title: Interareal coupling reduces encoding variability in multi-area models of spatial working memory.
abstract: Persistent activity observed during delayed-response tasks for spatial working memory (Funahashi et al., 1989) has commonly been modeled by recurrent networks whose dynamics is described as a bump attractor (Compte et al., 2000). We examine the effects of interareal architecture on the dynamics of bump attractors in stochastic neural fields. Lateral inhibitory synaptic structure in each area sustains stationary bumps in the absence of noise. Introducing noise causes bumps in individual areas to wander as a Brownian walk. However, coupling multiple areas together can help reduce the variability of the bump's position in each area. To examine this quantitatively, we approximate the position of the bump in each area using a small noise expansion that also assumes weak amplitude interareal projections. Our asymptotic results show the motion of the bumps in each area can be approximated as a multivariate Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. This shows reciprocal coupling between areas can always reduce variability, if sufficiently strong, even if one area contains much more noise than the other. However, when noise is correlated between areas, the variability-reducing effect of interareal coupling is diminished. Our results suggest that distributing spatial working memory representations across multiple, reciprocally-coupled brain areas can lead to noise cancelation that ultimately improves encoding.
authors.affiliation: Department of Mathematics, University of Houston Houston, TX, USA.
authors.forename: Zachary P
authors.initials: ZP
authors.lastname: Kilpatrick
keywords: bump attractor; correlations; neural field; noise cancelation; spatial working memory
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1998 Jun;79(6):2919-40
references.pmid: 9636098
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 17;109(16):6295-300
references.pmid: 22474377
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1995 Dec;74(6):2754-8
references.pmid: 8747231
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2003 Nov;13(11):1185-95
references.pmid: 14576210
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Aug;5(8):775-82
references.pmid: 12134153
references.citation: Science. 2000 Jan 14;287(5451):273-8
references.pmid: 10634775
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1997 Oct 15;17(20):7606-25
references.pmid: 9315883
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2000 Sep;10(9):910-23
references.pmid: 10982751
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 1998 Feb;10(2):794-7
references.pmid: 9749746
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:441-71
references.pmid: 10845071
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan;11(1):103-7
references.pmid: 18066057
references.citation: Neural Comput. 2001 Jul;13(7):1473-94
references.pmid: 11440594
references.citation: Neuroscientist. 2004 Dec;10(6):553-65
references.pmid: 15534040
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Aug;5(8):805-11
references.pmid: 12134152
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1989 Apr;61(4):814-32
references.pmid: 2723722
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Apr 25;92(9):3844-8
references.pmid: 7731993
references.citation: Science. 1992 Nov 27;258(5087):1498-501
references.pmid: 1359647
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1996 Nov;76(5):2841-52
references.pmid: 8930237
references.citation: J Comput Neurosci. 1998 Dec;5(4):383-405
references.pmid: 9877021
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 1977 Aug 3;27(2):77-87
references.pmid: 911931
references.citation: Vision Res. 1994 Jan;34(1):79-92
references.pmid: 8116271
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1996 Aug 15;16(16):5154-67
references.pmid: 8756444
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1997 May 15;17(10):3870-82
references.pmid: 9133405
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 May;14(5):216-22
references.pmid: 20381406
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1993 Mar;13(3):1227-43
references.pmid: 8441009
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2013 Nov 27;33(48):18999-9011
references.pmid: 24285904
references.citation: Kybernetik. 1973 Sep;13(2):55-80
references.pmid: 4767470
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2011 Nov 25;107(22):228103
references.pmid: 22182044
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 Jan;81(1 Pt 1):011911
references.pmid: 20365403
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1989 Feb;61(2):331-49
references.pmid: 2918358
references.citation: J Comput Neurosci. 2012 Apr;32(2):233-52
references.pmid: 21748526
references.citation: Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28;139(1):173-80
references.pmid: 16326021
references.citation: Neuron. 1995 Mar;14(3):477-85
references.pmid: 7695894
references.citation: SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst. 2022;21(4):2579-2609
references.pmid: 38250343
references.citation: Nature. 1997 Sep 4;389(6646):66-9
references.pmid: 9288967
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):1047-53
references.pmid: 22591667
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 2;33(1):133-49
references.pmid: 23283328
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 1996 Jan-Feb;6(1):31-8
references.pmid: 8670636
references.citation: Front Comput Neurosci. 2011 Oct 24;5:40
references.pmid: 22028690