title: Distinct phenotypes in zebrafish models of human startle disease.
abstract: Startle disease is an inherited neurological disorder that causes affected individuals to suffer noise- or touch-induced non-epileptic seizures, excessive muscle stiffness and neonatal apnea episodes. Mutations known to cause startle disease have been identified in glycine receptor subunit (GLRA1 and GLRB) and glycine transporter (SLC6A5) genes, which serve essential functions at glycinergic synapses. Despite the significant successes in identifying startle disease mutations, many idiopathic cases remain unresolved. Exome sequencing in these individuals will identify new candidate genes. To validate these candidate disease genes, zebrafish is an ideal choice due to rapid knockdown strategies, accessible embryonic stages, and stereotyped behaviors. The only existing zebrafish model of startle disease, bandoneon (beo), harbors point mutations in glrbb (one of two zebrafish orthologs of human GLRB) that cause compromised glycinergic transmission and touch-induced bilateral muscle contractions. In order to further develop zebrafish as a model for startle disease, we sought to identify common phenotypic outcomes of knocking down zebrafish orthologs of two known startle disease genes, GLRA1 and GLRB, using splice site-targeted morpholinos. Although both morphants were expected to result in phenotypes similar to the zebrafish beo mutant, our direct comparison demonstrated that while both glra1 and glrbb morphants exhibited embryonic spasticity, only glrbb morphants exhibited bilateral contractions characteristic of beo mutants. Likewise, zebrafish over-expressing a dominant startle disease mutation (GlyR α1(R271Q)) exhibited spasticity but not bilateral contractions. Since GlyR βb can interact with GlyR α subunits 2-4 in addition to GlyR α1, loss of the GlyR βb subunit may produce more severe phenotypes by affecting multiple GlyR subtypes. Indeed, immunohistochemistry of glra1 morphants suggests that in zebrafish, alternate GlyR α subunits can compensate for the loss of the GlyR α1 subunit. To address the potential for interplay among GlyR subunits during development, we quantified the expression time-course for genes known to be critical to glycinergic synapse function. We found that GlyR α2, α3 and α4a are expressed in the correct temporal pattern and could compensate for the loss of the GlyR α1 subunit. Based on our findings, future studies that aim to model candidate startle disease genes in zebrafish should include measures of spasticity and synaptic development.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology and Physics, 1000 Chastain Rd, #1202, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA.
authors.forename: Lisa R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Ganser
authors.forename: Qing
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Yan
authors.forename: Victoria M
authors.initials: VM
authors.lastname: James
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Kozol
authors.forename: Maya
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Topf
authors.forename: Robert J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Harvey
authors.forename: Julia E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Dallman
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology; D004195:Disease Models, Animal; D060172:Morpholinos / Q000235:genetics; D010641:Phenotype; D021122:Protein Subunits / Q000235:genetics; D018009:Receptors, Glycine / Q000235:genetics*; D016750:Stiff-Person Syndrome / Q000235:genetics*; D015027:Zebrafish / Q000196:embryology / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D029961:Zebrafish Proteins / Q000235:genetics*
chemical_list: D060172:Morpholinos; D021122:Protein Subunits; D018009:Receptors, Glycine; D029961:Zebrafish Proteins
keywords: Glycine receptor; Hyperekplexia; Startle disease; Zebrafish; glra1; glrb
references.citation: Neuroscience. 1997 May;78(2):411-7
references.pmid: 9145798
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2010 Nov;33(11):485-92
references.pmid: 20864191
references.citation: J Physiol. 2003 Sep 15;551(Pt 3):905-16
references.pmid: 12837931
references.citation: Neuron. 1989 Sep;3(3):339-48
references.pmid: 2561971
references.citation: Mol Cell Neurosci. 2001 Feb;17(2):354-63
references.pmid: 11178872
references.citation: J Physiol. 1998 Sep 15;511 ( Pt 3):683-93
references.pmid: 9714852
references.citation: Cell. 2001 May 18;105(4):521-32
references.pmid: 11371348
references.citation: Neuron. 1994 Oct;13(4):1003-15
references.pmid: 7946325
references.citation: Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2010 Jun 07;2:4
references.pmid: 21423490
references.citation: J Child Neurol. 2013 Jan;28(1):90-4
references.pmid: 22532536
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2013 Mar 1;22(5):927-40
references.pmid: 23184146
references.citation: J Neurochem. 1990 Aug;55(2):421-6
references.pmid: 2164565
references.citation: Neuron. 1996 Aug;17(2):275-85
references.pmid: 8780651
references.citation: Neurobiol Dis. 2013 Apr;52:137-49
references.pmid: 23238346
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 28;29(43):13566-77
references.pmid: 19864569
references.citation: Methods Mol Biol. 2000;132:365-86
references.pmid: 10547847
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2006 Jul;38(7):801-6
references.pmid: 16751771
references.citation: J Physiol Paris. 2003 Jan;97(1):77-86
references.pmid: 14706693
references.citation: Science. 1988 Sep 30;241(4874):1807-10
references.pmid: 2845573
references.citation: Physiol Rev. 2007 Oct;87(4):1215-84
references.pmid: 17928584
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jun 7;102(23):8345-50
references.pmid: 15928085
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Feb 13;28(7):1588-97
references.pmid: 18272680
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 22;274(1609):489-98
references.pmid: 17476768
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Dec 7;444(7120):707-12
references.pmid: 17151658
references.citation: Front Mol Neurosci. 2010 Jan 08;2:26
references.pmid: 20161699
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Dec;11(12):1419-29
references.pmid: 18997790
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2002 Apr 1;11(7):853-60
references.pmid: 11929858
references.citation: Neural Dev. 2011 Aug 24;6:31
references.pmid: 21864334
references.citation: Development. 2008 May;135(10):1735-43
references.pmid: 18403413
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Jun 3;429(6991):523-30
references.pmid: 15175743
references.citation: Physiol Rev. 2005 Jul;85(3):883-941
references.pmid: 15987798
references.citation: Clin Genet. 2012 May;81(5):479-84
references.pmid: 21391991
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2008 Apr;40(4):449-54
references.pmid: 18344998
references.citation: Genetics. 2006 Dec;174(4):2245-7
references.pmid: 17028313
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1998 Nov;80(5):2608-20
references.pmid: 9819267
references.citation: Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2007 May;39(5):384-90
references.pmid: 17492136
references.citation: EMBO J. 1988 Dec 1;7(12):3717-26
references.pmid: 2850172
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2012 Aug 17;287(34):28975-85
references.pmid: 22700964
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 May 10;26(19):5117-30
references.pmid: 16687503
references.citation: Neural Dev. 2008 Mar 26;3:8
references.pmid: 18366789
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2002 Jul;16(2):186-96
references.pmid: 12169101
references.citation: Trends Genet. 2008 Sep;24(9):439-47
references.pmid: 18707791
references.citation: Nat Genet. 1994 Jun;7(2):131-5
references.pmid: 7920629
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2012 Aug 17;287(34):28986-9002
references.pmid: 22753417
references.citation: Dev Dyn. 1995 Jul;203(3):253-310
references.pmid: 8589427
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2011 Jan 7;286(1):806-17
references.pmid: 20843816
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 1999 Oct;46(4):634-8
references.pmid: 10514101
references.citation: Genesis. 2001 Jul;30(3):154-6
references.pmid: 11477696
references.citation: Neuron. 2002 Dec 19;36(6):989-91
references.pmid: 12495613
references.citation: Nat Genet. 1993 Dec;5(4):351-8
references.pmid: 8298642
references.citation: Front Mol Neurosci. 2009 Dec 23;2:30
references.pmid: 20126315
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 May 2;27(18):4984-94
references.pmid: 17475807
references.citation: J Neurobiol. 1998 Dec;37(4):622-32
references.pmid: 9858263
references.citation: Neurobiol Dis. 2011 Jul;43(1):184-9
references.pmid: 21420493
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Dec 8;48(5):773-86
references.pmid: 16337915
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 1994 Nov;3(11):2025-30
references.pmid: 7874121
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 18;108(3):1164-9
references.pmid: 21199947
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2010 Apr;7(4):248-9
references.pmid: 20354512
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 18;108(3):1170-5
references.pmid: 21199937
references.citation: Nat Genet. 1994 Jun;7(2):136-41
references.pmid: 7920630
references.citation: Neuron. 1998 Jan;20(1):43-53
references.pmid: 9459441
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 14;30(28):9612-20
references.pmid: 20631190
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2012 Jan 24;22(2):93-102
references.pmid: 22197243
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2000 Aug 1;20(15):5764-74
references.pmid: 10908617
references.citation: Mamm Genome. 2006 Sep;17(9):950-5
references.pmid: 16964444
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Jun;22(3):522-9
references.pmid: 22409856
references.citation: Neuron. 2001 Sep 27;31(6):1035-46
references.pmid: 11580902
references.citation: FEBS Lett. 1991 Apr 9;281(1-2):160-6
references.pmid: 1707830
references.citation: Physiol Rev. 2004 Oct;84(4):1051-95
references.pmid: 15383648
references.citation: Evol Dev. 2007 Nov-Dec;9(6):540-54
references.pmid: 17976051
references.citation: Science. 2004 May 7;304(5672):884-7
references.pmid: 15131310
references.citation: Development. 1996 Dec;123:399-413
references.pmid: 9007258
references.citation: Nat Protoc. 2009;4(7):1073-81
references.pmid: 19561590
references.citation: Vision Res. 1998 May;38(10):1411-30
references.pmid: 9667008
references.citation: Neuron. 1995 Dec;15(6):1287-98
references.pmid: 8845153