title: Individual differences in children's private speech: the role of imaginary companions.
abstract: Relations between children's imaginary companion status and their engagement in private speech during free play were investigated in a socially diverse sample of 5-year-olds (N=148). Controlling for socioeconomic status, receptive verbal ability, total number of utterances, and duration of observation, there was a main effect of imaginary companion status on type of private speech. Children who had imaginary companions were more likely to engage in covert private speech compared with their peers who did not have imaginary companions. These results suggest that the private speech of children with imaginary companions is more internalized than that of their peers who do not have imaginary companions and that social engagement with imaginary beings may fulfill a similar role to social engagement with real-life partners in the developmental progression of private speech.
authors: Department of Psychology and Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.
authors: Paige E
authors: PE
authors: Davis
authors: Elizabeth
authors: E
authors: Meins
authors: Charles
authors: C
authors: Fernyhough
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002663:Child Language; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination; D007206:Individuality; D008297:Male; D002666:Psychology, Child; D013060:Speech
keywords: Imaginary companions; Imagination; Internalization; Play; Private speech; Social interaction
references: Child Dev. 1997 Jun;68(3):436-55
references: 9249959
references: Dev Psychol. 2004 Nov;40(6):1173-87
references: 15535765
references: Dev Psychol. 2006 Jan;42(1):117-31
references: 16420122
references: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1991 Jun;19(3):357-77
references: 1865050
references: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;48(11):1094-101
references: 17995485
references: Br J Dev Psychol. 2011 Sep;29(Pt 3):680-6
references: 21848753
references: Dev Psychol. 2000 Jul;36(4):419-28
references: 10902694
references: J Child Lang. 2003 Aug;30(3):583-608
references: 14513469
references: J Genet Psychol. 1999 Dec;160(4):397-410
references: 10584318
references: Dev Psychopathol. 2012 May;24(2):651-60
references: 22559137
references: Infancy. 2012 Jul;17(4):393-415
references: 32693485
references: Child Dev. 2003 May-Jun;74(3):659-78
references: 12795383
references: J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Dec;107(4):438-51
references: 20633894
references: Dev Psychol. 2002 Nov;38(6):979-92
references: 12428709
references: Child Dev. 1968 Sep;39(3):691-736
references: 5687321
references: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999 Sep;40(6):891-904
references: 10509884
references: Infancy. 2011 Mar;16(2):137-165
references: 32693527
references: Child Dev. 2009 Jul-Aug;80(4):1301-13
references: 19630910
references: Child Dev. 1993 Apr;64(2):556-71
references: 8477634
references: Dev Sci. 2008 Jul;11(4):531-40
references: 18576961