title: Effect of culture medium, host strain and oxygen transfer on recombinant Fab antibody fragment yield and leakage to medium in shaken E. coli cultures.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Fab antibody fragments in E. coli are usually directed to the oxidizing periplasmic space for correct folding. From periplasm Fab fragments may further leak into extracellular medium. Information on the cultivation parameters affecting this leakage is scarce, and the unpredictable nature of Fab leakage is problematic regarding consistent product recovery. To elucidate the effects of cultivation conditions, we investigated Fab expression and accumulation into either periplasm or medium in E. coli K-12 and E. coli BL21 when grown in different types of media and under different aeration conditions.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Small-scale Fab expression demonstrated significant differences in yield and ratio of periplasmic to extracellular Fab between different culture media and host strains. Expression in a medium with fed-batch-like glucose feeding provided highest total and extracellular yields in both strains. Unexpectedly, cultivation in baffled shake flasks at 150 rpm shaking speed resulted in higher yield and accumulation of Fabs into culture medium as compared to cultivation at 250 rpm. In the fed-batch medium, extracellular fraction in E. coli K-12 increased from 2-17% of total Fab at 250 rpm up to 75% at 150 rpm. This was partly due to increased lysis, but also leakage from intact cells increased at the lower shaking speed. Total Fab yield in E. coli BL21 in glycerol-based autoinduction medium was 5 to 9-fold higher at the lower shaking speed, and the extracellular fraction increased from ≤ 10% to 20-90%. The effect of aeration on Fab localization was reproduced in multiwell plate by variation of culture volume.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Yield and leakage of Fab fragments are dependent on expression strain, culture medium, aeration rate, and the combination of these parameters. Maximum productivity in fed-batch-like conditions and in autoinduction medium is achieved under sufficiently oxygen-limited conditions, and lower aeration also promotes increased Fab accumulation into extracellular medium. These findings have practical implications for screening applications and small-scale Fab production, and highlight the importance of maintaining consistent aeration conditions during scale-up to avoid changes in product yield and localization. On the other hand, the dependency of Fab leakage on cultivation conditions provides a practical way to manipulate Fab localization.
authors.affiliation: Department of Process and Environmental Engineering, Bioprocess Engineering Laboratory, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. kaisa.ukkonen@oulu.fi
authors.forename: Kaisa
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Ukkonen
authors.forename: Johanna
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Veijola
authors.forename: Antti
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Vasala
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Neubauer
mesh_terms: D061249:Batch Cell Culture Techniques; D003470:Culture Media / Q000494:pharmacology; D004926:Escherichia coli / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism*; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D007140:Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D010100:Oxygen / Q000378:metabolism*; D019897:Periplasm / Q000187:drug effects / Q000378:metabolism; D011994:Recombinant Proteins / Q000096:biosynthesis / Q000235:genetics
chemical_list: D003470:Culture Media; D007140:Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments; D011994:Recombinant Proteins; D010100:Oxygen
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002 Mar;58(3):386-92
references.pmid: 11935192
references.citation: Microb Cell Fact. 2011 Aug 08;10:65
references.pmid: 21824411
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008 Nov;81(2):311-7
references.pmid: 18795288
references.citation: Microb Cell Fact. 2010 Feb 19;9:11
references.pmid: 20167131
references.citation: Biotechnol Prog. 2007 May-Jun;23(3):585-98
references.pmid: 17506520
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Oct 11;23(19):4009-10
references.pmid: 7479055
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003 Feb;60(6):654-64
references.pmid: 12664143
references.citation: Biotechnol Lett. 2011 Aug;33(8):1539-43
references.pmid: 21452014
references.citation: Microb Cell Fact. 2011 Dec 12;10:107
references.pmid: 22152005
references.citation: Biotechnol Prog. 1998 May-Jun;14(3):393-409
references.pmid: 9622520
references.citation: Protein Expr Purif. 2007 Mar;52(1):219-29
references.pmid: 17141527
references.citation: FEBS Lett. 1997 Mar 24;405(2):224-8
references.pmid: 9089295
references.citation: Microb Cell Fact. 2010 May 20;9:35
references.pmid: 20487563
references.citation: Microb Cell Fact. 2008 Nov 18;7:31
references.pmid: 19017379
references.citation: Nat Protoc. 2012 Feb 02;7(2):364-73
references.pmid: 22301775
references.citation: Biotechnol J. 2011 Aug;6(8):1003-8
references.pmid: 21751399
references.citation: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Sep;37(9):935-42
references.pmid: 20512396
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2011 Mar 25;286(12):10147-54
references.pmid: 21252224
references.citation: Microb Cell Fact. 2011 Jan 07;10:1
references.pmid: 21211066
references.citation: Microb Cell Fact. 2011 May 10;10:31
references.pmid: 21554746
references.citation: Can J Microbiol. 2000 Jun;46(6):532-41
references.pmid: 10913975
references.citation: Protein Expr Purif. 2000 Feb;18(1):1-10
references.pmid: 10648163
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1964 Nov;239:3893-900
references.pmid: 14257624
references.citation: J Appl Microbiol. 2013 Feb;114(2):364-72
references.pmid: 23127122
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2006 Mar 17;357(1):49-61
references.pmid: 16427080
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2002 Jan 4;315(1):1-8
references.pmid: 11771962
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Sep;67(9):3994-4000
references.pmid: 11525996
references.citation: Protein Eng Des Sel. 2010 Apr;23(4):161-8
references.pmid: 20123884
references.citation: Microb Cell Fact. 2010 May 30;9:42
references.pmid: 20509968
references.citation: Protein Expr Purif. 2001 Nov;23(2):338-47
references.pmid: 11676610
references.citation: N Biotechnol. 2012 Jan 15;29(2):235-42
references.pmid: 22100433
references.citation: Protein Eng. 1997 Apr;10(4):435-44
references.pmid: 9194169
references.citation: J Immunol Methods. 1997 Jan 15;200(1-2):69-77
references.pmid: 9005945
references.citation: Biochem J. 1965 Sep;96(3):771-6
references.pmid: 5324304
references.citation: Protein Expr Purif. 2007 Mar;52(1):194-201
references.pmid: 17005419
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2001 Sep 7;312(1):79-93
references.pmid: 11545587
references.citation: Biotechnology (N Y). 1991 Jun;9(6):545-51
references.pmid: 1367224
references.citation: Biochemistry. 2010 Dec 28;49(51):10842-53
references.pmid: 21090805
references.citation: J Biotechnol. 2008 Jul 31;135(4):358-65
references.pmid: 18579250
references.citation: Protein Expr Purif. 2005 May;41(1):207-34
references.pmid: 15915565
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2002 Jun 28;320(1):1-10
references.pmid: 12079330