title: Response to letters regarding article, “Randomized comparison of sevoflurane versus propofol to reduce perioperative myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery".
authors: Giovanna A L
authors: GA
authors: Lurati Buse
authors: Philippe
authors: P
authors: Schumacher
authors: Esther
authors: E
authors: Seeberger
authors: Wolfgang
authors: W
authors: Studer
authors: Regina M
authors: RM
authors: Schuman
authors: Jens
authors: J
authors: Fassl
authors: Jorge
authors: J
authors: Kasper
authors: Miodrag
authors: M
authors: Filipovic
authors: Daniel
authors: D
authors: Bolliger
authors: Manfred D
authors: MD
authors: Seeberger
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007431:Intraoperative Complications / Q000517:prevention & control*; D008297:Male; D008738:Methyl Ethers / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D017202:Myocardial Ischemia / Q000517:prevention & control*; D019990:Perioperative Care / Q000379:methods*; D015742:Propofol / Q000627:therapeutic use*
chemical_list: D008738:Methyl Ethers; D015742:Propofol