title: If you've got it, flaunt it: humans flaunt attractive partners to enhance their status and desirability.
abstract: Mating decisions are influenced by conspecifics' mate choices in many species including humans. Recent research has shown that women are more attracted to men with attractive putative partners than those with less attractive partners. We integrate these findings with traditional accounts of social signaling and test five hypotheses derived from it. In our study, 64 men and 75 women were paired with attractive and unattractive opposite-sex putative partners and asked whether they would prefer to give surveys to peers or to older adults. Consistent with predictions, both men and women wanted to show off (flaunt) attractive partners by administering surveys to peers and both men and women wanted to hide (conceal) unattractive partners from peers by administering surveys to older adults. These decisions were mediated by how participants expected others to evaluate their status and desirability when they administered the surveys, consistent with partners serving a social signaling function in humans.
authors: Department of Psychological Sciences, The University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
authors: Benjamin M
authors: BM
authors: Winegard
authors: Bo
authors: B
authors: Winegard
authors: David C
authors: DC
authors: Geary
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002755:Choice Behavior; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D012747:Sexual Partners; D012928:Social Desirability; D055815:Young Adult
references: Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91
references: 18697684
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Feb;21(2):83-8
references: 16701479
references: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 May;34(5):635-47
references: 18303129
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Apr;100(4):664-80
references: 21038972
references: Evol Psychol. 2012 May 06;10(2):225-37
references: 22947636
references: J Theor Biol. 1975 Sep;53(1):205-14
references: 1195756
references: Curr Biol. 2009 May 12;19(9):730-4
references: 19361993
references: Hum Nat. 2007 Sep;18(3):264-71
references: 26181063
references: Am Nat. 1992 Dec;140(6):1000-9
references: 19426031
references: Evol Hum Behav. 2008 Sep;29(5):327-334
references: 21874105
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Mar 22;274(1611):899-903
references: 17251104