title: Being uninsured is bad for your health: can medical homes play a role in treating the uninsurance ailment?
abstract: In the United States, stable health insurance coverage is associated with improved health outcomes. A lack of insurance is associated with premature death from preventable causes. Although primary care clinicians are often in a position to see firsthand the impact that being uninsured has on patients, most ambulatory care clinics are not actively involved in helping patients obtain health insurance, retain their coverage, or make important health insurance coverage decisions. The magnitude and complexity of the US "uninsurance" problem, as well as recent federal initiatives to expand coverage options, inspire important questions: Can medical homes play a more active role in helping patients find and keep insurance coverage? How can basic tenets from the chronic care model be operationalized to build systems to treat the uninsurance ailment? Creating effective processes and tools within the medical home to keep a patient insured may be as important to improving population health as helping a patient maintain a normal blood pressure. Similar system-level interventions could be used to support both endeavors.
authors.affiliation: Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
authors.forename: Jennifer E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Devoe
mesh_terms: D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans; D019458:Insurance Coverage; D007348:Insurance, Health; D008484:Medicaid; D017057:Medically Uninsured; D058991:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; D018802:Patient-Centered Care; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000191:economics*; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D014481:United States
keywords: access to health care; health; healthcare disparities; insurance; medical home; primary health care; public health
references.citation: JAMA. 2001 Jan 10;285(2):200-6
references.pmid: 11176814
references.citation: Am Sociol Rev. 1969 Jun;34(3):318-34
references.pmid: 4892957
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):75-85
references.pmid: 19124857
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2007 Oct;97(10):1732-3; author reply 1733
references.pmid: 17761559
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1993 Jul 29;329(5):326-31
references.pmid: 8321261
references.citation: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Nov 12;59(44):1448-54
references.pmid: 21063276
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 28;353(4):382-91
references.pmid: 16049210
references.citation: JAMA. 1998 Jun 10;279(22):1820-5
references.pmid: 9628715
references.citation: JAMA. 2006 Dec 20;296(23):2815-22
references.pmid: 17179458
references.citation: JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1248-54
references.pmid: 16160133
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):199-201
references.pmid: 22747178
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2009 Dec;99(12):2289-95
references.pmid: 19762659
references.citation: JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1775-9
references.pmid: 12365965
references.citation: JAMA. 2007 Mar 14;297(10):1073-84
references.pmid: 17356028
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2001 Oct 11;345(15):1106-12
references.pmid: 11596591
references.citation: JAMA. 2000 Oct 25;284(16):2061-9
references.pmid: 11042754
references.citation: JAMA. 2002 Oct 16;288(15):1909-14
references.pmid: 12377092
references.citation: J Med Ethics. 1999 Oct;25(5):388-93
references.pmid: 10536763
references.citation: Med Care Res Rev. 2003 Jun;60(2 Suppl):3S-75S; discussion 76S-112S
references.pmid: 12800687
references.citation: Ann Fam Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;3(6):545-52
references.pmid: 16338919