title: A pilot registry of unexplained fatiguing illnesses and chronic fatigue syndrome.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has no diagnostic clinical signs or biomarkers, so diagnosis requires ruling out conditions with similar signs and symptoms. We conducted a pilot registry of unexplained fatiguing illnesses and CFS to determine the feasibility of establishing and operating a registry and implementing an education outreach initiative. The pilot registry was conducted in Bibb County, Georgia. Patient referrals were obtained from healthcare providers who were identified by using various education outreach initiatives. These referrals were later supplemented with self-referrals by members of a local CFS support group. All patients meeting referral criteria were invited to participate in a screening interview to determine eligibility. If patients met registry criteria, they were invited to a one-day clinic for physical and laboratory evaluations. We classified patients based on the 1994 case definition.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We registered 827 healthcare providers. Forty-two providers referred 88 patients, and 58 patients (66%) completed clinical evaluation. Of the 188 CFS support group members, 53 were self-referred and 46 (87%) completed the clinical evaluation. Of the 104 participants completing evaluation, 36% (n = 37) met the criteria for CFS, 17% (n = 18) had insufficient fatigue or symptoms (ISF), and 47% (n = 49) were found to have exclusionary medical or psychiatric illnesses. Classification varied significantly by type of referral but not by previous history of CFS diagnosis. Healthcare providers referred more patients who were classified as CFS as compared to support group referrals in which more exclusionary conditions were identified. Family practice and internal medicine specialties made the most referrals and had the highest number of CFS cases. We conducted three CME events, held three "Meet and Greet" sessions, visited four large clinical health practices and health departments, mailed five registry newsletters, and conducted in-person office visits as part of education outreach, which contributed to patient referrals.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Referrals from healthcare providers and self-referrals from the patient support group were important to registry enrollment. The number of potentially treatable conditions that were identified highlights the need for continued medical management in this population, as well as the limitations of registries formed without clinical examination. Education initiatives were successful in part because of partnerships with local organizations.
authors.affiliation: Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS-G41, Atlanta, GA 30033, USA. dyv4@cdc.gov
authors.forename: Dana J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Brimmer
authors.forename: Elizabeth
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Maloney
authors.forename: Rebecca
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Devlin
authors.forename: James F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.forename: Roumiana
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Boneva
authors.forename: Caryn
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Nagler
authors.forename: Lisa
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: LeRoy
authors.forename: Scott
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Royal
authors.forename: Hao
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Tian
authors.forename: Jin-Mann S
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Lin
authors.forename: Jennifer
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kasten
authors.forename: Elizabeth R
authors.initials: ER
authors.lastname: Unger
mesh_terms: D015673:Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D010865:Pilot Projects; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D012042:Registries
references.citation: MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1997 Feb 21;46(2):1-13
references.pmid: 12412768
references.citation: Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Dec;87(12):1145-52
references.pmid: 23140977
references.citation: Fam Pract. 2005 Aug;22(4):389-93
references.pmid: 15805128
references.citation: Popul Health Metr. 2007 Jun 08;5:5
references.pmid: 17559660
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1994 Dec 15;121(12):953-9
references.pmid: 7978722
references.citation: JRSM Short Rep. 2012 Jan;3(1):4
references.pmid: 22299071
references.citation: BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Apr 21;11:28
references.pmid: 20406491
references.citation: J Psychosom Res. 2005 Nov;59(5):283-90
references.pmid: 16253618
references.citation: BMC Res Notes. 2011 May 09;4:139
references.pmid: 21554673
references.citation: Psychosom Med. 2001 Nov-Dec;63(6):936-43
references.pmid: 11719632
references.citation: Twin Res. 1999 Sep;2(3):203-11
references.pmid: 10555131
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 1999 Oct 11;159(18):2129-37
references.pmid: 10527290
references.citation: Twin Res Hum Genet. 2007 Oct;10(5):729-33
references.pmid: 17903114
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jul 14;163(13):1530-6
references.pmid: 12860574
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2004 Nov 8;164(20):2241-5
references.pmid: 15534161
references.citation: Arch Environ Health. 1999 Sep-Oct;54(5):313-8
references.pmid: 10501146