title: Influence of probiotic supplementation on blood parameters and growth performance in broiler chickens.
abstract: Effects of commercial probiotic (Bactocell®) on growth performance and blood parameters were evaluated. A total of 800 one day-old Ross broiler chicks were raised over 42 days. Chicks were wing-banded, weighed individually and randomly allocated into four equally major groups each having two replicates. Chicks of group 1 (control group) were fed the starter and finisher diets that did not supplemented with probiotic. The chicks of groups 2, 3, and 4 were fed the control starter and finisher diets supplemented with 1.6 g, 1 g and 0.8 g of probiotic per kg feed, respectively. Weekly body weight, feed consumption and feed conversion were measured. Blood parameters at 1, 4 and 6 weeks of age including packed cell volume (PCV), haemoglobin (Hb), total protein, albumin, total lipid and cholesterol were determined. All birds were kept under similar environmental, managerial and hygienic conditions. The results of the current study revealed that there was no significant change for Hb and PCV concentrations among different groups at all studied times. Also, total protein, lipids and albumin concentrations were not affected by probiotic supplementation. Chicken fed a diet containing various levels of probiotic showed a significant decrease (p ⩽ 0.05) in cholesterol concentration compared to control group. Probiotic supplementation significantly increased the body weight and daily weight gain of broiler chicks at late ages (3-6 weeks). Also, the birds fed on probiotic levels 1 and 0.8 g/kg diet exhibited higher body weight among chicken groups at 6 weeks of age. Improved feed conversion was noticed in birds fed a diet supplemented with probiotic. There was no significant difference in mortality rate among groups. We concluded that use of selected commercial probiotic resulted in improved performance parameters and reduced serum cholesterol in broiler chickens. Moreover, supplementation of the probiotic to broilers in the levels of 1 and 0.8 g/kg diet was found to be better than control and 1.6 g/kg level indicating that increasing dietary probiotic level does not has the best performance.
authors: Dept. of Veterinary Medicine, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia.
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Alkhalf
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Alhaj
authors: I
authors: I
authors: Al-Homidan
keywords: Blood parameters; Broiler chicks; Growth performance; Probiotic supplementation
references: Poult Sci. 1994 Nov;73(11):1699-711
references: 7862610
references: Br Poult Sci. 1996 May;37(2):341-6
references: 8773843
references: Br J Nutr. 1995 May;73(5):701-10
references: 7626589
references: Poult Sci. 2007 Mar;86(3):444-6
references: 17297154
references: Br Poult Sci. 1995 Dec;36(5):799-803
references: 8746981
references: Poult Sci. 2007 Feb;86(2):309-17
references: 17234844
references: Poult Sci. 2003 Apr;82(4):627-31
references: 12710484
references: Br Poult Sci. 2004 Jun;45(3):355-66
references: 15327122
references: Poult Sci. 2006 Aug;85(8):1383-8
references: 16903468
references: Poult Sci. 2004 Jan;83(1):84-8
references: 14761088
references: Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2000 May;14(4):295-301
references: 10794950
references: Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2000 May;14(4):327-35
references: 10794955
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Apr;59(4):1120-4
references: 8489229
references: J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2005 Aug;52(6):263-7
references: 16050905
references: Poult Sci. 1998 Sep;77(9):1259-65
references: 9733111
references: Br Poult Sci. 2000 Dec;41(5):593-7
references: 11201439
references: J Appl Bacteriol. 1989 May;66(5):365-78
references: 2666378
references: Poult Sci. 1997 Feb;76(2):381-5
references: 9057222
references: Br Poult Sci. 1996 May;37(2):395-401
references: 8773848
references: Poult Sci. 1997 Jan;76(1):179-96
references: 9037704
references: Br Poult Sci. 2007 Aug;48(4):507-14
references: 17701504
references: Poult Sci. 2006 Oct;85(10):1855-63
references: 17012181
references: Poult Sci. 2007 Sep;86(9):1856-60
references: 17704371
references: J Nutr. 2000 Feb;130(2S Suppl):396S-402S
references: 10721914