title: Developing a semantically rich ontology for the biobank-administration domain.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Biobanks are a critical resource for translational science. Recently, semantic web technologies such as ontologies have been found useful in retrieving research data from biobanks. However, recent research has also shown that there is a lack of data about the administrative aspects of biobanks. These data would be helpful to answer research-relevant questions such as what is the scope of specimens collected in a biobank, what is the curation status of the specimens, and what is the contact information for curators of biobanks. Our use cases include giving researchers the ability to retrieve key administrative data (e.g. contact information, contact's affiliation, etc.) about the biobanks where specific specimens of interest are stored. Thus, our goal is to provide an ontology that represents the administrative entities in biobanking and their relations. We base our ontology development on a set of 53 data attributes called MIABIS, which were in part the result of semantic integration efforts of the European Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure (BBMRI). The previous work on MIABIS provided the domain analysis for our ontology. We report on a test of our ontology against competency questions that we derived from the initial BBMRI use cases. Future work includes additional ontology development to answer additional competency questions from these use cases.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We created an open-source ontology of biobank administration called Ontologized MIABIS (OMIABIS) coded in OWL 2.0 and developed according to the principles of the OBO Foundry. It re-uses pre-existing ontologies when possible in cooperation with developers of other ontologies in related domains, such as the Ontology of Biomedical Investigation. OMIABIS provides a formalized representation of biobanks and their administration. Using the ontology and a set of Description Logic queries derived from the competency questions that we identified, we were able to retrieve test data with perfect accuracy. In addition, we began development of a mapping from the ontology to pre-existing biobank data structures commonly used in the U.S.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In conclusion, we created OMIABIS, an ontology of biobank administration. We found that basing its development on pre-existing resources to meet the BBMRI use cases resulted in a biobanking ontology that is re-useable in environments other than BBMRI. Our ontology retrieved all true positives and no false positives when queried according to the competency questions we derived from the BBMRI use cases. Mapping OMIABIS to a data structure used for biospecimen collections in a medical center in Little Rock, AR showed adequate coverage of our ontology.
authors.affiliation: Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. mbrochhausen@uams.edu.
authors.forename: Mathias
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Brochhausen
authors.forename: Martin N
authors.initials: MN
authors.lastname: Fransson
authors.forename: Nitin V
authors.initials: NV
authors.lastname: Kanaskar
authors.forename: Mikael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Eriksson
authors.forename: Roxana
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Merino-Martinez
authors.forename: Roger A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Hall
authors.forename: Loreana
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Norlin
authors.forename: Sanela
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kjellqvist
authors.forename: Maria
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hortlund
authors.forename: Umit
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Topaloglu
authors.forename: William R
authors.initials: WR
authors.lastname: Hogan
authors.forename: Jan-Eric
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Litton