title: Sensory ERP effects in auditory distraction: did we miss the main event?
abstract: Event-related potentials (ERPs) offer unique insights into processes related to involuntary attention changes triggered by rare, unpredictably occurring sensory events, that is, distraction. Contrasting ERPs elicited by distracters and frequent standard stimuli in oddball paradigms allowed the formulation of a three-stage model describing distraction-related processing: first, the distracting event is highlighted by a sensory filter. Second, attention is oriented towards the event, and finally, the task-optimal attention set is restored, or task priorities are changed. Although this model summarizes how distracting stimulus information is processed, not much is known about the cost of taking this exceptional route of processing. The present study demonstrates the impact of distraction on sensory processing. Participants performed a Go/NoGo tone-duration discrimination task, with infrequent pitch distracters. In the two parts of the experiment the duration-response mapping was reversed. Contrasts of distracter and standard ERPs revealed higher P3a- and reorienting negativity amplitudes for short than for long tones, independently from response type. To understand the cause of these asymmetries, short vs. long ERP contrasts were calculated. The ERP pattern showed that short standards elicited an attention-dependent offset response, which was abolished for short distracters. That is, the apparent P3a- and RON enhancements were caused by the removal of a task-related attentional sensory enhancement. This shows that the disruption of task-optimal attention set precedes the elicitation of the P3a, which suggests that P3a does not reflect a process driving the initial distraction-related attention change.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, RCNS, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, P.O.B. 398, Szondi u 83/85, 1394, Budapest, Hungary, horvath.janos@ttk.mta.hu.
authors.forename: János
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Horváth
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D004569:Electroencephalography; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000502:physiology*; D005072:Evoked Potentials, Auditory / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Cognition. 2010 Jun;115(3):504-11
references.pmid: 20338553
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1998 Jul;7(1):71-87
references.pmid: 9714745
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2001 Sep;14(5):877-83
references.pmid: 11576192
references.citation: Audiol Neurootol. 2000 May-Aug;5(3-4):151-66
references.pmid: 10859410
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1987 Jul;24(4):375-425
references.pmid: 3615753
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 1982 Feb-Mar;14(1-2):53-98
references.pmid: 7104425
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Jan;10(3):265-73
references.pmid: 11167050
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jul;17(2):347-57
references.pmid: 12880905
references.citation: Brain Res. 2008 Sep 10;1229:193-203
references.pmid: 18634759
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Mar;22(3):451-6
references.pmid: 15722214
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Mar;106(3):259-61
references.pmid: 9743285
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2009 Mar;46(2):425-38
references.pmid: 19207193
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Nov;8(6):527-39
references.pmid: 23961983
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Nov;83(5):306-21
references.pmid: 1385087
references.citation: Neurobiol Aging. 2009 Jul;30(7):1157-72
references.pmid: 18023507
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2008 Mar 5;19(4):443-6
references.pmid: 18287943
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1461-8
references.pmid: 22563629
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1978 Jul;42(4):313-29
references.pmid: 685709
references.citation: Exp Psychol. 2013;60(4):260-8
references.pmid: 23628699
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Oct;18(10):1734-48
references.pmid: 17014377
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2010 Mar;83(3):229-38
references.pmid: 20064580
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2013 Sep;50(9):920-30
references.pmid: 23763292
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):664-74
references.pmid: 22022895
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2010 Feb;83(2):143-52
references.pmid: 19963034
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Sep 26;27(39):10383-90
references.pmid: 17898210
references.citation: Science. 1973 Oct 12;182(4108):177-80
references.pmid: 4730062
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2001 Jun;25(4):355-73
references.pmid: 11445140
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2004 Sep;41(5):665-78
references.pmid: 15318873
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2008 Oct;79(2):139-47
references.pmid: 18468765
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2005 Aug;37(3):379-84
references.pmid: 16405133
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2003 Dec;8(4):434-47
references.pmid: 14664681
references.citation: Neuroreport. 1998 Oct 26;9(15):3355-8
references.pmid: 9855279
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2006 Apr 3;396(3):177-81
references.pmid: 16356637
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Feb;114(2):341-9
references.pmid: 12559243