title: Word frequency and the attentional blink: the effects of target difficulty on retrieval and consolidation processes.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  When a second target (T2) is presented in close succession of a first target (T1) within a stream of non-targets, people often fail to detect T2-a deficit known as the attentional blink (AB). Two types of theories can be distinguished that have tried to account for this phenomenon. Whereas attentional-control theories suggest that protection of consolidation processes induces the AB, limited-resource theories claim that the AB is caused by a lack of resources. According to the latter type of theories, increasing difficulty of one or both targets should increase the magnitude of the AB. Similarly, attentional-control theories predict that a difficult T1 increases the AB due to prolonged processing. However, the prediction for T2 is not as straightforward. Prolonged processing of T2 could cause conflicts and increase the AB. However, if consolidation of T2 is postponed without loss of identity, the AB might be attenuated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Participants performed an AB task that consisted of a stream of distractor non-words and two target words. Difficulty of T1 and T2 was manipulated by varying word-frequency. Overall performance for high-frequency words was better than for low-frequency words. When T1 was highly frequent, the AB was reduced. The opposite effect was found for T2. When T2 was highly frequent, performance during the AB period was relatively worse than for a low-frequency T2. A threaded-cognition model of the AB was presented that simulated the observed pattern of behavior by taking changes in the time-course of retrieval and consolidation processes into account. Our results were replicated in a subsequent ERP study.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The finding that a difficult low-frequency T2 reduces the magnitude of the AB is at odds with limited-resource accounts of the AB. However, it was successfully accounted for by the threaded-cognition model, thus providing an explanation in terms of attentional control.
authors.affiliation: Neuroimaging Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands ; Department of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Stefan M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Wierda
authors.forename: Niels A
authors.initials: NA
authors.lastname: Taatgen
authors.forename: Hedderik
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: van Rijn
authors.forename: Sander
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Martens
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D054518:Attentional Blink; D003071:Cognition; D004569:Electroencephalography; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jul;67(5):770-88
references.pmid: 16334051
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Dec;24(6):1656-74
references.pmid: 9861716
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Dec;28(6):1275-87
references.pmid: 12542127
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2005 Jan;69(3):191-200
references.pmid: 15597184
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2011 Mar 9;22(4):161-5
references.pmid: 21304326
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):739-43
references.pmid: 12613677
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;118(10):2128-48
references.pmid: 17573239
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2001 May;38(3):557-77
references.pmid: 11352145
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Sep;18(9):1423-38
references.pmid: 16989545
references.citation: Can J Exp Psychol. 2007 Jun;61(2):102-8
references.pmid: 17665751
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 May;34(6):947-57
references.pmid: 20025902
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Apr;20(2):357-71
references.pmid: 8189198
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Nov 24;5(11):e15024
references.pmid: 21124833
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998 Jul;24(4):979-92
references.pmid: 9699304
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Apr;73(3):751-65
references.pmid: 21264711
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jun;17(1):177-87
references.pmid: 12763203
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2009 Aug;59(1):1-29
references.pmid: 19217086
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Feb;114(2):336-40
references.pmid: 12559242
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 29;109(22):8456-60
references.pmid: 22586101
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004 Feb;57(2):357-77
references.pmid: 14742180
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1486-94
references.pmid: 20695696
references.citation: Neuroreport. 1999 Nov 26;10(17):3691-5
references.pmid: 10619668
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Jun;35(3):787-807
references.pmid: 19485692
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Apr;33(2):285-97
references.pmid: 17469969
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2001 Mar;38(2):165-74
references.pmid: 11347861
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 1;24(3):704-14
references.pmid: 15652305
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Nov;123(3):204-18
references.pmid: 17099955
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):159-69
references.pmid: 19170478
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1997 May;59(4):593-600
references.pmid: 9158333
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Apr;16(4):265-9
references.pmid: 15828972
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Jan;15(1):1-25
references.pmid: 11747097
references.citation: Hum Factors. 1980 Apr;22(2):211-24
references.pmid: 7390505
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;115(4):836-63
references.pmid: 18954206
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1998 Jul;36(2):138-202
references.pmid: 9721199
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Aug;18(3):849-60
references.pmid: 1500880
references.citation: Nature. 1996 Oct 17;383(6601):616-8
references.pmid: 8857535
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988 Jul;70(1):33-45
references.pmid: 2455628
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1980 May;17(3):259-73
references.pmid: 7384376
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 Feb;54(1):169-96
references.pmid: 11216315
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Feb;21(1):109-27
references.pmid: 7707027
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2008 May;70(4):658-66
references.pmid: 18556927