title: The role of subcortical structures in recited speech: Studies in Parkinson's disease.
abstract: The role of subcortical structures in language function is complex and dependent on language task, with studies increasingly showing subcortical involvement for the production of formulaic language, including recited speech. Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD), with (n= 6) and without (n= 7) surgical treatment, deep brain stimulation (DBS), were compared to healthy adults (n= 14) to determine whether individuals with subcortical dysfunction produce more errors during a recitation speech task. Participants were asked to recite poems, prayers, and rhymes familiar to them in order to determine the effects of subcortical disease on recited speech ability. When compared with healthy controls, the DBS-OFF group produced significantly more error words, suggesting that deficits in recitation arise with severe states of subcortical dysfunction. Individuals with DBS in the ON or OFF conditions did not differ significantly during the recited speech task. Results support a model of language where large units of overlearned language are at least partially modulated by subcortical structures.
authors.affiliation: Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, 665 Broadway, New York, NY 10012, USA ; Geriatrics Division, The Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Rd., Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA.
authors.forename: Kelly A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Bridges
authors.forename: Diana
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Van Lancker Sidtis
authors.forename: John J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Sidtis
keywords: Dual-process model; Formulaic language; Parkinson's disease; Recited speech
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;75(12):1678-81
references.pmid: 15548481
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1966 Oct;29(5):467-71
references.pmid: 5926468
references.citation: Lancet Neurol. 2009 Jan;8(1):67-81
references.pmid: 19081516
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Jun;115(6):1239-48
references.pmid: 15134690
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2006 May 15;31(1):301-7
references.pmid: 16466936
references.citation: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1998 Jul-Sep;70(1-2):119-36
references.pmid: 9753592
references.citation: Neurology. 1993 Sep;43(9):1768-74
references.pmid: 8414029
references.citation: Aphasiology. 2013 Jul 1;27(7):
references.pmid: 24187417
references.citation: Brain. 2011 Oct;134(Pt 10):3083-93
references.pmid: 21948939
references.citation: Cleve Clin J Med. 2008 Mar;75 Suppl 2:S59-65
references.pmid: 18540149
references.citation: J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Jan-Feb;21(1):6-17
references.pmid: 15097290
references.citation: Clin Linguist Phon. 2009 Apr;23(4):270-84
references.pmid: 19382014
references.citation: Brain Lang. 1988 Jan;33(1):146-60
references.pmid: 3342316
references.citation: Acta Neurol Psychiatr Belg. 1967 Nov;67(11):1013-20
references.pmid: 4972539
references.citation: Confin Neurol. 1949;9(1-2):64-79
references.pmid: 18125314
references.citation: Cortex. 1982 Apr;18(1):141-52
references.pmid: 6197231
references.citation: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012 Jan;32(1):41-9
references.pmid: 21971352
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Jun;44(3):535-51
references.pmid: 11407559
references.citation: Curr Biol. 1996 Apr 1;6(4):368-71
references.pmid: 8723334
references.citation: Brain. 1965 Nov;88(4):835-40
references.pmid: 5323042
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Oct;53(5):1167-77
references.pmid: 20643796
references.citation: Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2004 Jan-Mar;39(1):1-44
references.pmid: 14660185
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1989 Jun;16(2):407-28
references.pmid: 2760133
references.citation: Neurocase. 2010 Aug;16(4):317-20
references.pmid: 20178035
references.citation: Brain Res Bull. 1998 Aug;46(6):467-74
references.pmid: 9744282