title: Within-population genetic structure in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands characterized by different disturbance histories: does forest management simplify population substructure?
abstract: The fine-scale assessment of both spatially and non-spatially distributed genetic variation is crucial to preserve forest genetic resources through appropriate forest management. Cryptic within-population genetic structure may be more common than previously thought in forest tree populations, which has strong implications for the potential of forests to adapt to environmental change. The present study was aimed at comparing within-population genetic structure in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) plots experiencing different disturbance levels. Five plot pairs made up by disturbed and undisturbed plots having the same biogeographic history were sampled throughout Europe. Overall, 1298 individuals were analyzed using four highly polymorphic nuclear microsatellite markers (SSRs). Bayesian clustering within plots identified 3 to 11 genetic clusters (within-plot θ ST ranged from 0.025 to 0.124). The proportion of within-population genetic variation due to genetic substructuring (F CluPlot = 0.067) was higher than the differentiation among the 10 plots (F PlotTot = 0.045). Focusing on the comparison between managed and unmanaged plots, disturbance mostly explains differences in the complexity of within-population genetic structure, determining a reduction of the number of genetic clusters present in a standardized area. Our results show that: i) genetic substructuring needs to be investigated when studying the within-population genetic structure in forest tree populations, and ii) indices describing subtle characteristics of the within-population genetic structure are good candidates for providing early signals of the consequences of forest management, and of disturbance events in general.
authors.affiliation: Plant Genetics Institute, National Research Council, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy ; Dipartimento di Bioscienze, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy.
authors.forename: Andrea
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Piotti
authors.forename: Stefano
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Leonardi
authors.forename: Myriam
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Heuertz
authors.forename: Joukje
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Buiteveld
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Geburek
authors.forename: Sophie
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Gerber
authors.forename: Koen
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kramer
authors.forename: Cristina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Vettori
authors.forename: Giovanni Giuseppe
authors.initials: GG
authors.lastname: Vendramin
mesh_terms: D029964:Fagus / Q000235:genetics*; D016468:Forestry / Q000379:methods*; D005828:Genetics, Population; D018895:Microsatellite Repeats
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2011 Dec;107(6):589-600
references.pmid: 21712844
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2012 Oct 1;28(19):2537-9
references.pmid: 22820204
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2010 Feb;19(3):459-71
references.pmid: 20070522
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2004 Apr;13(4):921-35
references.pmid: 15012766
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2013 Mar;22(6):1531-45
references.pmid: 23379310
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2009 Jul;103(1):90-6
references.pmid: 19384337
references.citation: Theor Appl Genet. 2003 Aug;107(4):598-610
references.pmid: 12750773
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2003 Sep;12(9):2483-95
references.pmid: 12919486
references.citation: J Hered. 2009 Jan-Feb;100(1):106-13
references.pmid: 18936113
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2010 Oct;105(4):348-57
references.pmid: 20531447
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Mar;24(3):621-31
references.pmid: 17150975
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2001 Jun;88(6):1006-10
references.pmid: 11410463
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2009 Nov;18(22):4564-76
references.pmid: 19793351
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2006 Oct;15(12):3617-30
references.pmid: 17032261
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2009 Jan;14(1):51-8
references.pmid: 19042147
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008 Apr;11(2):149-55
references.pmid: 18262830
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2004 Nov;13(11):3305-15
references.pmid: 15487991
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2007 Mar;16(5):925-36
references.pmid: 17305851
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2012 May;108(5):563-8
references.pmid: 22234249
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Jul;11(7):459-63
references.pmid: 20548291
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 1999 May;82 ( Pt 5):561-73
references.pmid: 10383677
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 Sep;10(5):785-96
references.pmid: 21565090
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2012 Jun;108(6):633-9
references.pmid: 22354112
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2008 Jul;17(14):3389-400
references.pmid: 18677808
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2011 May;20(9):1997-2010
references.pmid: 21426434
references.citation: New Phytol. 2012 Nov;196(3):713-725
references.pmid: 22861491
references.citation: Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370
references.pmid: 28563791
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2012 Mar;108(3):322-31
references.pmid: 21897442
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2010 Oct;105(4):331-2
references.pmid: 20717161