title: Can endopolyploidy explain body size variation within and between castes in ants?
abstract: Endoreduplication is the process by which the nuclear genome is repeatedly replicated without mitotic cell division, resulting in nuclei that contain numerous additional genome copies. Endoreduplication occurs widely throughout Eucarya and is particularly common in angiosperms and insects. Although endoreduplication is an important process in the terminal differentiation of some specialized cell types, and often increases cell size and metabolism, the direct effects of increasing nuclear ploidy on cell function are not well resolved. Here, we examine if endoreduplication may play a role in body size and/or caste differentiation in ants. Nuclear ploidy was measured by flow cytometry of whole individuals (providing the basis for overall body size patterns) and individual body segments for multiple polymorphic ant species. We used cell cycle values, interpreted as the mean number of endocycles performed by each cell in the sample, as our measure of overall endoreduplication. Among females of four polymorphic ant species, endoreduplication was positively related with size within the worker caste, but was not related to caste generally in two species where we also examined queens. Additionally, abdomens had the greatest endoreduplication of all body parts regardless of caste or size. We also found that males, having derived from haploid unfertilized eggs, had the highest rates of endoreduplication and may compensate for their haploid origin by performing an additional endocycle relative to females. These results suggest that endoreduplication may play a role in body size variation in eusocial insects and the development of some segment-specific tissues.
authors.affiliation: Program in Ecology Evolution and Conservation Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 515 Morrill Hall, 505 S Goodwin Ave, Urbana, Illinois, 61801.
authors.forename: Daniel R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Scholes
authors.forename: Andrew V
authors.initials: AV
authors.lastname: Suarez
authors.forename: Ken N
authors.initials: KN
authors.lastname: Paige
keywords: Ants; body size; caste; endoreduplication; ploidy
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2000 Dec;3(6):488-92
references.pmid: 11074380
references.citation: Science. 1983 Jun 3;220(4601):1049-51
references.pmid: 17754551
references.citation: Nature. 1976 Jun 17;261(5561):614-5
references.pmid: 934306
references.citation: Genes Dev. 2009 Nov 1;23(21):2461-77
references.pmid: 19884253
references.citation: Int Rev Cytol. 1977;50:275-332
references.pmid: 332657
references.citation: Evolution. 1985 Jul;39(4):888-903
references.pmid: 28561366
references.citation: Monogr Popul Biol. 1978;12:1-352
references.pmid: 740003
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 22;272(1577):2173-80
references.pmid: 16188606
references.citation: Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol. 1982 Nov;191(6):381-384
references.pmid: 28305263
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2005 May 10;15(9):824-7
references.pmid: 15886099
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2008 Oct;9(10):735-48
references.pmid: 18802413
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2001 Feb;52(355):183-92
references.pmid: 11283162
references.citation: Arthropod Struct Dev. 2008 Nov;37(6):469-79
references.pmid: 18621145
references.citation: Q Rev Biol. 1953 Jun;28(2):136-56
references.pmid: 13074471
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Feb;57(2):327-34
references.pmid: 16591473
references.citation: Annu Rev Entomol. 1992;37:637-65
references.pmid: 1539941
references.citation: Funct Integr Genomics. 2010 Nov;10(4):433-46
references.pmid: 20625914
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Apr;28(4):1381-92
references.pmid: 21172833
references.citation: Insect Mol Biol. 2004 Dec;13(6):581-5
references.pmid: 15606806
references.citation: Science. 2003 Oct 10;302(5643):296-9
references.pmid: 14551438
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Jul;10(7):281-6
references.pmid: 21237037
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2007 Feb;16(3):675-83
references.pmid: 17257122
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 May 9;97(10):5285-90
references.pmid: 10805788
references.citation: Lancet. 1964 Nov 14;2(7368):1066-7
references.pmid: 14206035
references.citation: Evolution. 1989 Jan;43(1):223-225
references.pmid: 28568501
references.citation: Ecology. 2011 Aug;92(8):1691-8
references.pmid: 21905435
references.citation: Science. 2012 Jan 6;335(6064):79-82
references.pmid: 22223805
references.citation: Science. 2007 Oct 19;318(5849):441-4
references.pmid: 17901299
references.citation: Trends Genet. 2012 Jan;28(1):14-21
references.pmid: 21982512
references.citation: Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1972 Jun 6;181(1063):109-35
references.pmid: 4403285
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 May;25(5):275-82
references.pmid: 20106547
references.citation: Bioessays. 2006 Mar;28(3):271-81
references.pmid: 16479577
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2006 Mar 7;16(5):493-8
references.pmid: 16527744