title: Critical damping conditions for third order muscle models: implications for force control.
abstract: Experimental results presented in the literature suggest that humans use a position control strategy to indirectly control force rather than direct force control. Modeling the muscle-tendon system as a third-order linear model, we provide an explanation of why an indirect force control strategy is preferred. We analyzed a third-order muscle system and verified that it is required for a faithful representation of muscle-tendon mechanics, especially when investigating critical damping conditions. We provided numerical examples using biomechanical properties of muscles and tendons reported in the literature. We demonstrated that at maximum isotonic contraction, for muscle and tendon stiffness within physiologically compatible ranges, a third-order muscle-tendon system can be under-damped. Over-damping occurs for values of the damping coefficient included within a finite interval defined by two separate critical limits (such interval is a semi-infinite region in second-order models). An increase in damping beyond the larger critical value would lead the system to mechanical instability. We proved the existence of a theoretical threshold for the ratio between tendon and muscle stiffness above which critical damping can never be achieved; thus resulting in an oscillatory free response of the system, independently of the value of the damping. Under such condition, combined with high muscle activation, oscillation of the system can be compensated only by active control.
authors.forename: Davide
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Piovesan
authors.forename: Alberto
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pierobon
authors.forename: Ferdinando A
authors.initials: FA
authors.lastname: Mussa Ivaldi
mesh_terms: D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D004548:Elasticity; D006801:Humans; D007551:Isotonic Contraction / Q000502:physiology; D016014:Linear Models; D008954:Models, Biological; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000502:physiology; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000502:physiology*; D011187:Posture / Q000502:physiology; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013710:Tendons / Q000502:physiology*; D016474:Weight-Bearing / Q000502:physiology
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jul;102(1):460-74
references.pmid: 19420127
references.citation: Int Mech Eng Congress Expo. 2012 Nov;2:493-501
references.pmid: 26191541
references.citation: Surg Radiol Anat. 2001;23(4):259-62
references.pmid: 11694971
references.citation: J Biomech. 1970 Jul;3(4):381-404
references.pmid: 5521553
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1997 Mar;77(3):1538-52
references.pmid: 9084618
references.citation: Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1989;17(4):359-411
references.pmid: 2676342
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19568
references.pmid: 21637750
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 1995;72(6):475-85
references.pmid: 7612720
references.citation: IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011;2011:5975372
references.pmid: 22275576
references.citation: J Biomech. 2002 Jan;35(1):19-26
references.pmid: 11747879
references.citation: J Biomech. 2008;41(9):1945-52
references.pmid: 18499113
references.citation: J Biomech. 1997 Jul;30(7):705-12
references.pmid: 9239550
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2003 Jul;151(2):145-57
references.pmid: 12783150
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2003 Sep;152(1):17-28
references.pmid: 12879184
references.citation: J Biomech. 2003 Aug;36(8):1117-24
references.pmid: 12831737
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33086
references.pmid: 22448233
references.citation: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:8239-42
references.pmid: 22256255
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1976 Jan;39(1):119-42
references.pmid: 1249597
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2001 Dec;141(3):312-23
references.pmid: 11715075
references.citation: Arthroscopy. 2007 May;23(5):537-41
references.pmid: 17478286
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1994 May;14(5 Pt 2):3208-24
references.pmid: 8182467
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 1988;60(1):1-16
references.pmid: 3214648
references.citation: J Biomech Eng. 2011 Mar;133(3):031003
references.pmid: 21303179
references.citation: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:4076-81
references.pmid: 22255236
references.citation: J Biomech. 1995 Jul;28(7):791-9
references.pmid: 7657677
references.citation: J Physiol. 1999 Nov 15;521 Pt 1:307-13
references.pmid: 10562354
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Mar 25;29(12):3939-47
references.pmid: 19321790
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1981 Aug;46(2):250-9
references.pmid: 7264713
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Mar;90(3):865-72
references.pmid: 11181594
references.citation: J Biomech. 2013 Jan 4;46(1):151-7
references.pmid: 23178037
references.citation: Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996;72(4):380-2
references.pmid: 8851909
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Jul 18;27(29):7705-16
references.pmid: 17634365
references.citation: J Morphol. 1982 Aug;173(2):185-95
references.pmid: 7120421
references.citation: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:1282-5
references.pmid: 19963999
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2001 Sep;140(2):171-81
references.pmid: 11521149
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2013 Feb;109(4):1126-39
references.pmid: 23100138
references.citation: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jul;19(5):697-9
references.pmid: 20413332
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2011 Jul;106(1):449-59
references.pmid: 21543751
references.citation: J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Oct;32(8):1225-9
references.pmid: 17923307
references.citation: Proc IEEE RAS EMBS Int Conf Biomed Robot Biomechatron. 2012 Jun;2012:1488-1493
references.pmid: 26180655