title: On the anthropological foundation of bioethics: a critique of the work of J.-F. Malherbe.
abstract: In this article, I critically analyze the anthropological foundation of the bioethics of philosopher Jean-François Malherbe, particularly as presented in his book, Pour une Éthique de la Médecine. Malherbe argues that such practices as organ donation and transplants, assisted reproduction, resuscitation, and other uses of biotechnologies in contemporary medicine are unethical because they go against essential human nature. Furthermore, he uses this position as a basis to prescribe public policy and institutional practice. In contrast, I argue not only that 'human nature' is much more malleable and adaptive to changes in technology and society than Malherbe allows, but also that his criticisms of medicine and technoscientific development overstep the bounds of the social function of philosophical ethics, which is to inform and clarify public debate. Public policy and institutional practice is thus best left to the democratic political process under the parameters of the just rule of law.
authors: Faculty of Philosophy, University of Sudbury, 935 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada, henrimbulu@hotmail.com.
authors: Henri
authors: H
authors: Mbulu
mesh_terms: D000883:Anthropology; D000884:Anthropology, Cultural; D060432:Anthropology, Medical; D001675:Bioethics; D001709:Biotechnology / Q000941:ethics*; D015510:Clinical Medicine; D004194:Disease; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D040821:Human Characteristics; D006801:Humans; D007049:Iatrogenic Disease; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D028723:Personhood; D010686:Philosophy, Medical; D011050:Policy Making; D011640:Public Policy
references: Hastings Cent Rep. 1979 Aug;9(4):16-22
references: 385551
references: South Calif Law Rev. 1986 Jul;59(5):939-1041
references: 11655852
references: Soc Philos Policy. 1996 Summer;13(2):18-46
references: 11653297
references: Am J Bioeth. 2004 Spring;4(2):67-8
references: 15186699
references: J Med Philos. 2006 Jun;31(3):235-50
references: 16760102
references: J Med Philos. 2006 Jun;31(3):205-12
references: 16760100
references: Theor Med Bioeth. 2012 Jun;33(3):163-78
references: 22528149
references: Theor Med Bioeth. 2000;21(2):153-69
references: 10967951
references: N Engl J Med. 1980 Nov 27;303(22):1293-7
references: 6999354