title: Land use planning and wildfire: development policies influence future probability of housing loss.
abstract: Increasing numbers of homes are being destroyed by wildfire in the wildland-urban interface. With projections of climate change and housing growth potentially exacerbating the threat of wildfire to homes and property, effective fire-risk reduction alternatives are needed as part of a comprehensive fire management plan. Land use planning represents a shift in traditional thinking from trying to eliminate wildfires, or even increasing resilience to them, toward avoiding exposure to them through the informed placement of new residential structures. For land use planning to be effective, it needs to be based on solid understanding of where and how to locate and arrange new homes. We simulated three scenarios of future residential development and projected landscape-level wildfire risk to residential structures in a rapidly urbanizing, fire-prone region in southern California. We based all future development on an econometric subdivision model, but we varied the emphasis of subdivision decision-making based on three broad and common growth types: infill, expansion, and leapfrog. Simulation results showed that decision-making based on these growth types, when applied locally for subdivision of individual parcels, produced substantial landscape-level differences in pattern, location, and extent of development. These differences in development, in turn, affected the area and proportion of structures at risk from burning in wildfires. Scenarios with lower housing density and larger numbers of small, isolated clusters of development, i.e., resulting from leapfrog development, were generally predicted to have the highest predicted fire risk to the largest proportion of structures in the study area, and infill development was predicted to have the lowest risk. These results suggest that land use planning should be considered an important component to fire risk management and that consistently applied policies based on residential pattern may provide substantial benefits for future risk reduction.
authors: Conservation Biology Institute, La Mesa, California, United States of America.
authors: Alexandra D
authors: AD
authors: Syphard
authors: Avi
authors: A
authors: Bar Massada
authors: Van
authors: V
authors: Butsic
authors: Jon E
authors: JE
authors: Keeley
mesh_terms: D002140:California; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D058735:Environmental Policy; D005390:Fires; D006798:Housing; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011336:Probability; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012306:Risk
references: J Environ Manage. 2011 Jul;92(7):1882-93
references: 21477919
references: Divers Distrib. 2008 May;14(3):462-471
references: 32313432
references: Conserv Biol. 2006 Oct;20(5):1445-56
references: 17002762
references: Int J Health Geogr. 2010 Feb 12;9:8
references: 20152044
references: Conserv Biol. 2009 Jun;23(3):758-69
references: 22748094
references: J Environ Manage. 2004 Aug;72(1-2):105-15
references: 15246577
references: J Environ Manage. 2010 Jan-Feb;91(3):732-41
references: 19879685
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 4;104(36):14272-6
references: 17717082
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33954
references: 22470499
references: Ecol Appl. 2007 Jul;17(5):1388-402
references: 17708216
references: Science. 1999 Jun 11;284(5421):1829-32
references: 10364554
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 30;106(26):10706-11
references: 19506256