title: Ecological Validity and the Study of Procedural and Episodic Memory Function in Songbirds.
abstract: Memory in songbirds, from song learning, production, and recognition to that for locations in complex environments, has led to the attractiveness of these animals as model systems for the changes occurring within and between neurons that lead to relevant modifications in behavior. Zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) in particular are excellent models attributable to their ability to readily perform the above-mentioned, ecologically relevant memories in the laboratories, and the ease with which these stereotyped behaviors can be manipulated and measured. This review centers on the independent functioning of and possible interactions between two primary memory systems in songbirds: those important for song or "procedural" memories, as well as those for place, such as food location, a "spatial" or "episodic-like" memory. Work over several decades has formed a relatively comprehensive understanding of the behavioral changes, neural substrates, and plasticity central to procedural memory (song learning and production) function in birds. However, few studies have examined spatial memory ability in those that do not store and retrieve caches, orient some distance away from and back to a home loft, or are not brood parasites. Zebra finches offer a rather unique advantage in this study of memory function and the interaction of memory systems: they do not store food, and are closed-ended song learners, biparental, not territorial, and non-migratory. Thus, their memory for song is not necessarily intertwined with that for time (of year) or location, as in a bird that learns a new song each breeding season, migrates to a particular breeding ground, or forgoes song and reproductive behavior in periods of food scarcity. Episodic-like memory in zebra finches is controlled by the hippocampus, and damage to this region, as in rodents and humans, compromises the ability to learn and/or remember particular spatial locations. In male zebra finches, hippocampal damage causes no appreciable, concurrent deficit in song learning or recognition. Interestingly, in females, while lesions do not disrupt a normal preference for conspecific over heterospecific songs, they do seem to abolish the preference for tutor song versus other novel, conspecific songs. It is therefore exciting to hypothesize a potential overlap between these memory systems. Support for this is provided by data from several anatomical, functional, and behavioral studies, chief among these that cells within the hippocampus show selectivity to conspecific but not other song stimuli and mate versus non-mate calls, and that several afferent and efferent projections to/of the hippocampus suggest a modulatory role for hippocampal neurons in song behavior. Specifically, we suggest that the hippocampus in zebra finches plays a role in "episodic-like characteristics of song perception," making these birds exceptional models for examining functional overlaps among memory systems central to discrete, ecologically relevant behaviors.
authors.forename: David J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Bailey
authors.forename: Colin J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Saldanha
keywords: caudomedial nidopallium; hippocampus; song learning; song perception; zebra finch
references.citation: C R Biol. 2008 May;331(5):347-56
references.pmid: 18472080
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Feb 29;97(5):2282-5
references.pmid: 10681421
references.citation: J Neurobiol. 1997 Nov;33(5):532-48
references.pmid: 9369458
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jul 1;162(1):108-15
references.pmid: 15922071
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2004 Aug 25;24(34):7503-13
references.pmid: 15329397
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1997 May 15;17(10):3861-9
references.pmid: 9133404
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 1999;54(1):15-27
references.pmid: 10516401
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2008 Jul 19;190(2):201-5
references.pmid: 18384892
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1999 Jan 1;19(1):311-5
references.pmid: 9870960
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1995 Oct;15(10):6919-25
references.pmid: 7472448
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Aug 1;89(15):6818-22
references.pmid: 1495970
references.citation: Dev Neurobiol. 2009 Jul;69(8):491-504
references.pmid: 19280648
references.citation: J Neurobiol. 2001 Sep 5;48(3):163-80
references.pmid: 11466705
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1998 Apr 20;393(4):426-38
references.pmid: 9550149
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2003 Mar;117(1):61-6
references.pmid: 12735365
references.citation: Brain Res. 1999 Oct 9;844(1-2):78-82
references.pmid: 10536263
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 2005 Jun 27;487(2):119-26
references.pmid: 15880474
references.citation: Neuron. 1997 Feb;18(2):315-25
references.pmid: 9052801
references.citation: J Neurobiol. 2002 Jul;52(1):43-51
references.pmid: 12115892
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2004 Apr;45(4):250-8
references.pmid: 15053941
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1999 Jan;57(1):173-180
references.pmid: 10053084
references.citation: Brain Res Bull. 2002 Apr;57(6):737-49
references.pmid: 12031270
references.citation: Am Sci. 1970 Nov-Dec;58(6):669-73
references.pmid: 5480089
references.citation: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000 Nov;74(3):179-84
references.pmid: 11031126
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Feb 22;445(7130):919-21
references.pmid: 17314979
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2004 May 26;24(21):4971-7
references.pmid: 15163689
references.citation: Nature. 2002 May 16;417(6886):351-8
references.pmid: 12015616
references.citation: J Neurobiol. 1997 Nov;33(5):549-71
references.pmid: 9369459
references.citation: J Neurobiol. 1997 Nov;33(5):501-16
references.pmid: 9369456
references.citation: Neuroreport. 1994 Sep 8;5(14):1718-20
references.pmid: 7827315
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:1-25
references.pmid: 11752477
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Feb;86(4):1388-92
references.pmid: 2919184
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Sep 17;395(6699):272-4
references.pmid: 9751053
references.citation: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2004 Sep;82(2):99-108
references.pmid: 15341795
references.citation: Science. 1984 May 25;224(4651):901-3
references.pmid: 6719123
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Dec 22;267(1461):2553-8
references.pmid: 11197134
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1997 Feb 1;17(3):1147-67
references.pmid: 8994068
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 May 1;17(9):789-93
references.pmid: 17433683
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(3):245-51
references.pmid: 12457750
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:651-82
references.pmid: 10074688
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995 Dec;5(6):733-41
references.pmid: 8805417
references.citation: J Neurobiol. 2003 Sep 5;56(3):209-21
references.pmid: 12884261
references.citation: Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2003 Aug 19;116(1-2):147-54
references.pmid: 12941470
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1999 Jul;58(1):105-111
references.pmid: 10413546
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Jan;17(1):149-54
references.pmid: 12534978
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 1996 Mar;110(1):77-87
references.pmid: 8851555
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1992 Apr;99(2):195-231
references.pmid: 1594723
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2004 Nov 5;155(1):147-52
references.pmid: 15325788
references.citation: J Neurobiol. 2001 Jan;46(1):48-58
references.pmid: 11108615
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1989 Jan 8;279(2):312-26
references.pmid: 2464011
references.citation: Age (Dordr). 2005 Dec;27(4):287-96
references.pmid: 23598662
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Mar 24;434(7032):455-6
references.pmid: 15791244
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1990 May;10(5):1541-56
references.pmid: 2332796
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 30;23(17):6928-35
references.pmid: 12890787
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Oct;1(1):31-40
references.pmid: 11252766
references.citation: Science. 1991 Jan 18;251(4991):303-5
references.pmid: 1987645
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2001 Jun;13(11):2165-70
references.pmid: 11422458
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 May;7(5):347-57
references.pmid: 16760915
references.citation: Science. 1976 Oct 8;194(4261):211-3
references.pmid: 959852
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Apr 15;94(8):4097-102
references.pmid: 9108111
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1994 Nov;14(11 Pt 1):6652-66
references.pmid: 7965067
references.citation: Neuroreport. 1998 Sep 14;9(13):3047-52
references.pmid: 9804314
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 2009 Oct 1;516(4):312-20
references.pmid: 19637285
references.citation: Trends Genet. 2009 Apr;25(4):166-77
references.pmid: 19304338
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 1998 Nov;96(1-2):151-9
references.pmid: 9821551
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1991 Sep;11(9):2896-913
references.pmid: 1880555
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2000 Jul 1;20(13):5054-64
references.pmid: 10864963
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:567-631
references.pmid: 10202549
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 2006 Feb 10;494(5):784-91
references.pmid: 16374807
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2002 Dec;188(11-12):943-59
references.pmid: 12471493
references.citation: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000 Nov;74(3):185-216
references.pmid: 11031127
references.citation: Neuron. 1997 Nov;19(5):1049-59
references.pmid: 9390518
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 1996 Aug;110(4):831-5
references.pmid: 8864273