title: 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl as a screening tool for recombinant monoterpene biosynthesis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Monoterpenes are a class of natural C10 compounds with a range of potential applications including use as fuel additives, fragrances, and chemical feedstocks. Biosynthesis of monoterpenes in heterologous systems is yet to reach commercially-viable levels, and therefore is the subject of strain engineering and fermentation optimization studies. Detection of monoterpenes typically relies on gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; this represents a significant analytical bottleneck which limits the potential to analyse combinatorial sets of conditions. To address this, we developed a high-throughput method for pre-screening monoterpene biosynthesis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  An optimised DPPH assay was developed for detecting monoterpenes from two-phase microbial cultures using dodecane as the extraction solvent. The assay was useful for reproducible qualitative ranking of monoterpene concentrations, and detected standard preparations of myrcene and γ-terpinene dissolved in dodecane at concentrations as low as 10 and 15 μM, respectively, and limonene as low as 200 μM. The assay could not be used quantitatively due to technical difficulties in capturing the initial reaction rate in a multi-well plate and the presence of minor DPPH-reactive contaminants. Initially, limonene biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was tested using two different limonene synthase enzymes and three medium compositions. The assay indicated that limonene biosynthesis was enhanced in a supplemented YP medium and that the Citrus limon limonene synthase (CLLS) was more effective than the Mentha spicata limonene synthase (MSLS). GC-MS analysis revealed that the DPPH assay had correctly identified the best limonene synthase (CLLS) and culture medium (supplemented YP medium). Because only traces of limonene were detected in SD medium, we subsequently identified medium components that improved limonene production and developed a defined medium based on these findings. The best limonene titres obtained were 1.48 ± 0.22 mg limonene per L in supplemented YP medium and 0.9 ± 0.15 mg limonene per L in a pH-adjusted supplemented SD medium.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The DPPH assay is useful for detecting biosynthesis of limonene. Although the assay cannot be used quantitatively, it proved successful in ranking limonene production conditions qualitatively and thus is suitable as a first-tier screen. The DPPH assay will likely be applicable in detecting biosynthesis of several other monoterpenes and for screening libraries of monoterpene-producing strains.
authors: Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia QLD 4072, Australia. c.vickers@uq.edu.au.
authors: James Byh
authors: JB
authors: Behrendorff
authors: Claudia E
authors: CE
authors: Vickers
authors: Panagiotis
authors: P
authors: Chrysanthopoulos
authors: Lars K
authors: LK
authors: Nielsen
mesh_terms: D000975:Antioxidants; D001713:Biphenyl Compounds / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D002957:Citrus / Q000737:chemistry / Q000201:enzymology; D019753:Intramolecular Lyases / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D039821:Monoterpenes / Q000138:chemical synthesis / Q000378:metabolism*; D010851:Picrates / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D012441:Saccharomyces cerevisiae / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D000975:Antioxidants; D001713:Biphenyl Compounds; D039821:Monoterpenes; D010851:Picrates; C004931:1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl; D019753:Intramolecular Lyases; C040265:pinene cyclase I
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Nov 9;96(23):13062-7
references: 10557273
references: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009 Apr;36(4):571-83
references: 19190948
references: Trends Biotechnol. 2008 Jul;26(7):375-81
references: 18471913
references: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005 Feb 1;243(1):107-15
references: 15668008
references: J Am Chem Soc. 2006 Dec 13;128(49):15819-23
references: 17147392
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Oct;61(10):3604-8
references: 7486996
references: Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984 Sep 27;766(3):679-84
references: 6089881
references: Nat Prod Rep. 2008 Aug;25(4):656-61
references: 18663389
references: Nature. 2006 Apr 13;440(7086):940-3
references: 16612385
references: J Agric Food Chem. 2000 Sep;48(9):4156-61
references: 10995330
references: Gene. 2002 May 15;290(1-2):1-18
references: 12062797
references: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009 Jun;12(3):274-81
references: 19447673
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006 Nov 5;95(4):684-91
references: 16878333
references: Arch Biochem Biophys. 1992 Jul;296(1):49-57
references: 1605644
references: Biotechnol Lett. 2009 Nov;31(11):1651-9
references: 19609491
references: J Biol Chem. 1993 Nov 5;268(31):23016-24
references: 8226816
references: Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007 Sep 15;465(2):417-29
references: 17662687
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012 Oct;109(10):2513-22
references: 22539043
references: Nature. 2010 Jan 28;463(7280):559-62
references: 20111002
references: Free Radic Res. 2002 Nov;36(11):1219-27
references: 12592674
references: Biochemistry. 1998 Sep 1;37(35):12213-20
references: 9724535
references: Eur J Biochem. 2002 Jul;269(13):3160-71
references: 12084056
references: Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Aug;25(16):7375-85
references: 16055745
references: Microb Cell Fact. 2011 Jul 29;10:59
references: 21801353
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):19949-54
references: 22123987
references: Phytochemistry. 2012 Jun;78:20-8
references: 22459969
references: Biotechnol J. 2010 Feb;5(2):147-62
references: 20084640
references: J Food Sci. 2012 Jan;77(1):H40-6
references: 22260108
references: Life Sci. 2006 May 15;78(25):2872-88
references: 16325868
references: Nat Commun. 2011 Sep 27;2:483
references: 21952217
references: J Biotechnol. 1995 Jan 15;38(2):165-72
references: 7765807
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Sep;63(9):3341-4
references: 9292983
references: J Org Chem. 2009 Apr 3;74(7):2699-709
references: 19275193
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Apr;78(8):2497-504
references: 22287010
references: Mol Syst Biol. 2011 May 10;7:487
references: 21556065
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Feb;64(2):530-4
references: 9464389
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2002 Aug;7(8):366-73
references: 12167332
references: ChemSusChem. 2009;2(12):1072-95
references: 20013989
references: J Agric Food Chem. 2001 Jun;49(6):2774-9
references: 11409965
references: Org Biomol Chem. 2005 Sep 21;3(18):3336-47
references: 16132095