The value of 100% retrospective peer review in a forensic pathology practice.
Peer review in forensic pathology practice has become an important cornerstone of continuous quality improvement. Although there are several components to an effective and transparent peer review process, one of the most essential is the review of completed reports. The autopsy report may be reviewed prospectively (report reviewed before sign out) or retrospectively (report reviewed after sign out). Prospective reviews are more likely to be performed on criminal or criminally suspicious cases, pediatric and SIDS deaths and high profile cases. Retrospective reviews on the other hand are performed on a proportion of all other signed-out routine medico-legal cases. The actual percentage varies by jurisdiction since there are no agreed minimum standards. Manpower and workload factors appear to be critical to determining what percentage of cases are reviewed retrospectively. The objective of this report is to present a mechanism by which a 100% retrospective review policy has been implemented, how it integrates with quality management protocols, the outcomes of the reviews and what challenges remain to improve compliance with key quality indicators especially turn around time (TAT) statistics.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, NB E2L 4L2, Canada. Electronic address: fineneedle@hotmail.com.
Ken
K
Obenson
Claire M
CM
Wright
D001344:Autopsy / Q000592:standards; D049429:Forensic Pathology / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D008485:Medical Audit; D010380:Peer Review / Q000379:methods*; D058996:Quality Improvement
Quality management protocols; Retrospective peer review