title: A dynamical approach toward understanding mechanisms of team science: change, kinship, tension, and heritage in a transdisciplinary team.
abstract: Since the concept of team science gained recognition among biomedical researchers, social scientists have been challenged with investigating evidence of team mechanisms and functional dynamics within transdisciplinary teams. Identification of these mechanisms has lacked substantial research using grounded theory models to adequately describe their dynamical qualities. Research trends continue to favor the measurement of teams by isolating occurrences of production over relational mechanistic team tendencies. This study uses a social constructionist-grounded multilevel mixed methods approach to identify social dynamics and mechanisms within a transdisciplinary team. A National Institutes of Health-funded research team served as a sample. Data from observations, interviews, and focus groups were qualitatively coded to generate micro/meso level analyses. Social mechanisms operative within this biomedical scientific team were identified. Dynamics that support such mechanisms were documented and explored. Through theoretical and emergent coding, four social mechanisms dominated in the analysis-change, kinship, tension, and heritage. Each contains relational social dynamics. This micro/meso level study suggests such mechanisms and dynamics are key features of team science and as such can inform problems of integration, praxis, and engagement in teams.
authors.affiliation: Clinical and Translational Science Programs, George Washington University, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. glotrecc@gwu.edu
authors.forename: Gaetano R
authors.initials: GR
authors.lastname: Lotrecchiano
mesh_terms: D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003625:Data Collection; D006801:Humans; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication
keywords: cross disciplinary teams; social dynamics; social mechanisms; team science; transdisciplinary
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S77-89
references.pmid: 18619407
references.citation: J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2006 Feb;19(1):29-40
references.pmid: 16464214
references.citation: Science. 2003 Oct 3;302(5642):63-72
references.pmid: 14526066
references.citation: J Nurs Adm. 2010 Apr;40(4):150-3
references.pmid: 20305458
references.citation: Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Dec;5 Suppl 1:S11-9
references.pmid: 14668084
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S243-9
references.pmid: 18619406
references.citation: Sci Transl Med. 2010 Mar 10;2(22):22cm9
references.pmid: 20374998
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S116-23
references.pmid: 18619391
references.citation: Ann Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;5(4):377-8
references.pmid: 17664507
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S182-92
references.pmid: 18619398
references.citation: J Nurs Adm. 2009 Dec;39(12):507-10
references.pmid: 19955961
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 2009 Sep;94(5):1128-45
references.pmid: 19702361
references.citation: Nurs Res. 2007 Mar-Apr;56(2):71
references.pmid: 17356436
references.citation: Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Dec;5 Suppl 1:S21-39
references.pmid: 14668085
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 1996;47:307-38
references.pmid: 15012484
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 2004 Dec;89(6):1035-56
references.pmid: 15584840
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(2):331-46
references.pmid: 17371082
references.citation: Am J Community Psychol. 2006 Sep;38(1-2):63-77
references.pmid: 16791514
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:623-55
references.pmid: 14744229
references.citation: Sci Transl Med. 2010 Sep 15;2(49):49cm24
references.pmid: 20844283
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S96-115
references.pmid: 18619410
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S193-5
references.pmid: 18619399
references.citation: BMJ. 2001 Sep 15;323(7313):625-8
references.pmid: 11557716