title: Assessment of waist-to-hip ratio attractiveness in women: an anthropometric analysis of digital silhouettes.
abstract: The low proportion of waist to hip size in females is a unique and adaptive human feature. In contemporary human populations, the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) is negatively associated with women's health, fecundity, and cognitive ability. It is, therefore, hypothesized that men will prefer women with low WHR. Although this prediction is supported by many studies, considerable disagreement persists about which WHR values are the most attractive and the importance of WHR for attractiveness of the female body. Unfortunately, the methods applied thus far are flawed in several ways. In the present study, we investigated male preferences for female WHR using a high precision assessment procedure and digitally manufactured, high quality, anthropometrically informed stimuli which were disentangled from body mass covariation. Forty men were requested to choose the most attractive silhouette consecutively from six series (2 levels of realism × 3 levels of body mass), each consisting of 26 female images that varied in WHR (from .60 to .85 by .01). Substantial inter-individual variation in the choices made was observed. Nevertheless, low and average WHR values were chosen more frequently than above-average values or values below the normal variation of the trait. This preference pattern mirrors the relationship between WHR and mate value, suggesting that the preferences are adaptive.
authors: Institute of Anthropology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614, Poznan, Poland, koscinski@amu.edu.pl.
authors: Krzysztof
authors: K
authors: Kościński
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000886:Anthropometry; D001504:Beauty; D002755:Choice Behavior; D005260:Female; D005298:Fertility; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012747:Sexual Partners; D049629:Waist-Hip Ratio; D055815:Young Adult
references: J Theor Biol. 2009 Feb 7;256(3):343-50
references: 19013182
references: Biol Psychol. 2006 Feb;71(2):223-9
references: 16019126
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jun 22;271(1545):1213-7
references: 15306344
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Nov 7;269(1506):2205-13
references: 12427313
references: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999 Feb;23(2):116-25
references: 10078844
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Feb 22;271(1537):347-52
references: 15101692
references: Biol Psychol. 2005 Mar;68(3):299-308
references: 15620796
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jul 7;269(1498):1331-40
references: 12079655
references: Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Feb;40(1):43-50
references: 19688590
references: Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Jan 22;266(1415):211-8
references: 10097394
references: Hum Reprod. 1997 Sep;12(9):2057-60
references: 9363729
references: J Evol Biol. 2010 Oct;23(10):2238-48
references: 20840313
references: Am J Hum Biol. 2003 Mar-Apr;15(2):144-50
references: 12621602
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Aug;65(2):293-307
references: 8366421
references: Perception. 2006;35(12):1693-7
references: 17283934
references: Nature. 1994 Mar 17;368(6468):239-42
references: 8145822