title: Revisiting Darwin's conundrum reveals a twist on the relationship between phylogenetic distance and invasibility.
abstract: A key goal of invasion biology is to identify the factors that favor species invasions. One potential indicator of invasiveness is the phylogenetic distance between a nonnative species and species in the recipient community. However, predicting invasiveness using phylogenetic information relies on an untested assumption: that both biotic resistance and facilitation weaken with increasing phylogenetic distance. We test the validity of this key assumption using a mathematical model in which a novel species is introduced into communities with varying ecological and phylogenetic relationships. Contrary to what is generally assumed, we find that biotic resistance and facilitation can either weaken or intensify with phylogenetic distance, depending on the mode of interspecific interactions (phenotype matching or phenotype differences) and the resulting evolutionary trajectory of the recipient community. Thus, we demonstrate that considering the mechanisms that drive phenotypic divergence between native and nonnative species can provide critical insight into the relationship between phylogenetic distance and invasibility.
authors.affiliation: School of Biological Sciences and Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.
authors.forename: Emily I
authors.initials: EI
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.forename: Scott L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Nuismer
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Gomulkiewicz
mesh_terms: D008954:Models, Biological; D010641:Phenotype; D010802:Phylogeny
keywords: coevolution; competition; consumer–resource; ecophylogenetics; mutualism