title: Should we provide life-sustaining treatments to patients with permanent loss of cognitive capacities?
abstract: A very troubling issue for health care systems today is that of life-sustaining treatment for patients who have permanently lost their cognitive capacities. These include patients in persistent vegetative state (PVS), or minimally conscious state (MCS), as well as a growing population of patients at the very end stage of dementia. These patients are totally dependent on life-sustaining treatments and are, actually, kept alive "artificially." This phenomenon raises doubts as to the ethics of sustaining the life of patients who have lost their consciousness and cognitive capacities, and whether there is a moral obligation to do so. The problem is that the main facts concerning the experiences and well-being of such patients and their wishes are unknown. Hence the framework of the four principles-beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice-is not applicable in these cases; therefore we examined solidarity as another moral value to which we may resort in dealing with this dilemma. This article shows that the source of the dilemma is the social attitudes towards loss of cognitive capacities, and the perception of this state as loss of personhood. Consequently, it is suggested that the principle of solidarity-which both sets an obligation to care for the worst-off, and can be used to identify obligations that appeal to an ethos of behavior-can serve as a guiding principle for resolving the dilemma. The value of solidarity can lead society to care for these patients and not deny them basic care and life-sustaining treatment when appropriate.
authors.affiliation: The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology & Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; and.
authors.forename: Ofra G
authors.initials: OG
authors.lastname: Golan
authors.forename: Esther-Lee
authors.initials: EL
authors.lastname: Marcus
keywords: Dementia; ethics; life-sustaining treatment; minimally conscious state; persistent vegetative state; solidarity
references.citation: Hastings Cent Rep. 1993 Jul-Aug;23(4):18-24
references.pmid: 8407296
references.citation: Hastings Cent Rep. 2006 Nov-Dec;36(6):8
references.pmid: 17278863
references.citation: J Neurol. 2011 Jun;258(6):1058-65
references.pmid: 21221625
references.citation: J Med Ethics. 2009 Aug;35(8):508-11
references.pmid: 19644010
references.citation: J Med Philos. 1992 Aug;17(4):367-70
references.pmid: 1431655
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jul 15;125(2):104-10
references.pmid: 8678363
references.citation: Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2011 Oct 31;2(4):e0067
references.pmid: 23908825
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31735
references.pmid: 22355392
references.citation: Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:495-511
references.pmid: 16186044
references.citation: Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Nov 15;33(10):1697-705
references.pmid: 11595981
references.citation: J Med Philos. 1992 Aug;17(4):445-54
references.pmid: 1431662
references.citation: Science. 2006 Sep 8;313(5792):1395-6
references.pmid: 16959993
references.citation: Neurology. 2010 Nov 2;75(18 Suppl 1):S33-8
references.pmid: 21041769
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1997 Oct 1;127(7):509-17
references.pmid: 9313018
references.citation: JAMA. 2000 Feb 23;283(8):1065-7
references.pmid: 10697071
references.citation: Bioethics. 2010 Feb;24(2):78-86
references.pmid: 19222445
references.citation: Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2009 May 14;4:6
references.pmid: 19442284
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurol. 2007 Dec;20(6):620-6
references.pmid: 17992079
references.citation: Theor Med Bioeth. 2003;24(3):199-214
references.pmid: 12948046
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Aug;86(8):624-9
references.pmid: 18797621
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurol. 2007 Dec;20(6):609-13
references.pmid: 17992077
references.citation: J Health Law. 2003 Fall;36(4):523-48
references.pmid: 15068274
references.citation: Nurse Educ Today. 1999 Aug;19(6):472-9
references.pmid: 10693495
references.citation: Health Care Anal. 2004 Jun;12(2):69-81; discussion 83-89
references.pmid: 15487812
references.citation: Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:537-43
references.pmid: 16186047
references.citation: Am Anthropol. 2000 Mar;102(1):69-83
references.pmid: 12484398