title: Within-person variability in calculated risk factors: comparing the aetiological association of adiposity ratios with risk of coronary heart disease.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Within-person variability in measured values of a risk factor can bias its association with disease. We investigated the extent of regression dilution bias in calculated variables and its implications for comparing the aetiological associations of risk factors.
  
  
  METHODS
  Using a numerical illustration and repeats from 42,300 individuals (12 cohorts), we estimated regression dilution ratios (RDRs) in calculated risk factors [body-mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR)] and in their components (height, weight, waist circumference, and hip circumference), assuming the long-term average exposure to be of interest. Error-corrected hazard ratios (HRs) for risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) were compared across adiposity measures per standard-deviation (SD) change in: (i) baseline and (ii) error-corrected levels.
  
  
  RESULTS
  RDRs in calculated risk factors depend strongly on the RDRs, correlation, and comparative distributions of the components of these risk factors. For measures of adiposity, the RDR was lower for WHR [RDR: 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.65-0.80)] than for either of its components [waist circumference: 0.87 (0.85-0.90); hip circumference: 0.90 (0.86-0.93) or for BMI: 0.96 (0.93-0.98) and WHtR: 0.87 (0.85-0.90)], predominantly because of the stronger correlation and more similar distributions observed between waist circumference and hip circumference than between height and weight or between waist circumference and height. Error-corrected HRs for BMI, waist circumference, WHR, and WHtR, were respectively 1.24, 1.30, 1.44, and 1.32 per SD change in baseline levels of these variables, and 1.24, 1.27, 1.35, and 1.30 per SD change in error-corrected levels.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The extent of within-person variability relative to between-person variability in calculated risk factors can be considerably larger (or smaller) than in its components. Aetiological associations of risk factors should be compared through the use of error-corrected HRs per SD change in error-corrected levels of these risk factors.
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. david.wormser@phpc.cam.ac.uk
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Wormser
authors.forename: Ian R
authors.initials: IR
authors.lastname: White
authors.forename: Simon G
authors.initials: SG
authors.lastname: Thompson
authors.forename: Angela M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Wood
mesh_terms: D050154:Adiposity; D015982:Bias; D015992:Body Mass Index; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology*; D016021:Epidemiologic Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009765:Obesity / Q000150:complications*; D012307:Risk Factors; D055105:Waist Circumference
keywords: Regression dilution bias; adiposity measures; measurement error; within-person variation
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;39(5):1156-9
references.pmid: 21051367
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;39(5):1159-61
references.pmid: 21051368
references.citation: Stat Med. 2009 Mar 30;28(7):1067-92
references.pmid: 19222086
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Oct;132(4):734-45
references.pmid: 2403114
references.citation: Lancet. 2002 Dec 14;360(9349):1903-13
references.pmid: 12493255
references.citation: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1995 Sep;19(9):644-52
references.pmid: 8574275
references.citation: BMJ. 1996 Jun 29;312(7047):1659-61
references.pmid: 8664725
references.citation: Stat Med. 2013 Jan 30;32(2):230-9
references.pmid: 22806695
references.citation: JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):1993-2000
references.pmid: 19903920
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;34(6):1359-68
references.pmid: 16051613
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 2005 May 1;161(9):856-63
references.pmid: 15840618
references.citation: Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22(12):839-69
references.pmid: 17876711
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;35(6):1570-8
references.pmid: 17148467
references.citation: BMJ. 1994 Feb 5;308(6925):363-6
references.pmid: 8124143
references.citation: Lancet. 1990 Mar 31;335(8692):765-74
references.pmid: 1969518
references.citation: Clin Chem. 1972 Jun;18(6):499-502
references.pmid: 4337382
references.citation: Lancet. 2011 Mar 26;377(9771):1085-95
references.pmid: 21397319
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;39(5):1137-50
references.pmid: 21051364
references.citation: Stat Med. 1989 Sep;8(9):1051-69; discussion 1071-3
references.pmid: 2799131
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;39(5):1151-3
references.pmid: 21051365
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(11):1223-31
references.pmid: 1941017
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;39(5):1153-5
references.pmid: 21051366
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;39(5):1345-59
references.pmid: 20439481
references.citation: BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
references.pmid: 12958120