title: To supplement or not to supplement: a metabolic network framework for human nutritional supplements.
abstract: Flux balance analysis and constraint based modeling have been successfully used in the past to elucidate the metabolism of single cellular organisms. However, limited work has been done with multicellular organisms and even less with humans. The focus of this paper is to present a novel use of this technique by investigating human nutrition, a challenging field of study. Specifically, we present a steady state constraint based model of skeletal muscle tissue to investigate amino acid supplementation's effect on protein synthesis. We implement several in silico supplementation strategies to study whether amino acid supplementation might be beneficial for increasing muscle contractile protein synthesis. Concurrent with published data on amino acid supplementation's effect on protein synthesis in a post resistance exercise state, our results suggest that increasing bioavailability of methionine, arginine, and the branched-chain amino acids can increase the flux of contractile protein synthesis. The study also suggests that a common commercial supplement, glutamine, is not an effective supplement in the context of increasing protein synthesis and thus, muscle mass. Similar to any study in a model organism, the computational modeling of this research has some limitations. Thus, this paper introduces the prospect of using systems biology as a framework to formally investigate how supplementation and nutrition can affect human metabolism and physiology.
authors: Bioinformatics Program, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America. nogiec@bu.edu
authors: Christopher D
authors: CD
authors: Nogiec
authors: Simon
authors: S
authors: Kasif
mesh_terms: D000596:Amino Acids / Q000378:metabolism; D019587:Dietary Supplements; D006801:Humans; D053858:Metabolic Networks and Pathways; D008954:Models, Biological; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D000596:Amino Acids
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 6;104(6):1777-82
references: 17267599
references: J Nutr. 2004 Oct;134(10 Suppl):2888S-2894S; discussion 2895S
references: 15465806
references: J Nutr. 2006 Jan;136(1 Suppl):269S-73S
references: 16365096
references: Trends Biotechnol. 2009 Jan;27(1):37-44
references: 19010556
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 1976 Apr;29(4):340-50
references: 1266783
references: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001 Mar;280(3):R695-704
references: 11171647
references: Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Sep;26(9):1003-10
references: 18711341
references: J Nutr. 2006 Feb;136(2):529S-532S
references: 16424141
references: Physiol Rev. 2000 Apr;80(2):853-924
references: 10747208
references: J Nutr. 2008 Oct;138(10):2045S-2049S
references: 18806122
references: Mol Syst Biol. 2009;5:320
references: 19888215
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(5):e1002518
references: 22615553
references: Physiol Rev. 1992 Apr;72(2):419-48
references: 1557428
references: Theor Biol Med Model. 2007 Dec 10;4:48
references: 18070347
references: Nutrition. 2002 Sep;18(9):761-6
references: 12297216
references: J Clin Invest. 1969 Dec;48(12):2273-82
references: 5355340
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Jul;32(7):1244-9
references: 10912889
references: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2010 Feb;21(1):63-9
references: 20163950
references: J Clin Invest. 1996 Sep 15;98(6):1361-72
references: 8823301
references: Mol Syst Biol. 2010 Sep 7;6:401
references: 20823844
references: N Engl J Med. 1997 Mar 13;336(11):775-85
references: 9052657