title: Socioeconomic status, John Henryism and blood pressure among African-Americans in the Jackson Heart Study.
abstract: John Henryism connotes a strong behavioral predisposition to engage in effortful, active coping with difficult social and economic stressors. This behavioral predisposition is measured by the 12 item John Henryism Scale for Active Coping (JHAC). The John Henry hypothesis predicts that the well-known inverse socioeconomic status (SES)-blood pressure association will be stronger among persons who score high rather than low on the JHAC. We tested this hypothesis in a large African American cohort using baseline data from the Jackson Heart Study. Unlike previous studies, we used multiple indicators of SES: income, education, occupation, childhood SES and cumulative SES. Because the hypothesis is most relevant for adults still in the labor force, we excluded retired participants, yielding a sample size of 3978. Gender-specific Poisson regression models for hypertension adjusting for age, John Henryism, SES, and a John Henryism-SES interaction term, were fit to examine associations. Separate models were fit for each SES indicator. We found some evidence that John Henryism modified the association between income and hypertension in men: low income was associated with higher prevalence of hypertension in men who scored high on John Henryism (prevalence ratio (PR) for low vs. high income tertile 1.12), but with lower hypertension prevalence among men who scored low on John Henryism (PR 0.85, one sided P value for multiplicative interaction <0.05). For women, the association of low income with higher hypertension prevalence was stronger at lower than higher levels of John Henryism (PR 1.27 and 1.06 at low and high levels of John Henryism respectively, P value<0.05). There was no evidence that John Henryism modified the associations of hypertension with other SES indicators in men or women. The modest support of the John Henryism Hypothesis in men only, adds to the literature on this subject, but underscores questions regarding the gender, spatial, socioeconomic and historical contexts in which the hypothesis is valid.
authors.affiliation: Social Epidemiology, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, VGEC Campus, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 382424, India. malavika@iitgn.ac.in
authors.forename: Malavika A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Subramanyam
authors.forename: Sherman A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: James
authors.forename: Ana V
authors.initials: AV
authors.lastname: Diez-Roux
authors.forename: DeMarc A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Hickson
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Sarpong
authors.forename: Mario
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sims
authors.forename: Herman A
authors.initials: HA
authors.lastname: Taylor
authors.forename: Sharon B
authors.initials: SB
authors.lastname: Wyatt
mesh_terms: D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D000328:Adult; D001741:Black or African American / Q000523:psychology* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015331:Cohort Studies; D005260:Female; D054624:Health Status Disparities; D006801:Humans; D006973:Hypertension / Q000208:ethnology* / Q000523:psychology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008922:Mississippi; D011582:Psychological Theory; D017678:Sex Distribution; D012923:Social Class; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000208:ethnology* / Q000523:psychology; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: African American; Hypertension; John Henryism; Socioeconomic status; United States
references.citation: Qual Health Res. 2010 May;20(5):668-83
references.pmid: 20154298
references.citation: Ethn Dis. 2005 Autumn;15(4 Suppl 6):S6-56-61
references.pmid: 16317986
references.citation: J Chronic Dis. 1973 Sep;26(9):595-611
references.pmid: 4759583
references.citation: Epidemiology. 2007 May;18(3):329-39
references.pmid: 17435441
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Jan 1;135(1):59-67
references.pmid: 1736661
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 15;338(3):171-9
references.pmid: 9428819
references.citation: Lancet. 2004 Sep 11-17;364(9438):953-62
references.pmid: 15364186
references.citation: Circulation. 1976 Dec;54(6):987-92
references.pmid: 991416
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1977 Nov;106(5):351-61
references.pmid: 920724
references.citation: Epidemiology. 1997 Sep;8(5):482-7
references.pmid: 9270947
references.citation: Psychosom Med. 1998 Sep-Oct;60(5):620-4
references.pmid: 9773768
references.citation: Cult Med Psychiatry. 1994 Jun;18(2):163-82
references.pmid: 7924399
references.citation: Ethn Dis. 2005 Autumn;15(4 Suppl 6):S6-18-29
references.pmid: 16317982
references.citation: J Behav Med. 1983 Sep;6(3):259-78
references.pmid: 6663614
references.citation: Psychosom Med. 1988 Jul-Aug;50(4):353-9
references.pmid: 3413269
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Apr 15;143(8):787-91
references.pmid: 8610688
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Oct;126(4):664-73
references.pmid: 3631056
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Apr 1;159(7):702-6
references.pmid: 15033648
references.citation: Ethn Dis. 2005 Autumn;15(4 Suppl 6):S6-4-17
references.pmid: 16320381
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2006 May;96(5):826-33
references.pmid: 16380565
references.citation: J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2001 Fall;56(4):133-6, 149-50
references.pmid: 11759779
references.citation: Ethn Dis. 2005 Autumn;15(4 Suppl 6):S6-38-48
references.pmid: 16317984