title: Relationship between quality of care and choice of clinical computing system: retrospective analysis of family practice performance under the UK's quality and outcomes framework.
abstract: To investigate the relationship between performance on the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme and choice of clinical computer system.
  
  
  
  Retrospective longitudinal study.
  
  
  
  Data for 2007-2008 to 2010-2011, extracted from the clinical computer systems of general practices in England.
  
  
  
  All English practices participating in the pay-for-performance scheme: average 8257 each year, covering over 99% of the English population registered with a general practice.
  
  
  
  Levels of achievement on 62 quality-of-care indicators, measured as: reported achievement (levels of care after excluding inappropriate patients); population achievement (levels of care for all patients with the relevant condition) and percentage of available quality points attained. Multilevel mixed effects multiple linear regression models were used to identify population, practice and clinical computing system predictors of achievement.
  
  
  
  Seven clinical computer systems were consistently active in the study period, collectively holding approximately 99% of the market share. Of all population and practice characteristics assessed, choice of clinical computing system was the strongest predictor of performance across all three outcome measures. Differences between systems were greatest for intermediate outcomes indicators (eg, control of cholesterol levels).
  
  
  
  Under the UK's pay-for-performance scheme, differences in practice performance were associated with the choice of clinical computing system. This raises the question of whether particular system characteristics facilitate higher quality of care, better data recording or both. Inconsistencies across systems need to be understood and addressed, and researchers need to be cautious when generalising findings from samples of providers using a single computing system.
authors.affiliation: NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
authors.forename: Evangelos
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Kontopantelis
authors.forename: Iain
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Buchan
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Reeves
authors.forename: Kath
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Checkland
authors.forename: Tim
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Doran
keywords: General Medicine (see Internal Medicine); Primary Care; Public Health
references.citation: J Immunol Methods. 1997 Feb 14;201(1):99-114
references.pmid: 9032413
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2011 May;61(586):e279-89
references.pmid: 21619752
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 27;355(4):375-84
references.pmid: 16870916
references.citation: J Ambul Care Manage. 2008 Jul-Sep;31(3):201-10
references.pmid: 18574377
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Nov;56(532):830-5
references.pmid: 17132349
references.citation: Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Dec;16(6):446-9
references.pmid: 18055889
references.citation: Lancet. 2008 Aug 30;372(9640):728-36
references.pmid: 18701159
references.citation: JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38
references.pmid: 15755945
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Sep;22(9):1317-20
references.pmid: 17594128
references.citation: BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Nov 13;7:68
references.pmid: 17096861
references.citation: BMJ. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):765
references.pmid: 15767266
references.citation: Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun;47(3 Pt 1):1117-36
references.pmid: 22171997
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Jan;61(582):e12-21
references.pmid: 21401985
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1448-54
references.pmid: 15459308
references.citation: BMJ. 2012 Apr 17;344:e2405
references.pmid: 22511209
references.citation: Inform Prim Care. 2007;15(3):143-50
references.pmid: 18005561
references.citation: JAMA. 1987 Jul 3;258(1):61-6
references.pmid: 3586293
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Sep;60(578):e335-44
references.pmid: 20849683
references.citation: JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1197-203
references.pmid: 15755942
references.citation: JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1339-46
references.pmid: 9794315
references.citation: BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jan;22(1):53-64
references.pmid: 22918988
references.citation: Int J Biomed Comput. 1995 Apr;39(1):59-66
references.pmid: 7601543
references.citation: JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1311-6
references.pmid: 9794308
references.citation: Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Oct;16(5):407-16
references.pmid: 15375102
references.citation: BMJ. 2010 Apr 06;340:c1717
references.pmid: 20371570