title: Rapid diagnosis of leptospirosis in patients with different clinical manifestations by 16S rRNA gene based nested PCR.
abstract: Leptospirosis, a zoonosis of global importance and it is underreported in India and more than 50,000 severe cases are reported each year. Here we present the evaluation of 16S rRNA based nested PCR assay for the rapid identification of human leptospires using serum and urine samples. The study includes 261 suspected cases for leptospirosis with different clinical manifestations. 16S rRNA based nested PCR assay was compared and evaluated against the conventional serological methods such as MAT and ELISA. The technique enabled amplification of a 289 bp product with notable percentage of positivity in all sample groups including 94.8 in pediatric cases, 93 in pregnant women, 94.2 in renal failure, 87.8 in jaundice and 94.6 in common febrile cases. The sensitivity and specificity was 94.4% and 100%, respectively. The technique proved to be prompt and effective for the diagnosis of leptospiral infection at the acute phase of the disease. PCR based approach detects leptospiral DNA from the clinical samples both at the acute and leptospiruria phase on comparison with its counter parts where detection is made possible only after 7 days or 7-30 days post-infection. In this regard PCR based diagnosis of leptospirosis should be made available for clinicians for the early diagnosis and prompt treatment of the disease.
authors: Medical Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli 620 024, India.
authors: K
authors: K
authors: Natarajaseenivasan
authors: V
authors: V
authors: Raja
authors: R
authors: R
authors: Narayanan
keywords: 16S rRNA nested PCR; ELISA; Leptospirosis/diagnosis; MAT
references: J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2010 Feb;43(1):62-9
references: 20434125
references: J Gen Microbiol. 1987 Apr;133(4):911-4
references: 3655736
references: Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2001 Oct;14(5):527-38
references: 11964872
references: J Med Microbiol. 2006 Nov;55(Pt 11):1549-1557
references: 17030915
references: J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Aug;32(8):1949-57
references: 7989548
references: Mol Biotechnol. 1994 Aug;2(1):1-14
references: 7866864
references: Clin Infect Dis. 1999 Dec;29(6):1561-3
references: 10585813
references: Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 Apr;14(2):296-326
references: 11292640
references: Vet Microbiol. 1987 Oct;15(1-2):71-8
references: 3439017
references: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006 Nov;264(1):31-9
references: 17020546
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Apr;78(4):628-32
references: 18385360
references: J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Feb;43(2):539-45
references: 15695642
references: Vet Microbiol. 2002 Jun 20;87(2):139-47
references: 12034542
references: J Gen Microbiol. 1985 Feb;131(2):377-85
references: 3981131
references: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Mar;63(3):251-6
references: 19097839
references: J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Sep;30(9):2219-24
references: 1400983
references: J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Dec;26(12):2495-500
references: 3230128
references: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2006 Nov 23;5:28
references: 17121682
references: J Clin Microbiol. 1992 May;30(5):1243-9
references: 1583126
references: J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Oct;44(10):3510-6
references: 17021075
references: J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Mar;28(3):495-503
references: 1691208