title: Comparing sociocultural features of cholera in three endemic African settings.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Cholera mainly affects developing countries where safe water supply and sanitation infrastructure are often rudimentary. Sub-Saharan Africa is a cholera hotspot. Effective cholera control requires not only a professional assessment, but also consideration of community-based priorities. The present work compares local sociocultural features of endemic cholera in urban and rural sites from three field studies in southeastern Democratic Republic of Congo (SE-DRC), western Kenya and Zanzibar.
  
  
  METHODS
  A vignette-based semistructured interview was used in 2008 in Zanzibar to study sociocultural features of cholera-related illness among 356 men and women from urban and rural communities. Similar cross-sectional surveys were performed in western Kenya (n = 379) and in SE-DRC (n = 360) in 2010. Systematic comparison across all settings considered the following domains: illness identification; perceived seriousness, potential fatality and past household episodes; illness-related experience; meaning; knowledge of prevention; help-seeking behavior; and perceived vulnerability.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Cholera is well known in all three settings and is understood to have a significant impact on people's lives. Its social impact was mainly characterized by financial concerns. Problems with unsafe water, sanitation and dirty environments were the most common perceived causes across settings; nonetheless, non-biomedical explanations were widespread in rural areas of SE-DRC and Zanzibar. Safe food and water and vaccines were prioritized for prevention in SE-DRC. Safe water was prioritized in western Kenya along with sanitation and health education. The latter two were also prioritized in Zanzibar. Use of oral rehydration solutions and rehydration was a top priority everywhere; healthcare facilities were universally reported as a primary source of help. Respondents in SE-DRC and Zanzibar reported cholera as affecting almost everybody without differentiating much for gender, age and class. In contrast, in western Kenya, gender differentiation was pronounced, and children and the poor were regarded as most vulnerable to cholera.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This comprehensive review identified common and distinctive features of local understandings of cholera. Classical treatment (that is, rehydration) was highlighted as a priority for control in the three African study settings and is likely to be identified in the region beyond. Findings indicate the value of insight from community studies to guide local program planning for cholera control and elimination.
authors.affiliation: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, PO Box, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. mitchell-g.weiss@unibas.ch.
authors.forename: Christian
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Schaetti
authors.forename: Neisha
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Sundaram
authors.forename: Sonja
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Merten
authors.forename: Said M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Ali
authors.forename: Erick O
authors.initials: EO
authors.lastname: Nyambedha
authors.forename: Bruno
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Lapika
authors.forename: Claire-Lise
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Chaignat
authors.forename: Raymond
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Hutubessy
authors.forename: Mitchell G
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Weiss
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000351:Africa, Eastern / Q000453:epidemiology; D002771:Cholera / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000208:ethnology / Q000523:psychology; D015023:Democratic Republic of the Congo / Q000453:epidemiology; D019353:Endemic Diseases; D005260:Female; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice / Q000208:ethnology; D006801:Humans; D006920:Hygiene; D008297:Male; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care / Q000208:ethnology; D012424:Rural Population; D014505:Urban Population
references.citation: Vaccine. 2003 Mar 28;21(13-14):1304-9
references.pmid: 12615424
references.citation: Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012 Sep;8(9):1223-9
references.pmid: 22894965
references.citation: Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2009 Dec 11;84(50):517-32
references.pmid: 19999831
references.citation: Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 May;14(5):798-800
references.pmid: 18439365
references.citation: PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Jan 25;5(1):e952
references.pmid: 21283614
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Mar;78(3):527-33
references.pmid: 18337355
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Oct 1;90(10):714
references.pmid: 23109735
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Jun;84(6):862-9
references.pmid: 21633020
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2009 Apr 07;9:99
references.pmid: 19351401
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1996 Sep;43(6):1007-24
references.pmid: 8888470
references.citation: Emerg Infect Dis. 2002 Mar;8(3):336-8
references.pmid: 11927038
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Mar 1;90(3):209-218A
references.pmid: 22461716
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41527
references.pmid: 22844489
references.citation: PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(2):e332
references.pmid: 19238216
references.citation: Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2011 Jul 29;86(31):325-39
references.pmid: 21800468
references.citation: BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Nov 26;10:339
references.pmid: 21110853
references.citation: PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(10):e1844
references.pmid: 23056660
references.citation: Glob Public Health. 2013;8(5):534-51
references.pmid: 23672503
references.citation: Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2010 Mar 26;85(13):117-28
references.pmid: 20349546
references.citation: J Health Popul Nutr. 2004 Sep;22(3):286-92
references.pmid: 15609781
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 22;13:60
references.pmid: 23339647
references.citation: Lancet. 2004 Jan 17;363(9404):223-33
references.pmid: 14738797
references.citation: Epidemiol Infect. 2012 Mar;140(3):500-9
references.pmid: 21554781
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jul;6(7):699-706
references.pmid: 15186348
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Aug;71(8):4645-54
references.pmid: 16085859
references.citation: Hum Vaccin. 2011 Dec;7(12):1299-308
references.pmid: 22108036
references.citation: Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2009 Jul 31;84(31):309-24
references.pmid: 19645127
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009 Dec;81(6):1085-90
references.pmid: 19996441
references.citation: BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2009 Apr 30;9:8
references.pmid: 19405948
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Aug;83(2):370-3
references.pmid: 20682884
references.citation: Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Nov;17(11):2026-34
references.pmid: 22099090
references.citation: Lancet. 2012 Jun 30;379(9835):2466-2476
references.pmid: 22748592
references.citation: Epidemiol Infect. 2013 Mar;141(3):639-50
references.pmid: 22564277
references.citation: Vaccine. 2006 Jan 23;24(4):485-94
references.pmid: 16137802
references.citation: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999 Feb;60(2):271-6
references.pmid: 10072150
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2003 Oct;57(8):1397-407
references.pmid: 12927470
references.citation: Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Aug;7(8):521-30
references.pmid: 17584531
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2011 Jan 6;364(1):5-7
references.pmid: 21142691