title: Sport and team differences on baseline measures of sport-related concussion.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  With the advent of the National Collegiate Athletic Association's (NCAA's) mandating the presence and practice of concussion-management plans in collegiate athletic programs, institutions will consider potential approaches for concussion management, including both baseline and normative comparison approaches.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To examine sport and team differences in baseline performance on a computer-based neurocognitive measure and 2 standard sideline measures of cognition and balance and to determine the potential effect of premorbid factors sex and height on baseline performance.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cross-sectional study.
  
  
  METHODS
  University laboratory.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 437 NCAA Division II student-athletes (males = 273, females = 164; age = 19.61 ± 1.64 years, height = 69.89 ± 4.04 inches [177.52 ± 10.26 cm]) were recruited during mandatory preseason testing conducted in a concussion-management program.
  
  
  METHODS
  The computerized Concussion Resolution Index (CRI), the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (Form A; SAC), and the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Players on the men's basketball team tended to perform worse on the baseline measures, whereas soccer players tended to perform better. We found a difference in total BESS scores between these sports (P = .002). We saw a difference between sports on the hard-surface portion of the BESS (F6,347 = 3.33, P = .003, ηp(2) = 0.05). No sport, team, or sex differences were found with SAC scores (P > .05). We noted differences between sports and teams in the CRI indices, with basketball, particularly the men's team, performing worse than soccer (P < .001) and softball/baseball (P = .03). When sex and height were considered as possible sources of variation in BESS and CRI team or sport differences, height was a covariate for the team (F1,385 = 5.109, P = .02, ηp(2) = 0.013) and sport (F1,326 = 11.212, P = .001, ηp(2) = 0.033) analyses, but the interaction of sex and sport on CRI indices was not significant in any test (P > .05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Given that differences in neurocognitive functioning and performance among sports and teams exist, the comparison of posttraumatic and baseline assessment may lead to more accurate diagnoses of concussion and safer return-to-participation decision making than the use of normative comparisons.
authors: School of Psychology, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne.
authors: Adam
authors: A
authors: Zimmer
authors: Kyle
authors: K
authors: Piecora
authors: Danielle
authors: D
authors: Schuster
authors: Frank
authors: F
authors: Webbe
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D056352:Athletes / Q000523:psychology; D001265:Athletic Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis*; D001924:Brain Concussion / Q000175:diagnosis*; D003071:Cognition; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005080:Exercise Test; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D038223:Post-Concussion Syndrome / Q000175:diagnosis*; D004856:Postural Balance / Q000502:physiology; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012737:Sex Factors; D013177:Sports; D013334:Students; D014495:Universities; D055815:Young Adult
references: J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1998 Apr;13(2):27-35
references: 9575254
references: Clin J Sport Med. 2009 Nov;19(6):471-5
references: 19898074
references: JAMA. 2003 Nov 19;290(19):2556-63
references: 14625332
references: Neurosurgery. 2000 Sep;47(3):659-69; discussion 669-72
references: 10981754
references: Pediatrics. 2010 Sep;126(3):597-615
references: 20805152
references: J Athl Train. 2009 Sep-Oct;44(5):497-502
references: 19771288
references: Clin Sports Med. 2011 Jan;30(1):89-102, ix
references: 21074084
references: Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 Apr;18(3):293-316
references: 14591461
references: J Athl Train. 2000 Jan;35(1):19-25
references: 16558603
references: J Athl Train. 2007 Oct-Dec;42(4):515-23
references: 18174940
references: Clin Sports Med. 2011 Jan;30(1):49-61, viii
references: 21074081
references: J Athl Train. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):42-6
references: 17597942
references: Br J Sports Med. 2009 May;43 Suppl 1:i76-90
references: 19433429
references: J Athl Train. 2004 Sep;39(3):280-297
references: 15514697
references: Br J Sports Med. 2006 Nov;40(11):923-7; discussion 927
references: 16990442
references: J Athl Train. 2001 Sep;36(3):280-287
references: 12937497
references: Clin J Sport Med. 2001 Jul;11(3):182-9
references: 11495323
references: Clin J Sport Med. 2004 Jan;14(1):18-24
references: 14712162
references: J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009 Winter;21(1):43-51
references: 19359451
references: Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 Jan;18(1):91-101
references: 14591481
references: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001 Sep;7(6):693-702
references: 11575591
references: Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Nov;22(8):909-16
references: 17988831