title: How to distinguish altruism from spite (and why we should bother).
abstract: Social behaviour is often described as altruistic, spiteful, selfish or mutually beneficial. These terms are appealing, but it has not always been clear how they are defined and what purpose they serve. Here, I show that the distinctions among them arise from the ways in which fitness is partitioned: none can be drawn when the fitness consequences of an action are wholly aggregated, but they manifest clearly when the consequences are partitioned into primary and secondary (neighbourhood) effects. I argue that the primary interaction is the principal source of adaptive design, because (i) it is this interaction that determines the fit of an adaptation and (ii) it is the actor and primary recipients whom an adaptation foremost affects. The categories of social action are thus instrumental to any account of evolved function.
authors.affiliation: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Program in Evolution of Governance, One Earth Future, Broomfield, CO, USA.
authors.forename: D B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Krupp
mesh_terms: D000533:Altruism; D006801:Humans; D012919:Social Behavior
keywords: adaptation; fitness partitions; function; inclusive fitness; social evolution