title: Mechanistic modeling of sulfur-deprived photosynthesis and hydrogen production in suspensions of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
abstract: The ability of unicellular green algal species such as Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to produce hydrogen gas via iron-hydrogenase is well known. However, the oxygen-sensitive hydrogenase is closely linked to the photosynthetic chain in such a way that hydrogen and oxygen production need to be separated temporally for sustained photo-production. Under illumination, sulfur-deprivation has been shown to accommodate the production of hydrogen gas by partially-deactivating O2 evolution activity, leading to anaerobiosis in a sealed culture. As these facets are coupled, and the system complex, mathematical approaches potentially are of significant value since they may reveal improved or even optimal schemes for maximizing hydrogen production. Here, a mechanistic model of the system is constructed from consideration of the essential pathways and processes. The role of sulfur in photosynthesis (via PSII) and the storage and catabolism of endogenous substrate, and thus growth and decay of culture density, are explicitly modeled in order to describe and explore the complex interactions that lead to H2 production during sulfur-deprivation. As far as possible, functional forms and parameter values are determined or estimated from experimental data. The model is compared with published experimental studies and, encouragingly, qualitative agreement for trends in hydrogen yield and initiation time are found. It is then employed to probe optimal external sulfur and illumination conditions for hydrogen production, which are found to differ depending on whether a maximum yield of gas or initial production rate is required. The model constitutes a powerful theoretical tool for investigating novel sulfur cycling regimes that may ultimately be used to improve the commercial viability of hydrogen gas production from microorganisms.
authors.affiliation: British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK. chll1@bas.ac.uk.
authors.forename: C R
authors.initials: CR
authors.lastname: Williams
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Bees
mesh_terms: D016825:Chlamydomonas reinhardtii / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D006859:Hydrogen / Q000378:metabolism*; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D010788:Photosynthesis; D013455:Sulfur / Q000378:metabolism*; D013535:Suspensions
chemical_list: D013535:Suspensions; D013455:Sulfur; D006859:Hydrogen
keywords: Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; hydrogen production; light limitation; mechanistic model; photosynthetic growth; sulfur deprivation
references.citation: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2005;12(2):66-70
references.pmid: 15859112
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 1956 Jan;19(1):1-12
references.pmid: 13304065
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009 Sep 1;104(1):76-90
references.pmid: 19489016
references.citation: Trends Biotechnol. 2000 Dec;18(12):506-11
references.pmid: 11102662
references.citation: Photosynth Res. 2010 Nov;106(1-2):145-54
references.pmid: 20658193
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 30;110(18):7223-8
references.pmid: 23589846
references.citation: Biotechnol Prog. 2004 May-Jun;20(3):989-91
references.pmid: 15176910
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2000 Jan;122(1):127-36
references.pmid: 10631256
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011 Oct;108(10):2288-99
references.pmid: 21520019
references.citation: Planta. 2002 Feb;214(4):552-61
references.pmid: 11925039
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 1942 Nov 20;26(2):219-40
references.pmid: 19873339
references.citation: Biotechnol Prog. 2006 Mar-Apr;22(2):431-7
references.pmid: 16599558
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1992 Sep;100(1):1-6
references.pmid: 16652929
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2005 Feb;137(2):492-9
references.pmid: 15591440
references.citation: Aquat Toxicol. 2006 Jun 15;78(2):136-48
references.pmid: 16621059
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1998 May;117(1):129-39
references.pmid: 9576782
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2004 Aug;16(8):2151-63
references.pmid: 15269330
references.citation: Planta. 1990 Sep;182(2):161-8
references.pmid: 24197090
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002 Jun 30;78(7):731-40
references.pmid: 12001165
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1994 Mar;104(3):981-987
references.pmid: 12232142
references.citation: Planta. 2008 Jan;227(2):397-407
references.pmid: 17885762
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Oct 29;357(1426):1499-507; discussion 1507-11
references.pmid: 12437889
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009 Jan 1;102(1):232-45
references.pmid: 18688816
references.citation: J Biotechnol. 2012 Feb 20;157(4):620-7
references.pmid: 21771618
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Aug;70(8):2317-20
references.pmid: 16592104
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2002 Jun;7(6):246-50
references.pmid: 12049920
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1986 Oct 5;191(3):421-32
references.pmid: 3820291
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Jan;89(1):3-15
references.pmid: 20878321
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2011 Jul 15;214(Pt 14):2398-408
references.pmid: 21697432
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Mar;84(6):1497-501
references.pmid: 3550792
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1994 Jan;6(1):53-63
references.pmid: 12244220
references.citation: Plant Mol Biol. 1995 Mar;27(5):1031-5
references.pmid: 7766872
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2009 Oct;151(2):631-40
references.pmid: 19700559
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2006 Aug;47(8):1135-45
references.pmid: 16857695
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Oct;71(10):6199-205
references.pmid: 16204539
references.citation: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1997 Spring;63-65:141-51
references.pmid: 18576077