title: Recruitment for a clinical trial of chronic disease self-management for older adults with multimorbidity: a successful approach within general practice.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A robust research base is required in General Practice. The research output for General Practice is much less than those of other clinical disciplines. A major impediment to more research in this sector is difficulty with recruitment. Much of the research in this area focuses on barriers to effective recruitment and many projects have great difficulty with this process. This paper seeks to describe a systematic approach to recruitment for a randomized controlled trial that allowed the study team to recruit a substantial number of subjects from General Practice over a brief time period.
  
  
  METHODS
  A systematic approach to recruitment in this setting based on prior literature and the experience of the investigator team was incorporated into the design and implementation of the study. Five strategies were used to facilitate this process. These included designing the study to minimize the impact of the research on the day-to-day operations of the clinics, engagement of general practitioners in the research, making the research attractive to subjects, minimizing attrition and ensuring recruitment was a major focus of the management of the study. Outcomes of the recruitment process were measured as the proportion of practices that agreed to participate, the proportion of potentially eligible subjects who consented to take part in the trial and the attrition rate of subjects. Qualitative interviews with a subset of successfully recruited participants were done to determine why they chose to participate in the study; data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Five out of the six general practices contacted agreed to take part in the study. Thirty-eight per cent of the 1663 subjects who received a letter of invitation contacted the university study personnel regarding their interest in the project. Recruitment of the required number of eligible participants (n = 256) was accomplished in seven months. Thematic analysis of interviews with 30 participants regarding key factors in their study participation identified a personalised letter of endorsement from their general practitioner, expectation of personal benefit and altruism as important factors in their decision to participate.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Recruitment can be successfully achieved in General Practice through design of the research project to facilitate recruitment, minimize the impact on general practice operations and ensure special care in enrolling and maintaining subjects in the project.
authors: Discipline of General Practice, Flinders Prevention Promotion and Primary Health Care Cluster, Flinders University, Health Sciences Building, Level 3, Registry Road, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia. Richard.Reed@flinders.edu.au.
authors: Richard L
authors: RL
authors: Reed
authors: Christopher A
authors: CA
authors: Barton
authors: Linda M
authors: LM
authors: Isherwood
authors: Jodie M Oliver
authors: JM
authors: Baxter
authors: Leigh
authors: L
authors: Roeger
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001294:Attitude to Health; D002908:Chronic Disease / Q000628:therapy*; D015897:Comorbidity; D058006:General Practice / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D018579:Patient Selection; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D036301:Qualitative Research; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000379:methods / Q000523:psychology*; D012648:Self Care / Q000379:methods*
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;60(8):757-65
references: 17606170
references: Qual Health Res. 2005 Feb;15(2):224-39
references: 15611205
references: Control Clin Trials. 1985 Jun;6(2):156-67
references: 4006489
references: BMJ. 1991 Oct 19;303(6808):969-71
references: 1954424
references: Qual Prim Care. 2012;20(2):115-23
references: 22824564
references: Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Mar;51(464):221-2
references: 11255904
references: Br J Gen Pract. 2003 May;53(490):394-8
references: 12830569
references: Med J Aust. 2009 Nov 2;191(9):492-5
references: 19883343
references: Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Nov;58(556):759-66, i-ii
references: 19000399
references: Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 May;28(3):258-67
references: 17030154
references: Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 Nov;32(6):946-52
references: 21864719
references: Fam Pract. 2007 Dec;24(6):601-3
references: 17872907
references: Fam Pract. 2007 Jun;24(3):269-75
references: 17504773
references: Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Jun;56(527):407-14
references: 16762121
references: J Prim Health Care. 2010 Dec 01;2(4):294-302
references: 21125070
references: J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Apr;47(4):477-81
references: 10203125
references: Med J Aust. 2001 Feb 5;174(3):144-6
references: 11247619
references: Control Clin Trials. 1997 Aug;18(4):328-52
references: 9257072
references: Med J Aust. 2008 Nov 17;189(S10):S17-20
references: 19143580
references: J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Apr;1(2):77-80
references: 10180853
references: Fam Pract. 2000 Apr;17(2):187-91
references: 10758084
references: Fam Pract. 2009 Oct;26(5):391-7
references: 19549623
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Dec;52(12):1143-56
references: 10580777
references: Med J Aust. 2008 Jul 21;189(2):103-4
references: 18637781