title: A hierarchical model for probabilistic independent component analysis of multi-subject fMRI studies.
abstract: An important goal in fMRI studies is to decompose the observed series of brain images to identify and characterize underlying brain functional networks. Independent component analysis (ICA) has been shown to be a powerful computational tool for this purpose. Classic ICA has been successfully applied to single-subject fMRI data. The extension of ICA to group inferences in neuroimaging studies, however, is challenging due to the unavailability of a pre-specified group design matrix. Existing group ICA methods generally concatenate observed fMRI data across subjects on the temporal domain and then decompose multi-subject data in a similar manner to single-subject ICA. The major limitation of existing methods is that they ignore between-subject variability in spatial distributions of brain functional networks in group ICA. In this article, we propose a new hierarchical probabilistic group ICA method to formally model subject-specific effects in both temporal and spatial domains when decomposing multi-subject fMRI data. The proposed method provides model-based estimation of brain functional networks at both the population and subject level. An important advantage of the hierarchical model is that it provides a formal statistical framework to investigate similarities and differences in brain functional networks across subjects, for example, subjects with mental disorders or neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's as compared to normal subjects. We develop an EM algorithm for model estimation where both the E-step and M-step have explicit forms. We compare the performance of the proposed hierarchical model with that of two popular group ICA methods via simulation studies. We illustrate our method with application to an fMRI study of Zen meditation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, U.S.A.
authors.forename: Ying
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Guo
authors.forename: Li
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Tang
mesh_terms: D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping / Q000379:methods*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D019122:Meditation; D008959:Models, Neurological; D015233:Models, Statistical; D025341:Principal Component Analysis / Q000379:methods*
keywords: EM algorithm; Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); Group inferences; Hierarchical model; Independent component analysis; Maximum likelihood estimation; Multi-subject imaging data
references.citation: Neural Comput. 1995 Nov;7(6):1129-59
references.pmid: 7584893
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
references.pmid: 11994752
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Sep 03;3(9):e3083
references.pmid: 18769538
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 1998;6(3):160-88
references.pmid: 9673671
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004 Feb;23(2):137-52
references.pmid: 14964560
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):676-82
references.pmid: 11209064
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 1996 Feb;35(2):261-77
references.pmid: 8622592
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Nov 06;6:301
references.pmid: 23133413
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2005 Mar;25(1):294-311
references.pmid: 15734364
references.citation: Biometrics. 2011 Dec;67(4):1532-42
references.pmid: 21517789
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Sep 1;42(3):1078-93
references.pmid: 18650105
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):715-23
references.pmid: 19027073
references.citation: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999 Mar-Apr;23(2):265-71
references.pmid: 10096335
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2001 Nov;14(3):140-51
references.pmid: 11559959
references.citation: IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1999;10(3):626-34
references.pmid: 18252563