title: Equity in specialist waiting times by socioeconomic groups: evidence from Spain.
abstract: In countries with publicly financed health care systems, waiting time--rather than price--is the rationing mechanism for access to health care services. The normative statement underlying such a rationing device is that patients should wait according to need and irrespective of socioeconomic status or other non-need characteristics. The aim of this paper is to test empirically that waiting times for publicly funded specialist care do not depend on patients' socioeconomic status. Waiting times for specialist care can vary according to the type of medical specialty, type of consultation (review or diagnosis) and the region where patients' reside. In order to take into account such variability, we use Bayesian random parameter models to explain waiting times for specialist care in terms of need and non-need variables. We find that individuals with lower education and income levels wait significantly more time than their counterparts.
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Economía de las Instituciones, Estadística Económica y Econometría, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de La Laguna, Campus de Guajara, 38071, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain, iabasolo@ull.es.
authors.forename: Ignacio
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Abásolo
authors.forename: Miguel A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Negrín-Hernández
authors.forename: Jaime
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Pinilla
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D005260:Female; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008511:Medicine / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008875:Middle Aged; D012017:Referral and Consultation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012737:Sex Factors; D012923:Social Class; D013030:Spain; D013222:State Medicine; D014850:Waiting Lists; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: BMJ. 2000 Jan 1;320(7226):15-8
references.pmid: 10617517
references.citation: J Health Econ. 1988 Jun;7(2):173-83
references.pmid: 10288957
references.citation: CMAJ. 2003 Feb 18;168(4):413-6
references.pmid: 12591780
references.citation: Health Policy. 2002 Dec;62(3):329-41
references.pmid: 12385854
references.citation: Fam Pract. 2000 Dec;17(6):462-71
references.pmid: 11120716
references.citation: Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Apr;17(2):133-40
references.pmid: 15665067
references.citation: Biometrics. 2003 Jun;59(2):305-16
references.pmid: 12926715
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2005 Mar;60(6):1251-66
references.pmid: 15626522
references.citation: Stat Med. 2005 Aug 15;24(15):2401-28
references.pmid: 16015676
references.citation: Health Econ. 2004 Jul;13(7):629-47
references.pmid: 15259043
references.citation: Health Econ. 2013 May;22(5):533-53
references.pmid: 22674841
references.citation: J Health Econ. 2000 Sep;19(5):553-83
references.pmid: 11184794
references.citation: Can J Surg. 2002 Aug;45(4):269-76
references.pmid: 12174981
references.citation: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Apr;12(2):104-9
references.pmid: 17407661
references.citation: CMAJ. 2006 Jan 17;174(2):177-83
references.pmid: 16415462
references.citation: Br J Cancer. 2005 Jun 6;92(11):1971-5
references.pmid: 15900296
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1994 Oct 20;331(16):1068-71
references.pmid: 8090168
references.citation: J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 Feb;10(1):3-9
references.pmid: 14731146
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2009 Apr;19(3):577-81
references.pmid: 19425419
references.citation: Health Econ. 2005 Apr;14(4):391-406
references.pmid: 15729741
references.citation: J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Mar;26(1):56-60
references.pmid: 15044576
references.citation: QJM. 1995 Jan;88(1):15-22
references.pmid: 7894984
references.citation: Health Econ. 2009 Nov;18(11):1295-306
references.pmid: 19191260
references.citation: BMJ. 2009 Sep 03;339:b3264
references.pmid: 19729415