title: Conspecific plasticity and invasion: invasive populations of Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera) have performance advantage over native populations only in low soil salinity.
abstract: Global climate change may increase biological invasions in part because invasive species may have greater phenotypic plasticity than native species. This may be especially important for abiotic stresses such as salt inundation related to increased hurricane activity or sea level rise. If invasive species indeed have greater plasticity, this may reflect genetic differences between populations in the native and introduced ranges. Here, we examined plasticity of functional and fitness-related traits of Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera) populations from the introduced and native ranges that were grown along a gradient of soil salinity (control: 0 ppt; Low: 5 ppt; Medium: 10 ppt; High: 15 ppt) in a greenhouse. We used both norm reaction and plasticity index (PIv) to estimate the conspecific phenotypic plasticity variation between invasive and native populations. Overall, invasive populations had higher phenotypic plasticity of height growth rate (HGR), aboveground biomass, stem biomass and specific leaf area (SLA). The plasticity Index (PIv) of height growth rate (HGR) and SLA each were higher for plants from invasive populations. Absolute performance was always comparable or greater for plants from invasive populations versus native populations with the greatest differences at low stress levels. Our results were consistent with the "Master-of-some" pattern for invasive plants in which the fitness of introduced populations was greater in more benign conditions. This suggests that the greater conspecific phenotypic plasticity of invasive populations compared to native populations may increase invasion success in benign conditions but would not provide a potential interspecific competitive advantage in higher salinity soils that may occur with global climate change in coastal areas.
authors.affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China ; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America ; State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
authors.forename: Leiyi
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: Candice J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Tiu
authors.forename: Shaolin
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Peng
authors.forename: Evan
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Siemann
mesh_terms: D057231:Climate Change; D017753:Ecosystem; D031285:Hippomane / Q000502:physiology*; D058865:Introduced Species; D010641:Phenotype; D018521:Plant Physiological Phenomena; D054712:Salinity; D012492:Salts / Q000737:chemistry; D012621:Seasons; D012987:Soil / Q000737:chemistry*; D014197:Trees; D014481:United States
chemical_list: D012492:Salts; D012987:Soil
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2006 Aug;9(8):981-93
references.pmid: 16913942
references.citation: Oecologia. 2005 Jun;144(1):1-11
references.pmid: 15891837
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2007 Apr;94(4):526-32
references.pmid: 21636422
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48829
references.pmid: 23166596
references.citation: Oecologia. 2004 Mar;138(4):521-31
references.pmid: 14689299
references.citation: Am J Bot. 1999 Aug;86(8):1146-53
references.pmid: 10449394
references.citation: New Phytol. 2005 Sep;167(3):645-63
references.pmid: 16101905
references.citation: New Phytol. 2012 Feb;193(3):730-744
references.pmid: 22171967
references.citation: Am Nat. 2002 Apr;159(4):396-419
references.pmid: 18707424
references.citation: New Phytol. 2010 Feb;185(3):747-58
references.pmid: 19925556
references.citation: J Ecol. 2010 Sep;98(5):1147-1156
references.pmid: 20852668
references.citation: Am Nat. 2002 Aug;160(2):271-83
references.pmid: 18707492
references.citation: Ecology. 2012 Nov;93(11):2343-52
references.pmid: 23236906
references.citation: Oecologia. 2004 May;139(3):399-407
references.pmid: 14991396
references.citation: Evolution. 2000 Dec;54(6):1982-94
references.pmid: 11209775
references.citation: Oecologia. 2002 Aug;132(3):428-435
references.pmid: 28547421
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 6;104(10):3883-8
references.pmid: 17360447
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33877
references.pmid: 22442731
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2005 Aug;92(8):1311-21
references.pmid: 21646151
references.citation: New Phytol. 2007;176(4):749-763
references.pmid: 17997761
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2003 Feb;90(2):243-9
references.pmid: 21659114
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Jun;88(6):1499-512
references.pmid: 17601142
references.citation: Oecologia. 2006 Nov;150(2):272-81
references.pmid: 16917777
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2000 Mar;87(3):402-11
references.pmid: 10719001
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2011 Apr;14(4):419-31
references.pmid: 21314880
references.citation: Oecologia. 2001 May;127(4):487-494
references.pmid: 28547485
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2008 Aug;95(8):931-42
references.pmid: 21632416
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2010 Feb;13(2):235-45
references.pmid: 20002494
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2011 Jan;14(1):36-41
references.pmid: 21073641
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2006 Aug;16(4):1367-76
references.pmid: 16937804
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e42794
references.pmid: 23118844