title: Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period.
abstract: The goal of this study was to assess the impact of individual neuropsychological differences on the ability to share attention between concurrent tasks. Participants (n = 20) were trained on six single task practice sessions and dual-task was assessed with reaction time performance on a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm. Neuropsychological test scores were also acquired. Furthermore, one of the known variables that can influence performances on neuropsychological tests is gender, which was added as a potential predictor. Results show that the small PRP group was associated with better performances in processing speed, inhibition, flexibility and working memory on neuropsychological tests. Gender also had an impact on the PRP, males having a lower PRP than females. A multiple regression was performed to determine which variables explained the most PRP duration, which showed that 49.1% of the variance of the PRP length could be explained by gender, reaction times of the PRP practice trials at the sixth session, the denomination and flexibility conditions of the Modified Stroop Task as well as results on the Symbol Search Test. Gender was the variable that explained the PRP variance the most (23%). Processing speed also seemed to be a great determinant of the PRP as well as the ability to alternate between task-sets as assessed by the Flexibility condition of the Modified Stroop Task. Thus, this study reveals that good performances on certain neuropsychological tests could predict one's ease to manage two tasks simultaneously with a higher chance for males to perform better.
authors: Université du Québec à Montréal : Département de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQÀM), C.P. 8888, succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3P8 Canada ; Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, 4545 Chemin Queen-Mary, Montréal, Québec, H3W 1W4 Canada.
authors: Maude
authors: M
authors: Laguë-Beauvais
authors: Christine
authors: C
authors: Gagnon
authors: Nathalie
authors: N
authors: Castonguay
authors: Louis
authors: L
authors: Bherer
keywords: Divided attention; Gender; Individual differences; Neuropsychological predictors; Processing speed; Psychological refractory period
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Oct;30(5):795-810
references: 15462621
references: Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Jul;35(4):501-14
references: 12729814
references: Clin Neuropsychol. 1992 Apr;6(2):178-184
references: 29022450
references: Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2013 Nov;4(6):623-640
references: 26304268
references: Neuropsychologia. 1997 Oct;35(10):1341-53
references: 9347480
references: Neuropsychology. 2005 Jan;19(1):18-27
references: 15656759
references: Dev Neuropsychol. 2001;19(3):273-93
references: 11758669
references: J Neurosci. 2004 Nov 24;24(47):10636-41
references: 15564579
references: Cogn Psychol. 2005 Aug;51(1):42-100
references: 16039935
references: Brain Cogn. 2003 Nov;53(2):346-50
references: 14607178
references: Prog Neurobiol. 1998 Jul;55(4):343-61
references: 9654384
references: Psychol Rev. 1997 Jan;104(1):3-65
references: 9009880
references: Psychol Aging. 2007 Jun;22(2):215-22
references: 17563177
references: Percept Psychophys. 2003 Jul;65(5):801-16
references: 12956587
references: Psychol Aging. 2004 Dec;19(4):649-67
references: 15584790
references: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Jun;62 Spec No 1:19-31
references: 17565162
references: Br J Psychol. 1998 Nov;89 ( Pt 4):611-27
references: 9854806
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1998 Jun;99(1):1-16
references: 9664836
references: Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100
references: 10945922
references: Psychol Aging. 2002 Sep;17(3):453-67
references: 12243387
references: Neuropsychology. 1997 Apr;11(2):187-94
references: 9110326
references: Psychol Bull. 1995 Mar;117(2):250-70
references: 7724690
references: Psychol Sci. 2001 Mar;12(2):101-8
references: 11340917
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Mar;7(3):134-140
references: 12639695
references: Psychol Res. 2006 Nov;70(6):494-503
references: 16184395
references: Mem Cognit. 2008 Oct;36(7):1262-82
references: 18927042