title: A ground-like surface facilitates visual search in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
abstract: Ground surfaces play an important role in terrestrial species' locomotion and ability to manipulate objects. In humans, ground surfaces have been found to offer significant advantages in distance perception and visual-search tasks ("ground dominance"). The present study used a comparative perspective to investigate the ground-dominance effect in chimpanzees, a species that spends time both on the ground and in trees. During the experiments chimpanzees and humans engaged in a search for a cube on a computer screen; the target cube was darker than other cubes. The search items were arranged on a ground-like or ceiling-like surface, which was defined by texture gradients and shading. The findings indicate that a ground-like, but not a ceiling-like, surface facilitated the search for a difference in luminance among both chimpanzees and humans. Our findings suggest the operation of a ground-dominance effect on visual search in both species.
authors.affiliation: Department of Information Systems, Niigata University of International and Information Studies, 3-1-1 Mizukino, Nishi-ku, Niigata, Japan. imura@nuis.ac.jp
authors.forename: Tomoko
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Imura
authors.forename: Masaki
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Tomonaga
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003463:Cues; D017753:Ecosystem; D005556:Form Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D002679:Pan troglodytes / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2008 Mar;77(3):306-12
references.pmid: 17766056
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Aug;71(6):1305-12
references.pmid: 19633346
references.citation: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009 Jun;139(2):172-81
references.pmid: 19012327
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1985 May;37(5):415-9
references.pmid: 4047903
references.citation: Behav Brain Funct. 2010 Jul 08;6:38
references.pmid: 20615212
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Nov 21;92(24):11155-9
references.pmid: 7479956
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jul;67(5):802-15
references.pmid: 16334053
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2003 Dec;6(4):199-211
references.pmid: 14566577
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Dec;22(6):1467-81
references.pmid: 8953230
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2006 Sep 25;172(2):219-32
references.pmid: 16790282
references.citation: Vision Res. 2003 Aug;43(17):1869-77
references.pmid: 12826110
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2003 Dec;6(4):253-8
references.pmid: 14610661
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2001 Feb;63(2):195-208
references.pmid: 11281096
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2009 Aug;123(3):280-6
references.pmid: 19685969
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2000 Apr;62(3):540-9
references.pmid: 10909244
references.citation: Vision Res. 2002 Jul;42(16):1953-61
references.pmid: 12160568
references.citation: Nature. 1986 Mar 20-26;320(6059):264-5
references.pmid: 3960106
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2006 Nov;68(8):1297-309
references.pmid: 17378416
references.citation: Vis Neurosci. 2007 Mar-Apr;24(2):207-15
references.pmid: 17640412