title: Inter-vertebral flexibility of the ostrich neck: implications for estimating sauropod neck flexibility.
abstract: The flexibility and posture of the neck in sauropod dinosaurs has long been contentious. Improved constraints on sauropod neck function will have major implications for what we know of their foraging strategies, ecology and overall biology. Several hypotheses have been proposed, based primarily on osteological data, suggesting different degrees of neck flexibility. This study attempts to assess the effects of reconstructed soft tissues on sauropod neck flexibility through systematic removal of muscle groups and measures of flexibility of the neck in a living analogue, the ostrich (Struthio camelus). The possible effect of cartilage on flexibility is also examined, as this was previously overlooked in osteological estimates of sauropod neck function. These comparisons show that soft tissues are likely to have limited the flexibility of the neck beyond the limits suggested by osteology alone. In addition, the inferred presence of cartilage, and varying the inter-vertebral spacing within the synovial capsule, also affect neck flexibility. One hypothesis proposed that flexibility is constrained by requiring a minimum overlap between successive zygapophyses equivalent to 50% of zygapophyseal articular surface length (ONP50). This assumption is tested by comparing the maximum flexibility of the articulated cervical column in ONP50 and the flexibility of the complete neck with all tissues intact. It is found that this model does not adequately convey the pattern of flexibility in the ostrich neck, suggesting that the ONP50 model may not be useful in determining neck function if considered in isolation from myological and other soft tissue data.
authors: School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom. cobley.mj@gmail.com
authors: Matthew J
authors: MJ
authors: Cobley
authors: Emily J
authors: EJ
authors: Rayfield
authors: Paul M
authors: PM
authors: Barrett
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002356:Cartilage; D005260:Female; D055595:Mechanical Phenomena; D009333:Neck / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D013131:Spine; D020310:Struthioniformes
references: Biol Lett. 2012 Dec 23;8(6):1032-5
references: 23034173
references: PeerJ. 2013 Feb 12;1:e36
references: 23638372
references: Biol Lett. 2009 Jun 23;5(3):317-9
references: 19364714
references: Science. 2009 Mar 27;323(5922):1671-2; author reply 1671-2
references: 19325098
references: J Morphol. 2007 Aug;268(8):701-14
references: 17514722
references: Science. 1999 Apr 30;284(5415):798-800
references: 10221910
references: Naturwissenschaften. 2012 Aug;99(8):637-43
references: 22790834
references: PLoS One. 2011 Apr 06;6(4):e18304
references: 21494685
references: J Morphol. 2007 Nov;268(11):986-1020
references: 17823914
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2008 May 7;275(1638):1015-21
references: 18252667
references: Nature. 1971 Jan 15;229(5281):172-4
references: 4923260
references: J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2009 Oct 1;311(8):600-10
references: 19189317
references: Biol Lett. 2010 Dec 23;6(6):823-5
references: 20519198
references: J Morphol. 2005 Feb;263(2):151-78
references: 15593309
references: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 Feb;86(1):117-55
references: 21251189
references: Biol Lett. 2011 Oct 23;7(5):779-81
references: 21429913