title: Equifinality and its violations in a redundant system: multifinger accurate force production.
abstract: We explored a hypothesis that transient perturbations applied to a redundant system result in equifinality in the space of task-related performance variables but not in the space of elemental variables. The subjects pressed with four fingers and produced an accurate constant total force level. The "inverse piano" device was used to lift and lower one of the fingers smoothly. The subjects were instructed "not to intervene voluntarily" with possible force changes. Analysis was performed in spaces of finger forces and finger modes (hypothetical neural commands to fingers) as elemental variables. Lifting a finger led to an increase in its force and a decrease in the forces of the other three fingers; the total force increased. Lowering the finger back led to a drop in the force of the perturbed finger. At the final state, the sum of the variances of finger forces/modes computed across repetitive trials was significantly higher than the variance of the total force/mode. Most variance of the individual finger force/mode changes between the preperturbation and postperturbation states was compatible with constant total force. We conclude that a transient perturbation applied to a redundant system leads to relatively small variance in the task-related performance variable (equifinality), whereas in the space of elemental variables much more variance occurs that does not lead to total force changes. We interpret the results within a general theoretical scheme that incorporates the ideas of hierarchically organized control, control with referent configurations, synergic control, and the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania; and.
authors.forename: Luke
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Wilhelm
authors.forename: Vladimir M
authors.initials: VM
authors.lastname: Zatsiorsky
authors.forename: Mark L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Latash
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D005385:Fingers / Q000294:innervation / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008959:Models, Neurological; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: abundance; equifinality; finger; force; redundancy; referent configuration
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2000 Oct;84(4):1708-18
references.pmid: 11024063
references.citation: J Mot Behav. 1986 Mar;18(1):17-54
references.pmid: 15136283
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2005 Jun 10-17;381(1-2):92-6
references.pmid: 15882796
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2001 Nov;86(5):2125-43
references.pmid: 11698506
references.citation: Motor Control. 2013 Apr;17(2):145-75
references.pmid: 23370796
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 1990;62(4):331-6
references.pmid: 2310787
references.citation: Front Comput Neurosci. 2013 Mar 21;7:19
references.pmid: 23519326
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1995 Oct;74(4):1787-92
references.pmid: 8989414
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 2003 Feb;88(2):91-8
references.pmid: 12567224
references.citation: Motor Control. 2007 Jul;11(3):276-308
references.pmid: 17715460
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2003 Oct;152(3):281-92
references.pmid: 12904934
references.citation: Hum Mov Sci. 2011 Jun;30(3):446-58
references.pmid: 21450360
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1995 May;73(5):2120-2
references.pmid: 7623104
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2012 Mar;217(1):1-5
references.pmid: 22246105
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2000 Mar;131(2):187-95
references.pmid: 10766271
references.citation: Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 May;2(3):287-304
references.pmid: 26302077
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 2005 Mar;92(3):186-91
references.pmid: 15739110
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009 Dec;19(6):601-7
references.pmid: 19828310
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2001 Jun;138(3):288-303
references.pmid: 11460767
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2011 Sep;106(3):1424-36
references.pmid: 21676927
references.citation: Motor Control. 2010 Jul;14(3):294-322
references.pmid: 20702893
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1980 May;43(5):1183-96
references.pmid: 7373360
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1994 Jul;72(1):299-313
references.pmid: 7965013
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 1998 Aug;79(2):139-50
references.pmid: 9791934
references.citation: Motor Control. 2000 Jul;4(3):259-60
references.pmid: 10970151
references.citation: J Mot Behav. 1980 Jun;12(2):149-61
references.pmid: 15215060
references.citation: J Physiol. 1994 Sep 15;479 ( Pt 3):487-97
references.pmid: 7837104
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jun;126(3):289-306
references.pmid: 10382616
references.citation: Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;629:637-43
references.pmid: 19227525
references.citation: Motor Control. 1998 Oct;2(4):306-13
references.pmid: 9758883
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2000 Dec;135(3):382-404
references.pmid: 11146817
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jan;176(1):54-69
references.pmid: 16874517
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jul;181(1):49-67
references.pmid: 17340124
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1976 Mar;39(2):435-44
references.pmid: 815518
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 1994;71(5):441-50
references.pmid: 7993931
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;95(4):2199-212
references.pmid: 16394079
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2005 Feb;161(1):91-103
references.pmid: 15490137
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jul;188(3):411-25
references.pmid: 18425506
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2011 Feb;208(3):423-35
references.pmid: 21104236
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2002 Aug;145(3):275-85
references.pmid: 12136377
references.citation: J Physiol. 2003 Jun 15;549(Pt 3):953-63
references.pmid: 12717002
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2010 Apr;202(1):213-29
references.pmid: 20033397