title: Developmental changes in effects of risk and valence on adolescent decision-making.
abstract: Recent research on risky decision-making in adults has shown that both the risk in potential outcomes and their valence (i.e., whether those outcomes involve gains or losses) exert dissociable influences on decisions. We hypothesised that the influences of these two crucial decision variables (risk and valence) on decision-making would vary developmentally during adolescence. We adapted a risk-taking paradigm that provides precise metrics for the impacts of risk and valence. Decision-making in 11-16 year old female adolescents was influenced by both risk and valence. However, their influences assumed different developmental patterns: the impact of valence diminished with age, while there was no developmental change in the impact of risk. These different developmental patterns provide further evidence that risk and valence are fundamentally dissociable constructs and have different influences on decisions across adolescence.
authors.affiliation: UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
authors.forename: Laura K
authors.initials: LK
authors.lastname: Wolf
authors.forename: Nicholas D
authors.initials: ND
authors.lastname: Wright
authors.forename: Emma J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Kilford
authors.forename: Raymond J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Dolan
authors.forename: Sarah-Jayne
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Blakemore
keywords: Adolescence; Decision-making; Loss aversion; Risk-taking; Valence
references.citation: Child Dev. 2001 Jan-Feb;72(1):103-22
references.pmid: 11280473
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May;35(3):709-30
references.pmid: 19379045
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2012 May 16;32(20):7009-20
references.pmid: 22593069
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 1999 Oct;2(10):861-3
references.pmid: 10491603
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 May 15;51(1):345-55
references.pmid: 20188198
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2012 Sep;15(9):1184-91
references.pmid: 22929913
references.citation: Cognition. 1994 Apr-Jun;50(1-3):7-15
references.pmid: 8039375
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 18;2:72
references.pmid: 21687443
references.citation: Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;1(4):578-90
references.pmid: 22436570
references.citation: Dev Psychopathol. 2008 Fall;20(4):1213-29
references.pmid: 18838039
references.citation: Brain Struct Funct. 2010 Jun;214(5-6):645-53
references.pmid: 20512378
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2011 Oct 15;58(4):1139-49
references.pmid: 21763444
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2010 Jan;46(1):193-207
references.pmid: 20053017
references.citation: Cogn Dev. 2010 Apr;25(2):183-196
references.pmid: 20689728
references.citation: Dev Neuropsychol. 2008;33(2):179-96
references.pmid: 18443976