title: Evaluation of physician return-for-service agreements in Newfoundland and Labrador.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Despite the widespread use of physician return-for-service (RFS) programs in Canada, few have been evaluated. We examined two types of RFS agreements (Family Medicine Bursary and Special Funded Residency Position) and (a) describe the proportion of RFS physicians who complete their service obligation and identify the predictors of completion and (b) compare the retention of RFS physicians to that of non-RFS physicians.
  
  
  METHODS
  Using administrative data on physicians with RFS agreements in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), Memorial University's Postgraduate Medical Education Office and the Physician and Medical Practice Database, we calculated the proportion of RFS physicians (1997-2009) who fulfilled their service obligation and also identified predictors of completion. We then followed to 2010 a cohort of physicians who started practice in NL between 2000 and 2005 to compare the retention of RFS and non-RFS physicians.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Ninety-six (71.6%) of 134 RFS physicians fulfilled the service obligation in full. Physicians who held Special Funding Residency Position RFS agreements were 11.1 times less likely (95% CI: 4.0-33.3) to complete their service commitment than physicians who held Family Medicine Bursary RFS agreements. In the cohort of 60 RFS and 67 non-RFS physicians, 16.9% of RFS versus 41.8% of non-RFS physicians left NL by 2010 (p=0.004). RFS physicians were 3.22 times less likely (95% CI: 1.41-7.14) than non-RFS physicians to leave the province. Four years after starting practice, roughly 90% of RFS versus 60% of non-RFS physicians remained in NL; after 10 years, 70% of RFS versus 60% of non-RFS physicians remained (p=0.006).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The RFS program improves the retention of physicians in NL. Using RFS tied to bursaries rather than residency positions may increase service completion and retention rates.
authors: Division of Community Health & Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada. mmathews@mun.ca
authors: Maria
authors: M
authors: Mathews
authors: Sara Lynn
authors: SL
authors: Heath
authors: Shelley May
authors: SM
authors: Neufeld
authors: Asoka
authors: A
authors: Samarasena
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D005380:Financing, Government; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008507:Medically Underserved Area; D009523:Newfoundland and Labrador; D010816:Physician Incentive Plans / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010820:Physicians / Q000600:supply & distribution*
references: J Rural Health. 2003;19 Suppl:329-39
references: 14526516
references: JAMA. 2000 Oct 25;284(16):2084-92
references: 11042757
references: Can J Rural Med. 2004 Spring;9(2):82-8
references: 15603680
references: Can Med Assoc J. 1979 Nov 3;121(9):1170
references: 497996
references: BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 May 29;9:86
references: 19480656
references: Healthc Policy. 2007 Nov;3(2):50-7
references: 19305779
references: Rural Remote Health. 2010 Oct-Dec;10(4):1605
references: 21070088
references: Can Fam Physician. 1987 Jul;33:1683-5
references: 21263785
references: Open Med. 2008;2(2):e62-9
references: 21602945
references: Aust J Rural Health. 2004 Jun;12(3):104-11
references: 15200520
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD005314
references: 19160251
references: J Med Educ. 1971 Jul;46(7):575-83
references: 5558297
references: Healthc Policy. 2012 May;7(4):82-94
references: 23634165
references: Can Med Assoc J. 1975 Sep 6;113(5):403-7
references: 1156967
references: J Med Educ. 1977 Oct;52(10):817-23
references: 903947