title: Alternative ear-canal measures related to absorbance.
abstract: Several alternative ear-canal measures are similar to absorbance in their requirement for prior determination of a Thévenin-equivalent sound source. Examples are (1) sound intensity level, (2) forward pressure level, (3) time-domain ear-canal reflectance, and (4) cochlear reflectance. These four related measures are similar to absorbance in their utilization of wideband stimuli and their focus on recording ear-canal sound pressure. The related measures differ from absorbance in how the ear-canal pressure is analyzed and in the type of information that is extracted from the recorded response. Sound intensity level and forward pressure level have both been shown to be better as measures of sound level in the ear canal compared with sound pressure level because they reduced calibration errors due to standing waves in studies of behavioral thresholds and otoacoustic emissions. Time-domain ear-canal reflectance may be used to estimate ear-canal geometry and may have the potential to assess middle ear pathology. Cochlear reflectance reveals information about the inner ear that is similar to what is provided by other types of otoacoustic emissions, and may have theoretical advantages that strengthen its interpretation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.
authors.forename: Stephen T
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: Neely
authors.forename: Stefan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Stenfelt
authors.forename: Kim S
authors.initials: KS
authors.lastname: Schairer
mesh_terms: D000158:Acoustic Impedance Tests / Q000379:methods*; D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D001298:Audiology / Q000295:instrumentation*; D004424:Ear Canal; D006801:Humans; D009626:Terminology as Topic
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 May;93(5):2809-19
references.pmid: 8315148
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Dec;126(6):3114-24
references.pmid: 20000925
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jul;124(1):288-300
references.pmid: 18646977
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Feb;129(2):779-91
references.pmid: 21361437
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jun;103(6):3431-44
references.pmid: 9637030
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jul;126(1):15-24
references.pmid: 19603858
references.citation: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010 Sep;11(3):343-65
references.pmid: 20440634
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Mar;131(3):1863-73
references.pmid: 22423684
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2011 Mar-Apr;32(2):230-7
references.pmid: 21057318
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Nov;104(5):2925-34
references.pmid: 9821338
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2010 Aug;31(4):533-45
references.pmid: 20458246
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Nov;94(5):2617-38
references.pmid: 8270739
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Dec;130(6):3873-81
references.pmid: 22225043
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Jan;91(1):470-85
references.pmid: 1737890
references.citation: Hear Res. 1994 Nov;80(2):146-52
references.pmid: 7896573
references.citation: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012 Oct;13(5):591-607
references.pmid: 22688355
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Jun;85(6):2492-503
references.pmid: 2745874
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Feb;105(2 Pt 1):782-98
references.pmid: 9972564
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 May;101(5 Pt 1):2754-70
references.pmid: 9165730
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Jan;95(1):372-84
references.pmid: 8120248