title: The absent discourse of communication: understanding ethics of provider-patient relationship in six hospitals in urban India.
abstract: Understanding the complexities of a provider-patient relationship is considered to be of critical importance especially in medical ethics. It is important to understand this relation from the perspectives of all stakeholders. This article derives from a qualitative study conducted across six obstetric care providing institutions in the cities of Mumbai and Navi Mumbai, India, over a period of 10 months. Thirty obstetricians were interviewed in-depth to understand what they perceived as the most important aspect in developing a good provider-patient relationship. The study found that while most providers highlighted the point of communication as the most critical part of the provider-patient relationship, they admitted that they could not engage in communication with the patients for various reasons. Obstetric consultants and residents said that they were too overburdened to spend time communicating with patients; providers working in public hospitals added that the lack of education of their patients posed a hindrance in effective communication. However, providers practicing in private institutions explained that they faced a challenge in communicating with patients because their patients came from educated families who tended to trust the provider less and were generally more critical of the provider's clinical judgement. The article shows how provider-patient communication exists as an idea among medical providers but is absent in daily clinical practice. This gives rise to a discourse shaped around an absence. The authors conclude by decoding the term 'communication' - they read the word against the context of its use in the interviews, and argue that for the providers 'communication' was not intended to be a trope towards setting up a dialogue-based, egalitarian provider-patient relationship. Providers used the word in lieu of 'counselling', 'guiding', 'talking to'. It concludes that, despite the providers' insisting on the significance of communication and complaining about its absence, what they desired in reality was not the possibility of a dialogue with the patient or a chance to be able to share decision-making power with the patient, but to be able to provide better instructions and chart out what was best for them in a more detailed way.
authors.affiliation: PhD Fellow and Senior Researcher, Centre for Studies in Ethics and Rights, Mumbai;
authors.forename: Rakhi
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ghoshal
authors.forename: Neha
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Madhiwalla
authors.forename: Amar
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Jesani
authors.forename: Padmaja
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Samant
authors.forename: Vijaya
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Badhwar
authors.forename: Sweta
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Surve
keywords: Communication; Counselling; India; Provider-patient
references.citation: Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth. 2008 Jul 1;18(4):106-109
references.pmid: 19593391
references.citation: Issues Med Ethics. 2001 Jul-Sep;9(3):82-3
references.pmid: 16334480
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1992 Nov;35(9):1079-91
references.pmid: 1439926
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1995 Apr;40(7):903-18
references.pmid: 7792630
references.citation: Indian J Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;49(3):150-3
references.pmid: 20661374
references.citation: West J Med. 2000 Oct;173(4):279-82
references.pmid: 11018003
references.citation: Med Health Care Philos. 2011 Feb;14(1):1-3
references.pmid: 21086052
references.citation: Qual Health Res. 2006 Nov;16(9):1236-51
references.pmid: 17038755
references.citation: J Postgrad Med. 2001 Jan-Mar;47(1):3-7
references.pmid: 11590282
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1996 Nov 1;125(9):763-9
references.pmid: 8929011
references.citation: Issues Med Ethics. 2000 Oct-Dec;8(4):116-7
references.pmid: 16323373
references.citation: Singapore Med J. 2002 Mar;43(3):152-5
references.pmid: 12005343
references.citation: Indian J Urol. 2009 Jul;25(3):356-60
references.pmid: 19881132