title: The challenge of truth telling across cultures: a case study.
abstract: Accompanied with various opinions across cultures, truth telling is a major debate in bioethics. Many studies have focused on attitudes toward truth disclosure. We intend to review several relevant research studies, and discuss the issue through a clinical case consultation. It seems that while "the right to know" is emphasized in bioethics, in some cultural contexts, health professionals fear communicating bad news. The patients may not receive information directly, because it is believed that the truth may make the patient feel hopeless and unable to cope with the problem. Nevertheless, some believe that sharing information may strengthen a trusting relationship between patients and medical professionals. Extensive efforts are in process in some societies to make patient rights to know the truth as a natural part of medical practice. However, in some cases, the principles of respect for patient autonomy require us to accept patient's refusal to know the truth, with the provision that he assigns someone to receive information and make medical decisions on his behalf. In conclusion, it is suggested that healthcare professionals should not act on a unique presumption in all cases and they should explore what the real interest of patient is, in order to respect individual autonomy.
authors.affiliation: MD, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Centre, Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 5th floor, Shariati Hospital, North Kargar Avenue, Tehran 14114-13137, Iran, Tel: (+98 21) 88220037-8, , Email: fzahedi@sina.tums.ac.ir.
authors.forename: Farzaneh
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Zahedi
keywords: Autonomy; Clinical ethics; Culture; Ethics consultation; Informed consent; Truth telling
references.citation: Cancer Nurs. 2008 Jul-Aug;31(4):E36-42
references.pmid: 18600109
references.citation: Child Care Health Dev. 2005 May;31(3):355-63
references.pmid: 15840156
references.citation: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2004 Dec;52(3):165-72
references.pmid: 15582784
references.citation: Intern Med J. 2004 Sep-Oct;34(9-10):578-80
references.pmid: 15482274
references.citation: JAMA. 1979 Mar 2;241(9):897-900
references.pmid: 762865
references.citation: JAMA. 1992 Oct 7;268(13):1661-2
references.pmid: 1309178
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997 Feb 20;809:197-210
references.pmid: 9103571
references.citation: J Med Ethics. 2008 May;34(5):384-8
references.pmid: 18448722
references.citation: Chest. 2000 Oct;118(4):1172-82
references.pmid: 11035693
references.citation: J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2009 May 31;2:6
references.pmid: 23908720
references.citation: J Psychosom Res. 2004 Jul;57(1):53-8
references.pmid: 15256295
references.citation: Lancet Oncol. 2006 Nov;7(11):944-50
references.pmid: 17081920
references.citation: J Clin Ethics. 2009 Spring;20(1):79-89
references.pmid: 19385326
references.citation: Ann Oncol. 1991 Apr;2(4):273-80
references.pmid: 1868023
references.citation: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010 Sep;19(5):589-93
references.pmid: 20030693
references.citation: JAMA. 1995 Sep 13;274(10):820-5
references.pmid: 7650806
references.citation: CMAJ. 1997 Jan 15;156(2):225-8
references.pmid: 9012726
references.citation: Med Health Care Philos. 2004;7(3):269-79
references.pmid: 15679019
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997 Feb 20;809:290-9
references.pmid: 9103580
references.citation: Palliat Med. 1994;8(1):39-44
references.pmid: 8180739