title: Relationship between microstructure, material distribution, and mechanical properties of sheep tibia during fracture healing process.
abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between microstructural parameters, material distribution, and mechanical properties of sheep tibia at the apparent and tissue levels during the fracture healing process. Eighteen sheep underwent tibial osteotomy and were sacrificed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Radiographs and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scanning were taken for microstructural assessment, material distribution evaluation, and micro-finite element analysis. A displacement of 5% compressive strain on the longitudinal direction was applied to the micro-finite element model, and apparent and tissue-level mechanical properties were calculated. Principle component analysis and linear regression were used to establish the relationship between principle components (PCs) and mechanical parameters. Visible bony callus formation was observed throughout the healing process from radiographic assessment. Apparent mechanical property increased at 8 weeks, but tissue-level mechanical property did not increase significantly until 12 weeks. Three PCs were extracted from microstructural parameters and material distribution, which accounted for 87.592% of the total variation. The regression results showed a significant relationship between PCs and mechanical parameters (R>0.8, P<0.05). Results of this study show that microstructure and material distribution based on micro-CT imaging could efficiently predict bone strength and reflect the bone remodeling process during fracture healing, which provides a basis for exploring the fracture healing mechanism and may be used as an approach for fractured bone strength assessment.
authors.affiliation: 1. Department of Engineering Mechanics, Jilin University, Changchun (130022), People's Republic of China;
authors.forename: Jiazi
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Gao
authors.forename: He
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Gong
authors.forename: Xing
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Huang
authors.forename: Juan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Fang
authors.forename: Dong
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Zhu
authors.forename: Yubo
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Fan
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D020342:Finite Element Analysis; D017102:Fracture Healing / Q000502:physiology*; D011859:Radiography; D012756:Sheep; D013977:Tibia / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000378:metabolism*
keywords: Fracture healing process; Material distribution; Mechanical properties.; Microstructure; Tibia
references.citation: J Orthop Res. 2009 Jul;27(7):922-30
references.pmid: 19117066
references.citation: J Biomech. 2006;39(7):1287-95
references.pmid: 15922348
references.citation: Clin Orthop Surg. 2009 Mar;1(1):40-7
references.pmid: 19884996
references.citation: J Biomech. 2002 Jul;35(7):951-60
references.pmid: 12052397
references.citation: Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2009 Jul;95(1):23-30
references.pmid: 19231021
references.citation: Int J Biol Sci. 2011 Jan 26;7(1):112-32
references.pmid: 21278921
references.citation: J Biomech. 2010 Mar 22;43(5):1011-5
references.pmid: 19942221
references.citation: Acta Biomater. 2008 Sep;4(5):1569-75
references.pmid: 18400573
references.citation: J Orthop Res. 1998 Sep;16(5):622-8
references.pmid: 9820288
references.citation: Drug Discov Today. 2003 Nov 1;8(21):980-9
references.pmid: 14643161
references.citation: Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2009 Sep;6(3):234-46
references.pmid: 22461252
references.citation: Ann Biomed Eng. 2012 Jul;40(7):1575-85
references.pmid: 22258889
references.citation: BMC Med. 2011 May 31;9:66
references.pmid: 21627784
references.citation: J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003 Sep-Oct;11(5):344-54
references.pmid: 14565756
references.citation: Med Eng Phys. 2003 Jul;25(6):455-64
references.pmid: 12787983
references.citation: J Orthop Res. 2012 Dec;30(12):1999-2006
references.pmid: 22707347
references.citation: Bone. 2004 Jul;35(1):65-73
references.pmid: 15207742
references.citation: Ann Biomed Eng. 2006 Jul;34(7):1157-63
references.pmid: 16732432
references.citation: Bone. 2006 Jun;38(6):864-70
references.pmid: 16359937
references.citation: J Orthop Res. 1991 Jan;9(1):131-42
references.pmid: 1984043
references.citation: J Biomech. 2010 Feb 10;43(3):557-62
references.pmid: 19875119
references.citation: Bone. 2009 Feb;44(2):335-44
references.pmid: 19013264
references.citation: BMC Genomics. 2011 Mar 24;12:158
references.pmid: 21435219
references.citation: Bone. 2008 Mar;42(3):591-6
references.pmid: 18180212
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33776
references.pmid: 22470474
references.citation: J Biomech Eng. 2001 Apr;123(2):176-83
references.pmid: 11340879
references.citation: J Biomech. 2008 Oct 20;41(14):3066-72
references.pmid: 18778822
references.citation: J Cell Biochem. 2003 Apr 1;88(5):873-84
references.pmid: 12616527
references.citation: Calcif Tissue Int. 1997 Feb;60(2):194-9
references.pmid: 9056170
references.citation: Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2008 Oct;19(5):459-66
references.pmid: 18692584
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26490
references.pmid: 22046293
references.citation: Bone. 2005 Mar;36(3):480-8
references.pmid: 15777656
references.citation: Integr Comp Biol. 2009 Jul;49(1):59-68
references.pmid: 21669846
references.citation: J Biomech. 2000 Apr;33(4):415-25
references.pmid: 10768390