title: Energetic cost of brain functional connectivity.
abstract: The brain's functional connectivity is complex, has high energetic cost, and requires efficient use of glucose, the brain's main energy source. It has been proposed that regions with a high degree of functional connectivity are energy efficient and can minimize consumption of glucose. However, the relationship between functional connectivity and energy consumption in the brain is poorly understood. To address this neglect, here we propose a simple model for the energy demands of brain functional connectivity, which we tested with positron emission tomography and MRI in 54 healthy volunteers at rest. Higher glucose metabolism was associated with proportionally larger MRI signal amplitudes, and a higher degree of connectivity was associated with nonlinear increases in metabolism, supporting our hypothesis for the energy efficiency of the connectivity hubs. Basal metabolism (in the absence of connectivity) accounted for 30% of brain glucose utilization, which suggests that the spontaneous brain activity accounts for 70% of the energy consumed by the brain. The energy efficiency of the connectivity hubs was higher for ventral precuneus, cerebellum, and subcortical hubs than for cortical hubs. The higher energy demands of brain communication that hinges upon higher connectivity could render brain hubs more vulnerable to deficits in energy delivery or utilization and help explain their sensitivity to neurodegenerative conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease.
authors.affiliation: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. tomasidg@mail.nih.gov
authors.forename: Dardo
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Tomasi
authors.forename: Gene-Jack
authors.initials: GJ
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Nora D
authors.initials: ND
authors.lastname: Volkow
mesh_terms: D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D004734:Energy Metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D005947:Glucose / Q000378:metabolism*; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008959:Models, Neurological; D049268:Positron-Emission Tomography
chemical_list: D005947:Glucose
keywords: PET-FDG; allometric scaling; energy budget; fMRI connectivity; graph theory
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 1;34(1):137-43
references.pmid: 17070709
references.citation: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2001 Oct;21(10):1133-45
references.pmid: 11598490
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 6;99(16):10237-9
references.pmid: 12149485
references.citation: Neuroscientist. 2006 Dec;12(6):512-23
references.pmid: 17079517
references.citation: Science. 2003 Sep 26;301(5641):1870-4
references.pmid: 14512617
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2003 Mar 18;13(6):493-7
references.pmid: 12646132
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Apr;79(8):2554-8
references.pmid: 6953413
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Jan 4;26(1):63-72
references.pmid: 16399673
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jul 6;96(14):8235-40
references.pmid: 10393978
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2142-54
references.pmid: 22019881
references.citation: Mol Psychiatry. 2012 May;17(5):471, 549-58
references.pmid: 21727896
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2011 Aug 1;57(3):908-17
references.pmid: 21609769
references.citation: Science. 2009 Sep 11;325(5946):1405-8
references.pmid: 19745156
references.citation: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008 Jul;28(7):1377-87
references.pmid: 18382468
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):440-2
references.pmid: 9623998
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 25;107(21):9885-90
references.pmid: 20457896
references.citation: BMC Biol. 2007 May 09;5:18
references.pmid: 17488526
references.citation: Science. 2005 Aug 5;309(5736):948-51
references.pmid: 16081740
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 1979 Nov;6(5):371-88
references.pmid: 117743
references.citation: Radiology. 1993 Jan;186(1):59-65
references.pmid: 8416587
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2005 Sep;15(9):1332-42
references.pmid: 15635061
references.citation: Science. 2006 Nov 24;314(5803):1249-50
references.pmid: 17124311
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Feb 11;29(6):1860-73
references.pmid: 19211893
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 12;107(41):17757-62
references.pmid: 20837536
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 28;30(30):10233-42
references.pmid: 20668206
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Nov 15;43(3):528-39
references.pmid: 18786642
references.citation: NMR Biomed. 2001 Nov-Dec;14(7-8):389-96
references.pmid: 11746930
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 1995 Oct;34(4):537-41
references.pmid: 8524021
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Apr 22;6(4):e1000748
references.pmid: 20421990
references.citation: J Neurosci Res. 2003 Oct 15;74(2):179-83
references.pmid: 14515346
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Sep;52(3):1059-69
references.pmid: 19819337
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 May 1;45(4):1107-16
references.pmid: 19349228
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2007 Apr;5(4):e116
references.pmid: 17373859
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2005 Oct 21;236(4):438-47
references.pmid: 15904934
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Jul 12;412(6843):150-7
references.pmid: 11449264
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jul 01;6:e1000840
references.pmid: 20617202
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jan 6;95(1):316-21
references.pmid: 9419373
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Apr 13;13(5):336-49
references.pmid: 22498897
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Sep;8(9):700-11
references.pmid: 17704812
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:449-76
references.pmid: 16776593