Non-ideal effects in indentation testing of soft tissues.
Indentation has several advantages as a loading mode for determining constitutive behavior of soft, biological tissues. However, indentation induces a complex, spatially heterogeneous deformation field that creates analytical challenges for the calculation of constitutive parameters. As a result, investigators commonly assume small indentation depths and large sample thicknesses to simplify analysis and then restrict indentation depth and sample geometry to satisfy these assumptions. These restrictions limit experimental resolution in some fields, such as brain biomechanics. However, recent experimental evidence suggests that conventionally applied limits are in fact excessively conservative. We conducted a parametric study of indentation loading with various indenter geometries, surface interface conditions, sample compressibility, sample geometry and indentation depth to quantitatively describe the deviation from previous treatments that results from violation of the assumptions of small indentation depth and large sample thickness. We found that the classical solution was surprisingly robust to violation of the assumption of small strain but highly sensitive to violation of the assumption of large sample thickness, particularly if the indenter was cylindrical. The ramifications of these findings for design of indentation experiments are discussed and correction factors are presented to allow future investigators to account for these effects without recreating our finite element models.
Neurotrauma and Repair Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, 351 Engineering Terrace, 1210 Amsterdam Avenue MC 8904, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
John D
JD
Finan
Patrick M
PM
Fox
Barclay
B
Morrison
D003238:Connective Tissue / Q000502:physiology*; D020342:Finite Element Analysis; D006801:Humans