title: One-to-one versus group setting for conducting computer-assisted TTO studies: findings from pilot studies in England and the Netherlands.
abstract: We compare two settings for administering time trade-off (TTO) tasks in computer-assisted interviews (one-to-one, interviewer-led versus group, self-complete) by examining the quality of the data generated in pilot studies undertaken in England and the Netherlands. The two studies used near-identical methods, except that in England, data were collected in one-to-one interviews with substantial amounts of interviewer assistance, whereas in the Netherlands, the computer aid was used as a self-completion tool in group interviews with lesser amounts of interviewer assistance. In total, 801 members of the general public (403 in England; 398 in the Netherlands) each completed five TTO valuations of EQ-5D-5L health states. Respondents in the Netherlands study showed a greater tendency to give 'round number' values such as 0 and 1 and to complete tasks using a minimal number of iterative steps. They also showed a greater tendency to skip the animated instructions that preceded the first task and to take into account assumptions that they were specifically asked not to take into account. When faced with a pair of health states in which one state dominated the other, respondents in the Netherlands study were more likely than those in the England study to give a higher value to the dominant health state. On the basis of these comparisons, we conclude that the one-to-one, interviewer-led setting is superior to the group, self-complete setting in terms of the quality of data generated and that the former is more suitable than the latter for TTO studies being used to value EQ-5D-5L.
authors.affiliation: Office of Health Economics, 7th Floor Southside, 105 Victoria Street, London SW1E 6QT, UK. kshah@ohe.org
authors.forename: Koonal K
authors.initials: KK
authors.lastname: Shah
authors.forename: Andrew
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Lloyd
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Oppe
authors.forename: Nancy J
authors.initials: NJ
authors.lastname: Devlin
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003194:Computer-Assisted Instruction; D004739:England; D005260:Female; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D009426:Netherlands; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011788:Quality of Life / Q000523:psychology*; D019057:Quality-Adjusted Life Years; D012107:Research Design; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013997:Time Factors; D026712:Value of Life
references.citation: Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(9):i-iv, 1-164
references.pmid: 10392311
references.citation: Health Econ. 2013 May;22(5):517-32
references.pmid: 22715069
references.citation: Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):499-508
references.pmid: 20174998
references.citation: Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Feb;17(2):151-65
references.pmid: 10947338
references.citation: Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
references.pmid: 21479777
references.citation: Health Econ. 2006 Apr;15(4):393-402
references.pmid: 16389652
references.citation: J Public Health (Oxf). 2005 Sep;27(3):281-91
references.pmid: 15870099
references.citation: Med Care. 1997 Nov;35(11):1095-108
references.pmid: 9366889
references.citation: Qual Life Res. 1996 Feb;5(1):175-82
references.pmid: 8901381
references.citation: Health Econ. 2011 Mar;20(3):348-61
references.pmid: 21308856