title: A risk prediction model for determining appropriateness of CEA in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The benefit of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) over medical therapy in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is predicated upon a life expectancy of at least 5 years after the procedure. The goal of this study was to create a scoring system for prediction of 5-year survival after CEA that can be used to triage patients with ACAS.
  
  
  METHODS
  All patients who underwent CEA for severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis from 1989 to 2005 were identified. Long-term survival was determined by a review of hospital records and the social security death index. Because all patients had at least 5-year follow-up, a logistic regression of predictors of survival at 5 years was performed and the odds ratios associated with particular significant comorbidities were used to create a scoring system to predict survival. The scoring system was then validated within the cohort using the Hosmer-Lemeshow Test and a derivation/validation receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were 2004 CEA performed in 1791 patients. The average follow-up was 130 ± 49 months. The clinical profile of the cohort data included 84% hypertension, 56% coronary artery disease (CAD), 24% diabetes, and 71% on statins. The 30-day stroke rate was 1.1% and the death rate was 0.7%. The actual 5-year survival was 73%. Logistic regression yielded the following predictors of mortality: age (by decade) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.8, P < 0.0001), CAD (OR = 1.5, P = 0.0007), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 2.5; P < 0.0001), diabetes (OR = 1.7, P < 0.0001), neck radiation (OR = 2.6, P = 0.005), no statin (OR = 2.1, P < 0.0001), and creatinine more than 1.5 (OR = 2.6, P < 0.0001). These variables were then assigned a hierarchal point scoring system in accordance with the OR value. The 5-year survival based on the scoring system was as follows: 0 to 5 points = 92.5%, 6 to 8 points = 83.6%, 9 to 11 points = 63.7%, 12 to 14 points = 46.5%, and more than 15 points = 33.8%. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test validated the scoring system (P = 0.26) and there was no difference in the ROC curves (C statistic = 0.74 vs 0.73).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This validated scoring system can be a useful tool for determining which patients are likely to benefit most from CEA based on the probability of long-term survival. Given that the 5-year survival of patients in the medical arm of the asymptomatic CEA trials was 60% to 70%, it is reasonable to conclude that patients who score 0 to 8 points are excellent candidates for CEA whereas most patients with ≥12 points should be managed with medical therapy alone.
authors: From the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
authors: Mark F
authors: MF
authors: Conrad
authors: Jeanwan
authors: J
authors: Kang
authors: Shankha
authors: S
authors: Mukhopadhyay
authors: Virendra I
authors: VI
authors: Patel
authors: Glenn M
authors: GM
authors: LaMuraglia
authors: Richard P
authors: RP
authors: Cambria
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D058070:Asymptomatic Diseases; D016893:Carotid Stenosis / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D016894:Endarterectomy, Carotid; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016017:Odds Ratio; D012372:ROC Curve; D018570:Risk Assessment; D015996:Survival Rate; D016896:Treatment Outcome