Who cries wolf, and when? Manipulation of perceived threats to preserve rank in cooperative groups.
People perform greater within-group cooperation when their groups face external threats, such as hostile outgroups or natural disasters. Researchers and social commentators suggest that high-ranking group members manipulate this "threat-dependent" cooperation by exaggerating threats in order to promote cooperation and suppress competition for their position. However, little systematic research tests this claim or possible situational moderators. In three studies, we use a cooperative group game to show that participants pay to increase others' perceptions of group threats, and spend more on manipulation when holding privileged positions. This manipulation cost-effectively elicits cooperation and sustains privilege, and is fostered by competition over position, not only position per se. Less cooperative people do more manipulation than more cooperative people do. Furthermore, these effects generalize to broader definitions of privilege. Conceptually, these results offer new insights into an understudied dimension of group behavior. Methodologically, the research extends cooperative group games to allow for analyzing more complex group dynamics.
Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Pat
P
Barclay
Stephen
S
Benard
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D005260:Female; D005717:Games, Experimental; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010465:Perception; D012044:Regression Analysis; D055815:Young Adult