title: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging in live vs. post mortem rat brains.
abstract: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is an increasingly popular technique for examining neurobiology in rodents because it is both noninvasive and nondestructive. MRI scans can be acquired from either live or post mortem specimens. In vivo scans have a key advantage in that subjects can be scanned at multiple time-points in longitudinal studies. However, repeated exposure to anesthesia and stress may confound studies. In contrast, post mortem scans offer improved image quality and increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) due to several key advantages: First, the images are not disrupted by motion and pulsation artifacts. Second, they allow the brain tissue to be perfused with contrast agents, enhancing tissue contrast. Third, they allow longer image acquisition times, yielding higher resolution and/or improved SNR. Fourth, they allow assessment of groups of animals at the same age without scheduling complications. Despite these advantages, researchers are often skeptical of post mortem MRI scans because of uncertainty about whether the fixation process alters the MRI measurements. To address these concerns, we present a thorough comparative study of in vivo and post mortem MRI scans in healthy male Wistar rats at three age points throughout adolescence (postnatal days 28 through 80). For each subject, an in vivo scan was acquired, followed by perfusion and two post mortem scans at two different MRI facilities. The goal was to assess robustness of measurements, to detect any changes in volumetric measurements after fixation, and to investigate any differential bias that may exist between image acquisition techniques. We present this volumetric analysis for comparison of 22 anatomical structures between in vivo and post mortem scans. No significant changes in volumetric measurements were detected; however, as hypothesized, the image quality is dramatically improved in post mortem scans. These findings illustrate the validity and utility of using post mortem scans in volumetric neurobiological studies.
authors: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Psychiatry, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. ipek@cs.unc.edu
authors: Ipek
authors: I
authors: Oguz
authors: Richard
authors: R
authors: Yaxley
authors: Francois
authors: F
authors: Budin
authors: Marion
authors: M
authors: Hoogstoel
authors: Joohwi
authors: J
authors: Lee
authors: Eric
authors: E
authors: Maltbie
authors: Wen
authors: W
authors: Liu
authors: Fulton T
authors: FT
authors: Crews
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001344:Autopsy; D001921:Brain / Q000473:pathology*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D008297:Male; D009929:Organ Size; D051381:Rats; D059629:Signal-To-Noise Ratio
references: Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S151-60
references: 15501084
references: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2011 Mar;7962:7962251-7962257
references: 21909227
references: Neuroreport. 2009 Nov 25;20(17):1554-8
references: 19858767
references: J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Oct 30;202(1):17-27
references: 21889536
references: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2011 Mar 15;7962:7962481-79624811
references: 21909228
references: Front Neuroanat. 2008 Apr 17;2:1
references: 18958199
references: Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):611-9
references: 19027864
references: J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;18(2):371-80
references: 19625739
references: NMR Biomed. 2007 May;20(3):352-9
references: 17451177
references: Brain Res. 2010 Feb 16;1314:15-28
references: 19631614
references: Hippocampus. 2004;14(5):636-48
references: 15301440
references: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009 Jul;33(7):1089-98
references: 19463853
references: Magn Reson Med. 2003 Oct;50(4):743-8
references: 14523960
references: Front Neuroinform. 2012 Mar 23;6:6
references: 22470335
references: Methods Mol Biol. 2010;611:141-9
references: 19960328
references: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2009 Feb 1;7259:725943-725949
references: 20640188
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e20653
references: 21747929
references: Exp Physiol. 2010 Jan;95(1):26-31
references: 19748967
references: Phys Med Biol. 1999 Dec;44(12):N261-4
references: 10616158
references: Radiology. 2002 Mar;222(3):789-93
references: 11867802