title: Detecting self-produced speech errors before and after articulation: an ERP investigation.
abstract: It has been argued that speech production errors are monitored by the same neural system involved in monitoring other types of action errors. Behavioral evidence has shown that speech errors can be detected and corrected prior to articulation, yet the neural basis for such pre-articulatory speech error monitoring is poorly understood. The current study investigated speech error monitoring using a phoneme-substitution task known to elicit speech errors. Stimulus-locked event-related potential (ERP) analyses comparing correct and incorrect utterances were used to assess pre-articulatory error monitoring and response-locked ERP analyses were used to assess post-articulatory monitoring. Our novel finding in the stimulus-locked analysis revealed that words that ultimately led to a speech error were associated with a larger P2 component at midline sites (FCz, Cz, and CPz). This early positivity may reflect the detection of an error in speech formulation, or a predictive mechanism to signal the potential for an upcoming speech error. The data also revealed that general conflict monitoring mechanisms are involved during this task as both correct and incorrect responses elicited an anterior N2 component typically associated with conflict monitoring. The response-locked analyses corroborated previous observations that self-produced speech errors led to a fronto-central error-related negativity (ERN). These results demonstrate that speech errors can be detected prior to articulation, and that speech error monitoring relies on a central error monitoring mechanism.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University Kingston ON, Canada ; Centre for Research in Human Development Montreal, QC, Canada ; Department of Psychology, Concordia University Montreal, QC, Canada.
authors.forename: Kevin M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Trewartha
authors.forename: Natalie A
authors.initials: NA
authors.lastname: Phillips
keywords: conflict monitoring; error-related negativity; event-related potentials; speech errors; speech production