title: Systematic review of aortic valve preservation and repair.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Aortic valve repair has emerged as a feasible alternative to replacement in the surgical treatment of selected patients with aortic valve (AV) pathology. In order to provide a synopsis of the current literature, we preformed a systematic review with a focus on valve-related events following AV repair.
  
  
  METHODS
  Structured keyword searches of Embase and PubMed were performed in January 2012. A study was eligible for inclusion if it reported early mortality, late mortality, or valve-related morbidity in the adult population.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Initial search results identified 3,507 unique studies. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 111 studies remained for full-text review. Of these, 17 studies involving 2,891 patients were included for quantitative assessment. No randomized trials were identified. Tricuspid and bicuspid AV pathologies were present in 65% (range, 21-100%) and 13.5% (range, 5-100%) of the population, respectively. Cusp repair techniques were applied in a median of 46% (range, 5-100%) of patients. The median requirement for early reoperation for post-operative bleeding and early reintervention for primary AV repair failure was 3% (range, 0-10%) and 2% (range, 0-16%), respectively. Pooled early mortality was 2.6% (95% CI: 1.4-4.4%, I(2) =0%). Late mortality and valve-related events were linearized [(number of events/number of patient-years) ×100] (%/pt-yr) for each study. Late operated valve endocarditis was reported at median event rate of 0.23%/pt-yr (range, 0-0.78%/pt-yr), while a composite outcome of neurological events and thromboembolism occurred at a median rate of 0.52%/pt-yr (0-0.95%/pt-yr). Late AV re-intervention requiring AV replacement or re-repair occurred at a rate of 2.4%/pt-yr (range, 0-4.2%/pt-yr). The median 5-year freedom from AV re-intervention and late recurrent aortic insufficiency >2+ estimated from survival curves was 92% (range, 87-98%) and 88% (range, 87-100%), respectively. Pooled late mortality produced summary estimate of 1.3%/pt-yr (95% CI: 0.9-2.1%, I(2) =0%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The present systematic review confirmed the low operative risk of patients who underwent aortic valve preservation and repair. There is a need for long-term follow-up studies with meticulous reporting of outcomes following AV repair, as well as comparative studies with aortic valve replacement.
authors: Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada;
authors: Richard
authors: R
authors: Saczkowski
authors: Tarek
authors: T
authors: Malas
authors: Laurent
authors: L
authors: de Kerchove
authors: Gebrine
authors: G
authors: El Khoury
authors: Munir
authors: M
authors: Boodhwani
keywords: Aortic valve repair; aortic valve preservation; systematic review; valve-sparing root replacement
references: Circulation. 2005 Aug 30;112(9 Suppl):I253-9
references: 16159826
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 May;89(5):1443-7
references: 20417759
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Dec;140(6 Suppl):S23-7; discussion S45-51
references: 21092792
references: Circulation. 2009 Feb 24;119(7):1034-48
references: 19237674
references: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Aug;38(2):147-54
references: 20211566
references: Eur Heart J. 2003 Jul;24(13):1231-43
references: 12831818
references: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Jan;37(1):127-32
references: 19643618
references: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Nov;38(5):515-22
references: 20400326
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Nov;92(5):1639-44
references: 21945227
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Mar;127(3):645-53
references: 15001892
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Feb;137(2):286-94
references: 19185138
references: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Apr;29(4):537-44
references: 16500110
references: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;9(1):113-6
references: 19401293
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Nov;92(5):1646-9; discussion 1649-50
references: 22051261
references: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Jan;25(1):6-15
references: 14690726
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jan;139(1):98-102
references: 19660397
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 May;87(5):1344-9; discussion 1349-50
references: 19379862
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Dec;140(6 Suppl):S14-9; discussion S45-51
references: 21092781
references: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Nov;38(5):523-7
references: 20456970
references: J Heart Valve Dis. 2006 Mar;15(2):169-73; discussion 173
references: 16607896
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Apr;85(4):1490-5
references: 18355567