title: Transgenerational shifts in reproduction hormesis in green peach aphid exposed to low concentrations of imidacloprid.
abstract: Hormesis is a biphasic phenomenon that in toxicology is characterized by low-dose stimulation and high-dose inhibition. It has been observed in a wide range of organisms in response to many chemical stressors, including insects exposed to pesticides, with potential repercussions for agriculture and pest management. To address questions related to the nature of the dose-response and potential consequences on biological fitness, we examined transgenerational hormesis in the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae, when exposed to sublethal concentrations of the insecticide imidacloprid. A hormetic response in the form of increased reproduction was consistently observed and a model previously developed to test for hormesis adequately fit some of our data. However, the nature of the dose-response differed within and across generations depending upon the duration and mode of exposure. Decreased reproduction in intermediate generations confirmed that fitness tradeoffs were a consequence of the hormetic response. However, recovery to levels of reproduction equal to that of controls in subsequent generations and significantly greater total reproduction after four generations suggested that biological fitness was increased by exposure to low concentrations of the insecticide, even when insects were continuously exposed to the stressor. This was especially evident in a greenhouse experiment where the instantaneous rate of population increase almost doubled and total aphid production more than quadrupled when aphids were exposed to potato plants systemically treated with low amounts of imidacloprid. Our results show that although fitness tradeoffs do occur with hormetic responses, this does not necessarily compromise overall biological fitness.
authors.affiliation: Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University Agricultural Campus, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada ; School of Environmental Sciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Murali-Mohan
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Ayyanath
authors.forename: G Christopher
authors.initials: GC
authors.lastname: Cutler
authors.forename: Cynthia D
authors.initials: CD
authors.lastname: Scott-Dupree
authors.forename: Paul K
authors.initials: PK
authors.lastname: Sibley
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001042:Aphids / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000235:genetics; D005260:Female; D056084:Genetic Fitness / Q000187:drug effects*; D059165:Hormesis; D007093:Imidazoles / Q000494:pharmacology*; D007305:Insecticide Resistance; D007306:Insecticides / Q000494:pharmacology*; D008297:Male; D000073943:Neonicotinoids; D009574:Nitro Compounds / Q000494:pharmacology*; D011157:Population Dynamics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D027861:Prunus / Q000469:parasitology; D012098:Reproduction / Q000187:drug effects; D011198:Solanum tuberosum / Q000187:drug effects / Q000469:parasitology
chemical_list: D007093:Imidazoles; D007306:Insecticides; D000073943:Neonicotinoids; D009574:Nitro Compounds; C082359:imidacloprid
references.citation: J Econ Entomol. 2009 Feb;102(1):170-6
references.pmid: 19253633
references.citation: Aquat Toxicol. 2012 Mar;109:100-10
references.pmid: 22210498
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33432
references.pmid: 22438929
references.citation: Exp Gerontol. 2011 Oct;46(10):794-802
references.pmid: 21763414
references.citation: Pest Manag Sci. 2011 Jun;67(6):719-24
references.pmid: 21337675
references.citation: Pest Manag Sci. 2011 Mar;67(3):253-7
references.pmid: 21308950
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005 Dec;24(12):3166-72
references.pmid: 16445100
references.citation: Hum Exp Toxicol. 2002 Feb;21(2):91-7
references.pmid: 12102503
references.citation: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2006 Jun;64(2):207-14
references.pmid: 16730524
references.citation: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2011 Jul;18(6):1004-14
references.pmid: 21301977
references.citation: Hum Exp Toxicol. 2002 Feb;21(2):103-4; discussion 113-4
references.pmid: 12102492
references.citation: Ecotoxicology. 2013 Mar;22(2):263-70
references.pmid: 23179410
references.citation: Environ Pollut. 2005 Dec;138(3):379-411
references.pmid: 16098930
references.citation: J Econ Entomol. 1968 Feb;61(1):7-12
references.pmid: 5636848
references.citation: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007 Jul 1;222(1):122-8
references.pmid: 17459441
references.citation: Ageing Res Rev. 2008 Jan;7(1):1-7
references.pmid: 18162444
references.citation: Pest Manag Sci. 2009 Feb;65(2):205-9
references.pmid: 19089851
references.citation: Dose Response. 2012 Mar 30;11(2):154-77
references.pmid: 23930099
references.citation: Pest Manag Sci. 2008 Apr;64(4):489-96
references.pmid: 18293284
references.citation: Q Rev Biol. 2001 Dec;76(4):459-67
references.pmid: 11783398
references.citation: Pest Manag Sci. 2013 Aug;69(8):949-54
references.pmid: 23281229
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2008 Jul;27(7):1451-74
references.pmid: 18275256
references.citation: Hum Exp Toxicol. 1998 May;17(5):266-9
references.pmid: 9663935
references.citation: J Appl Toxicol. 2000 Mar-Apr;20(2):103-12
references.pmid: 10715607
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2010 Nov;13(11):1435-47
references.pmid: 20849442
references.citation: Annu Rev Entomol. 2003;48:505-19
references.pmid: 12221038
references.citation: Dose Response. 2010 Jun 25;9(1):130-43
references.pmid: 21431082