title: Comparison of Echocardiographic Markers of Cardiac Dyssynchrony and Latest Left Ventricular Activation Site in Heart Failure Patients with and without Left Bundle Branch Block.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Several echocardiographic markers have been introduced to assess the left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony. We studied dyssynchrony markers and the latest LV activation site in heart failure patients with and without left bundle branch block (LBBB).
  
  
  METHODS
  Conventional echocardiography and tissue velocity imaging were performed for 78 patients (LV ejection fraction ≤ 35%), who were divided into two groups: LBBB (n = 37) and non-LBBB (n = 41). Time-to-peak systolic velocity (Ts) was measured in 12 LV segments in the mid and basal levels. Seven dyssynchrony markers were defined: delay and standard deviation (SD) of Ts in all and basal segments, septal-lateral and anteroseptal-posterior wall delay (at the basal level), and interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The LBBB patients had significantly higher QRS duration and IVMD. The posterior wall was the latest activated site in the LBBB and the inferior wall was the latest in the non-LBBB patients. The most common dyssynchrony marker in the LBBB group was the SD of Ts in all segments (73%), whereas it was Ts delay in the basal segments in the non-LBBB group (48.8%). Ts delay and SD of all LV segments, septal lateral delay, septal-to-posterior wall delay by M-mode, pre-ejection period of the aortic valve, and IVMD were significantly higher in the LBBB group than in the non-LBBB group. Also, 29.3% of the non-LBBB and 10.8% of the LBBB patients did not show dyssynchrony by any marker. The number of patients showing dyssynchrony by ≥ 3 markers was remarkably higher in the LBBB patients (73% vs. 43.9%, respectively; p value = 0.044).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The LBBB patients presented with a higher prevalence of dyssynchrony according to the frequently used echocardiographic markers. The latest activation site was different between the groups.
authors: Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
authors: Masoumeh
authors: M
authors: Lotfi-Tokaldany
authors: Zahra Savand
authors: ZS
authors: Roomi
authors: Ali
authors: A
authors: Kasemisaeid
authors: Hakimeh
authors: H
authors: Sadeghian
keywords: Block, left bundle branch; Echocardiography; Heart failure
references: Circulation. 2008 May 20;117(20):2608-16
references: 18458170
references: Heart. 2004 Dec;90 Suppl 6:vi17-22
references: 15564420
references: Circulation. 2002 Oct 15;106(16):2078-84
references: 12379577
references: Circulation. 2005 Aug 16;112(7):992-1000
references: 16087800
references: Circulation. 2001 Dec 18;104(25):3026-9
references: 11748094
references: Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jun 15;103(12):1746-52
references: 19539087
references: Am J Cardiol. 2004 May 1;93(9):1178-81
references: 15110219
references: Europace. 2007 Jan;9(1):41-7
references: 17224421
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Nov 6;40(9):1615-22
references: 12427414
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Oct 21;52(17):1402-9
references: 18940531
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 May 20;51(20):1944-52
references: 18482662
references: J Tehran Heart Cent. 2011 Nov;6(4):193-201
references: 23074368
references: Eur Heart J. 2009 Dec;30(23):2880-7
references: 19136487
references: Am J Cardiol. 2003 Nov 15;92(10):1238-40
references: 14609610
references: Am J Cardiol. 2008 Sep 1;102(5):598-601
references: 18721519
references: Circulation. 2008 May 20;117(20):2617-25
references: 18474810
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Mar 1;45(5):677-84
references: 15734610
references: Echocardiography. 2010 Aug;27(7):823-30
references: 20545999
references: J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Dec;18(12):1440-63
references: 16376782
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Feb 6;39(3):489-99
references: 11823088
references: Echocardiography. 2007 Apr;24(4):348-52
references: 17381642