title: Comparative evaluation of microtensile bond strength of different solvent based one step and two step adhesive systems to dentin. An in-vitro study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare and evaluate the micro tensile bond strength of different solvent based one step and two step adhesive systems to dentin.
  
  
  METHODS
  Sixty recently extracted human mandibular premolars were subjected for the study and divided into 4 groups of fifteen each. The adhesive materials Single Bond, Prime and Bond XP, Clearfil S3 Bond and G-Bond were applied to flat dentin surfaces according to the manufacturer's instructions. After resin composite build up, teeth were sectioned to obtain beams with an approximate cross sectional area of 2 mm(2) and stressed to failure. Data were analysed statistically by ANOVA and student Neuman Keuls multiple comparison tests.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The study demonstrated that Single Bond has better bond strength to dentin compared to the other adhesive systems.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Ethanol and water based two-step adhesive Single Bond exhibited significantly higher microtensile bond strength values to dentin among all the adhesive systems tested.
authors: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dental Sciences, Davangere, India.
authors: Pavithra
authors: P
authors: Somasundaram
authors: Roshan
authors: R
authors: Uthappa
authors: Vinay
authors: V
authors: Shivgange
authors: Gb
authors: G
authors: Shivamurthy
authors: Vasundhara
authors: V
authors: Shivanna
keywords: Clearfil S3; G-Bond; Prime and Bond XP; Single-Bond; microtensile bond strength; tertiary butanol
references: Am J Dent. 2001 Feb;14(1):31-3
references: 11806477
references: J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Jul;32(7):531-40
references: 15975134
references: Am J Dent. 2001 Dec;14(6):340-3
references: 11949791
references: J Adhes Dent. 2006 Dec;8(6):367-73
references: 17243593
references: Oper Dent. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):215-35
references: 12760693
references: Pediatr Dent. 2005 Nov-Dec;27(6):457-62
references: 16532885
references: J Conserv Dent. 2010 Jul;13(3):116-8
references: 21116383
references: J Conserv Dent. 2012 Oct;15(4):383-7
references: 23112489
references: J Conserv Dent. 2011 Jan;14(1):62-7
references: 21691509
references: J Dent. 2008 Feb;36(2):163-9
references: 18248872
references: Oper Dent. 2008 Sep-Oct;33(5):534-49
references: 18833860
references: Am J Dent. 2000 Feb;13(1):44-50
references: 11763902
references: J Adhes Dent. 2005 Spring;7(1):57-64
references: 15892365
references: Oper Dent. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):25-32
references: 16536190
references: J Adhes Dent. 2001 Fall;3(3):237-45
references: 11803711
references: J Adhes Dent. 2007 Jun;9(3):291-6
references: 17655068