title: Conscious thought does not guide moment-to-moment actions-it serves social and cultural functions.
abstract: Humans enjoy a private, mental life that is richer and more vivid than that of any other animal. Yet as central as the conscious experience is to human life, numerous disciplines have long struggled to explain it. The present paper reviews the latest theories and evidence from psychology that addresses what conscious thought is and how it affects human behavior. We suggest that conscious thought adapts human behavior to life in complex society and culture. First, we review research challenging the common notion that conscious thought directly guides and controls action. Second, we present an alternative view-that conscious thought processes actions and events that are typically removed from the here and now, and that it indirectly shapes action to favor culturally adaptive responses. Third, we summarize recent empirical work on conscious thought, which generally supports this alternative view. We see conscious thought as the place where the unconscious mind assembles ideas so as to reach new conclusions about how best to behave, or what outcomes to pursue or avoid. Rather than directly controlling action, conscious thought provides the input from these kinds of mental simulations to the executive. Conscious thought offers insights about the past and future, socially shared information, and cultural rules. Without it, the complex forms of social and cultural coordination that define human life would not be possible.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Wake Forest University Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
authors.forename: E J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Masicampo
authors.forename: Roy F
authors.initials: RF
authors.lastname: Baumeister
keywords: action control; conscious thought; consciousness; cultural evolution; unconscious
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2008 Sep;17(3):628-45
references.pmid: 18226923
references.citation: Science. 2006 May 19;312(5776):1006-7
references.pmid: 16709773
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Jan 1;6(1):47-52
references.pmid: 11849615
references.citation: Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):998-1002
references.pmid: 17510357
references.citation: Science. 2005 Oct 7;310(5745):116-9
references.pmid: 16210542
references.citation: Brain. 2000 Jul;123 ( Pt 7):1293-326
references.pmid: 10869045
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Apr;90(4):692-708
references.pmid: 16649864
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2008 May;12(2):168-92
references.pmid: 18453477
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Jun;88(6):969-83
references.pmid: 15982116
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Oct;28(5):675-91; discussion 691-735
references.pmid: 16262930
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Jun;90(6):927-43
references.pmid: 16784343
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:331-61
references.pmid: 21126180
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jan;94(1):133-45
references.pmid: 18179323
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 May 29;362(1481):773-86
references.pmid: 17395575
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2008 May;11(5):543-5
references.pmid: 18408715
references.citation: Science. 2010 Nov 12;330(6006):932
references.pmid: 21071660
references.citation: Am Psychol. 1998 Apr;53(4):429-39
references.pmid: 9572006
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):614-21
references.pmid: 17614870
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2002 May;128(3):473-89
references.pmid: 12002698
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2005 Oct;112(4):1000-21
references.pmid: 16262477
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Dec;79(6):975-87
references.pmid: 11138766
references.citation: Science. 2008 Aug 22;321(5892):1100-2
references.pmid: 18719288
references.citation: Cognition. 2011 Feb;118(2):280-5
references.pmid: 21145538
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2010 Jul;117(3):945-71
references.pmid: 20658859
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):378-84
references.pmid: 18399891
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;4(2):162-76
references.pmid: 26158943
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;3(1):73-9
references.pmid: 18584056
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Aug;95(2):404-19
references.pmid: 18665710
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;81(6):1014-27
references.pmid: 11761304
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2011 Apr;34(2):57-74; discussion 74-111
references.pmid: 21447233
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 May;80(5):736-53
references.pmid: 11374746
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 May;35(5):608-22
references.pmid: 19213924
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Apr;78(4):753-63
references.pmid: 10794378
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;23(8):861-8
references.pmid: 22745347