Comparison of removed dentin thickness with hand and rotary instruments.
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of dentine removed after canal preparation using stainless steel (SS) hand instruments or rotary ProFile instruments.


METHODS
Thirty-six extracted human teeth with root canal curvatures less than 30º were embedded in clear polyester resin. The roots were cut horizontally at apical 2, 4 and 7 mm. Dentin thickness was measured at each section and the sections were accurately reassembled using a muffle. Root canals were randomly prepared by SS hand instruments or rotary ProFile instruments. Root sections were again separated, and the remaining dentin thickness was measured. Mann-Whitney U and t tests were performed for analytic comparison of the results.


RESULTS
The thickness of removed dentin was significantly different between the two used methods (P<0.05). Significantly greater amounts of dentin was removed mesially in all sections in hand instrumentation group (P<0.001).


CONCLUSIONS
ProFile rotary instrumentation prepares root canals with a greater conservation of tooth structure.
Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Shahriar
S
Shahriari
Hasan
H
Abedi
Mahdi
M
Hashemi
Seyed Mohsen
SM
Jalalzadeh
Instrumentation; ProFile; Root canal preparation; Stainless Steel; Technique