title: Feature-based attention: it is all bottom-up priming.
abstract: Feature-based attention (FBA) enhances the representation of image characteristics throughout the visual field, a mechanism that is particularly useful when searching for a specific stimulus feature. Even though most theories of visual search implicitly or explicitly assume that FBA is under top-down control, we argue that the role of top-down processing in FBA may be limited. Our review of the literature indicates that all behavioural and neuro-imaging studies investigating FBA suffer from the shortcoming that they cannot rule out an effect of priming. The mere attending to a feature enhances the mandatory processing of that feature across the visual field, an effect that is likely to occur in an automatic, bottom-up way. Studies that have investigated the feasibility of FBA by means of cueing paradigms suggest that the role of top-down processing in FBA is limited (e.g. prepare for red). Instead, the actual processing of the stimulus is needed to cause the mandatory tuning of responses throughout the visual field. We conclude that it is likely that all FBA effects reported previously are the result of bottom-up priming.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, , Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Jan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Theeuwes
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D005364:Field Dependence-Independence; D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D060865:Repetition Priming / Q000502:physiology*; D012107:Research Design; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: feature-based attention; priming, top-down control; selective attention
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2000 Jul;62(5):960-8
references.pmid: 10997042
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):1030-44
references.pmid: 1431742
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Feb;72(2):326-41
references.pmid: 20139449
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1970;33:280-92
references.pmid: 5445966
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):202-38
references.pmid: 24203471
references.citation: Vision Res. 2003 Mar;43(6):629-37
references.pmid: 12604099
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1994 Nov;22(6):657-72
references.pmid: 7808275
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Oct;29(5):1021-35
references.pmid: 14585020
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1991 Aug;50(2):184-93
references.pmid: 1945740
references.citation: Cognition. 2002 Aug;85(1):37-52
references.pmid: 12086712
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2006 Jun;29(6):317-22
references.pmid: 16697058
references.citation: Nature. 1999 Oct 7;401(6753):584-7
references.pmid: 10524624
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Dec;33(6):1335-51
references.pmid: 18085947
references.citation: Neuron. 2007 Jul 19;55(2):301-12
references.pmid: 17640530
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Apr;72(3):672-82
references.pmid: 20348574
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 1999 Jul;2(7):671-6
references.pmid: 10404202
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1994 May;55(5):485-96
references.pmid: 8008550
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Jun;22(3):758-79
references.pmid: 8666962
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2005 Apr;67(3):483-94
references.pmid: 16119396
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2005 Nov;67(8):1354-61
references.pmid: 16555587
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1995 May;57(4):421-32
references.pmid: 7596740
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
references.pmid: 11994752
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1981 Sep;30(3):291-302
references.pmid: 7322805
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Dec;25(6):1595-608
references.pmid: 10641312
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2008 Feb;70(2):208-18
references.pmid: 18372744
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Aug;24(4):1296-310
references.pmid: 9706716
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1996 Jan;58(1):88-101
references.pmid: 8668524
references.citation: Science. 1990 Jun 22;248(4962):1556-9
references.pmid: 2360050
references.citation: Vision Res. 1995 Mar;35(5):621-34
references.pmid: 7900301
references.citation: Vision Res. 2004 Jun;44(12):1411-26
references.pmid: 15066400
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1990 Oct;97(4):523-47
references.pmid: 2247540
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Oct;24(5):1342-53
references.pmid: 9778827
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):514-21
references.pmid: 23325704
references.citation: Psychol Res. 1993;56(1):44-58
references.pmid: 8310104
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1980 Jun;109(2):160-74
references.pmid: 7381367
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1988 May;40(2):201-37
references.pmid: 3406448
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1989 Jul;96(3):433-58
references.pmid: 2756067
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jan;74(1):43-69
references.pmid: 22052445
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1995 Jan;57(1):1-17
references.pmid: 7885801
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1999 Jan;61(1):61-79
references.pmid: 10070200
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1996 Oct;58(7):977-91
references.pmid: 8920835
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Oct;73(7):2092-103
references.pmid: 21744177
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1999 Jul;61(5):860-73
references.pmid: 10499000
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1992 Jun;51(6):599-606
references.pmid: 1620571
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25
references.pmid: 7367577
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jan;12(1):24-5
references.pmid: 19029890
references.citation: Vision Res. 2011 Oct 1;51(19):2099-109
references.pmid: 21784093
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Feb;16(1):121-34
references.pmid: 2137514
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1986 Oct;40(4):225-40
references.pmid: 3786090
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Oct;72(7):1725-9
references.pmid: 20952771
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1989 Oct;72(2):177-92
references.pmid: 2589098
references.citation: J Vis. 2013 Apr 19;13(3):
references.pmid: 23603144
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1988 Jul;44(1):15-21
references.pmid: 3405725
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Jun;10(3):329-39
references.pmid: 6242410
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Nov;132(3):201-12
references.pmid: 19635610
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Apr;29(2):483-502
references.pmid: 12760630
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug;16(8):437-43
references.pmid: 22795563
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):77-99
references.pmid: 20507828
references.citation: Vis Neurosci. 1999 Jan-Feb;16(1):15-34
references.pmid: 10022475
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Jul;5(7):631-2
references.pmid: 12068304
references.citation: Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1484-525
references.pmid: 21549742