title: The role of horizontal gene transfer in kleptoplastidy and the establishment of photosynthesis in the eukaryotes.
abstract: Found in different eukaryotic lineages, kleptoplastidy is the ability to sequester chloroplasts from algal preys that are ingested and partially digested. While most of the genetic information required for the activity and maintenance of the kleptoplastids disappeared with the digestion of the algal nuclei, the photosynthetic organelles remain active during extended period of time. Many different hypotheses have been proposed to explain the longevity of the kleptoplastids within their host. The most popular one involves Horizontal Gene Transfer (HGT) from the algal genome to the host nucleus. In order to test this hypothesis, transcriptome-based analyses have been performed on different kleptoplastidic organisms during the past few years. However, the variability of the results obtained does not allow drawing a convincing conclusion regarding the precise role of HGT in kleptoplastidy. Understanding the mechanism that allow persistence of the plastids is crucial, not only for the characterization of kleptoplastidy, but also for important evolutionary questions surrounding endosymbiotic events and the emergence and spread of photosynthesis in the eukaryotes. Here, I discuss alternative theories that could explain the longevity of sequestered plastids in their host, with special focus on the simplest chloroplast stability hypothesis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Genetics and Evolution; University of Geneva; Geneva, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Loïc
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Pillet
keywords: EST; diatom; endosymbiosis; foraminifera; horizontal gene transfer; kleptoplastidy; photosymbiosis; photosynthesis; plastid
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Sep 17;99(19):12246-51
references.pmid: 12218172
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2004 May;21(5):809-18
references.pmid: 14963099
references.citation: Photosynth Res. 2011 Jan;107(1):117-32
references.pmid: 20405214
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 18;105(46):17867-71
references.pmid: 19004808
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2007 Jan;9(1):39-45
references.pmid: 17227410
references.citation: Annu Rev Genet. 2007;41:147-68
references.pmid: 17600460
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2010 Mar;19(6):1174-86
references.pmid: 20149089
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2009 Jan 27;19(2):R81-8
references.pmid: 19174147
references.citation: Gene. 2004 Mar 31;329:11-6
references.pmid: 15033524
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Jun;29(6):1545-56
references.pmid: 22319135
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Apr 8;464(7290):908-12
references.pmid: 20376150
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2008 Sep;10(9):2411-7
references.pmid: 18518896
references.citation: Protist. 2011 Jul;162(3):394-404
references.pmid: 21130034
references.citation: BMC Genomics. 2010 Jun 10;11:366
references.pmid: 20537123
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 19;105(7):2533-7
references.pmid: 18268342
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Jan;30(1):66-9
references.pmid: 22993235
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2008 Aug;9(8):605-18
references.pmid: 18591983
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Mar 12;365(1541):699-712
references.pmid: 20124339
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Jan 25;445(7126):426-8
references.pmid: 17251979
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2011 Apr;155(4):1561-5
references.pmid: 21346171