title: Differential expression analysis with global network adjustment.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Large-scale chromosomal deletions or other non-specific perturbations of the transcriptome can alter the expression of hundreds or thousands of genes, and it is of biological interest to understand which genes are most profoundly affected. We present a method for predicting a gene's expression as a function of other genes thereby accounting for the effect of transcriptional regulation that confounds the identification of genes differentially expressed relative to a regulatory network. The challenge in constructing such models is that the number of possible regulator transcripts within a global network is on the order of thousands, and the number of biological samples is typically on the order of 10. Nevertheless, there are large gene expression databases that can be used to construct networks that could be helpful in modeling transcriptional regulation in smaller experiments.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We demonstrate a type of penalized regression model that can be estimated from large gene expression databases, and then applied to smaller experiments. The ridge parameter is selected by minimizing the cross-validation error of the predictions in the independent out-sample. This tends to increase the model stability and leads to a much greater degree of parameter shrinkage, but the resulting biased estimation is mitigated by a second round of regression. Nevertheless, the proposed computationally efficient "over-shrinkage" method outperforms previously used LASSO-based techniques. In two independent datasets, we find that the median proportion of explained variability in expression is approximately 25%, and this results in a substantial increase in the signal-to-noise ratio allowing more powerful inferences on differential gene expression leading to biologically intuitive findings. We also show that a large proportion of gene dependencies are conditional on the biological state, which would be impossible with standard differential expression methods.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  By adjusting for the effects of the global network on individual genes, both the sensitivity and reliability of differential expression measures are greatly improved.
authors: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA. gelfondjal@uthscsa.edu.
authors: Jonathan A
authors: JA
authors: Gelfond
authors: Joseph G
authors: JG
authors: Ibrahim
authors: Mayetri
authors: M
authors: Gupta
authors: Ming-Hui
authors: MH
authors: Chen
authors: Jannine D
authors: JD
authors: Cody
mesh_terms: D019295:Computational Biology / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D005786:Gene Expression Regulation / Q000235:genetics*; D053263:Gene Regulatory Networks / Q000235:genetics*; D008957:Models, Genetic; D012044:Regression Analysis; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D059629:Signal-To-Noise Ratio
references: Cell. 2007 Jun 1;129(5):1011-23
references: 17462724
references: Bioinformatics. 2008 Nov 1;24(21):2482-90
references: 18779235
references: Biostatistics. 2008 Jul;9(3):432-41
references: 18079126
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 20;101(16):6062-7
references: 15075390
references: Bioinformatics. 2003 Jul 1;19(10):1236-42
references: 12835267
references: Bioinformatics. 2004 Dec 12;20(18):3705-6
references: 15297296
references: PLoS One. 2010 Feb 04;5(2):e8944
references: 20140212
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan;39(Database issue):D1005-10
references: 21097893
references: J Med Genet. 2005 Sep;42(9):699-705
references: 16141005
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D760-5
references: 17099226
references: Cancer Res. 2010 Mar 1;70(5):1753-8
references: 20160033
references: Biostatistics. 2004 Apr;5(2):155-76
references: 15054023
references: Am J Hum Genet. 2003 May;72(5):1293-9
references: 12690580
references: PLoS Genet. 2008 Nov;4(11):e1000287
references: 19043577
references: PLoS One. 2010 Feb 16;5(2):e9134
references: 20169069
references: PLoS One. 2010 Feb 23;5(2):e9202
references: 20186320
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 2;105(48):18718-23
references: 19033188