title: Commentary on strengthening the assessment of factorial invariance across population subgroups: a commentary on Varni et al. (2013).
abstract: In his commentary on Varni et al.'s (Qual Life Res. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0370-4 , 2013) article, McIntosh (Qual Life Res. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0465-y , 2013) has two main arguments. First, we should have paid more attention to statistical tests (i.e., χ2values) instead of approximate fit indexes for our analysis, especially with the baseline model. Second, Bayesian methods are better than the frequentist methods we used in determining the model's invariance across age and gender groups. We believe that statistical tests do have a place in assessing model fit, but overemphasis on them, especially with larger sample sizes, can lead to errant decisions. Second, while we agree that Bayesian methods have the potential to contribute much to the field of assessing invariance, more development needs to be conducted before they can be widely utilized in assessing factorial invariance across groups.
authors: Department of Educational Psychology, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97301, Waco, TX, 76798-7301, USA, Alex_Beaujean@Baylor.edu.
authors: A Alexander
authors: AA
authors: Beaujean
authors: Christine A
authors: CA
authors: Limbers
authors: James W
authors: JW
authors: Varni
references: Qual Life Res. 2013 Nov;22(9):2581-94
references: 23423759
references: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;5(6):675-86
references: 26161883
references: Psychol Bull. 1991 May;109(3):512-9
references: 2062982
references: Qual Life Res. 2013 Nov;22(9):2595-601
references: 23836434
references: Am Psychol. 2008 Jan;63(1):32-50
references: 18193979
references: Psychol Bull. 1992 May;111(3):490-504
references: 16250105
references: Can J Exp Psychol. 2003 Sep;57(3):189-202
references: 14596477
references: Psychol Methods. 2002 Mar;7(1):64-82
references: 11928891
references: Psychol Bull. 1992 Sep;112(2):351-62
references: 1454899