title: Self-reported sleep disturbance in patients with advanced cancer: Frequency, intensity, and factors associated with response to outpatient supportive care consultation--A preliminary report.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Self-reported sleep disturbance (SD) is a distressing symptom in patients with advanced cancer. There are limited data on the treatment of SD and predictors to response of SD to outpatient supportive care clinic (OPC) consultation. The aims of our study was to determine the frequency, intensity, and correlates of SD as assessed with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) sleep item at the time of initial consultation and identify the predictors of improvement in SD at follow-up.
  
  
  METHODS
  We reviewed the records of consecutive patients with advanced cancer presenting to the OPC. ESAS scores were obtained at the initial and subsequent visits between January 2008 and February 2010. All patients underwent screening for SD (0-10 scale: 0 = best sleep, presence of SD defined as ≥ 3) and interdisciplinary assessment and treatment, including drug review, counseling, sleep hygiene review, and drug therapy. A response was defined as a 1-point improvement at the follow-up visit on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) sleep item score. Baseline patient characteristics, medication use, and ESAS scores were analyzed to determine their association with response.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The median age was 58 years, and 53% of patients were men. The most common cancer type was head and neck or lung (36%). Of the 442 patients, 330 had baseline SD (score ≥ 3/10, 75%). Median and mean (standard deviation) baseline SD scores were 5 and 5.1 (2.9). The multivariable regression model found the intensity of baseline ESAS sleep item scores to be associated with baseline sedative use, baseline ESAS pain scores, baseline ESAS fatigue scores, baseline ESAS feeling of well-being scores, and sedative use (R 2 = 0.22). Sleep disturbance response at first follow-up was seen in 196 of 330 patients (59%). Moderate to high SD score and anxiety at initial visit with odds ratios (OR) of 2.53 (p = 0.0007) and 1.59 (p = 0.048), respectively, were associated with a response.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Both the frequency and severity of SD were high. Response to supportive care consultation was substantial. The severity of SD and anxiety at the initial visit predicted a response at first follow-up. Further research is needed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Houston,Texas.
authors.forename: Sriram
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Yennurajalingam
authors.affiliation: Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Houston,Texas.
authors.forename: Gary
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Chisholm
authors.affiliation: Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Houston,Texas.
authors.forename: Shana L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Palla
authors.affiliation: Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Houston,Texas.
authors.forename: Holly
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Holmes
authors.affiliation: Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Houston,Texas.
authors.forename: James M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Reuben
authors.affiliation: Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Houston,Texas.
authors.forename: Eduardo
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Bruera
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000150:complications*; D010166:Palliative Care; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D012893:Sleep Wake Disorders / Q000209:etiology* / Q000628:therapy*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016896:Treatment Outcome
keywords: Predictors of response