title: Four-year cumulative radiation exposure in patients undergoing computed tomography angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism.
abstract: Purpose. The objective of this study was to determine the estimated effective radiation dose of pulmonary CT angiography (CTA) for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) contributing to total medical radiation exposure over a 4-year period. Materials and Methods. This investigation retrospectively reviewed 300 patients who presented to the emergency department and received a pulmonary CTA scan for suspected PE. We evaluated these patients' electronic medical record to determine their estimated radiation exposure to CT scans during the following four years. Using DLP to E conversion coefficients, we calculated the cumulative effective radiation dose each subject received. Results. A total of 900 CT scans were reviewed in this study. Pulmonary CTA delivered an average effective radiation dose of 10.7 ± 2.5 mSv and accounted for approximately 65% of subjects' 4-year cumulative medical radiation dose. Only 6.3% of subjects had a positive acute PE according to their radiology report. Conclusion. Pulmonary CTA accounted for the majority of subjects' medically related effective radiation dose over a 4-year period. With only a minority of subjects having positive findings for acute PE, increased efforts should be made to clinically assess pretest probability before the consideration of imaging.
authors: John A. Burns School of Medicine at the University of Hawaii, 651 Ilalo Street Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
authors: Edwin A
authors: EA
authors: Takahashi
authors: Hyo-Chun
authors: HC
authors: Yoon
references: Thromb Haemost. 2000 Mar;83(3):416-20
references: 10744147
references: Arch Surg. 2001 May;136(5):505-11
references: 11343539
references: Singapore Med J. 2009 Apr;50(4):403-6
references: 19421686
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug;191(2):471-4
references: 18647919
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Nov;197(5):1170-4
references: 22021511
references: Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;30(2):325-30
references: 21277141
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jan;184(1):264-7
references: 15615986
references: Eur Radiol. 2004 Jan;14(1):93-8
references: 12942280
references: Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2071-7
references: 20008689
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 25;100(24):13761-6
references: 14610281
references: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Oct;28(7):1799-805
references: 22228471
references: J Thromb Haemost. 2008 Jul;6(7):1059-71
references: 18419743
references: Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:125-7
references: 21468171
references: J Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;43(2):211-20
references: 21764536
references: Perm J. 2009 Fall;13(4):4-10
references: 20740096
references: Semin Nucl Med. 2008 Nov;38(6):418-31
references: 19331836
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jun;198(6):1332-9
references: 22623545
references: Thromb Res. 2010 Jun;125(6):518-22
references: 20451960
references: N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 1;354(22):2317-27
references: 16738268
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Mar;196(3):497-515
references: 21343491
references: N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):1-4
references: 20573919
references: Int J Hematol. 2008 Apr;87(3):250-5
references: 18283526
references: Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2009 Sep;15(5):425-9
references: 19465853
references: Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2078-86
references: 20008690