title: Positive effects of bacterial diversity on ecosystem functioning driven by complementarity effects in a bioremediation context.
abstract: Despite their importance as ecosystem drivers, our understanding of the influence of bacterial diversity on ecosystem functioning is limited. After identifying twelve bacterial strains from two petroleum-contaminated sites, we experimentally explored the impact of biodiversity on total density by manipulating the number of strains in culture. Irrespective of the origin of the bacteria relative to the contaminant, biodiversity positively influenced total density. However, bacteria cultured in the crude oil of their origin (autochthonous) reached higher densities than bacteria from another origin (allochthonous) and the relationship between diversity and density was stronger for autochthonous bacteria. By measuring the relative contribution of each strain to total density we showed that the observed positive effect of increasing diversity on total density was mainly due to positive interactions among species and not the presence of a particular species. Our findings can be explained by the complex chemical composition of crude oil and the necessity of a diverse array of organisms with complementary enzymatic capacities to achieve its degradation. The long term exposure to a contaminant may have allowed different bacteria to become adapted to the use of different fractions of the crude, resulting in higher complementarity in resource use in autochthonous bacteria compared to allochthonous ones. Our results could help improve the success of bioaugmentation as a bioremediation technique by suggesting the use of a diversified set of autochthonous organisms.
authors.affiliation: Centro de Investigaciones Microbiológicas, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
authors.forename: Patrick A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Venail
authors.forename: Martha J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Vives
mesh_terms: D001419:Bacteria / Q000145:classification / Q000378:metabolism*; D001673:Biodegradation, Environmental; D044822:Biodiversity; D017753:Ecosystem
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2006 Oct;9(10):1146-56
references.pmid: 16972878
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2007 Jun;9(6):1562-71
references.pmid: 17504493
references.citation: Chemosphere. 2008 Jan;70(4):737-44
references.pmid: 17659320
references.citation: J Basic Microbiol. 2002;42(4):284-91
references.pmid: 12210553
references.citation: Nature. 2012 Jun 06;486(7401):59-67
references.pmid: 22678280
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 May;88(5):1075-85
references.pmid: 17536392
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2009 Apr 1;407(8):3024-32
references.pmid: 19201450
references.citation: Ecology. 2011 Aug;92(8):1573-81
references.pmid: 21905424
references.citation: Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2000 Feb;77(2):103-16
references.pmid: 10768470
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Apr;67(4):1675-81
references.pmid: 11282620
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 May 26;5(5):e10834
references.pmid: 20520808
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 13;104(46):18123-8
references.pmid: 17991772
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e37620
references.pmid: 22701572
references.citation: Nature. 2011 Jan 6;469(7328):89-92
references.pmid: 21131946
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003 Dec;67(4):503-49
references.pmid: 14665675
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Jul 5;412(6842):72-6
references.pmid: 11452308
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2011 Mar;98(3):572-92
references.pmid: 21613148
references.citation: Microbiol Rev. 1996 Jun;60(2):342-65
references.pmid: 8801437
references.citation: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002 May;28(5):252-60
references.pmid: 11986928
references.citation: Microbiol Rev. 1990 Sep;54(3):305-15
references.pmid: 2215423
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Oct 26;443(7114):989-92
references.pmid: 17066035
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2008 Mar;11(3):296-310
references.pmid: 18047587
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Aug 25;436(7054):1157-60
references.pmid: 16121181
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Apr;60(1):74-84
references.pmid: 17286581
references.citation: Science. 2008 May 23;320(5879):1034-9
references.pmid: 18497287
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2012 May;15(5):468-74
references.pmid: 22394557
references.citation: Trends Biotechnol. 2005 Feb;23(2):74-7
references.pmid: 15661343
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402
references.pmid: 9254694
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jul;7(7):909-15
references.pmid: 15946288
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2001 Oct;3(10):649-57
references.pmid: 11722545
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2011 Jun;14(6):537-45
references.pmid: 21435139
references.citation: Ecology. 2009 Dec;90(12):3324-32
references.pmid: 20120802
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Aug 7;277(1692):2339-45
references.pmid: 20335204