title: Attitude and practice of dental surgeons towards pharmaceutical companies' marketing gifts.
abstract: Interaction of pharmaceutical companies (PC) with healthcare services has been a reason for concern. In medicine, awareness of the ethical implications of these interactions have been emphasized upon, while this issue has not been highlighted in dentistry. This study undertook a cross-sectional rapid assessment procedure to gather views of dentists in various institutions towards unethical practices in health care and pharmaceutical industry. The purpose of this study was to assess the need for the formulation and implementation of guidelines for the interaction of dentists with the pharmaceutical and device industry in the best interest of patients. A group of 209 dentists of Lahore including faculty members, demonstrators, private practitioners and fresh graduates responded to a questionnaire to assess their attitudes and practices towards pharmaceutical companies' marketing gifts. The study was conducted during 2011 and provided interesting data that showed the pharmaceutical industry is approaching private practitioners more frequently than academicians and fresh graduates. Private practioners accepted the gifts but mostly recognized them as unethical (over 65%). Both groups considered sponsoring of on-campus lectures as acceptable (over 70%). Respondents are not fully aware of the ethical demands which are imperative for all health care industries, and there is a dire need of strict guidelines and code of ethics for the dentist's interaction with the pharmaceutical and device industry so that patient interest is protected.
authors: Fatima Memorial College of Medicine & Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan;
authors: Shaila
authors: S
authors: Tahir
authors: Adeela
authors: A
authors: Rafique
authors: Farkhanda
authors: F
authors: Ghafoor
authors: Akif
authors: A
authors: Saleem
authors: Amanullah
authors: A
authors: Khan
keywords: Attitude; Dentists; Marketing gifts; Pharmaceutical companies; practice
references: PLoS Med. 2008 Jan 3;5(1):e1
references: 18177202
references: J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jul;24(7):795-801
references: 19424764
references: Acad Psychiatry. 2005 May-Jun;29(2):222-9
references: 15937271
references: Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Aug;24(4):949-60
references: 16136634
references: Pediatrics. 1991 Dec;88(6):1233-7
references: 1956742
references: N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 28;351(18):1891-900
references: 15509824
references: Indian J Med Ethics. 2010 Oct-Dec;7(4):223-5
references: 22106572
references: Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Jul;66(7):727-33
references: 20300742
references: Arch Intern Med. 2003 Oct 13;163(18):2213-8
references: 14557219
references: Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2009 Fall;20(3):236-42
references: 19757223
references: Libyan J Med. 2012;7:
references: 23002397
references: Med J Aust. 2002 Feb 4;176(3):118-21
references: 11936308
references: Gen Dent. 1999 Jul-Aug;47(4):357-60
references: 10687461
references: PLoS Med. 2011 May;8(5):e1001037
references: 21629685
references: Acad Med. 2009 Aug;84(8):994-1002
references: 19638762
references: J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jan;25(1):79-83
references: 19756874
references: J Med Ethics. 2006 Oct;32(10):559-63
references: 17012493
references: JAMA. 2000 Jan 19;283(3):373-80
references: 10647801
references: J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Feb;22(2):184-90
references: 17356984