title: Changes in the abundance of grassland species in monocultures versus mixtures and their relation to biodiversity effects.
abstract: Numerous studies have reported positive effects of species richness on plant community productivity. Such biodiversity effects are usually quantified by comparing the performance of plant mixtures with reference monocultures. However, several mechanisms, such as the lack of resource complementarity and facilitation or the accumulation of detrimental agents, suggest that monocultures are more likely than mixtures to deteriorate over time. Increasing biodiversity effects over time could therefore result from declining monocultures instead of reflecting increases in the functioning of mixtures. Commonly, the latter is assumed when positive trends in biodiversity effects occur. Here, we analysed the performance of 60 grassland species growing in monocultures and mixtures over 9 years in a biodiversity experiment to clarify whether their temporal biomass dynamics differed and whether a potential decline of monocultures contributed significantly to the positive net biodiversity effect observed. Surprisingly, individual species' populations produced, on average, significantly more biomass per unit area when growing in monoculture than when growing in mixture. Over time, productivity of species decreased at a rate that was, on average, slightly more negative in monocultures than in mixtures. The mean net biodiversity effect across all mixtures was continuously positive and ranged between 64-217 g per m(2). Short-term increases in the mean net biodiversity effect were only partly due to deteriorating monocultures and were strongly affected by particular species gaining dominance in mixtures in the respective years. We conclude that our species performed, on average, comparably in monocultures and mixtures; monoculture populations being slightly more productive than mixture populations but this trend decreased over time. This suggested that negative feedbacks had not yet affected monocultures strongly but could potentially become more evident in the future. Positive biodiversity effects on aboveground productivity were heavily driven by a small, but changing, set of species that behaved differently from the average species.
authors.affiliation: UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Conservation Biology, Leipzig, Germany.
authors.forename: Elisabeth
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Marquard
authors.forename: Bernhard
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Schmid
authors.forename: Christiane
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Roscher
authors.forename: Enrica
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: De Luca
authors.forename: Karin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Nadrowski
authors.forename: Wolfgang W
authors.initials: WW
authors.lastname: Weisser
authors.forename: Alexandra
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Weigelt
mesh_terms: D044822:Biodiversity; D018533:Biomass; D017753:Ecosystem; D005858:Germany; D006109:Poaceae / Q000254:growth & development*; D011157:Population Dynamics; D013045:Species Specificity