Comparing approaches to measuring the adoption and usability of electronic health records: lessons learned from Canada, Denmark and Finland.
Internationally, the adoption of health information technology is increasing. However, a number of issues have complicated the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs). In addition to adoption issues, it is becoming increasingly recognized that healthcare providers face a variety of usability issues. In this paper, we consider approaches that have been taken to assess both adoption and usability of EHRs in Canada, Denmark and Finland. Although all three countries deploy surveys to assess adoption, the approach and focus of the surveys differs across the countries. In Denmark and Finland, these surveys are dedicated to assessing information technology (IT) usage; while in Canada, questions about IT usage are part of a larger physician survey. Regarding usability, approaches vary considerably. In Finland, the approach includes a national survey about EHR usability. In Canada, ratings of system usability are reported regionally on web sites; while in Denmark, regional study results are reported based on evaluation of commercial products. This paper highlights the need to consider different evaluation approaches internationally.
School of Health Information Science, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Andre
A
Kushniruk
Johanna
J
Kaipio
Marko
M
Nieminen
Christian
C
Nøhr
Elizabeth
E
Borycki
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001292:Attitude to Computers; D002170:Canada; D003718:Denmark; D057286:Electronic Health Records / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005387:Finland; D019538:Health Care Surveys / Q000379:methods*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014600:Utilization Review / Q000379:methods*