title: Reduction of the spatial stroop effect by peripheral cueing as a function of the presence/absence of placeholders.
abstract: In a paradigm combining spatial Stroop with spatial cueing, the current study investigated the role of the presence vs. absence of placeholders on the reduction of the spatial Stroop effect by peripheral cueing. At a short cue-target interval, the modulation of peripheral cueing over the spatial Stroop effect was observed independently of the presence/absence of placeholders. At the long cue-target interval, however, this modulation over the spatial Stroop effect only occurred in the placeholders-present condition. These findings show that placeholders are modulators but not mediators of the reduction of the spatial Stroop effect by peripheral cueing, which further favor the cue-target integration account.
authors.affiliation: Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. luocm@psych.ac.cn
authors.forename: Chunming
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Luo
authors.forename: Juan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lupiáñez
authors.forename: María Jesús
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Funes
authors.forename: Xiaolan
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Fu
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012984:Software; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D057190:Stroop Test; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jul;72(5):1367-76
references.pmid: 20601717
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Oct;23(5):1353-64
references.pmid: 9411021
references.citation: J Gen Psychol. 1999 Oct;126(4):392-418
references.pmid: 10555867
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Nov;8(11):494-500
references.pmid: 15491903
references.citation: Psychol Res. 1991;53(2):127-35
references.pmid: 1946872
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):268-86
references.pmid: 16634670
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1992 Apr;24(2):175-219
references.pmid: 1582172
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 May;143(1):7-13
references.pmid: 23500109
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Jun;34(3):569-77
references.pmid: 18505324
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Dec;64(12):2455-69
references.pmid: 21923623
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994 Jun;123(2):161-77
references.pmid: 8014611
references.citation: Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(21):2251-9
references.pmid: 18639573
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Mar;63(3):516-30
references.pmid: 19565432
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1992 Oct;81(1):53-74
references.pmid: 1456080
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Apr;27(2):494-503
references.pmid: 11318063
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2010 May;74(3):277-90
references.pmid: 19693533
references.citation: Cogn Process. 2005 Jun;6(2):98-116
references.pmid: 18219508
references.citation: Psychol Res. 1993;55(3):208-22
references.pmid: 8416040
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Jun;2(2):174-207
references.pmid: 24203654
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Apr;33(2):348-62
references.pmid: 17469972
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 Aug;54(3):753-73
references.pmid: 11548033
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct;36(5):1184-92
references.pmid: 20718565
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Apr;20(2):286-98
references.pmid: 8189193
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Dec;22(6):1505-13
references.pmid: 8953232
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1988 Apr;43(4):346-54
references.pmid: 3362663