title: [Clinical analysis of thoracoscopic lobectomy in the treatment of peripheral lung cancer with single utility port].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is now generally accepted for patients with lung cancer. The aim of this study is to review the technology of thoracoscopic lobectomy with single utility port in the treatment of peripheral lung cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 87 patients with peripheral lung cancer who underwent single utility port complete VATS lobectomy from February 2011 to January 2013 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (single utility port group), and compared them with 75 patients with peripheral lung cancer who underwent conventional, 3-port VATS lobectomy in the same period (3-port group). The clinical outcomes including operation time, time to first activity out of bed, postoperative hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, chest drainage duration, lymph node dissection number, postoperative complications and degree of chest pain were compared between the two groups.
  
  
  RESULTS
  No perioperative death was observed in both groups. There was no statistical difference in operation time (151.03±25.97 min vs 156.27±26.49 min), lymph node dissection number (13.06±1.36 vs 12.61±1.56), intraoperative blood loss (188.62±47.03 mL vs 179.60±28.96 mL) and incidence of serious postoperative complications (18/87 vs 21/75) between the two groups. There were statistical differences in time to first activity out of bed (11.17±8.69 h vs 13.76±7.43 h), postoperative hospital stay (7.18±1.95 d vs 7.92±2.03 d), chest drainage duration (3.85±1.21 d vs 4.43±1.43 d) and total postoperative drainage volume (671.49±178.31 mL vs 736.93±170.39 mL) between the two groups (P<0.05). The change of vision analogue score (VAS) score between the two groups after operation was also statistically significant (P<0.01).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The completely thoracoscopic lobectomy with single utility port is a safe and feasible surgical procedure compared with conventional 3-port VATS lobectomy for selected patients.
authors.affiliation: Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
authors.forename: Chang
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Haitao
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Ma
authors.forename: Jingkang
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: He
authors.forename: Bin
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Ni
authors.forename: Chun
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Xu
authors.forename: Jun
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Zhao
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011013:Pneumonectomy / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D020775:Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted / Q000379:methods*
references.citation: J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2006 Feb;7(2):118-28
references.pmid: 16421967
references.citation: Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Dec;86(6):2008-16; discussion 2016-8
references.pmid: 19022040
references.citation: Mayo Clin Proc. 2009 Jun;84(6):509-13
references.pmid: 19483167
references.citation: World J Surg. 2010 Apr;34(4):616-20
references.pmid: 20082195
references.citation: Br J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;108(1):126-33
references.pmid: 21980121
references.citation: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007 Oct;6(5):614-7
references.pmid: 17670728
references.citation: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Mar;8(3):316-9; discussion 319-20
references.pmid: 19059949
references.citation: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jan;39(1):120-6
references.pmid: 20558077
references.citation: Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2010 Dec;13(12):1141-4
references.pmid: 21159251