Decision deadlines and uncertainty monitoring: the effect of time constraints on uncertainty and perceptual responses.
The behavioral uncertainty response has grounded the study of animal metacognition and influenced the study of human psychophysics. However, the interpretation of this response is debated--especially whether it is a behavioral index of metacognition. The authors advanced this interpretation using the dissociative technique of response deadlines. Uncertainty responding, if it is higher level or metacognitive, should depend on a slower, more controlled decisional process and be more vulnerable to time constraints. Humans performed sparse-uncertain-dense or sparse-middle-dense discriminations in which, respectively, they could decline difficult trials or positively identify middle stimuli. Uncertainty responses were sharply and selectively reduced under a decision deadline, as compared to primary perceptual responses (i.e., "sparse," "middle," and "dense" responses). This dissociation suggests that the uncertainty response does reflect a higher-level, decisional response. It grants the uncertainty response a distinctive psychological role in its task and encourages an interpretation of this response as an elemental behavioral index of uncertainty that deserves continuing research.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA, azakrzew@buffalo.edu.
Alexandria C
AC
Zakrzewski
Mariana V C
MV
Coutinho
Joseph
J
Boomer
Barbara A
BA
Church
J David
JD
Smith
D000328:Adult; D003657:Decision Making / Q000502:physiology*; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D013997:Time Factors; D035501:Uncertainty; D055815:Young Adult