title: Sex differences in nicotine self-administration in rats during progressive unit dose reduction: implications for nicotine regulation policy.
abstract: Reducing the nicotine content in tobacco products is being considered by the FDA as a policy to reduce the addictiveness of tobacco products. Understanding individual differences in response to nicotine reduction will be critical to developing safe and effective policy. Animal and human research demonstrating sex differences in the reinforcing effects of nicotine suggests that males and females may respond differently to nicotine-reduction policies. However, no studies have directly examined sex differences in the effects of nicotine unit-dose reduction on nicotine self-administration (NSA) in animals. The purpose of the present study was to examine this issue in a rodent self-administration model. Male and female rats were trained to self-administer nicotine (0.06mg/kg) under an FR 3 schedule during daily 23h sessions. Rats were then exposed to saline extinction and reacquisition of NSA, followed by weekly reductions in the unit dose (0.03 to 0.00025mg/kg) until extinction levels of responding were achieved. Males and females were compared with respect to baseline levels of intake, resistance to extinction, degree of compensatory increases in responding during dose reduction, and the threshold reinforcing unit dose of nicotine. Exponential demand-curve analysis was also conducted to compare the sensitivity of males and females to increases in the unit price (FR/unit dose) of nicotine (i.e., elasticity of demand or reinforcing efficacy). Females exhibited significantly higher baseline intake and less compensation than males. However, there were no sex differences in the reinforcement threshold or elasticity of demand. Dose-response relationships were very well described by the exponential demand function (r(2) values>0.96 for individual subjects). These findings suggest that females may exhibit less compensatory smoking in response to nicotine reduction policies, even though their nicotine reinforcement threshold and elasticity of demand may not differ from males.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, United States.
authors.forename: Patricia
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Grebenstein
authors.forename: Danielle
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Burroughs
authors.forename: Yan
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: Mark G
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: LeSage
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D009538:Nicotine / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D051381:Rats; D017207:Rats, Sprague-Dawley; D012646:Self Administration; D012737:Sex Factors
chemical_list: D009538:Nicotine
keywords: Behavioral economics; Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act; Nicotine self-administration; Rat; Sex differences