title: Faecal avoidance and selective foraging: do wild mice have the luxury to avoid faeces?
abstract: Host-parasite interactions are a key determinant of the population dynamics of wild animals, and behaviours that reduce parasite transmission and infection may be important for improving host fitness. While antiparasite behaviours have been demonstrated in laboratory animals and domesticated ungulates, whether these behaviours operate in the wild is poorly understood. Therefore, examining antiparasite behaviours in natural populations is crucial for understanding their ecological significance. In this study, we examined whether two wild rodents (white-footed mice,Peromyscus leucopus, and deer mice,Peromyscus maniculatus), selectively foraged away from conspecific faeces or avoided faeces altogether, and whether faecal gastrointestinal parasite status affected their behaviour. We also tested whether wild mice, when nesting, avoided using material that had previously been used by healthy or parasite-infected conspecifics. Our results, in contrast to laboratory mouse studies, suggest that wild mice do not demonstrate faecal avoidance, selective foraging or selective use of nesting material; they preferred being near faeces and did not differentiate between faeces from parasitized and uninfected conspecifics. Behavioural avoidance to reduce parasite infection may still represent an important strategy; however, mice in our study population appeared to favour the opportunity to feed and nest over the risks of coming into contact with faecal-transmitted parasites. Furthermore, the presence of conspecific faeces may actually provide a positive cue of a good foraging or nesting location. Ultimately, balancing the trade-off of performing antiparasite behaviours to reduce infection with missing an important feeding or nesting opportunity may be very different for animals in the wild facing complex and stochastic environments.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, U.K.
authors.forename: Patrick T
authors.initials: PT
authors.lastname: Walsh
authors.forename: Erin
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: McCreless
authors.forename: Amy B
authors.initials: AB
authors.lastname: Pedersen
keywords: Peromyscus; antiparasite behaviour; faecal avoidance; faecal–oral transmission; feeding behaviour; laboratory mouse; parasite; selective foraging; wild immunology
references.citation: Oecologia. 2002 Feb;130(3):420-425
references.pmid: 28547049
references.citation: Oecologia. 2011 Apr;165(4):1043-50
references.pmid: 20857146
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2011 Mar;20(5):881-92
references.pmid: 21073587
references.citation: Oecologia. 2000 Aug;124(2):242-251
references.pmid: 28308185
references.citation: Oecologia. 2007 Dec;154(3):493-503
references.pmid: 17924149
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1990 Fall;14(3):273-94
references.pmid: 2234607
references.citation: Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2000 Aug 1;69(1):15-33
references.pmid: 10856782
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2008 Mar;77(2):370-7
references.pmid: 18028357
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2011 Dec;20(23):5103-10
references.pmid: 21895821
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29(8):1347-59
references.pmid: 16055189
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Oct 1;13(10):391-6
references.pmid: 21238358
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2012 Jan;81(1):70-9
references.pmid: 21939438
references.citation: J Parasitol. 1992 Apr;78(2):256-65
references.pmid: 1556641
references.citation: Parasitology. 1958 Nov;48(3-4):251-60
references.pmid: 13600852
references.citation: Nature. 1979 Aug 2;280(5721):361-7
references.pmid: 460412
references.citation: Insects. 2012 Aug 15;3(3):789-820
references.pmid: 26466629
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Jul 22;261(1360):31-5
references.pmid: 7644547
references.citation: Oecologia. 2000 Jul;124(1):19-25
references.pmid: 28308408
references.citation: Parasitology. 1994;109 Suppl:S139-51
references.pmid: 7854847
references.citation: J Parasitol. 1995 Apr;81(2):187-94
references.pmid: 7707193
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2013 May 08;9(4):20130205
references.pmid: 23658004