title: Influence of different dose calculation algorithms on the estimate of NTCP for lung complications.
abstract: Due to limitations and uncertainties in dose calculation algorithms, different algorithms can predict different dose distributions and dose-volume histograms for the same treatment. This can be a problem when estimating the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for patient-specific dose distributions. Published NTCP model parameters are often derived for a different dose calculation algorithm than the one used to calculate the actual dose distribution. The use of algorithm-specific NTCP model parameters can prevent errors caused by differences in dose calculation algorithms. The objective of this work was to determine how to change the NTCP model parameters for lung complications derived for a simple correction-based pencil beam dose calculation algorithm, in order to make them valid for three other common dose calculation algorithms. NTCP was calculated with the relative seriality (RS) and Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) models. The four dose calculation algorithms used were the pencil beam (PB) and collapsed cone (CC) algorithms employed by Oncentra, and the pencil beam convolution (PBC) and anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) employed by Eclipse. Original model parameters for lung complications were taken from four published studies on different grades of pneumonitis, and new algorithm-specific NTCP model parameters were determined. The difference between original and new model parameters was presented in relation to the reported model parameter uncertainties. Three different types of treatments were considered in the study: tangential and locoregional breast cancer treatment and lung cancer treatment. Changing the algorithm without the derivation of new model parameters caused changes in the NTCP value of up to 10 percentage points for the cases studied. Furthermore, the error introduced could be of the same magnitude as the confidence intervals of the calculated NTCP values. The new NTCP model parameters were tabulated as the algorithm was varied from PB to PBC, AAA, or CC. Moving from the PB to the PBC algorithm did not require new model parameters; however, moving from PB to AAA or CC did require a change in the NTCP model parameters, with CC requiring the largest change. It was shown that the new model parameters for a given algorithm are different for the different treatment types.
authors.affiliation: University of Gothenburg. emma.hedin@radfys.gu.se.
authors.forename: Emma
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Hedin
authors.forename: Anna
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Bäck
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D001940:Breast / Q000528:radiation effects*; D004307:Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000150:complications* / Q000532:radiotherapy; D008954:Models, Biological; D058958:Organs at Risk / Q000528:radiation effects*; D011336:Probability; D011880:Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; D020266:Radiotherapy, Conformal
references.citation: Radiother Oncol. 2004 Oct;73(1):21-32
references.pmid: 15465142
references.citation: Med Phys. 2011 May;38(5):2412-8
references.pmid: 21776775
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jan 15;46(2):373-81
references.pmid: 10661344
references.citation: Med Phys. 2007 Sep;34(9):3579-86
references.pmid: 17926961
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2003 Jul 7;48(13):1863-84
references.pmid: 12884921
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2006 Nov 21;51(22):5785-807
references.pmid: 17068365
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Mar 1;55(3):724-35
references.pmid: 12573760
references.citation: Radiat Res Suppl. 1985;8:S13-9
references.pmid: 3867079
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2007 Mar 7;52(5):1363-85
references.pmid: 17301460
references.citation: Radiother Oncol. 2003 Oct;69(1):1-10
references.pmid: 14597351
references.citation: Int J Radiat Biol. 1992 Aug;62(2):249-62
references.pmid: 1355519
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989 Jun;16(6):1623-30
references.pmid: 2722599
references.citation: Radiother Oncol. 2007 Mar;82(3):308-16
references.pmid: 17224197