title: Conservation, spillover and gene flow within a network of Northern European marine protected areas.
abstract: To ensure that marine protected areas (MPAs) benefit conservation and fisheries, the effectiveness of MPA designs has to be evaluated in field studies. Using an interdisciplinary approach, we empirically assessed the design of a network of northern MPAs where fishing for European lobster (Homarusgammarus) is prohibited. First, we demonstrate a high level of residency and survival (50%) for almost a year (363 days) within MPAs, despite small MPA sizes (0.5-1 km(2)). Second, we demonstrate limited export (4.7%) of lobsters tagged within MPAs (N = 1810) to neighbouring fished areas, over a median distance of 1.6 km out to maximum 21 km away from MPA centres. In comparison, median movement distance of lobsters recaptured within MPAs was 164 m, and recapture rate was high (40%). Third, we demonstrate a high level of gene flow within the study region, with an estimated F ST of less than 0.0001 over a ≈ 400 km coastline. Thus, the restricted movement of older life stages, combined with a high level of gene flow suggests that connectivity is primarily driven by larval drift. Larval export from the MPAs can most likely affect areas far beyond their borders. Our findings are of high importance for the design of MPA networks for sedentary species with pelagic early life stages.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
authors.forename: Mats Brockstedt Olsen
authors.initials: MB
authors.lastname: Huserbråten
authors.forename: Even
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Moland
authors.forename: Halvor
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Knutsen
authors.forename: Esben Moland
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Olsen
authors.forename: Carl
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: André
authors.forename: Nils Chr
authors.initials: NC
authors.lastname: Stenseth
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D017753:Ecosystem; D005060:Europe; D051456:Gene Flow; D009068:Movement; D008121:Nephropidae / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D011157:Population Dynamics
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2003 Feb;12(2):385-94
references.pmid: 12535089
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Jan;8(1):103-6
references.pmid: 21585727
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jun 22;273(1593):1459-64
references.pmid: 16777738
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 26;107(43):18286-93
references.pmid: 20200311
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 08;280(1754):20122679
references.pmid: 23303544
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2012 Jun 5;22(11):1023-8
references.pmid: 22633811
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31216
references.pmid: 22363583
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Oct;11(10):697-709
references.pmid: 20847747
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 22;270(1527):1871-8
references.pmid: 14561299
references.citation: Science. 2009 Jul 31;325(5940):578-85
references.pmid: 19644114
references.citation: Genetics. 1943 Mar;28(2):114-38
references.pmid: 17247074
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e58160
references.pmid: 23573187
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Feb;20(2):74-80
references.pmid: 16701346
references.citation: Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370
references.pmid: 28563791
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2011 Feb;20(4):768-83
references.pmid: 21199035
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Jul 28;9:323
references.pmid: 18662398