title: Synonymous site conservation in the HIV-1 genome.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Synonymous or silent mutations are usually thought to evolve neutrally. However, accumulating recent evidence has demonstrated that silent mutations may destabilize RNA structures or disrupt cis regulatory motifs superimposed on coding sequences. Such observations suggest the existence of stretches of codon sites that are evolutionary conserved at both DNA-RNA and protein levels. Such stretches may point to functionally important regions within protein coding sequences not necessarily reflecting functional constraints on the amino-acid sequence. The HIV-1 genome is highly compact, and often harbors overlapping functional elements at the protein, RNA, and DNA levels. This superimposition of functions leads to complex selective forces acting on all levels of the genome and proteome. Considering the constraints on HIV-1 to maintain such a highly compact genome, we hypothesized that stretches of synonymous conservation would be common within its genome.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We used a combined computational-experimental approach to detect and characterize regions exhibiting strong purifying selection against synonymous substitutions along the HIV-1 genome. Our methodology is based on advanced probabilistic evolutionary models that explicitly account for synonymous rate variation among sites and rate dependencies among adjacent sites. These models are combined with a randomization procedure to automatically identify the most statistically significant regions of conserved synonymous sites along the genome. Using this procedure we identified 21 conserved regions. Twelve of these are mapped to regions within overlapping genes, seven correlate with known functional elements, while the functions of the remaining four are yet unknown. Among these four regions, we chose the one that deviates most from synonymous rate homogeneity for in-depth computational and experimental characterization. In our assays aiming to quantify viral fitness in both early and late stages of the replication cycle, no differences were observed between the mutated and the wild type virus following the introduction of synonymous mutations.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The contradiction between the inferred purifying selective forces and the lack of effect of these mutations on viral replication may be explained by the fact that the phenotype was measured in single-cycle infection assays in cell culture. Such a system does not account for the complexity of HIV-1 infections in vivo, which involves multiple infection cycles and interaction with the host immune system.
authors.affiliation: Department of Molecular Biology and Ecology of Plants, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel. itaymay@post.tau.ac.il
authors.forename: Itay
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Mayrose
authors.forename: Adi
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Stern
authors.forename: Ela O
authors.initials: EO
authors.lastname: Burdelova
authors.forename: Yosef
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Sabo
authors.forename: Nihay
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Laham-Karam
authors.forename: Rachel
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Zamostiano
authors.forename: Eran
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Bacharach
authors.forename: Tal
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Pupko
mesh_terms: D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D001483:Base Sequence; D003062:Codon / Q000235:genetics; D017124:Conserved Sequence; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D016679:Genome, Viral; D015497:HIV-1 / Q000235:genetics*; D006801:Humans; D016366:Open Reading Frames; D014764:Viral Proteins / Q000235:genetics*
chemical_list: D003062:Codon; D014764:Viral Proteins
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Jan;2(1):13-34
references.pmid: 3916708
references.citation: Mol Cell. 2006 Jun 23;22(6):769-781
references.pmid: 16793546
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 1998;52:491-532
references.pmid: 9891806
references.citation: J Virol. 1995 Apr;69(4):2101-9
references.pmid: 7884856
references.citation: J Virol. 2007 Oct;81(19):10687-98
references.pmid: 17652403
references.citation: Methods Enzymol. 1995;262:347-62
references.pmid: 8594360
references.citation: Nature. 1978 Apr 6;272(5653):532-5
references.pmid: 692657
references.citation: Genome Res. 2003 May;13(5):831-7
references.pmid: 12727903
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7
references.pmid: 15034147
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Mar 1;102(9):3179-80
references.pmid: 15728394
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 23;107(8):3645-50
references.pmid: 20133581
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 2003 Aug;57(2):212-21
references.pmid: 14562964
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jan 26;315(5811):525-8
references.pmid: 17185560
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Feb 05;6(2):e1000664
references.pmid: 20140241
references.citation: Science. 2006 Dec 22;314(5807):1930-3
references.pmid: 17185601
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Feb;7(2):98-108
references.pmid: 16418745
references.citation: Trends Genet. 2002 Sep;18(9):486
references.pmid: 12175810
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Jun 04;3(6):e2356
references.pmid: 18523584
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2007 Jul 1;23(13):i319-27
references.pmid: 17646313
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Feb 11;15(3):1281-95
references.pmid: 3547335
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Dec;28(12):3297-308
references.pmid: 21690564
references.citation: J Virol. 1991 May;65(5):2415-21
references.pmid: 2016765
references.citation: Virol J. 2008 Dec 23;5:160
references.pmid: 19105834
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 1999 Apr;48(4):390-7
references.pmid: 10079277
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2005 May 1;21(9):2101-3
references.pmid: 15647294
references.citation: J Virol. 2004 Apr;78(7):3722-32
references.pmid: 15016892
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Mar 07;11:59
references.pmid: 21385374
references.citation: Science. 2009 Apr 10;324(5924):255-8
references.pmid: 19359587
references.citation: Trends Genet. 2002 May;18(5):228-32
references.pmid: 12047938
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1994 Sep 2;241(5):651-62
references.pmid: 7520946
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2003 Oct;52(5):696-704
references.pmid: 14530136
references.citation: Nature. 2008 Jan 24;451(7177):425-30
references.pmid: 18200009
references.citation: Genetics. 2000 May;155(1):431-49
references.pmid: 10790415
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Aug;27(8):1912-22
references.pmid: 20231333
references.citation: J Virol. 1996 May;70(5):2963-73
references.pmid: 8627772
references.citation: Curr Biol. 1996 Mar 1;6(3):315-24
references.pmid: 8805248
references.citation: Methods Enzymol. 2002;344:536-56
references.pmid: 11771409
references.citation: J Virol. 2004 Sep;78(18):9675-88
references.pmid: 15331700
references.citation: J Virol. 2002 Oct;76(20):10473-84
references.pmid: 12239324
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Mar;27(3):520-36
references.pmid: 19864470
references.citation: Cell. 1990 Feb 23;60(4):675-83
references.pmid: 2406030
references.citation: J Virol. 1995 Jul;69(7):4587-92
references.pmid: 7769729
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008;3(11):e3746
references.pmid: 19015730
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2002 Jun 21;319(5):1059-66
references.pmid: 12079347
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Aug 6;460(7256):711-6
references.pmid: 19661910