title: The influence of scene context on object recognition is independent of attentional focus.
abstract: Humans can quickly and accurately recognize objects within briefly presented natural scenes. Previous work has provided evidence that scene context contributes to this process, demonstrating improved naming of objects that were presented in semantically consistent scenes (e.g., a sandcastle on a beach) relative to semantically inconsistent scenes (e.g., a sandcastle on a football field). The current study was aimed at investigating which processes underlie the scene consistency effect. Specifically, we tested: (1) whether the effect is due to increased visual feature and/or shape overlap for consistent relative to inconsistent scene-object pairs; and (2) whether the effect is mediated by attention to the background scene. Experiment 1 replicated the scene consistency effect of a previous report (Davenport and Potter, 2004). Using a new, carefully controlled stimulus set, Experiment 2 showed that the scene consistency effect could not be explained by low-level feature or shape overlap between scenes and target objects. Experiments 3a and 3b investigated whether focused attention modulates the scene consistency effect. By using a location cueing manipulation, participants were correctly informed about the location of the target object on a proportion of trials, allowing focused attention to be deployed toward the target object. Importantly, the effect of scene consistency on target object recognition was independent of spatial attention, and was observed both when attention was focused on the target object and when attention was focused on the background scene. These results indicate that a semantically consistent scene context benefits object recognition independently of the focus of attention. We suggest that the scene consistency effect is primarily driven by global scene properties, or "scene gist", that can be processed with minimal attentional resources.
authors: Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento Trento, Italy ; Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands.
authors: Jaap
authors: J
authors: Munneke
authors: Valentina
authors: V
authors: Brentari
authors: Marius V
authors: MV
authors: Peelen
keywords: high-level vision; natural scene processing; object recognition; semantic consistency; spatial attention
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Apr;16(2):123-44
references: 12668221
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998 Dec;127(4):398-415
references: 9857494
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1978 Nov;4(4):565-72
references: 722248
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 3;108(18):7635-40
references: 21502509
references: Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;113(4):766-86
references: 17014302
references: Vision Res. 2003 Feb;43(4):393-404
references: 12535996
references: Percept Psychophys. 1992 Jun;51(6):599-606
references: 1620571
references: J Vis. 2009 Mar 27;9(3):24.1-15
references: 19757963
references: Vis cogn. 2006 Aug 1;14(4-8):411-443
references: 17387378
references: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Aug;73(6):1742-53
references: 21607814
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 10;103(2):449-54
references: 16407167
references: Vision Res. 2007 Dec;47(26):3286-97
references: 17967472
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:243-71
references: 10074679
references: Psychol Res. 1990;52(4):317-29
references: 2287695
references: Science. 1975 Mar 14;187(4180):965-6
references: 1145183
references: Psychol Sci. 2004 Aug;15(8):559-64
references: 15271002
references: Prog Brain Res. 2006;155:23-36
references: 17027377
references: Psychol Rev. 1989 Jul;96(3):433-58
references: 2756067
references: Psychol Sci. 2001 Mar;12(2):157-62
references: 11340926
references: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Aug;73(6):1650-71
references: 21671156
references: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(2):507-17
references: 19837103
references: Cogn Psychol. 1982 Apr;14(2):143-77
references: 7083801
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Aug;5(8):617-29
references: 15263892
references: Front Psychol. 2011 Oct 03;2:243
references: 22007180
references: Cogn Psychol. 2009 Mar;58(2):137-76
references: 18762289