title: Structural alignment in similarity and difference judgments.
abstract: Similarity is a central construct in models of cognitive processing, and as such has been the focus of psychological inquiry. This work has revealed that similarity and difference judgments are not always inverses. One explanation for this effect is that similarity judgments focus on matching relations between the items, while difference judgments focus on the mismatching attributes. A second explanation is that both similarity and difference judgments involve a process of structural alignment, and that they use the output of this process differently. These views are contrasted by using the one-shot mapping technique that places attribute similarity and relational similarity in competition. The results suggest that similarity and difference judgments both involve structural alignment.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Columbia University, 406 Schermerhorn Hall, 10027, New York, NY, markman@psych.columbia.edu.
authors.forename: A B
authors.initials: AB
authors.lastname: Markman