title: Major clades of Australasian Rutoideae (Rutaceae) based on rbcL and atpB sequences.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Rutaceae subfamily Rutoideae (46 genera, c. 660 species) is diverse in both rainforests and sclerophyll vegetation of Australasia. Australia and New Caledonia are centres of endemism with a number of genera and species distributed disjunctly between the two regions. Our aim was to generate a high-level molecular phylogeny for the Australasian Rutoideae and identify major clades as a framework for assessing morphological and biogeographic patterns and taxonomy.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Phylogenetic analyses were based on chloroplast genes, rbcL and atpB, for 108 samples (78 new here), including 38 of 46 Australasian genera. Results were integrated with those from other molecular studies to produce a supertree for Rutaceae worldwide, including 115 of 154 genera. Australasian clades are poorly matched with existing tribal classifications, and genera Philotheca and Boronia are not monophyletic. Major sclerophyll lineages in Australia belong to two separate clades, each with an early divergence between rainforest and sclerophyll taxa. Dehiscent fruits with seeds ejected at maturity (often associated with myrmecochory) are inferred as ancestral; derived states include woody capsules with winged seeds, samaras, fleshy drupes, and retention and display of seeds in dehisced fruits (the last two states adaptations to bird dispersal, with multiple origins among rainforest genera). Patterns of relationship and levels of sequence divergence in some taxa, mostly species, with bird-dispersed (Acronychia, Sarcomelicope, Halfordia and Melicope) or winged (Flindersia) seeds are consistent with recent long-distance dispersal between Australia and New Caledonia. Other deeper Australian/New Caledonian divergences, some involving ant-dispersed taxa (e.g., Neoschmidia), suggest older vicariance.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This comprehensive molecular phylogeny of the Australasian Rutoideae gives a broad overview of the group's evolutionary and biogeographic history. Deficiencies of infrafamilial classifications of Rutoideae have long been recognised, and our results provide a basis for taxonomic revision and a necessary framework for more focused studies of genera and species.
authors: School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. mbayly@unimelb.edu.au
authors: Michael J
authors: MJ
authors: Bayly
authors: Gareth D
authors: GD
authors: Holmes
authors: Paul I
authors: PI
authors: Forster
authors: David J
authors: DJ
authors: Cantrill
authors: Pauline Y
authors: PY
authors: Ladiges
mesh_terms: D001315:Australia; D005075:Biological Evolution; D005638:Fruit; D061125:Genes, Chloroplast; D009510:New Caledonia; D010641:Phenotype; D010802:Phylogeny; D019666:Rubiaceae / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics*; D012639:Seeds; D014887:Weather
references: Am J Bot. 2008 Dec;95(12):1621-31
references: 21628168
references: Syst Biol. 2008 Apr;57(2):243-50
references: 18398769
references: Am J Bot. 2011 Jan;98(1):76-87
references: 21613086
references: Ann Bot. 2011 Jun;107(8):1259-77
references: 21610209
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Oct 27;363(1508):3309-17
references: 18765357
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Oct 29;359(1450):1551-71
references: 15519972
references: Syst Biol. 2010 Dec;59(6):705-22
references: 20841320
references: Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4
references: 12912839
references: Am J Bot. 2008 Aug;95(8):985-1005
references: 21632420
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Jun;43(3):1106-17
references: 17434758
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Dec 7;272(1580):2535-44
references: 16271980
references: Syst Biol. 2009 Jun;58(3):360-7
references: 20525590
references: Algorithms Mol Biol. 2010 Feb 24;5:18
references: 20181274
references: Am J Bot. 2010 Aug;97(8):1296-303
references: 21616882
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Aug;29(8):1969-73
references: 22367748
references: Syst Biol. 2012 Mar;61(2):289-313
references: 22201158
references: Nature. 1999 Nov 25;402(6760):402-4
references: 10586878
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Mar 7;268(1466):459-69
references: 11296857
references: Syst Biol. 2012 Jul;61(4):703-8
references: 22234419
references: Am J Bot. 2005 Apr;92(4):667-73
references: 21652444
references: Am J Bot. 2009 Mar;96(3):668-85
references: 21628223
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Dec;49(3):736-48
references: 18824111
references: Am J Bot. 1999 Aug;86(8):1191-9
references: 10449399