title: Comparative genomics of transport proteins in developmental bacteria: Myxococcus xanthus and Streptomyces coelicolor.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Two of the largest fully sequenced prokaryotic genomes are those of the actinobacterium, Streptomyces coelicolor (Sco), and the δ-proteobacterium, Myxococcus xanthus (Mxa), both differentiating, sporulating, antibiotic producing, soil microbes. Although the genomes of Sco and Mxa are the same size (~9 Mbp), Sco has 10% more genes that are on average 10% smaller than those in Mxa.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Surprisingly, Sco has 93% more identifiable transport proteins than Mxa. This is because Sco has amplified several specific types of its transport protein genes, while Mxa has done so to a much lesser extent. Amplification is substrate- and family-specific. For example, Sco but not Mxa has amplified its voltage-gated ion channels but not its aquaporins and mechano-sensitive channels. Sco but not Mxa has also amplified drug efflux pumps of the DHA2 Family of the Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) (49 versus 6), amino acid transporters of the APC Family (17 versus 2), ABC-type sugar transport proteins (85 versus 6), and organic anion transporters of several families. Sco has not amplified most other types of transporters. Mxa has selectively amplified one family of macrolid exporters relative to Sco (16 versus 1), consistent with the observation that Mxa makes more macrolids than does Sco.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Except for electron transport carriers, there is a poor correlation between the types of transporters found in these two organisms, suggesting that their solutions to differentiative and metabolic needs evolved independently. A number of unexpected and surprising observations are presented, and predictions are made regarding the physiological functions of recognizable transporters as well as the existence of yet to be discovered transport systems in these two important model organisms and their relatives. The results provide insight into the evolutionary processes by which two dissimilar prokaryotes evolved complexity, particularly through selective chromosomal gene amplification.
authors.forename: Ilya
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Getsin
authors.forename: Gina H
authors.initials: GH
authors.lastname: Nalbandian
authors.forename: Daniel C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Yee
authors.forename: Ake
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Vastermark
authors.forename: Philipp C G
authors.initials: PC
authors.lastname: Paparoditis
authors.forename: Vamsee S
authors.initials: VS
authors.lastname: Reddy
authors.affiliation: Department of Molecular Biology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0116, USA. msaier@ucsd.edu.
authors.forename: Milton H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Saier
mesh_terms: D001426:Bacterial Proteins / Q000235:genetics*; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D005784:Gene Amplification; D016680:Genome, Bacterial; D026901:Membrane Transport Proteins / Q000235:genetics*; D016941:Myxococcus xanthus / Q000235:genetics*; D048372:Streptomyces coelicolor / Q000235:genetics*
chemical_list: D001426:Bacterial Proteins; D026901:Membrane Transport Proteins