title: fMRI orientation decoding in V1 does not require global maps or globally coherent orientation stimuli.
abstract: The orientation of a large grating can be decoded from V1 functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, even at low resolution (3-mm isotropic voxels). This finding has suggested that columnar-level neuronal information might be accessible to fMRI at 3T. However, orientation decodability might alternatively arise from global orientation-preference maps. Such global maps across V1 could result from bottom-up processing, if the preferences of V1 neurons were biased toward particular orientations (e.g., radial from fixation, or cardinal, i.e., vertical or horizontal). Global maps could also arise from local recurrent or top-down processing, reflecting pre-attentive perceptual grouping, attention spreading, or predictive coding of global form. Here we investigate whether fMRI orientation decoding with 2-mm voxels requires (a) globally coherent orientation stimuli and/or (b) global-scale patterns of V1 activity. We used opposite-orientation gratings (balanced about the cardinal orientations) and spirals (balanced about the radial orientation), along with novel patch-swapped variants of these stimuli. The two stimuli of a patch-swapped pair have opposite orientations everywhere (like their globally coherent parent stimuli). However, the two stimuli appear globally similar, a patchwork of opposite orientations. We find that all stimulus pairs are robustly decodable, demonstrating that fMRI orientation decoding does not require globally coherent orientation stimuli. Furthermore, decoding remained robust after spatial high-pass filtering for all stimuli, showing that fine-grained components of the fMRI patterns reflect visual orientations. Consistent with previous studies, we found evidence for global radial and vertical preference maps in V1. However, these were weak or absent for patch-swapped stimuli, suggesting that global preference maps depend on globally coherent orientations and might arise through recurrent or top-down processes related to the perception of global form.
authors: Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit Cambridge, UK.
authors: Arjen
authors: A
authors: Alink
authors: Alexandra
authors: A
authors: Krugliak
authors: Alexander
authors: A
authors: Walther
authors: Nikolaus
authors: N
authors: Kriegeskorte
keywords: decoding; fMRI; global form; hyperacuity; orientation selectivity; pattern analysis; radial bias; visual cortex
references: J Neurophysiol. 2008 May;99(5):2456-69
references: 18322002
references: Science. 1995 May 12;268(5212):889-93
references: 7754376
references: J Vis. 2008 Aug 01;8(10):5.1-13
references: 19146347
references: Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):1965-76
references: 19800408
references: Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):1943-8
references: 19285144
references: Neuroimage. 2010 Aug 15;52(2):600-5
references: 20434564
references: Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):1957-64
references: 19715765
references: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009 Mar;4(1):101-9
references: 19151374
references: Neuron. 2002 Nov 14;36(4):739-50
references: 12441061
references: Nat Neurosci. 2005 May;8(5):686-91
references: 15852013
references: Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jun;3(6):535-6
references: 10816307
references: J Neurosci. 2013 Dec 11;33(50):19695-703
references: 24336733
references: Neuroimage. 2005 Nov 1;28(2):440-52
references: 16046147
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 30;31(13):4792-804
references: 21451017
references: Neuroimage. 2012 Nov 15;63(3):1212-22
references: 22917989
references: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Dec;5(12):1332-8
references: 12426571
references: J Neurosci. 1996 Jul 1;16(13):4207-21
references: 8753882
references: Nat Neurosci. 2011 Sep 18;14(10):1243-4
references: 21926984
references: Nat Neurosci. 2005 May;8(5):679-85
references: 15852014
references: Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 25;3:245
references: 22848204
references: Cereb Cortex. 2010 Aug;20(8):1946-54
references: 20019147
references: J Neurosci. 2010 Jan 6;30(1):325-30
references: 20053913
references: Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):1949-52
references: 19559797
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 29;105(30):10607-12
references: 18641121
references: Exp Brain Res. 1997 Sep;116(2):216-28
references: 9348122
references: Neuron. 2006 Sep 7;51(5):661-70
references: 16950163
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan 23;93(2):615-22
references: 8570604
references: Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 1;50(2):567-71
references: 20035886
references: J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jun;103(6):3465-71
references: 20410358
references: Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):1953-6
references: 19596071
references: Neuroimage. 2009 Jun;46(2):511-5
references: 19385017