title: Luminance, but not chromatic visual pathways, mediate amplification of conditioned danger signals in human visual cortex.
abstract: Complex organisms rely on experience to optimize the function of perceptual and motor systems in situations relevant to survival. It is well established that visual cues reliably paired with danger are processed more efficiently than neutral cues, and that such facilitated sensory processing extends to low levels of the visual system. The neurophysiological mechanisms mediating biased sensory processing, however, are not well understood. Here we used grating stimuli specifically designed to engage luminance or chromatic pathways of the human visual system in a differential classical conditioning paradigm. Behavioral ratings and visual electroencephalographic steady-state potentials were recorded in healthy human participants. Our findings indicate that the visuocortical response to high-spatial-frequency isoluminant (red-green) grating stimuli was not modulated by fear conditioning, but low-contrast, low-spatial-frequency reversal of grayscale gratings resulted in pronounced conditioning effects. We conclude that sensory input conducted via the chromatic pathways into retinotopic visual cortex has limited access to the bi-directional connectivity with brain networks mediating the acquisition and expression of fear, such as the amygdaloid complex. Conversely, luminance information is necessary to establish amplification of learned danger signals in hierarchically early regions of the visual system.
authors.affiliation: Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
authors.forename: Andreas
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Keil
authors.forename: Vladimir
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Miskovic
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Gray
authors.forename: Jasna
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Martinovic
mesh_terms: D003118:Color Perception; D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual; D005239:Fear; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D014793:Visual Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D014795:Visual Pathways / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: differential fear conditioning; sensory biases; steady-state potentials; visual learning
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Apr;28(4):323-34
references.pmid: 16779799
references.citation: J Physiol. 2011 Jan 1;589(Pt 1):41-7
references.pmid: 20724364
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Oct;25(2):459-71
references.pmid: 16140512
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2007 Mar 25;45(6):1187-95
references.pmid: 17118408
references.citation: Brain Topogr. 1997 Spring;9(3):203-17
references.pmid: 9104831
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2002 Jan;142(1):139-50
references.pmid: 11797091
references.citation: Neuroscientist. 2009 Jun;15(3):274-90
references.pmid: 19436076
references.citation: Vis Neurosci. 2004 Jan-Feb;21(1):63-8
references.pmid: 15137582
references.citation: Neuron. 1995 Nov;15(5):1029-39
references.pmid: 7576647
references.citation: Science. 2006 Mar 17;311(5767):1606-9
references.pmid: 16543459
references.citation: Vision Res. 1983;23(12):1495-500
references.pmid: 6666050
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 May 25;31(21):7784-90
references.pmid: 21613491
references.citation: Neuroscience. 2003;118(4):1099-120
references.pmid: 12732254
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):466-78
references.pmid: 11561921
references.citation: J Vis. 2009 Mar 13;9(3):10.1-16
references.pmid: 19757949
references.citation: Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:861705
references.pmid: 21577273
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 19;103(38):14250-4
references.pmid: 16956975
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2006 Mar;43(2):216-26
references.pmid: 16712592
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 Jun;36(2):472-9
references.pmid: 17451974
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Feb 17;45(4):613-23
references.pmid: 15721246
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2009 Jun;20(6):707-13
references.pmid: 19422624
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2002 Jan 21;13(1):133-7
references.pmid: 11926166
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jun;91(6):2501-14
references.pmid: 14749310
references.citation: J Integr Neurosci. 2011 Mar;10(1):15-32
references.pmid: 21425480
references.citation: Schizophr Res. 2005 Jul 1;76(1):55-65
references.pmid: 15927798
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Apr;5(4):279-90
references.pmid: 15034553
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 23;31(47):17052-7
references.pmid: 22114274
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Sep;26(1):65-79
references.pmid: 15954123
references.citation: Vis Neurosci. 2000 Jul-Aug;17(4):579-90
references.pmid: 11016577
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references.pmid: 9176952
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Dec;1000:337-47
references.pmid: 14766647
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 1;24(3):874-86
references.pmid: 15652322
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 10;30(45):14955-63
references.pmid: 21068298
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 4;30(31):10337-50
references.pmid: 20685977
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2000 Jul;37(4):523-32
references.pmid: 10934911
references.citation: Vision Res. 2005 Nov;45(25-26):3210-23
references.pmid: 16087209