title: A central storage facility to reduce pesticide suicides--a feasibility study from India.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Pesticide suicides are considered the single most important means of suicide worldwide. Centralized pesticide storage facilities have the possible advantage of delaying access to pesticides thereby reducing suicides. We undertook this study to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a centralized pesticide storage facility as a preventive intervention strategy in reducing pesticide suicides.
  
  
  METHODS
  A community randomized controlled feasibility study using a mixed methods approach involving a household survey; focus group discussions (FGDs) and surveillance were undertaken. The study was carried out in a district in southern India. Eight villages that engaged in floriculture were identified. Using the lottery method two were randomized to be the intervention sites and two villages constituted the control site. Two centralized storage facilities were constructed with local involvement and lockable storage boxes were constructed. The household survey conducted at baseline and one and a half years later documented information on sociodemographic data, pesticide usage, storage and suicides.
  
  
  RESULTS
  At baseline 4446 individuals (1097 households) in the intervention and 3307 individuals (782 households) in the control sites were recruited while at follow up there were 4308 individuals (1063 households) in the intervention and 2673 individuals (632 households) in the control sites. There were differences in baseline characteristics and imbalances in the prevalence of suicides between intervention and control sites as this was a small feasibility study.The results from the FGDs revealed that most participants found the storage facility to be both useful and acceptable. In addition to protecting against wastage, they felt that it had also helped prevent pesticide suicides as the pesticides stored here were not as easily and readily accessible. The primary analyses were done on an Intention to Treat basis. Following the intervention, the differences between sites in changes in combined, completed and attempted suicide rates per 100,000 person-years were 295 (95% CI: 154.7, 434.8; p < 0.001) for pesticide suicide and 339 (95% CI: 165.3, 513.2, p < 0.001) for suicide of all methods.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Suicide by pesticides poisoning is a major public health problem and needs innovative interventions to address it. This study, the first of its kind in the world, examined the feasibility of a central storage facility as a means of limiting access to pesticides and, has provided preliminary results on its usefulness. These results need to be interpreted with caution in view of the imbalances between sites. The facility was found to be acceptable, thereby underscoring the need for larger studies for a longer duration.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  ISRCTN04912407.
authors.affiliation: Sneha, Voluntary Health Services, Chennai, India. lakshmi@vijayakumars.com.
authors.forename: Lakshmi
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Vijayakumar
authors.forename: Lakshmanan
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Jeyaseelan
authors.forename: Shuba
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kumar
authors.forename: Rani
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Mohanraj
authors.forename: Shanmugasundaram
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Devika
authors.forename: Sarojini
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Manikandan
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D005191:Family Characteristics; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D017144:Focus Groups; D006801:Humans; D007194:India; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010575:Pesticides / Q000506:poisoning*; D019064:Product Packaging; D012449:Safety; D012637:Security Measures; D013406:Suicide, Attempted / Q000517:prevention & control; D055815:Young Adult; D000092864:Suicide Prevention
chemical_list: D010575:Pesticides
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2011 Nov 21;11:879
references.pmid: 22104027
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2012 Apr 02;12:260
references.pmid: 22471759
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;36(1):203-7
references.pmid: 17301103
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2007 Jan 26;7:13
references.pmid: 17257415
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2009 Feb 24;9:69
references.pmid: 19239714
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2009 Nov 05;9:405
references.pmid: 19889236
references.citation: Toxicology. 2003 Nov 5;192(2-3):249-61
references.pmid: 14580791
references.citation: Lancet. 2002 Jul 27;360(9329):319-26
references.pmid: 12147388
references.citation: Crisis. 2007 Jan;28 Suppl 1:10-20
references.pmid: 26212190
references.citation: Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;55(5):401-6
references.pmid: 19617276
references.citation: Trop Med Int Health. 2009 Feb;14(2):213-9
references.pmid: 19236667
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2006 Apr;62(7):1710-9
references.pmid: 16165259
references.citation: Crisis. 2006;27(2):77-81
references.pmid: 16913329
references.citation: Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996 May;93(5):327-38
references.pmid: 8792901
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2007 Dec 21;7:357
references.pmid: 18154668
references.citation: Lancet. 2012 Jun 23;379(9834):2343-51
references.pmid: 22726517
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Jul;187:62-7
references.pmid: 15994573
references.citation: Lancet. 2002 Oct 12;360(9340):1163-7
references.pmid: 12387969
references.citation: Lancet. 2007 Jan 20;369(9557):169-70
references.pmid: 17240268
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;36(6):1235-42
references.pmid: 17726039
references.citation: Lancet. 2002 Nov 30;360(9347):1728-36
references.pmid: 12480425
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2011 Sep 20;11:712
references.pmid: 21933432
references.citation: Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1999 Jun;99(6):407-11
references.pmid: 10408261
references.citation: Lancet. 2004 Apr 3;363(9415):1117-8
references.pmid: 15064031
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Sep;86(9):726-32
references.pmid: 18797649
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;196(1):26-30
references.pmid: 20044655
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;189:201-3
references.pmid: 16946353