title: Three-dimensional dual-energy computed tomography for enhancing stone/stent contrasting and stone visualization in urolithiasis.
abstract: The use of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for evaluating urinary calculi has been appreciated due to the modality's capability of differentiating between uric acid (UA) and non-UA stones, which are color coded based on a postprocessing algorithm. No other imaging modality or laboratory test is able to identify the stone composition without first attaining the stone material. Knowledge of the stone composition is clinically significant since UA calculi may be treated medically whereas non-UA calculi may require surgical removal. Regardless of the stone type, ureteral stents are often placed to prevent or treat obstruction. Recent work has demonstrated that commonly used stents are also colored based on their dual energy characteristics and may thereby either improve or obscure the identification of adjacent calculi. Herein, we report the case of a 65-year-old man who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy of a large staghorn stone with subsequent significant residual stone fragments noted on a follow-up scan. By using three-dimensional DECT and taking advantage of color contrasting, the stone composition, burden, shape, and boundary were clearly depicted apart from the adjacent stent, resulting in successful medical treatment and obviating the need for further surgical intervention.
authors: Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
authors: El-Sayed H
authors: el-SH
authors: Ibrahim
authors: William E
authors: WE
authors: Haley
authors: Maria A
authors: MA
authors: Jepperson
authors: David D
authors: DD
authors: Thiel
authors: Michael J
authors: MJ
authors: Wehle
authors: Joseph G
authors: JG
authors: Cernigliaro
references: Acad Radiol. 2007 Dec;14(12):1441-7
references: 18035274
references: Abdom Imaging. 2010 Oct;35(5):629-35
references: 19727931
references: Radiology. 2009 Mar;250(3):813-20
references: 19244048
references: Eur Radiol. 2009 Jan;19(1):13-23
references: 18677487
references: Urol Res. 2008 Aug;36(3-4):133-8
references: 18545993
references: Prim Care. 2008 Jun;35(2):369-91, vii
references: 18486720
references: Urology. 2012 Nov;80(5):986-9
references: 22921702
references: Urology. 2008 Nov;72(5):1164-8
references: 18619656
references: Radiol Clin North Am. 2012 Mar;50(2):191-205, v
references: 22498438