title: Cost-effectiveness analysis at 2 years of surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia by photoselective vaporization of the prostate with GreenLight-Photo vaporization 120 W versus transurethral resection of the prostate.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Transurethral resection of the prostate is the gold standard of surgical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated to benign prostate hyperplasia. The new Green Light Photovaporization has been shown to be an alternative that is as effective for this condition as the transurethral resection of the prostate.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To compare the efficiency of Green Light Photovaporization 120 W versus transurethral resection of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) in a 2-year time horizon from the perspective of the Spanish health service perspective.
  
  
  METHODS
  A cost utility analysis was performed retrospectively with the data from 98 patients treated sequentially with transurethral resection of the prostate (n: 50) and Green Light Photovaporization 120 W (n: 48). A Markov model was designed to estimate the cost (2012€) and results (quality adjusted life years) in a 2-year time horizon.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The total cost associated to Green Light Photovaporization 120 W treatment was less (3,377€; 95% CI: 3,228; 3,537) than that of the transurethral resection of the prostate (3,770€; 95% CI: 3,579; 3,945). The determining factor of the cost was the surgical phase (difference: -450€; 95% CI: -625; -158) because admission to hospital after surgery was not necessary with the GreenLight-PhotoVaporization.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Surgical treatment of BPH patients with GreenLight-PhotoVaporization 120 W is more efficient than transurethral resection of the prostate in the surgical treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia as it has similar effectiveness and lower cost (-393€; 95% CI: -625; -158).
authors.affiliation: Servicio de Urología, Hospital de Manacor, Manacor, Islas Baleares, España.
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Benejam-Gual
authors.affiliation: Proyectos de Farmacoeconomía, Navacerrada, Madrid, España. Electronic address: a.sanzgranda@terra.com.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Sanz-Granda
authors.affiliation: Servicio de Urología, Hospital de Manacor, Manacor, Islas Baleares, España.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: García-Miralles Grávalos
authors.affiliation: Servicio de Urología, Hospital de Manacor, Manacor, Islas Baleares, España.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Severa-Ruíz de Velasco
authors.affiliation: Servicio de Urología, Hospital de Manacor, Manacor, Islas Baleares, España.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Pons-Viver
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006801:Humans; D053685:Laser Therapy / Q000191:economics*; D008297:Male; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods*; D011470:Prostatic Hyperplasia / Q000191:economics* / Q000601:surgery*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013997:Time Factors; D020728:Transurethral Resection of Prostate
keywords: Benign prostate hyperplasia; Cost-effectiveness; Coste-efectividad; GreenLight-PhotoVaporization; Hiperplasia benigna de próstata; Resección transuretral de la próstata; Transurethral resection of the prostate