title: Image quality assessment of three cone beam CT machines using the SEDENTEXCT CT phantom.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The SEDENTEXCT Project proposed quality assurance (QA) methods and introduced a QA image quality phantom. A new prototype was recently introduced that may be improved according to previous reports. The purpose of this study is to evaluate image quality in various protocols of three cone beam CT (CBCT) machines using the proposed QA phantom.
  
  
  METHODS
  Using three CBCT machines, nine image quality parameters, including image homogeneity (noise), uniformity, geometrical distortion, pixel intensity value, contrast resolution, spatial resolution [line pair (LP) chart, point spread function (PSF) and modulation transfer function (MTF)] and metal artefacts, were evaluated using a QA phantom proposed by SEDENTEXCT. Exposure parameters, slice thickness and field of view position changed variously, and the number of total protocols was 22.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Many protocols showed a uniform gray value distribution except in the minimum slice thickness image acquired using 3D Accuitomo 80 (Morita, Kyoto, Japan) and Veraviewepocs 3Df (Morita). Noise levels differed among the protocols. There was no geometric distortion, and the pixel intensity values were correlated with the CT value. Low contrast resolution differed among the protocols, but high contrast resolution performed well in all. Many protocols showed that the maximum line pair was larger than 1 LP mm(-1) but smaller than 3 LP mm(-1). PSF and MTF did not correlate well with the pixel size. The measured metal artefact areas varied for each device.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We studied the image quality of three CBCT machines using the SEDENTEXCT phantom. Image quality varied with exposure protocols and machines.
authors: Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Showa University School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan.
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Bamba
authors: K
authors: K
authors: Araki
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Endo
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Okano
mesh_terms: D000535:Aluminum / Q000737:chemistry; D016477:Artifacts; D054893:Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000592:standards; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000592:standards; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000592:standards; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D020959:Polyethylene / Q000737:chemistry; D019904:Polymethyl Methacrylate / Q000737:chemistry; D011138:Polytetrafluoroethylene / Q000737:chemistry; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000592:standards; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000592:standards*; D011858:Radiographic Magnification; D012117:Resins, Synthetic / Q000737:chemistry; D014025:Titanium / Q000737:chemistry; D015898:Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed / Q000592:standards
chemical_list: D012117:Resins, Synthetic; D011138:Polytetrafluoroethylene; D020959:Polyethylene; D019904:Polymethyl Methacrylate; C010102:delrin; D000535:Aluminum; D014025:Titanium
keywords: Radiographic phantom; cone beam CT; image quality; quality assurance
references: Aust Dent J. 2012 Mar;57 Suppl 1:46-60
references: 22376097
references: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Apr;105(4):512-8
references: 17900939
references: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Jan;27(1):60-6
references: 16418357
references: Med Phys. 2000 Jun;27(6):1311-23
references: 10902561
references: Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 Sep;37(6):309-18
references: 18757715
references: Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 Sep;38(6):367-78
references: 19700530
references: Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):461-8
references: 18639404
references: Eur J Radiol. 2010 Aug;75(2):265-9
references: 19410409
references: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Aug;22(8):873-9
references: 21244502
references: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Aug;102(2):225-34
references: 16876067
references: Br Dent J. 1995 Mar 11;178(5):165-7
references: 7702946
references: Eur J Radiol. 2012 Feb;81(2):267-71
references: 21196094
references: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Jul;114(1):127-35
references: 22727102
references: J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011 Nov 15;12(4):3478
references: 22089004
references: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Aug;24(8):862-5
references: 22092375
references: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Aug;24 Suppl A100:94-9
references: 22168574