title: The influences of guiding cues on motor skill autonomy in rats.
abstract: How does the effectiveness of guiding cues influence the development of motor skill autonomy? We utilized two sets of guiding cues (lights vs. reversed-lights conditions) that differed in their effectiveness to control a left-right leverpress sequence in rats. We separately measured the development of stimulus control by panel lights on guiding-cues trials and the development of stimulus control by practice cues on no-cue probe trials within the same sessions. Accuracy in the presence of the guiding cues was acquired faster in the lights condition than in the reversed-lights condition, but subjects in the reversed-lights condition were more able to complete the skill autonomously than those in the lights condition. Throughout acquisition, control by guiding cues and practice cues developed at the same rate in the reversed-lights condition, but control by practice cues (autonomy) developed at a slower rate than did control by guiding cues in the lights condition. At the end of training, subjects that had been exposed to the reversed-lights condition displayed higher levels of autonomy than did those exposed to the lights condition. The less effective guiding cue (reversed-lights) produced greater levels of autonomy than did the more effective cue (lights), even though control by this guiding cue developed more slowly. Thus, guiding your child by the hand too much may reduce his or her ability to complete the task independently. We discuss the similarity to prompt dependence in children with learning disabilities and transfer of stimulus control.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Wofford College, 429 N. Church St., Spartanburg, SC, 29303, USA, reidak@wofford.edu.
authors.forename: Alliston K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Reid
authors.forename: Grace
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Demarco
authors.forename: Kelsey
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: Theodore
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Fort
authors.forename: Erica
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Cousins
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003463:Cues; D009048:Motor Skills; D051381:Rats; D014163:Transfer, Psychology
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1965 Mar;72:89-104
references.pmid: 14282677
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:223-32
references.pmid: 13980669
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Mar;23(2):241-6
references.pmid: 16811845
references.citation: J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Summer;42(2):327-34
references.pmid: 19949520
references.citation: J Gen Psychol. 2004 Jan;131(1):86-96
references.pmid: 14977034
references.citation: J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Summer;17(2):175-88
references.pmid: 6735950
references.citation: Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Jan;14(1):4-58
references.pmid: 26173288
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2005 Apr;8(2):67-74
references.pmid: 15365876
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Appl. 2007 Sep;13(3):171-8
references.pmid: 17924802
references.citation: Learn Behav. 2013 Dec;41(4):402-13
references.pmid: 23846327
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1970 Sep;77(5):419-50
references.pmid: 4319167
references.citation: J Gen Psychol. 2007 Apr;134(2):247-57
references.pmid: 17503698
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2010 May;84(1):511-5
references.pmid: 20067827
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 May;15(3):347-54
references.pmid: 4252714
references.citation: J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1970 Aug;72(2):177-92
references.pmid: 5489452
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Nov;36(3):303-15
references.pmid: 7310261
references.citation: J Appl Behav Anal. 2004 Winter;37(4):503-7
references.pmid: 15669408