title: Controls on bacterial and archaeal community structure and greenhouse gas production in natural, mined, and restored Canadian peatlands.
abstract: Northern peatlands are important global C reservoirs, largely because of their slow rates of microbial C mineralization. Particularly in sites that are heavily influenced by anthropogenic disturbances, there is scant information about microbial ecology and whether or not microbial community structure influences greenhouse gas production. This work characterized communities of bacteria and archaea using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) and sequence analysis of 16S rRNA and functional genes across eight natural, mined, or restored peatlands in two locations in eastern Canada. Correlations were explored among chemical properties of peat, bacterial and archaeal community structure, and carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) production rates under oxic and anoxic conditions. Bacteria and archaea similar to those found in other peat soil environments were detected. In contrast to other reports, methanogen diversity was low in our study, with only 2 groups of known or suspected methanogens. Although mining and restoration affected substrate availability and microbial activity, these land-uses did not consistently affect bacterial or archaeal community composition. In fact, larger differences were observed between the two locations and between oxic and anoxic peat samples than between natural, mined, and restored sites, with anoxic samples characterized by less detectable bacterial diversity and stronger dominance by members of the phylum Acidobacteria. There were also no apparent strong linkages between prokaryote community structure and CH4 or CO2 production, suggesting that different organisms exhibit functional redundancy and/or that the same taxa function at very different rates when exposed to different peat substrates. In contrast to other earlier work focusing on fungal communities across similar mined and restored peatlands, bacterial and archaeal communities appeared to be more resistant or resilient to peat substrate changes brought about by these land uses.
authors.affiliation: Department of Geography, University of Toronto Mississauga Mississauga, ON, Canada ; Max-Planck-Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology Marburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Nathan
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Basiliko
authors.forename: Kevin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Henry
authors.forename: Varun
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Gupta
authors.forename: Tim R
authors.initials: TR
authors.lastname: Moore
authors.forename: Brian T
authors.initials: BT
authors.lastname: Driscoll
authors.forename: Peter F
authors.initials: PF
authors.lastname: Dunfield
keywords: archaea; bacteria; carbon dioxide; decomposition; methane; methanogen
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008 Jun;64(3):433-48
references.pmid: 18430005
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Apr;60(1):51-9
references.pmid: 17263837
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2005 Mar;7(3):382-95
references.pmid: 15683399
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Jun;60(3):442-8
references.pmid: 17391330
references.citation: Front Microbiol. 2011 Sep 16;2:184
references.pmid: 21954394
references.citation: Oecologia. 1999 Sep;120(4):563-574
references.pmid: 28308307
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Oct;28(10):2731-9
references.pmid: 21546353
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2000 Jun 1;32(3):241-247
references.pmid: 10858583
references.citation: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010 Feb;60(Pt 2):301-306
references.pmid: 19651730
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 18;104(51):20404-9
references.pmid: 18077371
references.citation: J Comput Biol. 2000 Feb-Apr;7(1-2):203-14
references.pmid: 10890397
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 2007 Oct;54(3):508-22
references.pmid: 17450394
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Sep;78(17):6386-9
references.pmid: 22752167
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 2005 Feb;49(2):209-17
references.pmid: 15965727
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Apr;75(7):2046-56
references.pmid: 19201974
references.citation: Science. 2006 Dec 22;314(5807):1933-5
references.pmid: 17185602
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009 Dec;70(3):356-66
references.pmid: 19811539
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Apr;71(4):2195-8
references.pmid: 15812059
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Jul 13;442(7099):192-4
references.pmid: 16699521
references.citation: ISME J. 2008 Nov;2(11):1157-68
references.pmid: 18650929
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Mar;75(6):1589-96
references.pmid: 19151179
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Feb;62(2):668-75
references.pmid: 8593069
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2001 Mar;3(3):194-204
references.pmid: 11321536
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Apr;64(4):1283-9
references.pmid: 9546163
references.citation: Front Microbiol. 2012 Feb 29;3:70
references.pmid: 22393328
references.citation: Environ Microbiol Rep. 2009 Oct;1(5):307-18
references.pmid: 23765883
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 May;60(2):240-51
references.pmid: 17316328
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Oct;78(19):7023-31
references.pmid: 22843538
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Mar;72(3):2110-7
references.pmid: 16517660
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Apr;74(7):2059-68
references.pmid: 18281434
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jun;11(6):1395-409
references.pmid: 19222542
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Jun;47(6):1266-71
references.pmid: 16346565
references.citation: Am Nat. 2002 Apr;159(4):420-6
references.pmid: 18707425
references.citation: Science. 2005 Aug 12;309(5737):1088-90
references.pmid: 16099988
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Jan;68(1):326-34
references.pmid: 11772642
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2008 Apr;10(4):926-41
references.pmid: 18218029