Methods for identifying translational researchers.
There is currently no generally accepted method for identifying the community of translational researchers when evaluating Clinical and Translational Science Centers. We use data from the multiyear evaluation of the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) to investigate the complexities of reliably identifying translational researchers. We use three methods to identify translational researchers: (1) participating in CCTS services and programs; (2) self-identifying as a translational researcher; and (3) engaging in activities that are characteristic of translational science. We find little overlap of these differently defined research groups. We conclude with a discussion of how the findings suggest challenges for evaluating translational science programs and the need for better definition, communication, and demonstration of translational science for scientists and evaluators.
University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA.
Mary K
MK
Feeney
Timothy
T
Johnson
Eric W
EW
Welch
D019985:Benchmarking / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D002641:Chicago; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D009316:National Institutes of Health (U.S.); D015397:Program Evaluation / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D012108:Research Personnel / Q000145:classification* / Q000592:standards; D012109:Research Support as Topic; D057566:Self Report; D057170:Translational Research, Biomedical / Q000145:classification* / Q000379:methods; D014481:United States; D000078329:Workforce
CTSA; NIH; evaluation; surveys; translational