title: Test-retest reliability of graph metrics in functional brain networks: a resting-state fNIRS study.
abstract: Recent research has demonstrated the feasibility of combining functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and graph theory approaches to explore the topological attributes of human brain networks. However, the test-retest (TRT) reliability of the application of graph metrics to these networks remains to be elucidated. Here, we used resting-state fNIRS and a graph-theoretical approach to systematically address TRT reliability as it applies to various features of human brain networks, including functional connectivity, global network metrics and regional nodal centrality metrics. Eighteen subjects participated in two resting-state fNIRS scan sessions held ∼20 min apart. Functional brain networks were constructed for each subject by computing temporal correlations on three types of hemoglobin concentration information (HbO, HbR, and HbT). This was followed by a graph-theoretical analysis, and then an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was further applied to quantify the TRT reliability of each network metric. We observed that a large proportion of resting-state functional connections (∼90%) exhibited good reliability (0.6< ICC <0.74). For global and nodal measures, reliability was generally threshold-sensitive and varied among both network metrics and hemoglobin concentration signals. Specifically, the majority of global metrics exhibited fair to excellent reliability, with notably higher ICC values for the clustering coefficient (HbO: 0.76; HbR: 0.78; HbT: 0.53) and global efficiency (HbO: 0.76; HbR: 0.70; HbT: 0.78). Similarly, both nodal degree and efficiency measures also showed fair to excellent reliability across nodes (degree: 0.52∼0.84; efficiency: 0.50∼0.84); reliability was concordant across HbO, HbR and HbT and was significantly higher than that of nodal betweenness (0.28∼0.68). Together, our results suggest that most graph-theoretical network metrics derived from fNIRS are TRT reliable and can be used effectively for brain network research. This study also provides important guidance on the choice of network metrics of interest for future applied research in developmental and clinical neuroscience.
authors.affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
authors.forename: Haijing
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Niu
authors.forename: Zhen
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Xuhong
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Liao
authors.forename: Jinhui
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Tengda
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Zhao
authors.forename: Ni
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Shu
authors.forename: Xiaohu
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Zhao
authors.forename: Yong
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: He
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000465:Algorithms; D019540:Area Under Curve; D001931:Brain Mapping; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008954:Models, Biological; D009415:Nerve Net / Q000502:physiology*; D025341:Principal Component Analysis; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012146:Rest / Q000502:physiology; D019265:Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):179-93
references.pmid: 22713670
references.citation: Science. 1977 Dec 23;198(4323):1264-7
references.pmid: 929199
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 7;30(14):4877-82
references.pmid: 20371807
references.citation: Lancet Neurol. 2011 Sep;10(9):829-43
references.pmid: 21778116
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):1460-8
references.pmid: 19463959
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
references.pmid: 18839484
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Apr 15;45(3):788-94
references.pmid: 19166945
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Feb 1;6(2):59-64
references.pmid: 15866182
references.citation: Biomed Opt Express. 2010 Jul 28;1(1):324-336
references.pmid: 21258470
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2012 Feb 22;32(8):2703-13
references.pmid: 22357854
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2001 Nov 5;87(19):198701
references.pmid: 11690461
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 2007 Nov-Dec;12(6):062111
references.pmid: 18163814
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 2007 Jul-Aug;12(4):044014
references.pmid: 17867818
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):440-2
references.pmid: 9623998
references.citation: PLoS One. 2007 Jul 04;2(7):e597
references.pmid: 17611629
references.citation: Brain. 2009 Dec;132(Pt 12):3366-79
references.pmid: 19439423
references.citation: Med Biol Eng Comput. 1988 May;26(3):289-94
references.pmid: 2855531
references.citation: Brain Connect. 2011;1(5):349-65
references.pmid: 22432450
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 15;55(4):1679-85
references.pmid: 21256223
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 2010 Jul-Aug;15(4):047003
references.pmid: 20799834
references.citation: Science. 2002 May 3;296(5569):910-3
references.pmid: 11988575
references.citation: J Neurosci Methods. 2010 Feb 15;186(2):242-9
references.pmid: 19931310
references.citation: Med Phys. 2000 Apr;27(4):801-15
references.pmid: 10798703
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S275-88
references.pmid: 15501097
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32766
references.pmid: 22412922
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45771
references.pmid: 23029235
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 14;54(4):2922-36
references.pmid: 21029781
references.citation: Ann Biomed Eng. 2009 Nov;37(11):2288-98
references.pmid: 19629692
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 6;103(23):8577-82
references.pmid: 16723398
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2008 Jul 1;6(7):e159
references.pmid: 18597554
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2005 Sep;15(9):1332-42
references.pmid: 15635061
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2000 Dec;12(6):623-39
references.pmid: 11112395
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Mar;10(3):186-98
references.pmid: 19190637
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Jul 1;51(3):1150-61
references.pmid: 20211741
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 1997 Oct;20(10):435-42
references.pmid: 9347608
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 14;106(28):11747-52
references.pmid: 19564605
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2002 Nov 11;89(20):208701
references.pmid: 12443515
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5;102(27):9673-8
references.pmid: 15976020
references.citation: Br J Radiol. 2006 Dec;79 Spec No 2:S134-40
references.pmid: 17209119
references.citation: Stat Med. 2002 Nov 30;21(22):3431-46
references.pmid: 12407682
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 1995 Oct;34(4):537-41
references.pmid: 8524021
references.citation: Front Neuroinform. 2010 Dec 08;4:117
references.pmid: 21165174
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 May 15;61(1):70-81
references.pmid: 22426347
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):3128-38
references.pmid: 22119653
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2011 Jun 1;56(3):1362-71
references.pmid: 21385616
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Sep;52(3):1059-69
references.pmid: 19819337
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurol. 2010 Aug;23(4):341-50
references.pmid: 20581686
references.citation: Stat Med. 1994 Dec 15-30;13(23-24):2465-76
references.pmid: 7701147
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 2007 Nov-Dec;12(6):062106
references.pmid: 18163809
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 May 1;60(4):2096-106
references.pmid: 22343126
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Jan 4;26(1):63-72
references.pmid: 16399673
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 Oct;17(2):719-31
references.pmid: 12377147
references.citation: Neuroimage. 1998 Feb;7(2):119-32
references.pmid: 9558644
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5226
references.pmid: 19381298
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Feb 22;273(1585):503-11
references.pmid: 16615219
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1404-12
references.pmid: 21888983
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2011 Mar 15;55(2):607-15
references.pmid: 21146616
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Feb 2;3(2):e17
references.pmid: 17274684
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Aug 1;47(1):148-56
references.pmid: 19344773
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21976
references.pmid: 21818285
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 Jul;22(3):165-78
references.pmid: 15195284
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2529-38
references.pmid: 21925609
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Apr 13;13(5):336-49
references.pmid: 22498897
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2007 Oct;17(10):2407-19
references.pmid: 17204824
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2009 Mar;19(3):524-36
references.pmid: 18567609
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 2011 Apr;16(4):046006
references.pmid: 21529075
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003 Feb;67(2 Pt 2):026112
references.pmid: 12636753
references.citation: IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1999;10(3):626-34
references.pmid: 18252563
references.citation: Math Biosci. 2009 Aug;220(2):102-17
references.pmid: 19442671
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 7;100(1):253-8
references.pmid: 12506194
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 Feb 1;34(3):1171-81
references.pmid: 17157035
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2518-28
references.pmid: 21945793
references.citation: Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 Jun 07;4:16
references.pmid: 20589099
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2009 Oct;19(10):2209-29
references.pmid: 19221144
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):3933-40
references.pmid: 22036999