title: The influence of spatial variation in chromatin density determined by X-ray tomograms on the time to find DNA binding sites.
abstract: In this work, we examine how volume exclusion caused by regions of high chromatin density might influence the time required for proteins to find specific DNA binding sites. The spatial variation of chromatin density within mouse olfactory sensory neurons is determined from soft X-ray tomography reconstructions of five nuclei. We show that there is a division of the nuclear space into regions of low-density euchromatin and high-density heterochromatin. Volume exclusion experienced by a diffusing protein caused by this varying density of chromatin is modeled by a repulsive potential. The value of the potential at a given point in space is chosen to be proportional to the density of chromatin at that location. The constant of proportionality, called the volume exclusivity, provides a model parameter that determines the strength of volume exclusion. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the mean time for a protein to locate a binding site localized in euchromatin is minimized for a finite, nonzero volume exclusivity. For binding sites in heterochromatin, the mean time is minimized when the volume exclusivity is zero (the protein experiences no volume exclusion). An analytical theory is developed to explain these results. The theory suggests that for binding sites in euchromatin there is an optimal level of volume exclusivity that balances a reduction in the volume searched in finding the binding site, with the height of effective potential barriers the protein must cross during the search process.
authors: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA, isaacson@math.bu.edu.
authors: Samuel A
authors: SA
authors: Isaacson
authors: Carolyn A
authors: CA
authors: Larabell
authors: Mark A
authors: MA
authors: Le Gros
authors: David M
authors: DM
authors: McQueen
authors: Charles S
authors: CS
authors: Peskin
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001665:Binding Sites; D002467:Cell Nucleus / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000378:metabolism; D002843:Chromatin / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D004247:DNA / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D055641:Mathematical Concepts; D051379:Mice; D008954:Models, Biological; D014056:Tomography, X-Ray / Q000706:statistics & numerical data
chemical_list: D002843:Chromatin; D004247:DNA
references: Science. 2012 Jun 22;336(6088):1595-8
references: 22723426
references: Trends Cell Biol. 2009 Nov;19(11):587-95
references: 19818625
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1;108(9):3815-20
references: 21300894
references: Cell Rep. 2016 Nov 15;17(8):2125-2136
references: 27851973
references: Biochem Soc Trans. 2009 Apr;37(Pt 2):343-8
references: 19290859
references: Biochemistry. 1981 Nov 24;20(24):6929-48
references: 7317363
references: Science. 2008 Jun 6;320(5881):1332-6
references: 18535242
references: Cell. 2012 Nov 9;151(4):724-737
references: 23141535
references: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Jun;1819(6):482-93
references: 22342464
references: J Phys Chem B. 2013 Oct 24;117(42):12695-701
references: 23316873
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 22;102(47):17008-13
references: 16284251
references: Science. 2007 May 25;316(5828):1191-4
references: 17525339
references: Biophys J. 2004 Dec;87(6):4021-35
references: 15465864
references: EMBO J. 2009 Dec 16;28(24):3785-98
references: 19927119
references: Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013 Feb;20(2):141-2
references: 23381630