title: Optimal isolation and xeno-free culture conditions for limbal stem cell function.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To preserve limbal stem cell (LSC) function in vitro with xenobiotic-free culture conditions.
  
  
  METHODS
  Limbal epithelial cells were isolated from 139 donors using 15 variations of three dissociation solutions. All culture conditions were compared to the baseline condition of murine 3T3-J3 feeders with xenobiotic (Xeno) keratinocyte growth medium at 20% O2. Five Xeno and Xeno-free media with increasing concentrations of calcium and epidermal growth factor (EGF) were evaluated at 5%, 14%, and 20% O2. Human MRC-5, dermal (fetal, neonatal, or adult), and limbal stromal fibroblasts were compared. Statistical analysis was performed on the number of maximum serial weekly passages, percentage of aborted colonies, colony-forming efficiency (CFE), p63α(bright) cells, and RT-PCR ratio of p63α/K12. Immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR for p63α, ABCG2, Bmi1, C/EBPδ , K12, and MUC1 were performed to evaluate phenotype.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Dispase/TrypLE was the isolation method that consistently showed the best yield, viability, and CFE. On 3T3-J2 feeders, Xeno-free medium with calcium 0.1 mM and EGF 10 ng/mL at 20% O2 supported more passages with equivalent percentage of aborted colonies, p63α(bright) cells, and p63α/K12 RT-PCR ratio compared to baseline Xeno-media. With this Xeno-free medium, MRC-5 feeders showed the best performance, followed by fetal, neonatal, adult HDF, and limbal fibroblasts. MRC-5 feeders supported serial passages with sustained high expression of progenitor cell markers at levels as robust as the baseline condition without significant difference between 20% and 5% O2.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The LSC function can be maintained in vitro under appropriate Xeno-free conditions.
authors.affiliation: The Scheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
authors.forename: Kalliopi
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Stasi
authors.forename: DaVida
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Goings
authors.forename: Jiayan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Huang
authors.forename: Lindsay
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Herman
authors.forename: Filipa
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Pinto
authors.forename: Russell C
authors.initials: RC
authors.lastname: Addis
authors.forename: Dahlia
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Klein
authors.forename: Giacomina
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Massaro-Giordano
authors.forename: John D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Gearhart
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000818:Animals; D002454:Cell Differentiation; D049109:Cell Proliferation; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D018920:Coculture Techniques; D017077:Culture Media, Conditioned; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007150:Immunohistochemistry; D016850:Limbus Corneae / Q000166:cytology* / Q000378:metabolism; D008297:Male; D051379:Mice; D008875:Middle Aged; D010100:Oxygen / Q000378:metabolism; D013234:Stem Cells / Q000502:physiology*; D015262:Xenobiotics
chemical_list: D017077:Culture Media, Conditioned; D015262:Xenobiotics; D010100:Oxygen
keywords: cell culture; limbal; oxygen; stem; xeno-free
references.citation: J Cell Physiol. 2013 May;228(5):1025-30
references.pmid: 23042632
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2004 Jun 4;279(23):24218-25
references.pmid: 15044468
references.citation: Genes Dev. 2008 Mar 1;22(5):654-67
references.pmid: 18283121
references.citation: Microsc Res Tech. 2006 Dec;69(12):983-91
references.pmid: 16972233
references.citation: Regen Med. 2007 Nov;2(6):919-27
references.pmid: 18034630
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(8):2302-6
references.pmid: 2436229
references.citation: Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep;94(9):1244-50
references.pmid: 20538654
references.citation: J Cell Physiol. 2011 Sep;226(9):2429-37
references.pmid: 21660966
references.citation: Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2012 Sep;8(3):696-705
references.pmid: 21964568
references.citation: Exp Eye Res. 2011 Jan;92(1):10-9
references.pmid: 20970420
references.citation: Can J Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;48(1):13-21
references.pmid: 23419294
references.citation: Cell. 1989 Apr 21;57(2):201-9
references.pmid: 2702690
references.citation: Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Nov;95(11):1525-9
references.pmid: 21890785
references.citation: Lancet. 1997 Apr 5;349(9057):990-3
references.pmid: 9100626
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 2008 Nov;115(11):1989-97
references.pmid: 18554721
references.citation: Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2013 Jul;19(7):531-7
references.pmid: 23151007
references.citation: High Alt Med Biol. 2012 Sep;13(3):162-8
references.pmid: 22994515
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 1999 May 17;145(4):769-82
references.pmid: 10330405
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38825
references.pmid: 22723892
references.citation: Stem Cell Res. 2013 May;10(3):349-60
references.pmid: 23435010
references.citation: J Biol Stand. 1976 Apr;4(2):97-9
references.pmid: 932048
references.citation: Regen Med. 2006 Sep;1(5):715-9
references.pmid: 17465740
references.citation: Exp Eye Res. 2008 Feb;86(2):412-8
references.pmid: 18187131
references.citation: Curr Mol Med. 2010 Dec;10(9):841-50
references.pmid: 21091422
references.citation: Tissue Eng. 2006 Feb;12(2):245-55
references.pmid: 16548683
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Aug;48(8):3586-93
references.pmid: 17652727
references.citation: Bioessays. 2008 Sep;30(9):897-903
references.pmid: 18693268
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 2007 Jun 18;177(6):1037-49
references.pmid: 17562792
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 May;50(5):2109-15
references.pmid: 19136703
references.citation: Stem Cells. 2007 Aug;25(8):1995-2005
references.pmid: 17495107
references.citation: Nature. 1970 Jul 11;227(5254):168-70
references.pmid: 4316953
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Dec;44(12):5130-5
references.pmid: 14638708
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Mar;47(3):909-16
references.pmid: 16505023
references.citation: Nature. 1977 Feb 3;265(5593):421-4
references.pmid: 299924
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 8;363(2):147-55
references.pmid: 20573916
references.citation: Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Aug;94(8):963-4
references.pmid: 20679087
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 2000 May 29;149(5):1117-30
references.pmid: 10831615
references.citation: Curr Eye Res. 2012 Jul;37(7):644-53
references.pmid: 22559728
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Feb;51(2):765-74
references.pmid: 19710417
references.citation: Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010 Oct;16(5):921-7
references.pmid: 19916804
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5;102(27):9523-8
references.pmid: 15983386
references.citation: Age (Dordr). 2013 Apr;35(2):289-300
references.pmid: 22252434
references.citation: Curr Eye Res. 2012 Dec;37(12):1067-74
references.pmid: 22913741
references.citation: Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;155(3):544-549.e2
references.pmid: 23218703
references.citation: Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Dec;96(12):1504-9
references.pmid: 22976585
references.citation: Int J Ophthalmol. 2012;5(5):549-54
references.pmid: 23166863
references.citation: Cornea. 2008 Sep;27 Suppl 1:S41-7
references.pmid: 18813074
references.citation: Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Nov;124(11):1543-51
references.pmid: 17102000
references.citation: Trends Mol Med. 2011 Jan;17(1):1-7
references.pmid: 21075055
references.citation: Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Dec;124(12):1734-40
references.pmid: 17159033
references.citation: Curr Eye Res. 2011 Aug;36(8):691-8
references.pmid: 21780918