title: Effects of laboratory housing on exploratory behaviour, novelty discrimination and spatial reference memory in a subterranean, solitary rodent, the Cape mole-rat (Georychus capensis).
abstract: A large number of laboratory and field based studies are being carried out on mole-rats, both in our research group and others. Several studies have highlighted the development of adverse behaviours in laboratory animals and have emphasised the importance of enrichment for captive animals. Hence we were interested in evaluating how laboratory housing would affect behavioural performance in mole-rats. We investigated exploratory behaviour, the ability to discriminate between novel and familiar environments and reference memory in the solitary Cape mole-rat (Georychus capensis). Our data showed that both wild and captive animals readily explore open spaces and tunnels. Wild animals were however more active than their captive counterparts. In the Y maze two trial discrimination task, wild animals failed to discriminate between novel and familiar environments, while laboratory housed mole-rats showed preferential spatial discrimination in terms of the length of time spent in the novel arm. The performance of the laboratory and wild animals were similar when tested for reference memory in the Y maze, both groups showed a significant improvement compared to the first day, from the 3rd day onwards. Wild animals made more mistakes whereas laboratory animals were slower in completing the task. The difference in performance between wild and laboratory animals in the Y-maze may be as a result of the lower activity of the laboratory animals. Laboratory maintained Cape mole-rats show classic behaviours resulting from a lack of stimulation such as reduced activity and increased aggression. However, they do display an improved novelty discrimination compared to the wild animals. Slower locomotion rate of the laboratory animals may increase the integration time of stimuli, hence result in a more thorough inspection of the surroundings. Unlike the captive animals, wild animals show flexibility in their responses to unpredictable events, which is an important requirement under natural living conditions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
authors.forename: Maria Kathleen
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Oosthuizen
authors.forename: Anne-Gita
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Scheibler
authors.forename: Nigel Charles
authors.initials: NC
authors.lastname: Bennett
authors.forename: Irmgard
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Amrein
mesh_terms: D000822:Animal Husbandry / Q000379:methods*; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D005106:Exploratory Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D007753:Laboratories; D018782:Maze Learning; D019577:Mole Rats; D065852:Spatial Memory; D013045:Species Specificity
references.citation: Brain Res Bull. 2008 Mar 18;75(2-4):356-64
references.pmid: 18331898
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2012 Sep;15(5):797-806
references.pmid: 22570181
references.citation: Learn Mem. 2002 Nov-Dec;9(6):387-94
references.pmid: 12464698
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2008 Sep;211(Pt 17):2817-26
references.pmid: 18723540
references.citation: Anim Learn Behav. 1976 May;4(2):125-30
references.pmid: 964436
references.citation: Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2012;72(4):452-60
references.pmid: 23377274
references.citation: Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2004 Jul;78(3):569-79
references.pmid: 15251266
references.citation: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Jun 30;34(5):742-55
references.pmid: 19903505
references.citation: J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1975 Oct;89(8):892-8
references.pmid: 1184796
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 2003;62(3):141-51
references.pmid: 12966188
references.citation: Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 1980;40(1):161-71
references.pmid: 7424576
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2001 Jan;61(1):171-180
references.pmid: 11170707
references.citation: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000 Jan;73(1):31-48
references.pmid: 10686122
references.citation: Brain Res. 1992 Aug 14;588(1):132-9
references.pmid: 1393562
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 2009 Jan 8;96(1):128-34
references.pmid: 18824187
references.citation: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Jun 30;34(5):733-41
references.pmid: 20394792
references.citation: Can J Psychol. 1951 Sep;5(3):122-8
references.pmid: 14870071
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2012 May 16;231(1):193-200
references.pmid: 22440234
references.citation: Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008 Jan;33(2):394-405
references.pmid: 17429409
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2003 Jan;43(1):187-96
references.pmid: 12614649