title: Is there an optimal resting velopharyngeal gap in operated cleft palate patients?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Videofluoroscopy in operated cleft palate patients.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine the existence of an optimal resting velopharyngeal (VP) gap in operated cleft palate patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  A retrospective analysis of lateral view videofluoroscopy of operated cleft palate patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 117 cases of operated cleft palate underwent videofluoroscopy between 2006 and 2011. The lateral view of videofluoroscopy was utilised in the study. A retrospective analysis of the lateral view of videofluoroscopy of these 117 patients was performed to analyse the resting VP gap and its relationship to VP closure.
  
  
  METHODS
  None.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of the 117 cases, 35 had a resting gap of less than 6 mm, 34 had a resting gap between 6 and 10 mm and 48 patients had a resting gap of more than 10 mm.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The conclusive finding was that almost all the patients with a resting gap of <6 mm (group C) achieved radiological closure of the velopharynx with speech; thus, they had the least chance of VP insufficiency (VPI). Those patients with a resting gap of >10 mm (group A) did not achieve VP closure on phonation, thus having full-blown VPI. Therefore, it can be concluded that the ideal resting VP gap is approximately 6 mm so as to get the maximal chance of VP closure and thus prevent VPI.
authors: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
authors: Rajesh
authors: R
authors: Yellinedi
authors: Mukunda Reddy
authors: MR
authors: Damalacheruvu
keywords: Resting gap; cleft palate; velopharyngeal incompetence; videofluoroscopy
references: Indian J Plast Surg. 2009 Oct;42 Suppl:S129-36
references: 19884668
references: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Aug;120(2):495-505
references: 17632355
references: J Craniofac Surg. 2003 Sep;14(5):621-8; discussion 629
references: 14501319
references: Clin Plast Surg. 2004 Apr;31(2):261-9
references: 15145668
references: Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002 May;39(3):295-307
references: 12019005