title: Has the world really survived the population bomb? (Commentary on "how the world survived the population bomb: lessons from 50 years of extraordinary demographic history").
abstract: In his PAA presidential address and corresponding article in Demography, David Lam (Demography 48:1231-1262, 2011) documented the extraordinary progress of humankind-vis-à-vis poverty alleviation, increased schooling, and reductions in mortality and fertility-since 1960 and noted that he expects further improvements by 2050. However, although Lam briefly covered the problems of global warming and pollution, he did not address several other major environmental problems that are closely related to the rapid human population growth in recent decades and to the progress he described. This commentary highlights some of these problems to provide a more balanced perspective on the situation of the world. Specifically, humans currently are using resources at an unsustainable level. Groundwater depletion and overuse of river water are major problems on multiple continents. Fossil fuel resources and several minerals are being depleted. Other major problems include deforestation, with the annual forest clearing globally estimated to be an area the size of New York State; and species extinction, with rates estimated to be 100 to 1,000 times higher than background rates. Principles of ecological economics are presented that allow an integration of ecology and economic development and better potential for preservation of the world for future generations.
authors: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, E4148, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD, USA, 21205, sbecker@jhsph.edu.
authors: Stan
authors: S
authors: Becker
mesh_terms: D001723:Birth Rate / Q000639:trends*; D004467:Economics / Q000639:trends*; D006801:Humans; D011158:Population Growth; D011203:Poverty / Q000639:trends*; D012922:Social Change
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 14;107(50):21300-5
references: 21149725
references: Am J Public Health. 2011 Sep;101(9):1587-97
references: 21778492
references: Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004;17(1):47-57
references: 15212206
references: Nature. 2012 Aug 9;488(7410):197-200
references: 22874965
references: Science. 2010 Sep 10;329(5997):1298-303
references: 20829476
references: Science. 2011 Aug 5;333(6043):712-7
references: 21817042
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 08;280(1754):20122845
references: 23303549
references: PLoS Biol. 2012;10(6):e1001345
references: 22723741
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 10;106(6):1704-9
references: 19179281
references: Nature. 2012 Jun 06;486(7401):52-8
references: 22678279
references: Nature. 2009 Sep 24;461(7263):472-5
references: 19779433
references: Science. 2010 Dec 10;330(6010):1496-501
references: 20978282
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32688
references: 22393438
references: Science. 2008 Aug 15;321(5891):926-9
references: 18703733
references: Demography. 2011 Nov;48(4):1231-62
references: 22005884
references: Ambio. 2011 Nov;40(7):739-61
references: 22338713
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 31;104(31):12942-7
references: 17616580
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 22;107(25):11155-62
references: 20498082
references: J Dev Stud. 2011;47(2):316-37
references: 21506303
references: Science. 2000 Jul 21;289(5478):395-6
references: 10939949
references: PLoS Biol. 2011 Aug;9(8):e1001127
references: 21886479
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 23;105(38):14245-50
references: 18799733