title: What is chosen first, the hand used for reaching or the target that is reached?
abstract: Models of information processing generally assume that stimuli are processed before actions are selected, at least in typical laboratory experiments where stimuli are presented and responses follow. In everyday life, however, there are generally fewer constraints on the ordering of decisions pertaining to stimuli and actions. This raises the question of which sorts of decisions normally precede which others. To address this question, we asked participants to aim for either of two targets with either hand on the basis of whichever combination seemed easiest. We analyzed the choices made in this free condition with choices made when the hand was specified or when the target was specified. We found that a model assuming similar selection processes in the hand-specified condition and the free condition provided the best account for the data. The data accord with the hypothesis that hand was generally chosen first in the free-choice condition.
authors.affiliation: Department of Computer Science, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, 72072, Tübingen, Germany, oliver.herbort@psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de.
authors.forename: Oliver
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Herbort
authors.forename: David A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Rosenbaum
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006225:Hand / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 21;27(8):2001-12
references.pmid: 17314296
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90
references.pmid: 24203555
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:269-98
references.pmid: 20345247
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Dec;35(6):1649-60
references.pmid: 19968426
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980 Dec;109(4):444-74
references.pmid: 6449531
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;1(2):110-22
references.pmid: 26151466
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Jul 28;5(7):e11805
references.pmid: 20676371