Pro-Choice Versus Pro-Life: The Relationship Between State Abortion Policy and Child Well-Being in the United States.
In the United States, pro-choice supporters contend that the desire of pro-life supporters to protect the life of the fetus ends at birth and that thereafter they ignore the health and well-being of infants and children. This study examines the question of whether infants and children fare better in U.S. states that have the most restrictive abortion laws. Eighteen indicators of infant/child health, family, economic, and educational status are analyzed. The empirical evidence finds that states with the most antiabortion policies are also the same states that have significantly lower indicators of infant/child well-being. This supports the contention by pro-choice supporters that efforts by pro-life supporters to protect the life of the fetus end at birth.
a Department of Economics, California State University, Long Beach , Long Beach , California , USA.
Marshall
M
Medoff
D000028:Abortion, Induced; D000022:Abortion, Spontaneous; D002648:Child; D002669:Child Welfare; D002755:Choice Behavior; D005260:Female; D005333:Fetus; D006304:Health Status; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007878:Legislation as Topic; D011247:Pregnancy; D014481:United States