title: A qualitative study of the perceived effects of blue lights in washrooms on people who use injection drugs.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Blue lights are sometimes placed in public washrooms to discourage injection drug use. Their effectiveness has been questioned and concerns raised that they are harmful but formal research on the issue is limited to a single study. We gathered perceptions of people who use injection drugs on the effects of blue lights with the aim of informing harm reduction practice.
  
  
  METHODS
  We interviewed 18 people in two Canadian cities who currently or previously used injection drugs to better understand their perceptions of the rationale for and consequences of blue lights in public washrooms.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Participants described a preference for private places to use injection drugs, but explained that the need for an immediate solution would often override other considerations. While public washrooms were in many cases not preferred, their accessibility and relative privacy appear to make them reasonable compromises in situations involving urgent injecting. Participants understood the aim of blue lights to be to deter drug use. The majority had attempted to inject in a blue-lit washroom. While there was general agreement that blue lights do make injecting more difficult, a small number of participants were entirely undeterred by them, and half would use a blue-lit washroom if they needed somewhere to inject urgently. Participants perceived that, by making veins less visible, blue lights make injecting more dangerous. By dispersing public injection drug use to places where it is more visible, they also make it more stigmatizing. Despite recognizing these harms, more than half of the participants were not opposed to the continued use of blue lights.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Blue lights are unlikely to deter injection drugs use in public washrooms, and may increase drug use-related harms. Despite recognizing these negative effects, people who use injection drugs may be reluctant to advocate against their use. We attempt to reconcile this apparent contradiction by interpreting blue lights as a form of symbolic violence and suggest a parallel with other emancipatory movements for inspiration in advocating against this and other oppressive interventions.
authors.affiliation: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. alexis.crabtree@alumni.ubc.ca.
authors.forename: Alexis
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Crabtree
authors.forename: Gareth
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Mercer
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Horan
authors.forename: Shannon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Grant
authors.forename: Tracy
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Tan
authors.forename: Jane A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Buxton
mesh_terms: D001294:Attitude to Health; D001955:British Columbia; D003116:Color; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008029:Lighting; D008297:Male; D010465:Perception; D018907:Privacy; D011633:Public Facilities; D012752:Shame; D015819:Substance Abuse, Intravenous / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000523:psychology*