title: Day-surgery versus overnight stay surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is used to manage symptomatic gallstones. There is considerable controversy regarding whether it should be done as day-surgery or as an overnight stay surgery with regards to patient safety.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To assess the impact of day-surgery versus overnight stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient-oriented outcomes such as mortality, severe adverse events, and quality of life.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and mRCT until September 2012.
  
  
  METHODS
  We included randomised clinical trials comparing day-surgery versus overnight stay surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, irrespective of language or publication status.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and independently extracted the data. We analysed the data with both the fixed-effect and the random-effects models using Review Manager 5 analysis. We calculated the risk ratio (RR), mean difference (MD), or standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on intention-to-treat or available case analysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We identified a total of six trials at high risk of bias involving 492 participants undergoing day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 239) versus overnight stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 253) for symptomatic gallstones. The number of participants in each trial ranged from 28 to 150. The proportion of women in the trials varied between 74% and 84%. The mean or median age in the trials varied between 40 and 47 years.With regards to primary outcomes, only one trial reported short-term mortality. However, the trial stated that there were no deaths in either of the groups. We inferred from the other outcomes that there was no short-term mortality in the remaining trials. Long-term mortality was not reported in any of the trials. There was no significant difference in the rate of serious adverse events between the two groups (4 trials; 391 participants; 7/191 (weighted rate 1.6%) in the day-surgery group versus 1/200 (0.5%) in the overnight stay surgery group; rate ratio 3.24; 95% CI 0.74 to 14.09). There was no significant difference in quality of life between the two groups (4 trials; 333 participants; SMD -0.11; 95% CI -0.33 to 0.10).There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the secondary outcomes of our review: pain (3 trials; 175 participants; MD 0.02 cm visual analogue scale score; 95% CI -0.69 to 0.73); time to return to activity (2 trials, 217 participants; MD -0.55 days; 95% CI -2.18 to 1.08); and return to work (1 trial, 74 participants; MD -2.00 days; 95% CI -10.34 to 6.34). No significant difference was seen in hospital readmission rate (5 trials; 464 participants; 6/225 (weighted rate 0.5%) in the day-surgery group versus 5/239 (2.1%) in the overnight stay surgery group (rate ratio 1.25; 95% CI 0.43 to 3.63) or in the proportion of people requiring hospital readmissions (3 trials; 290 participants; 5/136 (weighted proportion 3.5%) in the day-surgery group versus 5/154 (3.2%) in the overnight stay surgery group; RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.33 to 3.60). No significant difference was seen in the proportion of failed discharge (failure to be discharged as planned) between the two groups (5 trials; 419 participants; 42/205 (weighted proportion 19.3%) in the day-surgery group versus 43/214 (20.1%) in the overnight stay surgery group; RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.41). For all outcomes except pain, the accrued information was far less than the diversity-adjusted required information size to exclude random errors.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Day-surgery appears just as safe as overnight stay surgery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Day-surgery does not seem to result in improvement in any patient-oriented outcomes such as return to normal activity or earlier return to work. The randomised clinical trials backing these statements are weakened by risks of systematic errors (bias) and risks of random errors (play of chance). More randomised clinical trials are needed to assess the impact of day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the quality of life as well as other outcomes of patients.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, London, UK.
authors.forename: Jessica
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Vaughan
authors.forename: Kurinchi Selvan
authors.initials: KS
authors.lastname: Gurusamy
authors.forename: Brian R
authors.initials: BR
authors.lastname: Davidson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000556:Ambulatory Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects*; D017081:Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / Q000009:adverse effects*; D005260:Female; D042882:Gallstones / Q000601:surgery*; D006760:Hospitalization; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010359:Patient Readmission / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
references.citation: Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
references.pmid: 12111919
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jan;61(1):64-75
references.pmid: 18083463
references.citation: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Dec 15;145(50):2434-9
references.pmid: 11776671
references.citation: Stat Med. 2001 Feb 28;20(4):641-54
references.pmid: 11223905
references.citation: Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995 Nov;30(11):1125-8
references.pmid: 8578175
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2012 Sep 18;157(6):429-38
references.pmid: 22945832
references.citation: JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):408-12
references.pmid: 7823387
references.citation: BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
references.pmid: 9310563
references.citation: Anaesthesia. 2011 May;66(5):417-34
references.pmid: 21418041
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2002 Jun;16(6):921-6
references.pmid: 12163955
references.citation: Health Technol Assess. 2012 Sep;16(35):1-82
references.pmid: 22989478
references.citation: J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Aug;14(4):577-84
references.pmid: 18462280
references.citation: Lancet. 1998 Aug 22;352(9128):609-13
references.pmid: 9746022
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2004 Jun;91(6):734-8
references.pmid: 15164444
references.citation: Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
references.pmid: 3802833
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2008 Feb;95(2):161-8
references.pmid: 18196561
references.citation: Stat Med. 1987 Apr-May;6(3):341-50
references.pmid: 3616287
references.citation: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Jun;11(3):182-4
references.pmid: 11444748
references.citation: Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004 Jun;389(3):164-71
references.pmid: 15133671
references.citation: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Fall;19(4):591-603
references.pmid: 15095765
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Nov;126(5):912-21
references.pmid: 3310613
references.citation: Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2004 Jul;96(7):435-8, 438-41
references.pmid: 15283626
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;21(5):837-41
references.pmid: 1468842
references.citation: NIH Consens Statement. 1992 Sep 14-16;10(3):1-28
references.pmid: 1301217
references.citation: Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug 09;2:57-66
references.pmid: 20865104
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2011 Mar;98(3):391-6
references.pmid: 21254014
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD006798
references.pmid: 18254116
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7
references.pmid: 23295957
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;38(1):276-86
references.pmid: 18824467
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2009 Apr;96(4):342-9
references.pmid: 19283747
references.citation: BMJ. 2008 Mar 15;336(7644):601-5
references.pmid: 18316340
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;61(8):763-9
references.pmid: 18411040
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:MR000033
references.pmid: 23235689
references.citation: Aust N Z J Surg. 1999 Dec;69(12):841-3
references.pmid: 10613279
references.citation: Aust N Z J Surg. 2000 Oct;70(10):743
references.pmid: 11021490
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2001 Dec 4;135(11):982-9
references.pmid: 11730399
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;38(1):287-98
references.pmid: 18824466
references.citation: J Qual Clin Pract. 2001 Mar-Jun;21(1-2):2-7; discussion 8
references.pmid: 11422706
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1998 Dec;228(6):734-40
references.pmid: 9860471
references.citation: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Dec 30;9:86
references.pmid: 20042080
references.citation: Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Feb;3(2):142-6
references.pmid: 8808375
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2006 May;93(5):639-40
references.pmid: 16607688
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2002 Mar;16(3):453-7
references.pmid: 11928027
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2006 Jan;93(1):40-5
references.pmid: 16329083