Liberalism, authority, and bioethics commissions.
Bioethicists working on national ethics commissions frequently think of themselves as advisors to the government, but distance themselves from any claims to actual authority. Governments however may find it beneficial to appear to defer to the authority of these commissions when designing laws and policies, and might appoint such commissions for exactly this reason. Where does the authority for setting laws and policies come from? This question is best answered from within a normative political philosophy. This paper explains the locus of moral authority as understood within one family of normative political theories--liberal political theories--and argues that most major "liberal" commentators have understood both the source and scope of ethics commissions' authority in a manner at odds with liberalism, rightly interpreted. The author argues that reexamining the implications of liberalism for bioethics commissions would mean changing what are considered valid criticisms of such commissions and also changing the content of national bioethics commission mandates. The author concludes that bioethicists who participate in such commissions ought to carefully examine their own views about the normative limits of governmental authority because such limits have important implications for the contribution that bioethicists can legitimately make to government commissions.
D Robert
DR
MacDougall
D026683:Advisory Committees / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends; D026822:Ethicists; D017041:Ethics Committees / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends; D033161:Government Regulation; D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals; D010684:Philosophy; D011050:Policy Making; D011057:Politics; D011640:Public Policy; D012941:Social Responsibility