title: What is the subjective cost of cognitive effort? Load, trait, and aging effects revealed by economic preference.
abstract: It has long been assumed that people treat cognitive effort as costly, but also that such effort costs may vary greatly across individuals. Individual differences in subjective effort could present a major and pervasive confound in behavioral and neuroscience assessments, by conflating cognitive ability with cognitive motivation. Self-report cognitive effort scales have been developed, but objective measures are lacking. In this study, we use the behavioral economic approach of revealed preferences to quantify subjective effort. Specifically, we adapted a well-established discounting paradigm to measure the extent to which cognitive effort causes participants to discount monetary rewards. The resulting metrics are sensitive to both within-individual factors, including objective load and reward amount, and between-individual factors, including age and trait cognitive engagement. We further validate cognitive effort discounting by benchmarking it against well-established measures of delay discounting. The results highlight the promise and utility of behavioral economic tools for assessing trait and state influences on cognitive motivation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
authors.forename: Andrew
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Westbrook
authors.forename: Daria
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Kester
authors.forename: Todd S
authors.initials: TS
authors.lastname: Braver
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000375:Aging / Q000523:psychology*; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D003657:Decision Making; D060909:Economics, Behavioral; D006801:Humans; D009042:Motivation / Q000502:physiology; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012201:Reward; D057566:Self Report; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2010 Nov;136(6):1068-91
references.pmid: 21038939
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1996 Jun;30(3):257-303
references.pmid: 8660786
references.citation: Neuroimage. 1997 Jan;5(1):49-62
references.pmid: 9038284
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(6):791-807
references.pmid: 16901542
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1993 Mar;113(2):247-78
references.pmid: 8451334
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Apr;34(5):678-88
references.pmid: 19501615
references.citation: J Pers Assess. 1984 Jun;48(3):306-7
references.pmid: 16367530
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Oct 1;42(4):1577-86
references.pmid: 18634891
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2006 Jan;132(1):1-25
references.pmid: 16435954
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May;25(1):46-59
references.pmid: 15846822
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 1983 Jun;140(6):734-9
references.pmid: 6846631
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Dec;36(6):704-5; discussion 707-26
references.pmid: 24304803
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2012 Jul;90(3):302-10
references.pmid: 22445576
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Dec;36(6):661-79
references.pmid: 24304775
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 1996 Mar;11(1):79-84
references.pmid: 8726373
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Nov;139(4):665-82
references.pmid: 20853993
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Apr;191(3):461-82
references.pmid: 17225164
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:471-507
references.pmid: 15012462
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Mar;12(1):74-84
references.pmid: 22012275
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 20;30(42):14080-90
references.pmid: 20962229
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Sep;76(2):235-43
references.pmid: 11599641
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2007 Dec;10(12):1625-33
references.pmid: 17982449
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Nov;64(3):263-76
references.pmid: 16812772
references.citation: Nord J Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;65(1):74-80
references.pmid: 20560870
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Dec 16;29(50):15727-34
references.pmid: 20016088
references.citation: Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Jul;37(8):1825-37
references.pmid: 22453140
references.citation: Neural Netw. 2006 Oct;19(8):1302-14
references.pmid: 16949252
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Apr;191(3):507-20
references.pmid: 17031711
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009 Mar;9(1):16-27
references.pmid: 19246324
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2012 Feb;10(2):e1001266
references.pmid: 22363208
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 Jul;67(4):447-55
references.pmid: 22131365
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 May 23;27(21):5796-804
references.pmid: 17522323
references.citation: Science. 1989 May 26;244(4907):933-8
references.pmid: 2658056
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 27;107(17):7922-6
references.pmid: 20385798
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:173-96
references.pmid: 19035823