title: Comparison of a percutaneous device and the bougie-assisted surgical technique for emergency cricothyrotomy: an experimental study on a porcine model performed by air ambulance anaesthesiologists.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A large number of techniques and devices for cricothyroidotomy have been developed. In this study, the Portex™ Cricothyroidotomy Kit (PCK, Smiths Medical Ltd, Hythe, UK) was compared with the bougie assisted emergency surgical cricothyrotomy technique (BACT).
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty air ambulance anaesthesiologists performed emergency cricothyrotomy on a cadaveric porcine airway model using both PCK and BACT. Baseline performance and performance after the intensive training package were recorded. Success rate, time to secured airway and tracheal damage were the primary endpoints, and confidence rating was a secondary endpoint.
  
  
  RESULTS
  During baseline testing, success rates for PCK and BACT were 60% and 95%, respectively. Tracheal injury rate with PCK was 60% while no such injury was found in BACT. A lecture was given and skills were trained until the participants were able to perform five consecutive successful procedures with both techniques. In the post-training test, all participants were successful with either technique. The mean time to successful insertion was reduced by 15.7 seconds (from 36.3 seconds to 20.6 seconds, p< 0.001) for PCK and by 7.8 seconds (from 44.9 seconds to 37.1 seconds, p=0.021) for BACT. In the post-training scenario, securing the airway with PCK was significantly faster than with BACT (p<0.001). Post-training tracheal laceration occurred in six (30%) of the PCK procedures and in none of the BACT procedures (p=0.028).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Testing the base-line PCK skills of prehospital anaesthesiologists revealed low confidence, sub-optimal performance and a very high failure rate. The BACT technique demonstrated a significantly higher success rate and no tracheal damage. In spite of PCK being a significantly faster technique in the post-training test, the anaesthesiologists still reported a higher confidence in BACT. Limitations of the cadaveric porcine airway may have influenced this study because the airway did not challenge the clinicians with realistic tissue bleeding.
authors.forename: Anders R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Nakstad
authors.forename: Per P
authors.initials: PP
authors.lastname: Bredmose
authors.forename: Mårten
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sandberg
mesh_terms: D017732:Air Ambulances; D000776:Anesthesiology; D000818:Animals; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003413:Cricoid Cartilage / Q000601:surgery*; D004195:Disease Models, Animal; D004867:Equipment Design; D007442:Intubation, Intratracheal / Q000295:instrumentation*; D013552:Swine; D000078329:Workforce
references.citation: J Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;41(3):326-32
references.pmid: 20605389
references.citation: Emerg Med J. 2008 Nov;25(11):732-4
references.pmid: 18955605
references.citation: Emerg Med J. 2013 Aug;30(8):646-9
references.pmid: 22843552
references.citation: Anesthesiology. 2005 Jan;102(1):7-11
references.pmid: 15618780
references.citation: Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;29(6):639-44
references.pmid: 20825848
references.citation: J Emerg Med. 1999 Jan-Feb;17(1):17-21
references.pmid: 9950380
references.citation: J Emerg Med. 1993 Jan-Feb;11(1):41-5
references.pmid: 8445185
references.citation: Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;17(6):666-9
references.pmid: 20491685
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Oct;32(4):442-6
references.pmid: 9774928
references.citation: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Jun 13;19:36
references.pmid: 21668944
references.citation: Br J Anaesth. 2011 Jan;106(1):57-64
references.pmid: 21037267
references.citation: J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2):487-92
references.pmid: 18301219
references.citation: Lancet. 2005 Oct 15-21;366(9494):1407-9
references.pmid: 16226619
references.citation: J Emerg Med. 2003 Feb;24(2):151-6
references.pmid: 12609644
references.citation: Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009 Nov;37(6):961-7
references.pmid: 20014603
references.citation: Anaesthesia. 2009 Jun;64(6):601-8
references.pmid: 19453312
references.citation: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Feb;57(2):199-205
references.pmid: 23210510
references.citation: Anesth Analg. 2007 Jul;105(1):148-54
references.pmid: 17578970
references.citation: Anesth Analg. 2009 Sep;109(3):866-72
references.pmid: 19690259
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Oct;32(4):454-60
references.pmid: 9774930
references.citation: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 Aug;52(7):897-907
references.pmid: 18702752
references.citation: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jan;266(1):105-9
references.pmid: 18488242
references.citation: Arch Emerg Med. 1989 Jun;6(2):143-5
references.pmid: 2742668
references.citation: Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):251-70
references.pmid: 23364566
references.citation: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013 May 31;21:43
references.pmid: 23725520
references.citation: Anaesthesia. 2008 Nov;63(11):1204-8
references.pmid: 19032254