title: Inverse probability weighting for covariate adjustment in randomized studies.
abstract: Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials has the potential benefit of precision gain. It also has the potential pitfall of reduced objectivity as it opens the possibility of selecting a 'favorable' model that yields strong treatment benefit estimate. Although there is a large volume of statistical literature targeting on the first aspect, realistic solutions to enforce objective inference and improve precision are rare. As a typical randomized trial needs to accommodate many implementation issues beyond statistical considerations, maintaining the objectivity is at least as important as precision gain if not more, particularly from the perspective of the regulatory agencies. In this article, we propose a two-stage estimation procedure based on inverse probability weighting to achieve better precision without compromising objectivity. The procedure is designed in a way such that the covariate adjustment is performed before seeing the outcome, effectively reducing the possibility of selecting a 'favorable' model that yields a strong intervention effect. Both theoretical and numerical properties of the estimation procedure are presented. Application of the proposed method to a real data example is presented.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, U.S.A.
authors.forename: Changyu
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Shen
authors.forename: Xiaochun
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Lingling
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Li
mesh_terms: D003198:Computer Simulation; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008105:Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary / Q000188:drug therapy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015233:Models, Statistical; D010396:Penicillamine / Q000627:therapeutic use; D011336:Probability; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000379:methods*
chemical_list: D010396:Penicillamine
keywords: clinical trials; covariate adjustment; efficiency; inverse probability weighting; objectivity
references.citation: Stat Med. 1998 Aug 15-30;17(15-16):1863-92
references.pmid: 9749453
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Jun 15;163(12):1149-56
references.pmid: 16624967
references.citation: Biometrics. 2003 Dec;59(4):1046-55
references.pmid: 14969484
references.citation: Stat Med. 2004 Mar 15;23(5):697-9
references.pmid: 14981669
references.citation: Control Clin Trials. 2000 Aug;21(4):330-42
references.pmid: 10913808
references.citation: Biometrika. 2012 Jun;99(2):439-456
references.pmid: 23843666
references.citation: Stat Methods Med Res. 2013 Feb;22(1):14-30
references.pmid: 21705435
references.citation: Stat Med. 1989 Apr;8(4):467-75
references.pmid: 2727470
references.citation: Biostatistics. 2012 Apr;13(2):256-73
references.pmid: 22294672
references.citation: Stat Med. 2003 Dec 15;22(23):3583-96
references.pmid: 14652862
references.citation: Stat Med. 2002 Oct 15;21(19):2917-30
references.pmid: 12325108
references.citation: Stat Med. 2008 Oct 15;27(23):4658-77
references.pmid: 17960577
references.citation: Int J Biostat. 2008;4(1):Article 5
references.pmid: 19381345
references.citation: BMJ. 2013 Jan 08;346:e7586
references.pmid: 23303884
references.citation: Biometrika. 2010 Dec;97(4):997-1001
references.pmid: 22822256
references.citation: Hepatology. 1989 Jul;10(1):1-7
references.pmid: 2737595
references.citation: Stat Med. 1992 Sep 30;11(13):1685-704
references.pmid: 1485053
references.citation: Biometrics. 2008 Jun;64(2):567-76
references.pmid: 17970813