title: The role of working memory and divided attention in metaphor interpretation.
abstract: Although several types of figurative language exist, neuropsychological tests of non-literal language have focused on proverbs. Metaphors in the form X is (a) Y (e.g., The body's immunological response is a battle against disease.) place a lower demand on language skills and are more easily manipulated for novelty than proverbs. Forty healthy participants completed the Metaphor Interpretation Test (developed by the authors). The task includes 20 items chosen from a list of metaphors that were rated on several scales (e.g. imagery, aptness) in a study by Katz et al. (Metaphor Symb Act 3(4):191-214, 1988). Participants were asked to rate the familiarity and provide an explanation of each metaphor. A scoring system was developed to categorize answers into: abstract complete (AC), abstract partial (AP), concrete (CT), and other/unrelated (OT) types. Participants also completed short-term memory and divided attention tests. Overall, participants produced 56 % AC, 25.38 % AP, 7.88 % CT, and 10.88 % OT responses. It was found that a measure of verbal short-term memory span was the best predictor of performance on this task (adjusted R(2) = .369). It appears that short-term memory span, not working memory or divided attention, contributes most to providing abstract responses in explaining metaphors. This is in line with the idea that when one accesses the semantic network associated with a novel metaphor, one must hold this information in mind long enough to search for and link similar cognitive networks.
authors.affiliation: Psychology Department, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON , N9B 3P4, Canada, iskandas@uwindsor.ca.
authors.forename: Sam
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Iskandar
authors.forename: Anne D
authors.initials: AD
authors.lastname: Baird
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D032882:Comprehension / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D019365:Metaphor; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Psychiatry Res. 1995 Mar 27;56(2):155-61
references.pmid: 7667440
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2010 Nov;136(6):1045-67
references.pmid: 20822208
references.citation: Cogn Sci. 2011 Mar;35(2):251-96
references.pmid: 21429000
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Feb;7(2):92-96
references.pmid: 12584028
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Apr;90(4):578-96
references.pmid: 16649856
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Jun;8(2):331-5
references.pmid: 11495122
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Nov;19(11):1071-7
references.pmid: 19076475
references.citation: Cortex. 1984 Dec;20(4):585-90
references.pmid: 6518799
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 May;17(2):520-38
references.pmid: 1830090
references.citation: Brain Inj. 2005 Sep;19(10):743-51
references.pmid: 16175835
references.citation: J Nerv Ment Dis. 1970 Apr;150(4):291-300
references.pmid: 5436955
references.citation: Clin Neuropsychol. 2002 Aug;16(3):373-80
references.pmid: 12607149
references.citation: Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1998 Oct;13(7):585-95
references.pmid: 14590619
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2003 Jun;85(3):451-66
references.pmid: 12744957
references.citation: Brain. 2001 Jul;124(Pt 7):1450-60
references.pmid: 11408339
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Mar;19(2):295-308
references.pmid: 7681095
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Apr;40(2):245-53
references.pmid: 9130197
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 1990 Mar;5(1):94-100
references.pmid: 2317307
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2008 Jun;67(1):51-7
references.pmid: 18164527
references.citation: Brain. 1977 Dec;100(4):717-29
references.pmid: 608117
references.citation: Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 May;17(2):159-69
references.pmid: 13680423
references.citation: Appl Neuropsychol. 2000;7(3):154-9
references.pmid: 11125709