title: Spike triggered covariance in strongly correlated gaussian stimuli.
abstract: Many biological systems perform computations on inputs that have very large dimensionality. Determining the relevant input combinations for a particular computation is often key to understanding its function. A common way to find the relevant input dimensions is to examine the difference in variance between the input distribution and the distribution of inputs associated with certain outputs. In systems neuroscience, the corresponding method is known as spike-triggered covariance (STC). This method has been highly successful in characterizing relevant input dimensions for neurons in a variety of sensory systems. So far, most studies used the STC method with weakly correlated Gaussian inputs. However, it is also important to use this method with inputs that have long range correlations typical of the natural sensory environment. In such cases, the stimulus covariance matrix has one (or more) outstanding eigenvalues that cannot be easily equalized because of sampling variability. Such outstanding modes interfere with analyses of statistical significance of candidate input dimensions that modulate neuronal outputs. In many cases, these modes obscure the significant dimensions. We show that the sensitivity of the STC method in the regime of strongly correlated inputs can be improved by an order of magnitude or more. This can be done by evaluating the significance of dimensions in the subspace orthogonal to the outstanding mode(s). Analyzing the responses of retinal ganglion cells probed with [Formula: see text] Gaussian noise, we find that taking into account outstanding modes is crucial for recovering relevant input dimensions for these neurons.
authors.affiliation: Computational Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, United States of America ; Center for Theoretical Biological Physics and Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
authors.forename: Johnatan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Aljadeff
authors.forename: Ronen
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Segev
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Berry
authors.forename: Tatyana O
authors.initials: TO
authors.lastname: Sharpee
mesh_terms: D000200:Action Potentials; D008954:Models, Biological; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Jul 7;436(7047):71-7
references.pmid: 16001064
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Dec;114(6 Pt 1):3394-411
references.pmid: 14714819
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2012 May 25;108(21):218701
references.pmid: 23003310
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2011 Oct;106(4):1841-61
references.pmid: 21753019
references.citation: J Vis. 2006 Apr 28;6(4):414-28
references.pmid: 16889478
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:1193-216
references.pmid: 11520932
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Oct;7(10):e1002249
references.pmid: 22046122
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 23;107(8):3840-5
references.pmid: 20133721
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2002 Jun;65(6 Pt 2):066126
references.pmid: 12188802
references.citation: J Comput Neurosci. 2013 Feb;34(1):137-61
references.pmid: 22798148
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2002 Dec 15;22(24):10811-8
references.pmid: 12486174
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Feb;69(2 Pt 2):026124
references.pmid: 14995537
references.citation: Vision Res. 2002 Aug;42(17):2095-103
references.pmid: 12169429
references.citation: Cell. 2009 Aug 21;138(4):774-86
references.pmid: 19703402
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 12;108(28):11530-5
references.pmid: 21690407
references.citation: J Physiol. 2004 Aug 1;558(Pt 3):717-28
references.pmid: 15155794
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Feb 23;439(7079):936-42
references.pmid: 16495990
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 22;106(51):21894-9
references.pmid: 19918079
references.citation: J Vis. 2006 Jul 17;6(4):484-507
references.pmid: 16889482
references.citation: Network. 2003 Aug;14(3):437-64
references.pmid: 12938766
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2007 Feb;5(2):e19
references.pmid: 17253902
references.citation: Network. 2011;22(1-4):45-73
references.pmid: 21780916
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Mar 3;45(5):781-91
references.pmid: 15748852
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov;96(5):2724-38
references.pmid: 16914609
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 1994 Aug 8;73(6):814-817
references.pmid: 10057546
references.citation: Neuron. 2008 Jun 26;58(6):956-66
references.pmid: 18579084
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Dec 7;265(1412):2315-20
references.pmid: 9881476
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2005 Oct;3(10):e342
references.pmid: 16171408
references.citation: Network. 2001 Aug;12(3):289-316
references.pmid: 11563531
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2004 Oct;7(10):1154-61
references.pmid: 15452581
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A. 1987 Dec;4(12):2379-94
references.pmid: 3430225
references.citation: J Comput Neurosci. 2011 Feb;30(1):143-61
references.pmid: 20730480
references.citation: Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1980 Feb 29;207(1167):187-217
references.pmid: 6102765
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013 Nov 08;8(11):e71959
references.pmid: 24250780
references.citation: Network. 2009;20(2):49-68
references.pmid: 19568981
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Jun 16;46(6):945-56
references.pmid: 15953422