title: Simultaneous knockout of Slo3 and CatSper1 abolishes all alkalization- and voltage-activated current in mouse spermatozoa.
abstract: During passage through the female reproductive tract, mammalian sperm undergo a maturation process termed capacitation that renders sperm competent to produce fertilization. Capacitation involves a sequence of changes in biochemical and electrical properties, the onset of a hyperactivated swimming behavior, and development of the ability to undergo successful fusion and penetration with an egg. In mouse sperm, the development of hyperactivated motility is dependent on cytosolic alkalization that then results in an increase in cytosolic Ca(2+). The elevation of Ca(2+) is thought to be primarily driven by the concerted interplay of two alkalization-activated currents, a K(+) current (KSPER) composed of pore-forming subunits encoded by the Kcnu1 gene (also termed Slo3) and a Ca(2+) current arising from a family of CATSPER subunits. After deletion of any of four CATSPER subunit genes (CATSPER1-4), the major remaining current in mouse sperm is alkalization-activated KSPER current. After genetic deletion of the Slo3 gene, KSPER current is abolished, but there remains a small voltage-activated K(+) current hypothesized to reflect monovalent flux through CATSPER. Here, we address two questions. First, does the residual outward K(+) current present in the Slo3 (-/-) sperm arise from CATSPER? Second, can any additional membrane K(+) currents be detected in mouse sperm by patch-clamp methods other than CATSPER and KSPER? Here, using mice bred to lack both SLO3 and CATSPER1 subunits, we show conclusively that the voltage-activated outward current present in Slo3 (-/-) sperm is abolished when CATSPER is also deleted. Any leak currents that may play a role in setting the resting membrane potential in noncapacitated sperm are likely smaller than the pipette leak current and thus cannot be resolved within the limitation of the patch-clamp technique. Together, KSPER and CATSPER appear to be the sole ion channels present in mouse sperm that regulate membrane potential and Ca(2+) influx in response to alkalization.
authors: Institute of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330031, China.
authors: Xu-Hui
authors: XH
authors: Zeng
authors: Betsy
authors: B
authors: Navarro
authors: Xiao-Ming
authors: XM
authors: Xia
authors: David E
authors: DE
authors: Clapham
authors: Christopher J
authors: CJ
authors: Lingle
mesh_terms: D000200:Action Potentials; D000818:Animals; D015220:Calcium Channels / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D017353:Gene Deletion; D051036:Large-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium Channels / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D051379:Mice; D018345:Mice, Knockout; D011188:Potassium / Q000378:metabolism; D013094:Spermatozoa / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000502:physiology
chemical_list: D015220:Calcium Channels; C488642:Catsper1 protein, mouse; C110627:Kcnu1 protein, mouse; D051036:Large-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium Channels; D011188:Potassium
references: FEBS Lett. 2010 Mar 5;584(5):1041-6
references: 20138882
references: Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2007;65:229-44
references: 17644965
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 23;104(4):1219-23
references: 17227845
references: J Physiol. 2003 Jan 15;546(Pt 2):387-401
references: 12527726
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Dec 9;100(25):14864-8
references: 14657352
references: J Biol Chem. 2007 Jun 29;282(26):18945-52
references: 17478420
references: J Biol Chem. 2000 Mar 31;275(13):9340-7
references: 10734076
references: Cell. 2010 Feb 5;140(3):327-37
references: 20144758
references: Nature. 2001 Oct 11;413(6856):603-9
references: 11595941
references: Channels (Austin). 2010 Jan-Feb;4(1):22-41
references: 19934650
references: J Androl. 1998 Mar-Apr;19(2):242-8
references: 9570749
references: Mol Hum Reprod. 2011 Aug;17(8):478-99
references: 21642646
references: Reproduction. 2006 Jun;131(6):977-88
references: 16735537
references: PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60578
references: 23577126
references: J Reprod Immunol. 2002 Jan;53(1-2):133-50
references: 11730911
references: J Biol Chem. 2005 Sep 16;280(37):32238-44
references: 16036917
references: J Biol Chem. 2004 Aug 6;279(32):33742-50
references: 15178683
references: Physiol Rev. 1999 Apr;79(2):481-510
references: 10221988
references: Development. 2003 Apr;130(7):1317-26
references: 12588848
references: Biol Reprod. 2009 Sep;81(3):539-44
references: 19516020
references: J Physiol. 1997 Mar 15;499 ( Pt 3):661-75
references: 9130163
references: Biol Reprod. 2005 Dec;73(6):1235-42
references: 16107607
references: Biol Reprod. 1998 Jul;59(1):1-6
references: 9674985
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Dec 9;100(25):14869-74
references: 14657366
references: Methods Enzymol. 2013;525:59-83
references: 23522465
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 5;108(14):5879-84
references: 21427226
references: Front Biosci. 2006 May 01;11:1636-45
references: 16368543
references: J Gen Physiol. 1986 Sep;88(3):293-319
references: 2428919
references: Biol Reprod. 2007 Jul;77(1):37-44
references: 17344468
references: Mol Hum Reprod. 2005 Dec;11(12):891-7
references: 16421215
references: Nature. 2006 Feb 9;439(7077):737-40
references: 16467839
references: Nat Commun. 2011 Jan 11;2:153
references: 21224844
references: J Biol Chem. 2004 Jul 2;279(27):28220-6
references: 15078889
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998 Jun;8(3):321-9
references: 9687354
references: J Biol Chem. 1998 Nov 20;273(47):30863-9
references: 9812978
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 11;108(2):644-9
references: 21187400
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7688-92
references: 17460039
references: Reproduction. 2001 Oct;122(4):519-26
references: 11570958
references: Hum Reprod Update. 2008 Nov-Dec;14(6):647-57
references: 18653675
references: Int J Dev Biol. 2008;52(5-6):607-13
references: 18649274
references: Physiol Rev. 2011 Oct;91(4):1305-55
references: 22013213
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 23;108(34):14342-7
references: 21831833
references: Int Rev Cytol. 2005;243:79-172
references: 15797459