title: Respect for cultural diversity and the empirical turn in bioethics: a plea for caution.
abstract: In the last two decades, there have been numerous calls for a culturally sensitive bioethics. At the same time, bioethicists have become increasingly involved in empirical research, which is a sign of dissatisfaction with the analytic methods of traditional bioethics. In this article, I will argue that although these developments have broadened and enriched the field of bioethics, they can easily be construed to be an endorsement of ethical relativism, especially by those not well grounded in academic moral philosophy. I maintain that bioethicists must resist the temptation of moving too quickly from cultural relativism to ethical relativism and from empirical findings to normative conclusions. Indeed, anyone who reasons in this way is guilty of the naturalistic fallacy. I conclude by saying that properly conceptualized, empirical research and sensitivity to cultural diversity should give rise to objective rational discourse and criticism and not indiscriminate tolerance of every possible moral practice. Bioethics must remain a normative discipline that is characterized by rigorous argumentation.
authors.affiliation: University of Nairobi, P. O. Box 30197-00100 Nairobi, Kenya., Email: Karorim@yahoo.co.uk.
authors.forename: Karori
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Mbugua
keywords: Cultural sensitivity; Empirical bioethics; Ethical relativism; Ethics; Naturalistic fallacy
references.citation: Hastings Cent Rep. 2005 Jul-Aug;35(4):40-7
references.pmid: 16225305
references.citation: Dev World Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(1):49-58
references.pmid: 19961513
references.citation: Med J Aust. 2002 Feb 18;176(4):174-5
references.pmid: 11913919
references.citation: Bioethics. 1994 Jan;8(1):1-26
references.pmid: 11657373
references.citation: J Med Ethics. 2006 Jan;32(1):17-20
references.pmid: 16373517
references.citation: Health Care Anal. 2008 Mar;16(1):1-6
references.pmid: 18080836
references.citation: BMC Med Educ. 2004 Oct 15;4:21
references.pmid: 15488145
references.citation: Bioethics. 2008 Feb;22(2):92-100
references.pmid: 18251769
references.citation: J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2009 May 31;2:6
references.pmid: 23908720
references.citation: Bioethics. 1999 Jul;13(3-4):227-35
references.pmid: 11657232
references.citation: Theol Stud. 2004 Mar;65(1):158-77
references.pmid: 15515232
references.citation: J Med Ethics. 2006 Apr;32(4):240-5
references.pmid: 16574880
references.citation: Dev World Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(3):158-63
references.pmid: 21062403
references.citation: Bioethics. 2008 Mar;22(3):137-46
references.pmid: 18257800
references.citation: J Med Ethics. 2001 Feb;27(1):51-4
references.pmid: 11233380
references.citation: Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):70-2
references.pmid: 19998124