title: Thymic proliferative response during different physiological states: a comparative study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To study the thymic proliferative response during different physiological states to distinguish those changes due to alterations in steroid hormone secretion from those resulting from the presence of spermatozoa and/or early conceptual products in the female reproductive tract.
  
  
  METHODS
  Using mature female rats of an inbred AO(RT1(u)) strain, observations on the thymus were made at 24 hour intervals during the oestrous cycle, early pseudopregnancy and early syngeneic pregnancy. Each daily group contained a minimum of 6 animals.
  
  
  RESULTS
  During the oestrous cycle, a significant mid-cycle increase of thymocyte proliferation occurred during dioestrus which peaked on day 2, and as a repetitive response may be a preparation for a coital challenge. This response may be oestrogen-dependent since oestrogen levels begin to increase during early dioestrus. The induction of pseudopregnancy generates a comparable but delayed increase in thymic proliferative activity. Since thymocyte proliferation and oestrogen secretion both peak on day 3 of pseudopregnancy, such a response may indeed also be oestrogen-dependent. After syngeneic mating, there was a significant depression in thymic proliferative activity on day 3 followed by a significant increase on day 5 compared with the same days of pseudopregnancy.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This initial depression of proliferative activity may be induced by the immunosuppressive action of seminal plasma, to safeguard the preimplantation conceptus while the day 5 increase in cellular proliferation suggests a response to implantation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O.Box: 35, Postal Code: 123, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
authors.forename: O A
authors.initials: OA
authors.lastname: Habbal
authors.forename: I M
authors.initials: IM
authors.lastname: McLean
authors.forename: M F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Abu-Hijleh
keywords: implantation; oestrous cycle; pseudopregnancy; seminal fluid; thymus
references.citation: J Immunol. 1984 Jul;133(1):110-6
references.pmid: 6725953
references.citation: Exp Cell Res. 1967 May;46(2):441-51
references.pmid: 6028143
references.citation: Endocrinology. 1967 Sep;81(3):617-22
references.pmid: 6033194
references.citation: Acta Anat (Basel). 1992;144(4):363-70
references.pmid: 1414205
references.citation: Lancet. 1995 Jan 14;345(8942):99-103
references.pmid: 7815892
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1977 Mar 11;286:384-97
references.pmid: 152594
references.citation: Am J Reprod Immunol. 1990 May;23(1):29-32
references.pmid: 2118766
references.citation: J Reprod Immunol. 1988 Jul;13(2):113-22
references.pmid: 3172053
references.citation: Cell Immunol. 1980 Mar 15;50(2):290-304
references.pmid: 7357620
references.citation: J Exp Med. 1990 Nov 1;172(5):1277-85
references.pmid: 2230642
references.citation: Immunol Lett. 1988 Apr;17(4):297-302
references.pmid: 3286490
references.citation: J Reprod Immunol. 1979 Oct;1(3):145-58
references.pmid: 399294
references.citation: Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 1990;38(1-2):87-100
references.pmid: 2288477
references.citation: Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol. 1986 Jul;11(3):98-101
references.pmid: 3752339
references.citation: Endocrinology. 1966 Aug;79(2):440-2
references.pmid: 5950842
references.citation: Am J Reprod Immunol. 1983 Jan-Feb;3(1):23-7
references.pmid: 6222660
references.citation: Mt Sinai J Med. 1980 Sep-Oct;47(5):491-510
references.pmid: 6969358
references.citation: Clin Exp Immunol. 1981 May;44(2):253-61
references.pmid: 6458427
references.citation: Endocrinology. 1974 Jun;94(6):1704-8
references.pmid: 4857496
references.citation: Am J Reprod Immunol. 1990 Sep;24(1):9-14
references.pmid: 1704704
references.citation: Science. 1976 Jan 23;191(4224):302-4
references.pmid: 128818
references.citation: Acta Anat (Basel). 1992;144(4):296-303
references.pmid: 1414193
references.citation: J Exp Zool. 1984 Apr;230(1):37-52
references.pmid: 6374014
references.citation: Thymus. 1984;6(3):153-65
references.pmid: 6464096
references.citation: Endocrinology. 1974 Jul;95(1):275-9
references.pmid: 4857737
references.citation: J Cell Biol. 1971 Sep;50(3):583-97
references.pmid: 5098862
references.citation: Br J Cancer. 1975 Jan;31(1):100-10
references.pmid: 1080423
references.citation: Am J Reprod Immunol. 1984 Dec;6(4):185-9
references.pmid: 6241430
references.citation: Endocrinology. 1968 Feb;82(2):333-41
references.pmid: 4951280
references.citation: Cell Immunol. 1984 Feb;83(2):422-32
references.pmid: 6229345
references.citation: J Reprod Immunol. 1981 Jul;3(3):157-64
references.pmid: 6974241
references.citation: J Reprod Immunol. 1984 Jan;6(1):25-37
references.pmid: 6694160
references.citation: Endocrinology. 1963 Feb;72:317-26
references.pmid: 14002588
references.citation: J Immunol. 1982 Feb;128(2):535-9
references.pmid: 7054287
references.citation: Andrologia. 1984 Mar-Apr;16(2):124-8
references.pmid: 6742463
references.citation: Cell Tissue Res. 1990 Feb;259(2):361-9
references.pmid: 2159849
references.citation: Endocr Rev. 1984 Summer;5(3):435-55
references.pmid: 6381037
references.citation: Thymus. 1982 Sep;4(5):299-308
references.pmid: 6983746