title: Intraoperative monitoring: do you know where your neurophysiologist is?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The professional practice of intraoperative monitoring has evolved over the past 30 years. This report describes the field's current state and how site of service affects practice.
  
  
  METHODS
  A survey queried American Academy of Neurology intraoperative monitoringneurologist members about their intraoperative monitoring volume, case type, duration, numbers of simultaneous cases, and location of the monitoring physician.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Physicians located locally typically monitored fewer cases annually and simultaneously compared with physicians who monitored from remote locations. Physicians at remote locations monitored proportionally more spine procedures, whereas physicians who monitored locally monitored more intracranial procedures and a greater variety of cases.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The remote monitoring practice model is different from local models in annual volume, simultaneous cases, work per case, and types of cases.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.
authors.forename: Gloria M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Galloway
mesh_terms: D003625:Data Collection; D006801:Humans; D064795:Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D010820:Physicians / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011364:Professional Practice / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D019114:Remote Consultation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D017216:Telemedicine / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*