title: Varying the costs of sunk costs: optimal and non-optimal choices in a sunk-cost task with humans.
abstract: Twelve adult human subjects were exposed to a sunk-cost procedure with two options: a mixed-ratio schedule of points later exchangeable for money, and an escape schedule that cancelled the current trial and initiated a new one. The mixed ratio included four values, arranged probabilistically in such a way that the expected ratios favored either persistence or escape. These probabilities were varied systematically on a within-subject basis across conditions. Absolute ratio size was thus varied across four groups of three subjects each, yielding unique combinations of expected ratios from escaping and persisting. When the differences between escaping and persisting differed the least, subjects tended to persist, committing the sunk-cost error. When the differences between persisting and escaping differed by a larger margin, choice patterns tended toward optimal-escaping or persisting as a function of the contingencies. These findings demonstrate that sunk-cost decision-making errors in humans are sensitive to their relative costs and benefits, and illustrate a promising set of methods for bringing such behavior under experimental control in the laboratory.
authors.affiliation: National Autonomous University of Mexico.
authors.forename: Raul
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Avila
authors.forename: Rachelle L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Yankelevitz
authors.forename: Juan C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Gonzalez
authors.forename: Timothy D
authors.initials: TD
authors.lastname: Hackenberg
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002755:Choice Behavior; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011336:Probability; D012055:Reinforcement Schedule; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D012201:Reward
keywords: adult humans; choice; fixed-ratio schedules; monetary reinforcers; sunk cost
references.citation: Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Jun;74(3):229-53
references.pmid: 9719653
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Jan;83(1):1-13
references.pmid: 15762377
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Oct;16(10):820-5
references.pmid: 16181446
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Nov;100(3):301-15
references.pmid: 24590698
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Jan;97(1):85-100
references.pmid: 22287806
references.citation: Learn Behav. 2012 Jun;40(2):195-206
references.pmid: 22090197
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2005 May 31;69(2):165-71
references.pmid: 15845305
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2002 Apr 28;57(2-3):211-226
references.pmid: 11947999
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2013 Mar;94:55-9
references.pmid: 23274847
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2012 Mar;89(3):212-8
references.pmid: 22108673
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2012 Feb;126(1):1-9
references.pmid: 21574688