title: On the processing of canonical word order during eye fixations in reading: Do readers process transposed word previews?
abstract: Whether readers always identify words in the order they are printed is subject to considerable debate. In the present study, we used the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) to manipulate the preview for a two-word target region (e.g.white wallsinMy neighbor painted the white walls black). Readers received an identical (white walls), transposed (walls white), or unrelated preview (vodka clubs). We found that there was a clear cost of having a transposed preview compared to an identical preview, indicating that readers cannot or do not identify words out of order. However, on some measures, the transposed preview condition did lead to faster processing than the unrelated preview condition, suggesting that readers may be able to obtain some useful information from a transposed preview. Implications of the results for models of eye movement control in reading are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego.
authors.forename: Keith
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Rayner
authors.forename: Bernhard
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Angele
authors.forename: Elizabeth R
authors.initials: ER
authors.lastname: Schotter
authors.forename: Klinton
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Bicknell
keywords: Eye movements; parafoveal processing; preview benefit; reading; word order