Authenticity and psychiatric disorder: does autonomy of personal preferences matter?
In healthcare ethics there is a discussion regarding whether autonomy of personal preferences, what sometimes is referred to as authenticity, is necessary for autonomous decision-making. It has been argued that patients' decisions that lack sufficient authenticity could be deemed as non-autonomous and be justifiably overruled by healthcare staff. The present paper discusses this issue in relation certain psychiatric disorders. It takes its starting point in recent qualitative studies of the experiences and thoughts of patients' with anorexia nervosa where issues related to authenticity seem particularly relevant. The paper examines different interpretations of authenticity relevant for autonomy and concludes that the concept, as it has been elaborated in recent debate, is highly problematic to use as a criterion for autonomous decision-making in healthcare.
Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 17A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden, manne.sjostrand@ki.se.
Manne
M
Sjöstrand
Niklas
N
Juth
D003192:Compulsive Behavior / Q000523:psychology; D003657:Decision Making / Q000941:ethics*; D026689:Ethical Analysis; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000523:psychology* / Q000628:therapy*; D009014:Morals; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010686:Philosophy, Medical; D016728:Self-Injurious Behavior / Q000523:psychology