title: Validity of a computer-assisted manual segmentation software to quantify wrist erosion volume using computed tomography scans in rheumatoid arthritis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  To investigate the performance of conventional radiography (CR) for the detection of bone erosions of wrist in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using multidetector computed tomography (CT) as the reference method and to evaluate the validity of a computer-assisted manual segmentation (outlining) technique to quantify erosion volume on CT scans.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty five RA patients and six controls underwent CT and radiographic evaluation of the dominant wrist on the same day. CT was performed by using a 64 GE light Speed VCT power. Wrists images were evaluated separately and scored for the presence of erosions according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) and the Sharp/van der Heijde scoring method. Measurements of bone erosion volumes were obtained using OsiriX medical imaging software. The mean value of the volumes of the CT bone erosions detected at two readings was used to calculate inter-rater agreement.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of radiography for detecting erosions were 25.5%, 98.3% and 70.1%, respectively. Using computer-assisted manual segmentation (outlining) technique, erosion volume on CT measurements per subject was ranged from 0.001 cm³ to 2.01 cm³. Spearman's RAMRIS score of each wrist bones in all subjects (n = 25) were correlated with the total erosion volume on CT (p < 0.0001), with the ratio between erosion volume and the corresponding bone volume on a percentage basis (p < 0.0001). The total Sharp/van der Heijde erosion score of the all wrist bones was correlate with the RAMRIS score (p = 0.008). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for manual segmentation showed high agreement (ICC = 0.901).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Considering CT as the reference method, CR showed very low sensitivity. A close correlation with CT erosion volumes supports the OMERACT RAMRIS erosion score as a semiquantitative measure of joint damage in RA. Although the computer-assisted manual segmentation can be beneficial for diagnostic decision in cross-sectional CT examinations of the wrist in RA, this technique will require further evaluation in terms of responsiveness.
authors.affiliation: Rheumatology Department, Politechnic University of the Marche, Ospedale "C, Urbani", Via dei Colli, 52, Ancona, Jesi 60035, Italy. fsalaff@tin.it.
authors.forename: Fausto
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Salaffi
authors.forename: Marina
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Carotti
authors.forename: Alessandro
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ciapetti
authors.forename: Alarico
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ariani
authors.forename: Stefania
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Gasparini
authors.forename: Walter
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Grassi
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001172:Arthritis, Rheumatoid / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D061330:Multidetector Computed Tomography; D015588:Observer Variation; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012986:Software Validation; D014955:Wrist Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*
references.citation: Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(4):R110
references.pmid: 16848914
references.citation: Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Aug;25(4):569-84
references.pmid: 22137925
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Oct;66(10):1388-92
references.pmid: 17606464
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Jul;59(7):521-8
references.pmid: 10873961
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Feb;64 Suppl 1:i3-7
references.pmid: 15647420
references.citation: Med Image Anal. 2003 Mar;7(1):21-45
references.pmid: 12467720
references.citation: Med Phys. 2008 Jun;35(6):2321-30
references.pmid: 18649465
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Aug;52(8):2300-6
references.pmid: 16052593
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2001 Aug;28(8):1825-36
references.pmid: 11508585
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2005 Feb;32(2):256-67
references.pmid: 15693085
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Dec;52(12):3860-7
references.pmid: 16320333
references.citation: Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
references.pmid: 2868172
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Sep;60(9):817-27
references.pmid: 11502606
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Jun;43(6):1378-86
references.pmid: 10857798
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Jun;42(6):1232-45
references.pmid: 10366117
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Jun;67(6):794-800
references.pmid: 17981915
references.citation: BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 May 30;12:120
references.pmid: 21624120
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Jan;48(1):64-71
references.pmid: 12528105
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Mar;48(3):614-24
references.pmid: 12632412
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Feb;64 Suppl 1:i11-21
references.pmid: 15647417
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2011 Sep;38(9):2014-7
references.pmid: 21885509
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2001 Oct;28(10):2193-200
references.pmid: 11669155
references.citation: Med Phys. 2000 Sep;27(9):2037-47
references.pmid: 11011731
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 1997 Oct;24(10):2055-6
references.pmid: 9330960
references.citation: J Digit Imaging. 2012 Aug;25(4):486-91
references.pmid: 22270788
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 Aug;24(8):997-1010
references.pmid: 16092332
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2004 Jun;31(6):1050-61
references.pmid: 15170915
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Aug;48(8):2128-31
references.pmid: 12905465
references.citation: J Hand Surg Am. 2003 May;28(3):427-34
references.pmid: 12772099
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 1999 Mar;26(3):743-5
references.pmid: 10090194
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Feb;64 Suppl 1:i23-47
references.pmid: 15647419
references.citation: Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003 Feb;17(1):17-32
references.pmid: 12659819
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Aug;72(8):1351-7
references.pmid: 22993229
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002 Aug;21(8):888-903
references.pmid: 12472262
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 1999 Mar;58(3):156-63
references.pmid: 10364913
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Oct;68(10):1585-90
references.pmid: 19019887
references.citation: J Digit Imaging. 2004 Sep;17(3):205-16
references.pmid: 15534753
references.citation: J Digit Imaging. 1995 Nov;8(4):156-61
references.pmid: 8573624
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Mar;31(3):315-24
references.pmid: 3358796
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2007 Apr;34(4):857-8
references.pmid: 17407239
references.citation: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Sep;50(9):1537-9
references.pmid: 21183451
references.citation: Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009 Mar-Apr;27(2):197-200
references.pmid: 19473557
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 1996 Feb;23(2):265-72
references.pmid: 8882030
references.citation: Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1996 Aug;10(3):435-53
references.pmid: 8876953
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):4-6
references.pmid: 20573920
references.citation: Radiol Med. 1997 Mar;93(3):174-84
references.pmid: 9221406
references.citation: Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1977 Jul;18(4):481-91
references.pmid: 920239
references.citation: Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1997 May-Jun;15 Suppl 17:S53-61
references.pmid: 9266133
references.citation: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005 Jan-Feb;29(1):94-8
references.pmid: 15665691
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2003 Jun;30(6):1385-6
references.pmid: 12784422
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Feb;60(2):98-103
references.pmid: 11156539