title: Dilemmas in the treatment of premature infants at the borderline of viability.
abstract: As more reports emerge of improved mortality and morbidity rates in infants born at the edge of viability, there may be need to reassess protocols and recommendations that encourage only comfort care for infants who are born at less than 24 weeks' gestation. Analysis of those studies that report extremely poor survival of these infants reveals that, all too often, the results are measures of a self-fulfilling prophesy that reflects a predetermined non-aggressive global policy of no resuscitation and minimal investment in intensive care. Furthermore, little distinction is made between high- and low-risk infants of the same gestational age despite repeated studies that indicate that one can identify subpopulations that have as much as a 20-50% increased chance of surviving with little if any long-term neurodevelopmental impairment. Thus, the need to reassess current policies is discussed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jerusalem, Israel; Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
authors.forename: Arthur I
authors.initials: AI
authors.lastname: Eidelman
keywords: Extreme prematurity; medical ethics; morbidity; mortality; neonatal mortality; viability
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 1998 Feb;43(2):224-35
references.pmid: 9485064
references.citation: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Feb;165(2):126-33
references.pmid: 21300652
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2010 Sep;126(3):e644-50
references.pmid: 20713479
references.citation: JAMA. 2000 Oct 18;284(15):1939-47
references.pmid: 11035890
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1973 Oct 25;289(17):890-4
references.pmid: 4729120
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2010 Sep;126(3):443-56
references.pmid: 20732945
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Feb;196(2):147.e1-8
references.pmid: 17306659
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2004 Jul;114(1):58-64
references.pmid: 15231908
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Nov 1;48(2):458-63
references.pmid: 19560547
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 17;358(16):1672-81
references.pmid: 18420500
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2002 Nov;110(5):1024-7
references.pmid: 12415047
references.citation: Lancet Neurol. 2009 Nov;8(11):1042-55
references.pmid: 19800293
references.citation: JAMA. 2009 Jun 3;301(21):2225-33
references.pmid: 19491184
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125(4):e931-7
references.pmid: 20194275
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2009 Jul;124(1):422-7
references.pmid: 19564329
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2002 Jul;110(1 Pt 1):143-51
references.pmid: 12093960
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):286-94
references.pmid: 15687434
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125(4):696-703
references.pmid: 20351002
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):1588-90
references.pmid: 19482770
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):1884-93
references.pmid: 19376244
references.citation: Clin Perinatol. 1980 Mar;7(1):135-43
references.pmid: 7398174
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2011 Jan;127(1):62-70
references.pmid: 21187312