title: Surgical treatment of Scheuermann's kyphosis using a combined antero-posterior strategy and pedicle screw constructs: efficacy, radiographic and clinical outcomes in 111 cases.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There is sparse literature on how best to correct Scheuermann's kyphosis (SK). The efficacy of a combined strategy with anterior release and posterior fusion (AR/PSF) with regard to correction rate and outcome is yet to be determined.
  
  
  METHODS
  A review of a consecutive series of SK patients treated with AR/PSF using pedicle screw-rod systems was performed. Assessment of demographics, complications, surgical parameters and radiographs including flexibility and correction measures, proximal junctional kyphosis angle (JKA + 1) and spino-pelvic parameters was performed, focusing on the impact of curve flexibility on correction and clinical outcomes.
  
  
  RESULTS
  111 patients were eligible with a mean age of 23 years, follow-up of 24 months and an average of eight levels fused. Cobb angle at fusion level was 68° preoperatively and 37° postoperatively. Flexibility on traction films was 34 % and correction rate 47 %. Postoperative and follow-up Cobb angles were highly correlated with preoperative bending films (r = 0.7, p < 0.05). Screw density rate was 87 %, with increased correction with higher screw density (p < 0.001, r = 0.4). Patients with an increased junctional kyphosis angle (JKA + 1) were at higher risk of revision surgery (p = 0.049). 22 patients sustained complication, and 21 patients had revision surgery. 42 patients with ≥24 months follow-up were assessed for clinical outcomes (follow-up rate for clinical measures was 38 %). This subgroup showed no significant differences regarding baseline parameters as compared to the whole group. Median approach-related morbidity (ArM) was 8.0 %, SRS-sum score was 4.0, and ODI was 4 %. There was a significant negative correlation between the SRS-24 self-image scores and the number of segments fused (r = -0.5, p < 0.05). Patients with additional surgery had decreased clinical outcomes (SRS-24 scores, p = 0.004, ArM, p = 0.0008, and ODI, p = 0.0004).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The study highlighted that AR/PSF is an efficient strategy providing reliable results in a large single-center series. Results confirmed that flexibility was the decisive measure when comparing surgical outcomes with different treatment strategies. Findings indicated that changes at the proximal junctional level were impacted by individual spino-pelvic morphology and determined by the individually predetermined thoracolumbar curvature and sagittal balance. Results stressed that in SK correction, reconstruction of a physiologic alignment is decisive to achieving good clinical outcomes and avoiding complications.
authors.affiliation: German Scoliosis Center, Werner Wicker Clinic, Im Kreuzfeld 4, 34537, Bad Wildungen, Germany, heiko.koller@t-online.de.
authors.forename: Heiko
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Koller
authors.forename: Zenner
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Juliane
authors.forename: Marianne
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Umstaetter
authors.forename: Oliver
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Meier
authors.forename: René
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Schmidt
authors.forename: Wolfgang
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Hitzl
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D016268:Internal Fixators; D008297:Male; D010388:Pelvis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D011859:Radiography; D012544:Scheuermann Disease / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000601:surgery*; D013123:Spinal Fusion / Q000379:methods*; D013904:Thoracic Vertebrae / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references.citation: Spine J. 2005 Jan-Feb;5(1):104-8
references.pmid: 15739277
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986 Mar;68(2):189-93
references.pmid: 3958000
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Oct;(189):65-76
references.pmid: 6478705
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jan 1;35(1):99-103
references.pmid: 20042960
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Jun;57(4):439-48
references.pmid: 1141252
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952
references.pmid: 11074683
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 May;18(6):685-91
references.pmid: 8516695
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Feb 1;24(3):225-39
references.pmid: 10025017
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 15;30(14):1637-42
references.pmid: 16025034
references.citation: J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998 Jan-Feb;6(1):36-43
references.pmid: 9692939
references.citation: Orthop Clin North Am. 1999 Jul;30(3):475-87, ix
references.pmid: 10393769
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Nov;77(6):943-50
references.pmid: 7593112
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980 Jul;62(5):705-12
references.pmid: 7391093
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 15;32(24):2644-52
references.pmid: 18007239
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979 Jun;61(4):496-503
references.pmid: 438235
references.citation: Spine J. 2009 Apr;9(4):296-302
references.pmid: 18640879
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 1;37(10):826-32
references.pmid: 22024909
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Aug 15;29(16):1789-94
references.pmid: 15303023
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 1;32(19 Suppl):S115-9
references.pmid: 17728677
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2002 Dec;11(6):561-9
references.pmid: 12522714
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 15;34(8):765-70
references.pmid: 19365243
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 1;35(25):2224-31
references.pmid: 21102297
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 1;30(13):1528-34
references.pmid: 15990668
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 May;12(4):336-41
references.pmid: 3616746
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Aug 1;19(15):1680-5
references.pmid: 7973960
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Feb 1;31(3):309-14
references.pmid: 16449904
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):E729-34
references.pmid: 19752692
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jul;93(7):857-64
references.pmid: 21705553
references.citation: J Spinal Disord. 1993 Aug;6(4):339-50
references.pmid: 8219548
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 May;(386):139-49
references.pmid: 11347827
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 May 15;31(11):1227-31
references.pmid: 16688036
references.citation: J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jan;16(1):15-21
references.pmid: 21943245
references.citation: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1978 Apr 18;91(2):113-9
references.pmid: 655821
references.citation: Int Orthop. 2001;25(2):70-3
references.pmid: 11409454
references.citation: J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Jul;22(5):311-4
references.pmid: 19525784
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):2147-50
references.pmid: 19752700
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun 15;36(14):1103-12
references.pmid: 21245788
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Sep 15;31(20):2316-21
references.pmid: 16985459
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 15;32(24):2731-8
references.pmid: 18007253
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Feb;(251):134-9
references.pmid: 2295164
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jan 15;27(2):167-75
references.pmid: 11805663
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Oct 1;30(19):2176-81
references.pmid: 16205343
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2005 Nov;14(9):817-27
references.pmid: 15830215
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2000 Feb;9 Suppl 1:S17-23
references.pmid: 10766053
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 15;32(24):2764-70
references.pmid: 18007258