title: Lexical influences on auditory streaming.
abstract: Biologically salient sounds, including speech, are rarely heard in isolation. Our brains must therefore organize the input arising from multiple sources into separate "streams" and, in the case of speech, map the acoustic components of the target signal onto meaning. These auditory and linguistic processes have traditionally been considered to occur sequentially and are typically studied independently [1, 2]. However, evidence that streaming is modified or reset by attention [3], and that lexical knowledge can affect reports of speech sound identity [4, 5], suggests that higher-level factors may influence perceptual organization. In two experiments, listeners heard sequences of repeated words or acoustically matched nonwords. After several presentations, they reported that the initial /s/ sound in each syllable formed a separate stream; the percept then fluctuated between the streamed and fused states in a bistable manner. In addition to measuring these verbal transformations, we assessed streaming objectively by requiring listeners to detect occasional targets-syllables containing a gap after the initial /s/. Performance was better when streaming caused the syllables preceding the target to transform from words into nonwords, rather than from nonwords into words. Our results show that auditory stream formation is influenced not only by the acoustic properties of speech sounds, but also by higher-level processes involved in recognizing familiar words.
authors.affiliation: MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
authors.forename: Alexander J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Billig
authors.forename: Matthew H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Davis
authors.forename: John M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Deeks
authors.forename: Jolijn
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Monstrey
authors.forename: Robert P
authors.initials: RP
authors.lastname: Carlyon
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000162:Acoustics; D001288:Attention; D001307:Auditory Perception; D006801:Humans; D010700:Phonetics
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Oct;28(5):1120-30
references.pmid: 12421059
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Aug;34(4):992-1006
references.pmid: 18665740
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Aug;106(2):938-45
references.pmid: 10462799
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Apr;17(4):641-51
references.pmid: 15829084
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Apr 5;367(1591):965-76
references.pmid: 22371618
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2006 Jul 11;16(13):1351-7
references.pmid: 16824924
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 May 15;36(1):123-30
references.pmid: 17418591
references.citation: Am J Psychol. 1965 Jun;78:257-63
references.pmid: 14290755
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Jun 1;25(22):5382-8
references.pmid: 15930387
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Feb;27(1):115-27
references.pmid: 11248927
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Aug;37(4):1253-62
references.pmid: 21480747
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Apr 5;367(1591):977-87
references.pmid: 22371619
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1994 Jan;101(1):129-156
references.pmid: 8121955
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2012 Apr 10;22(7):615-21
references.pmid: 22425155
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1974 Apr;55(4):819-21
references.pmid: 4833077
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Jun;23(3):299-325; discussion 325-70
references.pmid: 11301575
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 1961 Aug;52:249-58
references.pmid: 13783239
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2001 Jan;12(1):24-9
references.pmid: 11294224
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2002 Jul;64(5):795-803
references.pmid: 12201338
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Oct 6;48(1):139-48
references.pmid: 16202714
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2008 Aug 5;18(15):1124-8
references.pmid: 18656355
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 20;32(25):8443-53
references.pmid: 22723684