title: Elliptical excision with midline primary closure versus rhomboid excision with limberg flap reconstruction in sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a prospective, randomized study.
abstract: To compare elliptical excision with primary midline closure and rhomboid excision with limberg flap reconstruction techniques for the sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. This prospective randomized study of 80 patients of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus was performed in SKIMS medical college from 2004 to 2007. After assigning patients randomly to either of the surgical groups, group A patients (40/80) were operated by using rhomboid excision with limberg flap reconstruction whereas group B patients (40/80) were operated by using elliptical excision with primary midline closure. Data was compiled in terms of operative period required, immediate post operative complications, post operative pain (VAS scores), work-off period, hospital stay and recurrences over a follow up of 3 years for the two study groups. Data thereby collected was analyzed by using Microsoft excel. The parameters in which the two techniques were found to differ significantly were work-off period, immediate post operative complications profiles and recurrence rates. Rhomboid excision with limberg flap reconstruction technique surely outscores elliptical excision with primary midline closure in certain important parameters. While facing a patient with uncomplicated sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus, instead of, which procedure for the patient? Surgeons should pose the question why not rhomboid excision with limberg flaps reconstruction?
authors.affiliation: Registrar, General Surgery Department Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS) Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India 190001.
authors.forename: Tufale A
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Dass
authors.forename: Muneer
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Zaz
authors.forename: Ajaz
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Rather
authors.forename: Shamsul
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Bari
keywords: Limberg flap; Pilonidal sinus; Sacrococcygeal
references.citation: ANZ J Surg. 2001 Jun;71(6):362-4
references.pmid: 11409022
references.citation: Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1995 Jul;77(4):242-4
references.pmid: 7574311
references.citation: Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008 Mar;393(2):185-9
references.pmid: 17899165
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 May;45(5):656-9
references.pmid: 12004216
references.citation: Surg Today. 2004;34(5):419-23
references.pmid: 15108080
references.citation: J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1986 Dec;12(12):1295-9
references.pmid: 3782603
references.citation: Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(3):161-6
references.pmid: 7561435
references.citation: Chirurg. 2003 May;74(5):461-8
references.pmid: 12748795
references.citation: Int J Colorectal Dis. 2000 Jun;15(3):173-5
references.pmid: 10954190
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Jun;41(6):775-7
references.pmid: 9645748
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1985 Apr;72(4):303-4
references.pmid: 3886069
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Nov;45(11):1458-67
references.pmid: 12432292
references.citation: Tech Coloproctol. 2002 Apr;6(1):27-32
references.pmid: 12077638
references.citation: Aust N Z J Surg. 2000 Mar;70(3):196-8
references.pmid: 10765903
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2005 Sep;92(9):1081-4
references.pmid: 16078300
references.citation: Surgery. 2003 Nov;134(5):745-9
references.pmid: 14639351
references.citation: Eur J Surg. 1999 May;165(5):468-72
references.pmid: 10391165
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Nov;46(11):1545-8
references.pmid: 14605577