title: Females paired with new and heavy mates reduce intra-clutch differences in resource allocation.
abstract: Reproductive investment affects both offspring and parental fitness and influences the evolution of life histories. Females may vary their overall primary reproductive effort in relation to the phenotypic characteristics of their mate. However, the effects of male quality on differential resource allocation within clutches have been largely neglected despite the potential implications for mate choice and population dynamics, especially in species exhibiting biparental care and brood reduction. Female southern rockhopper penguins Eudyptes chrysocome paired with heavy mates reduced intra-clutch variation in egg and albumen masses. Females paired with new mates also reduced intra-clutch variation in yolk androgen levels. Since both an increased mass and increased androgen concentrations positively influence chick survival under sibling competition, the chances of fledging the whole clutch are likely to be higher for newly formed pairs with heavy males than for previously formed pairs with light males. Interestingly, total clutch provisioning did not vary with male quality. We show for the first time that females vary intra-clutch variation in resource allocation according to male quality. In species with brood reduction, it may be more adaptive for females to modulate the distribution of resources within the clutch according to breeding conditions, than to change their total clutch provisioning.
authors: Department of Biology - Ethology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium. maud.poisbleau@ua.ac.be
authors: Maud
authors: M
authors: Poisbleau
authors: Nina
authors: N
authors: Dehnhard
authors: Laurent
authors: L
authors: Demongin
authors: Charline
authors: C
authors: Parenteau
authors: Petra
authors: P
authors: Quillfeldt
authors: Marcel
authors: M
authors: Eens
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D001835:Body Weight; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D009425:Nesting Behavior; D012098:Reproduction; D046429:Spheniscidae
references: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005 Apr;29(2):329-52
references: 15811503
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Feb 7;279(1728):523-8
references: 21733898
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 22;269(1495):1005-9
references: 12028756
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 7;268(1482):2229-34
references: 11674870
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Jan 7;279(1726):163-70
references: 21632630
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e42174
references: 22860073
references: Biol Lett. 2011 Aug 23;7(4):605-7
references: 21325311
references: J Comp Physiol B. 2003 Jun;173(4):327-31
references: 12677460
references: Evolution. 1991 Aug;45(5):1162-1168
references: 28564166
references: Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Oct 22;266(1433):2101-7
references: 10902545
references: Evolution. 1990 Mar;44(2):279-294
references: 28564384
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27765
references: 22110758
references: Anim Behav. 1997 Dec;54(6):1475-1482
references: 9794773
references: Ecology. 2008 Aug;89(8):2315-24
references: 18724741
references: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1994 Feb;69(1):35-59
references: 8193216
references: Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011 Feb 1;170(3):622-8
references: 21130090
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jul 22;267(1451):1451-6
references: 10983830
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Jun;1046:168-80
references: 16055850
references: J Evol Biol. 2006 May;19(3):981-93
references: 16674593
references: Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2008 Aug;158(1):5-9
references: 18577385
references: Curr Biol. 1999 Jul 1;9(13):R487-9
references: 10395531
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Oct 1;15(10):397-402
references: 10998516
references: Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1999 Aug;115(2):220-7
references: 10417235
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jan 7;278(1702):99-106
references: 20667883
references: Nature. 2000 Mar 2;404(6773):74-7
references: 10716444
references: Horm Behav. 2009 Apr;55(4):500-6
references: 19232349
references: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 Feb;77(1):1-26
references: 11911371
references: Evolution. 1990 Nov;44(7):1780-1786
references: 28567813
references: Toxicol Sci. 2006 Jan;89(1):173-87
references: 16221957