title: Choice of saccade endpoint under risk.
abstract: Eye movements function to bring detailed information onto the high-resolution region of the retina. Previous research has shown that human observers select fixation points that maximize information acquisition and minimize target location uncertainty. In this study, we ask whether human observers choose the saccade endpoint that maximizes gain when there are explicit rewards associated with correctly detecting the target. Observers performed an 8-alternative forced-choice detection task for a contrast-defined target in noise. After a single saccade, observers indicated the target location. Each potential target location had an associated reward that was known to the observer. In some conditions, the reward at one location was higher than at the other locations. We compared human saccade endpoints to those of an ideal observer that maximizes expected gain given the respective human observer's visibility map, i.e., d' for target detection as a function of retinal location. Varying the location of the highest reward had a significant effect on human observers' distribution of saccade endpoints. Both human and ideal observers show a high density of saccades made toward the highest rewarded and actual target locations. But humans' overall spatial distributions of saccade endpoints differed significantly from the ideal observer as they made a greater number of saccade to locations far from the highest rewarded and actual target locations. Suboptimal choice of saccade endpoint, possibly in combination with suboptimal integration of information across saccades, had a significant effect on human observers' ability to correctly detect the target and maximize gain.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
authors.forename: John F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Ackermann
authors.forename: Michael S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Landy
mesh_terms: D002755:Choice Behavior; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D012438:Saccades / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: ideal observer; saccade; visual search
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Aug 15;27(33):8757-70
references.pmid: 17699658
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Mar 17;434(7031):387-91
references.pmid: 15772663
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:1-21
references.pmid: 20192813
references.citation: J Vis. 2006 Aug 03;6(9):858-73
references.pmid: 17083280
references.citation: J Vis. 2011 Jan 21;11(1):18
references.pmid: 21257707
references.citation: Vision Res. 2013 Jun 7;85:26-35
references.pmid: 23147690
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 18;30(33):11096-103
references.pmid: 20720117
references.citation: Vision Res. 2012 Dec 1;74:80-5
references.pmid: 22902641
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 17;28(51):13866-75
references.pmid: 19091976
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 16;107(11):5232-7
references.pmid: 20194768
references.citation: Vision Res. 1997 Mar;37(5):617-31
references.pmid: 9156206
references.citation: Vision Res. 1995 Sep;35(17):2503-22
references.pmid: 8594817
references.citation: J Vis. 2006 Nov 08;6(11):1294-306
references.pmid: 17209736
references.citation: J Vis. 2007 Feb 27;7(3):6
references.pmid: 17461684
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 3;32(40):13744-52a
references.pmid: 23035086
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243-66
references.pmid: 16811440
references.citation: Perception. 2001;30(11):1389-401
references.pmid: 11768491
references.citation: Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Nov;34(4):613-7
references.pmid: 12564564
references.citation: Science. 2004 Jun 18;304(5678):1782-7
references.pmid: 15205529
references.citation: Spat Vis. 2001;15(1):61-75
references.pmid: 11893125