title: Dynamics of macronutrient self-medication and illness-induced anorexia in virally infected insects.
abstract: Some animals change their feeding behaviour when infected with parasites, seeking out substances that enhance their ability to overcome infection. This 'self-medication' is typically considered to involve the consumption of toxins, minerals or secondary compounds. However, recent studies have shown that macronutrients can influence the immune response and that pathogen-challenged individuals can self-medicate by choosing a diet rich in protein and low in carbohydrates. Infected individuals might also reduce food intake when infected (i.e. illness-induced anorexia). Here, we examine macronutrient self-medication and illness-induced anorexia in caterpillars of the African armyworm (Spodoptera exempta) by asking how individuals change their feeding decisions over the time course of infection with a baculovirus. We measured self-medication behaviour across several full-sib families to evaluate the plasticity of diet choice and underlying genetic variation. Larvae restricted to diets high in protein (P) and low in carbohydrate (C) were more likely to survive a virus challenge than those restricted to diets with a low P : C ratio. When allowed free choice, virus-challenged individuals chose a higher protein diet than controls. Individuals challenged with either a lethal or sublethal dose of virus increased the P : C ratio of their chosen diets. This was mostly due to a sharp decline in carbohydrate intake, rather than an increased intake of protein, reducing overall food intake, consistent with an illness-induced anorexic response. Over time the P : C ratio of the diet decreased until it matched that of controls. Our study provides the clearest evidence yet for dietary self-medication using macronutrients and shows that the temporal dynamics of feeding behaviour depends on the severity and stage of the infection. The strikingly similar behaviour shown by different families suggests that self-medication is phenotypically plastic and not a consequence of genetically based differences in diet choice between families.
authors.affiliation: Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK.
authors.forename: Sonia
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Povey
authors.forename: Sheena C
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Cotter
authors.forename: Stephen J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Simpson
authors.forename: Kenneth
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Wilson
mesh_terms: D000824:Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; D000818:Animals; D016367:Baculoviridae / Q000502:physiology*; D004044:Dietary Proteins; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005518:Food Preferences; D054884:Host-Pathogen Interactions; D007814:Larva / Q000821:virology; D018411:Spodoptera / Q000502:physiology / Q000821:virology*; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D004044:Dietary Proteins
keywords: Lepidoptera; Spodoptera exempta; diet; geometric framework; immunity; nucleopolyhedrovirus; parasite; pathogen; resistance
references.citation: J Virol. 2001 Jan;75(2):996-1003
references.pmid: 11134313
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Nov 22;272(1579):2429-34
references.pmid: 16243690
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2014 Jan;83(1):245-55
references.pmid: 24033221
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Apr 7;273(1588):823-9
references.pmid: 16618675
references.citation: Science. 1989 Mar 31;243(4899):1728-30
references.pmid: 2648574
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 10;93(25):14304-7
references.pmid: 8962043
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2009 Jul;7(7):e1000150
references.pmid: 19597539
references.citation: Integr Comp Biol. 2009 Sep;49(3):329-37
references.pmid: 21665823
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2012 Sep;15(9):993-1000
references.pmid: 22731846
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2004 Mar;17(2):421-9
references.pmid: 15009275
references.citation: Proc Nutr Soc. 2003 May;62(2):361-70
references.pmid: 14506883
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2012 Mar;81(2):386-94
references.pmid: 21999965
references.citation: Oecologia. 2008 Mar;155(2):237-46
references.pmid: 18038154
references.citation: J Insect Physiol. 2004 Dec;50(12):1171-80
references.pmid: 15670864
references.citation: Science. 2000 Nov 10;290(5494):1166-8
references.pmid: 11073456
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2009 Mar;78(2):437-46
references.pmid: 19021780
references.citation: Brain Behav Immun. 2007 Mar;21(3):292-300
references.pmid: 17126528
references.citation: Dev Comp Immunol. 2010 Mar;34(3):264-71
references.pmid: 19835909
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1998 Aug;56(2):265-274
references.pmid: 9787017
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2010 Dec;13(12):1485-93
references.pmid: 21040353
references.citation: Am J Physiol. 1997 Nov;273(5):R1631-7
references.pmid: 9374803
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 7;270 Suppl 2:S220-2
references.pmid: 14667388
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2571-4
references.pmid: 16959651
references.citation: Primates. 2007 Jan;48(1):73-6
references.pmid: 16897194
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4796
references.pmid: 19274098