title: Digital approach for measuring dentin translucency in forensic age estimation.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Dentin translucency is best suited for age estimation not only in terms of accuracy but also in terms of simplicity. Conventionally, translucency has been measured using calipers. Computer-based methods have been proposed for the same, although these required the use of custom-built software programs.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The objectives of the study were to use a simple digital method to measure dentinal translucency on sectioned teeth and to compare digital measurements to conventionally obtained translucency measurements.
  
  
  METHODS
  Fifty extracted permanent teeth were collected and were sectioned to 250 μm. Translucency measurements were obtained using the digital method and compared with those obtained using a caliper.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Correlation coefficients of translucency measurements to age were statistically significant for both methods (P < 0.001), and marginally higher for the conventional approach (r = 0.4671). Application of derived linear regression equations on an independent sample (n = 10) revealed a similar ability of both the methods to assess age to within ±5 years of the actual age.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The translucency measurements obtained by the two methods were very similar, with no clear superiority of one method over the other. Hence, further studies on a large scale are warranted to determine which method is more reliable to estimate the age.
authors: Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Mahatma Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry, India.
authors: Simranjit
authors: S
authors: Singh
authors: Ramesh
authors: R
authors: Venkatapathy
authors: Pd
authors: P
authors: Balamurali
authors: Nsc
authors: N
authors: Charles
authors: R
authors: R
authors: Suganya
keywords: Age assessment; Gustafson's criteria; computer software; dentinal translucency; forensic odontology
references: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1977 Apr;43(4):572-8
references: 265484
references: J Dent Res. 1960 May-Jun;39:598-607
references: 14425932
references: Acta Odontol Scand. 1970 Mar;28(1):3-35
references: 5265990
references: Scand J Dent Res. 1989 Jun;97(3):189-97
references: 2740830
references: J Am Dent Assoc. 1950 Jul;41(1):45-54
references: 15428197
references: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1968 Jun;25(6):834-8
references: 5239738
references: J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2001 Jun;19(1):9-17
references: 11494678
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 1991 May;85(1):25-30
references: 1853940
references: J Forensic Sci. 2001 Jul;46(4):889-92
references: 11451072
references: Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2002 Dec;23(4):386-9
references: 12464819
references: Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2010 Jun;31(2):133-7
references: 20081523
references: J Forensic Sci. 1992 Sep;37(5):1373-9
references: 1402761
references: Proc R Soc Med. 1972 Sep;65(9):801-6
references: 5085071
references: J Forensic Dent Sci. 2010 Jan;2(1):18-21
references: 21189985