title: Guidelines and incentives for conservation development in local land-use regulations.
abstract: Effective conservation of biological diversity on private lands will require changes in land-use policy and development practice. Conservation development (CD) is an alternative form of residential development in which homes are built on smaller lots and clustered together and the remainder of the property is permanently protected for conservation purposes. We assessed the degree to which CD is permitted and encouraged by local land-use regulations in 414 counties in the western United States. Thirty-two percent of local planning jurisdictions have adopted CD ordinances, mostly within the past 10 years. CD ordinances were adopted in counties with human population densities that were 3.0 times greater and in counties with 2.5 times more land use at urban, suburban, and exurban densities than counties without CD ordinances. Despite strong economic incentives for CD (e.g., density bonuses, which allow for a mean of 66% more homes to be built per subdivision area), several issues may limit the effectiveness of CD for biological diversity conservation. Although most CD ordinances required a greater proportion of the site area be protected than in a typical residential development, just 13% (n = 17) of the ordinances required an ecological site analysis to identify and map features that should be protected. Few CD ordinances provided guidelines regarding the design and configuration of the protected lands, including specifying a minimum size for protected land parcels or encouraging contiguity with other protected lands within or near to the site. Eight percent (n =11) of CD ordinances encouraged consultation with a biological expert or compliance with a conservation plan. We recommend that conservation scientists help to improve the effectiveness of CD by educating planning staff and government officials regarding biological diversity conservation, volunteering for their local planning boards, or consulting on development reviews.
authors.affiliation: North America Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, 301 N. Willson Avenue, Bozeman, MT, 59715, U.S.A.; Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1474, U.S.A.. sreed@wcs.org.
authors.forename: Sarah E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Reed
authors.forename: Jodi A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Hilty
authors.forename: David M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Theobald
mesh_terms: D044822:Biodiversity; D003132:Commerce; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D058735:Environmental Policy; D006798:Housing; D006801:Humans; D009042:Motivation
keywords: desarrollo residencial; diseño sustentable; extensión; land-use planning; planificación del uso de suelos; private lands; protected area; residential development; sprawl; sustainable design; tierras privadas; área protegida