title: Dynamic relationships between microbial biomass, respiration, inorganic nutrients and enzyme activities: informing enzyme-based decomposition models.
abstract: We re-examined data from a recent litter decay study to determine if additional insights could be gained to inform decomposition modeling. Rinkes et al. (2013) conducted 14-day laboratory incubations of sugar maple (Acer saccharum) or white oak (Quercus alba) leaves, mixed with sand (0.4% organic C content) or loam (4.1% organic C). They measured microbial biomass C, carbon dioxide efflux, soil ammonium, nitrate, and phosphate concentrations, and β-glucosidase (BG), β-N-acetyl-glucosaminidase (NAG), and acid phosphatase (AP) activities on days 1, 3, and 14. Analyses of relationships among variables yielded different insights than original analyses of individual variables. For example, although respiration rates per g soil were higher for loam than sand, rates per g soil C were actually higher for sand than loam, and rates per g microbial C showed little difference between treatments. Microbial biomass C peaked on day 3 when biomass-specific activities of enzymes were lowest, suggesting uptake of litter C without extracellular hydrolysis. This result refuted a common model assumption that all enzyme production is constitutive and thus proportional to biomass, and/or indicated that part of litter decay is independent of enzyme activity. The length and angle of vectors defined by ratios of enzyme activities (BG/NAG vs. BG/AP) represent relative microbial investments in C (length), and N and P (angle) acquiring enzymes. Shorter lengths on day 3 suggested low C limitation, whereas greater lengths on day 14 suggested an increase in C limitation with decay. The soils and litter in this study generally had stronger P limitation (angles >45°). Reductions in vector angles to <45° for sand by day 14 suggested a shift to N limitation. These relational variables inform enzyme-based models, and are usually much less ambiguous when obtained from a single study in which measurements were made on the same samples than when extrapolated from separate studies.
authors: Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Toledo Toledo, OH, USA.
authors: D L
authors: DL
authors: Moorhead
authors: Z L
authors: ZL
authors: Rinkes
authors: R L
authors: RL
authors: Sinsabaugh
authors: M N
authors: MN
authors: Weintraub
keywords: decomposition; enzyme efficiency; extracellular enzymes; models; soil microorganisms
references: New Phytol. 2012 May;194(3):775-783
references: 22404566
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 12;105 Suppl 1:11512-9
references: 18695234
references: Ecol Appl. 2013 Jan;23(1):255-72
references: 23495650
references: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Sep;81(3):610-7
references: 22500928
references: Front Microbiol. 2012 Sep 27;3:338
references: 23060866
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 16;102(33):11923-7
references: 16091465
references: Microb Ecol. 1998 Jul;36(1):75-92
references: 9622567
references: Ecol Lett. 2008 Nov;11(11):1252-1264
references: 18823393
references: Microb Ecol. 2012 May;63(4):883-97
references: 22193925
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Nov;67(11):5063-8
references: 11679327
references: Ecol Lett. 2012 Sep;15(9):1058-70
references: 22642621
references: Ecol Lett. 2013 Jul;16(7):930-9
references: 23627730