Mechanism of bystander-blaming: defensive attribution, counterfactual thinking, and gender.
Contemporary victimology recognizes that an understanding of the mechanism of blaming requires a comprehensive approach that includes the victim, the offender, and the bystander. However, most of the existing research on blaming focuses on the victim and the offender, ignoring the issue of bystander-blaming. This study highlights the bystander and investigates bystander-blaming by exploring some theoretical explanations, including counterfactual thinking, defensive attribution, and gender differences. The study included 363 young male and female participants, who read vignettes describing the behavior of the victim and the bystander in a rape scenario and answered questions regarding bystander-blaming. The results show that both counterfactual thinking and defensive attribution play a role in bystander-blaming. This article addresses the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.
Ariel University, Israel Zefat Academic College, Israel University of Haifa, Israel Inna.levy1@gmail.com.
Inna
I
Levy
Ariel University, Israel Bar-Ilan University, Israel.
Sarah
S
Ben-David
D019548:Crime Victims / Q000523:psychology*; D057237:Criminals / Q000523:psychology*; D003674:Defense Mechanisms; D005260:Female; D005783:Gender Identity; D006167:Guilt; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D007557:Israel; D008297:Male; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011902:Rape / Q000523:psychology*; D012941:Social Responsibility; D013850:Thinking; D055815:Young Adult
blaming; bystander; counterfactual thinking; defensive attribution theory; gender differences