title: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effects on neglect: a visual-evoked potential study.
abstract: We studied the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in six right-brain-damaged patients with left unilateral spatial neglect (USN), using both standard clinical tests (reading, line, and letter cancelation, and line bisection), and electrophysiological measures (steady-state visual-evoked potentials, SSVEP). TENS was applied on left neck muscles for 15', and measures were recorded before, immediately after, and 60' after stimulation. Behavioral results showed that the stimulation temporarily improved the deficit in all patients. In cancelation tasks, omissions and performance asymmetries between the two hand-sides were reduced, as well as the rightward deviation in line bisection. Before TENS, SSVEP average latency to stimuli displayed in the left visual half-field [LVF (160 ms)] was remarkably longer than to stimuli shown in the right visual half-field [RVF (120 ms)]. Immediately after TENS, latency to LVF stimuli was 130 ms; 1 h after stimulation the effect of TENS faded, with latency returning to baseline. TENS similarly affected also the latency SSVEP of 12 healthy participants, and their line bisection performance, with effects smaller in size. The present study, first, replicates evidence concerning the positive behavioral effects of TENS on the manifestations of left USN in right-brain-damaged patients; second, it shows putatively related electrophysiological effects on the SSVEP latency. These behavioral and novel electrophysiological results are discussed in terms of specific directional effects of left somatosensory stimulation on egocentric coordinates, which in USN patients are displaced toward the side of the cerebral lesion. Showing that visual-evoked potentials latency is modulated by proprioceptive stimulation, we provide electrophysiological evidence to the effect that TENS may improve some manifestations of USN, with implications for its rehabilitation.
authors: Department of Human Movement, Social and Health Sciences, University of Rome , Foro Italico , Italy ; Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation , Rome , Italy.
authors: Sabrina
authors: S
authors: Pitzalis
authors: Donatella
authors: D
authors: Spinelli
authors: Giuseppe
authors: G
authors: Vallar
authors: Francesco
authors: F
authors: Di Russo
keywords: TENS; neglect; neglect rehabilitation; proprioceptive stimulation; steady-state VEP
references: Eur J Neurosci. 1996 Jan;8(1):30-52
references: 8713448
references: Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(1):93-110
references: 10617294
references: Neuropsychologia. 1988;26(1):161-6
references: 3242500
references: Exp Brain Res. 1995;105(2):321-4
references: 7498386
references: Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006;24(4-6):337-45
references: 17119308
references: Neuropsychologia. 1996 Dec;34(12):1151-7
references: 8951825
references: Neurology. 2006 Jun 27;66(12):1859-67
references: 16801651
references: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011 Oct;21(5):618-49
references: 21604229
references: Neuropsychologia. 2007 Nov 5;45(14):3127-48
references: 17889040
references: Cortex. 2013 Jan;49(1):107-19
references: 22154751
references: Brain. 2007 Feb;130(Pt 2):431-41
references: 17008330
references: J Rehabil Med. 2003 Nov;35(6):249-53
references: 14664313
references: Neuroreport. 1996 Jan 31;7(2):553-6
references: 8730827
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Apr;28(4):323-34
references: 16779799
references: Cortex. 1998 Apr;34(2):233-41
references: 9606588
references: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Oct;9(10):1337-43
references: 16998482
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Apr;82(4):440-8
references: 11295002
references: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Nov;8(11):1603-10
references: 16234807
references: Brain. 2008 Mar;131(Pt 3):842-54
references: 18024488
references: Neurosci Lett. 2001 Mar 23;301(1):64-8
references: 11239717
references: Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Mar;47(1):123-47
references: 21448124
references: Curr Biol. 2007 Nov 6;17(21):1890-5
references: 17964160
references: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Apr;89(4):1994-2013
references: 12686576
references: Neuropsychologia. 1995 Jan;33(1):73-82
references: 7731542
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Sep;12(5):869-77
references: 11054928
references: J Physiol. 1970 May;207(3):635-52
references: 5499740
references: Nature. 1995 Aug 31;376(6543):778-81
references: 7651537
references: Neurology. 1973 Jun;23(6):658-64
references: 4736313
references: Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006;24(4-6):347-56
references: 17119309
references: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1996 Sep;2(5):452-9
references: 9375170
references: Eur J Neurol. 2008 Sep;15(9):922-7
references: 18637956
references: Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 15;82:517-30
references: 23770406
references: Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Nov;113(11):1771-7
references: 12417230
references: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;74(1):116-9
references: 12486281
references: Prog Brain Res. 2003;142:257-71
references: 12693266
references: Neurology. 2010 Jan 12;74(2):173-6
references: 20042705
references: Neurochirurgie. 1978;24 Suppl 1:1-138
references: 307702
references: Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jan;50(2):245-53
references: 22142667
references: J Neurosci. 2013 Mar 20;33(12):5346-51
references: 23516299
references: Cereb Cortex. 2012 May;22(5):1068-77
references: 21743097
references: Exp Brain Res. 2001 Feb;136(3):281-94
references: 11243470
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1997 Oct 29;352(1360):1401-9
references: 9368928
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Mar 1;2(3):87-97
references: 21227084
references: Neuroreport. 2000 Jun 26;11(9):1945-8
references: 10884048
references: Vis Neurosci. 1994 Sep-Oct;11(5):909-18
references: 7947404
references: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2012;22(4):550-62
references: 22435361
references: Neurology. 1991 Dec;41(12):1918-22
references: 1745349
references: Cortex. 2013 Apr;49(4):931-9
references: 22664139
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Nov;10(11):494-501
references: 16997611
references: Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 2):S52-8
references: 11373133