title: Difference in defense strategy in flower heads and leaves of Asteraceae: multiple-species approach.
abstract: Although a vast number of studies have investigated defenses against herbivores in leaves, relatively little is known about defenses in flowers. Using wild individuals of 34 species of Asteraceae, we investigated differences in five traits that are thought to affect the intensity of herbivory (C, N, P, water, and total phenolic contents). Combinations of these traits between flower heads and leaves were studied as well. We also evaluated phylogenetic patterns of flower head and leaf traits. Flower heads had higher P and lower total phenolics than leaves. Water and C contents were negatively correlated both in the flower heads and leaves. N, P, and water contents were positively correlated in the flower heads, whereas this pattern was not found in the leaves. Thus, the traits we measured were more tightly inter-correlated in flower heads than in leaves. Because the flower heads had a lower total phenolic content, the relative allocation of defensive compounds could not be explained solely by fitness values of the organs. Perhaps plants employ an escape strategy rather than a defense strategy to cope with floral herbivores and higher allocation in P may enhance their escape from herbivores by improving the growth rate of flower heads, though our result might be affected in part by the plasticity of plants growing at different sites. Moreover, we found weak phylogenetic signals in the defensive traits. Because we found significant differences in the flower head traits, these weak signals may imply that the traits we measured evolved frequently.
authors.affiliation: Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba 6-3, Sendai, 980-8578, Japan, mogu@biology.tohoku.ac.jp.
authors.forename: Michio
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Oguro
authors.forename: Satoki
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Sakai
mesh_terms: D019659:Asteraceae / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000145:classification; D002244:Carbon / Q000737:chemistry; D035264:Flowers / Q000737:chemistry*; D060434:Herbivory; D007564:Japan; D009584:Nitrogen / Q000737:chemistry; D010636:Phenols / Q000737:chemistry; D010758:Phosphorus / Q000737:chemistry; D010802:Phylogeny; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000737:chemistry*; D014867:Water / Q000737:chemistry
chemical_list: D010636:Phenols; D014867:Water; D010758:Phosphorus; D002244:Carbon; D009584:Nitrogen
references.citation: Oecologia. 1996 Mar;107(1):102-112
references.pmid: 28307197
references.citation: Oecologia. 2006 Sep;149(3):444-55
references.pmid: 16794833
references.citation: Ecology. 2006 Mar;87(3):535-41
references.pmid: 16602282
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1974 Dec;54(6):863-9
references.pmid: 16658991
references.citation: New Phytol. 2007;175(4):773-784
references.pmid: 17688592
references.citation: J Econ Entomol. 2008 Jun;101(3):944-54
references.pmid: 18613598
references.citation: Ecology. 2006 Jul;87(7 Suppl):S132-49
references.pmid: 16922309
references.citation: Oecologia. 2008 Apr;155(4):729-37
references.pmid: 18188605
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2002 Aug;89(8):1295-302
references.pmid: 21665732
references.citation: J Econ Entomol. 2007 Dec;100(6):1821-30
references.pmid: 18232399
references.citation: Oecologia. 2002 Jan;130(1):72-77
references.pmid: 28547027
references.citation: Oecologia. 1989 Jun;79(4):482-488
references.pmid: 28313482
references.citation: Tree Physiol. 2000 May;20(9):591-598
references.pmid: 12651423
references.citation: Science. 1959 May 29;129(3361):1466-70
references.pmid: 13658975
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2008 Jun;34(6):757-65
references.pmid: 18484139
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1982 Dec;8(12):1429-36
references.pmid: 24414887
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2006 Aug;9(8):960-7
references.pmid: 16913940
references.citation: Evolution. 2003 Apr;57(4):717-45
references.pmid: 12778543
references.citation: Phytochemistry. 2001 Oct;58(3):429-40
references.pmid: 11557075
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009 Aug;12(4):473-8
references.pmid: 19540153
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2010 Jun 1;26(11):1463-4
references.pmid: 20395285
references.citation: Q Rev Biol. 2003 Mar;78(1):23-55
references.pmid: 12661508
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Jun;15(6):238-243
references.pmid: 10802549
references.citation: Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2004 Nov;6(6):746-54
references.pmid: 15570481
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Feb;22(2):103-9
references.pmid: 17097760
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2008 Aug;57(4):591-601
references.pmid: 18709597
references.citation: Oecologia. 1999 May;119(3):408-418
references.pmid: 28307764
references.citation: Am Nat. 2011 Jun;177(6):709-27
references.pmid: 21597249
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 27;106(43):18085-90
references.pmid: 19841278
references.citation: Science. 2012 Oct 5;338(6103):116-9
references.pmid: 23042895
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Apr 22;428(6985):821-7
references.pmid: 15103368
references.citation: Am Nat. 2006 Oct;168(4):E103-22
references.pmid: 17004214
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2012 Oct;15(10):1140-8
references.pmid: 22834564
references.citation: Oecologia. 2006 Jan;146(4):566-71
references.pmid: 16328552
references.citation: Science. 1985 Nov 22;230(4728):895-9
references.pmid: 17739203
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2006 Dec;9(12):1351-65
references.pmid: 17118009
references.citation: Am Nat. 2013 May;181 Suppl 1:S35-45
references.pmid: 23598358
references.citation: Oecologia. 2008 Aug;157(1):53-67
references.pmid: 18488251
references.citation: Planta. 2002 Feb;214(4):562-71
references.pmid: 11925040
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 22;20(2):289-90
references.pmid: 14734327
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Nov 30;408(6812):578-80
references.pmid: 11117743