title: Discharge planning in chronic conditions: an evidence-based analysis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Chronically ill people experience frequent changes in health status accompanied by multiple transitions between care settings and care providers. Discharge planning provides support services, follow-up activities, and other interventions that span pre-hospital discharge to post-hospital settings.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine if discharge planning is effective at reducing health resource utilization and improving patient outcomes compared with standard care alone.
  
  
  METHODS
  A standard systematic literature search was conducted for studies published from January 1, 2004, until December 13, 2011.
  
  
  METHODS
  Reports, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses with 1 month or more of follow-up and limited to specified chronic conditions were examined. Outcomes included mortality/survival, readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits, hospital length of stay (LOS), health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and patient satisfaction.
  
  
  RESULTS
  One meta-analysis compared individualized discharge planning to usual care and found a significant reduction in readmissions favouring individualized discharge planning. A second meta-analysis compared comprehensive discharge planning with postdischarge support to usual care. There was a significant reduction in readmissions favouring discharge planning with postdischarge support. However, there was significant statistical heterogeneity. For both meta-analyses there was a nonsignificant reduction in mortality between the study arms.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There was difficulty in distinguishing the relative contribution of each element within the terms "discharge planning" and "postdischarge support." For most studies, "usual care" was not explicitly described.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Compared with usual care, there was moderate quality evidence that individualized discharge planning is more effective at reducing readmissions or hospital LOS but not mortality, and very low quality evidence that it is more effective at improving HRQOL or patient satisfaction. Compared with usual care, there was low quality evidence that the discharge planning plus postdischarge support is more effective at reducing readmissions but not more effective at reducing hospital LOS or mortality. There was very low quality evidence that it is more effective at improving HRQOL or patient satisfaction.
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: McMartin
mesh_terms: D002908:Chronic Disease / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D006304:Health Status; D017052:Hospital Mortality; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay; D009864:Ontario / Q000453:epidemiology; D010351:Patient Discharge / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010359:Patient Readmission / Q000191:economics / Q000639:trends*; D011788:Quality of Life