title: Separate mechanisms for perception of numerosity and density.
abstract: Despite the existence of much evidence for a number sense in humans, several researchers have questioned whether number is sensed directly or derived indirectly from texture density. Here, we provide clear evidence that numerosity and density judgments are subserved by distinct mechanisms with different psychophysical characteristics. We measured sensitivity for numerosity discrimination over a wide range of numerosities: For low densities (less than 0.25 dots/deg(2)), thresholds increased directly with numerosity, following Weber's law; for higher densities, thresholds increased with the square root of texture density, a steady decrease in the Weber fraction. The existence of two different psychophysical systems is inconsistent with a model in which number is derived indirectly from noisy estimates of density and area; rather, it points to the existence of separate mechanisms for estimating density and number. These results provide strong confirmation for the existence of neural mechanisms that sense number directly, rather than indirectly from texture density.
authors.affiliation: 1Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology, and Child Health, University of Florence.
authors.forename: Giovanni
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Anobile
authors.forename: Guido Marco
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Cicchini
authors.forename: David C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Burr
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004056:Differential Threshold; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D055641:Mathematical Concepts; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: number comprehension; perception; visual perception