title: A longitudinal analysis of the impact of family support on the morale of older parents in Japan: does the parent's normative belief in filial responsibilities make a difference?
abstract: Japan presents a unique social laboratory in which to examine how family support impacts on older adults' psychological wellbeing. This is because of its cultural climate where distinctively different expectations of old-age independence and the traditional norm of filial piety coexist. This study investigated how structural and functional dimensions of the family support of older Japanese parents influence their psychological morale, and whether the impacts of family support on parents' morale vary depending on the parents' belief in the traditional cultural norm of filial piety. Four waves of data from the Nihon University Japanese Longitudinal Study of Aging (NUJLSOA) collected in 1999, 2001, 2003 and 2006 were analysed. Combining the two- or three-year span of longitudinal data between each wave (N=3,882), an ordered logistic regression analysis was undertaken. The results reveal that although parents who were widowed or received emotional support from a child tended to report a lower level of morale, the negative influences of such support tended to be mitigated if the parent agreed with the traditional cultural norm of filial responsibilities. These results imply that the meaning and benefit of family support may differ depending on the degree to which Japanese older parents support the traditional norm of filial responsibilities.
authors.affiliation: Department of Health Science , Towson University , Towson, Maryland , USA .
authors.forename: Emiko
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Takagi
authors.forename: Yasuhiko
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Saito
keywords: Japan; family; filial piety; psychological wellbeing; social support
references.citation: J Gerontol. 1975 Jan;30(1):85-9
references.pmid: 1109399
references.citation: Gerontologist. 1975 Feb;15(1 Pt 1):64-7
references.pmid: 1110012
references.citation: J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2008 Mar;23(1):39-55
references.pmid: 18228121
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002 Jul;57(4):S209-20
references.pmid: 12084791
references.citation: Gerontologist. 1990 Apr;30(2):220-7
references.pmid: 2347504
references.citation: J Gerontol. 1987 Jan;42(1):37-43
references.pmid: 3794194
references.citation: Australas J Ageing. 2009 Jun;28(2):81-6
references.pmid: 19566802
references.citation: J Gerontol. 1992 Mar;47(2):S45-54
references.pmid: 1538075
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006 Sep;61(5):S256-66
references.pmid: 16960239
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1996 Jul;51(4):S191-200
references.pmid: 8673648
references.citation: J Cross Cult Gerontol. 1994 Jul;9(3):323-33
references.pmid: 24390094
references.citation: J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2000;15(4):331-47
references.pmid: 14617998
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1998 Mar;53(2):P86-95
references.pmid: 9520925
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006 Sep;61(5):P262-9
references.pmid: 16960229
references.citation: Demography. 2011 Nov;48(4):1559-79
references.pmid: 21826562
references.citation: Gerontologist. 2011 Aug;51(4):425-32
references.pmid: 21804114
references.citation: J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2010 Sep;25(3):239-56
references.pmid: 20552391
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 May;65B(3):351-7
references.pmid: 20028952
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 1992 Mar;33(1):10-24
references.pmid: 1619255
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 1986 Mar;27(1):78-89
references.pmid: 3711634