title: Feasibility study of a wearable exoskeleton for children: is the gait altered by adding masses on lower limbs?
abstract: We are designing a pediatric exoskeletal ankle robot (pediatric Anklebot) to promote gait habilitation in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). Few studies have evaluated how much or whether the unilateral loading of a wearable exoskeleton may have the unwanted effect of altering significantly the gait. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether adding masses up to 2.5 kg, the estimated overall added mass of the mentioned device, at the knee level alters the gait kinematics. Ten healthy children and eight children with CP, with light or mild gait impairment, walked wearing a knee brace with several masses. Gait parameters and lower-limb joint kinematics were analyzed with an optoelectronic system under six conditions: without brace (natural gait) and with masses placed at the knee level (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 kg). T-tests and repeated measures ANOVA tests were conducted in order to find noteworthy differences among the trial conditions and between loaded and unloaded legs. No statistically significant differences in gait parameters for both healthy children and children with CP were observed in the five "with added mass" conditions. We found significant differences among "natural gait" and "with added masses" conditions in knee flexion and hip extension angles for healthy children and in knee flexion angle for children with CP. This result can be interpreted as an effect of the mechanical constraint induced by the knee brace rather than the effect associated with load increase. The study demonstrates that the mechanical constraint induced by the brace has a measurable effect on the gait of healthy children and children with CP and that the added mass up to 2.5 kg does not alter the lower limb kinematics. This suggests that wearable devices weighing 25 N or less will not noticeably modify the gait patterns of the population examined here.
authors.affiliation: DEIM Department of Economics and Management - Industrial Engineering, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy ; MARLab Movement Analysis and Robotics Laboratory - Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation Department, "Bambino Gesù" Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
authors.forename: Stefano
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Rossi
authors.forename: Alessandra
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Colazza
authors.forename: Maurizio
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Petrarca
authors.forename: Enrico
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Castelli
authors.forename: Paolo
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Cappa
authors.forename: Hermano Igo
authors.initials: HI
authors.lastname: Krebs
mesh_terms: D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002547:Cerebral Palsy / Q000534:rehabilitation; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004867:Equipment Design; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D005684:Gait; D006801:Humans; D007866:Leg / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D012046:Rehabilitation / Q000295:instrumentation*; D012371:Robotics / Q000295:instrumentation*; D062211:Spatio-Temporal Analysis
references.citation: Gait Posture. 2003 Aug;18(1):23-8
references.pmid: 12855297
references.citation: BMC Pediatr. 2008 Apr 24;8:14
references.pmid: 18435840
references.citation: Orthopedics. 1993 Oct;16(10):1127-31
references.pmid: 8255807
references.citation: J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009 Jun 18;6:21
references.pmid: 19538735
references.citation: Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2002;8(3):146-50
references.pmid: 12216058
references.citation: Aust J Physiother. 2003;49(1):7-12
references.pmid: 12600249
references.citation: Clin Rehabil. 2003 Feb;17(1):48-57
references.pmid: 12617379
references.citation: Neuromodulation. 2003 Apr;6(2):108-15
references.pmid: 22150969
references.citation: Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006 Apr;11(2):117-25
references.pmid: 16338186
references.citation: PM R. 2010 Jan;2(1):71-5
references.pmid: 20129516
references.citation: J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010 May 21;7:23
references.pmid: 20492698
references.citation: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008 Jul;23(6):762-8
references.pmid: 18325646
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2006 Mar;169(4):482-95
references.pmid: 16328304
references.citation: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2009 Feb;17(1):2-8
references.pmid: 19211317
references.citation: Arch Dis Child. 2009 Aug;94(8):615-20
references.pmid: 19208675
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2009 Jan;212(Pt 1):21-31
references.pmid: 19088207
references.citation: J Mot Behav. 1989 Dec;21(4):337-55
references.pmid: 15136250
references.citation: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007 Sep;15(3):379-86
references.pmid: 17894270
references.citation: Int J Rehabil Res. 2010 Jun;33(2):165-71
references.pmid: 19910797
references.citation: J Biomech. 2006;39(10):1832-41
references.pmid: 16023126
references.citation: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:4481-4
references.pmid: 21095776
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2008 Jan;121(1):e187-92
references.pmid: 18070932
references.citation: Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997 Apr;39(4):214-23
references.pmid: 9183258
references.citation: Med Eng Phys. 2012 May;34(4):397-408
references.pmid: 22177895
references.citation: Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 May;25(4):378-85
references.pmid: 21343525
references.citation: IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011;2011:5975410
references.pmid: 22275613