title: Validating posttransplant hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence data in the United Network for Organ Sharing database.
abstract: The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)/United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database is the most comprehensive collection of liver transplantation data, but the quality of these data with respect to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence has not been well assessed. In this study, we compared observed HCC recurrence rates in the UNOS database to expected rates calculated with a hierarchical model for recurrence adjusted for recipient and tumor characteristics. We used the UNOS Standard Transplant Analysis and Research data set for adult transplant patients with an initial exception for an HCC diagnosis granted between January 1, 2006 and September 30, 2010 who underwent transplantation within the same time window. We developed a risk-adjusted Poisson model with patients as the unit of analysis, random effects for transplant centers, and years of follow-up as an offset to predict expected recurrences for each center. To further investigate the possibility of underreporting, we imputed expected recurrences for non-HCC deaths. In all, 5034 HCC liver transplant recipients were identified, and 6.8% experienced recurrence at a median of 1 year after transplantation. The covariate-adjusted shrinkage estimates of the observed/expected HCC recurrence ratios by transplant center ranged from 0.6 to 1.76 (median = 0.97). The 95% confidence intervals for the shrinkage ratios included unity for every center, and this indicated that none could be unambiguously identified as having lower or higher than expected HCC recurrence rates. Imputing outcomes for patients potentially experiencing unreported recurrence changed the center-specific shrinkage ratios to 0.72 to 1.39 (median = 0.98), with no centers having a shrinkage ratio significantly different from 1. The observed HCC recurrence rate was not significantly lower than the expected rate at any center, and this suggests that no systematic underreporting has occurred. This study validates the OPTN HCC recurrence data and supports their potential for further analysis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
authors.forename: Mariya L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Samoylova
authors.forename: Jennifer L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Dodge
authors.forename: Eric
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Vittinghoff
authors.forename: Francis Y
authors.initials: FY
authors.lastname: Yao
authors.forename: John Paul
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Roberts
mesh_terms: D006528:Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000601:surgery*; D016208:Databases, Factual; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D008113:Liver Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000601:surgery*; D016031:Liver Transplantation / Q000009:adverse effects*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D009364:Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D013997:Time Factors; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology
references.citation: Am J Transplant. 2010 Jul;10(7):1621-33
references.pmid: 20199501
references.citation: Am J Transplant. 2006 Apr;6(4):783-90
references.pmid: 16539636
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2010 Feb;100(2):264-9
references.pmid: 20019317
references.citation: Med Care. 2007 Jun;45(6):529-36
references.pmid: 17515780
references.citation: Hepatology. 2009 Mar;49(3):832-8
references.pmid: 19152426
references.citation: Liver Transpl. 2011 Jul;17(7):789-97
references.pmid: 21360649
references.citation: Am J Transplant. 2008 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):958-76
references.pmid: 18336699
references.citation: Gastroenterology. 2008 May;134(5):1342-51
references.pmid: 18471511
references.citation: J Hepatol. 2011 Oct;55(4):814-9
references.pmid: 21334400
references.citation: Liver Transpl. 2013 Jun;19(6):634-45
references.pmid: 23536495
references.citation: Radiology. 2013 Feb;266(2):376-82
references.pmid: 23362092