title: Shaving Versus Depilation Cream for Pre-operative Skin Preparation.
abstract: A prospective, randomised study was carried out to compare the effect of pre-operative shaving with chemical depilation on wound infection in 100 patients. It was shown that depilatory creams saved time for pre-operative preparation and had an advantage in areas where shaving was difficult. The use of depilatory creams was shown to be effective, atraumatic, non-toxic and could be self-administered. Depilatory creams could be used safely on granulating wounds and did not give rise to bacterial growth. Their use was associated with a significant reduction in skin-surface bacteria and was cheaper compared with shaving. The best practice is to refrain from hair removal unless it interferes with the surgical procedure or wound closure. If hair has to be removed, it should be done using a depilatory cream. The depilatory cream has an advantage in areas which are difficult to shave or if the patient is scheduled to undergo diagnostic procedures and operations in the same area in close succession. The fight against post-operative wound infections has long been undertaken by practitioners. The authors realise that surgical-site infections are frequently caused by the bacteria commonly found on the skin; hence, reducing the number of bacteria on the skin has been a common pre-operative practice.
authors.affiliation: S.S.Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Davangere, India.
authors.forename: Jyothi S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Karegoudar
authors.forename: P J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Prabhakar
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Vijayanath
authors.forename: M R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Anitha
authors.forename: Rajeshwari R
authors.initials: RR
authors.lastname: Surpur
authors.forename: Venkatesh M
authors.initials: VM
authors.lastname: Patil
keywords: Cream; Preparation; Shave
references.citation: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Dec;31(12):1219-29
references.pmid: 20969449
references.citation: Am J Surg. 1971 Mar;121(3):251-4
references.pmid: 5546329
references.citation: AORN J. 1979 Nov;30(5):881-4
references.pmid: 259001
references.citation: Ann Acad Med Singap. 1985 Oct;14(4):700-4
references.pmid: 4083810
references.citation: Arch Surg. 1983 Mar;118(3):347-52
references.pmid: 6824435
references.citation: J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009 Dec;37(8):477-80
references.pmid: 19604702
references.citation: Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 Jan;76(1):3-4
references.pmid: 8117015
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 2008 Sep;128(9):2240-7
references.pmid: 18401425
references.citation: Am J Infect Control. 2010 May;38(4):319-23
references.pmid: 20171756
references.citation: J Hosp Infect. 2008 Nov;70 Suppl 2:11-4
references.pmid: 19022116
references.citation: Br J Nurs. 2009 Jun 11-24;18(11):665-9
references.pmid: 19525910
references.citation: Prof Nurse. 1993 Jul;8(10):670-2
references.pmid: 8327530
references.citation: N Z Med J. 1984 Oct 24;97(766):727-9
references.pmid: 6595560
references.citation: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;20(4):250-78; quiz 279-80
references.pmid: 10219875
references.citation: J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Feb;108(2):723-30
references.pmid: 19709343
references.citation: Am J Surg. 1983 Mar;145(3):377-8
references.pmid: 6837864
references.citation: Arch Surg. 1973 Aug;107(2):206-10
references.pmid: 4719566