title: Quality of life and fecal incontinence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for benign and malignant rectal lesions.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive treatment used to excise a variety of rectal lesions. Potential overstretching of the sphincter's musculature due to dilation of the anal canal to allow placement of a 40-mm-wide scope combined with partial resection of the rectum and subsequent loss of rectal volume creates a concern regarding anorectal function postoperatively. Data regarding patient satisfaction with anorectal function and quality of life after TEM are scant. This report presents data on patient satisfaction gathered during a period of 10 years.
  
  
  METHODS
  A prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing TEM from 1997 to 2007 was queried to identify patients to survey using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale questionnaire, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire version 3, and a questionnaire designed by the authors to assess satisfaction with quality of life. From a group of 86 patients, 57 (66 %) responded to the questionnaires. Patient satisfaction outcomes were determined by age, preoperative diagnosis, tumor level in the rectum, excision method, and radiation treatment.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Most of the patients (94.7 %) preferred TEM to having a stoma. Age (p = 0.03) and nature of the lesion (p = 0.03) were the only factors that affected coping. Depression was affected only by the presence of malignancy (p = 0.001). Excision method was the only factor that significantly influenced overall lifestyle (p = 0.002). Neither tumor level (p = 0.8) nor radiation therapy (p = 0.9) affected patient satisfaction with lifestyle after TEM. The presence of malignancy (p = 0.004) and full-thickness excision (p = 0.02) were related to more problems with fecal incontinence.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Satisfaction with fecal continence generally is high after TEM. Tumor level, size of tumor, and radiation therapy do not affect the level of satisfaction after TEM. Younger age and benign nature of the lesion help patients to cope better with lifestyle changes and reduce depression. Patients with submucosal excision have a significantly higher level of satisfaction.
authors.affiliation: Department of Colorectal Surgery, Lankenau Hospital and Institute of Medical Research, 100 Lancaster Avenue, Medical Office Building West, Suite 330, Wynnewood, PA, 19096, USA.
authors.forename: Elsa B
authors.initials: EB
authors.lastname: Valsdottir
authors.forename: Shadi S
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Yarandi
authors.forename: John H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Marks
authors.forename: Gerald J
authors.initials: GJ
authors.lastname: Marks
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003113:Colonoscopy; D005242:Fecal Incontinence / Q000209:etiology / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008866:Microsurgery / Q000009:adverse effects*; D008875:Middle Aged; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000523:psychology*; D011788:Quality of Life; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000523:psychology / Q000601:surgery*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2009 May;23(5):1081-7
references.pmid: 19263164
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2005 Dec;92(12):1546-52
references.pmid: 16252312
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2005 Aug;242(2):212-23
references.pmid: 16041212
references.citation: J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76
references.pmid: 8433390
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Apr;51(4):379-84; discussion 384
references.pmid: 18236108
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 1990 Sep;33(9):735-9
references.pmid: 2390908
references.citation: Tech Coloproctol. 2009 Jun;13(2):105-11
references.pmid: 19484350
references.citation: Colorectal Dis. 2003 May;5(3):258-61
references.pmid: 12780889
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):612-6
references.pmid: 18095021
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2006 Apr;20(4):541-5
references.pmid: 16508812
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Feb;48(2):270-84
references.pmid: 15711865
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2011 Nov;98(11):1635-43
references.pmid: 21713758
references.citation: J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):4664-70
references.pmid: 19720920
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Aug;43(8):1064-71; discussion 1071-4
references.pmid: 10950004
references.citation: Int J Colorectal Dis. 2001 Nov;16(6):370-6
references.pmid: 11760898
references.citation: J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Oct;181(4):335-46
references.pmid: 7551328
references.citation: Lancet. 1986 Jun 28;1(8496):1479-82
references.pmid: 2425199
references.citation: Colorectal Dis. 2006 Nov;8(9):795-9
references.pmid: 17032328
references.citation: Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Jul;23(7):709-13
references.pmid: 18379797
references.citation: Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997 Jan;79(1):3-7
references.pmid: 9038488
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Jul;48(7):1366-71
references.pmid: 15933798
references.citation: Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Feb;39(2):164-70
references.pmid: 23177350
references.citation: Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 May-Jun;51(57):718-21
references.pmid: 15143900
references.citation: Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2001 Jul;10(3):709-31, xi
references.pmid: 11685937
references.citation: Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jul;9(6):553-8
references.pmid: 17573752
references.citation: Gastroenterology. 2004 Jan;126(1 Suppl 1):S106-13
references.pmid: 14978646