title: Modelling and inference reveal nonlinear length-dependent suppression of somatic instability for small disease associated alleles in myotonic dystrophy type 1 and Huntington disease.
abstract: More than 20 human genetic diseases are associated with inheriting an unstable expanded DNA simple sequence tandem repeat, for example, CTG (cytosine-thymine-guanine) repeats in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and CAG (cytosine-adenine-guanine) repeats in Huntington disease (HD). These sequences mutate by changing the number of repeats not just between generations, but also during the lifetime of affected individuals. Levels of somatic instability contribute to disease onset and progression but as changes are tissue-specific, age- and repeat length-dependent, interpretation of the level of somatic instability in an individual is confounded by these considerations. Mathematical models, fitted to CTG repeat length distributions derived from blood DNA, from a large cohort of DM1-affected or at risk individuals, have recently been used to quantify inherited repeat lengths and mutation rates. Taking into account age, the estimated mutation rates are lower than predicted among individuals with small alleles (inherited repeat lengths less than 100 CTGs), suggesting that these rates may be suppressed at the lower end of the disease-causing range. In this study, we propose that a length-specific effect operates within this range and tested this hypothesis using a model comparison approach. To calibrate the extended model, we used data derived from blood DNA from DM1 individuals and, for the first time, buccal DNA from HD individuals. In a novel application of this extended model, we identified individuals whose effective repeat length, with regards to somatic instability, is less than their actual repeat length. A plausible explanation for this distinction is that the expanded repeat tract is compromised by interruptions or other unusual features. We quantified effective length for a large cohort of DM1 individuals and showed that effective length better predicts age of onset than inherited repeat length, thus improving the genotype-phenotype correlation. Under the extended model, we removed some of the bias in mutation rates making them less length-dependent. Consequently, rates adjusted in this way will be better suited as quantitative traits to investigate cis- or trans-acting modifiers of somatic mosaicism, disease onset and progression.
authors.affiliation: School of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science and Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK. catherine.higham@glasgow.ac.uk
authors.forename: Catherine F
authors.initials: CF
authors.lastname: Higham
authors.forename: Darren G
authors.initials: DG
authors.lastname: Monckton
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000483:Alleles; D015331:Cohort Studies; D005260:Female; D056726:Genetic Association Studies; D042822:Genomic Instability; D006801:Humans; D006816:Huntington Disease / Q000235:genetics*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008957:Models, Genetic; D009223:Myotonic Dystrophy / Q000235:genetics*; D019655:Quantitative Trait, Heritable; D018911:Trinucleotide Repeats
keywords: Huntington disease; mathematical modelling; mutation rates; myotonic dystrophy type 1; somatic instability; statistical inference
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2009 Aug 15;18(16):3039-47
references.pmid: 19465745
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28260
references.pmid: 22163004
references.citation: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Mar;11(3):165-70
references.pmid: 20177394
references.citation: Neurology. 1992 Oct;42(10):1877-83
references.pmid: 1407566
references.citation: Nat Genet. 1999 Dec;23(4):471-3
references.pmid: 10581038
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 1995 Jan;4(1):1-8
references.pmid: 7711720
references.citation: Biophys J. 2007 Apr 1;92(7):2491-7
references.pmid: 17218463
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2003 Jan 1;12(1):41-50
references.pmid: 12490531
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jan;56(1):114-22
references.pmid: 7825566
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Aug 15;21(16):3558-67
references.pmid: 22595968
references.citation: Neurology. 1993 Dec;43(12):2674-8
references.pmid: 8255475
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1997 Jul 4;272(27):16793-7
references.pmid: 9201984
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 1993 May;52(5):875-83
references.pmid: 8098180
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 2008 Jan 28;180(2):273-84
references.pmid: 18209104
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Nov;11(11):786-99
references.pmid: 20953213
references.citation: Am J Med Genet A. 2009 Jul;149A(7):1365-74
references.pmid: 19514047
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 1998 Aug;7(8):1285-91
references.pmid: 9668171
references.citation: Ann Hum Genet. 2007 May;71(Pt 3):295-301
references.pmid: 17181545
references.citation: Mutat Res. 2006 Jun 25;598(1-2):15-34
references.pmid: 16500684
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2002 Jan 15;11(2):191-8
references.pmid: 11809728
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2004 Aug 15;13(16):1815-25
references.pmid: 15198993
references.citation: Nat Genet. 1992 Jun;1(3):192-5
references.pmid: 1303233
references.citation: DNA Repair (Amst). 2007 Jun 1;6(6):789-96
references.pmid: 17293170
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Jun 21;447(7147):932-40
references.pmid: 17581576
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2003 Dec 15;12(24):3359-67
references.pmid: 14570710
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 13;107(28):12593-8
references.pmid: 20571119
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2010 Apr 15;19(8):1399-412
references.pmid: 20080938
references.citation: Eur J Hum Genet. 2000 Jun;8(6):423-30
references.pmid: 10878662
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Apr 1;10(8):845-54
references.pmid: 11285250
references.citation: Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):799-808
references.pmid: 1310900
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2003 Apr 4;90(13):138101
references.pmid: 12689326
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1996 Apr 16;35(15):5041-53
references.pmid: 8664297
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2001 Apr;27(4):407-11
references.pmid: 11279522
references.citation: EMBO J. 2003 May 1;22(9):2264-73
references.pmid: 12727892
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Jun;52(6):1164-74
references.pmid: 8503448
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2000 May 1;9(8):1185-94
references.pmid: 10767343
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Jun 1;21(11):2450-63
references.pmid: 22367968
references.citation: Science. 1992 Mar 6;255(5049):1256-8
references.pmid: 1546326
references.citation: Cell. 1993 Mar 26;72(6):971-83
references.pmid: 8458085
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 1999 Jun;8(6):1061-7
references.pmid: 10332038
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2000 Oct 12;9(17):2539-44
references.pmid: 11030759
references.citation: Mol Cell. 2003 Nov;12(5):1077-86
references.pmid: 14636568
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2000 Feb 12;9(3):439-45
references.pmid: 10655554
references.citation: Nature. 1992 Feb 6;355(6360):547-8
references.pmid: 1346924