title: Standards and stories: the interactional work of informed choice in Ontario midwifery care.
abstract: This paper uses a discourse-rhetorical approach to analyze how Ontario midwives and their clients interactionally accomplish the healthcare communicative process of "informed choice." Working with four excerpts from recorded visits between Ontario midwives and women, the analysis focuses on the discursive rendering during informed choice conversations of two contrasting kinds of evidence - professional standards and story-telling - related to potential interventions during labour. We draw on the concepts of discursive hybridity (Sarangi and Roberts 1999) and recontextualization (Linell 1998; Sarangi 1998) to trace the complex and creative ways in which the conversational participants reconstruct the meanings of these evidentiary sources to address their particular care contexts. This analysis shows how, though very different in their forms, both modes of evidence function as hybrid and flexible discursive resources that perform both instrumental and social-relational healthcare work.
authors.affiliation: Professor, Department of English, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON.
authors.forename: Philippa
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Spoel
authors.forename: Pamela
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: McKenzie
authors.forename: Susan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: James
authors.forename: Jessica
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hobberlin
mesh_terms: D002755:Choice Behavior; D003142:Communication; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007743:Labor, Obstetric / Q000523:psychology; D008880:Midwifery / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D009864:Ontario; D011247:Pregnancy; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations