Developing future surgical workforce structures: a review of post-training non-Consultant grade specialist roles and the results of a national trainee survey from the Association of Surgeons in Training.
The optimal workforce model for surgery has been much debated historically; in particular, whether there should be a recognised role for those successfully completing training employed as non-Consultant grade specialists. This role has been termed the 'sub-consultant' grade. This paper discusses historical and future career structures in surgery, draws international comparisons, and presents the results of a national trainee survey examining the post-Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT) non-consultant specialist grade. Junior doctors in surgical training (i.e. pre-CCT) were invited to participate in an electronic, 38-item, self-administered national training survey. Of 1710 questionnaires submitted, 1365 were appropriately completed and included in the analysis. Regarding the question 'Do you feel that there is a role in the surgical workforce for a post-CCT non-consultant specialist ("sub-consultant") grade in surgery?', 56.0% felt there was no role, 31.1% felt there was a role and 12.8% were uncertain. Only 12.6% of respondents would consider applying for such a post, while 72.4% would not and 15.0% were uncertain. Paediatric (23.3%), general (15.7%) and neurosurgery (11.6%) were the specialties with the highest proportions of trainees prepared to consider applying for such a role. For both questions, there was a significant gender difference in responses (p < 0.0001, Chi-square test) with female trainees more likely to consider applying. Overall 50.8% of respondents felt that the introduction of a post-CCT non-consultant specialist grade would impact positively upon service provision, however, only 21.6% felt it would have a positive impact on patient care, 13.9% a positive impact on surgical training, 11.1% a positive impact on the surgical profession and just 7.9% a positive impact on their surgical career. This survey indicates that the introduction of a 'sub-consultant' grade for surgeons who have completed training would be unpopular, with the majority believing it would be to the detriment of both patient care and surgical training. Changes to surgical career structures must be made in the interests of patient safety and quality, and on this basis ASiT supports the continued provision of primarily Consultant-delivered care.
Association of Surgeons in Training, 35-43 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, United Kingdom(a).
J
J
Shalhoub
C E B
CE
Giddings
H J M
HJ
Ferguson
S T
ST
Hornby
G
G
Khera
J E F
JE
Fitzgerald
D005260:Female; D013502:General Surgery / Q000193:education* / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D013038:Specialization; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D006113:United Kingdom; D000078329:Workforce
Career; Consultant; Education; Surgery; Training; Workforce