title: Cross-modal associations between vision, touch, and audition influence visual search through top-down attention, not bottom-up capture.
abstract: Recently, Guzman-Martinez, Ortega, Grabowecky, Mossbridge, and Suzuki (Current Biology : CB, 22(5), 383-388, 2012) reported that observers could systematically match auditory amplitude modulations and tactile amplitude modulations to visual spatial frequencies, proposing that these cross-modal matches produced automatic attentional effects. Using a series of visual search tasks, we investigated whether informative auditory, tactile, or bimodal cues can guide attention toward a visual Gabor of matched spatial frequency (among others with different spatial frequencies). These cues improved visual search for some but not all frequencies. Auditory cues improved search only for the lowest and highest spatial frequencies, whereas tactile cues were more effective and frequency specific, although less effective than visual cues. Importantly, although tactile cues could produce efficient search when informative, they had no effect when uninformative. This suggests that cross-modal frequency matching occurs at a cognitive rather than sensory level and, therefore, influences visual search through voluntary, goal-directed behavior, rather than automatic attentional capture.
authors: School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia, emily.orchardmills@sydney.edu.au.
authors: Emily
authors: E
authors: Orchard-Mills
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Alais
authors: Erik
authors: E
authors: Van der Burg
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D014110:Touch / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult