title: Effect of household-based drinking water chlorination on diarrhoea among children under five in Orissa, India: a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Boiling, disinfecting, and filtering water within the home can improve the microbiological quality of drinking water among the hundreds of millions of people who rely on unsafe water supplies. However, the impact of these interventions on diarrhoea is unclear. Most studies using open trial designs have reported a protective effect on diarrhoea while blinded studies of household water treatment in low-income settings have found no such effect. However, none of those studies were powered to detect an impact among children under five and participants were followed-up over short periods of time. The aim of this study was to measure the effect of in-home water disinfection on diarrhoea among children under five.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We conducted a double-blind randomised controlled trial between November 2010 and December 2011. The study included 2,163 households and 2,986 children under five in rural and urban communities of Orissa, India. The intervention consisted of an intensive promotion campaign and free distribution of sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) tablets during bi-monthly households visits. An independent evaluation team visited households monthly for one year to collect health data and water samples. The primary outcome was the longitudinal prevalence of diarrhoea (3-day point prevalence) among children aged under five. Weight-for-age was also measured at each visit to assess its potential as a proxy marker for diarrhoea. Adherence was monitored each month through caregiver's reports and the presence of residual free chlorine in the child's drinking water at the time of visit. On 20% of the total household visits, children's drinking water was assayed for thermotolerant coliforms (TTC), an indicator of faecal contamination. The primary analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. Binomial regression with a log link function and robust standard errors was used to compare prevalence of diarrhoea between arms. We used generalised estimating equations to account for clustering at the household level. The impact of the intervention on weight-for-age z scores (WAZ) was analysed using random effect linear regression. Over the follow-up period, 84,391 child-days of observations were recorded, representing 88% of total possible child-days of observation. The longitudinal prevalence of diarrhoea among intervention children was 1.69% compared to 1.74% among controls. After adjusting for clustering within household, the prevalence ratio of the intervention to control was 0.95 (95% CI 0.79-1.13). The mean WAZ was similar among children of the intervention and control groups (-1.586 versus -1.589, respectively). Among intervention households, 51% reported their child's drinking water to be treated with the tablets at the time of visit, though only 32% of water samples tested positive for residual chlorine. Faecal contamination of drinking water was lower among intervention households than controls (geometric mean TTC count of 50 [95% CI 44-57] per 100 ml compared to 122 [95% CI 107-139] per 100 ml among controls [p<0.001] [n = 4,546]).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our study was designed to overcome the shortcomings of previous double-blinded trials of household water treatment in low-income settings. The sample size was larger, the follow-up period longer, both urban and rural populations were included, and adherence and water quality were monitored extensively over time. These results provide no evidence that the intervention was protective against diarrhoea. Low compliance and modest reduction in water contamination may have contributed to the lack of effect. However, our findings are consistent with other blinded studies of similar interventions and raise additional questions about the actual health impact of household water treatment under these conditions.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  ClinicalTrials.govNCT01202383 Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
authors: Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. sophie.boisson@lshtm.ac.uk
authors: Sophie
authors: S
authors: Boisson
authors: Matthew
authors: M
authors: Stevenson
authors: Lily
authors: L
authors: Shapiro
authors: Vinod
authors: V
authors: Kumar
authors: Lakhwinder P
authors: LP
authors: Singh
authors: Dana
authors: D
authors: Ward
authors: Thomas
authors: T
authors: Clasen
mesh_terms: D002675:Child, Preschool; D003967:Diarrhea / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology; D004203:Disinfection; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005191:Family Characteristics; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D018508:Water Purification; D014881:Water Supply / Q000032:analysis*
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36735
references: 22586491
references: Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;40(6):1678-92
references: 22268237
references: Epidemiol Infect. 2009 May;137(5):644-53
references: 18840321
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Jan;82(1):16-22
references: 20064989
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Jun;70(6):651-7
references: 15211008
references: Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2006 Mar;209(2):173-81
references: 16387550
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Jul 15;43(14):5542-4; author reply 5545-6
references: 19708394
references: J Water Health. 2007 Sep;5(3):385-94
references: 17878553
references: Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Feb 15;157(4):364-75
references: 12578807
references: BMJ. 2007 Apr 14;334(7597):782
references: 17353208
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Oct;69(4):411-9
references: 14640502
references: Am J Public Health. 2007 May;97(5):846-52
references: 17267712
references: Trop Med Int Health. 2004 Jan;9(1):106-17
references: 14728614
references: J Hyg (Lond). 1985 Apr;94(2):173-80
references: 2985691
references: Br J Nutr. 1999 Sep;82(3):165-77
references: 10655963
references: Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;38(6):1651-61
references: 19574492
references: Lancet. 2010 Jun 5;375(9730):1969-87
references: 20466419
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Dec 1;43(23):8991-7
references: 19943678
references: PLoS Med. 2009 Aug;6(8):e1000125
references: 19688036
references: Control Clin Trials. 2004 Apr;25(2):143-56
references: 15020033
references: Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Sep 15;144(6):582-8
references: 8797518
references: Stat Med. 1996 Jul 15;15(13):1421-34
references: 8841652
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Feb 15;43(4):986-92
references: 19320147
references: Sci Total Environ. 2009 Apr 1;407(8):2621-4
references: 19193396
references: Water Sci Technol. 2008;58(4):757-63
references: 18776609
references: Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):28-55
references: 22036893
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Feb;82(2):289-300
references: 20134007
references: Int J Infect Dis. 2001;5(3):144-50
references: 11724671
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Jan;76(1):187-92
references: 17255252
references: Lancet Infect Dis. 2005 Jan;5(1):42-52
references: 15620560
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Feb;76(2):354-64
references: 17297049
references: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Dec;64(12):1074-9
references: 19955098
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD004794
references: 16856059
references: J Water Health. 2004 Mar;2(1):1-13
references: 15384725
references: Int J Epidemiol. 1991 Dec;20(4):1057-63
references: 1800404
references: PLoS One. 2010 Sep 10;5(9):e12613
references: 20856584