title: Assessing L2 lexical versus inflectional accuracy across skill levels.
abstract: This study measures whether number and type of morphemes in an elicited imitation string results in a greater number of modifications with L2 experience. Rationale is drawn from L2 working memory processing limitations at distinct levels of proficiency. 38 subjects (L2 Spanish university students) comprise three proficiency groups: beginning, undergraduate majors and graduate students. Number of morphemes was varied within each syllable count; and responses were either correct or modified (lexemically/inflectionally as deletions or substitutions). Two way ANOVAs determined significance between mean proportions for each group. Findings indicate that increases in number of morphemes yielded significant differences; and that while the lowest proficiency group produced higher proportions of lexical deletions, the more advanced groups' modifications were inflectional substitutions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Modern Languages, State University of New York, P.O. Box 2000, Cortland, NY, 13045, USA, westsimon@odyssey.net.
authors.forename: Donna E
authors.initials: DE
authors.lastname: West
mesh_terms: D001931:Brain Mapping; D006801:Humans; D007100:Imitative Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D007802:Language; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D019303:Multilingualism
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1996 Oct;103(4):761-72
references.pmid: 8888653
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Feb;22(1):77-94; discussion 95-126
references.pmid: 11301522
references.citation: Lang Speech. 1977 Jan-Mar;20(1):86-97
references.pmid: 592956
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1995 Apr;102(2):211-45
references.pmid: 7740089
references.citation: J Psycholinguist Res. 1981 May;10(3):273-88
references.pmid: 7277260
references.citation: J Child Lang. 2005 Aug;32(3):617-41
references.pmid: 16220637
references.citation: Science. 1974 Feb 8;183(4124):482-8
references.pmid: 17773029
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):81-97
references.pmid: 13310704
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Nov 1;4(11):417-423
references.pmid: 11058819
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1996 Oct;103(4):773-80
references.pmid: 8888654