title: Options for managing severe acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty. A systematic review.
abstract: Revision hip arthroplasty in the presence of severe acetabular bone loss is challenging and requires a solid understanding of current techniques. A literature search of multiple databases applying specific criteria revealed a total of 50 articles of level IV scientific evidence comprising 2415 patients (2480 hips) managed with reinforcement devices (roof-reinforcement rings and anti-protrusio cages), custom-made triflanged acetabular components (CTACs), jumbo cups and tantalum metal (TM) systems. Overall, patients had improved postoperative hip scores for each technique. The use of reinforcement devices resulted in a mean revision rate of 8.2% and a mean complication rate of 29.21%. CTACs were associated with a revision rate of 15.9% and had a complication rate of 24.5%. Jumbo cups were revised in 8.8% of patients and had a complication rate of 18.4%. TM systems had an overall revision rate of 8.5% with complications seen in 18.5% of patients. CTACs had considerably higher revision rates compared to the other techniques. Jumbo cups and TM systems had lower complication rates compared to the use of reinforcement devices and CTACs. The most frequently occurring complications seen throughout the series were aseptic loosening, dislocation and infection.
authors.affiliation: 1 Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, Yorkshire - UK.
authors.forename: Sameer
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Jain
authors.forename: Richard J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Grogan
authors.forename: Peter V
authors.initials: PV
authors.lastname: Giannoudis
mesh_terms: D000077:Acetabulum / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D012086:Reoperation; D013812:Therapeutics; D016896:Treatment Outcome