"We now control our evolution": circumventing ethical and logical cul-de-sacs of an anticipated engineering revolution.
Philosophers, scientists, and other researchers have increasingly characterized humanity as having reached an epistemic and technical stage at which “we can control our own evolution.” Moral–philosophical analysis of this outlook reveals some problems, beginning with the vagueness of “we.” At least four glosses on “we” in the proposition “we, humanity, control our evolution” can be made: “we” is the bundle of all living humans, a leader guiding the combined species, each individual acting severally, or some mixture of these three involving a market interpretation of future evolutionary processes. While all of these glosses have difficulties under philosophical analysis, how we as a species handle our fate via technical developments is all-important. I propose our role herein should be understood as other than controllers of our evolution.
Lantz Fleming
LF
Miller
D001290:Attitude; D057005:Bioengineering / Q000941:ethics*; D001675:Bioethics; D005075:Biological Evolution; D004738:Engineering / Q000941:ethics; D026689:Ethical Analysis; D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals