title: DNA barcoding unveils skate (Chondrichthyes: Rajidae) species diversity in 'ray' products sold across Ireland and the UK.
abstract: Skates are widely consumed across the globe, but many large species are subject to considerable concern regarding their conservation and management. Within Europe such issues have recently driven policy changes so that, for the first time, reports of skate landings now have to be made under species-specific names. Total allowable catches have also been established for many groups, which have been set to zero for a number of the most vulnerable species (e.g., Dipturus batis, Raja undulata and Rostoraja alba). Whilst accurate species identification has become an important issue for landings, the sale of skates is still usually made under a blanket term of "skate" or "ray". The matter of identifying species of skate is further complicated by their morphologically conservative nature and the fact that they are commercially valued for their wings. Thus, before sale their bodies are usually discarded (i.e., "winged") and often skinned, making morphological identification impossible. For the first time, DNA barcoding (of the mitochondrial COI gene) was applied to samples of skate wings from retail outlets across the British Isles, providing insight into which species are sold for consumption. A total of 98 wing samples were analysed, revealing that six species were sold; blonde ray (Raja brachyura), spotted ray (Raja montagui), thornback ray (Raja clavata), cuckoo ray (Leucoraja naevus) small-eyed ray (Raja microocellata) and shagreen ray (Leucoraja fullonica). Statistical testing demonstrated that there were significant differences in the species sold in the distinct retail groups which suggests complex drivers behind the patterns of sale in skates. The results also indicate that endangered species are not commonly being passed on to consumers. In addition, the practice of selling skate wings under ambiguous labels is highlighted as it makes it extremely difficult for consumers to exercise a right to avoid species of conservation concern. Interestingly, a single retailer chain labelled their wings as originating from three smaller-growing species (generally to be considered of lower conservation concern); of the six samples analysed from this company a third were mislabelled and originated from the thornback ray (a larger species that is currently undergoing population declines).
authors.affiliation: School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
authors.forename: Andrew Mark
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Griffiths
authors.affiliation: School of Biology & Environmental Science, Science Education and Research Centre-West, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.|Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
authors.forename: Dana D
authors.initials: DD
authors.lastname: Miller
authors.affiliation: School of Biology & Environmental Science, Science Education and Research Centre-West, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
authors.forename: Aaron
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Egan
authors.affiliation: School of Biology & Environmental Science, Science Education and Research Centre-West, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
authors.forename: Jennifer
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Fox
authors.affiliation: School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
authors.forename: Adam
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Greenfield
authors.affiliation: School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
authors.forename: Stefano
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Mariani
keywords: DNA barcoding; Elasmobranch; Forensically informative nucleotide sequencing; Mislabelling; Ray; Skate; Species identification
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Jul 15;430(6997):309-10
references.pmid: 15254528
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 Jul;9(4):1077-85
references.pmid: 21564845
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 22;277(1687):1497-503
references.pmid: 20106849
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 29;360(1462):1847-57
references.pmid: 16214743
references.citation: J Fish Biol. 2012 Apr;80(5):1057-74
references.pmid: 22497373
references.citation: J Fish Biol. 2009 Feb;74(2):329-56
references.pmid: 20735564
references.citation: Evolution. 1999 Aug;53(4):1247-1258
references.pmid: 28565510
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 7;270(1512):313-21
references.pmid: 12614582
references.citation: Mol Ecol Notes. 2007 May 1;7(3):355-364
references.pmid: 18784790
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Nov;11(6):968-78
references.pmid: 21658180