title: Context-dependency of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant-insect interactions in an agroecosystem.
abstract: Plants interact with a variety of other community members that have the potential to indirectly influence each other through a shared host plant. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are generally considered plant mutualists because of their generally positive effects on plant nutrient status and growth. AMF may also have important indirect effects on plants by altering interactions with other community members. By influencing plant traits, AMF can modify aboveground interactions with both mutualists, such as pollinators, and antagonists, such as herbivores. Because herbivory and pollination can dramatically influence plant fitness, comprehensive assessment of plant-AMF interactions should include these indirect effects. To determine how AMF affect plant-insect interactions, we grew Cucumis sativus (Cucurbitaceae) under five AMF inoculum treatments and control. We measured plant growth, floral production, flower size, and foliar nutrient content of half the plants, and transferred the other half to a field setting to measure pollinator and herbivore preference of wild insects. Mycorrhizal treatment had no effect on plant biomass or floral traits but significantly affected leaf nutrients, pollinator behavior, and herbivore attack. Although total pollinator visitation did not vary with AMF treatment, pollinators exhibited taxon-specific responses, with honey bees, bumble bees, and Lepidoptera all responding differently to AMF treatments. Flower number and size were unaffected by treatments, suggesting that differences in pollinator preference were driven by other floral traits. Mycorrhizae influenced leaf K and Na, but these differences in leaf nutrients did not correspond to variation in herbivore attack. Overall, we found that AMF indirectly influence both antagonistic and mutualistic insects, but impacts depend on the identity of both the fungal partner and the interacting insect, underscoring the context-dependency of plant-AMF interactions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University DeKalb, IL, USA ; Institute for the Study of the Environment, Sustainability, and Energy, Northern Illinois University DeKalb, IL, USA ; Department of Plant, Soil, and Insect Sciences, University of Massachusetts-Amherst Amherst, MA, USA.
authors.forename: Nicholas A
authors.initials: NA
authors.lastname: Barber
authors.forename: E Toby
authors.initials: ET
authors.lastname: Kiers
authors.forename: Ruth V
authors.initials: RV
authors.lastname: Hazzard
authors.forename: Lynn S
authors.initials: LS
authors.lastname: Adler
keywords: Cucumis sativus; aboveground–belowground; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; herbivore; indirect interaction; pollinator
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2011;62:227-50
references.pmid: 21391813
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2011 Sep 27;21(18):R775-85
references.pmid: 21959168
references.citation: Ecology. 2012 May;93(5):1002-15
references.pmid: 22764487
references.citation: Oecologia. 1990 Aug;84(1):74-81
references.pmid: 28312778
references.citation: Science. 2011 Aug 12;333(6044):880-2
references.pmid: 21836016
references.citation: New Phytol. 1986 Sep;104(1):89-95
references.pmid: 33873810
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 18;105(46):17848-51
references.pmid: 19004798
references.citation: Ecology. 2008 Apr;89(4):944-51
references.pmid: 18481519
references.citation: Mycorrhiza. 2007 Jul;17(5):469-474
references.pmid: 17318595
references.citation: New Phytol. 2009;183(4):1176-1187
references.pmid: 19496945
references.citation: New Phytol. 1990 Jul;115(3):495-501
references.pmid: 33874272
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007 Aug;10(4):393-8
references.pmid: 17658291
references.citation: Science. 2004 Jun 11;304(5677):1629-33
references.pmid: 15192218
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jul;77(7):3769-72
references.pmid: 16592849
references.citation: New Phytol. 1994 Oct;128(2):211-218
references.pmid: 33874373
references.citation: Oecologia. 2011 Feb;165(2):377-86
references.pmid: 20859750
references.citation: Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63
references.pmid: 18481363
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Oct 12;96(21):11910-5
references.pmid: 10518550
references.citation: Environ Entomol. 2009 Feb;38(1):93-102
references.pmid: 19791601
references.citation: Oecologia. 2009 Aug;161(1):1-14
references.pmid: 19412705
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Aug;6(4):372-8
references.pmid: 12873533
references.citation: Am Nat. 2006 Feb;167(2):141-52
references.pmid: 16670976
references.citation: Oecologia. 2009 Jul;160(4):771-9
references.pmid: 19408016
references.citation: Ecology. 2009 Aug;90(8):2088-97
references.pmid: 19739371
references.citation: Ecology. 2012 Jul;93(7):1560-70
references.pmid: 22919903
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2012 Jun;38(6):651-64
references.pmid: 22623151
references.citation: Oecologia. 2012 Jan;168(1):131-9
references.pmid: 21744162
references.citation: Oecologia. 2007 Jun;152(3):541-51
references.pmid: 17356811
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2011 Aug;98(8):1299-308
references.pmid: 21795735