title: Insulin vials vs. insulin cartridges: Further cost considerations.
abstract: METHODS
  Many studies have provided evidence that favor the use of insulin pens over traditional insulin vials due to lower overall costs. The cost of insulin in the Royal Medical Services in Jordan is subject to other considerations due to the favorable tender prices and the process of dispensing of insulin within the Royal Medical Services.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To highlight further cost considerations associated with the wastage in the use of insulin vials and cartridges in the Jordanian Royal Medical Services.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two random samples were selected from prescriptions dispensed for diabetic patients using insulin in January 2012 from the outpatient pharmacy in Al-Hussein Hospital, King Hussein Medical Center, Amman, Jordan. First sample was selected from prescriptions of patients using vials; second sample was selected from prescriptions of patients using pens and cartridges. Average costs for insulin and wastage were calculated per patient from the Royal Medical Services perspective.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The average direct cost per patient using vials was JD 5.197 and for those using cartridges was JD 22.135. The average wasted quantity per patient in the first sample was more than ten times that of the second sample. The cost of the average wasted quantity per patient in the first sample (1.022 JD) was more than the double that in the second sample (0.441 JD).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although, the direct cost of insulin per patient by using vials was lower than cartridges, there was a substantial reduction in the cost of wastage by using the cartridges in the Jordanian Royal Medical Services outpatients.
authors: Health Economics, University of York, UK.
authors: Mohammad G
authors: MG
authors: Al-Sharayri
authors: Tariq M
authors: TM
authors: Alsabrah
authors: Tareq M
authors: TM
authors: Aljbori
authors: Ala'a Eddeen K
authors: AE
authors: Abu-Rumman
keywords: Cartridge; Cost; Insulin; Vial; Wastage
references: Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011 Jul 15;68(14):1349-52
references: 21719595
references: Adv Ther. 2010 Feb;27(2):94-104
references: 20352392
references: Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Jun 1;65(11):1076-82
references: 18499883
references: Postgrad Med. 1999 Oct 15;106(5):57-8, 61-4, 68
references: 10560468
references: Adv Ther. 2009 Sep;26(9):838-46
references: 19768641