title: Examining the impact of larval source management and insecticide-treated nets using a spatial agent-based model of Anopheles gambiae and a landscape generator tool.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Agent-based models (ABMs) have been used to estimate the effects of malaria-control interventions. Early studies have shown the efficacy of larval source management (LSM) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) as vector-control interventions, applied both in isolation and in combination. However, the robustness of results can be affected by several important modelling assumptions, including the type of boundary used for landscapes, and the number of replicated simulation runs reported in results. Selection of the ITN coverage definition may also affect the predictive findings. Hence, by replication, independent verification of prior findings of published models bears special importance.
  
  
  METHODS
  A spatially-explicit entomological ABM of Anopheles gambiae is used to simulate the resource-seeking process of mosquitoes in grid-based landscapes. To explore LSM and replicate results of an earlier LSM study, the original landscapes and scenarios are replicated by using a landscape generator tool, and 1,800 replicated simulations are run using absorbing and non-absorbing boundaries. To explore ITNs and evaluate the relative impacts of the different ITN coverage schemes, the settings of an earlier ITN study are replicated, the coverage schemes are defined and simulated, and 9,000 replicated simulations for three ITN parameters (coverage, repellence and mortality) are run. To evaluate LSM and ITNs in combination, landscapes with varying densities of houses and human populations are generated, and 12,000 simulations are run.
  
  
  RESULTS
  General agreement with an earlier LSM study is observed when an absorbing boundary is used. However, using a non-absorbing boundary produces significantly different results, which may be attributed to the unrealistic killing effect of an absorbing boundary. Abundance cannot be completely suppressed by removing aquatic habitats within 300 m of houses. Also, with density-dependent oviposition, removal of insufficient number of aquatic habitats may prove counter-productive. The importance of performing large number of simulation runs is also demonstrated. For ITNs, the choice of coverage scheme has important implications, and too high repellence yields detrimental effects. When LSM and ITNs are applied in combination, ITNs' mortality can play more important roles with higher densities of houses. With partial mortality, increasing ITN coverage is more effective than increasing LSM coverage, and integrating both interventions yields more synergy as the densities of houses increase.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Using a non-absorbing boundary and reporting average results from sufficiently large number of simulation runs are strongly recommended for malaria ABMs. Several guidelines (code and data sharing, relevant documentation, and standardized models) for future modellers are also recommended.
authors: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA. sarifin@nd.edu
authors: S M Niaz
authors: SM
authors: Arifin
authors: Gregory R
authors: GR
authors: Madey
authors: Frank H
authors: FH
authors: Collins
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000852:Anopheles / Q000187:drug effects*; D004772:Entomology / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D057148:Insecticide-Treated Bednets / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D007306:Insecticides / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D007814:Larva / Q000187:drug effects; D008954:Models, Biological; D015233:Models, Statistical; D009032:Mosquito Control / Q000379:methods*
chemical_list: D007306:Insecticides
references: Malar J. 2011 Nov 08;10:338
references: 22067606
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Aug;83(2):230-40
references: 20682861
references: Parasitology. 2000 Mar;120 ( Pt 3):319-27
references: 10759090
references: PLoS Med. 2007 Jul;4(7):e229
references: 17608562
references: Malar J. 2012 Jan 14;11:21
references: 22243516
references: Malar J. 2004 Jun 04;3:13
references: 15180900
references: Malar J. 2011 Oct 17;10:303
references: 21999664
references: Bull Entomol Res. 1969 Dec;59(3):441-56
references: 4393126
references: Malar J. 2004 Sep 06;3:32
references: 15350206
references: Malar J. 2013 Jan 25;12:36
references: 23351674
references: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Sep-Oct;95(5):469-76
references: 11706651
references: Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Sep;87(9):655-65
references: 19784445
references: Science. 2011 Dec 2;334(6060):1225
references: 22144612
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Aug;71(2 Suppl):87-93
references: 15331823
references: Science. 2011 Dec 2;334(6060):1232-3
references: 22144617
references: Malar J. 2005 May 13;4:23
references: 15892886
references: PLoS One. 2009 Sep 09;4(9):e6921
references: 19742312
references: Parasit Vectors. 2011 Jul 28;4:153
references: 21798055
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009 Sep;81(3):519-24
references: 19706925
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Apr;68(4 Suppl):168-73
references: 12749501
references: Bull Math Biol. 2012 May;74(5):1098-124
references: 22218880
references: Malar J. 2003 Sep 19;2:32
references: 14565850
references: Biostatistics. 2009 Jul;10(3):405-8
references: 19535325
references: Lancet. 2009 Jan 3;373(9657):11-3
references: 19019423
references: Science. 2011 Dec 2;334(6060):1226-7
references: 22144613
references: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009 Nov;103(11):1105-12
references: 19200566
references: Malar J. 2007 Jan 25;6:10
references: 17254339
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Jan;78(1):2-6
references: 18187774
references: J Med Entomol. 2007 Nov;44(6):923-9
references: 18047189
references: PLoS Med. 2011 Jan 25;8(1):e1000401
references: 21311587
references: Malar J. 2004 Jul 30;3:29
references: 15285781
references: Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(12):1401-11
references: 11196487
references: Malar J. 2011 Dec 13;10:353
references: 22166144
references: PLoS Med. 2010 Aug 10;7(8):
references: 20711482
references: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Sep;101(9):867-80
references: 17631372
references: Bull Entomol Res. 1970 Dec;60(2):225-35
references: 22894841
references: Malar J. 2012 Nov 19;11:378
references: 23164062
references: Malar J. 2009 Nov 16;8:256
references: 19917119
references: Trends Parasitol. 2009 Nov;25(11):511-6
references: 19744887