title: A cohort study evaluation of maternal PCB exposure related to time to pregnancy in daughters.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) remain ubiquitous environmental contaminants. Developmental exposures are suspected to impact reproduction. Analysis of mixtures of PCBs may be problematic as components have a complex correlation structure, and along with limited sample sizes, standard regression strategies are problematic. We compared the results of a novel, empirical method to those based on categorization of PCB compounds by (1) hypothesized biological activity previously proposed and widely applied, and (2) degree of ortho- substitution (mono, di, tri), in a study of the relation of maternal serum PCBs and daughter's time to pregnancy.
  
  
  METHODS
  We measured PCBs in maternal serum samples collected in the early postpartum in 289 daughters in the Child Health and Development Studies birth cohort. We queried time to pregnancy in these daughters 28-31 years later. We applied a novel weighted quantile sum approach to find the bad-actor compounds in the PCB mixture found in maternal serum. The approach includes empirical estimation of the weights through a bootstrap step which accounts for the variation in the estimated weights.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Bootstrap analyses indicated the dominant functionality groups associated with longer TTP were the dioxin-like, anti-estrogenic group (average weight, 22%) and PCBs not previously classified by biological activity (54%). In contrast, the unclassified PCBs were not important in the association with shorter TTP, where the anti-estrogenic groups and the PB-inducers group played a more important role (60% and 23%, respectively). The highly chlorinated PCBs (average weight, 89%) were mostly associated with longer TTP; in contrast, the degree of chlorination was less discriminating for shorter TTP. Finally, PCB 56 was associated with the strongest relationship with TTP with a weight of 47%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our empirical approach found some associations previously identified by two classification schemes, but also identified other bad actors. This empirical method can generate hypotheses about mixture effects and mechanisms and overcomes some of the limitations of standard regression techniques.
authors: Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. gennings@vcu.edu.
authors: Chris
authors: C
authors: Gennings
authors: Caroline
authors: C
authors: Carrico
authors: Pam
authors: P
authors: Factor-Litvak
authors: Nickilou
authors: N
authors: Krigbaum
authors: Piera M
authors: PM
authors: Cirillo
authors: Barbara A
authors: BA
authors: Cohn
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002140:California / Q000453:epidemiology; D015331:Cohort Studies; D004784:Environmental Monitoring; D004785:Environmental Pollutants / Q000097:blood / Q000633:toxicity*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D018811:Maternal Exposure; D011078:Polychlorinated Biphenyls / Q000097:blood / Q000633:toxicity*; D011247:Pregnancy; D011297:Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects / Q000139:chemically induced / Q000453:epidemiology*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D061685:Time-to-Pregnancy / Q000187:drug effects*
chemical_list: D004785:Environmental Pollutants; D011078:Polychlorinated Biphenyls
references: Environ Health Perspect. 2008 May;116(5):599-604
references: 18470317
references: Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002 Sep;12(2):83-92
references: 21782627
references: Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Feb 1;169(3):285-93
references: 19126583
references: Environ Res. 2004 Oct;96(2):186-95
references: 15325879
references: Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Nov 15;148(10):992-7
references: 9829871
references: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Nov;136(1):267-75
references: 23053646
references: Epidemiology. 2009 Jan;20(1):56-9
references: 19057382
references: J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Dec;50(12):1335-42
references: 19092487
references: Reprod Toxicol. 2011 Apr;31(3):290-6
references: 21296657
references: Am J Epidemiol. 1989 May;129(5):1079-83
references: 2705428
references: Ann Intern Med. 1995 May 15;122(10):778-88
references: 7717601
references: Chemosphere. 2008 Oct;73(6):999-1004
references: 18707752
references: J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 1;27(16):2677-85
references: 19364965
references: Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Sep 15;162(6):523-32
references: 16093292
references: Toxicol Lett. 1998 Dec 28;102-103:343-7
references: 10022276
references: Int J Androl. 2006 Dec;29(6):603-13
references: 17121658
references: Lancet. 2003 Jun 28;361(9376):2205-6
references: 12842376
references: Environ Health. 2012 Jul 20;11:49
references: 22817616
references: Am J Epidemiol. 1989 May;129(5):1072-8
references: 2705427
references: Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Sep;115(9):1320-4
references: 17805422
references: Biostatistics. 2002 Dec;3(4):565-78
references: 12933598
references: Arch Environ Health. 1999 Mar-Apr;54(2):110-4
references: 10094288
references: Stat Methods Med Res. 2006 Apr;15(2):127-40
references: 16615653
references: Environ Res. 2009 May;109(4):368-78
references: 19251256
references: Environ Int. 2012 Feb;39(1):181-7
references: 22208758
references: Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Feb;121(2):231-6
references: 23151773
references: Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):76-95
references: 20685716
references: Epidemiology. 2013 Mar;24(2):251-60
references: 23348067
references: Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Jan;116(1):70-7
references: 18197302
references: Int J Androl. 2010 Apr;33(2):346-59
references: 20487042
references: Epidemiology. 2000 Nov;11(6):700-5
references: 11055633
references: Environ Health Perspect. 2006 May;114(5):740-5
references: 16675430
references: Hum Reprod. 2009 Feb;24(2):451-8
references: 18940895
references: Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2013 Nov;216(6):703-9
references: 23491026
references: Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Jul 15;162(2):115-24
references: 15972942
references: Epidemiology. 2010 Jul;21 Suppl 4:S77-84
references: 21422968
references: Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Jan;105(1):13-4
references: 9074863
references: Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Sep;124(3):470-80
references: 3740046
references: Epidemiology. 2010 Jan;21(1):160-1; author reply 161
references: 20010224
references: Stat Med. 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15;13(5-7):671-81
references: 8023042
references: Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Feb;120(2):162-70
references: 21997443
references: Environ Res. 1999 Feb;80(2 Pt 2):S13-S18
references: 10092415