title: When Intuition Fails to Align with Data: A Reply to.
abstract: Holistic processing, a hallmark of face perception, is often measured in the so-called composite paradigm, in which participants are asked to match part of a stimulus while ignoring another part. In prior work, we recommended against the use of one version of the composite task we call the partial design, on the basis of confounds with response biases. Rossion wrote a lengthy piece that reviews the work that he has published using this design, raising a large number of criticisms, both about an alternative measure of holistic processing that we have used and advocated (which we call the complete design) and about our work in general. In this reply, we have limited our discussion to those issues that would be relevant to a researcher looking to decide which version of this composite paradigm to use, as we doubt a comprehensive reply would be of significant interest outside a very small circle.
authors.affiliation: Vanderbilt University.
authors.forename: Jennifer J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Richler
authors.forename: Isabel
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Gauthier