title: Current status of zirconia restoration.
abstract: During the past decade, zirconia-based ceramics have been successfully introduced into the clinic to fabricate fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), along with a dental computer-aided/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system. In this article (1) development of dental ceramics, (2) the current status of dental CAD/CAM systems, (3) CAD/CAM and zirconia restoration, (4) bond between zirconia and veneering ceramics, (5) bond of zirconia with resin-based luting agents, (6) surface finish of zirconia restoration and antagonist enamel wear, and (7) clinical evaluation of zirconia restoration are reviewed. Yttria partially stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline (Y-TZP) showed better mechanical properties and superior resistance to fracture than other conventional dental ceramics. Furthermore, ceria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline and alumina nanocomposites (Ce-TZP/A) had the highest fracture toughness and had resistance to low-temperature aging degradation. Both zirconia-based ceramics have been clinically available as an alternative to the metal framework for fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Marginal adaptation of zirconia-based FDPs is acceptable for clinical application. The most frequent clinical complication with zirconia-based FDPs was chipping of the veneering porcelain that was affected by many factors. The mechanism for the bonding between zirconia and veneering ceramics remains unknown. There was no clear evidence of chemical bonding and the bond strength between zirconia and porcelain was lower than that between metal and porcelain. There were two alternatives proposed that might avoid chipping of veneering porcelains. One was hybrid-structured FDPs comprising CAD/CAM-fabricated porcelain parts adhering to a CAD/CAM fabricated zirconia framework. Another option was full-contour zirconia FDPs using high translucent zirconia. Combined application of silica coating and/or silane coupler, and 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate is currently one of the most reliable bonding systems for zirconia. Adhesive treatments could be applied to luting the restorations and fabricating hybrid-structured FDPs. Full-contour zirconia FDPs caused concern about the wear of antagonist enamel, because the hardness of Y-TZP was over double that of porcelain. However, this review demonstrates that highly polished zirconia yielded lower antagonist wear compared with porcelains. Polishing of zirconia is possible, but glazing is not recommended for the surface finish of zirconia. Clinical data since 2010 are included in this review. The zirconia frameworks rarely got damaged in many cases and complications often occurred in the veneering ceramic materials. Further clinical studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to investigate the possible influencing factors of technical failures.
authors.affiliation: Division of Oral Biomaterials and Technology, Showa University School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: miyazaki@dent.showa-u.ac.jp.
authors.forename: Takashi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Miyazaki
authors.forename: Takashi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Nakamura
authors.forename: Hideo
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Matsumura
authors.forename: Seiji
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Ban
authors.forename: Taira
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Kobayashi
mesh_terms: D002516:Ceramics; D017076:Computer-Aided Design; D003460:Crystallization; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D017266:Dental Prosthesis; D017267:Dental Prosthesis Design / Q000379:methods; D003801:Dental Veneers; D006801:Humans; D055595:Mechanical Phenomena; D016876:Metal Ceramic Alloys; D057085:Tooth Wear; D015040:Zirconium
chemical_list: D016876:Metal Ceramic Alloys; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D015040:Zirconium; C028541:zirconium oxide
keywords: Antagonist wear; Dental CAD/CAM; FDPs; Friction; Full contour; Polishing; Zirconia