title: Using behavioural theories to optimise shared haemodialysis care: a qualitative intervention development study of patient and professional experience.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Patients in control of their own haemodialysis report better outcomes than those receiving professional controlled care in a hospital setting, even though home and hospital haemodialysis are largely equivalent from mechanical and physiological perspectives. Shared Haemodialysis Care (SHC) describes an initiative in which hospital haemodialysis patients are supported by dialysis staff to become as involved as they wish in their own care; and can improve patient safety, satisfaction and may reduce costs. We do not understand why interventions to support self-management in other conditions have variable effects or how to optimise the delivery of SHC. The purpose of this study was to identify perceived patient and professional (nurses and healthcare assistants) barriers to the uptake of SHC, and to use these data to identify intervention components to optimise care.
  
  
  METHODS
  Individual semi-structured interviews with patients and professionals were conducted to identify barriers and facilitators. Data were coded to behavioural theory to identify solutions. A national UK learning event with multiple stakeholders (patients, carers, commissioners and professionals) explored the salience of these barriers and the acceptability of solutions.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A complex intervention strategy was designed to optimise SHC for patients and professionals. Interviews were conducted with patients (n = 15) and professionals (n = 7) in two hospitals and three satellite units piloting SHC. Data from patient and professional interviews could be coded to behavioural theory. Analyses identified key barriers (knowledge, beliefs about capabilities, skills and environmental context and resources). An intervention strategy that focuses on providing, first, patients with information about the shared nature of care, how to read prescriptions and use machines, and second, providing professionals with skills and protected time to teach both professionals/patients, as well as providing continual review, may improve the implementation of SHC and be acceptable to stakeholders.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We have developed an intervention strategy to improve the implementation of SHC for patients and professionals. While this intervention strategy has been systematically developed using behavioural theory, it should be rigorously tested in a subsequent effectiveness evaluation study prior to implementation to ensure that shared haemodialysis care can be delivered equitably, efficiently and safely for all patients.
authors.affiliation: Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, UK. l.glidewell@leeds.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Liz
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Glidewell
authors.forename: Stephen
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Boocock
authors.forename: Kelvin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Pine
authors.forename: Rebecca
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Campbell
authors.forename: Julia
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hackett
authors.forename: Shamila
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Gill
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Wilkie
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006282:Health Personnel / Q000523:psychology*; D018575:Home Care Services, Hospital-Based; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011582:Psychological Theory; D036301:Qualitative Research; D006435:Renal Dialysis; D017678:Sex Distribution; D006113:United Kingdom