The role of ethics in shale gas policies.
The United States has experienced a boom in natural gas production due to recent technological innovations that have enabled natural gas to be produced from unconventional sources, such as shale. There has been much discussion about the costs and benefits of developing shale gas among scientists, policy makers, and the general public. The debate has typically revolved around potential gains in economics, employment, energy independence, and national security as well as potential harms to the environment, the climate, and public health. In the face of scientific uncertainty, national and international governments must make decisions on how to proceed. So far, the results have been varied, with some governments banning the process, others enacting moratoria until it is better understood, and others explicitly sanctioning shale gas development. These policies reflect legislature's preferences to avoid false negative errors or false positive ones. Here we argue that policy makers have a prima facie duty to minimize false negatives based on three considerations: (1) protection from serious harm generally takes precedence over the enhancement of welfare; (2) minimizing false negatives in this case is more respectful to people's autonomy; and (3) alternative solutions exist that may provide many of the same benefits while minimizing many of the harms.
Public Health, Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY 10065, USA.
Inmaculada
I
de Melo-Martín
Health-Energy Nexus, Physicians Scientists & Engineers for Healthy Energy, 452W. 57th St. Apt 3E New York, NY 10019, USA. Electronic address: hays@psehealthyenergy.org.
Jake
J
Hays
Clinical Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY 10065, USA.
Madelon L
ML
Finkel
D058735:Environmental Policy; D019652:Extraction and Processing Industry / Q000941:ethics*; D059206:Natural Gas; D014481:United States
D059206:Natural Gas
Environmental health; Ethics; Natural gas development; Policy; Shale gas