title: Sterilization of rural and urban women in the United States.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To examine the prevalence of sterilization among women aged 20-34 years in rural and urban areas in the United States.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data were obtained from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth, a cross-sectional survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The study population included the 4,685 female respondents who did not want to become pregnant at the time of the survey. Women who were not sexually active with men or were infertile for reasons other than contraception were excluded. We performed bivariate and stratified analysis and multivariable logistic regression modeling to determine the associations between place of residence and sterilization after considering other demographic characteristics.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Rural women were at increased odds of undergoing sterilization compared with urban and suburban women (22.75% compared with 12.69%, respectively; crude odds ratio [OR] 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-2.86; risk difference 0.10, 95% CI 0.05-0.16). Education level was found to be a significant effect modifier of the relationship between location of residence and sterilization. In adjusted analysis, controlling for age, parity, race and ethnicity, income, insurance status, history of unintended pregnancy, and relationship status, rural women without a high school degree were more likely to have undergone sterilization compared with urban and rural women with greater than a high school education (OR 8.34, 95% CI 4.45-15.61).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Rural women with low education levels have a high prevalence of sterilization. Future studies need to address the reasons for this interaction between education and geography and its influence on contraceptive method choice.
  
  
  METHODS
  II.
authors: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; and the University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
authors: Britt
authors: B
authors: Lunde
authors: Kristin
authors: K
authors: Rankin
authors: Bryna
authors: B
authors: Harwood
authors: Noel
authors: N
authors: Chavez
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004522:Educational Status; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D012424:Rural Population / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013245:Sterilization, Reproductive / Q000523:psychology* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D014481:United States; D055815:Young Adult
references: Hart LG, Larson EH, Lishner DM. Rural definitions for health policy and research. Am J Public Health 2005;95:1149–55.
references: Health disparities for rural women. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 429. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obset Gynecol 2009;113:762–5.
references: Hartlage SA, Breauxa C, Gehlertb S, Fogg L. Rural and urban Midwestern United States contraception practices. Contraception 2001;63:319–23.
references: Tobar A, Lutfiyya MN, Mabasa Y, Meena H, McGrath C, Brady S, et al.. Comparison of contraceptive choices of rural and urban US adults aged 18–55 years: an analysis of 2004 behavioral risk factor surveillance survey data. Rural Remote Health 2009;9:1186.
references: Hills SD, Marchbanks PA, Tylor LR, Peterson HB. Poststerilization regret: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:889–95.
references: Curtis KM, Mohllajee AP, Peterson HB. Regret following female sterilization at a young age: a systematic review. Contraception 2006;73:205–10.
references: Jamieson DJ, Hillis SD, Duerr A, Marchbanks PA, Costello C, Peterson HB. Complications of interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:997–1002.
references: Groves RM, Mosher WD, Lepkowski J, Kirgis NG. Planning and development of the continuous National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 1 2009:1–64.
references: Lepkowski JM, Mosher WD, Davis KE, Groves RM, Van Hoewyk J. The 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth: sample design and analysis of a continuous survey. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2 2010:1–36.
references: Santelli J, Rochat R, Hatfield-Timajchy K, Gilbert BC, Curtis K, Cabral R, et al.. The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2003;35:94–101.
references: Chandra A, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, Abma JC, Jones J. Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 23 2005:1–160.
references: Borrero S, Moore CG, Qin L, Schwarz EB, Akers A, Creinin MD, et al.. Unintended pregnancy influences racial disparity in tubal sterilization rates. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:122–8.