title: Mind wandering and education: from the classroom to online learning.
abstract: In recent years, cognitive and educational psychologists have become interested in applying principles of cognitive psychology to education. Here, we discuss the importance of understanding the nature and occurrence of mind wandering in the context of classroom and online lectures. In reviewing the relevant literature, we begin by considering early studies that provide important clues about student attentiveness via dependent measures such as physical markers of inattention, note taking, and retention. We then provide a broad overview of studies that have directly measured mind wandering in the classroom and online learning environments. Finally, we conclude by discussing interventions that might be effective at curbing the occurrence of mind wandering in educational settings, and consider various avenues of future research that we believe can shed light on this well-known but little studied phenomenon.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Harvard University Cambridge, MA, USA.
authors.forename: Karl K
authors.initials: KK
authors.lastname: Szpunar
authors.forename: Samuel T
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: Moulton
authors.forename: Daniel L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Schacter
keywords: attention; educational psychology; learning; mind wandering; online learning; teaching
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:417-44
references.pmid: 23020639
references.citation: Lancet. 1978 Sep 2;2(8088):514-6
references.pmid: 79879
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1117-22
references.pmid: 22941876
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2010 Jun;21(6):786-9
references.pmid: 20554601
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;132(6):946-958
references.pmid: 17073528
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Oct;16(5):857-63
references.pmid: 19815789
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2006 May;132(3):354-80
references.pmid: 16719566
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Nov;38(6):1765-72
references.pmid: 22468805
references.citation: J Pers. 1996 Jun;64(2):275-310
references.pmid: 8656320
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2013 May;139(3):519-535
references.pmid: 23607430
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;1(3):181-210
references.pmid: 26151629
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Mar;20(3):458-69
references.pmid: 18004943
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Apr;14(2):230-6
references.pmid: 17694906
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Dec;18(6):1140-7
references.pmid: 21796496
references.citation: Science. 2010 Nov 12;330(6006):932
references.pmid: 21071660
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):614-21
references.pmid: 17614870
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1392-9
references.pmid: 18980403
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 16;110(16):6313-7
references.pmid: 23576743
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Jun;18(3):518-23
references.pmid: 21465303
references.citation: Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Jan;14(1):4-58
references.pmid: 26173288