title: Community health workers and health care delivery: evaluation of a women's reproductive health care project in a developing country.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  As part of the mid-term evaluation of a Women's Health Care Project, a study was conducted to compare the utilization of maternal and neonatal health (MNH) services in two areas with different levels of service in Punjab, Pakistan.
  
  
  METHODS
  A cross-sectional survey was conducted to interview Married Women of Reproductive Age (MWRA). Information was collected on MWRA knowledge regarding danger signs during pregnancy, delivery, postnatal periods, and MNH care seeking behavior. After comparing MNH service utilization, the two areas were compared using a logistic regression model, to identify the association of different factors with the intervention after controlling for socio-demographic, economic factors and distance of the MWRA residence to a health care facility.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The demographic characteristics of women in the two areas were similar, although socioeconomic status as indicated by level of education and better household amenities, was higher in the intervention area. Consequently, on univariate analysis, utilization of MNH services: antenatal care, TT vaccination, institutional delivery and use of modern contraceptives were higher in the intervention than control area. Nonetheless, multivariable analysis controlling for confounders such as socioeconomic status revealed that utilization of antenatal care services at health centers and TT vaccination during pregnancy are significantly associated with the intervention.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our findings suggest positive changes in health care seeking behavior of women and families with respect to MNH. Some aspects of care still require attention, such as knowledge about danger signs and neonatal care, especially umbilical cord care. Despite overall success achieved so far in response to the Millennium Development Goals, over the past two decades decreases in maternal mortality are far from the 2015 target. This report identifies some of the key factors to improving MNH and serves as an interim measure of a national and global challenge that remains a work in progress.
authors.affiliation: College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
authors.forename: Abdul
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Wajid
authors.forename: Franklin
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: White
authors.forename: Mehtab S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Karim
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003150:Community Health Workers / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D003906:Developing Countries; D005260:Female; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D016015:Logistic Models; D010154:Pakistan; D011247:Pregnancy; D015397:Program Evaluation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D034121:Reproductive Health Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014932:Women's Health Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*