title: Correlation between safety climate and contractor safety assessment programs in construction.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Contractor safety assessment programs (CSAPs) measure safety performance by integrating multiple data sources together; however, the relationship between these measures of safety performance and safety climate within the construction industry is unknown.
  
  
  METHODS
  Four hundred and one construction workers employed by 68 companies on 26 sites and 11 safety managers employed by 11 companies completed brief surveys containing a nine-item safety climate scale developed for the construction industry. CSAP scores from ConstructSecure, Inc., an online CSAP database, classified these 68 companies as high or low scorers, with the median score of the sample population as the threshold. Spearman rank correlations evaluated the association between the CSAP score and the safety climate score at the individual level, as well as with various grouping methodologies. In addition, Spearman correlations evaluated the comparison between manager-assessed safety climate and worker-assessed safety climate.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were no statistically significant differences between safety climate scores reported by workers in the high and low CSAP groups. There were, at best, weak correlations between workers' safety climate scores and the company CSAP scores, with marginal statistical significance with two groupings of the data. There were also no significant differences between the manager-assessed safety climate and the worker-assessed safety climate scores.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A CSAP safety performance score does not appear to capture safety climate, as measured in this study. The nature of safety climate in construction is complex, which may be reflective of the challenges in measuring safety climate within this industry. Am. J. Ind. Med. 56:1463-1472, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
authors.affiliation: Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
authors.forename: Emily H
authors.initials: EH
authors.lastname: Sparer
authors.forename: Lauren A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Murphy
authors.forename: Kathryn M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Taylor
authors.forename: Jack T
authors.initials: JT
authors.lastname: Dennerlein
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D060389:Construction Industry / Q000592:standards*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016272:Occupational Health / Q000592:standards*; D015279:Organizational Culture; D017751:Safety Management / Q000592:standards*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
keywords: construction; contractor safety assessment; prequalifying assessment; safety climate
references.citation: J Safety Res. 2003;34(5):567-77
references.pmid: 14733991
references.citation: J Safety Res. 2010 Jun;41(3):263-81
references.pmid: 20630278
references.citation: J Safety Res. 2010 Oct;41(5):399-406
references.pmid: 21059457
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 2006 May;91(3):681-8
references.pmid: 16737363
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jul;90(4):616-28
references.pmid: 16060782
references.citation: Accid Anal Prev. 2004 May;36(3):359-66
references.pmid: 15003580
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 1980 Feb;65(1):96-102
references.pmid: 7364709
references.citation: Risk Anal. 1998 Feb;18(1):103-10
references.pmid: 9523448
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jul;95(4):713-27
references.pmid: 20604591
references.citation: Appl Ergon. 2005 Jul;36(4):461-9
references.pmid: 15892940
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 2008 Sep;93(5):1147-54
references.pmid: 18808232
references.citation: Am J Ind Med. 2007 Jun;50(6):438-42
references.pmid: 17492632
references.citation: J Safety Res. 2007;38(5):511-21
references.pmid: 18023636
references.citation: Harv Bus Rev. 1992 Jan-Feb;70(1):71-9
references.pmid: 10119714
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 2009 Sep;94(5):1103-27
references.pmid: 19702360
references.citation: Accid Anal Prev. 2006 May;38(3):425-33
references.pmid: 16442068