title: Not all minds that wander are lost: the importance of a balanced perspective on the mind-wandering state.
abstract: The waking mind is often occupied with mental contents that are minimally constrained by events in the here and now. These self-generated thoughts-e.g., mind-wandering or daydreaming-interfere with external task performance and can be a marker for unhappiness and even psychiatric problems. They also occupy our thoughts for upwards of half of the time, and under non-demanding conditions they (i) allow us to connect our past and future selves together, (ii) help us make successful long-term plans and (iii) can provide a source of creative inspiration. The lengths that the mind goes to self-generate thought, coupled with its apparent functionality, suggest that the mind places a higher priority on such cognition than on many other mental acts. Although mind-wandering may be unpleasant for the individual who experiences it and disruptive to the tasks of the moment, self-generated thought allows consciousness freedom from the here and now and so reflects a key evolutionary adaptation for the mind. Here we synthesize recent literature from cognitive and clinical psychology and propose two formal hypotheses that (1) highlight task context and thought content as critical factors that constrain the costs and benefits of self-generated thought and (2) provide direction on ways to investigate the costs and benefits from an impartial perspective.
authors: The Department of Social Neuroscience, The Max Planck Institute of Human Cognitive Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany.
authors: Jonathan
authors: J
authors: Smallwood
authors: Jessica
authors: J
authors: Andrews-Hanna
keywords: S; daydreaming; mind-wandering; self-generated thought; stimulus independent thought; task unrelated thought
references: Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1117-22
references: 22941876
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Sep;8(9):657-61
references: 17700624
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Mar;136(3):370-81
references: 21349473
references: Conscious Cogn. 2009 Mar;18(1):118-25
references: 19121953
references: Psychol Bull. 1966 Oct;66(4):291-308
references: 5341808
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44423
references: 22957071
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2007 Jun;30(3):299-313; discussion 313-51
references: 17963565
references: J Affect Disord. 2005 Aug;87(2-3):331-5
references: 15979154
references: Science. 2007 Sep 7;317(5843):1351-4
references: 17823345
references: Cogn Emot. 2011 Dec;25(8):1481-90
references: 21432633
references: Conscious Cogn. 2013 Mar;22(1):1-7
references: 23178292
references: Conscious Cogn. 2004 Dec;13(4):789-820
references: 15522632
references: J Consult Psychol. 1967 Oct;31(5):487-91
references: 6075977
references: Hum Neurobiol. 1987;6(2):67-80
references: 3305441
references: Mem Cognit. 2006 Dec;34(8):1644-51
references: 17489291
references: Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1604-11
references: 21917482
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):196-204
references: 19210090
references: Neuroscientist. 2012 Jun;18(3):251-70
references: 21677128
references: Psychol Bull. 2013 May;139(3):542-547
references: 23607432
references: Psychol Bull. 2008 Mar;134(2):163-206
references: 18298268
references: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Apr;70(2):275-87
references: 11952186
references: Science. 2007 Jan 19;315(5810):393-5
references: 17234951
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Nov;141(4):788-798
references: 22468669
references: Conscious Cogn. 2013 Jun;22(2):442-8
references: 23466878
references: Conscious Cogn. 2003 Sep;12(3):452-84
references: 12941287
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 2000 Aug;109(3):504-11
references: 11016119
references: Percept Mot Skills. 1963 Aug;17:187-209
references: 14045737
references: Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;132(6):946-958
references: 17073528
references: Psychol Sci. 2012 Apr;23(4):375-80
references: 22421205
references: Science. 2010 Nov 12;330(6006):932
references: 21071660
references: Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):614-21
references: 17614870
references: Psychol Sci. 2010 Sep;21(9):1300-10
references: 20679524
references: Mem Cognit. 1995 Sep;23(5):551-9
references: 7476241
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 May;141(2):302-320
references: 21875246
references: J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jul;104(1):322-35
references: 20463201
references: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;5(2):142-62
references: 26162121
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):13040-5
references: 19620724
references: Curr Biol. 2010 Dec 7;20(23):R1010-3
references: 21145013
references: Mem Cognit. 2008 Sep;36(6):1144-50
references: 18927032
references: Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1120-6
references: 21277803
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):676-82
references: 11209064
references: Psychol Bull. 2007 Jan;133(1):122-48
references: 17201573
references: Magn Reson Med. 1995 Oct;34(4):537-41
references: 8524021
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1967 Sep;7(1):49-62
references: 6052658
references: Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):R724-32
references: 17714666
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):525-549
references: 22004270
references: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965 Jan;12:71-6
references: 14221693
references: Psychol Rev. 1969 Nov;76(6):574-91
references: 5366413
references: Psychol Bull. 2010 Mar;136(2):208-210
references: 20192560
references: Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;139(4):815-40
references: 23025923
references: Psychol Bull. 2013 May;139(3):519-535
references: 23607430
references: Trans N Y Acad Sci. 1970 Feb;32(2):242-52
references: 5265228
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 May 12;364(1521):1317-24
references: 19528013
references: Emotion. 2009 Apr;9(2):271-276
references: 19348539
references: Cognition. 2009 Jun;111(3):345-55
references: 19327760
references: Brain Res Bull. 2010 Apr 5;81(6):565-73
references: 20003916