Public service quality improvements: a case for exemption from IRB review of public administration research.
Should the exemption from Institutional Review Board (IRB) evaluations currently in place for quality improvements research be extended to public administration research that addresses questions of improving the quality of public service delivery? As a means to both reduce the level of disdain held by a group of social science researchers for IRBs and to reduce the cost of review for minimal risk studies, I argue here that much of the current public administration research should also be exempted from normal processes of review by IRBs on the basis of their similarity to Quality Improvements (QI) research, a category of studies already granted exemption. This argument dovetails provisions currently in place for studies of public service and public benefit, but reframes these exemptions in the language of "quality improvements," which may be a more comfortable language for IRBs concerned to demonstrate compliance for review of all fields. To expedite this argument into the practices of IRBs, I included a checklist that researchers could use to self-identify their studies as QI, not research as such.
a University of Hong Kong , Department of Politics and Public Administration and The Graduate School , Pokfulam Road , Hong Kong.
Sara R
SR
Jordan
D028744:Ethics Committees, Research; D006302:Health Services Research; D011635:Public Health Administration; D058996:Quality Improvement; D012942:Social Sciences; D014481:United States