title: Global workspace dynamics: cortical "binding and propagation" enables conscious contents.
abstract: A global workspace (GW) is a functional hub of binding and propagation in a population of loosely coupled signaling elements. In computational applications, GW architectures recruit many distributed, specialized agents to cooperate in resolving focal ambiguities. In the brain, conscious experiences may reflect a GW function. For animals, the natural world is full of unpredictable dangers and opportunities, suggesting a general adaptive pressure for brains to resolve focal ambiguities quickly and accurately. GW theory aims to understand the differences between conscious and unconscious brain events. In humans and related species the cortico-thalamic (C-T) core is believed to underlie conscious aspects of perception, thinking, learning, feelings of knowing (FOK), felt emotions, visual imagery, working memory, and executive control. Alternative theoretical perspectives are also discussed. The C-T core has many anatomical hubs, but conscious percepts are unitary and internally consistent at any given moment. Over time, conscious contents constitute a very large, open set. This suggests that a brain-based GW capacity cannot be localized in a single anatomical hub. Rather, it should be sought in a functional hub - a dynamic capacity for binding and propagation of neural signals over multiple task-related networks, a kind of neuronal cloud computing. In this view, conscious contents can arise in any region of the C-T core when multiple input streams settle on a winner-take-all equilibrium. The resulting conscious gestalt may ignite an any-to-many broadcast, lasting ∼100-200 ms, and trigger widespread adaptation in previously established networks. To account for the great range of conscious contents over time, the theory suggests an open repertoire of binding coalitions that can broadcast via theta/gamma or alpha/gamma phase coupling, like radio channels competing for a narrow frequency band. Conscious moments are thought to hold only 1-4 unrelated items; this small focal capacity may be the biological price to pay for global access. Visuotopic maps in cortex specialize in features like color, retinal size, motion, object identity, and egocentric/allocentric framing, so that a binding coalition for the sight of a rolling billiard ball in nearby space may resonate among activity maps of LGN, V1-V4, MT, IT, as well as the dorsal stream. Spatiotopic activity maps can bind into coherent gestalts using adaptive resonance (reentry). Single neurons can join a dominant coalition by phase tuning to regional oscillations in the 4-12 Hz range. Sensory percepts may bind and broadcast from posterior cortex, while non-sensory FOKs may involve prefrontal and frontotemporal areas. The anatomy and physiology of the hippocampal complex suggest a GW architecture as well. In the intact brain the hippocampal complex may support conscious event organization as well as episodic memory storage.
authors: The Neurosciences Institute La Jolla, CA, USA.
authors: Bernard J
authors: BJ
authors: Baars
authors: Stan
authors: S
authors: Franklin
authors: Thomas Zoega
authors: TZ
authors: Ramsoy
keywords: attention; awareness; brain dynamics; consciousness; cortex; global workspace theory; theoretical biology; voluntary control
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Apr;7(4):166-172
references: 12691765
references: Neuroscience. 1991;44(3):521-35
references: 1754050
references: Neural Netw. 2007 Nov;20(9):1021-31
references: 17923391
references: Cognition. 2001 Apr;79(1-2):1-37
references: 11164022
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Jan 1;6(1):47-52
references: 11849615
references: Neural Netw. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(5-6):491-501
references: 19625165
references: PLoS Biol. 2009 Mar 17;7(3):e61
references: 19296722
references: PLoS One. 2011 Apr 25;6(4):e14803
references: 21541015
references: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Aug;36(7):1640-5
references: 22465050
references: Cereb Cortex. 2008 Feb;18(2):386-96
references: 17556771
references: Brain. 2012 Apr;135(Pt 4):1308-20
references: 22226806
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Nov;14(11):506-15
references: 20932795
references: J Neurophysiol. 2011 Sep;106(3):1068-77
references: 21676936
references: PLoS One. 2009 Jul 03;4(7):e6142
references: 19582165
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 5;107(40):17356-61
references: 20855620
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Mar;2(3):194-203
references: 11256080
references: Neuroscience. 2006;137(4):1087-106
references: 16343791
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 19;103(51):19219-20
references: 17159140
references: Neuron. 2011 Apr 28;70(2):200-27
references: 21521609
references: J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 26;32(39):13402-10
references: 23015431
references: Trends Neurosci. 2001 Aug;24(8):455-63
references: 11476885
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e33477
references: 22496749
references: Neuroreport. 2007 May 28;18(8):753-6
references: 17471060
references: Cognition. 1989 Nov;33(1-2):25-62
references: 2691184
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2003 Aug;19(4):248-72
references: 12874778
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Oct 5;367(1603):2704-14
references: 22927569
references: Nature. 2010 Oct 28;467(7319):1104-8
references: 20981100
references: Prog Brain Res. 2006;159:275-95
references: 17071238
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 4;105(9):3593-8
references: 18292226
references: Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 1;37(1):343-60
references: 17553704
references: J Anat. 2005 Jul;207(1):35-66
references: 16011544
references: Cognition. 2005 Dec;98(2):157-76
references: 16307957
references: Trends Neurosci. 1992 Jan;15(1):20-5
references: 1374953
references: Hippocampus. 2010 Nov;20(11):1206-16
references: 20824723
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013 Apr;23(2):239-44
references: 23273731
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:57-86
references: 11283305
references: Hippocampus. 2010 Jan;20(1):11-8
references: 19405148
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Apr;8(4):143-5
references: 15551481
references: Neuron. 2012 Jun 7;74(5):924-35
references: 22681695
references: Trends Neurosci. 2000 Oct;23(10):475-83
references: 11006464
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Jun 29;360(1458):1271-9
references: 16147522
references: Exp Brain Res. 2010 Nov;207(1-2):27-38
references: 20878395
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 May;10(5):204-11
references: 16603406
references: Neuron. 2001 Aug 30;31(4):653-60
references: 11545723
references: Conscious Cogn. 2001 Jun;10(2):165-83
references: 11414713
references: J Neurosci. 2006 Jan 4;26(1):63-72
references: 16399673
references: Neuropsychol Rev. 2005 Sep;15(3):105-30
references: 16328731
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Nov 29;353(1377):1801-18
references: 9854253
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Nov;132(3):221-7
references: 19664742
references: Neural Netw. 2007 Nov;20(9):955-61
references: 17998071
references: Hippocampus. 2001;11(6):707-14
references: 11811665
references: Neuropsychologia. 2008 Feb 12;46(3):774-85
references: 18037456
references: Lancet Neurol. 2012 Sep;11(9):814-26
references: 22898735
references: Front Psychol. 2011 Jan 25;2:4
references: 21713129
references: J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 27;32(26):8988-99
references: 22745498
references: Science. 2005 Sep 30;309(5744):2228-32
references: 16195466
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 27;107(30):13485-90
references: 20628011
references: PLoS Biol. 2005 May;3(5):e141
references: 15819609
references: Hippocampus. 2000;10(4):352-68
references: 10985275