title: Activity rating scales in adult muscle disease: what do they actually measure?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There is a diversity of rating scales that assess function in muscle disease. Definitive knowledge of the content covered by these scales would help in making choices.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched for activity rating scales used for muscle disease and assessed their content by linking scale items to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and the muscle regions they cover.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of the 119 scales found, 19 muscle disease-specific and 9 generic scales were prioritized for analysis. These 28 scales contained 457 items, from which 1145 concepts were identified and 160 were unique. Of these concepts, 97.8% could be linked to the ICF, most to the activities and participation domain (68.7%), followed by environmental factors (22.5%) and body functions (6.6%). Global muscle function was assessed most frequently, followed by lower and upper extremity function.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This content comparison should allow for a better-informed choice of activity rating scales for muscle disease.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
authors.forename: Farah
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Seedat
authors.forename: Meredith K
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: James
authors.forename: Michael R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Rose
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D000328:Adult; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D004777:Environment; D006801:Humans; D038801:International Classification of Diseases; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000502:physiology*; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000503:physiopathology; D009135:Muscular Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D009460:Neurologic Examination
keywords: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; functional rating scales; muscle disease; outcome measures; systematic review