title: Multidetector CT imaging of post-robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy complications.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) is currently accepted as the preferred minimally invasive surgical treatment for localised prostate cancer, with optimal oncologic and functional results. Despite growing surgical experience, reduced postoperative morbidity and hospital stays, RALRP-related complications may occur, which are severe in 5-7 % of patients and sometimes require reoperation. Therefore, in hospitals with an active urologic surgery, urgent diagnostic imaging is increasingly requested to assess suspected early complications following RALRP surgery.
  
  
  METHODS
  Based upon our experience, this pictorial review discusses basic principles of the surgical technique, the optimal multidetector CT (MDCT) techniques to be used in the postoperative urologic setting, the normal postoperative anatomy and imaging appearances.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Afterwards, we review and illustrate the varied spectrum of RALRP-related complications including haemorrhage, urinary leaks, anorectal injuries, peritoneal changes, surgical site infections, abscess collections and lymphoceles, venous thrombosis and port site hernias.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Knowledge of surgical procedure details, appropriate MDCT acquisition techniques, and familiarity with normal postoperative imaging appearances and possible complications are needed to correctly perform and interpret early post-surgical imaging studies, particularly to identify those occurrences that require prolonged in-hospital treatment or surgical reintervention.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  • Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy allows minimally invasive surgery of localised cancer • Urologic surgeons may request urgent imaging to assess suspected postoperative complications • Main complications include haemorrhage, urine leaks, anorectal injuries, infections and lymphoceles • Correct multidetector CT techniques allow identifying haematomas, active bleeding and extravasated urine • Imaging postoperative complications is crucial to assess the need for surgical reoperation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, "Luigi Sacco" University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy, mtonolini@sirm.org.
authors.forename: Massimo
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Tonolini
authors.forename: Federica
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Villa
authors.forename: Roberto
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Bianco
references.citation: Urology. 2009 Jun;73(6):1423.e3-5
references.pmid: 18619661
references.citation: Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):684-98
references.pmid: 21324583
references.citation: J Endourol. 2012 Jul;26(7):848-51
references.pmid: 22283233
references.citation: BJU Int. 2009 Apr;103(8):1108-10
references.pmid: 19021618
references.citation: Urol Oncol. 2007 Nov-Dec;25(6):465-7
references.pmid: 18047953
references.citation: BJU Int. 2011 Oct;108(7):1185-90
references.pmid: 21489117
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1077-87
references.pmid: 19770332
references.citation: Radiographics. 2004 Oct;24 Suppl 1:S181-94
references.pmid: 15486240
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Nov;187(5):1296-302
references.pmid: 17056919
references.citation: Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1092-7
references.pmid: 20022085
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2008 Jan;18(1):4-17
references.pmid: 17973110
references.citation: Anticancer Res. 2011 Oct;31(10):3497-501
references.pmid: 21965768
references.citation: Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1083-9
references.pmid: 20110114
references.citation: Eur Urol. 2010 Mar;57(3):363-70
references.pmid: 19944519
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2008 Jun;18(6):1281-91
references.pmid: 18270715
references.citation: Abdom Imaging. 2008 May-Jun;33(3):367-70
references.pmid: 17566817
references.citation: JSLS. 2007 Jan-Mar;11(1):1-7
references.pmid: 17651548
references.citation: Eur Urol. 2011 Jan;59(1):1-6
references.pmid: 21035248
references.citation: Urology. 2011 Apr;77(4):976-9
references.pmid: 21296400
references.citation: Urology. 2011 Oct;78(4):827-31
references.pmid: 21802119
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 May;188(5):1324-30
references.pmid: 17449778
references.citation: Radiographics. 2003 Sep-Oct;23(5):1133-47
references.pmid: 12975505
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):536-42
references.pmid: 20614139
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov;199(5):W595-601
references.pmid: 23096203
references.citation: Insights Imaging. 2012 Apr;3(2):181-7
references.pmid: 22696044
references.citation: Radiology. 2010 May;255(2):508-16
references.pmid: 20160002
references.citation: Abdom Imaging. 2002 Jan-Feb;27(1):88-92
references.pmid: 11740616
references.citation: BJU Int. 2009 Aug;104(4):534-9
references.pmid: 19281468
references.citation: World J Urol. 2008 Dec;26(6):595-602
references.pmid: 18584180
references.citation: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997 Jan-Feb;21(1):44-51
references.pmid: 9022769
references.citation: Radiographics. 2009 Mar-Apr;29(2):461-76
references.pmid: 19325059