title: Encoding of situations in the vocal repertoire of piglets (Sus scrofa): a comparison of discrete and graded classifications.
abstract: Two important questions in bioacoustics are whether vocal repertoires of animals are graded or discrete and how the vocal expressions are linked to the context of emission. Here we address these questions in an ungulate species. The vocal repertoire of young domestic pigs, Sus scrofa, was quantitatively described based on 1513 calls recorded in 11 situations. We described the acoustic quality of calls with 8 acoustic parameters. Based on these parameters, the k-means clustering method showed a possibility to distinguish either two or five clusters although the call types are rather blurred than strictly discrete. The division of the vocal repertoire of piglets into two call types has previously been used in many experimental studies into pig acoustic communication and the five call types correspond well to previously published partial repertoires in specific situations. Clear links exist between the type of situation, its putative valence, and the vocal expression in that situation. These links can be described adequately both with a set of quantitative acoustic variables and through categorisation into call types. The information about the situation of emission of the calls is encoded through five call types almost as accurately as through the full quantitative description.
authors: Institute of Animal Science, Ethology Department, Prague, Czechia. celine.tallet@rennes.inra.fr
authors: Céline
authors: C
authors: Tallet
authors: Pavel
authors: P
authors: Linhart
authors: Richard
authors: R
authors: Policht
authors: Kurt
authors: K
authors: Hammerschmidt
authors: Petr
authors: P
authors: Šimeček
authors: Petra
authors: P
authors: Kratinova
authors: Marek
authors: M
authors: Špinka
mesh_terms: D000162:Acoustics; D000818:Animals; D000831:Animals, Newborn; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D034421:Sus scrofa; D014828:Vocalization, Animal
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 5;367(1597):1785-801
references: 22641818
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 May;97(5 Pt 1):3099-111
references: 7759650
references: Z Tierpsychol. 1972 Aug;31(2):171-222
references: 4674022
references: Front Behav Neurosci. 2013 Jan 09;6:89
references: 23316149
references: Behav Brain Res. 2007 Mar 12;178(1):177-80
references: 17215052
references: Behav Brain Res. 2007 Sep 4;182(2):261-73
references: 17467067
references: Brain Behav Evol. 2003;61(4):213-24
references: 12784058
references: Biol Lett. 2005 Dec 22;1(4):381-5
references: 17148212
references: J Comp Psychol. 2010 Feb;124(1):81-91
references: 20175599
references: Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2001 Apr 2;72(1):23-39
references: 11259824
references: Anim Behav. 1998 Jun;55(6):1647-58
references: 9642008
references: Phonetica. 2000 Apr-Dec;57(2-4):205-18
references: 10992141
references: Behav Processes. 2002 Nov;60(2):165-180
references: 12426068
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 7;270(1526):1765-71
references: 12964977
references: Behav Processes. 1988 Sep;17(3):205-16
references: 24897547
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Oct 7;277(1696):2895-904
references: 20685706
references: Anim Behav. 1998 Apr;55(4):799-807
references: 9632468
references: Dev Psychobiol. 2010 Jan;52(1):1-12
references: 19774554