title: Total knee replacement with the use of a tourniquet: more pros than cons.
abstract: Total knee replacement (TKR) is an operation that can be performed with or without the use of a tourniquet. Meta-analyses of the available Level-1 studies have demonstrated that the use of a tourniquet leads to a significant reduction in blood loss. The opponents for use of a tourniquet cite development of complications such as skin bruising, neurovascular injury, and metabolic disturbance as drawbacks. Although there may certainly be reason for concern in arteriopathic patients, there is little evidence that routine use of a tourniquet during TKR results in any of the above complications. The use of a tourniquet, on the other hand, provides a bloodless field that allows the surgeon to perform the procedure with expediency and optimal visualisation. Blood conservation has gained great importance in recent years due to increased understanding of the problems associated with blood transfusion, such as increased surgical site infection (due to immunomodulation effect), increased length of hospital stay and increased cost. Based on the authors' understanding of the available evidence, the routine use of a tourniquet during TKR is justified as good surgical practice.
authors.affiliation: The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Sheridan Building, 10th Floor, 125 South 9th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Parvizi
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Diaz-Ledezma
mesh_terms: D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000379:methods*; D016063:Blood Loss, Surgical / Q000517:prevention & control*; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006801:Humans; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000517:prevention & control*; D014111:Tourniquets / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*
keywords: Total knee replacement; deep venous thrombosis.; intraoperative blood loss; postoperative blood loss; tourniquet; transfusion