title: Effects of display complexity on location and feature inhibition.
abstract: Inhibition of return refers to the lengthening of reaction times (RTs) to a target when a preceding stimulus has occupied the same location in space. Recently, we observed a robust inhibitory effect for color and shape in moderately complex displays: It is more difficult to detect a target with a particular nonspatial attribute if a stimulus with the same attribute was recently the focus of attention. Such nonspatial inhibitory effects have not generally been found in simpler displays. In the present study, we test how location-based and nonspatial inhibitory effects vary as a function of display complexity (eight, six, four, and two locations). The results demonstrated that (1) location-based inhibition effects were much stronger in more complex displays, whereas the nonspatial inhibition was only slightly stronger in more complex displays; (2) nonspatial inhibitory effects emerged at longer stimulus onset asynchronies than did location-based effects; and (3) nonspatial inhibition appeared only when cues and targets occurred in the same locations, confirming that pure feature repetition does not produce a cost. Taken together, the results are consistent with perceptual processes based on object files that are organized by spatial location. Using somewhat more complex displays than are most commonly employed provides a more sensitive method for observing the role of inhibitory processes in facilitating visual search. In addition, using a relatively wide set of cue-target timing relationships is necessary in order to clearly see how inhibitory effects operate.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
authors.forename: Frank K
authors.initials: FK
authors.lastname: Hu
authors.forename: Zhiwei
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Fan
authors.forename: Arthur G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Samuel
authors.forename: Shuchang
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: He
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D003118:Color Perception; D003463:Cues; D006185:Habituation, Psychophysiologic; D006801:Humans; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*; D011931:Reactive Inhibition
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2001 Jan;12(1):76-80
references.pmid: 11294232
references.citation: Nature. 1988 Aug 4;334(6181):430-1
references.pmid: 3405288
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Aug;27(4):798-812
references.pmid: 11518144
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Feb;140(1):35-50
references.pmid: 21171801
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1998 Nov;60(8):1452-5; discussion 1455-6
references.pmid: 9865084
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):957-63
references.pmid: 18087966
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1992 May;51(5):455-64
references.pmid: 1594435
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Oct;24(5):1467-75
references.pmid: 9778832
references.citation: Cogn Neuropsychol. 2006 Oct 1;23(7):1003-14
references.pmid: 21049364
references.citation: Vision Res. 2010 Jan;50(2):220-8
references.pmid: 19932128
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):238-51
references.pmid: 19293089
references.citation: Vision Res. 1996 Jul;36(14):2125-40
references.pmid: 8776479
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2004 Feb;68(1):41-54
references.pmid: 12827352
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2007 Aug;69(6):980-93
references.pmid: 18018980
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Dec;10(4):897-906
references.pmid: 15000537
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Oct;26(5):1591-605
references.pmid: 11039487
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Nov;8(11):494-500
references.pmid: 15491903
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Apr;4(4):138-147
references.pmid: 10740278
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Dec;27(6):1433-51
references.pmid: 11766935
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1992 Apr;24(2):175-219
references.pmid: 1582172
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Sep;16(9):684-8
references.pmid: 16137253
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2000 Jul;62(5):927-34
references.pmid: 10997039
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Jun;20(3):478-99
references.pmid: 8027711
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1985 Dec;11(6):777-87
references.pmid: 2934508
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Aug;71(6):1241-50
references.pmid: 19633340
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1995 Apr;57(3):402-8
references.pmid: 7770330
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991 May;43(2):289-98
references.pmid: 1866461
references.citation: ScientificWorldJournal. 2003 Mar 17;3:75-86
references.pmid: 12806122