title: A dissonant scale: stress recognition in the SAQ.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Our previous analyses using the Stress Recognition subscale of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) resulted in significant effect estimates with equally opposing explanations. We suspected construct validity issues and investigated such using our own data and correlation matrices of previous published studies.
  
  
  METHODS
  The correlation matrices for each of the SAQ subscales from two previous studies by Speroff and Taylor were replicated and compared. The SAS Proc Factor procedure and the PRIORS = SMC option were used to perform Common Factor Analysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The correlation matrices of both studies were very similar. Teamwork, Safety Climate, Job Satisfaction, Perceptions of Management and Working Conditions were well-correlated. The correlations ranged from 0.53 to 0.76. For Stress Recognition correlations ranged from -0.15 to 0.03. Common Factor Analysis confirmed the isolation of Stress Recognition. CFA returned a strong one-factor model that explained virtually all of the communal variance. Stress Recognition loaded poorly on this factor in both instances, and the CFA indicated that 96.4-100.0% of the variance associated with Stress Recognition was unique to that subscale, and not shared with the other 5 subscales.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We conclude that the Stress Recognition subscale does not fit into the overall safety climate construct the SAQ intended to reflect. We recommend that this domain be omitted from overall safety climate scale score calculations, and clearly identified as an important yet distinct organizational construct. We suggest that this subscale be investigated for its true meaning, characterized as such, and findings conveyed to SAQ end users. We make no argument against Stress Recognition as an important organizational metric, rather we suggest that as a stand-alone construct its current packaging within the SAQ may be misleading for those intent on intervention development and evaluation in healthcare settings if they interpret Stress Recognition results as emblematic of safety climate.
authors.affiliation: Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA. jat65@drexel.edu
authors.forename: Jennifer A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Taylor
authors.forename: Ravi
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Pandian
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D006126:Group Processes; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006282:Health Personnel / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D007588:Job Satisfaction; D016272:Occupational Health; D010465:Perception; D011594:Psychometrics; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D017751:Safety Management / Q000379:methods*; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D017132:Workplace / Q000523:psychology
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;204(3):216.e1-6
references.pmid: 21376160
references.citation: Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):547-54
references.pmid: 21127113
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr 03;6:44
references.pmid: 16584553
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Mar;49(3):327-37
references.pmid: 22035966
references.citation: Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Aug;20(4):254-63
references.pmid: 18460499
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Mar 31;10:85
references.pmid: 20356351
references.citation: Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):364-6
references.pmid: 16195571
references.citation: Crit Care Med. 2011 May;39(5):934-9
references.pmid: 21297460
references.citation: Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):165-76
references.pmid: 17110876
references.citation: J Crit Care. 2008 Jun;23(2):207-21
references.pmid: 18538214
references.citation: Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Aug;24(4):311-20
references.pmid: 22687703
references.citation: Med Care. 2010 Mar;48(3):279-84
references.pmid: 20125046
references.citation: J Nurs Care Qual. 2006 Jul-Sep;21(3):223-9
references.pmid: 16816602
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 20;12:457
references.pmid: 22716044
references.citation: BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):745-9
references.pmid: 10720356
references.citation: Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):592-6
references.pmid: 21127115
references.citation: J Patient Saf. 2010 Dec;6(4):206-9
references.pmid: 21500606
references.citation: Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Jun;22(3):151-61
references.pmid: 20382662
references.citation: BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Feb;21(2):101-11
references.pmid: 22016377