title: Pascal laser versus conventional laser for treatment of diabetic retinopathy.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the safety and efficacy of Pascal laser photocoagulation in comparison with the conventional laser photocoagulation in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy.
  
  
  METHODS
  A prospective randomized case series study was done on 120 procedures done in 120 patients divided into two main groups, group A, patients undergoing focal or modified grid macular laser and group B, patients undergoing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). Each of the two groups were subdivided into two subgroups randomly in the first we used conventional laser photocoagulation (groups A1 and B1) and in the other we used Pascal laser photocoagulation (groups A2 and B2).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Procedures in groups A1,2 and in groups B1,2 had successful outcomes. Significantly higher powers were required with the Pascal (groups A2 and B2) than with conventional laser (groups A1 and B1) (p < 0.001) in eyes that underwent PRP and focal/modified grid macular treatment with both systems. No adverse events were noted in all groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The Pascal photocoagulator is safe, rapid, effective, with rapid learning and had short exposure time. Although the shorter pulse duration of the Pascal necessitates the use of a higher power, it is not associated with adverse effects.
authors: Ophthalmology Department, Ain Shams University, Egypt.
authors: Abdelrahman G
authors: AG
authors: Salman
keywords: Conventional laser; Diabetic retinopathy; Pascal laser
references: J Biomed Opt. 2004 Mar-Apr;9(2):367-71
references: 15065904
references: Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Apr;93(4):518-25
references: 19074915
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Feb;46(2):714-9
references: 15671304
references: Lasers Surg Med. 2000;27(5):451-64
references: 11126439
references: Retina. 2006 Mar;26(3):370-6
references: 16508446
references: Eye (Lond). 1997;11 ( Pt 4):531-6
references: 9425420
references: Ophthalmology. 1982 Jul;89(7):772-9
references: 6181452
references: Exp Eye Res. 1966 Oct;5(4):242-8
references: 5954514
references: Eye (Lond). 1999 Apr;13 ( Pt 2):151-9
references: 10450373
references: Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jan;84(1):40-7
references: 10611098
references: Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan;126(1):78-85
references: 18195222
references: Ophthalmology. 1983 Aug;90(8):973-91
references: 6688867