title: Quantifying hub-like behavior in protein folding networks.
abstract: The free energy landscape of a protein is a function of many interdependent degrees of freedom. For this reason, conceptual constructs (e.g., funnels) have been useful to visualize these landscapes. One relatively new construct is the idea of a hub-like native state that is the final destination of many non-interconverting folding pathways. This is in contrast to the idea of a single predominant folding pathway connecting the native state to a rapidly interconverting ensemble of unfolded states. The key quantity to distinguish between these two ideas is the connectivity of the unfolded ensemble. We present a metric to determine this connectivity for a given network, which can be calculated either from continuous folding trajectories, or a Markov model. The metric determines how often a region of space is used as an intermediate on transition paths that connect two other regions of space, and we use it here to determine how often two parts of the unfolded ensemble are connected directly, versus how often these transitions are mediated by the native state.
authors.affiliation: Department of Chemistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, and Department of Chemistry and Biophysics Program, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
authors.forename: Alex
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Dickson
authors.forename: Charles L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Brooks
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 15;107(24):10890-5
references.pmid: 20534497
references.citation: Biopolymers. 1981 May;20(5):1013-31
references.pmid: 7225529
references.citation: Nat Struct Biol. 1997 Jan;4(1):10-9
references.pmid: 8989315
references.citation: J Chem Theory Comput. 2011 Oct 11;7(10):3412-3419
references.pmid: 22125474
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 2;108(31):12734-9
references.pmid: 21768345
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2004 Sep 3;342(1):299-306
references.pmid: 15313625
references.citation: Proteins. 1995 Mar;21(3):167-95
references.pmid: 7784423
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Dec 18;426(6968):884-90
references.pmid: 14685248
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 10;106(45):19011-6
references.pmid: 19887634
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2009 Oct 21;131(15):154104
references.pmid: 20568844
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2003 Nov 21;334(2):309-25
references.pmid: 14607121
references.citation: Science. 1995 Jul 21;269(5222):393-6
references.pmid: 7618103
references.citation: Protein Sci. 2002 Oct;11(10):2351-61
references.pmid: 12237457
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2008 Jun 21;128(23):235105
references.pmid: 18570534
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1990 Aug 7;29(31):7133-55
references.pmid: 2207096
references.citation: Science. 2000 Dec 8;290(5498):1903-4
references.pmid: 17742054
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Nov 5;105(19):198101
references.pmid: 21231198
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1992 Oct 13;31(40):9665-72
references.pmid: 1390743
references.citation: Nature. 1986 Jan 16-22;319(6050):199-203
references.pmid: 3945310
references.citation: Proteins. 2008 Mar;70(4):1185-95
references.pmid: 17847092
references.citation: J Comput Chem. 2009 Jul 30;30(10):1545-614
references.pmid: 19444816
references.citation: J Chem Theory Comput. 2011 Sep 13;7(9):2710-20
references.pmid: 26605464
references.citation: Science. 1998 Oct 23;282(5389):740-4
references.pmid: 9784131
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Dec 18;426(6968):900-4
references.pmid: 14685251