title: York Mason procedure to repair iatrogenic rectourinary fistula: our experience.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Rectourinary fistula (RUF) is an uncommon but devastating condition in men. It usually occurs as a complication of prostatic cancer treatment, whether this is by radiation therapy or surgery. It can also occur in patients with benign pathology of the prostate, inflammatory bowel disease, or Fournier's gangrene, and following pelvic trauma. RUF represents a challenge for the surgeon because spontaneous closure is a rare event. Several techniques have been described for surgical repair of fistula. The goal of the present study was to demonstrate that the York Mason posterior, transrectal correction of an iatrogenic RUF is a reliable approach that offers good postoperative outcomes.
  
  
  METHODS
  We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 39 patients who underwent York Mason repair from 1998 to 2012 at the University of Southern California (USC) and Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome (UCBM). The most frequent common causes of RUF were itemized, and statistical analysis was performed to determine correlations between the fistula's etiology and surgical outcome. Patients were then divided into two different cohorts: those who had undergone only one previous procedure (group 1) and those who had undergone two or more surgeries (group 2). We performed a statistical analysis between the two groups and calculated the percentage of fistula repair by means of the posterior trans-sphincteric approach with the York Mason technique in each groups We evaluated the presence of comorbidities (diabetes and infection) and their influence on the surgical outcome. Finally, we reported patient outcomes during follow-up.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In the present series, the RUF was iatrogenic in every case. The onset of the fistula followed prostate cancer treatment, most commonly after laparoscopic procedures. The success rate of fistula repair was found to be independent of the fistula's etiology. Diabetes and infections did not influence the surgical outcome. Overall, more than 50 % of patients treated with the York Mason posterior, transanal, transrectal approach remained free of fistula during follow-up. Almost 90 % of those who were previously operated only once remained free of fistula.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The posterior trans-sphincteric approach of the York Mason technique is effective in treating RUF.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy, crisfalavolti@libero.it.
authors.forename: Cristina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Falavolti
authors.forename: Federico
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Sergi
authors.forename: Ervin
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Shehu
authors.forename: Maurizio
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Buscarini
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001918:Brachytherapy / Q000009:adverse effects; D017679:Cryotherapy / Q000009:adverse effects; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000009:adverse effects; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000628:therapy; D012003:Rectal Fistula / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014548:Urinary Fistula / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery*; D013521:Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male / Q000379:methods*
references.citation: Am J Surg. 1997 Mar;173(3):213-7
references.pmid: 9124629
references.citation: J Urol. 1999 May;161(5):1518-20
references.pmid: 10210386
references.citation: Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2007 Dec;62(6):699-704
references.pmid: 18209910
references.citation: J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Nov;191(5):547-53
references.pmid: 11085735
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Sep;49(9):1379-83
references.pmid: 16819570
references.citation: Urology. 1990 Jan;35(1):27-30
references.pmid: 2296812
references.citation: Prostate Cancer. 2011;2011:629105
references.pmid: 22110993
references.citation: Can J Surg. 1998 Jun;41(3):241-4
references.pmid: 9627552
references.citation: J Urol. 1996 Jun;155(6):1989-91
references.pmid: 8618305
references.citation: J Urol. 1958 Oct;80(4):246-54
references.pmid: 13576603
references.citation: J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):966-71
references.pmid: 23009867
references.citation: J Urol. 2008 May;179(5):1882-6
references.pmid: 18353391
references.citation: BJU Int. 2010 Aug;106(3):436-47
references.pmid: 20653658
references.citation: J Urol. 2010 Dec;184(6):2400-4
references.pmid: 20952036
references.citation: J Urol. 2012 Aug;188(2):470-1
references.pmid: 22784733
references.citation: BJU Int. 2012 Apr;109(7):1095-8
references.pmid: 22035175
references.citation: J Surg Oncol. 2006 Sep 1;94(3):194-202
references.pmid: 16900535
references.citation: World J Surg. 2006 Jan;30(1):107-13
references.pmid: 16369708
references.citation: J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):1178-83
references.pmid: 19152921
references.citation: J Urol. 1995 Mar;153(3 Pt 1):730-3
references.pmid: 7861523
references.citation: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Mar;62(3):352-6
references.pmid: 19158006
references.citation: J Urol. 1999 May;161(5):1498-500
references.pmid: 10210381
references.citation: Cir Esp. 2008 Dec;84(6):323-7
references.pmid: 19087778
references.citation: J Urol. 1995 Oct;154(4):1435-8
references.pmid: 7658552
references.citation: J Endourol. 2006 Dec;20(12):1087-90
references.pmid: 17206908
references.citation: J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1222-5; discussion 1225
references.pmid: 14501729
references.citation: J Urol. 1996 Jan;155(1):256-8
references.pmid: 7490848
references.citation: BJU Int. 2009 Jan;103(2):242-6
references.pmid: 18782309
references.citation: Br J Urol. 1962 Dec;34:470-4
references.pmid: 14032622
references.citation: Urology. 2008 Feb;71(2):267-71
references.pmid: 18308098
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Mar;56(3):374-83
references.pmid: 23392154
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2003 Apr;237(4):483-7
references.pmid: 12677143
references.citation: Arch Esp Urol. 1995 Apr;48(3):241-6
references.pmid: 7755430
references.citation: J Urol Nephrol (Paris). 1971 Dec;77:Suppl:467-70
references.pmid: 5155468
references.citation: Int Braz J Urol. 2002 Jul-Aug;28(4):338-45
references.pmid: 15748341