title: Transcriptome analysis of two buffalograss cultivars.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Buffalograss [Buchloë dactyloides (Nutt.) Engel. syn. Bouteloua dactyloides (Nutt.) Columbus] is a United States native turfgrass species that requires less irrigation, fungicides and pesticides compared to more commonly used turfgrass species. In areas where water is limited, interest in this grass species for lawns is increasing. While several buffalograss cultivars have been developed through buffalograss breeding, the timeframe for new cultivar development is long and is limited by a lack of useful genetic resources. Two high throughput next-generation sequencing techniques were used to increase the genomic resources available for buffalograss.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Total RNA was extracted and purified from leaf samples of two buffalograss cultivars. '378' and 'Prestige' cDNA libraries were subjected to high throughput sequencing on the Illumina GA and Roche 454 Titanium FLX sequencing platforms. The 454 platform (3 samples) produced 1,300,885 reads and the Illumina platform (12 samples) generated approximately 332 million reads. The multiple k-mer technique for de novo assembly using Velvet and Oases was applied. A total of 121,288 contigs were assembled that were similar to previously reported Ensembl commelinid sequences. Original Illumina reads were also mapped to the high quality assembly to estimate expression levels of buffalograss transcripts. There were a total of 325 differentially expressed genes between the two buffalograss cultivars. A glycosyl transferase, serine threonine kinase, and nb-arc domain containing transcripts were among those differentially expressed between the two cultivars. These genes have been previously implicated in defense response pathways and may in part explain some of the performance differences between 'Prestige' and '378'.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  To date, this is the first high throughput sequencing experiment conducted on buffalograss. In total, 121,288 high quality transcripts were assembled, significantly expanding the limited genetic resources available for buffalograss genetic studies. Additionally, 325 differentially expressed sequences were identified which may contribute to performance or morphological differences between 'Prestige' and '378' buffalograss cultivars.
authors.affiliation: Department of Agronomy & Horticulture, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA. kamundsen2@unl.edu.
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Wachholtz
authors.forename: Tiffany
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Heng-Moss
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Twigg
authors.forename: Lisa
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Baird
authors.forename: Guoqing
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Lu
authors.forename: Keenan
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Amundsen
mesh_terms: D015723:Gene Library; D018745:Genome, Plant; D059014:High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; D058977:Molecular Sequence Annotation; D006109:Poaceae / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics*; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA; D059467:Transcriptome
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 1;22(13):1658-9
references.pmid: 16731699
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2011 Jun;23(6):2456-69
references.pmid: 21712415
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2004 Sep;16(9):2448-62
references.pmid: 15308753
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2004 Sep;17(9):999-1008
references.pmid: 15384490
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2002 Mar;128(3):1109-19
references.pmid: 11891265
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2010;11(10):R106
references.pmid: 20979621
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Jan;10(1):57-63
references.pmid: 19015660
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e53214
references.pmid: 23285269
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2005 Sep 15;21(18):3674-6
references.pmid: 16081474
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2009 Oct;151(2):741-54
references.pmid: 19656905
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2011 Apr;155(4):1545-51
references.pmid: 21330494
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2008;59(6):1383-97
references.pmid: 18390848
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2005 Mar 11;280(10):9203-9
references.pmid: 15572355
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2009;10(3):R25
references.pmid: 19261174
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41150
references.pmid: 22905098
references.citation: Genome. 2005 Jun;48(3):411-6
references.pmid: 16121238
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D48-53
references.pmid: 22144687
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W677-80
references.pmid: 15980561
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2008 May;21(5):507-17
references.pmid: 18393610
references.citation: Plant J. 2007 Nov;52(4):640-57
references.pmid: 17877712
references.citation: Nat Immunol. 2006 Dec;7(12):1243-9
references.pmid: 17110940
references.citation: BMC Genomics. 2010 Oct 16;11:571
references.pmid: 20950480
references.citation: J Econ Entomol. 2004 Jun;97(3):1086-95
references.pmid: 15279295
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2009;60(4):1109-21
references.pmid: 19196749
references.citation: EMBO Rep. 2004 Oct;5(10):994-9
references.pmid: 15448639
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1995 Apr;107(4):1333-41
references.pmid: 7770527
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2000 Sep;5(9):380-6
references.pmid: 10973093
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2005 Dec;139(4):1890-901
references.pmid: 16306146
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2012 Apr 15;28(8):1086-92
references.pmid: 22368243
references.citation: Gene Regul Syst Bio. 2007 Sep 26;1:167-75
references.pmid: 19936086
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 6;104(10):4223-7
references.pmid: 17360504
references.citation: Curr Biol. 1998 Mar 26;8(7):R226-7
references.pmid: 9545207
references.citation: J Econ Entomol. 2006 Feb;99(1):222-8
references.pmid: 16573343
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2009;60(2):377-90
references.pmid: 19073963
references.citation: Methods Mol Biol. 2011;722:167-78
references.pmid: 21590420
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2009 Nov 1;25(21):2839-40
references.pmid: 19737799
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2012 May 13;30(6):555-61
references.pmid: 22580951
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006 Aug;9(4):383-90
references.pmid: 16713729
references.citation: Genome Res. 2010 Oct;20(10):1432-40
references.pmid: 20693479