title: Mass drug administration for elimination of lymphatic filariasis: Recent experiences from a district of West Bengal, India.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Annual mass drug administration (MDA) with diethyl carbamazine (DEC) and Albendazole is the most cost-effective strategy to control lymphatic filariasis (LF).
  
  
  METHODS
  The aim of the present study was to assess the coverage and the compliance of MDA, to elicit factors that influenced compliance, to document side-effects reported and to assess the awareness of the community regarding the disease and MDA program in Bankura district, West Bengal after 2012 round of MDA. Multistage cluster sampling method was adopted. Total four clusters; three villages and one urban municipality ward were selected. In each cluster, minimum 30 families were randomly selected and the head or any responsible family member was interviewed using a pre-designed, pre-tested schedule after taking written informed consent. Data were compiled and analyzed using SPSS 19.0.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Total eligible population was 683 among which 98.8% received both the drugs. About 5% of the recipients took none of the drugs. More than two-thirds of the families took unsupervised dose. Drug compliance rate was significantly lower in urban (90.7%) than in the rural clusters (95.7%) (z = 2.46, P < 0.05). Effective coverage rate was significantly lower in urban than in the rural clusters (87.4% vs. 95.3%; z = 3.57, P < 0.01). Coverage compliance gap was higher in urban (5.7%) than in rural cluster (3.9%). Fear of side-effects was the main reason for non-compliance. Reported side-effects were few, mild, and transient. Around 60% of the surveyed families were aware about the MDA program whereas, 67% of them heard about LF. Only 41% families were provided information, education, and communication in last 15 days before MDA. Major sources of information for the surveyed families were leaflets (20.3%) and poster (9.8%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Widespread rural urban variation in performance status, poor social mobilization activities, lack of supervised dosing, and lack of knowledge of the community about the disease and the program are the major areas of concern.
authors: Department of Community Medicine, Bankura Sammilani Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal, India.
authors: Santanu
authors: S
authors: Ghosh
authors: Amrita
authors: A
authors: Samanta
authors: Seshadri
authors: S
authors: Kole
keywords: Coverage compliance gap; effective coverage rate; lymphatic filariasis; mass drug administration
references: Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002 Dec;96 Suppl 2:S15-40
references: 12630391
references: Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2004 Oct;98(7):703-14
references: 15509424
references: Indian J Community Med. 2008 Jan;33(1):38-42
references: 19966995
references: Filaria J. 2007 Nov 15;6:11
references: 18005398
references: Trop Med Int Health. 2006 Nov;11(11):1731-40
references: 17054754
references: Trends Parasitol. 2004 Nov;20(11):499-502
references: 15471698
references: J Vector Borne Dis. 2011 Jun;48(2):101-4
references: 21715733
references: Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2007 Oct 19;82(42):361-80
references: 17948605
references: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Dec;102(12):1207-13
references: 18632125
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996 Mar;54(3):299-303
references: 8600770
references: Parasit Vectors. 2008 May 27;1(1):14
references: 18505577
references: J Vector Borne Dis. 2008 Mar;45(1):73-5
references: 18399322
references: Filaria J. 2003 Sep 9;2(1):13
references: 13129436
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48395
references: 23185256