title: Conceptual and methodological concerns in the theory of perceptual load.
abstract: The present paper provides a short critical review of the theory of perceptual load. It closely examines the basic tenets and assumptions of the theory and identifies major conceptual and methodological problems that have been largely ignored in the literature. The discussion focuses on problems in the definition of the concept of perceptual load, on the circularity in the characterization and manipulation of perceptual load and the confusion between the concept of perceptual load and its operationalization. The paper also selectively reviews evidence supporting the theory as well as inconsistent evidence which proposed alternative dominant factors influencing the efficacy of attentional selection.
authors: Department of Psychology, Tel-Aviv University Tel-Aviv, Israel.
authors: Hanna
authors: H
authors: Benoni
authors: Yehoshua
authors: Y
authors: Tsal
keywords: dilution; distractor interference; early vs. late selection; perceptual load; selective attention; visual attention
references: Psychol Sci. 2002 May;13(3):284-7
references: 12009052
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Aug;11(4):697-702
references: 15581120
references: Psychol Rev. 1969 May;76(3):282-99
references: 4893203
references: Neuroreport. 1993 Jan;4(1):81-4
references: 8453043
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Jun;37(3):781-98
references: 21500943
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Oct;30(5):836-52
references: 15462624
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Apr;37(2):319-35
references: 21299322
references: Science. 1985 Aug 23;229(4715):782-4
references: 4023713
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):339-54
references: 15355143
references: J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Mar;14(1):73-83
references: 18377168
references: Psychol Aging. 1998 Dec;13(4):563-73
references: 9883457
references: Percept Psychophys. 1994 Aug;56(2):183-97
references: 7971119
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Apr;14(2):306-12
references: 17694918
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):451-68
references: 7790827
references: Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(9):937-49
references: 11516446
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Oct 1;13(7):867-76
references: 11595091
references: Percept Psychophys. 1991 Sep;50(3):267-84
references: 1754368
references: Mem Cognit. 1997 Mar;25(2):182-9
references: 9099070
references: Percept Psychophys. 2003 Aug;65(6):888-900
references: 14528898
references: Psychol Rev. 1990 Oct;97(4):523-47
references: 2247540
references: Psychol Rev. 1980 May;87(3):272-300
references: 7384344
references: Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):880-913
references: 15482066
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1986 Jun;62(2):161-76
references: 3766194
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Aug;19(4):631-8
references: 22467354
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Jun;26(3):1038-52
references: 10884008
references: Perception. 2012;41(8):997-1000
references: 23362678
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Jul;55(3):917-36
references: 12188520
references: Percept Psychophys. 2003 Feb;65(2):202-12
references: 12713239
references: J Vis. 2004 Mar 02;4(2):106-17
references: 15005651
references: Science. 1997 Nov 28;278(5343):1616-9
references: 9374459
references: Percept Psychophys. 2000 Jan;62(1):175-86
references: 10703265
references: Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):510-5
references: 12930485
references: Emotion. 2007 Feb;7(1):147-57
references: 17352570
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Sep;62(9):1685-95
references: 19382007
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1985 Nov;37(4):571-90
references: 4081101
references: Nature. 1993 May 27;363(6427):345-7
references: 8497317
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):576-9
references: 22390296
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Feb;16(1):135-49
references: 2137515
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Aug;30(4):708-19
references: 15301619
references: Percept Psychophys. 1990 Oct;48(4):382-8
references: 2243762
references: Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jul;17(7):1595-603
references: 16956980
references: Nat Neurosci. 2004 Sep;7(9):992-6
references: 15286791
references: Psychol Rev. 1989 Jul;96(3):433-58
references: 2756067
references: Vision Res. 2010 Jun 18;50(13):1292-8
references: 20430048
references: Q J Exp Psychol. 1968 Feb;20(1):62-8
references: 5649762
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Apr 20;31(16):6199-207
references: 21508243
references: Percept Psychophys. 1987 May;41(5):419-34
references: 3601624
references: Science. 1994 Jan 28;263(5146):520-2
references: 8290960
references: Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 07;4:327
references: 23761777
references: Emotion. 2012 Apr;12(2):236-49
references: 21875186
references: Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):748-51
references: 15085132
references: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Apr;73(3):714-9
references: 21264700
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Apr;55(2):609-25
references: 12047062
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(4):785-92
references: 24131273
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1645-56
references: 20822300
references: Psychol Rev. 1963 Jan;70:80-90
references: 14027390
references: Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jul;67(5):876-85
references: 16334059