title: An integrated model for developing research skills in an undergraduate medical curriculum: appraisal of an approach using student selected components.
abstract: Student selected components (SSCs), at that time termed special study modules, were arguably the most innovative element in Tomorrow's Doctors (1993), the document from the General Medical Council that initiated the modernization of medical curricula in the UK. SSCs were proposed to make up one-third of the medical curriculum and provide students with choice, whilst allowing individual schools autonomy in how SSCs were utilized. In response, at the University of Edinburgh the undergraduate medical curriculum provides an integrated and sequential development and assessment of research skill learning outcomes, for all students in the SSC programme. The curriculum contains SSCs which provide choice to students in all 5 years. There are four substantial timetabled SSCs where students develop research skills in a topic and speciality of their choice. These SSCs are fully integrated and mapped with core learning outcomes and assessment, particularly with the 'Evidence-Based Medicine and Research' programme theme. These research skills are developed incrementally and applied fully in a research project in the fourth year. One-third of students also perform an optional intercalated one-year honours programme between years 2 and 3, usually across a wide range of honours schools at the biomedical science interface. Student feedback is insightful and demonstrates perceived attainment of research competencies. The establishment of these competencies is discussed in the context of enabling junior graduate doctors to be effective and confident at utilizing their research skills to effectively practice evidence-based medicine. This includes examining their own practice through clinical audit, developing an insight into the complexity of the evidence base and uncertainty, and also gaining a view into a career as a clinical academic.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Medical Education, Chancellor's Building, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Simon.C.Riley@ed.ac.uk.|MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, Scotland, UK. Simon.C.Riley@ed.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Simon C
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Riley
authors.affiliation: Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
authors.forename: Jeremy
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Morton
authors.affiliation: Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
authors.forename: David C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Ray
authors.affiliation: Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
authors.forename: David G
authors.initials: DG
authors.lastname: Swann
authors.affiliation: MRC Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
authors.forename: Donald J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Davidson
references.citation: General Medical Council. Tomorrow’s Doctors: recommendations on undergraduate medical education. London. GMC, 1993, revised 2003, revised 2009.
references.citation: Simpson JG, Furnace J, Crosby J, et al. The Scottish doctor—learning outcomes for the medical undergraduate in Scotland: a foundation for competent and reflective practitioners. Med Teach. 2002;24:136–43.
references.pmid: 12098432
references.citation: Bland CJ, Starnaman S, Wersal L, Moorhead-Rosenberg L, Zonia S, Henry R. Curricular change in medical schools: how to succeed. Acad Med. 2000;75:575–94.
references.pmid: 10875502
references.citation: General Medical Council. Quality assurance of basic medical education. http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/medical_school_reports_full_list.asp (2013). Accessed 3 May 2013.
references.citation: Mylopoulos M, Regehr R. Putting the expert together again. Med Educ. 2011;45:920–6.
references.pmid: 21848720
references.citation: Ludmerer KM. Learner-centred medical education. New Engl J Med. 2004;351:1163–4.
references.pmid: 15371570
references.citation: McLean M, Gibbs T. Twelve tips to designing and implementing a learner-centred curriculum: prevention is better than cure. Med Teach. 2010;32:225–30.
references.pmid: 20218837
references.citation: Dyrbye L, Thomas MR, Natt N, Rohren CH. Prolonged delays for research training in medical school are associated with poorer subsequent clinical knowledge. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1101–6.
references.pmid: 17492473
references.citation: Cianciolo AT, Williams RG, Debra L, Klamen DL, Roberts NK. Biomedical knowledge, clinical cognition and diagnostic justification: a structural equation model. Med Educ. 2013;47:309–16.
references.pmid: 23398017
references.citation: Brew A. Teaching and research: new relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning. High Educ Res Dev. 2003;22:3–18.
references.citation: Jenkins A, Healy M, Zetter R. Linking teaching and research in disciplines and departments. New York: The Higher Education Academy; 2007.
references.citation: Healey M, Jenkins A. Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. New York: Higher Education Academy; 2009.
references.citation: MacDougall M. Research-teaching linkages: beyond the divide in undergraduate medicine. Int J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2012;6(2).
references.citation: Riley SC. Student selected components: AMEE guide 46. Med Teach. 2009;31:885–94.
references.pmid: 19877860
references.citation: MacDougall M, Riley SC. Initiating undergraduate medical students into communities of research practise: what do supervisors recommend? BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:83.
references.pmid: 21092088
references.citation: Laidlaw A, Aiton J, Struthers J, Guild S. Developing research skills in medical students: AMEE guide no. 69. Med Teach. 2012;34:754–71.
references.citation: Medical Education in Europe. MEDINE2. Integrating the research component in medical education in Europe. http://medine2.com/ (2013). Accessed 14 April 2013.
references.citation: Riley SC, Murphy MJ. Student choice in the undergraduate curriculum: student-selected components. Oxford textbook of medical education. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
references.citation: Riley SC, Ferrell WR, Gibbs TJ, Murphy MJ, Smith WCS. Twelve tips for developing and sustaining a programme of student selected components. Med Teach. 2008;30:370–6.
references.pmid: 18569657
references.citation: Murdoch-Eaton D, Whittle S. Generic skills in medical education: developing the tools for successful lifelong learning. Med Teach. 2012;46:120–8.
references.citation: Ellaway R, Dewhurst D, Cumming A. Managing and supporting medical education with a virtual learning environment: the Edinburgh Electronic Medical Curriculum. Med Teach. 2003;25:372–80.
references.pmid: 12893547
references.citation: Murphy MJ, Seneviratne R, De A, Remers OJ, Davis MH. Student selected components: student-designed modules are associated with closer alignment of planned and learnt outcomes. Med Teach. 2009;31:e489–93.
references.pmid: 19877858
references.citation: Riley SC, Gibbs TJ, Ferrell WR, Smith WCS, Murphy MJ. Getting the most out of student selected components (SSCs): 12 tips for participating students. Med Teach. 2009;31:895–902.
references.pmid: 19877861
references.citation: SSC2 student wiki reports accessible externally from EEMeC VLE. https://www.eemec.med.ed.ac.uk/pages/ssc4-outputs-more (2013). Accessed 5 Sept 2013.
references.citation: Duggan E, Doran K, O’Flynn S, O’Tuathaigh CMP. Providing research opportunities for medical students: challenges and opportunities. Med Sci Monit. 2013;23:99–107.
references.citation: Dowell J, Merrylees N. Electives: isn’t it time for a change? Med Educ. 2009;43:121–6.
references.pmid: 19161481
references.citation: Collins JP, Farish S, McCalman JS, McColl GJ. A mandatory intercalated degree programme: revitalising and enhancing academic and evidence-based medicine. Med Educ. 2010;32:e541–6.
references.citation: Laskowitz DT, Drucker RP, Parsonnet J, Cross PC, Gesundheit N. Engaging students in dedicated research and scholarship during medical school: the long term experiences of Duke and Stanford. Acad Med. 2010;85:419–28.
references.pmid: 20182114
references.citation: Howman M, Jones M. Does undertaking an intercalated BSc influence first year clinical exam results at a London medical school? BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:6.
references.pmid: 21291522
references.citation: Mahesan N, Crichton S, Sewell H, Howell S. The effect of an intercalated BSc on subsequent academic performance. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:76.
references.pmid: 21967682
references.citation: General Medical Council. Assessment in undergraduate medical education: advice supplementary to Tomorrow’s Doctors (2009). London: GMC; 2011.
references.citation: Murphy MJ, Seneviratne RD, Remers OJ, Davis MH. ‘Hawks’ and ‘doves’: effect of feedback on grades awarded by supervisor of student selected components. Med Teach. 2009;31:e484–8.
references.pmid: 19877857
references.citation: MacDougall M, Riley SC, Cameron HC, McKinstry B. Halo and horns in the assessment of undergraduate medical students: a consistency-based approach. J Appl Quant Method. 2008;3:116–28.
references.citation: Robinson L, Drewery S, Ellershaw J, Smith J, Whittle S, Murdoch-Eaton D. Research governance: impeding both research and teaching? A survey of impact on undergraduate research opportunities. Med Educ. 2007;41:729–36.
references.pmid: 17661880
references.citation: National Research Ethics Service. NRES leaflet: defining research. http://www.nres.nhs.uk/applications/guidance/research-guidance/ (2013). Accessed 16 May 2013.
references.citation: MacDougall M. Ten tips for promoting autonomous learning and effective engagement in the teaching of statistics to undergraduate medical students involved in short term research projects. J Appl Quant Method. 2008;3:223–40.
references.citation: Murphy MJ, Seneviratne RDA, Cochrane L, Davis MH, Mires GJ. Impact of student choice on academic performance: cross sectional and longitudinal observations of a student cohort. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:26.
references.pmid: 23421549
references.citation: O’Tuathaigh CM, Duggan E, Khashan AS, Boylan GB, O’Flynn S. Selection of student-selected component [SSCs] modules across the medical undergraduate curriculum: relationship with motivational factors. Med Teach. 2012;34:813–20.
references.pmid: 23043517
references.citation: Houlden RL, Raja JB, Collier CP, Albert F, Clark AF, Waugh JM. Medical students’ perceptions of an undergraduate research elective. Med Teach. 2004;26:659–61.
references.pmid: 15763861
references.citation: Mabvuure NT. Twelve tips for introducing students to research and publishing: a medical student’s perspective. Med Teach. 2012;34:705–9.
references.pmid: 22905656
references.citation: van Eyk HJ, Hooiveld MH, Van Leeuwen TN, et al. Scientific output of Dutch medical students. Med Teach. 2010;32:231–5.
references.pmid: 20218838
references.citation: Griffin MF, Hindocha S. Publication practices of medical students at British medical schools: experience, attitudes and barriers to publish. Med Teach. 2011;33:e1–8.
references.pmid: 21182368
references.citation: Stringer MD, Ahmadi O. Famous discoveries by medical students. Aust N Z J Surg. 2009;79:901–8.
references.citation: McLean AL, Saunders C, Velu PP, Iredale J, Hor K, Russell CD. Twelve tips for teachers to encourage student engagement in academic medicine. Med Teach. 2013; 35(7):549–54.