title: Intracystic papillary carcinoma of breast: interrelationship with in situ and invasive carcinoma and a proposal of pathogenesis: array comparative genomic hybridization study of 14 cases.
abstract: Classifying intracystic papillary carcinoma under invasive or in situ ductal carcinoma is still a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to explore the genomic relationship of this tumor to its concurrent invasive ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ using array comparative genomic hybridization. Intracystic papillary carcinoma cases were classified into three categories: pure, with concurrent ductal carcinoma in situ or with concurrent invasive ductal carcinoma. Each component was dissected using laser capture microdissection. DNA was extracted and array comparative genomic hybridization was performed. The test of difference in copy number changes among the three tumors was carried out using CGHMultiArray. Intracystic papillary carcinoma clustered with four of five concurrent ductal carcinoma in situ cases and with two of two invasive ductal carcinoma cases. Intracystic papillary carcinoma showed the highest proportions of genome copy number aberration, followed by ductal carcinoma in situ, and then by invasive ductal carcinoma (P=0.06). Comparing intracystic papillary carcinoma with invasive ductal carcinoma vs without invasive ductal carcinoma, the former had 11q22.1-23.3 loss (P=0.031) and chr5 gain (P=0.085), and was enriched with matrix metalloproteinase genes. Comparing intracystic papillary carcinoma with ductal carcinoma in situ vs without ductal carcinoma in situ, the former had gain in 5q35.3 (P=0.041), 8q24.3 (P=0.041) and 21q13.2 to 21q13.31 (P=0.011). Comparing intracystic papillary carcinoma with ductal carcinoma in situ, the latter acquired a group of genes involved in cell adhesion and motility, whereas intracystic papillary carcinoma differentially expressed genes that are involved in papillary carcinomas of other organs (thyroid and kidney). We conclude that the overall molecular change in intracystic papillary carcinoma is closer to ductal carcinoma in situ than to invasive ductal carcinoma, which may explain the indolent behavior of this tumor. We offer herein a proposal of intracystic papillary carcinoma pathogenesis through its relation to invasive ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pathology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
authors.forename: Thaer
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Khoury
authors.affiliation: Department of Biostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
authors.forename: Qiang
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Hu
authors.affiliation: Department of Biostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
authors.forename: Song
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.affiliation: Department of Biostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
authors.forename: Jianmin
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Wang
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics* / Q000473:pathology; D018270:Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics* / Q000473:pathology; D002285:Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics* / Q000473:pathology; D002291:Carcinoma, Papillary / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics* / Q000473:pathology; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D055028:Comparative Genomic Hybridization; D005260:Female; D018628:Gene Dosage; D006801:Humans; D061346:Laser Capture Microdissection; D008875:Middle Aged; D009361:Neoplasm Invasiveness
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Nov;13(11):795-806
references.pmid: 23044827
references.citation: Am J Clin Pathol. 2005 Jan;123(1):36-44
references.pmid: 15762278
references.citation: Am J Surg. 2002 Oct;184(4):364-8
references.pmid: 12383904
references.citation: Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Nov;129(11):1465-9
references.pmid: 16253028
references.citation: Cell. 1992 Aug 7;70(3):389-99
references.pmid: 1643657
references.citation: J Pathol. 2012 Feb;226(3):427-441
references.pmid: 22025283
references.citation: Hum Pathol. 1998 Oct;29(10):1113-8
references.pmid: 9781650
references.citation: Cancer Res. 2009 Jul 15;69(14):5639-42
references.pmid: 19584269
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 22;366(12):1090-8
references.pmid: 22417201
references.citation: Genet Med. 2007 Sep;9(9):585-95
references.pmid: 17873646
references.citation: Biostatistics. 2004 Oct;5(4):557-72
references.pmid: 15475419
references.citation: J Clin Pathol. 2012 Aug;65(8):710-4
references.pmid: 22554960
references.citation: Am J Surg Pathol. 2006 Aug;30(8):1002-7
references.pmid: 16861972
references.citation: Breast J. 2009 Nov-Dec;15(6):639-44
references.pmid: 19735389
references.citation: Oncogene. 2007 Mar 8;26(11):1533-45
references.pmid: 16983343
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2003 Jul;34(3):337-43
references.pmid: 12819783
references.citation: Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2004 Sep;4(6):463-70
references.pmid: 15379632
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2005 Jul 15;21(14):3193-4
references.pmid: 15879450
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2001 Dec 7;276(49):45826-32
references.pmid: 11590146
references.citation: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005 Mar;90(1):71-6
references.pmid: 15770529
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2008 Nov 15;17(22):3552-65
references.pmid: 18716323
references.citation: Clin Cancer Res. 1995 Mar;1(3):261-7
references.pmid: 9815981
references.citation: Am J Clin Pathol. 2009 Feb;131(2):228-42
references.pmid: 19141383
references.citation: Diagn Pathol. 2010 Mar 12;5:17
references.pmid: 20222992
references.citation: Am J Surg. 2006 Jun;191(6):761-6
references.pmid: 16720145
references.citation: Histopathology. 1991 Nov;19(5):403-10
references.pmid: 1757079
references.citation: Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Mar;2(3):161-74
references.pmid: 11990853
references.citation: Semin Diagn Pathol. 1994 Aug;11(3):167-80
references.pmid: 7831528
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2007 Apr 1;23(7):892-4
references.pmid: 17267432
references.citation: Histopathology. 2008 Jan;52(1):20-9
references.pmid: 18171414