title: Residual rates of mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a fatality or a new challenge?
abstract: Phase III clinical trials on severe sepsis and septic shock published during the past decade have failed to reveal the superiority of any therapeutic intervention on mortality compared with evolving standards of care, with the exception of the Early-Goal Directed Therapy reported in 2001. This viewpoint paper presents an analysis of these studies in order to understand what lessons can be learned and proposes perspectives for future study designs. A total of 102 studies were selected among clinical trials published in the field of severe sepsis and septic shock from 2001 to 2013, based on the assessment of a therapeutic intervention and mortality as an outcome. Studies were further selected according to randomized, controlled trial (RCT) quality criteria and analysed according to reported data. Most (n = 61) were excluded because they did not comply with RCT quality criteria or did not report inclusion criteria or patient severity (n = 22). The 19 remaining studies were categorized into three groups depending on whether the intervention assessed led to better, worse, or equivalent outcomes. It appears that the mortality rate in the control arm, ranging from 17% to 61%, impacted the results, with a benefit reported in the studies with the highest rates. Both heterogeneous studied populations and uncontrolled diversity of care among participating centres probably contributed to discrepancies between studies assessing the same intervention. The new challenge to enhance the probability of decreasing mortality rates should include a more appropriate definition of sepsis based on more specific criteria involving biomarker use and accurate patient phenotypes.
authors: Réanimation médicale polyvalente, Cochin University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France. jean-paul.mira@cch.aphp.fr.
authors: Pierre
authors: P
authors: Asfar
authors: Yann-Erick
authors: YE
authors: Claessens
authors: Jacques
authors: J
authors: Duranteau
authors: Eric
authors: E
authors: Kipnis
authors: Marc
authors: M
authors: Leone
authors: Bruno
authors: B
authors: Lévy
authors: Jean-Paul
authors: JP
authors: Mira
references: Lancet. 2012 Jul 7;380(9836):37-43
references: 22579043
references: N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 10;358(2):111-24
references: 18184957
references: Crit Care Med. 2004 Aug;32(8):1662-8
references: 15286541
references: N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 10;358(2):125-39
references: 18184958
references: JAMA. 2010 Jan 27;303(4):341-8
references: 20103758
references: JAMA. 2013 Mar 20;309(11):1154-62
references: 23512062
references: Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan;32(1):21-30
references: 14707556
references: N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2055-64
references: 22616830
references: JAMA. 2001 Oct 17;286(15):1869-78
references: 11597289
references: Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1319-25
references: 16540956
references: Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):448-54
references: 18216600
references: N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 28;358(9):877-87
references: 18305265
references: JAMA. 2009 Jun 17;301(23):2445-52
references: 19531784
references: Intensive Care Med. 2004 Dec;30(12):2222-9
references: 15452693
references: N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1368-77
references: 11794169
references: N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 29;353(13):1332-41
references: 16192478
references: Lancet. 2004 Aug 7-13;364(9433):545-8
references: 15302200
references: N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 8;344(10):699-709
references: 11236773
references: Lancet. 2013 Jun 29;381(9885):2250
references: 23809556
references: Shock. 2010 Apr;33(4):375-80
references: 19851126
references: Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;12(12):919-24
references: 23103175
references: Crit Care Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):589-97
references: 16505643
references: Lancet. 2007 Aug 25;370(9588):676-84
references: 17720019
references: JAMA. 2002 Aug 21;288(7):862-71
references: 12186604
references: BMC Emerg Med. 2005 Oct 14;5:7
references: 16225672
references: Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):683-4
references: 20083922
references: Crit Care Med. 2009 Apr;37(4):1329-35
references: 19242329
references: N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 12;367(2):124-34
references: 22738085