title: Moving life science ethics debates beyond national borders: some empirical observations.
abstract: The life sciences are increasingly being called on to produce "socially robust" knowledge that honors the social contract between science and society. This has resulted in the emergence of a number of "broad social issues" that reflect the ethical tensions in these social contracts. These issues are framed in a variety of ways around the world, evidenced by differences in regulations addressing them. It is important to question whether these variations are simply regulatory variations or in fact reflect a contextual approach to ethics that brings into question the existence of a system of "global scientific ethics". Nonetheless, within ethics education for scientists these broad social issues are often presented using this scheme of global ethics due to legacies of science ethics pedagogy. This paper suggests this may present barriers to fostering international discourse between communities of scientists, and may cause difficulties in harmonizing (and transporting) national regulations for the governance of these issues. Reinterpreting these variations according to how the content of ethical principles is attributed by communities is proposed as crucial for developing a robust international discourse. To illustrate this, the paper offers some empirical fieldwork data that considers how the concept of dual-use (as a broad social issue) was discussed within African and UK laboratories. Demonstrating that African scientists reshaped the concept of dual-use according to their own research environmental pressures and ascribed alternative content to the principles that underpin it, suggests that the limitations of a "global scientific ethics" system for these issues cannot be ignored.
authors.affiliation: Department of Sociology, Philosophy and Anthropology, University of Exeter, Amory Building, Exeter, EX4 4RJ, UK, loubez@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Louise
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Bezuidenhout
mesh_terms: D000349:Africa; D001690:Biological Science Disciplines / Q000941:ethics*; D032984:Ethics, Research; D006801:Humans; D007391:International Cooperation; D012106:Research; D012941:Social Responsibility; D006113:United Kingdom
references.citation: Bioethics. 2012 May;26(4):198-206
references.pmid: 21039690
references.citation: Bioethics. 2008 Nov;22(9):477-87
references.pmid: 18959730
references.citation: Nature. 1999 Dec 2;402(6761 Suppl):C81-4
references.pmid: 10591229
references.citation: Theor Med Bioeth. 2012 Feb;33(1):97-105
references.pmid: 22270710
references.citation: Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Dec;13(4):523-80
references.pmid: 18060518
references.citation: Account Res. 2009 Jul;16(4):218-28
references.pmid: 20183162
references.citation: Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Apr;9(2):273-90
references.pmid: 12774659
references.citation: Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Mar;13(1):25-43
references.pmid: 17703607