title: Resources, attitudes and culture: an understanding of the factors that influence the functioning of accountability mechanisms in primary health care settings.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  District level health system governance is recognised as an important but challenging element of health system development in low and middle-income countries. Accountability is a more recent focus in health system debates. Accountability mechanisms are governance tools that seek to regulate answerability between the health system and the community (external accountability) and/or between different levels of the health system (bureaucratic accountability). External accountability has attracted significant attention in recent years, but bureaucratic accountability mechanisms, and the interactions between the two forms of accountability, have been relatively neglected. This is an important gap given that webs of accountability relationships exist within every health system. There is a need to strike a balance between achieving accountability upwards within the health system (for example through information reporting arrangements) while at the same time allowing for the local level innovation that could improve quality of care and patient responsiveness.
  
  
  METHODS
  Using a descriptive literature review, this paper examines the factors that influence the functioning of accountability mechanisms and relationships within the district health system, and draws out the implications for responsiveness to patients and communities. We also seek to understand the practices that might strengthen accountability in ways that improve responsiveness--of the health system to citizens' needs and rights, and of providers to patients.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The review highlights the ways in which bureaucratic accountability mechanisms often constrain the functioning of external accountability mechanisms. For example, meeting the expectations of relatively powerful managers further up the system may crowd out efforts to respond to citizens and patients. Organisational cultures characterized by supervision and management systems focused on compliance to centrally defined outputs and targets can constrain front line managers and providers from responding to patient and population priorities.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Findings suggest that it is important to limit the potential negative impacts on responsiveness of new bureaucratic accountability mechanisms, and identify how these or other interventions might leverage the shifts in organizational culture necessary to encourage innovation and patient-centered care.
authors: Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. susan.cleary@uct.ac.za.
authors: Susan M
authors: SM
authors: Cleary
authors: Sassy
authors: S
authors: Molyneux
authors: Lucy
authors: L
authors: Gilson
mesh_terms: D001294:Attitude to Health; D003469:Culture; D003906:Developing Countries; D006295:Health Resources / Q000458:organization & administration; D006801:Humans; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration*; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration; D012941:Social Responsibility
references: Int J Health Plann Manage. 1994 Oct-Dec;9(4):309-40
references: 10139511
references: BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 22;11:229
references: 21936958
references: J Public Health (Oxf). 2007 Jun;29(2):147-56
references: 17459906
references: Reprod Health Matters. 2007 Nov;15(30):91-102
references: 17938074
references: Int J Health Plann Manage. 2009 Jul-Sep;24(3):205-24
references: 19384895
references: Soc Sci Med. 1998 Feb-Mar;46(4-5):475-94
references: 9460828
references: Health Policy. 2011 Mar;99(3):234-43
references: 20888061
references: Implement Sci. 2011 Feb 10;6:11
references: 21310021
references: Health Policy Plan. 2001 Dec;16 Suppl 2:52-60
references: 11772990
references: Health Policy Plan. 2013 Aug;28(5):454-7
references: 22962058
references: Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jan;72(1):39-48
references: 21134705
references: Health Policy Plan. 2004 Oct;19 Suppl 1:i78-i86
references: 15452018
references: Int J Health Serv. 1994;24(3):459-75
references: 7928013
references: Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(8):1024-35
references: 10994286
references: Glob Health Action. 2011;4:
references: 22072991
references: Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(10):1513-27
references: 9823047
references: Health Policy Plan. 2012 Oct;27(7):541-54
references: 22279082
references: Health Econ. 2010 Dec;19(12):1461-77
references: 19960481
references: Int J Health Plann Manage. 2008 Apr-Jun;23(2):153-71
references: 18229884
references: Health Policy. 2000 Aug;53(1):1-11
references: 10940459
references: Health Policy Plan. 2012 Jul;27(4):271-80
references: 21551121
references: Health Policy Plan. 2004 Nov;19(6):371-9
references: 15459162
references: Health Policy Plan. 2012 Sep;27(6):449-66
references: 22155589
references: Health Policy Plan. 1996 Mar;11(1):64-71
references: 10155879
references: Trop Med Int Health. 2008 Mar;13(3):369-83
references: 18397400
references: Health Place. 2003 Mar;9(1):45-53
references: 12609472
references: Health Policy Plan. 2002 Sep;17(3):304-13
references: 12135997
references: Hum Resour Health. 2011 Apr 12;9:10
references: 21486438
references: Int J Health Plann Manage. 2003 Oct-Dec;18(4):329-42
references: 14727711
references: Lancet. 2008 Sep 13;372(9642):917-27
references: 18790315