title: An evolutionary model of cooperation, fairness and altruistic punishment in public good games.
abstract: We identify and explain the mechanisms that account for the emergence of fairness preferences and altruistic punishment in voluntary contribution mechanisms by combining an evolutionary perspective together with an expected utility model. We aim at filling a gap between the literature on the theory of evolution applied to cooperation and punishment, and the empirical findings from experimental economics. The approach is motivated by previous findings on other-regarding behavior, the co-evolution of culture, genes and social norms, as well as bounded rationality. Our first result reveals the emergence of two distinct evolutionary regimes that force agents to converge either to a defection state or to a state of coordination, depending on the predominant set of self- or other-regarding preferences. Our second result indicates that subjects in laboratory experiments of public goods games with punishment coordinate and punish defectors as a result of an aversion against disadvantageous inequitable outcomes. Our third finding identifies disadvantageous inequity aversion as evolutionary dominant and stable in a heterogeneous population of agents endowed initially only with purely self-regarding preferences. We validate our model using previously obtained results from three independently conducted experiments of public goods games with punishment.
authors.affiliation: Chair of Entrepreneurial Risks, Department of Management, Technology and Economics, ETH-Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Moritz
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hetzer
authors.forename: Didier
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Sornette
mesh_terms: D000533:Altruism; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D010988:Play and Playthings; D011678:Punishment