title: Functional and radiologic outcome of open reduction and internal fixation of condylar head and neck fractures using miniplate or microplate system.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Although the appropriate management of condylar process fractures after miniplate or microplate fixation has been described, there has been no comparative analysis of these plating systems.
  
  
  METHODS
  A retrospective review of patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of condylar head or neck fractures at our institution from January 2000 through August 2010 identified 70 patients. Of these, 38 were treated with microplates and 32 with miniplates. The primary functional and radiographic results were the maximal mouth opening and condylar bone resorption, respectively. The rates of complications, including malocclusion, chin deviation, temporomandibular joint complaints, and facial nerve palsy, were recorded.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The maximal mouth opening was larger in the microplate group than in the miniplate group throughout the follow-up period; this difference was statistically significant 12 (P = 0.020), 18 (P = 0.026), and 24 (P = 0.032) months after ORIF. Similarly, the radiographic scores for bone resorption and condyle morphology were significantly better in the microplate group than in the miniplate group throughout the follow-up period [6 (P = 0.011), 12 (P = 0.035), 24 (P = 0.026), and 48 (P = 0.040) months after ORIF]. Moreover, patients who underwent miniplate fixation experienced a significantly higher incidence of temporomandibular joint click than those who underwent microplate fixation (P = 0.014).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Microplates limit dissection, providing excellent fixation for intracapsular condylar head fractures, and also provide adequate rigidity for fixation of condylar neck fractures. Microplate fixation of condylar head and neck fractures yielded excellent functional and radiographic results. The rates of complications after microplate fixation were equal to or less than those in the miniplate group. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
authors.affiliation: From the *Department of Plastic and Burn Surgery, Cleft Lip and Palate Treatment Center, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical Collage, Shantou, Guang Dong, China; †Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Craniofacial Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine; and ‡Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Craniofacial Research Center, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
authors.forename: Si-Tian
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: Xie
authors.forename: Dhruv
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Singhal
authors.forename: Chien-Tzung
authors.initials: CT
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: Yu-Ray
authors.initials: YR
authors.lastname: Chen
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001860:Bone Plates; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal / Q000295:instrumentation; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008335:Mandibular Condyle / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000293:injuries*; D008337:Mandibular Fractures / Q000150:complications / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D008440:Maxillary Fractures / Q000150:complications; D011182:Postoperative Care; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed