title: Dispatching the wandering mind? Toward a laboratory method for cuing "spontaneous" off-task thought.
abstract: Cognitive psychologists and neuroscientists study most phenomena of attention by measuring subjects' overt responses to discrete environmental stimuli that can be manipulated to test competing theories. The mind wandering experience, however, cannot be locally instigated by cleverly engineered stimuli. Investigators must therefore rely on correlational and observational methods to understand subjects' flow of thought, which is only occasionally and indirectly monitored. In an effort toward changing this state of affairs, we present four experiments that develop a method for inducing mind wandering episodes-on demand-in response to task-embedded cues. In an initial laboratory session, subjects described their personal goals and concerns across several life domains (amid some filler questionnaires). In a second session, 48 h later, subjects completed a go/no-go task in which they responded to the perceptual features of words; unbeknownst to subjects, some stimulus words were presented in triplets to represent the personal concerns they had described in session 1. Thought probes appearing shortly after these personal-goal triplets indicated that, compared to control triplets, priming subjects' concerns increased mind wandering rate by about 3-4%. We argue that this small effect is, nonetheless, a promising development toward the pursuit of an experimentally informed, theory-driven science of mind wandering.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro Greensboro, NC, USA.
authors.forename: Jennifer C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: McVay
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Kane
keywords: attention; consciousness; current concerns; goal priming; mind wandering
references.citation: Can J Exp Psychol. 2013 Mar;67(1):41-50
references.pmid: 23458550
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):614-21
references.pmid: 17614870
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2010 Mar;136(2):188-197
references.pmid: 20192557
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 26;106(21):8719-24
references.pmid: 19433790
references.citation: Emotion. 2009 Apr;9(2):271-276
references.pmid: 19348539
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1997 Jun;35(6):747-58
references.pmid: 9204482
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1604-11
references.pmid: 21917482
references.citation: Psychol Rep. 1971 Dec;29(3):763-7
references.pmid: 5124155
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):196-204
references.pmid: 19210090
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):832-842
references.pmid: 22905931
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jan 19;315(5810):393-5
references.pmid: 17234951
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Oct;101(4):667-83
references.pmid: 21688924
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Nov;141(4):788-798
references.pmid: 22468669
references.citation: Hum Factors. 2011 Feb;53(1):13-21
references.pmid: 21469530
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;132(6):946-958
references.pmid: 17073528
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2012 Dec;17(4):551-66
references.pmid: 22924598
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 1971 Aug;78(1):86-92
references.pmid: 5097100
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Oct;16(5):857-63
references.pmid: 19815789
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Mar;136(3):370-81
references.pmid: 21349473
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2010 Sep;21(9):1300-10
references.pmid: 20679524
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1995 Sep;23(5):551-9
references.pmid: 7476241
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 May;141(2):302-320
references.pmid: 21875246
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2004 Dec;13(4):657-90
references.pmid: 15522626
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2008 Sep;36(6):1144-50
references.pmid: 18927032
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1120-6
references.pmid: 21277803
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jul;75(1):242-55
references.pmid: 9686462
references.citation: Memory. 2011 May;19(4):331-45
references.pmid: 21678152
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 30;7:412
references.pmid: 23908622
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2009 Mar;18(1):118-25
references.pmid: 19121953
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2004 Jan;48(1):47-94
references.pmid: 14654036
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2008 Jul;36(5):920-32
references.pmid: 18630199
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1882-6
references.pmid: 21968150
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66
references.pmid: 22006061
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):525-549
references.pmid: 22004270
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2013 May;139(3):519-535
references.pmid: 23607430
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2004 Jul;32(5):789-803
references.pmid: 15552356
references.citation: Cognition. 2009 Jun;111(3):345-55
references.pmid: 19327760
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
references.pmid: 19565683