Evolutionary tradeoffs between economy and effectiveness in biological homeostasis systems.
Biological regulatory systems face a fundamental tradeoff: they must be effective but at the same time also economical. For example, regulatory systems that are designed to repair damage must be effective in reducing damage, but economical in not making too many repair proteins because making excessive proteins carries a fitness cost to the cell, called protein burden. In order to see how biological systems compromise between the two tasks of effectiveness and economy, we applied an approach from economics and engineering called Pareto optimality. This approach allows calculating the best-compromise systems that optimally combine the two tasks. We used a simple and general model for regulation, known as integral feedback, and showed that best-compromise systems have particular combinations of biochemical parameters that control the response rate and basal level. We find that the optimal systems fall on a curve in parameter space. Due to this feature, even if one is able to measure only a small fraction of the system's parameters, one can infer the rest. We applied this approach to estimate parameters in three biological systems: response to heat shock and response to DNA damage in bacteria, and calcium homeostasis in mammals.
Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Pablo
P
Szekely
Hila
H
Sheftel
Avi
A
Mayo
Uri
U
Alon
D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D020013:Calcium Signaling; D002417:Cattle; D019295:Computational Biology; D004260:DNA Repair; D025461:Feedback, Physiological / Q000502:physiology; D018869:Heat-Shock Response; D006706:Homeostasis / Q000502:physiology*; D051379:Mice; D008954:Models, Biological