title: The authors' conclusion that their study brings into question "the impact of motivational interviewing in terms of its ability to improve routine diabetes care in practice" is deserving of significant inquiry.
authors.affiliation: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania , United States . E-mail: adams.carson@medstudent.pitt.edu.
authors.forename: Carson
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Adams
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Cohen
authors.forename: Justin
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Schreiber
authors.forename: Robin
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Valpey
authors.forename: Kristy
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Benoit
authors.forename: Salomon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Puyana
authors.forename: Xiaoran
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: Antoine
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Douaihy
mesh_terms: D003920:Diabetes Mellitus / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D006442:Glycated Hemoglobin / Q000032:analysis*; D006801:Humans; D008019:Life Style; D008297:Male; D062405:Motivational Interviewing
chemical_list: D006442:Glycated Hemoglobin