title: Early embryonic determination of the sexual dimorphism in segment number in geophilomorph centipedes.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Most geophilomorph centipedes show intraspecific variability in the number of leg-bearing segments. This intraspecific variability generally has a component that is related to sex, with females having on average more segments than males. Neither the developmental basis nor the adaptive role of this dimorphism is known.
  
  
  RESULTS
  To determine when this sexual dimorphism in segment number is established, we have followed the development of Strigamia maritima embryos from the onset of segmentation to the first post-embryonic stage where we could determine the sex morphologically. We find that males and females differ in segment number by Stage 6.1, a point during embryogenesis when segment addition pauses while the embryo undergoes large-scale movements. We have confirmed this pattern by establishing a molecular method to determine the sex of single embryos, utilising duplex PCR amplification for Y chromosomal and autosomal sequences. This confirms that male embryos have a modal number of 43 segments visible at Stage 6, while females have 45. In our Strigamia population, adult males have a modal number of 47 leg-bearing segments, and females have 49. This implies that the sexual dimorphism in segment number is determined before the addition of the last leg-bearing segments and the terminal genital segments.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Sexual dimorphism in segment number is not associated with terminal segment differentiation, but must instead be related to some earlier process during segment patterning. The dimorphism may be associated with a difference in the rate and/or duration of segment addition during the main phase of rapid segment addition that precedes embryonic Stage 6. This suggests that the adaptive role, if any, of the dimorphism is likely to be related to segment number per se, and not to sexual differentiation of the terminal region.
authors.affiliation: Laboratory for Development and Evolution, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK. cb508@cam.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Carlo
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Brena
authors.forename: Jack
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Green
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Akam
references.citation: Evol Dev. 2008 Jul-Aug;10(4):487-92
references.pmid: 18638325
references.citation: Dev Biol. 2012 Mar 1;363(1):290-307
references.pmid: 22138381
references.citation: Genetics. 2013 May;194(1):163-73
references.pmid: 23410834
references.citation: Biotechniques. 2000 Jul;29(1):52, 54
references.pmid: 10907076
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2004 Jul 27;14(14):1250-5
references.pmid: 15268854
references.citation: Dev Biol. 2008 Jul 1;319(1):160-9
references.pmid: 18455712
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52623
references.pmid: 23285116
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 5;108(27):11139-44
references.pmid: 21690416
references.citation: Evol Dev. 2009 Jul-Aug;11(4):434-40
references.pmid: 19601976
references.citation: Evol Dev. 1999 Jul-Aug;1(1):62-9
references.pmid: 11324022
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jul 22;267(1451):1393-7
references.pmid: 10983822
references.citation: Evol Dev. 2010 Jul-Aug;12(4):347-52
references.pmid: 20618430
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2012;8(8):e1002874
references.pmid: 22912593