title: Covariance of paternity and sex with laying order explains male bias in extra-pair offspring in a wild bird population.
abstract: It has been hypothesized that parents increase their fitness by biasing the sex ratio of extra-pair offspring (EPO) towards males. Here, we report a male bias among EPO in a wild population of blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus). This resulted from a decline in both the proportion of males and EPO over the laying order of eggs in the clutch. However, previous studies suggest that, unlike the decline in EPO with laying order, the relationship between offspring sex ratio and laying order is not consistent between years and populations in this species. Hence, we caution against treating the decline in proportion of males with laying order, and the resulting male bias among EPO, as support for the above hypothesis. Variable patterns of offspring sex and paternity over the laying order may explain inconsistent associations between offspring sex and paternity, between and within species.
authors.affiliation: Behavioural Ecology and Self-Organization, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. o.h.vedder@rug.nl
authors.forename: Oscar
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Vedder
authors.forename: Michael J L
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Magrath
authors.forename: Marco
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: van der Velde
authors.forename: Jan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Komdeur
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001717:Birds / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D010334:Paternity; D012744:Sex Ratio; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal
keywords: extra-pair paternity; laying sequence; ovulation order; polyandry; sex allocation
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):21-64
references.pmid: 10740892
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 1998 Aug;7(8):1071-5
references.pmid: 9711866
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 22;276(1665):2285-9
references.pmid: 19324727
references.citation: Am Nat. 2006 May;167(5):766-73
references.pmid: 16671020
references.citation: Am Nat. 2011 Feb;177(2):177-87
references.pmid: 21460554
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2009 May 12;19(9):792-7
references.pmid: 19409787
references.citation: Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011 Apr;65(4):741-752
references.pmid: 21475737
references.citation: Science. 2002 Jan 11;295(5553):316-8
references.pmid: 11786641
references.citation: Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2012 Apr;66(4):603-612
references.pmid: 22448086
references.citation: Science. 1973 Jan 5;179(4068):90-2
references.pmid: 4682135
references.citation: Evolution. 2012 Oct;66(10):3111-29
references.pmid: 23025602