title: Challenges and strategies in the administration of a population based mortality follow-back survey design.
abstract: Population-based mortality follow-back survey designs have been used to collect information concerning end-of-life care from bereaved family members in several countries. In Canada, this design was recently employed to gather population-based information about the end-of-life care experience among adults in Nova Scotia as perceived by the decedent's family. In this article we describe challenges that emerged during the implementation of the study design and discuss resolutions strategies to help overcome them. Challenges encountered included the inability to directly contact potential participants, difficulties ascertaining eligibility, mailing strategy complications and the overall effect of these issues on response rate and subsequent sample size. Although not all challenges were amenable to resolution, strategies implemented proved beneficial to the overall process and resulted in surpassing the targeted sample size. The inability to directly contact potential participants is an increasing reality and limitations associated with this process best acknowledged during study development. Future studies should also consider addressing participant concerns pertaining to their eligibility and use of a more cost effective mailing strategy.
authors.affiliation: Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, 5909 Veterans Memorial Lane, Abbie J, Lane Building, 8th Fl, Halifax, NS B3H 2E2, Canada. Bev.Lawson@Dal.Ca.
authors.forename: Beverley
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Lawson
authors.forename: Kristine
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Van Aarsen
authors.forename: Frederick
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Burge
references.citation: J Public Health Med. 1991 May;13(2):81-7
references.pmid: 1854528
references.citation: J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2005;19(3):75-83
references.pmid: 16219618
references.citation: BMJ. 2002 May 18;324(7347):1183
references.pmid: 12016181
references.citation: J Palliat Care. 2004 Winter;20(4):297-302
references.pmid: 15690832
references.citation: JAMA. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):88-93
references.pmid: 14709580
references.citation: Palliat Med. 1995 Jan;9(1):27-35
references.pmid: 7719516
references.citation: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Aug;28(2):104-14
references.pmid: 15276191
references.citation: Palliat Med. 2005 Sep;19(6):492-9
references.pmid: 16218162
references.citation: J Palliat Med. 2005;8 Suppl 1:S42-9
references.pmid: 16499468
references.citation: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Sep;22(3):784-90
references.pmid: 11532591
references.citation: Palliat Med. 1995 Oct;9(4):295-305
references.pmid: 8548091
references.citation: BMC Palliat Care. 2002 Mar 25;1(1):2
references.pmid: 11911767
references.citation: J Palliat Care. 2004 Spring;20(1):12-9
references.pmid: 15132071
references.citation: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Apr;52(4):532-9
references.pmid: 15066067
references.citation: J Palliat Care. 2012 Autumn;28(3):169-74
references.pmid: 23098016
references.citation: Palliat Med. 2005 Dec;19(8):628-38
references.pmid: 16450880
references.citation: Control Clin Trials. 1990 Apr;11(2):116-28
references.pmid: 2161310
references.citation: J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1;25(13):1691-7
references.pmid: 17470861
references.citation: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Jul;32(1):5-12
references.pmid: 16824980
references.citation: BMJ. 2003 Jul 26;327(7408):173-4
references.pmid: 12881231
references.citation: J Palliat Care. 1992 Winter;8(4):8-12
references.pmid: 1487800
references.citation: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 May;60(5):412-6
references.pmid: 16614331
references.citation: Chest. 2003 Jul;124(1):392-7
references.pmid: 12853551