title: Separated by a common language: awareness of term usage differences between languages and disciplines in biopreparedness.
abstract: Preparedness for bioterrorism is based on communication between people in organizations who are educated and trained in several disciplines, including law enforcement, health, and science. Various backgrounds, cultures, and vocabularies generate difficulties in understanding and interpretating terms and concepts, which may impair communication. This is especially true in emergency situations, in which the need for clarity and consistency is vital. The EU project AniBioThreat initiated methods and made a rough estimate of the terms and concepts that are crucial for an incident, and a pilot database with key terms and definitions has been constructed. Analysis of collected terms and sources has shown that many of the participating organizations use various international standards in their area of expertise. The same term often represents different concepts in the standards from different sectors, or, alternatively, different terms were used to represent the same or similar concepts. The use of conflicting terminology can be problematic for decision makers and communicators in planning and prevention or when handling an incident. Since the CBRN area has roots in multiple disciplines, each with its own evolving terminology, it may not be realistic to achieve unequivocal communication through a standardized vocabulary and joint definitions for words from common language. We suggest that a communication strategy should include awareness of alternative definitions and ontologies and the ability to talk and write without relying on the implicit knowledge underlying specialized jargon. Consequently, cross-disciplinary communication skills should be part of training of personnel in the CBRN field. In addition, a searchable repository of terms and definitions from relevant organizations and authorities would be a valuable addition to existing glossaries for improving awareness concerning bioterrorism prevention planning.
authors: M Gunnar
authors: MG
authors: Andersson
authors: Katharina
authors: K
authors: Tomuzia
authors: Charlotta
authors: C
authors: Löfström
authors: Bernd
authors: B
authors: Appel
authors: Luca
authors: L
authors: Bano
authors: Haralampos
authors: H
authors: Keremidis
authors: Rickard
authors: R
authors: Knutsson
authors: Mikael
authors: M
authors: Leijon
authors: Susanna Ekströmer
authors: SE
authors: Lövgren
authors: Dario
authors: D
authors: De Medici
authors: Andrea
authors: A
authors: Menrath
authors: Bart J
authors: BJ
authors: van Rotterdam
authors: Henk J
authors: HJ
authors: Wisselink
authors: Gary C
authors: GC
authors: Barker
mesh_terms: D023482:Bioterrorism; D003144:Communication Barriers; D016208:Databases, Factual; D004014:Dictionaries as Topic; D004189:Disaster Planning; D005062:European Union; D006801:Humans; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D007802:Language; D009626:Terminology as Topic; D014175:Translating
references: Clin Chem. 2009 Apr;55(4):611-22
references: 19246619
references: J Biomed Inform. 2011 Feb;44(1):163-79
references: 20647054
references: Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Mar 1;145 Suppl 1:S123-8
references: 21093084
references: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Oct 27;8 Suppl 1:S2
references: 19007439
references: FAO Food Nutr Pap. 1993;55:1-77
references: 8181554
references: Database (Oxford). 2012 Oct 10;2012:bas033
references: 23060432
references: Methods Mol Biol. 2011;719:31-69
references: 21370078
references: Risk Anal. 2008 Dec;28(6):1749-61
references: 19000071