title: Gastrostomy feeding versus oral feeding alone for children with cerebral palsy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Children with cerebral palsy can be significantly disabled in terms of their ability to suck, chew and swallow. This can lead to significant impairment in feeding and, eventually, to undernutrition. It can also result in aspiration of food into the lungs. Length of feeding time may be considerably increased and, instead of being an enjoyable experience, mealtimes may be distressing for both child and carer. For children unable to maintain a normal nutritional state feeding by mouth, gastrostomy or jejunostomy tubes are increasingly being used to provide the digestive system with nutrients. A gastrostomy tube is a feeding tube inserted surgically through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach. A jejunostomy feeding tube is inserted into the jejunum, part of the small intestine, either directly or via a previous gastrostomy. Although gastrostomy or jejunostomy placement may greatly facilitate the feeding of children with cerebral palsy, many carers find it very emotionally difficult to accept this intervention. Moreover, the intervention is costly and there is the possibility of complications. The effectiveness and safety of the treatment requires further assessment. This review is an update of one previously published in 2004.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To assess the effects of nutritional supplementation given via gastrostomy or jejunostomy to children with feeding difficulties due to cerebral palsy.
  
  
  METHODS
  For this update, we searched the following databases in July 2012: CENTRAL, MEDLINE , Embase, CINAHL, Science Citation Index, Conference Proceedings Citation Index, LILACS and Zetoc. We searched for trials in ICTRP and Clinicaltrials.gov, and for theses in WorldCat and Proquest Index to Theses. We also contacted other researchers and experts in this field.
  
  
  METHODS
  We looked for randomised controlled trials that compared delivery of nutrition via a gastrostomy or jejunostomy tube compared with oral feeding alone for children up to the age of 16 years.
  
  
  METHODS
  Screening of search results was undertaken independently by two review authors. No data extraction was possible as there were no included studies.
  
  
  RESULTS
  No trials were identified that met the inclusion criteria for this review.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Considerable uncertainty about the effects of gastrostomy for children with cerebral palsy remains. A well designed and conducted randomised controlled trial should be undertaken to resolve the current uncertainties about medical management for children with cerebral palsy and physical difficulties in eating.
authors.affiliation: Department of Paediatrics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. sgantasala@doctors.org.uk.
authors.forename: Sapthagiri
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Gantasala
authors.forename: Peter B
authors.initials: PB
authors.lastname: Sullivan
authors.forename: Adrian G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Thomas
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D002547:Cerebral Palsy / Q000150:complications*; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004435:Eating; D005774:Gastrostomy / Q000009:adverse effects; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D009748:Nutrition Disorders / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control*
references.citation: Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
references.pmid: 12111919
references.citation: J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Mar;102(3):361-73
references.pmid: 11902369
references.citation: Arch Dis Child. 2004 Jun;89(6):534-9
references.pmid: 15155398
references.citation: Pediatr Neurol. 1998 Feb;18(2):143-9
references.pmid: 9535300
references.citation: J Am Diet Assoc. 1996 Sep;96(9):874-9
references.pmid: 8784331
references.citation: J Pediatr Nurs. 1998 Aug;13(4):234-43
references.pmid: 9753909
references.citation: J Pediatr Nurs. 1997 Apr;12(2):89-99
references.pmid: 9103777
references.citation: Pediatrics. 1988 Dec;82(6):857-62
references.pmid: 3186375
references.citation: BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
references.pmid: 9310563
references.citation: Dev Med Child Neurol. 1995 Apr;37(4):320-9
references.pmid: 7698523
references.citation: Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997 Apr;39(4):214-23
references.pmid: 9183258
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2011 Jun;127(6):e1471-81
references.pmid: 21624876
references.citation: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1998 Mar;26(3):269-73
references.pmid: 9523860
references.citation: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006 Jul;43(1):123-35
references.pmid: 16819391
references.citation: Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006 Sep;48(9):713-7
references.pmid: 16904015
references.citation: Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003 Jun;45(6):415-26
references.pmid: 12785443
references.citation: J Pediatr. 1999 Sep;135(3):307-10
references.pmid: 10484794
references.citation: Arch Dis Child. 2006 Jun;91(6):478-82
references.pmid: 16446283
references.citation: Dev Med Child Neurol. 1986 Dec;28(6):729-33
references.pmid: 3817311
references.citation: Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005 Feb;47(2):77-85
references.pmid: 15707230
references.citation: South Med J. 1998 Feb;91(2):161-72
references.pmid: 9496870
references.citation: Arch Dis Child. 2009 Sep;94(9):668-73
references.pmid: 19465586
references.citation: Dev Med Child Neurol. 1986 Dec;28(6):734-9
references.pmid: 3102303
references.citation: Paediatr Child Health. 2009 Jul;14(6):395-401
references.pmid: 20592978
references.citation: Child Care Health Dev. 2005 Jul;31(4):373-83
references.pmid: 15948874
references.citation: J Pediatr. 1999 Sep;135(3):272-3
references.pmid: 10484786
references.citation: Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
references.pmid: 1593914