title: Editorial decisions may perpetuate belief in invalid research findings.
abstract: Social psychology and related disciplines are seeing a resurgence of interest in replication, as well as actual replication efforts. But prior work suggests that even a clear demonstration that a finding is invalid often fails to shake acceptance of the finding. This threatens the full impact of these replication efforts. Here we show that the actions of two key players--journal editors and the authors of original (invalidated) research findings--are critical to the broader public's continued belief in an invalidated research conclusion. Across three experiments, we show that belief in an invalidated finding falls sharply when a critical failed replication is published in the same--versus different--journal as the original finding, and when the authors of the original finding acknowledge that the new findings invalidate their conclusions. We conclude by discussing policy implications of our key findings.
authors.affiliation: School of Education, Culture and Communication, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden ; Centre for the Study of Cultural Evolution, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
authors.forename: Kimmo
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Eriksson
authors.forename: Brent
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Simpson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003469:Culture; D003657:Decision Making; D035081:Editorial Policies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012106:Research
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan;7(1):58-9
references.pmid: 26168423
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):562-71
references.pmid: 26168113
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):608-14
references.pmid: 26168120
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):657-60
references.pmid: 26168127
references.citation: Am Psychol. 2007 Sep;62(6):555-62
references.pmid: 17874896
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Apr 07;5(4):e10068
references.pmid: 20383332
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2007 Feb;4(2):e28
references.pmid: 17326704
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29081
references.pmid: 22279526
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):615-31
references.pmid: 26168121
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):9-12
references.pmid: 26162108
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124
references.pmid: 16060722
references.citation: Am Psychol. 2008 Sep;63(6):561-2
references.pmid: 18793049
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):555-61
references.pmid: 26168112