title: The virtual-hand illusion: effects of impact and threat on perceived ownership and affective resonance.
abstract: The rubber hand illusion refers to the observation that participants perceive "body ownership" for a rubber hand if it moves, or is stroked in synchrony with the participant's real (covered) hand. Research indicates that events targeting artificial body parts can trigger affective responses (affective resonance) only with perceived body ownership, while neuroscientific findings suggest affective resonance irrespective of ownership (e.g., when observing other individuals under threat). We hypothesized that this may depend on the severity of the event. We first replicated previous findings that the rubber hand illusion can be extended to virtual hands-the virtual-hand illusion. We then tested whether hand ownership and affective resonance (assessed by galvanic skin conductance) are modulated by the experience of an event that either "impacted" (a ball hitting the hand) or "threatened" (a knife cutting the hand) the virtual hand. Ownership was stronger if the virtual hand moved synchronously with the participant's own hand, but this effect was independent from whether the hand was impacted or threatened. Affective resonance was mediated by ownership however: In the face of mere impact, participants showed more resonance in the synchronous condition (i.e., with perceived ownership) than in the asynchronous condition. In the face of threat, in turn, affective resonance was independent of synchronicity-participants were emotionally involved even if a threat was targeting a hand that they did not perceive as their own. Our findings suggest that perceived body ownership and affective responses to body-related impact or threat can be dissociated and are thus unlikely to represent the same underlying process. We argue that affective reactions to impact are produced in a top-down fashion if the impacted effector is assumed to be part of one's own body, whereas threatening events trigger affective responses more directly in a bottom-up fashion-irrespective of body ownership.
authors.affiliation: Institute for Psychological Research and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
authors.forename: Ke
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Ma
authors.forename: Bernhard
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Hommel
keywords: affective responses; body awareness; body ownership; rubber hand illusion; threat; vibrotactile stimulation; virtual hand illusion
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2009 Jul;20(7):794-8
references.pmid: 19493327
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Jun;4(2):270-8
references.pmid: 15460933
references.citation: Prog Brain Res. 1990;85:367-402; discussion 402-3
references.pmid: 2094906
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2008 Aug 20;2:6
references.pmid: 18958207
references.citation: Science. 2004 Feb 20;303(5661):1157-62
references.pmid: 14976305
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Sep;8(9):396-403
references.pmid: 15350240
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Apr 29;5(4):e10381
references.pmid: 20454463
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Feb;31(1):80-91
references.pmid: 15709864
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Feb 19;391(6669):756
references.pmid: 9486643
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jul 22;270(1523):1499-506
references.pmid: 12965016
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Feb 6;93(3):1325-9
references.pmid: 8577763