title: Low power gas discharge plasma mediated inactivation and removal of biofilms formed on biomaterials.
abstract: The antibacterial activity of gas discharge plasma has been studied for quiet some time. However, high biofilm inactivation activity of plasma was only recently reported. Studies indicate that the etching effect associated with plasmas generated represent an undesired effect, which may cause live bacteria relocation and thus contamination spreading. Meanwhile, the strong etching effects from these high power plasmas may also alter the surface chemistry and affect the biocompatibility of biomaterials. In this study, we examined the efficiency and effectiveness of low power gas discharge plasma for biofilm inactivation and removal. Among the three tested gases, oxygen, nitrogen, and argon, discharge oxygen demonstrated the best anti-biofilm activity because of its excellent ability in killing bacteria in biofilms and mild etching effects. Low power discharge oxygen completely killed and then removed the dead bacteria from attached surface but had negligible effects on the biocompatibility of materials. DNA left on the regenerated surface after removal of biofilms did not have any negative impact on tissue cell growth. On the contrary, dramatically increased growth was found for these cells seeded on regenerated surfaces. These results demonstrate the potential applications of low power discharge oxygen in biofilm treatments of biomaterials and indwelling device decontaminations.
authors.affiliation: Department of Chemistry, Chemical Biology, and Biomedical Engineering, Charles V. Schaefer School of Engineering and Sciences, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.
authors.forename: Christian
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Traba
authors.forename: Long
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: Jun F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Liang
keywords: Gas discharge plasma; biofilms; biomaterials; contamination; infections; sterilization
references.citation: J Contemp Dent Pract. 2000 Aug 15;1(3):18-29
references.pmid: 12167880
references.citation: Acta Biomater. 2012 May;8(5):1966-75
references.pmid: 22154860
references.citation: Am J Infect Control. 2010 May;38(4):293-301
references.pmid: 20085853
references.citation: Biomacromolecules. 2012 Oct 8;13(10):3327-33
references.pmid: 22934601
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Aug;(437):41-7
references.pmid: 16056024
references.citation: Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Apr 15;52(8):1038-45
references.pmid: 21460321
references.citation: J Pharm Sci. 2012 Apr;101(4):1508-17
references.pmid: 22227945
references.citation: J Microbiol. 2011 Aug;49(4):663-8
references.pmid: 21887652
references.citation: Int J Pharm. 2010 Aug 30;396(1-2):17-22
references.pmid: 20609423
references.citation: Int J Med Microbiol. 2002 Jul;292(2):107-13
references.pmid: 12195733
references.citation: Int J Biol Macromol. 2005 Apr;35(3-4):221-5
references.pmid: 15871167
references.citation: Radiat Environ Biophys. 2003 Oct;42(3):189-92
references.pmid: 13680259
references.citation: J Hosp Infect. 2006 Dec;64(4):313-25
references.pmid: 17046102
references.citation: Microbiology (Reading). 2009 Mar;155(Pt 3):724-732
references.pmid: 19246743
references.citation: Biofouling. 2011 Aug;27(7):763-72
references.pmid: 21774615
references.citation: Macromol Biosci. 2011 Jan 10;11(1):13-21
references.pmid: 21038349
references.citation: Int J Pharm. 2001 Sep 11;226(1-2):1-21
references.pmid: 11532565
references.citation: Am J Infect Control. 2003 Dec;31(8):481-98
references.pmid: 14647111
references.citation: JAMA. 2007 Oct 17;298(15):1763-71
references.pmid: 17940231
references.citation: Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2011;24(5):284-8
references.pmid: 21709431
references.citation: J Dent Hyg. 2009 Spring;83(2):55-61
references.pmid: 19470230