title: Defeating crypsis: detection and learning of camouflage strategies.
abstract: Camouflage is perhaps the most widespread defence against predators in nature and an active area of interdisciplinary research. Recent work has aimed to understand what camouflage types exist (e.g. background matching, disruptive, and distractive patterns) and their effectiveness. However, work has almost exclusively focused on the efficacy of these strategies in preventing initial detection, despite the fact that predators often encounter the same prey phenotype repeatedly, affording them opportunities to learn to find those prey more effectively. The overall value of a camouflage strategy may, therefore, reflect both its ability to prevent detection by predators and resist predator learning. We conducted four experiments with humans searching for hidden targets of different camouflage types (disruptive, distractive, and background matching of various contrast levels) over a series of touch screen trials. As with previous work, disruptive coloration was the most successful method of concealment overall, especially with relatively high contrast patterns, whereas potentially distractive markings were either neutral or costly. However, high contrast patterns incurred faster decreases in detection times over trials compared to other stimuli. In addition, potentially distractive markings were sometimes learnt more slowly than background matching markings, despite being found more readily overall. Finally, learning effects were highly dependent upon the experimental paradigm, including the number of prey types seen and whether subjects encountered targets simultaneously or sequentially. Our results show that the survival advantage of camouflage strategies reflects both their ability to avoid initial detection (sensory mechanisms) and predator learning (perceptual mechanisms).
authors.affiliation: Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Jolyon
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Troscianko
authors.forename: Alice E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Lown
authors.forename: Anna E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Hughes
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Stevens
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological / Q000502:physiology*; D000818:Animals; D003116:Color; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D010858:Pigmentation / Q000502:physiology*; D011235:Predatory Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D013997:Time Factors; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1991 May 22;244(1310):81-5
references.pmid: 1679552
references.citation: Science. 1979 Jun 22;204(4399):1332-3
references.pmid: 17813172
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 27;364(1516):489-96
references.pmid: 18990668
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2427-32
references.pmid: 16959631
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1998 Oct;56(4):963-972
references.pmid: 9790707
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1992 Jul;18(3):273-86
references.pmid: 1619395
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 22;276(1657):781-6
references.pmid: 19019788
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Mar 22;272(1563):665-70
references.pmid: 15817442
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2012 Aug 23;8(4):609-12
references.pmid: 22319093
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Sep 7;273(1598):2141-7
references.pmid: 16901833
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Mar 3;434(7029):72-4
references.pmid: 15744301
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1996 Apr;22(2):139-51
references.pmid: 8618099
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Feb 28;103(9):3214-9
references.pmid: 16481615
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jul 7;275(1642):1535-41
references.pmid: 18381256
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 27;364(1516):423-7
references.pmid: 18990674
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1983 Jul;9(3):292-306
references.pmid: 6886632
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 May 22;276(1663):1905-10
references.pmid: 19324754
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136
references.pmid: 7351125
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2433-8
references.pmid: 16959632
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Feb 7;415(6872):609-13
references.pmid: 11832937
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2008 Dec 23;4(6):648-50
references.pmid: 18842567
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1996 Apr;22(2):152-63
references.pmid: 8618100
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 May 22;274(1615):1325-31
references.pmid: 17360282