title: Bacterial exopolysaccharide and biofilm formation stimulate chickpea growth and soil aggregation under salt stress.
abstract: To compensate for stress imposed by salinity, biofilm formation and exopolysaccharide production are significant strategies of salt tolerant bacteria to assist metabolism. We hypothesized that two previously isolated salt-tolerant strains Halomonas variabilis (HT1) and Planococcus rifietoensis (RT4) have an ability to improve plant growth, These strains can form biofilm and accumulate exopolysacharides at increasing salt stress. These results showed that bacteria might be involved in developing microbial communities under salt stress and helpful in colonizing of bacterial strains to plant roots and soil particles. Eventually, it can add to the plant growth and soil structure. We investigated the comparative effect of exopolysacharide and biofilm formation in two bacterial strains Halomonas variabilis (HT1) and Planococcus rifietoensis (RT4) in response to varying salt stress. We found that biofilm formation and exopolysaccharide accumulation increased at higher salinity. To check the effect of bacterial inoculation on the plant (Cicer arietinum Var. CM-98) growth and soil aggregation, pot experiment was conducted by growing seedlings under salt stress. Inoculation of both strains increased plant growth at elevated salt stress. Weight of soil aggregates attached with roots and present in soil were added at higher salt concentrations compared to untreated controls. Soil aggregation was higher at plant roots under salinity. These results suggest the feasibility of using above strains in improving plant growth and soil fertility under salinity.
authors.affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of the Punjab , Quaid-i-Azam Campus , Lahore-54590.
authors.forename: Aisha Waheed
authors.initials: AW
authors.lastname: Qurashi
authors.forename: Anjum Nasim
authors.initials: AN
authors.lastname: Sabri
keywords: Biofilm; Cicer arietinum; exopolysaccharide; salinity; soil aggregates
references.citation: J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Nov;20(11):1577-84
references.pmid: 21124065
references.citation: Curr Microbiol. 2009 Aug;59(2):212-20
references.pmid: 19484302
references.citation: J Appl Microbiol. 2009 Mar;106(3):833-46
references.pmid: 19191973
references.citation: Lett Appl Microbiol. 2007 Aug;45(2):128-33
references.pmid: 17651207
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Dec;32(12):1682-94
references.pmid: 19671096
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Mar;64(3):1024-8
references.pmid: 9501442
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Sep;20(3):500-5
references.pmid: 6490834
references.citation: J Biosci Bioeng. 2009 Jun;107(6):630-5
references.pmid: 19447340
references.citation: J Appl Microbiol. 1998 Jun;84(6):1059-68
references.pmid: 9717291
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2007;61:401-22
references.pmid: 17506679
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006 May;56(2):195-206
references.pmid: 16629750
references.citation: Braz J Microbiol. 2010 Oct;41(4):946-55
references.pmid: 24031574
references.citation: Methods Enzymol. 1979;68:268-80
references.pmid: 232215
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jan;19(1):8-16
references.pmid: 6418765
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Dec;22(6):996-1006
references.pmid: 3905855
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Aug;70(8):5026-9
references.pmid: 15294844
references.citation: Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2009;29(2):120-30
references.pmid: 19514893
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1996 Jan;178(1):175-83
references.pmid: 8550413
references.citation: Carbohydr Res. 2003 Sep 1;338(18):1851-9
references.pmid: 12932368
references.citation: Pak J Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 15;11(4):664-7
references.pmid: 18817146
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000 Dec;64(4):847-67
references.pmid: 11104821