title: Mind wandering at the fingertips: automatic parsing of subjective states based on response time variability.
abstract: RESEARCH FROM THE LAST DECADE HAS SUCCESSFULLY USED TWO KINDS OF THOUGHT REPORTS IN ORDER TO ASSESS WHETHER THE MIND IS WANDERING: random thought-probes and spontaneous reports. However, none of these two methods allows any assessment of the subjective state of the participant between two reports. In this paper, we present a step by step elaboration and testing of a continuous index, based on response time variability within Sustained Attention to Response Tasks (N = 106, for a total of 10 conditions). We first show that increased response time variability predicts mind wandering. We then compute a continuous index of response time variability throughout full experiments and show that the temporal position of a probe relative to the nearest local peak of the continuous index is predictive of mind wandering. This suggests that our index carries information about the subjective state of the subject even when he or she is not probed, and opens the way for on-line tracking of mind wandering. Finally we proceed a step further and infer the internal attentional states on the basis of the variability of response times. To this end we use the Hidden Markov Model framework, which allows us to estimate the durations of on-task and off-task episodes.
authors.affiliation: Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, École Normale Supérieure, CNRS, EHESS Paris, France ; Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris, France.
authors.forename: Mikaël
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Bastian
authors.forename: Jérôme
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Sackur
keywords: Hidden Markov Models; mind wandering; response times variability; subjective report; time-course analysis
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 1995 Feb;39(2-3):159-72
references.pmid: 7734628
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;132(6):946-958
references.pmid: 17073528
references.citation: Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jun;2(2):91-7
references.pmid: 24168478
references.citation: Science. 2010 Nov 12;330(6006):932
references.pmid: 21071660
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2008 Feb;66(1):50-6
references.pmid: 17614178
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):525-549
references.pmid: 22004270
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Mar;23(3):570-8
references.pmid: 20515407
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):750-60
references.pmid: 21782031
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Sep;8(9):700-11
references.pmid: 17704812
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1997 Jun;35(6):747-58
references.pmid: 9204482
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 14;54(4):3040-7
references.pmid: 20946963
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2010 Dec;19(4):1013-36
references.pmid: 20580268
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Feb;23(2):460-70
references.pmid: 20146593
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Mar;100(3):407-25
references.pmid: 21280961
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Feb;39(1):1-5
references.pmid: 23244046
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2012 Mar;21(1):139-48
references.pmid: 22248446
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;15(7):319-26
references.pmid: 21684189
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1984 Mar;21(2):207-11
references.pmid: 6539480
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Mar;136(3):370-81
references.pmid: 21349473
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 26;106(21):8719-24
references.pmid: 19433790
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000 May;104(2):167-90
references.pmid: 10900704
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2008 Sep;36(6):1144-50
references.pmid: 18927032
references.citation: Cognition. 2009 Apr;111(1):98-113
references.pmid: 19215913
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2006 Dec;15(4):673-92; discussion 693-9
references.pmid: 17049881
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 01;4:373
references.pmid: 23847559
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1970 Jul;85(1):111-7
references.pmid: 5458316
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Mar 25;6(3):e18298
references.pmid: 21464969
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992 Dec;121(4):480-506
references.pmid: 1431740
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2013 May;139(3):519-535
references.pmid: 23607430