title: Quantifying the biomass of parasites to understand their role in aquatic communities.
abstract: By infecting multiple host species and acting as a food resource, parasites can affect food web topography and contribute to ecosystem energy transfer. Owing to the remarkable secondary production of some taxa, parasite biomass - although cryptic - can be comparable to other invertebrate and vertebrate groups. More resolved estimates of parasite biomass are therefore needed to understand parasite interactions, their consequences for host fitness, and potential influences on ecosystem energetics. We developed an approach to quantify the masses of helminth parasites and compared our results with those of biovolume-based approaches. Specifically, we massed larval and adult parasites representing 13 species and five life stages of trematodes and cestodes from snail and amphibian hosts. We used a replicated regression approach to quantify dry mass and compared these values with indirect biovolume estimates to test the validity of density assumptions. Our technique provided precise estimates (R (2) from 0.69 to 0.98) of biomass across a wide range of parasite morphotypes and sizes. Individual parasites ranged in mass from 0.368 ± 0.041 to 320 ± 98.1 μg. Among trematodes, adult parasites tended to be the largest followed by rediae, with nonclonal larval stages (metacercariae and cercariae) as the smallest. Among similar morphotypes, direct estimates of dry mass and the traditional biovolume technique provided generally comparable estimates (although important exceptions also emerged). Finally, we present generalized length-mass regression equations to calculate trematode mass from length measurements, and discuss the most efficient use of limited numbers of parasites. By providing a novel method of directly estimating parasite biomass while also helping to validate more traditional methods involving length-mass conversion, our findings aim to facilitate future investigations into the ecological significance of parasites, particularly with respect to ecosystem energetics. In addition, this novel technique can be applied to a wide range of difficult-to-mass organisms.
authors.affiliation: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Ramaley N122, Boulder, Colorado, 80309-0334.
authors.forename: Jason
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lambden
authors.forename: Pieter T J
authors.initials: PT
authors.lastname: Johnson
keywords: Aquatic ecosystem energetics; energy transfer; food webs; host–parasite interactions; parasite density; trematode; wet mass
references.citation: Parasitol Res. 1988;74(4):352-5
references.pmid: 3387408
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2009 Jan;78(1):191-201
references.pmid: 18671806
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Nov;23(11):610-8
references.pmid: 18823679
references.citation: Ecohealth. 2011 Dec;8(4):485-500
references.pmid: 22071719
references.citation: Int J Parasitol. 1999 Jun;29(6):903-14
references.pmid: 10480727
references.citation: Nature. 2008 Jul 24;454(7203):515-8
references.pmid: 18650923
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2009 May;78(3):563-72
references.pmid: 19175443
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 25;103(30):11211-6
references.pmid: 16844774
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Sep 15;437(7057):356-61
references.pmid: 16163346
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 1970;42(4):569-74
references.pmid: 5310951
references.citation: Int J Parasitol. 2005 Jun;35(7):725-32
references.pmid: 15925596
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 29;104(22):9335-9
references.pmid: 17517667
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Mar 7;278(1706):656-65
references.pmid: 20851830
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 5;109(23):9006-11
references.pmid: 22615371
references.citation: Parasitology. 1983 Apr;86 (Pt 4):121-60
references.pmid: 6346231
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jun;25(6):362-71
references.pmid: 20185202
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2013 Jan;16(1):9-21
references.pmid: 23157563
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Jul;21(7):381-5
references.pmid: 16713014
references.citation: Parasitology. 2002;124 Suppl:S101-17
references.pmid: 12396219
references.citation: Int J Parasitol. 2008 May;38(6):683-90
references.pmid: 17980880
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2013 May;82(3):509-17
references.pmid: 23488451
references.citation: J Helminthol. 1995 Sep;69(3):195-201
references.pmid: 8522764
references.citation: Parasitology. 2007 Jun;134(Pt 6):763-76
references.pmid: 17234043
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2008 Jun;11(6):533-46
references.pmid: 18462196
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2009 Sep;7(9):e1000210
references.pmid: 19787022
references.citation: Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):228-33
references.pmid: 10821283
references.citation: Oecologia. 1992 Oct;92(1):58-64
references.pmid: 28311812
references.citation: J Parasitol. 2009 Apr;95(2):477-80
references.pmid: 18763852
references.citation: Parasitol Res. 2008 Jan;102(2):277-82
references.pmid: 17924144
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Jan;24(1):41-8
references.pmid: 19026461
references.citation: Am Nat. 1998 Jun;151(6):497-513
references.pmid: 18811372
references.citation: Parasitology. 2001;123 Suppl:S57-75
references.pmid: 11769293
references.citation: Ecology. 2012 Jun;93(6):1247-53
references.pmid: 22834364
references.citation: Int J Parasitol. 2007 Mar;37(3-4):359-64
references.pmid: 17196596