title: Predictive value of E-PASS and POSSUM systems for postoperative risk assessment of spinal surgery.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The Estimation of Physiological Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) and Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) systems are surgical risk scoring systems that take into account both the patient's preoperative condition and intraoperative variables. While they predict postoperative morbidity and mortality rates for several types of surgery, spinal surgeries are currently not included. The authors assessed the usefulness of E-PASS and POSSUM algorithms and compared the predictive ability of both systems in patients with spinal disorders considered for surgery.
  
  
  METHODS
  The E-PASS system includes a preoperative risk score, a surgical stress score, and a comprehensive risk score that is determined by both the preoperative risk score and surgical stress score. The POSSUM system is composed of a physiological score and an operative severity score; its total score is based on both the physiological score and operative severity score. The authors calculated the E-PASS and POSSUM scores for 601 consecutive patients who had undergone spinal surgery and investigated the relationship between the individual scores of both systems and the incidence of postoperative complications. They also assessed the correctness of the predicted morbidity rate of both systems.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Postoperative complications developed in 64 patients (10.6%); there were no in-hospital deaths. All EPASS scores (p ≤ 0.001) and the operative severity score and total score of the POSSUM (p < 0.03) were significantly higher in patients with postoperative complications than in those without postoperative complications. The morbidity rates correlated linearly and significantly with all E-PASS scores (p ≤ 0.001); their coefficients (preoperative risk score, ρ = 0.179; surgical stress score, ρ = 0.131; and comprehensive risk score, ρ = 0.198) were higher than those for the POSSUM scores (physiological score, ρ = 0.059; operative severity score, ρ = 0.111; and total score, ρ = 0.091). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the predicted morbidity rate was 0.668 for the E-PASS and 0.588 for the POSSUM system.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  As E-PASS predicted morbidity more correctly than POSSUM, it is useful for estimating the postoperative risk of patients considered for spinal surgery.
authors.affiliation: Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and.
authors.forename: Jun
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hirose
authors.forename: Takuya
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Taniwaki
authors.forename: Toru
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Fujimoto
authors.forename: Tatsuya
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Okada
authors.forename: Takayuki
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Nakamura
authors.forename: Nobukazu
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Okamoto
authors.forename: Koichiro
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Usuku
authors.forename: Hiroshi
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Mizuta
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000465:Algorithms; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019637:Orthopedic Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology*; D011184:Postoperative Period; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011379:Prognosis; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D013131:Spine / Q000601:surgery*; D015996:Survival Rate