title: Age, sex, and telomere dynamics in a long-lived seabird with male-biased parental care.
abstract: The examination of telomere dynamics is a recent technique in ecology for assessing physiological state and age-related traits from individuals of unknown age. Telomeres shorten with age in most species and are expected to reflect physiological state, reproductive investment, and chronological age. Loss of telomere length is used as an indicator of biological aging, as this detrimental deterioration is associated with lowered survival. Lifespan dimorphism and more rapid senescence in the larger, shorter-lived sex are predicted in species with sexual size dimorphism, however, little is known about the effects of behavioral dimorphism on senescence and life history traits in species with sexual monomorphism. Here we compare telomere dynamics of thick-billed murres (Urialomvia), a species with male-biased parental care, in two ways: 1) cross-sectionally in birds of known-age (0-28 years) from one colony and 2) longitudinally in birds from four colonies. Telomere dynamics are compared using three measures: the telomere restriction fragment (TRF), a lower window of TRF (TOE), and qPCR. All showed age-related shortening of telomeres, but the TRF measure also indicated that adult female murres have shorter telomere length than adult males, consistent with sex-specific patterns of ageing. Adult males had longer telomeres than adult females on all colonies examined, but chick telomere length did not differ by sex. Additionally, inter-annual telomere changes may be related to environmental conditions; birds from a potentially low quality colony lost telomeres, while those at more hospitable colonies maintained telomere length. We conclude that sex-specific patterns of telomere loss exist in the sexually monomorphic thick-billed murre but are likely to occur between fledging and recruitment. Longer telomeres in males may be related to their homogamous sex chromosomes (ZZ) or to selection for longer life in the care-giving sex. Environmental conditions appeared to be the primary drivers of annual changes in adult birds.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology and Wildlife, Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States of America.
authors.forename: Rebecca C
authors.initials: RC
authors.lastname: Young
authors.forename: Alexander S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Kitaysky
authors.forename: Mark F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Haussmann
authors.forename: Sebastien
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Descamps
authors.forename: Rachael A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Orben
authors.forename: Kyle H
authors.initials: KH
authors.lastname: Elliott
authors.forename: Anthony J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Gaston
mesh_terms: D000375:Aging / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D001947:Breeding; D046091:Charadriiformes / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D008136:Longevity / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D012727:Sex Characteristics; D016615:Telomere / Q000235:genetics*
references.citation: Comp Med. 2006 Feb;56(1):17-22
references.pmid: 16521855
references.citation: Aging Cell. 2011 Dec;10(6):913-21
references.pmid: 21902801
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Sep 7;276(1670):3157-65
references.pmid: 19520803
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009 Oct 16;4(10):e7493
references.pmid: 19834611
references.citation: Trends Biochem Sci. 2002 Jul;27(7):339-44
references.pmid: 12114022
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2006 May;15(6):1681-7
references.pmid: 16629820
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2013 May;13(3):417-28
references.pmid: 23398661
references.citation: Oecologia. 2011 Jul;166(3):615-26
references.pmid: 21286924
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Aug 7;271(1548):1571-6
references.pmid: 15306302
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Nov 9;408(6809):233-8
references.pmid: 11089980
references.citation: Age (Dordr). 2008 Sep;30(2-3):169-76
references.pmid: 19424866
references.citation: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Aug;133(2):126-33
references.pmid: 17324494
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 7;101(49):17312-5
references.pmid: 15574496
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2011 Mar;80(2):375-83
references.pmid: 21182519
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 31;109(5):1743-8
references.pmid: 22232671
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Dec 22;277(1701):3765-71
references.pmid: 20591868
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 May 7;276(1662):1679-83
references.pmid: 19324831
references.citation: J Nutr. 2002 Jun;132(6 Suppl 2):1583S-97S
references.pmid: 12042467
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 1998 Aug;7(8):1071-5
references.pmid: 9711866
references.citation: J Biol. 2009;8(4):38
references.pmid: 19439039
references.citation: Exp Gerontol. 2007 Jul;42(7):610-8
references.pmid: 17470387
references.citation: Am Nat. 2008 Feb;171(2):E89-E101
references.pmid: 18173366
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 May 15;30(10):e47
references.pmid: 12000852
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2007 Apr 22;3(2):128-30
references.pmid: 17264051
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2010 Oct 23;6(5):651-3
references.pmid: 20356883
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2011 Jun;14(6):576-81
references.pmid: 21518210
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2011 May;20(10):2085-99
references.pmid: 21486373
references.citation: Cancer Res. 1999 Dec 1;59(23):5917-21
references.pmid: 10606235
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2004 Sep;13(9):2523-33
references.pmid: 15315667
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2010 Nov;79(6):1251-61
references.pmid: 20646122
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Mar;8(2):264-74
references.pmid: 21585768
references.citation: Oecologia. 2013 Dec;173(4):1271-82
references.pmid: 23771803
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Jan;25(1):220-8
references.pmid: 18071200
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Feb 22;6(2):e17199
references.pmid: 21364951