title: Artifacts and essentialism.
abstract: Psychological essentialism is an intuitive folk belief positing that certain categories have a non-obvious inner "essence" that gives rise to observable features. Although this belief most commonly characterizes natural kind categories, I argue that psychological essentialism can also be extended in important ways to artifact concepts. Specifically, concepts of individual artifacts include the non-obvious feature of object history, which is evident when making judgments regarding authenticity and ownership. Classic examples include famous works of art (e.g., the Mona Lisa is authentic because of its provenance), but ordinary artifacts likewise receive value from their history (e.g., a worn and tattered blanket may have special value if it was one's childhood possession). Moreover, in some cases, object history may be thought to have causal effects on individual artifacts, much as an animal essence has causal effects. I review empirical support for these claims and consider the implications for both artifact concepts and essentialism. This perspective suggests that artifact concepts cannot be contained in a theoretical framework that focuses exclusively on similarity or even function. Furthermore, although there are significant differences between essentialism of natural kinds and essentialism of artifact individuals, the commonalities suggest that psychological essentialism may not derive from folk biology but instead may reflect more domain-general perspectives on the world.
authors: University of Michigan.
authors: Susan A
authors: SA
authors: Gelman
references: Child Dev. 2006 Mar-Apr;77(2):427-42
references: 16611182
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jul;12(7):243
references: 18539075
references: J Cogn Cult. 2009 Jan 1;9(1-2):1-14
references: 20631919
references: New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2011 Summer;2011(132):1-8
references: 21671337
references: Dev Psychol. 2001 Jan;37(1):49-60
references: 11206433
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;101(6):1139-56
references: 22059842
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 12;363(1511):3837-44
references: 18840573
references: Psychol Rev. 2011 Apr;118(2):280-315
references: 21355662
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:115-40
references: 18631027
references: Behav Brain Sci. 1998 Aug;21(4):547-69; discussion 569-609
references: 10097021
references: Child Dev. 2012 Sep-Oct;83(5):1732-47
references: 22716967
references: Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):455-62
references: 17335793
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):166-88
references: 15149249
references: Cognition. 2011 Nov;121(2):219-27
references: 21774921
references: Dev Psychol. 2007 Mar;43(2):294-308
references: 17352540
references: Cogn Sci. 2013 May-Jun;37(4):668-710
references: 23363027
references: Cogn Dev. 2009 Jul 1;24(3):284-292
references: 20160988
references: Cogn Psychol. 2009 Mar;58(2):177-94
references: 18710700
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr;36(2):123-37
references: 23507091
references: J Comp Psychol. 2011 Nov;125(4):436-45
references: 21767009
references: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999 Jan;14(1):48-59
references: 10029936
references: Cognition. 2008 Oct;109(1):123-32
references: 18834976
references: Psychol Bull. 2011 Sep;137(5):800-18
references: 21142350
references: Curr Biol. 2007 Oct 9;17(19):1704-7
references: 17884499
references: Cognition. 1998 Apr;66(1):87-93
references: 9675980
references: Cogn Psychol. 1983 Jan;15(1):95-120
references: 6831859
references: Cogn Psychol. 2010 Nov;61(3):273-301
references: 20638053
references: Lang Learn Dev. 2008;4(1):1-31
references: 21765807
references: Cognition. 2001 Nov;82(1):59-69
references: 11672705
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Jun;7(6):246-251
references: 12804690
references: Cognition. 2009 Jan;110(1):1-22
references: 19046742
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Dec;10(12):546-50
references: 17079185
references: Cognition. 2006 Feb;99(1):73-112
references: 16443448
references: Cogn Psychol. 1996 Apr;30(2):111-53
references: 8635312
references: Mem Cognit. 2007 Oct;35(7):1785-800
references: 18062554
references: Cognition. 2007 Dec;105(3):615-48; discussion 649-57
references: 17187770
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26016
references: 22028804
references: Cognition. 2000 Feb 14;74(2):149-75
references: 10617780
references: Cogn Dev. 2013 Jan;28(1):63-75
references: 23335836
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Aug 21;109(34):13526-31
references: 22869722
references: Dev Psychol. 2012 Mar;48(2):303-14
references: 22369338
references: Cognition. 1996 Jun;59(3):247-74
references: 8706378
references: Child Dev. 2007 Nov-Dec;78(6):1675-88
references: 17988314
references: Child Dev. 2006 May-Jun;77(3):505-24
references: 16686784
references: Cognition. 1996 Jul;60(1):1-29
references: 8766388
references: Cognition. 1986 Aug;23(3):183-209
references: 3791915