title: Diagnostic utility of coeliac disease: a descriptive study in a tertiary care hospital, oman.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The prevalence of coeliac disease in Oman is unknown. We aim to estimate the prevalence of coeliac disease in at-risk subjects, describe the clinical characteristics and laboratory findings associated with coeliac disease and the validity of serological testing for coeliac disease at the Royal Hospital, Oman over a period of three years.
  
  
  METHODS
  This is a retrospective case finding study. The medical and laboratory records were reviewed for patients for whom serum antiendomysium IgA antibodies were requested at the Royal Hospital during a 3-year period (1(st) Jan 2006-31(st) Dec 2008). The data were extracted in order to assess the following: a) Prevalence rate of coeliac disease among at-risk subjects; b) Clinical characteristics in patients with coeliac disease and clinical manifestations for which the requesting clinicians considered coeliac disease as a possible diagnosis, including their specialties; c) Laboratory tests results in patients with coeliac disease; and d) Validity of antiendomysium antibodies testing in comparison with histopathology of jejunal biopsies for diagnosing coeliac disease.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The study included 431 patients (250 females, 181 males) who were suspected of having (or screened for) coeliac disease. The median of age was 15 years (range: 9 months-74 years) with mean ± SD 18.95 ± 14.1 years. Of these, 15 (3.5%) patients (10 females, 5 males) with a median age of 19 years and mean 21.4 ± 13.0 years (range: 2.5-38 years), had positive antiendomysium antibodies results with median (range) of 160 (40-320) IU/L and mean± SD 204.5 ± 160 IU/L. Of these 15 patients, 13 had positive jejunal histopathological changes indicative of coeliac disease; the remaining 2 patients had no biopsy examination. Of the 44 patients with negative antiendomysium antibodies <10 IU/L who had jejunal biopsy, 41 were negative and 3 had histopathological changes suggestive of mild coeliac disease. All the 3 patients had serum total IgA levels within the reference range. The calculated validity indicators for antiendomysium antibodies were: sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 93.2% and efficiency 94.7%. The most common mode of presentation in patients with coeliac disease was gastrointestinal features, type 1 diabetes mellitus, anemia, short stature and hypothyroidism. The seropositivity in tye 1 diabetics was 4.9%. Investigations for coeliac disease were most frequently made by endocrinologists (pediatric and adult) who accounted for 53.8% followed by gastroenterologists (pediatric and adult) with 40.6% with less consideration by the other clinicians (5.6%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The availability of highly specific and sensitive serological test and increased awareness for coeliac disease among some medical specialties has increased the number of diagnosed cases of coeliac disease. The requesting for serological test is being made mainly by endocrinologists and gastroenterologists.
authors.affiliation: OMSB Resident (R6) Clinical Biochemistry Program; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, PO Box 38, Al Khodh 123, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
authors.forename: Safana Salim
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Al Saidi
authors.forename: Salim Omar
authors.initials: SO
authors.lastname: Al Harthi
authors.forename: Waad-Allah Sharef
authors.initials: WA
authors.lastname: Mula-Abed
keywords: Antiendomysium antibodies; Coeliac disease; Oman; Prevalence
references.citation: Gastroenterology. 2005 Apr;128(4 Suppl 1):S38-46
references.pmid: 15825125
references.citation: Saudi Med J. 2003 Jul;24(7):791
references.pmid: 12883621
references.citation: Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Jun 1;17(11):1415-23
references.pmid: 12786636
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2003 Feb 10;163(3):286-92
references.pmid: 12578508
references.citation: Mol Med. 2011;17(11-12):1383-96
references.pmid: 21826374
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jul;20(7):644-6
references.pmid: 16050861
references.citation: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Sep;4(9):1112-7
references.pmid: 16860613
references.citation: Ann Clin Biochem. 2007 Mar;44(Pt 2):131-9
references.pmid: 17362578
references.citation: Br Med Bull. 2008;88(1):157-70
references.pmid: 19073695
references.citation: Arch Dis Child. 2002 Dec;87(6):495-8
references.pmid: 12456547
references.citation: Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):23-5
references.pmid: 22249088
references.citation: Oman Med J. 2013 Jan;28(1):70-2
references.pmid: 23386952
references.citation: J Clin Pathol. 1977 Nov;30(11):1007-10
references.pmid: 304071
references.citation: Gastroenterology. 2005 Apr;128(4 Suppl 1):S57-67
references.pmid: 15825128
references.citation: Lancet. 1997 Nov 8;350(9088):1370
references.pmid: 9365462
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1964 Nov 26;271:1153-6
references.pmid: 14200053
references.citation: Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jan;96(1):126-31
references.pmid: 11197241
references.citation: Gastroenterology. 1992 Jan;102(1):330-54
references.pmid: 1727768
references.citation: Niger Postgrad Med J. 2006 Mar;13(1):53-6
references.pmid: 16633380
references.citation: Ann Saudi Med. 2002 Sep-Nov;22(5-6):315-9
references.pmid: 17146251
references.citation: Clin Chem. 2008 Jul;54(7):1203-9
references.pmid: 18487281
references.citation: J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;43(3):225-32
references.pmid: 18724250
references.citation: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Nov;5(11):1276-81
references.pmid: 17683995
references.citation: Ann Clin Biochem. 2012 Sep;49(Pt 5):503-4
references.pmid: 22859725
references.citation: BMJ. 1999 Jan 16;318(7177):164-7
references.pmid: 9888912
references.citation: Gastroenterology. 2005 Apr;128(4 Suppl 1):S25-32
references.pmid: 15825123
references.citation: Postgrad Med J. 2002 Jan;78(915):31-3
references.pmid: 11796869
references.citation: Gut. 2006 Jul;55(7):1037-46
references.pmid: 16766754
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 25;357(17):1731-43
references.pmid: 17960014
references.citation: Clin Chem. 2010 Mar;56(3):464-8
references.pmid: 20022984
references.citation: Arch Dis Child. 2010 Apr;95(4):312-3
references.pmid: 20335241
references.citation: Clin Chem. 2010 Apr;56(4):661-5
references.pmid: 20022983
references.citation: Arch Dis Child. 1990 Aug;65(8):909-11
references.pmid: 2205160
references.citation: Clin Chem. 2007 Dec;53(12):2186-92
references.pmid: 17901114