title: Group rhythmic synchrony and attention in children.
abstract: Synchrony, or the coordinated processing of time, is an often-overlooked yet critical context for human interaction. This study tests the relationship between the ability to synchronize rhythmically in a group setting with the ability to attend in 102 elementary schoolchildren. Impairments in temporal processing have frequently been shown to exist in clinical populations with learning disorders, particularly those with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Based on this evidence, we hypothesized that the ability to synchronize rhythmically in a group setting-an instance of the type of temporal processing necessary for successful interaction and learning-would be correlated with the ability to attend across the continuum of the population. A music class is an ideal setting for the study of interpersonal timing. In order to measure synchrony in this context, we constructed instruments that allowed the recording and measurement of individual rhythmic performance. The SWAN teacher questionnaire was used as a measurement of attentional behavior. We find that the ability to synchronize with others in a group music class can predict a child's attentional behavior.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Alexander K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Khalil
authors.forename: Victor
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Minces
authors.forename: Grainne
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: McLoughlin
authors.forename: Andrea
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Chiba
keywords: attention; learning; music cognition; synchrony; temporal processing
references.citation: Int J Educ Psychol Assess. 2012 Apr;10(1):51-70
references.pmid: 26504617
references.citation: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2012 Nov;40(8):1313-26
references.pmid: 22581405
references.citation: J Neurosci Methods. 2006 Feb 15;151(1):15-29
references.pmid: 16378641
references.citation: Neurol Res. 1997 Feb;19(1):2-8
references.pmid: 9090630
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1968 Jul;31(4):639-56
references.pmid: 5709877
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2009 Mar;19(3):712-23
references.pmid: 18832336
references.citation: Neuropsychology. 2009 Mar;23(2):265-9
references.pmid: 19254099
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Aug;11(8):599-605
references.pmid: 20648064
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2004 Aug;15(8):511-4
references.pmid: 15270994
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 2012 Mar;106(3):135-54
references.pmid: 22526355
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Aug;3(8):617-28
references.pmid: 12154363
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2011 Sep;14(5):1150-60
references.pmid: 21884330
references.citation: Hum Mov Sci. 2011 Oct;30(5):834-45
references.pmid: 20817320
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3566
references.pmid: 18958177
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2000 Jul;36(4):511-23
references.pmid: 10902702
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Nov 15;60(10):1088-97
references.pmid: 16806097
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Oct 1;64(7):615-25
references.pmid: 18339358
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):969-92
references.pmid: 16615317