title: The role of fingers in number processing in young children.
abstract: The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between finger counting and numerical processing in 4-7-year-old children. Children were assessed on a variety of numerical tasks and we examined the correlations between their rates of success and their frequency of finger use in a counting task. We showed that children's performance on finger pattern comparison and identification tasks did not correlate with the frequency of finger use. However, this last variable correlated with the percentages of correct responses in an enumeration task (i.e., Give-N task), even when the age of children was entered as a covariate in the analysis. Despite this correlation, we showed that some children who never used their fingers in the counting task were able to perform optimally in the enumeration task. Overall, our results support the conclusion that finger counting is useful but not necessary to develop accurate symbolic numerical skills. Moreover, our results suggest that the use of fingers in a counting task is related to the ability of children in a dynamic enumeration task but not to static tasks involving recognition or comparison of finger patterns. Therefore, it could be that the link between fingers and numbers remain circumscribed to counting tasks and do not extent to static finger montring situations.
authors.affiliation: Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec, Université Laval Québec, QC, Canada.
authors.forename: Anne
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Lafay
authors.forename: Catherine
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Thevenot
authors.forename: Caroline
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Castel
authors.forename: Michel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Fayol
keywords: kindergartens; non-symbolic representations; numerical cognition; numerosity; preschoolers
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Apr;19(4):563-76
references.pmid: 17381248
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2011 Dec 12;2:368
references.pmid: 22180748
references.citation: Cortex. 2008 Apr;44(4):368-75
references.pmid: 18387567
references.citation: Cognition. 2010 Aug;116(2):251-66
references.pmid: 20513381
references.citation: Child Neuropsychol. 2005 Oct;11(5):413-30
references.pmid: 16306017
references.citation: Cogn Process. 2012 Aug;13 Suppl 1:S271-4
references.pmid: 22806653
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Aug;22(4):577-609; discussion 610-60
references.pmid: 11301525
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2011 Mar;209(3):395-400
references.pmid: 21298424
references.citation: Dev Neuropsychol. 2014;39(2):88-100
references.pmid: 24571928
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Sep;59(9):1648-63
references.pmid: 16873114
references.citation: Cortex. 2010 Feb;46(2):272-3
references.pmid: 18706540
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2011 Dec 08;2:359
references.pmid: 22171220
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Aug;109(4):525-39
references.pmid: 21497826
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 26;2:242
references.pmid: 21980315
references.citation: Cortex. 2008 Apr;44(4):359-67
references.pmid: 18387566
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2011 Oct 17;2:260
references.pmid: 22028696
references.citation: Cortex. 2009 Jul-Aug;45(7):796-803
references.pmid: 18976990
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(11):1609-24
references.pmid: 16009243
references.citation: Arch Neurol. 1963 May;8:490-501
references.pmid: 14032921
references.citation: Cognition. 1998 Aug;68(2):B63-70
references.pmid: 9818514