title: Effects of memory instruction on attention and information processing: Further investigation of inhibition of return in item-method directed forgetting.
abstract: In the item-method directed-forgetting paradigm, the magnitude of inhibition of return (IOR) is larger after an instruction to forget (F) than after an instruction to remember (R). In the present experiments, we further investigated this increased magnitude of IOR after F as compared to R memory instructions (dubbed the F > R IOR difference), in order to understand both the consequences for information processing and the purpose of the differential withdrawal of attention that results in this difference. Words were presented in one of four peripheral locations, followed by either an F or an R memory instruction. Then, a target appeared in either the same location as the previous word or one of the other locations. The results showed that the F > R IOR difference cannot be explained by attentional momentum (Exp. 1), that the spatial compatibility of the response options with target locations is not necessary for the F > R IOR difference to emerge (Exp. 2), and that the F > R IOR difference is location-specific rather than response-specific (Exp. 3). These results are consistent with the view that F > R IOR represents a bias against responding to information emanating from an unreliable source (Taylor & Fawcett, 2011).
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, thompskm@dal.ca.
authors.forename: Kate M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Thompson
authors.forename: Jeff P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Hamm
authors.forename: Tracy L
authors.initials: TL
authors.lastname: Taylor
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D007389:Internal-External Control; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D021641:Recognition, Psychology / Q000502:physiology*