title: Perspective on the cost-effectiveness of transapical aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients: Outcomes of a decision-analytic model.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The incremental cost-effectiveness of transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is ill-defined in high-risk patients where aortic valve replacement (AVR) is an option, and has not been ascertained outside a randomized controlled trial.
  
  
  METHODS
  We developed a Markov model to examine the progression of patients between health states, defined as peri- and post-procedural, post-complication, and death. The mean and variance of risks, transition probabilities, utilities and cost of transapical TAVI, high-risk AVR, and medical management were derived from analysis of relevant registries. Outcome and cost were derived from 10,000 simulations. Sensitivity analyses further evaluated the impact of mortality, stroke, and other commonly observed outcomes.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In the reference case, both transapical TAVI and high-risk AVR and TAVI were cost-effective when compared to medical management ($44,384/QALY and $42,637/QALY, respectively). Transapical TAVI failed to meet accepted criteria for incremental cost-effectiveness relative to AVR, which was the dominant strategy. In sensitivity analyses, the mortality rates related to the two strategies, the utilities post-AVR and post-transapical TAVI, and the cost of transapical TAVI, were the main drivers of model outcome.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Transapical TAVI did not satisfy current metrics of incremental cost-effectiveness relative to high-risk AVR in the reference case. However, it may provide net health benefits at acceptable cost in selected high-risk patients among whom AVR is the standard intervention.
authors: Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
authors: Hemal
authors: H
authors: Gada
authors: Shikhar
authors: S
authors: Agarwal
authors: Thomas H
authors: TH
authors: Marwick
keywords: Aortic valve replacement; aortic stenosis; cost-effectiveness; transcatheter valve
references: Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9):984-90
references: 18725854
references: Am Heart J. 2011 Jun;161(6):1114-24
references: 21641358
references: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Sep;42(3):486-92
references: 22427400
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Mar;133(3):608-13
references: 17320552
references: Stroke. 2005 Sep;36(9):1837-43
references: 16081859
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;145(2):391-7
references: 22329976
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 May;87(5):1440-5
references: 19379882
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;143(2):326-31
references: 21724204
references: Eur Heart J. 2011 Jan;32(2):148-57
references: 21075775
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Oct;92(4):1315-23
references: 21958779
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Nov 15;58(21):2151-62
references: 22078420
references: N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 9;364(23):2187-98
references: 21639811
references: Eur Heart J. 2011 Jan;32(2):191-7
references: 20843959
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Aug;88(2):468-74; discussion 474-5
references: 19632395
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Oct;92(4):1244-51
references: 21420661
references: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008 Sep;47(3):277-82
references: 18728521
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Aug;122(2):257-69
references: 11479498
references: Am Heart J. 2007 Feb;153(2):245-52
references: 17239685
references: Med Decis Making. 1993 Oct-Dec;13(4):322-38
references: 8246705
references: Circulation. 2011 Nov 1;124(18):1964-72
references: 21969017
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Aug 20;42(4):736-42
references: 12932612
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Jan;91(1):49-55; discussion 55-6
references: 21172485
references: N Engl J Med. 2012 May 3;366(18):1705-15
references: 22551129
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jan;85(1):102-6; discussion 107
references: 18154791
references: Stroke. 2001 Apr;32(4):964-72
references: 11283398
references: Med Decis Making. 2006 Jul-Aug;26(4):410-20
references: 16855129
references: Curr Probl Cardiol. 2000 Feb;25(2):73-154
references: 10709140
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Oct;142(4):768-75
references: 21840020
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Jun;83(6):2036-43
references: 17532392
references: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 May;12(5):762-7
references: 21349890
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Apr;141(4):940-7
references: 20599229
references: Circulation. 2001 Mar 20;103(11):1535-41
references: 11257081
references: Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23(1):57-65
references: 17065788
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jun;85(6):1980-6
references: 18498806
references: Clin Trials. 2009 Apr;6(2):109-18
references: 19342462
references: Am Heart J. 2005 Oct;150(4):707-15
references: 16209970
references: Circulation. 2011 Sep 13;124(11 Suppl):S124-9
references: 21911801
references: Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Mar;105(3):141-5
references: 22520796
references: Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Jun;59(4):229-32
references: 21409748
references: World J Cardiol. 2011 Nov 26;3(11):359-66
references: 22125671
references: J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Jul 14;4:32
references: 19602289
references: Circulation. 2011 Jul 26;124(4):425-33
references: 21747054