title: Prognosis of patients without perfusion defects with and without rest study in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is widely regarded as a useful imaging modality for diagnosing patients with suspected ischemic heart disease. Current European guidelines recommend stress study to be performed first since rest study can be omitted if stress study is interpreted as normal. Thus, a rest study should only be performed in patients with equivocal or abnormal studies. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognosis of a normal stress-only MPS compared to a normal stress-rest MPS in a retrospective manner and also with regard to normal/abnormal left ventricular function data.
  
  
  METHODS
  All 4,820 patients who underwent (99m)Tc MPS at Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, Sweden, in 2004 to 2007, for suspected or management of known ischemic heart disease were considered. The physician in clinical charge of the investigation decided whether a rest study was necessary or not. Based on the final report according to clinical routine, only patients with a normal perfusion study (no infarction or inducible ischemia) were included. The endpoints were non-fatal acute coronary syndrome or death from ischemic cardiac origin.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 3,426 patients with a normal perfusion study were included. Of these, 2,215 patients had a stress-only study and 1,211 patients had both stress and rest studies. Mean follow-up was 6.2 years. The lowest event rate was found in the normal stress-only group (0.56% for normal stress-only patients vs. 1.42% for normal stress-rest patients; p < 0.0001). When dividing patients according to sex and stress type, the best prognosis was also found in the normal stress-only group (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Regarding left ventricular function data, we did not find any significant difference in event rate between normal vs. abnormal ejection fraction (EF), normal vs. abnormal end-diastolic volume (EDV) or normal EF, and EDV vs. abnormal EF or EDV for either the normal stress-only patients or the normal stress-rest patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Patients with a normal stress-only study had an excellent prognosis over a mean follow-up time of 6 years. Thus, omitting the rest study if the stress study is normal is a safe procedure.
authors.affiliation: Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine Unit, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
authors.forename: Lars
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Edenbrandt
authors.affiliation: Computational Biology and Biological Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
authors.forename: Mattias
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ohlsson
authors.affiliation: Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine Unit, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
authors.forename: Elin
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Trägårdh
keywords: Ischemic heart disease; Myocardial perfusion imaging; Prognostic value
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 1993 Oct;34(10):1793-800
references.pmid: 8410300
references.citation: BMC Med Imaging. 2013 Apr 01;13:14
references.pmid: 23547878
references.citation: Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):905-14
references.pmid: 8598081
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Mar 20;39(6):999-1004
references.pmid: 11897442
references.citation: J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Oct;19(5):914-21
references.pmid: 22814773
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2003 Apr 28;163(8):965-71
references.pmid: 12719207
references.citation: J Nucl Cardiol. 2004 Sep-Oct;11(5):551-61
references.pmid: 15472640
references.citation: Circ J. 2012;76(10):2386-91
references.pmid: 22813875
references.citation: JAMA. 2001 Jan 24-31;285(4):430-6
references.pmid: 11242427
references.citation: J Nucl Cardiol. 2010 Jun;17(3):370-7
references.pmid: 20390394
references.citation: J Nucl Cardiol. 2006 Nov;13(6):e80-90
references.pmid: 17174798
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jan 19;55(3):221-30
references.pmid: 19913381
references.citation: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005 Jul;32(7):855-97
references.pmid: 15909197
references.citation: Circulation. 1998 Feb 17;97(6):535-43
references.pmid: 9494023
references.citation: J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;42(6):642-50
references.pmid: 21875774
references.citation: J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Feb;20(1):27-37
references.pmid: 23188624
references.citation: J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Oct;19(5):1026-43
references.pmid: 22760523