title: Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting.
abstract: The effectiveness of the left internal mammary artery graft to the anterior descending coronary artery as a surgical strategy has been shown to improve the survival rate and decrease the risk of adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. These clinical benefits appear to be related to the superior short and long-term patency rates of the internal thoracic artery graft. Although the advantages of using of both internal thoracic arteries (ITA) for bypass grafting have taken longer to prove, recent results from multiple data sets now support these findings. The major advantage of bilateral ITA grafting appears to be improved survival rate, while the disadvantages of complex ITA grafting include the increased complexity of operation, and an increased risk of wound complications. While these short-term disadvantages have been mitigated in contemporary surgical practice, they have not eliminated. Bilateral ITA grafting should be considered the procedure of choice for patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery that have a predicted survival rate of longer than ten years.
authors: Cleveland Clinic, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, USA.
authors: Bruce W
authors: BW
authors: Lytle
keywords: Coronary bypass surgery; bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Feb;79(2):544-51; discussion 544-51
references: 15680832
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 1983 Nov;36(5):540-7
references: 6639193
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Dec;78(6):2005-12; discussion 2012-4
references: 15561021
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Feb;75(2):501-4
references: 12607661
references: Eur Heart J. 2010 Oct;31(20):2470-81
references: 20805116
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Jan;135(1):32-7
references: 18179915
references: Circulation. 1998 Nov 10;98(19 Suppl):II1-6
references: 9852872
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 3;60(1):28-35
references: 22742399
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Nov;76(5):1490-6; discussion 1497
references: 14602274
references: Circulation. 2011 Sep 20;124(12):1321-9
references: 21900082
references: Circulation. 2001 Oct 30;104(18):2164-70
references: 11684625
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jul;90(1):101-8
references: 20609757
references: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000 Apr;17(4):407-14
references: 10773563
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Aug;72(2):450-5
references: 11515881
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Apr;143(4):844-853.e4
references: 22245240
references: N Engl J Med. 1986 Jan 2;314(1):1-6
references: 3484393
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985 Feb;89(2):248-58
references: 2857209
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Nov;94(5):1485-91
references: 22771486
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Apr;121(4):668-74
references: 11279406
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 May;117(5):855-72
references: 10220677