title: Differential transport function of lymphatic vessels in the rat tail model and the long-term effects of Indocyanine Green as assessed with near-infrared imaging.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Near-infrared (NIR) imaging has emerged as a novel imaging modality for assessing lymphatic function in vivo. While the technique has provided quantitative data previously unavailable, questions remain in regards to the spatiotemporal capabilities of the approach. We address three of the more important issues here using the rodent tail, one of the most widely utilized in vivo model systems in the lymphatic literature. Specifically we demonstrate (1) the transient vs. steady state response of lymphatics to tracer injection, (2) the functional characteristics of multiple collecting vessels draining the same tissue space in parallel, and (3) the long-term consequences of fluorescent tracers on lymphatic function to repeated functional measurements.
  
  
  METHODS
  Rat tails were imaged with NIR and metrics of function were calculated for both collecting vessels that drain the tail. A nitric oxide donor cream (GTNO) was applied to the tail. Additionally, two different NIR dyes, indocyanine green (ICG) and LI-COR IRDye 800CW PEG, were utilized for function imaging at the time of initial injection and at 1, 2, and 4 week follow-up time points after which both draining lymph nodes were harvested.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Significant differences were found between the two collecting vessels such that the vessel first showing fluorescence (dominant) produced enhanced functional metrics compared to the second vessel (non-dominant). GTNO significantly reduced lymphatic function in the non-dominant vessel compared to the dominant. ICG remained visible in the tail for 2 weeks after injection and was accompanied by significant losses in lymphatic function and enlarged draining lymph nodes. The Licor tracer also remained visible for 2 weeks. However, the dye produced significantly lower effects on lymphatic function than ICG, and lymph nodes were not enlarged at any time point, suggesting that this may be a more appropriate contrast agent for longitudinal lymphatic imaging.
authors: Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Parker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA, USA.
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Weiler
authors: J Brandon
authors: JB
authors: Dixon
keywords: ICG; indocyanine green; lymphatic; lymphatic function; lymphatic imaging; near-infrared imaging
references: Am J Pathol. 2001 Jun;158(6):2043-55
references: 11395382
references: Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2011 Dec;2(4):296-308
references: 23408477
references: J Photochem Photobiol B. 1997 Apr;38(2-3):178-83
references: 9203378
references: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2012 Feb 15;302(4):C709-19
references: 22049214
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 15;108(46):18784-9
references: 22065738
references: PLoS Med. 2006 Jul;3(7):e254
references: 16834456
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1131:13-36
references: 18519956
references: Science. 2013 Jan 18;339(6117):328-32
references: 23329049
references: Biomaterials. 2013 Jul;34(21):5128-37
references: 23566803
references: Arch Dermatol Res. 2000 Aug;292(8):404-11
references: 10994775
references: Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2003 Oct;7(5):626-34
references: 14580568
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Sep 2;52(10):799-806
references: 18755341
references: J Clin Invest. 2003 Mar;111(5):717-25
references: 12618526
references: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 May;139(1):81-6
references: 23613202
references: Microvasc Res. 2006 Nov;72(3):161-71
references: 16876204
references: Lymphat Res Biol. 2010 Jun;8(2):127-30
references: 20583875
references: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008 Nov;295(5):H2113-27
references: 18849330
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 21;110(21):8621-6
references: 23650393
references: J Clin Invest. 2005 Feb;115(2):247-57
references: 15668734
references: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009 Feb;20(1):74-82
references: 19233639
references: Mol Imaging Biol. 2012 Jun;14(3):301-14
references: 21688052
references: J Immunol Methods. 2010 Aug 31;360(1-2):167-72
references: 20600076
references: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007 May;292(5):H2176-83
references: 17189348
references: J Biomed Opt. 2012 Aug;17(8):086005
references: 23224192
references: Cardiovasc Res. 2010 Jul 15;87(2):198-210
references: 20200043
references: Microcirculation. 2006 Oct-Nov;13(7):597-610
references: 16990218
references: Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Aug;21(8):480-7
references: 20541951
references: Circ Res. 2003 Apr 18;92(7):801-8
references: 12623882
references: Semin Immunol. 2008 Apr;20(2):147-56
references: 18201895
references: J Physiol. 2013 Apr 15;591(8):2139-56
references: 23420659
references: Cancer Res. 2010 Sep 15;70(18):7053-62
references: 20823159
references: J Biomed Opt. 2012 Jun;17(6):066019
references: 22734775
references: Cell. 2010 Feb 19;140(4):460-76
references: 20178740
references: J Physiol. 2002 May 1;540(Pt 3):1023-37
references: 11986387
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jul;46(7):2531-9
references: 15980245
references: J Vasc Surg. 2007 May;45(5):1016-21
references: 17391894
references: Am J Physiol. 1994 Oct;267(4 Pt 2):H1507-13
references: 7943396
references: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011 Nov;301(5):H1897-906
references: 21890688
references: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009 Jul;297(1):R6-16
references: 19420292
references: Lymphat Res Biol. 2012 Mar;10(1):20-4
references: 22416911