title: The effect of discourse structure on depth of semantic integration in reading.
abstract: A coherent discourse exhibits certain structures in that subunits of discourses are related to one another in various ways and in that subunits that contribute to the same discourse purpose are joined to create a larger unit so as to produce an effect on the reader. To date, this crucial aspect of discourse has been largely neglected in the psycholinguistic literature. In two experiments, we examined whether semantic integration in discourse context was influenced by the difference of discourse structure. Readers read discourses in which the last sentence was locally congruent but either semantically congruent or incongruent when interpreted with the preceding sentence. Furthermore, the last sentence was either in the same discourse unit or not in the same discourse unit as the preceding sentence, depending on whether they shared the same discourse purpose. Results from self-paced reading (Experiment 1) and eye tracking (Experiment 2) showed that discourse-incongruous words were read longer than discourse-congruous words only when the critical sentence and the preceding sentence were in the same discourse unit, but not when they belonged to different discourse units. These results establish discourse structure as a new factor in semantic integration and suggest that discourse effects depend both on the content of what is being said and on the way that the contents are organized.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 4A Datun Road, , Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China.
authors.forename: Xiaohong
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Yang
authors.forename: Lijing
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: Yufang
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Yang
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008297:Male; D011932:Reading; D012660:Semantics; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Discourse Process. 1997 Jan;23(3):265-304
references.pmid: 25484476
references.citation: Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:210-8
references.pmid: 17433893
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jul;18(7):1098-111
references.pmid: 16839284
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 May;31(3):443-67
references.pmid: 15910130
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):691-701
references.pmid: 15894468
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1998 Nov;124(3):372-422
references.pmid: 9849112
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Nov;18(11):1829-42
references.pmid: 17069474
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Jan;101(1):514-21
references.pmid: 9000742
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Dec;8(4):851-7
references.pmid: 11848610
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2007 Jan;35(1):73-86
references.pmid: 17533882
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1993 Jul;21(4):477-87
references.pmid: 8350739
references.citation: Brain Res. 2009 Jul 28;1282:50-6
references.pmid: 19501067
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Mar;23(3):514-23
references.pmid: 19925201
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Sep 1;6(9):382
references.pmid: 12200180
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2009 Apr;47(5):1282-93
references.pmid: 19428392
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Aug 15;42(2):525-34
references.pmid: 18554927
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):1038-46
references.pmid: 17524387
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2008 Jul;45(4):554-8
references.pmid: 18282200
references.citation: Cognition. 2007 Sep;104(3):476-94
references.pmid: 16934793
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jun;8(6):245-7
references.pmid: 15165545
references.citation: Cognition. 2012 Jan;122(1):102-9
references.pmid: 21962826
references.citation: Brain. 1999 Jul;122 ( Pt 7):1317-25
references.pmid: 10388797
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 19;106(20):8362-7
references.pmid: 19416819
references.citation: Science. 1980 Jan 11;207(4427):203-5
references.pmid: 7350657
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2002 Dec;83(3):367-83
references.pmid: 12468394
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Oct;17(3):701-18
references.pmid: 14561457
references.citation: J Mem Lang. 2007 Jan;56(1):103-128
references.pmid: 17218992
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Nov;30(6):1290-301
references.pmid: 15521805
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Nov;11(6):657-71
references.pmid: 10601747
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Dec 1;4(12):463-470
references.pmid: 11115760
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):813-820
references.pmid: 21195102
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jul;34(4):1001-10
references.pmid: 18605885