title: Invertebrate and avian predators as drivers of chemical defensive strategies in tenthredinid sawflies.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Many insects are chemically defended against predatory vertebrates and invertebrates. Nevertheless, our understanding of the evolution and diversity of insect defenses remains limited, since most studies have focused on visual signaling of defenses against birds, thereby implicitly underestimating the impact of insectivorous insects. In the larvae of sawflies in the family Tenthredinidae (Hymenoptera), which feed on various plants and show diverse lifestyles, two distinct defensive strategies are found: easy bleeding of deterrent hemolymph, and emission of volatiles by ventral glands. Here, we used phylogenetic information to identify phylogenetic correlations among various ecological and defensive traits in order to estimate the relative importance of avian versus invertebrate predation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mapping of 12 ecological and defensive traits on phylogenetic trees inferred from DNA sequences reveals the discrete distribution of easy bleeding that occurs, among others, in the genus Athalia and the tribe Phymatocerini. By contrast, occurrence of ventral glands is restricted to the monophyletic subfamily Nematinae, which are never easy bleeders. Both strategies are especially effective towards insectivorous insects such as ants, while only Nematinae species are frequently brightly colored and truly gregarious. Among ten tests of phylogenetic correlation between traits, only a few are significant. None of these involves morphological traits enhancing visual signals, but easy bleeding is associated with the absence of defensive body movements and with toxins occurring in the host plant. Easy bleeding functions through a combination of attributes, which is corroborated by an independent contrasts test indicating a statistically significant negative correlation between species-level integument mechanical resistance and hemolymph feeding deterrence against ants.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our analyses evidence a repeated occurrence of easy bleeding, and no phylogenetic correlation including specific visual signals is significant. We conclude that the evolution of chemically-based defenses in tenthredinids may have been driven by invertebrate as much as by avian predation. The clear-cut visual signaling often encountered in the Nematinae would be linked to differential trends of habitat use by prey and predators. Further studies on (prey) insect groups should include visual signals and other traits, as well as several groups of natural enemies, to better interpret their relative significance and to refine our understanding of insect chemical defenses.
authors.affiliation: Department of Entomology, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Rue Vautier 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium. jean-luc.boeve@naturalsciences.be.
authors.forename: Jean-Luc
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Boevé
authors.forename: Stephan M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Blank
authors.forename: Gert
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Meijer
authors.forename: Tommi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Nyman
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D001717:Birds; D004463:Ecology; D006927:Hymenoptera / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D007313:Insecta; D007814:Larva / Q000502:physiology; D010802:Phylogeny; D011235:Predatory Behavior
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2012 Jul 30;9(8):772
references.pmid: 22847109
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2003 Apr;52(2):131-58
references.pmid: 12746144
references.citation: Evolution. 2000 Apr;54(2):526-33
references.pmid: 10937229
references.citation: Naturwissenschaften. 2010 Jun;97(6):595-9
references.pmid: 20396863
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Feb 23;7:88
references.pmid: 16504105
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1994 Dec;20(12):3233-50
references.pmid: 24241989
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4
references.pmid: 12912839
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2010 Oct 23;6(5):617-9
references.pmid: 20335201
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Feb;113(2):123-36
references.pmid: 15687048
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Jul;27(7):394-403
references.pmid: 22658878
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Sep 01;10:266
references.pmid: 20807452
references.citation: Oecologia. 2003 Jan;134(1):104-11
references.pmid: 12647187
references.citation: Evolution. 2010 Apr 1;64(4):1098-119
references.pmid: 19895553
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Feb;22(2):103-9
references.pmid: 17097760
references.citation: Evolution. 1988 Mar;42(2):293-305
references.pmid: 28567849
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1985 Aug;11(8):1019-36
references.pmid: 24310327
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Oct 01;5(10):
references.pmid: 20957208
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2002 Oct;51(5):729-39
references.pmid: 12396587
references.citation: Integr Zool. 2008 Sep;3(3):149-56
references.pmid: 21396063
references.citation: Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2008 Oct;38(10):895-904
references.pmid: 18687400
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2007 Mar;33(3):513-24
references.pmid: 17252214
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Nov 08;7:214
references.pmid: 17996036
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2008 Feb;34(2):179-88
references.pmid: 18236110
references.citation: Evolution. 2013 May;67(5):1493-502
references.pmid: 23617924
references.citation: J Econ Entomol. 2009 Dec;102(6):2056-60
references.pmid: 20069831
references.citation: Oecologia. 2009 May;160(2):399-410
references.pmid: 19252933
references.citation: Annu Rev Entomol. 2003;48:455-84
references.pmid: 12414737
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Nov;20(11):598-603
references.pmid: 16701442
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2009 May;35(5):507-17
references.pmid: 19390895
references.citation: Braz J Biol. 2011 Feb;71(1):1-7
references.pmid: 21437393
references.citation: Evolution. 2006 Aug;60(8):1622-37
references.pmid: 17017063
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2003 Dec;29(12):2683-94
references.pmid: 14969355
references.citation: J Nanobiotechnology. 2004 Oct 01;2(1):10
references.pmid: 15461785
references.citation: Annu Rev Entomol. 2006;51:163-85
references.pmid: 16332208
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Oct 22;278(1721):3026-33
references.pmid: 21367790
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2001 Dec;27(12):2505-16
references.pmid: 11789955
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Mar 27;98(7):3909-14
references.pmid: 11259651
references.citation: Naturwissenschaften. 2011 May;98(5):425-34
references.pmid: 21475942
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2417-24
references.pmid: 16959629
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jan 7;269(1486):1-6
references.pmid: 11788029
references.citation: Oecologia. 1991 Jan;85(3):440-446
references.pmid: 28312052
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876-82
references.pmid: 9396791
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2012 Dec 1;61(6):973-99
references.pmid: 22723471
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1994 Oct;20(10):2743-9
references.pmid: 24241845