title: Dietary inequalities of mother-child pairs in the rural Amazon: evidence of maternal-child buffering?
abstract: This paper explores the expected outcome of maternal nutritional "buffering," namely that children's diets will be more adequate than mothers' diets under conditions of food scarcity. Data on Amazonian mothers and their children, household demography and economics and direct, weighed measures of household food availability and dietary intakes of mother-child pairs were collected from 51 households to address the following research questions: (1) is there evidence of food scarcity in this setting?; (2) are there differences in energy and protein adequacy between children and their mothers?; and, (3) which individual and household-level factors are associated with these mother-child differences in energy and protein adequacy? In this context of food scarcity, we found that the majority of children had more adequate energy (p < 0.001) and protein (p < 0.001) intakes than their mothers. Multivariate OLS regression models showed that of the individual-level factors, child age and height-for-age were negatively associated with maternal-child energy and protein inequalities while maternal reproductive status (lactation) was positively associated with energy inequality. While there were no gender differences in dietary adequacy among children, boys had a larger advantage over their mothers in terms of protein adequacy than girls. Household food availability was related to maternal-child energy and protein inequalities in a curvilinear fashion with the lowest inequalities found in households with extremely low food availability and those with adequate food resources. This is the first study to quantify maternal-child dietary inequalities in a setting of food scarcity and demonstrates the importance of the household context and individual characteristics in understanding the degree to which mothers protect their children from resource scarcity.
authors.affiliation: The Ohio State University, Department of Anthropology, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Electronic address: piperata.1@osu.edu.
authors.forename: Barbara A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Piperata
authors.forename: Kammi K
authors.initials: KK
authors.lastname: Schmeer
authors.forename: Craig
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Hadley
authors.forename: Genevieve
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Ritchie-Ewing
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001938:Brazil; D002648:Child; D002664:Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004032:Diet / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005191:Family Characteristics; D005260:Female; D005523:Food Supply / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D039382:Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; D009034:Mother-Child Relations; D011247:Pregnancy; D012424:Rural Population
keywords: Amazon; Brazil; Food provisioning; Food security; Intra-household resource distribution; Nutrition; Parental investment
references.citation: J Nutr. 1993 Feb;123(2):189-96
references.pmid: 8429367
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2009 Feb;68(4):758-65
references.pmid: 19084311
references.citation: Am J Hum Biol. 2007 Sep-Oct;19(5):722-34
references.pmid: 17657725
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Apr;26(2):349-56
references.pmid: 9169170
references.citation: J Nutr. 2012 Jul;142(7):1343-9
references.pmid: 22623397
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1993 Jun;36(12):1605-12
references.pmid: 8327924
references.citation: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2011 Sep;146(1):1-13
references.pmid: 21541919
references.citation: Lancet. 2007 Jan 13;369(9556):145-57
references.pmid: 17223478
references.citation: Am J Hum Biol. 1992;4(2):197-207
references.pmid: 28524344
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2008 Oct;67(7):1094-103
references.pmid: 18614264
references.citation: Public Health. 2006 Sep;120(9):795-804
references.pmid: 16824562
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1997 Jun;44(11):1697-709
references.pmid: 9178413
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Jun;27(3):490-4
references.pmid: 9698141
references.citation: Am J Clin Nutr. 1985 Jun;41(6):1305-13
references.pmid: 4003335
references.citation: J Nutr. 2011 Jun;141(6):1114-9
references.pmid: 21525257
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jan;66(2):427-38
references.pmid: 17931763
references.citation: Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996 Feb;50 Suppl 1:S82-110; discussion S10-1
references.pmid: 8641268
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Aug;25(4):693-703
references.pmid: 8921445
references.citation: J Nutr. 2006 May;136(5):1438S-1448S
references.pmid: 16614441
references.citation: Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991 Apr;45(4):177-85
references.pmid: 1824042
references.citation: Am J Hum Biol. 2011 Jul-Aug;23(4):458-69
references.pmid: 21538648
references.citation: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008 May;62(5):665-73
references.pmid: 17440521
references.citation: BMJ. 2004 Apr 3;328(7443):823-6
references.pmid: 15070642
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2011 Oct;73(7):1071-9
references.pmid: 21852028
references.citation: Ecol Food Nutr. 2009 Jul-Aug;48(4):263-84
references.pmid: 21883069
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(6):553-9
references.pmid: 3317879
references.citation: Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997 Nov;51(11):750-6
references.pmid: 9368809
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(10):1127-33
references.pmid: 1767282
references.citation: Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996 Feb;50 Suppl 1:S37-80; discussion S80-1
references.pmid: 8641267
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1997 Jun;44(11):1675-84
references.pmid: 9178411
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1997 Jun;44(11):1739-49
references.pmid: 9178416