title: Participants, usage, and use patterns of a web-based intervention for the prevention of depression within a randomized controlled trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Although Web-based interventions have been shown to be effective, they are not widely implemented in regular care. Nonadherence (ie, participants not following the intervention protocol) is an issue. By studying the way Web-based interventions are used and whether there are differences between adherers (ie, participants that started all 9 lessons) and nonadherers, more insight can be gained into the process of adherence.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The aims of this study were to (1) describe the characteristics of participants and investigate their relationship with adherence, (2) investigate the utilization of the different features of the intervention and possible differences between adherers and nonadherers, and (3) identify what use patterns emerge and whether there are differences between adherers and nonadherers.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data were used from 206 participants that used the Web-based intervention Living to the full, a Web-based intervention for the prevention of depression employing both a fully automated and human-supported format. Demographic and baseline characteristics of participants were collected by using an online survey. Log data were collected within the Web-based intervention itself. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In all, 118 participants fully adhered to the intervention (ie, started all 9 lessons). Participants with an ethnicity other than Dutch were more often adherers (χ²₁=5.5, P=.02), and nonadherers used the Internet more hours per day on average (F₁,₂₀₃=3.918, P=.049). A logistic regression showed that being female (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.01-4.04; P=.046) and having a higher need for cognition (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.05; P=.02) increased the odds of adhering to the intervention. Overall, participants logged in an average of 4 times per lesson, but adherers logged in significantly more times per lesson than nonadherers (F₁,₂₀₄=20.710; P<.001). For use patterns, we saw that early nonadherers seemed to use fewer sessions and spend less time than late nonadherers and adherers, and fewer sessions to complete the lesson than adherers. Furthermore, late nonadherers seemed to have a shorter total duration of sessions than adherers.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  By using log data combined with baseline characteristics of participants, we extracted valuable lessons for redesign of this intervention and the design of Web-based interventions in general. First, although characteristics of respondents can significantly predict adherence, their predictive value is small. Second, it is important to design Web-based interventions to foster adherence and usage of all features in an intervention.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Dutch Trial Register Number: NTR3007; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=3007 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6ILhI3rd8).
authors: Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands. s.m.kelders@utwente.nl
authors: Saskia M
authors: SM
authors: Kelders
authors: Ernst T
authors: ET
authors: Bohlmeijer
authors: Julia Ewc
authors: JE
authors: Van Gemert-Pijnen
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003863:Depression / Q000517:prevention & control*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged
keywords: Web-based intervention; adherence; attrition; depression; design; engagement; usage; use patterns
references: Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2011 Mar;34(1):167-83
references: 21333846
references: J Med Internet Res. 2009 Apr 24;11(2):e13
references: 19403466
references: J Pers Assess. 1984 Jun;48(3):306-7
references: 16367530
references: J Med Internet Res. 2011 Aug 05;13(3):e52
references: 21821503
references: J Med Internet Res. 2009 Dec 21;11(4):e52
references: 20026451
references: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;19(6):558-63
references: 15211536
references: Early Interv Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;5 Suppl 1:58-62
references: 21208393
references: Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;184:526-33
references: 15172947
references: J Med Internet Res. 2002 Jan-Mar;4(1):e3
references: 11956035
references: Int J Med Inform. 2009 Oct;78(10):688-703
references: 19625210
references: J Med Internet Res. 2010 Nov 18;12(4):e52
references: 21087922
references: J Med Internet Res. 2007 May 08;9(2):e10
references: 17513281
references: Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Sep 15;52(6):610-30
references: 12361671
references: Psychol Med. 1997 Mar;27(2):363-70
references: 9089829
references: BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun 25;10:181
references: 20579332
references: J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 25;13(1):e9
references: 21371992
references: J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 30;13(3):e71
references: 21959968
references: Am J Public Health. 2010 Dec;100(12):2372
references: 20966360
references: Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;165(10):1272-80
references: 18765483
references: J Med Internet Res. 2008 Nov 14;10(5):e41
references: 19017583
references: Psychol Sci. 2012 Jun;23(6):578-81
references: 22547658
references: J Med Internet Res. 2008 Dec 17;10(5):e54
references: 19097975
references: Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
references: 6880820
references: Psychol Med. 2012 Mar;42(3):485-95
references: 21740624
references: J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 14;14(6):e152
references: 23151820
references: PLoS One. 2010 Oct 13;5(10):e13196
references: 20967242
references: J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 06;13(1):e2
references: 21212045
references: J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 31;7(1):e11
references: 15829473
references: J Med Internet Res. 2011 Mar 10;13(1):e30
references: 21393123
references: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Feb 20;13:26
references: 23425322
references: J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 05;13(4):e111
references: 22155738
references: Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38(4):196-205
references: 20183695
references: Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;23(1):8-11
references: 19901835
references: J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 26;7(1):e7
references: 15829479
references: Comput Inform Nurs. 2011 Feb;29(2 Suppl):TC9-20
references: 21372645
references: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Apr;76(2):341-6
references: 18377129
references: PLoS Med. 2011 Jan 18;8(1):e1000387
references: 21267058
references: Psychol Bull. 1995 May;117(3):497-529
references: 7777651
references: Health Promot Int. 2013 Mar;28(1):36-42
references: 22377974
references: Behav Res Ther. 2011 Jan;49(1):62-7
references: 21074752
references: Telemed J E Health. 2008 Oct;14(8):775-82
references: 18954247
references: J Med Internet Res. 2010 Mar 29;12(1):e9
references: 20350926
references: J Med Internet Res. 2011 Apr 14;13(2):e32
references: 21493191
references: J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 31;13(4):e126
references: 22209829
references: J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jan 11;14(1):e4
references: 22260810