title: GM crop co-existence: a question of choice, not prejudice.
abstract: The rapid uptake of biotech crops around the world demonstrates not only strong producer and consumer demand for the technology and its products, but also that where regulatory regimes function effectively and markets are allowed to operate as normal, co-existence between genetically modified (GM) and non-GM supply chains is readily achievable. However, the polarized debate over GMOs within the European Union over the past 15 years has resulted in a highly politicized and progressively impractical approach to the issue of GM crop co-existence, which in itself has become a further barrier to the technology's development. This article argues that co-existence should not be treated as a pro- or anti-GM issue, and that the aim of co-existence measures should be to permit consumer choice and freedom to operate whatever the production method involved. It suggests that supply chain-based solutions to co-existence, rather than Government prescription, offer the most pragmatic and flexible response to the commercial realities of servicing differentiated market demands.
authors.affiliation: Front Foot Communications Ltd; Bourne, UK.
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Pearsall
mesh_terms: D000383:Agriculture; D002755:Choice Behavior; D018556:Crops, Agricultural / Q000235:genetics* / Q000254:growth & development*; D003663:Decision Trees; D005062:European Union; D030821:Plants, Genetically Modified / Q000254:growth & development*; D011287:Prejudice; D012106:Research; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D003313:Zea mays / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development
keywords: GM crops; public policy