title: Premotor cortex is critical for goal-directed actions.
abstract: Shifting between motor plans is often necessary for adaptive behavior. When faced with changing consequences of one's actions, it is often imperative to switch from automatic actions to deliberative and controlled actions. The pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) in primates, akin to the premotor cortex (M2) in mice, has been implicated in motor learning and planning, and action switching. We hypothesized that M2 would be differentially involved in goal-directed actions, which are controlled by their consequences vs. habits, which are more dependent on their past reinforcement history and less on their consequences. To investigate this, we performed M2 lesions in mice and then concurrently trained them to press the same lever for the same food reward using two different schedules of reinforcement that differentially bias towards the use of goal-directed versus habitual action strategies. We then probed whether actions were dependent on their expected consequence through outcome revaluation testing. We uncovered that M2 lesions did not affect the acquisition of lever-pressing. However, in mice with M2 lesions, lever-pressing was insensitive to changes in expected outcome value following goal-directed training. However, habitual actions were intact. We confirmed a role for M2 in goal-directed but not habitual actions in separate groups of mice trained on the individual schedules biasing towards goal-directed versus habitual actions. These data indicate that M2 is critical for actions to be updated based on their consequences, and suggest that habitual action strategies may not require processing by M2 and the updating of motor plans.
authors: 1Laboratory for Integrative Neuroscience, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD, USA.
authors: Christina M
authors: CM
authors: Gremel
authors: Rui M
authors: RM
authors: Costa
keywords: action selection; goal-directed actions; habitual actions; premotor cortex; value-based decision making
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Jul;22(2):513-23
references: 16045504
references: J Neurophysiol. 2004 Dec;92(6):3482-99
references: 15269227
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2000 Jan;9(1):103-9
references: 10666562
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Apr;35(7):1105-14
references: 22487040
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6;93(16):8694-8
references: 8710933
references: J Comp Neurol. 2011 Dec 15;519(18):3766-801
references: 21800317
references: Front Integr Neurosci. 2010 May 28;4:
references: 20725502
references: Neuron. 2002 Nov 14;36(4):751-65
references: 12441062
references: Nat Commun. 2013;4:2264
references: 23921250
references: Brain Struct Funct. 2007 Sep;212(2):149-79
references: 17717690
references: Behav Brain Res. 2003 Nov 30;146(1-2):145-57
references: 14643467
references: J Neurosci. 2009 Jun 24;29(25):8280-7
references: 19553467
references: J Neurophysiol. 2002 May;87(5):2577-92
references: 11976394
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Jan;19(1):181-9
references: 14750976
references: Neurosci Lett. 1984 Feb 24;44(3):247-52
references: 6728294
references: Front Integr Neurosci. 2009 Oct 09;3:23
references: 19847323
references: Cereb Cortex. 2003 Apr;13(4):400-8
references: 12631569
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Apr;35(7):1036-51
references: 22487034
references: Front Neuroanat. 2010 Dec 27;4:147
references: 21212837
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Sep;18(5):1286-94
references: 12956727
references: J Comp Neurol. 2005 Jan 31;482(1):17-32
references: 15612019
references: Nat Neurosci. 2007 Feb;10(2):240-8
references: 17237780
references: Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jan;35(1):48-69
references: 19776734
references: Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Apr 18;7:150
references: 23616761
references: J Comp Neurol. 2003 Dec 15;467(3):271-92
references: 14608594
references: Behav Brain Res. 2006 Jan 30;166(2):189-96
references: 16153716
references: J Neurophysiol. 1996 Oct;76(4):2327-42
references: 8899607
references: Brain Res Bull. 1987 Aug;19(2):203-21
references: 2822206
references: J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 3;30(44):14719-23
references: 21048130
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jun;7(6):464-76
references: 16715055
references: Nat Neurosci. 2011 Aug 14;14(9):1202-8
references: 21841777
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 May;1104:147-71
references: 17360797
references: Front Integr Neurosci. 2007 Nov 02;1:6
references: 18958234