title: Evaluation of applying drug dose adjustment by physicians in patients with renal impairment.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine whether appropriate dose adjustment was taken into account or not by the physicians when prescribing drugs in patients with renal impairment.
  
  
  METHODS
  A retrospective chart review was performed and included 98 adult in-patients, diagnosed with renal impairment based on clinical evaluation and laboratory data, in King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, who was admitted to the hospital from September 2005 to January 2011. Data of the patients were noted and recorded including baseline demographics, clinical data, laboratory data, renal state, treatment data and medications.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The initial number of the patients was reduced to 80 where a total of 502 drugs were investigated in the present study with an average of six drugs per patient. Of these 502 studied drugs, 196 (39%) required dose adjustment where 92 (46.9%) were adjusted and 104 (53.1%) were not adjusted. It was found also that most of the drugs requiring dose adjustment were antibiotics (39.8%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The current study confirms that physicians still do not take into account sufficiently patients' renal function when prescribing drugs. Continuous medical education and collaboration with clinical pharmacist should be encouraged for quality improvement in patients with renal impairment.
authors: Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
authors: Abdulrahman M
authors: AM
authors: Alahdal
authors: Ahmed A
authors: AA
authors: Elberry
keywords: Dose adjustment; Physicians; Prescription; Renal impairment
references: Am Fam Physician. 2007 May 15;75(10):1487-96
references: 17555141
references: Postgrad Med J. 1998 Jul;74(873):420-2
references: 9799917
references: Am J Med. 1977 Apr;62(4):486-9
references: 851118
references: Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2004 Sep;18(3):551-79, viii-ix
references: 15308276
references: Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992 Dec;49(12):2944-8
references: 1481798
references: Nephron. 1976;16(1):31-41
references: 1244564
references: Am J Kidney Dis. 1983 Nov;3(3):155-93
references: 6356890
references: Clin Biochem Rev. 2011 May;32(2):69-73
references: 21611079
references: Am J Kidney Dis. 1996 Sep;28(3):315-28
references: 8804228
references: Arch Intern Med. 2005 Apr 11;165(7):790-5
references: 15824299
references: Semin Nephrol. 1986 Sep;6(3):259-95
references: 3299583
references: N Engl J Med. 1996 May 30;334(22):1448-60
references: 8618585
references: Ann Pharmacother. 1995 Dec;29(12):1202-7
references: 8672821
references: JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1339-46
references: 9794315
references: Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Sep;107(37):647-55; quiz 655-6
references: 20959896
references: Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Aug;15(4):331-5
references: 12930048