title: Combined open and endovascular treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A combined open-endovascular technique has emerged as an alternative treatment option for thoracoabdominal pathologies. However, reported experiences from various medical centers have been contradictory and heterogeneous. The aim of this study is to assess the mortality rate and various complication rates associated with this approach.
  
  
  METHODS
  An electronic health database search was performed on all articles published up to March of 2012 describing combined open-endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal pathologies. Studies were included in the meta-analysis if they had ≥10 patients and reported the basic outcome criteria. End points of the meta-analysis were defined as primary technical success, endoprosthesis related complications, 30-day/in-hospital mortality, symptoms of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) and irreversible paraplegia, permanent renal function impairment, and other major complications.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Fourteen studies were deemed eligible for this meta-analysis with a total of 528 patients (68.0% male, mean age 70.5 years). The mean follow-up period was 34.2 months. The pooled estimate for primary technical success and visceral graft patency was 95.4% and 96.5% respectively. An endoleak developed in 106 (21.1%) patients in whom both stages had been completed. The pooled rate for symptomatic SCI was 7.0% and for irreversible paraplegia 4.4%. The pooled proportion for permanent renal failure was 7.0% and for mesenteric ischemia 4.5%. Prolonged respiratory support and cardiac complications were observed in a pooled rate of 7.8% and 4.6% respectively. The meta-analysis for 30-day/in-hospital mortality revealed a pooled rate of 14.3%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although the hybrid technique for thoracoabdominal aortic pathology provides a less invasive approach, the technique is still associated with a considerable morbidity and mortality rates. High risk patients unfit to withstand open repair, are equally likely to suffer significant complications with the hybrid procedure. The choice of the optimal treatment strategy for thoracoabdominal pathologies should be carefully made on a patient to patient basis, assessing the clinical fitness and the anatomical suitability of each patient. The hybrid approach should be reserved for high volume centers with accumulated experience and high standards of perioperative management.
authors: Department of Vascular Surgery, Athens University Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece; ; The Systematic Review Unit, The Collaborative Research (CORE) Group, Sydney, Australia.
authors: Konstantinos G
authors: KG
authors: Moulakakis
authors: Spyridon N
authors: SN
authors: Mylonas
authors: Constantinos N
authors: CN
authors: Antonopoulos
authors: Christos D
authors: CD
authors: Liapis
keywords: Aneurysm; thoracoabdominal aneurysm; visceral debranching
references: Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
references: 3802833
references: J Vasc Surg. 2009 Dec;50(6):1280-4
references: 19958984
references: J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2010 Dec;51(6):821-32
references: 21124278
references: Vascular. 2008 May-Jun;16(3):140-6
references: 18674462
references: J Endovasc Ther. 2006 Aug;13(4):481-9
references: 16928162
references: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Feb;39(2):171-8
references: 19945316
references: J Vasc Surg. 2009 May;49(5):1125-34
references: 19394542
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Feb;135(2):324-30
references: 18242262
references: Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Jan;25(1):64-70
references: 20889300
references: Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Oct;7(6):607-13
references: 10519668
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Sep;205(3):420-31
references: 17765158
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Feb;83(2):S851-5; discussion S890-2
references: 17257940
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Feb;83(2):S862-4; discussion S890-2
references: 17257942
references: J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):217-22; discussion 223
references: 16476589
references: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009 Nov;38(5):578-85
references: 19666233
references: J Vasc Surg. 2009 Aug;50(2):341-348.e1
references: 19372025
references: Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1088-101
references: 7786990
references: J Vasc Surg. 1999 Sep;30(3):555-60
references: 10477650
references: J Vasc Surg. 2005 Feb;41(2):191-8
references: 15767997
references: Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2012 Mar;24(1):5-13
references: 22316552
references: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Sep;38(3):299-304
references: 20359906
references: J Vasc Surg. 2011 Dec;54(6):1623-8
references: 21802242
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Dec;140(6 Suppl):S171-8
references: 21092788
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Dec;138(6):1331-8
references: 19660382
references: JAMA. 2000 Apr 19;283(15):2008-12
references: 10789670
references: J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jul;54(1):30-40; discussion 40-1
references: 21334163
references: J Vasc Surg. 2002 Feb;35(2):236-45
references: 11854720
references: Circulation. 2011 Dec 13;124(24):2670-80
references: 22086877