title: On Vaccination & Chiropractic: when ideology, history, perception, politics and jurisprudence collide.
abstract: The Palmers espoused anti-vaccination opinions in the early part of the 20(th) century, rejecting the germ theory of disease in favor of a worldview that a subluxation-free spine, achieved by spinal adjustments, would result in an unfettered innate intelligence; this, along with other healthful lifestyle choices, would allow a person to thwart disease by marshaling the body's natural recuperative abilities. Some chiropractors continue to staunchly champion the Palmer postulates, while others do not. At the national level, advocacy organizations publish conflicting position statements. We explore how this divisiveness has impacted chiropractic ideology, perceptions among students and practitioners, politics and issues of jurisprudence as reflected by the evolution of a standard of chiropractic practice in at least one Canadian province (Ontario). We opine that the chiropractic profession should champion a health promotion and disease prevention approach to vaccination, which would allow it to align itself with the broader healthcare community while not abandoning its traditional tenets.
authors.forename: Brian
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Gleberzon
authors.forename: Marlee
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lameris
authors.forename: Catherine
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Schmidt
authors.forename: Jillian
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ogrady
keywords: chiropractic; vaccination