title: Text messaging among residents and faculty in a university general surgery residency program: prevalence, purpose, and patient care.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There is little information about the use of text messaging (texting) devices among resident and faculty physicians for patient-related care (PRC).
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine the prevalence, frequency, purpose, and concerns regarding texting among resident and attending surgeons and to identify factors associated with PRC texting.
  
  
  METHODS
  E-mail survey.
  
  
  METHODS
  University medical center and its affiliated hospitals.
  
  
  METHODS
  Surgery resident and attending staff.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prevalence, frequency, purpose, and concerns regarding patient-related care text messaging.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Overall, 73 (65%) surveyed physicians responded, including 45 resident (66%) and 28 attending surgeons (62%). All respondents owned a texting device. Majority of surgery residents (88%) and attendings (71%) texted residents, whereas only 59% of residents and 65% of attendings texted other faculty. Most resident to resident text occurred at a frequency of 3-5 times/d (43%) compared with most attending to resident texts, which occurred 1-2 times/d (33%). Most resident to attending (25%) and attending to attending (30%) texts occurred 1-2 times/d. Among those that texted, PRC was the most frequently reported purpose for resident to resident (46%), resident to attending (64%), attending to resident (82%), and attending to other attending staff (60%) texting. Texting was the most preferred method to communicate about routine PRC (47% of residents vs 44% of attendings). Age (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.79-0.95; p = 0.003), but not sex, specialty/clinical rotation, academic rank, or postgraduate year (PGY) level predicted PRC texting.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Most resident and attending staff surveyed utilize texting, mostly for PRC. Texting was preferred for communicating routine PRC information. Our data may facilitate the development of guidelines for the appropriate use of PRC texting.
authors.affiliation: Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California.
authors.forename: Dhruvil R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Shah
authors.forename: Joseph M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Galante
authors.forename: Richard J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Bold
authors.forename: Robert J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Canter
authors.forename: Steve R
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Martinez
mesh_terms: D000046:Academic Medical Centers; D000328:Adult; D002140:California; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D004503:Education, Medical, Graduate / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D013502:General Surgery / Q000193:education*; D006785:Hospitals, University; D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D008297:Male; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008875:Middle Aged; D005791:Patient Care; D015995:Prevalence; D011786:Quality Control; D060145:Text Messaging / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*
keywords: Interpersonal, and Communication Skills; Patient Care; Professionalism; communication; patient care; professionalism; text messaging