title: Wildlife researchers running the permit maze.
abstract: The study of wildlife, whether in the field or in the lab, may start with a hypothesis, a literature search, or a grant proposal, but in many cases, the work will never happen unless the researcher successfully navigates a maze of permit requirements. A single project can involve multiple permits at the national and state levels, and it can take months to obtain any one permit. Therefore, permits may not have been issued at the time of protocol review, but Public Health Service Policy makes accommodations for this situation. Once in hand, however, the permits convey critical information to the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC): one or more government agencies have determined that the activity will not be detrimental to the population or that any detriment is justified by the scientific knowledge that will be generated. This paper assumes that IACUCs are reviewing all wildlife protocols involving live vertebrates, regardless of the current, albeit temporary, distinction made by Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Animal Care with regard to birds.
authors.forename: Ellen
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Paul
authors.forename: Robert S
authors.initials: RS
authors.lastname: Sikes
mesh_terms: D035661:Animal Care Committees / Q000639:trends; D000818:Animals; D000835:Animals, Wild; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D004463:Ecology / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000379:methods; D008004:Licensure / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D012106:Research / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D013045:Species Specificity; D014481:United States; D014492:United States Public Health Service / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D015046:Zoology / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000379:methods
keywords: permits; population impacts; research; wildlife
references.citation: ILAR J. 2013;54(1):5-13
references.pmid: 23904527