title: Assessing the cryptic invasion of a domestic conspecific: American mink in their native range.
abstract: Control of invasions is facilitated by their early detection, but this may be difficult when invasions are cryptic due to similarity between invaders and native species. Domesticated conspecifics offer an interesting example of cryptic invasions because they have the ability to hybridize with their native counterparts, and can thus facilitate the introgression of maladaptive genes. We assessed the cryptic invasion of escaped domestic American mink (Neovison vison) within their native range. Feral mink are a known alien invader in many parts of the world, but invasion of their native range is not well understood. We genetically profiled 233 captive domestic mink from different farms in Ontario, Canada and 299 free-ranging mink from Ontario, and used assignments tests to ascertain genetic ancestries of free-ranging animals. We found that 18% of free-ranging mink were either escaped domestic animals or hybrids, and a tree regression showed that these domestic genotypes were most likely to occur south of a latitude of 43.13°N, within the distribution of mink farms in Ontario. Thus, domestic mink appear not to have established populations in Ontario in locations without fur farms. We suspect that maladaptation of domestic mink and outbreeding depression of hybrid and introgressed mink have limited their spread. Mink farm density and proximity to mink farms were not important predictors of domestic genotypes but rather, certain mink farms appeared to be important sources of escaped domestic animals. Our results show that not all mink farms are equal with respect to biosecurity, and thus that the spread of domestic genotypes can be mitigated by improved biosecurity.
authors.affiliation: Wildlife Research and Development Section, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Trent University DNA Building, 2140 East Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 7B8, Canada.
authors.forename: Kaela B
authors.initials: KB
authors.lastname: Beauclerc
authors.forename: Jeff
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Bowman
authors.forename: Albrecht I
authors.initials: AI
authors.lastname: Schulte-Hostedde
keywords: Domestic; Neovison vison; hybridization; invasion; mink farm; outbreeding depression
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Apr;27(4):747-52
references.pmid: 20022889
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2012 Oct 1;28(19):2537-9
references.pmid: 22820204
references.citation: J Wildl Dis. 2009 Jan;45(1):128-43
references.pmid: 19204342
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21693
references.pmid: 21789177
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2011 Dec;20(24):5154-66
references.pmid: 22066758
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 6;104(10):3883-8
references.pmid: 17360447
references.citation: Environ Res. 2012 Jan;112:77-82
references.pmid: 22130127
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 1999 Aug;8(8):1352-4
references.pmid: 10507871
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Jun;13(6):288-94
references.pmid: 18467157
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2009 Jan;18(1):43-53
references.pmid: 19140963
references.citation: Risk Anal. 2004 Aug;24(4):869-78
references.pmid: 15357806
references.citation: Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59
references.pmid: 10835412
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2009 Mar;18(6):1175-86
references.pmid: 19243512
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2010 Sep;19(17):3532-48
references.pmid: 20723053
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Nov 22;274(1627):2819-28
references.pmid: 17785272
references.citation: Genetics. 2008 Jan;178(1):385-92
references.pmid: 18202381
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2005 Jul;14(8):2611-20
references.pmid: 15969739
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 May;20(5):223-8
references.pmid: 16701373
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Jan;8(1):103-6
references.pmid: 21585727
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2001 Feb;10(2):319-36
references.pmid: 11298948
references.citation: Evolution. 2007 May;61(5):1225-37
references.pmid: 17492973
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 1999 May;82 ( Pt 5):561-73
references.pmid: 10383677
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Dec 7;270(1532):2443-50
references.pmid: 14667333
references.citation: Anim Genet. 2006 Apr;37(2):185-8
references.pmid: 16573539
references.citation: Evol Appl. 2012 Jun;5(4):330-40
references.pmid: 25568054
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 1996 Apr;5(2):311-2
references.pmid: 8673278
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Apr 26;6(4):e14806
references.pmid: 21541309
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 1999 Aug;8(8):1309-15
references.pmid: 10447871