title: Postpartum contraception in publicly-funded programs and interpregnancy intervals.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess the extent to which women received contraceptive services within 90 days after birth at their first or subsequent visits and whether contraceptive provision was associated with optimal interpregnancy intervals.
  
  
  METHODS
  We linked California's 2008 Birth Statistical Master File with Medicaid databases to build a cohort of women aged 15-44 years who had given birth in 2008 and received publicly-funded health care services in the 18 months after their previous live birth (N=117,644). We determined whether provision of contraception within 90 days after birth was associated with optimal interpregnancy intervals when controlling for covariates.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Only 41% (n=48,775) of women had a contraceptive claim within 90 days after birth. To avoid short interpregnancy intervals, 6 women would need to receive contraception to avoid one additional short interval (number needed to treat=6.38). Receipt of a contraceptive method, receiving contraception at the first clinic visit, and being seen by Medi-Cal and its family planning expansion program were significantly associated with avoidance of short interpregnancy intervals. Receiving contraception at the first postpartum clinic visit had an additional independent effect on avoiding short interpregnancy intervals when controlling for the other variables. Although foreign-born women had 47% higher odds of avoiding short interpregnancy intervals than U.S.-born women, women of Asian and Pacific Islander ethnicity had 24% lower odds of avoiding short interpregnancy intervals than white women.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Findings of this study suggest that closer attention to provision of postpartum contraception in publicly-funded programs has the potential to improve optimal interpregnancy intervals among low-income women.
  
  
  METHODS
  II.
authors: Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Sacramento, California.
authors: Heike
authors: H
authors: Thiel de Bocanegra
authors: Richard
authors: R
authors: Chang
authors: Mary
authors: M
authors: Menz
authors: Mike
authors: M
authors: Howell
authors: Philip
authors: P
authors: Darney
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002140:California; D003267:Contraception / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008423:Maternal Age; D008484:Medicaid / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010298:Parity; D049590:Postpartum Period / Q000208:ethnology*; D011247:Pregnancy; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D014481:United States; D055815:Young Adult
references: Zhu BP, Rolfs RT, Nangle BE, Horan JM. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes. N Engl J Med 1999;340:589–94.
references: Basso O, Olsen J, Knudsen LB, Christensen K. Low birth weight and preterm birth after short interpregnancy intervals. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:259–63.
references: Hussaini KS, Ritenour D, Coonrod DV. Interpregnancy intervals and the risk for infant mortality: a case control study of Arizona infants 2003–2007. Matern Child Health J 2013;17:646–53.
references: Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2006;295:1809–23.
references: Zhu B, Haines K, Le T, McGrath-Miller K, Boulton M. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes among black and white women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1403–10.
references: James AT, Bracken MB, Cohen AP, Saftlas A, Lieberman E. Interpregnancy interval and disparity in term small for gestational age births between black and white women. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:109–12.
references: Speroff L, Mishell DR. The postpartum visit: it’s time for a change in order to optimally initiate contraception. Contraception 2008;78:90–8.
references: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010;59:1–86.
references: Fellegi IP, Sunter AB. A theory for record linkage. J Am Stat Assoc 1969;64:1183–210.
references: Bryant A, Fernandez-Lamothe A, Kupperman M. Attitudes toward birth spacing among low-income, postpartum women: a qualitative analysis. Matern Child Health J 2012;16:1440–6.
references: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Contraceptive use among postpartum women—12 states and New York City, 2004–2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009;58:821–6.
references: Tsa PJS, Nakashima L, Yamamoto J, Ngo L, Kaneshiro B. Postpartum follow-up rates before and after the postpartum follow-up initiative at Queen Emma clinic. Hawaii Med J 2011;70:56–9.
references: Bryant AS, Haas JS, McElrath TF, McCormick MC. Predictors of compliance with the postpartum visit among women living in healthy start project areas. Matern Child Health J 2006;10:511–6.
references: Hernandez LE, Sappenfield WM, Goodman D, Pooler J. Is effective contraceptive use conceived prenatally in Florida? The association between prenatal contraceptive counseling and postpartum contraceptive use. Matern Child Health J 2012;16:423–9.
references: Smith KB, Van der Spuy ZM, Cheng L, Elton R, Glasier AF. Is postpartum contraceptive advice given antenatally of value? Contraception 2002;65:237–43.
references: Akman M, Tuzun S, Uzuner A, Basgul A, Kavak Z. The influence of prenatal counseling on postpartum contraceptive choice. J Int Med Res 2010;38:1243–9.
references: Gil SL. Breastfeeding by Hispanic women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2009;38:244–52.
references: Wojcicki JM, Gugig R, Tran C, Kathiravan S, Holbrook K, Heyman MB. Early exclusive breastfeeding and maternal attitudes towards infant feeding in a population of new mothers in San Francisco, California. Breastfeed Med 2010;5:9–15.