title: Macular degeneration affects eye movement behavior during visual search.
abstract: Patients with a scotoma in their central vision (e.g., due to macular degeneration, MD) commonly adopt a strategy to direct the eyes such that the image falls onto a peripheral location on the retina. This location is referred to as the preferred retinal locus (PRL). Although previous research has investigated the characteristics of this PRL, it is unclear whether eye movement metrics are modulated by peripheral viewing with a PRL as measured during a visual search paradigm. To this end, we tested four MD patients in a visual search paradigm and contrasted their performance with a healthy control group and a healthy control group performing the same experiment with a simulated scotoma. The experiment contained two conditions. In the first condition the target was an unfilled circle hidden among c-shaped distractors (serial condition) and in the second condition the target was a filled circle (pop-out condition). Saccadic search latencies for the MD group were significantly longer in both conditions compared to both control groups. Results of a subsequent experiment indicated that this difference between the MD and the control groups could not be explained by a difference in target selection sensitivity. Furthermore, search behavior of MD patients was associated with saccades with smaller amplitudes toward the scotoma, an increased intersaccadic interval and an increased number of eye movements necessary to locate the target. Some of these characteristics, such as the increased intersaccadic interval, were also observed in the simulation group, which indicate that these characteristics are related to the peripheral viewing itself. We suggest that the combination of the central scotoma and peripheral viewing can explain the altered search behavior and no behavioral evidence was found for a possible reorganization of the visual system associated with the use of a PRL. Thus the switch from a fovea-based to a PRL-based reference frame impairs search efficiency.
authors.affiliation: Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands.
authors.forename: Stefan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Van der Stigchel
authors.forename: Richard A I
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Bethlehem
authors.forename: Barrie P
authors.initials: BP
authors.lastname: Klein
authors.forename: Tos T J M
authors.initials: TT
authors.lastname: Berendschot
authors.forename: Tanja C W
authors.initials: TC
authors.lastname: Nijboer
authors.forename: Serge O
authors.initials: SO
authors.lastname: Dumoulin
keywords: eye movements; macular degeneration; preferred retinal location; saccades; visual search
references.citation: J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999 Oct;36(4):356-64
references.pmid: 10678458
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 11;6:134
references.pmid: 22593741
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Feb 28;52(2):1164-70
references.pmid: 21087972
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991 Mar;32(3):567-74
references.pmid: 2001931
references.citation: Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Sep;89(9):1385-94
references.pmid: 22885785
references.citation: J Vis. 2010 Sep 15;10(11):13
references.pmid: 20884508
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988 Mar;29(3):470-5
references.pmid: 3343102
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sep 29;52(10):7603-9
references.pmid: 21873676
references.citation: Can J Ophthalmol. 2010 Feb;45(1):62-6
references.pmid: 20130713
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1997 Apr;59(3):323-46
references.pmid: 9136264
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987 Aug;28(8):1268-74
references.pmid: 3610545
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Nov;132(3):201-12
references.pmid: 19635610
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Jan 19;25(3):614-8
references.pmid: 15659597
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2008 Nov;18(11):2483-93
references.pmid: 18250083
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986 Jul;27(7):1137-47
references.pmid: 3721792
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990 Jun;31(6):1149-61
references.pmid: 2354915
references.citation: J Vis. 2008 May 19;8(5):6.1-18
references.pmid: 18842077
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1976 Sep;83(5):880-97
references.pmid: 794902
references.citation: J Am Optom Assoc. 1988 Feb;59(2):106-11
references.pmid: 3283201
references.citation: Vision Res. 1991;31(12):2209-18
references.pmid: 1771800
references.citation: Vision Res. 2005 Nov;45(25-26):3224-34
references.pmid: 16139858
references.citation: Vision Res. 2008 Aug;48(18):1910-9
references.pmid: 18620725
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988 Feb;29(2):268-78
references.pmid: 3338884
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 2002 Apr;7(2):190-8
references.pmid: 11966303
references.citation: Vis Neurosci. 2009 Nov;26(5-6):487-94
references.pmid: 20003597
references.citation: Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Feb;89(1):e82-8
references.pmid: 21272283
references.citation: Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Jan;82(1):27-35
references.pmid: 15630401
references.citation: Surv Ophthalmol. 1980 May-Jun;24(Suppl):335-610
references.pmid: 7444756