title: Organ-specific remodeling of the Arabidopsis transcriptome in response to spaceflight.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Spaceflight presents a novel environment that is outside the evolutionary experience of terrestrial organisms. Full activation of the International Space Station as a science platform complete with sophisticated plant growth chambers, laboratory benches, and procedures for effective sample return, has enabled a new level of research capability and hypothesis testing in this unique environment. The opportunity to examine the strategies of environmental sensing in spaceflight, which includes the absence of unit gravity, provides a unique insight into the balance of influence among abiotic cues directing plant growth and development: including gravity, light, and touch. The data presented here correlate morphological and transcriptome data from replicated spaceflight experiments.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The transcriptome of Arabidopsis thaliana demonstrated organ-specific changes in response to spaceflight, with 480 genes showing significant changes in expression in spaceflight plants compared with ground controls by at least 1.9-fold, and 58 by more than 7-fold. Leaves, hypocotyls, and roots each displayed unique patterns of response, yet many gene functions within the responses are related. Particularly represented across the dataset were genes associated with cell architecture and growth hormone signaling; processes that would not be anticipated to be altered in microgravity yet may correlate with morphological changes observed in spaceflight plants. As examples, differential expression of genes involved with touch, cell wall remodeling, root hairs, and cell expansion may correlate with spaceflight-associated root skewing, while differential expression of auxin-related and other gravity-signaling genes seemingly correlates with the microgravity of spaceflight. Although functionally related genes were differentially represented in leaves, hypocotyls, and roots, the expression of individual genes varied substantially across organ types, indicating that there is no single response to spaceflight. Rather, each organ employed its own response tactics within a shared strategy, largely involving cell wall architecture.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Spaceflight appears to initiate cellular remodeling throughout the plant, yet specific strategies of the response are distinct among specific organs of the plant. Further, these data illustrate that in the absence of gravity plants rely on other environmental cues to initiate the morphological responses essential to successful growth and development, and that the basis for that engagement lies in the differential expression of genes in an organ-specific manner that maximizes the utilization of these signals--such as the up-regulation of genes associated with light-sensing in roots.
authors.affiliation: Department of Horticultural Sciences, Program in Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
authors.forename: Anna-Lisa
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Paul
authors.forename: Agata K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Zupanska
authors.forename: Eric R
authors.initials: ER
authors.lastname: Schultz
authors.forename: Robert J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Ferl
mesh_terms: D017360:Arabidopsis / Q000235:genetics* / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism; D029681:Arabidopsis Proteins / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism; D017753:Ecosystem; D018506:Gene Expression Regulation, Plant; D013026:Space Flight; D013045:Species Specificity; D059467:Transcriptome
chemical_list: D029681:Arabidopsis Proteins
references.citation: Front Plant Sci. 2012 Aug 22;3:187
references.pmid: 22936938
references.citation: Biol Sci Space. 2003 Dec;17(4):307-8
references.pmid: 15136754
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1995 Oct;7(10):1555-67
references.pmid: 7580251
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2011 Jun;62(10):3545-61
references.pmid: 21402660
references.citation: Mol Plant. 2009 Jan;2(1):108-19
references.pmid: 19529818
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2011 Jun;62(10):3459-66
references.pmid: 21459767
references.citation: BMC Plant Biol. 2012 Dec 07;12:232
references.pmid: 23217113
references.citation: New Phytol. 2010 May;186(3):648-56
references.pmid: 20298479
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2013 Jan;100(1):111-25
references.pmid: 23281392
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2013 Jan;100(1):203-14
references.pmid: 23284058
references.citation: Plant J. 2012 Mar;69(6):1064-76
references.pmid: 22098134
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2013 Jan;100(1):235-48
references.pmid: 23258370
references.citation: Endeavour. 2012 Sep;36(3):117-24
references.pmid: 22613222
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2004 Jan;134(1):215-23
references.pmid: 14701916
references.citation: Planta. 2008 Dec;229(1):151-9
references.pmid: 18807069
references.citation: Life Support Biosph Sci. 2002;8(2):83-91
references.pmid: 11987307
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1997 Nov;9(11):1963-71
references.pmid: 9401121
references.citation: J Mol Endocrinol. 2000 Oct;25(2):169-93
references.pmid: 11013345
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2004 Jun;135(2):959-68
references.pmid: 15181211
references.citation: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000 Oct 22;277(2):305-10
references.pmid: 11032722
references.citation: Int J Plant Sci. 2001 Mar;162(2):249-55
references.pmid: 11725801
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2004 Apr;134(4):1555-73
references.pmid: 15047898
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2013 Jan;100(1):14-24
references.pmid: 23258371
references.citation: Plant Mol Biol. 2011 Jan;75(1-2):77-92
references.pmid: 21052782
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2013 Jan;100(1):143-52
references.pmid: 23002165
references.citation: Adv Space Res. 2003;31(1):51-61
references.pmid: 12577926
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2000 Apr;41(4):391-8
references.pmid: 10845451
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2013 Jan;100(1):47-59
references.pmid: 23152332
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2013 Jan;100(1):1-3
references.pmid: 23281390
references.citation: J Gravit Physiol. 2002 Jul;9(1):P223-4
references.pmid: 15002557
references.citation: J Biosci. 2011 Dec;36(5):911-9
references.pmid: 22116289
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2006 Nov 24;2(11):e202
references.pmid: 17121469
references.citation: Planta. 2011 May;233(5):911-20
references.pmid: 21234599
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36210
references.pmid: 22590525
references.citation: Astrobiology. 2012 Jan;12(1):40-56
references.pmid: 22221117
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2007 Mar;19(3):731-49
references.pmid: 17337630
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2013 Jan;100(1):226-34
references.pmid: 23281389
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2010 Feb;152(2):866-75
references.pmid: 19955262
references.citation: Planta. 2006 Oct;224(5):1038-49
references.pmid: 16708225
references.citation: Development. 2004 Mar;131(5):1089-100
references.pmid: 14973283
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Dec 8;95(25):14863-8
references.pmid: 9843981
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2010 Nov;51(11):1821-39
references.pmid: 20980270
references.citation: Astrobiology. 2011 Oct;11(8):787-97
references.pmid: 21970704
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2013 Jan;100(1):126-42
references.pmid: 23048015
references.citation: Biotechniques. 2007 Jul;43(1 Suppl):25-30
references.pmid: 17936939
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2011 May;156(1):11-9
references.pmid: 21415277
references.citation: Planta. 2012 Aug;236(2):635-45
references.pmid: 22481136
references.citation: Plant J. 1995 Nov;8(5):777-84
references.pmid: 8528289
references.citation: Plant J. 2004 Dec;40(5):686-98
references.pmid: 15546352
references.citation: New Phytol. 2009;183(4):1043-1052
references.pmid: 19538548