title: Axial length measurement techniques in pediatric eyes with cataract.
abstract: Globe axial length (AL) in children is commonly measured using either contact or immersion technique. Office measurement of AL can be difficult in young children and infants and must often be done under anesthesia in an eye that is unable to cooperate with precise fixation and centration. Contact A-scan measurements yield shorter AL, on average, than immersion A-scan measurements in pediatric eyes. This difference is mainly the result of the anterior chamber depth rather than the lens thickness value. During intraocular lens power calculation, if globe axial length is measured by the contact technique, it will result in the use of an average 1-D stronger IOL power than is actually required. This can lead to induced myopia in the postoperative refraction. In our studied patients, there was a significant difference in prediction error between contact A-scan biometry and immersion A-scan biometry. The immersion A-scan technique is recommended for pediatric IOL power calculation. We also provide a review of biometry in pediatric eyes. The overall mean AL of pediatric cataractous eyes is significantly different than the mean AL of non cataractous eyes. More importantly, the standard deviation is higher in eyes with cataract than in those without. Three phases of eye growth in children have been documented: A rapid, postnatal phase from birth to 6 months of age, followed by a slower, infantile phase from 6 to 18 months of age, and finally a slow, juvenile phase from 18 months forward. In our study, girls had shorter ALs than boys and African-American subjects had longer ALs than Caucasians. Eyes with unilateral cataract had shorter ALs than eyes with bilateral cataract during the earlier years, but had longer ALs during later childhood.
authors: Miles Center for Pediatric Ophthalmology, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
authors: M Edward
authors: ME
authors: Wilson
authors: Rupal H
authors: RH
authors: Trivedi
keywords: Biometry; IOL power calculation; Immersion; Prediction error
references: J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Sep;25(9):1209-13
references: 10476503
references: Ophthalmology. 2011 Mar;118(3):498-502
references: 21035871
references: J AAPOS. 2008 Oct;12(5):440-4
references: 18599330
references: Ophthalmic Paediatr Genet. 1993 Dec;14(4):177-88
references: 8015788
references: Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Aug;88(8):912-9
references: 21552178
references: Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Aug;121(8):1141-7
references: 12912692
references: J AAPOS. 2011 Oct;15(5):432-4
references: 22108354
references: Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987 Mar;64(3):204-10
references: 3578486
references: Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1971;49(6):873-86
references: 5172264
references: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Mar;37(3):501-5
references: 21333874
references: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Dec;36(12):2100-4
references: 21111313
references: Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1996 Jun;74(3):220-3
references: 8828714
references: Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Jun;103(6):785-9
references: 4004614
references: Ophthalmology. 1995 May;102(5):827-30
references: 7777283
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Oct;48(10):4671-8
references: 17898291