title: Beyond Performance: A Motivational Experiences Model of Stereotype Threat.
abstract: The contributing role of stereotype threat (ST) to learning and performance decrements for stigmatized students in highly evaluative situations has been vastly documented and is now widely known by educators and policy makers. However, recent research illustrates that underrepresented and stigmatized students' academic and career motivations are influenced by ST more broadly, particularly through influences on achievement orientations, sense of belonging, and intrinsic motivation. Such a focus moves conceptualizations of ST effects in education beyond the influence on a student's performance, skill level, and feelings of self-efficacy per se to experiencing greater belonging uncertainty and lower interest in stereotyped tasks and domains. These negative experiences are associated with important outcomes such as decreased persistence and domain identification, even among students who are high in achievement motivation. In this vein, we present and review support for the Motivational Experience Model of ST, a self-regulatory model framework for integrating research on ST, achievement goals, sense of belonging, and intrinsic motivation to make predictions for how stigmatized students' motivational experiences are maintained or disrupted, particularly over long periods of time.
authors.affiliation: California State University, Long Beach.
authors.forename: Dustin B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Thoman
authors.forename: Jessi L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: Elizabeth R
authors.initials: ER
authors.lastname: Brown
authors.forename: Justin
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Chase
authors.forename: Joo Young K
authors.initials: JY
authors.lastname: Lee
keywords: belonging; interest; motivation; self-regulation; stereotype; stereotype threat
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;116(2):365-83
references.pmid: 19348546
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;115(2):336-56
references.pmid: 18426293
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2009 Sep;20(9):1132-9
references.pmid: 19656335
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Dec;77(6):1135-45
references.pmid: 10626368
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Feb;39(2):131-43
references.pmid: 23187722
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Nov;16(11):852-5
references.pmid: 16262768
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1995 May;117(3):497-529
references.pmid: 7777651
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 May;11(2):107-30
references.pmid: 18453458
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;81(6):1001-13
references.pmid: 11761303
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Apr;94(4):615-30
references.pmid: 18361675
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul;7(4):384-403
references.pmid: 26168474
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Feb;36(2):173-86
references.pmid: 19833898
references.citation: Am Psychol. 2004 Jan;59(1):7-13
references.pmid: 14736315
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Sep;31(9):1189-202
references.pmid: 16055639
references.citation: J Res Pers. 2009 Apr;43(2):262-263
references.pmid: 20161302
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:109-32
references.pmid: 11752481
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Apr;76(4):628-44
references.pmid: 10234849
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:415-37
references.pmid: 26361054
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Mar;16(3):175-9
references.pmid: 15733195
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Jun;29(6):790-801
references.pmid: 15189634
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 2008 Nov;93(6):1314-34
references.pmid: 19025250
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 May;66(5):968-80
references.pmid: 8014838
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2010 Oct;21(10):1411-6
references.pmid: 20855899
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Feb;96(2):288-304
references.pmid: 19159133
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Dec;1(4):316-45
references.pmid: 26151798
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Mar;102(3):513-32
references.pmid: 22023711
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Jun;37(6):757-69
references.pmid: 21558556
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Feb;96(2):415-431
references.pmid: 19159140
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Mar;29(3):313-24
references.pmid: 15273009
references.citation: Br J Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;44(Pt 4):645-57
references.pmid: 16368024
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Apr;29(4):435-48
references.pmid: 15272999
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Oct;103(4):635-646
references.pmid: 22746674
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Feb;88(2):276-87
references.pmid: 15841859
references.citation: Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2007 Oct;13(4):321-7
references.pmid: 17967100
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Mar;29(3):371-81
references.pmid: 15273014
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Sep;63(3):379-90
references.pmid: 1403621
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Oct;83(4):896-918
references.pmid: 12374443
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):82-96
references.pmid: 17201544
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jun;102(6):1239-51
references.pmid: 22409487
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jun;96(6):1089-103
references.pmid: 19469589
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jul;75(1):219-29
references.pmid: 9686460
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2001 Nov;127(6):797-826
references.pmid: 11726072
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Nov;69(5):797-811
references.pmid: 7473032
references.citation: Sex Roles. 2010 Oct;63(7-8):475-488
references.pmid: 20930923
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Jul;87(1):38-56
references.pmid: 15250791
references.citation: Br J Educ Psychol. 2007 Jun;77(Pt 2):323-38
references.pmid: 17504550
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Apr;70(4):868-76
references.pmid: 8636903
references.citation: Science. 2011 Mar 18;331(6023):1447-51
references.pmid: 21415354
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Oct;33(10):1448-62
references.pmid: 17933739
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2010 May;136(3):422-49
references.pmid: 20438145
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Sep;73(3):447-58
references.pmid: 9294896
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Feb;100(2):255-70
references.pmid: 21142376
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2000 Sep;11(5):365-71
references.pmid: 11228906
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:487-503
references.pmid: 16318604
references.citation: Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):3-53
references.pmid: 10620380
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Dec;97(6):1045-60
references.pmid: 19968418
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jul;101(1):109-28
references.pmid: 21381851
references.citation: Am Psychol. 1997 Jun;52(6):613-29
references.pmid: 9174398
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2007 Oct;18(10):879-85
references.pmid: 17894605
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(4):979-85
references.pmid: 16834521
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Apr;37(4):464-80
references.pmid: 21441217
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Sep;32(9):1246-63
references.pmid: 16902243
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2010 Jan;136(1):103-127
references.pmid: 20063928