title: What role do plain radiographs have in assessing the skeletally immature acromioclavicular joint?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Because of incomplete ossification of the coracoid process and acromion, acromioclavicular joint configuration in the skeletally immature patient differs from that of adults. Although comparison to radiographic standards for this joint is critical in the evaluation of acromioclavicular joint injuries, these standards are not well defined for children or adolescents.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  We therefore sought to determine (1) the reliability of numerous radiographic measurements of the skeletally immature acromioclavicular joint, including the vertical and shortest coracoclavicular interval, and the acromioclavicular joint offset; (2) the timing of ossification of the acromion and coracoid in males and females; and (3) the differences in the values of these radiographic measurements based on age and sex.
  
  
  METHODS
  This study was based on a total of 485 subjects, 8 to 18 years old, who underwent conventional AP view radiographs of both shoulders. The 485 subjects were included to assess normal configuration around the acromioclavicular joint and 466 of these subjects were evaluated for comparison between both sides. The vertical and shortest coracoclavicular interval, coracoclavicular clavicle width ratio, acromioclavicular joint offset, and difference of the coracoclavicular interval of both sides were measured. A reliability test was conducted before obtaining the main measurements. The relationship of measurements with sex, age, and stage of ossification was evaluated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The vertical and shortest coracoclavicular interval showed excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ([ICC], 0.918 and 0.934). The acromioclavicular joint offset showed low reliability (ICC, 0.543). The ossification centers of the acromion and the coracoid processes appeared and fused earlier in females than in males. The vertical coracoclavicular interval, which was not affected by partial ossification of the coracoid process, was less than 11 mm in the 90% quantile of total subjects in males and 10 mm in the 90% quantile in females. The difference of the vertical coracoclavicular interval of both sides was less than 50% in 436 of 466 (93.4%) patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The vertical coracoclavicular interval was the best parameter to assess acromioclavicular joint dislocation in skeletally immature patients. Comparison of both sides of the acromioclavicular joint could help to inform physicians in predicting the need for additional evaluations.
authors: Seung Yeol
authors: SY
authors: Lee
authors: Soon-Sun
authors: SS
authors: Kwon
authors: Chin Youb
authors: CY
authors: Chung
authors: Kyoung Min
authors: KM
authors: Lee
authors: Moon Seok
authors: MS
authors: Park
mesh_terms: D000173:Acromioclavicular Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000254:growth & development; D000293:Adolescent; D000367:Age Factors; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011859:Radiography; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012737:Sex Factors
references: Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1971 Jul;112(3):493-506
references: 5570359
references: Am J Sports Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2072-7
references: 22707749
references: Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
references: 18839484
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Nov;89(11):2504-7
references: 17974895
references: Am J Sports Med. 1991 Nov-Dec;19(6):644-6
references: 1781505
references: Stat Med. 2002 May 15;21(9):1331-5
references: 12111881
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Mar;(432):41-8
references: 15738802
references: Am J Sports Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):316-29
references: 17251175
references: J Sports Med. 1973;1(4):5-17
references: 4806603
references: Acta Orthop Scand. 1983 Jun;54(3):431-3
references: 6858662
references: Clin Orthop Surg. 2012 Jun;4(2):149-55
references: 22662301
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jul 21;92(8):1732-7
references: 20660236
references: N Engl J Med. 1949 Aug 11;241(6):221-5
references: 18138673