title: Rapid and effective oxidative pretreatment of woody biomass at mild reaction conditions and low oxidant loadings.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  One route for producing cellulosic biofuels is by the fermentation of lignocellulose-derived sugars generated from a pretreatment that can be effectively coupled with an enzymatic hydrolysis of the plant cell wall. While woody biomass exhibits a number of positive agronomic and logistical attributes, these feedstocks are significantly more recalcitrant to chemical pretreatments than herbaceous feedstocks, requiring higher chemical and energy inputs to achieve high sugar yields from enzymatic hydrolysis. We previously discovered that alkaline hydrogen peroxide (AHP) pretreatment catalyzed by copper(II) 2,2΄-bipyridine complexes significantly improves subsequent enzymatic glucose and xylose release from hybrid poplar heartwood and sapwood relative to uncatalyzed AHP pretreatment at modest reaction conditions (room temperature and atmospheric pressure). In the present work, the reaction conditions for this catalyzed AHP pretreatment were investigated in more detail with the aim of better characterizing the relationship between pretreatment conditions and subsequent enzymatic sugar release.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We found that for a wide range of pretreatment conditions, the catalyzed pretreatment resulted in significantly higher glucose and xylose enzymatic hydrolysis yields (as high as 80% for both glucose and xylose) relative to uncatalyzed pretreatment (up to 40% for glucose and 50% for xylose). We identified that the extent of improvement in glucan and xylan yield using this catalyzed pretreatment approach was a function of pretreatment conditions that included H2O2 loading on biomass, catalyst concentration, solids concentration, and pretreatment duration. Based on these results, several important improvements in pretreatment and hydrolysis conditions were identified that may have a positive economic impact for a process employing a catalyzed oxidative pretreatment. These improvements include identifying that: (1) substantially lower H2O2 loadings can be used that may result in up to a 50-65% decrease in H2O2 application (from 100 mg H2O2/g biomass to 35-50 mg/g) with only minor losses in glucose and xylose yield, (2) a 60% decrease in the catalyst concentration from 5.0 mM to 2.0 mM (corresponding to a catalyst loading of 25 μmol/g biomass to 10 μmol/g biomass) can be achieved without a subsequent loss in glucose yield, (3) an order of magnitude improvement in the time required for pretreatment (minutes versus hours or days) can be realized using the catalyzed pretreatment approach, and (4) enzyme dosage can be reduced to less than 30 mg protein/g glucan and potentially further with only minor losses in glucose and xylose yields. In addition, we established that the reaction rate is improved in both catalyzed and uncatalyzed AHP pretreatment by increased solids concentrations.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This work explored the relationship between reaction conditions impacting a catalyzed oxidative pretreatment of woody biomass and identified that significant decreases in the H2O2, catalyst, and enzyme loading on the biomass as well as decreases in the pretreatment time could be realized with only minor losses in the subsequent sugar released enzymatically. Together these changes would have positive implications for the economics of a process based on this pretreatment approach.
authors: Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA. erichegg@msu.edu.
authors: Zhenglun
authors: Z
authors: Li
authors: Charles H
authors: CH
authors: Chen
authors: Eric L
authors: EL
authors: Hegg
authors: David B
authors: DB
authors: Hodge
references: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2000 Spring;84-86:561-76
references: 10849819
references: Bioresour Technol. 2012 Sep;119:174-80
references: 22728198
references: Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012 Jun 06;5(1):38
references: 22672858
references: FEBS Lett. 1999 Mar 5;446(1):49-54
references: 10100613
references: Fungal Genet Biol. 1999 Jul-Aug;27(2-3):175-85
references: 10441443
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 1984 Jan;26(1):46-52
references: 18551585
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 1989 Jan 10;33(2):233-6
references: 18587907
references: J Appl Microbiol. 2002;92(1):32-40
references: 11849325
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013 Apr;110(4):1078-86
references: 23192283
references: Biotechnol Biofuels. 2011 Sep 07;4:29
references: 21899748
references: Biotechnol Prog. 2012 Jul;28(4):893-8
references: 22718309
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012 Jun;109(6):1430-42
references: 22359283
references: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994 Jan;13(1):25-58
references: 8117466
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008 Apr 15;99(6):1320-8
references: 18023037
references: Bioresour Technol. 2009 Sep;100(18):4203-13
references: 19386492
references: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2007 Apr;137-140(1-12):367-77
references: 18478402
references: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2006 Mar;30(2):215-42
references: 16472305
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Oct;50(4):807-11
references: 16346914
references: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2009 May;157(2):174-209
references: 18581264
references: ChemSusChem. 2010 Oct 25;3(10):1142-5
references: 20853392
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 1985 Oct;27(10):1418-26
references: 18553587
references: Ecol Appl. 2007 Apr;17(3):675-91
references: 17494388
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004 Apr 5;86(1):88-95
references: 15007845
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012 Apr;109(4):922-31
references: 22125119
references: Biotechnol Prog. 2010 Jul-Aug;26(4):1180-6
references: 20730772
references: Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2010 Jan;55(1):29-34
references: 20336501
references: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008 May;32(3):501-21
references: 18371173