title: Comparison of two methods, UHPLC-UV and UHPLC-MS/MS, for the quantification of polyphenols in cider apple juices.
abstract: The aim of this study was to develop faster and more efficient phenotyping methods for in-depth genetic studies on cider apple progeny. The UHPLC chromatographic system was chosen to separate polyphenolic compounds, and quantifications were then simultaneously performed with a UV-PDA detector and an ESI-triple quadrupole mass analyzer (SRM mode). Both quantification methods were validated for 15 major compounds using two apple juice samples, on the basis of linearity, limits of detection and quantification, recovery and precision tests. The comparison between UV and SRM quantifications in 120 different samples of a cider apple progeny showed an excellent correlation for major compounds quantified with both methods. However, an overestimation was revealed for five compounds with the UV detector and the mass analyzer. Co-elution and matrix effects are discussed to explain this phenomenon. SRM methods should therefore be considered with restrictions in some cases for quantification measurements when several phenolic compounds are simultaneously quantified in complex matrices such as apple juices. For both methods, analyses were carried out over short periods of time while maintaining a high quality for the simultaneous quantification of phenolic compounds in apple juice. Each method is relevant for more in-depth genetic studies of the polyphenol content of apple juice.
authors: Laboratoire SONAS, Université d'Angers, SFR QUASAV, Angers 49045, France.
authors: Cindy F
authors: CF
authors: Verdu
authors: Julia
authors: J
authors: Gatto
authors: Ingrid
authors: I
authors: Freuze
authors: Pascal
authors: P
authors: Richomme
authors: François
authors: F
authors: Laurens
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Guilet
mesh_terms: D001628:Beverages; D002138:Calibration; D002851:Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid / Q000592:standards; D005638:Fruit / Q000737:chemistry*; D027845:Malus / Q000737:chemistry*; D010936:Plant Extracts / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000302:isolation & purification; D059808:Polyphenols / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000302:isolation & purification; D012015:Reference Standards; D021241:Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization / Q000592:standards; D013056:Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet / Q000592:standards; D053719:Tandem Mass Spectrometry / Q000592:standards
chemical_list: D010936:Plant Extracts; D059808:Polyphenols
references: Mol Nutr Food Res. 2005 Aug;49(8):797-806
references: 15991215
references: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007 Nov;389(6):1815-31
references: 17713761
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Mar;85(3):895-909
references: 17344514
references: Talanta. 2010 Mar 15;80(5):1970-9
references: 20152441
references: Carcinogenesis. 2005 Jul;26(7):1291-5
references: 15790589
references: Clin Biochem. 2011 Feb;44(2-3):231-6
references: 20970416
references: Anal Chem. 2008 Dec 1;80(23):9343-8
references: 19551950
references: J Agric Food Chem. 2004 Dec 29;52(26):8006-16
references: 15612789
references: J Agric Food Chem. 2003 Oct 22;51(22):6516-20
references: 14558772
references: Free Radic Biol Med. 2006 Dec 15;41(12):1727-46
references: 17157175
references: Nutr J. 2004 May 12;3:5
references: 15140261
references: Nat Prod Rep. 2009 Aug;26(8):1001-43
references: 19636448
references: Stroke. 2013 May;44(5):1360-8
references: 23539529
references: J Agric Food Chem. 2003 Oct 8;51(21):6347-53
references: 14518966
references: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jan 19;92(2):154-60
references: 10639518