title: Assessment of diet and physical activity of brazilian schoolchildren: usability testing of a web-based questionnaire.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Information and communication technology (ICT) has been used with increasing frequency for the assessment of diet and physical activity in health surveys. A number of Web-based questionnaires have been developed for children and adolescents. However, their usability characteristics have scarcely been reported, despite their potential importance for improving the feasibility and validity of ICT-based methods.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The objective of this study was to describe the usability evaluation of the Consumo Alimentar e Atividade Física de Escolares (CAAFE) questionnaire (Food Consumption and Physical Activity Questionnaire for schoolchildren), a new Web-based survey tool for the self-assessment of diet and physical activity by schoolchildren.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 114 schoolchildren aged 6 to 12 years took part in questionnaire usability testing carried out in computer classrooms at five elementary schools in the city of Florianopolis, Brazil. Schoolchildren used a personal computer (PC) equipped with software for recording what is on the computer screen and the children's speech during usability testing. Quantitative and qualitative analyses took into account objective usability metrics such as error counts and time to complete a task. Data on the main difficulties in accomplishing the task and the level of satisfaction expressed by the children were assessed by the observers using a standardized form and interviews with the children. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to summarize both the quantitative and the qualitative aspects of the data obtained.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean time for completing the questionnaire was 13.7 minutes (SD 3.68). Compared to the children in 2nd or 3rd grades, those in 4th or 5th grades spent less time completing the questionnaire (median 12.4 vs 13.3 minutes, P=.022), asked for help less frequently (median 0 vs 1.0 count, P=.005), had a lower error count (median 2.0 vs 8.0 count, P<.001), and obtained a higher overall performance score (median 73.0 vs 68.0, P=.005). Children with a PC at home spent less time completing the questionnaire (median 12.3 vs 14.9 minutes, P<.001), had a lower overall error count (median 2.0 vs 9.0 count, P=.03), and had a higher performance score (median 72.0 vs 64.0, P=.005) compared to the children without a PC at home. The most common difficulty in completing the questionnaire was in using the scroll bar. The majority of children reported a positive evaluation (liked a lot or liked) for the four design elements, which were evaluated.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results of the present study provided feedback to improve the final version of the CAAFE questionnaire. Quantitative data showed minor errors and system failures, while qualitative data indicated that, overall, the children enjoyed the CAAFE questionnaire. Grade levels and PC use must be taken into account in Web-based tools designed for children.
authors: Graduate Course in Physical Education, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil. filipefcosta@outlook.com.
authors: Filipe Ferreira
authors: FF
authors: da Costa
authors: Camilie Pacheco
authors: CP
authors: Schmoelz
authors: Vanessa Fernandes
authors: VF
authors: Davies
authors: Patrícia Faria
authors: PF
authors: Di Pietro
authors: Emil
authors: E
authors: Kupek
authors: Maria Alice Altenburg
authors: MA
authors: de Assis
keywords: children; diet; physical activity; questionnaire; usability testing
references: J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Feb;107(2):321-4
references: 17258971
references: J Med Internet Res. 2002 Apr-Nov;4(2):E13
references: 12554560
references: Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Aug;41(4):1187-203
references: 22933652
references: J Hum Nutr Diet. 2012 Feb;25(1):59-68
references: 21615806
references: J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Sep;14(5):390-6
references: 21454126
references: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004 Mar 29;1(1):8
references: 15169559
references: Int J Sports Med. 2006 Feb;27(2):131-6
references: 16475059
references: Appetite. 2008 Jul;51(1):187-93
references: 18375017
references: Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec 1;172(11):1292-8
references: 20880962
references: Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000 Jun;71(2 Suppl):S59-73
references: 10925827
references: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Sep;59(9):1015-21
references: 15970941
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000 Jul-Aug;7(4):426-9
references: 10887170
references: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006 May 26;3:10
references: 16725055
references: Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Nov;32 Suppl 5:S26-34
references: 19011650
references: Int J Pediatr Obes. 2006;1(1):11-25
references: 17902211
references: J Med Internet Res. 2012 Feb 15;14(1):e29
references: 22356755
references: Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2009 Nov;21(4):506-19
references: 20128368
references: Public Health Nutr. 2009 Nov;12(11):2009-17
references: 19545471
references: J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014 Jan;27 Suppl 1:66-71
references: 22616645
references: Cad Saude Publica. 2010 Jul;26(7):1355-65
references: 20694361
references: J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 Feb;103(2):186-94
references: 12589324
references: J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014 Jan;27 Suppl 1:43-53
references: 22594587
references: Am J Clin Nutr. 1994 Jan;59(1 Suppl):212S-217S
references: 8279427
references: Rev Saude Publica. 2012 Dec;46 Suppl 1:117-25
references: 23223787
references: Cad Saude Publica. 2009 Aug;25(8):1816-26
references: 19649423
references: Res Q Exerc Sport. 2004 Dec;75(4):370-80
references: 15673036
references: J Med Internet Res. 2012 Apr 13;14(2):e58
references: 22504018
references: Br J Nutr. 2004 Oct;92 Suppl 2:S213-22
references: 15522159
references: J Sci Med Sport. 2013 Jul;16(4):327-31
references: 22858164
references: Br J Nutr. 2008 Jun;99(6):1266-74
references: 18042307