title: The use of family history in primary health care: a qualitative study.
abstract: The aim of this study is to describe how Belgian family physicians register and use the family history data of their patients in daily practice. Qualitative in-depth semistructured one-to-one interviews were conducted including 16 family physicians in Belgium. These interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed. Recurring themes were identified and compared with findings from the existing literature. All interviewed family physicians considered the family history as an important part of the medical records. Half of the surveyed physicians confirmed knowing the family history of at least 50% of their patients. The data on family history were mainly collected during the first consultations with the patient. The majority of physicians did not use a standardised questionnaire or form to collect and to record the family history. To estimate the impact of a family history, physicians seldom use official guidance or resources. Physicians perceived a lack of time and unreliable information provided by their patients as obstacles to collect and interpret the family history. Solutions that foster the use of family history data were identified at the level of the physician and also included the development of specific instruments integrated within the electronic medical record.
authors: Department of Family Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
authors: Sarah
authors: S
authors: Daelemans
authors: Jan
authors: J
authors: Vandevoorde
authors: Johan
authors: J
authors: Vansintejan
authors: Liesbeth
authors: L
authors: Borgermans
authors: Dirk
authors: D
authors: Devroey
references: Am J Prev Med. 2003 Feb;24(2):128-35
references: 12568818
references: Fam Pract. 2008 Oct;25(5):334-40
references: 18765407
references: Scand J Caring Sci. 2001;15(2):133-41
references: 12078626
references: BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Feb 17;12:5
references: 21329524
references: Fam Pract. 1999 Feb;16(1):78-83
references: 10321401
references: BMJ. 1999 Nov 27;319(7222):1410-3
references: 10574861
references: Br J Gen Pract. 2010 May;60(574):e221-30
references: 20423577
references: Genet Med. 2008 Feb;10(2):107-13
references: 18281917
references: Acad Med. 2000 Aug;75(8):850-2
references: 10965867
references: Genet Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;1(1):13-21
references: 11261424
references: Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Mar;27(1):84-91
references: 22630335
references: Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Sep;18(9):972-7
references: 20442748
references: Genet Med. 2011 Jan;13(1):21-5
references: 21057319
references: Am J Prev Med. 2004 Oct;27(3):239-45
references: 15450637
references: Genet Med. 2009 Jul;11(7):495-506
references: 19521245
references: Clin Genet. 1999 Jul;56(1):28-34
references: 10466414
references: Genet Med. 2002 Jul-Aug;4(4):304-10
references: 12172397
references: J Genet Couns. 2010 Feb;19(1):84-96
references: 19856089
references: Aust Fam Physician. 2006 Nov;35(11):879-82, 884-5
references: 17099808
references: J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Mar;19(3):273-80
references: 15009784
references: Am J Med Genet. 1997 Aug 22;71(3):315-24
references: 9268102
references: Ann Fam Med. 2004 Mar-Apr;2(2):130-2
references: 15083852
references: Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jul;59(2):223-33
references: 15110415
references: Genet Med. 2003 Mar-Apr;5(2):70-6
references: 12644775
references: BMJ. 2001 Apr 28;322(7293):1052-6
references: 11325775
references: Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(3-4):181-8
references: 22488461