title: Good agreements make good friends.
abstract: When starting a new collaborative endeavor, it pays to establish upfront how strongly your partner commits to the common goal and what compensation can be expected in case the collaboration is violated. Diverse examples in biological and social contexts have demonstrated the pervasiveness of making prior agreements on posterior compensations, suggesting that this behavior could have been shaped by natural selection. Here, we analyze the evolutionary relevance of such a commitment strategy and relate it to the costly punishment strategy, where no prior agreements are made. We show that when the cost of arranging a commitment deal lies within certain limits, substantial levels of cooperation can be achieved. Moreover, these levels are higher than that achieved by simple costly punishment, especially when one insists on sharing the arrangement cost. Not only do we show that good agreements make good friends, agreements based on shared costs result in even better outcomes.
authors.affiliation: 1] AI lab, Computer Science Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium [2] MLG, Département d'Informatique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Boulevard du Triomphe CP212, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
authors.forename: The Anh
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Han
authors.forename: Luís Moniz
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Pereira
authors.forename: Francisco C
authors.initials: FC
authors.lastname: Santos
authors.forename: Tom
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Lenaerts
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D012919:Social Behavior
references.citation: Sci Rep. 2012;2:458
references.pmid: 22701161
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 Jul;74(1 Pt 1):011909
references.pmid: 16907129
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Apr 8;428(6983):646-50
references.pmid: 15071593
references.citation: Nat Commun. 2011 Aug 16;2:434
references.pmid: 21847108
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 2;102(31):10797-800
references.pmid: 16043717
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Jan 1;457(7225):79-82
references.pmid: 19122640
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Apr 22;275(1637):871-8
references.pmid: 18198144
references.citation: Science. 2010 Apr 9;328(5975):208-13
references.pmid: 20378813
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 23;107(12):5500-4
references.pmid: 20212124
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 18;100(6):3531-5
references.pmid: 12631700
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Feb;35(1):1-15
references.pmid: 22289303
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 11;98(19):10757-62
references.pmid: 11553811
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Jan 10;415(6868):137-40
references.pmid: 11805825
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Aug 12;466(7308):861-3
references.pmid: 20631710
references.citation: Science. 2008 Mar 7;319(5868):1362-7
references.pmid: 18323447
references.citation: Science. 2010 Apr 30;328(5978):617-20
references.pmid: 20431013
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(1):e1002868
references.pmid: 23341764
references.citation: Science. 2006 Dec 8;314(5805):1560-3
references.pmid: 17158317
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Nov;22(11):593-600
references.pmid: 17963994
references.citation: Artif Life. 2012 Fall;18(4):365-83
references.pmid: 22938562
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2011 Apr 7;274(1):30-5
references.pmid: 21232542
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 13;106(41):17448-51
references.pmid: 19805085
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Sep 22;279(1743):3716-21
references.pmid: 22764167
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2009 Jan 7;256(1):45-57
references.pmid: 18938180
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jun 29;316(5833):1905-7
references.pmid: 17600218
references.citation: Nature. 2008 Mar 20;452(7185):348-51
references.pmid: 18354481