title: Uranium mining in Portugal: a review of the environmental legacies of the largest mines and environmental and human health impacts.
abstract: The history of uranium mining in Portugal during almost one century has followed international demand peaks of both radium and uranium, which in turn were driven by medical, military, and civil applications. Nowadays, following price drop in the 1980s, mining activities decreased and ceased in 2001. The current challenge is to deal with environmental legacies left by old uranium mines, mainly located in Viseu and Guarda districts. In 2001, based on several radiological surveys carried out, the Portuguese government assumed the remediation costs of abandoned mine areas for environmental safety and public health protection. Detailed environmental and public health risk assessments were performed under the scope of studies both requested by the government and by funded research projects. It was found that the existing risks, due to radiological and chemical exposures to metals and radionuclide's, were particularly high at the old milling facilities and mines where in situ and heap leaching of low-grade ore occurred. The different studies, involving both humans and non-human species from different trophic levels, demonstrated the existence of effects at different levels of biological organization (molecular, cellular, tissues, individuals, and populations) and on ecosystem services. To mitigate the risks, the environmental rehabilitation works at the Urgeiriça mine complex are almost complete, while at Cunha Baixa mine, they are presently in progress. These works and environmental improvements achieved and expected are described herein.
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 4169-007, Porto, Portugal, ruthp@ua.pt.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Pereira
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Barbosa
authors.forename: F P
authors.initials: FP
authors.lastname: Carvalho
mesh_terms: D017753:Ecosystem; D004781:Environmental Exposure / Q000009:adverse effects; D004785:Environmental Pollutants / Q000032:analysis / Q000378:metabolism / Q000633:toxicity; D052918:Environmental Restoration and Remediation; D006801:Humans; D008906:Mining / Q000379:methods; D011174:Portugal; D011634:Public Health; D018570:Risk Assessment; D018675:Toxicity Tests / Q000379:methods; D014501:Uranium / Q000032:analysis* / Q000633:toxicity*; D062065:Wastewater
chemical_list: D004785:Environmental Pollutants; D014501:Uranium; D062065:Wastewater
references.citation: Toxicology. 2011 May 10;283(2-3):65-87
references.pmid: 21414382
references.citation: Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007 Aug;53(2):207-13
references.pmid: 17587142
references.citation: Environ Geochem Health. 2012 Apr;34(2):181-9
references.pmid: 21964853
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Aug;42(2):325-35
references.pmid: 7025758
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2012 Feb 1;416:156-63
references.pmid: 22178025
references.citation: Environ Pollut. 2009 Aug-Sep;157(8-9):2368-77
references.pmid: 19361901
references.citation: Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2010 May;58(4):1023-31
references.pmid: 20012274
references.citation: J Environ Qual. 2005 Sep 08;34(5):1789-800
references.pmid: 16151231
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2011 Dec 1;410-411:87-95
references.pmid: 22018959
references.citation: J Environ Radioact. 2007;98(3):298-314
references.pmid: 17624644
references.citation: J Hazard Mater. 2011 Feb 15;186(1):788-95
references.pmid: 21146299
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2008 Feb 15;390(2-3):377-86
references.pmid: 17919686
references.citation: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013 Feb;88:65-71
references.pmid: 23174268
references.citation: J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2011;46(6):659-68
references.pmid: 21547821
references.citation: Mutagenesis. 2005 Nov;20(6):417-23
references.pmid: 16195314
references.citation: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002 Apr;42(1):25-34
references.pmid: 11923066
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2008 Feb 15;390(2-3):387-95
references.pmid: 17854861
references.citation: J Environ Radioact. 2007;96(1-3):39-46
references.pmid: 17433852
references.citation: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012 Jan;75(1):46-54
references.pmid: 21955884
references.citation: Ecotoxicology. 2011 Aug;20(6):1315-27
references.pmid: 21516444
references.citation: Chemosphere. 2011 Nov;85(10):1630-4
references.pmid: 21911243
references.citation: J Environ Radioact. 2007;94(3):151-82
references.pmid: 17360083
references.citation: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013 Feb;88:16-25
references.pmid: 23164450
references.citation: J Environ Radioact. 2012 Oct;112:96-107
references.pmid: 22694913
references.citation: Toxicology. 2013 Mar 8;305:89-98
references.pmid: 23370006
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2008 Aug 25;402(1):29-35
references.pmid: 18538823
references.citation: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013 Jan;87:115-9
references.pmid: 23146668
references.citation: Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2009 Nov;83(5):668-73
references.pmid: 19590808
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jan 15;443:673-80
references.pmid: 23220759
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2013 Feb 15;445-446:321-8
references.pmid: 23348721
references.citation: Aquat Toxicol. 2009 Jan 31;91(2):187-95
references.pmid: 18541315
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2007 Mar 15;374(2-3):252-9
references.pmid: 17316767