title: Getting the biggest birch for the bang: restoring and expanding upland birchwoods in the Scottish Highlands by managing red deer.
abstract: High deer populations threaten the conservation value of woodlands and grasslands, but predicting the success of deer culling, in terms of allowing vegetation to recover, is difficult. Numerical simulation modeling is one approach to gain insight into the outcomes of management scenarios. We develop a spatially explicit model to predict the responses of Betula spp. to red deer (Cervus elaphus) and land management in the Scottish Highlands. Our model integrates a Bayesian stochastic stage-based matrix model within the framework of a widely used individual-based forest simulation model, using data collected along spatial and temporal gradients in deer browsing. By initializing our model with the historical spatial locations of trees, we find that densities of juvenile trees (<3 m tall) predicted after 9-13 years closely match counts observed in the field. This is among the first tests of the accuracy of a dynamical simulation model for predicting the responses of tree regeneration to herbivores. We then test the relative importance of deer browsing, ground cover vegetation, and seed availability in facilitating landscape-level birch regeneration using simulations in which we varied these three variables. We find that deer primarily control transitions of birch to taller (>3 m) height tiers over 30 years, but regeneration also requires suitable ground cover for seedling establishment. Densities of adult seed sources did not influence regeneration, nor did an active management scenario where we altered the spatial configuration of adults by creating "woodland islets". Our results show that managers interested in maximizing tree regeneration cannot simply reduce deer densities but must also improve ground cover for seedling establishment, and the model we develop now enables managers to quantify explicitly how much both these factors need to be altered. More broadly, our findings emphasize the need for land managers to consider the impacts of large herbivores rather than their densities.
authors.affiliation: Forest Ecology and Conservation Group, Department of Plant Sciences, Downing Street, University of Cambridge Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.
authors.forename: Andrew J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Tanentzap
authors.forename: James
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Zou
authors.forename: David A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Coomes
keywords: Afforestation; disturbance; evidence-based conservation; herbivory; modeling; restoration; wildlife management
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Nov;88(11):2766-72
references.pmid: 18051645
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2009 Oct;19(7):1909-19
references.pmid: 19831079
references.citation: Nature. 2004 May 20;429(6989):261-2
references.pmid: 15152241
references.citation: J Environ Manage. 2004 Jul;71(3):261-70
references.pmid: 15158288
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2007 Oct;10(10):889-901
references.pmid: 17845289
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2007 Aug;21(4):956-63
references.pmid: 17650246
references.citation: J Environ Manage. 2009 Jul;90(9):2857-65
references.pmid: 18838205