title: Inclusion of ethical issues in dementia guidelines: a thematic text analysis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) aim to improve professionalism in health care. However, current CPG development manuals fail to address how to include ethical issues in a systematic and transparent manner. The objective of this study was to assess the representation of ethical issues in general CPGs on dementia care.
  
  
  RESULTS
  To identify national CPGs on dementia care, five databases of guidelines were searched and national psychiatric associations were contacted in August 2011 and in June 2013. A framework for the assessment of the identified CPGs' ethical content was developed on the basis of a prior systematic review of ethical issues in dementia care. Thematic text analysis and a 4-point rating score were employed to assess how ethical issues were addressed in the identified CPGs. Twelve national CPGs were included. Thirty-one ethical issues in dementia care were identified by the prior systematic review. The proportion of these 31 ethical issues that were explicitly addressed by each CPG ranged from 22% to 77%, with a median of 49.5%. National guidelines differed substantially with respect to (a) which ethical issues were represented, (b) whether ethical recommendations were included, (c) whether justifications or citations were provided to support recommendations, and (d) to what extent the ethical issues were explained.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Ethical issues were inconsistently addressed in national dementia guidelines, with some guidelines including most and some including few ethical issues. Guidelines should address ethical issues and how to deal with them to help the medical profession understand how to approach care of patients with dementia, and for patients, their relatives, and the general public, all of whom might seek information and advice in national guidelines. There is a need for further research to specify how detailed ethical issues and their respective recommendations can and should be addressed in dementia guidelines. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
authors: Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
authors: Hannes
authors: H
authors: Knüppel
authors: Marcel
authors: M
authors: Mertz
authors: Martina
authors: M
authors: Schmidhuber
authors: Gerald
authors: G
authors: Neitzke
authors: Daniel
authors: D
authors: Strech
mesh_terms: D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000941:ethics*; D003704:Dementia; D005260:Female; D019983:Guideline Adherence / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male
references: Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2008 Winter;17(1):15-29
references: 18462542
references: Lancet. 2002 Feb 9;359(9305):520-2
references: 11853819
references: Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;202:400-6
references: 23732935
references: BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6
references: 18436948
references: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jan;10(1):45-53
references: 15667704
references: CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14;182(18):E839-42
references: 20603348
references: Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;23(4):352-7
references: 22026491
references: Health Policy. 2007 Oct;83(2-3):131-43
references: 17433489
references: J Med Ethics. 2011 Jul;37(7):390-6
references: 21343629
references: J R Soc Med. 2002 May;95(5):242-6
references: 11983765
references: CMAJ. 2007 Nov 6;177(10):1221-6
references: 17984472
references: Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;164(12 Suppl):5-56
references: 18340692
references: Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 1;152(11):738-41
references: 20479011
references: Crit Care Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):864-70
references: 16521283