Evaluating moral reasoning in nursing education.
Evidence-based practice suggests the best approach to improving professionalism in practice is ethics curricula. However, recent research has demonstrated that millennium graduates do not advocate for patients or assert themselves during moral conflicts. The aim of this article is the exploration of evaluation techniques to evaluate one measurable outcome of ethics curricula: moral reasoning. A review of literature, published between 1995 and 2013, demonstrated that the moral orientations of care and justice as conceptualized by Gilligan and Kohlberg are utilized by nursing students to solve ethical dilemmas. Data obtained by means of reflective journaling, Ethics of Care Interview (ECI) and Defining Issues Test (DIT), would objectively measure the interrelated pathways of care-based and justice-based moral reasoning. In conclusion, educators have an ethical responsibility to foster students' ability to exercise sound clinical judgment, and support their professional development. It is recommended that educators design authentic assessments to demonstrate student's improvement of moral reasoning.
Pace University, USA rmcleodsordjan@pace.edu.
Renee
R
McLeod-Sordjan
D003071:Cognition; D003479:Curriculum; D004993:Ethics, Nursing; D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals; D011364:Professional Practice; D013338:Students, Nursing / Q000523:psychology*
Ethics; moral reasoning; nursing; professionalism