title: High and distinct range-edge genetic diversity despite local bottlenecks.
abstract: The genetic consequences of living on the edge of distributional ranges have been the subject of a largely unresolved debate. Populations occurring along persistent low latitude ranges (rear-edge) are expected to retain high and unique genetic diversity. In contrast, currently less favourable environmental conditions limiting population size at such range-edges may have caused genetic erosion that prevails over past historical effects, with potential consequences on reducing future adaptive capacity. The present study provides an empirical test of whether population declines towards a peripheral range might be reflected on decreasing diversity and increasing population isolation and differentiation. We compare population genetic differentiation and diversity with trends in abundance along a latitudinal gradient towards the peripheral distribution range of Saccorhiza polyschides, a large brown seaweed that is the main structural species of kelp forests in SW Europe. Signatures of recent bottleneck events were also evaluated to determine whether the recently recorded distributional shifts had a negative influence on effective population size. Our findings show decreasing population density and increasing spatial fragmentation and local extinctions towards the southern edge. Genetic data revealed two well supported groups with a central contact zone. As predicted, higher differentiation and signs of bottlenecks were found at the southern edge region. However, a decrease in genetic diversity associated with this pattern was not verified. Surprisingly, genetic diversity increased towards the edge despite bottlenecks and much lower densities, suggesting that extinctions and recolonizations have not strongly reduced diversity or that diversity might have been even higher there in the past, a process of shifting genetic baselines.
authors: Centro de Ciências do Mar do Algarve, CIMAR-Laboratório Associado, University of Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, Faro, Portugal. jorgemfa@gmail.com
authors: Jorge
authors: J
authors: Assis
authors: Nelson
authors: N
authors: Castilho Coelho
authors: Filipe
authors: F
authors: Alberto
authors: Myriam
authors: M
authors: Valero
authors: Pete
authors: P
authors: Raimondi
authors: Dan
authors: D
authors: Reed
authors: Ester Alvares
authors: EA
authors: Serrão
mesh_terms: D044822:Biodiversity; D005060:Europe; D014644:Genetic Variation; D018895:Microsatellite Repeats; D000459:Phaeophyceae / Q000235:genetics*; D058974:Phylogeography; D011156:Population Density; D011157:Population Dynamics
references: J Phycol. 2009 Apr;45(2):436-43
references: 27033822
references: Mol Ecol. 2005 Jul;14(8):2611-20
references: 15969739
references: Science. 2008 Jul 4;321(5885):96
references: 18599779
references: Genetics. 1997 Apr;145(4):1219-28
references: 9093870
references: Science. 2002 Nov 1;298(5595):1015-7
references: 12411702
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Oct;11(10):413-8
references: 21237900
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Dec;53(3):679-93
references: 19647087
references: Mol Ecol. 2012 Feb;21(4):851-61
references: 22221402
references: Mol Ecol. 2006 Oct;15(12):3515-25
references: 17032254
references: Nature. 2003 Jan 2;421(6918):37-42
references: 12511946
references: Mol Ecol. 2008 Mar;17(5):1170-88
references: 18302683
references: Ecology. 2010 Jan;91(1):49-56
references: 20380195
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Sep;21(9):524-30
references: 16815588
references: Annu Rev Physiol. 2005;67:177-201
references: 15709956
references: Evolution. 1997 Apr;51(2):354-362
references: 28565367
references: J Phycol. 2011 Aug;47(4):894-903
references: 27020024
references: Heredity (Edinb). 2004 Nov;93(5):504-9
references: 15292911
references: Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):461-7
references: 21352449
references: J Hered. 2009 May-Jun;100(3):394-7
references: 19126639
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Nov;8(11):409-13
references: 21236213
references: Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Mar;8(2):406-8
references: 21585804
references: Evolution. 1997 Feb;51(1):21-28
references: 28568782
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 16;104(42):16576-80
references: 17913882
references: Mol Ecol. 2007 Jun;16(12):2450-62
references: 17561905
references: New Phytol. 2008;180(2):534-544
references: 18694448
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Jun 06;12:78
references: 22672720
references: J Phycol. 2012 Dec;48(6):1374-9
references: 27009989
references: Am J Bot. 2008 May;95(5):542-8
references: 21632380
references: Mol Ecol. 2001 Feb;10(2):305-18
references: 11298947
references: Genetics. 1996 Dec;144(4):2001-14
references: 8978083
references: Mar Genomics. 2011 Mar;4(1):41-9
references: 21429464
references: Mol Ecol. 2010 Nov;19(21):4812-22
references: 20958817
references: Biotechniques. 2001 Dec;31(6):1320-4
references: 11768661
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 Jun;9(6):223-7
references: 21236827
references: Mol Ecol. 2003 Jul;12(7):1817-29
references: 12803634
references: J Phycol. 2011 Apr;47(2):244-51
references: 27021856
references: New Phytol. 2003 Nov;160(2):349-358
references: 33832171
references: Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):479-91
references: 1644282
references: Cancer Res. 1967 Feb;27(2):209-20
references: 6018555
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Mar 7;278(1706):649-55
references: 20843850
references: Am J Hum Genet. 1967 May;19(3 Pt 1):233-57
references: 6026583
references: Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59
references: 10835412
references: Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370
references: 28563791
references: BMC Biol. 2013 Jan 23;11:6
references: 23342999
references: Mol Ecol. 2012 Apr;21(7):1647-57
references: 22369278