title: Yersinia pestis subverts the dermal neutrophil response in a mouse model of bubonic plague.
abstract: The majority of human Yersinia pestis infections result from introduction of bacteria into the skin by the bite of an infected flea. Once in the dermis, Y. pestis can evade the host's innate immune response and subsequently disseminate to the draining lymph node (dLN). There, the pathogen replicates to large numbers, causing the pathognomonic bubo of bubonic plague. In this study, several cytometric and microscopic techniques were used to characterize the early host response to intradermal (i.d.) Y. pestis infection. Mice were infected i.d. with fully virulent or attenuated strains of dsRed-expressing Y. pestis, and tissues were analyzed by flow cytometry. By 4 h postinfection, there were large numbers of neutrophils in the infected dermis and the majority of cell-associated bacteria were associated with neutrophils. We observed a significant effect of the virulence plasmid (pCD1) on bacterial survival and neutrophil activation in the dermis. Intravital microscopy of i.d. Y. pestis infection revealed dynamic interactions between recruited neutrophils and bacteria. In contrast, very few bacteria interacted with dendritic cells (DCs), indicating that this cell type may not play a major role early in Y. pestis infection. Experiments using neutrophil depletion and a CCR7 knockout mouse suggest that dissemination of Y. pestis from the dermis to the dLN is not dependent on neutrophils or DCs. Taken together, the results of this study show a very rapid, robust neutrophil response to Y. pestis in the dermis and that the virulence plasmid pCD1 is important for the evasion of this response.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  Yersinia pestis remains a public health concern today because of sporadic plague outbreaks that occur throughout the world and the potential for its illegitimate use as a bioterrorism weapon. Since bubonic plague pathogenesis is initiated by the introduction of Y. pestis into the skin, we sought to characterize the response of the host's innate immune cells to bacteria early after intradermal infection. We found that neutrophils, innate immune cells that engulf and destroy microbes, are rapidly recruited to the injection site, irrespective of strain virulence, indicating that Y. pestis is unable to subvert neutrophil recruitment to the site of infection. However, we saw a decreased activation of neutrophils that were associated with Y. pestis strains harboring the pCD1 plasmid, which is essential for virulence. These findings indicate a role for pCD1-encoded factors in suppressing the activation/stimulation of these cells in vivo.
authors: Laboratory of Zoonotic Pathogens, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutesof Health, Hamilton, Montana, USA. jshannon@niaid.nih.gov
authors: Jeffrey G
authors: JG
authors: Shannon
authors: Aaron M
authors: AM
authors: Hasenkrug
authors: David W
authors: DW
authors: Dorward
authors: Vinod
authors: V
authors: Nair
authors: Aaron B
authors: AB
authors: Carmody
authors: B Joseph
authors: BJ
authors: Hinnebusch
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D004195:Disease Models, Animal; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D057131:Immune Evasion; D051379:Mice; D008810:Mice, Inbred C57BL; D009504:Neutrophils / Q000276:immunology*; D010930:Plague / Q000276:immunology* / Q000382:microbiology*; D012867:Skin / Q000276:immunology* / Q000382:microbiology; D015010:Yersinia pestis / Q000276:immunology* / Q000502:physiology
references: PLoS One. 2011 Apr 29;6(4):e19267
references: 21559445
references: Infect Immun. 2010 Feb;78(2):773-82
references: 19933831
references: Infect Immun. 2005 Nov;73(11):7142-50
references: 16239508
references: Infect Immun. 2008 Aug;76(8):3754-60
references: 18490459
references: Science. 1969 Feb 28;163(3870):950-2
references: 5763880
references: Science. 2005 Sep 9;309(5741):1739-41
references: 16051750
references: Infect Immun. 2010 May;78(5):2045-52
references: 20160020
references: Nat Immunol. 2004 Dec;5(12):1243-50
references: 15543150
references: Trends Immunol. 2012 Jun;33(6):271-80
references: 22459312
references: PLoS One. 2010 Feb 18;5(2):e9279
references: 20174624
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 1;103(31):11766-71
references: 16864791
references: Infect Immun. 2012 Nov;80(11):4034-45
references: 22966041
references: Br J Exp Pathol. 1956 Jun;37(3):286-99
references: 13342354
references: J Biol Chem. 2008 Nov 14;283(46):31511-21
references: 18650418
references: J Immunol. 1959 Oct;83:348-63
references: 13808585
references: Infect Immun. 1984 Sep;45(3):649-54
references: 6469351
references: J Immunol. 1961 Jul;87:64-71
references: 13692772
references: Am J Pathol. 2005 May;166(5):1427-39
references: 15855643
references: Mol Microbiol. 2004 Jun;52(5):1363-73
references: 15165239
references: Infect Immun. 2010 Dec;78(12):5086-98
references: 20876291
references: J Hyg (Lond). 1914 Jan;13(Suppl):423-39
references: 20474555
references: Nature. 1956 Mar 3;177(4505):426-7
references: 13309325
references: Nat Rev Immunol. 2008 May;8(5):362-71
references: 18379575
references: Mol Microbiol. 1997 Mar;23(5):861-7
references: 9076724
references: Science. 2008 Aug 15;321(5891):970-4
references: 18703742
references: Trends Immunol. 2005 Jul;26(7):388-95
references: 15922663
references: Immunity. 2008 Sep 19;29(3):487-96
references: 18718768
references: Infect Immun. 1984 Sep;45(3):655-9
references: 6469352
references: J Clin Invest. 1993 Sep;92(3):1467-76
references: 8376598
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Sep 6;102(36):12909-14
references: 16120681
references: Blood. 2005 Sep 1;106(5):1843-50
references: 15886329
references: J Infect Dis. 2005 Jun 1;191(11):1907-12
references: 15871125
references: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2005;59:69-89
references: 15847602
references: Science. 1996 Jul 19;273(5273):367-70
references: 8662526
references: J Immunol. 2008 Oct 15;181(8):5560-7
references: 18832714
references: Blood. 2000 Jul 15;96(2):719-26
references: 10887140
references: Infect Immun. 1984 Mar;43(3):895-900
references: 6365786
references: Clin Immunol. 2005 Mar;114(3):216-26
references: 15721832