title: Clinimetrics corner: a closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).
abstract: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) scores are commonly used by clinicians when determining patient response to treatment and to guide clinical decision-making during the course of treatment. For research purposes, the MCID score is often used in sample size calculations for adequate powering of a study to minimize the false-positives (type 1 errors) and the false-negatives (type 2 errors). For clinicians and researchers alike, it is critical that the MCID score is a valid and stable measure. A low MCID value may result in overestimating the positive effects of treatment, whereas a high MCID value may incorrectly classify patients as failing to respond to treatment when in fact the treatment was beneficial. The wide range of methodologies for calculating the MCID score results in varied outcomes, which leads to difficulties with interpretation and application. This clinimetrics corner outlines key factors influencing MCID estimates and discusses limitations with the use of the MCID in both clinical and research practice settings.
authors.affiliation: Department of Physical Therapy, High Point University, High Point, NC, USA.
authors.forename: Alexis
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Wright
authors.forename: Joseph
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hannon
authors.forename: Eric J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Hegedus
authors.forename: Alicia Emerson
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Kavchak
keywords: MCID; Outcome measures; Psychometric properties; Responsiveness
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):90-4
references.pmid: 18165753
references.citation: Phys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):675-88
references.pmid: 21372203
references.citation: Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4):407-15
references.pmid: 2691207
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 15;32(26):3047-51
references.pmid: 18091500
references.citation: Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):541-6
references.pmid: 17448732
references.citation: Phys Ther. 2006 May;86(5):735-43
references.pmid: 16649896
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2010 Sep;19(9):1484-94
references.pmid: 20397032
references.citation: Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(14):i-iv, 1-74
references.pmid: 9812244
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 May;56(5):395-407
references.pmid: 12812812
references.citation: Pain. 1996 Apr;65(1):71-76
references.pmid: 8826492
references.citation: J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Nov;5(4):401-16
references.pmid: 10579704
references.citation: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;18(6):927-32
references.pmid: 19535272
references.citation: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011 May;41(5):319-27
references.pmid: 21335930
references.citation: Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002 Mar;14(2):109-14
references.pmid: 11845014
references.citation: J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(4):E82-3
references.pmid: 19771185
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):524-34
references.pmid: 19926446
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jan;64(1):34-7
references.pmid: 15130902
references.citation: JAMA. 1994 Mar 2;271(9):703-7
references.pmid: 8309035
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jan;63(1):28-36
references.pmid: 19800198
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;50(8):869-79
references.pmid: 9291871
references.citation: Spine J. 2010 Jun;10(6):469-74
references.pmid: 20359958
references.citation: Eur J Pain. 2004 Aug;8(4):283-91
references.pmid: 15207508
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2003 Feb;12(1):12-20
references.pmid: 12592542
references.citation: Phys Ther. 1999 Apr;79(4):371-83
references.pmid: 10201543
references.citation: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;18(6):920-6
references.pmid: 19297202