title: Comparative morphometry of the antebrachial and crural interosseous membranes: preliminary study for the use of the crural interosseous membrane in the surgical repair of the antebrachial interosseous membrane tears.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Traumatic tears of the antebrachial interosseous membrane (AIOM) on its whole length are difficult to treat, particularly in the Essex-Lopresti syndrome. The number of ligamentoplasty techniques described in the literature witnesses the difficulty of its reconstruction and the absence of reliable and satisfying procedure. The aim of this study was to explore a new way of treatment, which consists in replacing the AIOM by the crural interosseous membrane (CIOM), harvested from the same patient.
  
  
  METHODS
  A morphometric study of the AIOM and CIOM has been conducted on both sides of 15 formalin preserved corpses (i.e. 30 AIOM and 30 CIOM). Studied data were: length of forearms and legs, length and width (at different locations) of the membranes, in situ and after harvesting, and orientation of their fibers. The thickness of membrane was also measured but only after harvesting.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Concerning the AIOM, the mean length was 13.3 cm in situ and 12.8 cm after harvesting. Its width was maximal at the union of middle and distal thirds with an average value of 1.7 cm in situ and 1.45 cm after harvesting. Mean thickness was 1 mm. Anterior fibers were oblique distally and medially (20.5° ± 0.95°), and posterior fibers were oblique distally and laterally (40° ± 3.4°). Concerning the CIOM, the mean length was 24.75 cm in situ and 23.9 cm after harvesting. Its width was maximal at the union of proximal and middle thirds with an average value of 2.3 cm in situ and 1.85 cm after harvesting. Mean thickness was 0.5 mm. Obliquity of its fibers was reverse of that of the AIOM: the anterior fibers were quite oblique distally and laterally (13° ± 2.6°), and the posterior fibers oblique were oblique distally and medially (24.2° ± 2.48°).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  From these results, one may conclude that the largest length and width of the CIOM allow its use as substitute for the injured AIOM. The orientation of its fibers should necessitate either its reversal while using the same side or the use of the CIOM of the opposite side; its relative sharpness could signify that its biomechanical properties could be worse. A biomechanical study is necessary to evaluate how this new way of replacing the AIOM could resist to the strains imposed on the forearm.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Caddi Ayad, Marrakech, Morocco.
authors.forename: Driss
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Elamrani
authors.forename: Aurélien
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Aumar
authors.forename: Guillaume
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Wavreille
authors.forename: Christian
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Fontaine
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002102:Cadaver; D005260:Female; D005542:Forearm / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D005543:Forearm Injuries / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D007866:Leg / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D008022:Ligaments / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000293:injuries* / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008566:Membranes / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000293:injuries* / Q000637:transplantation; D008875:Middle Aged
references.citation: Chin J Traumatol. 2011 Jun 1;14(3):147-50
references.pmid: 21635800
references.citation: J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Dec;36(12):1981-7
references.pmid: 22100813
references.citation: Orthopedics. 1995 Apr;18(4):373-83
references.pmid: 7603921
references.citation: J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2011 Jul;36(6):447-54
references.pmid: 21447533
references.citation: J Hand Surg Am. 1997 Nov;22(6):981-5
references.pmid: 9471064
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Sep;(330):261-70
references.pmid: 8804301
references.citation: J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Mar;34(3):415-22
references.pmid: 19211201
references.citation: J Hand Surg Am. 1997 Nov;22(6):986-94
references.pmid: 9471065
references.citation: Hand Clin. 2010 Nov;26(4):543-8
references.pmid: 20951903
references.citation: Surg Radiol Anat. 2006 May;28(2):142-9
references.pmid: 16463081
references.citation: J Hand Ther. 2006 Apr-Jun;19(2):137-44
references.pmid: 16713861
references.citation: J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jan;35(1):129-36
references.pmid: 20117315
references.citation: Chir Main. 1998;17(4):348-61
references.pmid: 10855305
references.citation: Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2010 Dec;14(4):222-5
references.pmid: 21107218
references.citation: Acta Orthop Scand. 1976 Apr;47(2):236-40
references.pmid: 1274549
references.citation: J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Mar;30(2):326-34
references.pmid: 15781356
references.citation: Hand Clin. 2008 Feb;24(1):125-37
references.pmid: 18299026
references.citation: Skeletal Radiol. 2004 Oct;33(10):561-8
references.pmid: 15338212
references.citation: Surg Radiol Anat. 1998;20(4):239-42
references.pmid: 9787388
references.citation: Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1994 Sep;26(5):246-50
references.pmid: 7988957
references.citation: Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998 Aug;383(3-4):259-64
references.pmid: 9776453
references.citation: Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2012 Dec;16(4):187-93
references.pmid: 23160548
references.citation: J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Jan;33(1):124-30
references.pmid: 18261676
references.citation: Surg Radiol Anat. 2006 Jun;28(3):300-7
references.pmid: 16474924
references.citation: Chir Main. 2007 Dec;26(6):255-77
references.pmid: 18023237
references.citation: J Hand Surg Br. 2003 Jun;28(3):267-70
references.pmid: 12809663