title: The scientific basis for postoperative respiratory care.
abstract: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are common and expensive. Costs, morbidity, and mortality are higher with PPCs than with cardiac or thromboembolic complications. Preventing and treating PPCs is a major focus of respiratory therapists, using a wide variety of techniques and devices, including incentive spirometry, CPAP, positive expiratory pressure, intrapulmonary percussive ventilation, and chest physical therapy. The scientific evidence for these techniques is lacking. CPAP has some evidence of benefit in high risk patients with hypoxemia. Incentive spirometry is used frequently, but the evidence suggests that incentive spirometry alone has no impact on PPC. Chest physical therapy, which includes mechanical clapping and postural drainage, appears to worsen atelectasis secondary to pain and splinting. As with many past respiratory therapy techniques, the profession needs to take a hard look at these techniques and work to provide only practices based on good evidence. The idea of a PPC bundle has merit and should be studied in larger, multicenter trials. Additionally, intraoperative ventilation may play a key role in the development of PPCs and should receive greater attention.
authors.affiliation: Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
authors.forename: Richard D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Branson
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research; D006801:Humans; D011182:Postoperative Care / Q000379:methods*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D012120:Respiration Disorders / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D012138:Respiratory Therapy / Q000379:methods*
keywords: complications; incentive spirometry; postoperative pulmonary complications