title: Testing the PRISMA-Equity 2012 reporting guideline: the perspectives of systematic review authors.
abstract: Reporting guidelines can be used to encourage standardised and comprehensive reporting of health research. In light of the global commitment to health equity, we have previously developed and published a reporting guideline for equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012). The objectives of this study were to explore the utility of the equity extension items included in PRISMA-E 2012 from a systematic review author perspective, including facilitators and barriers to its use. This will assist in designing dissemination and knowledge translation strategies. We conducted a survey of systematic review authors to expose them to the new items in PRISMA-E 2012, establish the extent to which they had historically addressed those items in their own reviews, and gather feedback on the usefulness of the new items. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel 2008 and Stata (version 11.2 for Mac). Of 151 respondents completing the survey, 18.5% (95% CI: 12.7% to 25.7%) had not heard of the PRISMA statement before, although 83.4% (95% CI: 77.5% to 89.3%) indicated that they plan to use PRISMA-E 2012 in the future, depending on the focus of their review. Most (68.9%; 95% CI: 60.8% to 76.2%) thought that using PRISMA-E 2012 would lead them to conduct their reviews differently. Important facilitators to using PRISMA-E 2012 identified by respondents were journal endorsement and incorporation of the elements of the guideline into systematic review software. Barriers identified were lack of time, word limits and the availability of equity data in primary research. This study has been the first to 'road-test' the new PRISMA-E 2012 reporting guideline and the findings are encouraging. They confirm the acceptability and potential utility of the guideline to assist review authors in reporting on equity in their reviews. The uptake and impact of PRISMA-E 2012 over time on design, conduct and reporting of primary research and systematic reviews should continue to be examined.
authors.affiliation: Cochrane Public Health Group and Jack Brockhoff Child Health and Wellbeing Program, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: Belinda J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Burford
authors.forename: Vivian
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Welch
authors.forename: Elizabeth
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Waters
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Tugwell
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Moher
authors.forename: Jennifer
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: O'Neill
authors.forename: Tracey
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Koehlmoos
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Petticrew
mesh_terms: D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D012196:Review Literature as Topic