title: Practicing field hockey skills along the contextual interference continuum: a comparison of five practice schedules.
abstract: To overcome the weakness of the contextual interference (CI) effect within applied settings, Brady, 2008 recommended that the amount of interference be manipulated. This study investigated the effect of five practice schedules on the learning of three field hockey skills. Fifty-five pre-university students performed a total of 90 trials for each skill under blocked, mixed or random practice orders. Results showed a significant time effect with all five practice conditions leading to improvements in acquisition and learning of the skills. No significant differences were found between the groups. The findings of the present study did not support the CI effect and suggest that either blocked, mixed, or random practice schedules can be used effectively when structuring practice for beginners. Key pointsThe contextual interference effect did not surface when using sport skills.There appears to be no difference between blocked and random practice schedules in the learning of field hockey skills.Low (blocked), moderate (mixed) or high (random) interference practice schedules can be used effectively when conducting a multiple skill practice session for beginners.
authors.forename: Jadeera Phaik Geok
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Cheong
authors.forename: Brendan
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Lay
authors.forename: J Robert
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Grove
authors.forename: Nikola
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Medic
authors.forename: Rizal
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Razman
keywords: Skill acquisition; blocked practice; random practice