title: Examining the impact of feedback and repeated readings on oral reading fluency: let's not forget prosody.
abstract: Although extensive research supports repeated readings (RR) as an intervention for improving reading fluency, it largely ignores reading prosody, which is a key component of reading fluency. The current study extends the RR literature by examining the impact of RR on prosody and whether the content of directions and feedback might impact what components of fluency are improved. Elementary students (N = 76) were randomly assigned to either a rate- or prosody-focused RR intervention. The study differs from existing RR research in that (a) students were average as opposed to struggling students, (b) prosody was evaluated, and (c) measures of prosody were objective as opposed to subjective. Results support previous research suggesting that RR improves fluency but indicate that the nature of the instruction and performance feedback provided to students influences the components of reading fluency (i.e., rate or prosody) that are improved.
authors.affiliation: Department of Educational Psychology, University of Georgia.
authors.forename: Scott P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Ardoin
authors.affiliation: Department of Educational Psychology, University of Georgia.
authors.forename: Laura S
authors.initials: LS
authors.lastname: Morena
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology and Education, Mount Holyoke College.
authors.forename: Katherine S
authors.initials: KS
authors.lastname: Binder
authors.affiliation: Department of Educational Psychology, University of Georgia.
authors.forename: Tori E
authors.initials: TE
authors.lastname: Foster
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D030141:Feedback, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011932:Reading; D013060:Speech / Q000502:physiology*; D013334:Students; D013663:Teaching / Q000379:methods*; D014705:Verbal Behavior / Q000502:physiology*