title: Evidence and ideology as a rationale for light-therapy in Russia: from the Soviet Union to the present day.
abstract: Light therapy is still used to treat a number of common diseases in Russia. The practice is firmly anchored in history: Soviet clinical practice was divorced from the emerging field of evidence-based medicine. Medical researchers were cut off from international medical research and scientific literature, with much Soviet scientific activity based on a particular socialist ideology. In this study, the use of light therapy serves as a case study to explore tensions between international evidence-based medicine and practices developed in isolation under the Soviet Union, the legacy of which is to the detriment of many patients today. We used four different search methods to uncover scientific and grey literature, both historical and contemporary. We assessed the changing frequency of publications over time and contrasted the volume of literature on light therapy with more orthodox treatments such as statins and painkillers. Our search found an increasing number and comparatively large body of scientific publications on light therapy in the Russian language, and many publications emanating from prestigious Russian institutions. Combined with our analysis of the historical literature and our appraisal of 22 full text articles, this leads us to suggest that light therapy entered mainstream Soviet medical practice before the Stalinist period and still occupies an important position in contemporary Russian clinical practice. We propose that this outdated treatment survives in Russia in part due to the political, economic and social forces that helped to popularize it during Soviet times, and by the seeming justification offered by poorly executed studies.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
authors.forename: Charlotte
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Kühlbrandt
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: McKee
references.citation: Sov Med. 1991;(4):57-8
references.pmid: 1871633
references.citation: Am J Health Behav. 2013 Jan;37(1):112-21
references.pmid: 22943108
references.citation: Vopr Onkol. 1997;43(4):445-7
references.pmid: 9381702
references.citation: Klin Med (Mosk). 2003;81(11):30-2
references.pmid: 14689706
references.citation: Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2000;100(12):40-2
references.pmid: 11195536
references.citation: Vrach Delo. 1991 May;(5):89-90
references.pmid: 1866930
references.citation: Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk. 2004;(7):15-9
references.pmid: 15293793
references.citation: Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 1997;97(11):22-7
references.pmid: 9463032
references.citation: Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2008 Sep 30;5:15
references.pmid: 18826569
references.citation: Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 1999;99(5):20-4
references.pmid: 10358913
references.citation: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Jun;66(6):482-8
references.pmid: 21051778
references.citation: Klin Med (Mosk). 2001;79(5):11-4
references.pmid: 11510176
references.citation: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Oct;54(10):740-4
references.pmid: 10990475
references.citation: J Public Health Policy. 2011 Aug;32(3):293-304
references.pmid: 21808248
references.citation: Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 1996;96(3):67-71
references.pmid: 8992841
references.citation: J R Soc Med. 2011 Feb;104(2):84-6
references.pmid: 21282799