title: Testing for optic ataxia in a blind field.
abstract: Optic ataxia is a component of Balint's syndrome and is a disorder that results from damage to the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) leading to deficits in reaching and grasping objects presented in the visual field opposite to the damaged hemisphere. It is also often the case that Balint's syndrome is accompanied by visual field defects due to the proximity of parietal and occipital cortices and also due to the subcortical pathway relaying visual information from the retina to the visual cortex passing underneath the parietal cortex. The presence of primary visual defects such as hemianopia often prevents clinicians from diagnosing higher-level visual deficits such as optic ataxia; the patient cannot reach to targets he/she cannot see. Here, we show that through the use of a paradigm that takes advantage of remapping mechanisms, we were able to observe optic ataxia in the blind field. We measured reach endpoints of a patient presenting with left optic ataxia as well as a quadrantanopia in the left lower visual field in eye-static and eye-dynamic conditions. In static conditions, we first asked the patient to reach to targets viewed in her non-optic ataxic intact right visual field (fixating on the left of the target array). In this case, the patient showed undershoots equivalent to controls. Next, we asked her to reach to (the same) targets viewed in the upper left optic ataxic but intact visual field (fixating to the right of the target array). The undershooting pattern increased greatly, consistent with unilateral left optic ataxia. In dynamic conditions, we asked her to view targets in her good (right lower) visual field before reorienting her line of sight to the opposite side, causing the internal representation of the target to be updated into the opposite (ataxic) blind visual field. The patient then reached to the remembered (and updated) location of the target. We found errors typical of optic ataxia for reaches guided toward the quadrantanopic field. This confirmed that reaching errors depended on the updated internal representation of the target and not on where the target was viewed initially. In both the patient and the controls, the updating of target location was partial, with reaching errors observed subsequent to an eye movement made from left to right fixation positions being intermediate between the left and right static conditions. Thus, using this remapping paradigm, we were able to observe optic ataxia in the blind field. In conclusion, this remapping paradigm would allow clinicians to test for visuo-manual transformation deficits (optic ataxia) even when it is associated with hemianopia.
authors.affiliation: INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, ImpAct Team Bron, France ; Mouvement et Handicap, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Inserm et Université de Lyon Bron, France.
authors.forename: Aarlenne Z
authors.initials: AZ
authors.lastname: Khan
authors.forename: Laure
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Pisella
authors.forename: Ludovic
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Delporte
authors.forename: Gilles
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Rode
authors.forename: Yves
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Rossetti
keywords: Bálint's syndrome; eye movements; hemianopia; reaching; updating
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(13):2766-73
references.pmid: 16321407
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 19;26(16):4188-97
references.pmid: 16624939
references.citation: Cortex. 1997 Dec;33(4):639-52
references.pmid: 9444466
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 16;23(15):6209-14
references.pmid: 12867504
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(8):1196-208
references.pmid: 11931923
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1998 Feb 15;18(4):1583-94
references.pmid: 9454863
references.citation: Brain. 1972;95(1):49-60
references.pmid: 5023090
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2005 Oct;15(10):1547-60
references.pmid: 15746004
references.citation: Brain. 1988 Jun;111 ( Pt 3):643-74
references.pmid: 3382915
references.citation: Neuroreport. 1996 Feb 29;7(3):793-7
references.pmid: 8733747
references.citation: Rev Neurol (Paris). 1981;137(5):357-72
references.pmid: 7291847
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 Apr;28(2):181-200
references.pmid: 15172763
references.citation: Vision Res. 2011 Apr 22;51(8):932-9
references.pmid: 21316385
references.citation: Neurology. 2006 Mar 28;66(6):906-10
references.pmid: 16567710
references.citation: Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010 May;27(3):245-60
references.pmid: 20936548
references.citation: Neuron. 2003 Jul 17;39(2):361-73
references.pmid: 12873391
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2012 Apr;50(5):997-1005
references.pmid: 22361254
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2009 Dec;47(14):3033-44
references.pmid: 19563817
references.citation: Vision Res. 2007 Dec;47(28):3434-46
references.pmid: 18053848
references.citation: Cortex. 2010 Jan;46(1):77-93
references.pmid: 19345345
references.citation: J Vis. 2012 Oct 22;12(11):
references.pmid: 23090615
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Apr;8(4):418-20
references.pmid: 15768034