title: Looking time predicts choice but not aesthetic value.
abstract: Although visual fixations are commonly used to index stimulus-driven or internally-determined preference, recent evidence suggests that visual fixations can also be a source of decisional bias that moves selection toward the fixated object. These contrasting results raise the question of whether visual fixations always index comparative processes during choice-based tasks, or whether they might better reflect internal preferences when the decision does not carry any economic or corporeal consequences. In two experiments, participants chose which of two objects were more aesthetically pleasing (Exp.1) or appeared more organic (Exp.2), and provided independent aesthetic ratings of the stimuli. Our results demonstrated that fixation parameters were a better index of choice in both decisional domains than of aesthetic preference. The data support models in which visual fixations are specifically related to the evolution of decision processes even when the decision has no tangible consequences.
authors: Department of Psychology, Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
authors: Eve A
authors: EA
authors: Isham
authors: Joy J
authors: JJ
authors: Geng
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003657:Decision Making; D004954:Esthetics; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult
references: Behav Brain Res. 1983 Oct;10(1):25-38
references: 6685522
references: Psychol Sci. 2000 Mar;11(2):132-8
references: 11273420
references: Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Sep 12;5:98
references: 21941476
references: Iperception. 2012;3(7):426-39
references: 23145294
references: Nat Neurosci. 2010 Oct;13(10):1292-8
references: 20835253
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jul;9(7):545-56
references: 18545266
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13852-7
references: 21808009
references: Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):17-21
references: 19152537
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 21;107(51):22014-9
references: 21135218
references: Vision Res. 2000;40(10-12):1489-506
references: 10788654
references: Perception. 1994;23(7):823-31
references: 7845772
references: Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1123-1129
references: 22933456
references: J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 23;28(17):4435-45
references: 18434522
references: Nat Neurosci. 2003 Dec;6(12):1317-22
references: 14608360
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 May;6(5):363-75
references: 15832198
references: Brain. 1983 Sep;106 (Pt 3):623-42
references: 6640273
references: Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):550-92
references: 11488378