title: Are we afraid of different categories of stimuli in identical ways? Evidence from skin conductance responses.
abstract: Studies have shown that emotional pictures attract more attention than neutral pictures, and pictures of living stimuli have similar advantage in driving attention (vs. nonliving). However, factors of emotion, category and picture context are usually mixed so that whether living and nonliving categories elicit different skin conductance (SC) responses, in both conscious and unconscious conditions, remains to be clarified. In this study, participants were presented with negative and neutral pictures denoting different living and nonliving concepts in conscious (Experiments 1 and 2) and unconscious conditions (40ms, Experiment 3) when their SC responses were measured. The picture context was manipulated in Experiments 2 and 3 as half including human-related information. In three experiments, the emotional levels of different categories were matched in different and identical cohorts of participants. The results showed that living pictures in a negative, high-arousing dimension elicited stronger SC responses than nonliving pictures. When nonhuman animals and inanimate objects were compared, the increased SC responses to animals was obtained only for negative pictures without human contexts in the conscious condition, but regardless of human context in the unconscious condition. These results suggested that contextual information and level of conscious awareness are important to modulate the animate advantage in emotional processing.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
authors.forename: Tengteng
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Tan
authors.forename: Han
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Yingying
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Jiongjiong
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Yang
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001143:Arousal / Q000502:physiology; D001364:Awareness; D004644:Emotions / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D005712:Galvanic Skin Response; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 1997 May;35(5):415-22
references.pmid: 9149450
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;101(4):1749-54
references.pmid: 19144740
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2012 Sep;50(11):2566-72
references.pmid: 22820342
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Apr;16(2):123-44
references.pmid: 12668221
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2003 Nov 12;23(32):10274-82
references.pmid: 14614086
references.citation: Prog Brain Res. 2006;155:37-48
references.pmid: 17027378
references.citation: Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;21(1):43-50
references.pmid: 18281840
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 May;139(2):222-46
references.pmid: 20438250
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):483-522
references.pmid: 11488376
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Nov 15;52(10):927-37
references.pmid: 12437934
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Mar;12(1):115-39
references.pmid: 21964552
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2013 Jan;50(1):15-22
references.pmid: 23094650
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Oct 20;48(2):175-87
references.pmid: 16242399
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Dec;16(6):723-7
references.pmid: 17084617
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 16;104(42):16396-7
references.pmid: 17925439
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Jun;34(3):660-75
references.pmid: 18505330
references.citation: Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):300-19
references.pmid: 12934688
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Dec;16(10):1818-29
references.pmid: 15701231
references.citation: Emotion. 2012 Jun;12(3):540-51
references.pmid: 22251055
references.citation: J Affect Disord. 2000 Dec;61(3):137-59
references.pmid: 11163418
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2012 Aug;49(8):1017-34
references.pmid: 22680988
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):466-78
references.pmid: 11561921
references.citation: Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Mar;79(3):341-6
references.pmid: 21145923
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Aug;59(8):1484-504
references.pmid: 16846972
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 1986 Aug;95(3):195-207
references.pmid: 3745640
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Jul;55(3):1007-26
references.pmid: 12188507
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 16;104(42):16598-603
references.pmid: 17909181
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 1989;27(3):269-78
references.pmid: 2730508
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2007 Sep;44(5):680-6
references.pmid: 17584187
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 1981;19(2):109-15
references.pmid: 7271686
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2007 Mar;74(3):328-36
references.pmid: 17049710
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Mar;7(3):242-9
references.pmid: 16495945
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2012 Jan;49(1):11-6
references.pmid: 22092301
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2000 Apr 15;20(8):3033-40
references.pmid: 10751455
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2009 Jul;46(4):731-8
references.pmid: 19386053
references.citation: Neuroscientist. 2002 Apr;8(2):132-42
references.pmid: 11954558
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 1993 Feb;102(1):121-32
references.pmid: 8436688
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1993 May;30(3):261-73
references.pmid: 8497555
references.citation: Emotion. 2005 Sep;5(3):360-4
references.pmid: 16187872
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Mar 15;53(6):494-501
references.pmid: 12644354
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:287-313
references.pmid: 21838544
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Aug;5(8):617-29
references.pmid: 15263892
references.citation: Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 May;80(2):150-6
references.pmid: 21392544
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1999 Jul 1;19(13):5473-81
references.pmid: 10377356
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2007 Jun;18(6):469-74
references.pmid: 17576256
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Nov;7(11):498-504
references.pmid: 14585447
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2004 May;41(3):441-9
references.pmid: 15102130
references.citation: Emotion. 2004 Sep;4(3):233-50
references.pmid: 15456393
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Dec;1000:337-47
references.pmid: 14766647
references.citation: Int J Psychophysiol. 1997 Feb;25(2):97-109
references.pmid: 9101335
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1998 Nov;124(3):372-422
references.pmid: 9849112
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Aug;30(4):760-77
references.pmid: 15301623
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1996 Mar;33(2):103-11
references.pmid: 8851238
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2001 May;38(3):474-8
references.pmid: 11352135
references.citation: Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;22(1):96-110
references.pmid: 19122541
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2006 Aug;115(3):580-9
references.pmid: 16866598
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jun;10(6):271-7
references.pmid: 16697695
references.citation: Emotion. 2007 Nov;7(4):691-6
references.pmid: 18039035
references.citation: Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):276-98
references.pmid: 12934687