title: Self-Associations Influence Task-Performance through Bayesian Inference.
abstract: The way we think about ourselves impacts greatly on our behavior. This paper describes a behavioral study and a computational model that shed new light on this important area. Participants were primed "clever" and "stupid" using a scrambled sentence task, and we measured the effect on response time and error-rate on a rule-association task. First, we observed a confirmation bias effect in that associations to being "stupid" led to a gradual decrease in performance, whereas associations to being "clever" did not. Second, we observed that the activated self-concepts selectively modified attention toward one's performance. There was an early to late double dissociation in RTs in that primed "clever" resulted in RT increase following error responses, whereas primed "stupid" resulted in RT increase following correct responses. We propose a computational model of subjects' behavior based on the logic of the experimental task that involves two processes; memory for rules and the integration of rules with subsequent visual cues. The model incorporates an adaptive decision threshold based on Bayes rule, whereby decision thresholds are increased if integration was inferred to be faulty. Fitting the computational model to experimental data confirmed our hypothesis that priming affects the memory process. This model explains both the confirmation bias and double dissociation effects and demonstrates that Bayesian inferential principles can be used to study the effect of self-concepts on behavior.
authors: Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute , Stockholm , Sweden.
authors: Sara L
authors: SL
authors: Bengtsson
authors: Will D
authors: WD
authors: Penny
keywords: Bayesian; cognitive control; computational model; normative model; priming; rule task; self-esteem
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Apr;7(4):268-77
references: 16552413
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Aug;71(2):230-44
references: 8765481
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Apr;74(4):865-77
references: 9569649
references: Nature. 1966 Oct 22;212(5060):438
references: 5970176
references: Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jun;14(6):647-54
references: 15084488
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 12;99(23):15238-43
references: 12417766
references: Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):1188-200
references: 18973817
references: Nat Neurosci. 2011 Oct 09;14(11):1475-9
references: 21983684
references: Cereb Cortex. 2009 Apr;19(4):797-804
references: 18660499
references: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2001 Jun;1(2):137-60
references: 12467110
references: Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;113(4):700-65
references: 17014301
references: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(3):220-47
references: 15454347
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Sep;59(3):538-49
references: 2231284
references: Neural Comput. 2009 Jun;21(6):1520-53
references: 19191595
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Jun;35(3):700-17
references: 19485686
references: Cognition. 2009 May;111(2):275-9
references: 19285310
references: Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 May 27;5:48
references: 21647306
references: Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):429-33
references: 11807554
references: Dev Psychol. 2006 Mar;42(2):381-90
references: 16569175
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Dec;35(6):1865-97
references: 19968441
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Dec;4(12):e1000254
references: 19112488
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Oct;51(4):858-66
references: 3783430
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Jan 1;5(1):10-16
references: 11164731
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 May;50(5):1039-44
references: 3712228
references: J Neurosci. 2006 Oct 25;26(43):11239-47
references: 17065463
references: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Sep;6(4):417-25
references: 20551143
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Jul 1;14(5):785-94
references: 12167262
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Sep;83(3):711-24
references: 12219864
references: Nature. 2004 Jan 15;427(6971):244-7
references: 14724638
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Sep;18(9):1586-94
references: 16989558
references: BMC Med. 2009 Sep 11;7:46
references: 19747369
references: Psychol Rev. 2000 Apr;107(2):261-88
references: 10789197
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 2;31(5):1780-9
references: 21289188