title: Slipping through the cracks: rubber plantation is unsuitable breeding habitat for frogs in Xishuangbanna, China.
abstract: Conversion of tropical forests into agriculture may present a serious risk to amphibian diversity if amphibians are not able to use agricultural areas as habitat. Recently, in Xishuangbanna Prefecture, Yunnan Province - a hotspot of frog diversity within China - two-thirds of the native tropical rainforests have been converted into rubber plantation agriculture. We conducted surveys and experiments to quantify habitat use for breeding and non-breeding life history activities of the native frog species in rainforest, rubber plantation and other human impacted sites. Rubber plantation sites had the lowest species richness in our non-breeding habitat surveys and no species used rubber plantation sites as breeding habitat. The absence of breeding was likely not due to intrinsic properties of the rubber plantation pools, as our experiments indicated that rubber plantation pools were suitable for tadpole growth and development. Rather, the absence of breeding in the rubber plantation was likely due to a misalignment of breeding and non-breeding habitat preferences. Analyses of our breeding surveys showed that percent canopy cover over pools was the strongest environmental variable influencing breeding site selection, with species exhibiting preferences for pools under both high and low canopy cover. Although rubber plantation pools had high canopy cover, the only species that bred in high canopy cover sites used the rainforest for both non-breeding and breeding activities, completing their entire life cycle in the rainforest. Conversely, the species that did use the rubber plantation for non-breeding habitat preferred to breed in low canopy sites, also avoiding breeding in the rubber plantation. Rubber plantations are likely an intermediate habitat type that 'slips through the cracks' of species habitat preferences and is thus avoided for breeding. In summary, unlike the rainforests they replaced, rubber plantations alone may not be able to support frog populations.
authors.affiliation: Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanic Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Yunnan, China ; Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America ; Department of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Jocelyn E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Behm
authors.forename: Xiaodong
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Yang
authors.forename: Jin
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Chen
mesh_terms: D000383:Agriculture / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends; D000818:Animals; D001001:Anura / Q000145:classification / Q000254:growth & development*; D001947:Breeding; D002681:China; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D017753:Ecosystem; D016468:Forestry; D028482:Hevea / Q000254:growth & development*; D006801:Humans; D014329:Tropical Climate
references.citation: Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1783-6
references.pmid: 15486254
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Apr;114 Suppl 1:40-50
references.pmid: 16818245
references.citation: Science. 2000 Apr 14;288(5464):328-30
references.pmid: 10764644
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):480-6
references.pmid: 21352451
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 15;104(20):8352-6
references.pmid: 17449638
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2010 Feb;24(1):287-94
references.pmid: 19758391
references.citation: Science. 2007 Dec 14;318(5857):1775-7
references.pmid: 18079402
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2010 Jun 23;6(3):336-8
references.pmid: 20007165
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):853-8
references.pmid: 10706275
references.citation: Oecologia. 2007 Nov;154(1):219-26
references.pmid: 17665220
references.citation: Oecologia. 2007 Oct;153(4):951-8
references.pmid: 17622564
references.citation: Oecologia. 2008 Mar;155(2):377-84
references.pmid: 18049825
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2005 Mar 22;1(1):13-6
references.pmid: 17148116
references.citation: Nature. 2011 Sep 14;478(7369):378-81
references.pmid: 21918513
references.citation: Braz J Biol. 2007 Aug;67(3):403-11
references.pmid: 18094822
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Mar;22(3):627-35
references.pmid: 12627652
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2007 Jan;17(1):291-301
references.pmid: 17479852
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2004 Jul;23(7):1737-42
references.pmid: 15230326
references.citation: Oecologia. 2002 Jan;130(1):157-161
references.pmid: 28547021
references.citation: Sci China C Life Sci. 2007 Apr;50(2):265-76
references.pmid: 17447035
references.citation: Nature. 2011 Nov 16;480(7378):516-9
references.pmid: 22089134
references.citation: Oecologia. 1973 Mar;13(1):93-95
references.pmid: 28307986
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Feb 20;3(2):e1636
references.pmid: 18286193
references.citation: Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2001 Apr;40(3):399-405
references.pmid: 11443372