title: How can stress be controlled in endodontically treated teeth? A 3D finite element analysis.
abstract: The aim of this study was to analyze the stresses that develop by oblique and vertical forces in endodontically treated maxillary second premolars that were restored with resin composite. Additionally, in our study the effects of the different restorative approaches and use of different base materials on stress formation were analyzed using three-dimensional finite element stress analysis. For restoration, the models representing both cusp capping, palatinal cusp capping, standard MOD restoration, and use of woven fiber in occlusal part were prepared. In all models, oblique forces caused more stress than did vertical forces. Materials with low elastic moduli cause high amounts of stress, whereas materials with elastic moduli similar to that of dental tissues cause low amounts of stress. Additional approaches such as cusp capping, functional cusp capping, and woven fiber use do not affect stress formation on the tooth after endodontic treatment.
authors: Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 06510 Emek, Ankara, Turkey. ihsanyikilgan@gazi.edu.tr
authors: Ihsan
authors: I
authors: Yıkılgan
authors: Oya
authors: O
authors: Bala
mesh_terms: D020342:Finite Element Analysis; D006801:Humans; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D019553:Tooth, Nonvital
references: Dent Traumatol. 2008 Apr;24(2):214-9
references: 18352927
references: Int Endod J. 2010 May;43(5):356-62
references: 20518927
references: Oper Dent. 2008 Sep-Oct;33(5):526-33
references: 18833859
references: J Adhes Dent. 2008 Oct;10(5):365-71
references: 19058682
references: Oper Dent. 2010 Nov-Dec;35(6):663-71
references: 21180006
references: Int Endod J. 2010 Jun;43(6):469-77
references: 20536574
references: Oper Dent. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):59-64
references: 18335734
references: J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 May-Jun;17(3):161-5
references: 19466244
references: J Endod. 1986 Sep;12(9):382-7
references: 3531376
references: Int Endod J. 2005 Feb;38(2):73-80
references: 15667628
references: Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Dec;15(6):923-9
references: 20830497
references: J Adhes Dent. 2007 Apr;9(2):175-81
references: 17489478
references: J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Oct;98(4):277-84
references: 17936127
references: J Endod. 2009 Oct;35(10):1428-32
references: 19801245
references: Int Endod J. 2000 Nov;33(6):509-15
references: 11307254
references: J Endod. 2009 Mar;35(3):413-6
references: 19249607
references: J Endod. 1981 Apr;7(4):182-5
references: 7014754
references: J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Jan;103(1):6-12
references: 20105674
references: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006 Oct;79(1):35-41
references: 16470831
references: Int Endod J. 2006 Feb;39(2):136-42
references: 16454794
references: J Endod. 2008 Aug;34(8):1015-9
references: 18634938
references: Int Endod J. 2011 May;44(5):407-15
references: 21219366
references: J Conserv Dent. 2008 Jul;11(3):121-6
references: 20142899
references: Endod Dent Traumatol. 2000 Oct;16(5):218-21
references: 11202885
references: Oper Dent. 2009 May-Jun;34(3):306-11
references: 19544820
references: Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Jun;15(3):403-8
references: 20238232
references: Int Endod J. 2011 Jun;44(6):543-9
references: 21276020
references: J Endod. 2007 Jun;33(6):732-6
references: 17509416