title: Recovery from slow inactivation in K+ channels is controlled by water molecules.
abstract: Application of a specific stimulus opens the intracellular gate of a K(+) channel (activation), yielding a transient period of ion conduction until the selectivity filter spontaneously undergoes a conformational change towards a non-conductive state (inactivation). Removal of the stimulus closes the gate and allows the selectivity filter to interconvert back to its conductive conformation (recovery). Given that the structural differences between the conductive and inactivated filter are very small, it is unclear why the recovery process can take up to several seconds. The bacterial K(+) channel KcsA from Streptomyces lividans can be used to help elucidate questions about channel inactivation and recovery at the atomic level. Although KcsA contains only a pore domain, without voltage-sensing machinery, it has the structural elements necessary for ion conduction, activation and inactivation. Here we reveal, by means of a series of long molecular dynamics simulations, how the selectivity filter is sterically locked in the inactive conformation by buried water molecules bound behind the selectivity filter. Potential of mean force calculations show how the recovery process is affected by the buried water molecules and the rebinding of an external K(+) ion. A kinetic model deduced from the simulations shows how releasing the buried water molecules can stretch the timescale of recovery to seconds. This leads to the prediction that reducing the occupancy of the buried water molecules by imposing a high osmotic stress should accelerate the rate of recovery, which was verified experimentally by measuring the recovery rate in the presence of a 2-molar sucrose concentration.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, 929 E57th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
authors.forename: Jared
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ostmeyer
authors.forename: Sudha
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Chakrapani
authors.forename: Albert C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Pan
authors.forename: Eduardo
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Perozo
authors.forename: Benoît
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Roux
mesh_terms: D001426:Bacterial Proteins / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism*; D001665:Binding Sites; D003460:Crystallization; D018360:Crystallography, X-Ray; D015640:Ion Channel Gating / Q000187:drug effects*; D007700:Kinetics; D056004:Molecular Dynamics Simulation; D011188:Potassium / Q000378:metabolism; D015221:Potassium Channels / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism*; D011487:Protein Conformation; D048170:Streptomyces lividans / Q000737:chemistry; D013395:Sucrose / Q000494:pharmacology; D013816:Thermodynamics; D014867:Water / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism / Q000494:pharmacology*
chemical_list: D001426:Bacterial Proteins; D015221:Potassium Channels; C107790:prokaryotic potassium channel; D014867:Water; D013395:Sucrose; D011188:Potassium
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 6;107(14):6216-21
references.pmid: 20212150
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 2010 Jun;135(6):555-62
references.pmid: 20513757
references.citation: Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011 Jan;18(1):67-74
references.pmid: 21186363
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Jul 8;466(7303):203-8
references.pmid: 20613835
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 2001 Feb;117(2):165-80
references.pmid: 11158168
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 2007 Nov;130(5):465-78
references.pmid: 17938230
references.citation: Biophys J. 2011 May 18;100(10):2387-93
references.pmid: 21575572
references.citation: Biophys J. 1996 Feb;70(2):798-805
references.pmid: 8789096
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2010 Aug 13;401(2):155-66
references.pmid: 20600123
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 2011 Dec;138(6):571-80
references.pmid: 22124115
references.citation: Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007 Nov;14(11):1062-9
references.pmid: 17922012
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 2007 Nov;130(5):479-96
references.pmid: 17938231
references.citation: Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006 Apr;13(4):311-8
references.pmid: 16532009
references.citation: J Comput Chem. 2005 Dec;26(16):1781-802
references.pmid: 16222654
references.citation: J Chem Theory Comput. 2012 Nov 13;8(11):4672-80
references.pmid: 26605623
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 1998 Apr 30;102(18):3586-616
references.pmid: 24889800
references.citation: Structure. 2011 Jan 12;19(1):70-9
references.pmid: 21220117
references.citation: Biophys J. 1989 Sep;56(3):631-6
references.pmid: 2477074
references.citation: Methods Enzymol. 1986;127:400-16
references.pmid: 3736427
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2009 Jun 12;389(3):637-45
references.pmid: 19393663
references.citation: Eur Biophys J. 1997;26(6):433-45
references.pmid: 9404006
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Jul 8;466(7303):272-5
references.pmid: 20613845
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Nov 1;414(6859):43-8
references.pmid: 11689936