title: Ecological constraints influence the emergence of cooperative breeding when population dynamics determine the fitness of helpers.
abstract: Cooperative breeding is a system in which certain individuals facilitate the production of offspring by others. The ecological constraints hypothesis states that ecological conditions deter individuals from breeding independently, and so individuals breed cooperatively to make the best of a bad situation. Current theoretical support for the ecological constraints hypothesis is lacking. We formulate a mathematical model that emphasizes the underlying ecology of cooperative breeders. Our goal is to derive theoretical support for the ecological constraints hypothesis using an ecological model of population dynamics. We consider a population composed of two kinds of individuals, nonbreeders (auxiliaries) and breeders. We suppose that help provided by an auxiliary increases breeder fecundity, but reduces the probability with which the auxiliary becomes a breeder. Our main result is a condition that guarantees success of auxiliary help. We predict that increasing the cost of dispersal promotes helping, in agreement with verbal theory. We also predict that increasing breeder mortality can either hinder helping (at high population densities), or promote it (at low population densities). We conclude that ecological constraints can exert influence over the evolution of auxiliary help when population dynamics are considered; moreover, that influence need not coincide with direct fitness benefits as previously found.
authors.affiliation: Department of Applied Mathematics, The University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B7.
authors.forename: David V
authors.initials: DV
authors.lastname: McLeod
authors.forename: Geoff
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Wild
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D056084:Genetic Fitness; D008954:Models, Biological; D011156:Population Density; D012098:Reproduction
keywords: Alloparental care; helpers-at-the-nest; inclusive fitness; kin selection; mathematical model; sociality