title: Open surgical simulation--a review.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Surgical simulation has benefited from a surge in interest over the last decade as a result of the increasing need for a change in the traditional apprentice model of teaching surgery. However, despite the recent interest in surgical simulation as an adjunct to surgical training, most of the literature focuses on laparoscopic, endovascular, and endoscopic surgical simulation with very few studies scrutinizing open surgical simulation and its benefit to surgical trainees. The aim of this review is to summarize the current standard of available open surgical simulators and to review the literature on the benefits of open surgical simulation.
  Open surgical simulators currently used include live animals, cadavers, bench models, virtual reality, and software-based computer simulators. In the current literature, there are 18 different studies (including 6 randomized controlled trials and 12 cohort studies) investigating the efficacy of open surgical simulation using live animal, bench, and cadaveric models in many surgical specialties including general, cardiac, trauma, vascular, urologic, and gynecologic surgery. The current open surgical simulation studies show, in general, a significant benefit of open surgical simulation in developing the surgical skills of surgical trainees. However, these studies have their limitations including a low number of participants, variable assessment standards, and a focus on short-term results often with no follow-up assessment.
  The skills needed for open surgical procedures are the essential basis that a surgical trainee needs to grasp before attempting more technical procedures such as laparoscopic procedures. In this current climate of medical practice with reduced hours of surgical exposure for trainees and where the patient's safety and outcome is key, open surgical simulation is a promising adjunct to modern surgical training, filling the void between surgeons being trained in a technique and a surgeon achieving fluency in that open surgical procedure. Better quality research is needed into the benefits of open surgical simulation, and this would hopefully stimulate further development of simulators with more accurate and objective assessment tools.
authors.affiliation: Imperial College London, Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, London, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Jennifer
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Davies
authors.forename: Manaf
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Khatib
authors.forename: Fernando
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Bello
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D017544:Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / Q000601:surgery; D003198:Computer Simulation; D013502:General Surgery / Q000193:education*; D006552:Hernia, Inguinal / Q000601:surgery; D006801:Humans; D023421:Models, Animal; D017145:Models, Educational; D016544:Patient Simulation; D013663:Teaching / Q000379:methods*; D014584:User-Computer Interface
keywords: Medical Knowledge; Patient Care; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; literature review; open surgical simulation; surgical education; surgical training; virtual reality simulation