title: Self-reported versus diagnosed stress fractures in norwegian female elite athletes.
abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of self- reported versus diagnosed stress fractures in female elite athletes and non-athletic controls. A random sample of Norwegian elite athletes from the national teams, aged 13-39 years (n = 186) and a random sample of non-athletic controls (n = 145) in the same age group participated in the study. The athletes represented a junior- or senior team, or a recruiting squad for one of these teams, in one of 46 different sports/events. A higher percentage of athletes self-reported stress fractures (14.0%) compared to those diagnosed with stress fractures (8.1%) (p < 0.001). Six controls self- reported stress fractures, but none of them were diagnosed with stress fractures. These results indicate that self-reporting of stress fractures has low validity. This finding has important implications for further research on stress fractures in athletes. Key pointsThis study is the first to compare self-reported and diagnosed stress fractures in the total population of elite athletes representing all kinds of sports.The results indicate that self-reporting of stress fractures has low validity in both athletes and non-athletic controls, and other measurement methods should be considered when evaluating possible stress fractures.Based on our results, stress fractures seem to be a sport-related injury.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway.
authors.forename: Jannike
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Oyen
authors.forename: Monica Klungland
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Torstveit
authors.forename: Jorunn
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Sundgot-Borgen
keywords: Imaging; injuries; sports; validity