title: Meanings over time of working as a nurse in elderly care.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Although registered nurses (RNs) play a central role in the care of older persons, their work in elderly care has historically been described as "low status" in nursing. This is especially problematic due to the global issue of RN turnover, but there is still little evidence of how to change this trend. Better understanding is needed of the reasons why RNs work in elderly care, as well as knowledge of whether these reasons have changed over time.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The aim was to explore the meaning of working in elderly care, over time, from the perspective of RNs.
  
  
  METHODS
  We interviewed thirteen RNs working in nursing homes, six of them in 2000 and the remaining seven in 2012, and analysed the resulting data using Interpretive Description.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The results show similarities and differences over time in the RNs' reasoning about the meaning of their work with older persons, from a focus on obstacles to a view of opportunities.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  An RN's intention to continue working in elderly care might be based on their beliefs; their view of older people, and their experiences of being able to influence the care. Managing this knowledge could be an essential factor in reversing the historical trend of RN work in elderly care being seen as low status, and the increasing turnover in such nurses. Our results could stimulate reflection on daily care and beliefs about caring for older persons.
authors.affiliation: School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
authors.forename: Karin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Blomberg
authors.forename: Inger
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: James
authors.forename: Annica
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kihlgren
keywords: Beliefs; elderly care; nursing.; registered nurse
references.citation: Int J Older People Nurs. 2009 Sep;4(3):203-10
references.pmid: 20925777
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2009 Jan;65(1):11-9
references.pmid: 19120580
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jan;44(1):71-82
references.pmid: 16376347
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2010 Jul;66(7):1422-34
references.pmid: 20497270
references.citation: J Nurs Manag. 2010 Nov;18(8):970-80
references.pmid: 21073569
references.citation: J Clin Nurs. 2005 Jan;14(1):9-19
references.pmid: 15656843
references.citation: J Nurs Manag. 2007 Apr;15(3):264-73
references.pmid: 17359426
references.citation: Swiss Med Wkly. 2010 Sep 01;140:w13062
references.pmid: 20458647
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2004 Aug;47(3):303-10
references.pmid: 15238125
references.citation: Scand J Caring Sci. 2010 Sep;24(3):620-34
references.pmid: 21050249
references.citation: Australas Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;12(1):58-61
references.pmid: 15715741
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jul;49(7):887-905
references.pmid: 22019402
references.citation: Int J Older People Nurs. 2012 Jun;7(2):163-72
references.pmid: 22329682
references.citation: Ergonomics. 2005 Aug 15;48(10):1260-81
references.pmid: 16253944
references.citation: Gerontologist. 2005 Apr;45(2):196-205
references.pmid: 15799984
references.citation: J Clin Nurs. 2004 Jul;13(5):617-26
references.pmid: 15189415
references.citation: J Clin Nurs. 2003 Mar;12(2):168-76
references.pmid: 12603548
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):CD000072
references.pmid: 19588316
references.citation: Crit Care Nurse. 2008 Apr;28(2):56-63; quiz 64
references.pmid: 18378728
references.citation: Scand J Caring Sci. 2007 Sep;21(3):379-89
references.pmid: 17727551
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2003 Jan;41(1):15-21
references.pmid: 12519284
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 May;43(4):491-505
references.pmid: 16126210