title: Architectural design of the pelvic floor is consistent with muscle functional subspecialization.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Skeletal muscle architecture is the strongest predictor of a muscle's functional capacity. The purpose of this study was to define the architectural properties of the deep muscles of the female pelvic floor (PFMs) to elucidate their structure-function relationships.
  
  
  METHODS
  PFMs coccygeus (C), iliococcygeus (IC), and pubovisceral (PV) were harvested en bloc from ten fixed human cadavers (mean age 85 years, range 55-102). Fundamental architectural parameters of skeletal muscles [physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA), normalized fiber length, and sarcomere length (L(s))] were determined using validated methods. PCSA predicts muscle-force production, and normalized fiber length is related to muscle excursion. These parameters were compared using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc t tests, as appropriate. Significance was set to α = 0.05.
  
  
  RESULTS
  PFMs were thinner than expected based on data reported from imaging studies and in vivo palpation. Significant differences in fiber length were observed across PFMs: C = 5.29 ± 0.32 cm, IC = 7.55 ± 0.46 cm, PV = 10.45 ± 0.67 cm (p < 0.001). Average L(s) of all PFMs was short relative to the optimal L(s) of 2.7 μm of other human skeletal muscles: C = 2.05 ± 0.02 μm, IC = 2.02 ± 0.02 μm, PC/PR = 2.07 ± 0.01 μm (p = <0.001 compared with 2.7 μm; p = 0.15 between PFMs, power = 0.46). Average PCSA was very small compared with other human muscles, with no significant difference between individual PFMs: C = 0.71 ± 0.06 cm(2), IC = 0.63 ± 0.04 cm(2), PV = 0.59 ± 0.05 cm(2) (p = 0.21, power = 0.27). Overall, C had shortest fibers, making it a good stabilizer. PV demonstrated the longest fibers, suggesting that it functions to produce large excursions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  PFM design shows individual muscles demonstrating differential architecture, corresponding to specialized function in the pelvic floor.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Lori J
authors.initials: LJ
authors.lastname: Tuttle
authors.forename: Olivia T
authors.initials: OT
authors.lastname: Nguyen
authors.forename: Mark S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Cook
authors.forename: Marianna
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Alperin
authors.forename: Sameer B
authors.initials: SB
authors.lastname: Shah
authors.forename: Samuel R
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Ward
authors.forename: Richard L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Lieber
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002102:Cadaver; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D018485:Muscle Fibers, Skeletal / Q000166:cytology / Q000502:physiology; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology; D017773:Pelvic Floor / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1987 Jun;57(6):1730-45
references.pmid: 3598628
references.citation: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Sep;97(9):770-9
references.pmid: 2242361
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;98(4):646-51
references.pmid: 11576582
references.citation: J Physiol. 1998 Oct 15;512 ( Pt 2):603-14
references.pmid: 9763648
references.citation: J Hand Ther. 1993 Apr-Jun;6(2):105-13
references.pmid: 8343877
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Oct;111(1):19-22
references.pmid: 20650455
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Feb;109(2 Pt 1):295-302
references.pmid: 17267827
references.citation: J Morphol. 1982 Aug;173(2):185-95
references.pmid: 7120421
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2012 Aug 1;215(Pt 15):2551-9
references.pmid: 22786631
references.citation: J Physiol. 1939 Jun 14;96(1):45-64
references.pmid: 16995114
references.citation: J Reprod Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;56(1-2):53-7
references.pmid: 21366128
references.citation: Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(3):377-85
references.pmid: 17279560
references.citation: Biophys J. 1984 May;45(5):1007-16
references.pmid: 6610443
references.citation: Muscle Nerve. 2000 Nov;23(11):1647-66
references.pmid: 11054744
references.citation: J Neurol Sci. 1988 Apr;84(2-3):275-94
references.pmid: 3379447
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Mar 1;36(5):355-62
references.pmid: 21325932
references.citation: J Surg Res. 2005 Dec;129(2):231-5
references.pmid: 16140336
references.citation: Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Apr;31(4):481-6
references.pmid: 22378544
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jan;91(1):176-85
references.pmid: 19122093
references.citation: J Biomech. 2005 Nov;38(11):2317-20
references.pmid: 16154420
references.citation: J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1984 Dec;57(6):1715-21
references.pmid: 6511546
references.citation: J Biomech. 2003 Jun;36(6):749-57
references.pmid: 12742442
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;104(1):168-73
references.pmid: 15229017
references.citation: J Hand Surg Am. 1990 Mar;15(2):244-50
references.pmid: 2324452
references.citation: Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Aug;22(8):1019-24
references.pmid: 21468737
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2008 Dec;22(12):2571-5
references.pmid: 18810545
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2005 Sep;208(Pt 17):3275-9
references.pmid: 16109889
references.citation: Clin Chim Acta. 1980 Jun 10;104(2):161-7
references.pmid: 7389130
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Apr;467(4):1074-82
references.pmid: 18972175
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;198(3):306.e1-5
references.pmid: 18068145