title: On the edge: haptic discrimination of edge sharpness.
abstract: The increasing ubiquity of haptic displays (e.g., smart phones and tablets) necessitates a better understanding of the perceptual capabilities of the human haptic system. Haptic displays will soon be capable of locally deforming to create simple 3D shapes. This study investigated the sensitivity of our haptic system to a fundamental component of shapes: edges. A novel set of eight high quality shape stimuli with test edges that varied in sharpness were fabricated in a 3D printer. In a two alternative, forced choice task, blindfolded participants were presented with two of these shapes side by side (one the reference, the other selected randomly from the remaining set of seven) and after actively exploring the test edge of each shape with the tip of their index finger, reported which shape had the sharper edge. We used a model selection approach to fit optimal psychometric functions to performance data, and from these obtained just noticeable differences and Weber fractions. In Experiment 1, participants performed the task with four different references. With sharpness defined as the angle at which one surface meets the horizontal plane, the four JNDs closely followed Weber's Law, giving a Weber fraction of 0.11. Comparisons to previously reported Weber fractions from other haptic manipulations (e.g. amplitude of vibration) suggests we are sufficiently sensitive to changes in edge sharpness for this to be of potential utility in the design of future haptic displays. In Experiment 2, two groups of participants performed the task with a single reference but different exploration strategies; one was limited to a single touch, the other unconstrained and free to explore as they wished. As predicted, the JND in the free exploration condition was lower than that in the single touch condition, indicating exploration strategy affects sensitivity to edge sharpness.
authors.affiliation: School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Andy L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Skinner
authors.forename: Christopher
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Kent
authors.forename: Jonathan M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Rossiter
authors.forename: Christopher P
authors.initials: CP
authors.lastname: Benton
authors.forename: Martin G M
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Groen
authors.forename: Jan M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Noyes
mesh_terms: D034201:Computers, Handheld; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D005246:Feedback; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010812:Physical Stimulation; D055698:Touch Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Perception. 2010;39(7):993-1006
references.pmid: 20842975
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2007 Mar;177(3):304-11
references.pmid: 16947061
references.citation: Somatosens Mot Res. 2003;20(1):33-43
references.pmid: 12745443
references.citation: IEEE Trans Haptics. 2012 Jan-Mar;5(1):58-65
references.pmid: 26963830
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Nov;141(3):295-303
references.pmid: 23079190
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 12;366(1581):3106-14
references.pmid: 21969692
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jun;187(4):587-94
references.pmid: 18305930
references.citation: Somatosens Mot Res. 1991;8(3):241-8
references.pmid: 1767620
references.citation: Commun ACM. 2012 Jan;55(1):96-104
references.pmid: 22815563
references.citation: Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2361-6
references.pmid: 7991127
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2007 Apr;178(2):240-51
references.pmid: 17051380
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2005 Jul;164(3):347-56
references.pmid: 15959722
references.citation: Cogn Process. 2012 Nov;13(4):285-301
references.pmid: 22669262
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Oct;71(7):1439-59
references.pmid: 19801605
references.citation: Perception. 2000;29(5):621-6
references.pmid: 10992958
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1985 Apr;37(4):299-302
references.pmid: 4034346
references.citation: J Physiol. 1981 Jan;310:117-44
references.pmid: 7230030
references.citation: Percept Mot Skills. 1974 Feb;38(1):15-23
references.pmid: 4815486
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2002 Jul;145(2):251-60
references.pmid: 12110966
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jun;128(2):255-63
references.pmid: 18377853
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1997 Oct 1;17(19):7480-9
references.pmid: 9295394
references.citation: IEEE Trans Haptics. 2012;5(4):323-31
references.pmid: 26964130
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1987 Jul;19(3):342-68
references.pmid: 3608405
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1991;86(3):663-72
references.pmid: 1761098
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2002 Jul;145(2):239-50
references.pmid: 12110965
references.citation: Perception. 2007;36(6):865-79
references.pmid: 17718365
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1987 Jun;7(6):1682-97
references.pmid: 3598642
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2006 Aug;16(8):1168-80
references.pmid: 16221922
references.citation: IEEE Trans Haptics. 2011 Mar-Apr;4(2):100-10
references.pmid: 26963161
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1962 Nov;69:477-91
references.pmid: 13947730