title: Comparison of the neural correlates of encoding item-item and item-context associations.
abstract: fMRI was employed to investigate the role of the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) in the encoding of item-item and item-context associations. On each of a series of study trials subjects viewed a picture that was presented either to the left or right of fixation, along with a subsequently presented word that appeared at fixation. Memory was tested in a subsequent memory test that took place outside of the scanner. On each test trial one of two forced choice judgments was required. For the associative test, subjects chose between the word paired with the picture at study and a word studied on a different trial. For the source test, the judgment was whether the picture had been presented on the left or right. Successful encoding of associative information was accompanied by subsequent memory effects in several cortical regions, including much of the LIFG. By contrast, successful source encoding was selectively associated with a subsequent memory effect in right fusiform cortex. The finding that the LIFG was enhanced during successful associative, but not source, encoding is interpreted in light of the proposal that subsequent memory effects are localized to cortical regions engaged by the on-line demands of the study task.
authors: Center for Vital Longevity and School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas Dallas, TX, USA.
authors: Jenny X
authors: JX
authors: Wong
authors: Marianne
authors: M
authors: de Chastelaine
authors: Michael D
authors: MD
authors: Rugg
keywords: associative memory; episodic encoding; fMRI; source memory; subsequent memory paradigm
references: J Neurosci. 2008 Oct 15;28(42):10541-8
references: 18923030
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90
references: 24203555
references: J Neurosci. 2010 Dec 15;30(50):16809-17
references: 21159952
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov;15(11):527-36
references: 22001867
references: Curr Biol. 2001 Oct 2;11(19):1528-30
references: 11591321
references: Neuropsychologia. 2012 Nov;50(13):3070-9
references: 22732490
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 31;31(35):12613-28
references: 21880922
references: Mem Cognit. 2005 Jan;33(1):151-70
references: 15915801
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jul;23(7):1597-608
references: 20666593
references: Learn Mem. 2012 Nov 19;19(12):605-14
references: 23166292
references: Neuroimage. 2002 Jun;16(2):465-83
references: 12030832
references: Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(5):732-43
references: 15721186
references: Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):693-712
references: 14568445
references: Neuron. 2002 Aug 15;35(4):803-12
references: 12194878
references: Learn Mem. 2008 May 29;15(6):417-25
references: 18511693
references: Cereb Cortex. 2009 Dec;19(12):2767-96
references: 19329570
references: Neuron. 2006 May 4;50(3):507-17
references: 16675403
references: Neuropsychologia. 2012 Dec;50(14):3764-74
references: 22982484
references: Cortex. 2013 Mar;49(3):611-25
references: 23260615
references: J Neurosci. 2009 Jun 24;29(25):8270-9
references: 19553466
references: J Neurosci. 2005 Feb 2;25(5):1203-10
references: 15689557
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Feb 1;6(2):93-102
references: 15866193
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Jan;2(1):51-61
references: 11253359
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 23;94(26):14792-7
references: 9405692
references: Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):456-62
references: 14741683
references: Neuroimage. 2008 Oct 15;43(1):165-72
references: 18675362
references: Brain Res. 2012 Aug 30;1471:81-92
references: 22800807
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Oct;2(10):685-94
references: 11584306
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2533-43
references: 21254802
references: Neuroimage. 2004 Nov;23(3):921-7
references: 15528092
references: J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 6;26(36):9162-72
references: 16957073
references: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009 Feb;91(2):139-54
references: 19028591
references: PLoS Biol. 2006 May;4(5):e128
references: 16605307
references: Neuropsychologia. 2007 Oct 1;45(13):2883-901
references: 17675110
references: Hippocampus. 2007;17(11):1071-80
references: 17604351
references: Brain Res. 2011 Feb 10;1373:110-23
references: 21145314
references: Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2446-61
references: 20869446
references: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(1):137-44
references: 19720071
references: Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(1):2-13
references: 14615072
references: Neuroimage. 2005 Nov 15;28(3):635-62
references: 16172003
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 2;31(44):16026-32
references: 22049444
references: Neuron. 2006 Nov 9;52(3):547-56
references: 17088219
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 Jul 29;354(1387):1215-28
references: 10466147
references: Nat Neurosci. 2009 May;12(5):535-40
references: 19396166
references: Prog Brain Res. 2008;169:339-52
references: 18394485
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jan;23(1):257-65
references: 20146616
references: Cereb Cortex. 2002 Oct;12(10):1048-56
references: 12217968
references: Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):1400-10
references: 14568509
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:1-38
references: 18400922
references: Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):402-7
references: 15641430
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:123-52
references: 17417939
references: Cereb Cortex. 2011 Sep;21(9):2166-76
references: 21282317
references: Neuron. 1999 Jul;23(3):513-22
references: 10433263
references: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan;11(1):103-7
references: 18066057
references: Science. 1998 Aug 21;281(5380):1188-91
references: 9712582