title: Biocontrol attack increases pollen limitation under some circumstances in the invasive plant Centaurea solstitialis.
abstract: Herbivore damage often deters pollinator visitation and many invasive plants in North America are pollinator-dependent. This has important implications for the biological control of invasive plants because it means that agents that deter pollinators may have a larger than expected impact on the plant. Yet interactions between pollinators and biocontrol agents are rarely evaluated. Centaurea solstitialis, one of the most problematic invasive species in California, is dependent on pollinators for reproduction. I factorially manipulated infection by a biocontrol pathogen and pollen supplementation to test for (1) pollen limitation in C. solstitialis, (2) whether infection increased pollen limitation, and (3) whether this varied across a soil moisture gradient. Plants growing on north-facing slopes where soil moisture was higher experienced mild pollen limitation in the absence of the pathogen and more pronounced pollen limitation when they were infected. Plants on drier south-facing slopes did not suffer from pollen limitation but instead appeared to suffer from resource limitation. Pathogen infection directly reduced seed set in C. solstitialis by 67-72%. On north-facing slopes, infection had an additional, indirect effect by increasing the degree of pollen limitation plants experienced. The trait that mediates this indirect pathogen-pollinator interaction is the number of inflorescences plants produced: infected plants made fewer inflorescences which led to greater pollen limitation. Although in the present study this outcome is dependent on abiotic factors that vary over small spatial scales, exploiting other invasive plants' dependence on pollinators by selecting agents that deter visitation may enhance agent impact.
authors.affiliation: USDA ARS Great Basin Rangelands Research Unit, 920 Valley Rd, Reno, NV, 89512, USA, sswope@mills.edu.
authors.forename: Sarah M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Swope
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001487:Basidiomycota / Q000472:pathogenicity*; D061046:Biological Control Agents; D002140:California; D031179:Centaurea / Q000145:classification / Q000382:microbiology / Q000502:physiology*; D035264:Flowers; D058865:Introduced Species; D011058:Pollen; D012639:Seeds; D012987:Soil
chemical_list: D061046:Biological Control Agents; D012987:Soil
references.citation: Ecology. 2011 Sep;92(9):1769-80
references.pmid: 21939073
references.citation: Oecologia. 1996 Mar;107(1):102-112
references.pmid: 28307197
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2006 Feb;93(2):271-7
references.pmid: 21646188
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2012 Dec;22(8):2122-34
references.pmid: 23387114
references.citation: Ecology. 2010 Aug;91(8):2284-93
references.pmid: 20836450
references.citation: Oecologia. 2011 Feb;165(2):377-86
references.pmid: 20859750
references.citation: Oecologia. 1997 Jul;111(3):396-403
references.pmid: 28308135
references.citation: New Phytol. 2006;169(4):719-27
references.pmid: 16441753
references.citation: Oecologia. 2010 Sep;164(1):117-28
references.pmid: 20443027
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2009 Apr;19(3):709-21
references.pmid: 19425433
references.citation: Evolution. 2000 Jun;54(3):764-77
references.pmid: 10937251
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Apr;88(4):1021-9
references.pmid: 17536717
references.citation: Annu Rev Entomol. 2006;51:663-89
references.pmid: 16332227
references.citation: Science. 1984 Nov 2;226(4674):537-9
references.pmid: 17821511