title: Joint action syntax in Japanese martial arts.
abstract: Participation in interpersonal competitions, such as fencing or Japanese martial arts, requires players to make instantaneous decisions and execute appropriate motor behaviors in response to various situations. Such actions can be understood as complex phenomena emerging from simple principles. We examined the intentional switching dynamics associated with continuous movement during interpersonal competition in terms of their emergence from a simple syntax. Linear functions on return maps identified two attractors as well as the transitions between them. The effects of skill differences were evident in the second- and third-order state-transition diagrams for these two attractors. Our results suggest that abrupt switching between attractors is related to the diverse continuous movements resulting from quick responses to sudden changes in the environment. This abrupt-switching-quick-response behavior is characterized by a joint action syntax. The resulting hybrid dynamical system is composed of a higher module with discrete dynamics and a lower module with continuous dynamics. Our results suggest that intelligent human behavior and robust autonomy in real-life scenarios are based on this hybrid dynamical system, which connects interpersonal coordination and competition.
authors.affiliation: Research Center of Health, Physical Fitness, and Sports, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
authors.forename: Yuji
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Yamamoto
authors.forename: Keiko
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Yokoyama
authors.forename: Motoki
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Okumura
authors.forename: Akifumi
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kijima
authors.forename: Koji
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kadota
authors.forename: Kazutoshi
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Gohara
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003163:Competitive Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D016139:Martial Arts; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Oct;7(10):e1002181
references.pmid: 21998570
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 1985;51(5):347-56
references.pmid: 3978150
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Aug 9;26(32):8360-7
references.pmid: 16899731
references.citation: Neuron. 2010 Nov 4;68(3):362-85
references.pmid: 21040841
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1998 Apr 1;18(7):2777-87
references.pmid: 9502834
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 May;16(2):227-47
references.pmid: 2142196
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1967 Jul;16(1):15-42
references.pmid: 6035757
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):447-57
references.pmid: 21479660
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 1998 May;1(1):80-4
references.pmid: 10195114
references.citation: Neural Netw. 2009 Apr;22(3):277-85
references.pmid: 19395236
references.citation: Neuron. 2003 Aug 14;39(4):713-26
references.pmid: 12925284
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 1994;70(4):369-76
references.pmid: 8148414
references.citation: Science. 1992 Aug 28;257(5074):1230-5
references.pmid: 1519060
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Mar;77(3 Pt 2):036210
references.pmid: 18517488
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1992;90(2):275-90
references.pmid: 1397142
references.citation: Nature. 1994 Aug 25;370(6491):615-20
references.pmid: 8065447
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e47911
references.pmid: 23144834
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51877
references.pmid: 23284799
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Oct;1(1):59-65
references.pmid: 11252769
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 1987 Jan;23(1):59-68
references.pmid: 3828046