title: Conceptualizing and experiencing compassion.
abstract: Does compassion feel pleasant or unpleasant? Westerners tend to categorize compassion as a pleasant or positive emotion, but laboratory compassion inductions, which present another's suffering, may elicit unpleasant feelings. Across two studies, we examined whether prototypical conceptualizations of compassion (as pleasant) differ from experiences of compassion (as unpleasant). After laboratory-based neutral or compassion inductions, participants made abstract judgments about compassion relative to various emotion-related adjectives, thereby providing a prototypical conceptualization of compassion. Participants also rated their own affective states, thereby indicating experiences of compassion. Conceptualizations of compassion were pleasant across neutral and compassion inductions. After exposure to others' suffering, however, participants felt increased levels of compassion and unpleasant affect, but not pleasant affect. After neutral inductions, participants reported more pleasant than unpleasant affect, with moderate levels of compassion. Thus, prototypical conceptualizations of compassion are pleasant, but experiences of compassion can feel pleasant or unpleasant. The implications for emotion theory in general are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Northeastern University.
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Condon
authors.forename: Lisa
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Feldman Barrett
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000339:Affect; D003210:Concept Formation; D004644:Emotions; D004645:Empathy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010865:Pilot Projects
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2013 Jul;23(7):1552-61
references.pmid: 22661409
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:373-403
references.pmid: 17002554
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jun;52(6):1061-86
references.pmid: 3598857
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1105-1127
references.pmid: 21192959
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(1):20-46
references.pmid: 16430327
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Aug;87(2):266-81
references.pmid: 15301632
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1985 Oct;11(4):629-54
references.pmid: 2932520
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun;24(6):947-56
references.pmid: 23603916
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Aug;7(6):635-48
references.pmid: 21896494