title: Testing potentiates new learning in the misinformation paradigm.
abstract: Retrieval enhanced suggestibility (RES) is the finding that the misinformation effect is exacerbated when a test precedes misleading postevent information (Chan, Thomas, & Bulevich Psychological Science 20: 66-73, 2009). In the present study, we tested three hypotheses relevant to RES. First, we examined whether retrieval of critical details was necessary for the RES effect. Second, we examined whether initial testing influenced the allocation of attention to critical details during postevent information processing. Finally, we examined whether RES resulted in impaired access to the originally learned information. We compared three groups of participants in three experiments: an identical-test group, a related-test group, and a standard misinformation group. Both testing groups were tested on the original event before the introduction of misinformation; however, the identical-test group took the same test before and after the misinformation, whereas the related-test group took different tests before and after misinformation. We found that testing before misleading postevent information affected attention allocation to details in the postevent narrative. Furthermore, the RES effect did not accompany reduced accessibility to the original information, as measured by a modified-modified free recall test. These data have implications for how testing may potentiate new learning.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Tufts University, 490 Boston Avenue, Medford, MA, 02155, USA, leamarie.gordon@tufts.edu.
authors.forename: Leamarie T
authors.initials: LT
authors.lastname: Gordon
authors.forename: Ayanna K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Thomas
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D003142:Communication; D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Dec;18(6):1140-7
references.pmid: 21796496
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 1993 May;84 ( Pt 2):171-99
references.pmid: 8319054
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Nov;135(4):553-71
references.pmid: 17087573
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1989 Jul;17(4):423-34
references.pmid: 2761400
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1981 Sep;110(3):306-40
references.pmid: 6457080
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1992 Nov;20(6):633-42
references.pmid: 1435266
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Appl. 2011 Dec;17(4):418-32
references.pmid: 21859229
references.citation: Science. 2011 Feb 11;331(6018):772-5
references.pmid: 21252317
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1959 Aug;58:97-105
references.pmid: 13796886
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jan;37(1):248-55
references.pmid: 20919785
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Nov;37(6):1547-52
references.pmid: 21707217
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1986 Jul;14(4):329-38
references.pmid: 3762387
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):66-73
references.pmid: 19037905
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1993 Jul;114(1):3-28
references.pmid: 8346328
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):249-55
references.pmid: 16507066
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):737-46
references.pmid: 22060276
references.citation: Law Hum Behav. 2009 Aug;33(4):298-307
references.pmid: 18561007
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1993 Oct;100(4):609-39
references.pmid: 8255951
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2001 Oct;29(7):940-7
references.pmid: 11820753
references.citation: Learn Mem. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):361-6
references.pmid: 16027179
references.citation: J Educ Psychol. 1982 Oct;74(5):623-32
references.pmid: 7142561
references.citation: Law Hum Behav. 2010 Apr;34(2):105-17
references.pmid: 19301110
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1563-9
references.pmid: 19857026
references.citation: Learn Mem. 2007 Jan 03;14(1-2):47-53
references.pmid: 17202429
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1392-9
references.pmid: 18980403
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Appl. 2002 Jun;8(2):127-42
references.pmid: 12075691
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1985 Jun;114(2):159-97
references.pmid: 3159828