Reciprocity explains food sharing in humans and other primates independent of kin selection and tolerated scrounging: a phylogenetic meta-analysis.
Helping, i.e. behaviour increasing the fitness of others, can evolve when directed towards kin or reciprocating partners. These predictions have been tested in the context of food sharing both in human foragers and non-human primates. Here, we performed quantitative meta-analyses on 32 independent study populations to (i) test for overall effects of reciprocity on food sharing while controlling for alternative explanations, methodological biases, publication bias and phylogeny and (ii) compare the relative effects of reciprocity, kinship and tolerated scrounging, i.e. sharing owing to costs imposed by others. We found a significant overall weighted effect size for reciprocity of r = 0.20-0.48 for the most and least conservative measure, respectively. Effect sizes did not differ between humans and other primates, although there were species differences in in-kind reciprocity and trade. The relative effect of reciprocity in sharing was similar to those of kinship and tolerated scrounging. These results indicate a significant independent contribution of reciprocity to human and primate helping behaviour. Furthermore, similar effect sizes in humans and primates speak against cognitive constraints on reciprocity. This study is the first to use meta-analyses to quantify these effects on human helping and to directly compare humans and other primates.
Integrative Anthropological Sciences, Department of Anthropology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-3210, USA. ajaeggi@anth.ucsb.edu
Adrian V
AV
Jaeggi
Michael
M
Gurven
D000818:Animals; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D006379:Helping Behavior; D006801:Humans; D010802:Phylogeny; D011323:Primates / Q000523:psychology*; D013045:Species Specificity
altruism; cooperation; food sharing; kin selection; meta-analysis; reciprocity