title: Removing sensory input disrupts spinal locomotor activity in the early postnatal period.
abstract: Motor patterns driving rhythmic movements of our lower limbs during walking are generated by groups of neurons within the spinal cord, called central pattern generators (CPGs). After suffering a spinal cord injury (SCI), many descending fibers from our brain are severed or become nonfunctional, leaving the spinal CPG network without its initiating drive. Recent studies have focused on the importance of maintaining sensory stimulation to the limbs of SCI patients as a way to initiate and control the CPG locomotor network. We began assessing the role of sensory feedback to the locomotor CPG network using a neonatal mouse spinal cord preparation where the hindlimbs are still attached. Removing sensory feedback coming from the hindlimbs by way of a lower lumbar transection or by ventral root denervation revealed a positive correlation in the ability of sensory input deprivation to disrupt ongoing locomotor activity on older versus younger animals. The differences in the motor responses as a function of age could be correlated with the loss of excitatory activity from sensory afferents. Continued studies on this field could eventually provide key information that translates into the design of novel therapeutic strategies to treat patients who have suffered a SCI.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Neurobiology and Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, 201 Boulevard del Valle, San Juan, 00901, Puerto Rico.
authors.forename: Jean Marie
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Acevedo
authors.forename: Manuel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Díaz-Ríos
mesh_terms: D000200:Action Potentials; D000344:Afferent Pathways / Q000503:physiopathology*; D000818:Animals; D000831:Animals, Newborn; D019771:Axotomy; D002818:Cordotomy; D004298:Dopamine / Q000494:pharmacology; D004525:Efferent Pathways / Q000503:physiopathology; D056228:Feedback, Sensory; D006614:Hindlimb / Q000294:innervation; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D007395:Interneurons / Q000502:physiology; D008124:Locomotion / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D051379:Mice; D008813:Mice, Inbred ICR; D016202:N-Methylaspartate / Q000494:pharmacology; D011930:Reaction Time; D012701:Serotonin / Q000494:pharmacology; D013116:Spinal Cord / Q000187:drug effects / Q000503:physiopathology*; D013119:Spinal Cord Injuries / Q000503:physiopathology; D013126:Spinal Nerve Roots / Q000503:physiopathology
chemical_list: D012701:Serotonin; D016202:N-Methylaspartate; D004298:Dopamine
references.citation: Exp Neurol. 2010 Apr;222(2):277-84
references.pmid: 20079735
references.citation: Lancet. 2011 Jun 4;377(9781):1938-47
references.pmid: 21601270
references.citation: Brain Res Rev. 2009 Dec 11;62(1):45-56
references.pmid: 19720083
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):1114-22
references.pmid: 19073815
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Mar;95(3):1545-55
references.pmid: 16338993
references.citation: Exp Neurol. 1986 May;92(2):421-35
references.pmid: 3956672
references.citation: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 Jun;23(3):531-9
references.pmid: 23369875
references.citation: Exp Neurol. 2012 May;235(1):110-5
references.pmid: 21530507
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jan;97(1):44-56
references.pmid: 17021027
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1998 Mar;79(3):1329-40
references.pmid: 9497414
references.citation: Neuroscience. 1996 Nov;75(1):263-73
references.pmid: 8923540
references.citation: J Comput Neurosci. 2001 Sep-Oct;11(2):183-200
references.pmid: 11717534
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1996 Apr;75(4):1472-82
references.pmid: 8727391
references.citation: Prog Brain Res. 2011;188:229-41
references.pmid: 21333814
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011;34:413-40
references.pmid: 21469957
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2009 Oct;12(10):1333-42
references.pmid: 19767747
references.citation: Brain Res Rev. 2008 Jan;57(1):228-40
references.pmid: 17822774
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 1998 Sep;10(9):2856-70
references.pmid: 9758155
references.citation: Brain Res. 1975 May 2;88(2):367-71
references.pmid: 1148835
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Jun 14;26(24):6509-17
references.pmid: 16775138
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Aug 15;21(16):5984-92
references.pmid: 11487621
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 1995 Jun;18(6):270-9
references.pmid: 7571002
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2002 Aug;88(2):732-9
references.pmid: 12163525
references.citation: Brain Res Rev. 2008 Jan;57(1):241-54
references.pmid: 18022244
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1998;21:25-45
references.pmid: 9530490
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Sep 29;361(1473):1647-71
references.pmid: 16939980
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Mar;6(3):167-74
references.pmid: 20101254
references.citation: Brain Res. 1988 Feb 2;440(1):1-8
references.pmid: 3359201
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Jun;1198:54-62
references.pmid: 20536920
references.citation: Exp Neurol. 2008 Feb;209(2):417-25
references.pmid: 17850791
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Sep;102(3):1358-65
references.pmid: 19571197
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1999 Apr;81(4):1730-40
references.pmid: 10200208
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1997 Jul;115(3):485-92
references.pmid: 9262203
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Jan 6;30(1):24-37
references.pmid: 20053884
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;98(4):2157-67
references.pmid: 17581844
references.citation: Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2008 Sep;38(7):695-701
references.pmid: 18720012
references.citation: Brain Res Rev. 2008 Jan;57(1):255-64
references.pmid: 18042493
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):4031-9
references.pmid: 8985898
references.citation: Brain Res. 1987 May 26;412(1):84-95
references.pmid: 3607464