title: Through your eyes: incongruence of gaze and action increases spontaneous perspective taking.
abstract: What makes people spontaneously adopt the perspective of others? Previous work suggested that perspective taking can serve understanding the actions of others. Two studies corroborate and extend that interpretation. The first study varied cues to intentionality of eye gaze and action, and found that the more the actor was perceived as potentially interacting with the objects, the stronger the tendency to take his perspective. The second study investigated how manipulations of gaze affect the tendency to adopt the perspective of another reaching for an object. Eliminating gaze cues by blurring the actor's face did not reduce perspective-taking, suggesting that in the absence of gaze information, observers rely entirely on the action. Intriguingly, perspective-taking was higher when gaze and action did not signal the same intention, suggesting that in presence of ambiguous behavioral intention, people are more likely take the other's perspective to try to understand the action.
authors: Department of Psychology, Center for Cognitive Science, University of Torino Torino, Italy.
authors: Tiziano
authors: T
authors: Furlanetto
authors: Andrea
authors: A
authors: Cavallo
authors: Valeria
authors: V
authors: Manera
authors: Barbara
authors: B
authors: Tversky
authors: Cristina
authors: C
authors: Becchio
keywords: action; agency; ambiguous intention; gaze; incongruous cues; spontaneous perspective taking
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jul;4(7):267-278
references: 10859571
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1156:97-117
references: 19338505
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(12):2447-60
references: 22901326
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Dec;18(12):2130-7
references: 17129195
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct;36(5):1255-66
references: 20731512
references: J Neurosci. 2001 Sep 1;21(17):6917-32
references: 11517279
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:47-73
references: 16903802
references: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 01;6:117
references: 22557961
references: J Neurosci. 2010 May 26;30(21):7202-14
references: 20505087
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1490-500
references: 19803652
references: Emotion. 2011 Jun;11(3):681-6
references: 21534666
references: Cognition. 2009 May;111(2):212-8
references: 19296931
references: Soc Neurosci. 2008;3(1):51-9
references: 18633846
references: Nature. 2006 Jan 26;439(7075):466-9
references: 16421576
references: Exp Brain Res. 2007 May;179(3):427-42
references: 17171337
references: Biol Lett. 2010 Dec 23;6(6):758-61
references: 20573616
references: Cognition. 2010 Oct;117(1):101-5
references: 20696424
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36390
references: 22693550
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):441-62
references: 24049785
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Dec;16(6):1089-93
references: 19966260
references: Cognition. 2009 Jan;110(1):124-9
references: 19056081
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jul;12(7):254-8
references: 18555735