title: Whose mind matters more--the agent or the artist? An investigation of ethical and aesthetic evaluations.
abstract: Theory of mind, the capacity for reasoning about mental states such as beliefs and intentions, represents a critical input to ethical and aesthetic evaluations. Did the agent cause harm on purpose? Were those brushstrokes intentional? The current study investigates theory of mind for moral and artistic judgments within the same paradigm. In particular, we target the role of intent for two kinds of judgments: "objective" judgments of quality and "subjective" judgments of preference or liking. First, we show that intent matters more for objective versus subjective judgments in the case of ethics and aesthetics. Second, we show that, overall, intent matters more for ethical versus aesthetic evaluations. These findings suggest that an "objective-subjective" dimension describes judgments across both domains, and that observers assign more weight to the mind of the moral agent than the mind of the artist when making the relevant evaluations.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States of America.
authors.forename: Angelina
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hawley-Dolan
authors.forename: Liane
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Young
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D004954:Esthetics; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D010151:Paintings / Q000523:psychology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 2;110(14):5648-53
references.pmid: 23479657
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Aug;108(2):353-80
references.pmid: 18439575
references.citation: Neuron. 2004 Oct 14;44(2):389-400
references.pmid: 15473975
references.citation: Soc Neurosci. 2012;7(1):1-10
references.pmid: 21590587
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2006 Aug;17(8):692-9
references.pmid: 16913952
references.citation: Cognition. 2011 Aug;120(2):202-14
references.pmid: 21601839
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2003 May;14(3):267-72
references.pmid: 12741752
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2012 Dec;108(11):3068-72
references.pmid: 22956794
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2001 Oct;108(4):814-34
references.pmid: 11699120
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Aug;33(4):315-29; discussion 329-65
references.pmid: 20964912
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 15;104(20):8235-40
references.pmid: 17485679
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 2004 Nov;95(Pt 4):489-508
references.pmid: 15527534
references.citation: Cognition. 1996 Jul;60(1):1-29
references.pmid: 8766388
references.citation: Nebr Symp Motiv. 1977;25:77-116
references.pmid: 753994
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 May;18(5):803-17
references.pmid: 16768379
references.citation: Cognition. 2003 Dec;90(2):B23-32
references.pmid: 14599758
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Apr;11(4):143-52
references.pmid: 17329147
references.citation: New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2011 Summer;2011(132):79-89
references.pmid: 21671343
references.citation: Cognition. 1998 May;66(2):B35-B47
references.pmid: 9677767
references.citation: Cognition. 2000 Aug 14;76(2):91-103
references.pmid: 10856739
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2011 Apr;22(4):435-41
references.pmid: 21372327
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Nov;138(4):535-45
references.pmid: 19883135
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 13;107(15):6753-8
references.pmid: 20351278
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Dec;3(12):461-468
references.pmid: 10562725
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1339-66
references.pmid: 17692306
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2006 Dec;17(12):1082-9
references.pmid: 17201791
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jul;21(7):1396-405
references.pmid: 18823250
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 May 1;40(4):1912-20
references.pmid: 18342544
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jan;22(1):209-20
references.pmid: 21616985
references.citation: J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013 May 1;49(3):559-565
references.pmid: 23729845
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 May;141(2):227-32
references.pmid: 21823807
references.citation: Soc Neurosci. 2006;1(3-4):245-58
references.pmid: 18633791
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Jan;38(1):52-62
references.pmid: 22214885