[Assessment comparison between area sampling and personal sampling noise measurement in new thermal power plant].
OBJECTIVE
To compare the results of noise hazard evaluations based on area sampling and personal sampling in a new thermal power plant and to analyze the similarities and differences between the two measurement methods.


METHODS
According to Measurement of Physical agents in Workplace Part 8: Noise(GBZff 189.8-2007), area sampling was performed at various operating points for noise measurement, and meanwhile the workers under different types of work wore noise dosimeters for personal noise exposure measurement. The two measurement methods were used to evaluate the level of noise hazards in the enterprise according to the corresponding occupational health standards, and the evaluation results were compared.


RESULTS
Area sampling was performed at 99 operating points, the mean noise level was 88.9 ± 11.1 dB (A)(range, 51.3-107.0 dB (A)), with an over-standard rate of 75.8%. Personal sampling was performed (73 person times),and the mean noise level was 79.3 ± 6.3 dB (A), with an over-standard rate of 6.6% ( 16/241 ). There was a statistically significant difference in the over-standard rate between the evaluation results of the two measurement methods ( x2=53.869, ?<0.001 ).


CONCLUSIONS
Because of the characteristics of the work in new thermal power plants, the noise hazard evaluation based on area sampling cannot be used instead of personal noise exposure measurement among workers. Personal sampling should be used in the noise measurement in new thermal power plant.
Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Hua
H
Zhang
Qing-song
QS
Chen
Nan
N
Li
Yan
Y
Hua
Lin
L
Zeng
Guo-yang
GY
Xu
Li-yuan
LY
Tao
Yi-ming
YM
Zhao
D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D009623:Noise, Occupational; D011210:Power Plants