title: Reproductive differentiation into sexual and apomictic polyploid cytotypes in Potentilla puberula (Potentilleae, Rosaceae).
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Intraspecific reproductive differentiation into sexual and apomictic cytotypes of differing ploidy is a common phenomenon. However, mechanisms enabling the maintenance of both reproductive modes and integrity of cytotypes in sympatry are as yet poorly understood. This study examined the association of sexual and apomictic seed formation with ploidy as well as gene flow towards sexuals within populations of purely polyploid Potentilla puberula.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study is based on 22 populations representing various combinations of five polyploid cytotypes (tetraploid-octoploid) from East Tyrol, Austria. Embryo ploidy and the endosperm/embryo ploidy ratio obtained by a flow cytometric seed screen were used to infer reproductive modes of seed formation and to calculate the male and female genomic contributions to the embryo and endosperm. Self-incompatibility (SI) patterns were assessed and a new indirect approach was used to test for the occurrence of intercytotype matings based on the variation in the male genomic contribution to sexually derived embryos on the level of developed seed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Tetraploids formed seeds almost exclusively via sexual reproduction, whereas penta- to octoploids were preferentially apomictic. Non-random distribution of reproductive modes within maternal plants further revealed a tendency to separate the sexual from the apomictic mode among individuals. Self-incompatibility of sexuals indicated functionality of the gametophytic SI system despite tetraploidy of the nuclear genome. We found no indication for significant cross-fertilization of tetraploids by the high polyploids.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The study revealed a rare example of intraspecific differentiation into sexual and apomictic cytotypes at the polyploid level. The integrity of the sexual tetraploids was maintained due to reproductive isolation from the apomictic higher polyploids. Functionality of the gametophytic SI system suggested that the tetraploids are functional diploids.
authors: Department of Pharmacognosy, Pharmacobotany, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
authors: Ch
authors: Ch
authors: Dobeš
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Milosevic
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Prohaska
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Scheffknecht
authors: T F
authors: TF
authors: Sharbel
authors: K
authors: K
authors: Hülber
mesh_terms: D060832:Apomixis; D001317:Austria; D001947:Breeding; D056625:Endosperm / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology; D005434:Flow Cytometry; D051456:Gene Flow; D005828:Genetics, Population; D016014:Linear Models; D011058:Pollen / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology; D054817:Pollination; D011123:Polyploidy; D031987:Potentilla / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D012098:Reproduction; D060047:Reproductive Isolation; D012639:Seeds / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology; D060436:Self-Incompatibility in Flowering Plants
keywords: Apomixis, endosperm, European Alps, FCSS, flow cytometry, pollen, polyploidy, Potentilla puberula, reproductive isolation, Rosaceae, sexual reproduction
references: Mol Gen Genet. 1996 Mar 20;250(5):547-57
references: 8676858
references: Q Rev Biol. 2002 Mar;77(1):17-32
references: 11963459
references: Ann Bot. 2009 Jul;104(1):81-9
references: 19386790
references: Sex Plant Reprod. 2010 Mar;23(1):73-86
references: 20165965
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Aug 01;12:132
references: 22852761
references: Am J Bot. 2004 Dec;91(12):2087-101
references: 21652357
references: Ann Bot. 2005 Jan;95(1):255-60
references: 15596473
references: J Evol Biol. 2007 Sep;20(5):1933-40
references: 17714310
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010 Jul;56(1):156-75
references: 20214995
references: New Phytol. 2007;175(4):764-772
references: 17688591
references: Nat Protoc. 2007;2(9):2233-44
references: 17853881
references: Heredity (Edinb). 2001 Aug;87(Pt 2):136-45
references: 11703503
references: Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1998 Jun;49:371-395
references: 15012239
references: New Phytol. 2007;173(2):231-49
references: 17204072
references: Plant J. 2000 Jan;21(1):97-108
references: 10652155
references: Ann Bot. 2008 Jan;101(1):59-71
references: 17998212
references: New Phytol. 2013 Apr;198(2):605-616
references: 23425259
references: Evolution. 1995 Dec;49(6):1108-1118
references: 28568531
references: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:561-88
references: 19575590
references: Evolution. 1977 Mar;31(1):32-46
references: 28567723
references: Mol Ecol. 2006 Oct;15(11):3389-400
references: 16968277
references: Mol Ecol. 2009 Mar;18(6):1145-60
references: 19243504
references: Science. 2000 Sep 29;289(5488):2335-8
references: 11009416