title: Detection of shigella in lettuce by the use of a rapid molecular assay with increased sensitivity.
abstract: A Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay to be used as an alternative to the conventional culture method in detecting Shigella and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC) virulence genes ipaH and ial in lettuce was developed. Efficacy and rapidity of the molecular method were determined as compared to the conventional culture. Lettuce samples were inoculated with different Shigella flexneri concentrations (from 10 CFU/ml to 10(7) CFU/ml). DNA was extracted directly from lettuce after inoculation (direct-PCR) and after an enrichment step (enrichment PCR). Multiplex PCR detection limit was 10(4)CFU/ml, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 100% accurate. An internal amplification control (IAC) of 100 bp was used in order to avoid false negative results. This method produced results in 1 to 2 days while the conventional culture method required 5 to 6 days. Also, the culture method detection limit was 10(6) CFU/ml, diagnostic sensitivity was 53% and diagnostic specificity was 100%. In this study a Multiplex PCR method for detection of virulence genes in Shigella and EIEC was shown to be effective in terms of diagnostic sensitivity, detection limit and amount of time as compared to Shigella conventional culture.
authors.affiliation: Infection-Nutrition Section, Instituto de Investigaciones en Salud (INISA), Universidad de Costa Rica , San José , Costa Rica.
authors.forename: Kenia Barrantes
authors.initials: KB
authors.lastname: Jiménez
authors.forename: Clyde B
authors.initials: CB
authors.lastname: McCoy
authors.forename: Rosario
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Achí
keywords: PCR; Shigella; food; lettuce; rapid method
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(8):651-66
references.pmid: 10516787
references.citation: Clin Microbiol Infect. 1996 Aug;2(1):55-58
references.pmid: 11866812
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Dec;42(12):5849-53
references.pmid: 15583323
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2004 May;42(5):2031-5
references.pmid: 15131166
references.citation: J Med Microbiol. 2005 Jan;54(Pt 1):51-54
references.pmid: 15591255
references.citation: Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008 Jan;21(1):134-56
references.pmid: 18202440
references.citation: BMC Infect Dis. 2005 Feb 14;5:8
references.pmid: 15707504
references.citation: Infect Immun. 1997 Sep;65(9):3686-92
references.pmid: 9284138
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Jan;69(1):290-6
references.pmid: 12514007
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2004 May;42(5):1863-8
references.pmid: 15131141
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2005 Apr;187(8):2768-73
references.pmid: 15805523
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 May 25;83(1):39-48
references.pmid: 12672591
references.citation: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2008 Nov;103(7):731-3
references.pmid: 19057826
references.citation: Methods Mol Biol. 2002;179:235-44
references.pmid: 11692869
references.citation: J Infect. 1996 May;32(3):211-8
references.pmid: 8793710