title: Watch me if you can: imagery ability moderates observational learning effectiveness.
abstract: Recent research has revealed similarities in brain activity during observational learning and motor execution. However, whilst action develops visual, motor and afferent representations during acquisition, action-observation has been proposed to only develop visual-spatial learning via visual representation. In addition, it has been suggested that the vividness of visual representations are determined by imagery ability. Thus, the purpose of the current investigation was to explore the possible moderating role of imagery ability in the effectiveness of observational learning. Participants (n = 40) were assessed on their imagery ability via the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire-2 (VMIQ-2) and then assigned to one of four groups; high imagery ability and observational learning (HIA-OL), low imagery ability and observational learning (LIA-OL), high imagery ability control (HIA-C) and low imagery ability control (LIA-C). Following group allocation all participants performed a pre-test consisting of five actual practice trials of a novel gymnastics routine. The HIA-OL and LIA-OL groups then participated in a 14 day observational learning intervention whilst the HIA-C and LIA-C groups acted as controls. Following this, participants performed a post test, which was identical in nature to the pre-test, before finally completing the VMIQ-2 again. Performance on both the pre-test and post test was evaluated by two qualified gymnastics judges. Results revealed that gymnastics performance increased from pre-test to post test for both the HIA-OL and LIA-OL groups. However, this effect was greater in the HIA-OL group suggesting that the relationship between observational learning and successful imitation performance is moderated by imagery ability.
authors.affiliation: School of Sport Health and Exercise Sciences, Bangor University Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.
authors.forename: Gavin
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Lawrence
authors.forename: Nichola
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Callow
authors.forename: Ross
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Roberts
keywords: action observation; form tasks; gymnastics; motor learning; skill acquisition
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2798-807
references.pmid: 22005592
references.citation: Cogn Sci. 2007 Sep 10;31(5):733-64
references.pmid: 21635316
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2011 Sep;49(11):3071-7
references.pmid: 21802436
references.citation: Vision Res. 2007 Feb;47(4):474-8
references.pmid: 17239915
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jan;208(1):11-9
references.pmid: 21046370
references.citation: J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2013 Feb;35(1):60-71
references.pmid: 23404880
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005 Apr;58(3):387-419
references.pmid: 16025755
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2002 May;144(1):127-31
references.pmid: 11976767
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 1;62(1):266-80
references.pmid: 22584231
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2006 Apr 3;168(2):190-6
references.pmid: 16313979
references.citation: Memory. 2004 Jul;12(4):479-88
references.pmid: 15487543
references.citation: J Neurol Sci. 2000 Mar 15;174(2):122-6
references.pmid: 10727697
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Mar;129(1):126-45
references.pmid: 10756490
references.citation: Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011 Sep;82(3):431-41
references.pmid: 21957701
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Jul;30(7):2157-72
references.pmid: 18819106
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2001 Jan;12(1):1-19
references.pmid: 11198101
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 1999 Oct;22(10):464-71
references.pmid: 10481194
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):240-51
references.pmid: 20673569
references.citation: J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008 Apr;30(2):200-21
references.pmid: 18490791
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Jul 15;41(4):1471-83
references.pmid: 18479943
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(1):105-12
references.pmid: 14615080
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2010 Sep;205(3):325-34
references.pmid: 20652689
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Oct 12;25(41):9339-46
references.pmid: 16221842
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 2003 Feb;94(Pt 1):29-44
references.pmid: 12648387
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2012 Sep;221(4):459-66
references.pmid: 22821082
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2001 May 25;12(7):1489-92
references.pmid: 11388435
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 Oct 1;37(4):1315-28
references.pmid: 17689268
references.citation: J Neurol Phys Ther. 2012 Dec;36(4):182-8
references.pmid: 23095902
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2010 Nov;136(6):1023-44
references.pmid: 20822209
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Apr;35(2):390-407
references.pmid: 19331496
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1991;14:361-77
references.pmid: 2031575
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(7):1260-73
references.pmid: 22494362
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2012 Jan 11;506(2):346-50
references.pmid: 22155050
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1986 Nov;14(6):469-77
references.pmid: 3796284
references.citation: Hum Mov Sci. 2013 Jun;32(3):400-11
references.pmid: 23632202
references.citation: Brain. 1997 Oct;120 ( Pt 10):1763-77
references.pmid: 9365369