title: Measurement of self-monitoring web technology acceptance and use in an e-health weight-loss trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Research on technology acceptance and use in e-health weight-loss interventions is limited. Using data from a randomized controlled trial of two e-health interventions, we evaluated the acceptance and use of a self-monitoring Web site for weight loss.
  
  
  METHODS
  We examined eight theoretical constructs about technology acceptance using adapted 5-point Likert scales and the association of measured Web site usage and weight loss.
  
  
  RESULTS
  All scales had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.74-0.97) in both interventions and at 3 and 15 months (end of intensive and maintenance intervention, respectively). From 3 to 15 months mean scores changed unfavorably for two constructs (compatibility and behavioral intention) among coach-led intervention participants, who received ongoing feedback on their self-monitoring entries. Among self-directed intervention participants, who received minimal coach support, mean scores changed unfavorably for five constructs (usefulness, ease of use, concern, compatibility, and behavioral intention). At 3 months, usefulness, ease of use, effect, compatibility, and behavioral intention in the coach-led group (Pearson r=0.33-0.5) and usefulness and affect in the self-directed group (r=0.43-0.46) were significantly correlated with Web site usage, which was correlated with weight loss (β=-0.02, p≤0.001 for both interventions). From 3 to 15 months, mean score changes for usefulness and behavioral intention correlated significantly with Web site usage in the coach-led group.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The adapted acceptance measures showed acceptable psychometric properties and significant associations with actual Web site use, which correlated with weight loss. Better understanding of technology acceptance and use in e-health weight-loss interventions may improve participant adherence and outcome.
authors: 1 Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute , Palo Alto, California.
authors: Jun
authors: J
authors: Ma
authors: Lan
authors: L
authors: Xiao
authors: Andrea C
authors: AC
authors: Blonstein
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001292:Attitude to Computers; D003258:Consumer Behavior; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011594:Psychometrics; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012648:Self Care; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires / Q000592:standards; D061217:Weight Reduction Programs
references: Obes Rev. 2011 May;12(5):e236-43
references: 20804523
references: Ann Intern Med. 2001 Jan 2;134(1):1-11
references: 11187414
references: Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6):505-11
references: 19944916
references: Obes Rev. 2010 Apr;11(4):306-21
references: 19754633
references: Am J Prev Med. 2007 Oct;33(4):336-345
references: 17888860
references: J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Jan;111(1):92-102
references: 21185970
references: J Med Internet Res. 2010 Jul 27;12(3):e29
references: 20663751
references: JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):491-7
references: 22253363
references: Circulation. 2005 Oct 25;112(17):2735-52
references: 16157765
references: Telemed J E Health. 2011 Sep;17(7):509-23
references: 21718092
references: JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jan 28;173(2):113-21
references: 23229846
references: BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Nov 12;10:71
references: 19909549
references: Lancet. 2009 Nov 14;374(9702):1677-86
references: 19878986
references: J Health Commun. 2002 Jul-Sep;7(4):267-72
references: 12356287
references: Ann Behav Med. 2009 Aug;38(1):18-27
references: 19802647
references: N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 7;346(6):393-403
references: 11832527