title: The pattern of medical errors and litigation against doctors in Saudi Arabia.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Adverse events are frequent in clinical practice, but only a few studies in Saudi Arabia have addressed them. The current study was designed to review the lawsuits against healthcare professionals by analyzing records of the cases dealt with by the Medico-legal Committees (MLC) in various provinces in Saudi Arabia, in order to determine the pattern of medical errors and litigations in the country.
  
  
  METHODS
  A pre-designed data sheet was used to collect data from the records of the Medical Violation Committee (MVC) and the Medical Jurisprudence Committee (MJC). The data sheets consisted of information on details of the cases, details on where the error had occurred, and details of the errors.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The review of records revealed 642 cases, most of which were from hospitals run by the Ministry of Health (MOH). The operating room was where most of the errors (20.4%) had occurred, followed by the emergency room (18.1%). Surgery was at the top of the specialties (25.1%). Most of the deaths occurred in surgery and obstetrics (about 25% for each), followed by other medical specialties (17%). About half of the lawsuit cases studied (46.5%) involved patients belonging to a relatively young age group (20-50 years).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Most of the medical error litigations involved surgeons and obstetricians especially in MOH hospitals. The process of litigations and documentation need to be improved, and access to the records for research and education need to be made easier. In addition, there is a need for more prospective field studies.
authors: Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
authors: Jamal S
authors: JS
authors: Aljarallah
authors: Norah
authors: N
authors: Alrowaiss
keywords: Litigations; Saudi Arabia; medical errors; patient safety
references: J Biomed Inform. 2004 Jun;37(3):193-204
references: 15196483
references: Can Fam Physician. 2005 Mar;51:386-7
references: 16926931
references: N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 7;324(6):370-6
references: 1987460
references: JAMA. 1995 Jul 5;274(1):29-34
references: 7791255
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Feb;17(1):37-46
references: 18245218
references: JAMA. 1994 Dec 21;272(23):1851-7
references: 7503827
references: Issue Brief Natl Health Policy Forum. 2000 Mar 15;(753):1-9
references: 11010616
references: Surgery. 2006 Jul;140(1):25-33
references: 16857439
references: BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):771-3
references: 10720364
references: J Surg Res. 2005 Jun 15;126(2):167-71
references: 15919415
references: Surgery. 1999 Jul;126(1):66-75
references: 10418594
references: Med J Aust. 2006 Jul 17;185(2):95-8
references: 16842067
references: BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):774-7
references: 10720365
references: Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Feb;18(4):693-706
references: 16749564
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Oct;16(5):369-77
references: 17913779
references: N Z Med J. 2002 Dec 13;115(1167):U271
references: 12552260
references: Int J Med Inform. 2006 Feb;75(2):148-55
references: 16095963
references: N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 11;346(15):1128-37
references: 11948273
references: JAMA. 1995 Jul 5;274(1):35-43
references: 7791256
references: Saudi Med J. 2004 Jul;25(7):901-6
references: 15235697
references: CMAJ. 2004 May 25;170(11):1678-86
references: 15159366
references: N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 7;324(6):377-84
references: 1824793
references: Saudi J Anaesth. 2010 Sep;4(3):122-6
references: 21189845
references: Int J Surg. 2005;3(1):75-81
references: 17462262
references: Surgery. 2003 Jun;133(6):614-21
references: 12796727