title: Does digital mammography increase detection of high-risk breast lesions presenting as calcifications?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The objective of our study was to evaluate whether the transition from film-screen mammography (FSM) to digital mammography (DM) was associated with increased detection of high-risk breast lesions.
  
  
  METHODS
  A retrospective search identified 142 cases of atypia or lobular neoplasia (LN) diagnosed in women with mammographic calcifications between January 2004 and August 2010. We excluded lesions upgraded to cancer at excisional biopsy, lesions in women with ipsilateral cancer within 2 years of mammography, and lesions that presented as a mass only. The cases included in the cohort were 82 (57.7%) cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia; 17 (12%) atypical lobular hyperplasia; 25 (17.6%) lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS); 12 (8.5%) atypia and LCIS; and six (4.2%) other atypia. The institution transitioned from predominantly performing FSM in 2004 to performing only DM by 2010. Pathology was interpreted by breast pathologists. The annual detection rate was calculated by dividing the number of high-risk lesions by mammography volume.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of the 142 cases of atypia or LN, 52 (36.6%) were detected using FSM and 90 (63.4%) were detected using DM. The detection rate was higher with DM (1.24/1000 mammographic studies) than FSM (0.37/1000 mammographic studies). The detection rate by year ranged between 0.21 and 0.64 per 1000 mammographic studies for FSM and between 0.32 and 1.49 per 1000 mammographic studies for DM. The median size of the calcifications was 8 mm on DM and 7 mm on FSM. The most common appearance was clustered amorphous or indistinct calcifications on both FSM and DM.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The transition from FSM to DM was associated with a threefold increase in the detection rate of high-risk lesions. Improved detection may allow enhanced screening, risk reduction treatment, and possibly breast cancer prevention. However, increased detection of high-risk lesions may also result in oversurveillance and treatment.
authors.affiliation: 1 Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Med Inn Bldg C415, SPC 5842, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-4852.
authors.forename: Colleen H
authors.initials: CH
authors.lastname: Neal
authors.forename: Monette C
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Coletti
authors.forename: Annette
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Joe
authors.forename: Deborah O
authors.initials: DO
authors.lastname: Jeffries
authors.forename: Mark A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Helvie
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001706:Biopsy; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D002114:Calcinosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D002278:Carcinoma in Situ / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D018275:Carcinoma, Lobular / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D055088:Early Detection of Cancer; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008327:Mammography / Q000379:methods*; D008403:Mass Screening; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies