title: Development, implementation, and evaluation of a structured reporting web tool for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The majority of radiological reports are lacking a standard structure. Even within a specialized area of radiology, each report has its individual structure with regards to details and order, often containing too much of non-relevant information the referring physician is not interested in. For gathering relevant clinical key parameters in an efficient way or to support long-term therapy monitoring, structured reporting might be advantageous.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  Despite of new technologies in medical information systems, medical reporting is still not dynamic. To improve the quality of communication in radiology reports, a new structured reporting system was developed for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), intended to enhance professional communication by providing the pertinent clinical information in a predefined standard.
  
  
  METHODS
  Actual state analysis was performed within the departments of radiology and vascular surgery by developing a Technology Acceptance Model. The SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis focused on optimization of the radiology reporting of patients with AAA. Definition of clinical parameters was achieved by interviewing experienced clinicians in radiology and vascular surgery. For evaluation, a focus group (4 radiologists) looked at the reports of 16 patients. The usability and reliability of the method was validated in a real-world test environment in the field of radiology.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A Web-based application for radiological "structured reporting" (SR) was successfully standardized for AAA. Its organization comprises three main categories: characteristics of pathology and adjacent anatomy, measurements, and additional findings. Using different graphical widgets (eg, drop-down menus) in each category facilitate predefined data entries. Measurement parameters shown in a diagram can be defined for clinical monitoring and be adducted for quick adjudications. Figures for optional use to guide and standardize the reporting are embedded. Analysis of variance shows decreased average time required with SR to obtain a radiological report compared to free-text reporting (P=.0001). Questionnaire responses confirm a high acceptance rate by the user.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The new SR system may support efficient radiological reporting for initial diagnosis and follow-up for AAA. Perceived advantages of our SR platform are ease of use, which may lead to more accurate decision support. The new system is open to communicate not only with clinical partners but also with Radiology Information and Hospital Information Systems.
authors: German Cancer Research Center, Department of Radiology, Heidelberg, Germany.
authors: Sulafa
authors: S
authors: Karim
authors: Christian
authors: C
authors: Fegeler
authors: Dittmar
authors: D
authors: Boeckler
authors: Lawrence
authors: L
authors: H Schwartz
authors: Hans-Ulrich
authors: HU
authors: Kauczor
authors: Hendrik
authors: H
authors: von Tengg-Kobligk
keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysms; radiology; structured reporting; vascular surgery
references: J Am Coll Radiol. 2005 Feb;2(2):159-67
references: 17411786
references: Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010 Aug;44(6):449-53
references: 20547575
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Mar;176(3):591-8
references: 11222186
references: Autom Exp. 2010 Apr 23;2:3
references: 20416048
references: Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994;:216-22
references: 7949923
references: Ann Emerg Med. 1993 May;22(5):805-12
references: 8470837
references: J Vasc Surg. 1991 Mar;13(3):452-8
references: 1999868
references: Endoscopy. 1991 Nov;23(6):334-7
references: 1778139
references: J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Jul;1(7):497-505
references: 17411639
references: Implement Sci. 2010 Jun 16;5:48
references: 20553616
references: Med Care. 1995 Oct;33(10 Suppl):OS43-58
references: 7475411
references: J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 Dec;6(12):851-60
references: 19945040
references: Methods Inf Med. 1992 Nov;31(4):268-74
references: 1470038
references: J Digit Imaging. 2009 Dec;22(6):562-8
references: 19816742
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Nov;187(5):1151-5
references: 17056898
references: Invest Radiol. 1992 Mar;27(3):236-9
references: 1551775
references: J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 May;4(5):313-9
references: 17467614
references: Radiology. 2008 Dec;249(3):739-47
references: 19011178
references: Int J Health Plann Manage. 2012 Jan-Mar;27(1):34-49
references: 20603842
references: Radiology. 2011 Jul;260(1):174-81
references: 21518775
references: J Vasc Surg. 2002 May;35(5):1048-60
references: 12021727