title: Development of biodegradable polycaprolactone film as an internal fixation material to enhance tendon repair: an in vitro study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Current tendon repair techniques do not provide sufficient tensile strength at the repair site, and thus early active motion rehabilitation after tendon repair is discouraged. To enhance the post-operative tensile strength, we proposed and tested an internal fixation technique using a polycaprolactone (PCL) biofilm. PCL was chosen for its good biocompatibility, excellent mechanical strength, and an appropriate degradation time scale.
  
  
  METHODS
  PCL biofilms were prepared by a modified melt-molding/leaching technique, and the physical and mechanical properties and in vitro degradation rate were assessed. The pore size distribution of the biofilm and the paratenon of native tendons were observed using scanning electron microscopy. Next, we determined whether this biofilm could enhance the tensile strength of repaired tendons. We performed tensile tests on rabbit Achilles tendons that were first lacerated and then repaired: 1) using modified Kessler suture combined with running peripheral suture ('control' group), or 2) using biofilm to wrap the tendon and then fixation with sutures ('biofilm' group). The influence of different repair techniques on tendon tensile strength was evaluated by mechanical testing.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The novel biofilm had supple texture and a smooth surface. The mean thickness of the biofilm was 0.25 mm. The mean porosity of the biofilm was 45.3%. The paratenon of the rabbit Achilles tendon had pores with diameters ranging from 1 to 9 μm, which were similar to the 4-12 μm diameter pores in the biofilm cross-section. The weight loss of the biofilms at 4 weeks was only 0.07%. The molecular weight of PCL biofilms did not change after immersion in phosphate buffered saline for 4 weeks. The failure loads of the biofilm were similar before (48 ± 9 N) and after immersion (47 ± 7 N, P > 0.1). The biofilm group had ~70% higher mean failure loads and 93% higher stiffness compared with the control group.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We proposed and tested an internal fixation technique using a PCL biofilm to enhance tendon repair. Internal fixation with the biofilm followed by standard suturing can significantly increase the tensile strength of tendon repair sites. This technique has the potential to allow active motion rehabilitation during the early post-operative period.
authors: Jian-Zhong
authors: JZ
authors: Hu
authors: Yong-Chun
authors: YC
authors: Zhou
authors: Li-Hua
authors: LH
authors: Huang
authors: Hong-Bin
authors: HB
authors: Lu
mesh_terms: D020341:Absorbable Implants / Q000639:trends; D000125:Achilles Tendon / Q000293:injuries* / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D000818:Animals; D018441:Biofilms; D016268:Internal Fixators / Q000639:trends; D011091:Polyesters / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000378:metabolism; D011817:Rabbits; D013708:Tendon Injuries / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D013718:Tensile Strength / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology
chemical_list: D011091:Polyesters; C016240:polycaprolactone
references: Open Orthop J. 2012;6:28-35
references: 22431948
references: J Hand Surg Am. 1996 Mar;21(2):234-9
references: 8683052
references: J Hand Surg Am. 1992 Mar;17(2):291-8
references: 1564277
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Jun;83(6):891-9
references: 11407798
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963 Sep;45:1217-33
references: 14077985
references: J Trauma. 1962 Mar;2:175-84
references: 14488263
references: J Hand Surg Am. 1979 Sep;4(5):454-60
references: 387859
references: J Hand Surg Br. 1989 Nov;14(4):392-5
references: 2621397
references: J Hand Surg Am. 1994 Jul;19(4):626-35
references: 7963323
references: Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1964 Aug;119:241-50
references: 14200952
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 May;(386):252-9
references: 11347844
references: Biomaterials. 2006 Mar;27(9):1735-40
references: 16198413
references: Chir Main. 2001 Dec;20(6):458-65
references: 11778333
references: Am J Surg. 1965 Mar;109:346-52
references: 14259163
references: J Hand Surg Br. 1989 Nov;14(4):363-7
references: 2695587
references: Hand Clin. 1985 Feb;1(1):55-68
references: 3912395
references: Hand Clin. 1985 Feb;1(1):43-53
references: 3912394
references: J Hand Surg Am. 1993 Jan;18(1):58-65
references: 8423320
references: Hand. 1981 Jun;13(2):120-8
references: 7286796
references: J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012 Nov;23(11):2619-30
references: 22875607
references: Hand Clin. 2010 May;26(2):179-89
references: 20494744
references: Ann Chir Main Memb Super. 1997;16(3):229-34
references: 9421604
references: J Orthop Res. 1991 Sep;9(5):705-13
references: 1870034
references: Acta Orthop Scand. 1981 Dec;52(6):615-22
references: 7331798
references: J Hand Surg Am. 1985 Nov;10(6 Pt 1):776-84
references: 2416800
references: J Hand Surg Am. 1977 Nov;2(6):441-51
references: 336675
references: Hand. 1973 Oct;5(3):253-5
references: 4583860
references: J Hand Surg Am. 1990 Nov;15(6):953-8
references: 2269790
references: Biomaterials. 2000 Dec;21(23):2335-46
references: 11055281
references: J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 Jul;37(6):555-63
references: 22170243
references: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013 Jan;101(1):167-75
references: 22829533
references: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 Sep 1;90(3):906-19
references: 18646204
references: Hand Clin. 1985 Feb;1(1):35-42
references: 4093463
references: JAMA. 1964 Jan 18;187:187-91
references: 14067983
references: Hand. 1975 Oct;7(3):250-5
references: 1107183
references: Biomaterials. 2012 Sep;33(27):6551-8
references: 22710127
references: J Hand Surg Am. 1982 Mar;7(2):170-5
references: 7069172
references: J Hand Surg Br. 1988 Aug;13(3):237-45
references: 3049854
references: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012 May;100(4):956-66
references: 22447487
references: Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012;67(6):629-38
references: 22760903
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Nov-Dec;(153):283-9
references: 7449228
references: Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 1997 Dec;1(4):286-96
references: 16609498
references: J Hand Surg Br. 1994 Oct;19(5):607-12
references: 7822920
references: J Hand Ther. 2005 Apr-Jun;18(2):94-110; quiz 111
references: 15891967