title: Genome-wide association analyses for carcass quality in crossbred beef cattle.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Genetic improvement of beef quality will benefit both producers and consumers, and can be achieved by selecting animals that carry desired quantitative trait nucleotides (QTN), which result from intensive searches using genetic markers. This paper presents a genome-wide association approach utilizing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the Illumina BovineSNP50 BeadChip to seek genomic regions that potentially harbor genes or QTN underlying variation in carcass quality of beef cattle.This study used 747 genotyped animals, mainly crossbred, with phenotypes on twelve carcass quality traits, including hot carcass weight (HCW), back fat thickness (BF), Longissimus dorsi muscle area or ribeye area (REA), marbling scores (MRB), lean yield grade by Beef Improvement Federation formulae (BIFYLD), steak tenderness by Warner-Bratzler shear force 7-day post-mortem (LM7D) as well as body composition as determined by partial rib (IMPS 103) dissection presented as a percentage of total rib weight including body cavity fat (BDFR), lean (LNR), bone (BNR), intermuscular fat (INFR), subcutaneous fat (SQFR), and total fat (TLFR).
  
  
  RESULTS
  At the genome wide level false discovery rate (FDR < 10%), eight SNP were found significantly associated with HCW. Seven of these SNP were located on Bos taurus autosome (BTA) 6. At a less stringent significance level (P < 0.001), 520 SNP were found significantly associated with mostly individual traits (473 SNP), and multiple traits (47 SNP). Of these significant SNP, 48 were located on BTA6, and 22 of them were in association with hot carcass weight. There were 53 SNP associated with percentage of rib bone, and 12 of them were on BTA20. The rest of the significant SNP were scattered over other chromosomes. They accounted for 1.90 - 5.89% of the phenotypic variance of the traits. A region of approximately 4 Mbp long on BTA6 was found to be a potential area to harbor candidate genes influencing growth. One marker on BTA25 accounting for 2.67% of the variation in LM7D may be worth further investigation for the improvement of beef tenderness.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study provides useful information to further assist the identification of chromosome regions and subsequently genes affecting carcass quality traits in beef cattle. It also revealed many SNP that acted pleiotropically to affect carcass quality. This knowledge is important in selecting subsets of SNP to improve the performance of beef cattle.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada. duclu@uoguelph.ca.
authors.forename: Duc
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Lu
authors.forename: Mehdi
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sargolzaei
authors.forename: Matthew
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kelly
authors.forename: Gordon
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Vander Voort
authors.forename: Zhiquan
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Ira
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Mandell
authors.forename: Stephen
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Moore
authors.forename: Graham
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Plastow
authors.forename: Stephen Paul
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Miller
mesh_terms: D000483:Alleles; D000818:Animals; D002154:Calpain / Q000235:genetics; D002417:Cattle / Q000235:genetics*; D002875:Chromosomes / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism; D016678:Genome; D055106:Genome-Wide Association Study; D005838:Genotype; D008460:Meat / Q000032:analysis*; D010641:Phenotype; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; D040641:Quantitative Trait Loci
chemical_list: D002154:Calpain
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 1994 Jun;72(6):1492-501
references.pmid: 8071174
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2009 Jan;87(1):24-36
references.pmid: 18791160
references.citation: Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Jun 25;41:36
references.pmid: 19555501
references.citation: Genet Mol Res. 2010 Dec 14;9(4):2395-405
references.pmid: 21161888
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 1995 Nov;73(11):3317-24
references.pmid: 8586590
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2001 Nov;79(11):2790-7
references.pmid: 11768106
references.citation: Anim Genet. 2010 Dec;41(6):597-607
references.pmid: 20477797
references.citation: Anim Genet. 2008 Feb;39(1):51-61
references.pmid: 18254735
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2013 Aug;91(8):3612-33
references.pmid: 23851991
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2007 Dec;85(12):3170-81
references.pmid: 17709790
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2000 Mar;78(3):560-9
references.pmid: 10764062
references.citation: Genetics. 2005 Jan;169(1):275-83
references.pmid: 15466433
references.citation: Genetics. 2001 Oct;159(2):727-35
references.pmid: 11606547
references.citation: Genet Mol Res. 2004 Sep 30;3(3):380-94
references.pmid: 15614729
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2010 Mar;88(3):837-48
references.pmid: 19966163
references.citation: Genet Mol Biol. 2009 Jul;32(3):491-6
references.pmid: 21637511
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2003 Dec;81(12):2976-83
references.pmid: 14677852
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 1996 Oct;74(10):2394-405
references.pmid: 8904708
references.citation: Genet Res. 1966 Feb;7(1):44-57
references.pmid: 5906491
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2011 Jun;89(6):1742-50
references.pmid: 21278116
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2000 Oct;78(10):2589-94
references.pmid: 11048924
references.citation: Meat Sci. 2005 Sep;71(1):8-38
references.pmid: 22064049
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2007 Jan;85(1):1-10
references.pmid: 17179534
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
references.pmid: 17701901
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2007 Apr;85(4):891-900
references.pmid: 17178813
references.citation: BMC Genet. 2012 May 20;13:40
references.pmid: 22607022