title: The Crisis Intervention Team Model of Police Response to Mental Health Crises: A Primer for Mental Health Practitioners.
abstract: As persons with mental illnesses and law enforcement become increasingly entangled, the collaboration of police and mental health service providers has become critical to appropriately serving the needs of individuals experiencing mental health crises. This article introduces the Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Model as a collaborative approach to safely and effectively address the needs of persons with mental illnesses, link them to appropriate services, and divert them from the criminal justice system if appropriate. We discuss the key elements of the CIT model, implementation and its related challenges, as well as variations of the model. While this model has not undergone enough research to be deemed an Evidence-Based Practice, it has been successfully utilized in many law enforcement agencies worldwide and is considered a "Best Practice" model in law enforcement. This primer for mental health practitioners serves as an introduction to a model that may already be utilized in their community or serve as a springboard for the development CIT programs where they do not currently exist.
authors.forename: Amy C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Watson
authors.forename: Anjali J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Fulambarker
keywords: BEST PRACTICE; CIT; CRISIS INTERVENTION TEAM; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MENTAL HEALTH
references.citation: Behav Sci Law. 2006;24(6):845-56
references.pmid: 17171772
references.citation: Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 Jul-Aug;34(4):287-94
references.pmid: 21820177
references.citation: Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Aug;57(8):1199-202
references.pmid: 16870973
references.citation: Psychiatr Serv. 2000 May;51(5):645-9
references.pmid: 10783184
references.citation: Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Feb;59(2):201-4
references.pmid: 18245166
references.citation: Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Jun;60(6):761-5
references.pmid: 19487344
references.citation: J Police Crisis Negot. 2010;10(1-2):72-85
references.pmid: 21113319
references.citation: Behav Sci Law. 1998 Autumn;16(4):455-72
references.pmid: 9924767
references.citation: Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Feb;57(2):232-7
references.pmid: 16452701
references.citation: Community Ment Health J. 2008 Dec;44(6):427-32
references.pmid: 18465226
references.citation: Behav Sci Law. 2004;22(4):519-41
references.pmid: 15282838
references.citation: Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Feb;52(2):219-22
references.pmid: 11157122
references.citation: Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Jan;50(1):99-101
references.pmid: 9890588
references.citation: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006 Sep;33(5):544-57
references.pmid: 16791518
references.citation: Am Psychol. 1984 Jul;39(7):794-803
references.pmid: 6465666
references.citation: Behav Sci Law. 2011 Jan-Feb;29(1):81-94
references.pmid: 20568255
references.citation: J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33(1):42-6
references.pmid: 15809237
references.citation: J Police Crisis Negot. 2010 Jan 1;10:116-132
references.pmid: 21113331
references.citation: J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2000;28(3):338-44
references.pmid: 11055533
references.citation: Behav Sci Law. 1998 Autumn;16(4):393-405
references.pmid: 9924765