title: Light structures phototroph, bacterial and fungal communities at the soil surface.
abstract: The upper few millimeters of soil harbour photosynthetic microbial communities that are structurally distinct from those of underlying bulk soil due to the presence of light. Previous studies in arid zones have demonstrated functional importance of these communities in reducing soil erosion, and enhancing carbon and nitrogen fixation. Despite being widely distributed, comparative understanding of the biodiversity of the soil surface and underlying soil is lacking, particularly in temperate zones. We investigated the establishment of soil surface communities on pasture soil in microcosms exposed to light or dark conditions, focusing on changes in phototroph, bacterial and fungal communities at the soil surface (0-3 mm) and bulk soil (3-12 mm) using ribosomal marker gene analyses. Microbial community structure changed with time and structurally similar phototrophic communities were found at the soil surface and in bulk soil in the light exposed microcosms suggesting that light can influence phototroph community structure even in the underlying bulk soil. 454 pyrosequencing showed a significant selection for diazotrophic cyanobacteria such as Nostoc punctiforme and Anabaena spp., in addition to the green alga Scenedesmus obliquus. The soil surface also harboured distinct heterotrophic bacterial and fungal communities in the presence of light, in particular, the selection for the phylum Firmicutes. However, these light driven changes in bacterial community structure did not extend to the underlying soil suggesting a discrete zone of influence, analogous to the rhizosphere.
authors.affiliation: School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom. l.o.davies@warwick.ac.uk
authors.forename: Lawrence O
authors.initials: LO
authors.lastname: Davies
authors.forename: Hendrik
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Schäfer
authors.forename: Samantha
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Marshall
authors.forename: Irene
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Bramke
authors.forename: Robin G
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Oliver
authors.forename: Gary D
authors.initials: GD
authors.lastname: Bending
mesh_terms: D001419:Bacteria / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics; D044822:Biodiversity; D002734:Chlorophyll; D000077194:Chlorophyll A; D005658:Fungi / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D008027:Light; D017440:Photoperiod; D052817:Phototrophic Processes; D010802:Phylogeny; D010839:Phytoplankton / Q000145:classification; D012150:Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length; D012338:RNA, Ribosomal, 23S / Q000235:genetics; D012987:Soil / Q000737:chemistry; D012988:Soil Microbiology
chemical_list: D012338:RNA, Ribosomal, 23S; D012987:Soil; D002734:Chlorophyll; D000077194:Chlorophyll A
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 2003 Jan;45(1):63-71
references.pmid: 12469245
references.citation: Geobiology. 2009 Jun;7(3):348-59
references.pmid: 19573165
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e59859
references.pmid: 23573215
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2010 Sep;7(9):668-9
references.pmid: 20805793
references.citation: BMC Microbiol. 2008 Jul 24;8:125
references.pmid: 18652685
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010 Jun;72(3):418-28
references.pmid: 20298501
references.citation: Genome Res. 2011 Sep;21(9):1552-60
references.pmid: 21690186
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200
references.pmid: 21700674
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2005 Jul;56(417):1729-39
references.pmid: 15911554
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Apr;67(4):1902-10
references.pmid: 11282648
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 2009 Aug;58(2):394-407
references.pmid: 19479305
references.citation: Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997 Apr;47(2):328-35
references.pmid: 9103617
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Feb;64(2):795-9
references.pmid: 9464425
references.citation: Genome Res. 2011 Mar;21(3):494-504
references.pmid: 21212162
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2012 Sep;31(9):2138-46
references.pmid: 22752973
references.citation: Photosynth Res. 2006 Jul;89(1):27-41
references.pmid: 16763878
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jul;72(7):5069-72
references.pmid: 16820507
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005 Oct 1;54(2):233-45
references.pmid: 16332322
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7
references.pmid: 17586664
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 3;109(27):10931-6
references.pmid: 22715291
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 2002 Jan;43(1):1-12
references.pmid: 11984624
references.citation: Mycologia. 2012 Mar-Apr;104(2):353-61
references.pmid: 22123652
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1
references.pmid: 20709691
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 1993 Apr;2(2):113-8
references.pmid: 8180733
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jan;7(1):1-12
references.pmid: 15643930
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Feb;70(2):973-83
references.pmid: 14766579
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012 Jul 09;10(8):551-62
references.pmid: 22772903
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002 Apr 1;40(1):55-63
references.pmid: 19709211
references.citation: Environ Microbiol Rep. 2012 Apr;4(2):248-56
references.pmid: 23757280
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jan;11(1):56-67
references.pmid: 18764875
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 15;26(2):266-7
references.pmid: 19914921
references.citation: New Phytol. 2010 Apr;186(2):451-60
references.pmid: 20136719
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 2006 Feb;51(2):189-96
references.pmid: 16453200
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6
references.pmid: 20383131
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Apr;69(4):2100-9
references.pmid: 12676689
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
references.pmid: 2231712