title: Metabolic analyses elucidate non-trivial gene targets for amplifying dihydroartemisinic acid production in yeast.
abstract: Synthetic biology enables metabolic engineering of industrial microbes to synthesize value-added molecules. In this, a major challenge is the efficient redirection of carbon to the desired metabolic pathways. Pinpointing strategies toward this goal requires an in-depth investigation of the metabolic landscape of the organism, particularly primary metabolism, to identify precursor and cofactor availability for the target compound. The potent antimalarial therapeutic artemisinin and its precursors are promising candidate molecules for production in microbial hosts. Recent advances have demonstrated the production of artemisinin precursors in engineered yeast strains as an alternative to extraction from plants. We report the application of in silico and in vivo metabolic pathway analyses to identify metabolic engineering targets to improve the yield of the direct artemisinin precursor dihydroartemisinic acid (DHA) in yeast. First, in silico extreme pathway (ExPa) analysis identified NADPH-malic enzyme and the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) as mechanisms to meet NADPH demand for DHA synthesis. Next, we compared key DHA-synthesizing ExPas to the metabolic flux distributions obtained from in vivo (13)C metabolic flux analysis of a DHA-synthesizing strain. This comparison revealed that knocking out ethanol synthesis and overexpressing glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in the oxidative PPP (gene YNL241C) or the NADPH-malic enzyme ME2 (YKL029C) are vital steps toward overproducing DHA. Finally, we employed in silico flux balance analysis and minimization of metabolic adjustment on a yeast genome-scale model to identify gene knockouts for improving DHA yields. The best strategy involved knockout of an oxaloacetate transporter (YKL120W) and an aspartate aminotransferase (YKL106W), and was predicted to improve DHA yields by 70-fold. Collectively, our work elucidates multiple non-trivial metabolic engineering strategies for improving DHA yield in yeast.
authors.affiliation: Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Maryland College Park, MD, USA.
authors.forename: Ashish
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Misra
authors.forename: Matthew F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Conway
authors.forename: Joseph
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Johnnie
authors.forename: Tabish M
authors.initials: TM
authors.lastname: Qureshi
authors.forename: Bao
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Lige
authors.forename: Anne M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Derrick
authors.forename: Eddy C
authors.initials: EC
authors.lastname: Agbo
authors.forename: Ganesh
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Sriram
keywords: artemisinin; extreme pathway; flux balance analysis; isotope labeling; metabolic engineering; metabolic flux analysis; metabolic pathway; minimization of metabolic adjustment
references.citation: J Am Chem Soc. 2012 Aug 22;134(33):13577-9
references.pmid: 22866604
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Dec;77(6 Suppl):198-202
references.pmid: 18165493
references.citation: J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:541609
references.pmid: 20589069
references.citation: Molecules. 2010 Apr 29;15(5):3135-70
references.pmid: 20657468
references.citation: Metab Eng. 2001 Jul;3(3):195-206
references.pmid: 11461141
references.citation: Res Microbiol. 1996 Jul-Sep;147(6-7):448-55
references.pmid: 9084754
references.citation: Planta Med. 2005 Jan;71(1):40-7
references.pmid: 15678372
references.citation: Metab Eng. 2011 Mar;13(2):159-68
references.pmid: 21241816
references.citation: Nat Protoc. 2011 Aug 04;6(9):1290-307
references.pmid: 21886097
references.citation: Malar J. 2007 Sep 15;6:125
references.pmid: 17868471
references.citation: Planta Med. 2010 Oct;76(15):1778-83
references.pmid: 20486073
references.citation: Mol Genet Metab. 2008 Feb;93(2):145-59
references.pmid: 18029214
references.citation: BMC Syst Biol. 2009 Mar 25;3:37
references.pmid: 19321003
references.citation: Metab Eng. 2013 Jan;15:34-47
references.pmid: 23111062
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2004 Oct;136(2):3043-57
references.pmid: 15466217
references.citation: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012 Feb 13;51(7):1706-9
references.pmid: 22250044
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59086
references.pmid: 23516601
references.citation: Lancet Infect Dis. 2010 Aug;10(8):545-55
references.pmid: 20637696
references.citation: Drug Discov Today Dis Models. 2008 Winter;5(4):299-309
references.pmid: 27840651
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 8;104(19):7797-802
references.pmid: 17463081
references.citation: Metab Eng. 2005 May;7(3):155-64
references.pmid: 15885614
references.citation: Metab Eng. 2013 Jan;15:206-17
references.pmid: 22898717
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2008 Aug 1;283(31):21501-8
references.pmid: 18495659
references.citation: J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:753904
references.pmid: 20467567
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2000 Apr 7;203(3):229-48
references.pmid: 10716907
references.citation: BMC Mol Biol. 2009 Oct 30;10:99
references.pmid: 19874630
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 15;21(8):1739-40
references.pmid: 15613397
references.citation: Biophys J. 2002 Aug;83(2):808-18
references.pmid: 12124266
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 17;109(3):E111-8
references.pmid: 22247290
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Apr 15;6(4):e1000744
references.pmid: 20419153
references.citation: Microb Cell Fact. 2011 Jun 21;10:45
references.pmid: 21689458
references.citation: Metab Eng. 2009 Nov;11(6):328-34
references.pmid: 19619667
references.citation: Eukaryot Cell. 2010 Jul;9(7):1039-48
references.pmid: 20495057
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42703
references.pmid: 22900042
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2010 Dec 10;285(50):39544-50
references.pmid: 20937805
references.citation: Biotechnol Prog. 2008 Sep-Oct;24(5):1026-32
references.pmid: 19194910
references.citation: Microb Cell Fact. 2012 Oct 09;11:136
references.pmid: 23043429
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 12;99(23):15112-7
references.pmid: 12415116
references.citation: Lancet. 2010 Nov 6;376(9752):1566-78
references.pmid: 21035842
references.citation: Phytochemistry. 2008 Dec;69(17):2881-5
references.pmid: 18977499
references.citation: Eur J Biochem. 1995 Sep 1;232(2):433-48
references.pmid: 7556192
references.citation: Metab Eng. 2012 Nov;14(6):687-704
references.pmid: 23036703
references.citation: Planta Med. 2000 Feb;66(1):57-62
references.pmid: 10705736
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2009 Jan;149(1):585-98
references.pmid: 18987214
references.citation: Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Dec 1;49(11):1638-40
references.pmid: 19877970
references.citation: Yeast. 2001 Jan 15;18(1):19-32
references.pmid: 11124698
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Mar;28(3):245-8
references.pmid: 20212490
references.citation: Apoptosis. 2013 Oct;18(10):1201-13
references.pmid: 23661289
references.citation: Mol Biosyst. 2013 Jan 27;9(1):99-112
references.pmid: 23114423
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Apr 13;440(7086):940-3
references.pmid: 16612385
references.citation: Q Rev Biophys. 1998 Feb;31(1):41-106
references.pmid: 9717198
references.citation: Nature. 2013 Apr 25;496(7446):528-32
references.pmid: 23575629
references.citation: J Gen Microbiol. 1983 Apr;129(4):965-71
references.pmid: 6684148
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003 Dec 20;84(6):647-57
references.pmid: 14595777
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2000 Apr 7;203(3):249-83
references.pmid: 10716908
references.citation: FEBS Lett. 2006 Feb 20;580(5):1411-6
references.pmid: 16458889
references.citation: Genome Res. 2004 Nov;14(11):2367-76
references.pmid: 15520298
references.citation: Plant Biotechnol J. 2011 May;9(4):445-54
references.pmid: 20723135
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009 Dec;7(12):864-74
references.pmid: 19881520