title: Usage of a generic web-based self-management intervention for breast cancer survivors: substudy analysis of the BREATH trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Generic fully automated Web-based self-management interventions are upcoming, for example, for the growing number of breast cancer survivors. It is hypothesized that the use of these interventions is more individualized and that users apply a large amount of self-tailoring. However, technical usage evaluations of these types of interventions are scarce and practical guidelines are lacking.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To gain insight into meaningful usage parameters to evaluate the use of generic fully automated Web-based interventions by assessing how breast cancer survivors use a generic self-management website. Final aim is to propose practical recommendations for researchers and information and communication technology (ICT) professionals who aim to design and evaluate the use of similar Web-based interventions.
  
  
  METHODS
  The BREAst cancer ehealTH (BREATH) intervention is a generic unguided fully automated website with stepwise weekly access and a fixed 4-month structure containing 104 intervention ingredients (ie, texts, tasks, tests, videos). By monitoring https-server requests, technical usage statistics were recorded for the intervention group of the randomized controlled trial. Observed usage was analyzed by measures of frequency, duration, and activity. Intervention adherence was defined as continuous usage, or the proportion of participants who started using the intervention and continued to log in during all four phases. By comparing observed to minimal intended usage (frequency and activity), different user groups were defined.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Usage statistics for 4 months were collected from 70 breast cancer survivors (mean age 50.9 years). Frequency of logins/person ranged from 0 to 45, total duration/person from 0 to 2324 minutes (38.7 hours), and activity from opening none to all intervention ingredients. 31 participants continued logging in to all four phases resulting in an intervention adherence rate of 44.3% (95% CI 33.2-55.9). Nine nonusers (13%), 30 low users (43%), and 31 high users (44%) were defined. Low and high users differed significantly on frequency (P<.001), total duration (P<.001), session duration (P=.009), and activity (P<.001). High users logged in an average of 21 times, had a mean session duration of 33 minutes, and opened on average 91% of all ingredients. Signing the self-help contract (P<.001), reporting usefulness of ingredients (P=.003), overall satisfaction (P=.028), and user friendliness evaluation (P=.003) were higher in high users. User groups did not differ on age, education, and baseline distress.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  By reporting the usage of a self-management website for breast cancer survivors, the present study gained first insight into the design of usage evaluations of generic fully automated Web-based interventions. It is recommended to (1) incorporate usage statistics that reflect the amount of self-tailoring applied by users, (2) combine technical usage statistics with self-reported usefulness, and (3) use qualitative measures. Also, (4) a pilot usage evaluation should be a fixed step in the development process of novel Web-based interventions, and (5) it is essential for researchers to gain insight into the rationale of recorded and nonrecorded usage statistics.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): 2935; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=2935 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6IkX1ADEV).
authors: Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands. s.vandenberg@mps.umcn.nl
authors: Sanne W
authors: SW
authors: van den Berg
authors: Esmee J
authors: EJ
authors: Peters
authors: J Frank
authors: JF
authors: Kraaijeveld
authors: Marieke F M
authors: MF
authors: Gielissen
authors: Judith B
authors: JB
authors: Prins
mesh_terms: D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D008875:Middle Aged; D012648:Self Care; D017741:Survivors
keywords: Internet; Web-based intervention; breast cancer; exposure; intervention adherence; log file analysis; usage evaluation; usage statistics; user groups; website use
references: Ann Behav Med. 2009 Aug;38(1):4-17
references: 19787305
references: CA Cancer J Clin. 2003 Nov-Dec;53(6):356-71
references: 15224975
references: Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
references: 6880820
references: Health Psychol. 2004 Jan;23(1):3-15
references: 14756598
references: Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Mar;82(3):307-12
references: 21277146
references: Clin Nurs Res. 2007 Nov;16(4):278-93; discussion 294-301
references: 17991908
references: BMC Cancer. 2012 Sep 07;12:394
references: 22958799
references: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Jul;122(2):573-8
references: 19960243
references: Health Psychol. 2010 Mar;29(2):160-8
references: 20230089
references: J Med Internet Res. 2002 Apr-Nov;4(2):E9
references: 12554556
references: J Med Internet Res. 2013 Mar 01;15(3):e34
references: 23454601
references: Cancer. 2008 Aug 15;113(4):870-8
references: 18618581
references: J Med Internet Res. 2009 Apr 24;11(2):e13
references: 19403466
references: Support Care Cancer. 2011 Dec;19(12):1899-908
references: 21898134
references: J Behav Med. 2014 Jun;37(3):458-68
references: 23212928
references: J Psychosom Res. 2013 Jan;74(1):74-81
references: 23272992
references: J Broadcast Electron Media. 2009;53(1):112-133
references: 23172985
references: CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90
references: 21296855
references: Behav Res Ther. 2012 Aug;50(7-8):463-8
references: 22659155
references: J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 14;14(6):e152
references: 23151820
references: J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 06;13(1):e2
references: 21212045
references: Psychooncology. 2011 Jun;20(6):655-63
references: 21381148
references: J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jan 31;15(1):e23
references: 23363466
references: Health Educ Behav. 2011 Feb;38(1):49-62
references: 21189422
references: Clin Breast Cancer. 2000 Jul;1(2):148-53; discussion 154-5
references: 11899653
references: J Med Internet Res. 2011 Aug 05;13(3):e52
references: 21821503
references: J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 31;7(1):e11
references: 15829473
references: J Med Internet Res. 2011 Mar 10;13(1):e30
references: 21393123
references: Ann Behav Med. 2009 Aug;38(1):18-27
references: 19802647
references: J Med Internet Res. 2006 Aug 30;8(3):e15
references: 16954125
references: J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 31;13(4):e126
references: 22209829
references: Ann Oncol. 2011 Oct;22(10):2330-3
references: 21339383
references: Psychooncology. 2013 Apr;22(4):947-51
references: 22438297