title: Predicting risk of emergency admission to hospital using primary care data: derivation and validation of QAdmissions score.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To develop and externally validate a risk algorithm (QAdmissions) to estimate the risk of emergency hospital admission for patients aged 18-100 years in primary care.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective open cohort study using routinely collected data from general practice linked to hospital episode data during the 2-year study period 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2011.
  
  
  METHODS
  405 general practices in England contributing to the national QResearch database to develop the algorithm. Two validation cohorts to validate the algorithm (1) 202 different QResearch practices and (2) 343 practices in England contributing to the Clinical Practice Research DataLink (CPRD). All general practices had data linked to hospital episode statistics at the individual patient level.
  
  
  METHODS
  We studied 2 849 381 patients aged 18-100 years in the derivation cohort with over 4.6 million person-years of follow-up. 265 573 of these patients had one or more emergency admissions during follow-up. For the QResearch validation cohort, we identified 1 340 622 patients aged 18-100 years with over 2.2 million person-years of follow-up. Of these patients, 132 723 had one or more emergency admissions during follow-up. The CPRD cohort included 2 475 360 patients aged 18-100 years with over 3.8 million person-years of follow-up. 234 204 of these patients had one or more emergency admissions during follow-up. We excluded patients without a valid NHS number and a valid Townsend score.
  
  
  METHODS
  First (ie, incident) emergency admission to hospital in the next 2 years as recorded on the linked hospital episodes records.
  
  
  METHODS
  Candidate variables recorded on the general practitioner computer system including (1) demographic variables (age, sex, strategic health authority, Townsend deprivation score, ethnicity); (2) lifestyle variables (smoking, alcohol intake); (3) chronic diseases; (4) prescribed medication; (5) clinical values (body mass index, systolic blood pressure); (6) laboratory test results (haemoglobin, platelets, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, ratio of total serum cholesterol to high density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations, liver function tests). We also included the number of emergency admissions in the preceding year based on information recorded on the linked hospital episodes records.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The final QAdmissions algorithm incorporated 30 variables. When applied to the QResearch validation cohort, it explained 41% of the variation in women and 43% of that in men. The D statistic for QAdmissions was 1.7 in women and 1.8 in men. The receiver operating curve statistic was 0.78 for men and 0.77 for women. QAdmissions had good performance on all measures of discrimination and calibration. The positive predictive value for emergency admissions for the top tenth of patients at highest risk was 42% and the sensitivity was 39%. The results for the CPRD validation cohort were similar.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The QAdmissions model provided a valid measure of absolute risk of emergency admission to hospital in the general population as shown by its performance in a separate validation cohort. Further research is needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using these algorithms in primary care.
authors: Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
authors: Julia
authors: J
authors: Hippisley-Cox
authors: Carol
authors: C
authors: Coupland
keywords: EPIDEMIOLOGY; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PRIMARY CARE
references: BMJ. 2006 Aug 12;333(7563):327
references: 16815882
references: Stat Med. 2004 Mar 15;23(5):723-48
references: 14981672
references: BMJ. 2013 May 02;346:f2573
references: 23641033
references: Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jul 14;168(13):1416-22
references: 18625922
references: BMJ. 2012 May 22;344:e3427
references: 22619194
references: BMJ. 2011 Jun 22;342:d3651
references: 21697214
references: Health Stat Q. 2004 Spring;(21):5-14
references: 15615148
references: BMJ. 2011 Aug 16;343:d4656
references: 21846713
references: Diabet Med. 2011 May;28(5):599-607
references: 21480970
references: JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 22;173(8):632-8
references: 23529115
references: J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Apr;46(4):419-25
references: 9560062
references: Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9):782-93
references: 12218769
references: BMJ. 1991 Mar 30;302(6779):766-8
references: 2021768
references: BMJ. 2009 Mar 17;338:b880
references: 19297312
references: BMJ Open. 2012 Aug 10;2(4):
references: 22885591
references: BMJ. 2007 Jul 21;335(7611):136
references: 17615182
references: Fam Pract. 2007 Apr;24(2):158-67
references: 17210987
references: BMJ. 2009 Nov 19;339:b4229
references: 19926696
references: Heart. 2008 Jan;94(1):34-9
references: 17916661
references: J R Soc Med. 2006 Aug;99(8):406-14
references: 16893941
references: Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;28(5):964-74
references: 10597998
references: BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Jun 21;11:49
references: 20565929
references: Am J Med. 1999 Jul;107(1):13-7
references: 10403347
references: BMJ. 2008 Jun 28;336(7659):1475-82
references: 18573856