title: Prenatal exposure to testosterone impairs oxidative damage repair efficiency in the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus).
abstract: Elevated levels of maternal androgens in avian eggs affect numerous traits, including oxidative stress. However, current studies disagree as to whether prenatal androgen exposure enhances or ameliorates oxidative stress. Here, we tested how prenatal testosterone exposure affects oxidative stress in female domestic chickens (Gallus gallus) during the known oxidative challenge of an acute stressor. Prior to incubation, eggs were either injected with an oil vehicle or 5 ng testosterone. At either 17 or 18 days post-hatch, several oxidative stress markers were assessed from blood taken before and after a 20 min acute stressor, as well as following a 25 min recovery from the stressor. We found that, regardless of yolk treatment, during both stress and recovery all individuals were in a state of oxidative stress, with elevated levels of oxidative damage markers accompanied by a reduced total antioxidant capacity. In addition, testosterone-exposed individuals exhibited poorer DNA damage repair efficiencies in comparison with control individuals. Our work suggests that while yolk androgens do not alter oxidative stress directly, they may impair mechanisms of oxidative damage repair.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837, USA.
authors.forename: L A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Treidel
authors.forename: B N
authors.initials: BN
authors.lastname: Whitley
authors.forename: Z M
authors.initials: ZM
authors.lastname: Benowitz-Fredericks
authors.forename: M F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Haussmann
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002645:Chickens; D004249:DNA Damage; D004260:DNA Repair; D005260:Female; D018811:Maternal Exposure; D018384:Oxidative Stress / Q000187:drug effects*; D013739:Testosterone / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000494:pharmacology*
chemical_list: D013739:Testosterone
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005 Apr;29(2):329-52
references.pmid: 15811503
references.citation: Int J Cancer. 2001 May 1;92(3):322-8
references.pmid: 11291065
references.citation: Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010 Apr 12;317(1-2):14-24
references.pmid: 20035825
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2011 Feb 23;7(1):93-5
references.pmid: 20659922
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Mar 22;274(1611):819-25
references.pmid: 17251089
references.citation: Physiol Rev. 1998 Apr;78(2):547-81
references.pmid: 9562038
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2013 Oct 23;9(5):20130684
references.pmid: 24046877
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Apr 7;279(1732):1447-56
references.pmid: 22072607
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1998 Dec 11;273(50):33811-6
references.pmid: 9837971
references.citation: Ecology. 2008 Sep;89(9):2584-93
references.pmid: 18831179
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2011 Jun 23;7(3):429-32
references.pmid: 21247942
references.citation: Mutat Res. 2011 Jul-Oct;728(1-2):35-46
references.pmid: 21679774
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2009 Jan;12(1):75-92
references.pmid: 19016828
references.citation: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2013 May-Jun;86(3):333-45
references.pmid: 23629883
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2012 Feb 23;8(1):61-3
references.pmid: 21865247
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2008 Mar 7;251(1):68-81
references.pmid: 18082771
references.citation: Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2009 Sep 1;163(1-2):175-83
references.pmid: 19362557