title: Grouping and crowding affect target appearance over different spatial scales.
abstract: Crowding is the impairment of peripheral target perception by nearby flankers. A number of recent studies have shown that crowding shares many features with grouping. Here, we investigate whether effects of crowding and grouping on target perception are related by asking whether they operate over the same spatial scale. A target letter T had two sets of flanking Ts of varying orientations. The first set was presented close to the target, yielding strong crowding. The second set was either close enough to cause crowding on their own or too far to cause crowding on their own. The Ts of the second set had the same orientation that either matched the target's orientation (Grouped condition) or not (Ungrouped condition). In Experiment 1, the Grouped flankers reduced crowding independently of their distance from the target, suggesting that grouping operated over larger distances than crowding. In Experiments 2 and 3 we found that grouping did not affect sensitivity but produced a strong bias to report that the grouped orientation was present at the target location whether or not it was. Finally, we investigated whether this bias was a response or perceptual bias, rejecting the former in favor of a perceptual grouping explanation. We suggest that the effect of grouping is to assimilate the target to the identity of surrounding flankers when they are all the same, and that this shape assimilation effect differs in its spatial scale from the integration effect of crowding.
authors: Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France. bilge.sayim@ppw.kuleuven.be
authors: Bilge
authors: B
authors: Sayim
authors: Patrick
authors: P
authors: Cavanagh
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009949:Orientation; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013028:Space Perception; D014796:Visual Perception
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Apr;15(4):160-8
references: 21420894
references: Nature. 1970 Apr 11;226(5241):177-8
references: 5437004
references: J Vis. 2007 Jan 29;7(2):1.1-7
references: 18217816
references: Vision Res. 1976 Jan;16(1):71-8
references: 1258390
references: Percept Psychophys. 1991 Jun;49(6):495-508
references: 1857623
references: Perception. 1999;28(11):1413-6
references: 10755149
references: Vision Res. 1992 Jul;32(7):1349-57
references: 1455707
references: J Vis. 2004 Dec 30;4(12):1136-69
references: 15669917
references: J Vis. 2009 Feb 06;9(2):5.1-11
references: 19271915
references: J Vis. 2014 Jul 29;14(8):23
references: 25074901
references: Vision Res. 2008 Feb;48(5):635-54
references: 18226828
references: J Vis. 2010 Mar 23;10(3):1.1-14
references: 20377278
references: Spat Vis. 1994;8(2):255-79
references: 7993878
references: J Vis. 2011 Jul 05;11(8):
references: 21730225
references: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Oct;11(10):1129-35
references: 18828191
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1997 Oct;97(1):37-70
references: 9448513
references: J Vis. 2008 Jun 30;8(8):12.1-9
references: 18831635
references: Cogn Psychol. 2001 Nov;43(3):171-216
references: 11689021
references: Vis Neurosci. 2004 May-Jun;21(3):383-8
references: 15518218
references: Percept Psychophys. 1984 Sep;36(3):285-95
references: 6522221
references: Vision Res. 1992 Apr;32(4):771-7
references: 1413560
references: J Vis. 2002;2(2):167-77
references: 12678590
references: Psychol Sci. 2010 May;21(5):641-4
references: 20483840
references: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1997 Sep;14(9):2057-68
references: 9291601
references: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Feb;40(2):504-12
references: 9950611
references: J Vis. 2005 Dec 29;5(11):1024-37
references: 16441200
references: Vision Res. 2005 Mar;45(5):617-33
references: 15621179
references: J Vis. 2010 Aug 18;10(10):17
references: 20884482
references: Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1293-313
references: 11800458
references: Nat Neurosci. 2001 Jul;4(7):739-44
references: 11426231
references: Vision Res. 2001 Jun;41(14):1833-50
references: 11369047
references: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references: 9176952
references: J Vis. 2007 Feb 14;7(2):7.1-23
references: 18217822
references: Nature. 1996 Sep 26;383(6598):334-7
references: 8848045
references: J Vis. 2006 Feb 21;6(2):163-9
references: 16522143
references: Perception. 2005;34(7):823-33
references: 16124268
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1980 Aug;6(3):404-412
references: 6447756
references: J Vis. 2007 Feb 05;7(2):4.1-12
references: 18217819
references: Curr Biol. 2010 Mar 23;20(6):496-501
references: 20206527
references: J Vis. 2011 Jan 05;11(1):6
references: 21209275
references: J Opt Soc Am. 1976 Apr;66(4):332-8
references: 1262981
references: J Vis. 2012 Sep 26;12(10):13
references: 23019118
references: Psychol Res. 2007 Nov;71(6):641-5
references: 16718511
references: J Vis. 2007 Oct 29;7(13):9.1-15
references: 17997637
references: Vision Res. 1993 Jan;33(2):173-93
references: 8447091