title: Accuracy of axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients: an observer-performance study comparison of MRI and ultrasound.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) for axillary lymph node (LN) staging in breast cancer patients in an observer-performance study.
  
  
  METHODS
  An observer-performance study was conducted with five breast radiologists reviewing 50 consecutive patients of newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer with the use of ipsilateral axillary MRI and US. LN status was pathologically proved in all patients. Each observer reviewed the images in two separate sessions: one for MRI and the other for US. Observers were asked to indicate their confidence of the presence of at least one ipsilateral metastatic LN on a quasi-continuous rating scale and whether they recommend percutaneous biopsy preoperatively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and area under the ROC curve were used to characterize diagnostic performance. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated from whether observers recommended biopsy.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were no statistically significant differences in each observer's performance between MRI and US, or in the performance of all observers as a group, in terms of ROC analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, PPV, or NPV between MRI and US, but there were statistically significant improvements in specificity and PPV from either MRI or US alone to MRI and US combined.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Observer performance on MRI and US are comparable for axillary LN staging. When US and MRI are concordant for positive findings, higher specificity and PPV can be obtained.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637. Electronic address: habe@radiology.bsd.uchicago.edu.
authors.forename: Hiroyuki
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Abe
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Schacht
authors.forename: Kirti
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kulkarni
authors.forename: Akiko
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Shimauchi
authors.forename: Ken
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Yamaguchi
authors.forename: Charlene A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Sennett
authors.forename: Yulei
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Jiang
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001365:Axilla / Q000473:pathology*; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology*; D003287:Contrast Media; D005260:Female; D019786:Gadolinium DTPA; D006801:Humans; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis / Q000473:pathology*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D016217:Ultrasonography, Mammary / Q000379:methods*
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media; C064925:gadodiamide; D019786:Gadolinium DTPA
keywords: Breast cancer; MRI; lymph node; ultrasound