title: Topographic scale-range synergy at the functional bone/implant interface.
abstract: We sought to explore the biological mechanisms by which endosseous implant surface topography contributes to bone anchorage. To address this experimentally, we implanted five groups of custom-made commercially pure titanium implants of varying surface topographical complexity in rat femora for 9 days; subjected them to mechanical testing; and then examined the interfacial bone matrix by electron microscopy. The five implant surfaces were prepared by combinations of dual acid etching and grit blasting the titanium substrates and, in some cases, modifying the created surfaces with the deposition of nanocrystals of calcium phosphate, which resulted in 10 samples per group. In parallel, we cultured rat bone marrow cells on surrogate implants constructed from polymer resin coated with the same calcium phosphate nanocrystals, and monitored the deposition of bone sialoprotein by transmission electron immunohisto-micrography. We found that implant samples modified with sub-micron scale crystals were bone-bonding, as described by the interdigitation of a mineralized cement line matrix with the underlying implant surface. The in vitro assay showed that bone sialoprotein could be deposited in the interstices between, and undercuts below, the nanocrystals. In addition, when mineralized, the cement line matrix globules occupied micron-sized pits in the implant surfaces, and in part obliterated them, creating an additional form of anchorage. Our results also showed that collagen, elaborated by the osteogenic cells, wrapped around the coarse-micron features, and became mineralized in the normal course of bone formation. This provided a mechanism by which coarse-micron implant features contributed to a functional interface, which we have previously described, that is capable of resisting the mechanical loading that increases as peri-implant bone matures. Thus, our findings provide mechanistic explanations for the biologically-relevant criteria that can be employed to assess the importance of implant surface topography at different scale-ranges.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, 164 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G9, Canada; Dental Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, 124 Edward Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1G6, Canada. Electronic address: davies@ecf.utoronto.ca.
authors.forename: John E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Davies
authors.forename: Vanessa C
authors.initials: VC
authors.lastname: Mendes
authors.forename: James C H
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Ko
authors.forename: Elnaz
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Ajami
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001842:Bone and Bones; D008297:Male; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D019736:Prostheses and Implants; D051381:Rats; D017208:Rats, Wistar
keywords: Bone anchorage; Bone implant; Bone-bonding; Surface topography; Three scale ranges; True and functional interfaces