title: Unfair offers, unfair offenders? Fairness considerations in incarcerated individuals with and without psychopathy.
abstract: Offenders with psychopathy have often committed crimes violating social norms, which may suggest a biased moral reasoning in psychopathy. Yet, as findings on utilitarian decisions remain conflicting, the current study investigated different aspects of fairness considerations in offenders with psychopathy, offenders without psychopathy and healthy individuals (N = 18/14/18, respectively). Unfair offers in a modified Ultimatum Game (UG) were paired with different unselected alternatives, thereby establishing the context of a proposal, and made under opposing intentionality constraints (intentional vs. unintentional). As in previous studies, unfair offers were most often rejected when the alternative was fair and when the offer was made intentionally. Importantly, however, offenders with psychopathy demonstrated a similar rejection pattern to that of healthy individuals, i.e., taking the unselected alternative into account. In contrast, delinquents without psychopathy did not adjust their decision behavior to the alternatives to an offer, suggesting stronger impairments in social decision-making. Crucially, the mechanisms and processes underlying rejection decisions might differ, particularly with regard to cognitive vs. emotional competencies. While preserved cognitive perspective-taking could drive seemingly intact decision patterns in psychopathy, emotional empathy is likely to be compromised.
authors.affiliation: Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen Nijmegen, Netherlands.
authors.forename: Sina
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Radke
authors.forename: Inti A
authors.initials: IA
authors.lastname: Brazil
authors.forename: Inge
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Scheper
authors.forename: Berend H
authors.initials: BH
authors.lastname: Bulten
authors.forename: Ellen R A
authors.initials: ER
authors.lastname: de Bruijn
keywords: antisocial; fairness; psychopathy; social decision-making; ultimatum game
references.citation: Science. 2001 Sep 14;293(5537):2105-8
references.pmid: 11557895
references.citation: J Res Pers. 2011 Jun 1;45(3):322-327
references.pmid: 21647247
references.citation: Clin Psychol Rev. 2000 Jan;20(1):113-36
references.pmid: 10660831
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Apr 1;69(7):693-9
references.pmid: 21215385
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Jun 1;61(11):1260-71
references.pmid: 17046722
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Aug;7(6):708-14
references.pmid: 21768207
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 2010 Aug;101(Pt 3):383-99
references.pmid: 19321035
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50339
references.pmid: 23166843
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Jan 15;65(2):137-43
references.pmid: 18814860
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Aug;9(8):1099-107
references.pmid: 23748499
references.citation: J Pers Disord. 2004 Apr;18(2):163-77
references.pmid: 15176755
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 May;121(2):484-97
references.pmid: 21842959
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Aug;121(3):659-67
references.pmid: 22390288
references.citation: Law Hum Behav. 2002 Aug;26(4):377-94
references.pmid: 12182529
references.citation: Neuropsychology. 2006 Mar;20(2):153-165
references.pmid: 16594776
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31491
references.pmid: 22363656
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jun;48(7):2198-204
references.pmid: 20403367
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(5):523-6
references.pmid: 12559146
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1997 Jan;121(1):133-48
references.pmid: 9000895
references.citation: J Interpers Violence. 2004 Jan;19(1):13-29
references.pmid: 14680527
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2009 Dec;82(3):199-210
references.pmid: 19576948
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2008 May;117(2):406-13
references.pmid: 18489216
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 17;102(20):7398-401
references.pmid: 15878990
references.citation: Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1991 Feb;22(1):15-9
references.pmid: 1877068
references.citation: Cortex. 2010 May;46(5):668-77
references.pmid: 19501818
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Dec;104(4):398-409
references.pmid: 19674756
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2010 Apr;13(4):419-21
references.pmid: 20228805
references.citation: Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2011 Dec;55(8):1234-50
references.pmid: 22114168
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Mar;5(1):59-67
references.pmid: 20053752
references.citation: J Pers Disord. 2009 Aug;23(4):384-98
references.pmid: 19663658
references.citation: Pers Individ Dif. 2013 Jan 1;54(2):272-277
references.pmid: 23185100