title: Effect of diets on growth, digestibility, carcass and meat quality characteristics of four rabbit breeds.
abstract: The current study was conducted to evaluate three diets using four rabbit breeds. A total of 320 male weaned rabbits representing four breeds named V-line, Saudi-1, Saudi-2 and Saudi-3 were randomly distributed into three comparable dietary treatments. Three levels of indigenous feedstuffs (IFS) of 42.5%, 65% or 87.5% (alfalfa hay, barley and wheat bran) were substituted for the same levels of non-indigenous feedstuffs in the diet (corn grain, soybean, molasses, and limestone) to form three diets named D1, D2 and D3, respectively. These dietary treatments were used to evaluate post-weaning growth performance, feed intake, feed conversion, carcass and lean composition, and nutrients digestibility in four rabbit breeds. Partial replacement of IFS with non-indigenous feedstuffs attained significant increase in growth performance. The diet containing 87.5% IFS led to significant increase in daily weight gains by 8.4, 4.0, 8.1, 6.2 and 6.7 g at age intervals of 5-6, 7-8, 9-10, 10-11 and 11-12 weeks compared to the control diet, respectively. The diet containing 87.5% IFS showed a significant reduction in feed conversion ratio compared to control diet during the experimental periods. The diet containing 65% IFS showed significant increases in pre-slaughter weight (112 g) and hot carcass weight (89 g), while dressing percent, offal weight and percent, and non-carcass weights and percentages (head, fur, legs + tail, viscera) were not significantly different. The diet containing 87.5% IFS gave an increase of 1.1%, 6.4%, 8.8%, 17.9%, 7.4%, and 19.6% in digestibility coefficients of organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fibre (NFD), acid detergent fiber (ADF), hemi-cellulose (HC) and cellulose (C) compared to control diet, respectively. Feed intakes were moderate and ranged from 69 to 124 g for V-line, 77 to 128 g for Saudi-1, 79 to 130 g for Saudi-2, and 76 to 119 g for Saudi-3 along with moderate ratios of feed conversion ranging from 2.65 to 3.80, 2.45 to 3.90, 2.46 to 3.79 and 2.63 to 3.65, respectively. Pre-slaughter weight, hot carcass weight, and offal weight were in favour of Saudi-2 rabbits compared to the other groups. Both Saudi-1 and Saudi-2 rabbits were slightly higher than Saudi-3 in weights and percentages of head, fur, viscera and legs + tail. Lean and bone weights and percentages and meat to bone ratio in Saudi-2 carcasses were slightly higher than those recorded in the other groups, while moisture, DM, CP, EE and ash contents in the lean have shown little differences between groups. Rabbits of Saudi-1 were ranked the first in digestibility coefficients of OM, CP, NDF, ADF, HC, C and cell count compared to other groups. Rabbits of Saudi-2 fed diet containing 87.5% IFS recorded the heaviest body weights and gains since this class showed considerable deviations in body weights of 345, 341, 269, 307, 321, 345 and 347 g at 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 weeks of age, respectively, in comparison with the lightest class. Both Saudi-2 and Saudi-3 rabbits fed the diet containing 87.5% IFS had favourable estimates of feed conversions ranging from 2.1 to 3.4, while rabbits of Saudi-1 fed the diet containing 87.5% IFS recorded the best digestibility coefficients.
authors: Department of Animal Production and Breeding, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Buriedah 51452, P.O. Box 6622, Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
authors: S N
authors: SN
authors: Al-Dobaib
keywords: Carcass; Digestibility; Growth; Indigenous feedstuffs; Meat quality; Rabbits
references: J Anim Sci. 2002 Apr;80(4):1029-37
references: 12002309
references: J Anim Breed Genet. 1994 Jan 12;111(1-6):138-47
references: 21395761
references: J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2006 Dec;90(11-12):467-73
references: 17083427
references: J Anim Sci. 2007 Dec;85(12):3313-21
references: 17709783
references: J Anim Sci. 1991 Apr;69(4):1566-74
references: 1649153
references: Br J Nutr. 1984 Mar;51(2):265-77
references: 6704374
references: J Anim Sci. 1983 Nov;57(5):1108-16
references: 6685724
references: Meat Sci. 1996 Sep;44(1-2):85-92
references: 22060758
references: Animal. 2007 Aug;1(7):923-8
references: 22444793
references: J Anim Sci. 2001 May;79(5):1173-8
references: 11374536