title: Identity categories and transformational paths for face changes across the age spectrum.
abstract: How faces change across lengthy time periods and whether the changing appearance of a face functions as an identity category was investigated in two experiments. In Experiment 1, the faces of 15 individuals were multidimensionally scaled at each of seven age epochs (roughly <6 months to 75 years of age) and correlated with the same persons, but at different ages. In Experiment 2, three individuals at each of seven age epochs were multidimensionally scaled, and analyses explored the conceptual structure and transformational path of each person within the space. The results revealed that even the earliest age epochs (<6 months) were correlated with the later epochs, except for the most extreme age, with the correlation highest at intermediate ages. Transformational paths were found that emerged and terminated at haphazard points in the space. Results are discussed in terms of principled change in categories whose members systematically change across their life cycle, including suggestions for the need to incorporate systematic change in current theories of categorization.
authors.forename: Phuong
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Do
authors.forename: Donald
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Homa
authors.forename: Kathryn
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Koehler
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000375:Aging / Q000502:physiology*; D003210:Concept Formation / Q000502:physiology*; D005145:Face; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1983 Feb;33(2):193-6
references.pmid: 6844112
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991 May;43(2):161-204
references.pmid: 1866456
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1985 Oct;11(4):780-94
references.pmid: 2932525
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1975 Nov;1(4):374-82
references.pmid: 1185124
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Oct;16(5):920-4
references.pmid: 19815799
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1985 Jul;92(3):289-316
references.pmid: 4023146
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):1043-7
references.pmid: 16615326
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Sep;8(9):404-9
references.pmid: 15350241
references.citation: Child Dev. 1991 Dec;62(6):1302-20
references.pmid: 1786717
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1991 Jan;19(1):63-71
references.pmid: 2017030
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Oct;8(10):1386-90
references.pmid: 16136037
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jan;64(1):17-23
references.pmid: 21213196
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jun;13(6):258-63
references.pmid: 19447670
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2000 Sep;11(5):379-85
references.pmid: 11228908
references.citation: Perception. 2000;29(11):1291-312
references.pmid: 11219986
references.citation: Cognition. 2011 Dec;121(3):313-23
references.pmid: 21890124
references.citation: Cognition. 2011 Feb;118(2):201-10
references.pmid: 21130422
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1999 Sep;39(2):69-115
references.pmid: 10462456
references.citation: Am J Psychol. 1982 Fall;95(3):363-81
references.pmid: 7180946
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991 Sep;17(5):811-36
references.pmid: 1834766