title: The flexible fairness: equality, earned entitlement, and self-interest.
abstract: The current study explored whether earned entitlement modulated the perception of fairness in three experiments. A preliminary resource earning task was added before players decided how to allocate the resource they jointly earned. Participants' decision in allocation, their responses to equal or unequal offers, whether advantageous or disadvantageous, and subjective ratings of fairness were all assessed in the current study. Behavioral results revealed that participants proposed more generous offers and showed enhanced tolerance to disadvantageous unequal offers from others when they performed worse than their presumed "partners," while the reverse was true in the better-performance condition. The subjective ratings also indicated the effect of earned entitlement, such that worse performance was associated with higher perceived feelings of fairness for disadvantageous unequal offers, while better performance was associated with higher feelings of fairness for advantageous unequal offers. Equal offers were considered "fair" only when earned entitlement was even between two parties. In sum, the perception of fairness is modulated by an integration of egalitarian motivation and entitlement. In addition to justice principles, participants were also motivated by self-interest, such that participants placed more weight on entitlement in the better-performance condition than in the worse-performance condition. These results imply that earned entitlement is evaluated in a self-serving way.
authors.affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
authors.forename: Chunliang
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Feng
authors.forename: Yi
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Luo
authors.forename: Ruolei
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Gu
authors.forename: Lucas S
authors.initials: LS
authors.lastname: Broster
authors.forename: Xueyi
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Shen
authors.forename: Tengxiang
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Tian
authors.forename: Yue-Jia
authors.initials: YJ
authors.lastname: Luo
authors.forename: Frank
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Krueger
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D005717:Games, Experimental; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 24;109(17):6479-83
references.pmid: 22493264
references.citation: Neuron. 2008 Apr 24;58(2):273-83
references.pmid: 18439411
references.citation: Neuron. 2012 Mar 8;73(5):1040-51
references.pmid: 22405212
references.citation: Nature. 2008 Aug 28;454(7208):1079-83
references.pmid: 18756249
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 1;62(1):102-12
references.pmid: 22548807
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
references.pmid: 9176953
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):339-47
references.pmid: 18399886
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references.pmid: 9176952
references.citation: Science. 2010 Mar 19;327(5972):1480-4
references.pmid: 20299588
references.citation: Science. 2008 May 23;320(5879):1092-5
references.pmid: 18467558
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:23-48
references.pmid: 20822437
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Jun;46(2):542-8
references.pmid: 19385019
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2012 Mar;107(5):1403-12
references.pmid: 22157114
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Apr;8(4):424-31
references.pmid: 22287263
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Mar;8(3):277-84
references.pmid: 22198968
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135
references.pmid: 20550733
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Apr 6;31(14):5244-52
references.pmid: 21471359
references.citation: Science. 2006 Nov 3;314(5800):829-32
references.pmid: 17023614
references.citation: Science. 2007 Nov 23;318(5854):1305-8
references.pmid: 18033886
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Aug 24;442(7105):912-5
references.pmid: 16929297
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):59-78
references.pmid: 23445574
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Jan 21;463(7279):356-9
references.pmid: 19997098
references.citation: Science. 2003 Jun 13;300(5626):1755-8
references.pmid: 12805551
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2013 Feb;23(2):399-410
references.pmid: 22368088
references.citation: Cognition. 2010 Jan;114(1):89-95
references.pmid: 19786275
references.citation: Neuron. 2007 Oct 4;56(1):185-96
references.pmid: 17920024
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Apr;23(1):24-33
references.pmid: 15795131
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 2;104(40):15631-4
references.pmid: 17909184
references.citation: Science. 2008 Dec 12;322(5908):1681-5
references.pmid: 19023045
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 1;49(1):956-62
references.pmid: 19695331
references.citation: Neuron. 2012 Mar 8;73(5):859-61
references.pmid: 22405198
references.citation: Science. 2000 Sep 8;289(5485):1773-5
references.pmid: 10976075
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2011 Jul 15;57(2):634-41
references.pmid: 21554961
references.citation: Science. 2010 May 28;328(5982):1176-8
references.pmid: 20508132