title: Evaluation of bone marrow lesion volume as a knee osteoarthritis biomarker--longitudinal relationships with pain and structural changes: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Bone marrow lesion (BML) size may be an important imaging biomarker for osteoarthritis-related clinical trials and reducing BML size may be an important therapeutic goal. However, data on the interrelationships between BML size, pain, and structural progression are inconsistent and rarely examined in the same cohort. Therefore, we evaluated the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of BML volume with knee pain and joint space narrowing (JSN).
  
  
  METHODS
  A BML volume assessment was performed on magnetic resonance images of the knee collected at the 24- and 48-month Osteoarthritis Initiative visits from a convenience sample of 404 participants in the progression cohort. During the same visits, knee pain was assessed with WOMAC pain scores and knee radiographs were acquired and scored for JSN. BML volume was summed to generate a total knee volume and an index tibiofemoral compartment volume (compartment with greater baseline JSN). Primary analyses included multiple linear regressions (outcome = pain, predictor = total knee BML volume) and logistic regressions (outcome = JSN, predictor = index tibiofemoral compartment BML volume).
  
  
  RESULTS
  This sample was 49% female with a mean age of 63 (9.2 standard deviation (SD)) years, and 71% had radiographic osteoarthritis in the study knee. Larger baseline BMLs were associated with greater baseline knee pain (P = 0.01), the presence of JSN at baseline (odds ratio (OR) = 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.23 to 1.83), and JSN progression (OR = 1.27, 95%CI = 1.11 to 1.46). Changes in total knee BML volume had a positive association with changes in knee pain severity (P = 0.004) and this association may be driven by knees that were progressing from no or small baseline BMLs to larger BMLs. In contrast, we found no linear positive relationship between BML volume change and JSN progression. Instead, regression of medial tibiofemoral BML volume was associated with JSN progression compared to knees with no or minimal changes in BML volume (OR = 3.36, 95%CI = 1.55 to 7.28). However, follow-up analyses indicated that the association between JSN progression and BML volume change may primarily be influenced by baseline BML volume.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Large baseline BMLs are associated with greater baseline knee pain, the presence of JSN at baseline, and disease progression. Additionally, BML regression is associated with decreased knee pain but not a reduced risk of concurrent JSN progression.
authors.forename: Jeffrey B
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Driban
authors.forename: Lori
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Price
authors.forename: Grace H
authors.initials: GH
authors.lastname: Lo
authors.forename: Jincheng
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Pang
authors.forename: David J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Hunter
authors.forename: Eric
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Miller
authors.forename: Robert J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Ward
authors.forename: Charles B
authors.initials: CB
authors.lastname: Eaton
authors.forename: John A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Lynch
authors.forename: Timothy E
authors.initials: TE
authors.lastname: McAlindon
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D018771:Arthralgia / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology* / Q000503:physiopathology; D001853:Bone Marrow / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology*; D015331:Cohort Studies; D018450:Disease Progression; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology* / Q000503:physiopathology; D016014:Linear Models; D016015:Logistic Models; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020370:Osteoarthritis, Knee / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000379:methods; D011859:Radiography; D012307:Risk Factors; D013997:Time Factors
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan;58(1):130-6
references.pmid: 18163483
references.citation: Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2007 Mar-Apr;48(2):105-12
references.pmid: 17385365
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 May;67(5):683-8
references.pmid: 17728333
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Mar;63(3):691-9
references.pmid: 21360498
references.citation: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Dec;49(12):2413-9
references.pmid: 20823092
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15 Suppl A:A1-56
references.pmid: 17320422
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Sep;68(9):1461-5
references.pmid: 18829615
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2008 Oct;18(10):2292-302
references.pmid: 18491096
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 May;19(5):557-88
references.pmid: 21396463
references.citation: BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jan 02;14:3
references.pmid: 23281825
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Sep;56(9):2986-92
references.pmid: 17763427
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2006 May;54(5):1529-35
references.pmid: 16646037
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Nov;18(11):1429-35
references.pmid: 20727415
references.citation: Radiology. 2005 Dec;237(3):998-1007
references.pmid: 16251398
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40
references.pmid: 3068365
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Feb;67(2):206-11
references.pmid: 17472995
references.citation: Skeletal Radiol. 1994 Aug;23(6):445-8
references.pmid: 7992110
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003 Jun;11(6):387-93
references.pmid: 12801478
references.citation: Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(1):R10
references.pmid: 20085624
references.citation: JAMA. 2013 Jan 9;309(2):155-62
references.pmid: 23299607
references.citation: Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(1):R11
references.pmid: 19171047
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2003 Sep 2;139(5 Pt 1):330-6
references.pmid: 12965941
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Dec;20(12):1519-26
references.pmid: 22940708
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jan;70(1):60-7
references.pmid: 20829200
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2008 Oct;35(10):2047-54
references.pmid: 18793000
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Dec;20(12):1514-8
references.pmid: 22944524
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Aug;18(8):1062-6
references.pmid: 20472082
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Nov;50(11):3516-25
references.pmid: 15529367
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Dec;16(12):1433-41
references.pmid: 18786841
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Dec;17(12):1562-9
references.pmid: 19583959
references.citation: Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(6):R223
references.pmid: 21190555
references.citation: Radiology. 2000 Jun;215(3):835-40
references.pmid: 10831707
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Aug;71(8):1322-8
references.pmid: 22355040
references.citation: BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Sep 30;12:217
references.pmid: 21961433
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Sep;17(9):1115-31
references.pmid: 19358902
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2001 Apr 3;134(7):541-9
references.pmid: 11281736