords: ablation; fractional; laser; photorejuvenation; resurfacing; skin
references.citation: J Drugs Dermatol. 2006 Sep;5(8):731-8
references.pmid: 16989187
references.citation: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 May;58(5):719-37; quiz 738-40
references.pmid: 18423256
references.citation: Photomed Laser Surg. 2012 Feb;30(2):107-11
references.pmid: 22133153
references.citation: J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2009 Jun;11(2):78-84
references.pmid: 19408182
references.citation: Dermatol Surg. 2012 Feb;38(2):199-206
references.pmid: 22093448
references.citation: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jan;109(1):308-16; discussion 317-8
references.pmid: 11786830
references.citation: Lasers Surg Med. 2000;26(2):208-14
references.pmid: 10685094
references.citation: Dermatol Surg. 2011 Mar;37(3):342-8
references.pmid: 21342312
references.citation: Arch Dermatol. 1999 Apr;135(4):444-54
references.pmid: 10206052
references.citation: Dermatol Surg. 2007 Mar;33(3):295-9
references.pmid: 17338686
references.citation: Skin Therapy Lett. 2006 Nov;11(9):7-11
references.pmid: 17075654
references.citation: J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2005 Mar;7(1):11-5
references.pmid: 16020210
references.citation: Lasers Surg Med. 2002;31(2):106-14
references.pmid: 12210594
references.citation: Dermatol Surg. 2006 Mar;32(3):346-52
references.pmid: 16640677
references.citation: Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008 Jul-Aug;10(4):238-43; discussion 244-5
references.pmid: 18645090
references.citation: Skin Res Technol. 2011 Nov;17(4):505-9
references.pmid: 21707764
references.citation: Dermatol Surg. 2005 Aug;31(8 Pt 1):903-9
references.pmid: 16042934
references.citation: J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999 Mar;40(3):401-11
references.pmid: 10071310
references.citation: Br J Dermatol. 2011 Dec;165(6):1256-62
references.pmid: 21910712
references.citation: Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(2):98-103
references.pmid: 15004819
references.citation: Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2008 Dec;27(4):252-8
references.pmid: 19150296
references.citation: Curr Probl Dermatol. 2011;42:48-55
references.pmid: 21865798
references.citation: J Drugs Dermatol. 2006 Sep;5(8):740-4
references.pmid: 16989188
references.citation: Dermatol Surg. 2007 Jan;33(1):23-8
references.pmid: 17214675
references.citation: Dermatol Surg. 2001 Aug;27(8):709-15
references.pmid: 11493293
references.citation: Clin Dermatol. 2007 Sep-Oct;25(5):474-9
references.pmid: 17870525
references.citation: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Mar;56(3):432-8
references.pmid: 17239987
references.citation: Dermatol Surg. 2004 Feb;30(2 Pt 1):147-51
references.pmid: 14756641
references.citation: Lasers Surg Med. 2010 Feb;42(2):160-7
references.pmid: 20166156
references.citation: Dermatol Surg. 2004 Oct;30(10):1287-91
references.pmid: 15458524
references.citation: J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2011 Jun;13(3):98-106
references.pmid: 21609211
references.citation: Curr Probl Dermatol. 2011;42:40-47
references.pmid: 21865797
references.citation: Dermatol Surg. 2004 Mar;30(3):382-4
references.pmid: 15008865
references.citation: G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2009 Jun;144(3):229-41
references.pmid: 19528905
references.citation: Dermatol Surg. 1996 Feb;22(2):151-4; discussion 154-5
references.pmid: 8608377
references.citation: Lasers Surg Med. 2008 Sep;40(7):454-60
references.pmid: 18727019
references.citation: Dermatol Surg. 2004 Feb;30(2 Pt 1):152-7
references.pmid: 14756642
references.citation: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Jul;55(1):80-7
references.pmid: 16781297
references.citation: Dermatol Surg. 2003 Feb;29(2):124-8
references.pmid: 12562339
references.citation: Dermatol Surg. 2000 Feb;26(2):102-4
references.pmid: 10691935
references.citation: Dermatol Surg. 1999 Mar;25(3):160-3
references.pmid: 10193959
references.citation: Dermatol Surg. 1999 Mar;25(3):153-8; discussion 159
references.pmid: 10193958
references.citation: Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2009 Feb;25(1):3-7
references.pmid: 19152509
references.citation: Aesthet Surg J. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(6):675-8; discussion 679-80
references.pmid: 19083597
references.citation: Lasers Surg Med. 2009 Mar;41(3):179-84
references.pmid: 19291745