title: Our midterm results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing with and without navigation.
abstract: We reviewed 148 consecutive hip resurfacings in order to assess the clinical outcomes of the BHR at midterm follow-up and to compare the accuracy of the navigation in the positioning of femoral component. We retrospectively analyzed 85 hips using the conventional jig to implant the femoral component and we prospectively followed 63 hips operated on by navigation. At a mean follow-up of 50.54 months, the Harris hip score improved significantly from 44.66 preoperatively to 98.45 postoperatively without any differences between the groups. Radiologically, we classic navigated group. Our clinical outcomes are excellent at midterm follow-up and the navigation definitely improves the implant position in both planes.
authors.affiliation: Brussels Centrum of Arthroplasty (BCA), Cliniques de l'Europe Sainte Elisabeth, Brussels, Belgium.
authors.forename: Mohamed
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: El Hachmi
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinique Notre-Dame, Tournai, Belgium.
authors.forename: Michel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Penasse
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000601:surgery*; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D007592:Joint Diseases / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D025321:Surgery, Computer-Assisted; D016896:Treatment Outcome
keywords: hip resurfacing; midterm results; navigation