title: Perinatal mortality following assisted reproductive technology treatment in Australia and New Zealand, a public health approach for international reporting of perinatal mortality.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There is a need to have uniformed reporting of perinatal mortality for births following assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment to enable international comparison and benchmarking of ART practice.
  
  
  METHODS
  The Australian and New Zealand Assisted Reproduction Database was used in this study. Births of ≥ 20 weeks gestation and/or ≥ 400 grams of birth weight following embryos transfer cycles in Australia and New Zealand during the period 2004 to 2008 were included. Differences in the mortality rates by different perinatal periods from a gestational age cutoff of ≥ 20, ≥ 22, ≥ 24, or ≥ 28 weeks (wks) to a neonatal period cutoff of either < 7 or < 28 days after birth were assessed. Crude and specific (number of embryos transferred and plurality) rates of perinatal mortality were calculated for selected gestational and neonatal periods.
  
  
  RESULTS
  When the perinatal period is defined as ≥ 20 wks gestation to < 28 days after birth, the perinatal mortality rate (PMR) was 16.1 per 1000 births (n = 630). A progressive contraction of the gestational age groups resulted in marked reductions in the PMR for deaths at < 28 days (22 wks 11.0; 24 wks 7.7; 28 wks 5.6); and similarly for deaths at < 7 days (20 wks 15.6, 22 wks 10.5; 24 wks 7.3; 28 wks 5.3). In contrast, a contraction of the perinatal period from < 28 to < 7 days after birth only marginally reduced the PMR from 16.2 to 15.6 per 1000 births which was consistent across all gestational ages.The PMR for single embryo transfer (SET) births (≥ 20 weeks gestation to < 7 days post-birth) was significantly lower (12.8 per 1000 SET births) compared to double embryo transfer (DET) births (PMR 18.3 per 1000 DET births; p < 0.001, Fisher's Exact Test). Similarly, the PMR for SET births (≥ 22 weeks gestation to < 7 days post-birth) was significantly lower (8.8 per 1000 SET births, p < 0.001, Fisher's Exact Test) when compared to DET births (12.2 per 1000 DET births). The highest PMR (50.5 per 1000 SET births, 95% CI 36.5-64.5) was for twins following SET births (≥ 20 weeks gestation to < 7 days post-birth) compared to twins following DET (23.9 per 1000 DET births, 95% CI 20.8-27.1).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Reporting of perinatal mortality of ART births is an essential component of quality ART practice. This should include measures that monitor the impact on perinatal mortality of multiple embryo transfer. We recommend that reporting of perinatal deaths following ART treatment, should be stratified for three gestation-specific perinatal periods of ≥ 20, ≥ 22 and ≥ 28 completed weeks to < 7 days post-birth; and include plurality specific rates by SET and DET. This would provide a valuable international evidence-base of PMR for use in evaluating ART policy, practice and new research.
authors.affiliation: National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052 NSW, Australia. e.sullivan@unsw.edu.au.
authors.forename: Elizabeth A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Sullivan
authors.forename: Yueping A
authors.initials: YA
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Robert J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Norman
authors.forename: Georgina M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Chambers
authors.forename: Abrar Ahmad
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Chughtai
authors.forename: Cynthia M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Farquhar
mesh_terms: D001315:Australia / Q000453:epidemiology; D001724:Birth Weight; D004624:Embryo Transfer / Q000379:methods / Q000401:mortality*; D005260:Female; D046689:Fetal Mortality; D005865:Gestational Age; D006801:Humans; D007226:Infant Mortality; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D009520:New Zealand / Q000453:epidemiology; D054238:Perinatal Mortality; D011247:Pregnancy; D059285:Pregnancy, Twin / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D058028:Research Report / Q000592:standards*; D050497:Stillbirth; D009626:Terminology as Topic
references.citation: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Aug;133(2):173-8
references.pmid: 17056174
references.citation: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 May;90(5):494-500
references.pmid: 21306346
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013 May 20;8(5):e64869
references.pmid: 23700489
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2013 May;28(5):1375-90
references.pmid: 23442757
references.citation: JAMA. 1988 Dec 9;260(22):3306-8
references.pmid: 3054193
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2009 Nov;92(5):1520-4
references.pmid: 19828144
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003416
references.pmid: 19370588
references.citation: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Feb 23;10 Suppl 1:S1
references.pmid: 20233382
references.citation: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Nov 28;111 Suppl 1:S15-32
references.pmid: 14642317
references.citation: Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Oct;23(4):500-4
references.pmid: 21840757
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2012 May 10;366(19):1803-13
references.pmid: 22559061
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2011 Oct;26(10):2878-86
references.pmid: 21771774
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2009 Nov;92(5):1557-61
references.pmid: 18973885
references.citation: Med J Aust. 2009 Mar 2;190(5):234-7
references.pmid: 19296784
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2010 Sep;25(9):2281-9
references.pmid: 20650968
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2005 Jan;20(1):4-8
references.pmid: 15567878
references.citation: Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Apr;10(4):436-41
references.pmid: 15901449
references.citation: BMJ. 2012 Feb 17;344:e746
references.pmid: 22344455
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2006 Mar;21(3):694-700
references.pmid: 16253972
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2011 Feb;95(2):542-7.e1-10
references.pmid: 20656287
references.citation: Lancet. 2008 Aug 30;372(9640):737-43
references.pmid: 18674812
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2008 Aug;23(8):1941-8
references.pmid: 18487216
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2012 Sep;27(9):2571-84
references.pmid: 22786779
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2011 Jul;128(1):177-81
references.pmid: 21708807
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2007 Apr;22(4):1073-9
references.pmid: 17251357
references.citation: Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):45-55
references.pmid: 18927071
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2010 Apr;25(4):914-23
references.pmid: 20124395
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2007 Aug;22(8):2202-7
references.pmid: 17562674
references.citation: BMJ. 2004 Sep 18;329(7467):675-8
references.pmid: 15374920