title: Comparison of Placido disc and Scheimpflug image-derived topography-guided excimer laser surface normalization combined with higher fluence CXL: the Athens Protocol, in progressive keratoconus.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of two alternative corneal topography data sources used in topography-guided excimer laser normalization, combined with corneal collagen cross-linking in the management of keratoconus using the Athens protocol, ie, a Placido disc imaging device and a Scheimpflug imaging device.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 181 consecutive patients with keratoconus who underwent the Athens protocol between 2008 and 2011 were studied preoperatively and at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 postoperatively for visual acuity, keratometry, and anterior surface corneal irregularity indices. Two groups were formed, depending on the primary source used for topoguided photoablation, ie, group A (Placido disc) and group B (Scheimpflug rotating camera). One-year changes in visual acuity, keratometry, and seven anterior surface corneal irregularity indices were studied in each group.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Changes in visual acuity, expressed as the difference between postoperative and preoperative corrected distance visual acuity were +0.12 ± 0.20 (range +0.60 to -0.45) for group A and +0.19 ± 0.20 (range +0.75 to -0.30) for group B. In group A, K1 (flat keratometry) changed from 45.202 ± 3.782 D to 43.022 ± 3.819 D, indicating a flattening of -2.18 D, and K2 (steep keratometry) changed from 48.670 ± 4.066 D to 45.865 ± 4.794 D, indicating a flattening of -2.805 D. In group B, K1 (flat keratometry) changed from 46.213 ± 4.082 D to 43.190 ± 4.398 D, indicating a flattening of -3.023 D, and K2 (steep keratometry) changed from 50.774 ± 5.210 D to 46.380 ± 5.006 D, indicating a flattening of -4.394 D. For group A, the index of surface variance decreased to -5.07% and the index of height decentration to -26.81%. In group B, the index of surface variance decreased to -18.35% and the index of height decentration to -39.03%. These reductions indicate that the corneal surface became less irregular (index of surface variance) and the "cone" flatter and more central (index of height decentration) postoperatively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Of the two sources of primary corneal data, the Scheimpflug rotating camera (Oculyzer™) for topography-guided normalization treatment with the WaveLight excimer laser platform appeared to provide more statistically significant improvement than the Placido disc topographer (Topolyzer™). Overall, the Athens protocol, aiming both to halt progression of keratoconic ectasia and to improve corneal topometry and visual performance, produced safe and satisfactory refractive, keratometric, and topometric results. The observed changes in visual acuity, along with keratometric flattening and topometric improvement, are suggestive of overall postoperative improvement.
authors.affiliation: Laservision.gr Eye Institute, Athens, Greece ; New York University School of Medicine, Department of Opthalmology, NY, NY, USA.
authors.forename: Anastasios John
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Kanellopoulos
authors.forename: George
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Asimellis
keywords: Athens protocol; EX500 excimer laser; WaveLight/Alcon excimer laser; anterior Pentacam indices; cross-linking; higher fluence collagen cross-linking; keratoconus
references.citation: Clin Exp Optom. 2013 Mar;96(2):155-64
references.pmid: 23414201
references.citation: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jan;37(1):149-60
references.pmid: 21183110
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Feb 19;54(2):1418-25
references.pmid: 23361513
references.citation: J Refract Surg. 2012 Aug;28(8):562-6
references.pmid: 22785060
references.citation: Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;152(2):157-162.e1
references.pmid: 21708379
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994 May;35(6):2749-57
references.pmid: 8188468
references.citation: Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:329-35
references.pmid: 23440024
references.citation: J Refract Surg. 2009 Sep;25(9):S812-8
references.pmid: 19772257
references.citation: J Refract Surg. 2010 Oct;26(10):S827-32
references.pmid: 20954679
references.citation: Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:97-101
references.pmid: 22275813
references.citation: Cornea. 2007 Aug;26(7):891-5
references.pmid: 17667633
references.citation: J Refract Surg. 2013 Dec;29(12):832-7
references.pmid: 24088061
references.citation: Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar;143(3):401-8
references.pmid: 17224117
references.citation: J Refract Surg. 2009 Nov;25(11):1034-7
references.pmid: 19731884
references.citation: Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul;18(4):325-33
references.pmid: 17568210
references.citation: J Refract Surg. 2011 May;27(5):323-31
references.pmid: 21117539
references.citation: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):1282-90
references.pmid: 21700105
references.citation: Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:261-9
references.pmid: 23459015
references.citation: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Dec;33(12):2035-40
references.pmid: 18053900
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 2009 Mar;116(3):369-78
references.pmid: 19167087
references.citation: Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2005 Feb;222(2):117-22
references.pmid: 15719315
references.citation: Cornea. 2002 Oct;21(7):671-9
references.pmid: 12352084
references.citation: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Jan;34(1):137-45
references.pmid: 18165094
references.citation: Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002 Aug;80(4):379-83
references.pmid: 12190779
references.citation: Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1539-48
references.pmid: 23935360
references.citation: Cornea. 2006 Jan;25(1):29-33
references.pmid: 16331037
references.citation: J Refract Surg. 2011 Oct;27(10):753-8
references.pmid: 21800785
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jul;48(7):3062-8
references.pmid: 17591874
references.citation: J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Apr;24(4):456-63
references.pmid: 9584238
references.citation: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Oct;33(10):1708-12
references.pmid: 17889764
references.citation: J Refract Surg. 2012 Dec;28(12):895-900
references.pmid: 23092131
references.citation: Surv Ophthalmol. 1984 Jan-Feb;28(4):293-322
references.pmid: 6230745
references.citation: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 May;34(5):796-801
references.pmid: 18471635
references.citation: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;249(8):1223-7
references.pmid: 21494876
references.citation: Cornea. 2009 Jun;28(5):510-5
references.pmid: 19421048
references.citation: Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:895-901
references.pmid: 22791969
references.citation: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Sep;35(9):1597-603
references.pmid: 19683159
references.citation: Cornea. 2013 Mar;32(3):267-72
references.pmid: 22825402