title: Colony fusion in a parthenogenetic ant, Pristomyrmex punctatus.
abstract: In the ant Pristomyrmex punctatus Smith (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), all young workers lay a small number of eggs parthenogenetically. Some colonies consist of monoclonal individuals that provide high inclusive fitness, according to the kin selection theory. However, in some populations, a majority of the colonies contain multiple lineages. Intracolonial genetic variation of parthenogenetic ants cannot be explained by the multiple mating of single founderesses or by the foundation of a colony by multiple foundresses, which are the usual causes of genetically diverse colonies in social insects. Here, we hypothesized that the fusion of established colonies might facilitate the formation of multiclonal colonies. Colony fusion decreases indirect benefits because of the reduction in intracolonial relatedness. However, when suitable nesting places for overwintering are scarce, colony fusion provides a strategy for the survival of colonies. Here, ants derived from different colonies were allowed to encounter one another in a container with just one nesting place. Initially, high aggression was observed; however, after several days, no aggression was observed and the ants shared the nest. When the fused colonies were allowed to transfer to two alternative nests, ants from different colonies occupied the same nest. This study highlights the importance of limiting the number of nesting places in order to understand the genetic diversity of parthenogenetic ant colonies.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Yamagata University, Yamagata-shi, Japan. step1sato@yahoo.co.jp
authors.forename: Show
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Satow
authors.forename: Toshiyuki
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Satoh
authors.forename: Tadao
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Hirota
mesh_terms: D000374:Aggression; D000818:Animals; D001000:Ants; D003163:Competitive Behavior; D005260:Female; D009425:Nesting Behavior; D010312:Parthenogenesis
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Nov 5;462(7269):51-7
references.pmid: 19890322
references.citation: Science. 1999 Aug 6;285(5429):891-3
references.pmid: 10436157
references.citation: Genetics. 1980 Sep;96(1):263-73
references.pmid: 7203010
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2006 Sep 22;2(3):359-63
references.pmid: 17148403
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2010 Feb;23(2):397-406
references.pmid: 20021548
references.citation: Science. 2004 Jul 16;305(5682):402-4
references.pmid: 15218093
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2009 Aug;35(8):922-32
references.pmid: 19609617
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jul 20;317(5836):362-4
references.pmid: 17641199
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2008 Oct;9(10):735-48
references.pmid: 18802413
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1-16
references.pmid: 5875341
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Sep 29;5(9):
references.pmid: 20927374
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Dec;14(12):477-482
references.pmid: 10542454
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Aug;22(8):408-13
references.pmid: 17573148
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 7;276(1656):567-74
references.pmid: 18854297
references.citation: Science. 1994 Nov 11;266(5187):1030-2
references.pmid: 7973654
references.citation: J Insect Physiol. 2002 Mar;48(3):357-365
references.pmid: 12770110
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 1996 Aug;5(4):511-9
references.pmid: 8794560
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Mar 7;277(1682):755-63
references.pmid: 19889701
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Jun 30;435(7046):1230-4
references.pmid: 15988525
references.citation: Naturwissenschaften. 2007 Oct;94(10):865-9
references.pmid: 17551706