title: Self-Expanding Stent and Delivery System for Aortic Valve Replacement.
abstract: Currently, aortic valve replacement procedures require a sternotomy and use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to arrest the heart and provide a bloodless field in which to operate. A less invasive alternative to open heart surgery is transapical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), already emerging as a feasible treatment for patients with high surgical risk. The bioprosthetic valves are delivered via catheters using transarterial or transapical approaches and are implanted within diseased aortic valves. This paper reports the development of a new self-expanding stent for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement and its delivery device for the transapical approach under real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance. Made of nitinol, the new stent is designed to implant and embed a commercially available bioprosthetic aortic valve in aortic root. An MRI passive marker was affixed onto the stent and an MRI active marker to the delivery device. These capabilities were tested in ex vivo and in vivo experiments. Radial resistive force, chronic outward force, and the integrity of bioprosthesis on stent were measured through custom design dedicated test equipment. In vivo experimental evaluation was done using a porcine large animal model. Both ex vivo and in vivo experiment results indicate that the self-expanding stent provides adequate reinforcement of the bioprosthetic aortic valve and it is easier to implant the valve in the correct position. The orientation and positioning of the implanted valve is more precise and predictable with the help of the passive marker on stent and the active marker on delivery device. The new self-expanding nitinol stent was designed to exert a constant radial force and, therefore, a better fixation of the prosthesis in the aorta, which would result in better preservation of long-term heart function. The passive marker affixed on the stent and active marker embedded in the delivery devices helps to achieve precise orientation and positioning of the stent under MRI guidance. The design allows the stent to be retracted in the delivery device with a snaring catheter if necessary. Histopathology reports reveal that the stent is biocompatible and fully functional. All the stented bioprosthesis appeared to be properly seated in the aortic root.
authors.affiliation: e-mail:  mazilud@nhlbi.nih.gov.
authors.forename: Dumitru
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Mazilu
authors.forename: Ming
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Ozgur
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Kocaturk
authors.forename: Keith A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Horvath
keywords: minimally invasive aortic valve replacement; real-time MRI guidance; self-expanding nitinol stents; shape memory materials
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2006 Nov;56(5):958-64
references.pmid: 17036300
references.citation: Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug;3(4):359-66
references.pmid: 20606135
references.citation: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005 Nov 1;75(2):256-67
references.pmid: 16078209
references.citation: Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2000;9(3-4):235-46
references.pmid: 20156021
references.citation: Circulation. 2006 Aug 8;114(6):591-6
references.pmid: 16880325
references.citation: Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Jan;83(1):284-7
references.pmid: 17184681
references.citation: Circulation. 2006 Oct 10;114(15):1616-24
references.pmid: 17015786
references.citation: Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jul;82(1):110-6
references.pmid: 16798200
references.citation: Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Winter;19(4):330-5
references.pmid: 18395633
references.citation: JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Aug;1(4):341-50
references.pmid: 19463328
references.citation: Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Mar;105(3):146-52
references.pmid: 22520797
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 21;363(17):1597-607
references.pmid: 20961243
references.citation: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Jan;31(1):9-15
references.pmid: 17097302
references.citation: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Feb;139(2):424-30
references.pmid: 19969312
references.citation: Circulation. 2007 Sep 11;116(11 Suppl):I240-5
references.pmid: 17846311
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2004 Feb;14(2):292-301
references.pmid: 12955452
references.citation: Eur Heart J. 2011 Apr;32(7):878-87
references.pmid: 21148541
references.citation: Circulation. 2007 Aug 14;116(7):755-63
references.pmid: 17646579
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Mar 21;47(6):1214-23
references.pmid: 16545654
references.citation: Circulation. 2010 Jul 6;122(1):62-9
references.pmid: 20566953
references.citation: Biomaterials. 1997 Aug;18(16):1115-20
references.pmid: 9247349
references.citation: Circulation. 2002 Feb 12;105(6):775-8
references.pmid: 11839637
references.citation: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003 Jul 1;66(1):129-37
references.pmid: 12833439
references.citation: Eur Heart J. 2011 Jan;32(2):140-7
references.pmid: 21131653
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jul 19;46(2):366-70
references.pmid: 16022969
references.citation: Circulation. 2002 Dec 10;106(24):3006-8
references.pmid: 12473543
references.citation: Heart. 2004 Nov;90(11):1326-31
references.pmid: 15486135
references.citation: Innovations (Phila). 2007 Mar;2(2):51-5
references.pmid: 22436922
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jul 3;50(1):69-76
references.pmid: 17601548