title: Comparison of the complete genome sequence of two closely related isolates of 'Candidatus Phytoplasma australiense' reveals genome plasticity.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  'Candidatus Phytoplasma australiense' is associated with at least nine diseases in Australia and New Zealand. The impact of this phytoplasma is considerable, both economically and environmentally. The genome of a NZ isolate was sequenced in an effort to understand its pathogenicity and ecology. Comparison with a closely related Australian isolate enabled us to examine mechanisms of genomic rearrangement.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The complete genome sequence of a strawberry lethal yellows (SLY) isolate of 'Candidatus Phytoplasma australiense' was determined. It is a circular genome of 959,779 base pairs with 1126 predicted open reading frames. Despite being 80 kbp larger than another 'Ca. Phytoplasma australiense' isolate PAa, the variation between housekeeping genes was generally less than 1% at a nucleotide level. The difference in size between the two isolates was largely due to the number and size of potential mobile units (PMUs), which contributed to some changes in gene order. Comparison of the genomes of the two isolates revealed that the highly conserved 5' UTR of a putative DNA-directed RNA polymerase seems to be associated with insertion and rearrangement events. Two types of PMUs have been identified on the basis of the order of three to four conserved genes, with both PMUs appearing to have been present in the last common ancestor of 'Ca. Phytoplasma asteris' and 'Ca. Phytoplasma australiense'. Comparison with other phytoplasma genomes showed that modification methylases were, in general, species-specific. A putative methylase (xorIIM) found in 'Ca. Phytoplasma australiense' appeared to have no analogue in any other firmicute, and we believe has been introduced by way of lateral gene transfer. A putative retrostransposon (ltrA) analogous to that found in OY-M was present in both isolates, although all examples in PAa appear to be fragments. Comparative analysis identified highly conserved 5' and 3' UTR regions of ltrA, which may indicate how the gene is excised and inserted.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Comparison of two assembled 'Ca. Phytoplasma australiense' genomes has shown they possess a high level of plasticity. This comparative analysis has yielded clues as to how rearrangements occur, and the identification of sets of genes that appear to be associated with these events.
authors.affiliation: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Private Bag 92169, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. Mark.Andersen@plantandfood.co.nz
authors.forename: Mark T
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Andersen
authors.forename: Lia W
authors.initials: LW
authors.lastname: Liefting
authors.forename: Ilkka
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Havukkala
authors.forename: Ross E
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: Beever
mesh_terms: D001483:Base Sequence; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D031985:Fragaria / Q000382:microbiology; D005798:Genes, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics; D023281:Genomics; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D010802:Phylogeny; D045582:Phytoplasma / Q000235:genetics* / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D010935:Plant Diseases / Q000382:microbiology
references.citation: Gene. 1995 Aug 30;162(1):157-8
references.pmid: 7557406
references.citation: Plant Dis. 2009 Sep;93(9):969
references.pmid: 30754545
references.citation: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004 Jul;54(Pt 4):1243-1255
references.pmid: 15280299
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2004 Jan;36(1):27-9
references.pmid: 14661021
references.citation: Mol Plant Pathol. 2007 Jul;8(4):481-9
references.pmid: 20507515
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Apr 27;404(6781):1018-21
references.pmid: 10801134
references.citation: Plasmid. 2006 Sep;56(2):138-44
references.pmid: 16620976
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W455-9
references.pmid: 15980511
references.citation: Plant Dis. 2001 May;85(5):462-469
references.pmid: 30823120
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 14;106(15):6416-21
references.pmid: 19329488
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 1993 Feb;7(4):497-503
references.pmid: 8384687
references.citation: EMBO J. 2001 Nov 15;20(22):6550-8
references.pmid: 11707425
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Dec 25;23(24):4992-9
references.pmid: 8559656
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 14;103(11):4252-7
references.pmid: 16537517
references.citation: BMC Genomics. 2008 Jun 26;9:306
references.pmid: 18582369
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D307-10
references.pmid: 14681420
references.citation: Microbiology (Reading). 2003 Aug;149(Pt 8):2243-2250
references.pmid: 12904564
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2009 Jan;22(1):18-30
references.pmid: 19061399
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2006 May;188(10):3682-96
references.pmid: 16672622
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 19;105(33):11827-32
references.pmid: 18701718
references.citation: DNA Cell Biol. 2008 Apr;27(4):209-17
references.pmid: 18163879
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006 Feb;255(1):59-65
references.pmid: 16436062
references.citation: DNA Cell Biol. 2007 Aug;26(8):557-64
references.pmid: 17688407
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998 Sep;62(3):725-74
references.pmid: 9729608
references.citation: Mol Biotechnol. 1996 Jun;5(3):233-41
references.pmid: 8837029
references.citation: Microbiology (Reading). 1997 Oct;143 ( Pt 10):3381-3389
references.pmid: 9353940
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2000;54:221-55
references.pmid: 11018129
references.citation: Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997 Apr;47(2):262-9
references.pmid: 9103609
references.citation: Annu Rev Genet. 2004;38:1-35
references.pmid: 15568970
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2008 Jun;190(11):3979-91
references.pmid: 18359806
references.citation: Plant Dis. 1998 Jun;82(6):606-609
references.pmid: 30857007
references.citation: Phytopathology. 2006 Aug;96(8):838-45
references.pmid: 18943748