[Hernia repair at the groin - who undergoes which surgical intervention?].
BACKGROUND
Within the Guidelines of the European Hernia Society (EHS), there are disctinct statements about where and how inguinal hernia has to be surgically approached. In ASA-I and -II patients, it is recommended to perform the operation in an outpatient clinic setting. Male patients older than 30 years of age should undergo preferably surgical intervention using a mesh. In this context, there are two basic questions: "Are these recommendations already implemented in daily surgical practice (?)" and "Are these guidelines the road to success (?)", which are to be commented based on i) data from two registries, ii) data obtained in the surgical practice of the first author and iii) a selective literature search.


METHODS
An analysis was made of prospectively obtained data from two German registries (Herniamed registry [H-med]; Quality Assurance Inguinal Hernia Registry [QIHR]) and a consecutive and representative patient cohort of a single surgical practice [Surg-Pract] specialised in hernia surgery. Main results and concluding remarks are discussed in light of data reported in the literature.


RESULTS
Proportions of hernia repair in an outpatient clinic setting were substantially different among the 3 groups (as follows): H-med (22.3 %), QIHR (62.7 %), Surg-Pract (80.5 %) whereas the percentages of ASA-I and -II patients differed only slightly: H-med (83.4 %), QIHR (89.5 %) and Surg-Pract (88.3 %). Recurrency rates after 12 months were 0.6 % (QIHR) and 0.7 % (Surg-Pract), respectively. In Surg-Pract, for 30 % of hernia repairs, "only" suturing for reconstruction was used.


CONCLUSIONS
In ASA-I and -II patients, a substantial proportion of individuals can be surgically treated in an outpatient clinic setting with no disadvantages regarding high surgical quality and favourable outcome. Data from the national H-med indicated a much lower percentage of such patients than internationally reported and, in addition, a disproportionately high rate of endoscopic procedures. Moreover, reimbursement for hernia repair in an outpatient clinic setting is much worse in Germany compared with international standards, and, interestingly, there is by a factor of 1/3 an above average number of hospital beds in Germany compared with the OECD countries.
Spezialisierung Hernienchirurgie, Chirurgische Praxis, Cottbus, Deutschland.
A
A
Koch
R
R
Lorenz
F
F
Meyer
D
D
Weyhe
D000328:Adult; D000556:Ambulatory Surgical Procedures / Q000191:economics; D017046:Cost Savings; D018588:Fee-for-Service Plans / Q000191:economics; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D006552:Hernia, Inguinal / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*; D059685:Herniorrhaphy / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000191:economics; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011331:Private Practice / Q000191:economics; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D012042:Registries; D013526:Surgical Mesh