title: The Interrelations among the Perception of Parental Styles and Psychological Well-Being in Adolescence: A Longitudinal Study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  This longitudinal study aims to examine the relationships between the perception of parental style, hope, self-esteem and Eysenck's psychoticism dimension throughout the span of four years.
  
  
  METHODS
  The sample was composed of 884 students from the Wollongong Youth Study, which commenced when students entered high school. During the course of the 4 years of the study, each participant completed the test booklets each time data was collected. Data was analyzed using one way ANOVA, Post-hoc test, Repeated Measurement, Pearson and Partial Correlation and General Linear Model in order to provide the aims of the study.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean score of hope and self-esteem among adolescents from authoritative parents were higher from permissive and authoritarian families while the hope with a permissive perception were lower than those with authoritarian, and self-esteem was lower in the authoritarian group compared to the permissive group. Children with a permissive perception reported higher psychoticism compared to the two other. Significant correlations were found between authoritative perception and hope, self-esteem and psychoticism. Finally, hope, self-esteem and psychoticism showed a significant inter correlation in all of the parental styles.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Adolescents with the perception of each kind of parental style showed significant between group differences in psychological well-being throughout the four years of the study.
authors: Dept. of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
authors: Farnaz
authors: F
authors: Shahimi
authors: Patrick
authors: P
authors: Heaven
authors: Joseph
authors: J
authors: Ciarrochi
keywords: Adolescent; Parental Style; Well-being
references: Psychol Rep. 2004 Dec;95(3 Pt 2):1092-4
references: 15762390
references: Int J Eat Disord. 2002 Apr;31(3):261-73
references: 11920987
references: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2000 Oct;35(10):463-70
references: 11127721
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Jan;84(1):205-20
references: 12518980
references: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2006 Feb;35(1):34-45
references: 16390301
references: Child Dev. 1991 Oct;62(5):1049-65
references: 1756655
references: Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2008 Feb 1;17(1):31-35
references: 19756219
references: Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 1993 Summer;23(4):273-82
references: 8325135
references: J Pers. 2005 Dec;73(6):1465-83
references: 16274442
references: Child Dev. 1993 Oct;64(5):1461-74
references: 8222884
references: Child Dev. 1996 Dec;67(6):3296-319
references: 9071782
references: Child Dev. 1996 Oct;67(5):2101-14
references: 9022232
references: Child Dev. 1997 Apr;68(2):312-32
references: 9180004
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 May;74(5):1197-208
references: 9599439
references: Psychol Bull. 1998 Sep;124(2):197-229
references: 9747186
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:365-99
references: 14744220
references: Transcult Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;41(2):233-52
references: 15446722
references: Child Dev. 1989 Dec;60(6):1424-36
references: 2612251
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Feb;70(2):321-35
references: 8636885
references: J Adolesc. 2004 Dec;27(6):611-24
references: 15561306
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Dec;73(6):1257-67
references: 9418279
references: Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2003 May;4(1):1-44
references: 26151640
references: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;13(1):8-18
references: 14991427
references: J Res Adolesc. 2006 Mar 1;16(1):47-58
references: 20016759
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:255-84
references: 16318596
references: J Pers. 2007 Feb;75(1):43-64
references: 17214591
references: J Pers Assess. 1991 Aug;57(1):110-9
references: 16370893
references: Child Dev. 2002 Jul-Aug;73(4):1151-65
references: 12146740
references: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;46(1):35-46
references: 15660642