title: Binocular symmetry/asymmetry of scleral redness as a cue for sadness, healthiness, and attractiveness in humans.
abstract: Among primates, only humans have the white sclerae that provide the ground necessary to display their own color and that of the overlying conjunctiva. Scleral color, primarily redness, provides cues of socially and biologically significant information about an individual. The present study examines the effect of the asymmetry of binocular scleral redness on perceived sadness, healthiness, and attractiveness by contrasting ratings of images of individuals who had one, both, or neither sclera reddened by digital editing. Building upon previous research, this study further defines the details of the scleral color display and contributes to the more general issue of facial and body symmetry, predictors of phenotypic condition and genotypic quality that are of interest to evolutionary theorists. Individuals with binocular and monocular redness were rated as sadder, less healthy, and less attractive than those with untinted control sclerae, with ratings corresponding to the degree of redness or whiteness. Bilaterally symmetrical (binocular) scleral redness or whiteness provided anchorage points for ratings, with ratings for bilaterally asymmetrical (monocular) redness or whiteness falling between them; there was no unique effect of asymmetry.
authors: Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. provine@umbc.edu
authors: Robert R
authors: RR
authors: Provine
authors: Marcello O
authors: MO
authors: Cabrera
authors: Jessica
authors: J
authors: Nave-Blodgett
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001504:Beauty; D003116:Color; D003463:Cues; D004644:Emotions; D005260:Female; D056084:Genetic Fitness / Q000502:physiology; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012590:Sclera / Q000502:physiology*; D012938:Social Perception; D055815:Young Adult
references: Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1988 Winter;28(4):294-302
references: 3053488
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Dec 22;274(1629):3113-7
references: 17925281
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Aug 7;268(1476):1617-23
references: 11487409
references: Exp Eye Res. 2004 Mar;78(3):609-23
references: 15106941
references: N Engl J Med. 2000 Aug 3;343(5):345-51
references: 10922425
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Dec;3(12):452-460
references: 10562724
references: Surv Ophthalmol. 1986 Mar-Apr;30(5):298-313
references: 2872731
references: J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Dec;11(12):1728-31
references: 17896166
references: Am Fam Physician. 2004 Jan 15;69(2):299-304
references: 14765767
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 7;270(1526):1759-63
references: 12964976
references: Biol Lett. 2006 Jun 22;2(2):217-21
references: 17148366
references: Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Sep 22;266(1431):1913-7
references: 10535106
references: Arch Ophthalmol. 1961 Jul;66:90-4
references: 13733331
references: PLoS One. 2008 May 07;3(5):e2106
references: 18461131
references: Ophthalmologica. 1975;171(1):82-5
references: 1124206
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jan;10(1):9-13
references: 16311066
references: Hum Nat. 2013 Jun;24(2):126-36
references: 23660975
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jan 7;268(1462):39-44
references: 12123296
references: J Hum Evol. 2001 May;40(5):419-35
references: 11322803
references: Psychol Bull. 2000 May;126(3):390-423
references: 10825783
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:199-226
references: 16318594