title: A yeast mitotic activator sensitises the shoot apical meristem to become floral in day-neutral tobacco.
abstract: True day-neutral (DN) plants flower regardless of day-length and yet they flower at characteristic stages. DN Nicotiana tabacum cv. Samsun, makes about forty nodes before flowering. The question still persists whether flowering starts because leaves become physiologically able to export sufficient floral stimulus or the shoot apical meristem (SAM) acquires developmental competence to interpret its arrival. This question was addressed using tobacco expressing the Schizosaccharomyces pombe cell cycle gene, Spcdc25, as a tool. Spcdc25 expression induces early flowering and we tested a hypothesis that this phenotype arises because of premature floral competence of the SAM. Scions of vegetative Spcdc25 plants were grafted onto stocks of vegetative WT together with converse grafts and flowering onset followed (as the time since sowing and number of leaves formed till flowering). Spcdc25 plants flowered significantly earlier with fewer leaves, and, unlike WT, also formed flowers from axillary buds. Scions from vegetative Spcdc25 plants also flowered precociously when grafted to vegetative WT stocks. However, in a WT scion to Spcdc25 stock, the plants flowered at the same time as WT. SAMs from young vegetative Spcdc25 plants were elongated (increase in SAM convexity determined by tracing a circumference of SAM sections) with a pronounced meristem surface cell layers compared with WT. Presumably, Spcdc25 SAMs were competent for flowering earlier than WT and responded to florigenic signal produced even in young vegetative WT plants. Precocious reproductive competence in Spcdc25 SAMs comprised a pronounced mantle, a trait of prefloral SAMs. Hence, we propose that true DN plants export florigenic signal since early developmental stages but the SAM has to acquire competence to respond to the floral stimulus.
authors.affiliation: Department of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 5, 128 44, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
authors.forename: Petra
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Vojvodová
authors.forename: Petra
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Mašková
authors.forename: Dennis
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Francis
authors.forename: Helena
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Lipavská
mesh_terms: D035264:Flowers / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D018519:Meristem / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D010749:Phosphoprotein Phosphatases / Q000096:biosynthesis* / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D030821:Plants, Genetically Modified / Q000235:genetics; D029702:Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins / Q000096:biosynthesis* / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D014026:Nicotiana / Q000502:physiology*
chemical_list: D029702:Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins; C570820:Cdc25 protein, S pombe; D010749:Phosphoprotein Phosphatases
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1995 Feb;7(2):225-34
references.pmid: 7756832
references.citation: Plant J. 2012 Dec;72(6):908-21
references.pmid: 22889438
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2004;16 Suppl:S1-17
references.pmid: 15020744
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2008 Jan;20(1):88-100
references.pmid: 18223038
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Oct;11(10):474-9
references.pmid: 16949857
references.citation: Dev Biol. 1992 Sep;153(1):59-69
references.pmid: 1516752
references.citation: Plant Physiol Biochem. 2004 Jan;42(1):49-55
references.pmid: 15061084
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 18;103(16):6398-403
references.pmid: 16606827
references.citation: Development. 2002 Feb;129(4):957-64
references.pmid: 11861478
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2012 Nov;53(11):1827-42
references.pmid: 23008422
references.citation: Planta. 1996;200(1):2-12
references.pmid: 8987615
references.citation: Plant Mol Biol. 1993 Nov;23(3):445-51
references.pmid: 8219080
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2006;57(13):3405-14
references.pmid: 17005925
references.citation: Plant Physiol Biochem. 2008 Jul;46(7):673-84
references.pmid: 18550380
references.citation: New Phytol. 2007;176(4):804-812
references.pmid: 17997765
references.citation: Science. 2005 Aug 12;309(5737):1052-6
references.pmid: 16099979
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2009;60(9):2501-15
references.pmid: 19414498
references.citation: Plant J. 2005 Oct;44(2):290-9
references.pmid: 16212607
references.citation: Planta. 1992 Nov;188(4):546-50
references.pmid: 24178387
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2008;59(2):187-201
references.pmid: 18256052
references.citation: Development. 2004 Aug;131(15):3615-26
references.pmid: 15229176
references.citation: Plant Mol Biol. 1998 Mar;36(4):601-12
references.pmid: 9484455
references.citation: Int Rev Cytol. 1967;21:203-351
references.pmid: 5338240
references.citation: Planta. 1991 Nov;185(4):513-7
references.pmid: 24186528
references.citation: Planta. 1979 Jan;145(2):151-7
references.pmid: 24317670
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2005 Jan;137(1):308-16
references.pmid: 15618425
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 19;106(20):8392-7
references.pmid: 19416824
references.citation: Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):1030-3
references.pmid: 17446353
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2005 Oct;139(2):770-8
references.pmid: 16183837
references.citation: Science. 2000 Jun 2;288(5471):1613-6
references.pmid: 10834834
references.citation: Nat Cell Biol. 2005 Jun;7(6):535-41
references.pmid: 15928697