title: Resource quantity and quality determine the inter-specific associations between ecosystem engineers and resource users in a cavity-nest web.
abstract: While ecosystem engineering is a widespread structural force of ecological communities, the mechanisms underlying the inter-specific associations between ecosystem engineers and resource users are poorly understood. A proper knowledge of these mechanisms is, however, essential to understand how communities are structured. Previous studies suggest that increasing the quantity of resources provided by ecosystem engineers enhances populations of resource users. In a long-term study (1995-2011), we show that the quality of the resources (i.e. tree cavities) provided by ecosystem engineers is also a key feature that explains the inter-specific associations in a tree cavity-nest web. Red-naped sapsuckers (Sphyrapicusnuchalis) provided the most abundant cavities (52% of cavities, 0.49 cavities/ha). These cavities were less likely to be used than other cavity types by mountain bluebirds (Sialiacurrucoides), but provided numerous nest-sites (41% of nesting cavities) to tree swallows (Tachycinetabicolour). Swallows experienced low reproductive outputs in northern flicker (Colaptesauratus) cavities compared to those in sapsucker cavities (1.1 vs. 2.1 fledglings/nest), but the highly abundant flickers (33% of cavities, 0.25 cavities/ha) provided numerous suitable nest-sites for bluebirds (58%). The relative shortage of cavities supplied by hairy woodpeckers (Picoidesvillosus) and fungal/insect decay (<10% of cavities each, <0.09 cavities/ha) provided fewer breeding opportunities (<15% of nests), but represented high quality nest-sites for both bluebirds and swallows. Because both the quantity and quality of resources supplied by different ecosystem engineers may explain the amount of resources used by each resource user, conservation strategies may require different management actions to be implemented for the key ecosystem engineer of each resource user. We, therefore, urge the incorporation of both resource quantity and quality into models that assess community dynamics to improve conservation actions and our understanding of ecological communities based on ecosystem engineering.
authors.affiliation: Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Centre for Applied Conservation Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
authors.forename: Hugo
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Robles
authors.forename: Kathy
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Martin
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001717:Birds / Q000502:physiology*; D001955:British Columbia; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D004463:Ecology; D017753:Ecosystem; D009425:Nesting Behavior; D016011:Normal Distribution; D016012:Poisson Distribution; D011157:Population Dynamics; D011336:Probability; D014197:Trees
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Feb;19(2):101-8
references.pmid: 16701236
references.citation: Ecology. 2008 Jan;89(1):26-33
references.pmid: 18376543
references.citation: Oecologia. 2002 Jun;132(1):96-101
references.pmid: 28547281
references.citation: Oecologia. 2006 Apr;147(4):744-53
references.pmid: 16323016
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jan 15;90(2):592-4
references.pmid: 11607351
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2012 Sep;22(6):1733-42
references.pmid: 23092011
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2012 May;81(3):667-78
references.pmid: 22098534
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Apr 19;6(4):e19083
references.pmid: 21526161
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44346
references.pmid: 23028525