title: Hybrid in situ replacement for Samson group V Staphylococcus aureus aortic graft infection.
abstract: Aortic prosthesis replacements including extra-anatomical bypass procedures, in situ revascularisations with the neoaortoiliac system, antibiotic bounded prostheses or allogeneic grafts have high graft reinfection rates. We described a case of a 68-year-old man with Samson group V Staphylococcus aureus infection of his aortobifemoral graft. He underwent an explantation of the infected graft, wound debridement and a hybrid in situ allogeneic aortoiliofemoral replacement. During surgery one of the limbs of the cryopreserved human aortic allogeneic graft was anastomosed with the endarterectomised left common iliac artery, which later was angioplastied and stented. The closed system Jackson-Pratt drains were used to prevent perigraft fluid collection. The groin wound was treated with the vacuum-assisted closure dressing. On review in 6 months he remained symptom free. We conclude that a hybrid management of infected aortic prosthesis may reduce graft reinfection.
authors.affiliation: Research Institute of Circulation Pathology, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
authors.forename: A A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Karpenko
authors.forename: P V
authors.initials: PV
authors.lastname: Ignatenko
authors.forename: A M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Beliaev
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001012:Aorta, Abdominal / Q000601:surgery*; D001807:Blood Vessel Prosthesis; D019917:Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / Q000379:methods*; D004691:Endarterectomy / Q000379:methods; D005263:Femoral Artery / Q000601:surgery; D006801:Humans; D007083:Iliac Artery / Q000601:surgery; D008297:Male; D054843:Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy; D016459:Prosthesis-Related Infections / Q000601:surgery*; D012086:Reoperation; D013203:Staphylococcal Infections / Q000601:surgery*; D013211:Staphylococcus aureus; D014184:Transplantation, Homologous
references.citation: J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jul;50(1):30-9
references.pmid: 19563952
references.citation: J Vasc Surg. 2001 Sep;34(3):411-9; discussion 419-20
references.pmid: 11533591
references.citation: J Infect. 2000 Mar;40(2):184-7
references.pmid: 10841097
references.citation: Neth J Med. 2004 Dec;62(11):446-52
references.pmid: 15685895
references.citation: J Vasc Surg. 2008 Nov;48(5):1125-30; discussion 1130-1
references.pmid: 18804940
references.citation: Swiss Med Wkly. 2013 Jan 24;143:w13754
references.pmid: 23348860
references.citation: Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993 May;7(3):301-7
references.pmid: 8513910
references.citation: J Vasc Surg. 2009 Mar;49(3):660-6
references.pmid: 19268771
references.citation: Am J Surg. 2010 Jul;200(1):47-52
references.pmid: 20074700
references.citation: J Vasc Surg. 1987 Mar;5(3):421-31
references.pmid: 3509595
references.citation: Chin Med J (Engl). 2007 May 20;120(10):935-7
references.pmid: 17543187
references.citation: Am Surg. 2013 Jan;79(1):61-6
references.pmid: 23317613
references.citation: J Vasc Surg. 1988 Aug;8(2):147-53
references.pmid: 3398172
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1993 Sep;218(3):239-48; discussion 248-9
references.pmid: 8373267
references.citation: Rozhl Chir. 2012 Nov;91(11):597-600
references.pmid: 23301678
references.citation: J Vasc Surg. 2010 Aug;52(2):323-30
references.pmid: 20570473