title: Unexpected benefits of deciding by mind wandering.
abstract: The mind wanders, even when people are attempting to make complex decisions. We suggest that mind wandering-allowing one's thoughts to wander until the "correct" choice comes to mind-can positively impact people's feelings about their decisions. We compare post-choice satisfaction from choices made by mind wandering to reason-based choices and randomly assigned outcomes. Participants chose a poster by mind wandering or deliberating, or were randomly assigned a poster. Whereas forecasters predicted that participants who chose by mind wandering would evaluate their outcome as inferior to participants who deliberated (Experiment 1), participants who used mind wandering as a decision strategy evaluated their choice just as positively as did participants who used deliberation (Experiment 2). In some cases, it appears that people can spare themselves the effort of deliberation and instead "decide by wind wandering," yet experience no decrease in satisfaction.
authors.affiliation: Marketing, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
authors.forename: Colleen E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Giblin
authors.forename: Carey K
authors.initials: CK
authors.lastname: Morewedge
authors.forename: Michael I
authors.initials: MI
authors.lastname: Norton
keywords: decision strategies; deliberation; mind wandering; post-choice satisfaction; spontaneous thought
references.citation: Med Educ. 2011 Nov;45(11):1072-80
references.pmid: 21988623
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;1(2):95-109
references.pmid: 26151465
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Oct;93(4):515-24
references.pmid: 17892329
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;132(6):946-958
references.pmid: 17073528
references.citation: Science. 2010 Nov 12;330(6006):932
references.pmid: 21071660
references.citation: Behav Sci Law. 2003;21(5):601-18
references.pmid: 14502691
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Aug;99(2):232-47
references.pmid: 20658841
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Nov;83(5):1178-97
references.pmid: 12416921
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jan 19;315(5810):393-5
references.pmid: 17234951
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;15(7):319-26
references.pmid: 21684189
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Nov;19(11):1118-23
references.pmid: 19076483
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1995 Sep;23(5):551-9
references.pmid: 7476241
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Feb;60(2):181-92
references.pmid: 2016668
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Dec;79(6):995-1006
references.pmid: 11138768
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Feb;96(2):249-64
references.pmid: 19159131