title: The crossmodal congruency task as a means to obtain an objective behavioral measure in the rubber hand illusion paradigm.
abstract: The rubber hand illusion (RHI) is a popular experimental paradigm. Participants view touch on an artificial rubber hand while the participants' own hidden hand is touched. If the viewed and felt touches are given at the same time then this is sufficient to induce the compelling experience that the rubber hand is one's own hand. The RHI can be used to investigate exactly how the brain constructs distinct body representations for one's own body. Such representations are crucial for successful interactions with the external world. To obtain a subjective measure of the RHI, researchers typically ask participants to rate statements such as "I felt as if the rubber hand were my hand". Here we demonstrate how the crossmodal congruency task can be used to obtain an objective behavioral measure within this paradigm. The variant of the crossmodal congruency task we employ involves the presentation of tactile targets and visual distractors. Targets and distractors are spatially congruent (i.e. same finger) on some trials and incongruent (i.e. different finger) on others. The difference in performance between incongruent and congruent trials - the crossmodal congruency effect (CCE) - indexes multisensory interactions. Importantly, the CCE is modulated both by viewing a hand as well as the synchrony of viewed and felt touch which are both crucial factors for the RHI. The use of the crossmodal congruency task within the RHI paradigm has several advantages. It is a simple behavioral measure which can be repeated many times and which can be obtained during the illusion while participants view the artificial hand. Furthermore, this measure is not susceptible to observer and experimenter biases. The combination of the RHI paradigm with the crossmodal congruency task allows in particular for the investigation of multisensory processes which are critical for modulations of body representations as in the RHI.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University. regine.zopf@mq.edu.au
authors.forename: Regine
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Zopf
authors.forename: Greg
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Savage
authors.forename: Mark A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Williams
mesh_terms: D006225:Hand; D006801:Humans; D007088:Illusions / Q000502:physiology* / Q000523:psychology; D055698:Touch Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Jun;107(3):978-98
references.pmid: 18262508
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Jun;4(2):170-81
references.pmid: 15460923
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Feb;48(3):703-12
references.pmid: 19819247
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 2;105(35):13169-73
references.pmid: 18725630
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jan;154(1):113-20
references.pmid: 14579008
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009 Aug 05;4(8):e6488
references.pmid: 19654862
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2008 Aug 5;191(1):1-10
references.pmid: 18423906
references.citation: Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep-Dec;2(3-4):147-54
references.pmid: 24168529
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jul 22;270(1523):1499-506
references.pmid: 12965016
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2006 Jan 9;392(1-2):96-100
references.pmid: 16213655
references.citation: Science. 2007 Aug 24;317(5841):1048
references.pmid: 17717177
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21659
references.pmid: 21738756
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2008 Nov;191(2):171-86
references.pmid: 18709500
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Jan;36(1):34-46
references.pmid: 21477616
references.citation: Psychol Med. 2012 Apr;42(4):819-28
references.pmid: 22017964
references.citation: J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jan-Jun;98(1-3):171-89
references.pmid: 15477031
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3832
references.pmid: 19050755
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1287-1293
references.pmid: 21320514
references.citation: Science. 2007 Aug 24;317(5841):1096-9
references.pmid: 17717189
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 5;104(23):9828-33
references.pmid: 17517605
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Feb;48(3):713-25
references.pmid: 19913040
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Mar 14;6:40
references.pmid: 22435056
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Feb;31(1):80-91
references.pmid: 15709864
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2000 Sep;11(5):353-9
references.pmid: 11228904
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Feb 19;391(6669):756
references.pmid: 9486643
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Jul 18;13(8):556-71
references.pmid: 22805909
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e27089
references.pmid: 22073126