title: Vagal modulation of cardiac ventricular arrhythmia.
abstract: What is the topic of this review? This article addresses the relationship between vagus nerve activity and malignant ventricular arrhythmias. It focuses on the clinical association of an impaired vagal tone in cardiac disease states with high mortality from sudden cardiac death and the potential underlying mechanisms. What advances does it highlight? The article summarizes the mounting evidence that vagal innervation in the cardiac ventricle plays a key direct role in the prevention of the initiation of ventricular fibrillation. Data are presented on the role that nitric oxide plays in mediating the effects of vagal protection against ventricular fibrillation, supporting the notion that a separate non-muscarinic, nitrergic population of vagal neurons is responsible for this protection. Sudden cardiac death remains a significant unresolved clinical problem, with many of the deaths being due to malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Markers of abnormal autonomic function have been shown to be strong prognostic predictors, highlighting the important relationship between reduced vagal tone and malignant ventricular arrhythmias, such as ventricular fibrillation, in cardiac patients. Exploring the mechanisms underlying the autonomic modulation of ventricular fibrillation, my group has shown that vagus nerve stimulation protects against ventricular fibrillation in the innervated isolated heart preparation. We have provided direct evidence that nitric oxide is released in the ventricle with cervical vagus nerve stimulation and NO mediates the antifibrillatory actions of vagus nerve stimulation in the ventricle. Classical physiology teaches that vagal postganglionic nerves modulate the heart via acetylcholine acting at muscarinic receptors and, dogmatically, that there is little vagal effect in the ventricle, as innervation was believed to be sparse. Mounting evidence from many species now supports the presence of a rich vagal innervation in the ventricle. Data from my group showing that the protective actions of vagus nerve stimulation against ventricular fibrillation and NO release are preserved in the presence of muscarinic block support the notion that a population of nitrergic neurons could be responsible. This potentially exploitable downstream pathway together with the availability of vagus nerve stimulators make it an exciting time to investigate the development of an effective strategy of vagal protection against ventricular fibrillation in the clinical setting.
authors.affiliation: * Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Cardiology group, University of Leicester, Clinical Sciences Wing, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK. gan1@le.ac.uk.
authors.forename: G André
authors.initials: GA
authors.lastname: Ng
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001145:Arrhythmias, Cardiac / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006352:Heart Ventricles / Q000294:innervation* / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D014630:Vagus Nerve / Q000502:physiology*