title: Inhibition of cereal rust fungi by both class I and II defensins derived from the flowers of Nicotiana alata.
abstract: Defensins are a large family of small, cysteine-rich, basic proteins, produced by most plants and plant tissues. They have a primary function in defence against fungal disease, although other functions have been described. This study reports the isolation and characterization of a class I secreted defensin (NaD2) from the flowers of Nicotiana alata, and compares its antifungal activity with the class II defensin (NaD1) from N. alata flowers, which is stored in the vacuole. NaD2, like all other class I defensins, lacks the C-terminal pro-peptide (CTPP) characteristic of class II defensins. NaD2 is most closely related to Nt-thionin from N. tabacum (96% identical) and shares 81% identity with MtDef4 from alfalfa. The concentration required to inhibit in vitro fungal growth by 50% (IC50 ) was assessed for both NaD1 and NaD2 for the biotrophic basidiomycete fungi Puccinia coronata f. sp. avenae (Pca) and P. sorghi (Ps), the necrotrophic pathogenic ascomycetes Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum (Fov), F. graminearum (Fgr), Verticillium dahliae (Vd) and Thielaviopsis basicola (Tb), and the saprobe Aspergillus nidulans. NaD1 was a more potent antifungal molecule than NaD2 against both the biotrophic and necrotrophic fungal pathogens tested. NaD2 was 5-10 times less effective at killing necrotrophs, but only two-fold less effective on Puccinia species. A new procedure for testing antifungal proteins is described in this study which is applicable to pathogens with spores that are not amenable to liquid culture, such as rust pathogens. Rusts are the most damaging fungal pathogens of many agronomically important crop species (wheat, barley, oats and soybean). NaD1 and NaD2 inhibited urediniospore germination, germ tube growth and germ tube differentiation (appressoria induction) of both Puccinia species tested. NaD1 and NaD2 were fungicidal on Puccinia species and produced stunted germ tubes with a granular cytoplasm. When NaD1 and NaD2 were sprayed onto susceptible oat plants prior to the plants being inoculated with crown rust, they reduced the number of pustules per leaf area, as well as the amount of chlorosis induced by infection. Similar to observations in vitro, NaD1 was more effective as an antifungal control agent than NaD2. Further investigation revealed that both NaD1 and NaD2 permeabilized the plasma membranes of Puccinia spp. This study provides evidence that both secreted (NaD2) and nonsecreted (NaD1) defensins may be useful for broad-spectrum resistance to pathogens.
authors.affiliation: Department of Botany, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic., 3086, Australia; La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic., 3086, Australia.
authors.forename: Peter M
authors.initials: PM
authors.lastname: Dracatos
authors.forename: Nicole L
authors.initials: NL
authors.lastname: van der Weerden
authors.forename: Kate T
authors.initials: KT
authors.lastname: Carroll
authors.forename: Elizabeth D
authors.initials: ED
authors.lastname: Johnson
authors.forename: Kim M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Plummer
authors.forename: Marilyn A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Anderson
mesh_terms: D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D000935:Antifungal Agents / Q000494:pharmacology; D018554:Avena / Q000187:drug effects / Q000382:microbiology; D001487:Basidiomycota / Q000166:cytology / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000254:growth & development; D001681:Biological Assay; D023082:Defensins / Q000737:chemistry / Q000302:isolation & purification / Q000494:pharmacology*; D002523:Edible Grain / Q000187:drug effects / Q000382:microbiology*; D035264:Flowers / Q000187:drug effects / Q000378:metabolism*; D018506:Gene Expression Regulation, Plant / Q000187:drug effects; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D010935:Plant Diseases / Q000382:microbiology; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000187:drug effects / Q000382:microbiology; D010940:Plant Proteins / Q000494:pharmacology; D013172:Spores, Fungal / Q000187:drug effects / Q000254:growth & development; D014026:Nicotiana / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000382:microbiology
chemical_list: D000935:Antifungal Agents; D023082:Defensins; D010940:Plant Proteins
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1997 Jan 10;272(2):1171-9
references.pmid: 8995418
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1992 Aug 5;267(22):15301-9
references.pmid: 1639777
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2005 Jun;138(2):600-10
references.pmid: 15955924
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2008 May 23;283(21):14445-52
references.pmid: 18339623
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 15;97(17):9531-6
references.pmid: 10931938
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006 Apr;9(2):142-6
references.pmid: 16459131
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2003 Mar;131(3):1283-93
references.pmid: 12644678
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2001 Jul;14(7):832-8
references.pmid: 11437256
references.citation: J Insect Physiol. 1997 Sep;43(9):833-842
references.pmid: 12770495
references.citation: Curr Opin Immunol. 1999 Feb;11(1):23-7
references.pmid: 10047545
references.citation: Fungal Genet Biol. 2003 Apr;38(3):320-6
references.pmid: 12684021
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1995 May;7(5):573-88
references.pmid: 7780308
references.citation: Dev Comp Immunol. 1999 Jun-Jul;23(4-5):329-44
references.pmid: 10426426
references.citation: Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2005 Feb;6(1):85-101
references.pmid: 15638771
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Apr 13;6(4):e18550
references.pmid: 21533249
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2000 Dec;18(12):1307-10
references.pmid: 11101813
references.citation: Transgenic Res. 2006 Jun;15(3):313-24
references.pmid: 16779647
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39557
references.pmid: 22745785
references.citation: Mol Plant Pathol. 2012 Dec;13(9):1032-46
references.pmid: 22776629
references.citation: J Pept Res. 2001 May;57(5):409-18
references.pmid: 11350601
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2004 Aug;135(4):2055-67
references.pmid: 15299136
references.citation: Cell Microbiol. 2007 Jun;9(6):1491-506
references.pmid: 17253976
references.citation: Mol Biol Cell. 2005 Oct;16(10):4941-53
references.pmid: 16079180
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008 Apr;11(2):187-92
references.pmid: 18343713
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2012 Jun 8;287(24):19961-72
references.pmid: 22511788
references.citation: Plant Dis. 2000 Feb;84(2):203
references.pmid: 30841334
references.citation: J Basic Microbiol. 2008 Dec;48(6):516-20
references.pmid: 18798177
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Oct 13;437(7061):975-80
references.pmid: 16222292
references.citation: Planta. 2002 Dec;216(2):193-202
references.pmid: 12447532
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 11;101(19):7363-8
references.pmid: 15118082
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2002 Jun;53(373):1387-96
references.pmid: 12021286
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Jun 14;411(6839):826-33
references.pmid: 11459065
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2010 Nov 26;285(48):37513-20
references.pmid: 20861017