title: Animal metacognition: a tale of two comparative psychologies.
abstract: A growing literature considers whether animals have capacities that are akin to human metacognition (i.e., humans' capacity to monitor their states of uncertainty and knowing). Comparative psychologists have approached this question by testing a dolphin, pigeons, rats, monkeys, and apes using perception, memory, and food-concealment paradigms. As part of this consideration, some associative modelers have attempted to describe animals' "metacognitive" performances in low-level, associative terms-an important goal if achievable. The authors summarize the empirical and theoretical situation regarding these associative descriptions. The associative descriptions in the animal-metacognition literature fail to encompass important phenomena. The sharp focus on abstract, mathematical associative models creates serious interpretative problems. The authors compare these failed associative descriptions with an alternative theoretical approach within contemporary comparative psychology. The alternative approach has the potential to strengthen comparative psychology as an empirical science and integrate it more fully within the mainstream of experimental psychology and cognitive science.
authors: Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York.
authors: J David
authors: JD
authors: Smith
authors: Department of Psychology, Fredonia State University.
authors: Justin J
authors: JJ
authors: Couchman
authors: Language Research Center, Georgia State University.
authors: Michael J
authors: MJ
authors: Beran
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D011587:Psychology, Comparative / Q000592:standards*; D035501:Uncertainty
references: Dev Sci. 2008 Sep;11(5):750-60
references: 18801131
references: Cognition. 2011 Jul;120(1):90-105
references: 21459372
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2003 Jun;26(3):317-39; discussion 340-73
references: 14968691
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998 Mar;127(1):55-68
references: 9503651
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 24;98(9):5359-62
references: 11274360
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Apr;35(2):129-42
references: 19364222
references: Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2009 Jan 1;4:17-28
references: 20046911
references: Psychol Sci. 2007 Jan;18(1):64-71
references: 17362380
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May;137(2):390-401
references: 18473665
references: Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):660-6
references: 23508741
references: Anim Cogn. 2009 Jan;12(1):169-80
references: 18712532
references: J Gen Psychol. 2005 Apr;132(2):165-86
references: 15871299
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):458-75
references: 22889164
references: Curr Biol. 2007 Mar 20;17(6):551-5
references: 17346969
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Oct;36(4):506-9
references: 20718554
references: Anim Cogn. 2009 Jul;12(4):575-85
references: 19242741
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1975 Oct;1(4):326-34
references: 811754
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Jul;35(3):371-81
references: 19594282
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Apr;32(2):185-9
references: 16634662
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Sep;1(3):357-75
references: 24203520
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1997 Jun;126(2):147-64
references: 9163934
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998 Sep;127(3):227-50
references: 9742715
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):679-91
references: 18792496
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1258-66
references: 16393045
references: Can J Exp Psychol. 2005 Mar;59(1):47-53
references: 15832633
references: Psychol Rev. 1993 Oct;100(4):609-39
references: 8255951
references: Anim Cogn. 2006 Apr;9(2):110-7
references: 16184375
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):686-708
references: 22250905
references: J Comp Psychol. 2010 Nov;124(4):356-68
references: 20836592
references: Anim Cogn. 2010 Jan;13(1):93-101
references: 19526256
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1297-309
references: 22492748
references: Anim Cogn. 2008 Jan;11(1):21-42
references: 17437141
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jul;27(4):984-1002
references: 11486931
references: Biol Lett. 2010 Apr 23;6(2):160-2
references: 19864272
references: Am J Primatol. 1982;2(3):237-248
references: 32192237
references: Anim Cogn. 2010 Sep;13(5):689-700
references: 20306102
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 May;135(2):282-97
references: 16719654
references: Neuroscience. 1980;5(11):1825-31
references: 7432624
references: Psychol Sci. 2002 Sep;13(5):437-42
references: 12219810
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Apr;34(2):266-82
references: 18426309
references: Anim Cogn. 2012 May;15(3):409-19
references: 22183204
references: Learn Behav. 2011 Mar;39(1):1-11
references: 21264568
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct;13(5):743-51
references: 17328367