title: Are the measurements of water-filled and air-charged catheters the same in urodynamics?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The aim of our study was to compare air-charged and water-filled catheters simultaneously in the measurement of the intravesical, abdominal and detrusor pressure during urodynamic investigations.
  
  
  METHODS
  Consecutive women with lower urinary tract symptoms, referred for urodynamics were prospectively studied. Readings of intravesical pressure (p(ves)), abdominal pressure (p(abd)) and detrusor pressure (p(det)), recorded by both the air-charged and water-filled catheters, were displayed simultaneously and compared at the end of filling, on standing, on sitting prior to voiding and at the maximum involuntary detrusor contraction. The signals (pressures) recorded by both types of catheter were compared using the Bland-Altman plot and paired samples t test.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Twenty women with a mean age of 49 (range 36-72) were recruited. One patient with normal urodynamics was excluded in view of the poor quality trace. At each of the four comparison points, the air-charged catheters consistently produced higher mean pressures than the water-filled catheters. There were wide variations in the difference between the readings produced by the two types of catheter.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Pressures measured using air-charged catheters are not comparable with water-filled catheters and are therefore not interchangeable. Caution must be used when comparing urodynamic parameters using air-charged and water-filled catheters.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urogynaecology, St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK, a.digesu@imperial.ac.uk.
authors.forename: G Alessandro
authors.initials: GA
authors.lastname: Digesu
authors.forename: Alexandros
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Derpapas
authors.forename: Penny
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Robshaw
authors.forename: Gopalan
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Vijaya
authors.forename: Caroline
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Hendricken
authors.forename: Vik
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Khullar
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000388:Air; D003950:Diagnostic Techniques, Urological / Q000592:standards*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D059411:Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D062885:Urinary Catheters / Q000592:standards*; D014563:Urodynamics; D014867:Water
chemical_list: D014867:Water
references.citation: Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
references.pmid: 2868172
references.citation: Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Mar;23(3):269-77
references.pmid: 22011933
references.citation: J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):1013-7
references.pmid: 18639301
references.citation: BMJ. 1996 Jul 13;313(7049):106
references.pmid: 8688716
references.citation: Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jan;21(1):5-26
references.pmid: 19937315
references.citation: Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Mar;24(3):447-52
references.pmid: 22814932
references.citation: Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(3):191-6
references.pmid: 18973145
references.citation: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Mar;97(3):251-9
references.pmid: 2334653
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;98(2):253-7
references.pmid: 11506841
references.citation: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Aug;18(8):931-5
references.pmid: 17131168
references.citation: Br J Urol. 1969 Apr;41(2):211-7
references.pmid: 5814020
references.citation: Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):140-5
references.pmid: 19693949
references.citation: Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(3):261-74
references.pmid: 11948720
references.citation: Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Mar;30(3):329-34
references.pmid: 21305591
references.citation: Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Mar;24(3):461-7
references.pmid: 22722647
references.citation: BJOG. 2002 Mar;109(3):322-6
references.pmid: 11950188
references.citation: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004 Mar-Apr;15(2):124-8; discussion 128
references.pmid: 15014940
references.citation: Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jun;23(6):681-5
references.pmid: 21935667