title: Strategies to retain rural breast cancer survivors in longitudinal research.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To describe the retention of rural women in the Rural Breast Cancer Survivors (RBCS) Intervention.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Few studies describe strategies and procedures for retention of participants enrolled in cancer research. Fewer studies focus on underserved rural cancer survivors.
  
  
  METHODS
  A descriptive design was used. A conceptual model of retention based on three factors: researcher, participant, and context with primary, secondary, and tertiary strategies was used to unify the data.
  
  
  RESULTS
  432 women enrolled in the RBCS study, of which 332 (77%) were retained and completed the 12 month study. Favorable retention strategies included: run-in period, persistent attempts to re-contact hard to reach, recruitment and enrollment tracking database, and a trusting and supportive relationship with the research nurse.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A conceptual model of retention with differential strategies can maintain participant retention in a longitudinal research study.
authors.affiliation: School of Nursing, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. Electronic address: rbenz@uab.edu.
authors.forename: Karen M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Meneses
authors.forename: Rachel L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Benz
authors.forename: Lauren A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Hassey
authors.forename: Ziqin Q
authors.initials: ZQ
authors.lastname: Yang
authors.forename: M Patrick
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: McNees
mesh_terms: D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D012424:Rural Population; D017741:Survivors
keywords: Attrition; Breast cancer; Retention; Rural; Survivors
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Jul;18(7):499-507
references.pmid: 12848832
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;60(8):757-65
references.pmid: 17606170
references.citation: Control Clin Trials. 2000 Oct;21(5 Suppl):226S-32S
references.pmid: 11018580
references.citation: JAMA. 2010 Jul 14;304(2):163-71
references.pmid: 20628129
references.citation: J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 May;15(4):412-29
references.pmid: 16724889
references.citation: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Mar;20(3):415-8
references.pmid: 21382981
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;60(10):990-1001
references.pmid: 17884592
references.citation: Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Sep;29(5):705-10
references.pmid: 18565801
references.citation: Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:1-28
references.pmid: 16533107
references.citation: Nurs Sci Q. 2011 Apr;24(2):146-51
references.pmid: 21471039
references.citation: Control Clin Trials. 2001 Dec;22(6 Suppl):236S-43S
references.pmid: 11728627
references.citation: Health Soc Work. 2011 Feb;36(1):55-65
references.pmid: 21446609