title: A framework for understanding medical epistemologies.
abstract: What clinicians, biomedical scientists, and other health care professionals know as individuals or as groups and how they come to know and use knowledge are central concerns of medical epistemology. Activities associated with knowledge production and use are called epistemic practices. Such practices are considered in biomedical and clinical literatures, social sciences of medicine, philosophy of science and philosophy of medicine, and also in other nonmedical literatures. A host of different kinds of knowledge claims have been identified, each with different uses and logics of justification. A general framework is needed to situate these diverse contributions in medical epistemology, so we can see how they fit together. But developing such a framework turns out to be quite tricky. In this survey, three possible frameworks are considered along with the difficulties associated with each of them. The essay concludes with a fourth framework, which considers any epistemology as part of a practice that is oriented toward overcoming errors that emerge in antecedently given practices where knowledge is developed and used. As medicine indirectly advances health by directly mitigating disease, so epistemology indirectly advances knowledge by directly mitigating error.
authors.affiliation: *Department of Philosophy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. khushf@sc.edu.
authors.forename: George
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Khushf
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D019359:Knowledge; D008606:Mental Processes; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D010686:Philosophy, Medical
keywords: clinical reasoning; epistemology; error; evidence-based medicine