title: Image and imaging an emergency department: expense and benefit of different quality assessment methods.
abstract: Introduction. In this era of high-tech medicine, it is becoming increasingly important to assess patient satisfaction. There are several methods to do so, but these differ greatly in terms of cost, time, and labour and external validity. The aim of this study is to describe and compare the structure and implementation of different methods to assess the satisfaction of patients in an emergency department. Methods. The structure and implementation of the different methods to assess patient satisfaction were evaluated on the basis of a 90-minute standardised interview. Results. We identified a total of six different methods in six different hospitals. The average number of patients assessed was 5012, with a range from 230 (M5) to 20 000 patients (M2). In four methods (M1, M3, M5, and M6), the questionnaire was composed by a specialised external institute. In two methods, the questionnaire was created by the hospital itself (M2, M4).The median response rate was 58.4% (range 9-97.8%). With a reminder, the response rate increased by 60% (M3). Conclusion. The ideal method to assess patient satisfaction in the emergency department setting is to use a patient-based, in-emergency department-based assessment of patient satisfaction, planned and guided by expert personnel.
authors: Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland ; Emergency Department, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
authors: Carmen Andrea
authors: CA
authors: Pfortmueller
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Keller
authors: Urs
authors: U
authors: Mueller
authors: Heinz
authors: H
authors: Zimmermann
authors: Aristomenis Konstantinos
authors: AK
authors: Exadaktylos
references: J Emerg Nurs. 1999 Jun;25(3):187-91
references: 10346840
references: Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2010;104(2):106-12
references: 20441017
references: Z Unfallchir Versicherungsmed Berufskr. 1984;77(4):207-14
references: 6442073
references: Health Mark Q. 2009 Jan-Mar;26(1):56-68
references: 19197588
references: Am J Med Qual. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):64-72
references: 19966114
references: Lancet. 1994 Jun 25;343(8913):1609-13
references: 7911925
references: Psychosom Med. 1995 May-Jun;57(3):234-44
references: 7652124
references: Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Apr 27;142:w13561
references: 22544462