Improving the peer review process in orthopaedic journals.
The peer review process for the evaluation of manuscripts for publication needs to be better understood by the orthopaedic community. Improving the degree of transparency surrounding the review process and educating orthopaedic surgeons on how to improve their manuscripts for submission will help improve both the review procedure and resultant feedback, with an increase in the quality of the subsequent publications. This article seeks to clarify the peer review process and suggest simple ways in which the quality of submissions can be improved to maximise publication success. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2013;2:245-7.
Warwick Medical School, Clinical SciencesBuilding, Warwick University, CliffordBridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.
A P
AP
Sprowson
K S
KS
Rankin
I
I
McNamara
M L
ML
Costa
A
A
Rangan
Blinding; Guidelines; Journals; Orthopaedics; Peer review; Publication