title: Transcriptional profiling of Staphylococcus aureus during growth in 2 M NaCl leads to clarification of physiological roles for Kdp and Ktr K+ uptake systems.
abstract: Staphylococcus aureus exhibits an unusually high level of osmotolerance and Na(+) tolerance, properties that support survival in various host niches and in preserved foods. The genetic basis of these traits is not well understood. We compared the transcriptional profiles of S. aureus grown in complex medium with and without 2 M NaCl. The stimulon for growth in high-osmolality media and Na(+) included genes involved in uptake of K(+), other compatible solutes, sialic acid, and sugars; capsule biosynthesis; and amino acid and central metabolism. Quantitative PCR analysis revealed that the loci responded differently from each other to high osmolality imposed by elevated NaCl versus sucrose. High-affinity K(+) uptake (kdp) genes and capsule biosynthesis (cap5) genes required the two-component system KdpDE for full induction by osmotic stress, with kdpA induced more by NaCl and cap5B induced more by sucrose. Focusing on K(+) importers, we identified three S. aureus genes belonging to the lower-affinity Trk/Ktr family that encode two membrane proteins (KtrB and KtrD) and one accessory protein (KtrC). In the absence of osmotic stress, the ktr gene transcripts were much more abundant than the kdpA transcript. Disruption of S. aureus kdpA caused a growth defect under low-K(+) conditions, disruption of ktrC resulted in a significant defect in 2 M NaCl, and a ΔktrC ΔkdpA double mutant exhibited both phenotypes. Protective effects of S. aureus Ktr transporters at elevated NaCl are consistent with previous indications that both Na(+) and osmolality challenges are mitigated by the maintenance of a high cytoplasmic K(+) concentration.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  There is general agreement that the osmotolerance and Na(+) tolerance of Staphylococcus aureus are unusually high for a nonhalophile and support its capacity for human colonization, pathogenesis, and growth in food. Nonetheless, the molecular basis for these properties is not well defined. The genome-wide response of S. aureus to a high concentration, 2 M, of NaCl revealed the upregulation of expected genes, such as those for transporters of compatible solutes that are widely implicated in supporting osmotolerance. A high-affinity potassium uptake system, KdpFABC, was upregulated, although it generally plays a physiological role under very low K(+) conditions. At higher K(+) concentrations, a lower-affinity and more highly expressed type of K(+) transporter system, Ktr transporters, was shown to play a significant role in high Na(+) tolerance. This study illustrates the importance of the K(+) status of the cell for tolerance of Na(+) by S. aureus and underscores the importance of monovalent cation cycles in this pathogen.
authors: Department of Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
authors: Alexa
authors: A
authors: Price-Whelan
authors: Chun Kit
authors: CK
authors: Poon
authors: Meredith A
authors: MA
authors: Benson
authors: Tess T
authors: TT
authors: Eidem
authors: Christelle M
authors: CM
authors: Roux
authors: Jeffrey M
authors: JM
authors: Boyd
authors: Paul M
authors: PM
authors: Dunman
authors: Victor J
authors: VJ
authors: Torres
authors: Terry A
authors: TA
authors: Krulwich
mesh_terms: D020869:Gene Expression Profiling; D055786:Gene Knockout Techniques; D006801:Humans; D026901:Membrane Transport Proteins / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D009997:Osmotic Pressure; D060888:Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; D012965:Sodium Chloride / Q000378:metabolism*; D013211:Staphylococcus aureus / Q000235:genetics* / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism*; D013312:Stress, Physiological
chemical_list: D026901:Membrane Transport Proteins; D012965:Sodium Chloride
references: Clin Chem. 2009 Apr;55(4):611-22
references: 19246619
references: J Bacteriol. 2004 Jul;186(14):4665-84
references: 15231800
references: J Bacteriol. 1992 Apr;174(8):2711-6
references: 1556089
references: mBio. 2013 Feb 12;4(1):e00537-12
references: 23404398
references: J Bacteriol. 2006 Apr;188(7):2593-603
references: 16547047
references: J Bacteriol. 2009 Apr;191(7):2133-43
references: 19181803
references: J Bacteriol. 1975 Oct;124(1):201-11
references: 1176430
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 29;105(4):1327-32
references: 18216255
references: Methods Enzymol. 2002;345:556-69
references: 11665639
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jan;78(1):464-8
references: 6787588
references: Infect Immun. 2011 Jun;79(6):2154-67
references: 21422185
references: J Gen Physiol. 1965 Nov 1;49(2):221-34
references: 19873561
references: J Bacteriol. 2013 Apr;195(8):1779-88
references: 23396916
references: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Nov 30;1717(2):67-88
references: 16277975
references: J Gen Microbiol. 1964 May;35:205-13
references: 14179669
references: Infect Immun. 2010 Aug;78(8):3506-15
references: 20498265
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Aug;78(16):5699-707
references: 22685146
references: J Bacteriol. 1992 Apr;174(8):2702-10
references: 1556088
references: J Gen Microbiol. 1970 Dec;64(2):171-85
references: 4995906
references: J Bacteriol. 2004 Jul;186(13):4085-99
references: 15205410
references: J Bacteriol. 1992 Apr;174(7):2152-9
references: 1532388
references: Nature. 1975 Oct 2;257(5525):398-400
references: 241020
references: Mol Biotechnol. 1995 Apr;3(2):93-9
references: 7620981
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Nov;70(11):6887-91
references: 15528558
references: J Bacteriol. 2001 Dec;183(24):7341-53
references: 11717293
references: J Gen Microbiol. 1961 May;25:97-102
references: 13693390
references: Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010 Sep;51(3):358-61
references: 20618890
references: Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Jan;17(1):218-34
references: 14726462
references: J Bacteriol. 1945 Aug;50:201-3
references: 20989336
references: J Bacteriol. 1985 Oct;164(1):434-45
references: 2995318
references: J Bacteriol. 2007 Oct;189(20):7316-25
references: 17675373
references: J Bacteriol. 2003 Feb;185(4):1289-98
references: 12562800
references: J Microbiol Methods. 2007 Aug;70(2):355-62
references: 17590462
references: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003 May 28;222(2):171-6
references: 12770703
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 May 11;17(9):3469-78
references: 2657660
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Feb;64(2):763-7
references: 9464420
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Jan;79(2):576-87
references: 23144141
references: J Bacteriol. 2006 Oct;188(19):6739-56
references: 16980476
references: Microbiol Rev. 1989 Mar;53(1):121-47
references: 2651863
references: Microbiology (Reading). 1996 Jun;142 ( Pt 6):1491-1497
references: 8704988
references: Microbiology (Reading). 1994 Nov;140 ( Pt 11):3131-8
references: 7812452
references: Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
references: 11846609
references: J Microbiol Methods. 2012 Sep;90(3):214-6
references: 22613804
references: J Bacteriol. 1992 Apr;174(7):2145-51
references: 1532387
references: Structure. 2009 Jun 10;17(6):893-903
references: 19523906
references: J Bacteriol. 2004 Feb;186(3):595-600
references: 14729683
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 28;110(22):9084-9
references: 23671116
references: Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010 Aug;67(15):2511-32
references: 20333436
references: J Biol Chem. 2007 May 11;282(19):14018-27
references: 17344221
references: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Nov;52(11):3955-66
references: 18725435
references: J Bacteriol. 2002 Oct;184(19):5457-67
references: 12218034
references: J Biosci. 2007 Apr;32(3):559-68
references: 17536175
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 May;63(5):1889-97
references: 9143120
references: Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997 Jul;10(3):505-20
references: 9227864
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2009 May 26;9:118
references: 19470179
references: Nature. 2013 Apr 18;496(7445):323-8
references: 23598340
references: J Bacteriol. 2011 Oct;193(19):5279-91
references: 21784926
references: J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Sep;41(9):4424-7
references: 12958283