title: Modelling mutational and selection pressures on dinucleotides in eukaryotic phyla--selection against CpG and UpA in cytoplasmically expressed RNA and in RNA viruses.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Loss of CpG dinucleotides in genomic DNA through methylation-induced mutation is characteristic of vertebrates and plants. However, these and other eukaryotic phyla show a range of other dinucleotide frequency biases with currently uncharacterized underlying mutational or selection mechanisms. We developed a parameterized Markov process to identify what neighbour context-dependent mutations best accounted for patterns of dinucleotide frequency biases in genomic and cytoplasmically expressed mRNA sequences of different vertebrates, other eukaryotic groups and RNA viruses that infect them.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Consistently, 11- to 14-fold greater frequencies of the methylation-associated mutation of C to T upstream of G (depicted as C→T,G) than other transitions best modelled dinucleotide frequencies in mammalian genomic DNA. However, further mutations such as G→T,T (5-fold greater than the default transversion rate) were required to account for the full spectrum of dinucleotide frequencies in mammalian sequence datasets. Consistent with modeling predictions for these two mutations, instability of both CpG and CpT dinucleotides was identified through SNP frequency analysis of human DNA sequences. Different sets of context-dependent mutations were modelled in other eukaryotes with non-methylated genomic DNA. In contrast to genomic DNA, best-fit models of dinucleotide frequencies in transcribed RNA sequences expressed in the cytoplasm from all organisms were dominated by mutations that eliminated UpA dinucleotides, observations consistent with cytoplasmically driven selection for mRNA stability. Surprisingly, mRNA sequences from organisms with methylated genomes showed evidence for additional selection against CpG through further context-dependent mutations (eg. C→A,G). Similar mutation or selection processes were identified among single-stranded mammalian RNA viruses; these potentially account for their previously described but unexplained under-representations of CpG and UpA dinucleotides.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Methods we have developed identify mutational processes and selection pressures in organisms that provide new insights into nucleotide compositional constraints and a wealth of biochemical and evolutionarily testable predictions for the future.
authors.affiliation: Division of Infection and Immunity, Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK. Peter.Simmonds@ed.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Simmonds
authors.forename: Wenjun
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Xia
authors.forename: J Kenneth
authors.initials: JK
authors.lastname: Baillie
authors.forename: Ken
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: McKinnon
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001482:Base Composition; D018899:CpG Islands; D003593:Cytoplasm / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism; D019175:DNA Methylation; D006801:Humans; D008390:Markov Chains; D008957:Models, Genetic; D009154:Mutation; D012328:RNA Viruses / Q000235:genetics*; D012333:RNA, Messenger / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism; D012641:Selection, Genetic
chemical_list: D012333:RNA, Messenger
references.citation: J Virol. 2011 Dec;85(24):13448-52
references.pmid: 21957290
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1980 Apr 11;8(7):1499-504
references.pmid: 6253938
references.citation: Nature. 1981 Aug 27;292(5826):860-2
references.pmid: 6267477
references.citation: Mol Gen Genet. 1998 May;258(4):352-62
references.pmid: 9648739
references.citation: J Immunol. 2005 Feb 15;174(4):2273-9
references.pmid: 15699162
references.citation: BMC Res Notes. 2012 Jan 20;5:50
references.pmid: 22264264
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jan;86(1):192-6
references.pmid: 2463621
references.citation: Science. 2008 Jun 27;320(5884):1784-7
references.pmid: 18583614
references.citation: J Virol. 2009 Oct;83(19):9957-69
references.pmid: 19605476
references.citation: Gene. 2004 May 26;333:143-9
references.pmid: 15177689
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 2007 Sep;65(3):207-14
references.pmid: 17676366
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1976 Nov;108(1):1-23
references.pmid: 1003479
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56642
references.pmid: 23451064
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2012 May;61(3):510-21
references.pmid: 22331438
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1961 Mar;236:864-75
references.pmid: 13790780
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1962 Jun;237:1961-7
references.pmid: 13918810
references.citation: Biol Direct. 2008 Dec 16;3:52
references.pmid: 19087239
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(12):4692-6
references.pmid: 2352943
references.citation: Genomics. 2006 Jan;87(1):68-74
references.pmid: 16316740
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 2001 Oct-Nov;53(4-5):364-76
references.pmid: 11675596
references.citation: Nature. 1978 Aug 24;274(5673):775-80
references.pmid: 355893
references.citation: J Virol. 2006 Apr;80(7):3259-72
references.pmid: 16537593
references.citation: Gene. 1991 Oct 15;106(2):185-95
references.pmid: 1937049
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Mar;22(3):650-8
references.pmid: 15537806
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Sep;17(9):1371-83
references.pmid: 10958853
references.citation: J Gen Virol. 1997 Nov;78 ( Pt 11):2859-70
references.pmid: 9367373
references.citation: Insect Mol Biol. 2011 Oct;20(5):553-65
references.pmid: 21699596
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2003 Mar 21;327(2):303-8
references.pmid: 12628237
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Nov;17(11):1620-5
references.pmid: 11070050
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2010 Nov 02;8(11):e1000506
references.pmid: 21072239
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009 Jul 20;4(7):e6282
references.pmid: 19617912
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009 Jun 18;4(6):e5969
references.pmid: 19536338
references.citation: Virology. 2011 Mar 15;411(2):180-93
references.pmid: 21211811
references.citation: J Virol. 1994 May;68(5):2889-97
references.pmid: 8151759
references.citation: Genomics. 2008 Jul;92(1):33-40
references.pmid: 18485662
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 2003 Dec;57(6):694-701
references.pmid: 14745538
references.citation: PLoS Pathog. 2008 Jun 06;4(6):e1000079
references.pmid: 18535658