title: Reproducible culture and differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells using an automated microwell platform.
abstract: The use of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and their progeny in high throughput drug discovery and regenerative medicine will require production at scale of well characterized cells at an appropriate level of purity. The adoption of automated bioprocessing techniques offers the possibility to overcome the lack of consistency and high failure rates seen with current manual protocols. To build the case for increased use of automation this work addresses the key question: "can an automated system match the quality of a highly skilled and experienced person working manually?" To answer this we first describe an integrated automation platform designed for the 'hands-free' culture and differentiation of ESCs in microwell formats. Next we outline a framework for the systematic investigation and optimization of key bioprocess variables for the rapid establishment of validatable Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Finally the experimental comparison between manual and automated bioprocessing is exemplified by expansion of the murine Oct-4-GiP ESC line over eight sequential passages with their subsequent directed differentiation into neural precursors. Our results show that ESCs can be effectively maintained and differentiated in a highly reproducible manner by the automated system described. Statistical analysis of the results for cell growth over single and multiple passages shows up to a 3-fold improvement in the consistency of cell growth kinetics with automated passaging. The quality of the cells produced was evaluated using a panel of biological markers including cell growth rate and viability, nutrient and metabolite profiles, changes in gene expression and immunocytochemistry. Automated processing of the ESCs had no measurable negative effect on either their pluripotency or their ability to differentiate into the three embryonic germ layers. Equally important is that over a 6-month period of culture without antibiotics in the medium, we have not had any cases of culture contamination. This study thus confirms the benefits of adopting automated bioprocess routes to produce cells for therapy and for use in basic discovery research.
authors: The Advanced Centre for Biochemical Engineering, Department of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, UK.
authors: Waqar
authors: W
authors: Hussain
authors: Nathalie
authors: N
authors: Moens
authors: Farlan S
authors: FS
authors: Veraitch
authors: Diana
authors: D
authors: Hernandez
authors: Chris
authors: C
authors: Mason
authors: Gary J
authors: GJ
authors: Lye
keywords: Bioprocess automation; Consistency; Neural differentiation; Reproducibility; Stem cell; Stem cell expansion
references: Biotechnol Prog. 2009 Sep-Oct;25(5):1480-8
references: 19455654
references: Science. 1998 Nov 6;282(5391):1145-7
references: 9804556
references: Tissue Eng. 2006 Nov;12(11):3233-45
references: 17518637
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Apr 15;96(6):1211-21
references: 17006889
references: J Biomol Screen. 2012 Oct;17(9):1171-9
references: 22895460
references: Regen Med. 2007 May;2(3):227-9
references: 17511558
references: J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2010 Jan;4(1):45-54
references: 19842115
references: Tissue Eng. 2007 Feb;13(2):301-11
references: 17518564
references: Stem Cells. 2008 Dec;26(12):3068-74
references: 18787205
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Jan 1;96(1):195-201
references: 16960892
references: Cell Stem Cell. 2008 Oct 9;3(4):369-81
references: 18940729
references: Trends Biotechnol. 2007 May;25(5):224-30
references: 17379341
references: Biotechnol Prog. 2007 Jan-Feb;23(1):187-93
references: 17269687
references: Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2007 Oct;7(5):515-20
references: 17681491
references: Stem Cells. 2006 Feb;24(2):230-5
references: 16510428
references: Nat Methods. 2008 May;5(5):389-92
references: 18391958
references: Curr Gene Ther. 2007 Aug;7(4):249-60
references: 17969558
references: J Biotechnol. 2008 Sep 10;136(3-4):148-55
references: 18672011
references: Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Jan;23(1):19-20
references: 15637610
references: Nature. 1984 May 17-23;309(5965):255-6
references: 6717601
references: Biomaterials. 2006 Dec;27(36):6032-42
references: 16884768
references: Stem Cells. 2006 Aug;24(8):1908-13
references: 16627686
references: Methods Cell Sci. 2000 Mar;22(1):33-41
references: 10650333
references: Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001;17:435-62
references: 11687496
references: Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Feb;24(2):160-1
references: 16465158
references: J Cell Physiol. 2007 Feb;210(2):498-506
references: 17111366
references: Regen Med. 2008 Jan;3(1):1-5
references: 18154457
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009 Apr 15;102(6):1636-44
references: 19062183
references: Nat Genet. 2006 Apr;38(4):431-40
references: 16518401
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 May 1;29(9):e45
references: 11328886
references: Regen Med. 2007 Jul;2(4):349-62
references: 17635044
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Dec;78(12):7634-8
references: 6950406
references: Biotechnol Prog. 2007 Jul-Aug;23(4):785-93
references: 17592858
references: Nat Genet. 2000 Apr;24(4):372-6
references: 10742100
references: Cell. 2007 Nov 30;131(5):861-72
references: 18035408
references: Cell Tissue Res. 2008 Jan;331(1):5-22
references: 18026755
references: Nat Biotechnol. 2003 Feb;21(2):183-6
references: 12524553
references: Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 2004 Nov 25;153(2):163-73
references: 15527884
references: Methods Enzymol. 2003;365:327-41
references: 14696356
references: Regen Med. 2008 May;3(3):287-308
references: 18462054
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008 Apr 1;99(5):1216-29
references: 17929326
references: Tissue Eng. 2006 Jul;12(7):2025-30
references: 16889530
references: Nature. 2006 Aug 3;442(7102):533-8
references: 16767105
references: Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004 Jan;3(1):70-80
references: 14708022