title: A systematic review of plate versus intramedullary fixation in the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures.
abstract: The best method of fixation for clavicle fractures is not known. The purpose of this review was to examine the evidence comparing plate and intramedullary fixation for midshaft clavicle fractures. A search of MEDLINE in September 2011 identified five papers that compared plate and intramedullary fixation, and fulfilled our eligibility criteria, consisting of; one randomised controlled trial, two quasi-randomised controlled trials, and two retrospective studies. Level of evidence was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network guidance and the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group's quality assessment tool. No attempt at meta-analysis was made due to the heterogeneity of the study populations and interventions. We found no difference between intramedullary fixation and plate fixation. There was a trend towards a lower complication rate with intramedullary fixation. On the basis of the available evidence, we would advocate both techniques for the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures.
authors: University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, UK. timbarlow@doctors.org.uk
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Barlow
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Beazley
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Barlow
mesh_terms: D001860:Bone Plates; D002968:Clavicle / Q000293:injuries* / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal; D005594:Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary; D050723:Fractures, Bone / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D020127:Recovery of Function; D012606:Scotland / Q000453:epidemiology; D016896:Treatment Outcome
keywords: Clavicle; fracture fixation; internal; intramedullary