title: Implementation and assessment of an intervention to debias adolescents against causal illusions.
abstract: Researchers have warned that causal illusions are at the root of many superstitious beliefs and fuel many people's faith in pseudoscience, thus generating significant suffering in modern society. Therefore, it is critical that we understand the mechanisms by which these illusions develop and persist. A vast amount of research in psychology has investigated these mechanisms, but little work has been done on the extent to which it is possible to debias individuals against causal illusions. We present an intervention in which a sample of adolescents was introduced to the concept of experimental control, focusing on the need to consider the base rate of the outcome variable in order to determine if a causal relationship exists. The effectiveness of the intervention was measured using a standard contingency learning task that involved fake medicines that typically produce causal illusions. Half of the participants performed the contingency learning task before participating in the educational intervention (the control group), and the other half performed the task after they had completed the intervention (the experimental group). The participants in the experimental group made more realistic causal judgments than did those in the control group, which served as a baseline. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first evidence-based educational intervention that could be easily implemented to reduce causal illusions and the many problems associated with them, such as superstitions and belief in pseudoscience.
authors: Departamento de Fundamentos y Métodos de la Psicología, Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao, Spain. itxaso.barberia@deusto.es
authors: Itxaso
authors: I
authors: Barberia
authors: Fernando
authors: F
authors: Blanco
authors: Carmelo P
authors: CP
authors: Cubillas
authors: Helena
authors: H
authors: Matute
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D006801:Humans; D007088:Illusions / Q000523:psychology*; D007600:Judgment; D007858:Learning; D010465:Perception; D011287:Prejudice / Q000517:prevention & control*
references: Cogn Psychol. 2007 Feb;54(1):33-61
references: 16764849
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Feb;134(1):10-22
references: 15702960
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e46203
references: 23029435
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Jul;29(4):710-27
references: 12924869
references: Can J Exp Psychol. 2009 Mar;63(1):59-73
references: 19271817
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1119-40
references: 14622051
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1979 Dec;108(4):441-85
references: 528910
references: J Law Med. 2012 Mar;19(3):454-78
references: 22558899
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jul;64(7):1290-304
references: 21432736
references: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Jul;4(4):390-8
references: 26158987
references: Q J Exp Psychol B. 2005 Apr;58(2):177-92
references: 16095045
references: J Sch Psychol. 2012 Feb;50(1):7-36
references: 22386075
references: Mem Cognit. 1995 Jul;23(4):510-24
references: 7666763
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Aug;14(4):577-96
references: 17972719
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
references: 3806354
references: Psychol Rev. 2004 Jul;111(3):781-99
references: 15250784
references: Br J Psychol. 2011 Aug;102(3):392-405
references: 21751996
references: J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011 Jul;15(3):298-303
references: 21665105
references: Psychol Monogr. 1965;79:SUPPL 1:1-17
references: 14300511
references: J Sports Sci Med. 2011 Mar 01;10(1):230-1
references: 24137054
references: Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):996-7
references: 17510356
references: Am Psychol. 2003 Sep;58(9):697-720
references: 14584987
references: Lancet. 2005 Aug 27-Sep 2;366(9487):726-32
references: 16125589