title: Posterior vertebral column resection in early onset spinal deformities.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Early onset spinal deformities (EOSD) can be life-threatening in very young children. In the growing spine, surgical intervention is often unavoidable and should be carried out as soon as possible. A deformed section of the spine not only affects the development of the remaining healthy spine, but also that of the chest wall (which influences pulmonary function), the extremities and body balance. Posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) represents an effective surgical solution to address such problems. However, reports in the literature concerning PVCR are mostly limited to its use in adolescents or adults. The purpose of this study was to illustrate our experience with PVCR in EOSD and to describe the surgical technique with respect to the unique anatomy of young children.
  
  
  METHODS
  Four children [mean age 3.7 (range 2.5-5.2) years] with severe spinal deformity underwent PVCR through a single approach. Multimodal intraoperative monitoring was used in all cases. Surgery included one stage posterior circumferential resection of one vertebral body along with the adjoining intervertebral discs and removal of all posterior elements. A transpedicular screw-rod system was used for correction and stabilisation. Fusion was strictly limited to the resection site, allowing for later conversion into a growing rod construct at the remaining spine, if necessary. Relevant data were extracted retrospectively from patient charts and long spine radiographs.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean operation time was 500 (range 463-541) min, with an estimated blood loss of 762 (range 600-1,050) ml. Mean follow-up time was 6.3 (range 3.5-12.4) years. After PVCR, the mean Cobb angle for scoliosis was reduced from 69° (range 50-99°) to 29° (5-44°) and the sagittal curvature (kyphosis) from 126° (87-151°) to 61° (47-75°). The mean correction of scoliosis was 57 % (18-92°) and of kyphosis, 51 % (44-62°). There were no spinal cord-related complications. In three patients, spinal instrumentation for growth guidance (fusion less growing rod technique) was applied. Two patients had complications: one patient had a complication of anesthesia, halo pin failure, and revision surgery with extension of the instrumentation cranially due to loss of correction; the second patient had a postoperative infection, which required plastic reconstructive measures.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  PVCR appears to be an effective technique to treat severe EOSD. There are important differences in its use in young children when compared with older patients. In patients with EOSD, additional surgical procedures are often necessary during growth, and hence non-fusion instrumentation beyond the vertebral resection site is advantageous, as it permits spinal growth and the later addition of fusion.
authors: Schulthess Clinic, Spine Center, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zürich, Switzerland.
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Jeszenszky
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Haschtmann
authors: F S
authors: FS
authors: Kleinstück
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Sutter
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Eggspühler
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Weiss
authors: T F
authors: TF
authors: Fekete
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D017668:Age of Onset; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D016343:Monitoring, Intraoperative; D009984:Orthopedic Fixation Devices; D019637:Orthopedic Procedures / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D011859:Radiography; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013121:Spinal Curvatures / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D013131:Spine / Q000601:surgery*; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 1;32(19 Suppl):S81-90
references: 17728686
references: Pediatr Neurosurg. 1997 Mar;26(3):130-43
references: 9419030
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1949 Jul;31A(3):464-78
references: 18153890
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 15;32(20):2171-7
references: 17873807
references: Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2006 Jan-Feb;144(1):74-9
references: 16498564
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 15;37(11):E655-61
references: 22166930
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Jul 15;22(14):1590-9
references: 9253094
references: Acta Orthop Belg. 2001 Apr;67(2):157-63
references: 11383294
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 15;38(8):E493-503
references: 23354113
references: Thorax. 1982 Aug;37(8):564-71
references: 7179184
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jun 15;20(12):1399-405
references: 7676339
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Mar;468(3):687-99
references: 19727995
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Mar 1;36(5):E340-4
references: 21325930
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 15;30(14):1682-7
references: 16025041
references: Arch Dis Child. 1960 Dec;35:544-7
references: 13726619
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Mar;(163):192-8
references: 7067252
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Nov 1;29(21):2357-64
references: 15507795
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jan 15;38(2):119-32
references: 22825478
references: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;176:326-9
references: 22744521
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 1;27(21):2374-82
references: 12438987
references: Eur Spine J. 2007 Nov;16 Suppl 2:S153-61
references: 17653777
references: Eur Spine J. 2011 Nov;20(11):1892-8
references: 21766167
references: Eur Spine J. 1995;4(5):296-301
references: 8581531
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):1815-27
references: 19644333
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973 Jun;(93):215-24
references: 4722944
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):2213-21
references: 19752708
references: J Pediatr Orthop B. 2005 Jul;14(4):287-93
references: 15931035
references: J Pediatr Orthop. 2001 Jul-Aug;21(4):549-55
references: 11433174
references: J Spinal Disord. 1991 Jun;4(2):193-202
references: 1806084
references: J Pediatr Orthop. 2001 Jul-Aug;21(4):519-24
references: 11433168