title: Effect of exposure time on the accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions in dry skulls.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To investigate the accuracy and reliability of implant site measurements, recorded from low-dose cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.
  
  
  METHODS
  CBCT reformatted images of five skulls were obtained using 40, 20 and 7 s exposure protocols. From these protocols, edentulous ridge dimensions were recorded by two observers and compared with measurements recorded directly from the bone. The measurement errors and intra- and inter-examiner reliability were calculated for each exposure protocol and compared with each other.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean absolute errors from the 40, 20 and 7 s protocols were 0.50, 0.46, and 0.51 mm, respectively. The intra-examiner reliability scores were 0.996, 0.995 and 0.998, respectively. The inter-examiner reliability scores were 0.993, 0.998 and 0.994, respectively. There was no significant difference in accuracy or reliability between the three protocols.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In imaging of dry skulls, lowering the CBCT exposure time from 40 s to 20 or 7 s does not affect the reliability or accuracy of implant site measurements.
authors: Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O. Box 56810, Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia.
authors: Asmáa A
authors: AA
authors: Al-Ekrish
keywords: CBCT; Dental implantation; Dry skull; Radiation dosage; Reliability
references: Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Feb;40(2):67-75
references: 21239568
references: Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 Nov;33(6):361-9
references: 15665229
references: Radiologe. 2003 May;43(5):379-87
references: 12764587
references: Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999 Jul;28(4):245-8
references: 10455389
references: Med Phys. 2000 Jun;27(6):1311-23
references: 10902561
references: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Jul;106(1):106-14
references: 18504152
references: Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 Jan;33(1):51-9
references: 15140823
references: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Dec;104(6):829-36
references: 17448704
references: Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 Sep;38(6):367-78
references: 19700530
references: Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006 Jul;35(4):219-26
references: 16798915
references: Eur Radiol. 1998;8(9):1558-64
references: 9866761
references: Implant Dent. 2012 Apr;21(2):78-86
references: 22382748
references: Med Phys. 2001 Feb;28(2):220-31
references: 11243347
references: Br J Radiol. 2009 Jan;82(973):35-40
references: 18852212