title: Detection of Steps in Single Molecule Data.
abstract: Over the past few decades, single molecule investigations employing optical tweezers, AFM and TIRF microscopy have revealed that molecular behaviors are typically characterized by discrete steps or events that follow changes in protein conformation. These events, that manifest as steps or jumps, are short-lived transitions between otherwise more stable molecular states. A major limiting factor in determining the size and timing of the steps is the noise introduced by the measurement system. To address this impediment to the analysis of single molecule behaviors, step detection algorithms incorporate large records of data and provide objective analysis. However, existing algorithms are mostly based on heuristics that are not reliable and lack objectivity. Most of these step detection methods require the user to supply parameters that inform the search for steps. They work well, only when the signal to noise ratio (SNR) is high and stepping speed is low. In this report, we have developed a novel step detection method that performs an objective analysis on the data without input parameters, and based only on the noise statistics. The noise levels and characteristics can be estimated from the data providing reliable results for much smaller SNR and higher stepping speeds. An iterative learning process drives the optimization of step-size distributions for data that has unimodal step-size distribution, and produces extremely low false positive outcomes and high accuracy in finding true steps. Our novel methodology, also uniquely incorporates compensation for the smoothing affects of probe dynamics. A mechanical measurement probe typically takes a finite time to respond to step changes, and when steps occur faster than the probe response time, the sharp step transitions are smoothed out and can obscure the step events. To address probe dynamics we accept a model for the dynamic behavior of the probe and invert it to reveal the steps. No other existing method addresses the impact of probe dynamics on step detection. Importantly, we have also developed a comprehensive set of tools to evaluate various existing step detection techniques. We quantify the performance and limitations of various step detection methods using novel evaluation scales. We show that under these scales, our method provides much better overall performance. The method is validated on different simulated test cases, as well as experimental data.
authors: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, 200 Union St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
authors: Tanuj
authors: T
authors: Aggarwal
authors: Donatello
authors: D
authors: Materassi
authors: Robert
authors: R
authors: Davison
authors: Thomas
authors: T
authors: Hays
authors: Murti
authors: M
authors: Salapaka
keywords: Dwell time sequence; Molecular motors; Step detection
references: Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Apr;3(4):425-8
references: 11283618
references: Biophys J. 2007 May 1;92(9):2986-95
references: 17325011
references: J Cell Biol. 1998 Mar 23;140(6):1395-405
references: 9508772
references: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Oct;10(10):682-96
references: 19773780
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):468-72
references: 11149943
references: Neural Comput. 1998 Oct 1;10(7):1679-703
references: 9744892
references: Rev Sci Instrum. 2009 Aug;80(8):084301
references: 19725671
references: Annu Rev Biochem. 2008;77:205-28
references: 18307407
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Mar 5;93(5):1913-7
references: 8700858
references: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000 Jun 7;272(2):586-90
references: 10833456
references: Biosci Rep. 1992 Aug;12(4):237-62
references: 1384755
references: J Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;131(2):411-25
references: 7593168
references: Cell. 1985 Aug;42(1):39-50
references: 3926325
references: Nature. 1993 Oct 21;365(6448):721-7
references: 8413650
references: Biophys J. 2002 Jul;83(1):491-501
references: 12080136
references: Science. 2004 Mar 12;303(5664):1674-8
references: 15017000
references: ACS Chem Biol. 2007 Jan 23;2(1):53-61
references: 17243783
references: Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2004 Feb;14(1):76-88
references: 15102453
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 15;97(17):9482-6
references: 10944217
references: Nat Struct Biol. 2000 Sep;7(9):715-8
references: 10966636
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 2;104(1):87-92
references: 17190808
references: Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009 Jun 28;11(24):4899-910
references: 19506765
references: Rev Sci Instrum. 2010 Dec;81(12):123105
references: 21198012