Decision making in concurrent multitasking: do people adapt to task interference?
While multitasking has received a great deal of attention from researchers, we still know little about how well people adapt their behavior to multitasking demands. In three experiments, participants were presented with a multicolumn subtraction task, which required working memory in half of the trials. This primary task had to be combined with a secondary task requiring either working memory or visual attention, resulting in different types of interference. Before each trial, participants were asked to choose which secondary task they wanted to perform concurrently with the primary task. We predicted that if people seek to maximize performance or minimize effort required to perform the dual task, they choose task combinations that minimize interference. While performance data showed that the predicted optimal task combinations indeed resulted in minimal interference between tasks, the preferential choice data showed that a third of participants did not show any adaptation, and for the remainder it took a considerable number of trials before the optimal task combinations were chosen consistently. On the basis of these results we argue that, while in principle people are able to adapt their behavior according to multitasking demands, selection of the most efficient combination of strategies is not an automatic process.
Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Menno
M
Nijboer
Niels A
NA
Taatgen
Annelies
A
Brands
Jelmer P
JP
Borst
Hedderik
H
van Rijn
D000293:Adolescent; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D055815:Young Adult