title: Indirect cueing elicits distinct types of autobiographical event representations.
abstract: Studies that distinguish among believed memories, believed-not-remembered events (e.g., family stories), and nonbelieved memories (i.e., memories no longer believed to have occurred) typically rely on experimenter provided or overtly elicited events. These methods may mis-estimate the frequency and nature of such events in everyday memory. Three studies examined whether such events would be elicited via indirect cueing. Participants recalled and rated events on autobiographical belief, recollection, and other characteristics associated with remembering. All three event types resulted, but with a low rate of nonbelieved memories. Believed and nonbelieved memories received similar perceptual and re-experiencing ratings, and both exceeded believed-not-remembered events. Lifespan cueing found nonbelieved memories to be most frequent in middle childhood (ages 6-11). Cueing for "events" vs. "memories" revealed that "memory" cues lead to retrieval of a more homogeneous set of events and differences when predicting autobiographical belief and recollection. These studies support the distinction between autobiographical belief and recollection for autobiographical events.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset, Windsor, ON N9B3P4, Canada. Electronic address: scoboria@uwindsor.ca.
authors.forename: Alan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Scoboria
authors.forename: Jennifer M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Talarico
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D061212:Memory, Episodic; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Autobiographical belief; Cueing; Event; Memory; Nonbelieved memory