title: What do letters to the editor publish about randomized controlled trials? A cross-sectional study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  To identify published letters to the editor (LTE) written in response to randomized controlled trials (RCTs), determine the topics addressed in the letters, and to examine if these topics were affected by the characteristics and results of the RCTs.
  
  
  METHODS
  Comparative cross-sectional study of a representative sample of RCTs from a set of high-impact medical journals (BMJ, Lancet, NEJM, JAMA, and Annals of Internal Medicine). RCTs and their published LTE were searched from these 5 journals in 2007. Data were collected on RCTs and their characteristics (author affiliation, funding source, intervention, and effect on the primary outcome) and the topics addressed in published LTE related to these RCTs. Analysis included chi-square and regression analysis (RCT characteristics) and thematic analysis (LTE topics).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of 334 identified RCTs, 175 trials had at least one LTE. Of these, 381 published LTE were identified. Most RCTs, tested drug interventions (68%), were funded by government (54%) or industry (33%), and described an intervention that had a positive impact on the primary outcome (62%). RCT authors were primarily affiliated with an academic centre (78%). Ninety percent of the 623 LTE topics concerned methodological issues regarding the analysis, intervention, and population in the RCT. There was a significant association between funding source and impact on outcomes (p = 0.002) or type of intervention tested (p = 0.001) in these trials. Clinical and "Other" LTE topics were more likely to be published in response to a government funded RCT (p = 0.005 and p = 0.033, respectively); no other comparisons were significant.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study showed that most LTE are about methodological topics, but found little evidence to support that these topics are affected by the characteristics or results of the RCTs. The lack of association may be explained by editorial censorship as a small proportion of LTE that are submitted are actually published.
authors.affiliation: Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (LKSKI) of St, Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. monika.kastner@utoronto.ca.
authors.forename: Monika
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kastner
authors.forename: Anita
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Menon
authors.forename: Sharon E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Straus
authors.forename: Andreas
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Laupacis
mesh_terms: D015709:Correspondence as Topic; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D011643:Publishing; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic