title: Ultrasonographic evaluation of relative gastrointestinal layer thickness in cats without clinical evidence of gastrointestinal tract disease.
abstract: The objectives of this study were (1) to measure normal thickness values of the muscularis, submucosal, mucosal and serosal layers in each gastrointestinal (GI) segment (gastric fundus, body and pyloric antrum; duodenum; jejunum; ileum; colon), and (2) to calculate a ratio of muscularis and mucosal layer thickness to aortic diameter measured at the level of the celiac artery (Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao) in each GI segment in a sample of healthy cats. Ultrasonographic examination of the GI tract was performed, and measurements of the individual layers in each GI segment were obtained in 38 healthy cats without clinical evidence of disease. The muscularis layer was significantly thickest in the ileum, compared with other segments, and it was thicker than the submucosa in all segments except the colon. The mucosa was the thickest layer in all segments, and was thickest in the duodenum and ileum. Measurements of the submucosal and serosal layers were not significantly different between all segments. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao in each segment were 0.12 and 0.25 (gastric fundus), 0.12 and 0.18 (gastric body), 0.11 and 0.16 (pyloric antrum), 0.08 and 0.27 (duodenum), 0.08 and 0.22 (jejunum), 0.14 and 0.25 (ileum), and 0.05 and 0.08 (colon), respectively. Musc:Ao and Muc:Ao are clinically relevant values that can be used to objectively identify thickening of the muscularis and mucosal layers in response to GI diseases.
authors.affiliation: 1University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Gainesville, FL, USA.
authors.forename: Matthew D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Winter
authors.forename: Leonel
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Londono
authors.forename: Clifford R
authors.initials: CR
authors.lastname: Berry
authors.forename: Jorge A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Hernandez
mesh_terms: D000375:Aging; D000821:Animal Feed; D000818:Animals; D002415:Cats / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D016292:Procedural Sedation; D007422:Intestines / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D014463:Ultrasonography
references.citation: J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2000 May-Jun;36(3):224-8
references.pmid: 10825093
references.citation: J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1999 Aug 1;215(3):349-54
references.pmid: 10434972
references.citation: Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2010 Jul-Aug;51(4):458-61
references.pmid: 20806880
references.citation: Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(6):719-26
references.pmid: 18569990
references.citation: Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2003 Sep-Oct;44(5):556-64
references.pmid: 14599169
references.citation: J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009 Mar 15;234(6):771-6
references.pmid: 19284343
references.citation: Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2003 Sep-Oct;44(5):566-9
references.pmid: 14599170
references.citation: Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2007 Sep-Oct;48(5):434-8
references.pmid: 17899978
references.citation: Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2004 Sep-Oct;45(5):424-37
references.pmid: 15487568
references.citation: Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 1999 Jan-Feb;40(1):40-3
references.pmid: 10023994
references.citation: Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2003 Jan-Feb;44(1):81-5
references.pmid: 12620056
references.citation: J Vet Intern Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;24(2):289-92
references.pmid: 20102493
references.citation: J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002 Dec 1;221(11):1559-67
references.pmid: 12479324