title: Temporal vocal features suggest different call-pattern generating mechanisms in mice and bats.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Mice produce ultrasonic vocalizations in various inter-individual encounters and with high call rates. However, it is so far virtually unknown how these vocal patterns are generated. On the one hand, these vocal patterns could be embedded into the normal respiratory cycle, as happens in bats and other mammals that produce similar call rates and frequencies. On the other, mice could possess distinct vocal pattern generating systems that are capable of modulating the respiratory cycle, which is what happens in non-human and human primates. In the present study, we investigated the temporal call patterns of two different mammalian species, bats and mice, in order to differentiate between these two possibilities for mouse vocalizations. Our primary focus was on comparing the mechanisms for the production of rapid, successive ultrasound calls of comparable frequency ranges in the two species.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We analyzed the temporal call pattern characteristics of mice, and we compared these characteristics to those of ultrasonic echolocation calls produced by horseshoe bats. We measured the distributions of call durations, call intervals, and inter-call intervals in the two species. In the bat, and consistent with previous studies, we found that call duration was independent of corresponding call intervals, and that it was negatively correlated with the corresponding inter-call interval. This indicates that echolocation call production mechanisms in the bat are highly correlated with the respiratory cycle. In contrast, call intervals in the mouse were directly correlated with call duration. Importantly, call duration was not, or was only slightly, correlated with inter-call intervals, consistent with the idea that vocal production in the mouse is largely independent of the respiratory cycle.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our findings suggest that ultrasonic vocalizations in mice are produced by call-pattern generating mechanisms that seem to be similar to those that have been found in primates. This is in contrast to the production mechanisms of ultrasonic echolocation calls in horseshoe bats. These results are particularly interesting, especially since mouse vocalizations have recently attracted increased attention as potential indicators for the degree of progression of several disease patterns in mouse models for neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders of humans.
authors.affiliation: Animal Physiology, Institute of Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, Tübingen, 72076, Germany. steffen.hage@uni-tuebingen.de.
authors.forename: Steffen R
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Hage
authors.forename: Natalja
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Gavrilov
authors.forename: Ferdinand
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Salomon
authors.forename: Anna M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Stein
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002685:Chiroptera / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D051379:Mice / Q000502:physiology*; D014828:Vocalization, Animal / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Oct;108(4):1443-50
references.pmid: 11051470
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 1995 Jan;198(Pt 1):175-91
references.pmid: 7891034
references.citation: Genes Brain Behav. 2011 Feb;10(1):17-27
references.pmid: 20579107
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5;102(27):9643-8
references.pmid: 15983371
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 1987 Aug;161(2):267-74
references.pmid: 3625576
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2007 Sep 4;182(2):308-14
references.pmid: 17173983
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Jun 28;26(26):7105-15
references.pmid: 16807339
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009 Apr;33(4):508-15
references.pmid: 18771687
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Aug 27;3(8):e3067
references.pmid: 18728777
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2005 Dec;3(12):e386
references.pmid: 16248680
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Dec;37(6):529-46
references.pmid: 24827156
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 15;107(24):11074-9
references.pmid: 20534473
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 5;105(5):1710-5
references.pmid: 18227507
references.citation: BMC Neurosci. 2012 Apr 25;13:40
references.pmid: 22533376
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 1986 Nov;159(5):675-87
references.pmid: 3543318
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 May 3;26(18):4860-9
references.pmid: 16672660
references.citation: Head Neck. 2011 Oct;33 Suppl 1:S21-5
references.pmid: 21901780
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2006 May;192(5):535-50
references.pmid: 16418857
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 5;110(10):4063-8
references.pmid: 23431172
references.citation: J Voice. 2009 Jan;23(1):1-10
references.pmid: 18207362
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1994 Jun;71(6):2294-304
references.pmid: 7931518