title: What happened (and what didn't): Discourse constraints on encoding of plausible alternatives.
abstract: Three experiments investigated how font emphasis influences reading and remembering discourse. Although past work suggests that contrastive pitch contours benefit memory by promoting encoding of salient alternatives, it is unclear both whether this effect generalizes to other forms of linguistic prominence and how the set of alternatives is constrained. Participants read discourses in which some true propositions had salient alternatives (e.g.,British scientists found the endangered monkeywhen the discourse also mentionedFrench scientists) and completed a recognition memory test. In Experiments 1 and 2, font emphasis in the initial presentation increased participants' ability to later reject false statements about salient alternatives but not about unmentioned items (e.g.,Portuguese scientists). In Experiment 3, font emphasis helped reject false statements about plausible alternatives, but not about less plausible alternatives that were nevertheless established in the discourse. These results suggest readers encode a narrow set of only those alternatives plausible in the particular discourse. They also indicate that multiple manipulations of linguistic prominence, not just prosody, can lead to consideration of alternatives.
authors.affiliation: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
authors.forename: Scott H
authors.initials: SH
authors.lastname: Fraundorf
authors.forename: Aaron S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Benjamin
authors.forename: Duane G
authors.initials: DG
authors.lastname: Watson
keywords: alternative sets; discourse; fonts; reading; recognition memory