title: Coevolutionary aesthetics in human and biotic artworlds.
abstract: This work proposes a coevolutionary theory of aesthetics that encompasses both biotic and human arts. Anthropocentric perspectives in aesthetics prevent the recognition of the ontological complexity of the aesthetics of nature, and the aesthetic agency of many non-human organisms. The process of evaluative coevolution is shared by all biotic advertisements. I propose that art consists of a form of communication that coevolves with its own evaluation. Art and art history are population phenomena. I expand Arthur Danto'sArtworldconcept to any aesthetic population of producers and evaluators. Current concepts of art cannot exclusively circumscribe the human arts from many forms of non-human biotic art. Without assuming an arbitrarily anthropocentric perspective, any concept of art will need to engage with biodiversity, and either recognize many instances of biotic advertisements as art, or exclude some instances of human art. Coevolutionary aesthetic theory provides a heuristic account of aesthetic change in both human and biotic artworlds, including the coevolutionary origin of aesthetic properties and aesthetic value within artworlds. Restructuring aesthetics, art criticism, and art history without human beings at the organizing centers of these disciplines stimulate new progress in our understanding of art, and the unique human contributions to aesthetics and aesthetic diversity.
authors: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT USA.
authors: Richard O
authors: RO
authors: Prum
keywords: Aesthetic evolution; Aesthetics of nature; Aposematism; Art; Mate choice; Ornament
references: Mol Ecol. 2007 Sep;16(17):3689-702
references: 17845441
references: Neuron. 1998 Oct;21(4):775-88
references: 9808464
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 19;367(1600):2253-65
references: 22777014
references: Evolution. 2007 Aug;61(8):1938-45
references: 17683435
references: J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 21;144(4):473-516
references: 2402152
references: Evolution. 2010 Nov;64(11):3085-100
references: 20633044
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 27;101(30):11040-5
references: 15263073
references: Evolution. 1982 Jan;36(1):1-12
references: 28581098
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3721-5
references: 16593036
references: Nature. 2000 Nov 30;408(6812):537
references: 11117730
references: Am Nat. 2005 Oct;166(4):437-46
references: 16224700
references: Eugen Rev. 1915 Oct;7(3):184-92
references: 21259607