title: MRI of the foetal brain using a rapid 3D steady-state sequence.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the capacity of a rapid T2 weighted three-dimensional (3D) sequence to diagnose foetal brain abnormalities by comparing the results with current two-dimensional (2D) methods. We have also made assessments of the estimates of energy deposition using those methods.
  
  
  METHODS
  50 pregnant females were included in this study under the guidance of the institutional review board. All their foetuses had suspected brain abnormalities on antenatal ultrasonography or were at increased risk of a brain malformation based on the results of an earlier pregnancy. All the foetuses had a routine MR protocol that includes three orthogonal plane single-shot fast-spin echoes and 2D steady-state sequences. In addition, a 3D rapid steady-state sequence of the foetal brain was performed (acquisition time approximately 40 s), and the standard and 3D sequences were reported independently and the results were compared. The specific absorption rate (SAR) predicted by the scanner was recorded in 12 cases in order to estimate the energy deposited by the three sequences.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The 3D rapid steady-state sequences produced diagnostic-quality images in 41/50 (82%) cases. All the failures were in second trimester foetuses (9/26-35% failure rate). There was a discrepancy between the standard report and findings using the 3D sequence in 2/41 of the foetuses with good-quality 3D imaging. The predicted SAR deposition of the 3D steady-state sequences was comparable with the single-shot fast-spin echo sequence.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our initial assessments of a 3D rapid steady-state sequence to image the foetus are encouraging in terms of diagnostic information and acceptable energy deposition values. The high failure rate in second trimester foetuses probably relates to the greater mobility of the smaller foetuses, and improvements in the 3D sequence are required in terms of reduced acquisition time and higher resolution.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We have shown that 3D T2 weighted images of the foetal brain can be acquired in a clinical setting and produce diagnostic-quality imaging in a high proportion of cases. The success rate in acquiring diagnostic-quality images is related to gestational age. Good-quality images were obtained in all third trimester foetuses but only in approximately two-thirds of second trimester foetuses. This probably reflects the problem of the greater mobility of second trimester foetuses. 3D T2 weighted acquisitions have great potential for improving the antenatal diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities and may reduce the time that a pregnant female needs to spend on the MR scanner.
authors.affiliation: Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. p.griffiths@sheffield.ac.uk
authors.forename: P D
authors.initials: PD
authors.lastname: Griffiths
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Jarvis
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: McQuillan
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Williams
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Paley
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Armitage
mesh_terms: D001921:Brain / Q000002:abnormalities*; D005260:Female; D005333:Fetus / Q000473:pathology*; D005865:Gestational Age; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000379:methods; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D011247:Pregnancy; D011296:Prenatal Diagnosis
references.citation: BJOG. 2004 Aug;111(8):784-92
references.pmid: 15270925
references.citation: Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2004 May;14(2):293-306, viii
references.pmid: 15182820
references.citation: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Jan;31(1):106-11
references.pmid: 19762458
references.citation: Med Image Anal. 2012 Jan;16(1):28-37
references.pmid: 21636311
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 2006 Aug;105(2 Suppl):94-100
references.pmid: 16922069
references.citation: J Radiol. 2002 Jun;83(6 Pt 1):723-30
references.pmid: 12149589
references.citation: Radiology. 1997 Sep;204(3):635-42
references.pmid: 9280237
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Jan;29(1):146-58
references.pmid: 19744911
references.citation: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;34(4):471-4
references.pmid: 19746445
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Sep;26(3):672-7
references.pmid: 17729346
references.citation: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Oct;21(9):1688-98
references.pmid: 11039352