title: Conservative sharp wound debridement: an overview of Canadian education, practice, risk, and policy.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study was to describe the education, policy, practice, and risk management strategies of nurses performing conservative sharp wound debridement (CSWD) in Canada, prior to the release of the Canadian Association for Enterostomal Therapy Evidence-Based Recommendations for Conservative Sharp Wound Debridement.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data collection was based on a nonrandomized, nonexperimental study design and reported using descriptive statistics.
  
  
  METHODS
  Invitations for health care professionals to participate in a CSWD scan were sent to 4315 people via e-mail through the membership lists of 2 Canadian voluntary professional wound care associations. Skip logic screened out respondents who had no experience in CSWD (n = 57). The total number of professionals who participated was 487. A 26-question electronic scan addressed demographics, education, policy, practice, and risk/quality issues related to CSWD. A comment section was included for some questions.
  
  
  METHODS
  A selected subsample of 397 nurses was chosen from the original total of 487 respondents. Nonnurse respondents were excluded due to the low total number of participants in each of these other professional categories.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Nurses perform CSWD in all types of care settings in Canada from outpost nursing stations to hospital wards, homes, and long-term care facilities. The wound education preparation reported varied. The most frequently reported formal wound care education was a 2-day course (59%; n = 220), followed by an enterostomal therapy course (42%; n = 155) and the International Interdisciplinary Wound Care Course (26%; n = 98), with overlapping preparation evident. Eleven percent of respondents (n = 47) reported having taken no formal wound course, and 7% (n = 27) taught themselves to perform CSWD. Twenty-eight percent of nurses (n = 112) were unclear about whether CSWD was within their scope of practice or replied that it was not, and 69% (n = 273) did not know if there was provincial legislation that restricted their practice of CSWD. Forty-eight percent of nurses (n = 181) reported that their institutions do not have policies on CSWD, and 9% (n = 35) did not know. Adverse events associated with CSWD were reported by 196 respondents, with minor bleeding reported most frequently (98% n = 192) by those who answered the question.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The education, policy, practice, and risk management of nurses practicing CSWD could benefit from development and dissemination of a set of National Standards and Competencies for this high-risk wound intervention.
authors.affiliation: Elise Rodd-Nielsen, RN, BSN, IIWCC, CETN (C), ERodd-Nielsen Consulting, Quebec, Canada. Connie L. Harris, RN, ET, IIWCC, MSc, Red Cross Care Partners, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Elise
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Rodd-Nielsen
authors.forename: Connie L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Harris
mesh_terms: D002170:Canada; D003646:Debridement / Q000379:methods*; D004506:Education, Nursing / Q000639:trends*; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000451:nursing