title: A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an a priori and precise prediction.
abstract: Question order effects are commonly observed in self-report measures of judgment and attitude. This article develops a quantum question order model (the QQ model) to account for four types of question order effects observed in literature. First, the postulates of the QQ model are presented. Second, an a priori, parameter-free, and precise prediction, called the QQ equality, is derived from these mathematical principles, and six empirical data sets are used to test the prediction. Third, a new index is derived from the model to measure similarity between questions. Fourth, we show that in contrast to the QQ model, Bayesian and Markov models do not generally satisfy the QQ equality and thus cannot account for the reported empirical data that support this equality. Finally, we describe the conditions under which order effects are predicted to occur, and we review a broader range of findings that are encompassed by these very same quantum principles. We conclude that quantum probability theory, initially invented to explain order effects on measurements in physics, appears to be a powerful natural explanation for order effects of self-report measures in social and behavioral sciences, too.
authors.affiliation: School of Communication, Center for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, The Ohio State University.
authors.forename: Zheng
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Jerome R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Busemeyer
mesh_terms: D001290:Attitude; D036262:Empirical Research; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008433:Mathematics; D008960:Models, Psychological; D015233:Models, Statistical; D011336:Probability; D011338:Probability Theory; D011789:Quantum Theory; D057566:Self Report
keywords: Bayesian; Constructive; Judgment; Markov; Order effects; Quantum probability; Question order; Vector feature space