title: Evaluating the message or the messenger? Implications for self-validation in persuasion.
abstract: Characteristics of persuasive message sources have been extensively studied. However, little attention has been paid to situations when people are motivated to form an evaluation of the communicator rather than the communicated issue. We postulated that these different foci can affect how a source validates message-related cognitions. Participants focused on the source (Studies 1 and 2) or the issue (Study 2) while reading weak or strong message arguments. Later, the communicator was described as low or high in credibility. When focused on the source, highly motivated participants were more confident and their attitudes were more reflective of thoughts when argument quality matched (e.g., weak arguments-low credibility) rather than mismatched (e.g., weak arguments-high credibility) source credibility. Conversely, when participants were focused on the issue, self-validation was greater when credibility was high rather than low-regardless of argument quality. Implications of these findings for the study and practice of persuasion are discussed.
authors: 1University of Iowa, USA.
authors: Jason K
authors: JK
authors: Clark
authors: Duane T
authors: DT
authors: Wegener
authors: Vanessa
authors: V
authors: Sawicki
authors: Richard E
authors: RE
authors: Petty
authors: Pablo
authors: P
authors: Briñol
mesh_terms: D001290:Attitude; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D010565:Persuasive Communication; D012649:Self Concept; D013850:Thinking
keywords: attitude change; metacognition; persuasion; self-validation; source credibility