title: Utility of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography imaging in evaluation of chronic low back pain.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Abnormal morphologic findings in imaging were thought to explain the etiology of low back pain (LBP). However, it is now known that variety of morphologic abnormalities is noted even in asymptomatic individuals. Single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) could be used to differentiate incidental findings from clinically significant findings.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  This study was performed to define the SPECT/CT patterns in patients with LBP and to correlate these with clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.
  
  
  METHODS
  Thirty adult patients with LBP of duration 3 months or more were prospectively evaluated in this study. Patients with known or suspected malignancy, trauma or infectious processes were excluded. A detailed history of sensory and motor symptoms and neurologic examination was performed. All the patients were subjected to MRI and bone scintigraphy with hybrid SPECT/CT of the lumbo-sacral spine within 1 month of each other. The patients were classified into those with and without neurologic symptoms, activity limitation. The findings of clinical examination and imaging were compared. MRI and SPECT/CT findings were also compared.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Thirty patients (18 men and 12 women; mean age 38 years; range 17-64 years) were eligible for the study. Clinically, 14 of 30 (46%) had neurologic signs and or symptoms. Six of the 30 patients (20%) had positive straight leg raising test (SLRT). Twenty-two of the 30 patients (73%) had SPECT abnormality. Most frequent SPECT/CT abnormality was tracer uptake in the anterior part of vertebral body with osteophytes/sclerotic changes. Significant positive agreement was noted between this finding and MRI evidence of degenerative disc disease. Only 13% of patients had more than one abnormality in SPECT. All 30 patients had MRI abnormalities. The most frequent abnormality was degenerative disc disease and facet joint arthropathy. MRI showed single intervertebral disc abnormality in 36% of the patients and more than one intervertebral disc abnormality in remaining 64% patients. Fifteen of the 30 patients had facet joint arthropathy. 60% of these patients had involvement of more than one level facet joints while 38% had associated inter vertebral disc disease. 83% of the patients with positive SLRT had SPECT and MRI abnormalities. 100% of patients with neurologic symptoms had SPECT and MRI abnormalities.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Addition of hybrid SPECT/CT data will help differentiate incidental from significant MRI abnormalities as all patients with LBP have MRI abnormalities and most have MRI abnormalities at multiple sites. Tracer uptake in the anterior part of the vertebral body represents degenerative disc disease. MRI is sensitive and SPECT/CT is specific for facet joint arthropathy. Both investigations are best used complementary to each other.
authors.affiliation: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
authors.forename: Chidambaram Natrajan Balasubramanian
authors.initials: CN
authors.lastname: Harisankar
authors.forename: Bhagwant Rai
authors.initials: BR
authors.lastname: Mittal
authors.forename: Anish
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Bhattacharya
authors.forename: Paramjeet
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Singh
authors.forename: Ramesh
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Sen
keywords: Bone scan; low back pain; magnetic resonance imaging; single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography; straight leg raising test
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 Sep;12(7 Suppl):S1-59
references.pmid: 2961086
references.citation: JAMA. 1981 Sep 4;246(10):1105-8
references.pmid: 7265399
references.citation: Radiographics. 1999 Jul-Aug;19(4):901-12; discussion 912-4
references.pmid: 10464798
references.citation: Radiology. 2006 Feb;238(2):693-8
references.pmid: 16436824
references.citation: Radiology. 1992 Mar;182(3):849-54
references.pmid: 1531544
references.citation: Radiology. 1994 Mar;190(3):669-72
references.pmid: 8115608
references.citation: Scand J Rheumatol. 2002;31(4):245-8
references.pmid: 12369658
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Apr 1;19(7):801-6
references.pmid: 8202798
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Sep 1;23(17):1860-6; discussion 1867
references.pmid: 9762743
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jul 8;162(13):1444-7; discussion 1447-8
references.pmid: 12090877
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Jul 15;22(14):1650-60
references.pmid: 9253102
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Feb 15;22(4):427-34
references.pmid: 9055372
references.citation: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 May;27(4):238-44
references.pmid: 15148462
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Jan 15;19(2):156-8
references.pmid: 8153823
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Nov 1;20(21):2298-302
references.pmid: 8553117
references.citation: Postgrad Med J. 2009 Nov;85(1009):606-13
references.pmid: 19892896
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Sep;13(9):966-71
references.pmid: 2974632
references.citation: Nucl Med Commun. 2006 Dec;27(12):977-87
references.pmid: 17088684
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 1995 Feb;54(2):100-6
references.pmid: 7702395
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Apr 1;25(7):819-28
references.pmid: 10751293
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2008 Aug;49(8):1305-19
references.pmid: 18632825
references.citation: Pain Physician. 1999 Oct;2(3):59-64
references.pmid: 16906217
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2007 Feb;48(2):319-24
references.pmid: 17268031
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 1999 Aug;26(8):1738-45
references.pmid: 10451071
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Apr;88(4):449-55
references.pmid: 17398245
references.citation: Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Dec;35(12):1269-73
references.pmid: 9010055
references.citation: Phys Ther. 1999 Apr;79(4):384-96
references.pmid: 10201544
references.citation: Nucl Med Commun. 1998 Jan;19(1):13-21
references.pmid: 9515543