title: The Effect of Budgetary Restrictions on Breast Cancer Diagnostic Decisions.
abstract: We develop a finite-horizon discrete-time constrained Markov decision process (MDP) to model diagnostic decisions after mammography where we maximize the total expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of a patient under resource constraints. We use clinical data to estimate the parameters of the MDP model and solve it as a mixed-integer program. By repeating optimization for a sequence of budget levels, we calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios attributable to consecutive levels of funding and compare actual clinical practice with optimal decisions. We prove that the optimal value function is concave in the allocated budget. Comparing to actual clinical practice, using optimal thresholds for decision making may result in approximately 22% cost savings without sacrificing QALYs. Our analysis indicates short-term follow-ups are the immediate target for elimination when budget becomes a concern. Policy change is more drastic in the older age group with the increasing budget, yet the gains in total expected QALYs related to larger budgets are predominantly seen in younger women along with modest gains for older women.
authors.affiliation: Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.
authors.forename: Mehmet U S
authors.initials: MU
authors.lastname: Ayvaci
authors.forename: Oguzhan
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Alagoz
authors.forename: Elizabeth S
authors.initials: ES
authors.lastname: Burnside
keywords: Markov decision processes; breast cancer; constrained MDPs; cost-effectiveness; diagnostic decisions; linear programming; mammography; medical decision making; mixed-integer programming; service operations
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):750-2
references.pmid: 19920276
references.citation: Science. 2010 Feb 19;327(5968):936-8
references.pmid: 20167758
references.citation: CA Cancer J Clin. 2003 May-Jun;53(3):141-69
references.pmid: 12809408
references.citation: J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Dec 2;90(23):1801-9
references.pmid: 9839520
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jan 22;156(2):209-13
references.pmid: 8546556
references.citation: Br J Cancer. 1990 Dec;62(6):1018-22
references.pmid: 2257206
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2000 Apr 10;160(7):953-8
references.pmid: 10761960
references.citation: Radiology. 2002 Feb;222(2):529-35
references.pmid: 11818624
references.citation: Radiology. 2002 Feb;222(2):536-42
references.pmid: 11818625
references.citation: ANZ J Surg. 2005 Sep;75(9):762-7
references.pmid: 16173989
references.citation: Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):641-51
references.pmid: 19864507
references.citation: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 May 5;102(9):605-13
references.pmid: 20413742
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2000 Dec 5;133(11):855-63
references.pmid: 11103055
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jun;174(6):1769-77
references.pmid: 10845521
references.citation: Clin Breast Cancer. 2001 Jul;2(2):145-52
references.pmid: 11899786
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jul 25;165(14):1593-8
references.pmid: 16043676
references.citation: Radiology. 2009 Jun;251(3):663-72
references.pmid: 19366902
references.citation: Radiology. 2006 Oct;241(1):55-66
references.pmid: 16990671
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Dec;165(6):1373-7
references.pmid: 7484568
references.citation: CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Mar-Apr;60(2):99-119
references.pmid: 20228384
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Apr;192(4):1117-27
references.pmid: 19304723
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):738-47
references.pmid: 19920274
references.citation: Oncologist. 2007 Jan;12(1):20-37
references.pmid: 17227898
references.citation: Radiology. 1999 Oct;213(1):15-8; discussion 19-21
references.pmid: 10540636
references.citation: Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006 Apr 19;54(14):1-40
references.pmid: 16681183
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):1025-32
references.pmid: 21916640
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 14;363(16):1495-7
references.pmid: 20942664
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1998 Apr 16;338(16):1089-96
references.pmid: 9545356
references.citation: Radiology. 2001 May;219(2):475-83
references.pmid: 11323475
references.citation: JAMA. 2003 Oct 22;290(16):2129-37
references.pmid: 14570948
references.citation: Cancer. 2002 May 15;94(10):2766-92
references.pmid: 12173348
references.citation: J Infect Dis. 1996 Oct;174(Suppl. 2):S162-75
references.pmid: 11658138
references.citation: J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 10;26(20):3324-30
references.pmid: 18612148
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1994 Dec 1;331(22):1493-9
references.pmid: 7969300
references.citation: CA Cancer J Clin. 2005 Mar-Apr;55(2):74-108
references.pmid: 15761078
references.citation: JAMA. 1996 Oct 16;276(15):1253-8
references.pmid: 8849754
references.citation: Oper Res. 2010 Nov 1;58(6):1577-1591
references.pmid: 21415931
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):727-37, W237-42
references.pmid: 19920273
references.citation: Radiology. 2005 Jan;234(1):79-85
references.pmid: 15618376
references.citation: Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8(2):205
references.pmid: 16677422
references.citation: Breast. 2010 Aug;19(4):268-72
references.pmid: 20371181
references.citation: Cancer. 2010 Jul 15;116(14):3310-21
references.pmid: 20564067
references.citation: Milbank Q. 1994;72(3):431-50
references.pmid: 7935241
references.citation: Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Nov;82(5):491-3
references.pmid: 17952101
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2005 Oct 10;165(18):2083-8
references.pmid: 16216997
references.citation: Radiology. 1995 Sep;196(3):817-22
references.pmid: 7644649
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1784-92
references.pmid: 16251534
references.citation: CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Jan-Feb;57(1):43-66
references.pmid: 17237035
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1992 May 1;116(9):722-30
references.pmid: 1558343
references.citation: Imaging Med. 2010 Jun 1;2(3):313-323
references.pmid: 20835372
references.citation: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Mar 19;95(6):429-36
references.pmid: 12644536