title: Comparison of three respirator user training methods.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This study addresses methods for training respirator users, particularly when occupational health professionals are not immediately available.
  
  
  METHODS
  A randomized trial compared three training methods-printed brochure, video, and computer-based training-for two respirator types (filtering facepiece and a dual-cartridge half facemask). Quantitative fit testing (PortaCount) measured the effectiveness of training. The study included 226 subjects.
  
  
  RESULTS
  For both respirator types, video was significantly superior to either print or computer-based training methods. Conclusions were consistent, whether determined by average fit factor (analysis of variance), log-transformed fit factors, or the number of users in the lowest quartile of achieved fit.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Video training for proper respirator use can be effective when direct training from an occupational health professional is unavailable. These methods are particularly relevant to "rapid rollout" situations, such as natural disasters, epidemics, or bioterrorism concerns.
authors.affiliation: From the Community, Environment, and Policy Division, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson.
authors.forename: Philip
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Harber
authors.forename: Robert J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Boumis
authors.forename: Jing
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Su
authors.forename: Sarah
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Barrett
authors.forename: Gabriela
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Alongi
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003194:Computer-Assisted Instruction; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007318:Inservice Training / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010174:Pamphlets; D012134:Respiratory Protective Devices; D014741:Video Recording; D055815:Young Adult