title: The impact of sensorimotor experience on affective evaluation of dance.
abstract: Past research demonstrates that we are more likely to positively evaluate a stimulus if we have had previous experience with that stimulus. This has been shown for judgment of faces, architecture, artworks and body movements. In contrast, other evidence suggests that this relationship can also work in the inverse direction, at least in the domain of watching dance. Specifically, it has been shown that in certain contexts, people derive greater pleasure from watching unfamiliar movements they would not be able to physically reproduce compared to simpler, familiar actions they could physically reproduce. It remains unknown, however, how different kinds of experience with complex actions, such as dance, might change observers' affective judgments of these movements. Our aim was to clarify the relationship between experience and affective evaluation of whole body movements. In a between-subjects design, participants received either physical dance training with a video game system, visual and auditory experience or auditory experience only. Participants' aesthetic preferences for dance stimuli were measured before and after the training sessions. Results show that participants from the physical training group not only improved their physical performance of the dance sequences, but also reported higher enjoyment and interest in the stimuli after training. This suggests that physically learning particular movements leads to greater enjoyment while observing them. These effects are not simply due to increased familiarity with audio or visual elements of the stimuli, as the other two training groups showed no increase in aesthetic ratings post-training. We suggest these results support an embodied simulation account of aesthetics, and discuss how the present findings contribute to a better understanding of the shaping of preferences by sensorimotor experience.
authors.affiliation: Wales Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Bangor University Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.
authors.forename: Louise P
authors.initials: LP
authors.lastname: Kirsch
authors.forename: Kim A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Drommelschmidt
authors.forename: Emily S
authors.initials: ES
authors.lastname: Cross
keywords: aesthetics; dance; motor learning; neuroaesthetics; observational learning; training
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2013 Jun;22(2):603-12
references.pmid: 23624142
references.citation: Brain. 1994 Jun;117 ( Pt 3):607-36
references.pmid: 8032869
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 May;11(5):197-203
references.pmid: 17347026
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2008 Jul;72(4):461-72
references.pmid: 17899177
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2004 Apr 9;15(5):893-7
references.pmid: 15073538
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Feb;139(2):300-8
references.pmid: 22305351
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Jun;27(12):3380-4
references.pmid: 18598273
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2006 Aug;16(8):1157-67
references.pmid: 16221923
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Oct;19(10):1656-63
references.pmid: 18271739
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2010 Jul;74(4):400-6
references.pmid: 19856185
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013 May 21;8(5):e64195
references.pmid: 23704980
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33343
references.pmid: 22457754
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Aug;31(8):1196-206
references.pmid: 20024944
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2009 Feb;19(2):315-26
references.pmid: 18515297
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2006 Oct 10;16(19):1905-10
references.pmid: 17027486
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2008 Sep;17(3):911-22
references.pmid: 18207423
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2001 Jan;12(1):1-19
references.pmid: 11198101
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2004 Apr;91(4):1699-705
references.pmid: 15010496
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2006 Jan 1;29(1):276-85
references.pmid: 16087351
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(4):364-82
references.pmid: 15582859
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Oct;30(7):1383-92
references.pmid: 19788567
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2013 Jan;124(1):1-8
references.pmid: 23332807
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1257-67
references.pmid: 16530429
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 2003 Feb;94(Pt 1):111-24
references.pmid: 12648393
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jun;74(6):1464-80
references.pmid: 9654756
references.citation: J Dance Med Sci. 2010;14(1):19-25
references.pmid: 20214851
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2006 Apr 15;30(3):917-26
references.pmid: 16380270
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Feb;34(2):467-86
references.pmid: 22102260
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Apr 7;46(1):153-60
references.pmid: 15820701
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 20;101(16):6321-5
references.pmid: 15079079
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr;36(2):139-40
references.pmid: 23507094
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2012 Jul;76(4):525-41
references.pmid: 22198511
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2005 Aug;15(8):1243-9
references.pmid: 15616133
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Sep 21;5:102
references.pmid: 21960969
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 2004 Nov;95(Pt 4):489-508
references.pmid: 15527534