title: How the weight of the ethical arguments depends on the empirical "facts".
authors: Institute for Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, München, Germany. Marckmann@lmu.de
authors: Georg
authors: G
authors: Marckmann
authors: Anna M
authors: AM
authors: Sanktjohanser
authors: Sabine
authors: S
authors: Wicker
mesh_terms: D003428:Cross Infection / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006282:Health Personnel; D006801:Humans; D007252:Influenza Vaccines / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D007251:Influenza, Human / Q000517:prevention & control*; D037141:Mandatory Programs / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D032541:Mass Vaccination / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011634:Public Health / Q000941:ethics*; D035862:Vulnerable Populations
chemical_list: D007252:Influenza Vaccines