title: Using value of information to guide evaluation of decision supports for differential diagnosis: is it time for a new look?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Decision support systems for differential diagnosis have traditionally been evaluated on the basis of criteria how sensitively and specifically they are able to identify the correct diagnosis established by expert clinicians.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This article questions whether evaluation criteria pertaining to identifying the correct diagnosis are most appropriate or useful. Instead it advocates evaluation of decision support systems for differential diagnosis based on the criterion of maximizing value of information.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This approach quantitatively and systematically integrates several important clinical management priorities, including avoiding serious diagnostic errors of omission and avoiding harmful or expensive tests.
authors.affiliation: Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, VZ30 6th floor, 615, New York, NY 10016, USA. Scott.Braithwaite@nyumc.org.
authors.forename: R Scott
authors.initials: RS
authors.lastname: Braithwaite
authors.forename: Matthew
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Scotch
mesh_terms: D020000:Decision Support Systems, Clinical / Q000592:standards*; D003936:Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted / Q000592:standards*; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D003951:Diagnostic Errors / Q000517:prevention & control; D006801:Humans
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1982 Aug 19;307(8):468-76
references.pmid: 7048091
references.citation: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):563-72
references.pmid: 12925549
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1994 Jun 23;330(25):1792-6
references.pmid: 8190157
references.citation: Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997;:667-71
references.pmid: 9357709
references.citation: Med Decis Making. 2010 Mar-Apr;30(2):155-62
references.pmid: 20040743
references.citation: J Med Syst. 1991 Feb;15(1):93-110
references.pmid: 1748852
references.citation: JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1583-4
references.pmid: 22511682
references.citation: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Apr 28;6:22
references.pmid: 16646956
references.citation: Proc AMIA Symp. 1999;:520-4
references.pmid: 10566413
references.citation: AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;:76-80
references.pmid: 14728137
references.citation: Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991;:68-72
references.pmid: 1807689
references.citation: Am J Med. 1989 Apr;86(4):433-41
references.pmid: 2648823
references.citation: JAMA. 1999 Nov 17;282(19):1851-6
references.pmid: 10573277
references.citation: Chest. 2000 Aug;118(2 Suppl):8S-17S
references.pmid: 10939994
references.citation: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996 Nov-Dec;3(6):429-31
references.pmid: 8930859
references.citation: Health Econ. 1996 Nov-Dec;5(6):513-24
references.pmid: 9003938
references.citation: BMJ. 2002 Oct 26;325(7370):941
references.pmid: 12399345