Movement of the patient and the cone beam computed tomography scanner: objectives and possible solutions.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed (1) to determine whether scanner arm rotation causes significant movement of the head restraint and (2) to measure patient movement and its variation during the scan.


METHODS
The iCAT scanner and a high-speed camera were used. The 40 patients were divided into 2 groups: the open-eyed group and the blindfolded group.


RESULTS
The mean level of head restraint movement was 0.130 mm, with a significantly higher level at the beginning, probably owing to the accelerating arm. Mean movement of patients was 1.135 mm and 1.119 mm in the open-eyed and blindfolded groups, respectively. Patient movement was also significantly higher at the beginning of the scan, when noise and vibrations are likely to surprise the patient.


CONCLUSIONS
Patient instruction and a dry-run scan should be done by clinicians. Manufacturers should consider separating the seat and head restraint from the rest of the scanner to avoid vibration transfer.
Institute of Clinical and Experimental Stomatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: thanzelka@gmail.com.
Tomas
T
Hanzelka
Jaroslav
J
Dusek
Filip
F
Ocasek
Josef
J
Kucera
Jiri
J
Sedy
Jiri
J
Benes
Gabriela
G
Pavlikova
Rene
R
Foltan
D016477:Artifacts; D054893:Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; D006801:Humans; D009068:Movement; D009622:Noise; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012149:Restraint, Physical / Q000379:methods*; D014732:Vibration; D014741:Video Recording; D014785:Vision, Ocular