title: The maintenance of sex: Ronald Fisher meets the Red Queen.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Sex in higher diploids carries a two-fold cost of males that should reduce its fitness relative to cloning, and result in its extinction. Instead, sex is widespread and clonal species face early obsolescence. One possible reason is that sex is an adaptation that allows organisms to respond more effectively to endless changes in their environment. The purpose of this study was to model mutation and selection in a diploid organism in an evolving environment and ascertain their support for sex.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We used a computational approach to model finite populations where a haploid environment subjects a diploid host to endlessly evolving change. Evolution in both populations is primarily through adoption of novel advantageous mutations within a large allele space. Sex outcompetes cloning by two complementary mechanisms. First, sexual diploids adopt advantageous homozygous mutations more rapidly than clonal ones under conditions of lag load (the gap between the actual adaptation of the diploid population and its theoretical optimum). This rate advantage can offset the higher fecundity of cloning. Second, a relative advantage to sex emerges where populations are significantly polymorphic, because clonal polymorphism runs the risk of clonal interference caused by selection on numerous lines of similar adaptation. This interference extends allele lifetime and reduces the rate of adaptation. Sex abolishes the interference, making selection faster and elevating population fitness. Differences in adaptation between sexual and clonal populations increase markedly with the number of loci under selection, the rate of mutation in the host, and a rapidly evolving environment. Clonal interference in these circumstances leads to conditions where the greater fecundity of clones is unable to offset their poor adaptation. Sexual and clonal populations then either co-exist, or sex emerges as the more stable evolutionary strategy.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Sex can out-compete clones in a rapidly evolving environment, such as that characterized by pathogens, where clonal interference reduces the adaptation of clonal populations and clones adopt advantageous mutations more slowly. Since all organisms carry parasitic loads, the model is of potentially general applicability.
authors: Department of Anatomy, University of Otago Medical School, Great King Street, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. david.green@anatomy.otago.ac.nz.
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Green
authors: Chris
authors: C
authors: Mason
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004171:Diploidy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008954:Models, Biological; D009154:Mutation; D059645:Mutation Rate; D012098:Reproduction; D012723:Sex
references: Nature. 2003 Mar 27;422(6930):428-33
references: 12660783
references: Nature. 2009 Nov 19;462(7271):350-2
references: 19847164
references: Nature. 2008 May 29;453(7195):615-9
references: 18418375
references: Science. 2013 Mar 29;339(6127):1578-82
references: 23413192
references: Science. 2004 Jul 16;305(5682):371-6
references: 15218094
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 May;87(9):3566-73
references: 2185476
references: Trends Genet. 2012 Oct;28(10):480-6
references: 22867968
references: Science. 2011 Jul 8;333(6039):216-8
references: 21737739
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Mar 30;12:43
references: 22462622
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 May 22;274(1615):1301-7
references: 17360283
references: Hum Immunol. 2008 Jul;69(7):443-64
references: 18638659
references: Nature. 2009 Oct 29;461(7268):1243-7
references: 19838166
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan;39(1):e4
references: 20959296
references: Am Nat. 2009 Jul;174 Suppl 1:S1-S14
references: 19441962
references: Genetics. 2005 Mar;169(3):1553-71
references: 15545656
references: J Hered. 2010 Mar-Apr;101 Suppl 1:S13-20
references: 20421322
references: Annu Rev Genet. 1976;10:253-80
references: 797310
references: Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):127-44
references: 9720276
references: Nature. 1989 May 25;339(6222):300-1
references: 2725643
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jan 7;270(1510):19-28
references: 12590767
references: Bull Math Biol. 2002 Nov;64(6):1033-43
references: 12508529
references: J Theor Biol. 1982 Feb 21;94(4):905-8
references: 7078231
references: Evolution. 1992 Jun;46(3):775-782
references: 28568655
references: J Theor Biol. 1971 Feb;30(2):319-35
references: 5548029
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Aug 21;12:152
references: 22909344
references: Science. 1998 Sep 25;281(5385):1986-90
references: 9748151
references: Am Nat. 2009 Jul;174 Suppl 1:S43-53
references: 19441961
references: PLoS Biol. 2012;10(5):e1001317
references: 22563299