title: From understanding to appreciating music cross-culturally.
abstract: It has long been debated which aspects of music perception are universal and which are developed only after exposure to a specific musical culture. Here we investigated whether "iconic" meaning in Western music, emerging from musical information resembling qualities of objects, or qualities of abstract concepts, can be recognized cross-culturally. To this end we acquired a profile of semantic associations (such as, for example, fight, river, etc.) to Western musical pieces from each participant, and then compared these profiles across cultural groups. Results show that the association profiles between Mafa, an ethnic group from northern Cameroon, and Western listeners are different, but that the Mafa have a consistent association profile, indicating that their associations are strongly informed by their enculturation. Results also show that listeners for whom Western music is novel, but whose association profile was more similar to the mean Western music association profile also had a greater appreciation of the Western music. The data thus show that, to some degree, iconic meaning transcends cultural boundaries, with a high inter-individual variance, probably because meaning in music is prone to be overwritten by individual and cultural experience.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science, Leipzig, Germany ; Institute for Psychoacoustics and Electronic Music, University of Gent, Gent, Belgium ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
authors.forename: Thomas Hans
authors.initials: TH
authors.lastname: Fritz
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Schmude
authors.forename: Sebastian
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Jentschke
authors.forename: Angela D
authors.initials: AD
authors.lastname: Friederici
authors.forename: Stefan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Koelsch
mesh_terms: D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D009146:Music
references.citation: Brain Res. 2009 May 13;1270:88-94
references.pmid: 19306846
references.citation: Cortex. 2013 Jul-Aug;49(7):1844-55
references.pmid: 23107380
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2009 Apr 14;19(7):573-6
references.pmid: 19303300
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2003 Sep;129(5):770-814
references.pmid: 12956543
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2004 Mar;7(3):302-7
references.pmid: 14983184
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2013 Oct;38(7):3099-105
references.pmid: 23859464
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 May 09;6(5):e19501
references.pmid: 21573026
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Mar;23(3):604-21
references.pmid: 19925192
references.citation: J Voice. 1995 Sep;9(3):235-48
references.pmid: 8541967
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Mar;27(3):239-50
references.pmid: 16078183
references.citation: Brain. 2010 Apr;133(Pt 4):1200-13
references.pmid: 20142334
references.citation: Cognition. 2010 Mar;114(3):405-22
references.pmid: 20036356
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Oct;21(10):1882-92
references.pmid: 18823240
references.citation: Phys Life Rev. 2011 Jun;8(2):89-105
references.pmid: 21601541
references.citation: Science. 1969 Apr 4;164(3875):86-8
references.pmid: 5773719
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2009 May 15;455(2):129-33
references.pmid: 19368861
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 May 21;3(5):e2226
references.pmid: 18493611
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2007 Mar;44(2):293-304
references.pmid: 17343712
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2000 Oct;107(4):885-913
references.pmid: 11089410