title: Is the Belief in Meritocracy Palliative for Members of Low Status Groups? Evidence for a Benefit for Self-Esteem and Physical Health via Perceived Control.
abstract: Consensually held ideologies may serve as the cultural "glue" that justifies hierarchical status differences in society (e.g. Augustinos, 1998). Yet to be effective these beliefs need to be embraced by low-status groups. Why would members of low-status groups endorse beliefs that justify their relative disadvantage? We propose that members of low-status groups in the United States may benefit from some system-justifying beliefs (such as the belief in meritocracy) to the extent that these beliefs emphasize the perception of control over future outcomes. In 2 studies, among women, lower-SES women, and women of color, we found a positive relationship between the belief in meritocracy and well-being (self-esteem and physical health) that was mediated by perceived control. Members of low-status groups may benefit from some system-justifying beliefs to the extent that these beliefs, like the belief in meritocracy, emphasize the perception of control over future outcomes.
authors.affiliation: University of Maine.
authors.forename: Shannon K
authors.initials: SK
authors.lastname: McCoy
authors.forename: Joseph D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Wellman
authors.forename: Brandon
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Cosley
authors.forename: Laura
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Saslow
authors.forename: Elissa
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Epel
keywords: Meritocracy; Self-Esteem; Socio-economic Status; System Justification
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91
references.pmid: 18697684
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Dec;97(6):992-1004
references.pmid: 19968415
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Sep;101(3):433-50
references.pmid: 21787093
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;92(6):1068-86
references.pmid: 17547489
references.citation: Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
references.pmid: 1593914
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 1998 Dec;13(4):553-62
references.pmid: 9883456
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Aug;29(8):1005-17
references.pmid: 15189619
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Jun;80(6):931-41
references.pmid: 11414375
references.citation: Multivariate Behav Res. 2005 Apr 1;40(2):235-59
references.pmid: 26760108
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 1978 Mar;19(1):2-21
references.pmid: 649936
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Oct;67(4):732-40
references.pmid: 7965617
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
references.pmid: 3806354
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1988 Mar;103(2):193-210
references.pmid: 3283814
references.citation: Health Psychol. 2000 Nov;19(6):586-92
references.pmid: 11129362
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;18(3):267-74
references.pmid: 17444925
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jan;100(1):149-71
references.pmid: 21058869
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Dec;31(12):1718-29
references.pmid: 16254091
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Dec;31(12):1730-8
references.pmid: 16254092