title: The impact of beneficial plant-associated microbes on plant phenotypic plasticity.
abstract: Plants show phenotypic plasticity in response to changing or extreme abiotic environments; but over millions of years they also have co-evolved to respond to the presence of soil microbes. Studies on phenotypic plasticity in plants have focused mainly on the effects of the changing environments on plants' growth and survival. Evidence is now accumulating that the presence of microbes can alter plant phenotypic plasticity in a broad range of traits in response to a changing environment. In this review, we discuss the effects of microbes on plant phenotypic plasticity in response to changing environmental conditions, and how this may affect plant fitness. By using a range of specific plant-microbe interactions as examples, we demonstrate that one way that microbes can alleviate the effect of environmental stress on plants and thus increase plant fitness is to remove the stress, e.g., nutrient limitation, directly. Furthermore, microbes indirectly affect plant phenotypic plasticity and fitness through modulation of plant development and defense responses. In doing so, microbes affect fitness by both increasing or decreasing the degree of phenotypic plasticity, depending on the phenotype and the environmental stress studied, with no clear difference between the effect of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbes in general. Additionally, plants have the ability to modulate microbial behaviors, suggesting that they manipulate bacteria, enhancing interactions that help them cope with stressful environments. Future challenges remain in the identification of the many microbial signals that modulate phenotypic plasticity, the characterization of plant genes, e.g. receptors, that mediate the microbial effects on plasticity, and the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms that link phenotypic plasticity with fitness. The characterization of plant and microbial mutants defective in signal synthesis or perception, together with carefully designed glasshouse or field experiments that test various environmental stresses will be necessary to understand the link between molecular mechanisms controlling plastic phenotypes with the resulting effects on plant fitness.
authors.affiliation: Department of Plant Science, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia.
authors.forename: Chooi-Hua
authors.initials: CH
authors.lastname: Goh
authors.forename: Debora F
authors.initials: DF
authors.lastname: Veliz Vallejos
authors.forename: Adrienne B
authors.initials: AB
authors.lastname: Nicotra
authors.forename: Ulrike
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Mathesius
mesh_terms: D000220:Adaptation, Biological; D005075:Biological Evolution; D056084:Genetic Fitness; D010641:Phenotype; D010944:Plants / Q000235:genetics / Q000382:microbiology*; D013559:Symbiosis
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2009 Dec;151(4):2006-17
references.pmid: 19854857
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2013 Jul;39(7):1036-44
references.pmid: 23797931
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2008 Mar;11(3):296-310
references.pmid: 18047587
references.citation: Evolution. 1992 Apr;46(2):390-411
references.pmid: 28564020
references.citation: New Phytol. 2005 Apr;166(1):49-60
references.pmid: 15760350
references.citation: New Phytol. 2006;170(4):644-8
references.pmid: 16684227
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2010 Dec;15(12):684-92
references.pmid: 20970368
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2012 May;159(1):489-500
references.pmid: 22399647
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Jun;13(6):637-48
references.pmid: 10830263
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2011 Oct;108(5):789-95
references.pmid: 21856632
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1996 Oct;8(10):1899-1913
references.pmid: 12239369
references.citation: Am Nat. 1999 Jul;154(S1):S43-S54
references.pmid: 29586708
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 22;277(1681):503-11
references.pmid: 19846457
references.citation: Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2013 Nov;58(6):579-85
references.pmid: 23564626
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013 Apr;11(4):252-63
references.pmid: 23493145
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2011;62:227-50
references.pmid: 21391813
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006 Dec;19(12):1406-19
references.pmid: 17153925
references.citation: ISME J. 2008 Apr;2(4):404-16
references.pmid: 18256707
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55:165-99
references.pmid: 11544353
references.citation: Nature. 2011 Jan 6;469(7328):58-63
references.pmid: 21209659
references.citation: Am Nat. 1993 Aug;142(2):352-65
references.pmid: 19425981
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 3;102 Suppl 1:6543-9
references.pmid: 15851679
references.citation: Integr Comp Biol. 2003 Jul;43(3):459-69
references.pmid: 21680454
references.citation: Science. 2001 Oct 12;294(5541):321-6
references.pmid: 11598291
references.citation: Evol Appl. 2012 Dec;5(8):850-7
references.pmid: 23346229
references.citation: New Phytol. 2009;182(2):314-330
references.pmid: 19236579
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2002 Nov;15(11):1147-56
references.pmid: 12423020
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1133:187-203
references.pmid: 18559822
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2007 Jun;144(2):604-14
references.pmid: 17556524
references.citation: Plant J. 2009 May;58(4):568-77
references.pmid: 19154225
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009;63:541-56
references.pmid: 19575558
references.citation: Planta. 2002 Feb;214(4):584-90
references.pmid: 11925041
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2012 Feb;25(2):139-50
references.pmid: 21995763
references.citation: Phytopathology. 1997 Jun;87(6):588-93
references.pmid: 18945074
references.citation: New Phytol. 1994 Oct;128(2):211-218
references.pmid: 33874373
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2005 Nov;18(6):1403-15
references.pmid: 16313453
references.citation: Front Plant Sci. 2011 Dec 29;2:100
references.pmid: 22639622
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2005;59:19-42
references.pmid: 16153162
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 4;100(3):1444-9
references.pmid: 12511600
references.citation: Nature. 2012 Aug 2;488(7409):91-5
references.pmid: 22859207
references.citation: Science. 2002 Nov 22;298(5598):1581
references.pmid: 12446900
references.citation: Evolution. 2004 Dec;58(12):2645-56
references.pmid: 15696744
references.citation: Tree Physiol. 1995 May;15(5):281-93
references.pmid: 14965952
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e14823
references.pmid: 21750695
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 May;10(5):212-7
references.pmid: 21237012
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2010;61(1):249-60
references.pmid: 19812243
references.citation: Biosystems. 1975 Mar;6(3):153-64
references.pmid: 1120179
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1995 Aug;108(4):1449-1454
references.pmid: 12228554
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2012 Aug;17(8):478-86
references.pmid: 22564542
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1995 Jun;108(2):533-542
references.pmid: 12228491
references.citation: Plant J. 2005 Oct;44(2):195-207
references.pmid: 16212600
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003 Dec;67(4):574-92
references.pmid: 14665677
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2006 Jun;209(Pt 12):2344-61
references.pmid: 16731811
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2013 Jul;39(7):962-8
references.pmid: 23797930
references.citation: Am Nat. 2000 Dec;156(6):567-576
references.pmid: 29592542
references.citation: J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2005 Nov 15;304(6):610-8
references.pmid: 16161068
references.citation: Mol Plant Pathol. 2012 Aug;13(6):579-92
references.pmid: 22212404
references.citation: New Phytol. 2013 Mar;197(4):1300-1310
references.pmid: 23311946
references.citation: New Phytol. 2002 Dec;156(3):457-467
references.pmid: 33873566
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2009 Apr;22(4):852-60
references.pmid: 19226418
references.citation: New Phytol. 2000 Oct;148(1):79-91
references.pmid: 33863045
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2011 Apr;14(4):419-31
references.pmid: 21314880
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2003 Sep;16(9):827-34
references.pmid: 12971606
references.citation: Evolution. 2006 May;60(5):980-90
references.pmid: 16817538
references.citation: Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002 Aug;81(1-4):343-51
references.pmid: 12448732
references.citation: Evol Appl. 2012 Dec;5(8):838-49
references.pmid: 23346228
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23545
references.pmid: 21887270
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Nov;148(3):1547-56
references.pmid: 18820082
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Oct 7;269(1504):2017-22
references.pmid: 12396500
references.citation: Science. 2009 May 8;324(5928):753-4
references.pmid: 19423817
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2010 Apr;23(4):738-47
references.pmid: 20210835
references.citation: Mycorrhiza. 2011 Apr;21(3):173-81
references.pmid: 20544230
references.citation: New Phytol. 2009 Jun;182(4):829-837
references.pmid: 19383099
references.citation: New Phytol. 2006;172(4):655-66
references.pmid: 17096792
references.citation: Evolution. 1985 May;39(3):505-522
references.pmid: 28561964
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2006 Jun;209(Pt 12):2377-83
references.pmid: 16731814
references.citation: Physiol Plant. 2010 Sep 1;140(1):21-31
references.pmid: 20444196
references.citation: New Phytol. 2007;174(1):11-25
references.pmid: 17335493
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53:203-24
references.pmid: 12221973
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 16;110(16):6548-53
references.pmid: 23576752
references.citation: Nature. 2012 Aug 2;488(7409):86-90
references.pmid: 22859206
references.citation: Mycorrhiza. 2012 Apr;22(3):237-45
references.pmid: 21710353
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jan 26;315(5811):513-5
references.pmid: 17255511
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Dec;20(12):685-92
references.pmid: 16701458