title: The dynamic reorganization of the default-mode network during a visual classification task.
abstract: The default-mode network has been reported to possess highly versatile and even contrasting functions but the underlying functioning mechanism remains elusive. In this study, we adopt a dynamic view of the default-mode network structure and hypothesize that it could potentially contribute to different functions through dynamic reorganization of its functional interaction pattern within and across network boundaries depending on the ongoing cognitive demands. With four experimental states and functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging, we show that the default-mode network is characterized by within-network desynchronization and outside-network integration during the transition from resting state to an external visual classification task. Such default-mode network dynamics are task demand-dependent and return to their original status during the transition back to resting. More importantly, the degree of within-network desynchronization correlates with reaction time while the level of outside-network integration indexes task performance accuracy. Overall, the documented dynamic reorganization of the default-mode network and the significant behavioral correlations provide new insights into our understanding of this complex network and emphasize a dynamic view in future studies of its functioning mechanism.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
authors.forename: Wei
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Gao
authors.forename: John H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Gilmore
authors.forename: Sarael
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Alcauter
authors.forename: Weili
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Lin
keywords: default-mode network; dynamic reorganization; functional connectivity; resting-state; task-dependent
references.citation: Neural Comput. 1995 Nov;7(6):1129-59
references.pmid: 7584893
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Sep;8(9):657-61
references.pmid: 17700624
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Sep 29;356(1413):1441-51
references.pmid: 11571035
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):676-82
references.pmid: 11209064
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;154(7):918-25
references.pmid: 9210741
references.citation: Nature. 2007 May 3;447(7140):83-6
references.pmid: 17476267
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jul;17(7):1664-71
references.pmid: 16963517
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2003 Feb;18(2):324-33
references.pmid: 12595186
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 31;109(31):12788-93
references.pmid: 22807481
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):1448-59
references.pmid: 19446646
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 May 29;362(1481):773-86
references.pmid: 17395575
references.citation: Neuron. 2010 Feb 25;65(4):550-62
references.pmid: 20188659
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Feb;32(1):45-58
references.pmid: 16478325
references.citation: Rev Neurosci. 1999;10(1):49-57
references.pmid: 10356991
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Fall;9(5):648-63
references.pmid: 23965122
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 Mar;15(3):596-603
references.pmid: 11848702
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Apr;7(4):268-77
references.pmid: 16552413
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Mar 27;98(7):4259-64
references.pmid: 11259662
references.citation: Neuroscientist. 2012 Jun;18(3):251-70
references.pmid: 21677128
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):893-905
references.pmid: 18976716
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):966-77
references.pmid: 22446489
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2008 Aug;18(8):1856-64
references.pmid: 18063564
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(14):2836-45
references.pmid: 16879844
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Nov;28(11):1251-66
references.pmid: 17274023
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2013 Mar;23(3):739-49
references.pmid: 22437053
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jul;9(7):971-8
references.pmid: 16767087
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 28;27(9):2349-56
references.pmid: 17329432
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 15;53(1):303-17
references.pmid: 20600998
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2001 Sep;11(9):825-36
references.pmid: 11532888
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Jan;11(1):80-95
references.pmid: 9950716
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 26;105(34):12569-74
references.pmid: 18723676
references.citation: Neuroscientist. 2013 Feb;19(1):76-87
references.pmid: 22785104
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 Jan;15(1):273-89
references.pmid: 11771995
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6790-5
references.pmid: 19351894
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Oct;2(10):685-94
references.pmid: 11584306
references.citation: Brain. 2006 Feb;129(Pt 2):290-2
references.pmid: 16434422
references.citation: Brain Struct Funct. 2010 Jun;214(5-6):629-43
references.pmid: 20512371
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2013 Mar;23(3):594-603
references.pmid: 22368080
references.citation: Brain. 2006 Mar;129(Pt 3):564-83
references.pmid: 16399806
references.citation: Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 Jun;31(6):1318-26
references.pmid: 16237382
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2006 Aug;17(8):692-9
references.pmid: 16913952
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5;102(27):9673-8
references.pmid: 15976020
references.citation: Neuroreport. 1997 Dec 22;8(18):3969-72
references.pmid: 9462476
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2011 Nov;106(5):2322-45
references.pmid: 21795627
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jul 6;317(5834):43; author reply 43
references.pmid: 17615325
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Jan;33(1):192-202
references.pmid: 21391263
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 1995 Oct;34(4):537-41
references.pmid: 8524021
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2000 Apr 15;20(8):3033-40
references.pmid: 10751455
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2000 Oct;23(10):475-83
references.pmid: 11006464
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jan 27;106(4):1279-84
references.pmid: 19164577
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 11;105(10):4028-32
references.pmid: 18322013
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;154(7):926-33
references.pmid: 9210742
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jan;103(1):297-321
references.pmid: 19889849
references.citation: Brain Struct Funct. 2010 Jun;214(5-6):655-67
references.pmid: 20512370
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Aug 1;62(3):198-206
references.pmid: 17137558
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2001 Nov;14(3):140-51
references.pmid: 11559959
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:1-38
references.pmid: 18400922
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 30;106(26):10841-6
references.pmid: 19541656
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jun;101(6):3270-83
references.pmid: 19339462
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 7;100(1):253-8
references.pmid: 12506194
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2142-54
references.pmid: 22019881
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Jul;29(7):839-47
references.pmid: 18219620
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 30;101(13):4637-42
references.pmid: 15070770
references.citation: Cortex. 2012 Oct;48(9):1187-96
references.pmid: 21872853
references.citation: Brain. 2010 Feb;133(Pt 2):611-24
references.pmid: 20008375
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Jul;32(7):1029-35
references.pmid: 20648663
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(12):2189-208
references.pmid: 16806314
references.citation: Neuron. 2007 Dec 6;56(5):924-35
references.pmid: 18054866