title: National health insurance, social influence and antenatal care use in Ghana.
abstract: The study explores the importance of social influence and the availability of health insurance on maternal care utilization in Ghana through the use of antenatal care services. A number of studies have found that access to health insurance plays a critical role in women's decision to utilize antenatal care services. However, little is known about the role that social forces play in this decision. This study uses village-level data from the 2008 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey to investigate the effects of health insurance and social influences on the intensity of antenatal care utilization by Ghanaian women. Using GIS information at the village level, we employ a spatial lag regression model in this study. Results indicate that, controlling for a host of socioeconomic and geographical factors, women who have health insurance appear to use more antenatal services than women who do not. In addition, the intensity of antenatal visits appears to be spatially correlated among the survey villages, implying that there may be some social influences that affect a woman's decision to utilize antenatal care. A reason for this may be that women who benefit from antenatal care through positive pregnancy outcomes may pass this information along to their peers who also increase their use of these services in response. Traditional/Cultural leaders as "gate-keepers" may be useful in the dissemination of maternal health care information. Public health officials may also explore the possibility of disseminating information relating to maternal care services via the mass media.
authors.affiliation: Department of Economics, University of Ghana, P, O, Box LG 57, Legon, Accra, Ghana. nowoo@ug.edu.gh.
authors.forename: Nkechi S
authors.initials: NS
authors.lastname: Owoo
authors.forename: Monica P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Lambon-Quayefio
references.citation: J Health Popul Nutr. 2003 Dec;21(4):374-82
references.pmid: 15038593
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1996 Aug;43(4):459-71
references.pmid: 8844947
references.citation: Health Promot Int. 2003 Dec;18(4):327-37
references.pmid: 14695364
references.citation: Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1973 Winter;51(1):95-124
references.pmid: 4198894
references.citation: J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 Oct;29(10):806-16
references.pmid: 17915064
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2009 Jul;99(7):1220-6
references.pmid: 19443831
references.citation: Health Policy. 2003 Apr;64(1):99-112
references.pmid: 12644332
references.citation: Health Econ Rev. 2012 Aug 06;2(1):14
references.pmid: 22866869
references.citation: J Biosoc Sci. 2000 Jan;32(1):1-15
references.pmid: 10676056
references.citation: J Midwifery Womens Health. 2002 Jan-Feb;47(1):28-34
references.pmid: 11874089
references.citation: Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):7
references.pmid: 26864987
references.citation: Cad Saude Publica. 2011;27 Suppl 2:S237-53
references.pmid: 21789416
references.citation: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Feb;55(2):111-22
references.pmid: 11154250
references.citation: Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2006 Mar;32(1):6-16
references.pmid: 16723297
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2007 Oct;65(8):1666-82
references.pmid: 17643685
references.citation: Public Health Rep. 1992 Nov-Dec;107(6):653-8
references.pmid: 1454977
references.citation: Integration. 1992 Aug;(33):50-3
references.pmid: 12343897
references.citation: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Jan 16;13:1
references.pmid: 23324161
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1994 May;38(9):1209-20
references.pmid: 8016686
references.citation: Int J Qual Health Care. 1996 Feb;8(1):13-20
references.pmid: 8680812
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1987;24(11):927-44
references.pmid: 3616686