title: Early scrotal approximation after hemiscrotectomy in patients with Fournier's gangrene prevents scrotal reconstruction with skin graft.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  We report the outcomes of an early loose closure of the scrotum with a modified U-stitch to minimize use of split thickens skin graft for patients with hemiscrotal tissue loss after surgical debridement.
  
  
  METHODS
  From January 2006 to August 2011, 28 male patients presented with Fournier's gangrene, requiring major urological surgical care and scrotal debridement at Denver Health Medical Center. Surgical outcomes were compared between patients receiving a novel U-Stitch approximation and those treated by traditional management.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean age of the patients was 47.1 ± 10.2 years. In total 8 patients (2.2%) developed bacteremia and 3 (0.1%) had methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. There was conversion from the U-Stitch approximation patients to traditional management. U-stitch patients required less hospitalization than patients requiring split-thickness skin graft (STSG) due to loss of >50% of the total scrotal tissue (11 vs. 35 days, p = 0.081). The U-stitch demonstrated non-inferiority to traditional treatment.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Immediate loose scrotal wound approximation with efficient surgical debridement for Fournier's gangrene may prevent testis exposure facilitating local wound treatment, decreasing the length of hospital stay in patients with Fournier's gangrene involving the scrotum. Future randomized trials may validate these findings.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO;
authors.forename: Oleg
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Akilov
authors.forename: Alexandre
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pompeo
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Sehrt
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Bowlin
authors.forename: Wilson R
authors.initials: WR
authors.lastname: Molina
authors.forename: Fernando J
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: Kim
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2000 Jun;87(6):718-28
references.pmid: 10848848
references.citation: Urol Clin North Am. 1989 May;16(2):387-97
references.pmid: 2652863
references.citation: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Jul;64(7):944-8
references.pmid: 21185247
references.citation: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Apr;64(4):528-34
references.pmid: 20797927
references.citation: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006 Apr;20(4):365-9
references.pmid: 16643131
references.citation: Postgrad Med J. 2006 Aug;82(970):516-9
references.pmid: 16891442
references.citation: BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E1096-100
references.pmid: 22726768
references.citation: J Urol. 1995 Jul;154(1):89-92
references.pmid: 7776464
references.citation: Urol Clin North Am. 1999 Nov;26(4):841-9
references.pmid: 10584624
references.citation: Am J Surg. 2009 May;197(5):660-5; discussion 665
references.pmid: 18789410
references.citation: Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1193-8
references.pmid: 20451745
references.citation: Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(4):997-1004
references.pmid: 18563618
references.citation: J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Feb;208(2):279-88
references.pmid: 19228540