title: Novel approach for improving sensitivity of microscopic detection of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) by use of the ReaSLR method.
abstract: The ReaSLR methodology developed for sputum processing is a novel, low-cost, and simple technique that has improved the sensitivity of smear microscopy for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). Sample processing consists of rapid liquefaction of the sputum specimen with the ReaSLR reagent, followed by syringe filtration, concentration by centrifugation, and use of the sediment for smear microscopy. The performance of the ReaSLR kit was evaluated on 150 sputum samples and was compared with that of the modified Petroff method for sputum decontamination and concentration. Ziehl-Neelsen staining was performed for smear microscopy after processing by these two techniques; simultaneously, culture on Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium was done to evaluate the two methods. The efficiency of smear microscopy was 18/150 (12%) with the modified Petroff method compared to 47/150 (31.33%) with the ReaSLR method, and this difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The ReaSLR method for smear microscopy demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 90.47% and 91.6%, respectively, whereas the modified Petroff method showed a sensitivity and specificity of 40.47% and 99.07%, respectively, compared to those of culture, which was used as the gold standard. With the newer ReaSLR method, the kappa coefficient (κ) was 0.8, which implies an excellent positive agreement. The ReaSLR method was found to be more sensitive than the conventional method for sputum smear microscopy. The newer ReaSLR method holds promise for adoption in TB control programs across the globe, as it was found suitable for the laboratory diagnosis of pulmonary TB. Further large-scale studies are needed to evaluate other aspects of this method.
authors: Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
authors: Sheetal
authors: S
authors: Verma
authors: Tapan N
authors: TN
authors: Dhole
authors: Manoj
authors: M
authors: Kumar
authors: Saurabh
authors: S
authors: Kashyap
mesh_terms: D001431:Bacteriological Techniques / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008853:Microscopy / Q000379:methods*; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013048:Specimen Handling / Q000379:methods; D013183:Sputum / Q000382:microbiology*; D013194:Staining and Labeling / Q000379:methods; D014376:Tuberculosis / Q000175:diagnosis*
references: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1998 Jul-Aug;92(4):415-6
references: 9850395
references: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000 Feb;4(2):97-107
references: 10694086
references: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Apr;155(4):1478-81
references: 9105098
references: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003 Apr;7(4):376-81
references: 12729344
references: J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Apr;31(4):771-5
references: 8463385
references: J Med Microbiol. 2008 Sep;57(Pt 9):1094-1098
references: 18719178
references: J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Sep;40(9):3219-22
references: 12202556
references: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012 Feb;16(2):230-1
references: 22236924
references: J Commun Dis. 2001 Dec;33(4):241-4
references: 12561500
references: Lancet Infect Dis. 2006 Oct;6(10):664-74
references: 17008175
references: Lancet. 1999 Feb 6;353(9151):444-9
references: 9989714
references: Infect Drug Resist. 2008;1:21-6
references: 21694877
references: J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jul;36(7):1996-2003
references: 9650951
references: J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Jun;43(6):2703-8
references: 15956386
references: J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Sep;36(9):2769-71
references: 9705435
references: J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Feb;40(2):508-11
references: 11825964
references: J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Aug;40(8):3017-20
references: 12149368