title: Cellulase and xylanase activity during the decomposition of three aquatic macrophytes in a tropical oxbow lagoon.
abstract: Due to the connection between enzymatic activity and degradation of different fractions of organic matter, enzyme assays can be used to estimate degradation rates of particulate and dissolved organic carbon in freshwater systems. The aim of this study was to quantify and model the enzymatic degradation involving the decomposition of macrophytes, describing temporal activity of cellulases (EC 3.2.1.4 and EC 3.2.1.91) and xylanase (EC 3.2.1.8) during in situ decomposition of three aquatic macrophytes (Salvinia sp., Eichhornia azurea and Cyperus giganteus) on the surface and water-sediment interface (w-s interface) of an oxbow lagoon (Óleo lagoon) within a natural Brazilian Savanna Reserve. Overall, the enzymatic degradation of aquatic macrophytes in Óleo lagoon occurred during the whole year and was initiated together with leaching. Xylanase production was ca. 5 times higher than cellulase values due to easy access to this compound by cellulolytic microorganisms. Enzymatic production and detritus mass decay were similar on the surface and w-s interface. Salvinia sp. was the most recalcitrant detritus, with low mass decay and enzymatic activity. E. azurea and C. giganteus decomposition rates and enzymatic production were high and similar. Due to the physicochemical homogeneity observed in the Óleo lagoon, the differences between the decay rates of each species are mostly related with detritus chemical quality.
authors.affiliation: Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais , São Carlos, SP , Brasil.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Sciessere
authors.forename: M B
authors.initials: MB
authors.lastname: Cunha-Santino
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Bianchini
keywords: enzymes; litterbags; mass decay; particulate organic matter
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1952 Mar;195(1):19-23
references.pmid: 14938350
references.citation: Int Microbiol. 2002 Jun;5(2):53-63
references.pmid: 12180781
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002 Sep;66(3):506-77, table of contents
references.pmid: 12209002
references.citation: Int J Biol Macromol. 1993 Apr;15(2):109-12
references.pmid: 8485102
references.citation: Adv Microb Physiol. 1995;37:1-81
references.pmid: 8540419
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 1996;50:183-212
references.pmid: 8905079
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 1995;49:399-426
references.pmid: 8561466
references.citation: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003 May;30(5):279-91
references.pmid: 12698321
references.citation: Braz J Microbiol. 2011 Jan;42(1):75-83
references.pmid: 24031607
references.citation: Microb Ecol. 2001 Jan;41(1):20-35
references.pmid: 11252161
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng Symp. 1976;(6):21-33
references.pmid: 1000065
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Feb;64(2):607-12
references.pmid: 16349503
references.citation: Ecology. 2006 Oct;87(10):2559-69
references.pmid: 17089664