title: Acoustical correlates of performance on a dynamic range compression discrimination task.
abstract: Dynamic range compression is widely used to reduce the difference between the most and least intense portions of a signal. Such compression distorts the shape of the amplitude envelope of a signal, but it is unclear to what extent such distortions are actually perceivable by listeners. Here, the ability to distinguish between compressed and uncompressed versions of a noise vocoded sentence was initially measured in listeners with normal hearing while varying the threshold, ratio, attack, and release parameters. This narrow condition was selected in order to characterize perception under the most favorable listening conditions. The average behavioral sensitivity to compression was highly correlated to several acoustical indices of modulation depth. In particular, performance was highly correlated to the Euclidean distance between the modulation spectra of the uncompressed and compressed signals. Suggesting that this relationship is not restricted to the initial test conditions, the correlation remained largely unchanged both (1) when listeners with normal hearing were tested using a time-compressed version of the original signal, and (2) when listeners with impaired hearing were tested using the original signal. If this relationship generalizes to more ecologically valid conditions, it will provide a straightforward method for predicting the detectability of compression-induced distortions.
authors: Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, Illinois 60201, USA. a-sabin@northwestern.edu
authors: Andrew T
authors: AT
authors: Sabin
authors: Frederick J
authors: FJ
authors: Gallun
authors: Pamela E
authors: PE
authors: Souza
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000162:Acoustics; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001302:Audiometry, Speech; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D005260:Female; D006319:Hearing Loss, Sensorineural / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009622:Noise / Q000009:adverse effects*; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D019986:Persons with Hearing Disabilities / Q000523:psychology*; D011571:Psychoacoustics; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D013067:Speech Perception; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Mar;105(3):1801-9
references: 10089603
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Dec;106(6):3603-19
references: 10615700
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Nov;102(5 Pt 1):2906-19
references: 9373977
references: Ear Hear. 1986 Aug;7(4):257-65
references: 3743918
references: Audiology. 1984;23(5):453-66
references: 6487143
references: Trends Amplif. 2002 Dec;6(4):131-65
references: 25425919
references: Science. 1995 Oct 13;270(5234):303-4
references: 7569981
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Sep;106(3 Pt 1):1452-64
references: 10489703
references: Scand Audiol Suppl. 1993;38:92-100
references: 8153570
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Dec;106(6):3637-48
references: 10615702
references: Am J Audiol. 2013 Dec;22(2):216-25
references: 23824436
references: Br J Audiol. 1992 Dec;26(6):351-61
references: 1292819
references: Br J Audiol. 1992 Aug;26(4):229-37
references: 1446186
references: J Speech Hear Res. 1984 Dec;27(4):571-7
references: 6521465
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 Jul;74(1):67-72
references: 6886200
references: Int J Audiol. 2006 Mar;45(3):130-52
references: 16579490
references: Trends Amplif. 2008 Jun;12(2):103-12
references: 18567591
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 May;81(5):1546-56
references: 3584692
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+
references: 5541744
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Oct;51(5):1315-27
references: 18664702
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Jun;48(3):651-67
references: 16197279
references: Ear Hear. 1994 Feb;15(1):93-9
references: 8194684
references: Ear Hear. 2008 Oct;29(5):800-13
references: 18596640
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2311-23
references: 15532662
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Nov;106(5):2719-32
references: 10573888
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug;118(2):887-906
references: 16158645
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jul;124(1):422-38
references: 18646987
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Mar;121(3):1654-64
references: 17407902
references: Int J Audiol. 2003 Jul;42 Suppl 1:S77-85
references: 12918613
references: Ear Hear. 2010 Apr;31(2):268-76
references: 20071993
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):188-94
references: 19170481
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 Aug;74(2):467-73
references: 6619424
references: J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Jun;35(3):642-53
references: 1608256
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Nov;102(5 Pt 1):2892-905
references: 9373976
references: Audiology. 1985;24(2):117-34
references: 3994589
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Feb;95(2):1085-99
references: 8132902
references: Am J Audiol. 1994 Nov 1;3(3):51-65
references: 26661811
references: Int J Audiol. 2008 Apr;47(4):189-98
references: 18389415
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Mar;83(3):1093-101
references: 3356814
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 Mar;73(3):976-84
references: 6841824
references: J Neurosci. 2012 May 9;32(19):6542-9
references: 22573676
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Sep;88(3):1367-73
references: 2229672
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Jun;101(6):3688-93
references: 9193056
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Jul;94(1):1-12
references: 8354752
references: Int J Audiol. 2004 Sep;43(8):442-8
references: 15643737
references: Int J Audiol. 2010 Dec;49(12):891-903
references: 21070124