title: Motor cortex neuroplasticity following brachial plexus transfer.
abstract: In the past decade, research has demonstrated that cortical plasticity, once thought only to exist in the early stages of life, does indeed continue on into adulthood. Brain plasticity is now acknowledged as a core principle of brain function and describes the ability of the central nervous system to adapt and modify its structural organization and function as an adaptive response to functional demand. In this clinical case study we describe how we used neuroimaging techniques to observe the functional topographical expansion of a patch of cortex along the sensorimotor cortex of a 27-year-old woman following brachial plexus transfer surgery to re-innervate her left arm. We found bilateral activations present in the thalamus, caudate, insula as well as across the sensorimotor cortex during an elbow flex motor task. In contrast we found less activity in the sensorimotor cortex for a finger tap motor task in addition to activations lateralized to the left inferior frontal gyrus and thalamus and bilaterally for the insula. From a pain perspective the patient who had experienced extensive phantom limb pain (PLP) before surgery found these sensations were markedly reduced following transfer of the right brachial plexus to the intact left arm. Within the context of this clinical case the results suggest that functional improvements in limb mobility are associated with increased activation in the sensorimotor cortex as well as reduced PLP.
authors: Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW , Australia.
authors: Stefan
authors: S
authors: Dimou
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Biggs
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Tonkin
authors: Ian B
authors: IB
authors: Hickie
authors: Jim
authors: J
authors: Lagopoulos
keywords: MRI; brachial plexus transfer; motor cortex; neuroimaging; phantom limb
references: J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 21;30(16):5519-24
references: 20410105
references: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000 Jul;74(1):27-55
references: 10873519
references: Ann Neurol. 1995 Jul;38(1):15-20
references: 7611718
references: Science. 1991 Feb 22;251(4996):944-7
references: 2000496
references: Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Apr 22;263(1369):377-86
references: 8637922
references: J Neurosci. 1996 Jul 15;16(14):4529-35
references: 8699262
references: Neurosurgery. 2012 May;70(5):1305-11; discussion 1311
references: 22513809
references: Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001 Oct;36(2-3):169-74
references: 11690613
references: Exp Brain Res. 1994;100(1):121-32
references: 7813640
references: Neuropsychologia. 1990;28(6):547-54
references: 2395525
references: Nat Neurosci. 1999 Jun;2(6):501-2
references: 10448212
references: Neurocase. 2010 Dec;16(6):461-5
references: 20425663
references: Microsurgery. 2006;26(4):303-10
references: 16671052
references: Neurosci Lett. 1996 Aug 23;214(2-3):191-5
references: 8878116
references: Nature. 1976 Dec 23-30;264(5588):705-12
references: 189195
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Nov;7(11):873-81
references: 17053811
references: Neuroimage. 2003 Dec;20(4):2259-70
references: 14683727
references: Trends Neurosci. 1990 Mar;13(3):88-92
references: 1691874
references: J Rehabil Med. 2003 May;(41 Suppl):66-72
references: 12817660
references: Neurol Res. 2008 Nov;30(9):968-73
references: 18671900
references: Science. 2004 Aug 6;305(5685):875-7
references: 15232072
references: Behav Brain Res. 2001 Sep 14;123(2):133-41
references: 11399326
references: Nature. 1995 Jun 8;375(6531):482-4
references: 7777055
references: Neurosurgery. 2008 Apr;62(4):873-85; discussion 885-6
references: 18496193
references: Neurosurgery. 2007 Apr;60(4):723-32; discussion 732-3
references: 17415210