title: Spatiotemporal characteristics of muscle patterns for ball catching.
abstract: What sources of information and what control strategies the central nervous system (CNS) uses to perform movements that require accurate sensorimotor coordination, such as catching a flying ball, is still debated. Here we analyzed the EMG waveforms recorded from 16 shoulder and elbow muscles in six subjects during catching of balls projected frontally from a distance of 6 m and arriving at two different heights and with three different flight times (550, 650, 750 ms). We found that a large fraction of the variation in the muscle patterns was captured by two time-varying muscle synergies, coordinated recruitment of groups of muscles with specific activation waveforms, modulated in amplitude and shifted in time according to the ball's arrival height and flight duration. One synergy was recruited with a short and fixed delay from launch time. Remarkably, a second synergy was recruited at a fixed time before impact, suggesting that it is timed according to an accurate time-to-contact estimation. These results suggest that the control of interceptive movements relies on a combination of reactive and predictive processes through the intermittent recruitment of time-varying muscle synergies. Knowledge of the dynamic effect of gravity and drag on the ball may be then implicitly incorporated in a direct mapping of visual information into a small number of synergy recruitment parameters.
authors: Laboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, Santa Lucia Foundation Rome, Italy.
authors: M
authors: M
authors: D'Andola
authors: B
authors: B
authors: Cesqui
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Portone
authors: L
authors: L
authors: Fernandez
authors: F
authors: F
authors: Lacquaniti
authors: A
authors: A
authors: d'Avella
keywords: EMG activity; interception; intermittency; muscle synergies; time-to-contact
references: J Neurophysiol. 2010 Mar;103(3):1532-42
references: 20071634
references: Nat Neurosci. 2001 Jul;4(7):693-4
references: 11426224
references: Neural Netw. 2002 Mar;15(2):163-79
references: 12022506
references: Nature. 1993 Mar 4;362(6415):23
references: 8446164
references: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Sep;100(3):1433-54
references: 18596190
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Oct;19(5):1041-52
references: 8228838
references: J Neurophysiol. 2004 Apr;91(4):1620-34
references: 14627663
references: J Neurosci. 1989 Jan;9(1):134-48
references: 2913200
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Jun;20(3):591-612
references: 8027714
references: J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Mar 30;196(2):264-75
references: 21256864
references: J Physiol. 2011 Jan 15;589(Pt 2):307-24
references: 21098004
references: Exp Brain Res. 1992;89(1):223-8
references: 1601100
references: Front Comput Neurosci. 2013 Feb 28;7:12
references: 23450266
references: Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jan;67(1):129-49
references: 15912877
references: Biol Cybern. 2011 Feb;104(1-2):31-51
references: 21327829
references: Exp Brain Res. 1999 Nov;129(1):87-92
references: 10550506
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Mar;4(3):99-107
references: 10689344
references: Front Comput Neurosci. 2013 Feb 26;7:8
references: 23471195
references: Biol Cybern. 1998 Apr;78(4):307-18
references: 9652080
references: Science. 1995 Apr 28;268(5210):569-73
references: 7725104
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Feb;21(1):19-31
references: 7707030
references: Exp Brain Res. 2012 Feb;216(4):499-514
references: 22120106
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 22;102(8):3076-81
references: 15708969
references: J Neurophysiol. 2012 Apr;107(8):2123-42
references: 22279190
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1983 May;35(Pt 2):333-46
references: 6571315
references: J Neurosci. 2006 Jul 26;26(30):7791-810
references: 16870725
references: J Neurophysiol. 2011 Dec;106(6):2796-812
references: 21880939
references: Exp Brain Res. 1998 Oct;122(4):467-74
references: 9827866
references: Vision Res. 2008 Jun;48(14):1532-8
references: 18499213
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31770
references: 22384072
references: Exp Brain Res. 2009 Feb;192(4):571-604
references: 19139857
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Aug;3(8):301-310
references: 10431184
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Sep 4;109(36):14652-6
references: 22908288
references: Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jun;171(4):421-35
references: 16307234