title: Mandibular cephalometric characteristics of a Saudi sample of patients having impacted third molars.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the cephalometric characteristics of mandibles of Saudi patients having impacted third molars and to compare them to those of patients having normally erupted third molars.
  
  
  METHODS
  One hundred and twenty-one Saudi adult subjects (59 females and 62 males; age: 20-40 years) were divided into two groups based on the status of the mandibular third molars: (1) impaction group and (2) normal group. Means and standard deviations of 21 cephalometric measurements related to mandibular geometry were measured and compared between the two groups using the unpaired t-test. Males and females in the impaction group were also compared with their equivalent subgroups in the normal group using the unpaired t-test.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Anteroposteriorly, space distal to second molar, ramal width and mandibular body length were significantly less in the impaction group than in the control group. In addition, posterior teeth were more upright in the impaction group. Vertically, posterior alveolar height was significantly less in the impaction group. The Y-axis was significantly increased in the impaction group. The significance of these measurements was variable between males and females.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Third-molar impactions in the Saudis living in the Western region of Saudi Arabia were more likely to occur when inadequate retromolar space is present. This can be attributed to certain mandibular skeletal and dental features, among which the increased width of mandibular ramus and backward inclination of posterior teeth seem to be the most influencing factors in both sexes.
authors: Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Board in Orthodontics - Western Region, Saudi Arabia.
authors: Ali H
authors: AH
authors: Hassan
keywords: Cephalometrics; Etiology; Impaction; Mandibular geometry; Saudi; Third molar
references: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Oct;32(5):548-52
references: 14759117
references: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Feb;107(2):e14-20
references: 19138633
references: Aust Dent J. 2008 Dec;53(4):320-4
references: 19133947
references: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Aug;98(2):161-7
references: 2378320
references: Angle Orthod. 1972 Oct;42(4):368-86
references: 4507153
references: Hum Biol. 2001 Apr;73(2):271-90
references: 11446429
references: Angle Orthod. 2006 Jan;76(1):109-13
references: 16448278
references: Angle Orthod. 1985 Jan;55(1):70-6
references: 3856410
references: Angle Orthod. 1977 Jul;47(3):165-72
references: 268949
references: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jul;130(1):47-55
references: 16849071
references: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Feb;123(2):138-45
references: 12594419
references: Ann Saudi Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;24(5):354-6
references: 15573847
references: Angle Orthod. 1991 Fall;61(3):223-9
references: 1928824
references: J Dent Res. 1963 Jan-Feb;42(1)Pt 2:400-11
references: 13971295
references: Am J Orthod. 1982 Nov;82(5):418-25
references: 6961812
references: Swed Dent J. 1989;13(1-2):23-31
references: 2734697
references: Angle Orthod. 1975 Jul;45(3):207-12
references: 1056717
references: Angle Orthod. 1975 Jul;45(3):153-8
references: 1056712
references: J Am Dent Assoc. 1979 Sep;99(3):460-4
references: 288779
references: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Jul;94(1):57-62
references: 3164583
references: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Oct;15(5):569-71
references: 3097182
references: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jun;66(6):1218-24
references: 18486787
references: J Clin Orthod. 1976 Apr;10(4):272-81
references: 1074882
references: Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2010 Oct 11;2:109-13
references: 23662088