title: Initial development of a temporal-envelope-preserving nonlinear hearing aid prescription using a genetic algorithm.
abstract: Most hearing aid prescriptions focus on the optimization of a metric derived from the long-term average spectrum of speech, and do not consider how the prescribed values might distort the temporal envelope shape. A growing body of evidence suggests that such distortions can lead to systematic errors in speech perception, and therefore hearing aid prescriptions might benefit by including preservation of the temporal envelope shape in their rationale. To begin to explore this possibility, we designed a genetic algorithm (GA) to find the multiband compression settings that preserve the shape of the original temporal envelope while placing that envelope in the listener's audiometric dynamic range. The resulting prescription had a low compression threshold, short attack and release times, and a combination of compression ratio and gain that placed the output signal within the listener's audiometric dynamic range. Initial behavioral tests of individuals with impaired hearing revealed no difference in speech-in-noise perception between the GA and the NAL-NL2 prescription. However, gap detection performance was superior with the GA in comparison to NAL-NL2. Overall, this work is a proof of concept that consideration of temporal envelope distortions can be incorporated into hearing aid prescriptions.
authors.affiliation: 1Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
authors.forename: Andrew T
authors.initials: AT
authors.lastname: Sabin
authors.forename: Pamela E
authors.initials: PE
authors.lastname: Souza
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000465:Algorithms; D001302:Audiometry, Speech; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D012048:Correction of Hearing Impairment / Q000295:instrumentation*; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D006309:Hearing; D006310:Hearing Aids; D006319:Hearing Loss, Sensorineural / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009622:Noise / Q000009:adverse effects; D017711:Nonlinear Dynamics; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D019986:Persons with Hearing Disabilities / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D013067:Speech Perception; D013997:Time Factors
keywords: compression; genetic algorithms; optimization; temporal processing
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 Jul;74(1):67-72
references.pmid: 6886200
references.citation: Trends Amplif. 2008 Jun;12(2):103-12
references.pmid: 18567591
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Feb;95(2):1053-64
references.pmid: 8132899
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2008 Oct;29(5):800-13
references.pmid: 18596640
references.citation: J Speech Hear Res. 1970 Jun;13(2):426-37
references.pmid: 5421459
references.citation: Ear Hear. 1998 Aug;19(4):255-66
references.pmid: 9728721
references.citation: Trends Amplif. 2002 Dec;6(4):131-65
references.pmid: 25425919
references.citation: Audiol Res. 2011 Mar 23;1(1):e24
references.pmid: 26557309
references.citation: Int J Audiol. 2010 Dec;49(12):891-903
references.pmid: 21070124
references.citation: Br J Audiol. 1992 Dec;26(6):351-61
references.pmid: 1292819
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Dec;106(6):3637-48
references.pmid: 10615702
references.citation: Int J Audiol. 2010 Jun;49(6):395-409
references.pmid: 20225931
references.citation: Am J Audiol. 2013 Dec;22(2):216-25
references.pmid: 23824436
references.citation: Hear Res. 1992 Dec;64(1):81-92
references.pmid: 1490904
references.citation: Hear Res. 2004 Feb;188(1-2):70-88
references.pmid: 14759572
references.citation: J Am Acad Audiol. 1996 Aug;7(4):260-8
references.pmid: 8827920
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Feb;91(2):1069-77
references.pmid: 1556308
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2395-405
references.pmid: 15532670
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Apr;77(4):1505-13
references.pmid: 3989105
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+
references.pmid: 5541744
references.citation: J Am Acad Audiol. 2003 Sep;14(7):347-60
references.pmid: 14620609
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2005 Aug;26(4 Suppl):57S-72S
references.pmid: 16082268
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Mar;121(3):1654-64
references.pmid: 17407902
references.citation: Int J Audiol. 2003 Jul;42 Suppl 1:S77-85
references.pmid: 12918613
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2010 Apr;31(2):268-76
references.pmid: 20071993
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 Aug;74(2):467-73
references.pmid: 6619424
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Nov;86(5):1747-55
references.pmid: 2808923
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Mar;97(3):1854-64
references.pmid: 7699167
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2007 Jun;28(3):370-80
references.pmid: 17485986
references.citation: Trends Amplif. 2005;9(4):159-97
references.pmid: 16424945
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Jan;119(1):41-4
references.pmid: 16454262
references.citation: J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Mar;20(3):161-71
references.pmid: 19927686
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Sep;84(3):1100-4
references.pmid: 3183202
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Jun 29;336(1278):367-73
references.pmid: 1354376
references.citation: J Am Acad Audiol. 2001 Jan;12(1):37-51
references.pmid: 11214977