title: Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of 2 resorbable-blasting media implant surfaces at early implantation times.
abstract: This study evaluated 3 implant surfaces in a dog model: (1) resorbable-blasting media + acid-etched (RBMa), alumina-blasting + acid-etching (AB/AE), and AB/AE + RBMa (hybrid). All of the surfaces were minimally rough, and Ca and P were present for the RBMa and hybrid surfaces. Following 2 weeks in vivo, no significant differences were observed for torque, bone-to-implant contact, and bone-area fraction occupied measurements. Newly formed woven bone was observed in proximity with all surfaces.
authors: Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, UNIGRANRIO University, School of Health Sciences, Duque de Caxias, RJ, Brazil.
authors: Charles
authors: C
authors: Marin
authors: Estevam A
authors: EA
authors: Bonfante
authors: Ryan
authors: R
authors: Jeong
authors: Rodrigo
authors: R
authors: Granato
authors: Gabriela
authors: G
authors: Giro
authors: Marcelo
authors: M
authors: Suzuki
authors: Claiton
authors: C
authors: Heitz
authors: Paulo G
authors: PG
authors: Coelho
mesh_terms: D020341:Absorbable Implants; D000134:Acid Etching, Dental; D020906:Air Abrasion, Dental / Q000379:methods*; D000537:Aluminum Oxide; D000818:Animals; D003758:Dental Implantation, Endosseous; D015921:Dental Implants; D004285:Dogs; D017886:Durapatite; D008297:Male; D016348:Osseointegration; D013499:Surface Properties; D013977:Tibia / Q000601:surgery; D019415:Torque
chemical_list: D015921:Dental Implants; D017886:Durapatite; D000537:Aluminum Oxide