title: Looking while eating: the importance of social context to social attention.
abstract: Recent studies have found that participants consistently look less at social stimuli in live situations than expected from conventional laboratory experiments, raising questions as to the cause for this discrepancy and concerns about the validity of typical studies. We tested the possibility that it is the consequences of a potential social interaction that dictates one's looking behaviour. By placing participants in a situation where the social consequences of interacting are congruent with social norms (sharing a meal), we find an increased preference for participants to look at each other. Dyads who were particularly interactive also looked more at the other person than dyads who did not interact. Recent landmark studies have shown that in real world settings people avoid looking at strangers, but we show that in a situation with a different social context the opposite holds true.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. david.wl.wu@gmail.com
authors.forename: David W-L
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Wu
authors.forename: Walter F
authors.initials: WF
authors.lastname: Bischof
authors.forename: Alan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kingstone
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D012919:Social Behavior; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2013 May;85(5):941-947
references.pmid: 25264374
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 25;6:143
references.pmid: 22654747
references.citation: Addict Behav. 2010 Jan;35(1):49-52
references.pmid: 19733978
references.citation: Br J Nutr. 1997 Apr;77 Suppl 1:S21-8
references.pmid: 9155491
references.citation: Alcohol Alcohol. 2011 Jul-Aug;46(4):393-8
references.pmid: 21493639
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2003 Nov;129(6):873-86
references.pmid: 14599286
references.citation: Appetite. 2007 Jul;49(1):92-9
references.pmid: 17296248
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 5;108(14):5548-53
references.pmid: 21436052
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2012 Aug 23;8(4):520-2
references.pmid: 22456331
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8;109(19):7245-50
references.pmid: 22529369
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Oct 23;425(6960):785-91
references.pmid: 14574401
references.citation: Folia Primatol (Basel). 2001 Sep-Oct;72(5):268-77
references.pmid: 11805423
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Jan;104(1):103-25
references.pmid: 23163747
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53286
references.pmid: 23326407
references.citation: Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453-8
references.pmid: 7455683
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19762-6
references.pmid: 18077409
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2003 Jul;14(4):334-9
references.pmid: 12807406
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31027
references.pmid: 22312438
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2004 Jan;15(1):71-4
references.pmid: 14717835
references.citation: Science. 2006 Jun 23;312(5781):1767-70
references.pmid: 16794075
references.citation: Science. 2010 Mar 19;327(5972):1480-4
references.pmid: 20299588