title: Contact Between Adoptive and Birth Families: Perspectives from the Minnesota Texas Adoption Research Project.
abstract: A growing number of adoptive families have contact with their children's birth relatives. The Minnesota Texas Adoption Research Project is examining longitudinally the consequences of variations in contact arrangements for birth mothers, adoptive parents, and adopted children in domestic infant adoptions, and is studying the dynamics of relationships within these family systems. Individuals who had contact were more satisfied with their arrangements than those who did not have contact. Satisfaction with contact predicted more optimal adjustment among adopted adolescents and emerging adults. Adoption-related communication predicted identity development among adopted adolescents and emerging adults. Birth mothers who were more satisfied with their contact arrangements, regardless of level of contact, had less unresolved grief 12 to 20 years after placement. Adoptive and birth relatives who engage in contact need flexibility, strong interpersonal skills, and commitment to the relationship. These skills can be learned, and they can be supported by others, through informal, psychoeducational, and therapeutic means.
authors: Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
authors: Harold D
authors: HD
authors: Grotevant
authors: Ruth G
authors: RG
authors: McRoy
authors: Gretchen M
authors: GM
authors: Wrobel
authors: Susan
authors: S
authors: Ayers-Lopez
keywords: adjustment; adoption; contact; grief; identity; loss
references: J Fam Psychol. 2008 Aug;22(4):529-40
references: 18729667
references: J Fam Psychol. 2011 Jun;25(3):393-401
references: 21517175
references: Int J Behav Dev. 2013 Sep 1;37(5):
references: 24376288
references: J Fam Psychol. 2011 Aug;25(4):620-4
references: 21728420
references: Adopt Q. 2008 Jul 1;10(3 &amp; 4):79-101
references: 20802843
references: J Fam Commun. 2011 Jul 1;11(3):181-197
references: 23926444
references: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011 May;52(5):529-36
references: 20955207
references: J Fam Psychol. 2006 Sep;20(3):531-4
references: 16938012
references: JAMA. 2005 May 25;293(20):2501-15
references: 15914751