title: A comparison of methods for clustering 16S rRNA sequences into OTUs.
abstract: Recent studies of 16S rRNA sequences through next-generation sequencing have revolutionized our understanding of the microbial community composition and structure. One common approach in using these data to explore the genetic diversity in a microbial community is to cluster the 16S rRNA sequences into Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) based on sequence similarities. The inferred OTUs can then be used to estimate species, diversity, composition, and richness. Although a number of methods have been developed and commonly used to cluster the sequences into OTUs, relatively little guidance is available on their relative performance and the choice of key parameters for each method. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of ten existing OTU inference methods. We found that the appropriate dissimilarity value for defining distinct OTUs is not only related with a specific method but also related with the sample complexity. For data sets with low complexity, all the algorithms need a higher dissimilarity threshold to define OTUs. Some methods, such as, CROP and SLP, are more robust to the specific choice of the threshold than other methods, especially for shorter reads. For high-complexity data sets, hierarchical cluster methods need a more strict dissimilarity threshold to define OTUs because the commonly used dissimilarity threshold of 3% often leads to an under-estimation of the number of OTUs. In general, hierarchical clustering methods perform better at lower dissimilarity thresholds. Our results show that sequence abundance plays an important role in OTU inference. We conclude that care is needed to choose both a threshold for dissimilarity and abundance for OTU inference.
authors: College of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
authors: Wei
authors: W
authors: Chen
authors: Clarence K
authors: CK
authors: Zhang
authors: Yongmei
authors: Y
authors: Cheng
authors: Shaowu
authors: S
authors: Zhang
authors: Hongyu
authors: H
authors: Zhao
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D019295:Computational Biology / Q000379:methods; D056186:Metagenomics / Q000379:methods*; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Q000235:genetics*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
references: Science. 2009 May 29;324(5931):1190-2
references: 19478181
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Oct 15;43(20):7977-84
references: 19921923
references: Nature. 2006 Dec 21;444(7122):1022-3
references: 17183309
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 2;102(31):11070-5
references: 16033867
references: EMBO Rep. 2001 Jan;2(1):5-7
references: 11252724
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(20):6955-9
references: 2413450
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jul 08;6(7):e1000844
references: 20628621
references: PLoS Genet. 2008 Nov;4(11):e1000255
references: 19023400
references: Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 1;22(13):1658-9
references: 16731699
references: BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Jun 30;12:271
references: 21718538
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Jan 20;7(1):e1001061
references: 21283775
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Mar;71(3):1501-6
references: 15746353
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Aug;39(14):e95
references: 21596775
references: ISME J. 2012 Jul;6(7):1277-80
references: 22170430
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;75(23):7537-41
references: 19801464
references: ISME J. 2010 Jul;4(7):852-61
references: 20182525
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Aug;74(15):4898-909
references: 18487399
references: Environ Microbiol. 2010 Jul;12(7):1889-98
references: 20236171
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7
references: 17586664
references: Brief Bioinform. 2012 Jan;13(1):107-21
references: 21525143
references: Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1
references: 20709691
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 May;77(10):3219-26
references: 21421784
references: BMC Res Notes. 2011 Oct 26;4:449
references: 22029428
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12115-20
references: 16880384
references: Nature. 2009 Jan 22;457(7228):480-4
references: 19043404
references: Science. 1997 May 2;276(5313):734-40
references: 9115194
references: BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Dec 17;11:601
references: 21167044
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jun;37(10):e76
references: 19417062
references: Genome Biol. 2007;8(7):R143
references: 17659080
references: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004 Dec;68(4):686-91
references: 15590780
references: Nature. 2005 Sep 15;437(7057):376-80
references: 16056220
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Oct;36(18):e120
references: 18723574
references: Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 1;27(5):611-8
references: 21233169
references: Bioinformatics. 2000 May;16(5):412-24
references: 10871264
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Dec;38(22):e205
references: 20929878
references: Nat Methods. 2009 Sep;6(9):639-41
references: 19668203
references: Science. 2005 Jun 10;308(5728):1635-8
references: 15831718
references: PLoS One. 2008 Oct 08;3(10):e3373
references: 18841204
references: Nat Methods. 2009 Sep;6(9):636-7
references: 19718016
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7
references: 15034147
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jun 9;95(12):6578-83
references: 9618454
references: ISME J. 2013 Mar;7(3):457-60
references: 23018771