title: Genetic analysis of population structure and reproductive mode of the termite Reticulitermes chinensis snyder.
abstract: The subterranean termite Reticulitermes chinensis Snyder is an important pest of trees and buildings in China. Here, we characterized genetic structure and reproductive modes of R. chinensis from China for the first time. A total of 1,875 workers from 75 collection sites in Huanggang, Changsha and Chongqing cities were genotyped at eight microsatellite loci. Analysis of genetic clusters showed two subpopulations in Chongqing city. The Huanggang population showed a uniform genetic pattern and was separated from the other populations by the largest genetic distances (F ST: 0.17-0.20). In contrast, smaller genetic distances (F ST: 0.05-0.12) separated Changsha, Chongqing-1 and Chongqing-2 populations. Chongqing-1 was the only population showing a genetic bottleneck. Isolation by distance among colonies in the Huanggang population indicated limited alate dispersal or colony budding. Lack of isolation by distance among colonies within the populations of Changsha, Chongqing-1 and Chongqing-2, suggested long-range dispersal by alates and/or human-mediated transport. Overall, extended family colonies (73.91%) were predominant in all four populations, followed by simple (20.29%), and mixed family colonies (5.80%). Most simple families were headed by inbred related reproductive pairs in the Changsha population, while most simple families in the Chongqing-1 population were headed by outbred unrelated pairs. Simple families in the Huanggang population were a mixture of colonies headed by outbred or inbred reproductive pairs. The sample size of simple families in the Chongqing-2 population was too small to yield significant results. Extended families in all four populations were headed on the average by ≤10 neotenics. Mixed families likely originated from pleometrosis. Presence of heterozygote genotypes showed that all neotenic reproductives collected in addition from five field colonies in Wuhan city were sexually produced, suggesting that these colonies did not undergo parthenogenesis. This study contributes to better understanding of the variance of genetic structure and reproductive mode in the genus Reticulitermes.
authors.affiliation: Hubei Insect Resources Utilization and Sustainable Pest Management Key Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
authors.forename: Qiuying
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Huang
authors.forename: Ganghua
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Claudia
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Husseneder
authors.forename: Chaoliang
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Lei
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001947:Breeding; D005260:Female; D060005:Genotyping Techniques; D020049:Isoptera / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D018895:Microsatellite Repeats / Q000235:genetics; D010312:Parthenogenesis; D012098:Reproduction
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2010 Mar;19(6):1227-38
references.pmid: 20163549
references.citation: Science. 2009 Mar 27;323(5922):1687
references.pmid: 19325106
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2005 Nov;95(5):408-15
references.pmid: 16118658
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2005 Jul;14(8):2611-20
references.pmid: 15969739
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2012 Jul;21(14):3403-18
references.pmid: 22646281
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002 Mar;22(3):454-9
references.pmid: 11884170
references.citation: Annu Rev Entomol. 2009;54:379-403
references.pmid: 18793101
references.citation: J Econ Entomol. 2005 Oct;98(5):1421-34
references.pmid: 16334307
references.citation: Environ Entomol. 2008 Apr;37(2):400-8
references.pmid: 18419912
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2000 Jun;9(6):817-20
references.pmid: 10849299
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2005 Apr;14(5):1311-20
references.pmid: 15813772
references.citation: Evolution. 2003 Dec;57(12):2805-18
references.pmid: 14761059
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2004 Feb;13(2):431-41
references.pmid: 14717897
references.citation: J Econ Entomol. 2007 Aug;100(4):1037-46
references.pmid: 17849849
references.citation: Evolution. 2002 Jan;56(1):70-83
references.pmid: 11915853
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Feb 22;279(1729):813-9
references.pmid: 21831899
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2005 Apr;14(5):1527-32
references.pmid: 15813790
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2007 Oct;99(4):443-51
references.pmid: 17611493
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2001 Feb;10(2):265-84
references.pmid: 11298944
references.citation: J Econ Entomol. 2008 Aug;101(4):1349-59
references.pmid: 18767747
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2003 Oct;12(10):2599-608
references.pmid: 12969464
references.citation: Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59
references.pmid: 10835412
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2013 Mar;22(5):1447-62
references.pmid: 23293875
references.citation: J Econ Entomol. 2007 Aug;100(4):1370-80
references.pmid: 17849891
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2004 Oct;13(10):3099-113
references.pmid: 15367123
references.citation: Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370
references.pmid: 28563791