title: Temporal variation of residential pesticide use and comparison of two survey platforms: a longitudinal study among households with young children in Northern California.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Pesticide use patterns are essential inputs into human pesticide exposure models. Currently, data included for modeling purposes have mostly been collected in cross-sectional surveys. However, it is questionable whether responses to one-time surveys are representative of pesticide use over longer periods, which is needed for assessment of health impact. This study was designed to evaluate population-wide temporal variations and within-household variations in reported residential pesticide use patterns and to compare alternative pesticide data collection methods - web surveys versus telephone interviews.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 481 households in Northern California provided up to 3 annual telephone interviews on residential pesticide use; 182 of these households provided up to 6 quarterly web surveys that covered the same topics for some of the same time periods. Information on frequency and areas of application were collected for outdoor and indoor sprays, indoor foggers, professional applications, and behind-the-neck treatments for pets. Population-wide temporal variation and within-household consistency were examined both within telephone surveys and within web surveys, and quantified using Generalized Estimating Equations and Mixed Effect Modeling. Reporting between the two methods, the telephone survey and the web survey, was also compared.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Use prevalence of outdoor sprays across the population reported in both the annual telephone surveys and the quarterly web surveys decreased over time, as did behind-the-neck treatment of pets reported in the quarterly web survey. Similarly, frequencies of use of these products decreased in the quarterly web surveys. Indoor sprays showed no statistically significant population-wide temporal variation in either survey. Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated consistent use within a household for behind-the-neck treatment on pets and outdoor sprays but great variability for the use of indoor sprays. Indoor sprays were most consistently applied in the bathroom and kitchen. Outdoor sprays were consistently more often applied by male household members, while indoor sprays were not. The two survey approaches obtained fairly similar results on the prevalence of using pesticides, but found discrepancies in use frequencies. In addition, the number of products purchased was positively correlated with application frequency for outdoor sprays (R = 0.51, p = 0.0005) but not for indoor sprays.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In this population, repeated surveys are necessary either to obtain a reliable estimate of the average household use of pesticides or to project potential temporal changes of pesticide use. Web surveys could collect comparable data to traditional telephone surveys for some information. However, researchers need to consider the internet acceptability among the target population and balance lower participant burden against the need for sufficiently accurate time-varying measurement, to improve subject retention in longitudinal surveys.
authors: Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. maywu@ucdavis.edu.
authors: Xiangmei May
authors: XM
authors: Wu
authors: Deborah H
authors: DH
authors: Bennett
authors: Beate
authors: B
authors: Ritz
authors: Daniel J
authors: DJ
authors: Tancredi
authors: Irva
authors: I
authors: Hertz-Picciotto
mesh_terms: D002140:California; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004781:Environmental Exposure; D004784:Environmental Monitoring; D004785:Environmental Pollutants / Q000032:analysis*; D005191:Family Characteristics; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D010575:Pesticides / Q000032:analysis*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D004785:Environmental Pollutants; D010575:Pesticides
references: Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Jan;111(1):79-84
references: 12515682
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Jan 15;47(2):859-67
references: 23244175
references: Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008 Apr;20(2):191-7
references: 18332717
references: Biometrics. 2003 Dec;59(4):849-58
references: 14969463
references: Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Sep;114(9):1419-23
references: 16966099
references: Environ Health. 2010 Aug 29;9:54
references: 20799988
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Jun 15;43(12):4294-300
references: 19603637
references: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;21(4):427-36
references: 20588323
references: Food Chem Toxicol. 2010 Nov;48(11):3109-19
references: 20696198
references: Reprod Toxicol. 2011 Feb;31(2):171-6
references: 20955780
references: Annu Rev Public Health. 2004;25:155-97
references: 15015917
references: Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Jun;108(6):505-14
references: 10856023
references: Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1994 Jan;26(1):47-59
references: 8110023
references: Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Dec;120(6):876-87
references: 6507428
references: Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1995 May;54(5):768-74
references: 7780222
references: J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2004 Jan;14(1):74-83
references: 14726946
references: Arch Environ Health. 1981 Nov-Dec;36(6):304-9
references: 7316568
references: Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1992 Apr;22(3):260-6
references: 1616309
references: Biometrics. 1982 Sep;38(3):715-24
references: 7171697
references: Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jul;111(1):174-93
references: 16324748
references: Environ Health. 2012 Nov 09;11:83
references: 23140444
references: Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jun;107 Suppl 3:431-7
references: 10346991
references: Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Mar 15;165(6):643-51
references: 17166928
references: Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Jul;116(1):114-22
references: 7102647
references: J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2000 Mar-Apr;10(2):159-67
references: 10791597
references: Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Feb;113(2):123-36
references: 15687048
references: Front Biosci. 2008 Jan 01;13:1240-9
references: 17981626
references: Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Mar;107(3):173-7
references: 10064545
references: Toxicology. 2008 Jun 27;248(2-3):136-41
references: 18455858
references: J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2005 Sep;15(5):388-97
references: 15602583
references: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012 Mar-Apr;22(2):116-25
references: 21792233