title: Fetus as Human Being: Where is the Cut-off Point?
abstract: Abortion is one of the controversial issues discussed in medical ethics. We can formulate the argument which is put forward by the opponents of abortion as follows: 1) fetus has to be regarded as human being; 2) killing an innocent human being is morally wrong; 3) aborting is an example of killing and terminating a human being's life. So, being engaged in aborting is morally wrong. In this paper, I am going to argue that the proponents' argument with regard to the implausibility of categorizing fetus as human being is unjustified and wanting. In other words, the way in which the proponents of abortion talk about the idea of personhood is, inadequate and vague, semantically speaking. The outline of the argument is as follows. The proponents of abortion are confronted with a dilemma. According to the first horn of the dilemma, the proponents have to subscribe to infanticide which is morally wrong, intuitively speaking. According to the second horn of the dilemma, there is a semantic story which needs to be expressed by the proponents with regard to the cut-off point of the concept 'personhood'. Otherwise, the first premise will not be convincing if raised in favour of the plausibility of committing abortion.
authors.affiliation: Assistant Professor, Iranian Institute of Philosophy.
authors.forename: Soroush
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Dabbagh
keywords: Abortion; Fetus; human
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Oct;182(1):160-9
references.pmid: 16032411
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2001 Feb 16;299(1-2):57-60
references.pmid: 11166937
references.citation: Pain. 2004 Mar;108(1-2):129-36
references.pmid: 15109516
references.citation: J Clin Psychol. 2001 Apr;57(4):587-607
references.pmid: 11255208
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Feb 6;28(6):1398-403
references.pmid: 18256259
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Apr;23(1):2-10
references.pmid: 15795129
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2001 Oct 5;311(3):193-7
references.pmid: 11578827