title: The syllabic bridge: the first step in learning spelling-to-sound correspondences*.
abstract: It is widely agreed that learning to read starts with the establishment of letter-to-phoneme correspondences. However, it is also widely agreed that prereaders do not have access to phoneme units. Here we show that the building of associations between letters and syllables, which we call the 'syllabic bridge', might be a faster and more direct way of learning spelling-to-sound correspondences in French. After a few minutes of exposure, prereaders are able to learn the statistical properties of letter co-occurrences. Statistical learning is boosted by explicit instructions about the associations between letter clusters and syllables. Building the syllabic bridge from available phonological syllables and frequent letter clusters may therefore be the first step in learning to read.
authors.affiliation: Université de Strasbourg,France.
authors.forename: Nadege
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Doignon-Camus
authors.affiliation: Université de Lorraine,Nancy,France.
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Zagar
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D010700:Phonetics; D011932:Reading
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2006 Nov 1;33(2):739-48
references.pmid: 16956773
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Apr;61(3):193-215
references.pmid: 8636664
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 13;2:54
references.pmid: 21716577
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2011 Jan;21(1):191-9
references.pmid: 20457691
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Oct;17(10):1532-52
references.pmid: 16269095
references.citation: Res Dev Disabil. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):12-23
references.pmid: 22093643
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 27;107(17):7939-44
references.pmid: 20395549
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 Nov;17(4):902-23
references.pmid: 1837303
references.citation: Cognition. 2002 Mar;83(2):B35-42
references.pmid: 11869728
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1999 Jul;106(3):491-528
references.pmid: 10467896
references.citation: Cognition. 1995 May;55(2):151-218; discussion 219-26
references.pmid: 7789090
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2387-99
references.pmid: 21261451
references.citation: Neuron. 2007 Jul 5;55(1):143-56
references.pmid: 17610823
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2004 Jul;15(7):460-6
references.pmid: 15200630
references.citation: Ann Dyslexia. 2013 Jul;63(2):117-32
references.pmid: 22815106
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;131(1):3-29
references.pmid: 15631549
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jul;9(7):335-41
references.pmid: 15951224
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 1999 Feb;72(2):95-129
references.pmid: 9927525
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1989 Oct;96(4):523-68
references.pmid: 2798649
references.citation: Science. 1996 Dec 13;274(5294):1926-8
references.pmid: 8943209
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1995 Jun;124(2):107-36
references.pmid: 7782735
references.citation: Science. 1997 Mar 14;275(5306):1599-603
references.pmid: 9054348
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 May;11(3):235-60
references.pmid: 10402254
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Oct;21(10):1934-45
references.pmid: 18823241
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):579-89
references.pmid: 17958171
references.citation: Cognition. 2001 Sep;81(2):149-69
references.pmid: 11376640
references.citation: J Child Lang. 2006 May;33(2):369-99
references.pmid: 16826831