title: Humans process dog and human facial affect in similar ways.
abstract: Humans share aspects of their facial affect with other species such as dogs. Here we asked whether untrained human observers with and without dog experience are sensitive to these aspects and recognize dog affect with better-than-chance accuracy. Additionally, we explored similarities in the way observers process dog and human expressions. The stimulus material comprised naturalistic facial expressions of pet dogs and human infants obtained through positive (i.e., play) and negative (i.e., social isolation) provocation. Affect recognition was assessed explicitly in a rating task using full face images and images cropped to reveal the eye region only. Additionally, affect recognition was assessed implicitly in a lexical decision task using full faces as primes and emotional words and pseudowords as targets. We found that untrained human observers rated full face dog expressions from the positive and negative condition more accurately than would be expected by chance. Although dog experience was unnecessary for this effect, it significantly facilitated performance. Additionally, we observed a range of similarities between human and dog face processing. First, the facial expressions of both species facilitated lexical decisions to affectively congruous target words suggesting that their processing was equally automatic. Second, both dog and human negative expressions were recognized from both full and cropped faces. Third, female observers were more sensitive to affective information than were male observers and this difference was comparable for dog and human expressions. Together, these results extend existing work on cross-species similarities in facial emotions and provide evidence that these similarities are naturally exploited when humans interact with dogs.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore ; Duke/NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore ; LSI Neurobiology/Ageing Programme, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
authors.forename: Annett
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Schirmer
authors.forename: Cui Shan
authors.initials: CS
authors.lastname: Seow
authors.forename: Trevor B
authors.initials: TB
authors.lastname: Penney
mesh_terms: D000339:Affect; D000818:Animals; D004285:Dogs; D005145:Face; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011930:Reaction Time; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D013045:Species Specificity; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2010 Aug;42(3):627-33
references.pmid: 20805584
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2013 Jun;96:1-10
references.pmid: 23485925
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2006 Mar;132(2):297-326
references.pmid: 16536645
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2013 Mar;13(1):80-93
references.pmid: 23224782
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Sep;91(3):568-81
references.pmid: 16938038
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Oct;35(9):2000-8
references.pmid: 21241736
references.citation: Emotion. 2009 Dec;9(6):807-20
references.pmid: 20001124
references.citation: Rev Neurosci. 2003;14(4):303-16
references.pmid: 14640318
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1992 Jul;99(3):550-3
references.pmid: 1344638
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Mar;8(3):313-7
references.pmid: 22446301
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Feb;58(2):342-53
references.pmid: 2319446
references.citation: Emotion. 2007 Feb;7(1):172-81
references.pmid: 17352572
references.citation: Science. 1969 Apr 4;164(3875):86-8
references.pmid: 5773719
references.citation: Neuron. 2001 Jun;30(3):829-41
references.pmid: 11430815
references.citation: Science. 1977 Sep 9;197(4308):1097-9
references.pmid: 17836077
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2009 Sep 29;19(18):1543-8
references.pmid: 19682907
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Dec;1000:7-31
references.pmid: 14766618
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41745
references.pmid: 22844519
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):442-52
references.pmid: 16099357
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 12;366(1563):389-401
references.pmid: 21199843
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2013 Jan;16(1):137-45
references.pmid: 22960805
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2006 Dec;1(3):183-93
references.pmid: 18985105
references.citation: Science. 2002 Nov 22;298(5598):1634-6
references.pmid: 12446914
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2012 Mar;15(2):222-32
references.pmid: 22356178
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):445-59
references.pmid: 17958156
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2005 May;119(2):136-44
references.pmid: 15982157
references.citation: Emotion. 2006 Aug;6(3):406-17
references.pmid: 16938082
references.citation: Science. 2004 Jun 11;304(5677):1682-3
references.pmid: 15192233
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47653
references.pmid: 23071828
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Jul 15;72(2):93-100
references.pmid: 22507699
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jun;6(6):624-31
references.pmid: 12740580
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1680-5
references.pmid: 9990084