Illusion of control: the role of personal involvement.
The illusion of control consists of overestimating the influence that our behavior exerts over uncontrollable outcomes. Available evidence suggests that an important factor in development of this illusion is the personal involvement of participants who are trying to obtain the outcome. The dominant view assumes that this is due to social motivations and self-esteem protection. We propose that this may be due to a bias in contingency detection which occurs when the probability of the action (i.e., of the potential cause) is high. Indeed, personal involvement might have been often confounded with the probability of acting, as participants who are more involved tend to act more frequently than those for whom the outcome is irrelevant and therefore become mere observers. We tested these two variables separately. In two experiments, the outcome was always uncontrollable and we used a yoked design in which the participants of one condition were actively involved in obtaining it and the participants in the other condition observed the adventitious cause-effect pairs. The results support the latter approach: Those acting more often to obtain the outcome developed stronger illusions, and so did their yoked counterparts.
Universidad de Deusto, <location>Bilbao, Spain</location>
Ion
I
Yarritu
Universidad de Deusto, <location>Bilbao, Spain</location>
Helena
H
Matute
University College London, <location>UK</location>
Miguel A
MA
Vadillo
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006379:Helping Behavior; D006801:Humans; D007088:Illusions; D007389:Internal-External Control; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D012649:Self Concept
causal judgments; causal learning; contingency judgments; illusion of causality; illusion of control