title: Dissociating between object affordances and spatial compatibility effects using early response components.
abstract: objects may be perceived not only in terms of visual features, but also in terms of possibilities for action. Previous studies showed that when a centrally located object has a salient graspable feature (e.g., a handle), it facilitates motor responses corresponding with the feature's position. However, such so-called affordance effects have been criticized as resulting from spatial compatibility effects, due to the visual asymmetry created by the graspable feature, irrespective of any affordances. In order to dissociate between affordance and spatial compatibility effects, we asked participants to perform a simple reaction-time task to typically graspable and non-graspable objects with similar visual features (e.g., lollipop and stop sign). Responses were measured using either electromyography (EMG) on proximal arm muscles during reaching-like movements, or with finger key-presses. In both EMG and button press measurements, participants responded faster when the object was either presented in the same location as the responding hand, or was affordable, resulting in significant and independent spatial compatibility and affordance effects, but no interaction. Furthermore, while the spatial compatibility effect was present from the earliest stages of movement preparation and throughout the different stages of movement execution, the affordance effect was restricted to the early stages of movement execution. Finally, we tested a small group of unilateral arm amputees using EMG, and found residual spatial compatibility but no affordance, suggesting that spatial compatibility effects do not necessarily rely on individuals' available affordances. Our results show dissociation between affordance and spatial compatibility effects, and suggest that rather than evoking the specific motor action most suitable for interaction with the viewed object, graspable objects prompt the motor system in a general, body-part independent fashion.
authors.affiliation: Neurobiology Department, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem, Israel ; Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science Rehovot, Israel.
authors.forename: Meytal
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Wilf
authors.forename: Nicholas P
authors.initials: NP
authors.lastname: Holmes
authors.forename: Isabella
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Schwartz
authors.forename: Tamar R
authors.initials: TR
authors.lastname: Makin
keywords: EMG; affordance; amputees; hand; stimulus-response
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(1):226-34
references.pmid: 19766131
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;101(6):511-9
references.pmid: 9020824
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(1):13-24
references.pmid: 21824035
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jul;100(1):224-38
references.pmid: 18463184
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2007 Mar 26;18(5):483-7
references.pmid: 17496808
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2011 Nov;77(2):257-64
references.pmid: 21903319
references.citation: Cogn Process. 2012 Aug;13 Suppl 1:S215-8
references.pmid: 22806650
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jun 22;269(1497):1225-32
references.pmid: 12065038
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2013 Feb;224(3):373-82
references.pmid: 23138521
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
references.pmid: 5146491
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 4;30(31):10306-23
references.pmid: 20685975
references.citation: Science. 2011 Jan 14;331(6014):176-82
references.pmid: 21163965
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):449-58
references.pmid: 17905141
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Nov;63(11):2190-201
references.pmid: 20589580
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 2000 Nov;91 ( Pt 4):451-71
references.pmid: 11104173
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 1967 Jun;51(3):300-4
references.pmid: 6045637
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Aug;36(4):853-61
references.pmid: 20695704
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 23;29(38):11841-51
references.pmid: 19776270
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1991;87(2):407-20
references.pmid: 1769391
references.citation: Nat Commun. 2013;4:1570
references.pmid: 23463013
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2004 Jun;116(2):185-203
references.pmid: 15158182
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):830-46
references.pmid: 9627419
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2002 Nov;66(4):324-36
references.pmid: 12466929
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2010 Jan;21(1):55-7
references.pmid: 20424023
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2006 Aug;173(3):395-406
references.pmid: 16489431
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2002 Nov;66(4):312-23
references.pmid: 12466928
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1991;83(3):502-12
references.pmid: 2026193