title: A higher frequency of lumbar ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in elderly in an outpatient clinic in Japan.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Little is known about the prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of lumbar ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). We analyzed the rate of lumbar OPLL in an outpatient unit where primary care physicians are working in Japan, to better understand the epidemiological characteristics of the disease.
  
  
  METHODS
  We analyzed consecutive, first-time visiting outpatients who received abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan at the Department of General Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University Hospital, Japan, between April 2009 and March 2012. Each parameter such as age, sex, and clinical presentation was investigated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Out of 393 patients who underwent abdominal and pelvic CT scan, 33 (8.4%) were diagnosed as lumbar OPLL. When compared with patients without lumbar OPLL (n = 360), there was no significant difference in gender, body mass index (BMI), presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus or hyperlipidemia, and smoking habit, while the age in patients with lumbar OPLL was significantly higher.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These results suggest for the first time that lumbar OPLL is frequently observed in elderly people in the primary care setting, in Japan.
authors.affiliation: Department of General Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
authors.forename: Toshikatsu
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Okumura
authors.forename: Masumi
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ohhira
authors.forename: Shima
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kumei
authors.forename: Tsukasa
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Nozu
keywords: elderly; epidemiology; lumbar ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; primary care
references.citation: J Spinal Disord. 1993 Oct;6(5):432-54; discussion 454-5
references.pmid: 8274813
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Nov;13(11):1308-16
references.pmid: 3144759
references.citation: Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Mar;30(3):E7
references.pmid: 21434823
references.citation: Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Mar;30(3):E1
references.pmid: 21434817
references.citation: Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:735-8
references.pmid: 22969305
references.citation: Rheumatol Int. 2012 Jun;32(6):1695-9
references.pmid: 21431946
references.citation: J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Apr;21(2):116-9
references.pmid: 18391716
references.citation: Neurosurgery. 2010 Nov;67(5):1311-8; discussion 1318
references.pmid: 20871455
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 2004 Mar;100(3 Suppl Spine):245-8
references.pmid: 15029912
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 May 1;29(9):1006-10
references.pmid: 15105673
references.citation: J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;45(2):187-94
references.pmid: 19997854
references.citation: Intern Med. 2009;48(15):1263-6
references.pmid: 19652427
references.citation: J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Oct;3(4):262-70
references.pmid: 16266066
references.citation: Semin Neurol. 2002 Jun;22(2):143-8
references.pmid: 12524559
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 1999 Oct;91(2 Suppl):230-2
references.pmid: 10505511
references.citation: Asia Pac Fam Med. 2010 Nov 18;9(1):10
references.pmid: 21083939
references.citation: Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jan;107(1):142-3
references.pmid: 22218038
references.citation: Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Mar;30(3):E11
references.pmid: 21361749
references.citation: J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Sep;3(3):230-3
references.pmid: 16235707