A hypothesis to explain childhood cancers near nuclear power plants.
Over 60 epidemiological studies world-wide have examined cancer incidences in children near nuclear power plants (NPPs): most of them indicate leukemia increases. These include the 2008 KiKK study commissioned by the German Government which found relative risks (RR) of 1.6 in total cancers and 2.2 in leukemias among infants living within 5 km of all German NPPs. The KiKK study has retriggered the debate as to the cause(s) of these increased cancers. A suggested hypothesis is that the increased cancers arise from radiation exposures to pregnant women near NPPs. However any theory has to account for the >10,000 fold discrepancy between official dose estimates from NPP emissions and observed increased risks. An explanation may be that doses from spikes in NPP radionuclide emissions are significantly larger than those estimated by official models which are diluted through the use of annual averages. In addition, risks to embryos/fetuses are greater than those to adults and haematopoietic tissues appear more radiosensitive in embryos/fetuses than in newborn babies. The product of possible increased doses and possible increased risks per dose may provide an explanation.
115 Riversdale Road, London N5 2SU, United Kingdom. Electronic address: ianfairlie@gmail.com.
Ian
I
Fairlie
D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000209:etiology*; D055848:Nuclear Power Plants; D011247:Pregnancy
Cancer; Leukemia; Nuclear power stations; Radiation; Radioactivity; Relative risk