title: The impact of human-environment interactions on the stability of forest-grassland mosaic ecosystems.
abstract: Forest-grassland mosaic ecosystems can exhibit alternative stables states, whereby under the same environmental conditions, the ecosystem could equally well reside either in one state or another, depending on the initial conditions. We develop a mathematical model that couples a simplified forest-grassland mosaic model to a dynamic model of opinions about conservation priorities in a population, based on perceptions of ecosystem rarity. Weak human influence increases the region of parameter space where alternative stable states are possible. However, strong human influence precludes bistability, such that forest and grassland either co-exist at a single, stable equilibrium, or their relative abundance oscillates. Moreover, a perturbation can shift the system from a stable state to an oscillatory state. We conclude that human-environment interactions can qualitatively alter the composition of forest-grassland mosaic ecosystems. The human role in such systems should be viewed as dynamic, responsive element rather than as a fixed, unchanging entity.
authors.affiliation: 1] Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada [2] Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Colombia, Canada.
authors.forename: Clinton
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Innes
authors.forename: Madhur
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Anand
authors.forename: Chris T
authors.initials: CT
authors.lastname: Bauch
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D017753:Ecosystem; D004777:Environment; D006802:Human Activities; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D006109:Poaceae; D011157:Population Dynamics; D014197:Trees
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 1999 Oct;60(4 Pt A):3776-80
references.pmid: 11970211
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1997 Aug;12(9):352-6
references.pmid: 21238102
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Oct 1;15(10):413-417
references.pmid: 10998519
references.citation: Am Nat. 2007 Oct;170(4):587-601
references.pmid: 17891737
references.citation: Nature. 2011 Feb 3;470(7332):86-9
references.pmid: 21293376
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 28;362(1478):243-51
references.pmid: 17255033
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Aug;8(8):275-9
references.pmid: 21236168
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 3;108(18):7333-8
references.pmid: 21502517
references.citation: Ecology. 2011 May;92(5):1063-72
references.pmid: 21661567
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1989 Oct;4(10):293-8
references.pmid: 21227372
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Dec 8;438(7069):846-9
references.pmid: 16341012
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Oct 11;413(6856):591-6
references.pmid: 11595939
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Aug 22;272(1573):1669-75
references.pmid: 16087421
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(4):e1002452
references.pmid: 22496631
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2007 Oct;17(7):2024-36
references.pmid: 17974339