title: How contexts and issues influence the use of policy-relevant research syntheses: a critical interpretive synthesis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Evidence briefs have emerged as a promising approach to synthesizing the best available research evidence for health system policymakers and stakeholders. An evidence brief may draw on systematic reviews and many other types of policy-relevant information, including local data and studies, to describe a problem, options for addressing it, and key implementation considerations. We conducted a systematic review to examine the ways in which context- and issue-related factors influence the perceived usefulness of evidence briefs among their intended users.
  
  
  METHODS
  We used a critical interpretive synthesis approach to review both empirical and nonempirical literature and to develop a model that explains how context and issues influence policymakers' and stakeholders' views of the utility of evidence briefs prepared for priority policy issues. We used a "compass" question to create a detailed search strategy and conducted electronic searches in CINAHL, EMBASE, HealthSTAR, IPSA, MEDLINE, OAIster (gray literature), ProQuest A&I Theses, ProQuest (Sociological Abstracts, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Worldwide Political Science Abstracts, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, PAIS, Political Science), PsychInfo, Web of Science, and WilsonWeb (Social Science Abstracts). Finally, we used a grounded and interpretive analytic approach to synthesize the results.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of the 4,461 papers retrieved, 3,908 were excluded and 553 were assessed for "relevance," with 137 included in the initial sample of papers to be analyzed and an additional 23 purposively sampled to fill conceptual gaps. Several themes emerged: (1) many established types of "evidence" are viewed as useful content in an evidence brief, along with several promising formatting features; (2) contextual factors, particularly the institutions, interests, and values of a given context, can influence views of evidence briefs; (3) whether an issue is polarizing and whether it is salient (or not) and familiar (or not) to actors in the policy arena can influence views of evidence briefs prepared for that issue; (4) influential factors can emerge in several ways (as context driven, issue driven, or a result of issue-context resonance); (5) these factors work through two primary pathways, affecting either the users or the producers of briefs; and (6) these factors influence views of evidence briefs through a variety of mechanisms.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Those persons funding and preparing evidence briefs need to consider a variety of context- and issue-related factors when deciding how to make them most useful in policymaking.
authors.affiliation: McMaster University.
authors.forename: Kaelan A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Moat
authors.forename: John N
authors.initials: JN
authors.lastname: Lavis
authors.forename: Julia
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Abelson
mesh_terms: D055317:Evidence-Based Practice / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D006291:Health Policy; D006292:Health Priorities; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D011050:Policy Making
keywords: context; evidence brief; health policy; issues; knowledge translation and exchange; politics; systematic review
references.citation: CMAJ. 2010 Jun 15;182(9):E350-61
references.pmid: 20439449
references.citation: Ann Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;20(6):421-7
references.pmid: 20470968
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jul;61(2):417-30
references.pmid: 15893056
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Jan 1;89(1):54-61
references.pmid: 21346891
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1:S1
references.pmid: 20018099
references.citation: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Summer;20(3):325-36
references.pmid: 15446762
references.citation: Malar J. 2009 Apr 28;8:85
references.pmid: 19400953
references.citation: Health Policy. 2009 Apr;90(1):58-65
references.pmid: 18937995
references.citation: Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(11):931-45
references.pmid: 19888793
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1:S13
references.pmid: 20018103
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(11):1938-45
references.pmid: 22938912
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2011 Jun 16;9 Suppl 1:S10
references.pmid: 21679377
references.citation: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010 Apr;26(2):229-32
references.pmid: 20392332
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2003 Jun;56(12):2433-41
references.pmid: 12742606
references.citation: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:1-5
references.pmid: 16053579
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Aug;84(8):597-602
references.pmid: 16917645
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1:S5
references.pmid: 20018112
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1:I1
references.pmid: 20018098
references.citation: Health Policy. 2007 Jan;80(1):135-43
references.pmid: 16621124
references.citation: Implement Sci. 2011 Jun 06;6:59
references.pmid: 21645381
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1:S7
references.pmid: 20018114
references.citation: Implement Sci. 2010 May 26;5:39
references.pmid: 20504357
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Aug;84(8):620-8
references.pmid: 16917649
references.citation: Healthc Policy. 2006 Jan;1(2):21-33
references.pmid: 19305650
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2008 Dec 17;6:12
references.pmid: 19091083
references.citation: J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Jun;91 Suppl 2:S74-87
references.pmid: 19253490
references.citation: Women Health. 2005;41(3):83-97
references.pmid: 15970577
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1:S4
references.pmid: 20018111
references.citation: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Oct;7(4):239-44
references.pmid: 12425783
references.citation: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:21-34
references.pmid: 16053581
references.citation: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jan;10(1):45-53
references.pmid: 15667704
references.citation: Milbank Q. 2007 Dec;85(4):729-68
references.pmid: 18070335
references.citation: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jul 26;6:35
references.pmid: 16872487
references.citation: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25 Suppl 1:241-52
references.pmid: 19527543
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1999 Oct;49(8):1007-19
references.pmid: 10475666
references.citation: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Jul;58(7):546-51
references.pmid: 15194713
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2003 Jan 13;1(1):2
references.pmid: 12646071
references.citation: Value Health. 2002 Mar-Apr;5(2):71-8
references.pmid: 11918822
references.citation: Health Policy. 2009 Mar;89(3):261-70
references.pmid: 18657336
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jul 1;127(1):37-42
references.pmid: 9214251
references.citation: Health Care Anal. 2003 Dec;11(4):295-300
references.pmid: 14769011
references.citation: J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Aug;30(4):603-41
references.pmid: 16318164
references.citation: J Health Polit Policy Law. 1994 Spring;19(1):165-90
references.pmid: 8014408
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001186
references.pmid: 22427746
references.citation: J Health Organ Manag. 2009;23(6):627-41
references.pmid: 20020596
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1:S9
references.pmid: 20018116
references.citation: Int J Ment Health Syst. 2009 Jun 12;3(1):11
references.pmid: 19523226
references.citation: Ann Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;20(6):412-20
references.pmid: 20470967
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2010 Jan;7(1):e1000089
references.pmid: 20069038
references.citation: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Apr;12 Suppl 1:S1-23-31
references.pmid: 17411504
references.citation: Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2009 Apr 09;6:6
references.pmid: 19358711
references.citation: Health Policy Plan. 2011 Jan;26(1):73-82
references.pmid: 20547652
references.citation: Implement Sci. 2008 Dec 17;3:53
references.pmid: 19091107
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Aug;84(8):636-42
references.pmid: 16917651
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2011 Jun 16;9 Suppl 1:S5
references.pmid: 21679386
references.citation: BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2011 Mar 09;11 Suppl 1:S13
references.pmid: 21411000
references.citation: Aust Health Rev. 2010 Nov;34(4):435-40
references.pmid: 21108904
references.citation: Healthc Manage Forum. 2006 Spring;19(1):27-31
references.pmid: 17330642
references.citation: Online J Knowl Synth Nurs. 2002 Nov 18;9:7
references.pmid: 12439759
references.citation: Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Aug;18(2):149-60
references.pmid: 11067649
references.citation: BMJ. 2002 Aug 24;325(7361):436-8
references.pmid: 12193363
references.citation: Health Serv Manage Res. 2003 May;16(2):106-15
references.pmid: 12803950
references.citation: Implement Sci. 2008 Dec 17;3:55
references.pmid: 19091109
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Jun;83(6):480
references.pmid: 15976900
references.citation: Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12 Suppl 3:S26-30
references.pmid: 20586976
references.citation: Milbank Q. 2003;81(2):221-48, 171-2
references.pmid: 12841049
references.citation: Can J Public Health. 2005 May-Jun;96(3):I1-40 following 200
references.pmid: 15913085
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Sep;103 Suppl 6:213-22
references.pmid: 8549476
references.citation: Health Policy. 2010 May;95(2-3):144-52
references.pmid: 20022132
references.citation: Implement Sci. 2008 Dec 17;3:56
references.pmid: 19091110
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2011 Apr;72(7):1047-55
references.pmid: 21414704
references.citation: NeuroRx. 2004 Jul;1(3):356-62
references.pmid: 15717038
references.citation: J Child Neurol. 2001 Jul;16(7):513-9
references.pmid: 11453449
references.citation: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005 Spring;21(2):263-7
references.pmid: 15921068
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(7):1811-24
references.pmid: 16764980
references.citation: Lancet. 2008 Nov 29;372(9653):1855
references.pmid: 19041784
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1:S2
references.pmid: 20018109
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jan;58(1):207-17
references.pmid: 14572932
references.citation: Milbank Q. 2002;80(1):125-54
references.pmid: 11933791
references.citation: Lancet. 2004 Oct 30-Nov 5;364(9445):1615-21
references.pmid: 15519634
references.citation: Healthc Policy. 2006 Jan;1(2):43-8
references.pmid: 19305652
references.citation: Health Promot J Austr. 2010 Dec;21(3):222-8
references.pmid: 21118070
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Jul-Aug;27(4):1177-82
references.pmid: 18607053
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2005 Jul;2(7):e166
references.pmid: 15913387
references.citation: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:6-20
references.pmid: 16053580
references.citation: Health Policy Plan. 2008 Sep;23(5):351-60
references.pmid: 18664524
references.citation: Healthc Policy. 2005 Sep;1(1):55-71
references.pmid: 19308103
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2008 Sep;67(5):760-70
references.pmid: 18403076
references.citation: J Law Med Ethics. 2007 Winter;35(4):657-67, 513
references.pmid: 18076516
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2009 Nov;6(11):e1000141
references.pmid: 19936223
references.citation: Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2009 Aug 24;6:21
references.pmid: 19698186
references.citation: Milbank Q. 2010 Dec;88(4):444-83
references.pmid: 21166865
references.citation: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Jun;54(6):461-8
references.pmid: 10818123
references.citation: Lancet. 2007 Oct 13;370(9595):1370-9
references.pmid: 17933652
references.citation: Malar J. 2010 Jun 24;9:182
references.pmid: 20576114
references.citation: Malar J. 2005 Oct 20;4:51
references.pmid: 16242017
references.citation: Milbank Q. 2011 Mar;89(1):131-56
references.pmid: 21418315
references.citation: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:35-48
references.pmid: 16053582
references.citation: Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1111-36
references.pmid: 19490163