title: Reconciling conflicting electrophysiological findings on the guidance of attention by working memory.
abstract: Maintaining a representation in working memory has been proposed to be sufficient for the execution of top-down attentional control. Two recent electrophysiological studies that recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) during similar paradigms have tested this proposal, but have reported contradictory findings. The goal of the present study was to reconcile these previous reports. To this end, we used the stimuli from one study (Kumar, Soto, & Humphreys, 2009) combined with the task manipulations from the other (Carlisle & Woodman, 2011b). We found that when an item matching a working memory representation was presented in a visual search array, we could use ERPs to quantify the size of the covert attention effect. When the working memory matches were consistently task-irrelevant, we observed a weak attentional bias to these items. However, when the same item indicated the location of the search target, we found that the covert attention effect was approximately four times larger. This shows that simply maintaining a representation in working memory is not equivalent to having a top-down attentional set for that item. Our findings indicate that high-level goals mediate the relationship between the contents of working memory and perceptual attention.
authors.affiliation: Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, CA, USA, nancy.carlisle@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Nancy B
authors.initials: NB
authors.lastname: Carlisle
authors.forename: Geoffrey F
authors.initials: GF
authors.lastname: Woodman
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D003118:Color Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D004569:Electroencephalography; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D005556:Form Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D006040:Goals; D006801:Humans; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Apr;21(4):760-75
references.pmid: 18564048
references.citation: Exp Psychol. 2009;56(3):165-72
references.pmid: 19289358
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb;29(1):121-38
references.pmid: 12669752
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):2650-64
references.pmid: 21254796
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1275-91
references.pmid: 19803636
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Apr;31(2):248-61
references.pmid: 15826228
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1989 Jul;96(3):433-58
references.pmid: 2756067
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Jul;30(2):307-17
references.pmid: 19691812
references.citation: Nature. 1999 Aug 26;400(6747):867-9
references.pmid: 10476964
references.citation: Vision Res. 2006 Mar;46(6-7):1010-8
references.pmid: 16257030
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1976 May;13(3):277-8
references.pmid: 1273235
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 22;31(25):9315-22
references.pmid: 21697381
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1990 Oct;97(4):523-47
references.pmid: 2247540
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222
references.pmid: 7605061
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;15(7):327-34
references.pmid: 21665518
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Jun;33(3):730-7
references.pmid: 17563233
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Sep;12(9):342-8
references.pmid: 18693131
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):423-42
references.pmid: 16634680
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1292-302
references.pmid: 19803637
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Apr;33(2):363-77
references.pmid: 17469973
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):580-4
references.pmid: 22468723
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2011 May;49(6):1553-8
references.pmid: 21145332
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Aug;15(3):419-33
references.pmid: 2527952
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jun;21(6):1081-91
references.pmid: 18702589
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):897-903
references.pmid: 21691926
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Oct;32(5):1243-65
references.pmid: 17002535
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jun;137(2):217-25
references.pmid: 20643386