title: The impact of an interprofessional problem-based learning curriculum of clinical ethics on medical and nursing students' attitudes and ability of interprofessional collaboration: a pilot study.
abstract: Clinical ethic situations in modern multiprofessional healthcare systems may involve different healthcare professions who work together for patient care. The undergraduate interprofessional education of clinical ethics would help to incubate healthcare students' ability of interprofessional collaboration in solving ethical problems. However, the impact from an interprofessional educational model on student's attitudes and confidence of interprofessional collaboration should be carefully evaluated during the process of curricular development. This study aimed to conduct a pilot interprofessional PBL curriculum of clinical ethics and evaluate the curricular impact on interprofessional students' attitude and confidence of collaborative teamwork. Thirty-six medical and nursing students volunteered to participate in this study and were divided into three groups (medical group, nursing group, and mixed group). Tutors were recruited from the Medical School and the College of Nursing. The pilot curriculum included one lecture of clinical ethics, one PBL case study with two tutorial sessions, and one session of group discussion and feedback. A narrative story with multiple story lines and a multiperspective problem analysis tool were used in the PBL tutorials. The students' self-evaluation of learning questionnaire was used to evaluate students' learning of clinical ethics and interprofessional collaborative skills and attitude. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was measured by Cronbach α, and the criterion-related validity of the questionnaire was evaluated through associations between the dimension scores with the student group by one-way analysis of variance test (ANOVA) test and Tukey-Kramer honestly significant difference (HSD) comparison. There was significant difference among different groups in students' ability and attitudes about "interprofessional communication and collaboration" (p = 0.0184). The scores in the mixed group (37.58 ± 3.26) were higher than the medical group (32.10 ± 4.98). In conclusion, our model for the interprofessional PBL curriculum of clinical ethics is practicable and will produce positive impacts on students' attitudes and confidence of interprofessional collaboration.
authors.affiliation: Division of General Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
authors.forename: Yu-Chih
authors.initials: YC
authors.lastname: Lin
authors.forename: Te-Fu
authors.initials: TF
authors.lastname: Chan
authors.forename: Chung-Sheng
authors.initials: CS
authors.lastname: Lai
authors.forename: Chi-Chun
authors.initials: CC
authors.lastname: Chin
authors.forename: Fan-Hao
authors.initials: FH
authors.lastname: Chou
authors.forename: Hui-Ju
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Lin
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003479:Curriculum; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D010865:Pilot Projects; D013337:Students, Medical / Q000523:psychology*; D013338:Students, Nursing / Q000523:psychology*
keywords: Clinical ethics; Clinical ethics education; Interprofessional education; Narrative story; Problem-based learning
references.citation: Med Educ. 2001 Sep;35(9):867-75
references.pmid: 11555225
references.citation: BMC Med Educ. 2009 Sep 13;9:60
references.pmid: 19747400
references.citation: Gastroenterol Nurs. 2006 Mar-Apr;29(2):182-3
references.pmid: 16609314
references.citation: Arch Surg. 2010 Jun;145(6):582-8
references.pmid: 20566980
references.citation: J Interprof Care. 2005 Jun;19(3):269-79
references.pmid: 16029980
references.citation: J Interprof Care. 2003 May;17(2):161-72
references.pmid: 12745298
references.citation: Med Teach. 2007 Oct;29(8):735-51
references.pmid: 18236271
references.citation: Med Teach. 2004 Nov;26(7):604-9
references.pmid: 15763849
references.citation: Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Apr;28(3):327-36
references.pmid: 17881094
references.citation: Med Educ. 1999 Nov;33(11):818-22
references.pmid: 10583789
references.citation: J Allied Health. 2010 Fall;39 Suppl 1:196-7
references.pmid: 21174039
references.citation: Health Soc Care Community. 2000 Jul;8(4):269-276
references.pmid: 11560697
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Nov;45(11):1667-81
references.pmid: 18423644
references.citation: J Interprof Care. 2005 May;19 Suppl 1:21-38
references.pmid: 16096143
references.citation: Med Educ. 2005 Apr;39(4):394-401
references.pmid: 15813762
references.citation: Med Teach. 2009 Jan;31(1):30-8
references.pmid: 18825572
references.citation: BMJ. 1997 Jan 25;314(7076):306
references.pmid: 9022519
references.citation: Med Educ. 2007 Sep;41(9):892-6
references.pmid: 17696982
references.citation: J Interprof Care. 2007 Dec;21(6):588-9
references.pmid: 18038291
references.citation: Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 1986 Summer;6(4):3-16
references.pmid: 3653710