title: Image ambiguity and fluency.
abstract: Ambiguity is often associated with negative affective responses, and enjoying ambiguity seems restricted to only a few situations, such as experiencing art. Nevertheless, theories of judgment formation, especially the "processing fluency account", suggest that easy-to-process (non-ambiguous) stimuli are processed faster and are therefore preferred to (ambiguous) stimuli, which are hard to process. In a series of six experiments, we investigated these contrasting approaches by manipulating fluency (presentation duration: 10 ms, 50 ms, 100 ms, 500 ms, 1000 ms) and testing effects of ambiguity (ambiguous versus non-ambiguous pictures of paintings) on classification performance (Part A; speed and accuracy) and aesthetic appreciation (Part B; liking and interest). As indicated by signal detection analyses, classification accuracy increased with presentation duration (Exp. 1a), but we found no effects of ambiguity on classification speed (Exp. 1b). Fifty percent of the participants were able to successfully classify ambiguous content at a presentation duration of 100 ms, and at 500 ms even 75% performed above chance level. Ambiguous artworks were found more interesting (in conditions 50 ms to 1000 ms) and were preferred over non-ambiguous stimuli at 500 ms and 1000 ms (Exp. 2a - 2c, 3). Importantly, ambiguous images were nonetheless rated significantly harder to process as non-ambiguous images. These results suggest that ambiguity is an essential ingredient in art appreciation even though or maybe because it is harder to process.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Psychology, Department of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
authors.forename: Martina
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Jakesch
authors.forename: Helmut
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Leder
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Forster
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 1999 Sep;8(3):338-42
references.pmid: 10487787
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jul;28(4):686-713
references.pmid: 12109762
references.citation: Emotion. 2005 Mar;5(1):89-102
references.pmid: 15755222
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(4):364-82
references.pmid: 15582859
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1178-94
references.pmid: 17618616
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Oct;129(2):255-63
references.pmid: 18804752
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Apr;25(2):561-74
references.pmid: 10205867
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Jan 30;3(1):e1497
references.pmid: 18231584
references.citation: J Vis. 2009 Mar 27;9(3):24.1-15
references.pmid: 19757963
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Nov;141(4):699-714
references.pmid: 22409663
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2004 Sep;130(5):748-68
references.pmid: 15367079
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 9;99(14):9596-601
references.pmid: 12077298
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1976 Sep;2(5):509-22
references.pmid: 1003124
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Oct;32(10):1750-61
references.pmid: 20886578
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Sep;18(5):1074-83
references.pmid: 1402711
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Nov;136(4):569-76
references.pmid: 17999571
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Oct;63(4):545-52
references.pmid: 1447685
references.citation: Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(20):2143-53
references.pmid: 18619482
references.citation: J Mem Lang. 2007 Nov;57(4):483-501
references.pmid: 18071581
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2000 Jun;28(4):657-66
references.pmid: 10946548
references.citation: Emotion. 2006 Nov;6(4):670-4
references.pmid: 17144758
references.citation: J Vis. 2007 Jan 31;7(1):10
references.pmid: 17461678
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Mar;35(4):991-8
references.pmid: 21056591
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 May 15;13(4):454-61
references.pmid: 11388919
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1998 May;35(3):240-51
references.pmid: 9564744
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 1999 Jul-Aug;9(5):415-30
references.pmid: 10450888
references.citation: Vision Res. 2010 Aug 23;50(18):1905-11
references.pmid: 20600232
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Nov;62(11):2105-12
references.pmid: 19565431
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1998 Apr;98(2-3):141-65
references.pmid: 9621828
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1978 Nov;4(4):565-72
references.pmid: 722248
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2004 Feb;15(2):100-5
references.pmid: 14738516
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2004 Mar;13(1):47-60
references.pmid: 14990240
references.citation: Nature. 1996 Jun 6;381(6582):520-2
references.pmid: 8632824
references.citation: Emotion. 2013 Apr;13(2):280-9
references.pmid: 23088777
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug;18(4):742-50
references.pmid: 21494916
references.citation: Perception. 2001;30(6):655-68
references.pmid: 11464555
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30595
references.pmid: 22295095
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2004 Mar;13(1):173-96
references.pmid: 14990252
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Feb;138(1):39-63
references.pmid: 19203169
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 May;128(1):127-38
references.pmid: 18164689
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1985 Jul;98(1):185-99
references.pmid: 4034817
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Jun;20(3):353-60
references.pmid: 20471245
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Jun;20(3):382-8
references.pmid: 20545020
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jun;12(6):237-41
references.pmid: 18468944
references.citation: Emotion. 2004 Mar;4(1):65-86
references.pmid: 15053727
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2009 Aug;13(3):219-35
references.pmid: 19638628
references.citation: Can J Exp Psychol. 1999 Dec;53(4):323-34
references.pmid: 10646204
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Aug 23;5:73
references.pmid: 21897812
references.citation: Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1999 Feb;31(1):137-49
references.pmid: 10495845
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;17(9):799-806
references.pmid: 16984298
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;81(6):989-1000
references.pmid: 11761320
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;21(7):901-7
references.pmid: 20534779
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2000 Sep;11(5):424-8
references.pmid: 11228916
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1983 Jul;9(3):411-29
references.pmid: 6225831
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2008 Mar;17(1):159-70
references.pmid: 17222564
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jun;187(4):641-50
references.pmid: 18320179
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 2004 Nov;95(Pt 4):489-508
references.pmid: 15527534
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Aug;73(6):1742-53
references.pmid: 21607814
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2009 Jun;70(1):154-62
references.pmid: 19249146
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2000 Jan;12(1):303-10
references.pmid: 10651885
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Feb;33(1):20-30
references.pmid: 17311476