title: Online solid phase extraction liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (SPE-LC-MS/MS) method for the determination of sucralose in reclaimed and drinking waters and its photo degradation in natural waters from South Florida.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Sucralose has gained popularity as a low calorie artificial sweetener worldwide. Due to its high stability and persistence, sucralose has shown widespread occurrence in environmental waters, at concentrations that could reach up to several μg/L. Previous studies have used time consuming sample preparation methods (offline solid phase extraction/derivatization) or methods with rather high detection limits (direct injection) for sucralose analysis. This study described a faster and sensitive analytical method for the determination of sucralose in environmental samples.
  
  
  RESULTS
  An online SPE-LC-MS/MS method was developed, being capable to quantify sucralose in 12 minutes using only 10 mL of sample, with method detection limits (MDLs) of 4.5 ng/L, 8.5 ng/L and 45 ng/L for deionized water, drinking and reclaimed waters (1:10 diluted with deionized water), respectively. Sucralose was detected in 82% of the reclaimed water samples at concentrations reaching up to 18 μg/L. The monthly average for a period of one year was 9.1 ± 2.9 μg/L. The calculated mass loads per capita of sucralose discharged through WWTP effluents based on the concentrations detected in wastewaters in the U. S. is 5.0 mg/day/person. As expected, the concentrations observed in drinking water were much lower but still relevant reaching as high as 465 ng/L. In order to evaluate the stability of sucralose, photodegradation experiments were performed in natural waters. Significant photodegradation of sucralose was observed only in freshwater at 254 nm. Minimal degradation (<20%) was observed for all matrices under more natural conditions (350 nm or solar simulator). The only photolysis product of sucralose identified by high resolution mass spectrometry was a de-chlorinated molecule at m/z 362.0535, with molecular formula C12H20Cl2O8.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Online SPE LC-APCI/MS/MS developed in the study was applied to more than 100 environmental samples. Sucralose was frequently detected (>80%) indicating that the conventional treatment process employed in the sewage treatment plants is not efficient for its removal. Detection of sucralose in drinking waters suggests potential contamination of surface and ground waters sources with anthropogenic wastewater streams. Its high resistance to photodegradation, minimal sorption and high solubility indicate that sucralose could be a good tracer of anthropogenic wastewater intrusion into the environment.
authors: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida International University, 3000 NE 151st ST, FIU Biscayne Bay Campus, MSB-356, North Miami, FL 33181, USA. gardinal@fiu.edu.
authors: Sudha Rani
authors: SR
authors: Batchu
authors: Natalia
authors: N
authors: Quinete
authors: Venkata R
authors: VR
authors: Panditi
authors: Piero R
authors: PR
authors: Gardinali
references: J Environ Monit. 2011 Apr;13(4):966-73
references: 21359297
references: J Chromatogr A. 2012 Sep 21;1256:197-205
references: 22885054
references: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2000 Nov;11(11):942-50
references: 11073257
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2008 May 1;42(9):3125
references: 18522081
references: Anal Chem. 2000 Jul 15;72(14):3007-13
references: 10939360
references: Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester). 2006;12(2):79-115
references: 16723751
references: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2009 Jul;394(6):1585-94
references: 19533103
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2004 Jun 1;38(11):201A-208A
references: 15224722
references: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013 May;405(12):4167-75
references: 23471369
references: Water Res. 2010 Jun;44(12):3573-84
references: 20462625
references: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013 Jul;405(18):5953-64
references: 23494277
references: Food Chem Toxicol. 2000;38 Suppl 2:S1-6
references: 10882813
references: Anal Chem. 2001 Nov 15;73(22):5441-9
references: 11816571
references: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012 Jul;403(9):2503-18
references: 22543693
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Oct 15;45(20):8716-22
references: 21879743
references: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2006 Mar;384(5):1236-45
references: 16432722
references: Water Res. 2011 Jul;45(13):4019-27
references: 21665241
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Sep 1;43(17):6808-15
references: 19764253
references: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2011 Oct;22(10):1826-38
references: 21952896
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Feb 15;45(4):1363-9
references: 21235203
references: J Chromatogr A. 2009 Feb 13;1216(7):1126-31
references: 19131070
references: Anal Chem. 2004 Feb 1;76(3):839-47
references: 14750883
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Aug 21;46(16):8680-8
references: 22845779
references: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011 Mar;30(3):673-81
references: 21154846
references: Chemosphere. 2012 Jan;86(1):50-5
references: 21955350
references: J Chromatogr A. 2010 Jun 18;1217(25):4127-34
references: 20304407
references: J Food Sci. 2012 Sep;77(9):S323-8
references: 22908895
references: Sci Total Environ. 2010 Jul 15;408(16):3261-9
references: 20447681
references: Chemosphere. 2012 Jul;88(5):563-9
references: 22503463
references: J Chromatogr A. 2013 Jan 25;1274:87-96
references: 23273631
references: J Chromatogr A. 2011 May 13;1218(19):2745-53
references: 21185029
references: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1994 Oct;42(1):173-8
references: 7765816
references: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013 Jul;405(18):5887-99
references: 23386002
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Jun 15;43(12):4381-5
references: 19603650
references: Sci Total Environ. 2006 Aug 1;366(2-3):772-83
references: 16313947